democracy

讨论（承认反方，让步，迂回）
驳论（不承认对方，反驳，批评）
立论（自圆其说）
Well-beings of a society would definitely be improving while its people challenge the authority at a rational proportion. What we should take into consideration and justification is what kind of authority should be questioned? Do we really need to question all the policies and information sources? Hardly can citizens realize the importance and significance of the authority, before they confront puzzles and unbelievable issues.
Well-beings will be improved since the authority pure greater consideration and contemplation into considering folks’living condition and mental health. Only if the medicine company managements take illness as a killing pain of themselves they can honestly make the medicine safe enough in some developing country. Meanwhile, only if the government is effective and sufficient enough to justify the quality and price of these medicines can its citizens feel free about sickness. Though at a low pace the Medias have parts of power to criticize and guide the medicine industry morally. By no single means the society would be allowed to develop under a powerful authority uniquely.
In various areas false being spread widely, however, authorities have the magnificent and inspiring ability to make them impartial and objective. Authorities such as schools where always be regard as a place producing authorities are at the same time misleading and deserve doubting according to its performance. Although teachers spreading knowledge from generation to generation, some of them still spread partial bias to children who have less critic minds than adults with or without conscious. If no one is going to correct them the bias would be expend without of reach. Reforming the authority, especially the one getting in touch with massive people, the government is going to create an orthodoxy circumstance. What’s more, challenging the authorities as a habit people will be wiser and wiser and will not be fooled by same misleading informs. Consequently, the more critical thinking the less foolish we become.
It is human nature to credit people we trust at the beginning, so the moral part should gain highly notice in accepting authority itself. Questioning authorities does not mean challenging the truth and basic principles and does not mean withhold the critic thinking and fair judgments against partiality and prejudice. Questioning authorities may lead to a proper and impartial understanding of our
society. While accepting that a increasing number of individuals are pretend to becoming sort of professional in the overwhelming majority areas, food industry, marriage problems and education issues. Trying to be the authority in these areas make they feel like god leading people to do stuffs they do even not sure about. There a question appears how to lead the masses into a sane reaction towards that so called authority.。