美国FDA分析方法验证指南中英文对照

美国FDA生产过程(工艺)验证总则指南中英文版

GUIDELINEON GENERAL PRINCIPLES OFPROCESS VALIDATIONMay, 1987Prepared by: Center for Drugs and Biologics andCenter for Devices and Radiological HealthFood and Drug AdministrationMaintained by: Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality (HFN-320)Office of ComplianceCenter for Drugs and BiologicsFood and Drug Administration5600 Fishers LaneRockville, Maryland 20857General Principles of Process Validation May 1987GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF PROCESS VALIDATIONI. PURPOSEThis guideline outlines general principles that FDA considers to beacceptable elements of process validation for the preparation ofhuman and animal drug products and medical devices.II. SCOPEThis guideline is issued under Section 10.90 (21 CFR 10.90) and isapplicable to the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and medicaldevices. It states principles and practices of generalapplicability that are not legal requirements but are acceptable tothe FDA. A person may rely upon this guideline with the assurance of its acceptability to FDA, or may follow different procedures.When different procedures are used, a person may, but is notrequired to, discuss the matter in advance with FDA to prevent theexpenditure of money and effort on activities that may later bedetermined to be unacceptable. In short, this guideline listsprinciples and practices which are acceptable to the FDA for theprocess validation of drug products and medical devices; it doesnot list the principles and practices that must, in all instances,be used to comply with law.-1-This guideline may be amended from time to time. Interestedpersons are invited to submit comments on this document and anysubsequent revisions. Written comments should be submitted to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,Room 4-62, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Receivedcomments may be seen in that office between 9\a.m. and 4\p.m.,Monday through Friday.III. INTRODUCTIONProcess validation is a requirement of the Current GoodManufacturing Practices Regulations for Finished Pharmaceuticals,21 CFR Parts 210 and 211, and of the Good Manufacturing PracticeRegulations for Medical Devices, 21 CFR Part 820, and therefore, isapplicable to the manufacture of pharamaceuticals and medicaldevices.Several firms have asked FDA for specific guidance on what FDAexpects firms to do to assure compliance with the requirements forprocess validation. This guideline discusses process validationelements and concepts that are considered by FDA as acceptableparts of a validation program. The constituents of validationpresented in this document are not intended to be all-inclusive.FDA recognizes that, because of the great variety of medicalproducts (drug products and medical devices), processes and-2-manufacturing facilities, it is not possible to state in onedocument all of the specific validation elements that areapplicable. Several broad concepts, however, have generalapplicability which manufacturers can use successfully as a guidein validating a manufacturing process. Although the particular requirements of process validation will vary according to such factors as the nature of the medical product (e.g., sterile vsnon-sterile) and the complexity of the process, the broad concepts stated in this document have general applicability and provide an acceptable framework for building a comprehensive approach to process validation.DefinitionsInstallation qualification - Establishing confidence that process equipment and ancillary systems are capable of consistently operating within established limits and tolerances.Process performance qualification - Establishing confidence thatthe process is effective and reproducible.Product performance qualification - Establishing confidence through appropriate testing that the finished product produced by aspecified process meets all release requirements for functionalityand safety.-3-Prospective validation - Validation conducted prior to thedistribution of either a new product, or product made under arevised manufacturing process, where the revisions may affect the product's characteristics.Retrospective validation - Validation of a process for a product already in distribution based upon accumulated production, testing and control data.Validation - Establishing documented evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that a specific process will consistentlyproduce a product meeting its pre-determined specifications and quality attributes.Validation protocol - A written plan stating how validation will be conducted, including test parameters, product characteristics, production equipment, and decision points on what constitutes acceptable test results.Worst case - A set of conditions encompassing upper and lowerprocessing limits and circumstances, including those withinstandard operating procedures, which pose the greatest chance ofprocess or product failure when compared to ideal conditions. Such conditions do not necessarily induce product or process failure.-4-IV. GENERAL CONCEPTSAssurance of product quality is derived from careful attention to anumber of factors including selection of quality parts andmaterials, adequate product and process design, control of theprocess, and in-process and end-product testing. Due to thecomplexity of today's medical products, routine end-product testingalone often is not sufficient to assure product quality for severalreasons. Some end-product tests have limited sensitivity.1 Insome cases, destructive testing would be required to show that themanufacturing process was adequate, and in other situationsend-product testing does not reveal all variations that may occurin the product that may impact on safety and effectiveness.2The basic principles of quality assurance have as their goal theproduction of articles that are fit for their intended use. These1 For example, USP XXI states: "No sampling plan for applyingsterility tests to a specified proportion of discrete unitsselected from a sterilization load is capable of demonstrating withcomplete assurance that all of the untested units are in factsterile."2 As an example, in one instance a visual inspection failed to detecta defective structural weld which resulted in the failure of aninfant warmer. The defect could only have been detected by usingdestructive testing or expensive test equipment.-5-principles may be stated as follows: (1) quality, safety, and effectiveness must be designed and built into the product; (2) quality cannot be inspected or tested into the finished product;and (3) each step of the manufacturing process must be controlled to maximize the probability that the finished product meets all quality and design specifications. Process validation is a key element in assuring that these quality assurance goals are met.It is through careful design and validation of both the process and process controls that a manufacturer can establish a high degree of confidence that all manufactured units from successive lots will be acceptable. Successfully validating a process may reduce the dependence upon intensive in-process and finished product testing. It should be noted that in most all cases, end-product testingplays a major role in assuring that quality assurance goals are met; i.e., validation and end-product testing are not mutually exclusive.The FDA defines process validation as follows:Process validation is establishing documented evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that a specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its pre-determinedspecifications and quality characteristics.-6-It is important that the manufacturer prepare a written validation protocol which specifies the procedures (and tests) to be conducted and the data to be collected. The purpose for which data are collected must be clear, the data must reflect facts and becollected carefully and accurately. The protocol should specify a sufficient number of replicate process runs to demonstrate reproducibility and provide an accurate measure of variability among successive runs. The test conditions for these runs should encompass upper and lower processing limits and circumstances, including those within standard operating procedures, which pose the greatest chance of process or product failure compared to ideal conditions; such conditions have become widely known as "worst case" conditions. (They are sometimes called "most appropriate challenge" conditions.) Validation documentation should include evidence of the suitability of materials and the performance and reliability of equipment and systems.Key process variables should be monitored and documented. Analysisof the data collected from monitoring will establish thevariability of process parameters for individual runs and willestablish whether or not the equipment and process controls areadequate to assure that product specifications are met.-7-Finished product and in-process test data can be of value inprocess validation, particularly in those situations where qualityattributes and variabilities can be readily measured. Wherefinished (or in-process) testing cannot adequately measure certainattributes, process validation should be derived primarily fromqualification of each system used in production and fromconsideration of the interaction of the various systems.V. CGMP REGULATIONS FOR FINISHED PHARMACEUTICALS Process validation is required, in both general and specific terms,by the Current Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations for FinishedPharmaceuticals, 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211. Examples of suchrequirements are listed below for informational purposes, and arenot all-inclusive.A requirement for process validation is set forth in general termsin section\211.100 -- Written procedures; deviations -- whichstates, in part:"There shall be written procedures for production and processcontrol designed to assure that the drug products have theidentity, strength, quality, and purity they purport or arerepresented to possess."-8-Several sections of the CGMP regulations state validationrequirements in more specific terms. Excerpts from some ofthese sections are:Section 211.110, Sampling and testing of in-processmaterials and drug products.(a) "....control procedures shall be established to monitor theoutput and VALIDATE the performance of those manufacturingprocesses that may be responsible for causing variability in thecharacteristics of in-process material and the drug product."(emphasis added)Section 211.113, Control of Microbiological Contamination.(b) "Appropriate written procedures, designed to preventmicrobiological contamination of drug products purporting to besterile, shall be established and followed. Such proceduresshall include VALIDATION of any sterilization process."(emphasis added)VI. GMP REGULATION FOR MEDICAL DEVICESProcess validation is required by the medical device GMPRegulations, 21 CFR Part\820. Section 820.5 requires everyfinished device manufacturer to:"...prepare and implement a quality assurance program that isappropriate to the specific device manufactured..."-9-Section 820.3(n) defines quality assurance as:"...all activities necessary to verify confidence in the qualityof the process used to manufacture a finished device."When applicable to a specific process, process validation is anessential element in establishing confidence that a process willconsistently produce a product meeting the designed qualitycharacteristics.A generally stated requirement for process validation is containedin section\820.100:"Written manufacturing specifications and processing proceduresshall be established, implemented, and controlled to assure thatthe device conforms to its original design or any approvedchanges in that design."Validation is an essential element in the establishment andimplementation of a process procedure, as well as in determiningwhat process controls are required in order to assure conformanceto specifications.Section 820.100(a)(1) states:"...control measures shall be established to assure that thedesign basis for the device, components and packaging iscorrectly translated into approved specifications."-10-Validation is an essential control for assuring that thespecifications for the device and manufacturing process areadequate to produce a device that will conform to the approveddesign characteristics.VII. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONSA manufacturer should evaluate all factors that affect productquality when designing and undertaking a process validation study.These factors may vary considerably among different products andmanufacturing technologies and could include, for example,component specifications, air and water handling systems,environmental controls, equipment functions, and process controloperations. No single approach to process validation will beappropriate and complete in all cases; however, the followingquality activities should be undertaken in most situations.During the research and development (R&D) phase, the desiredproduct should be carefully defined in terms of itscharacteristics, such as physical, chemical, electrical and-11-performance characteristics.3 It is important to translate theproduct characteristics into specifications as a basis fordescription and control of the product.Documentation of changes made during development providetraceability which can later be used to pinpoint solutions tofuture problems.The product's end use should be a determining factor in thedevelopment of product (and component) characteristics andspecifications. All pertinent aspects of the product which impacton safety and effectiveness should be considered. These aspects3 For example, in the case of a compressed tablet, physicalcharacteristics would include size, weight, hardness, and freedomfrom defects, such as capping and splitting. Chemicalcharacteristics would include quantitative formulation/potency;performance characteristics may include bioavailability (reflectedby disintegration and dissolution). In the case of blood tubing,physical attributes would include internal and external diameters,length and color. Chemical characteristics would include rawmaterial formulation. Mechanical properties would include hardness and tensile strength; performance characteristics would includebiocompatibility and durability.-12-include performance, reliability and stability. Acceptable rangesor limits should be established for each characteristic to set upallowable variations.4 These ranges should be expressed inreadily measurable terms.The validity of acceptance specifications should be verifiedthrough testing and challenge of the product on a sound scientificbasis during the initial development and production phase.Once a specification is demonstrated as acceptable it is importantthat any changes to the specification be made in accordance withdocumented change control procedures.VIII. ELEMENTS OF PROCESS VALIDATIONA. Prospective ValidationProspective validation includes those considerations that should bemade before an entirely new product is introduced by a firm or whenthere is a change in the manufacturing process which may affect theproduct's characteristics, such as uniformity and identity. Thefollowing are considered as key elements of prospective validation.4 For example, in order to assure that an oral, ophthalmic, orparenteral solution has an acceptable pH, a specification may beestablished by which a lot is released only if it has been shown tohave a pH within a narrow established range. For a device, aspecification for the electrical resistance of a pacemaker leadwould be established so that the lead would be acceptable only ifthe resistance was within a specified range.-13-1. Equipment and ProcessThe equipment and process(es) should be designed and/or selectedso that product specifications are consistently achieved. Thisshould be done with the participation of all appropriate groupsthat are concerned with assuring a quality product, e.g.,engineering design, production operations, and quality assurancepersonnel.a. Equipment: Installation QualificationInstallation qualification studies establish confidence thatthe process equipment and ancillary systems are capable ofconsistently operating within established limits andtolerances. After process equipment is designed orselected, it should be evaluated and tested to verify thatit is capable of operating satisfactorily within theoperating limits required by the process.5 This phase ofvalidation includes examination of equipment design;determination of calibration, maintenance, and adjustmentrequirements; and identifying critical equipment featuresthat could affect the process and product. Informationobtained from these studies should be used to establishwritten procedures covering equipment calibration,maintenance, monitoring, and control.5 Examples of equipment performance characteristics which maybe measured include temperature and pressure of injectionmolding machines, uniformity of speed for mixers,temperature, speed and pressure for packaging machines, andtemperature and pressure of sterilization chambers.-14-In assessing the suitability of a given piece of equipment,it is usually insufficient to rely solely upon therepresentations of the equipment supplier, or uponexperience in producing some other product.6 Soundtheoretical and practical engineering principles andconsiderations are a first step in the assessment.It is important that equipment qualification simulate actualproduction conditions, including those which are "worstcase" situations.6 The importance of assessing equipment suitability based uponhow it will be used to attain desired product attributes isillustrated in the case of deionizers used to producePurified Water, USP. In one case, a firm used such water tomake a topical drug product solution which, in view of itsintended use, should have been free from objectionablemicroorganisms. However, the product was found to becontaminated with a pathogenic microorganism. The apparentcause of the problem was failure to assess the performanceof the deionizer from a microbiological standpoint. It isfairly well recognized that the deionizers are prone tobuild-up of microorganisms--especially if the flow rates arelow and the deionizers are not recharged and sanitized atsuitable intervals. Therefore, these factors should havebeen considered. In this case, however, the firm reliedupon the representations of the equipment itself, namely the"recharge" (i.e., conductivity) indicator, to signal thetime for regeneration and cleaning. Considering the desiredproduct characteristics, the firm should have determined theneed for such procedures based upon pre-use testing, takinginto account such factors as the length of time theequipment could produce deionized water of acceptablequality, flow rate, temperature, raw water quality,frequency of use, and surface area of deionizing resins.-15-Tests and challenges should be repeated a sufficient numberof times to assure reliable and meaningful results. Allacceptance criteria must be met during the test orchallenge. If any test or challenge shows that theequipment does not perform within its specifications, anevaluation should be performed to identify the cause of thefailure. Corrections should be made and additional testruns performed, as needed, to verify that the equipmentperforms within specifications. The observed variability ofthe equipment between and within runs can be used as a basisfor determining the total number of trials selected for thesubsequent performance qualification studies of theprocess.7Once the equipment configuration and performancecharacteristics are established and qualified, they shouldbe documented. The installation qualification shouldinclude a review of pertinent maintenance procedures, repairparts lists, and calibration methods for each piece ofequipment. The objective is to assure that all repairs canbe performed in such a way that will not affect the7 For example, the AAMI Guideline for Industrial EthyleneOxide Sterilization of Medical Devices approved 2 December 1981, states: "The performance qualification should includea minimum of 3 successful, planned qualification runs, inwhich all of the acceptance criteria are met.....(5.3.1.2.).-16-characteristics of material processed after the repair. Inaddition, special post-repair cleaning and calibrationrequirements should be developed to prevent inadvertentmanufacture a of non-conforming product. Planning during the qualification phase can prevent confusion duringemergency repairs which could lead to use of the wrongreplacement part.b. Process: Performance QualificationThe purpose of performance qualification is to providerigorous testing to demonstrate the effectiveness andreproducibility of the process. In entering the performance qualification phase of validation, it is understood that theprocess specifications have been established and essentially proven acceptable through laboratory or other trial methods and that the equipment has been judged acceptable on thebasis of suitable installation studies.Each process should be defined and described with sufficient specificity so that employees understand what is required.-17-Parts of the process which may vary so as to affectimportant product quality should be challenged.8In challenging a process to assess its adequacy, it isimportant that challenge conditions simulate those that willbe encountered during actual production, including "worstcase" conditions. The challenges should be repeated enoughtimes to assure that the results are meaningful andconsistent.8 For example, in electroplating the metal case of animplantable pacemaker, the significant process steps todefine, describe, and challenge include establishment andcontrol of current density and temperature values forassuring adequate composition of electrolyte and forassuring cleanliness of the metal to be plated. In theproduction of parenteral solutions by aseptic filling, thesignificant aseptic filling process steps to define andchallenge should include the sterilization anddepyrogenation of containers/closures, sterilization ofsolutions, filling equipment and product contact surfaces,and the filling and closing of containers.-18-Each specific manufacturing process should be appropriatelyqualified and validated. There is an inherent danger inrelying on what are perceived to be similarities betweenproducts, processes, and equipment without appropriatechallenge.9c. Product: Performance QualificationFor purposes of this guideline, product performancequalification activities apply only to medical devices.These steps should be viewed as pre-production qualityassurance activities.9 For example, in the production of a compressed tablet, afirm may switch from one type of granulation blender toanother with the erroneous assumption that both types have similar performance characteristics, and, therefore,granulation mixing times and procedures need not bealtered. However, if the blenders are substantiallydifferent, use of the new blender with procedures used forthe previous blender may result in a granulation with poorcontent uniformity. This, in turn, may lead to tabletshaving significantly differing potencies. This situationmay be averted if the quality assurance system detects theequipment change in the first place, challenges the blender performance, precipitates a revalidation of the process, and initiates appropriate changes. In this example,revalidation comprises installation qualification of the newequipment and performance qualification of the processintended for use in the new blender.-19-Before reaching the conclusion that a process has beensuccessfully validated, it is necessary to demonstrate thatthe specified process has not adversely affected thefinished product. Where possible, product performancequalification testing should include performance testingunder conditions that simulate actual use. Productperformance qualification testing should be conducted usingproduct manufactured from the same type of productionequipment, methods and procedures that will be used forroutine production. Otherwise, the qualified product maynot be representative of production units and cannot be usedas evidence that the manufacturing process will produce aproduct that meets the pre-determined specifications andquality attributes.1010 For example, a manufacturer of heart valves receivedcomplaints that the valve-support structure was fracturingunder use. Investigation by the manufacturer revealed thatall material and dimensional specifications had been met butthe production machining process created microscopicscratches on the valve supporting wireform. These scratchescaused metal fatigue and subsequent fracture. Comprehensivefatigue testing of production units under simulated useconditions could have detected the process deficiency.In another example, a manufacturer recalled insulin syringesbecause of complaints that the needles were clogged.Investigation revealed that the needles were clogged bysilicone oil which was employed as a lubricant duringmanufacturing. Investigation further revealed that themethod used to extract the silicone oil was only partiallyeffective. Although visual inspection of the syringesseemed to support that the cleaning method was effective,actual use proved otherwise.-20-After actual production units have sucessfully passed product performance qualification, a formal technical review should be conducted and should include:o Comparison of the approved product specifications and the actual qualified product.o Determination of the validity of test methods used to determine compliance with the approved specifications.o Determination of the adequacy of the specification change control program.2. System to Assure Timely RevalidationThere should be a quality assurance system in place which requires revalidation whenever there are changes in packaging, formulation, equipment, or processes which could impact on product effectiveness or product characteristics, and whenever there are changes in product characteristics. Furthermore, when a change is made in raw material supplier, the manufacturer should consider subtle, potentially adverse differences in theraw material characteristics. A determination of adverse differences in raw material indicates a need to revalidate the process.-21-One way of detecting the kind of changes that should initiate revalidation is the use of tests and methods of analysis whichare capable of measuring characteristics which may vary. Such tests and methods usually yield specific results which go beyond the mere pass/fail basis, thereby detecting variations within product and process specifications and allowing determination of whether a process is slipping out of control.The quality assurance procedures should establish the circumstances under which revalidation is required. These may be based upon equipment, process, and product performance observed during the initial validation challenge studies. It is desirable to designate individuals who have the responsibilityto review product, process, equipment and personnel changes to determine if and when revalidation is warranted.。

201507FDA行业指南：分析方法验证（中英文）（下）

201507FDA行业指南：分析方法验证（中英文）（下）VII. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND MODELS 统计学分析和模型A. Statistics 统计学Statistical analysis of validation data can be used to evaluate validation characteristics against predetermined acceptance criteria. All statistical procedures and parameters used in the analysis of the data should be based on sound principles and appropriate for the intended evaluation. Several statistical methods are useful for assessing validation characteristics, for example, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess regression analysis R (correlation coefficient) and R squared (coefficient of determination) or linear regression to measure linearity. Many statistical methods used for assessing validation characteristics rely on population normality, and it is important to determine whether or not to reject this assumption. There are many techniques, such as histograms, normality tests, and probability plots that can be used to evaluate the observed distribution. It may be appropriate to transform the data to better fit the normal distribution or apply distribution-free (nonparametric) approaches when the observed data are not normally distributed. Appropriate literature or text should be consulted for information on statistical procedures to use when developing new test methods, evaluating existing test methods or evaluating measurement system performance, as well as other general information on the interpretation and treatment of analytical data[18].The data analysis should be assured either by using appropriately validated software or independent verification for correctness.验证数据的统计学分析可以用于评估验证的属性是否符合预定的可接受标准。

美国FDA 分析方法验证指南

美国FDA 分析方法验证指南（中文）U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesFood and Drug AdministrationCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)August 2000目录一、结论………………………………………………………..…………………二、背景……………………………………………………………..……….…..三、分析方法的类型…………………………………………………………….A. 法定分析方法……………………………………………………………B. 替代分析方法……………………………………………………………C. 稳定性指示分析…………………………………………………………四、标准品……………………………………………………………………….. A．标准品的类型……………………………………………………………B．分析报告单………………………………………………………………C．标准品的界定……………………………………………………………五、IND 中的分析方法验证……………………………………………………..六、NDA、ANDA、BLA 和PLA 中分析方法的内容和格式…………………A．基本方法…………………………………………………………………B．取样………………………………………………………………………C．仪器和仪器参数…………………………………………………………. D．试剂………………………………………………………………………E．系统适应性实验…………………………………………………………. F．标准品的制备……………………………………………………………..G.操作过程…………………………………………………………………….H.操作程序……………………………………………………………………I．计算…………………………………………………………………………J.结果报告……………………………………………………………………. 1．通则……………………………………………………………………2．杂质分析规程…………………………………………………………七、NDA，ANDA，BLA 和PLA 中的分析方法验证………………………….. A．非药典分析方法…………………………………………………………1. 验证项目……………………………………………………………2. 其它验证资料……………………………………………………….(1) 讨论可能会形成的异构体并讨论异构体的控制…………………..a. 耐用性…………………………………………………….b. 强降解实验………………………………………………c.仪器输出/原始资料………………………………………i. 有机杂质……………………………………………ii. 原料药……………………………………………….iii. 制剂………………………………………………….(2) 各类检测的推荐验证项目…………………………………………..a. 鉴别………………………………………………………....b. 杂质………………………………………………………..c. 含量………………………………………………………..d. 特定实验…………………………………………………….B．药典分析方法(21CFR 211.194(a)(2))…………………………………..八. 统计分析…………………………………………………………………….A．基本原则………………………………………………………………B:对比研究…………………………………………………………………C:统计………………………………………………………………………九、再验证………………………………………………………………………十、分析方法验证资料：内容和数据处理…………………………………….A．分析方法验证资料…………………………………………………….B：样品的选择和运输…………………………………………………….C：各方职责……………………………………………………………….1.申请人……………………………………………………………….2.化学评审官………………………………………………………….3.FDA 实验室………………………………………………………….4.检查官……………………………………………………………….十一、方法学……………………………………………………………………A．高效液相色谱(HPLC)………………………………………………….1.色谱柱……………………………………………………………….2.系统适应性研究…………………………………………………….3.操作参数…………………………………………………………….B．气相色谱(GC)………………………………………………………….1.色谱柱……………………………………………………………….2.操作参数……………………………………………………………..3.系统适应性实验……………………………………………………..C：分光光度法，光谱法和相关的物理方法………………………………D：毛细管电泳(CE)…………………………………………………………E：旋光度……………………………………………………………………F：和粒径分析相关的分析方法……………………………………………G：溶出度…………………………………………………………………..H：其它仪器分析方法………………………………………………………附录A……………………………………………………………………………….. 附录B……………………………………………………………………………….. 术语表……………………………………………………………………………….一、绪论本指南旨在为申请者提供建议，以帮助其提交分析方法，方法验证资料和样品用于支持原料药和制剂的认定，剂量，质量，纯度和效力方面的文件。

美国FDA分析方法验证指南中文译稿[1]

1II. 背景 (2)III. 分析方法的类型 (3)A. 法定分析方法 (3)B. 可选择分析方法 (3)3 C. 稳定性指示分析 (3)IV. 对照品……………………………………………………………………………4A. 对照品的类型 (4)B. 分析报告单 (4)C. 对照品的界定 (4)V. IND 中的分析方法验证 (6)VI. NDA, ANDA, BLA 和PLA 中分析方法验证的内容和格式 (6)A. 原则 (6)B. 取样 (7)C. 仪器和仪器参数 (7)D. 试剂 (7)E. 系统适应性实验 (7)F. 对照品的制备 (7)G. 样品的制备 (8)H. 分析方法 (8)L. 计算 (8)J. 结果报告 (8)VII. NDA，ANDA,BLA 和PLA 中的分析方法验证 (9)A．非法定分析方法 (9)1．验证项目 (9)2. 其它分析方法验证信息 (10)a. 耐用性 (11)b. 强降解实验 (11)c. 仪器输出/原始资料 (11)3．各类检测的建议验证项目 (13)B．法定分析方法 (15)VIII. 统计分析…………………………………………………………………………15A. 总则 (15)C. 统计 (16)IX. 再验证 (16)X. 分析方法验证技术包：内容和过程……………………………………………17A. 分析方法验证技术包 (17)B. 样品的选择和运输 (18)C. 各方责任 (19)XI. 方法………………………………………………………………………………20A. 高效液相色谱(HPLC) (20)B. 气相色谱(GC) (22)C. 分光光度法，光谱学，光谱法和相关的物理方法 (23)D. 毛细管电泳 (23)E. 旋光度 (24)F. 粒径相关的分析方法 (25)G. 溶出度 (26)H. 其它仪器分析方法 (27)附件A：NDA，ANDA，BLA 和PLA 申请的内容 (28)附件B：分析方法验证的问题和延误 (29)参考文献……………………………………………………………………………………30术语表………………………………………………………………………………………32This guidance provides recommendations to applicants on submitting analytical procedures, validation data, and samples to support the documentation of the identity, strength, quality, purity, and potency of drug substances and drug products.1. 绪论本指南旨在为申请者提供建议，以帮助其提交分析方法，方法验证资料和样品用于支持原料药和制剂的认定，剂量，质量，纯度和效力方面的文件。

FDA最新版-药物分析程序及方法验证指导原则-中文翻译版

药品及生物制品的分析方法和方法验证指导原则目录1.介绍 (1)2.背景 (2)3.分析方法开发 (3)4.分析程序内容 (3)A.原则/范围 (4)B.仪器/设备 (4)C.操作参数 (4)D.试剂/标准 (4)E.样品制备 (4)F. .................................................................................................................... 标准对照品溶液的制备 (5)G.步骤 (5)H.系统适应性 (5)I.计算 (5)J.数据报告 (5)5.参考标准和教材 (6)6 分析方法验证用于新药，仿制药，生物制品和DMF (6)A.非药典分析方法 (6)B.验证特征 (7)C.药典分析方法 (8)7.统计分析和模型 (8)A.统计 (8)B.模型 (8)8.生命周期管理分析程序 (9)A.重新验证 (9)B.分析方法的可比性研究 (10)1.另一种分析方法 (10)2.分析方法转移的研究 (11)C.报告上市后变更已批准的新药，仿制药，或生物制品 (11)9.美国FDA 方法验证 (12)10.参考文献前言本指导原则草案，定稿后，将代表美国食品和药物管理局（FDA）目前关于这个话题目前的想法。

它不会创造或赋予或任何人的任何权利，不约束FDA 或公众。

您可以使用另一种方法，如果该方法符合适用的法律和法规的要求。

如果你想讨论一个替代方法，请与FDA 工作人员负责实施本指南。

如果你不能确定适当的FDA 工作人员，请拨打本指南的标题页上所列的电话号码。

介绍：该修订指南草案将取代行业2000 年的指导分析方法和方法验证草案，并最终确定后，也将取代1987 年美国FDA 行业指南《提交的样品和分析数据的方法验证》。

该草案提供了有关申请人如何提交分析程序和方法验证数据来支持说明原料药和制剂具有强度、质量、纯度和效用的文件。

准备FDA认证前检查中英文对照文档

认证量成果isoproducts产品简介allapisalldosageformsproduceonsite所有api和所有剂型的生产现场nonusmarkets美国和非美国市场销路inspectionalhistoryusfdausfdasfda食品药品监督管理局otherregulatoryagencies其他管理机构customeraudits消费者协会other其他richardneedhamrflassociates15flowpreapprovalinspection认证前检查流程companypresentation3045minutes公司介绍3045分钟plantlayoutplanphotographs工厂布局平面图和照片productionareasaudit说明fda将审查的生产区域indicatewarehouseareas请注明仓库区indicateqclaboratorylocation标明qc实验室位置giveareasquaremeterseachworkshopwarehouseqclaboratory注明各车间仓库qc实验室面积平方米richardneedhamrflassociates16flowpreapprovalinspection认证前检查companypresentation3045minutes公司介3045分钟organizationalchart组织机构图whole公司是一个整体qualityunitqaqcorganizationalchart质量部门qaqc的组织机构图qualitysystem质量体系简介manufacturingprocess制造工艺概述richardneedhamrflassociates17flowpreapprovalinspection认证前检查qclaboratory56hours生产和qc实验室巡检56小时warehouses仓库productionareas生产区cleanfinishingarea洁净完成区labeling包装和标签qclaboratoryqc实验室waterairvacuumpressuresystems水通风真空压力系统richardneedhamrflassociates18flowpreapprovalinspection认证前检查流程recordsreview2212days文件和记录的审查2

201507FDA行业指南：分析方法验证（中英文）（上）

201507FDA行业指南：分析方法验证（中英文）（上）Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics药品和生物制品分析方法验证Guidance for Industry行业指南U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesFood and Drug AdministrationCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)July 2015Pharmaceutical Quality/CMCAnalytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and BiologicsGuidance for IndustryAdditional copies are available from:Office of Communications, Division of Drug InformationCenter for Drug Evaluation and ResearchFood and Drug Administration10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Bldg., 4th FloorSilver Spring, MD 20993Phone: 855-543-3784 or 301-796-3400; Fax: 301-431-6353 Email:****************.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidan ces/default.htmand/orOffice of Communication, Outreach and DevelopmentCenter for Biologics Evaluation and ResearchFood and Drug Administration10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Room 3128Silver Spring, MD 20993Phone: 800-835-4709 or 240-402-7800Email:************.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInf ormation/Guidances/default.htmU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesFood and Drug AdministrationCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)July 2015Pharmaceutical Quality/CMCAnalytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics药物和生物制品分析方法验证Guidance for Industry[1]行业指南This guidance represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) on this topic. It does not create any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. To discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for this guidance as listed on the title page.本指南代表了FDA对本专题的当前想法。

准备FDA认证前检查中英文对照

Preparing for FDA Preapproval Inspections 准备FDA认证前检查
Richard Needham, RFL Associates
1
Purpose of a pre-Approval Inspection (DMF or ANDA) 认证前检查的目的（DMF或ANDA）
Richard Needham, RFL Associates
7
Flow of the pre-Approval Inspection 认证前检查
Inspection will usually take 4 full days 检查通常需要 4天 Initial Meeting (1- 1 ½ hours) 首次会议（1 - 1个半小时） Walkthrough of Warehouses, Production, QC Laboratory (5-6 hours) 仓库，生产，QC实验室巡检（5-6小时） Document Review (2-2 ½ days) 文件审查（2-2天半） Closeout (1-2 hours)总结（1-2小时） However, the FDA Inspectors may change this schedule 然而，FDA检查员可能会改变这个时间表 Be prepared for the unexpected
The Company Presentation (30-45 minutes)
公司介绍（30-45分钟）
Importance of the Initial Presentation 初始表现很重要
It is FDA’s first impression of your company 这是FDA对该公司的第一印象 It should be very professional (graphics and presentation) 应该很专业（图形和文稿） It should be in English 应当是英文的 It should not be too long (1 hour is too long) 不应该过长（不超过1小时） You should rehearse giving the presentation to make sure it is perfec 您应该提前演练您的演讲，保证他的完美

美国FDA分析方法验证指南中英文对照

I. INTRODUCTIONThis guidance provides recommendations to applicants on submitting analytical procedures, validation data, and samples to support the documentation of the identity, strength, quality, purity, and potency of drug substances and drug products.1. 绪论本指南旨在为申请者提供建议，以帮助其提交分析方法，方法验证资料和样品用于支持原料药和制剂的认定，剂量，质量，纯度和效力方面的文件。

This guidance is intended to assist applicants in assembling information, submitting samples, and presenting data to support analytical methodologies. The recommendations apply to drug substances and drug products covered in new drug applications (NDAs), abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs), biologics license applications (BLAs), product license applications (PLAs), and supplements to these applications.本指南旨在帮助申请者收集资料，递交样品并资料以支持分析方法。

这些建议适用于NDA，ANDA，BLA，PLA及其它们的补充中所涉及的原料药和制剂。

The principles also apply to drug substances and drug products covered in Type II drug master files (DMFs). If a different approach is chosen, the applicant is encouraged to discuss the matter in advance with the center with product jurisdiction to prevent the expenditure of resources on preparing a submission that may later be determined to be unacceptable.这些原则同样适用于二类DMF所涉及的原料药和制剂。

美国FDA药品中英文翻译

8.对完成的药品的现行良好制造规范 CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE FOR FINISHED PHARMACEUTICALS
9.药房配药 PHARMACY COMPOUNDING
10. 对含药饲料的现行良好制造规范 CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE FOR MEDICATED FEEDS
6.处方药的药物治疗指导 MEDICATION GUIDES FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRODUCTS
7.制造、加工、包装或者保存药品的现行良好制造规范；总则 CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE IN MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING, PACKING, OR HOLDING OF DRUGS; GENERAL
13.管制的药品 CONTROLLED DRUGS
14.药品；正式名称与已确定的名称 DRUGS; OFFICIAL NAMES AND ESTABLISHED NAMES
美国FDA药品中英文翻译
1.处方药广告 PRESCRIPTION DRUG ADVERTISING
ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
2.处方药销售 PRESCRIPTION DRUG MARKETING
3.对批发处方药销售商颁发州执照的指南 GUIDELINES FOR STATE LICENSING OF WHOLESALE PRESCRIPTION DRUG DISTRIBUTORS （奥咨达医疗器械咨询）
11.对A型含药物品的现行良好制造规范 CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE FOR TYPE A MEDICATED ARTICLES

FDA化验室OOS指南中英文_Guidance_for_Industry_OOS_CHEN

Guidance for Industry Investigating Out-of-Specification (OOS)Test Results forPharmaceutical ProductionU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesFood and Drug AdministrationCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)October 2006Pharmaceutical CGMPs Contains Nonbinding RecommendationsGuidance for Industry Investigating Out-of-Specification (OOS)Test Results forPharmaceutical ProductionAdditional copies are available from: 本文件可自以下途径得到Office of Training and Communication 培训和交流办公室Division of Drug Information HFD-240 药品信息分部Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 药品审评中心Food and Drug Administration 食品药品管理局5600 Fishers LaneRockville, MD 20857(Tel) 301-827-4573/cder/guidance/index.htmU.S. Department of Health and Human Services 美国卫生和福利部Food and Drug Administration 食品药品管理局Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) 药品审评中心October 2006Pharmaceutical CGMPs Contains Nonbinding RecommendationsTABLE OF CONTENTSInvestigating Out-of-Specification (OOS) Test Results for Pharmaceutical Production (4)I. INTRODUCTION 介绍 (4)II. BACKGROUND 背景 (5)III. IDENTIFYING AND ASSESSING OOS TEST RESULTS界定和评价OOS检验结果— PHASE I: LABORATORY INVESTIGATION第一步：化验室调查 (6)A. Responsibility of the Analyst 化验员职责 (7)B. Responsibilities of the Laboratory Supervisor化验室主管职责 (8)IV. INVESTIGATING OOS TEST RESULTS 对OOS结果的调查— PHASE II: FULL-SCALE OOS INVESTIGATION 第二步：全面OOS调查 (10)A. Review of Production 生产情况审核 (10)B. Additional Laboratory Testing 附加化验室测试 (11)C. Reporting Testing Results 报告测试结果 (14)V. CONCLUDING THE INVESTIGATION 调查结论 (17)A. Interpretation of Investigation Results 调查结果解释 (18)B. Cautions 注意事项 (19)C. Field Alert Reports (20)GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY1行业指南Investigating Out-of-Specification (OOS) Test Results forPharmaceutical Production药物生产中不合格结果的调查This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the appropriate number listed on the title page of this guidance.本指南代表FDA对本专题现行的想法。

美国FDA人用药品中英文翻译

美国FDA人用药品中英文翻译美国FDA人用药品中英文翻译1.总则 GENERAL2. 新药 NEW DRUGS3. 试验用新药申请 INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUG APPLICATION4.为FDA批准上市新药的申请 APPLICATIONS FOR FDA APPROVAL TO MARKET A NEW DRUG5.诊断用放射性药品 DIAGNOSTIC RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS（奥咨达医疗器械咨询）6.罕见病药 ORPHAN DRUGS7.生物利用度与生物等效性要求 BIOAVAILABILITY AND BIOEQUIVALENCE REQUIREMENTS8.含有酒精的预期用于口部摄入的非处方药品 OVER-THE-COUNTER DRUG PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR ORAL INGESTION THAT CONTAIN ALCOHOL 9. 一般认为安全与有效以及不错误标识的非处方人用药品OVER-THE-COUNTER (OTC) HUMAN DRUGS WHICH ARE GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE AND NOT MISBRANDED（只专注于医疗器械领域）10.用于非处方的人类使用的抗酸产品 ANTACID PRODUCTS FOROVER-THE-COUNTER (OTC) HUMAN USE11. 用于非处方的人类使用的抗胃肠气胀产品 ANTIFLATULENT PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE12. 用于非处方的人类使用的局部抗菌药品 TOPICAL ANTIMICROBIAL DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE 13. 用于非处方的人类使用的止泻药品 ANTIDIARRHEAL DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE14. 用于非处方的人类使用的止吐药品 ANTIEMETIC DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE15. 用于非处方的人类使用的帮助夜间睡眠的药品 NIGHTTIME SLEEP-AID DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE16. 用于非处方的人类使用的兴奋药品 STIMULANT DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE17.用于非处方的人类使用的感冒、咳嗽、过敏症药、支气管扩张以及平喘药品 COLD, COUGH, ALLERGY, BRONCHODILATOR, AND ANTIASTHMATIC DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE 18. 用于非处方的人类使用的内服的止痛、退热以及抗风湿药品INTERNAL ANALGESIC, ANTIPYRETIC, AND ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE19. 用于非处方的人类使用的局部的耳部药品 TOPICAL OTIC DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE20. 用于非处方的人类使用的肛肠药品 ANORECTAL DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE21.用于非处方的人类使用的皮肤保护药品 SKIN PROTECTANT DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE22. 用于非处方的人类使用的外部的止痛药品 EXTERNAL ANALGESIC DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE23. 用于非处方的人类使用的眼科药品 OPHTHALMIC DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE24.用于非处方的人类使用的止汗药品 ANTIPERSPIRANT DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE25. 用于非处方的人类使用的遮光药品 SUNSCREEN DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE [STAYED INDEFINITELY]26.用于非处方的人类使用的防龋药品 ANTICARIES DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE27. 用于非处方的人类使用的其他内服药品 MISCELLANEOUS INTERNAL DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE28. 用于非处方的人类使用的其他外用药品 MISCELLANEOUS EXTERNAL DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE29. 一般认为安全与有效以及不错误标识的处方人用药品：用于研究的药品 PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FOR HUMAN USE GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE AND NOT MISBRANDED: DRUGS USED IN RESEARCH30. 在用于非处方销售的药品与器械上关于警告的解释性声明INTERPRETATIVE STATEMENTS RE WARNINGS ON DRUGS AND DEVICES FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER SALE。

美国FDA分析方法验证指南

美国FDA 分析方法验证指南（中文）U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesFood and Drug AdministrationCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)August 2000目录一、结论………………………………………………………..…………………二、背景……………………………………………………………..……….…..三、分析方法的类型…………………………………………………………….A. 法定分析方法……………………………………………………………B. 替代分析方法……………………………………………………………C. 稳定性指示分析…………………………………………………………四、标准品……………………………………………………………………….. A．标准品的类型……………………………………………………………B．分析报告单………………………………………………………………C．标准品的界定……………………………………………………………五、IND 中的分析方法验证……………………………………………………..六、NDA、ANDA、BLA 和PLA 中分析方法的内容和格式…………………A．基本方法…………………………………………………………………B．取样………………………………………………………………………C．仪器和仪器参数…………………………………………………………. D．试剂………………………………………………………………………E．系统适应性实验…………………………………………………………. F．标准品的制备……………………………………………………………..G.操作过程…………………………………………………………………….H.操作程序……………………………………………………………………I．计算…………………………………………………………………………J.结果报告……………………………………………………………………. 1．通则……………………………………………………………………2．杂质分析规程…………………………………………………………七、NDA，ANDA，BLA 和PLA 中的分析方法验证………………………….. A．非药典分析方法…………………………………………………………1. 验证项目……………………………………………………………2. 其它验证资料……………………………………………………….(1) 讨论可能会形成的异构体并讨论异构体的控制…………………..a. 耐用性…………………………………………………….b. 强降解实验………………………………………………c.仪器输出/原始资料………………………………………i. 有机杂质……………………………………………ii. 原料药……………………………………………….iii. 制剂………………………………………………….(2) 各类检测的推荐验证项目…………………………………………..a. 鉴别………………………………………………………....b. 杂质………………………………………………………..c. 含量………………………………………………………..d. 特定实验…………………………………………………….B．药典分析方法(21CFR 211.194(a)(2))…………………………………..八. 统计分析…………………………………………………………………….A．基本原则………………………………………………………………B:对比研究…………………………………………………………………C:统计………………………………………………………………………九、再验证………………………………………………………………………十、分析方法验证资料：内容和数据处理…………………………………….A．分析方法验证资料…………………………………………………….B：样品的选择和运输…………………………………………………….C：各方职责……………………………………………………………….1.申请人……………………………………………………………….2.化学评审官………………………………………………………….3.FDA 实验室………………………………………………………….4.检查官……………………………………………………………….十一、方法学……………………………………………………………………A．高效液相色谱(HPLC)………………………………………………….1.色谱柱……………………………………………………………….2.系统适应性研究…………………………………………………….3.操作参数…………………………………………………………….B．气相色谱(GC)………………………………………………………….1.色谱柱……………………………………………………………….2.操作参数……………………………………………………………..3.系统适应性实验……………………………………………………..C：分光光度法，光谱法和相关的物理方法………………………………D：毛细管电泳(CE)…………………………………………………………E：旋光度……………………………………………………………………F：和粒径分析相关的分析方法……………………………………………G：溶出度…………………………………………………………………..H：其它仪器分析方法………………………………………………………附录A……………………………………………………………………………….. 附录B……………………………………………………………………………….. 术语表……………………………………………………………………………….一、绪论本指南旨在为申请者提供建议，以帮助其提交分析方法，方法验证资料和样品用于支持原料药和制剂的认定，剂量，质量，纯度和效力方面的文件。

中英文-美国FDA_GMP检查

(the bulk of record review) (大量的记录审查)
More Records 更多的记录
• Process Validation 工艺验证 • Equipment Qualification 设备确认 • Computer System Validation 计算机系统验证 (Protocol and Executed Protocol) (方案和已执行方案)
Objectives of Inspection 检查的目标
• Conduct the inspection in accordance with FD&C Act and Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) Regulations 检查的执行依据《联邦食品，药品和化妆品法》(FD&C Act) 及现行药品生产管理规范(CGMP) 条例 • Accomplish what is necessary per the established, supporting Compliance Policy Guidance Manual 检查执行的程度依据符合性方针指导手册 – 7356.002 “Drug Manufacturing Inspections” 7356.002 “药品生产检查” • “Systems Approach” “系统化方法” • Accomplish necessary, additional questions/concerns listed in the inspection assignment (“For Cause” Inspection) 要完成必要的检查、其它问题/额外关注点见“追因”检查的检查任务分配
The CGMP Regulation CGMP 法规

201507fda行业指南：分析方法验证(中英文)(下)

201507 FDA行业指南：分析方法验证（中英文）（下）VII. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND MODELS 统计学分析和模型A. Statistics 统计学Statistical analysis of validation data can be used to evaluate validation characteristics against predetermined acceptance criteria. All statistical procedures and parameters used in the analysis of the data should be based on sound principles and appropriate for the intended evaluation. Several statistical methods are useful for assessing validation characteristics, for example, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess regression analysis R (correlation coefficient) and R squared (coefficient of determination) or linear regression to measure linearity. Many statistical methods used for assessing validation characteristics rely on population normality, and it is important to determine whether or not to reject this assumption. There are many techniques, such as histograms, normality tests, and probability plots that can be used to evaluate the observed distribution. It may be appropriate to transform the data to better fit the normal distribution or apply distribution-free (nonparametric) approaches when the observed data are not normally distributed. Appropriateliterature or text should be consulted for information on statistical procedures to use when developing new test methods, evaluating existing test methods or evaluating measurement system performance, as well as other general information on the interpretation and treatment of analytical data[18].The data analysis should be assured either by using appropriately validated software or independent verification for correctness.验证数据的统计学分析可以用于评估验证的属性是否符合预定的可接受标准。

201507FDA行业指南：分析方法验证（中英文）（中）

201507FDA行业指南：分析方法验证（中英文）（中）A. Principle/Scope 原理/范围A description of the basic principles of the analytical test/technology (i.e., separation, detection); target analyte(s) and sample(s) type (e.g., drug substance, drug product, impurities or compounds in biological fluids).分析测试/技术（即分离、检测）基本原因的描述；目标分析物和样品类型（例如，原料药、制剂、杂质或生物流体中的化合物）。

B. Apparatus/Equipment 仪器/设备All required qualified equipment and components (e.g., instrument type, detector, column type, dimensions, and alternative column, filter type).所有需要的确认过的仪器和组件（例如，仪器类型、检测器、柱子类型、尺寸和可替代的柱子、过滤器类型）。

C. Operating Parameters 运行参数Qualified optimal settings and ranges (include allowed adjustments supported by compendial sources or development and/or validation studies) critical to the analysis (e.g., flow rate, components temperatures, run time, detector settings, gradient, head space sampler). A drawing with experimental configuration and integration parameters may be used, as applicable.确认过的优化的设置和范围（包括来自药典或研发和/或验证研究的允许调整），对于分析过程非常关键（例如，流速、部件温度、运行时间、检测器设置、梯度、顶空进样器）。

美国FDA 分析方法验证指南

美国FDA 分析方法验证指南（中文）U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesFood and Drug AdministrationCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)August 2000目录一、结论………………………………………………………..…………………二、背景……………………………………………………………..……….…..三、分析方法的类型…………………………………………………………….A. 法定分析方法……………………………………………………………B. 替代分析方法……………………………………………………………C. 稳定性指示分析…………………………………………………………四、标准品……………………………………………………………………….. A．标准品的类型……………………………………………………………B．分析报告单………………………………………………………………C．标准品的界定……………………………………………………………五、IND 中的分析方法验证……………………………………………………..六、NDA、ANDA、BLA 和PLA 中分析方法的内容和格式…………………A．基本方法…………………………………………………………………B．取样………………………………………………………………………C．仪器和仪器参数…………………………………………………………. D．试剂………………………………………………………………………E．系统适应性实验…………………………………………………………. F．标准品的制备……………………………………………………………..G.操作过程…………………………………………………………………….H.操作程序……………………………………………………………………I．计算…………………………………………………………………………J.结果报告……………………………………………………………………. 1．通则……………………………………………………………………2．杂质分析规程…………………………………………………………七、NDA，ANDA，BLA 和PLA 中的分析方法验证………………………….. A．非药典分析方法…………………………………………………………1. 验证项目……………………………………………………………2. 其它验证资料……………………………………………………….(1) 讨论可能会形成的异构体并讨论异构体的控制…………………..a. 耐用性…………………………………………………….b. 强降解实验………………………………………………c.仪器输出/原始资料………………………………………i. 有机杂质……………………………………………ii. 原料药……………………………………………….iii. 制剂………………………………………………….(2) 各类检测的推荐验证项目…………………………………………..a. 鉴别………………………………………………………....b. 杂质………………………………………………………..c. 含量………………………………………………………..d. 特定实验…………………………………………………….B．药典分析方法(21CFR 211.194(a)(2))…………………………………..八. 统计分析…………………………………………………………………….A．基本原则………………………………………………………………B:对比研究…………………………………………………………………C:统计………………………………………………………………………九、再验证………………………………………………………………………十、分析方法验证资料：内容和数据处理…………………………………….A．分析方法验证资料…………………………………………………….B：样品的选择和运输…………………………………………………….C：各方职责……………………………………………………………….1.申请人……………………………………………………………….2.化学评审官………………………………………………………….3.FDA 实验室………………………………………………………….4.检查官……………………………………………………………….十一、方法学……………………………………………………………………A．高效液相色谱(HPLC)………………………………………………….1.色谱柱……………………………………………………………….2.系统适应性研究…………………………………………………….3.操作参数…………………………………………………………….B．气相色谱(GC)………………………………………………………….1.色谱柱……………………………………………………………….2.操作参数……………………………………………………………..3.系统适应性实验……………………………………………………..C：分光光度法，光谱法和相关的物理方法………………………………D：毛细管电泳(CE)…………………………………………………………E：旋光度……………………………………………………………………F：和粒径分析相关的分析方法……………………………………………G：溶出度…………………………………………………………………..H：其它仪器分析方法………………………………………………………附录A……………………………………………………………………………….. 附录B……………………………………………………………………………….. 术语表……………………………………………………………………………….一、绪论本指南旨在为申请者提供建议，以帮助其提交分析方法，方法验证资料和样品用于支持原料药和制剂的认定，剂量，质量，纯度和效力方面的文件。

准备FDA认证前检查中英文对照

Purpose of a pre-Approval Inspection 认证前检验的目的
Ensure that data submitted in the ANDA or DMF submission is supported by raw data at the facility
确保在ANDA或DMF文件中提交的数据以设施的原始数据为依据
FDA什么时候审查ANDA
After the ANDA holder files the ANDA ANDA持有人将ANDA归档后
Because of backlogs, expect at least 6 month delay before reviewing 由于积压，预计至少延迟6个月才能被审查
The Company Presentation (30-45 minutes)
公司介绍（30-45分钟）
History of Business企业历史
When was it founded? By whom? 什么时候成立？由谁创建？
Important milestones during company development 公司发展中的重要里程碑
Name and title displayed at initial meeting 姓名和标题呈现在首次会议上
Name tags on uniform during inspection 检查期间所有姓名标签格式应统一
Consider also a handout with the following information for key people: 还考虑分发含有以下信息的资料给关键人员： ▪ Full name (and English surname if applicable) 全名（如果适用加上英文姓氏） ▪ Title 标题 ▪ Thumbnail photograph 照片缩图

FDA分析方法验证指南中文

工作对照品 (也就是内部标准品或二级标准品)是根据一级对照品标定的，并用来代替一级对照品的。
第2页
B．分析报告单对于非官方标准品，在申请的分析方法和控制章节中应当要提供该标准品的分析报告
四、标准品
A．标准品的类型可以从 USP/NF 处或其它官方(比如说，CBER，21CFR 610.20)获得标准品 (也就是一级
对照品)。如果不能确定一标准品的来源是否会被 FDA 认为是官方来源，申请者应当要向适当的化学评审人员咨询。如果没有官方来源，则被用来作标准品的物质应当要有尽可能高的纯度，并得到充分界定。
B．取样………………………………………………………………………
C．仪器和仪器参数…………………………………………………………………………
E．系统适应性实验………………………………………………………….
F．标准品的制备……………………………………………………………..
G.操作过程…………………………………………………………………….
H.操作程序……………………………………………………………………
I．计算…………………………………………………………………………
J.结果报告…………………………………………………………………….
1．通则……………………………………………………………………
C. 稳定性指示分析稳定性指示分析是能检测出原料药或制剂的某些性质随着时间的延长而出现的变化的
定量分析方法。稳定性指示分析能不受降解产物，工艺杂质，赋形剂或其它潜在杂质的影响而准确测定
其中的活性成分。如果申请者递交了用于放行检测的非稳定性指示分析方法，则应当要有能定性和定量地
监测杂质，包括降解产物，的分析方法对其进行补充。稳定性试验中所用的含量分析方法应当要有稳定性指示能力，除非有科学的理由能证明其合理性。