雅思写作评分标准-中英对照
雅思写作-评分标准
（style）和搭配(collocation)决定了6分还是7分， 如果根本不用，满篇简单词汇，就只能拿5分了
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
恰当使用逻辑连词 6分要求： Clear overall progression 文章推进总体清晰
Coherence and Cohesion
9分标准中： Uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no
attention 连接手法用到不引起读者注意的境界 即作文中很少有firstly,无关信息，起承转合逻辑通达 LR考查的是用词贴切，掌握复杂高级词汇，拼
写无错 GRA考查的是多种复杂句的灵活运用，语法和
标点的正确性
谋其上，得其中；谋其中，得其下
平时应该严格参照7分的写作标准来练习，这样 才能确保在考场上写出不低于6分的作文
Task Response
6分的标准说： Some parts may be more fully covered than
雅思写作 评分标准
By Jimmy Xu
雅思写作评分标准
答题纸上的玄机
TR- Task Response (大作文) TA- Task Achievement（小作文） CC- Coherence and Cohesion LR – Lexical Resource GRA – Grammatical Range and Accuracy
么说） 2. 语言问题（中文思维有了，用英语无法清晰
雅思写作评分标准对照表
雅思写作评分标准对照表雅思写作的评分标准根据四个不同维度进行评估：任务响应（Task Response）、连贯与衔接（Coherence and Cohesion）、词汇运用（Lexical Resource）以及语法使用（Grammar）。
任务响应（Task Response）是评估考生是否对题目进行了正确的回答，是否有效地表达了自己的观点和主张。
评分时会考虑到考生的观点是否明确，是否能清楚地论述观点并给出相关的例子，支持材料是否充足。
此外，逻辑的组织结构以及对于各个论点之间的衔接也会被评估。
连贯与衔接（Coherence and Cohesion）评估的是考生的文档结构和条理性。
评分时会考虑到段落之间是否有恰当的连接词，是否有明确的中心思想以及表达的清晰度。
此外，考生应注意使用恰当的语法和词汇，以便用更流畅的方式表达自己的观点。
词汇运用（Lexical Resource）评估的是考生对于词汇的掌握程度。
考生应尽量使用准确、多样化的词汇，展示自己的词汇储备。
评分时会考虑到使用词汇的恰当性、准确性和多样性，以及语法和文化上下文的运用。
语法使用（Grammar）评估的是考生对于语法结构的运用。
考生应尽量避免语法错误和拼写错误，并展示自己对于语法的正确理解和运用。
评分时会考虑到语法结构的正确性、多样性和复杂性。
以下是一些参考内容，帮助考生更好地理解雅思写作的评分标准：1. 任务响应（Task Response）：- 理解并回答题目中提出的问题，明确表达自己的观点和主张；- 提供恰当的例子来支持观点，并展示自己的论述能力；- 逻辑结构清晰，段落之间有明确的衔接关系。
2. 连贯与衔接（Coherence and Cohesion）：- 文章有明确的中心思想，并对相关观点进行适当的展开；- 使用恰当的连词（如：however, therefore, in addition）来连接不同的观点和段落；- 使用恰当的句子结构和过渡词，使文章的表达更加流畅。
雅思写作评分标准对照表
雅思写作评分标准对照表雅思写作评分标准对照表参考内容：1. Task Response（任务完成度）：是否完整回答了题目所要求的问题、是否针对各个部分都进行了回答以及是否展开了论述。
2. Coherence and Cohesion（连贯性和衔接性）：是否能够清晰、有条理地展开论述、是否使用了过渡词、连接处是否准确、是否能够使用句子间衔接性来使全文结构清晰。
3. Lexical Resource（词汇资源）：使用是否丰富、是否准确、是否适用、是否符合上下文语境。
4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy（语法结构掌握和正确性）：使用的语法结构掌握是否熟练（包括语法准确性）、是否进行了变化以及是否有错误。
5. Task, Achievement （任务实现）：文章是否达到了预定的写作目的、是不是仅仅回答了相应的问题，还是尝试在多个角度进行探究和论述。
6. Coherence and Cohesion, Performance（连贯性和衔接性的表现）：文章是否有很好的连贯性和衔接性，是否有很好的读者引导，是否用了恰当的过渡词、符号等来取得紧密的联系。
7. Lexical Resource, Performance（词汇资源的表现）：文章是否用了本质精确的字眼、措辞、短语等等，尽可能地表达自己的意见，是否还有表达全貌的瑕疵？8. Grammatical Range and Accuracy, Performance（语法结构掌握和正确性的表现）：文章中是否使用了简单、复杂和复杂的句子结构、措辞是否精确无误、法是否准确、避免使用错误的情况。
是否保持后者表达意见的一致性。
注意：以上内容只为参考，写作过程中请务必关注题目要求，根据题目来选择适当的语言表达方式，考生应按照自己的理解，把握基本分数线，不断提高自己的写作能力。
雅思写作大作文评分标准(英文版)
WRITING TASK 2: Band Descriptors (public version)BandTask responseCoherence and cohesionLexical resourceGrammatical range and accuracy9•fully addresses all parts of the task•presents a fully developed position in answer to the question with relevant, fully extended and well supported ideas•uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention •skilfully manages paragraphing•uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’•uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’8•sufficiently addresses all parts of the task•presents a well-developed response to the question with relevant, extended and supported ideas•sequences information and ideas logically •manages all aspects of cohesion well•uses paragraphing sufficiently and appropriately•uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings•skilfully uses uncommon lexical items but there may be occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation •produces rare errors in spelling and/or word formation •uses a wide range of structures•the majority of sentences are error-free•makes only very occasional errors or inappropriacies 7•addresses all parts of the task •presents a clear position throughout the response•presents, extends and supports main ideas, but there maybe a tendency to over-generalise and/or supporting ideasmay lack focus •logically organises information and ideas; there is clearprogression throughout •uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately although there may be some under-/over-use •presents a clear central topic within each paragraph •uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision•uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation•may produce occasional errors in word choice, spelling and/or word formation•uses a variety of complex structures •produces frequent error-free sentences•has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make a few errors6•addresses all parts of the task although some parts may be more fully covered than others•presents a relevant position although the conclusions may become unclear or repetitive•presents relevant main ideas but some may be inadequately developed/unclear•arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression•uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical •may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately •uses paragraphing, but not always logically•uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task •attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy•makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication•uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms•makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication5•addresses the task only partially; the format may be inappropriate in places •expresses a position but the development is not always clear and there may be no conclusions drawn •presents some main ideas but these are limited and not sufficiently developed; there may be irrelevant detail •presents information with some organisation but there may be a lack of overall progression •makes inadequate, inaccurate or over-use of cohesive devices •may be repetitive because of lack of referencing and substitution•may not write in paragraphs, or paragraphing may be inadequate•uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task•may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader•uses only a limited range of structures•attempts complex sentences but these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences•may make frequent grammatical errors and punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some difficulty for the reader4•responds to the task only in a minimal way or the answer is tangential; the format may be inappropriate •presents a position but this is unclear•presents some main ideas but these are difficult to identify and may be repetitive, irrelevant or not well supported•presents information and ideas but these are not arranged coherently and there is no clear progression in theresponse •uses some basic cohesive devices but these may beinaccurate or repetitive •may not write in paragraphs or their use may be confusing•uses only basic vocabulary which may be used repetitively or which may be inappropriate for the task •has limited control of word formation and/or spelling; errors may cause strain for the reader •uses only a very limited range of structures with only rare use of subordinate clauses•some structures are accurate but errors predominate, and punctuation is often faulty3•does not adequately address any part of the task •does not express a clear position •presents few ideas, which are largely undeveloped orirrelevant•does not organise ideas logically •may use a very limited range of cohesive devices, andthose used may not indicate a logical relationship between ideas •uses only a very limited range of words and expressions with very limited control of word formation and/or spelling •errors may severely distort the message•attempts sentence forms but errors in grammar and punctuation predominate and distort the meaning2•barely responds to the task •does not express a position•may attempt to present one or two ideas but there is no development•has very little control of organisational features •uses an extremely limited range of vocabulary; essentially no control of word formation and/or spelling•cannot use sentence forms except in memorised phrases1•answer is completely unrelated to the task •fails to communicate any message •can only use a few isolated words •cannot use sentence forms at all•does not attend•does not attempt the task in any way •writes a totally memorised responseIELTS is jointly owned by the British Council, IDP: IELTS Australia and the University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (Cambridge ESOL).Page 1 of 1。
雅思写作评分标准对照表
雅思写作评分标准对照表
雅思写作评分标准是一个严格的指导原则，帮助评判者评估雅思考生的写作水平。
下面是雅思写作评分标准的对照表，以及一些相关的参考内容。
Task Achievement 任务完成度
按照题目要求完成作文任务，包括是否回答了题目所提出的问题，对论点是否坚持一个明确的观点等等。
参考：准确地理解题目的要求，全面分析分析题目中的关键词和阐释他们的意义，构建逻辑清晰、脉络明显的结构，条理清晰，逐步展开自己的思想观点。
Coherence and Cohesion 连贯性和衔接
文本是否层次清晰，句子间的相互关系是否明确，使用词汇和短语是否合理。
参考：大量使用连接词和短语，在段落中使用恰当的转折词、引导词等准确地引导语句功能，使文章的逻辑性更强，有条理性。
Lexical Resource 词汇资源
考生的词汇的使用是否多变，能否在不同语言环境下使用适当的表达方式。
参考：使用准确、恰当的词汇用于语言表达，在不同环境中运用不同的词汇和短语，以显示语言的丰富多彩性。
Grammatical Range and Accuracy 语法精确度和多样性
文本的语法结构是否正确，是否使用恰当的句型和语法形式。
参考：使用多样化的语法结构和句型，尽量避免语法错误，尤其是一些基本语法和标点符号的错误。
总而言之，评判者评估雅思考生的写作能力时，需注意题目完成度、连贯性、词汇使用以及语法的准确性和多样化，在这些方面的表现会直接决定考生的评分。
因此，雅思考生在写作时应该时刻注意保持逻辑严谨，语言清晰流畅，灵活运用词汇和语法，才能获得最佳的写作成绩。
雅思大作文的评分标准 英文
雅思大作文的评分标准英文English: In the IELTS Writing Task 2, essays are graded based on four criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy. Task Achievement assesses how well the candidate fulfills the task requirements, presents a clear position, and provides relevant examples. Coherence and Cohesion evaluates the overall structure of the essay, including the organization of ideas, logical progression, and effective use of linking devices. Lexical Resource focuses on the range and accuracy of vocabulary, with candidates expected to use a variety of words and phrases appropriately. Grammatical Range and Accuracy considers the complexity and accuracy of sentence structures, tense usage, and punctuation. Each criterion is scored from 0 to 9, with the final score being an average of these four components.Translated content: 在雅思写作任务2中，文章根据四个标准进行评分：任务完成、连贯和衔接、词汇资源以及语法范围和准确性。
雅思写作评分标准对照表
千里之行，始于足下。
雅思写作评分标准对比表在雅思写作中，有四个评分标准：任务响应、语言表达、组织结构以及词汇语法。
下面是每个评分标准的具体对比表。
任务响应 (Task Response)Band 9: 完全符合任务要求，作文内容精确无误，观点明确，没有冗余或无关的信息。
Band 8: 完全符合任务要求，几乎没有错误或不精确的信息，观点明确，内容充实。
Band 7: 符合任务要求，给出了清楚的观点，但可能有少量不精确或冗余的信息。
Band 6: 符合任务要求，观点不够清楚或表达不够精确，可能存在一些冗余或无关的信息。
Band 5: 有肯定的内容，但可能未能充分回答任务要求，观点不够清楚或不精确。
Band 4: 有肯定的内容，但未能充分回答任务要求，观点不够明确或不精确。
Band 3: 没有明确回答任务要求，内容不连贯，缺乏观点。
Band 2: 几乎没有内容，未能回答任务要求。
Band 1: 没有内容，未回答任务要求。
语言表达 (Coherence and Cohesion)Band 9: 内容和思路清楚，使用恰当的连接词和句子结构，段落结构紧密，流畅度高。
Band 8: 内容和思路清楚，使用恰当的连接词和句子结构，段落结构紧密，流畅度较高。
第1页/共3页锲而不舍，金石可镂。
Band 7: 内容和思路清楚，使用肯定的连接词和句子结构，段落结构紧密，流畅度较高。
Band 6: 内容和思路清楚，使用一些连接词和句子结构，段落结构全都，流畅度一般。
Band 5: 内容和思路一般，使用一些连接词和句子结构，段落结构不全都，流畅度一般。
Band 4: 内容和思路不够清楚，连接词和句子结构错误或缺乏，段落结构混乱，流畅度较低。
Band 3: 内容和思路混乱，连接词和句子结构错误或缺乏，段落结构混乱，流畅度低。
Band 2: 没有连贯的思路和结构，段落结构混乱，流畅度很低。
Band 1: 没有结构，无法理解。
组织结构 (Task Achievement)Band 9: 规律清楚，有明确的引言、主体和结论，段落结构全都，有恰当的过渡。
雅思写作评分标准中文版
回答完全和任务要求无关
无法交流任何信息
只能使用一些零散单词
完全无法使用句子
分0
缺席考试；交白卷；完全抄袭背诵好的范文TASK2（中文版） Nhomakorabea作文评分标准
成绩
完成任务情况
连贯与衔接
词汇资源
语法结构的范围和准确性
9分
完全满足任务的所有要求；对于题目的回应非常切题,观点鲜明,论证非常充分
不露痕迹地使用衔接手段；分段得体
使用多种复杂结多数语句无误；构；语法和标点掌握较但可能会犯一好,些错误
分6．
虽然,回应题目要求
信息和观点组织连贯；文章
使用适当范围的词汇；试图使用较不
使用适当范围的词
有的部分涵盖不够完整；立场切题,虽然结论可能不清晰主要观点切或重复；题,但有的观点可能论证不够充分或不清晰
有延续性；衔接手段使用有,但是句子内部和句子之效间的衔接可能有误或过于机械；指代关系可能不能总是清晰、合理地使用；有分段,但没有逻辑性
灵活使用多种结构；大部分语句无误；极偶尔情况下出现错误或不准确
分7
文章涵盖题目要求；提出、立场清晰；引申、并支持主要观但可能有过度概点,,括分支观点不够紧凑
信息和观点组织有逻辑性；文章从头至尾有延续性；衔虽然可能,接手段使用合理有一些使用过少或过多；每个段落都有明确的主题
词汇使用丰富、有一定的准确性和灵对语体和活性；能使用较不常见词汇,搭配有所了解；在词汇的选择、拼写和构词法上偶尔有错误
信息和观点组织连贯；文章有延续性；衔接手但是句子段使用有效,内部和句子之间的衔接可能有误或过于机械；指代关系可能不能总是清晰、合理使用
使用适当范围的词汇；试图使用较不常见词汇,但有一些不准确；在拼写和构词法上有错但这些错误不至于影响交误,际
雅思大作文四个评分标准英文
雅思大作文四个评分标准英文1. Task Achievement: This criterion assesses how well you address the task and present a clear position throughout your essay. You need to fully respond to the prompt, develop your ideas logically, and support your arguments with relevant examples and evidence. Make sure to stay on topic and avoid going off on tangents.2. Coherence and Cohesion: This criterion looks at the organization of your essay and how well your ideas flow from one paragraph to the next. You should use a variety of cohesive devices such as linking words, pronouns, and transitional phrases to connect your ideas and create a smooth progression of thoughts. Your essay should be well-structured with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.3. Lexical Resource: This criterion assesses your vocabulary range and accuracy. You should use a variety of vocabulary, including both common and academic words, to convey your ideas effectively. Avoid repeating the same words or phrases and demonstrate an ability to use collocations and idiomatic expressions appropriately.Additionally, pay attention to word forms and spelling to show a good command of English vocabulary.4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: This criterion looks at your ability to use a variety of grammatical structures accurately. You should demonstrate a good understanding of sentence structure, verb tenses, subject-verb agreement, and other grammatical features. Avoid making frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, and sentence construction. Try to use complex sentences, passive voice, and conditional structures to show a high level of grammatical proficiency.1. 任务完成度：这一标准评估了您如何应对任务并在整篇文章中明确表达立场。
雅思写作评分标准对照表
雅思写作评分标准对照表雅思写作评分标准是考官用来评估考生写作能力的参考依据，同时也是考生备考时需要了解掌握的内容。
本文将介绍雅思写作评分标准对照表的相关内容，以供参考。
1. 任务完成度（Task Response）任务完成度指的是考生是否能够全面、准确地回答所提出的问题或就所给素材进行恰当的阐述。
具体的评分标准如下：Task response | 描述---|---9 | 完全满足任务要求，对所有问题都给出了详尽的、准确的答案或对素材进行了完整的阐述，有意义且具有连贯性。
8 | 基本满足任务要求，对问题或素材进行了详尽的回答或阐述，信息准确，只有轻微的遗漏或不准确的情况。
7 | 大多数堆问得到了回答或素材进行了较为完整的阐述，但可能有些细节或重要信息没有涉及或阐述不够准确。
6 | 回答或阐述基本准确，但只覆盖了部分问题或素材，没有完全阐述或未涉及的内容可能对整个文章的连贯性造成一定影响。
5 | 对问题或素材进行了一定涉及，但没有正面回答问题或进行有意义的阐述，也没有明显的错漏，但也缺乏亮点和深度。
4 | 文章没有明显偏离主题，但内容缺乏深度和亮点，回答或阐述不够准确或详尽，甚至可能出现信息错误或混乱。
3 | 文章与所要求的主题或素材明显不符，缺乏准确回答或充分阐述，错漏较多，表达混乱不连贯。
2 | 文章明显偏离主题或素材，对问题或素材缺乏回答或阐述，信息严重不准确或混乱，缺乏逻辑和语言表达能力。
1 | 文章与题目无法联系，对问题或素材没给出有效回答或阐述，表达几乎无法理解或存在严重语言错误。
2. 组织结构（Coherence and Cohesion）组织结构是指文章结构是否清晰，段落之间是否衔接自然、是否有充分的过渡。
具体评分标准如下：Coherence and Cohesion | 描述---|---9 | 文章结构清晰、合理，所有段落有充分发挥和合理布局，使用过渡自然，可让读者顺畅跟进。
8 | 文章结构合理，大部分段落有充分发挥和合理布局，过渡自然，只有个别段落可能存在过渡不够自然的情况。
雅思写作评分标准-中英对照
in formatio n
adequate
simple and
the task
and ideas
range of
complex
(Academic)
cohere ntly,
vocabulary
sentence
prese nts an
there is a
for the task
forms
overview with
clear overall
attempts to
makes some
in formatio n
progressi on
use less
errors in
appropriately
uses cohesive
com mon
grammar
selected
devices
vocabulary
precisi on
has good
(Ge neral
of cohesive
uses less
con trol of
Trai ning)
devices
com mon
grammar
prese nts a clear
appropriately
lexical items
and
purpose, with
although
with some
pun ctuati on
the tone
there may be
aware ness of
but may
con siste nt and
some
style and
make a few
雅思写作评分标准-中英对照
does not organize ideaslogically
may use a very limitedrange of cohesive devices,and those used may notindicate a logicalrelationship between ideas
arranges information andideas coherently,thereis a clear overallprogression
uses cohesive deviceseffectively, but cohesionwithin and/or betweensentences may be faulty ormechanical
produces frequent error-free sentences
has good control of grammar andpunctuation butmay make a few errors
6
addresses the requirements of the task
(Academic) presents an overview withinformation appropriately selected
some structures are accurate but errorspredominate, and punctuation is oftenfaulty
3
fails to address the task, which mayhave been completely misunderstood
雅思写作评分标准-中英对照(汇编)
uses a sufficient range of vocabulary toallow some flexibility and precision
uses paragraphingsufficiently andappropriately
uses a wide range of vocabulary fluentlyand flexibly to convey precise meanings
skillfully uses uncommon lexical items butthere may be occasional inaccuracies inword choice and collocation
uses less common lexical items withsome awareness of style andcollocation
may produce occasional errors in wordchoice, spelling and/or word formation
uses a variety of complex structures
rare minor errors occuronly as ‘slips’
uses a wide range of structures with fullflexibility and accuracy;
rare minor errorsoccur only as ‘slips’
8
covers all requirements of the tasksufficiently
雅思写作评分标准-中英对照
雅思写作评分标准-中英对照The XXX based on a set of criteria。
For the Task 1 Writing n。
there are two main categories: XXX.X of 9 in this category means that the candidate has XXX of the task。
They have developed their response XXX。
XXX's n。
They have also used a wide range of vocabulary and structureswith full XXX。
Any errors made are rare and only XXX.A score of 8 in this category means that the XXX have presented。
highlighted。
and XXX。
They have also managed alln and XXX。
fluently。
XXX are error-free。
and they make only very nal errors.Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A score of 9 in this category means that the XXX grammar。
using structures with full XXX.A score of 8 in this category means that the XXX vocabulary and structures。
presenting them well with n。
They have a good command of grammar。
and any errors made are only XXX.Overall。
雅思写作评分标准对照表
雅思写作评分标准对照表雅思写作的评分标准，主要根据四个方面进行评定，包括任务响应(Task Response)、连贯性和衔接(Coherence and Cohesion)、词汇和语法(Vocabulary and Grammar)以及发展观点和论证(Ideas, Development, and Support)。
以下是相关标准的详细对照表：任务响应(Task Response)：9分：完全符合任务要求，清晰准确地表述自己的观点，并提供具体的例子和论证。
结构合乎逻辑，信息完整、准确、恰如其分。
8分：清晰表达自己的观点，并提供相关的例子和论证，基本符合任务要求，但可能存在一些小的问题，如信息的完整性或准确性。
7分：在一般任务要求下，清晰地表达自己的观点，并提供一定的例子和论证，但可能存在一些问题，如信息的不完全或不准确。
6分：基本履行了任务要求，但可能存在一些不清晰的表达或一些有限的例子和论证。
5分：基本理解了任务，但任务响应存在一些模糊或一些未能提供充分的例子和论证。
4分：理解任务，但表达模糊不清，未能提供有效的例子和论证。
3分：未能有效理解任务要求，只提供了非常基本或不相关的观点。
2分：未能有效参与任务，只提供了非常有限的信息。
1分：未能完成任务，只提供了不相关或不一致的信息。
0分：什么都没有写，或只写了一些不相关的内容。
连贯性和衔接(Coherence and Cohesion)：9分：文章结构清晰，段落之间的衔接自然流畅，使用了适当的链接词和短语，使文章整体连贯。
8分：文章结构清晰，段落之间的衔接自然流畅，使用了一些适当的链接词和短语，使文章整体连贯，但可能存在一些不连贯之处。
7分：文章结构基本清晰，段落之间存在一些连贯性问题，但整体上看仍然能够理解。
6分：文章结构基本清晰，但段落之间缺乏明显的衔接，表达不够连贯。
5分：文章结构不太清晰，段落之间缺乏明确的衔接，表达不连贯。
4分：文章结构不清晰，段落之间缺乏明确的衔接，表达不连贯。
雅思写作评分标准-中英对照
covers therequirements of the task
(Academic) presents a clear overviewofthemain trends, differences,or stages
(General Training) presents a clearpurpose, with the tone consistent andappropriate
(General Training) presents a purposethat is generally clear; there may beinconsistencies in tone
presents and adequately highlights keyfeatures / bullet points,but details maybe irrelevant,inappropriate,orinaccurate
arranges information andideas coherently,thereis a clear overallprogression
uses cohesive deviceseffectively, but cohesionwithin and/or betweensentences may be faulty ormechanical
clearly presents and highlights keyfeatures / bullet points but could bemore fully extended
logicallyorganizesinformation and ideas; thereisaclear progressionthroughout
雅思写作评分标准对照表
雅思写作评分标准对照表雅思写作的评分标准对照表如下：评分标准 | 针对特定层次的描述---|---9分 | 完全符合题目要求，能够以流畅、准确、多样的方式表达自己的想法，并能合理、连贯地组织论证。
在使用语言和结构上几乎没有错误，词汇使用丰富且准确，句子结构多样且正确，表达清晰明了，能够准确地表达复杂的思想。
8分 | 完全符合题目要求，能够以流畅、准确、多样的方式表达自己的想法，并能合理、连贯地组织论证。
仅在使用语言和结构上出现少量错误，但不影响理解和阅读，并且能够使用较高级的词汇和句型，语言表达基本准确。
7分 | 总体上符合题目要求，能够以清晰、连贯的方式表达自己的想法，并能合理组织论证，但可能有一些组织上的缺失。
语言和结构上可能存在一些错误，但不影响理解和阅读。
词汇使用基本准确，使用较简单的句型，但能够展示一定的词汇和句型的准确性。
6分 | 符合题目要求，能够表达基本想法，并使用一些基本论证。
可能在组织上有一些缺失并在语言和结构上有一些错误，但不影响理解和阅读。
使用的词汇和句型相对简单，但基本准确。
5分 | 符合题目要求，能够表达基本想法，但语言和结构上有一些明显的错误，影响理解和阅读。
词汇和句型相对简单且不准确，可能有时使用不当。
4分 | 符合题目要求，但表达不清楚，组织混乱。
在语言和结构上有严重的错误，严重影响理解和阅读。
使用的词汇和句型非常简单且错误频繁。
3分 | 没有完全满足题目要求，表达不清楚，组织混乱。
语言和结构上存在严重和频繁的错误，导致无法理解和阅读。
词汇、句型使用不当，基本无法准确表达意思。
2分 | 没有满足题目要求，几乎无法表达任何想法。
严重的语言和结构错误，无法理解和阅读。
使用的词汇和句型非常有限且基本错误。
1分 | 未能满足题目要求，无法表达任何内容。
严重的语言和结构错误，完全无法理解和阅读。
几乎没有使用有效的词汇和句型。
0分 | 未能提供任何可评价的写作，无法判断成绩。
雅思写作评分标准是什么？
雅思写作的评分标准有四点：1.Task Response（任务回应情况）2.Coherence and Cohesion（连贯与衔接）3.Lexical Resources（词汇丰富程度）4.Grammatical Range and Accuracy（语法多样性及准确性）1、任务回应情况：Task Response简单来说就是你至少得在规定时间内写完大小作文，没写完基本分数就是4.5分了，所以一定先要保证写完且字数够(小作文150字大作文250字)。
还有就是一定不要偏题跑题，你文章写的再好表达再精彩，偏题了跑题了分数怎么也不会高。
2、连贯与衔接：Coherence and Cohesion中文很多都是意会，不用直接说明逻辑关系也能读懂读者要表明的意思，但是英文是非常直接的，所以你要表达转折你就需要用到转折连接but/however/nevertheless 等，要表达对比就需要用到by contrast/in contrast等，要表达并列或递进就要用到first of all/moreover/furthermore/in addition等。
所以整个雅思写作要做到过渡自然流畅，论证有理有据。
3、词汇丰富程度：Lexical Resources能自然地使用并掌握复杂的词汇特征。
需要强调的是词汇丰富并不是说要多堆砌“高大上”的词汇，而是要积累一些同意词的转换，如重要的，你至少要知道可以用important，significant，vital，crucial，key，essential等形容词，也能转换成is a determinant(是一个决定性因素)，也能转换成play an significant role in ; is an indispensable part等。
词汇不在难精确正确即可，句子更不在于句句都是长难句从句。
4、语法多样性及准确性：Grammatical Range and Accuracy般作文上不了6的学生大多数最明显的问题是语法很薄弱，写的句子都是破句子，各种语法问题。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
uses a wide range of structures
the majority of sentences are error-free
makes only very occasional errors orinappropriacies
clearly presents a fully developedresponse
uses cohesion in such away that it attracts no
attention
skillfully managesparagraphing
uses a wide range of vocabulary withvery natural and sophisticated control oflexical features;
(General Training) presents a purposethat is generally clear; there may beinconsistencies in tone
presents and adequately highlights keyfeatures / bullet points,but details maybe irrelevant, inappropriate,orinaccurate
clearly presents and highlights keyfeatures / bullet points but could bemore fully extended
logically organizesinformation and ideas; thereisaclear progressionthroughout
uses paragraphingsufficiently andappropriately
uses a wide range of vocabulary fluentlyand flexibly to convey precise meanings
skillfully uses uncommon lexical items butthere may be occasional inaccuracies inword choice and collocation
makes some errors in spelling and/orword formation, but they do not impedecommunication
uses a mix of simple and complex sentenceforms
makes some errors in grammar andpunctuation but they rarely reducecommunication
produces frequent error-free sentences
has good control of grammar andpunctuation butmay make a few errors
6
addresses the requirements of the task
(Academic) presents an overview withinformation appropriately selected
may not always usereferencesclearly orappropriately
uses an adequate range of vocabularyfor the task
attempts to use less common vocabularybut with some inaccuracy
arranges information andideas coherently,thereis a clear overallprogression
uses cohesive deviceseffectively, but cohesionwithin and/or betweensentences may be faulty ormechanical
(General Training) may present apurpose for the letter that is unclear attimes; the tone may be variable andsometimes inappropriate
presents, but inadequately covers, keyfeatures / bullet points; there may be atendency to focus on details
uses a range of cohesivedevices appropriatelyalthough there may besome under-/over-use
uses a sufficient range of vocabulary toallow some flexibility and precision
7
covers the requirements of the task
(Academic) presents a clear overviewofthemain trends, differences,or stages
(General Training) presents a clearpurpose, with the tone consistent andappropriate
has limited control of word formationand/or spelling;
errors may cause strain for thereader
uses only a very limited range of structureswith only rare use of subordinate clauses
4
attempts to address the task but doesnot cover allthekey features / bullet points; the format may be inappropriate
(General Training) fails to clearlyexplain the purpose of the letter; thetone may be inappropriate
presents limited ideas which may belargely irrelevant/repetitive
does not organize ideaslogically
may use a very limitedrange of cohesive devices,and those used may notindicate a logicalrelationshipbetween ideas
rare minor errors occuronly as ‘slips’
uses a wide range of structures with fullflexibility and accuracy;
rare minor errorsoccur only as ‘slips’
8
covers all requirements of the tasksufficiently
雅思（IELTS）考试评分标准（中英文对照）
IELTS Task 1 Writing band descriptors
Band
Task Achievement
Coherence and Cohesion
Lexical Resource
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
9
fully sΒιβλιοθήκη tisfies all the requirements ofthe task
presents information withsome organization but theremay be a lack of overallprogression
makes inadequate,inaccurate,or over-use ofcohesive devices
may be repetitive becauseof lack ofthereferencesandsubstitution
uses some basic cohesivedevices but these may beinaccurate or repetitive
uses only basic vocabulary which may beused repetitively or which may beinappropriate for the task
uses a limited range of vocabulary, butthis is minimally adequate for the task
may make noticeable errors in spellingand/or word formation that may causesome difficulty for thereader
some structures are accurate but errorspredominate, and punctuation is oftenfaulty
3
fails to address the task, which mayhave been completely misunderstood
may confuse key features / bulletpoints with detail; parts may beunclear, irrelevant, repetitive orinaccurate