英语作文携带枪支
雅思写作大作文思路 持有枪支是否应该合法 why gun ownership should be legal or illegal.doc
雅思写作大作文思路持有枪支是否应该合法 why gun ownership should be legal or illegal今天我们雅思写作大作文思路的文章来研究下持有枪支是否应该合法的问题。
新中国成立之后，政府对民间存在的枪支进行了几次大型的收缴活动，并制定法律，严惩私藏枪支的行为，即所谓的刀枪入库，马放南山。
这一措施对稳定社会秩序，提升社会治安起到了积极的作用。
作为平民，我们不用太过担心恶性犯罪的发生。
而美国的一些州则采取了相反的措施，允许民间持枪。
他们认为这是民众的合法权利。
民众要拥有保护自己的能力。
但这也滋生了一些犯罪问题，最典型的就是校园枪击案的层出不穷。
那么持有枪支是否应该合法呢？小编搜集了一些素材和思路，以供大家参考。
枪支为什么应该合法 why guns should be legalIn some countries, people are allowed to own firearms在一些国家，人们被允许拥有自己的枪械。
Individuals have the right to protect themselves个人拥有保护他们自己的权利。
People can use guns in self defence人们可以使用枪支自卫。
This deters criminals这可以威慑犯罪分子。
枪支为什么应该不合法 why gun owership should be illegalThere is a risk of accidents with guns枪支存在发生事故的风险。
The number of violent crimes increases when guns are available当枪支触手可及的时候，暴力犯罪的数量有所上升。
Criminals may be armed犯罪分子可能武装起来。
The police then need to use guns警察也相应的需要使用枪支。
枪支限制英文作文
枪支限制英文作文Gun control is a hotly debated topic in many countries around the world. Some people believe that strict gun control laws are necessary to reduce gun violence, while others argue that it infringes upon their rights to own firearms.The United States has some of the most lenient gun control laws among developed countries. This has led to a high rate of gun-related deaths and mass shootings, prompting calls for stricter regulations on firearms.In contrast, countries like Australia and Japan have implemented strict gun control measures, leading to significantly lower rates of gun violence. This has been achieved through a combination of strict licensing requirements, background checks, and limitations on the types of firearms that can be owned.Proponents of gun control argue that it is necessary toprevent dangerous individuals from obtaining firearms. They believe that stricter regulations can help reduce the number of gun-related deaths and mass shootings.On the other hand, opponents of gun control argue that it infringes upon their Second Amendment rights to bear arms. They believe that responsible gun owners should not be punished for the actions of a few individuals who misuse firearms.In conclusion, the issue of gun control is complex and multifaceted. While some argue that strict regulations are necessary to reduce gun violence, others believe that it infringes upon their rights. Finding a balance between these competing interests is crucial in addressing the issue of gun control.。
雅思大作文范文：警察携枪
Police in Britain do not carry guns. Some people believe that unarmed police are unable to protect citizens, but some suggest that arming the police will lead to a surge in violence in society. Discuss those two views.Whether to arm the police is a contentious subject. While some people maintain that unarmed police are unable to protect law-abiding citizens, others reject this notion, believing that it leads to a drop in violence in society. There are several factors that account for the stark/sharp contrast between the two thoughts.The primary concern on armed police is that it would increase the potential for miscarriage of justice and mistaken shootings of innocent civilians. The legislation in many countries is supportive of this concern. Laws protect citizens from torture or cruel treatment and also their rights on arrest or detainment. If armed, the police will be less likely to think twice before pulling the trigger. They can easily get away with private execution by inventing a legitimate excuse, such as self-defense. The chance of a shoot-out would naturally rise, causing many preventable injuries or losses of life.Arming the police might also add fuel to the gun culture. Nowadays, perhaps nothing is worse than the continued rise in the gun ownership rate. Arming the police can never redress the imbalance but worse, give criminals a motivator to carry guns even for minor crimes. On the other hand, in those communities that are otherwise peaceful, armed police are intimidating and the fear of crime will spread wildly. It would lead to further demand on private gun ownership, and expose members of the public to higher risk.Arming police is therefore not advisable in most cases but only allowed in exceptional circumstances. For example, in those areas where armed crimes are rampant, armed police protect not only the public but also themselves from the potential attack. It gives the police the leverage in their combat against criminals, especially those hardened criminals. Firearms also serve as a deterrent to would-be offenders. If street patrols in some neighbours are routinely armed, it helps cut the rates of crime.The access to weapons should therefore be limited, for the simple reason that carrying guns leads to higher likelihood of mistaken shootings and to higher levels of violence. Carrying guns is only accepted when the police are in conflict situations and confrontations with criminals.。
关于枪支的英文作文
关于枪支的英文作文Guns are a controversial topic that elicits strong emotions from people. Some see them as a symbol of freedom and protection, while others view them as a threat to public safety.The history of guns dates back centuries, with their invention revolutionizing warfare and hunting. From muskets to modern assault rifles, guns have evolved to become more efficient and deadly.The debate over gun control is a heated one, with advocates on both sides passionately defending their positions. Some argue for stricter regulations to prevent gun violence, while others believe in the right to bear arms as a fundamental freedom.The impact of guns on society is undeniable, with mass shootings and gun-related crimes dominating headlines. The fear of gun violence has led to calls for action to addressthe issue and protect the public.Despite the controversy surrounding guns, they continue to play a significant role in many cultures and communities. Whether for hunting, sport shooting, or self-defense, guns remain a part of daily life for many people around the world.In conclusion, guns are a complex and divisive issuethat sparks intense debate and emotions. The role of gunsin society, the need for regulation, and the impact of gun violence are all important considerations in this ongoing discussion.。
枪支管制 英文作文
枪支管制英文作文英文：Gun control is a hot topic in many countries, including the United States. As a responsible gun owner, I believe that there should be some level of control and regulation on firearms to ensure public safety.First and foremost, I want to make it clear that I am not advocating for a complete ban on all firearms. I believe in the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms, but I also believe that there should be reasonable restrictions in place. For example, background checks should be mandatory for all gun purchases to prevent firearms from falling into the wrong hands. In addition, I support waiting periods for gun purchases to allow for thorough background checks to be completed.Another aspect of gun control that I support is the restriction of certain types of firearms, such as assaultrifles. These weapons are designed for military use and have no place in civilian hands. By limiting access to these types of firearms, we can reduce the potential for mass shootings and other forms of gun violence.Furthermore, I believe that there should be stricter regulations on the storage and safekeeping of firearms. Many accidents involving guns occur because of improper storage or negligence. By enforcing laws that require gun owners to securely store their firearms, we can prevent tragic accidents from happening.In conclusion, I believe that gun control is necessary to ensure the safety of our communities. By implementing common-sense regulations, we can reduce the risk of gun violence while still respecting the rights of responsible gun owners.中文：枪支管制是许多国家的热门话题，包括美国。
枪支利弊英语作文
枪支利弊英语作文Guns can be a useful tool for self-defense and protection. In dangerous situations, having a gun can provide a sense of security and empowerment. It can also be a deterrent for potential attackers, as they are lesslikely to target someone who is armed.However, guns also pose a significant risk to public safety. Accidental shootings, especially involving children, are a major concern. In addition, the availability of guns makes it easier for criminals to obtain and use them for illegal activities. The presence of guns in society can escalate conflicts and lead to more violence.The use of guns in law enforcement can be a double-edged sword. While they are necessary for officers toprotect themselves and others, there have been numerous cases of excessive use of force and wrongful shootings.This has led to a lack of trust between the police and the communities they serve.On the other hand, hunting and sport shooting are popular activities for many people. Guns are essential for these purposes, providing a means for people to connect with nature and enjoy recreational activities. However, the misuse of guns in these settings can have devastating consequences for wildlife and the environment.In conclusion, the debate over the benefits and drawbacks of guns is complex and multifaceted. While they can be a tool for protection and recreation, they also pose significant risks to public safety and can be misused in various ways. It is important to carefully consider the implications of gun ownership and use in order to promote a safer and more peaceful society.。
Carry guns 个人不应该被允许携带枪支,这会增加犯罪和暴力 英语作文
Individuals should not be allowed to carry guns as it increases the crime and violence in the society.To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.Model Answer:In many countries, laws are quite flexible to let ordinary individuals carry firearms while in many other countries it is quite hard to get a license, even for a notable person, to own a gun. It is often said that when a state or country allows itscitizens to carry weapons, the crime and violence rates increase there and I quite agree with this statement.First, guns are meant to shot someone either to wound or kill him. Thus the very objective of a gun is to kill a person and thus this deathly weapon can only increase the crime and violence in a society. To understand how the mass ownership of guns can increase the violence in a country we can compare a country like the USA, where carrying a gun is allowed, with a country like Japan, where it is restricted. In 2014, when the United States experiencedover 18,000 gun-related homicides, Japan had only 14 and this is quite an alarming comparison that reveals how firearms ownership by mass people can increase violence in a country.Second, research indicates that owning and carrying a gun can psychologically affect our behaviours and thus people often commit crimes only because they have guns with them. Thus letting people carry guns puts others life in risk rather than ensuring safety. Accidental, psychological, and family violence gunshot wounds and death are quite high in many countries, especially where people can carryguns with them, and the only way to reduce such crime rate is to restrict the ownership of guns.In conclusion, the only reason the authority would permit someone to carry a gun is to ensure the safety of this person. However, the reality is quite contrary and allowing people to carry guns is actually letting criminals also won it. Thus there is no doubt that people in a country should not be allowed to carry firearms and restricting it would significantly decrease the crime and violence.。
禁止携带枪支英文作文
禁止携带枪支英文作文Banning Carrying Firearms。
In recent years, the issue of gun control has become a heated topic around the world. In order to prevent gun violence and protect the safety of citizens, many countries have implemented strict gun control policies, including the prohibition of carrying firearms. In my opinion, banning carrying firearms is a necessary measure to ensure public safety.Firstly, carrying firearms can easily lead to accidents and endanger people's lives. Even if the owner of the gun has a license and is trained, accidents can still occur. For example, in the United States, where the gun control policy is relatively loose, there are frequent cases of accidental shootings. In 2019, a 13-year-old boy in California accidentally shot and killed his friend while playing with a gun. This tragedy could have been avoided if carrying firearms was prohibited.Secondly, carrying firearms can increase the risk of crimes. Criminals can easily obtain guns through illegal means, and if carrying firearms is allowed, it will be more difficult for law enforcement to distinguish between criminals and law-abiding citizens. In addition, carrying firearms can also lead to the escalation of conflicts. For example, in the United States, there have been many casesof road rage incidents that have turned into shootings because one of the drivers was carrying a gun.Thirdly, banning carrying firearms is not equivalent to depriving citizens of their right to self-defense. Thereare many other ways to protect oneself, such as learningself-defense techniques or carrying non-lethal weapons like pepper spray. Moreover, in countries where carryingfirearms is prohibited, the crime rate is not necessarily higher than in countries where carrying firearms is allowed. For example, in Japan, where carrying firearms is strictly prohibited, the crime rate is relatively low.In conclusion, banning carrying firearms is a necessarymeasure to ensure public safety. It can prevent accidents, reduce the risk of crimes, and protect the lives of citizens. While some may argue that carrying firearms is a right, the safety of the public should always be the top priority.。
警察应不应该带枪英语作文
警察应不应该带枪英语作文Police officers should carry guns. Carrying a gun is a necessary part of a police officer's job. Police officers need to be able to protect themselves and the public from dangerous criminals. Guns are an important tool that allows police officers to do their job effectively and keep people safe.One of the main reasons police officers should carry guns is for self-defense. Police officers often find themselves in dangerous situations where they may need to use force to protect themselves. Criminals may be armed and willing to use violence against the police. Having a gun allows police officers to defend themselves and respond appropriately to threats. Without a gun, police officers would be at a significant disadvantage and would be unable to effectively protect themselves.In addition to self-defense, carrying a gun also allows police officers to protect the public. Police officers are responsible for maintaining law and order and keeping communities safe. If a police officer encounters a dangerous criminal, a gun allows them to stop that criminal and prevent them from harming innocent people. Guns give police officers the ability to quickly and effectively respond to threatsand emergencies, which can save lives.Furthermore, the mere presence of a gun can be a deterrent to crime. Criminals may be less likely to commit crimes if they know that police officers are armed and able to respond with force. This can help reduce the overall level of crime in a community and make people feel safer.Critics of police officers carrying guns argue that it can lead to more violence and that police officers are more likely to use excessive force. However, this is not supported by the evidence. Studies have shown that the majority of police shootings are justified and that police officers generally use force appropriately and only when necessary. Furthermore, proper training and strict policies on the use of force can help ensure that police officers use their guns responsibly and only when absolutely necessary.In conclusion, police officers should carry guns as part of their job. Guns are a necessary tool that allows police officers to protect themselves and the public from dangerous criminals. While there are valid concerns about the potential for misuse, the benefits of having armed police officers outweigh the risks. Proper training and policies can help ensure that police officers use their guns responsibly and effectively.。
美国枪支英文作文
美国枪支英文作文1. Guns are a hotly debated topic in the United States. Some people believe that owning a gun is a fundamental right, while others believe that gun ownership should be heavily restricted. The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms, but it is up to individual states to regulate gun ownership.2. Proponents of gun ownership argue that guns are necessary for self-defense and that they deter crime. They also argue that the government should not infringe on their right to own guns. However, opponents of gun ownershippoint to the high rates of gun violence in the United States and argue that stricter gun control laws could help reduce these rates.3. The United States has some of the highest rates of gun violence in the world. Mass shootings, in particular, have become all too common in recent years. Many people believe that these tragedies could have been prevented withstricter gun control laws. However, others argue that these shootings are the result of mental illness or othersocietal factors and that gun control laws would not make a difference.4. Gun control laws vary widely from state to state in the United States. Some states have very strict gun control laws, while others have very permissive laws. This patchwork of laws can make it difficult to regulate gun ownership on a national level.5. The debate over gun control in the United States is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. While some people believe that gun ownership is an essential part of American culture, others believe that it is a dangerous and unnecessary practice. Ultimately, it will be up to lawmakers and voters to decide how best to address the issue of gun violence in the United States.。
是否带枪这一问题英语作文
是否带枪这一问题英语作文Paragraph 1:Having a gun with me? Absolutely not! It's not my thing.I believe in resolving conflicts through peaceful means and promoting dialogue. Carrying a gun would only escalate tensions and increase the likelihood of violence. I preferto rely on my words and actions to make a positive impactin any situation.Paragraph 2:You know what they say, "Guns don't kill people, people kill people." But let's be honest, having a gun increases the chances of someone getting hurt, intentionally or accidentally. I don't want to be responsible for causing harm to others or myself. It's just not worth it.Paragraph 3:In some countries, carrying a gun is seen as a symbol of power and protection. However, I believe true strength lies in finding non-violent solutions to problems. Guns may provide a sense of security, but they also perpetuate a culture of fear and distrust. I would rather work towards creating a society where we can all feel safe without the need for weapons.Paragraph 4:I understand that some people argue that having a gun can be a form of self-defense. However, I believe there are alternative ways to protect oneself, such as learning self-defense techniques or investing in personal security measures. Carrying a gun doesn't guarantee safety, and it can actually put oneself at a higher risk of being targeted by criminals.Paragraph 5:Let's not forget the tragic consequences that can arise from gun ownership. Accidental shootings, suicides, andmass shootings are all too common in societies where guns are easily accessible. By choosing not to carry a gun, I am taking a stand against this cycle of violence and advocating for stricter gun control measures.Paragraph 6:Ultimately, the decision to carry a gun is a personal one. However, I firmly believe that promoting peace andnon-violence should be our priority. Carrying a gun may provide a temporary sense of security, but it does not address the root causes of conflicts. Let's focus on building a society where we can all coexist peacefully, without the need for weapons.。
枪支专业英文作文
枪支专业英文作文Guns have been a controversial topic for a long time. Some people believe that owning a gun is a right thatshould not be taken away, while others argue that strictgun control laws are necessary to reduce violence and crime.The design and technology of guns have evolved significantly over the years. From simple muskets to modern assault rifles, the capabilities of firearms have greatly improved. This has led to debates about the potential dangers of more advanced weaponry.The use of guns in self-defense is a hotly debated issue. Proponents of gun ownership argue that firearms can be used to protect oneself and others from harm. However, opponents point to the high number of gun-related accidents and incidents of misuse as reasons to restrict access to guns.The impact of guns on society is undeniable. Gunviolence has led to countless deaths and injuries, sparking calls for stricter gun control measures. On the other hand, some argue that responsible gun ownership should not be punished because of the actions of a few individuals.The cultural significance of guns cannot be overlooked. In many parts of the world, guns are deeply ingrained in the local culture and traditions. This makes it difficult to implement widespread gun control measures without facing significant pushback from certain communities.The future of guns is uncertain. As technology continues to advance, new types of firearms and ammunition are constantly being developed. This raises questions about how to regulate these emerging technologies and prevent them from falling into the wrong hands.。
描写带红外线枪的作文
描写带红外线枪的作文英文回答：Infrared Gun.I remember the first time I saw an infrared gun. It was during a game of laser tag with my friends. The gun was sleek and black, with a red light at the tip. It lookedlike something out of a sci-fi movie.As soon as I picked up the gun, I could feel the power in my hands. It was lightweight and easy to handle. The trigger was sensitive, and I could feel the anticipation building up inside me. I knew I was about to embark on an exciting adventure.Once the game started, I aimed the gun at my opponents and pulled the trigger. A beam of invisible infrared light shot out from the gun, seeking out my targets. It was like magic. I could see the red light on the gun flicker as itsent out the signal.The best part about the infrared gun was the element of surprise. Since the light was invisible, my opponentscouldn't see it coming. It gave me the upper hand and allowed me to strategize and plan my moves. I could hide in the shadows and catch my opponents off guard.One time, I was hiding behind a tree, waiting for the perfect moment to strike. My friend, who was on theopposing team, was walking right towards me. As soon as he was within range, I aimed my gun and pulled the trigger. He had no idea what hit him. It was a moment of triumph and exhilaration.Another advantage of the infrared gun was its accuracy. The beam of light was precise and could hit targets from a distance. I could take down multiple opponents with just a few shots. It made me feel like a sharpshooter, a force to be reckoned with.However, using an infrared gun wasn't all about winning.It was also about having fun and bonding with my friends. We would spend hours running around, laughing and shouting, as we tried to outsmart each other. The infrared gun added an extra level of excitement to our games.中文回答：红外线枪。
假如我带武器回到过去作文
假如我带武器回到过去作文英文回答：As I travel back in time with a weapon, I am faced with a moral dilemma. On one hand, I might feel the need to protect myself and ensure my survival in a different time period. On the other hand, I am aware of the potential consequences and ethical implications of introducing a weapon into a past society.I may be tempted to use the weapon for my ownprotection or to gain an advantage in a world that is unfamiliar to me. However, I must consider the potential harm and disruption that such actions could cause. For example, if I were to use the weapon to defend myself, it could lead to a chain of events that alter the course of history in unforeseen ways.Furthermore, the presence of a weapon from the future could create fear and mistrust among the people of the past.It may lead to conflict and violence, ultimately causing more harm than good. For instance, if I were to brandishthe weapon in a display of power, it could incite fear and aggression from those around me, leading to a breakdown of trust and communication.In considering these factors, I must also acknowledge the potential impact on my own sense of morality and ethics. If I were to resort to using the weapon, I would be compromising my own values and principles. This internal conflict highlights the complexity of the situation and the need to carefully weigh the consequences of my actions.Ultimately, I must recognize the responsibility that comes with possessing a weapon in the past. It is not a decision to be taken lightly, as it has the potential to alter the course of history and cause harm to others. Therefore, I must carefully consider the implications of my actions and strive to find alternative means of ensuring my safety and well-being in a different time period.中文回答：当我带着武器回到过去时，我面临着一种道德困境。
使用枪支 英文作文
使用枪支英文作文英文：Using firearms has always been a controversial topic.On one hand, it can be used for self-defense and hunting, but on the other hand, it can also lead to violence and tragedy. Personally, I have mixed feelings about using firearms.Firstly, I believe that owning a firearm for self-defense can be necessary in certain situations. For example, if someone breaks into my home and threatens my safety, I would want to have a way to protect myself and my family. However, I also recognize that owning a firearm comes witha great responsibility. It requires proper training, storage, and maintenance to ensure that it is used safely and effectively.Secondly, I understand the appeal of hunting with firearms. It can be a way to connect with nature andprovide food for oneself and others. However, I think it is important to hunt ethically and responsibly, and to follow all laws and regulations related to hunting.On the other hand, I am also aware of the dangers and risks associated with firearms. Gun violence is a serious issue in many parts of the world, and it is important to take steps to prevent it. This includes implementingstricter gun control laws, providing education and resources for responsible gun ownership, and addressing the root causes of violence.In conclusion, while I can see both the benefits and drawbacks of using firearms, I believe that it is important to approach the topic with caution and responsibility.中文：使用枪支一直是一个有争议的话题。
写枪的作文400字以上
写枪的作文400字以上英文回答：Guns have always been a controversial topic. Some people believe that owning a gun is a fundamental right, while others argue that guns only lead to violence and tragedy. As for me, I believe that guns can be both a tool for protection and a dangerous weapon if not handled properly.I grew up in a rural area where hunting was a common activity. My father taught me how to handle a gun safely and responsibly from a young age. He always emphasized the importance of gun safety and proper training. I remember the first time I went hunting with my father. He taught me how to aim, shoot, and most importantly, how to respect the power of the gun.However, I also understand the risks and dangers associated with guns. I have seen firsthand the devastatingeffects of gun violence in my community. I have friends who have lost loved ones due to gun accidents or intentional harm. It is heartbreaking to see the impact that a single bullet can have on so many lives.In my opinion, the key to responsible gun ownership is education and training. People should be required to undergo thorough background checks and training before owning a gun. It is not enough to simply buy a gun andthink you are prepared to use it. Proper training and education can prevent accidents and save lives.中文回答：枪一直是一个颇具争议的话题。
枪支自由英文作文
枪支自由英文作文英文：Gun control has been a hotly debated issue in many countries, and the topic of gun freedom is often brought up in such discussions. Some people argue that gun ownershipis a fundamental right and that individuals should be allowed to own and carry firearms for self-defense and recreational purposes. Others argue that gun control is necessary to prevent gun violence and protect public safety.As for me, I believe that gun ownership should be regulated to some extent. While I understand the argumentfor self-defense, I also recognize that guns can be dangerous in the wrong hands. There have been countless cases of accidental shootings, suicides, and mass shootings that could have been prevented if stricter gun laws were in place.Furthermore, the idea of gun freedom is not absolute.We already have laws in place that prohibit certain individuals from owning guns, such as convicted felons and those with mental illnesses. It is important to continue to assess and update these laws to ensure that they are effective in keeping guns out of the hands of those who should not have them.In conclusion, while I understand the argument for gun freedom, I believe that it is important to regulate gun ownership to prevent gun violence and protect public safety.中文：枪支管制一直是许多国家热议的话题，而枪支自由的议题也常常在这些讨论中被提出。
关于枪支的英语作文
关于枪支的英语作文Guns: A Complex and Divisive IssueThe topic of guns is one that has been at the forefrontof many debates, particularly in countries like the United States, where the right to bear arms is constitutionally protected. The discourse surrounding firearms is multifaceted, involving issues of public safety, personal freedom, and the interpretation of historical documents.On one hand, proponents of gun rights argue that the Second Amendment guarantees the individual's right to own firearms for self-defense and as a deterrent against tyranny. They believe that responsible gun ownership is a fundamental freedom and that attempts to restrict gun access infringeupon this right. Additionally, they often point to the fact that guns can be used for sport, hunting, and otherlegitimate purposes.On the other hand, those advocating for stricter gun control measures emphasize the need to reduce gun-related violence and accidents. They argue that the prevalence ofguns contributes to a higher rate of homicides and suicides, and that certain types of firearms, such as assault rifles, have no place in civilian hands. The call for background checks, waiting periods, and restrictions on magazine capacities is often cited as common-sense measures that could help prevent tragedies without violating the Second Amendment.The debate is further complicated by the fact that the effects of gun control laws can be difficult to predict and measure. While some studies suggest that stricter regulations can lead to a reduction in gun violence, others argue that criminals will always find ways to obtain firearms illegally. Moreover, the cultural significance of guns in some societies makes the issue deeply personal and emotionally charged.In conclusion, the issue of guns is a complex one that requires a nuanced approach. It involves balancing the rights of individuals with the need to protect public safety. As societies evolve and new challenges emerge, the conversation around guns must continue to adapt, taking into account both the historical context and the current realities of gun violence and its impact on communities.。
托福高分作文：警察平时是否应该佩带枪
托福高分作文：警察平时是否应该佩带枪［题目］Unlike other countries, police in UK do not carry guns. Some think it leaves citizen unprotected, others think it reduce the overall violence in the society. Please discuss.［范文］At the mention of a policeman, most people will have in their mind the image of a strong man or woman with a gun on his belt. But it is not the case in UK: police there do not carry guns. People’s opinions towards this vary.Some people think this contributes to the decrease of violence in society. For one thing, when a robber sees a policeman pointing a gun at him, he may get exasperated and desperate and, out of despair, he may hurt people around him. If the policeman does not carry a gun, nothing of the kind will happen. For another, to err is human andno one can guarantee that a policeman does not mis-shoot the pedestrians when he is hurriedly chasing a criminal. Lastly, some policemen have committed 123ious crimes with the guns they had.However, other people hold different views: police without guns leave citizens unprotected. To begin with, at critical moments, guns in policemen’s hands can be essential in fighting against the criminals. Imagine a bank robber pointing a gun at the head of a hostage. A policeman can hardly do anything about it if he does not carry a gun. However, the situation can be totally reversed otherwise. Moreover, policemen are well-trained and thus rarely hurt innocent people with their guns.As far as I am concerned, the latter is more favorable. To my mind, policemen are the very few people on earth who should carry guns, with which they can effectively protect the citizens. (283 words)。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
英语作文携带枪支篇一：雅思写作8分范文：警察配枪智课网IELTS备考资料雅思写作8分范文：警察配枪摘要：下面就是小马过河在线雅思频道为大家收集整理的雅思写作8分范文：警察配枪，供大家参考，希望大家能够对所学的知识进行融会贯通，在备考雅思考试的时候，针对自己的特点进行适当的参考和借鉴，才有利于提高自己的成绩。
题目：Unlike other countries, police in UK does not carry guns. Some think it leaves citizen unprotected. Others think it reduces the overall violence in UK society. Discuss.8分范文：This should be a familiar scene in a Hollywood detective movie: an American police officer, armed with a pistol in case of a sudden strke from a misty corner, patrols a dark alley in search of the criminal element.In the meantime, his UK counterparts has to do the same job with merely a short baton in ha12 He is like a fearless knight fighting for honour against enemies armed with guns with only his lance. Naturally, the ending will always be unfavourable to him. Or the ending will always not be to the delight of the spectators.Police, as protectors of hispeople , should do what they can, and use whatever means they can, to keep people out of harm's way. But in the UK, police are on duty without carying a gun, which is a very bad idea. They are handicapping themselves.Generally speaking, gun is recognized as a emblem of power and justice of police. It is clear that a police with gun on is able to prevent those potential criminal activities. For instance, a pistol on the belt works effectively to stop crimes range from those robbery, theft, and rape and it can also force the criminals to be arrested. Furthermore, gun serves for a reliable friend while the police crashs into a emergent situation like gun fighting or commotion. Guns are not expected to be employed to finish off the chaos but to help the police survive before the reinforcement comes. Meanwhile, the violence rate is rising in UK due to the global terrorism. Unlike the ordinary gangster and robbers who is armed daggers and knives, a large number of international terrorists are equipped with semi-auto rifles and massive destruction weapons. Proper measures must be taken to limit the uneven contrast of power and the great efforts should be made to protect civilian from the harm of terrorist attack. However, there is an old saying “combat poison with poison”, say, an overall upgrading of UK police equipments couldn’t be better to meet the needs. It is allnecessary that every police carries a pistol while they are on duty, that would be the practicable way to ensure the public security in Briton.As a consequence, having carry guns by police will evidently benefit people in UK, and of which will lead to a more steady and harmonic society. If there must be a controversy, it would go to whether the government should place a curb upon the possible abuse of gun.以上就是雅思写作8分范文：警察配枪的相关信息，非常详细，对于大家经常会在考试中出现的迷惑都做了详细的解答。
大家可以在备考自己的雅思阅读考试的过程中对此加以适当的练习和借鉴。
编辑推荐：实用雅思口语的方法介绍雅思写作评分标准备考了解怎样掌握背诵雅思词汇技巧相关字搜索：雅思写作范文篇二：雅思大作文范文：警察携枪Police in Britain do not carry guns. Some people believe that unarmed police are unable to protect citizens, but some suggest that arming the police will lead to a surge in violence in society. Discuss those two views.Whether to arm the police is a contentious subject. While some people maintain that unarmed police are unable to protect law-abiding citizens,it leads to a drop in violence in society. There are several factors that account for the stark/sharp contrast between the two thoughts.The primary concern on armed police is that it would increase the potential for miscarriage of justice and mistaken shootings of innocent civilians. The legislation in many countries is supportive of this concern. Laws protect citizens from torture or cruel treatment and also their rights on arrest or detainment. If armed, the police will be less likely to think twice before pulling the trigger. They can easily get away with private execution by inventing a legitimate excuse, such as self-defense. The chance of a shoot-out would naturally rise, causing many preventable injuries or losses of life. Arming the police might also add fuel to the gun culture. Nowadays, perhaps nothing is worse than the continued rise in the gun ownership rate. Arming the police can never redress the imbalance but worse, give criminals a motivator to carry guns even for minor crimes. On the other hand, in those communities that are otherwise peaceful, armed police are intimidating and the fear of crime will spread wildly. It would lead to further demand on private gun ownership, and expose members of the public to higher risk.Arming police is therefore not advisable in most cases but only allowed in exceptional circumstances. For example, in those areas where armed crimes are rampant, armed police protect not only the public but also themselves from the potential attack. It gives the police the leverage in their combat against criminals, especially those hardened criminals. Firearms also serve as a deterrent to would-be offenders. If street patrols in some neighbours are routinely armed, it helps cut the rates of crime.The access to weapons should therefore be limited, for the simple reason that carrying guns leads to higher likelihood of mistaken shootings and to higher levels of violence. Carrying guns is only accepted when the police are in conflict situations and confrontations with criminals.篇三：初中英语作文10篇学习的啊学习的武器学习的武器学英语简单吗？肯定会有许多学生说：“难死了”。