华尔街之狼英文观后感
大笑看影视2384《华尔街之狼》（英文名《The
⼤笑看影视2384《华尔街之狼》（英⽂名
《The Wolf Of Wall Street》）
⼤笑看影视2384《华尔街之狼》（英⽂名《The Wolf Of Wall Street》）
⼤笑观感（2014年1⽉18⽇）：
迪卡普⾥奥将在⽚中扮演长岛股票经纪⼈贝尔福特，他因为在上世纪90年代的⼀起⼤规模有价证券欺诈案中拒绝与警⽅合作，⼊狱20个⽉。
该欺诈案涉及华尔街和包括⿊帮势⼒渗透的商业银⾏的⼤⾯积腐败。
与迪卡普⾥奥之前主演的《猫⿏游戏》⼀样，《华尔街的狼》中也将有两个主⾓———影⽚故事情节的⼤部分将落在贝尔福特和⼀名想从他这⾥套出内情的FBI探员的关系上。
《华尔街之狼》与其说是⾃传，不如说是⼀本精彩的⼩说。
值得⼀提的是，这起诈骗案揭出了华尔街背后的诸多不可告⼈的秘密，牵涉到⼤量幕后⽼⼤的腐败案件。
（以上均为⽹络转载）
86届奥斯卡奖⼊围影⽚。
碰巧洒家刚看了些《公民凯恩》的⽚段，懂得⾃然懂。
看上去像是拍摄“盖茨⽐”时迪卡普⾥奥顺便拍的前传，45分钟后失去兴趣停看，并予以减星评定。
⼤笑评级：2星级。
⼤笑影评的6档评级如下：5星级：极佳，值得再三观赏。
4星级：很好，全神贯注欣赏。
3星级：较好，有空不妨⼀看。
2星级：⼀般，没空可以不看。
1星级：较差，可当败笔案例。
0星级：极差，实在看不下去。
⼤笑影评仅供个⼈独⽴学习、备忘之⽤。
影评 - The Wolf of Wall Street
影评 - The Wolf of Wall Street《华尔街之狼》：疯狂、震撼、令人深思的华尔街狂欢作为一名电影评论家，我曾看过许多令人难忘的电影，但《华尔街之狼》无疑是其中之一。
这部由马丁·斯科塞斯执导的电影，以其疯狂的节奏、震撼的故事和令人深思的主题，给我留下了深刻的印象。
首先，这部电影给我带来了一种狂热的感觉。
从一开始，观众就被投入到华尔街的疯狂世界中。
主人公乔丹·贝尔福特（由莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥饰演）的冒险精神和对财富的追求，让人无法抗拒地被吸引。
他的疯狂派对、奢华生活和无尽的欲望，让观众仿佛置身于一个无法想象的世界。
这种狂热感使我对故事的发展和角色的命运产生了浓厚的兴趣。
其次，这部电影在我内心引起了共鸣。
虽然大部分人无法与贝尔福特这样的富豪相提并论，但他的故事却触动了我们内心深处的某些东西。
贝尔福特的贪婪和欺骗手段，揭示了人性中的黑暗面。
他的成功让我们反思了金钱与道德之间的关系，以及我们自己在面对财富的诱惑时可能面临的道德抉择。
这种共鸣使得观影过程不仅仅是一种娱乐，更是一次对自我反思的旅程。
最后，这部电影引发了我对金融世界的思考。
《华尔街之狼》以贝尔福特的真实故事为基础，揭示了华尔街的黑暗面。
贪婪、欺诈和道德沦丧在金融界中并不罕见，这让我对整个金融体系产生了质疑。
电影通过对贝尔福特的描绘，向观众展示了一个充满诱惑和危险的世界，这种揭示让我对金融行业的运作方式产生了更深层次的思考。
总的来说，《华尔街之狼》是一部疯狂、震撼且令人深思的电影。
它通过贝尔福特的故事，向观众展示了一个充满贪婪、欺诈和道德困境的世界。
这部电影不仅仅是一种娱乐，更是一次对自我反思和对金融世界的思考。
如果你对疯狂的故事、令人深思的主题和出色的演技感兴趣，那么《华尔街之狼》绝对是一部值得一看的电影。
华尔街之狼影评2
Can you sell this pen now?这句类似的话在电影中一共出现过两次，第一次是Jordan与Danny壮志酬酬拉来一群主要以卖大麻为生的sales在餐厅中说服他们卖金融产品就是卖东西，而当时的sales回答的非常巧妙，他问Jordan xxxx（原话实在脑盲不记得，感谢各位大牛脑补，无论是填表格还是在餐巾纸上签名，这位都很聪明好嘛！）。
第二次是电影临近尾声，Jordan从监狱中被放出后，来到一个满是迷茫眼神的大房间做motivation speaker时候问大家这样一个问题。
这些人不是诺诺的说着这只笔有多么多么的好，就是傻傻局促的笑着说不出话，紧张的看着Jordan。
这个时刻，也应证了电影其中的一个隐喻更是Jordan成功精神之一，卖东西要了解顾客的需求。
看看the wolf of wallstreet“小说”当年的畅销记录，再看看同名电影现今的轰动，不禁默默感叹难怪Jordan Belfort可以在31岁那么年轻的年纪成为billionaire. 小说改编电影虽然对外公开只赚了1million，在金融街中只是沧海一粟，可是以一个问题大人的身份，在经历各种随时能打垮一个正常人的遭遇后，依然可以准确把握公众需求，sell his pens to you successfully, 这便是主人公天才的地方了。
可以说在过去的时代，Jordan给投资者卖垃圾股票（or penny stock）,现在，Jordan给公众卖自己的故事。
他依然很好的掌控着他参与的市场。
经常关注美国金融界应该或多或少听说过Jordan这号人物。
2013年的他在公众面前依然是非常非常的抢眼，不仅仅是因为华尔街之狼这部电影，更是因为他依然存在fraud的嫌疑（早期Jordan与美联储有过协议，必须要讲所得收入50%还给当年受骗的投资者，但实际上他在2013年依然被美联储怀疑隐藏大笔存款，还给受骗者只是收入的非常少的一部分。
影评 - The Wolf of Wall Street
影评 - The Wolf of Wall Street《华尔街之狼》是一部令人难以忘怀的电影。
这部由马丁·斯科塞斯执导的作品不仅给我带来了强烈的触动，还引发了我对贪婪、权力和道德的深思。
首先，这部电影让我感受到了强烈的刺激和兴奋。
从一开始，我就被主角乔丹·贝尔福特（由莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥饰演）那种疯狂的生活方式所吸引。
他的奢华派对、豪华庄园和无尽的金钱，都让我屏住呼吸。
电影通过绚丽的画面和动感的音乐，将这个世界展现得如此真实而诱人。
然而，随着故事的展开，我开始意识到这种疯狂的生活方式背后隐藏的黑暗。
贝尔福特和他的同伙们通过欺骗和诈骗来获取财富，他们对道德和法律毫不在乎。
这让我深思，贪婪和权力的诱惑对人性的影响是如此之大。
我开始思考我们在面临诱惑时，会不会也会放弃我们的原则和良知。
除了引发我的思考，这部电影还给我带来了一种共鸣。
尽管我不能理解贝尔福特和他的团队的行为，但我发现自己对他们的生活方式有一种奇怪的羡慕。
他们拥有无穷无尽的财富和自由，他们可以随心所欲地追求快乐。
然而，我也明白这种快乐是虚假的，以及他们在追求财富和权力的过程中失去了真正的人生意义。
此外，莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥的表演也让我深深着迷。
他将贝尔福特这个复杂的角色演绎得淋漓尽致，他的表演充满了能量和激情。
他的演技让我对这个角色产生了共鸣，我可以感受到他内心的挣扎和痛苦。
总的来说，《华尔街之狼》是一部令人难以忘怀的电影。
它不仅给我带来了刺激和兴奋，还引发了我对贪婪、权力和道德的思考。
这部电影通过精彩的表演和扣人心弦的剧情，让我对人性的弱点和对真正幸福的追求有了更深入的理解。
我强烈推荐这部电影给所有对人性和社会问题感兴趣的观众。
华尔街之狼观后感
华尔街之狼观后感《华尔街之狼》是一部由马丁·斯科塞斯执导的电影，根据真实事件改编而成。
影片讲述了华尔街股票经纪人乔丹·贝尔福特的故事，揭示了他在华尔街的疯狂生活和道德沦丧的行为。
观看这部电影后，我有些许触动和感悟。
电影以乔丹·贝尔福特（Jordan Belfort）的自传小说为基础，通过色彩艳丽、音乐活力十足的手法生动地展现了华尔街的奢靡与欲望。
主人公贝尔福特由莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥出演，他以精湛的演技诠释了这个前途无限的股票交易员，贝尔福特通过欺诈和诱骗手法，迅速积累了巨额财富，成为华尔街的传奇人物。
整部电影的节奏紧凑，情节跌宕起伏，将观众完全引入了华尔街的疯狂世界。
贝尔福特的金钱观极端扭曲，他不择手段地追求快速致富，无论是与客户签订高风险的投资合同，还是教唆员工进行盗窃和欺诈，他对金钱的渴望成为他行骗的动力。
电影中贝尔福特高调奢华的生活方式令人羡慕，他拥有豪宅、豪车，派对和异性纷扰，但同时也看到了他道德沦丧和丧失自我的一面。
观后，我对贝尔福特这样的人物产生了深深的矛盾之感。
一方面，贝尔福特的魅力和智慧令人赞叹不已，他凭借自己的聪明才智和出色的销售技巧在华尔街获得了巨大成功。
他的演讲能力日益提高，他能够将任何一只看似毫无价值的股票说得天花乱坠，让客户倾家荡产地跟着他买进。
然而，另一方面，贝尔福特的行为也引发了我对道德和伦理的思考。
他不仅违法乱纪，还腐蚀了他周围人的道德底线。
他的员工们被他带入了黑暗的世界，用股票市场作为赌场，肆意糟蹋客户的财产。
在这个过程中，贝尔福特的欺骗和犯罪行为毫无愧意，他几乎变成了一个没有良知和人性的存在。
华尔街是一个利益至上的世界，其中的金钱和权力游戏让人触目惊心。
贝尔福特成为这个世界的代表性人物，他用自己的故事揭示了华尔街股票交易行业的黑暗面。
这部电影给人一种警示，让我深思贪婪和道德之间的较量。
从电影中，我明白了金钱的力量会如何扭曲人的思维和行为。
观后感华尔街之狼贪婪与欲望的金融世界
观后感华尔街之狼贪婪与欲望的金融世界观后感：华尔街之狼——贪婪与欲望的金融世界华尔街之狼是一部由马丁·斯科塞斯执导的电影，该电影改编自乔丹·贝尔福特的同名传记。
故事主要讲述了一个真实的金融世界中，贪婪与欲望肆意扩张的故事。
观看这部电影，不禁让我深思人性的扭曲以及金融行业中的问题。
影片以乔丹·贝尔福特（Leonardo DiCaprio饰）的视角展开，我被他华丽的生活和无尽的财富所吸引。
然而，随着剧情的深入，我逐渐发现这个金融世界的真相，贝尔福特与他的同僚们利用庞大的财富和权力，肆无忌惮地进行内幕交易和诈骗，不顾他人的利益和道德底线。
贝尔福特和他的团队用各种手段不断膨胀自己的财富，哄抬股票价格和散布虚假信息成为他们日常生活的一部分。
他们透过电话推销和高额回报的保证，吸引无数普通民众将积蓄投入他们的公司。
这种行为不仅违法，也没有任何道德伦理可言，但却为他们带来了暴富的机会。
观看这部电影，我深感金融世界存在的问题。
贪婪和欲望驱使着这些金融从业者，他们不顾他人的福祉，只为了追求个人的利益和财富。
如此不负责任的行为导致了数以千计的人们失去了他们的积蓄和希望，金融市场也因为这种无情的欺骗而受到了严重的损害。
在电影中，贝尔福特的朋友和家人对他的行为视而不见，他们被他的富裕所诱惑，放任他的错误行为继续下去。
这让我思考人性中最黑暗的一面，当个人利益与伦理道德发生冲突时，我们会如何选择。
在这个金钱至上的金融世界中，很多人因为不能抵制贪婪和欲望，而最终被它所吞噬。
电影中还反映出金融监管机构的无能和腐败。
面对犯罪活动和虚假交易，在这个影片中却几乎没有出现任何严厉的处罚。
这引发了我对金融管理监管的思考，为了维护金融市场的公平和正义，我们需要更加严明的法律和监管机构来制约金融业的乱象。
总的来说，华尔街之狼是一部令人深思的电影。
它揭示了金融世界中贪婪和欲望的黑暗面，让人们反思人性的扭曲以及金融行业中的问题。
影评: The Wolf of Wall Street
影评: The Wolf of Wall Street《华尔街之狼》：贪婪与诱惑的现实写照作为一部由马丁·斯科塞斯执导的电影，《华尔街之狼》以其震撼人心的故事情节和出色的演技，让我深受触动。
这部电影以真实的事件为基础，讲述了华尔街肆虐的贪婪和诱惑，展现了人性中最黑暗的一面。
首先，电影给我带来了一种强烈的感觉，那就是贪婪是如何毁灭一个人的。
主人公乔丹·贝尔福特（由莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥饰演）在追逐金钱和权力的过程中，逐渐丧失了自我。
他与同伴们建立了一家名为斯特拉顿·奥克利的股票经纪公司，通过欺诈和操纵市场来获取巨额财富。
然而，这种贪婪迅速蔓延，最终导致了他的崩溃。
电影通过展示贪婪的后果，让观众深思人性中的弱点和道德边界。
其次，电影在我心中引发了共鸣的点是对人性的揭示。
乔丹·贝尔福特是一个迷人而复杂的角色，他既是一个成功的商人，又是一个道德沦丧的罪犯。
电影中的人物都不是黑白分明的，每个角色都有自己的动机和目标。
这让我意识到，在现实世界中，人性是复杂而多变的。
我们每个人都有可能在面临诱惑时选择错误的道路。
这种揭示让我对自己和他人的行为更加警觉。
此外，电影中的演技也是无可挑剔的。
莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥的表演令人叹为观止。
他将乔丹·贝尔福特的疯狂和狂喜演绎得淋漓尽致，让观众完全沉浸在角色的情绪中。
同时，乔纳·希尔和玛格特·罗比也展现了出色的演技，为电影增添了更多的魅力。
然而，尽管电影在许多方面都令人印象深刻，但也有一些缺点。
电影的时长较长，有些场景显得过于冗长，可能会让观众感到厌烦。
此外，电影中也存在一些过度暴力和淫秽的场景，可能会让一些观众感到不适。
总的来说，马丁·斯科塞斯的《华尔街之狼》是一部令人难忘的电影。
它通过讲述一个贪婪和诱惑充斥的世界，揭示了人性中最黑暗的一面。
我被电影中的故事情节和演技所深深吸引，同时也对人性的复杂性有了更深的认识。
华尔街之狼从金融视角的观后感
华尔街之狼从金融视角的观后感英文版Reflections on "The Wolf of Wall Street" from a Financial PerspectiveMartin Scorsese's "The Wolf of Wall Street" is not just a film about greed, excess, and debauchery; it's also a commentary on the financial industry and its culture. Viewed through the lens of finance, the movie offers a chilling insight into the world of high-stakes trading and the lengths some people are willing to go to achieve success.Jordan Belfort, the protagonist, embodies the epitome of Wall Street excess. His rise to power and subsequent fall are a testament to the risks and rewards of the financial world. What's striking is how Belfort's success is not just a result of his shrewd business acumen but also of the permissive culture within the financial industry. The movie highlights the culture of bonus-driven sales, where brokers are encouraged to push the limits tomeet their quarterly targets, often with little regard for ethics or long-term consequences.The film also exposes the close-knit network of Wall Street insiders, where information and opportunities flow freely among a select few. This exclusive club mentality excludes those who don't fit the mold, creating a divide between the haves and the have-nots. Belfort's rise and fall are linked to his ability to navigate this network and capitalize on its perks.The movie's portrayal of Belfort's wild lifestyle and drug-fueled binges is undoubtedly shocking. However, it's the financial aspect of the film that makes it truly haunting. The ease with which Belfort and his cronies manipulate markets and skirt regulations is a stark reminder of the power and influence that financial players can wield. It also raises questions about the regulatory frameworks that are meant to protect investors but often seem inadequate in the face of such widespread abuse."The Wolf of Wall Street" is not just a cautionary tale about the dangers of greed and excess; it's also a critique of the financial industry's culture and practices. Viewed from a financial perspective, the movie offers a sobering look at the risks and temptations that lie within the world of high finance.中文版《华尔街之狼》从金融视角的观后感马丁·斯科塞斯的《华尔街之狼》不仅仅是一部关于贪婪、放纵和放荡的电影，它也是对金融行业及其文化的一种评论。
华尔街之狼观后感英文
Wolf of Wall Street CinematographyThe wolf of Wall Street movie is a controversial motion picture based on a bestselling novel about the rise of a Wall Street trader Jordan Belfort. Leonardo Di Caprio, who delves into the life of drugs, women, money laundering and securities fraud plays the main character. Together with his friends, they are able to build a multi-million company that defrauds people by selling them penny stocks.Wolf of Wall Street movie may be classified as a narrative type of movie and is directed by Martin Scorsese. The cinematographer shot the interesting movie in film mode. Scorsese chose this approach as he saw the images shot by his cinematographer having richer skin tones and possessing more color nuance as compared to digital shots during preproduction testing runs. Most parts of the movie were therefore shot on film, and for night scenes, Alexa was used as well as green screen visual effects.A major challenge on the film’s director was on deciding how to depict the various phases of the main character’s (Belfort) life. In conjunction with the films cinematographer, Scorsese decided to differentiate scenes of Jordan’s life where he seemed lost or uncertain from the scenes he would appear to have found clarity in his life and some sense of right course. This was successfully achieve from the use of diverse optics, color schemes, and lighting styles. Being guided by Belfort’s mental state and thoughts, the cinematographer alternated between various lenses for example v-lite, Hawk V, V-plus lenses, among others to get various degrees of depth, clarity, and perspective (Barsam & Dave p.238). Moreover, to enhance the contrast, in the different mental states, the director mixed in several diffusion filters, with ambient smoke being used sometimes and pushing the negative. As Rodrigo Prieto, the movies cinematographer explains, at the start of the film, it has a softer and slightly murky look, as Jordan has not yetfound himself. He seems confused and somehow awestruck by the busy Wall Street. During this phase of Belfort’s career, the director used a more narrow depth of field together with some slight alteration of anamorphic lenses (Barsam & Dave p. 240).Jordan at first works at the firm LF Rothschild before starting his own business. The set at the investment firm is dominated by a color scheme of green and gold light that imply an oldvintage look. The director claimed a photo he had seen of a brokerage firm in the 1980’s inspired this idea. In making wide shots, the cinematographer captured the office space using short range V-lite lenses that were able to curve the frames ends a bit, creating a sense of uncertainty. The picture of LF Rothschild is not as crisp clear as the outlook of Jordan’s subsequent firm, which had more of the color white. This helps show a different ambience and timeline of the two firms.After the crash of 1987, LF Rothschild falls and is shut down. Belfort loses his job and desperately searches for anywhere he can find employment. Eventually, he starts to work as a regular employee at an investment center, an occupation he dislikes. This set was only lit through big windows from one side bringing out a feeling of sort of being in a cave. This part of his life the idea was to show the decline of Belfort’s life an d he falls into darkness. After some time Jordan establishes his own brokerage firm and gains massive success. When he knows how to make a lot of money, and is successful, the film has a crisper, pristine look. The cinematographer changed to spherical Master Primes and did not use diffusion for this part.When he is under investigation, the director, and cinematographer create a sort of paranoia look. They changed back to Hawk anamorphic, with lengthier focal lengths to depict a feeling of being investigated. In some scenes, they also added some smoke to make the background faintly milky and have a shallow depth of field. The cinematographer did also push the film stock for the scenes and stop to improve grain and contrast.Prieto used an approach aimed at visually differentiating the three reiterations of Belfort’s firm as it grew. It started out in a renovated auto shop then relocated to a suitable office, and later finally moved into a bigger, elaborate office space. To differentiate the sets Rodrigo used a variety of color temperature combinations, applying different filters and diffusion. In the initial location, the auto shop is dimmer and realistic than the later evolved offices. Subsequently, the film brings out a look of power from Belfort and his offices become more luxurious. This is depicted in a crisper look with widely focused shots, white light, clear distinction, and fast camera shifts.The final version of Jordan’s investment firm is a huge office space full of big windows and offices with glass walls. The location selected for this section was a third floor office building at Westchester in New York. Moreover, the height of the building made it hard to control the amount of sunlight on set and recreating it after sunset. In the evenings to maintain a look of daylight, the film crew had to improvise with light boxes in all sides of the set and vertical blinds to show an effect of a plain whiteout. On another side, Jordan’s lavish office was situated where there lay a window with a vast outward view. The crew also improvised with lamps lighting the backing, and others lighting the set to ensure the film would maintain daylight brightness regardless of the type of weather.Moreover, the director of the film also created certain images to display characters mental states and emotions. For example, during the many drug escapades of Belfort there were up close shots with the fraudster, as he delivered slow slurred words in his dialogue and feel dizzy or high. The images would bring to mind a feeling of blur but at the same time flowed delivering a sensation of being loose. In one of the scenes where Jordan was high on Quaaludes in a nightclub,the cinematographer used 20mm lens and brought out very close shots of Leonardo’s mouth and eye as he tried to talk.The movie may be categorized as a narrative type of movie. There are narrations orcommentaries given by the main character, which shape our itinerary in the movie. They are a sequence of cues that guide the viewers in the progression of the movie (Barsam p.159). At theinitial scene of the movie, we see busy stockbrokers leapt over their desks in a vast work placewhere there is a lion lurking the pathways. We are also shown a contrasting view at anotherangle of the office where there are exhilarated staff who are having fun about to throw a littleman towards a Velcro bull's eye. The small man is thrown and a freeze frame appears stoppingthe man in mid-air. One of the men who have thrown the man approaches the camera andintroduces himself as Jordan Belfort. He continues to explain to us with motion pictures andscenes how he lives motivated by drugs, sex, living large and the debauchery he engages in. thescenes are brief and vulgar and does not show the escapade of Belfort implicitly but directly andswiftly.This type of movie is able to limit our knowledge of certain events and is successful inmanipulating the films emotional level arbitrarily. At one time, Belfort angrily slaps Naomi, hisWife. However, the event is shown to the audience through a far camera shot where only aglimpse is seen of what really transpires. The act is seen through a doorway where the impact ofthe aggression by Belfort is minimized. Here we gain significant information in the story but notas openly as the nearby sexual exploits and drug abuse escapades we get from other sections.This may be explained that a near shot of the violence would have altered the audience’sperception of Jordan’s bad boy pranks as merely entertainment. It would have led viewers toacquire a negative attitude towards the main character.The director also utilizes suspense in the film to capture the attention of the audience. This is the intensified sense of impatience or anxiousness of what might happen next. For instance, in one scene, Jordan is too high on their special drugs they call Quaaludes to help his colleague Donnie from chocking. This scene makes us anticipate what might happen next due to the tense situation.The film characters performances especially Dicaprio’s confidence c ontribute significantly to the mood of the movie. The movie has a stylistically textured soundtrack that is beneficial to the movies nature. The music and sound effects together with Jordan’s Commentary bring out a stimulating and lively experience. The movie is also successful in demonstrating surprising and fascinating attributes of Jordan and his degenerate lifestyle.Scorsese was also careful in the shot angles he chose for various scenes in the motion picture. When Dunham, the FBI Agent, is interviewing Jordan, the long edgy scene at one instance may lead viewers to consider that the Agent may accept to be paid off by the degenerate Jordan. He makes facial expressions and asks questions implying he may be interested in Belfort’s offer. This conversatio n is filmed in constricted angles only showing certain parts of the setting. However, when the agent tells Jordan to repeat his proposal we see a shot where the FBI’s colle ague in the off screen draws in closer to listen in. This approach helps hide some information and surprise the audience with a different result than they expected.The film does contain clear depictions of the characters emotions and mental states. There is the use of vivid pictures of the themes contained in the movie. The colors have been expertly selected and used to bring out the season timing and mood as intended by the director.Works citedBarsam, Richard M, and Dave Monahan. Looking at Movies: An Introduction to Film. New York:W.W. Norton & Company, 2013. Print.The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies. Bordwell, David. 2006./books/wayhollywoodtellsit_intro.pdfWolf of Wall Street CinematographyFS 101: Introduction To Film –– Friday 9:00-1:05FS 101: Introduction To Film。
华尔街电影观后感英文
华尔街电影观后感英文After watching a recent Wall Street movie, I was deeply moved by the captivating storyline, charismatic performances, and thought-provoking themes. The movie depicted the ruthless and glamorous world of high finance, where greed, ambition, and power collide. The Wall Street movie not only provided a glimpse into the lives of men and women navigating the complex world of stock trading but also explored the ethical dilemmas and moral corruption that can occur in such a cutthroat environment.One aspect that immediately struck me was the remarkable performances of the cast. The actors brought their characters to life with their exceptional portrayals. From the arrogant and manipulative protagonist to the wise and seasoned veteran, each character had a depth that made them captivating and believable. Through their performances, the movie effectively conveyed the tension, drama, and intricate relationships within the financial industry.The script of the Wall Street movie was brilliant, providing razor-sharp dialogue that resonated with the audience. The conversations between characters were fast-paced and clever, reflecting the high-stakes nature of the financial world. The script not only entertained but also shed light on important themes such as greed, morality, and the pursuit of wealth. It made me question the extent to which one should go in order to achieve success and the impact it can have on one's personal life.Moreover, the cinematography and set design played a crucial role in creating the atmosphere and bringing the audience into the world of Wall Street. The sleek offices, bustling trading floors, and lavish penthouses showcased the opulence and extravagance of the financial industry. Thecamera work was dynamic, capturing the fast-paced and adrenaline-fueled nature of the stock market. The visual elements of the movie enhanced the storytelling, making the audience feel like they were part of this high-stakes world.Another aspect that stood out in the Wall Street movie was the exploration of the ethical dilemmas faced by the characters. The movie delved into the gray areas of morality, showcasing the temptations and compromises that come with pursuing financial success. It made me question the values and principles that guide individuals in such a competitive and cutthroat environment. It served as a stark reminder that the pursuit of wealth can often blur the lines between right and wrong.Furthermore, the Wall Street movie addressed the impact of financial decisions on the wider society. It highlighted the consequences of unbridled greed and the dangers of unchecked capitalism. It made me reflect on the responsibility of those in positions of power and the need for ethical decision-making. The movie served as a cautionary tale, warning against the unchecked pursuit of profit at the expense of others.In conclusion, the Wall Street movie offered a captivating and thought-provoking exploration of the world of high finance. The exceptional performances, brilliant script, mesmerizing cinematography, and thought-provoking themes made it a truly memorable cinematic experience. It made me reflect on the human desires for power and wealth, the moral compromises we are willing to make, and the impact of our actions on society. The Wall Street movie serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities and consequences of life in the financial industry.。
华尔街观后感英语
华尔街观后感英语As I walked out of the movie theater after watching "The Wolf of Wall Street," I couldn't help but feel a rush of emotions. The thrilling portrayal of the stockbroker Jordan Belfort's rise and fall on Wall Street had left a lasting impact on me. The director Martin Scorsese's film, based on Belfort's memoir, was a gripping tale of ambition, greed, and excess that captivated audiences worldwide."The Wolf of Wall Street" is set in the 1990s when Belfort, played brilliantly by Leonardo DiCaprio, starts his journey as a young and ambitious stockbroker. He quickly rises through the ranks, amassing wealth beyond his wildest dreams. However, his success comes at a price – he becomes entangled in a web of corruption, fraud, and illegal activities.One of the most striking aspects of the film is its portrayal of the extravagant lifestyle led by Belfort and his colleagues. They splurge on luxury goods, lavish parties, drugs, and more, all fueled by their insatiable greed. The excessive display of wealth and the overwhelming desire for more is both mesmerizing and disturbing. It showcases the dark underbelly of Wall Street, where the pursuit of money becomes an all-consuming obsession.Scorsese's direction brilliantly captures the frenetic energy and chaotic nature of the financial world. The fast-paced editing, vibrant cinematography, and pulsating soundtrack create a sensory overload that mirrors the characters' wild and unpredictable lives. The film's three-hour runtime never feels tedious as it relentlessly propels the narrative forward, leaving viewers on the edge of their seats.At the core of "The Wolf of Wall Street" is DiCaprio's powerhouse performance as Jordan Belfort. He effortlessly embodies the character's charm, charisma, and boundless energy. DiCaprio's portrayal is equal parts captivating and repulsive – a testament to his skills as an actor. His ability to convey Belfort's manipulative nature and moral decay is truly remarkable.The supporting cast also deserves accolades for their outstanding performances. Jonah Hill shines as Belfort's loyal but equally corrupt friend Donnie, while Margot Robbie delivers a standout performance as Belfort's seductive and strong-willed wife Naomi. Their performances add depth and complexity to the story, highlighting the destructive relationships that fuel Belfort's downfall.As a viewer, I couldn't help but question the morality and ethics of the characters in "The Wolf of Wall Street." The film raises important questions about the corrupting influence of wealth and the lengths people will go to achieve success. It serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us of the dangers of unchecked ambition and the consequences of our actions.Beyond its compelling narrative and brilliant performances, "The Wolf of Wall Street" also offers a scathing critique of the financial industry. It exposes the culture of excess and greed that permeated Wall Street during the 90s and continues to be a prevalent issue today. The film forces us to confront the uncomfortable truth that the pursuit of wealth often comes at the expense of values and integrity.In conclusion, "The Wolf of Wall Street" is a thought-provoking film that leaves a lasting impression. It offers a glimpse into the dark side of the financial world, highlighting the consequences of unchecked ambition andgreed. Scorsese's masterful direction, coupled with the outstanding performances of the cast, makes this film an absolute must-watch. However, it also serves as a stark reminder of the ethical challenges that we face in society, urging us to reflect on our own values and the choices we make.。
战狼2英语读后感
战狼2英语读后感One of the major themes that resonated with me was the concept of nationalism. Throughout the film, the Chinese characters are depicted as fierce and loyal fighters who are willing to risk their lives to protect their fellow countrymen. Leng Feng, the protagonist, embodies this sense of patriotism as he goes to great lengths to ensure the safety of the Chinese nationals in the war-torn African country. This made me think about the importance of national pride and the lengths people are willing to go to defend their homeland.Moreover, Wolf Warriors 2 highlights the courage and bravery of not just the Chinese characters, but also the local people who stand up against the rebels. There are scenes where the African civilians fight alongside the Chinese soldiers, showing unity and strength in the face of adversity. This resonated with me as it showcased the power of collective action and the potential for individuals to make a difference, no matter their nationality. Another aspect of the film that struck me was the portrayal of Leng Feng's character development. At the beginning of the movie, he is depicted as a troubled and reckless individual, haunted by his past mistakes. However, as the story progresses, we see him transform into a selfless and noble person, willing to put his life on the line to save others. This transformation reminded me of the potential for personal growth and redemption, as well as the impact that one individual can have when they choose to do what is right.The action sequences in the film were also impressive and kept me on the edge of my seat. From intense gunfights to thrilling chase scenes, the film was packed with adrenaline-pumping moments. Director Wu Jing did a fantastic job in creating visually stunning and well-executed action scenes, which added to the overall excitement and entertainment value of the film.Additionally, the cinematography and visuals in Wolf Warriors 2 were breathtaking. The African landscapes, with their vast plains and towering mountains, served as a stunning backdrop for the film's events. The attention to detail and the use of vibrant colors made each scene visually striking, adding to the immersive experience of watching the movie. However, despite the thrilling action and compelling story, there were a few aspects of Wolf Warriors 2 that raised some questions in my mind. The film seemed to depict a very black-and-white view of the world, with clear distinctions between the "good guys" (the Chinese characters) and the "bad guys" (the rebels). While this may have made for a more straightforward narrative, it oversimplified the complexities and nuances of the real-world conflicts that the film was based on. I wished for a more nuanced exploration of the political and social context in which the story was set.In conclusion, Wolf Warriors 2 is an action-packed and emotionally charged film that explores themes of nationalism, courage, and heroism. It showcases the power of collective action, personal growth, and the impact that individuals can have when they choose to dowhat is right. The cinematography and visuals are stunning, and the action sequences are thrilling. However, the simplistic portrayal of the conflict and the lack of nuance in the narrative were slight drawbacks for me. Overall, I was deeply moved by this film and left with a sense of admiration for the characters' bravery and loyalty.。
看华尔街之狼观后感
看华尔街之狼观后感《华尔街之狼》是一部极富争议的电影，该片改编自乔丹·贝尔福特（Jordan Belfort）的同名回忆录，由马丁·斯科塞斯（Martin Scorsese）执导，莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥（Leonardo DiCaprio）主演。
电影中讲述了一个庞大的贪婪和腐败网络，并以金钱与欲望为主线，展示了华尔街的黑暗一面。
整部电影贯穿着乔丹·贝尔福特的个人成长和堕落过程。
他开始时是一名年轻有为的股票经纪人，努力奋斗着追逐自己的财富梦想。
然而，随着时间的推移，乔丹陷入了贪婪的漩涡，从一个普通经纪人逐渐变成一个无恶不作的诈骗犯。
这部电影的巧妙之处在于，它既揭示了金钱与权力的诱惑，又以一种夸张和黑色幽默的方式呈现。
观众可以从中看到华尔街内部的腐败现象，以及这些金融巨头们无孔不入的欺诈手法。
同时，电影还揭示了华尔街文化中的虚荣和排他性，以及对财富的病态追逐。
马丁·斯科塞斯的导演手法非常精湛，通过艳丽的画面和创新的剪辑方式，将观众完全沉浸在这个残酷而混乱的世界中。
莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥的精彩表演也值得称赞，他将乔丹·贝尔福特这个角色塑造得生动而真实。
电影中最令人震惊的一幕莫过于乔丹·贝尔福特在他狂欢生活中的荒唐行径。
他与同伴们参与了一连串疯狂的派对和药物滥用，同时还进行大规模的金融欺诈活动。
这些场景不禁让人反思，贪婪和欲望在人类心中的力量是如此强大，让一个本来正直的人沦为了无可救药的罪犯。
值得一提的是，尽管《华尔街之狼》所揭示的一些现象可能使人感到愤慨和绝望，但这并不意味着所有在华尔街工作的人都是道德败坏的人。
电影只是一种夸张和戏剧化的表达方式，以突出问题的严重性。
事实上，华尔街也有很多诚实守信的人，在为客户提供服务的同时秉持着道德和伦理。
观看《华尔街之狼》让我深思美国金融体系中存在的某些问题，以及人性中的贪婪和欲望的力量。
华尔街之狼观后感
华尔街之狼观后感《华尔街之狼》观后感电影《华尔街之狼》是由马丁·斯科塞斯执导，于2013年上映的一部影片。
影片根据乔丹·贝尔福特的同名自传改编，讲述了一个关于金融界的真实故事。
观看这部电影给我留下了深刻的印象，引发了我对金融行业的思考。
电影以乔丹·贝尔福特（Leonardo DiCaprio 饰）的视角展开，他是一个年轻有为的股票经纪人。
在1987年美国股市大崩盘后，他失去了经济基础，但凭借自己的聪明才智和不择手段的手段，开始从事股票推销。
他与同伴成立了斯特雷顿·奥克利（Stratton Oakmont）公司，以欺骗和诱导投资者追逐快速利益为手段，不断敛取巨额财富。
观看这部电影，我对贝尔福特的人物形象有着复杂的感受。
他聪明、机智，善于捕捉市场机会，但他与其团队的行为也属于欺诈和操纵市场。
他追求金钱的欲望让他丧失了道德和底线，将自己沉沦于实现财富的无底深渊。
我对他的角色既充满了兴趣，又深感厌恶。
电影中揭示了金融界的黑暗面和缺乏监管的问题，使我对该行业的运作方式有所反思。
虽然影片以个别人物的经历为例，但它折射出整个金融世界的普遍现象。
在现实生活中，我们也经常听闻各种金融丑闻和各种形式的欺诈行为。
监管的不完善使得金融行业充满了机会主义者和稍纵即逝的暴利。
影片还透露出强烈的无度消费和物欲的思想，使我深深地反思了人性中的贪婪和追求的问题。
贝尔福特用手中的财富糟蹋了自己的生活，陷入了药物和堕落的漩涡。
他的生活充斥着银行的奢华豪宅、名车和名牌服装，但内心却空虚。
《华尔街之狼》对于金融界和人性的揭示使我触动颇深。
我开始意识到，人们在追逐利益时，很容易迷失自我，忽略了道德和良知。
金融市场的繁荣与人性的弱点紧密相连，只有自律和道义观念的约束才能让金融行业更加健康和持久地发展。
当然，《华尔街之狼》不仅仅是一部揭示金融黑暗面的电影，它也是一部扣人心弦的故事片。
影片紧凑的剧情、精彩的演员表演和华丽的画面效果无不增添了观影的乐趣。
声色犬马——华尔街之狼观后感
圣诞期间，又有一部好莱坞大片“华尔街之狼”（Wolf of Wall Street）上映。
这部由派拉蒙（Paramount）公司制作，Martin Scorsese导演，著名演员Leonardo DiCaprio主演的影片，耗资一亿多美元。
在此同时，“华尔街之狼”获得了金球奖最佳影片奖的提名，Leonardo DiCaprio获得了金球奖最佳男主角的提名。
“华尔街之狼”是根据一个真实的故事改编的。
Jordan Belfort 是上世纪八十年代末华尔街上的一名股票经纪。
九十年代初，他创立了Stratton Oakmount 公司，以大力推售廉价分币股票（penny stock，在华尔街这类股票被称为“垃圾股”）而大获利润。
在Stratton Oakmount 公司鼎盛时期，它有超过一千名的雇员，股票出售总价超过了十亿美元。
但是，这种所谓的廉价分币股票完全是一场骗局，它造成了投资者两亿美金的损失。
Jordan Belfort于1998年因交易欺诈与洗钱被起诉，在他与联邦调查局（FBI）合作并提供他人犯罪的证据之后，他被轻判，只服刑22个月就出狱。
在狱中，他起了写书的念头。
出狱后，他的两本回忆录“华尔街之狼”（Wolf of Wall Street）和“抓住华尔街之狼”（Catching the Wolf of Wall Street）先后出版。
电影“华尔街之狼”就是根据Belfort的回忆录改编的。
自从2008年金融危机以来，人们对华尔街的批评不绝于耳。
而“华尔街之狼”是自那以后第一部最为真实，深入地挖掘华尔街丑闻，披露华尔街蛀虫的影片。
“华尔街之狼”全片长达3小时，大大超过一般影片的长度。
但我在观看过程中，丝毫不觉得影片沉闷，冗长。
全片结构紧凑，情节起伏，紧紧抓住了观众的心灵。
当Belfort 自开公司后，立即向雇员面授一套欺骗顾客，鼓动他们买入垃圾股的基本程序。
从这里，我们可以充分感到，股票经纪那一套信誓旦旦，貌似诚恳的语言，都是骗人的鬼话。
最新整理WallSree华尔街英文版观后感.docx
最新整理Wall Street华尔街英文版观后感Wall StreetThis movie tells us a story about The Money Masters Gordon Gekko';s Avarice became a second nature. He controlled the ups and downs of the stock market by fair means or foul. However; as a consequence, he was defeated by an assistant who still had conscience at that terrible time.The movie reflects the cultural values of American stock transaction. The film was directed by Oliver Stone who was the son of stock broker used the scenic method to reflect the inside story of the dark stock market. Although the background of the movie is the financial center of the whole world, the movie';s theme mainly point out the phenomenon that modern people can not resist the temptation of plenty of money and do something which violate the morality. In the film, the hero who was acted by Michael Douglas showed a great quantity of momentum to express the greed and cattiness of the mercial decEiver. In addition, the film attack the phenomenon that people was eager to achieve the money by fair means or foul. On the contrary, it advocates more and more people to go through the storm and fight them to win. The movie also reflects the capital';s greed, impudence and cattiness and the darkness of the modern mercial society. In the end of the movie, Bud';s father';s word probably retells the theme of the movie. In his opinion, it is better to work hard and earn money in steady and sure rather than to think how to sell others properties.There are many conflicts such as money, greed and humanity in the Wall Street. In fact, the conflicts are also exist in everyone';s daily life. Maybe you are working as hard as a dog and there are also lots of dream in your heart. However, you are still in the edge of living. On the contrary, the surrounding people whose abilities are lower than you, but they have lots of money which are not able to spend at a time or they are in the higher position that you have to look up to. Yes, this is the fact that you e across. At this time, whether you are able to work as hard as usual and whether you could keep in the morality is decide whether you can succeed.pared with Chinese culture, there are so many differences between them. One of the differences is individualism. Americans adore individualism so much that they think it can show the ability. However, in the Chinese culture, people think the one has individualism is selfish. On the other hand, Chinese is more polite than American. From the film, people always directly talk something which Chinese will talk in a euphemistic way. In addition, petition is always as intense as the movie shows. On the contrary, there is less intense in Chinese culture. At last, the operation of money is very between Chinese culture and American culture. In general, Chinese operate the money sticking in the mud. But people in the American culture will use the money so bravely that they will not miss profit. All in all, we know many differences between Chinese culture and American culture form the firm.。
华尔街之狼观后感（最新）
华尔街之狼观后感（最新）小李子曾经说过，在他的眼里华尔街之狼就是一部现代版的罗马帝国艳情史。
统计显示，《华尔街之狼》是迄今为止在对白中使用“fuck”最多的非纪录片，这个单词在电影里总共出现了506次。
美国电影协会(MPAA)曾对导演马丁•斯科塞斯发出警告，如果他不对《华尔街之狼》中的性爱和裸体场面进行删改，影片则会被定级为NC-17级(17岁以下人士不得观看)。
马丁•斯科塞斯的回应是会进行适度修改，以保证影片被定为R级。
这部电影的大尺度场面被许多人津津乐道，我们之前只是在新闻上见到过游艇上疯狂的派对，这次终于在电影里见到了。
Jordan说自己对drug和sex都是addiction，在我眼里这不过是借口，年轻人的疯狂罢了。
泛滥的肾上腺激素与荷尔蒙。
奥斯卡的评委们很讨厌斯科塞斯的这种直接，说这是空洞且哗众取宠的，或许是他们不敢相信它的真实吧，总觉得有夸张的成分。
我相信在演艺圈那么久的.小李子一定见过这些。
才会演得这么拼。
我倒觉得尺度刚好，虽然整部片充斥着各种大尺度场面，但所有都是为剧情服务没有一场是为了抢戏，你记住的永远是这部片带给你的思考而不是这些镜头，这才是导演的大师之处。
最后说说小李子。
前几天看Ellen Show采访小李子那集，小李子提到他在一年半的时间里连着拍完了被解放的姜戈，了不起的盖茨比和华尔街之狼，三个在某种程度上都有些精神不正常的人物，这三部电影消耗了他太多的精力，尤其是华尔街之狼。
接着整整休息了一年，到现在都还在休息。
这三部电影我都很喜欢，他在里面的表演都很精彩，而且碰巧都是有钱人，可以看到小李子是有多么的努力。
现在小李子的冲奥都成为了每年奥斯卡必提到的话题，但好像每年大家都对他很高的评价但都不觉得他会拿奖，说他的表演太过卖力，反而显得刻意了。
不过我很喜欢。
现在还这么不断突破自己去演戏的人已经很少了，小李子也经历过低谷，当他现在再次走出来的时候他知道自己需要更加努力才能超越自己。
《华尔街之狼》观后感
《华尔街之狼》观后感“华尔街之狼”所讲诉的故事，发生在八十时代末，九十时代初，这已是二十年初的事，二十年后的今日，华尔街上的金融诈骗不惟没有收敛，反倒变本加厉，其手眼更增添变，扮饰更加华美，掩饰更加大深度邃，影响更加很大。
和今天的骗人圈套相形，Belfort 当年的骗人圈套只是小巫见大巫。
在货币和欲念的指示下，更多的不合法之徒设播种种活局子，骗取投资者的财富。
"华尔街之狼"的编剧Terence winter在接纳洛杉矶时报寻访时指出：“我们不拥有汲取教诲，事物并没有变更”。
这意味着，华尔街上的诈骗，还将正常地接着施行下去。
怎样杜绝华尔街的蛀虫，影片儿没有供给解答，这是由于，事实生存中也没有现成而容易的解答。
不过，影片儿从文艺作品的角度，揭发了华尔街上这些个丑恶的传统，环节和内部情况。
为许多人敲响了警钟。
到此而言，我感到这是一部值当观赏的影片儿。
“华尔街之狼”作为一部好莱坞大片，比之其它大片，其最大的独特的地方是它贴近生存，揭发了华尔街隐秘不宣的一面。
很多好莱坞大片，涵盖“指环王”，“哈比人”等，距离当今的事实生存，真的是太远了，尽管这些个大片浪费巨资，有精巧的经过，宏伟的场景，有卓然的特技导致的令人惊叹的效果，不过，他们难于真正给人留下深刻的记忆。
我不知另外的人怎么样，就我而言，我甚至于不可以记取这几部大片的基本经过。
我更愿意欣赏“华尔街之狼”这么的影片儿。
值当一提的是，Leonardo Dicaprio 在影片儿中的演出颇为特别好。
我们最早想的起来的他，是“Titanic ”中那一个略带青涩的大男孩。
而这部影片儿中，他展出了成熟的演技，把一个金融蛀虫的心理，塑造得栩栩如生，尤其是醉酒和吸毒品后的发疯状况，表达得痛快淋漓。
他被提名儿为最佳男演员奖，的确名副实际上。
当然，有人会觉得，在片中，遭到杀害者绝对未显露出来，联邦调查局探员的形象也显得单薄，惨白, 正义未获得扩大。
不过，假如在影片儿中展出人心大快的场面和最终结局，反倒会消弱影片儿的现心意真实义。
《华尔街之狼》观后感精选
三一文库（）〔《华尔街之狼》观后感精选〕其实他也不过是华尔街万千投行中的一个，只不过赶上了股市泡沫的浪潮赚了一笔。
说到底他只是卖不靠谱的penny stock，只不过做了一家公司的IPO，和真正的大投行家根本就没法比。
但电影的三个小时也给我们展示了足够多的花花世界，让我们见识到了有钱人的生活究竟可以多么荒淫与荒谬。
Jordan的成功有两点，一个是他的sales skill，另一个则是他的欲望。
不得不说Jordan永远都是一个最棒的salesman，他一开始把自己推销给了华尔街，接着把股票推销给了客户，再接着把挣钱的理念与技巧推销给了公司的初创团队，然后是第1页共4页每次当中演讲让大家打鸡血式的推销，最后到出狱后仍然靠着兜售自己的成功学为生。
这种能力给了他成功的基础。
这部电影当我看到一个小时的时候，我就更坚定了自己不入金融这一行的想法。
因为有的时候钱生钱是需要欲望的，对钱欲望强烈的人才适合做这类事情，才会让你在面临许多机遇时愿意冒更大的风险去选择利益更大的那一个。
对金钱强烈的欲望可以让你成为顶级的交易员，而对金钱有这么强的欲望的人在毒品和性欲望自然也不会少，这也是为什么我们会在片中看到Jordan会有如此表现。
究竟是男人要变坏才有钱，还是有钱才变坏谁都说不清楚。
他开始并不吸毒，对老婆也都还不错，一个蓬勃向上的青年，但有钱以后诱惑就会越来越多，他也就逐步地陷入其中无法自拔。
有时候钱会蒙蔽人的眼睛，当Jordan再也无法克制自己对金钱的欲望的时候也是他真正走向灭亡的时候。
我们挣钱究竟是为了什么?影片里面给了两种价值观供24。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
The Wolf of Wall Street
---------------------a ridiculous but introspective movie Beginning with the degenerate life of Jordan R. Belfort, the movie shows the fighting time of Jordan, and ultimately leaves us a questionable ending. Through its superficial manifestation mode, it still leaves us something worthy of being thought over again and again.
At first glance, I just consider it as an R level movie which shows the degenerate life of bourgeois class like repeated drinking, drugs, whores and others.Anyway, all these things make me feel uncomfortable initially.
After having appreciated the first 30 minutes of the firm, we can briefly have a further understanding of how Jordan attains his current life and becomes rich. We can firstly know that he did fight for his future in the past. Then here comes the core of the movie-----his criminal life and ending.
Full closure, I feel a little bit uncomfortable with the exaggerate expression. Throughout the firm, “fucking” or “fuck” appear more than 500 times, and the scene of drug taking as well as whoring also appear repeatedly. But when I am accustomed to them, I just find that it is actually a kind of manifestation mode of showing their degenerate life, but the repeated scene makes the movie dilatory more or less.
Many roles in this movie have their significant influence on Jordan. Mark Hanna, taught the significance of sex and drug to Jordan when he firstly entered the Wall Street. Actually Jordan even considers him as his tutor. Teresa, Jordan’s first wife, supported him firmly when his company went broke, but in the middle of the movie she divorced with Jordan due to Jordan’s affair. And Jordan’s best friend Donnie Azoff, followed and worked for Jordan just after he met with himat the first time. No matter what Jordan wants to do, he is always standing on his side. But to some extent, it is also him who causes the final bad ending.
After finishing watching this movie, I find it difficult to judge whether Jordan is a “good guy” or a “bad guy”. On the one hand, obviously he is a criminal as he forms lots of cheatings and money laundering. But on the other hand he does better than the wealth in general. He will share his wealth with his friends, and always concerns about his stuff. When he was monitored by government,he warned his friend that do not speak too much, though all of them are not able to escape anyway. He is a clever guy, and as for a further comment, he is talented in business, but all talents can beuseless when he takes the wrong way.
The question of “Can you sell me this pen now?” appears two times in this movie. The answer of this question really impresses me in the first time. When I amconsidering how to introduce this pen to customers, his friend just takes away his pen and asks “Can you please sign your name for me, sir?” A ver y impressive and also useful way. This question appears again in the ending of the movie, after Jordan is released from prison. But this time, all of the answers are pertaining how to introduce the size, type or other physical conditions of this pen. They are normal, and
are lacking of innovation. Thesimple but meaningful ending really makes everyone begin to think deeply of our recent society. It is a simple contrast between two kinds of people. T he result is, Jordan’s uneducated friend does better than those who considers themselves as elitists. Does it mean the recent education weaken and limit people’s imagination and innovation? When we are chasing the normal and ordinary life, innovation does disappear from our life.So maybe next time when we are confronted with problems, we should remind ourselves of this question. When all the people are walking on the same, normal road, maybe we should take another different and innovate road to reach our destination.
国贸创新班
祁嘉杰
20151603549。