公司理财罗斯第九版课后习题答案
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题(第13~15章)【圣才出品】
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题第13章风险、资本成本和资本预算一、概念题1.资产贝塔(asset beta)答:资产贝塔是指企业总资产的贝塔系数。
除非完全依靠权益融资,否则不能把资产贝塔看作普通股的贝塔系数。
其公式为:其中,β权益是杠杆企业权益的贝塔。
公式包括两部分,即负债的贝塔乘以负债在资本结构中的百分比;权益的贝塔乘以权益在资本结构中的百分比。
这个组合包括企业的负债和权益,所以组合贝塔就是资产贝塔。
在实际中,负债的贝塔很低,一般假设为零。
若假设负债的贝塔为零,则:对于杠杆企业,权益/(负债+权益)一定小于1,所以β资产<β权益,将上式变形,有:有财务杠杆的情况下,权益贝塔一定大于资产贝塔。
2.经营杠杆(operating leverage)答:经营杠杆是指由于固定成本的存在而导致息税前利润变动大于产销业务量变动的杠杆效应。
对经营杠杆的计量最常用的指标是经营杠杆系数或经营杠杆度。
经营杠杆系数,是指息税前利润变动率相当于销售量变动率的倍数。
用公式可以表示为:式中,EBIT为息税前利润;F为固定成本。
经营杠杆系数不是固定不变的。
当企业的固定成本总额、单位产品的变动成本、销售价格、销售数量等因素发生变动时,经营杠杆系数也会发生变动。
经营杠杆系数越高,对经营杠杆利益的影响就越强,经营杠杆风险也就越高。
经营杠杆越大,企业的贝塔系数就越大。
3.权益资本成本(cost of equity capital)答:权益资本成本就是投资股东要求的回报率,用CAPM模型表示股票的期望收益率为:其中,R F是无风险利率;是市场组合的期望收益率与无风险利率之差,也称为期望超额市场收益率或市场风险溢价。
所以要估计企业权益资本成本,需要知道以下三个变量:①无风险利率;②市场风险溢价;③公司权益的贝塔系数。
4.加权平均资本成本(weighted average cost of capital,r WACC)答:平均资本成本是权益资本成本和债务资本成本的加权平均,所以,通常称之为加权平均资本成本,r WACC,其计算公式如下:式中的权数分别是权益占总价值的比重,即和负债占总价值的比重,即。
罗斯公司理财第九版第四章课后答案
23题:This question is asking for the present value of an annuity, but the interest rate changes during the life of the annuity. We need to find the present value of the cash flows for the last eight years first. The PV of these cash flows is:PVA2 = $1,500 [{1 – 1 / [1 + (.09/12)]⌒96} / (.09/12)] = $102,387.66Note that this is the PV of this annuity exactly seven years from today. Now, we can discount this lump sum to today. The value of this cash flow today is:PV = $102,387.66 / [1 + (.13/12)]⌒84 = $41,415.70Now, we need to find the PV of the annuity for the first seven years. The value of these cash flows today is:PVA1 = $1,500 [{1 – 1 / [1 + (.13/12)]⌒84} / (.13/12)] = $82,453.99The value of the cash flows today is the sum of these two cash flows, so:PV = $82,453.99 + 41,415.70 = $123,869.9924题The monthly interest rate is the annual interest rate divided by 12, or:Monthly interest rate = .104 / 12 Monthly interest rate = .00867Now we can set the present value of the lease payments equal to the cost of the equipment, or $3,500. The lease payments are in the form of an annuity due, so:PV Adue = (1 + r) C({1 – [1/(1 + r)]⌒t } / r )$3,500 = (1 + .00867) C({1 – [1/(1 + .00867)]⌒24 } / .00867 ) C = $160.7625题Here, we need to compare to options. In order to do so, we must get the value of the two cash flow streams to the same time, so we will find the value of each today. We must also make sure to use the aftertax cash flows, since it is more relevant. For Option A, the aftertax cash flows are:Aftertax cash flows = Pretax cash flows(1 – tax rate)Aftertax cash flows = $175,000(1 – .28)Aftertax cash flows = $126,000The aftertax cash flows from Option A are in the form of an annuity due, so the present value of the cash flow today is:PV Adue = (1 + r) C({1 – [1/(1 + r)]⌒t } / r )PV Adue = (1 + .10)$126,000({1 – [1/(1 + .10)]⌒31 } / .10 )PV Adue = $1,313,791.22For Option B, the aftertax cash flows are:Aftertax cash flows = Pretax cash flows(1 – tax rate)Aftertax cash flows = $125,000(1 – .28)Aftertax cash flows = $90,000The aftertax cash flows from Option B are an ordinary annuity, plus the cash flow today, so the present value:PV = C({1 – [1/(1 + r)]⌒t } / r ) + CF0PV = $90,000{1 – [1/(1 + .10)]⌒30 } / .10 ) + $530,000PV = $1,378,422.3026题The cash flows for this problem occur monthly, and the interest rate given is the EAR. Since the cash flows occur monthly, we must get the effective monthly rate. One way to do this is to find the APR based on monthly compounding, and then divide by 12. So, the pre-retirement APR is: EAR = .11 = [1 + (APR / 12)]⌒12– 1; APR = 12[(1.11)1/12 – 1] = 10.48%And the post-retirement APR is:EAR = .08 = [1 + (APR / 12)]⌒12 – 1; APR = 12[(1.08)1/12 – 1] = 7.72%First, we will calculate how much he needs at retirement. The amount needed at retirement is the PV of the monthly spending plus the PV of the inheritance. The PV of these two cash flows is:PV A = $20,000{1 – [1 / (1 + .0772/12)⌒12*20]} / (.0772/12) = $2,441,554.61PV = $1,000,000 / (1 + .08)20 = $214,548.21So, at retirement, he needs: $2,441,554.61 + 214,548.21 = $2,656.102.81He will be saving $1,900 per month for the next 10 years until he purchases the cabin. The value of his savings after 10 years will be:FV A = $1,900[{[ 1 + (.1048/12)]⌒12*10– 1} / (.1048/12)] = $400,121.62After he purchases the cabin, the amount he will have left is: $400,121.62 – 320,000 = $80,121.62 He still has 20 years until retirement. When he is ready to retire, this amount will have grown to: FV = $80,121.62[1 + (.1048/12)]⌒12*20 = $646,965.50So, when he is ready to retire, based on his current savings, he will be short:$2,656,102.81 – 645,965.50 = $2,010,137.31This amount is the FV of the monthly savings he must make between years 10 and 30. So, finding the annuity payment using the FVA equation, we find his monthly savings will need to be: FVA = $2,010,137.31 = C[{[ 1 + (.1048/12)]⌒12*20 – 1} / (.1048/12)]C = $2,486.1227题To answer this question, we should find the PV of both options, and compare them. Since we are purchasing the car, the lowest PV is the best option. The PV of the leasing is simply the PV of the lease payments, plus the $1. The interest rate we would use for the leasing option is the same as the interest rate of the loan. The PV of leasing is:PV = $1 + $520{1 – [1 / (1 + .08/12)⌒12*3]} / (.08/12) = $16,595.14The PV of purchasing the car is the current price of the car minus the PV of the resale price. The PV of the resale price is:PV = $26,000 / [1 + (.08/12)]⌒12*3 = $20,468.62The PV of the decision to purchase is:$38,000 – 20,468.62 = $17,531.38In this case, it is cheaper to lease the car than buy it since the PV of the leasing cash flows is lower. To find the breakeven resale price, we need to find the resale price that makes the PV of the tw o options the same. In other words, the PV of the decision to buy should be:$38,000 – PV of resale price = $16,595.14PV of resale price = $21,404.86The resale price that would make the PV of the lease versus buy decision is the FV of this value, so:Breakeven resale price = $21,404.86[1 + (.08/12)]⌒12*3 = $27,189.2528题First, we will find the APR and EAR for the loan with the refundable fee. Remember, we need to use the actual cash flows of the loan to find the interest rate. With the $2,100 application fee, you will need to borrow $202,100 to have $200,000 after deducting the fee. Solving for the payment under these circumstances, we get:PV A = $202,100 = C {[1 – 1/(1.00567)⌒360]/.00567} where .00567 = .068/12 C = $1,317.54 We can now use this amount in the PV A equation with the original amount we wished to borrow, $200,000. Solving for r, we find:PV A = $200,000 = $1,317.54[{1 – [1 / (1 + r)]⌒360}/ r]Solving for r with a spreadsheet, on a financial calculator, or by trial and error, gives:r = 0.5752% per monthAPR = 12(0.5752%) = 6.90% EAR = (1 + .005752)⌒12– 1 = .0713 or 7.13%With the nonrefundable fee, the APR of the loan is simply the quoted APR since the fee is not considered part of the loan. So:APR = 6.80% EAR = [1 + (0.068/12)]⌒12– 1 = .0702 or 7.02%29题Here, we need to find the interest rate that makes us indifferent between an annuity and a perpetuity. To solve this problem, we need to find the PV of the two options and set them equal to each other. The PV of the perpetuity is:PV = $20,000 / rAnd the PV of the annuity is:PVA = $35,000[{1 – [1 / (1 + r)]⌒10 } / r ]Setting them equal and solving for r, we get:$20,000 / r = $35,000[{1 – [1 / (1 + r)]⌒10 } / r ]$20,000 / $35,000 = 1 – [1 / (1 + r)]⌒10 .057141/10 = 1 / (1 + r)r = 1 / .5714⌒1/10 – 1 r = .0576 or 5.76%30题。
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题(第1~3章)【圣才出品】
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题第1章公司理财导论一、概念题1.资本预算(capital budgeting)答:资本预算是指综合反映投资资金来源与运用的预算,是为了获得未来产生现金流量的长期资产而现在投资支出的预算。
资本预算决策也称为长期投资决策,它是公司创造价值的主要方法。
资本预算决策一般指固定资产投资决策,耗资大,周期长,长期影响公司的产销能力和财务状况,决策正确与否影响公司的生存与发展。
完整的资本预算过程包括:寻找增长机会,制定长期投资战略,预测投资项目的现金流,分析评估投资项目,控制投资项目的执行情况。
资本预算可通过不同的资本预算方法来解决,如回收期法、净现值法和内部收益率法等。
2.货币市场(money markets)答:货币市场指期限不超过一年的资金借贷和短期有价证券交易的金融市场,亦称“短期金融市场”或“短期资金市场”,包括同业拆借市场、银行短期存贷市场、票据市场、短期证券市场、大额可转让存单市场、回购协议市场等。
其参加者为各种政府机构、各种银行和非银行金融机构及公司等。
货币市场具有四个基本特征:①融资期限短,一般在一年以内,最短的只有半天,主要用于满足短期资金周转的需要;②流动性强,金融工具可以在市场上随时兑现,交易对象主要是期限短、流动性强、风险小的信用工具,如票据、存单等,这些工具变现能力强,近似于货币,可称为“准货币”,故称货币市场;③安全性高,由于货币市场上的交易大多采用即期交易,即成交后马上结清,通常不存在因成交与结算日之间时间相对过长而引起价格巨大波动的现象,对投资者来说,收益具有较大保障;④政策性明显,货币市场由货币当局直接参加,是中央银行同商业银行及其他金融机构的资金连接的主渠道,是国家利用货币政策工具调节全国金融活动的杠杆支点。
货币市场的交易主体是短期资金的供需者。
需求者是为了获得现实的支付手段,调节资金的流动性并保持必要的支付能力,供应者提供的资金也大多是短期临时闲置性的资金。
公司理财第九版罗斯课后案例答案 Case Solutions Corporate Finance
公司理财第九版罗斯课后案例答案 Case Solutions CorporateFinance1. 案例一:公司资金需求分析问题:一家公司需要资金支持其新项目。
通过分析现金流量,推断该公司是否需要向外部借款或筹集其他资金。
解答:为了确定公司是否需要外部资金,我们需要分析公司的现金流量状况。
首先,我们需要计算公司的净现金流量(净收入加上非现金项目)。
然后,我们需要将净现金流量与项目的投资现金流量进行对比。
假设公司预计在项目开始时投资100万美元,并在项目运营期为5年。
预计该项目每年将产生50万美元的净现金流量。
现在,我们需要进行以下计算:净现金流量 = 年度现金流量 - 年度投资现金流量年度投资现金流量 = 100万美元年度现金流量 = 50万美元净现金流量 = 50万美元 - 100万美元 = -50万美元根据计算结果,公司的净现金流量为负数(即净现金流出),意味着公司每年都会亏损50万美元。
因此,公司需要从外部筹集资金以支持项目的运营。
2. 案例二:公司股权融资问题:一家公司正在考虑通过股权融资来筹集资金。
根据公司的财务数据和资本结构分析,我们需要确定公司最佳的股权融资方案。
解答:为了确定最佳的股权融资方案,我们需要参考公司的财务数据和资本结构分析。
首先,我们需要计算公司的资本结构比例,即股本占总资本的比例。
然后,我们将不同的股权融资方案与资本结构比例进行对比,选择最佳的方案。
假设公司当前的资本结构比例为60%的股本和40%的债务,在当前的资本结构下,公司的加权平均资本成本(WACC)为10%。
现在,我们需要进行以下计算:•方案一:以新股发行筹集1000万美元,并将其用于项目投资。
在这种方案下,公司的资本结构比例将发生变化。
假设公司的股本增加至80%,债务比例减少至20%。
根据资本结构比例的变化,WACC也将发生变化。
新的WACC可以通过以下公式计算得出:新的WACC = (股本比例 * 股本成本) + (债务比例 * 债务成本)假设公司的股本成本为12%,债务成本为8%:新的WACC = (0.8 * 12%) + (0.2 * 8%) = 9.6%•方案二:以新股发行筹集5000万美元,并将其用于项目投资。
罗斯《公司理财》第9版英文原书课后部分章节答案
罗斯《公司理财》第9版精要版英文原书课后部分章节答案详细»1 / 17 CH5 11,13,18,19,20 11. To find the PV of a lump sum, we use: PV = FV / (1 + r) t PV = $1,000,000 / (1.10) 80 = $488.19 13. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is: FV = PV(1 + r) t Solving for r, we get: r = (FV / PV) 1 / t –1 r = ($1,260,000 / $150) 1/112 – 1 = .0840 or 8.40% To find the FV of the first prize, we use: FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $1,260,000(1.0840) 33 = $18,056,409.94 18. To find the FV of a lump sum, we use: FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $4,000(1.11) 45 = $438,120.97 FV = $4,000(1.11) 35 = $154,299.40 Better start early! 19. We need to find the FV of a lump sum. However, the money will only be invested for six years, so the number of periods is six. FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $20,000(1.084)6 = $32,449.33 20. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is: FV = PV(1 + r) t Solving for t, we get: t = ln(FV / PV) / ln(1 + r) t = ln($75,000 / $10,000) / ln(1.11) = 19.31 So, the money must be invested for 19.31 years. However, you will not receive the money for another two years. From now, you’ll wait: 2 years + 19.31 years = 21.31 years CH6 16,24,27,42,58 16. For this problem, we simply need to find the FV of a lump sum using the equation: FV = PV(1 + r) t 2 / 17 It is important to note that compounding occurs semiannually. To account for this, we will divide the interest rate by two (the number of compounding periods in a year), and multiply the number of periods by two. Doing so, we get: FV = $2,100[1 + (.084/2)] 34 = $8,505.93 24. This problem requires us to find the FV A. The equation to find the FV A is: FV A = C{[(1 + r) t – 1] / r} FV A = $300[{[1 + (.10/12) ] 360 – 1} / (.10/12)] = $678,146.38 27. The cash flows are annual and the compounding period is quarterly, so we need to calculate the EAR to make the interest rate comparable with the timing of the cash flows. Using the equation for the EAR, we get: EAR = [1 + (APR / m)] m – 1 EAR = [1 + (.11/4)] 4 – 1 = .1146 or 11.46% And now we use the EAR to find the PV of each cash flow as a lump sum and add them together: PV = $725 / 1.1146 + $980 / 1.1146 2 + $1,360 / 1.1146 4 = $2,320.36 42. The amount of principal paid on the loan is the PV of the monthly payments you make. So, the present value of the $1,150 monthly payments is: PV A = $1,150[(1 – {1 / [1 + (.0635/12)]} 360 ) / (.0635/12)] = $184,817.42 The monthly payments of $1,150 will amount to a principal payment of $184,817.42. The amount of principal you will still owe is: $240,000 – 184,817.42 = $55,182.58 This remaining principal amount will increase at the interest rate on the loan until the end of the loan period. So the balloon payment in 30 years, which is the FV of the remaining principal will be: Balloon payment = $55,182.58[1 + (.0635/12)] 360 = $368,936.54 58. To answer this question, we should find the PV of both options, and compare them. Since we are purchasing the car, the lowest PV is the best option. The PV of the leasing is simply the PV of the lease payments, plus the $99. The interest rate we would use for the leasing option is the same as the interest rate of the loan. The PV of leasing is: PV = $99 + $450{1 –[1 / (1 + .07/12) 12(3) ]} / (.07/12) = $14,672.91 The PV of purchasing the car is the current price of the car minus the PV of the resale price. The PV of the resale price is: PV = $23,000 / [1 + (.07/12)] 12(3) = $18,654.82 The PV of the decision to purchase is: $32,000 – 18,654.82 = $13,345.18 3 / 17 In this case, it is cheaper to buy the car than leasing it since the PV of the purchase cash flows is lower. To find the breakeven resale price, we need to find the resale price that makes the PV of the two options the same. In other words, the PV of the decision to buy should be: $32,000 – PV of resale price = $14,672.91 PV of resale price = $17,327.09 The resale price that would make the PV of the lease versus buy decision is the FV ofthis value, so: Breakeven resale price = $17,327.09[1 + (.07/12)] 12(3) = $21,363.01 CH7 3,18,21,22,31 3. The price of any bond is the PV of the interest payment, plus the PV of the par value. Notice this problem assumes an annual coupon. The price of the bond will be: P = $75({1 – [1/(1 + .0875)] 10 } / .0875) + $1,000[1 / (1 + .0875) 10 ] = $918.89 We would like to introduce shorthand notation here. Rather than write (or type, as the case may be) the entire equation for the PV of a lump sum, or the PV A equation, it is common to abbreviate the equations as: PVIF R,t = 1 / (1 + r) t which stands for Present V alue Interest Factor PVIFA R,t = ({1 – [1/(1 + r)] t } / r ) which stands for Present V alue Interest Factor of an Annuity These abbreviations are short hand notation for the equations in which the interest rate and the number of periods are substituted into the equation and solved. We will use this shorthand notation in remainder of the solutions key. 18. The bond price equation for this bond is: P 0 = $1,068 = $46(PVIFA R%,18 ) + $1,000(PVIF R%,18 ) Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error we find: R = 4.06% This is thesemiannual interest rate, so the YTM is: YTM = 2 4.06% = 8.12% The current yield is:Current yield = Annual coupon payment / Price = $92 / $1,068 = .0861 or 8.61% The effective annual yield is the same as the EAR, so using the EAR equation from the previous chapter: Effective annual yield = (1 + 0.0406) 2 – 1 = .0829 or 8.29% 20. Accrued interest is the coupon payment for the period times the fraction of the period that has passed since the last coupon payment. Since we have a semiannual coupon bond, the coupon payment per six months is one-half of the annual coupon payment. There are four months until the next coupon payment, so two months have passed since the last coupon payment. The accrued interest for the bond is: Accrued interest = $74/2 × 2/6 = $12.33 And we calculate the clean price as: 4 / 17 Clean price = Dirty price –Accrued interest = $968 –12.33 = $955.67 21. Accrued interest is the coupon payment for the period times the fraction of the period that has passed since the last coupon payment. Since we have a semiannual coupon bond, the coupon payment per six months is one-half of the annual coupon payment. There are two months until the next coupon payment, so four months have passed since the last coupon payment. The accrued interest for the bond is: Accrued interest = $68/2 × 4/6 = $22.67 And we calculate the dirty price as: Dirty price = Clean price + Accrued interest = $1,073 + 22.67 = $1,095.67 22. To find the number of years to maturity for the bond, we need to find the price of the bond. Since we already have the coupon rate, we can use the bond price equation, and solve for the number of years to maturity. We are given the current yield of the bond, so we can calculate the price as: Current yield = .0755 = $80/P 0 P 0 = $80/.0755 = $1,059.60 Now that we have the price of the bond, the bond price equation is: P = $1,059.60 = $80[(1 – (1/1.072) t ) / .072 ] + $1,000/1.072 t We can solve this equation for t as follows: $1,059.60(1.072) t = $1,111.11(1.072) t –1,111.11 + 1,000 111.11 = 51.51(1.072) t2.1570 = 1.072 t t = log 2.1570 / log 1.072 = 11.06 11 years The bond has 11 years to maturity.31. The price of any bond (or financial instrument) is the PV of the future cash flows. Even though Bond M makes different coupons payments, to find the price of the bond, we just find the PV of the cash flows. The PV of the cash flows for Bond M is: P M = $1,100(PVIFA 3.5%,16 )(PVIF 3.5%,12 ) + $1,400(PVIFA3.5%,12 )(PVIF 3.5%,28 ) + $20,000(PVIF 3.5%,40 ) P M = $19,018.78 Notice that for the coupon payments of $1,400, we found the PV A for the coupon payments, and then discounted the lump sum back to today. Bond N is a zero coupon bond with a $20,000 par value, therefore, the price of the bond is the PV of the par, or: P N = $20,000(PVIF3.5%,40 ) = $5,051.45 CH8 4,18,20,22,244. Using the constant growth model, we find the price of the stock today is: P 0 = D 1 / (R – g) = $3.04 / (.11 – .038) = $42.22 5 / 17 18. The price of a share of preferred stock is the dividend payment divided by the required return. We know the dividend payment in Year 20, so we can find the price of the stock in Y ear 19, one year before the first dividend payment. Doing so, we get: P 19 = $20.00 / .064 P 19 = $312.50 The price of the stock today is the PV of the stock price in the future, so the price today will be: P 0 = $312.50 / (1.064) 19 P 0 = $96.15 20. We can use the two-stage dividend growth model for this problem, which is: P 0 = [D 0 (1 + g 1 )/(R – g 1 )]{1 – [(1 + g 1 )/(1 + R)] T }+ [(1 + g 1 )/(1 + R)] T [D 0 (1 + g 2 )/(R –g 2 )] P0 = [$1.25(1.28)/(.13 –.28)][1 –(1.28/1.13) 8 ] + [(1.28)/(1.13)] 8 [$1.25(1.06)/(.13 – .06)] P 0 = $69.55 22. We are asked to find the dividend yield and capital gains yield for each of the stocks. All of the stocks have a 15 percent required return, which is the sum of the dividend yield and the capital gains yield. To find the components of the total return, we need to find the stock price for each stock. Using this stock price and the dividend, we can calculate the dividend yield. The capital gains yield for the stock will be the total return (required return) minus the dividend yield. W: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50(1.10)/(.19 – .10) = $55.00 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(1.10)/$55.00 = .09 or 9% Capital gains yield = .19 – .09 = .10 or 10% X: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50/(.19 – 0) = $23.68 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50/$23.68 = .19 or 19% Capital gains yield = .19 – .19 = 0% Y: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50(1 – .05)/(.19 + .05) = $17.81 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(0.95)/$17.81 = .24 or 24% Capital gains yield = .19 – .24 = –.05 or –5% Z: P 2 = D 2 (1 + g) / (R – g) = D 0 (1 + g 1 ) 2 (1 +g 2 )/(R – g 2 ) = $4.50(1.20) 2 (1.12)/(.19 – .12) = $103.68 P 0 = $4.50 (1.20) / (1.19) + $4.50(1.20) 2 / (1.19) 2 + $103.68 / (1.19) 2 = $82.33 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(1.20)/$82.33 = .066 or 6.6% Capital gains yield = .19 – .066 = .124 or 12.4% In all cases, the required return is 19%, but the return is distributed differently between current income and capital gains. High growth stocks have an appreciable capital gains component but a relatively small current income yield; conversely, mature, negative-growth stocks provide a high current income but also price depreciation over time. 24. Here we have a stock with supernormal growth, but the dividend growth changes every year for the first four years. We can find the price of the stock in Y ear 3 since the dividend growth rate is constant after the third dividend. The price of the stock in Y ear 3 will be the dividend in Y ear 4, divided by the required return minus the constant dividend growth rate. So, the price in Y ear 3 will be: 6 / 17 P3 = $2.45(1.20)(1.15)(1.10)(1.05) / (.11 – .05) = $65.08 The price of the stock today will be the PV of the first three dividends, plus the PV of the stock price in Y ear 3, so: P 0 = $2.45(1.20)/(1.11) + $2.45(1.20)(1.15)/1.11 2 + $2.45(1.20)(1.15)(1.10)/1.11 3 + $65.08/1.11 3 P 0 = $55.70 CH9 3,4,6,9,15 3. Project A has cash flows of $19,000 in Y ear 1, so the cash flows are short by $21,000 of recapturing the initial investment, so the payback for Project A is: Payback = 1 + ($21,000 / $25,000) = 1.84 years Project B has cash flows of: Cash flows = $14,000 + 17,000 + 24,000 = $55,000 during this first three years. The cash flows are still short by $5,000 of recapturing the initial investment, so the payback for Project B is: B: Payback = 3 + ($5,000 / $270,000) = 3.019 years Using the payback criterion and a cutoff of 3 years, accept project A and reject project B. 4. When we use discounted payback, we need to find the value of all cash flows today. The value today of the project cash flows for the first four years is: V alue today of Y ear 1 cash flow = $4,200/1.14 = $3,684.21 V alue today of Y ear 2 cash flow = $5,300/1.14 2 = $4,078.18 V alue today of Y ear 3 cash flow = $6,100/1.14 3 = $4,117.33 V alue today of Y ear 4 cash flow = $7,400/1.14 4 = $4,381.39 To findthe discounted payback, we use these values to find the payback period. The discounted first year cash flow is $3,684.21, so the discounted payback for a $7,000 initial cost is: Discounted payback = 1 + ($7,000 – 3,684.21)/$4,078.18 = 1.81 years For an initial cost of $10,000, the discounted payback is: Discounted payback = 2 + ($10,000 –3,684.21 –4,078.18)/$4,117.33 = 2.54 years Notice the calculation of discounted payback. We know the payback period is between two and three years, so we subtract the discounted values of the Y ear 1 and Y ear 2 cash flows from the initial cost. This is the numerator, which is the discounted amount we still need to make to recover our initial investment. We divide this amount by the discounted amount we will earn in Y ear 3 to get the fractional portion of the discounted payback. If the initial cost is $13,000, the discounted payback is: Discounted payback = 3 + ($13,000 – 3,684.21 – 4,078.18 – 4,117.33) / $4,381.39 = 3.26 years 7 / 17 6. Our definition of AAR is the average net income divided by the average book value. The average net income for this project is: A verage net income = ($1,938,200 + 2,201,600 + 1,876,000 + 1,329,500) / 4 = $1,836,325 And the average book value is: A verage book value = ($15,000,000 + 0) / 2 = $7,500,000 So, the AAR for this project is: AAR = A verage net income / A verage book value = $1,836,325 / $7,500,000 = .2448 or 24.48% 9. The NPV of a project is the PV of the outflows minus the PV of the inflows. Since the cash inflows are an annuity, the equation for the NPV of this project at an 8 percent required return is: NPV = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA 8%, 9 ) = $40,036.31 At an 8 percent required return, the NPV is positive, so we would accept the project. The equation for the NPV of the project at a 20 percent required return is: NPV = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA 20%, 9 ) = –$23,117.45 At a 20 percent required return, the NPV is negative, so we would reject the project. We would be indifferent to the project if the required return was equal to the IRR of the project, since at that required return the NPV is zero. The IRR of the project is: 0 = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA IRR, 9 ) IRR = 14.59% 15. The profitability index is defined as the PV of the cash inflows divided by the PV of the cash outflows. The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 10 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.1 + $6,900/1.1 2 + $5,700/1.1 3 ] / $14,000 = 1.187 The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 15 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.15 + $6,900/1.15 2 + $5,700/1.15 3 ] / $14,000 = 1.094 The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 22 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.22 + $6,900/1.22 2 + $5,700/1.22 3 ] / $14,000 = 0.983 8 / 17 We would accept the project if the required return were 10 percent or 15 percent since the PI is greater than one. We would reject the project if the required return were 22 percent since the PI。
罗斯公司理财第九版课后习题答案中文版
第一章1.在所有权形式的公司中,股东是公司的所有者。
股东选举公司的董事会,董事会任命该公司的管理层。
企业的所有权和控制权分离的组织形式是导致的代理关系存在的主要原因。
管理者可能追求自身或别人的利益最大化,而不是股东的利益最大化。
在这种环境下,他们可能因为目标不一致而存在代理问题2.非营利公司经常追求社会或政治任务等各种目标。
非营利公司财务管理的目标是获取并有效使用资金以最大限度地实现组织的社会使命。
3.这句话是不正确的。
管理者实施财务管理的目标就是最大化现有股票的每股价值,当前的股票价值反映了短期和长期的风险、时间以及未来现金流量。
4.有两种结论。
一种极端,在市场经济中所有的东西都被定价。
因此所有目标都有一个最优水平,包括避免不道德或非法的行为,股票价值最大化。
另一种极端,我们可以认为这是非经济现象,最好的处理方式是通过政治手段。
一个经典的思考问题给出了这种争论的答案:公司估计提高某种产品安全性的成本是30美元万。
然而,该公司认为提高产品的安全性只会节省20美元万。
请问公司应该怎么做呢?”5.财务管理的目标都是相同的,但实现目标的最好方式可能是不同的,因为不同的国家有不同的社会、政治环境和经济制度。
6.管理层的目标是最大化股东现有股票的每股价值。
如果管理层认为能提高公司利润,使股价超过35美元,那么他们应该展开对恶意收购的斗争。
如果管理层认为该投标人或其它未知的投标人将支付超过每股35美元的价格收购公司,那么他们也应该展开斗争。
然而,如果管理层不能增加企业的价值,并且没有其他更高的投标价格,那么管理层不是在为股东的最大化权益行事。
现在的管理层经常在公司面临这些恶意收购的情况时迷失自己的方向。
7.其他国家的代理问题并不严重,主要取决于其他国家的私人投资者占比重较小。
较少的私人投资者能减少不同的企业目标。
高比重的机构所有权导致高学历的股东和管理层讨论决策风险项目。
此外,机构投资者比私人投资者可以根据自己的资源和经验更好地对管理层实施有效的监督机制。
罗斯《公司理财》第9版笔记和课后习题(含考研真题)详解[视频详解](股票估值)【圣才出品】
罗斯《公司理财》第9版笔记和课后习题(含考研真题)详解[视频详解](股票估值)【圣才出品】罗斯《公司理财》第9版笔记和课后习题(含考研真题)详解[视频详解]第9章股票估值9.1复习笔记1.不同类型股票的估值(1)零增长股利股利不变时,一股股票的价格由下式给出:在这里假定Div1=Div2=…=Div。
(2)固定增长率股利如果股利以恒定的速率增长,那么一股股票的价格就为:式中,g是增长率;Div是第一期期末的股利。
(3)变动增长率股利2.股利折现模型中的参数估计(1)对增长率g的估计有效估计增长率的方法是:g=留存收益比率×留存收益收益率(ROE)只要公司保持其股利支付率不变,g就可以表示公司的股利增长率以及盈利增长率。
(2)对折现率R的估计对于折现率R的估计为:R=Div/P0+g该式表明总收益率R由两部分组成。
其中,第一部分被称为股利收益率,是预期的现金股利与当前的价格之比。
3.增长机会每股股价可以写做:该式表明,每股股价可以看做两部分的加和。
第一部分(EPS/R)是当公司满足于现状,而将其盈利全部发放给投资者时的价值;第二部分是当公司将盈利留存并用于投资新项目时的新增价值。
当公司投资于正NPVGO的增长机会时,公司价值增加。
反之,当公司选择负NPVGO 的投资机会时,公司价值降低。
但是,不管项目的NPV是正的还是负的,盈利和股利都是增长的。
不应该折现利润来获得每股价格,因为有部分盈利被用于再投资了。
只有股利被分到股东手中,也只有股利可以加以折现以获得股票价格。
4.市盈率即股票的市盈率是三个因素的函数:(1)增长机会。
拥有强劲增长机会的公司具有高市盈率。
(2)风险。
低风险股票具有高市盈率。
(3)会计方法。
采用保守会计方法的公司具有高市盈率。
5.股票市场交易商:持有一项存货,然后准备在任何时点进行买卖。
经纪人:将买者和卖者撮合在一起,但并不持有存货。
9.2课后习题详解一、概念题1.股利支付率(payout ratio)答:股利支付率一般指公司发放给普通股股东的现金股利占总利润的比例。
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题(第16~18章)【圣才出品】
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题第16章资本结构:基本概念一、概念题1.馅饼模型(pie model)答:馅饼模型是一种分析公司资本结构的模型,用来讨论公司应如何选择负债权益比的问题。
该理论将公司的筹资要求权之和比作一个馅饼,并且将公司的价值定义为负债和所有者权益之和。
该理论认为,债权人和股东将分别得到不同大小的馅饼块,但是整个馅饼的大小,也就是公司的实际价值,却完全不会受到馅饼分割方式的影响。
也就是说,公司的融资结构只影响公司利润的分配方式,即这个利润馅饼如何被分割以及由谁承担公司的风险,不会对公司的价值造成任何影响。
2.MM命题Ⅰ(MM Proposition I)答:不考虑公司所得税情况下的MM命题Ⅰ指的是,公司的价值取决于未来经营活动净收益的资本化程度,资本化率与公司的风险相一致。
这一命题有两个直接推论:a.公司的平均资本成本与公司资本结构无关;b.公司的平均资本成本等于与之风险相同的零举债公司的资本化率。
3.MM命题Ⅱ(MM Proposition II)答:不考虑公司所得税情况下的MM命题Ⅱ指的是,举债经营公司的权益资本成本等于零举债经营公司的权益资本成本加上风险报酬率。
风险报酬率的多少取决于公司举债经营的程度。
命题二表明,随着公司负债的增加,公司的权益资本成本也将提高。
4.MM命题Ⅰ(公司税)[MM Proposition I(corporate taxes)]答:MM命题一,零举债经营公司的价值是公司税后经营收益除以公司权益资本成本所得的结果,而举债经营公司的价值等于同类风险的零举债经营公司的价值加上税款节余额。
根据这一结论,当公司负债增加时,举债经营公司价值增加较快。
特别地,当公司负债筹资的比重为100%时,公司的价值最大。
5.MM命题Ⅱ(公司税)[MM Proposition II(corporate taxes)]答:MM命题二,举债公司的权益资本成本等于同类风险零举债经营公司的权益资本成本加上风险报酬率,而风险报酬率又取决于公司资本结构和公司所得税税率。
罗斯公司理财第九版第五章课后答案对应版
第五章:净现值和投资评价的其他方法1.如果项目会带来常规的现金流,回收期短于项目的生命周期意味着,在折现率为0 的情况下,NPV 为正值。
折现率大于0 时,回收期依旧会短于项目的生命周期,但根据折现率小于、等于、大于IRR 的情况,NPV 可能为正、为零、为负。
折现回收期包含了相关折现率的影响。
如果一个项目的折现回收期短于该项目的生命周期,NPV 一定为正值。
2.如果某项目有常规的现金流,而且NPV 为正,该项目回收期一定短于其生命周期。
因为折现回收期是用与NPV 相同的折现值计算出来的,如果NPV为正,折现回收期也会短于该项目的生命周期。
NPV 为正表明未来流入现金流大于初始投资成本,盈利指数必然大于1。
如果NPV 以特定的折现率R 计算出来为正值时,必然存在一个大于R 的折现率R’使得NPV 为0,因此,IRR 必定大于必要报酬率。
3.(1)回收期法就是简单地计算出一系列现金流的盈亏平衡点。
其缺陷是忽略了货币的时间价值,另外,也忽略了回收期以后的现金流量。
当某项目的回收期小于该项目的生命周期,则可以接受;反之,则拒绝。
回收期法决策作出的选择比较武断。
(2)平均会计收益率为扣除所得税和折旧之后的项目平均收益除以整个项目期限内的平均账面投资额。
其最大的缺陷在于没有使用正确的原始材料,其次也没有考虑到时间序列这个因素。
一般某项目的平均会计收益率大于公司的目标会计收益率,则可以接受;反之,则拒绝。
(3)内部收益率就是令项目净现值为0 的贴现率。
其缺陷在于没有办法对某些项目进行判断,例如有多重内部收益率的项目,而且对于融资型的项目以及投资型的项目判断标准截然相反。
对于投资型项目,若IRR 大于贴现率,项目可以接受;反之,则拒绝。
对于融资型项目,若IRR 小于贴现率,项目可以接受;反之,则拒绝。
(4)盈利指数是初始以后所有预期未来现金流量的现值和初始投资的比值。
必须注意的是,倘若初始投资期之后,在资金使用上还有限制,那盈利指数就会失效。
罗斯公司理财第九版第十八章课后答案对应版
第十八章:杠杆企业的股价与资本预算1、调整的净现值法(APV)如下:(UCF t=无杠杆企业项目第期流向权益所有者的现金流量R0=无杠杆企业项目的资本成本)2、APV 法用权益资本成本折现现金流得到无杠杆项目的价值,然后加上负债的节税现值,得到有杠杆情况下的项目价值;而WACC 法则将UCF 按R WACC折现,而R WACC 低于R0 。
3、FTE 法使用的是LCF,而其它两种方法使用的是UCF。
4、WACC 法在计算现金流量时使用的是无杠杆企业的现金流量,没有包含利息,但是在计算加权平均成本的时候包含了利息成本。
若在计算现金流时要把利息的支付包括进去,可使用FTF 法。
5、无杠杆企业的贝塔值可以用杠杆的贝塔来衡量,它是企业业务风险的衡量标准;另外,企业的金融风险也可以由贝塔值来衡量。
6.a. The maximum price that the company should be willing to pay for the fleet of cars with all-equity funding is the price that makes the NPV of the transaction equal to zero. The NPV equation for the project is:NPV = –Purchase Price + PV[(1 – t C )(EBTD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield)If we let P equal the purchase price of the fleet, then the NPV is:NPV = –P + (1 – .35)($140,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (.35)(P/5)PVIFA13%,5Setting the NPV equal to zero and solving for the purchase price, we find:0 = –P + (1 – .35)($140,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (.35)(P/5)PVIFA13%,5P = $320,068.04 + (P)(0.35/5)PVIFA13%,5 = $320,068.04 + .2462P.7538P = $320,068.04 则P = $424,609.54b. The adjusted present value (APV) of a project equals the net present value of the project if it were funded completely by equity plus the net present value of any financing side effects.In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of the cash flows resulting from the firm‘s debt, so:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)So, the NPV of each part of the APV equation is:NPV(All-Equity) = –Purchase Price + PV[(1 – t C )(EBTD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield) The company paid $395,000 for the fleet of cars. Because this fleet will be fully depreciated over five years using the straight-line method, annual depreciation expense equals: Depreciation = $395,000/5 = $79,000So, the NPV of an all-equity project is:NPV = –$395,000 + (1 – 0.35)($140,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (0.35)($79,000)PVIFA13%,5NPV = $22,319.49NPV(Financing Side Effects)The net present value of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm‘s debt, so:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Payments)Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt R B. So, the NPV of the financing side effects are:NPV = $260,000 – (1 – 0.35)(0.08)($260,000)PVIFA8%,5 – [$260,000/(1.08)⌒5] = $29,066.93 So, the APV of the project is:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)APV = $22,319.49 + 29,066.93 = $51,386.427. a. In order to value a firm‘s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, discount the cash flows available to equity holders at the cost of the firm‘s levered equity. The cash flows to equity holders will be the firm‘s net income. Remembering that the company has three stores, we find:Sales $3,600,000COGS 1,530,000G & A costs 1,020,000Interest 102,000EBT $948,000Taxes 379,200NI $568,800Since this cash flow will remain the same forever, the present value of cash flows available to the firm‘s equity holders is a perpetuity. We can discount at the levered cost of equity, so, the value of the company‘s equity is: PV(Flow-to-equity) = $568,800 / 0.19 = $2,993,684.21b. The value of a firm is equal to the sum of the market values of its debt and equity, or:V L = B + SWe calculat ed the value of the company‘s equity in part a, so now we need to calculate the value of debt. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.40, which can be written algebraically as: B / S = 0.40We can substitute the value of equity and solve for the value of debt, doing so, we find:B / $2,993,684.21 = 0.40 则B = $1,197,473.68So, the value of the company is: V = $2,993,684.21 + 1,197,473.68 = $4,191,157.898. a. In order to determine the cost of the firm‘s debt, we need to find the yield to maturity on its current bonds. With semiannual coupon payments, the yield to maturity in the company‘s bonds is: $975 = $40(PVIFA R%,40) + $1,000(PVIF R%,40) 则R = .0413 or 4.13%Since the coupon payments are semiannual, the YTM on the bonds is:YTM = 4.13%× 2 = 8.26%b. We can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to find the return on unlevered equity. According to the Capital Asset Pricing Model:R0 = R F + βUnlevered(R M – R F) = 5% + 1.1(12% – 5%) = 12.70%Now we can find the cost of levered equity. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxesR S = R0 + (B/S)(R0 – R B)(1 – t C) = .1270 + (.40)(.1270 – .0826)(1 – .34) = .1387 or 13.87% c. In a world with corporate taxes, a firm‘s weighted average cost of capital is equal to:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 – t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SThe problem does not provide either the debt-value ratio or equity-value ratio. However, the firm‘s debt-equity ratio of is: B/S = 0.40Solving for B: B = 0.4SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get: B/V = .4S / (.4S + S) = .4 / 1.4 = .29And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or: S/V = 1 – .29= .71So, the WACC for the company is: R WACC = .29(1 – .34)(.0826) + .71(.1387)R WACC = .1147 or 11.47%9. a. The equity beta of a firm financed entirely by equity is equal to its unlevered beta. Since each firm has an unlevered beta of 1.25, we can find the equity beta for each. Doing so, we find:North PoleβEquity = [1 + (1 – t C)(B/S)] βUnlevered = [1 + (1 – .35)($2,900,000/$3,800,000](1.25) = 1.87 South PoleβEquity = [1 + (1 – t C)(B/S)]βUnlevered = [1 + (1 – .35)($3,800,000/$2,900,000](1.25) = 2.31b. We can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to find th e required return on each firm‘s equity. Doing so, we find:North Pole: R S = R F + βEquity(R M – R F) = 5.30% + 1.87(12.40% – 5.30%) = 18.58%South Pole: R S = R F + βEquity(R M – R F) = 5.30% + 2.31(12.40% – 5.30%) = 21.73%10. First we need to find the aftertax value of the revenues minus expenses. The aftertax value is: Aftertax revenue = $3,800,000(1 – .40) = $2,280,000Next, we need to find the depreciation tax shield. The depreciation tax shield each year is: Depreciation tax shield = Depreciation(t C) = ($11,400,000 / 6)(.40) = $760,000Now we can find the NPV of the project, which is:NPV = Initial cost + PV of depreciation tax shield + PV of aftertax revenueTo find the present value of the depreciation tax shield, we should discount at the risk-free rate, and we need to discount the aftertax revenues at the cost of equity, so:NPV = –$11,400,000 + $760,000(PVIFA6%,6) + $2,280,000(PVIFA14%,6) = $1,203,328.43 11. a. The company has a capital structure with three parts: long-term debt, short-term debt, and equity. Since interest payments on both long-term and short-term debt are tax-deductible, multiply the pretax costs by (1 – t C) to determine the aftertax costs to be used in the weighted average cost of capital calculation. The WACC using the book value weights is:R WACC = (w STD)(R STD)(1 – t C) + (w LTD)(R LTD)(1 – t C) + (w Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = ($3 / $19)(.035)(1 – .35) + ($10 / $19)(.068)(1 – .35) + ($6 / $19)(.145)R WACC = 0.0726 or 7.26%b. Using the market value weights, the company‘s WACC is:R WACC = (w STD)(R STD)(1 – t C) + (w LTD)(R LTD)(1 – t C) + (w Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = ($3 / $40)(.035)(1 – .35) + ($11 / $40)(.068)(1 – .35) + ($26 / $40)(.145)R WACC = 0.1081 or 10.81%c. Using the target debt-equity ratio, the target debt-value ratio for the company is:B/S = 0.60 则B = 0.6SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get: B/V = .6S / (.6S + S) = .6 / 1.6 = .375And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or: S/V = 1 – .375 = .625We can use the ratio of short-term debt to long-term debt in a similar manner to find the short-term debt to total debt and long-term debt to total debt. Using the short-term debt to long-term debt ratio, we get: STD/LTD = 0.20 则STD = 0.2LTDSubstituting this in the short-term debt to total debt ratio, we get:STD/B = .2LTD / (.2LTD + LTD) = .2 / 1.2 = .167And the long-term debt to total debt ratio is one minus the short-term debt to total debt ratio, or: LTD/B = 1 – .167 = .833Now we can find the short-term debt to value ratio and long-term debt to value ratio by multiplying the respective ratio by the debt-value ratio. So:STD/V = (STD/B)(B/V) = .167(.375) = .063And the long-term debt to value ratio is:LTD/V = (LTD/B)(B/V) = .833(.375) = .313So, using the target capital structure we ights, the company‘s WACC is:R WACC = (w STD)(R STD)(1 – t C) + (w LTD)(R LTD)(1 – t C) + (w Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = (.06)(.035)(1 – .35) + (.31)(.068)(1 – .35) + (.625)(.145) = 0.1059 or 10.59%d. The differences in the WACCs are due to the different weighti ng schemes. The company‘s WACC will most closely resemble the WACC calculated using target weights since future projects will be financed at the target ratio. Therefore, the WACC computed with target weights should be used for project evaluation12.略13. The adjusted present value of a project equals the net present value of the project under all-equity financing plus the net present value of any financing side effects. First, we need to calculate the unlevered cost of equity. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes: R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0 – R B)(1 – t C).16 = R0 + (0.50)(R0 – 0.09)(1 – 0.40) 则R0 = 0.1438 or 14.38%Now we can find the NPV of an all-equity project, which is:NPV = PV(Unlevered Cash Flows)NPV = –$21,000,000 + $6,900,000/1.1438 + $11,000,000/(1.1438)2 + $9,500,000/(1.1438)3 NPV = –$212,638.89Next, we need to find the net present value of financing side effects. This is equal the aftertax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm‘s debt. So:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Payments)Each year, an equal principal payment will be made, which will reduce the interest accrued during the year. Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt, so the NPV of the financing effects are:NPV = $7,000,000 – (1 – .40)(.09)($7,000,000) / (1.09) – $2,333,333.33/(1.09)– (1 – .40)(.09)($4,666,666.67)/(1.09)⌒2 – $2,333,333.33/(1.09)⌒2– (1 – .40)(.09)($2,333,333.33)/(1.09)⌒3 – $2,333,333.33/(1.09)⌒3 = $437,458.31So, the APV of project is: APV = NPV(All-equity) + NPV(Financing side effects)APV = –$212,638.89 + 437,458.31 = $224,819.4214. a. To calculate the NPV of the project, we first need to find the company‘s WACC. In a world with cor porate taxes, a firm‘s weighted average cost of capital equals:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 – t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SThe market value of the company‘s equity is:Market value of equity = 6,000,000($20) = $120,000,000So, the debt-value ratio and equity-value ratio are:Debt-value = $35,000,000 / ($35,000,000 + 120,000,000) = .2258Equity-value = $120,000,000 / ($35,000,000 + 120,000,000) = .7742Since the CEO believes its current capital structure is optimal, these values can be used as thetarget weight s in the firm‘s weighted average cost of capital calculation. The yield to maturity of the company‘s debt is its pretax cost of debt. To find the company‘s cost of equity, we need to calculate the stock beta. The stock beta can be calculated as:β= 标准差S,M / 方差M = .036 / .202 = 0.90Now we can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to determine the cost of equity. The Capital Asset Pricing Model is: R S = R F + β(R M – R F) = 6% + 0.90(7.50%) = 12.75%Now, we can calculate the company‘s WACC, which is:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 – t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R S = .2258(1 – .35)(.08) + .7742(.1275)R WACC = .1105 or 11.05%Finally, we can use the WACC to discount the unlevered cash flows, which gives us an NPV of: NPV = –$45,000,000 + $13,500,000(PVIFA11.05%,5) = $4,837,978.59b. The weighted average cost of capital used in part a will not change if the firm chooses to fund the project entirely with debt. The weighted average cost of capital is based on optimal capital structure weights. Since the current capital structure is optimal, all-debt funding for the project simply implies that the firm will have to use more equity in the future to bring the capital structure back towards the target15. a. Since the company is currently an all-equity firm, its value equals the present value of its unlevered after-tax earnings, discounted at its unlevered cost of capital. The cash flows to shareholders for the unlevered firm are:EBIT $83,000Tax 33,200Net income $49,800So, the value of the company is: V U = $49,800 / .15 = $332,000b. The adjusted present value of a firm equals its value under all-equity financing plus the net present value of any financing side effects. In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of cash flows resulting from debt. Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt, so:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest payments)NPV = $195,000 – (1 – .40)(.09)($195,000) / 0.09 = $78,000So, using the APV method, the value of the company is:APV = V U + NPV(Financing side effects) = $332,000 + 78,000 = $410,000The value of the debt is given, so the value of equity is the value of the company minus the value of the debt, or: S = V – B = $410,000 – 195,000 = $215,000c. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes, the required return of levered equity is:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0 – R B)(1 – t C)R S = .15 + ($195,000 / $215,000)(.15 – .09)(1 – .40) = .1827 or 18.27%d. In order to value a firm‘s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, we can discount the cash flows available to equity holders at the cost of the firm‘s levered equity. First, we need to calculate the levered cash flows available to shareholders, which are:EBIT $83,000Interest 17,550EBT $65,450Tax 26,180Net income $39,270So, the value of equity with the flow-to-equity method is:S = Cash flows available to equity holders / R S = $39,270 / .1827 = $215,00016.. Since the company is not publicly traded, we need to use the industry numbers to calculate the industry levered return on equity. We can then find the industry unlevered return on equity, and re-lever the industry return on equity to account for the different use of leverage. So, using the CAPM to calculate the industry levered return on equity, we find:R S = R F + β(MRP) = 5% + 1.2(7%) = 13.40%Next, to find the average cost of unlevered equity in the holiday gift industry we can use Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes, so:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0 – R B)(1 – t C) =.1340 = R0 + (.35)(R0 – .05)(1 – .40)R0 = .1194 or 11.94%Now, we can use the Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes to re-lever the return on equity to account for this company‘s debt-equity ratio. Doing so, we find:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0 – R B)(1 – t C) = .1194 + (.40)(.1194 – .05)(1 – .40) = .1361 or 13.61% Since the project is financed at the firm‘s target debt-equity ratio, it must be discounted at the company‘s weighted average cost of capital. In a world with corporate taxes, a firm‘s weighted average cost of capital equals: R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 – t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R S So, we need the debt-value and equity-value ratios for the company. The debt-equity ratio for the company is: B/S = 0.40 则B = 0.40SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get: B/V = .40S / (.40S + S) = .40 / 1.40 = .29 And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or: S/V = 1 – .29 = .71So, using the capital structure weights, the company‘s WACC is:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 – t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SR WACC = .29(1 – .40)(.05) + .71(.1361) = .1058 or 10.58%Now we need the project‘s cash flows. The cash flows increase for the first five years before leveling off into perpetuity. So, the cash flows from the project for the next six years are: Year 1 cash flow $80,000.00Year 2 cash flow $84,000.00Year 3 cash flow $88,200.00Year 4 cash flow $92,610.00Year 5 cash flow $97,240.50Year 6 cash flow $97,240.50So, the NPV of the project is:NPV = –$475,000 + $80,000/1.1058 + $84,000/1.1058⌒2 + $88,200/1.1058⌒3 +$92,610/1.1058⌒4 + $97,240.50/1.1058⌒5 + ($97,240.50/.1058)/1.1058⌒5 = $408,125.67。
罗斯公司理财第九版第六章课后答案对应版
第六章:投资决策1.机会成本是指进行一项投资时放弃另一项投资所承担的成本。
选择投资和放弃投资之间的收益差是可能获取收益的成本。
2. (1)新的投资项目所来的公司其他产品的销售下滑属于副效应中的侵蚀效应,应被归为增量现金流。
(2)投入建造的机器和厂房属于新生产线的成本,应被归为增量现金流。
(3)过去3 年发生的和新项目相关的研发费用属于沉没成本,不应被归为增量现金流。
(4)尽管折旧不是现金支出,对现金流量产生直接影响,但它会减少公司的净收入,并且减低公司的税收,因此应被归为增量现金流。
(5)公司发不发放股利与投不投资某一项目的决定无关,因此不应被归为增量现金流。
(6)厂房和机器设备的销售收入是一笔现金流入,因此应被归为增量现金流。
(7)需要支付的员工薪水与医疗保险费用应被包括在项目成本里,因此应被归为增量现金流。
3. 第一项因为会产生机会成本,所以会产生增量现金流;第二项因为会产生副效应中的侵蚀效应,所以会会产生增量现金流;第三项属于沉没成本,不会产生增量现金流。
4. 为了避免税收,公司可能会选择MACRS,因为该折旧法在早期有更大的折旧额,这样可以减免赋税,并且没有任何现金流方面的影响。
但需要注意的是直线折旧法与MACRS 的选择只是时间价值的问题,两者的折旧是相等的,只是时间不同。
5. 这只是一个简单的假设。
因为流动负债可以全部付清,流动资产却不可能全部以现金支付,存货也不可能全部售完。
6. 这个说法是可以接受的。
因为某一个项目可以用权益来融资,另一个项目可以用债务来融资,而公司的总资本结构不会发生变化。
根据MM 定理,融资成本与项目的增量现金流量分析无关。
7. ECA 方法在分析具有不同生命周期的互斥项目的情况下比较适应,这是因为ECA 方法可以使得互斥项目具有相同的生命周期,这样就可以进行比较。
ECA 方法在假设项目现金流相同这一点与现实生活不符,它忽略了通货膨胀率以及不断变更的经济环境。
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)笔记和课后习题(含考研真题)详解
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)笔记和课后习题详解第1章公司理财导论1.1复习笔记公司的首要目标——股东财富最大化决定了公司理财的目标。
公司理财研究的是稀缺资金如何在企业和市场内进行有效配置,它是在股份有限公司已成为现代企业制度最主要组织形式的时代背景下,就公司经营过程中的资金运动进行预测、组织、协调、分析和控制的一种决策与管理活动。
从决策角度来讲,公司理财的决策内容包括投资决策、筹资决策、股利决策和净流动资金决策;从管理角度来讲,公司理财的管理职能主要是指对资金筹集和资金投放的管理。
公司理财的基本内容包括:投资决策(资本预算)、融资决策(资本结构)、短期财务管理(营运资本)。
1.资产负债表资产负债表是总括反映企业某一特定日期财务状况的会计报表,它是根据资产、负债和所有者权益之间的相互关系,按照一定的分类标准和一定的顺序,把企业一定日期的资产、负债和所有者权益各项目予以适当排列,并对日常工作中形成的大量数据进行高度浓缩整理后编制而成的。
资产负债表可以反映资本预算、资本支出、资本结构以及经营中的现金流量管理等方面的内容。
2.资本结构资本结构是指企业各种资本的构成及其比例关系,它有广义和狭义之分。
广义资本结构,亦称财务结构,指企业全部资本的构成,既包括长期资本,也包括短期资本(主要指短期债务资本)。
狭义资本结构,主要指企业长期资本的构成,而不包括短期资本。
通常人们将资本结构表示为债务资本与权益资本的比例关系(D/E)或债务资本在总资本的构成(D/A)。
准确地讲,企业的资本结构应定义为有偿负债与所有者权益的比例。
资本结构是由企业采用各种筹资方式筹集资本形成的。
筹资方式的选择及组合决定着企业资本结构及其变化。
资本结构是企业筹资决策的核心问题。
企业应综合考虑影响资本结构的因素,运用适当方法优化资本结构,从而实现最佳资本结构。
资本结构优化有利于降低资本成本,获取财务杠杆利益。
3.财务经理财务经理是公司管理团队中的重要成员,其主要职责是通过资本预算、融资和资产流动性管理为公司创造价值。
公司理财第九版课后习题答案(英文)(上册)
Solutions ManualCorporate FinanceRoss, Westerfield, and Jaffe9th editionCHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION TO CORPORATE FINANCEAnswers to Concept Questions1. In the corporate form of ownership, the shareholders are the owners of the firm. The shareholderselect the directors of the corporation, who in turn appoint the firm‘s management. This separation of ownership from control in the corporate form of organization is what causes agency problems to exist. Management may act in its own or someone else‘s best interests, rather than those of the shareholders. If such events occur, they may contradict the goal of maximizing the share price of the equity of the firm.2.Such organizations frequently pursue social or political missions, so many different goals areconceivable. One goal that is often cited is revenue minimization; i.e., provide whatever goods and services are offered at the lowest possible cost to society. A better approach might be to observe that even a not-for-profit business has equity. Thus, one answer is that the appropriate goal is to maximize the value of the equity.3.Presumably, the current stock value reflects the risk, timing, and magnitude of all future cash flows,both short-term and long-term. If this is correct, then the statement is false.4.An argument can be made either way. At the one extreme, we could argue that in a market economy,all of these things are priced. There is thus an optimal level of, for example, ethical and/or illegal behavior, and the framework of stock valuation explicitly includes these. At the other extreme, we could argue that these are non-economic phenomena and are best handled through the political process. A classic (and highly relevant) thought question that illustrates this debate goes something like this: ―A firm has estimated that the cost of improving the safety of one of its products is $30 million. However, the firm believes that improving the safety of the product will only save $20 million in product liability claims. What s hould the firm do?‖5.The goal will be the same, but the best course of action toward that goal may be different because ofdiffering social, political, and economic institutions.6.The goal of management should be to maximize the share price for the current shareholders. Ifmanagement believes that it can improve the profitability of the firm so that the share price will exceed $35, then they should fight the offer from the outside company. If management believes that this bidder or other unidentified bidders will actually pay more than $35 per share to acquire the company, then they should still fight the offer. However, if the current management cannot increase the value of the firm beyond the bid price, and no other higher bids come in, then management is not acting in the interests of the shareholders by fighting the offer. Since current managers often lose their jobs when the corporation is acquired, poorly monitored managers have an incentive to fight corporate takeovers in situations such as this.7.We would expect agency problems to be less severe in other countries, primarily due to the relativelysmall percentage of individual ownership. Fewer individual owners should reduce the number of diverse opinions concerning corporate goals. The high percentage of institutional ownership might lead to a higher degree of agreement between owners and managers on decisions concerning risky projects. In addition, institutions may be better able to implement effective monitoring mechanisms on managers than can individual owners, based on the institutions‘ deeper resources and experiences with their own management.8.The increase in institutional ownership of stock in the United States and the growing activism ofthese large shareholder groups may lead to a reduction in agency problems for U.S. corporations anda more efficient market for corporate control. However, this may not always be the case. If themanagers of the mutual fund or pension plan are not concerned with the interests of the investors, the agency problem could potentially remain the same, or even increase since there is the possibility of agency problems between the fund and its investors.9. How much is too much? Who is worth more, Ray Irani or Tiger Woods? The simplest answer is thatthere is a market for executives just as there is for all types of labor. Executive compensation is the price that clears the market. The same is true for athletes and performers. Having said that, one aspect of executive compensation deserves comment. A primary reason executive compensation has grown so dramatically is that companies have increasingly moved to stock-based compensation.Such movement is obviously consistent with the attempt to better align stockholder and management interests. In recent years, stock prices have soared, so management has cleaned up. It is sometimes argued that much of this reward is simply due to rising stock prices in general, not managerial performance. Perhaps in the future, executive compensation will be designed to reward only differential performance, i.e., stock price increases in excess of general market increases.10. Maximizing the current share price is the same as maximizing the future share price at any futureperiod. The value of a share of stock depends on all of the future cash flows of company. Another way to look at this is that, barring large cash payments to shareholders, the expected price of the stock must be higher in the future than it is today. Who would buy a stock for $100 today when the share price in one year is expected to be $80?CHAPTER 2FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND CASH FLOWAnswers to Concepts Review and Critical Thinking Questions1.True. Every asset can be converted to cash at some price. However, when we are referring to a liquidasset, the added assumption that the asset can be quickly converted to cash at or near market value is important.2.The recognition and matching principles in financial accounting call for revenues, and the costsassociated with producing those revenues, to be ―booked‖ when the revenue process is essentially complete, not necessarily when the cash is collected or bills are paid. Note that this way is not necessarily correct; it‘s the way accountants have chosen to do it.3.The bottom line number shows the change in the cash balance on the balance sheet. As such, it is nota useful number for analyzing a company.4. The major difference is the treatment of interest expense. The accounting statement of cash flowstreats interest as an operating cash flow, while the financial cash flows treat interest as a financing cash flow. The logic of the accounting statement of cash flows is that since interest appears on the income statement, which shows the operations for the period, it is an operating cash flow. In reality, interest is a financing expense, which results from the company‘s choice of debt and equity. We will have more to say about this in a later chapter. When comparing the two cash flow statements, the financial statement of cash flows is a more appropriate measure of the company‘s performance because of its treatment of interest.5.Market values can never be negative. Imagine a share of stock selling for –$20. This would meanthat if you placed an order for 100 shares, you would get the stock along with a check for $2,000.How many shares do you want to buy? More generally, because of corporate and individual bankruptcy laws, net worth for a person or a corporation cannot be negative, implying that liabilities cannot exceed assets in market value.6.For a successful company that is rapidly expanding, for example, capital outlays will be large,possibly leading to negative cash flow from assets. In general, what matters is whether the money is spent wisely, not whether cash flow from assets is positive or negative.7.It‘s probably not a good sign for an established company to have negative cash flow from operations,but it would be fairly ordinary for a start-up, so it depends.8.For example, if a company were to become more efficient in inventory management, the amount ofinventory needed would decline. The same might be true if the company becomes better at collecting its receivables. In general, anything that leads to a decline in ending NWC relative to beginning would have this effect. Negative net capital spending would mean more long-lived assets were liquidated than purchased.9.If a company raises more money from selling stock than it pays in dividends in a particular period,its cash flow to stockholders will be negative. If a company borrows more than it pays in interest and principal, its cash flow to creditors will be negative.10.The adjustments discussed were purely accounting changes; they had no cash flow or market valueconsequences unless the new accounting information caused stockholders to revalue the derivatives. Solutions to Questions and ProblemsNOTE: All end-of-chapter problems were solved using a spreadsheet. Many problems require multiple steps. Due to space and readability constraints, when these intermediate steps are included in this solutions manual, rounding may appear to have occurred. However, the final answer for each problem is found without rounding during any step in the problem.Basic1.To find owners‘ equity, we must construct a balance sheet as follows:Balance SheetCA $ 5,300 CL $ 3,900NFA 26,000 LTD 14,200OE ??TA $31,300 TL & OE $31,300We know that total liabilities and owners‘ equity (TL & OE) must equal total assets of $31,300. We also know that TL & OE is equal to current liabilities plus long-term debt plus owner‘s equity, so owner‘s equity is:O E = $31,300 –14,200 – 3,900 = $13,200N WC = CA – CL = $5,300 – 3,900 = $1,4002. The income statement for the company is:Income StatementSales $493,000Costs 210,000Depreciation 35,000EBIT $248,000Interest 19,000EBT $229,000Taxes 80,150Net income $148,850One equation for net income is:Net income = Dividends + Addition to retained earningsRearranging, we get:Addition to retained earnings = Net income – DividendsAddition to retained earnings = $148,850 – 50,000Addition to retained earnings = $98,8503.To find the book value of current assets, we use: NWC = CA – CL. Rearranging to solve for currentassets, we get:CA = NWC + CL = $800,000 + 2,100,000 = $2,900,000The market value of current assets and net fixed assets is given, so:Book value CA = $2,900,000 Market value CA = $2,800,000Book value NFA = $5,000,000 Market value NFA = $6,300,000Book value assets = $7,900,000 Market value assets = $9,100,0004.Taxes = 0.15($50K) + 0.25($25K) + 0.34($25K) + 0.39($246K – 100K)Taxes = $79,190The average tax rate is the total tax paid divided by net income, so:Average tax rate = $79,190 / $246,000Average tax rate = 32.19%The marginal tax rate is the tax rate on the next $1 of earnings, so the marginal tax rate = 39%.5.To calculate OCF, we first need the income statement:Income StatementSales $14,900Costs 5,800Depreciation 1,300EBIT $7,800Interest 780Taxable income $7,020Taxes 2,808Net income $4,212OCF = EBIT + Depreciation – TaxesOCF = $7,800 + 1,300 – 2,808OCF = $6,292 capital spending = NFA end– NFA beg + DepreciationNet capital spending = $1,730,000 – 1,650,000 + 284,000Net capital spending = $364,0007.The long-term debt account will increase by $10 million, the amount of the new long-term debt issue.Since the company sold 10 million new shares of stock with a $1 par value, the common stock account will increase by $10 million. The capital surplus account will increase by $33 million, the value of the new stock sold above its par value. Since the company had a net income of $9 million, and paid $2 million in dividends, the addition to retained earnings was $7 million, which will increase the accumulated retained earnings account. So, the new long-term debt and stockholders‘ equity portion of the balance sheet will be:Long-term debt $ 82,000,000Total long-term debt $ 82,000,000Shareholders equityPreferred stock $ 9,000,000Common stock ($1 par value) 30,000,000Accumulated retained earnings 104,000,000Capital surplus 76,000,000Total equity $ 219,000,000Total Liabilities & Equity $ 301,000,0008.Cash flow to creditors = Interest paid – Net new borrowingCash flow to creditors = $118,000 – (LTD end– LTD beg)Cash flow to creditors = $118,000 – ($1,390,000 – 1,340,000)Cash flow to creditors = $118,000 – 50,000Cash flow to creditors = $68,0009. Cash flow to stockholders = Dividends paid – Net new equityCash flow to stockholders = $385,000 – [(Common end + APIS end) – (Common beg + APIS beg)]Cash flow to stockholders = $385,000 – [($450,000 + 3,050,000) – ($430,000 + 2,600,000)]Cash flow to stockholders = $385,000 – ($3,500,000 – 3,030,000)Cash flow to stockholders = –$85,000Note, APIS is the additional paid-in surplus.10. Cash flow from assets = Cash flow to creditors + Cash flow to stockholders= $68,000 – 85,000= –$17,000Cash flow from assets = –$17,000 = OCF – Change in NWC – Net capital spending–$17,000 = OCF – (–$69,000) – 875,000Operating cash flow = –$17,000 – 69,000 + 875,000Operating cash flow = $789,000Intermediate11. a.The accounting statement of cash flows explains the change in cash during the year. Theaccounting statement of cash flows will be:Statement of cash flowsOperationsNet income $105Depreciation 90Changes in other current assets (55)Accounts payable (10)Total cash flow from operations $170Investing activitiesAcquisition of fixed assets $(140)Total cash flow from investing activities $(140)Financing activitiesProceeds of long-term debt $30Dividends (45)Total cash flow from financing activities ($15)Change in cash (on balance sheet) $15b.Change in NWC = NWC end– NWC beg= (CA end– CL end) – (CA beg– CL beg)= [($50 + 155) – 85] – [($35 + 140) – 95)= $120 – 80= $40c.To find the cash flow generated by the firm‘s assets, we need the operating cash flow, and thecapital spending. So, calculating each of these, we find:Operating cash flowNet income $105Depreciation 90Operating cash flow $195Note that we can calculate OCF in this manner since there are no taxes.Capital spendingEnding fixed assets $340Beginning fixed assets (290)Depreciation 90Capital spending $140Now we can calculate the cash flow generated by the firm‘s assets, which is:Cash flow from assetsOperating cash flow $195Capital spending (140)Change in NWC (40)Cash flow from assets $ 1512.With the information provided, the cash flows from the firm are the capital spending and the changein net working capital, so:Cash flows from the firmCapital spending $(15,000)Additions to NWC (1,500)Cash flows from the firm $(16,500)And the cash flows to the investors of the firm are:Cash flows to investors of the firmSale of long-term debt (19,000)Sale of common stock (3,000)Dividends paid 19,500Cash flows to investors of the firm $(2,500)13. a. The interest expense for the company is the amount of debt times the interest rate on the debt.So, the income statement for the company is:Income StatementSales $1,200,000Cost of goods sold 450,000Selling costs 225,000Depreciation 110,000EBIT $415,000Interest 81,000Taxable income $334,000Taxes 116,900Net income $217,100b. And the operating cash flow is:OCF = EBIT + Depreciation – TaxesOCF = $415,000 + 110,000 – 116,900OCF = $408,10014.To find the OCF, we first calculate net income.Income StatementSales $167,000Costs 91,000Depreciation 8,000Other expenses 5,400EBIT $62,600Interest 11,000Taxable income $51,600Taxes 18,060Net income $33,540Dividends $9,500Additions to RE $24,040a.OCF = EBIT + Depreciation – TaxesOCF = $62,600 + 8,000 – 18,060OCF = $52,540b.CFC = Interest – Net new LTDCFC = $11,000 – (–$7,100)CFC = $18,100Note that the net new long-term debt is negative because the company repaid part of its long-term debt.c.CFS = Dividends – Net new equityCFS = $9,500 – 7,250CFS = $2,250d.We know that CFA = CFC + CFS, so:CFA = $18,100 + 2,250 = $20,350CFA is also equal to OCF – Net capital spending – Change in NWC. We already know OCF.Net capital spending is equal to:Net capital spending = Increase in NFA + DepreciationNet capital spending = $22,400 + 8,000Net capital spending = $30,400Now we can use:CFA = OCF – Net capital spending – Change in NWC$20,350 = $52,540 – 30,400 – Change in NWC.Solving for the change in NWC gives $1,790, meaning the company increased its NWC by$1,790.15.The solution to this question works the income statement backwards. Starting at the bottom:Net income = Dividends + Addition to ret. earningsNet income = $1,530 + 5,300Net income = $6,830Now, looking at the income statement:EBT – (EBT × Tax rate) = Net incomeRecognize that EBT × tax rate is simply the calculation for taxes. Solving this for EBT yields: EBT = NI / (1– Tax rate)EBT = $6,830 / (1 – 0.65)EBT = $10,507.69Now we can calculate:EBIT = EBT + InterestEBIT = $10,507.69 + 1,900EBIT = $12,407.69The last step is to use:EBIT = Sales – Costs – Depreciation$12,407.69 = $43,000 – 27,500 – DepreciationDepreciation = $3,092.31Solving for depreciation, we find that depreciation = $3,092.3116.The balance sheet for the company looks like this:Balance SheetCash $183,000 Accounts payable $465,000 Accounts receivable 138,000 Notes payable 145,000 Inventory 297,000 Current liabilities $610,000 Current assets $618,000 Long-term debt 1,550,000Total liabilities $2,160,000 Tangible net fixed assets 3,200,000Intangible net fixed assets 695,000 Common stock ??Accumulated ret. earnings 1,960,000 Total assets $4,513,000 Total liab. & owners‘ equity$4,513,000 Total liabiliti es and owners‘ equity is:TL & OE = Total debt + Common stock + Accumulated retained earningsSolving for this equation for equity gives us:Common stock = $4,513,000 – 1,960,000 – 2,160,000Common stock = $393,00017.The market value of sharehol ders‘ equity cannot be negative. A negative market value in this casewould imply that the company would pay you to own the stock. The market value of shareholders‘ equity can be stated as: Shareholders‘ equity = Max [(TA – TL), 0]. So, if TA is $9,700, equity is equal to $800, and if TA is $6,800, equity is equal to $0. We should note here that while the market value of equity cannot be negative, the book value of shareholders‘ equity can be negative.18. a. Taxes Growth = 0.15($50K) + 0.25($25K) + 0.34($3K) = $14,770Taxes Income = 0.15($50K) + 0.25($25K) + 0.34($25K) + 0.39($235K) + 0.34($7.465M)= $2,652,000b. Each firm has a marginal tax rate of 34% on the next $10,000 of taxable income, despite theirdifferent average tax rates, so both firms will pay an additional $3,400 in taxes.19.Income StatementSales $740,000COGS 610,000A&S expenses 100,000Depreciation 140,000EBIT ($115,000)Interest 70,000Taxable income ($185,000)Taxes (35%) 0 income ($185,000)b.OCF = EBIT + Depreciation – TaxesOCF = ($115,000) + 140,000 – 0OCF = $25,000 income was negative because of the tax deductibility of depreciation and interest expense.However, the actual cash flow from operations was positive because depreciation is a non-cash expense and interest is a financing expense, not an operating expense.20. A firm can still pay out dividends if net income is negative; it just has to be sure there is sufficientcash flow to make the dividend payments.Change in NWC = Net capital spending = Net new equity = 0. (Given)Cash flow from assets = OCF – Change in NWC – Net capital spendingCash flow from assets = $25,000 – 0 – 0 = $25,000Cash flow to stockholders = Dividends – Net new equityCash flow to stockholders = $30,000 – 0 = $30,000Cash flow to creditors = Cash flow from assets – Cash flow to stockholdersCash flow to creditors = $25,000 – 30,000Cash flow to creditors = –$5,000Cash flow to creditors is also:Cash flow to creditors = Interest – Net new LTDSo:Net new LTD = Interest – Cash flow to creditorsNet new LTD = $70,000 – (–5,000)Net new LTD = $75,00021. a.The income statement is:Income StatementSales $15,300Cost of good sold 10,900Depreciation 2,100EBIT $ 2,300Interest 520Taxable income $ 1,780Taxes 712Net income $1,068b.OCF = EBIT + Depreciation – TaxesOCF = $2,300 + 2,100 – 712OCF = $3,688c.Change in NWC = NWC end– NWC beg= (CA end– CL end) – (CA beg– CL beg)= ($3,950 – 1,950) – ($3,400 – 1,900)= $2,000 – 1,500 = $500Net capital spending = NFA end– NFA beg + Depreciation= $12,900 – 11,800 + 2,100= $3,200CFA = OCF – Change in NWC – Net capital spending= $3,688 – 500 – 3,200= –$12The cash flow from assets can be positive or negative, since it represents whether the firm raised funds or distributed funds on a net basis. In this problem, even though net income and OCF are positive, the firm invested heavily in both fixed assets and net working capital; it had to raise a net $12 in funds from its stockholders and creditors to make these investments.d.Cash flow to creditors = Interest – Net new LTD= $520 – 0= $520Cash flow to stockholders = Cash flow from assets – Cash flow to creditors= –$12 – 520= –$532We can also calculate the cash flow to stockholders as:Cash flow to stockholders = Dividends – Net new equitySolving for net new equity, we get:Net new equity = $500 – (–532)= $1,032The firm had positive earnings in an accounting sense (NI > 0) and had positive cash flow from operations. The firm invested $500 in new net working capital and $3,200 in new fixed assets. The firm had to raise $12 from its stakeholders to support this new investment. It accomplished this by raising $1,032 in the form of new equity. After paying out $500 of this in the form of dividends to shareholders and $520 in the for m of interest to creditors, $12 was left to meet the firm‘s cash flow needs for investment.22. a.Total assets 2009 = $780 + 3,480 = $4,260Total liabilities 2009 = $318 + 1,800 = $2,118Owners‘ equity 2009= $4,260 – 2,118 = $2,142Total assets 2010 = $846 + 4,080 = $4,926Total liabilities 2010 = $348 + 2,064 = $2,412Owners‘ equity 2010 = $4,926 – 2,412 = $2,514b.NWC 2009 = CA09 – CL09 = $780 – 318 = $462NWC 2010 = CA10 – CL10 = $846 – 348 = $498Change in NWC = NWC10 – NWC09 = $498 – 462 = $36c.We can calculate net capital spending as:Net capital spending = Net fixed assets 2010 – Net fixed assets 2009 + DepreciationNet capital spending = $4,080 – 3,480 + 960Net capital spending = $1,560So, the company had a net capital spending cash flow of $1,560. We also know that net capital spending is:Net capital spending = Fixed assets bought – Fixed assets sold$1,560 = $1,800 – Fixed assets soldFixed assets sold = $1,800 – 1,560 = $240To calculate the cash flow from assets, we must first calculate the operating cash flow. The operating cash flow is calculated as follows (you can also prepare a traditional income statement):EBIT = Sales – Costs – DepreciationEBIT = $10,320 – 4,980 – 960EBIT = $4,380EBT = EBIT – InterestEBT = $4,380 – 259EBT = $4,121Taxes = EBT ⨯ .35Taxes = $4,121 ⨯ .35Taxes = $1,442OCF = EBIT + Depreciation – TaxesOCF = $4,380 + 960 – 1,442OCF = $3,898Cash flow from assets = OCF – Change in NWC – Net capital spending.Cash flow from assets = $3,898 – 36 – 1,560Cash flow from assets = $2,302 new borrowing = LTD10 – LTD09Net new borrowing = $2,064 – 1,800Net new borrowing = $264Cash flow to creditors = Interest – Net new LTDCash flow to creditors = $259 – 264Cash flow to creditors = –$5Net new borrowing = $264 = Debt issued – Debt retiredDebt retired = $360 – 264 = $9623.Balance sheet as of Dec. 31, 2009Cash $2,739 Accounts payable $2,877Accounts receivable 3,626 Notes payable 529Inventory 6,447 Current liabilities $3,406Current assets $12,812Long-term debt $9,173 Net fixed assets $22,970 Owners' equity $23,203Total assets $35,782 Total liab. & equity $35,782Balance sheet as of Dec. 31, 2010Cash $2,802 Accounts payable $2,790Accounts receivable 4,085 Notes payable 497Inventory 6,625 Current liabilities $3,287Current assets $13,512Long-term debt $10,702 Net fixed assets $23,518 Owners' equity $23,041Total assets $37,030 Total liab. & equity $37,030 2009 Income Statement 2010 Income Statement Sales $5,223.00Sales $5,606.00 COGS 1,797.00COGS 2,040.00 Other expenses 426.00Other expenses 356.00 Depreciation 750.00Depreciation 751.00 EBIT $2,250.00EBIT $2,459.00 Interest 350.00Interest 402.00 EBT $1,900.00EBT $2,057.00 Taxes 646.00Taxes 699.38 Net income $1,254.00Net income $1,357.62 Dividends $637.00Dividends $701.00 Additions to RE 617.00Additions to RE 656.62 24.OCF = EBIT + Depreciation – TaxesOCF = $2,459 + 751 – 699.38OCF = $2,510.62Change in NWC = NWC end– NWC beg = (CA – CL) end– (CA – CL) begChange in NWC = ($13,512 – 3,287) – ($12,812 – 3,406)Change in NWC = $819Net capital spending = NFA end– NFA beg+ DepreciationNet capital spending = $23,518 – 22,970 + 751Net capital spending = $1,299Cash flow from assets = OCF – Change in NWC – Net capital spendingCash flow from assets = $2,510.62 – 819 – 1,299Cash flow from assets = $396.62Cash flow to creditors = Interest – Net new LTDNet new LTD = LTD end– LTD begCash flow to creditors = $402 – ($10,702 – 9,173)Cash flow to creditors = –$1,127Net new equity = Common stock end– Common stock begCommon stock + Retained earnings = Total owners‘ equityNet new equity = (OE – RE) end– (OE – RE) begNet new equity = OE end– OE beg + RE beg– RE endRE end= RE beg+ Additions to RENet new equity = OE end– OE beg+ RE beg– (RE beg + Additions to RE)= OE end– OE beg– Additions to RENet new equity = $23,041 – 23,203 – 656.62 = –$818.62Cash flow to stockholders = Dividends – Net new equityCash flow to stockholders = $701 – (–$818.62)Cash flow to stockholders = $1,519.62As a check, cash flow from assets is $396.62.Cash flow from assets = Cash flow from creditors + Cash flow to stockholdersCash flow from assets = –$1,127 + 1,519.62Cash flow from assets = $392.62Challenge25.We will begin by calculating the operating cash flow. First, we need the EBIT, which can becalculated as:EBIT = Net income + Current taxes + Deferred taxes + InterestEBIT = $144 + 82 + 16 + 43EBIT = $380Now we can calculate the operating cash flow as:Operating cash flowEarnings before interest and taxes $285Depreciation 78Current taxes (82)Operating cash flow $281The cash flow from assets is found in the investing activities portion of the accounting statement of cash flows, so:Cash flow from assetsAcquisition of fixed assets $148Sale of fixed assets (19)Capital spending $129The net working capital cash flows are all found in the operations cash flow section of the accounting statement of cash flows. However, instead of calculating the net working capital cash flows as the change in net working capital, we must calculate each item individually. Doing so, we find:Net working capital cash flowCash $42Accounts receivable 15Inventories (18)Accounts payable (14)Accrued expenses 7Notes payable (5)Other (2)NWC cash flow $25Except for the interest expense and notes payable, the cash flow to creditors is found in the financing activities of the accounting statement of cash flows. The interest expense from the income statement is given, so:Cash flow to creditorsInterest $43Retirement of debt 135Debt service $178Proceeds from sale of long-term debt (97)Total $81And we can find the cash flow to stockholders in the financing section of the accounting statement of cash flows. The cash flow to stockholders was:Cash flow to stockholdersDividends $ 72Repurchase of stock 11Cash to stockholders $ 83Proceeds from new stock issue (37)Total $ 46。
罗斯公司理财第九版课后习题第四章答案
1.当你增加时间的长度时,终值会发生什么变化,现值会发生什么变化?答:当增加时间长度时根据公司PV=C/(1+r)^t得到现值会减少(dwindle,diminish),而终值FV=C*(1+r)^t会增加。
2.如果利率增加,年金的终值会有什么变化?现值会有什么变化?答:当利率增加时,终值增大,现值FV=C(1/r-1/(r*(1+r)^t))得现值会减小分析这两道题都考察了对终值和现值的概念的理解:终值:一笔资金经过一个时期或者多个时期的以后的价值,如果考察终值就是在现在或将来我得到一笔资金C那么这笔资金在更远的未来将会价值多少,如果考察现值则是将来我得到一笔钱那么它现在的价值是多少(在某个固定的折现率下)3.假设有两名运动员签署了一份10年8000万的合同,一份是每年支付800万,一份是8000万分十次,支付金额每年递增5%,哪种情况最好答:计算过程如下图:u由上图的应该选第一种4.贷款法是否应该要求贷款者报告实际利率而不是名义利率?为什么?答:他们应该报告实际利率,名义利率的优势只是在于它们方便计算,可是在计算机技术发达的今天,计算已经不再是一个问题5.有津贴的斯坦福联邦贷款是为大学生提供帮助的一种普遍来源,直到偿还贷款才开始付息。
谁将收到更多的津贴,新生还是高年级的学生?请解释答:新生将获得跟多的津贴,因为新生使用无息贷款的时间比高年级学生长。
详细数据如下:由此可见新生的津贴=22235-20000=2235;而高年级的学生为1089根据下面的信息回答接下去的5个题:6.由计算得到如果500美金若在30年后要变成10000则实际年利率是10.5%,我想应该是GMAC的决策者认为公司的投资收益率大于10.5%7.如果公司可以在30年内的任意时间内以10000元的价格购买该债券的话,将会使得该债券更具有吸引力8.1)这500元不能影响我后面30年的正常生活,也就是我说我是否有500元的多余资金;2)该公司是否能够保证在30年后我能收到10000元3)当前我认为的投资收益率是否高于10.5%,若高于10.5%则不应该考虑投资该债券我的回答是:是取决的承诺偿还的人9.财政部的发行该种债券的价格较高因为财政部在所有的债券发行者中信用最好10.价格会超过之前的500美元,因为如果随着时间的推移,该债券的价值就越接近10000美元,如果在2010年的看价格有可能会更高,但不能确定,因为GMAC有财务恶化的可能或者资本市场上的投资收益率提高。
第九版-公司理财-罗斯-中文答案-
1、如果项目带来的是常规的现金流,而且其回收期短于该项目的生命周期,还不能准备判断其净现值的正负。
仍需要其采用的折现率和其内部收益率IRR 做对比。
当折现率小于IRRA 时,净现值为正值,当折现率大于IRRA时,净现值为负值,两者相等时,净现值为零。
如果一个项目的折现回收期短于该项目的生命周期,则净现值一定为正值。
2、项目有常规的现金流,且NPV为正值,则各期流入的现金流折现总和一定大于期初项目资金流出。
而各期流入的现金流总和肯定大于折现总和,所以该项目的回收期一定短于其生命周期。
同时折现回收期是用和净现值同样的NPV计算出来的,所以折现回收期也一定短于其生命周期。
同样净现值为正值,说明初始投资所带来的后续现金流的现值大于初始投资,所以盈利指数PI 一定大于1。
如果使用内部收益率折现各期现金流量时,净现值为零。
而以折现率折现各期现金流量时,净现值为正,说明折现率小于内部收益率。
3、a 回收期是指投资引起的现金流入累计到与投资相等所需要的时间。
它代表收回投资所需要的年限。
回收年限越短,方案越有利。
其缺陷就是忽略了回收期内现金流量的时间序列,也忽略了回收期以后的现金支付,同时对于回收期的选择也存在主观臆断。
选择一个具体的回收期决策标准,当项目的回收期小于标准的就可行,大于标准的则拒绝。
b 平均会计收益率是指为扣除所得税和折旧之后的项目平均收益除以整个项目期限内的平均账面投资额。
其缺陷是使用账面收益而非现金流量,忽略了折旧对现金流量的影响,忽视了净收益的时间分布对项目经济价值的影响。
当项目的平均会计收益率小于目标平均会计收益率时,则拒绝项目,反之接受。
c 内部收益率就是令项目净现值为0的折现率。
其缺点是对于特殊项目无法用一般原则进行判断,并且有些项目可能会出现多个收益率的现象。
同时对于互斥项目容易忽视其规模问题和时间序列问题。
一般原则是当折现率小于IRR时,接受该项目,反之则拒绝。
d 盈利指数是初始投资所带来的后续现金流的现值和初始投资的比值。
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题(第19~21章)【圣才出品】
罗斯《公司理财》(第9版)课后习题第19章股利政策和其他支付政策一、概念题1.追随者(clienteles)答:追随者是由早期著名的财务学家Miller和Modigliani(1961)、Elton和Gruber (1970)以及Black和Scholes(1974)等人所提出的一种经典理论假说,该假说认为处于不同税收等级(具有不同交易成本或不同投资约束条件)的投资者对股利支付水平具有不同的需求,具体体现在公司股利支付率与投资者的税收等级(交易成本或投资约束条件)之间存在显著的相关关系。
如果股东在乎税收,股票将吸引重视股利收益率的税收追随者。
追随者的形成过程如下表所示:2.自制股利(homemade dividends)答:自制股利是指投资者抵销公司股利政策的一种做法:当股利水平低于投资者期望的水平时,投资者可以通过出售部分股票以获取期望的现金收入;若股利水平高于投资者期望的水平,投资者可以用股利收入购买一些该公司的股票。
通过自制股利,投资者可以使公司的股利政策的变化失效,因此股利政策是无关的。
3.股利发放日(date of payment)答:股利发放日:也称为付息日,指将股利正式支付给登记在册股东的日期。
在这一天,企业应将股利通过邮寄等方式支付给股东,计算机交易系统可以通过中央结算登记系统将股利直接打入股东资金账户,由股东向其证券代理商领取股利。
4.信息内涵效应(information-content effect)答:信息内涵效应是指股利政策的宣告导致股价随之变化的现象。
信息内涵效应是根据信号传播论提出的概念,主要内容是:公司管理者与外部投资者之间存在着信息不对称,管理者占有更多的有关企业前景方面的内部信息。
当管理者预计公司的发展前景良好,未来业绩有大幅度增长时,就会通过增加股利的方式将这一信息及时告诉股东和潜在的投资者;相反,如果预计到公司的发展前景不太好,未来盈利将呈持续性不理想时,那么他们往往维持甚至降低现有股利水平,这等于向股东和潜在投资者发出了利差信号。
罗斯公司理财第九版第十一章课后答案对应版
第十一章:收益和风险:资本资产定价模型1.系统性风险通常是不可分散的,而非系统性风险是可分散的。
但是,系统风险是可以控制的,这需要很大的降低投资者的期望收益。
2.(1)系统性风险(2)非系统性风险(3)都有,但大多数是系统性风险(4)非系统性风险(5)非系统性风险(6)系统性风险3.否,应在两者之间4.错误,单个资产的方差是对总风险的衡量。
5.是的,组合标准差会比组合中各种资产的标准差小,但是投资组合的贝塔系数不会小于最小的贝塔值。
6. 可能为0,因为当贝塔值为0 时,贝塔值为0 的风险资产收益=无风险资产的收益,也可能存在负的贝塔值,此时风险资产收益小于无风险资产收益。
7.因为协方差可以衡量一种证券与组合中其他证券方差之间的关系。
8. 如果我们假设,在过去3 年市场并没有停留不变,那么南方公司的股价价格缺乏变化表明该股票要么有一个标准差或贝塔值非常接近零。
德州仪器的股票价格变动大并不意味着该公司的贝塔值高,只能说德州仪器总风险很高。
9. 石油股票价格的大幅度波动并不表明这些股票是一个很差的投资。
如果购买的石油股票是作为一个充分多元化的产品组合的一部分,它仅仅对整个投资组合做出了贡献。
这种贡献是系统风险或β来衡量的。
所以,是不恰当的。
10. The statement is false. If a security has a negative beta, investors would want to hold the asset to reduce the variability of their portfolios. Those assets will have expected returns that are lower than the risk-free rate. To see this, examine the Capital Asset Pricing Model:E(R S) = R f + S[E(R M) – R f] If S < 0, then the E(R S) < R f11. Total value = 95($53) + 120($29) = $8,515The portfolio weight for each stock is:WeightA = 95($53)/$8,515 = .5913 WeightB = 120($29)/$8,515 = .4087 12.Total value = $1,900 + 2,300 = $4,200So, the expected return of this portfolio is:E(R p) = ($1,900/$4,200)(0.10) + ($2,300/$4,200)(0.15) = .1274 or 12.74%13. E(R p) = .40(.11) + .35(.17) + .25(.14) = .1385 or 13.85%14. Here we are given the expected return of the portfolio and the expected return of each asset in the portfolio and are asked to find the weight of each asset. We can use the equation for the expected return of a portfolio to solve this problem. Since the total weight of a portfolio must equal 1 (100%), the weight of Stock Y must be one minus the weight of Stock X. Mathematically speaking, this means:E(R p) = .129 = .16w X + .10(1 –w X)We can now solve this equation for the weight of Stock X as:.129 = .16w X + .10 – .10w X w X = 0.4833So, the dollar amount invested in Stock X is the weight of Stock X times the total portfolio value, or: Investment in X = 0.4833($10,000) = $4,833.33And the dollar amount invested in Stock Y is:Investment in Y = (1 – 0.4833)($10,000) = $5,166.6715. E(R) = .2(–.09) + .5(.11) + .3(.23) = .1060 or 10.60%16. E(RA) = .15(.06) + .65(.07) + .20(.11) = .0765 or 7.65%E(RB) = .15(–.2) + .65(.13) + .20(.33) = .1205 or 12.05%17. E(R A) = .10(–.045) + .25 (.044) + .45(.12) + .20(.207) = .1019 or 10.19%方差=.10(–.045 – .1019)⌒2 + .25(.044 – .1019)⌒2 + .45(.12 – .1019)⌒2 + .20(.207 – .1019)⌒2 = .00535标准差= (.00535)1/2 = .0732 or 7.32%18. E(R p) = .15(.08) + .65(.15) + .20(.24) = .1575 or 15.75%If we own this portfolio, we would expect to get a return of 15.75 percent.19. a.Boom: E(R p) = (.07 + .15 + .33)/3 = .1833 or 18.33%Bust: E(R p) = (.13 + .03 .06)/3 = .0333 or 3.33%E(Rp) = .80(.1833) + .20(.0333) = .1533 or 15.33%b. Boom: E(R p)=.20(.07) +.20(.15) + .60(.33) =.2420 or 24.20%Bust: E(R p) =.20(.13) +.20(.03) + .60( .06) = –.0040 or –0.40%E(R p) = .80(.2420) + .20( .004) = .1928 or 19.28%P的方差= .80(.2420 – .1928)⌒2 + .20( .0040 – .1928)⌒2 = .0096820.a.Boom: E(R p) = .30(.3) + .40(.45) + .30(.33) = .3690 or 36.90%Good: E(R p) = .30(.12) + .40(.10) + .30(.15) = .1210 or 12.10%Poor: E(R p) = .30(.01) + .40(–.15) + .30(–.05) = –.0720 or –7.20%Bust: E(R p) = .30(–.06) + .40(–.30) + .30(–.09) = –.1650 or –16.50%E(R p) = .20(.3690) + .35(.1210) + .30(–.0720) + .15(–.1650) = .0698 or 6.98%b. p⌒2 = .20(.3690 – .0698)⌒2 + .35(.1210 – .0698)⌒2 + .30(–.0720 – .0698)⌒2 + .15(–.1650 – .0698)⌒2 = .03312p的标准差= (.03312)⌒1/2 = .1820 or 18.20%21. β= .25(.75) + .20(1.90) + .15(1.38) + .40(1.16) = 1.2422.βp = 1.0 = 1/3(0) + 1/3(1.85) + 1/3(βX) βX = 1.1523.E(R i) = R f + [E(R M) – R f] ×βiE(R i) = .05 + (.12 – .05)(1.25) = .1375 or 13.75%24. We are given the values for the CAPM except for the of the stock. We need to substitute these values into the CAPM, and solve for the of the stock. One important thing we need to realize is that we are given the market risk premium. The market risk premium is the expected return of the market minus the risk-free rate. We must be careful not to use this value as the expected return of the market. Using the CAPM, we find:E(R i) = .142 = .04 + .07βi 则βi = 1.4625. E(R i) = .105 = .055 + [E(R M) – .055](.73) 则E(R M) = .1235 or 12.35%26. E(R i) = .162 = R f + (.11 – R f)(1.75).162 = R f + .1925 – 1.75R f则R f = .0407 or 4.07%27. a. E(R p) = (.103 + .05)/2 = .0765 or 7.65%b. We need to find the portfolio weights that result in a portfolio with a of 0.50. We know the 贝塔of the risk-free asset is zero. We also know the weight of the risk-free asset is one minus the weight of the stock since the portfolio weights must sum to one, or 100 percent. So:c. We need to find the portfolio weights that result in a portfolio with an expected return of 9 percent. We also know the weight of the risk-free asset is one minus the weight of the stock since the portfolio weights must sum to one, or 100 percent. So:d. Solving for the of the portfolio as we did in part a, we find:18. ßp = w W(1.3) + (1 –w W)(0) = 1.3w WSo, to find the βof the portfolio for any weight of the stock, we simply multiply the weight of the stock times its β.Even though we are solving for the and expected return of a portfolio of one stock and the risk-free asset for different portfolio weights, we are really solving for the SML. Any combination of this stock and the risk-free asset will fall on the SML. For that matter, a portfolio of any stock and the risk-free asset, or any portfolio of stocks, will fall on the SML. We know the slope of the SML line is the market risk premium, so using the CAPM and the information concerning this stock, the market risk premium is:E(R W) = .138 = .05 + MRP(1.30)MRP = .088/1.3 = .0677 or 6.77%So, now we know the CAPM equation for any stock is:E(R p) = .05 + .0677*贝塔p29. E(R Y) = .055 + .068(1.35) = .1468 or 14.68%E(R Z) = .055 + .068(0.85) = .1128 or 11.28%Reward-to-risk ratio Y = (.14 – .055) / 1.35 = .0630Reward-to-risk ratio Z = (.115 – .055) / .85 = .070630. (.14 – R f)/1.35 = (.115 – R f)/0.85We can cross multiply to get: 0.85(.14 – R f) = 1.35(.115 – R f)Solving for the risk-free rate, we find:0.119 – 0.85R f = 0.15525 – 1.35R f R f = .0725 or 7.25%31.32. [E(R A) – R f]/ A = [E(R B) – R f]/ßBRP A/β A = RP B/β B βB/βA = RP B/RP A33. Boom: E(R p) = .4(.20) + .4(.35) + .2(.60) = .3400 or 34.00%Normal: E(R p) = .4(.15) + .4(.12) + .2(.05) = .1180 or 11.80%Bust: E(R p) = .4(.01) + .4(–.25) + .2(–.50) = –.1960 or –19.60%E(R p) = .35(.34) + .40(.118) + .25(–.196) = .1172 or 11.72%σp⌒2= .35(.34 – .1172)2 + .40(.118 – .1172)2 + .25(–.196 – .1172)2 = .04190σp= (.04190)1/2 = .2047 or 20.47%b. RP i = E(R p) – R f = .1172 – .038 = .0792 or 7.92%c.Approximate expected real return = .1172 – .035 = .0822 or 8.22%1 + E(R i) = (1 + h)[1 + e(r i)]1.1172 = (1.0350)[1 + e(r i)]e(r i) = (1.1172/1.035) – 1 = .0794 or 7.94%Approximate expected real risk premium = .0792 – .035 = .0442 or 4.42%Exact expected real risk premium = (1.0792/1.035) – 1 = .0427 or 4.27%34. w A = $180,000 / $1,000,000 = .18 w B = $290,000/$1,000,000 = .29βp = 1.0 = w A(.75) + w B(1.30) + w C(1.45) + w Rf(0) w C = .33655172Invest in Stock C = .33655172($1,000,000) = $336,551.721 = w A + w B + w C + w Rf 1 = .18 + .29 + .33655172 + w Rf w Rf = .19344828Invest in risk-free asset = .19344828($1,000,000) = $193,448.28w X(.172) + w Y(.0875) + (1 –w X –w Y)(.055)35. E(R p) = .1070 =βp = .8 = w X(1.8) + w Y(0.50) + (1 –w X – w Y)(0)w X = –0.11111 w Y = 2.00000 w Rf = –0.88889Investment in stock X = –0.11111($100,000) = –$11,111.1136. E(R A) = .33(.082) + .33(.095) + .33(.063) = .0800 or 8.00%E(R B) = .33(–.065) + .33(.124) + .33(.185) = .0813 or 8.13%股票A:方差=.33(.082 – .0800)⌒2 + .33(.095 – .0800)⌒2 + .33(.063 – .0800)⌒2 = .00017 标准差=(.00017)⌒1/2 = .0131 or 1.31%股票B:方差=.33(–.065 – .0813)⌒2 + .33(.124 – .0813)⌒2 + .33(.185 – .0813)⌒2 = .01133 标准差= (.01133)1/2 = .1064 or 1064%Cov(A,B) = .33(.092 – .0800)(–.065 – .0813) + .33(.095 – .0800)(.124 – .0813) + .33(.063– .0800)(.185 – .0813) = –.000472ρA,B = Cov(A,B) / (标准差A 标准差B)= –.000472 / (.0131)(.1064) = –.337337. E(R A) = .30(–.020) + .50(.138) + .20(.218) = .1066 or 10.66%E(R B) = .30(.034) + .50(.062) + .20(.092) = .0596 or 5.96%A的方差 =.30(–.020 – .1066)⌒2 + .50(.138 – .1066)⌒2 + .20(.218 – .1066)⌒2 = .00778 2 A的标准差= (.00778)⌒1/2 = .0882 or 8.82%B的方差=.30(.034 – .0596)⌒2 + .50(.062 – .0596)⌒2 + .20(.092 – .0596)⌒2 = .00041B的标准差= (.00041)⌒1/2 = .0202 or 2.02%Cov(A,B) = .30(–.020 – .1066)(.034 – .0596) + .50(.138 – .1066)(.062 – .0596)+ .20(.218 – .1066)(.092 – .0596) = .001732ρA,B = Cov(A,B) / A的标准差*B的标准差= .001732 / (.0882)(.0202) = .970138. a. E(R P) = w F E(R F) + w G E(R G)E(R P) = .30(.10) + .70(.17) = .1490 or 14.90%b. The variance of a portfolio of two assets can be expressed as:标准差= (.18675)⌒1/2 = .4322 or 43.22%39. a. The expected return of the portfolio is the sum of the weight of each asset times the expected return of each asset, so:E(R P) = w A E(R A) + w B E(R B) = .45(.13) + .55(.19) = .1630 or 16.30%c. As Stock A and Stock B become less correlated, or more negatively correlated, the standard deviation of the portfolio decreases.40.(iv) The market has a correlation of 1 with itself.(v) The beta of the market is 1.(vi) The risk-free asset has zero standard deviation.(vii) The risk-free asset has zero correlation with the market portfolio.(viii) The beta of the risk-free asset is 0.b. Firm A: E(R A) = R f + βA[E(R M) – R f]E(R A) = 0.05 + 0.85(0.12 – 0.05) = .1095 or 10.95%Firm B: E(R B) = R f +βB[E(R M) – R f]E(R B) = 0.05 + 1.5(0.12 – 0.05) = .1550 or 15.50%Firm C: E(R C) = R f + βC[E(R M) – R f]E(R C) = 0.05 + 1.23(0.12 – 0.05) = .1358 or 13.58%According to the CAPM, the expected return on Firm C‘s stock should be 13.58 percent. However, the expected return on Firm C‘s stock given in the table is 17 percent. Therefor e, Firm C‘s stock is underpriced, and you should buy it.43. First, we need to find the standard deviation of the market and the portfolio, which are:M的标准差= (.0429)⌒1/2 = .2071 or 20.71%Z 的标准差= (.1783)⌒1/2 = .4223 or 42.23%Now we can use the equation for beta to find the beta of the portfolio, which is:βZ = (相关系数Z,M)*(标准差Z) / 标准差M = (.39)(.4223) / .2071 = .80Now, we can use the CAPM to find the expected return of the portfolio, which is:E(R Z) = R f + βZ[E(R M) – R f] = .048 + .80(.114 – .048) = .1005 or 10.05%。
罗斯公司理财第九版第十二章课后答案1
第十二章:套利定价理论1. Systematic risk is risk that cannot be diversified away through formation of a portfolio. Generally, systematic risk factors are those factors that affect a large number of firms in the market, however, those factors will not necessarily affect all firms equally. Unsystematic risk is the type of risk that can be diversified away through portfolio formation. Unsystematic risk factors are specific to the firm or industry. Surprises in these factors will affect the returns of the firm in which you are interested, but they will have no effect on the returns of firms in a different industry and perhaps little effect on other firms in the same industry.2. Any return can be explained with a large enough number of systematic risk factors. However, for a factor model to be useful as a practical matter, the number of factors that explain the returns on an asset must be relatively limited.3. The market risk premium and inflation rates are probably good choices. The price of wheat, while a risk factor for Ultra Products, is not a market risk factor and will not likely be priced as a risk factor common to all stocks. In this case, wheat would be a firm specific risk factor, not a market risk factor. A better model would employ macroeconomic risk factors such as interest rates, GDP, energy prices, and industrial production, among others.4. a. Real GNP was higher than anticipated. Since returns are positively related to the level of GNP, returns should rise based on this factor.b. Inflation was exactly the amount anticipated. Since there was no surprise in this announcement, it will not affect Lewis-Striden returns.c. Interest rates are lower than anticipated. Since returns are negatively related to interest rates, the lower than expected rate is good news. Returns should rise due to interest rates.d. The President 's death is bad news. Although the president was expected to retire, his retirement would not be effective for six months. During that period he would still contribute to the firm. His untimelydeath means that those contributions will not be made. Since he was generally considered an asset to the firm, his death will cause returns to fall. However, since his departure was expected soon, the drop might not be very large.e. The poor research results are also bad news. Since Lewis-Striden must continue to test the drug, it will not go into production as earlyas expected. The delay will affect expected future earnings, and thus it will dampen returns now.f. The research breakthrough is positive news for Lewis Striden. Since it was unexpected, it will cause returns to rise.g. The competitor ‘ s announcement is also unexpected, but it is not a welcome surprise. This announcement will lower the returns on Lewis- Striden.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
罗斯《公司理财》第9版精要版英文原书课后部分章节答案详细»1 / 17 CH5 11,13,18,19,20 11. To find the PV of a lump sum, we use: PV = FV / (1 + r) t PV = $1,000,000 / (1.10) 80 = $488.19 13. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is: FV = PV(1 + r) t Solving for r, we get: r = (FV / PV) 1 / t –1 r = ($1,260,000 / $150) 1/112 – 1 = .0840 or 8.40% To find the FV of the first prize, we use: FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $1,260,000(1.0840) 33 = $18,056,409.94 18. To find the FV of a lump sum, we use: FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $4,000(1.11) 45 = $438,120.97 FV = $4,000(1.11) 35 = $154,299.40 Better start early! 19. We need to find the FV of a lump sum. However, the money will only be invested for six years, so the number of periods is six. FV = PV(1 + r) t FV = $20,000(1.084)6 = $32,449.33 20. To answer this question, we can use either the FV or the PV formula. Both will give the same answer since they are the inverse of each other. We will use the FV formula, that is: FV = PV(1 + r) t Solving for t, we get: t = ln(FV / PV) / ln(1 + r) t = ln($75,000 / $10,000) / ln(1.11) = 19.31 So, the money must be invested for 19.31 years. However, you will not receive the money for another two years. From now, you’ll wait: 2 years + 19.31 years = 21.31 years CH6 16,24,27,42,58 16. For this problem, we simply need to find the FV of a lump sum using the equation: FV = PV(1 + r) t 2 / 17 It is important to note that compounding occurs semiannually. To account for this, we will divide the interest rate by two (the number of compounding periods in a year), and multiply the number of periods by two. Doing so, we get: FV = $2,100[1 + (.084/2)] 34 = $8,505.93 24. This problem requires us to find the FVA. The equation to find the FVA is: FV A = C{[(1 + r) t – 1] / r} FV A = $300[{[1 + (.10/12) ] 360 – 1} / (.10/12)] = $678,146.38 27. The cash flows are annual and the compounding period is quarterly, so we need to calculate the EAR to make the interest rate comparable with the timing of the cash flows. Using the equation for the EAR, we get: EAR = [1 + (APR / m)] m – 1 EAR = [1 + (.11/4)] 4 – 1 = .1146 or 11.46% And now we use the EAR to find the PV of each cash flow as a lump sum and add them together: PV = $725 / 1.1146 + $980 / 1.1146 2 + $1,360 / 1.1146 4 = $2,320.36 42. The amount of principal paid on the loan is the PV of the monthly payments you make. So, the present value of the $1,150 monthly payments is: PVA = $1,150[(1 – {1 / [1 + (.0635/12)]} 360 ) / (.0635/12)] = $184,817.42 The monthly payments of $1,150 will amount to a principal payment of $184,817.42. The amount of principal you will still owe is: $240,000 – 184,817.42 = $55,182.58 This remaining principal amount will increase at the interest rate on the loan until the end of the loan period. So the balloon payment in 30 years, which is the FV of the remaining principal will be: Balloon payment = $55,182.58[1 + (.0635/12)] 360 = $368,936.54 58. To answer this question, we should find the PV of both options, and compare them. Since we are purchasing the car, the lowest PV is the best option. The PV of the leasing is simply the PV of the lease payments, plus the $99. The interest rate we would use for the leasing option is the same as the interest rate of the loan. The PV of leasing is: PV = $99 + $450{1 –[1 / (1 + .07/12) 12(3) ]} / (.07/12) = $14,672.91 The PV of purchasing the car is the current price of the car minus the PV of the resale price. The PV of the resale price is: PV = $23,000 / [1 + (.07/12)] 12(3) = $18,654.82 The PV of the decision to purchase is: $32,000 – 18,654.82 = $13,345.18 3 / 17 In this case, it is cheaper to buy the car than leasing it since the PV of the purchase cash flows is lower. To find the breakeven resale price, we need to find the resale price that makes the PV of the two options the same. In other words, the PV of the decision to buy should be: $32,000 – PV of resale price = $14,672.91 PV of resale price = $17,327.09 The resale price that would make the PV of the lease versus buy decision is the FV ofthis value, so: Breakeven resale price = $17,327.09[1 + (.07/12)] 12(3) = $21,363.01 CH7 3,18,21,22,31 3. The price of any bond is the PV of the interest payment, plus the PV of the par value. Notice this problem assumes an annual coupon. The price of the bond will be: P = $75({1 – [1/(1 + .0875)] 10 } / .0875) + $1,000[1 / (1 + .0875) 10 ] = $918.89 We would like to introduce shorthand notation here. Rather than write (or type, as the case may be) the entire equation for the PV of a lump sum, or the PV A equation, it is common to abbreviate the equations as: PVIF R,t = 1 / (1 + r) t which stands for Present Value Interest Factor PVIFA R,t = ({1 – [1/(1 + r)] t } / r ) which stands for Present Value Interest Factor of an Annuity These abbreviations are short hand notation for the equations in which the interest rate and the number of periods are substituted into the equation and solved. We will use this shorthand notation in remainder of the solutions key. 18. The bond price equation for this bond is: P 0 = $1,068 = $46(PVIFA R%,18 ) + $1,000(PVIF R%,18 ) Using a spreadsheet, financial calculator, or trial and error we find: R = 4.06% This is the semiannual interest rate, so the YTM is: YTM = 2 4.06% = 8.12% The current yield is: Current yield = Annual coupon payment / Price = $92 / $1,068 = .0861 or 8.61% The effective annual yield is the same as the EAR, so using the EAR equation from the previous chapter: Effective annual yield = (1 + 0.0406) 2 – 1 = .0829 or 8.29% 20. Accrued interest is the coupon payment for the period times the fraction of the period that has passed since the last coupon payment. Since we have a semiannual coupon bond, the coupon payment per six months is one-half of the annual coupon payment. There are four months until the next coupon payment, so two months have passed since the last coupon payment. The accrued interest for the bond is: Accrued interest = $74/2 × 2/6 = $12.33 And we calculate the clean price as: 4 / 17 Clean price = Dirty price –Accrued interest = $968 –12.33 = $955.67 21. Accrued interest is the coupon payment for the period times the fraction of the period that has passed since the last coupon payment. Since we have a semiannual coupon bond, the coupon payment per six months is one-half of the annual coupon payment. There are two months until the next coupon payment, so four months have passed since the last coupon payment. The accrued interest for the bond is: Accrued interest = $68/2 × 4/6 = $22.67 And we calculate the dirty price as: Dirty price = Clean price + Accrued interest = $1,073 + 22.67 = $1,095.67 22. To find the number of years to maturity for the bond, we need to find the price of the bond. Since we already have the coupon rate, we can use the bond price equation, and solve for the number of years to maturity. We are given the current yield of the bond, so we can calculate the price as: Current yield = .0755 = $80/P 0 P 0 = $80/.0755 = $1,059.60 Now that we have the price of the bond, the bond price equation is: P = $1,059.60 = $80[(1 – (1/1.072) t ) / .072 ] + $1,000/1.072 t We can solve this equation for t as follows: $1,059.60(1.072) t = $1,111.11(1.072) t –1,111.11 + 1,000 111.11 = 51.51(1.072) t 2.1570 = 1.072 t t = log 2.1570 / log 1.072 = 11.06 11 years The bond has 11 years to maturity.31. The price of any bond (or financial instrument) is the PV of the future cash flows. Even though Bond M makes different coupons payments, to find the price of the bond, we just find the PV of the cash flows. The PV of the cash flows for Bond M is: P M = $1,100(PVIFA 3.5%,16 )(PVIF 3.5%,12 ) + $1,400(PVIFA 3.5%,12 )(PVIF 3.5%,28 ) + $20,000(PVIF 3.5%,40 ) P M = $19,018.78 Notice that for the coupon payments of $1,400, we found the PV A for the coupon payments, and then discounted the lump sum back to today. Bond N is a zero coupon bond with a $20,000 par value, therefore, the price of the bond is the PV of the par, or: P N = $20,000(PVIF 3.5%,40 ) = $5,051.45 CH8 4,18,20,22,24 4. Using the constant growth model, we find the price of the stock today is: P 0 = D 1 / (R – g) = $3.04 / (.11 – .038) = $42.22 5 / 17 18. The priceof a share of preferred stock is the dividend payment divided by the required return. We know the dividend payment in Year 20, so we can find the price of the stock in Year 19, one year before the first dividend payment. Doing so, we get: P 19 = $20.00 / .064 P 19 = $312.50 The price of the stock today is the PV of the stock price in the future, so the price today will be: P 0 = $312.50 / (1.064) 19 P 0 = $96.15 20. We can use the two-stage dividend growth model for this problem, which is: P 0 = [D 0 (1 + g 1 )/(R – g 1 )]{1 – [(1 + g 1 )/(1 + R)] T }+ [(1 + g 1 )/(1 + R)] T [D 0 (1 + g 2 )/(R –g 2 )] P 0 = [$1.25(1.28)/(.13 – .28)][1 –(1.28/1.13) 8 ] + [(1.28)/(1.13)] 8 [$1.25(1.06)/(.13 – .06)] P 0 = $69.55 22. We are asked to find the dividend yield and capital gains yield for each of the stocks. All of the stocks have a 15 percent required return, which is the sum of the dividend yield and the capital gains yield. To find the components of the total return, we need to find the stock price for each stock. Using this stock price and the dividend, we can calculate the dividend yield. The capital gains yield for the stock will be the total return (required return) minus the dividend yield. W: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50(1.10)/(.19 – .10) = $55.00 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(1.10)/$55.00 = .09 or 9% Capital gains yield = .19 – .09 = .10 or 10% X: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50/(.19 – 0) = $23.68 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50/$23.68 = .19 or 19% Capital gains yield = .19 – .19 = 0% Y: P 0 = D 0 (1 + g) / (R – g) = $4.50(1 – .05)/(.19 + .05) = $17.81 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(0.95)/$17.81 = .24 or 24% Capital gains yield = .19 – .24 = –.05 or –5% Z: P 2 = D 2 (1 + g) / (R – g) = D 0 (1 + g 1 ) 2 (1 +g 2 )/(R – g 2 ) = $4.50(1.20) 2 (1.12)/(.19 – .12) = $103.68 P 0 = $4.50 (1.20) / (1.19) + $4.50(1.20) 2 / (1.19) 2 + $103.68 / (1.19) 2 = $82.33 Dividend yield = D 1 /P 0 = $4.50(1.20)/$82.33 = .066 or 6.6% Capital gains yield = .19 – .066 = .124 or 12.4% In all cases, the required return is 19%, but the return is distributed differently between current income and capital gains. High growth stocks have an appreciable capital gains component but a relatively small current income yield; conversely, mature, negative-growth stocks provide a high current income but also price depreciation over time. 24. Here we have a stock with supernormal growth, but the dividend growth changes every year for the first four years. We can find the price of the stock in Year 3 since the dividend growth rate is constant after the third dividend. The price of the stock in Year 3 will be the dividend in Year 4, divided by the required return minus the constant dividend growth rate. So, the price in Year 3 will be: 6 / 17 P 3 = $2.45(1.20)(1.15)(1.10)(1.05) / (.11 – .05) = $65.08 The price of the stock today will be the PV of the first three dividends, plus the PV of the stock price in Year 3, so: P 0 = $2.45(1.20)/(1.11) + $2.45(1.20)(1.15)/1.11 2 + $2.45(1.20)(1.15)(1.10)/1.11 3 + $65.08/1.11 3 P 0 = $55.70 CH9 3,4,6,9,15 3. Project A has cash flows of $19,000 in Year 1, so the cash flows are short by $21,000 of recapturing the initial investment, so the payback for Project A is: Payback = 1 + ($21,000 / $25,000) = 1.84 years Project B has cash flows of: Cash flows = $14,000 + 17,000 + 24,000 = $55,000 during this first three years. The cash flows are still short by $5,000 of recapturing the initial investment, so the payback for Project B is: B: Payback = 3 + ($5,000 / $270,000) = 3.019 years Using the payback criterion and a cutoff of 3 years, accept project A and reject project B. 4. When we use discounted payback, we need to find the value of all cash flows today. The value today of the project cash flows for the first four years is: Value today of Year 1 cash flow = $4,200/1.14 = $3,684.21 Value today of Year 2 cash flow = $5,300/1.14 2 = $4,078.18 Value today of Year 3 cash flow = $6,100/1.14 3 = $4,117.33 V alue today of Year 4 cash flow = $7,400/1.14 4 = $4,381.39 To find the discounted payback, we use these values to find the payback period. The discounted first year cash flow is $3,684.21, so the discounted payback for a $7,000 initial cost is: Discounted payback= 1 + ($7,000 – 3,684.21)/$4,078.18 = 1.81 years For an initial cost of $10,000, the discounted payback is: Discounted payback = 2 + ($10,000 –3,684.21 – 4,078.18)/$4,117.33 = 2.54 years Notice the calculation of discounted payback. We know the payback period is between two and three years, so we subtract the discounted values of the Year 1 and Year 2 cash flows from the initial cost. This is the numerator, which is the discounted amount we still need to make to recover our initial investment. We divide this amount by the discounted amount we will earn in Year 3 to get the fractional portion of the discounted payback. If the initial cost is $13,000, the discounted payback is: Discounted payback = 3 + ($13,000 – 3,684.21 – 4,078.18 – 4,117.33) / $4,381.39 = 3.26 years 7 / 17 6. Our definition of AAR is the average net income divided by the average book value. The average net income for this project is: Average net income = ($1,938,200 + 2,201,600 + 1,876,000 + 1,329,500) / 4 = $1,836,325 And the average book value is: Average book value = ($15,000,000 + 0) / 2 = $7,500,000 So, the AAR for this project is: AAR = Average net income / Average book value = $1,836,325 / $7,500,000 = .2448 or 24.48% 9. The NPV of a project is the PV of the outflows minus the PV of the inflows. Since the cash inflows are an annuity, the equation for the NPV of this project at an 8 percent required return is: NPV = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA 8%, 9 ) = $40,036.31 At an 8 percent required return, the NPV is positive, so we would accept the project. The equation for the NPV of the project at a 20 percent required return is: NPV = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA 20%, 9 ) = –$23,117.45 At a 20 percent required return, the NPV is negative, so we would reject the project. We would be indifferent to the project if the required return was equal to the IRR of the project, since at that required return the NPV is zero. The IRR of the project is: 0 = –$138,000 + $28,500(PVIFA IRR, 9 ) IRR = 14.59% 15. The profitability index is defined as the PV of the cash inflows divided by the PV of the cash outflows. The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 10 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.1 + $6,900/1.1 2 + $5,700/1.1 3 ] / $14,000 = 1.187 The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 15 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.15 + $6,900/1.15 2 + $5,700/1.15 3 ] / $14,000 = 1.094 The equation for the profitability index at a required return of 22 percent is: PI = [$7,300/1.22 + $6,900/1.22 2 + $5,700/1.22 3 ] / $14,000 = 0.983 8 / 17 We would accept the project if the required return were 10 percent or 15 percent since the PI is greater than one. We would reject the project if the required return were 22 percent since the PI。