判例制度在我国确立的可行性研究

目录

目录 (1)

判例制度在我国确立的可行性研究 (2)

摘要 (2)

Abstract (3)

引言 (4)

一、判例制度概述 (4)

（一）判例及判例制度的含义 (4)

（二）判例制度的历史发展 (5)

二、我国建立判例制度的必要性 (5)

（一）成文法的缺陷是建立判例制度的根本原因 (5)

（二）司法解释并不足以弥补成文法的缺陷 (6)

（三）判例制度的建立能够极大提高法官的素质 (6)

（四）判例制度可以节约司法成本并提高效率 (7)

（五）判例制度是实现司法公正的必要条件 (7)

（六）判例制度的引入有助于法律的普及 (7)

三、在我国建立判例制度的可行性 (8)

（一）从世界范围看两大法系正在走向融合 (8)

（二）从我国历史上看存在判例制度的传统 (8)

（三）判例制度与我国立法体制并不矛盾 (9)

四、我国判例制度的构建 (9)

（一）构建我国判例制度的基本原则 (9)

1、判例只是制定法的一个补充制度 (9)

2、只有经过确认程序确认后的裁判才能成为判例 (9)

3、我国判例法的两级体系 (9)

4、效力原则 (9)

（二）判例的效力 (10)

（三）判例的发布 (10)

（四）判例的制作 (10)

（五）判例的运用 (11)

（六）判例的废止 (11)

注释 (12)

参考文献 (13)

判例制度在我国确立的可行性研究

摘要

瞬息万变的大千社会使当今的社会关系和社会事实纷繁复杂，而这无疑与法律的稳定性和系统性形成了矛盾。法律总是要滞后于社会现实的发展，当法律无明文规定或者规定不明的情况下，如何去解决社会现实中存在的林林总总的矛盾，如何去调节法律关系，实现社会的公平正义，从而保护弱者的利益这一命题就显得格外重要了。判例制度无疑是解决这些问题的一个好方法，所以对于我国建立判例制度的必要性和可行性的探索是必要的。本文从判例制度在我国建立的必要性、可行性以及如何建立等几个方面来研究。首先判例制度在我国建立的必要性：一是成文法的缺陷是建立判例制度的根本原因；二是司法解释并不足以弥补成文法的缺陷；三是判例制度的建立能够极大提高法官的素质；四是判例制度可以节约司法成本并提高效率；五是判例制度是实现司法公正的必要条件；六是判例制度的引入有助于法律的普及。其次判例制度在我国建立的可行性：第一，从世界范围来看，两大法系正在走向融合；第二，我国历史上存在判例制度的传统；第三，判例制度与我国的立法体例并不矛盾。最后，如何建立我国的判例制度：其基本原则是判例只是制定法的一个补充制度，只有经过确认程序确认后的裁判才能成为判例，我国判例法应采取两级体系并且遵循效力原则；判例的效力等级低于制定法，不得与宪法和法律、法规和司法解释相违背，法官在审理具体案件时，应尽量依据已有的制定法律规范作出裁判，只有在缺少制定法依据的情况下，才可以遵循先例或创制判例进行裁判；判例的发布应由法律授权中级以上人民法院；立法应当规定判例的运用方法，必须将待处理案件的要点与判例中的要点进行对比，找出其中具有本质联系的法律规则，最后依据公平、正义的法律价值观念作出裁判；应当有相关的立法规定对判例进行更新，将失效的判例对社会公开。由此，我们可以得出结论，我国应尽早建立自己的判例制度，服务于实践，更好地帮助我国的法制建设。

【关键词】判例判例制度建立必要性可行性

Abstract

Fast-changing society makes today's universe of social relations and social reality, and this undoubtedly complicated with legal stability and systemic formed a contradiction. The law should always lags behind the social reality of development, when the law is expressly or provisions, under the situation of unknown how to solve social existing in reality, the conflict

it-those of how to adjust legal relationship, to realize social justice, thus protecting the interests of the weak and the proposition is especially important. The judicial precedent system to solve these problems is undoubtedly a good method to establish China's case, so the necessity and feasibility of the system of exploration is necessary. This article from the case the necessity of establishing the system in China, the feasibility and how to set up these aspects to study. First case the necessity of establishing the system in China: one is the statute is to establish a precedent system defect the fundamental reasons; 2 it is not enough to make good judicial interpretation of the statute defects, Three is case system establishment can greatly enhance the quality of judges; Four is case system can save the cost and improve efficiency; Five is the case system is the necessary condition of achieving judicial fairness; Six is the introduction of judicial precedent system to the popularity of law. Second case system in China: first, the feasibility of establishing from world scale, two big law is going to merge; Second, our country history existence of traditional judicial precedent system; Third, case system and the legislation of our country is not contradictory layouts. Finally, how to establish China's case system: the basic principle is a case just enacted law system, and only after supplement the referee confirmed after validation procedure can become a case, our case law should adopt two-stage system and follows the effect principle; Cases effectiveness level below enacted law, not with the constitution and laws, regulations and judicial interpretations, the judge in the trial against specific cases, formulated based on the existing should as far as possible legal norms to adjudicate, only in the lack of enacted law based on the circumstances, can follow precedent or creating precedents for the referee; The release by legal precedents at or above the intermediate level shall be authorized by the people's court; The use of the legislation should stipulate a case method, must will stay handle cases points compared with case the essentials, find out which is the essential relationship between rule of law, equity and justice final basis of legal values judge; Should have the relevant legislation, will update of case of social public of cases of failure. Thus, we may safely draw the conclusion that China should be established as soon as possible their case system, service in practice and better help our legal system.

【Keywords】Case Case system Established Necessity Feasibility