雅思写作Task2考官范文：政府类(4)
2023.08.26雅思Task2：政府提供免费住房
8.26大陆雅思大作文范文及解析：政府提供免费住房观点类大作文，社会类话题As housing is a basic need for people, the government should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Sample Answer:Undeniably, shelter stands as a cornerstone of basic human requirements. Yet, I find myself in contention with the proposition that it is the government's role to proffer gratuitous housing to every individual incapable of independently footing the expense. My standpoint arises from apprehensions regarding feasibility, equity, and the potential for engendering a culture of dependency.A primary concern that must be addressed is the colossal fiscal burden such a policy would exert on a nation's treasury. Governments are tasked with the complex role of judiciously allocating resources across an array of sectors, and the pledge to furnish gratuitous housing couldprecipitate a considerable deflection of capital from other critical domains, such as the realm of education or public healthcare.A further apprehension lies in the unforeseen ramifications of such a policy, specifically its potential to stymie personal endeavour. The provision of gratuitous housing, whilst undoubtedly benevolent in intention, may inadvertently dissuade individuals from pursuing gainful employment or enhancing their fiscal circumstances. This could engender a culture of dependency that might prove detrimental in the broader perspective.Moreover, the question of equity emerges. Delineating housing allocation based on fiscal need could engender situations wherein those marginally falling short of the eligibility criteria bear disproportionate financial duress, thereby birthing a fresh cadre of societal disparities. A more balanced approach may lie in the government formulating policies aimed at enhancing the affordability of housing. This could encompass strategies such as offering financial aid to prospective homeowners, instituting rentcontrol measures, or incentivizing the creation ofcost-effective housing units.In conclusion, while the aim of guaranteeing universal access to housing is commendable, the dispensation of free housing to every individual incapable of affording it may not represent the most efficacious or equitable strategy. Instead, policies designed to bolster housing affordability could offer a more nuanced, sustainable resolution.范文作者：Sophia5相关词汇和语法结构In contention with 与...有争议Apprehensions regarding 对...的忧虑Colossal fiscal burden 巨大的财政负担Judiciously allocating resources 明智地分配资源Critical domains 关键领域Unforeseen ramifications 未预见的后果Stymie personal endeavour 阻碍个人努力Inadvertently dissuade 无意间劝阻Engender a culture of dependency 产生依赖文化Question of equity 公平问题Disproportionate financial duress 不成比例的财务压力Fresh cadre of societal disparities 新的社会差异阶层Instituting rent control measures 设立租金控制措施Incentivizing the creation 激励...的创造Efficacious or equitable strategy 有效或公平的策略Bolster housing affordability 提高住房可负担性Nuanced, sustainable resolution 细致的，可持续的解决方案。
#雅#思写作知识点系列之政府职能类
备考雅思写作需要考生投入一定的时间与精力，对于每个知识点都要牢记。
今天，前程百利小编为大家带来的是雅思写作知识点系列之政府职能类，希望对考生有所帮助。
今天的任务是学习政府职能类写作。
透析“医疗服务是否应该让盈利性公司提供”，练习“只有政府才能解决住房紧缺”的问题;透析“政府是否应该花钱建设剧院和体育场”，练习政府是否该为田家体育运动员出资“的问题。
例题是一道观点比较类成目，通过这道例题，我们练习使用常见的“背景法”开头，用“总结(+建议)”法结尾，并练习用“因果法”这种最基本的段落扩展方法。
一、例题精讲You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write about the following topic:Some people think that good health is very Important to every person, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Write at least 250 words.题干：一些人认为健康对每个人都很重要，因此医疗服务不应该由通利性的公司提供。
私营医疗机构的缺点要大于它的优点么?1.审题从话题上来看，这是一道政府职能类题目。
“政府职能”是社会科学领域的重要话题，也是雅思写作考试经常关注的一类题目。
它主要探讨政府机构与私营机构的职能分配(如居民住房、大众交通等问题)和政府措施的合理性(如政府为保护公共安全侵犯个人隐私)。
雅思写作考官范文
雅思写作考官范文范文：In recent years, the issue of environmental protection has become increasingly important. Some people argue that individuals should be responsible for protecting the environment, while others believe that it is thegovernment's duty. In my opinion, both individuals and the government should take responsibility for protecting the environment.On the one hand, individuals play a crucial role in environmental protection. Each person can contribute to the conservation of the environment by making small changes in their daily lives. For example, people can reduce their carbon footprint by using public transportation instead of driving cars, recycling waste, and conserving energy at home. Furthermore, individuals can raise awareness about environmental issues and encourage others to take action.By making conscious choices and adopting sustainable habits,individuals can make a significant impact on the environment.On the other hand, the government also plays a key role in environmental protection. It is the government's responsibility to create and enforce laws and regulations that promote environmental conservation. For instance, the government can implement policies to reduce air and water pollution, protect natural habitats, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the government should invest in environmental education and research to develop sustainable solutions for environmental problems. By taking decisive action, the government can lead the way in preserving the environment for future generations.In conclusion, both individuals and the government have a vital role to play in protecting the environment. While individuals can make a difference through their everyday choices and actions, the government must also take responsibility for creating and enforcing policies that promote environmental conservation. By working together, we can ensure a sustainable future for our planet.。
雅思作文政府职能类话题
政府职能类话题大学专业该由学生的兴趣来决定还是由政府来决定(2006.9.16.)Some people say that governments should pay for the health care and education but other people say that it is not the governments' responsibility. Discuss the both viewpoints and give your opinion. (2007.1.20)Some people think that government should pay the course fees for those who want to study at university. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (政府决策类) (2007.11.3)Some people believe that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effcects than the positive effects. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (2007.11.24)some people believe that national sports teams and individual men and women who represent their country should bu financially supports by government. Some people think they should be funded by non-governemnt(e.g.business,scholarship)(2006.04.28)房屋紧缺带来的社会问题，有人认为只能靠government action 解决是否同意(2006.05.13)An increasing number of people choose to live in big cities. What problems will this bring about? Should the government encourage people to live in small towns? 2008.2.14(语义降格)The number of cars keeps increasing, so road systems should be expanded. Some people think the government should pay for it, while others think the car owners should pay for it. What’s your opinion? 2008.3.8(新题初现)Some people think government should ensure the healthy lifestyle. of people, but others argue that it should be decided by individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 2008.3.29(新题初现)Government encourages industries and business to move out of big cities to regional areas. To what extent do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages?08.08.09Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries, but it does not solve the poverty. So rich countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than the financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree?2009.02.07It is more important for the government to spend money on promoting the healthy lifestyle to prevent the illness than to spend money treating people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?09.03.21Some people think they should keep all the money they earn, and should not have to pay tax to the state. Agree or disagree? (2006.01.07)。
雅思大作文政府类
Presentor—Susan
政府类
国防（ defense ）：保护一个国家免受攻击 （ protect a country against attack or other threats） 保证法律和公共秩序（ enforcement of law and public order) 政府运作（operation of government） 政府职能（government function） 社会保障（social security） 医疗保健（health care system） 福利（welfare） 退休和残疾人福利（retirement and disabilitybenefits）
the direct result of overcrowding and overpopulation
zoning policies划地政策 housing allowance住房补贴
house allocation system dampen the ehthusiasm of individuals in housing investment降低私人投资热情 a grave shortage in the investment in house construction 房屋建设的投资少 ease the housing pressure减轻住房压力 the fundamental rele占主导地位 construction quality建筑工程质量 monotonous cityscape 单一的城市景观（ uniformity of house design) comprehensive requiements on living conditions对生活 的高要求
雅思培训丨从经济学角度解析雅思写作政府类话题
雅思培训丨从经济学角度解析雅思写作政府类话题 Revised by BETTY on December 25,2020雅思培训丨从经济学角度解析雅思写作政府类话题朗阁雅思培训中心周莉引言根据今年问世的剑11来看，政府类话题占据了非常重要的地位，Test 1、2、4都是与政府职能类相关的题目，并且都是Argumentation类型，自2015年以来，政府职能类话题平均每两个月出现一次。
对于大多数考生来说，此类话题较为陌生，并常伴有话题交叉，角度多样的特性，比如经常与教育、医疗、城市建设、犯罪等话题相结合，因此在背景知识和社会阅历的缺失下，考生往往不知从何下笔。
由于绝大多数的政府类题目都与政府投资、支出相关，因此在本文中，朗阁专家将从经济学的角度论述政府存在的意义和政府的职能特性，以帮助烤鸭们积累相关的话题知识、原版语料，并配以2012-2016年雅思写作政府类话题真题（见Appendix A），扩展解题思路。
Why governments exist政府是一个我们熟悉而又陌生的话题。
我们的生活的各个方面比如学习、工作、生活都与政府息息相关，但是对其的探究却并不充分，这导致了大多数学生在论述此类话题时都会存在话语空洞的问题。
要了解政府的职能，我们首先看一下政府存在的目的和原因。
Parkin (2012, 在《Economics》一书中说到“Governments exist for three major reasons. First, they establish and maintain property rights. Second, they provide nonmarket mechanisms for allocating scarce resources. Third, they implement arrangements that redistribute income and wealth”. 首先，政府存在的第一个理由是建立和维护产权，也就是说设定并执行相应的法律体系(set up and enforce legal system)——管控职能(supervision & regulation); 第二，政府提供了非市场机制(nonmarket mechanism)来分配稀缺的资源(allocate scarce resources)。
英语考试作文-关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文详解
英语考试作文关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文详解雅思写作高分范文能够让考生有效学习遣词造句的技巧，还能扩展词汇量。
对于基础薄弱的考生而言，背诵高分范文也是一个不错的选择。
除了能够快速提高语法的运用能力之外，还能积累大量的好词好句。
今天小站君为大家带来关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文。
希望能够帮助到大家。
雅思写作题目：Many people think that arts (painting and music) do not directly improve people’s life, so the government should spend money on other important areas. Do you agree or disagree?雅思写作题目讲解：第一段：引入话题，艺术是否该获得政府资金支持。
第二段：社会服务当然可以明显地提高人民的生活水平，如教育，医疗，环境或基础建设。
但是这些并不会增加人民的幸福感受。
第三段：人民需要艺术，因为：艺术相关人们的情感和价值观，这是人们行为的核心部分。
艺术培养人的创造和创新能力;艺术是娱乐休闲方式，艺术是感情和精力释放的安全方式，艺术促进不同文化和民族间的理解。
第四段：政府应该既投资社会基础服务，也投资艺术。
这样才能创造一个健康有生机的社会。
雅思写作范文：While the economy is booming in many countries, the funding for arts has been decreasing. The main reason is that some people overly emphasize social services such as medical care and education, but underestimate the intangible role of the arts as they find it difficult to quantify their benefits.在大多数国家经济繁荣的时候，艺术经费也会随之减少。
TOEFL独立写作(政府相关2篇)
独立写作（有关政府政策）（小马重一1）It i s m ore i mportant f or g overnment t o s pend m oney t o b uild a rt museums a nd m usic p erformance c enter t han t o b uild r ecreational f acilities(such as s wimming p ool, p laygrounds).Every y ear t here i s a t ime f or g overnment t o s ubmit i ts b udget t o p arliament t o d iscuss. That i s n ot a s mooth p rocess, d uring w hich h eat d ebate a re a lways a roused o n h ow t axes raised s hould b e s pent t o b est i mprove c itizens’ w ell b eing. S ome p eople i nsist o n b uilding more a rt m useums a nd m usic p erformance c enters t han r ecreational f acilities. H owever, i n my o pinion, t hat i s a c omplex i ssue, w hich r equires f urther a nd d eeper a nalysis.First, f or t he a rt m useums a nd m usic p erformance h alls, i t i s u ndeniable t hat t hey a re essential t o t he c itizens’ e ntertainment l ife, a nd t hey i ndisputably s hould b e t aken i nto t he government a nnual b udget. H owever, t hinking a bout t he s mall v illages a nd t iny t owns t hat cannot a fford t he h uge c ost o f t hese a rt h alls, t hey s hould b e o nly c onsidered b y t he megacities. E very c ity h as i ts o wn f inancial p ower d ues t o i ts p opulation s ize a nd e conomic level, a nd e ach i s d ifferent f rom t he o thers. F or t hese s mall c ities a nd t owns, l ocal government s hould m easure i ts p ower a nd f oresee t he p robable r esults o f t he p lan o f building a rt m useums a nd m usic h alls, f or i t i s a s evere, p ractical a nd t ough q uestion t o t he city f or l ong r un. I t hink, t hat i f o ne s mall c ity c ould a fford t he a nnual c osts o f t he m useums and h alls, i t s hould i nvest t o b uild t hese t hings, b ecause t hese a rt m useums a nd m usic h alls can n ot o nly c ultivate c itizens’ m inds b ut a lso s timulate t he d evelopment o f t ourism industry.As f or t he r ecreational f acilities, t hey a re n ot o nly t he c ommon r esponsibility f or t he s mall cities a nd m egacities, b ut a lso a d uty t o e very c itizen. N ow, i n e verywhere o f o ur c ountry, the r ecreational f acilities a re f ree o f c harge f or p eople t o u se, g iving e veryone t he opportunity t o r elax a s w ell a s e xercise. S o, p eople h ave t he d uty t o p ay f or b uilding t he recreational f acilities s uch a s t he s wimming p ools a nd f ootball g rounds. I n a ddition, t he charities, s port s tars, c elebrities, f ootball p arties a nd f amous s port t eams w ould l ike t o afford t he c ost o f c onstructions o f t hese f acilities, u sing i t a s t he d onations o r r eciprocations to i mprove t heir p ersonal r eputations. I n a w ord, b ecause t he c onstructions o f r ecreational facilities w ould b e f inished b y t he w hole p ower f rom a ll c lasses o f t he s ociety, e ven t he small t owns s hould d o s omething t o b uild t he r ecreational f acilities t o o ffer t he c itizensmore c hances t o r est, e xercise a nd e njoy.In c onclusion, t he f inal d ecision o n w hich s hould b e f ocused m ore a ctually d epend o n t he primarily l ocal g overnments’ p owers a nd p eople’s d emands.20120203 T he g overnment a nd c orporation s hould s hare a ll t heir s cientific discoveries w ith o ther c ountries i n t he w orld？不同意：1．国家间无偿分享大量发现会挫败科学家的积极性；企业间分享会破坏良性竞争关系 2．高端技术（高科技武器）被恐怖人士得到会危及世界的和平3．世界的和平其实是处于一种动态平衡与牵制的，因为各个国家不知道对方有什么能力，所以谨慎提防，从而维护了世界的和平。
雅思写作分类范文之政府类
雅思写作分类范文之政府类雅思写作中遇到政府类的话题该怎么写呢？下面小编给大家分享几篇优秀范文。
雅思大作文范文：政府是否应该给医疗买单【政府类】Some people believe that the healthcare should be free for everyone，while others say that people should pay for their own health care. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 有人认为健康医疗对于每一个公民应该免费，有人认为个人应该承担医疗费用，讨论两种观点，给出你的意见。
【老师预测——原题压中，见前预测】【政府类】Some people say that the government should pay for the health care and education of its citizens, but other people say that it is not the government’s responsibility. Discuss the two opinions and give your views. 有人认为政府应该给公民的教育和医疗买单，有人认为这不是政府的责任，讨论两种观点，说明你的立场?【作家立场】我认为，享受免费的医疗是公民的一项基本权利。
同时，政府应该合理地分配医疗预算。
【思路拓展】〖政府给医疗买单的理由〗① 公民是纳税人，有享受免费医疗的权利。
政府是人民利益的代表，普及免费医疗可以还利于民。
② 政府的医疗上的援助可以使得很多患病的，同时来自贫困家庭的人得到及时的治疗，这有助于提高政府的威信，以及增强民众的民族自豪感。
③ 普及免费医疗可以公民的健康指数，因此提高国民的基本素质，增强一个国家在国际舞台的竞争力。
〖反对政府给医疗买单的理由〗① 政府的财政有限，但是，要解决的民生问题是无穷的，完全普及免费医疗会无疑增加政府的财政压力。
雅思大作文真题之议论文优秀范文：政府类
雅思大作文真题之议论文优秀范文：政府类今天三立在线教育雅思网为大家带来的是雅思大作文真题之议论文优秀范文之政府类的相关资讯，备考的烤鸭们，赶紧来看看吧！Question 2Governmentsshould introduce healthcare which prevents illness rather than cures it.Howfar do you agree with this statement?Key words analysisgovernment: 政府，这里加了s.表示各国政府introduce: 介绍，这里表示引进，鼓励cure: 治疗Argument:这是属于议论文中的argument类型，通常会在agree或disagree之间进行选择。
但是该题特别提到说how far do you agree or disagree，那么我们最好是能够讨论到这个事件的两个方面，然后给出自己的意见。
Possible reasons:预防比治愈的成本小政府有责任去引导正确的生活方式，减少疾病率有些病是不能只预防的，所以同时治疗系统要完善Model Essay 1 –Part 1IntroductionHealthcare is very important for everyonein the world but it can be very expensive. Many people believe that governmentsshould try to prevent illness by making sure everyone in their country has ahealthy lifestyle. I agree that preventing illness is better than curing it.Main body 1The cost of medical treatment can be highso governments have to think of ways to encourage people to be healthier. Ifpeople are healthy, they will not need medical care so often. Many diseases canbe prevented if people have good diets, take exercise and give up unhealthyhabits such as smoking. If people cannot work or care for themselves or theirfamily due to illness, this will cost governments and taxpayers a lot of money.In my opinion, governments should spend money on producing information leafletsand films which encourage people to follow healthy lifestyles, such as eatingplenty of fruit and vegetables, taking regular exercise and giving up smoking. Governmentsshould also try to reduce environmental pollution because this can causeillness and health problems.Model Essay 1 –Part 2Main body 2However, having a healthy lifestyle cannotprevent all health problems. There are many diseases, such as cancer, which area result of living in the modern world and which cannot be prevented by ahealthy lifestyle. Accidents at work or on theroads will also cause injurieswhich need medical treatment. If governments focus mainly on prevention, theremay be less money for urgent healthcare and many people could suffer.ConclusionIn conclusion, I believe that governmentsshould provide a balance of prevention and treatment because of the differenttypes of health problem, but their main focus should be on prevention ratherthan cure.如上就是三立网课教育小编为大家带来的雅思大作文真题之议论文优秀范文之政府类的相关资讯，掌握最新雅思资讯，敬请关注（三立在线教育雅思网）更多雅思考试资讯以及备考资料免费领！。
雅思大作文-政府类
雅思大作文-政府类Most writers of fiction do not earn enough money to live from their writing.Do you think the government should give them financial assistance to help encourage good literature?Model Answer:There are some conditions under which a novelist could reasonably expect some government support. In general terms, if the writer has already proved that he or she can write well, and if the stories produced are stimulating and interesting, then I consider that some financial help might be given.Language quality is difficult to define, but if the writing shows, for example, good grammar, a wide vocabulary, and elegance and imagination, then I can see a valid reason for assisting an author to spend some time free from money problems. Such a writing needs to be encouraged. the entertainment value of a book would be also a factor in deciding whether to provide assistance to an author. Further consideration would include social and educational values expressed in the author's work.However, if the ideas were socially irresponsible, or if the stories contain unnecessary violence or pornography for its own sake, then I would not want to see the author sponsored to write stories which do not benefit society. Other exceptions are the many writers of good books who do not require financial help. Books which proved to be extremely popular, such as the Harry Potter stories, clearly need no subsidy at all because the authors have become rich through their writing.Views on what good quality writing means will vary widely, and so if any author is to be given money for writing, then the decision would have to be made by a committee or panel of judge. An individual opinion would certainly cause disagreement among the reading public.。
雅思大作文政府类
其次，政府是人民的代表，有这个责任。而且政府付钱有利于 维护社会稳定性。
最后，可以减轻人们的经济负担，提高人们的生活水平。当然 反过来可以从政府的财政预算是有限的，要致力于很多基础设 施建设， 从子女后代也可以承担部分责任。
social stability 社会稳定 prerequisite 前提 the representative of people 人民代表 corresponding 相应的 in consideration of 考虑到 social welfare 社会福利 financial burden 财政负担 tax revenue 税收 immense contribution to 对…有巨大贡献 rudimentary 根本的 physical inferiority 身体劣势 offspring/descendant 后代 improve people's living standard 提高人们的生活水平 tighten one's belt 勒紧裤腰带，生活拮据
commercialisation of housing unaffordable to low-income families economical housing government intervention the housing affordability gap widens
国际援助
Some people think that rich countries giving international aid to the poor countries has positive impact. Others argue that it may lead to problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 题目解析：国际援助是积极还是消极，需要讨论两边再给出 自己的观点。这道题需要对两边进行辩证思考。
雅思考试大作文范文政府类
雅思考试大作文范文政府类雅思写作是雅思考试中非常重要的一部分,同时也是广大考友们必须攻克的一大难关。
下面是店铺整理的一些雅思考试大作文范文，以供大家学习参考。
雅思大作文题目：Some people think that thegovernment should provide assistance to all kindsof artists includes painters, musicians, poets,however, other people think that is a waste ofmoney for providing this assistance. State youropinion.雅思大作文范文：To be of assistance or not, it indeed isdebatable if artists deserve and require funding bythe government. Firstly, I acknowledge that thebenefits from artists and poets can enrich oureveryday lives in so many different ways; otherwiseour life would have been a lot drabber without them.Any genuine artist most certainly deserves some form of aid and there can not be anydoubt about that, however, whether they require government assistance is another issuealtogether. Contrary to popular belief it seems to be that not all artists and literarypersonalities are wealthy, and most renowned personalities are deservedly rich and famous.While the other large group of artists is neither rich nor famous, they do continue toproduce the art works as for the passion and often the passion is what drives them. Itwould be ridiculous to think that any kind of financial incentives could power their creativity.However, not many of them are able to take up their passion on a full time basis because theycannot afford to. It is import to note that most creative artists are made, and were not bornso. It is the vagaries of life & struggles that theyhave to face which fuels their creativity,in the process they need to mature into renowned to be an artist or a writer. When they doand when their work is recognized, there will not be any dearth of money or fame.In my opinion, it would be criminal to take away this very drive and shun their creativity.Having said that, I do believe that they need to have some kind of incentives, it can be in theway of appreciation and opportunity to present their talent to the rest of the world. Thiscould be done in various ways, for instance, giving tax incentives to amateur artists and writersor financial rebates in government owned auditoriums to stage their presentations.In talking about artists in Australia, which has a concrete social security system in placeto take care of all kinds of basic needs, any kind of added financial incentives are not only anadded burden on the taxpayer. It would be an issue to find out worthy beneficiaries and therewill be enough crooks who will misuse any well intended government assistance schemes.Every human being craves for recognition and money happens to be one of the meanstowards this end, however, as I mentioned in the beginning it is more important toacknowledge their work than provide financial assistance.On the other hand, as a Chinese, my perception of the government's assistance is morequestionable. Firstly, we need to give artists a definition and how do you classify a personwho is an artist. In essence, calligraphy, poetry, music and art they all can be extended to aperson who writes well, paints well in his/her Blog. To extend this artist sense further, can wesay a singer is an artist? Well, there are many pop song and folk music singers in China. In thesame way, a dancer, a talk show's talent, a movie star,the director, the photographer theycan all be artists. And this number of artists would add up to whole population of Australia.How could the Chinese government provide any assistance without any discrimination tothose artists in every classification? I personally do not believe our government has enoughfinancial ability to accommodate this wide ganging number of artists.As a Chinese I can see that in my country, there is still a big gap between the poor and therich, I would rather government's financial assistance be directed toward the poor, this doesnot mean that I would think to provide assistance to artists is a waste of money. My point isthat while we can give a true definition of artists, government should use our taxes in a way tobe more accountable for.雅思大作文题目：The government should control the amountof violence in films and on television in order todecrease the violent crimes in society. To whatextent do you agree or disagree with this issue?雅思大作文范文：Violence appears more and more often in filmsand on television. Requests are made that thegovernment should take action because it leads tothe rise of violent crimes in society. However, somepeople think differently.They say that instead of inducing people tocommit a crime, violence onTV helps people to release the stress put on them by the fast pace of the modern societyand thus reduces the chance for them to break the law. The employee who was severelycriticized by the boss at work may feel relieved when he returns home and sees a strong manbeing punched in his face on TV.Admittedly, that may be one little good effect of violence on screen, but the side effect ofit is much serious and should not be ignored. As was mentioned in the beginning of the essay,violence on screen does result in more crimes in real life. For one thing, teenagers are good atintimating and they have a strong desire to release their extra energy. One good example ofthis is the notorious campus gun shot case in the US. The criminal, a university student, whoshot several of his teachers and fellow students, confessed that a violent movie inspired stly, violence in films and television fills people’s mind with evil and hatred. We certainlyshould be shown the better side of our society if we want to decrease the violent crimes.To sum up, in order to have fewer violent crimes in society, violence on screen should becontrolled.雅思大作文范文：政府补贴艺术工作者Traditional arts civilized a nation. Do you thinkgovernment should subsidize musicians, artists,actors or drama companies? What should agovernment do?Traditional arts, as valuable cultural relics of anation, are disappearing far away from the modernsociety. China, as one of the highly-civilized countriesin the world, abound in various forms of traditionalarts, such as painting, calligraphy, music,architecture and dramas, which are not only ournational cultural treasures, but also a rich fortune ofthe world.As essence of a local culture, traditional arts reflect a nation’s artistic talents andtraditions. For example, water-color painting depicts a harmony between people and nature.Architecture illustrates a nation’s aesthetic value and religious belief. Cathedrals, highlighted byGothic style in the Medieval, represent Christianity. Pagodas, totally different fromcathedralsstylistically, are a symbol of Buddhism. Peking Opera describes the history of our country.However, traditional arts are leaving contemporary people further and further away, oneof the main reasons for which is that the authorities concerned and some institutes lack fundsand professionals, which are quite essential to the research and promotion of traditionalculture. Another radical reason should be attributed to the impact of western cultures ontraditions. Young people, especially youngsters, are addicted to western music like rock and roll,without any knowledge about traditional musical instruments. With the economic globalization,traditional culture and arts will be in the danger of assimilation. How to maintain and developtraditional arts becomes the biggest concern of a government. (105 words)Firstly, the government should lay a fund for the research and promotion of traditionalarts. Secondly, the research institutes and universities should work out a long-term developingscheme, organizing systematic research on traditional arts. Arts belong to a nation and thewhole world as well. The prosperity of traditional arts will diversify the culture of the world.。
雅思政府类的英语作文范文
雅思政府类的英语作文范文政府应该做出更多的努力来促进替代能源。
你同意这个观点吗?为什么?下面有店铺整理的关于这个话题的英语作文，大家可以参考参考。
雅思英语作文【1】Governments should make more effort to promote alternative sources of energy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Model Answer:It has been known for some time now that a move towards sources of energy which are not carbon-based is urgently required to stop the effects of global warming. In my view, there are too few governments who seem to be promoting the use of other types of energy such as wind, wave, solar and nuclear sources of energy.Governments at present are too reliant on coil, oil and gas. Although some governments are doing research into the use of alternative energy sources, many are not. Energy from the wind, the sea and the sun does not pollute the environment and is an everlasting source of power. Nuclear power is clean, and although it is not totally unproblematic, it would provide a large amount of energy and dramatically improve the environment. Countries such as France have made good use of nuclear power.My feeling is that more use could be made of wind power. In some countries, there has been a reluctance to use wind turbines, even in areas which are not densely populated, as some people believe they are eyesores. Personally, I believe they are not only useful, but beautiful as well. Governments should spend more time and effort promoting the benefits of this source of energy and trying to make the public understand the reason for change.In conclusion, I believe that, if governments forced everyone to have a wind turbine and solar panels on the building they live in, made more use of wave power and built more nuclear power stations, then they would manage to avert the dangers that are seriously threatening the Earth.雅思英语作文【2】Some people say the government should not put money into building theatres and sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care and education.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Model Answer:What would the world be like without Shakespeare or the Olympics? While medical care and education are perhaps the highest causes to which money can be contributed, the arts and athletics are in some ways just as valuable. So, to ask the government to not extend support to these two areas could be just as detrimental to the welfare of society as the lack of sufficient health care and education.The Romans believed in “mens sana in corpore sano”. In short, that there is indeed a correlation between a healthy body and healthy mind. When we are healthy, we feel better and so are more likely to be productive academically. Plus, the practice of sports can also teach us the very same discipline we need for our studies. Why even a brisk walk or watching an exciting athletic match can refresh the mind for greater work. Moreover, sports can serve to create healthier bodies, which in turn would serve as a form of “preventive medicine” thereby cutting down on medical costs. In the same vein, the arts are known to induce a sense of well-being in performers and audience alike, reducing mental problems and their associated physical manifestationsand again, medical costs. As such, building theatres and stadiums, which spur interest in the arts and sports respectively, actually would be practically identical to spending money on medical care and education!Now I realize the question specifically addresses the building of theatres and sports stadiums by government. Some people would contend athletics and the arts can still be enjoyed and practiced without such constructions. I would hazard that these buildings stand as the altars to the sports and arts worlds, inspiring would-be athletes and performers. Without such venues where would sports spectators and music aficionados be able to enjoy these events? Now some other people would also say business could support their construction, but we know the avarice of business could very likely jeopardize the lofty spirit of athletics and the arts just as well. Therefore, allowing government to retain some say in the matter on behalf of the people would, I believe, be in the best interest of the people.In short, as long as the government does not go overboard in its expenditures for these buildings and uses such venues for the benefit of all, then, as mentioned above, people will benefit in terms of both medical care and education as well. This is not to say the government should neglect medical care and education, but rather to think of this not as an either-or choice but as a win-win situation for all.雅思英语作文【3】The costs of medical health care are increasing all the time. Governments are finding it difficult to balance the health care budget.Should citizens be totally responsible for their own health costs and take out private health insurance, or is it better to havea comprehensive health care system which provides free health services for all? Discuss.Model Answer:A much debated issue these days is whether citizens should take out private health insurance or not. The cost of providing free medical care for both the wealthy and the poor is far too great for any government, and most people agree that if you can pay for insurance, you should. In this essay, I will argue that all who can afford it should be insured, but free medical care must be made available for those too poor to do so.The most important reason for encouraging people to take out private health insurance is the cost to the government of health care. Free health cover for people who are able to pay for it is a waste of public money. Of course, people will only pay health insurance premiums if they know that they are getting good value for their money. If they get sick, they should pay very little or nothing at all. In addition, the privately insured are entitled to special benefits such as having the choice of their own doctors, and being able to avoid long waiting lists for hospital beds.On the other hand, those who really cannot afford to pay private insurance premiums, which are often very high, are still entitled as citizens to the best medical care available –they cannot be expected to pay their own medical bills. However, if they are working, they should still pay a percentage of their wage (say 1 to 2%) as a tax which pays towards the cost of providing "free" medical services.In conclusion, most people should privately insure their health, but it is unreasonable to suppose that all citizens can afford it. Therefore, a safety net in the form of a basic free healthcare system must exist for the very poor and the unemployed.下载文档。
雅思大作文范文三篇政府类
雅思大作文范文三篇政府类店铺网小编为大家整理收集了雅思考试大作文范文汇总：政府类，希望对各位考生的备考有所帮助，祝每位考生考试顺利，都能取得好成绩!雅思大作文范文：政府应限制艺术家发表见解的自由?The responsibility of an artist is to createartworks to cater for people’s needs for aesthesisand enjoyment. Some masterpieces by the world-renowned artists like Shakespeare, the greatestpoet in British literature; Vinci, the most famousItalian painter, architect and sculptor impress the people around the world deeply. From mypoint of view, the government should not give restrictions to artists. On the contrary, theircreativity and innovation should be encouraged.Creativity is the source of arts. The development of literature is a very vivid illustration.From Classicism to Romanticism, from Renaissances to Realism, from Humanity to Post-modernism, (从古典主义到浪漫主义，从文艺复兴到现实主义，从人文主义到后现代主义) all the styles ofliterature reflect people’s thinking and have epoch-making significance. Suppose there wereonly one style of literature, people would not appreciate so abundant poetry and novels andour world would become so monotonous.Furthermore, restrictions on creativity will arouse tragedies, one of which is “Burn booksand bury the literati in pits” (焚书坑儒) in Chinese history launched by Emperor Qin Shihuang,who buried the Confucian scholars alive and prohibited the dissemination of Confucian.Another tragedy was started by Emperor Yongzheng in the Qing Dynasty, who killed manycreative artists and intellectuals, undermining the literal development and distorting thedevelopment of humanity.History proves that only when a government encourages people toexpress their own idea and thought freely, can its country make progress and prosper.Finally, I will quote a classic sentence from a famous article entitled “Give Me Liberty OrGive Me Death” by Patrick Henry, the greatest writer in American history, “I know not whatcourse others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”雅思大作文范文：广告误导消费者,政府应采取措施吗?No one can avoid being influenced byadvertisements and advertising exerts a tremendousinfluence on us. Recently, there are people who areof the opinion that public has the right to know thecorrect information of the advertisements andgovernment also should restrict the contents of these advertisements. Personally I agree withthis opinion for the following reasons.In the first instance, consumers have the right to know the correct information beforedeciding on whether to buy them. Advertisements are highly information that helps people tomake choice before they go to buy what they need. If the advertisement exaggerates theproducts it also will persuade people into buying things, which they don’t really want.Secondly, any misleading advertisements will lead to the marketing tricks, causing chaos inthe market. Too many misleading advertisements are barrio to distinguishing between decentproducts or products of bad quality. His bread in truth is made with soy flour, while headvertises it as white bread. These misleading information causes illegal competition.Last but not least, government should stipulate laws in consumers’ interests. According tothe laws, advertisements must be truthful. If the advertisements misleadconsumers,government can impose great fine on them to set a lesson.In general, the role of advertisements is inevitable and undeniable. A good advertisementcan be a bridge between business and consumers and helps keep business moving. So we needcorrect information and government also needs to restrict the contents of advertisements. Letmisinformation of advertisements be far away from us.雅思大作文题目：Traditional arts civilized a nation. Do youthink government should subsidize musicians,artists, actors or drama companies? Whatshould a government do?雅思大作文范文：Traditional arts, as valuable cultural relics of anation, are disappearing far away from the modernsociety. China, as one of the highly-civilized countriesin the world, abound in various forms of traditionalarts, such as painting, calligraphy, music,architecture and dramas, which are not only ournational cultural treasures, but also a rich fortune ofthe world.As essence of a local culture, traditional arts reflect a nation’s artistic talents andtraditions. For example, water-color painting depicts a harmony between people and nature.Architecture illustrates a nation’s aesthetic value and religious belief. Cathedrals, highlighted byGothic style in the Medieval, represent Christianity. Pagodas, totally different from cathedralsstylistically, are a symbol of Buddhism. Peking Opera describes the history of our country.However, traditional arts are leaving contemporary people further and further away, oneof the main reasons for which is that the authorities concerned and some institutes lack fundsandprofessionals, which are quite essential to the research and promotion of traditionalculture. Another radical reason should be attributed to the impact of western cultures ontraditions. Young people, especially youngsters, are addicted to western music like rock and roll,without any knowledge about traditional musical instruments. With the economic globalization,traditional culture and arts will be in the danger of assimilation. How to maintain and developtraditional arts becomes the biggest concern of a government.Firstly, the government should lay a fund for the research and promotion of traditionalarts. Secondly, the research institutes and universities should work out a long-term developingscheme, organizing systematic research on traditional arts. Arts belong to a nation and thewhole world as well. The prosperity of traditional arts will diversify the culture of the world.。
政府相关的雅思英语作文
政府相关的雅思英语作文一些政府说可以通过税收控制孩子的数量。
政府有时以这种方式控制人口是必要的，也是正确的。
你对这个看法有什么一件?理由是什么?下面是店铺分享的政府相关的作文，欢迎大家阅读!雅思英语作文【1】Some governments say how many children a family can hare in their country. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. It is sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way.Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.Model Answer:It is certainly very understandable that some governments should start looking at ways of limiting their populations to a sustainable figure. In the past, populations were partly regulated by frequent war and widespread disease, but in recent years the effects of those factors have been diminished. Countries can be faced with a population that is growing much faster than she nation's food resources or employment opportunities and whose members can be condemned to poverty by the need to feed extra mouths. They identify population control as a means to raising living standards.But how should it be achieved? Clearly, this whole area is a very delicate personal and cultural issue. Many people feel that this is not a matter for the state. They feel this is one area of life where they have the right to make decisions for themselves. For that reason, it would seem that the best. Approach would be to work by persuasion rather than compulsion This could be done by a process of education that points out the way a smaller family can mean an improved quality of life for the family members, aswell as less strain on the country's perhaps very limited, resources.This is the preferred way. Of course if this docs not succeed within a reasonable time scale, it may be necessary to consider other measures. Such as tax incentives or child-benefit payments for small families only. These are midway between persuasion and compulsion.So. Yes. It is sometimes necessary, but governments should try very hard to persuade first. They should also remember that this is a very delicate area indeed, and that social engineering can create as many problems as it solves?雅思英语作文【2】All education, primary, secondary and further education, should be free to all people and paid for by the government.Do you agree or disagree with this statement?Model Answer:Different countries have different education systems. I don‛t know all the education systems in the world but all the ones I do know about have free school education at primary and secondary level. I certainly agree with the statement that this should be the case. I believe university education is different.No matter what standard of income someone has or what society someone comes from, everyone should have the opportunity to have a good standard of education. This is not always what happens but it is what should happen. Private schools can be available for those who want and can afford it but the free schools should always be there. This is certainly one of the best attributes of western democracy and all countries it seems strive to attain situation although some have problems due to the economic and political situations in their countries. Governments should make sure that all their citizens have accessto a good standard of free education at primary and secondary level.Further education is different. In an ideal world this should be free but governments have a lot of demands on their money.I think that students should have to pay, maybe not all, but at least a contribution towards their tuition fees. They will be able to earn it back once they have graduated. The UK has this system whereas in the US students have to pay all their high tuition fees which can run into the tens of thousands of dollars over a full course. I am not sure if I agree with this but it certainly would make sure that students make the best of efforts to pass or all their money would be wasted.Therefore I conclude that primary and secondary education should be freely available for all if possible but that further education should not necessarily be wholly free.雅思英语作文【3】Some people say the government should not put money into building theatres and sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care and education.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Model Answer:What would the world be like without Shakespeare or the Olympics? While medical care and education are perhaps the highest causes to which money can be contributed, the arts and athletics are in some ways just as valuable. So, to ask the government to not extend support to these two areas could be just as detrimental to the welfare of society as the lack of sufficient health care and education.The Romans b elieved in “mens sana in corpore sano”. In short, that there is indeed a correlation between a healthy bodyand healthy mind. When we are healthy, we feel better and so are more likely to be productive academically. Plus, the practice of sports can also teach us the very same discipline we need for our studies. Why even a brisk walk or watching an exciting athletic match can refresh the mind for greater work. Moreover, sports can serve to create healthier bodies, which in turn would serve as a form of “preventive medicine” thereby cutting down on medical costs. In the same vein, the arts are known to induce a sense of well-being in performers and audience alike, reducing mental problems and their associated physical manifestations and again, medical costs. As such, building theatres and stadiums, which spur interest in the arts and sports respectively, actually would be practically identical to spending money on medical care and education!Now I realize the question specifically addresses the building of theatres and sports stadiums by government. Some people would contend athletics and the arts can still be enjoyed and practiced without such constructions. I would hazard that these buildings stand as the altars to the sports and arts worlds, inspiring would-be athletes and performers. Without such venues where would sports spectators and music aficionados be able to enjoy these events? Now some other people would also say business could support their construction, but we know the avarice of business could very likely jeopardize the lofty spirit of athletics and the arts just as well. Therefore, allowing government to retain some say in the matter on behalf of the people would, I believe, be in the best interest of the people.In short, as long as the government does not go overboard in its expenditures for these buildings and uses such venues for the benefit of all, then, as mentioned above, people will benefitin terms of both medical care and education as well. This is not to say the government should neglect medical care and education, but rather to think of this not as an either-or choice but as a win-win situation for all.。
雅思写作高分词汇-政府篇
雅思写作高分词汇-政府篇
政府在日常生活中的任何时候任何地方都在影响着我们的一举一动，在的写作中，我们也会经常看见各种有关政府的话题，那么在书写有关媒体的文章的时候，我们有哪些相关的词汇可以用到呢，在这里雅思为大家搜集了一些有关政府的雅思词汇，希望对大家的写作会有所帮助。
当局 authorities
老百姓 citizens/the citizenry
规范，管理 regulate/administer/overse
实施 implement
立法 legislate/make laws
民主与开放的政府 a democratic and progressive government 严禁 strictly prohibit/ban altogether
严格的法律 stringent laws/legislation
规章制度 rules and regulations
为。
拨款 allocate monety to sth./subsidise/be a patron of/invest in/finance/fund/dedicate money to sth.
预算 budget
税收 tax revenue
政府在某方面的开支他和government spending/expenditure on sth.
削减 curtail
增加 augment
当务之急 priority
把。
当成当务之急 give priority to sth.
责任 responsibility/obligation
人道主义救援 humanitrian aid。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
雅思写作Task2考官范文：政府类(4)
本文收集整理了雅思写作Task2考官范文：政府类(4)。
认真研读一定的雅思范文及作文模板可以帮助我们检验自己的写作水平，并能很好地吸收和应用优秀范文里的优秀内容。
The costs of medical health care are increasing all the time. Governments are finding it difficult to balance the health care budget.
Should citizens be totally responsible for their own health costs and take out private health insurance, or is it better to have a comprehensive health care system which provides free health services for all? Discuss.
Model Answer:
A much debated issue these days is whether citizens should take out private health insurance or not. The cost of providing free medical care for both the wealthy and the poor is far too great for any government, and most people agree that if you can pay for insurance, you should. In this essay, I will argue that all who can afford it should be insured, but free medical care must be made available for those too poor to do so.
The most important reason for encouraging people to take out private health insurance is the cost to the government of health care.
Free health cover for people who are able to pay for it is a waste of public money. Of course, people will only pay health insurance premiums if they know that they are getting good value for their money. If they get sick, they should pay very little or nothing at all. In addition, the privately insured are entitled to special benefits such as having the choice of their own doctors, and being able to avoid long waiting lists for hospital beds.
On the other hand, those who really cannot afford to pay private insurance premiums, which are often very high, are still entitled as citizens to the best medical care available –they cannot be expected to pay their own medical bills. However, if they are working, they should still pay a percentage of their wage (say 1 to 2%) as a tax which pays towards the cost of providing "free" medical services.
In conclusion, most people should privately insure their health, but it is unreasonable to suppose that all citizens can afford it. Therefore, a safety net in the form of a basic free health care system must exist for the very poor and the unemployed.。