三种内固定物治疗股骨远端骨折的稳定性比较

三种内固定物治疗股骨远端骨折的稳定性比较
杨康华;杨晶;杨广忠
【期刊名称】《中国组织工程研究》
【年(卷),期】2014(000)004
【摘要】背景：目前，内固定植入物治疗股骨远端骨折的方式有多种，较多使用
的方法为锁定加压钢板、顺行髓内钉和逆行髓内钉，临床对这3种固定方法的疗
效持不同观点。

<br> 目的：通过对股骨远端骨折锁定加压钢板、顺行髓内钉
和逆行髓内钉治疗方法的比较，选择合适的内固定方法。

<br> 方法：回顾性
分析118例股骨远端骨折行内固定治疗患者临床资料，分别采用锁定加压钢板38例，顺行髓内钉21例，逆行髓内钉59例，比较3组内固定植入过程中失血量、
手术时间、骨折愈合时间、以及膝关节术后恢复的优良率。

<br> 结果与结论：118例患者均获随访，时间为14-26个月，平均为20个月。

所有患者未发生感染，1例患者因骨病例骨折导致骨缺失愈合延迟，采用骨填充后在第19周基本完全愈合，其余均在4.5个月内愈合。

在骨折愈合时间上3者比较，差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。

术中失血量及手术时间方面，顺行髓内钉组和逆行髓内钉组均优于锁
定加压钢板组，顺行髓内钉组要优于逆行髓内钉组，差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。

锁定加压钢板组、顺行髓内钉组及逆行髓内钉组3者膝关节Kolment的评分优良率分别为76.3%，52.4%，86.4%。

说明逆行髓内钉内固定牢固，稳定可靠，出血量少，创伤小、骨折易复位等优点，特别在膝关节功能恢复方面表现效果更好，与锁定加压钢板及顺行髓内钉组比较，逆行髓内钉治疗股骨远端骨折更有优
势。

%BACKGROUND:There are various internal fixators in treatment of distal femoral fracture. The commonly used fixators are locking
compression plate, anterograde intramedul ary nails and retrograde intramedul ary nails. However, the efficacy of three common fixation is controversial. <br> OBJECTIVE:To compare the effect of locking compression plate, anterograde intramedul ary nails and retrograde intramedul ary nails for treatment of distal femoral fracture, and to select the appropriate internal fixation method. <br> METHODS:From May 2007 to November 2007, 118 patients with distal femoral fractures were treated with internal fixation in the hospital and their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 38 cases received locking compression plate, 21 cases received anterograde intramedul ary nails, and 59 cases received retrograde intramedul ary nails. The intraoperative blood loss, operative time, fracture healing time and rate of good postoperative recovery of knee joint in three groups were compared. <br> RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Al the involved 118 patients were fol owed up for 14-26 months, average 20 months. No patients developed infection. Except one case delayed bone defect healing due to the fractures and was completely healed after bone fil ing at 19 weeks, the other cases healed within 4.5 months. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time among three groups (P>0.05). Intraoperative blood loss and&nbsp;operation time in anterograde intramedul ary nail group and retrograde intramedul ary nail group were superior to locking compression plate group. In addition, anterograde intramedul ary nail group was superior to retrograde intramedul ary nail group, with significant difference (P<0.05). Kolment grading fine rate in locking compression plate, anterograde intramedul ary
nail and retrograde intramedul ary nail groups was 76.3%, 52.4%and 76.3%respectively. Retrograde intramedul ary nail fixation is firm, stable and reliable, with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, smal trauma, and easy fracture reset, especial y in the recovery of knee joint function. Compared with locking compression plate and anterograde intramedul ary nail, retrograde intramedul ary nailing treatment of distal femoral fractures has more advantages.
【总页数】6页(P565-570)
【作者】杨康华;杨晶;杨广忠
【作者单位】新疆医科大学第一附属医院骨科中心显微修复外科，新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 830054;新疆医科大学第一附属医院急诊外科，新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 830054;新疆医科大学第一附属医院骨科中心显微修复外科，新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 830054
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】R318
【相关文献】
1.股骨远端粉碎性骨折三种内固定的疗效比较 [J], 林瑞忠;蔡延禄;陈华伟
2.三种内固定物治疗股骨远端骨折的稳定性比较 [J], 杨康华;杨晶;杨广忠;
3.三种内固定处理股骨远端骨折的临床疗效比较 [J], 杨田
4.两种内固定方法治疗股骨远端骨折的效果比较 [J], 王彦波
5.股骨远端骨折三种内固定方法生物力学比较研究与临床应用 [J], 李强一;张秋琴;韩擎天;王以进
因版权原因，仅展示原文概要，查看原文内容请购买。