美国总统辩论稿

合集下载

奥巴马罗姆尼第一场电视辩论-中文稿

奥巴马罗姆尼第一场电视辩论-中文稿

奥巴马罗姆尼第一场电视辩论-中文稿时间:2012年10月3日地点:科罗拉多州,丹佛市,丹佛大学玛格里斯运动场主持人:美国公共广播公司(PBS)“新闻时间”主持人吉姆·莱雷尔(Jim Lehrer)莱雷尔:晚上好。

这里是科罗拉多州丹佛市的丹佛大学玛格里斯运动场。

我是美国公共广播公司《新闻时间》节目主持人吉姆·莱雷尔。

欢迎大家来到2012年总统大选第一次辩论会。

今天辩论双方是民主党候选人、现任总统巴拉克·奥巴马和共和党候选人、前马萨诸塞州州长米特·罗姆尼。

本场以及后面的三场辩论--两场总统辩论和一场副总统辩论--是由总统辩论委员会资助的。

今天晚上的90分钟辩论将围绕国内议题、根据总统辩论委员会规划的形式进行。

辩论由六个部分组成,每个部分大约15分钟。

在每个部分里,辩论双方各花两分钟回答第一个问题,然后就该部分其余问题进行自由辩论。

很多人士通过互联网或其他途径就每部分要讨论的题目提出了各种建议,但是这些议题是由我来挑选的。

在此我声明,这些议题并未提交辩论委员会或候选人筛选。

提前声明,三个部分关于经济议题,其余三个分别是关于医疗服务、政府功能和社会治理议题的。

每个部分都会强调辩论双方的不同意见、具体想法和政策选择。

辩论双方还将各有两分钟的结辩。

现场观众已承诺保持安静。

辩论时不要有喝彩、掌声、嘘声以及其他分散注意力的噪声,确保大家能够把注意力集中到聆听候选人的发言上。

现在,整个辩论会只有现在才允许发出与辩论无关的声音:热烈欢迎奥巴马总统和罗姆尼州长。

(欢呼。

掌声)欢迎你们,两位先生!现在开始第一部分,辩论经济议题。

关于如何创造就业机会,两位主要有什么不同呢?你们都将有两分钟时间陈述观点。

根据抽签顺序,您先请,总统先生。

创造就业机会奥巴马:好的。

谢谢你给我这个机会,吉姆。

我还想感谢罗姆尼州长和丹佛大学的热情。

今晚我想说的很多,但其中最重要的一点,就是20年前米歇尔·奥巴马同意嫁给我,使我成为世界上最幸运的人。

美国总统选举辩论趣事(精选3篇)

美国总统选举辩论趣事(精选3篇)

美国总统选举辩论趣事(精选3篇)美国总统选举辩论趣事篇11992年,美国总统候选人电视辩论首次引入“市民大会”的形式,先由盖洛普民调机构抽样选出一班“未决定将票投给谁的选民”做现场观众,再由他们直接向候选人提出问题,而电视辩论的舞台上,也移走了传统的讲坛,改为让候选人坐在高脚椅上辩论,并且可以随意走动,增加与观众的互动。

辩论开始后,一位女士向两位候选人提问:“知道不知道国债越来越多对于普通市民生活的影响?”老布什率先回答,但他的态度非常冷淡,言语间都是官话、套话,绕来绕去,较为空泛。

这位女士认为他的回答并没有解释清楚,锲而不舍地纠缠在这个问题上,对老布什咄咄相逼。

老布什却始终没有改变策略,不停将问题绕开。

轮到克林顿作答时,他则向前走了几步,来到这位女士跟前,用诚恳的语言,微笑着与她分享自己很多朋友的类似遭遇,克林顿与现场群众的互动,让现场气氛达到了高潮。

这时,老布什却做了一个动作:他悄悄地拉高了袖子,低头偷偷地看了看手表。

偏偏这个动作,被摄像机拍了下来,并向全国观众直播出去。

这场电视辩论结束后,美国一位著名记者说,打从老布什偷偷看表的这一刻开始,“总统竞选战提早谢幕”。

的确如此,老布什偷偷看表的小动作,让许多选民产生不满,导致其支持率大大下降,最终竞选失败。

俗话说:“伸手不打笑脸人。

”一边是老布什冷冰冰的态度,一边是克林顿热呵呵的笑脸,观众当然会喜欢克林顿。

可谁想到,老布什不仅表面冷静,心里也很自在,竟在直播中偷偷看起了表,这种做法既不尊重对手,也不尊重提问的现场观众和观看电视直播的选民,支持率下降也在所难免了。

美国总统选举辩论趣事篇21960年9月26日,美国举行了历史上第一次总统选举电视辩论,两位主角分别是肯尼迪和尼克松,全国有700万人收看了这场直播。

在此之前,两人的支持率旗鼓相当,但在电视辩论之后,尼克松的支持率却直线下降。

原来,电视台为了直播效果好,加强了舞台灯光;为了让候选人看起来精神抖擞,要求候选人站立辩论。

美军总统竞选演讲稿范文

美军总统竞选演讲稿范文

大家好!今天,我站在这里,满怀激情地向大家宣布,我决定竞选美国总统。

作为一名热爱祖国、关心人民的美国人,我深知自己肩负的责任和使命。

在此,我要向大家表明我的立场、阐述我的政策,并为实现美国人民的美好未来而努力奋斗。

一、坚定信念,捍卫美国价值观美国是一个伟大的国家,拥有悠久的历史和灿烂的文化。

作为一个美国人,我深知我们的价值观:自由、民主、平等、法治。

这些价值观是美国的核心竞争力,也是我们赖以生存和发展的基石。

作为一名坚定的美国价值观捍卫者,我将全力以赴:1. 保护美国主权和领土完整,坚决维护国家利益。

2. 保障美国公民的基本权利,维护社会公平正义。

3. 持续推进民主改革,确保政治体制的健康发展。

4. 弘扬美国文化,传承民族精神,增强国家凝聚力。

二、加强国防,维护世界和平作为一个拥有全球影响力的国家,美国有责任维护世界和平与稳定。

在国防方面,我将采取以下措施:1. 优化国防预算,确保军队现代化建设。

2. 加强军事人才培养,提高军队战斗力。

3. 坚持走和平发展道路,积极参与国际事务。

4. 加强与盟友的合作,共同应对全球性挑战。

三、振兴经济,提高民生福祉经济发展是国家繁荣的基础,民生福祉是国家进步的体现。

在经济发展方面,我将:1. 推动产业结构优化升级,提高科技创新能力。

2. 采取措施降低企业税负,激发市场活力。

3. 加强基础设施建设,提高公共服务水平。

4. 扩大就业机会,提高低收入群体收入水平。

5. 保障社会保障体系,让更多人共享发展成果。

四、教育为本,培养优秀人才教育是国家发展的基石,人才培养是国家竞争力的关键。

在教育事业方面,我将:1. 加大教育投入,提高教育质量。

2. 改革教育体制,破除教育不公平现象。

3. 鼓励民间资本投入教育,激发教育活力。

4. 加强国际教育交流,培养具有全球视野的人才。

五、环境保护,建设美丽家园环境保护是人类生存发展的基础,也是我国的重要战略任务。

在环境保护方面,我将:1. 坚持绿色发展理念,推动产业结构调整。

美国总统选举辩论辩题

美国总统选举辩论辩题

美国总统选举辩论辩题正方(支持美国总统选举辩论):作为美国总统选举的重要环节,选举辩论是候选人展示自己政治理念和能力的重要机会。

首先,选举辩论能够帮助选民更好地了解候选人的政治立场和政策主张。

通过辩论,候选人可以就重大议题展开讨论,让选民更清楚地了解候选人的政治主张,有助于选民做出更明智的选择。

其次,选举辩论也能够提高选民的政治参与度。

通过观看辩论,选民可以更深入地了解候选人的政见,从而更加积极地参与到选举过程中来。

最后,选举辩论也有助于促进政治对话和民主价值观。

在辩论中,候选人可以就各种政治议题进行深入讨论,这有助于促进政治对话,让选民更好地了解各种政治观点,有助于民主社会的发展。

反方(反对美国总统选举辩论):选举辩论并不能真正反映候选人的政治能力和素质。

首先,选举辩论往往只是表面功夫,候选人会在辩论中使用花言巧语来迷惑选民,而实际上并不能真正展现其政治能力。

其次,选举辩论往往只是形式主义,候选人会在辩论中避重就轻,而不是真正就重大议题进行深入讨论。

最后,选举辩论也容易受到舆论和媒体的影响,这样就会导致候选人在辩论中表现不真实,从而误导选民的判断。

正如美国前总统林肯所说,“你可以骗所有人一部分时间,也可以骗一部分人所有时间,但你无法骗所有人所有时间。

”选举辩论往往只是候选人表面的政治表演,不能真正反映其政治能力和素质。

综上所述,选举辩论在一定程度上有助于选民更好地了解候选人的政治立场和政策主张,提高选民的政治参与度,促进政治对话和民主价值观。

但是,选举辩论也存在着表面功夫、形式主义和容易受到舆论和媒体影响的问题。

因此,我们应该在推进选举辩论的同时,也应该对选举辩论进行改革,让选举辩论更加真实、公正和深入。

美国总统竞选稿(25篇)

美国总统竞选稿(25篇)

美国总统竞选稿(25篇)竞选口号篇- "人民的力量,引领未来!"- "共同奋斗,重塑美国梦!"- "团结合作,共建繁荣美国!"- "我们的希望,我们的未来!"- "以人为本,为美国人民而战!"- "改变现状,创造更美好的明天!"- "共同进步,让美国更强大!"- "迈向新时代,走向幸福生活!"- "为每个人的声音发声!"- "团结一心,实现美国的伟大梦想!"经济发展篇- 我们将推动经济创新,打造更有活力的经济体系。

- 投资教育,培养更多人才,促进经济持续发展。

- 实施贸易政策,促进国际间的经济交流合作。

- 打破经济壁垒,为中小企业创造更好的商业环境。

- 加强基础设施建设,为经济发展提供稳定支撑。

科技创新篇- 积极推动科技创新,引领未来发展的潮流。

- 加大对科研机构的支持力度,培养更多科技人才。

- 加强网络安全,保护个人隐私和国家利益。

- 推动智能技术的发展,改善人们生活质量。

- 鼓励创新创业,营造良好的创新氛围。

社会公正篇- 推动社会公正,保障每个人的权利和尊严。

- 加大对弱势群体的帮助和支持,实现社会的和谐稳定。

- 提高职业教育的质量和普及率,让每个人都有工作机会。

- 促进性别平等,消除各种歧视行为。

- 推动司法改革,确保法律公正有效地执行。

环境保护篇- 制定环境保护政策,减少污染,保护自然资源。

- 推动可持续发展,促进清洁能源的利用。

- 加强对气候变化的应对,减少温室气体排放。

- 保护生态环境,保护物种多样性。

- 倡导绿色生活方式,提高人们对环境的保护意识。

国际关系篇- 推动国际合作,解决全球性问题。

- 加强和盟友的关系,共同维护国际和平稳定。

- 保护国家安全,打击恐怖主义和跨国犯罪。

- 积极参与国际组织和机构,发挥影响力。

2016年美国总统大学第一场总统辩论(中英对照)

2016年美国总统大学第一场总统辩论(中英对照)
“What I believe is that the more we can do for the middle class, the more we can invest in’ you, your education, your skills, your future, the better we’ll be off and the better we grow.”
Hilary:“The kind of plan that Donald is put forward would trickle down economy all over again. And that would be the most extreme version.”
“That is not how we grow the economy. ”
“I think we come out of it with somewhat different perspectives. I understand that. You know Donald was very fortunate in his life and that’s all to his benefit. He started his business with 14 million dollar borrowed from his father. And he really believes that the more you help wealthy people, the better off will be. I don’t buy that.”
“我们占全球5%的人口,我们必须跟剩下的95%进行贸易。”
“八年前,我们经历了最坏的金融危机,最大的衰退,自20世纪30年来以来最严重的。这最主要就是因为施加在富人身上的巨额税务,而不是为中产阶级进行投入。”

我要竞选美国总统演讲稿

我要竞选美国总统演讲稿

大家好!今天,我站在这里,怀着无比激动和自豪的心情,向大家宣布,我将竞选美国总统。

这是一个庄严的决定,也是一个充满挑战的承诺。

我知道,这个舞台属于每一个有梦想、有担当、有情怀的美国人。

今天,我愿意将我的梦想、担当和情怀与大家分享,共同为实现美国梦而努力。

首先,我要感谢这个伟大的国家,感谢这片充满希望的土地。

正是因为有了你们,美国才能从一个小小的殖民地发展成为世界强国。

今天,美国正面临着前所未有的挑战,我们不能再坐以待毙,必须勇敢地站出来,为美国的未来负责。

我竞选美国总统,是因为我相信,我有能力、有智慧、有决心带领美国走向繁荣昌盛。

以下是我竞选美国总统的几个核心主张:一、振兴经济,创造就业经济是国家的基石,就业是人民的根本。

当前,美国经济面临着诸多挑战,失业率居高不下,贫富差距日益扩大。

我承诺,如果当选总统,将采取以下措施:1. 减税降费,激发企业活力。

降低企业税负,减轻中小企业负担,鼓励创新创业。

2. 加强基础设施建设,创造更多就业岗位。

加大投资力度,提高基础设施建设水平,带动相关产业发展。

3. 支持高技能人才培养,提高劳动力素质。

加大对教育、科研的投入,培养更多高技能人才,提升国家竞争力。

4. 优化产业政策,推动产业升级。

鼓励新兴产业、绿色产业、高科技产业的发展,淘汰落后产能,提高产业链水平。

二、保障国家安全,维护世界和平国家安全是国家的核心利益,维护世界和平是国际社会的共同责任。

我承诺,如果当选总统,将采取以下措施:1. 加强国防建设,提升军事实力。

加大军事投入,提高国防科技水平,确保国家军事安全。

2. 深化国际军事合作,共同应对安全挑战。

加强与美国盟友的合作,共同维护地区和世界和平。

3. 推动国际秩序变革,维护世界和平。

积极参与国际事务,推动国际秩序朝着更加公正、合理的方向发展。

4. 坚决捍卫国家主权和领土完整。

坚决反对任何形式的“台独”、“港独”分裂活动,维护国家统一。

三、推进教育改革,培养优秀人才教育是国家的未来,人才是国家的希望。

美国总统选举辩题

美国总统选举辩题

美国总统选举辩题
正方,美国总统选举应当采取民主选举制度。

在美国总统选举中,应当采取民主选举制度,因为这样可以确保公民的选举权
利得到充分尊重。

民主选举制度是现代社会的基本政治原则,它体现了人民的意志和选择。

正如美国第三任总统杰斐逊所说,“民主是自由的基础,只有在民主的制度下,人民才能真正享有自由。

”因此,采取民主选举制度是符合现代社会价值观的。

此外,民主选举制度也可以确保选举结果的合法性和公正性。

通过普选的方式,可以让更多的人参与到选举中来,从而使选举结果更具代表性。

正如美国第六任总统林肯所说,“民主政府是‘人民、由人民、为人民’的政府。

”只有通过民主选举,才能真正实现政府的合法性和公正性。

反方,美国总统选举应当采取选举人制度。

在美国总统选举中,应当采取选举人制度,因为这样可以更好地保护少数派的
利益。

选举人制度是为了防止多数派对少数派的压迫和剥削,它可以确保每个州的利益都得到充分尊重。

正如美国第二任总统亚当斯所说,“选举人制度是为了保护少数派的权利,防止多数派的暴政。

”。

此外,选举人制度也可以防止选举结果被操纵和篡改。

通过选举人的间接选举
方式,可以减少选举过程中的不确定性和动荡,从而确保选举结果的稳定和可靠性。

正如美国第四任总统麦迪逊所说,“选举人制度是为了确保选举结果的稳定和可靠,防止选举过程中的混乱和纷争。

”。

综上所述,选举人制度是更符合现实情况的选举方式,它可以更好地保护少数
派的利益,防止选举结果的操纵和篡改。

因此,在美国总统选举中,应当采取选举人制度。

美国历史上最具争议的总统辩论

美国历史上最具争议的总统辩论

美国历史上最具争议的总统辩论在美国的政治舞台上,总统辩论一直是选民了解候选人政策主张和领导能力的重要窗口。

然而,有些总统辩论却因其激烈的交锋、尖锐的言辞以及引发的广泛争议而被铭记在历史的长河中。

其中,1960 年尼克松与肯尼迪之间的那场辩论堪称经典。

当时,电视媒体刚刚兴起,这场辩论也成为了美国历史上首次通过电视直播的总统辩论。

尼克松在辩论前刚刚因生病而显得面容憔悴、神情疲惫,而肯尼迪则年轻英俊、充满活力。

在电视画面中,肯尼迪的形象和表现明显更具吸引力,这在一定程度上影响了选民的判断。

对于这场辩论,争议不仅在于候选人的外在形象对选举结果的潜在影响,还在于这标志着电视媒体在政治竞选过程中的影响力开始凸显。

而2016 年特朗普与希拉里的总统辩论,则充满了火药味和戏剧性。

特朗普以其直言不讳、打破常规的风格,与希拉里的传统政客形象形成了鲜明对比。

在辩论中,特朗普多次打断希拉里的发言,两人就经济政策、移民问题、外交事务等展开了激烈的交锋。

关于这场辩论的争议点众多,比如特朗普的言辞和态度是否过于激进和不尊重对手,以及希拉里在应对特朗普攻击时的策略是否有效。

在经济政策方面,特朗普主张大幅减税、减少政府监管,以刺激经济增长和创造就业机会。

他声称要让制造业回流美国,重振美国的工业实力。

而希拉里则强调通过加大对基础设施的投资、提高最低工资标准以及加强对金融行业的监管来促进经济的公平增长。

两人在经济政策上的分歧引发了广泛的讨论和争议,选民们对于哪种政策更能解决美国当时面临的经济困境各持己见。

移民问题也是这场辩论中的一个焦点。

特朗普提出要在美墨边境修建隔离墙,以阻止非法移民的涌入,并主张对移民采取严格的审查和限制措施。

他的言论引发了移民群体和人权组织的强烈反对,认为这种做法不人道且不符合美国的价值观。

希拉里则主张通过改革移民制度,为非法移民提供获得合法身份的途径,并强调移民对美国经济和社会的贡献。

这一议题的激烈辩论反映了美国社会在移民问题上的深刻分歧和对立。

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道尊敬的评委、各位观众:
今天我们聚集在一起,就是要探讨美国总统候选人辩论的术与道。

在这个关键时刻,我们需要候选人展现出对国家未来的清晰愿景和坚定领导力。

而这种领导力不仅仅体现在政策上的承诺,更需要在辩论中展现出来。

首先,我们需要候选人展现出辩论的术。

这包括对事实的准确把握、对政策的深入理解和对对手观点的尊重。

在辩论中,候选人需要以理性、客观的态度对待问题,而不是陷入情绪化的攻击和争执。

他们需要展现出沉稳、自信的形象,通过言辞和逻辑的辩驳来赢得选民的支持。

其次,我们也需要候选人展现出辩论的道。

这意味着候选人需要在辩论中展现出对道德和价值观的尊重,以及对选民利益的真诚关怀。

在辩论中,候选人需要展现出对社会公平、正义和人权的承诺,而不是为了个人利益而无视道德底线。

他们需要展现出对选民诉求的理解和对社会问题的解决方案,而不是空洞的口号和虚假的承诺。

在今天的辩论中,我们希望看到候选人展现出辩论的术与道。

我们希望看到他们在辩论中展现出真正的领袖气质和对国家未来的责任感。

让我们共同期待这场辩论能够为美国的未来指明方向,为选民带来更多的启发和希望。

谢谢!。

奥巴马罗姆尼第三次辩论词

奥巴马罗姆尼第三次辩论词

在支持率落后罗姆尼后,2012年10月22日,美国佛州第三场总统辩论扭转了双方局势,助我们的黑人总统追平了其共和党对手罗姆尼。

在第三场美国总统候选人辩论结束后,奥巴马和罗姆尼两家人走上辩论台。

辩论时的唇枪舌剑一扫而光,场面非常温馨,其乐融融。

在这里特整理了一份辩论发言文字版首发,与广大学员共享。

Hoster:This is the fourth and last debate of the 2012 campaign, brought to you by Commission on President Debates. This one's on foreign policy. Now we welcome President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney.Gentlemen, your campaigns have agreed to certain rules and they are simple. They have asked me to divide the evening into segments. I'll pose a question at the beginning of each segment. You will each have two minutes to respond, and then we will have a general discussion until we move to the next segment. tonight's debate, as both of your know, comes on the 50th anniversary of the night that President Kennedy told the world that the Soviet Union had installed nuclear missiles in Cuba—perhaps the closet we've ever come to nuclear war. And it is a sobering reminder that every president faces at some point an unexpected threat to our national security from abroad. So let's begin.The first segment is the challenge of a changing Middle East and the new face of terrorism. I'm going to put this into two segments, so you'll have two topic questions within this one segment on that subject. The first question, and it concerns Libya, the controversy over what happened there continues. Four Americans are dead, including an American ambassador.Questions remain. What happened? What cause it? Was it spontaneous? Was it an intelligence failure? Was it a policy failure? Was there an attempt to mislead people about what really happened?Governor Romney, you said this was an example of an American policy in the Middle East that is unraveling before our very eyes. I'd like to hear each of you give your thoughts on ernor Romney, you want the toss, you go first.Governor Romney:Thank you, Bob,and thank you for agreeing to moderate thia debate this evening.Thank you to Lynn University for welcoming us here, and Mr. President, it's good to be with you again. We were together at a humorous event a little earlier, and it's nice to maybe fuuny this time not on purpose. We'll see what happens.this is obviouslyan area of great concern to the entire world and to American in particular, which is to see a complete change in the structure and the environment in the Middle East. With the Arab Spring came a great deal of hope that there would be a change towards more moderation and opportunity for greater participation on the part of women and public life and in economic life in the Middle East. But instead we've seen in nation after nation a number of disturbing events. of course,we see in Syria 30,000 civilians having been killed by the military there. We see in Libya an attack apparently by,well, I think we know now by terrorism of some kind against our people there, four people dead. Our hearts and minds go to them. Mali has been taken over, the northern part of Mali, by al-Qaida-type individuals. We have in Egypt a Muslim Brotherhood president. And so what we've seeing is a pretty dreamtic reversal in the kind of hopes we had for that region.Of course, the greatest threat of all is Iran. Four years closer to a nuclear weapon.And we're going to have to recognize that we have to do as the president done. I congratulate him on taking cut Osama bin Laden and going after the leadership in al-Qaida.But we can't kill our way, out of this mess. We're going to have to put in place a very comprehensive and robust strategy to help the world of Islam and other parts of the world reject this radical violent extremism which is-it's really not on the run. It's certainly not hiding. This is a group that is now involved in 10 or 12 coumtries and it presents an enormous threat to our friends, to the world, to America long term, and we must have a comprehensive strategy to help reject this kind of extremism. (stoped)Bob: Mr. Obama.President Obama: Well, my first jod as commander in chief, Bob, is to keep the American people safe, and that's what we've done over the last four years. We ended the war in Iraq, refocused our attention on those who actually killed us on 9/11. And as a consequence, al-Qaida's core leadership has been decimated. In addition, we've now able to transition out of Afghanistan in a responsible way, making sure that Afghans take responsibility for their own security, and that allows us also to rebuild alliances and make friends around the world to combat future threat. Now, with respect to Libya, as I indicatedin the last debate, when we received that phone call, I immediately made sure that, number one, we did everything we could to secure those Americans who were still in harm's way; number two, that we would investigate exactly what happened; and number three, most importantly, that we would go after those who killed Americans, and we would bring them to justice, and that's exactly what we're going to do. But I think it's important to step back and think about what happened in Libya.Now, keep in mind that I and Americans took leadership in organizing an international coalition that made sure that we were able to-without putting troops on the ground, at the cost of less than what we spent in two weeks in Iraq-liberate a country that had been under the yoke of dictatorship for 40 years, got rid of a despot who had killed Americans. And as a consequence, despite this tragedy, you had tens of thouands of Libyans after the events in Benghazi marching and saying, America's our friend. We stand with them. Now that represents the opportunity we have to take advantage of. And you know, Governor Romney, I'm glad that you agree that we have been successful in going after al-Qaida, but I have to tell you that, you know, your strategy previously has been one that has been all over the map and is not designed to keep Americans safe ot to build on the opportunities that exist in the Middle East.柯桥上元教育:俞老师2012.10.26.。

2021美国总统大选辩论会中文版(血泪翻译版)

2021美国总统大选辩论会中文版(血泪翻译版)

2021美国总统大选辩论会中文版(血泪翻译版)(掌声)吉姆莱勒:三十秒,伙计。

让我们有一个很棒的夜晚,为你,为我国。

晚上好从麦格尼斯竞技场在丹佛丹佛大学,科罗拉多。

我是吉姆莱勒的“公共广播新闻,“我欢迎你到2021第一场总统辩论之间的巴拉克总统奥巴马,民主党提名的候选人,和前马萨诸塞州州长米特・罗姆尼,共和党提名。

这次辩论和未来三――两国总统,副总统――是一个由总统辩论委员会主办。

今晚的90分钟将国内问题,将由委员会设计的格式。

大约15分钟会有六段两分钟回答第一个问题,然后公开讨论为余下的每一部分。

成千上万的人们提供建议部分科目或问题,通过互联网和其他手段,但我作出最后的选择。

并记录,他们没有提交批准委员会或候选人。

这段我提前宣布将三的经济和一个卫生保健,政府的作用和管理,重点在不同,细节和选择。

两位候选人也将有两分钟的最后陈述。

大厅中的观众都已经承诺保持沉默――没有欢呼,掌声,嘘声,嘘声,在嘈杂的分心的事情,所以我们可能都集中在候选人都说。

有一个声音异常现在,虽然,我们欢迎奥巴马总统和罗姆尼州长。

(掌声)先生们,欢迎你们。

让我们开始经济,段,并让我们开始工作。

什么是主要的差异两国之间的你,你将如何去创造新的工作?这次辩论和未来三――两国总统,副总统――是一个由总统辩论委员会主办。

今晚的90分钟将国内问题,将由委员会设计的格式。

大约15分钟会有六段两分钟回答第一个问题,然后公开讨论为余下的每一部分。

你有2分钟。

每一个你有2分钟开始。

掷硬币决定,总统先生,你先去。

奥巴马总统:好的,谢谢你,吉姆,这个机会。

我要感谢罗姆尼州长和丹佛大学的盛情款待。

有很多分,我希望今晚能,但其中最重要的是,20年前我成为世上最幸运的人因为米歇尔奥巴马同意嫁给我。

于是我只想祝福你,亲爱的,周年快乐,让你知道,从现在开始的一年我们将不庆祝它在40000000人面前。

(笑声)你知道,四年前我们经历了大萧条以来最严重金融危机。

林肯总统经典法庭辩论

林肯总统经典法庭辩论

林肯总统经典法庭辩论作为律师,林肯的名气似乎不够大,但他在为小阿姆斯特朗一案中所作的辩护却至今被当作辩论的范例而广为流传。

小阿姆斯特朗被人指控图财害命,原告收买了福尔逊作证人,一口咬定亲眼看见小阿姆斯特朗开枪击毙被害者。

小阿姆斯特朗有口难辩,林肯主动担任了他的辩护律师。

开庭复审时,林肯首先问证人福尔逊是否亲眼看见被告开枪杀人:“你认清是小阿姆斯特朗吗?”福尔逊回答:“是的。

”林肯问:“你在草堆后面,小阿姆斯特朗在大树下,相距有二三十米,你能看清楚吗?”福尔逊说:“看得很清楚,因为当时月光很明亮。

”林肯追问:“你肯定不是从衣着等方面认清的吗?”福尔逊再次证实:“不是从衣着等方面看清楚的,我肯定是看清了他的脸蛋,因为月光正照在他脸上。

”最后,林肯问证人:“具体时间也能肯定吗?”福尔逊说:“完全可以肯定,因为我回到屋里时,看了时钟,那是11点1刻。

”“这个证人是一个彻头彻尾的骗子,他一口咬定10月18日晚上11点左右他在月光下认清了被告人的脸。

请大家想想,1 0月18日那天是上弦月,到了晚上11点,月亮早下山了,哪里还有月光?退一步说,也许他时间记得不十分精确,当时时间稍有提前,月亮还没有下山。

但那时月光应是从西边往东边照射,草堆在东,大树在西,如果被告脸朝大树,月光可以照到脸上,可是证人就根本看不到被告的脸。

如果被告脸朝草堆,那么月光只能照在被告的后脑勺上,证人又怎么能看到月光照在被告的脸上、又怎么能从距离二三十米的地方看清被告的脸呢?”当林肯一口气说完这些话的时候,在场的人都沉默了。

接着,掌声、欢呼声一起进发出来。

福尔逊无地自容,小阿姆斯特朗无罪释放。

在这场论战中,林肯严密的逻辑论证是不可否认的,但最重要的是林肯在调查事实的基础上,掌握了与案情有关的重要情况,揭穿了福尔逊的伪证。

美国总统选举辩论辩题

美国总统选举辩论辩题

美国总统选举辩论辩题正方(支持美国总统选举辩论):作为正方辩手,我认为美国总统选举辩论是一个非常重要的政治事件,它可以帮助选民更好地了解候选人的政策和立场,从而作出更明智的选举决定。

首先,美国总统选举辩论是候选人展示自己能力和领导才能的重要机会。

在辩论中,候选人可以通过言辞和表现展示自己的政策观点和领导能力,让选民更好地了解他们的才能和价值观。

正如美国前总统约翰·肯尼迪曾经说过,“辩论是政治的最高形式,因为它是一种言辞和逻辑的较量,能够展示一个人的才能和智慧。

”。

其次,美国总统选举辩论也是选民了解候选人政策和立场的重要途径。

在辩论中,候选人会就各种政治议题展开讨论,包括经济、外交、社会福利等,这些都是选民关心的问题。

通过辩论,选民可以更好地了解候选人的政策观点,从而作出更明智的选举决定。

最后,美国总统选举辩论也可以帮助选民更好地了解候选人的性格和品质。

在辩论中,候选人的言辞和行为会展现出他们的性格和品质,这对选民来说也是一个重要的参考因素。

正如英国前首相温斯顿·丘吉尔曾经说过,“辩论是一个人品格的试金石,它能够展示一个人的胆识和品质。

”。

综上所述,美国总统选举辩论是一个非常重要的政治事件,它可以帮助选民更好地了解候选人的政策和立场,展示候选人的领导能力,同时也可以帮助选民了解候选人的性格和品质,从而作出更明智的选举决定。

反方(反对美国总统选举辩论):作为反方辩手,我认为美国总统选举辩论并不是一个必要的政治事件,它在一定程度上是一场政治秀,很难真正反映候选人的能力和政策观点。

首先,美国总统选举辩论往往更像是一场表演,而非真正的政策辩论。

候选人往往会在辩论中使用花言巧语和政治口号,而非深入讨论真正的政治议题。

这使得辩论往往只是一场政治秀,很难让选民真正了解候选人的政策观点和能力。

其次,美国总统选举辩论往往更像是一场形式主义的较量,而非真正的政治辩论。

候选人往往会在辩论中互相攻击对手,而非就政治议题展开深入讨论。

举行美军总统竞选演讲稿

举行美军总统竞选演讲稿

大家好!今天,我站在这里,是为了向大家宣布我的参选决定,我将竞选美国总统。

在此,我要感谢大家对我的关注和支持,同时也希望大家能够认真聆听我的演讲,了解我的理念和未来规划。

首先,我要说的是,我们的国家正处于一个关键的历史时刻。

过去几年,美国在国际舞台上遭遇了许多挑战,国内也面临着诸多困境。

作为一个负责任的国家,我们必须勇敢面对这些挑战,为实现国家的繁荣、稳定和长远发展而努力。

一、坚定捍卫国家利益美国是一个伟大的国家,我们的国家利益高于一切。

在新的历史时期,我将坚定捍卫国家利益,确保美国在国际事务中始终保持领先地位。

1. 重塑美国领导力。

在全球范围内,美国应发挥引领作用,推动构建公平、公正、合理的国际秩序。

我将积极推动多边主义,加强与世界各国的合作,共同应对全球性挑战。

2. 加强与盟友关系。

美国应加强与北约、日本、韩国等盟友的关系,共同维护地区和平与稳定。

同时,我们将坚决支持台湾地区,捍卫台海和平。

3. 维护美国国家安全。

我将采取一切必要措施,确保美国国家安全。

加强情报共享,提升军事实力,坚决打击恐怖主义、极端主义等威胁。

二、推动经济繁荣经济是国家的基石,我们要实现国家的繁荣,就必须发展经济。

以下是我对未来经济发展的几点规划:1. 促进就业。

我将采取一系列措施,降低企业税负,鼓励企业扩大投资,创造更多就业机会。

2. 改善基础设施。

加大基础设施建设投入,提高交通运输、能源、通信等领域的效率,为经济发展提供有力支撑。

3. 发展创新。

鼓励科技创新,支持高新技术产业发展,提高国家竞争力。

4. 促进教育改革。

提高教育质量,培养更多优秀人才,为国家发展提供源源不断的人力资源。

三、加强社会公平一个国家的繁荣不仅仅体现在经济上,还要体现在社会公平上。

以下是我对未来社会公平的几点规划:1. 改善社会福利。

加大对弱势群体的扶持力度,提高社会保障水平,让每个人都能享受到公平的机会。

2. 打击腐败。

坚决打击腐败现象,确保政府权力在阳光下运行,让民众享受到公平正义。

谎话连篇的美国总统辩论

谎话连篇的美国总统辩论

谎话连篇的美国总统辩论谎话连篇的美国总统辩论无撒谎,不总统副总统候选人辩论,拜登瑞恩激烈交锋“他们又开始撒谎了”“他们又开始撒谎了。

”——在10月3日第一场美国总统选举电视辩论结束以后,《华盛顿邮报》“关于辩论的事实检验”的报道用这句话作为了开头。

《华盛顿邮报》称,奥巴马和罗姆尼在辩论中都像雪花般地抛出了各种数据和事实,但相当一部分都非常可疑。

比如,奥巴马称,过去两年,民众健康保险的支出确实增长了,但这是过去50年来最慢的增长。

报道质疑称,奥巴马试图拿他力推的医保法案邀功说不通,实际上,这两年增长较慢是因为法案很多条款还未执行,而且遇上了经济不景气。

又如罗姆尼宣称,他所制定的经济复苏计划,将会为美国带来1200万个职位,但据独立的经济学家分析,未来四年的经济必然会走向复苏,为美国带来1200万个职位,这与哪位当选总统没有任何关系。

罗姆尼还称,他将为美国带来更多的开放市场,但奥巴马政府一个开放市场都没有带来,而事实上,奥巴马执政期间至少与哥伦比亚、巴拿马、韩国签署了新的贸易协定。

类似的误导性表达或者有意无意的举证错误在辩论中还有很多。

而美国媒体之所以死盯着这种行为,是因为这场势均力敌的“撒谎竞赛”(时代杂志语),并不是从电视辩论才开始的,而是从整个选举、甚至在很久以前就开始了。

…[详细]奥巴马,睁眼说瞎话的高手;罗姆尼,30周内共撒了533个谎奥巴马被认为有着“睁眼说瞎话”的天赋,能够把谎言说得“义正言辞”,甚至让听者感动不已。

一个典型例子是,当去年奥巴马被问到他是否认为最高法院会判罚他的医保法案违宪时,他回答说:“我相信最高法院不会做出这种史无前例的卓绝决定,来推翻一项民主选举的多数议会通过的立法。

”奥巴马的措辞让人感到非常自信而且还很有道理,但其实犯了非常基本的错误。

美国最高法院判罚一项“由民主议会通过的多数法律”违宪究并不是“史无前例”,事实上,美国最高法院这么做的历史,已经有209年之久,最高法院存在的意义之一就是“裁决违宪权”,这项权利是美国宪政的基础。

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道英文回答:As a presidential candidate, participating in debatesis a crucial aspect of the campaign trail. It provides a platform to present my vision for the country, articulatemy policies, and engage in direct dialogue with the electorate.In preparing for debates, I delve into a comprehensive study of current events, policy issues, and my opponents' positions. I also conduct mock debates with advisors and engage in rigorous practice sessions to hone my deliveryand response time.During the debates, my overarching goal is to convey my message clearly and effectively to the widest possible audience. I employ a combination of logical reasoning, emotional appeals, and personal anecdotes to make my case.I strive to maintain a respectful and professional demeanor,even when faced with challenging questions or interruptions.To illustrate my approach, I recall a particular debate where I was asked about my stance on healthcare. I began by acknowledging the importance of affordable and accessible healthcare for all Americans. I then outlined my specific policy proposals, emphasizing their benefits and addressing potential concerns.In addition to substance, I also focus on delivery and presentation. I use clear and concise language, avoiding jargon or technical terms. I maintain eye contact with the audience, modulating my tone and body language to convey both confidence and empathy.中文回答:作为总统候选人,参加辩论是我在竞选历程中非常重要的一环。

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道英文回答:As a seasoned political analyst, I've witnessed countless presidential debates, each a carefully orchestrated dance between rhetoric and substance. The candidates' words carry immense weight, shaping public opinion and influencing electoral outcomes. In this essay, I'll delve into the art and science of presidential debate strategy, examining the tactics and techniques employed to sway the hearts and minds of voters.The Art of Oratory。

A presidential debate is not merely an exchange of ideas; it's a performance, a battle of wits where candidates strive to outmaneuver each other with their eloquence and charisma. They employ a range of rhetorical devices, from soaring rhetoric to folksy anecdotes, to connect with the audience on an emotional level. Masteringthe art of oratory enables candidates to convey their message with clarity and conviction, leaving a lasting impression on voters.For instance, in the famous "I Have a Dream" speech, Martin Luther King Jr. used vivid imagery, biblical allusions, and rhythmic language to paint a compelling vision of racial equality. His words resonated deeply with listeners, galvanizing support for the civil rights movement.The Science of Strategy。

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道

美国总统候选人辩论的术与道尊敬的评委、各位观众:
今天我们聚集在一起,目睹了美国总统候选人的辩论。

在这个
历史性的时刻,我们不仅可以看到候选人们的政策立场和承诺,更
可以看到他们的辩论术与道。

辩论术,是指候选人们在辩论中所展现出来的辩论技巧和能力。

一个优秀的候选人应该具备良好的口才、逻辑思维和应变能力。


辩论中,候选人们应该能够清晰地表达自己的观点,有条理地反驳
对手的观点,以及灵活地应对各种突发情况。

一个优秀的辩手不仅
要有坚定的立场,还要有出色的辩论技巧,才能在辩论中脱颖而出。

然而,辩论道,更加重要。

辩论道,是指候选人们在辩论中所
展现出来的品德和修养。

一个优秀的候选人应该具备诚实守信、尊
重他人和平等公正的品质。

在辩论中,候选人们应该能够以礼貌和
尊重的方式与对手进行交锋,而不是采取攻击性的言辞和行为。


个优秀的候选人不仅要有出色的辩论技巧,还要有高尚的品德修养,才能在辩论中赢得人们的尊重和支持。

因此,我们应该关注的不仅是候选人们的政策立场和承诺,更应该关注他们的辩论术与道。

只有具备良好的辩论技巧和高尚的品德修养的候选人,才能够成为真正的领袖,为国家和人民谋福祉。

谢谢!。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

CANDY CROWLEY:Good evening from Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York. I’m Candy Crowley from CNN’s State of the Union. We are here for the second presidential debate, a town hall sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates.The Gallup Organization chose 82 uncommitted voters from the New York area. Their questions will drive the night. My goal is to give the conversation direction and to ensure questions get answered.The questions are known to me and my team only. Neither the commission nor the candidates have seen them. I hope to get to as many questions as possible. And because I am the optimistic sort, I’m sure the candidates will oblige by keeping their answers concise and on point. Each candidate has as much as two minutes to respond to a common question, and there will be a two-minute follow-up.The audience here in the hall has agreed to be polite and attentive; no cheering or booing or outbursts of any sort. We will set aside that agreement just this once to welcome President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney. (Cheers, sustained applause.)Gentlemen, thank you both for joining us here tonight. We have a lot of folks who’ve been waiting all day to talk to you, so I want to get right to it. Governor Romney, as you know, you won the coin toss, so the first question will go to you. And I want to turn to a first- time voter, Jeremy Epstein, who has a question for you.Q: Mr. President, Governor Romney, as a 20-year-old college student, all I hear from professors, neighbors and others is that when I graduate, I will have little chance to get employment. Can — what can you say to reassure me, but more importantly my parents, that I will be able to sufficiently support myself after I graduate?MITT ROMNEY: Thank you, Jeremy. I appreciate your — your question, and — and thank you for being here this evening. And to all of those from Nassau County here that have come, thank you for your time. Thank you to Hofstra University and to Candy Crowley for organizing and leading this — this event. Thank you, Mr. President, also for being part of this — this debate.Yours question —your question is one that’s being asked by college kids all over this country.I was in Pennsylvania with someone who’d just graduated. This was in Philadelphia, and she said, I — I —I got my degree. I can’t find a job. I’ve got three part-time jobs. They’re just barely enough to pay for my food and pay for an apartment. I can’t begin to pay back my student loans.So what we have to do is two things: we have to make sure that we make it easier for kids to afford college and also make sure that when they get out of college, there’s a job. When I was governor of Massachusetts, to get a high school degree, you had to pass an exam. If you graduated in the top quarter of your class, we gave you a John and Abigail Adams Scholarship, four years tuition-free to the college of your choice in Massachusetts. It’s apublic institution. I want to make sure we keep our Pell — Pell Grant program growing. We’re also going to have our loan progra m so that people are able to afford school.But the key thing is to make sure you can get a job when you get out of school. And what’s happened over the last four years has been very, very hard for America’s young people. I want you to be able to get a job. I know what it takes to get this economy going. With half of college kids graduating this year without a college — or excuse me, without a job and without a college-level job, that’s just unacceptable. And likewise, you got more and more debt on your back. So more debt and less jobs.I’m going to change that. I know what it takes to create good jobs again. I know what it takes to make sure that you have the kind of opportunity you deserve. And kids across this country are going to recognize we’re bringing back an economy. It’s not going to be like the last four years. The middle class has been crushed over the last four years, and jobs have been too scarce. I know what it takes to bring them back, and I’m going to do that and make sure when you graduate — when do you graduate?Q: (Off mic.)MR. ROMNEY: 2014. When you come out in 2014 —I presume I’m going to be president —I’m going to make sure you get a job. (Chuckles.) Thanks, Jeremy. Yeah, you bet.MS. CROWLEY: Mr. President.PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Jeremy, first of all, your future is bright, and the fact that you’re making investment in higher education is critical, not just to you but to the entire nation.Now, the most important thing we can do is to make sure that we are creating jobs in this country, but not just jobs, good-paying jobs, ones that can support a family. And what I want to do is build on the 5 million jobs that we’ve created over the last 30 months in the private sector alone. And there are a bunch of things that we can do to make sure your future is bright.Number one, I want to build manufacturing jobs in this country again. You know, when Governor Romney said we should let Detroit go bankrupt, I said, we’re going to bet on American workers and the American auto industry, and it’s com e surging back. I want to do that in industries, not just in Detroit but all across the country. And that means we change our tax code so we’re giving incentives to companies that are investing here in the United States and creating jobs here. It also mean s we’re helping them and small businesses to export all around the world in new markets.Number two, we’ve got to make sure that we have the best education system in the world. And the fact that you’re going to college is great, but I want everybody to get a great education. And we worked hard to make sure that student loans are available for folks like you, but I also want to make sure that community colleges are offering slots for workers to get retrained for the jobs that are out there right now and the jobs of the future.Number three, we’ve got to control our own energy, you know, not only oil and natural gas, which we’ve been investing in, but also we’ve got to make sure we’re building the energy sources of the future, not just thinking about next year, but 10 years from now, 20 years from now. That’s why we’ve invested in solar and wind and biofuels, energy-efficient cars.We’ve got to reduce our deficit, but we’ve got to do it in a balanced way — asking the wealthy to pay a little bit more, along with cuts, so that we can invest in education like yours. And let’s take the money that we’ve been spending on war over the last decade to rebuild America — roads, bridges, schools. If we do those things, not only is your future going to be bright, but America’s future’s going to be bright as well.MS. CROWLEY: Let me ask you for a more immediate answer, beginning with Mr. Romley (sic).Just quickly, what can you do —we’re looking at a situation where 40 percent of the unemployed have been unemployed for six m onths or more. They don’t have the two years that Jeremy has. What about those long- term unemployed who need a job right now?MR. ROMNEY:Well, what you’re seeing in this country is 23 million people struggling to find a job, and a lot of them, as you say, Candy, have been out of work for a long, long, long, long time.The president’s policies have been exercised over the last four years, and they haven’t put Americans back to work. We have fewer people working today than we had when the president took office. If the — the unemployment rate was 7.8 percent when he took office. It’s 7.8 percent now. But if you calculated that unemployment rate taking back the people who dropped out of the workforce, it would be 10.7 percent. We have not made the progress we need to make to put people back to work.That’s why I put out a five-point plan that gets America 12 million new jobs in four years and rising take-home pay. It’s going to help Jeremy get a job when he comes a out of school. It’s going to help people acros s the country that are unemployed right now.And one thing that the — the president said which I want to make sure that we understand — he — he said that I said we should take Detroit bankrupt, and —and that’s right. My plan was to have the company go through bankruptcy like 7-Eleven did and Macy’s and —and — and Continental Airlines and come out stronger. And — and I know he keeps saying, you wanted to take Detroit bankrupt. Well, the president took Detroit bankrupt. You took General Motors bankrupt. You took Chrysler bankrupt. So when you say that I wanted to take the auto industry bankrupt, you actually did. And —and I think it’s important to know that that was a process that was necessary to get those companies back on their feet, so they could start hiring more people. That was precisely what I recommend and ultimately what happened.MS. CROWLEY: Let me — let me give the president a chance. Go ahead.PRESIDENT OBAMA:Candy, what Governor Romney said just isn’t true. He wanted to take them into bankruptcy without providing them any way to stay open, and we would have lost a million jobs.And that —don’t take my word for it; take the executives at GM and Chrysler, some of whom are Republicans, may even support Governor Romney. But they’ll tell you hisp rescription wasn’t going to work.And Governor Romney says he’s got a five-point plan. Governor Romney doesn’t have a five-point plan; he has a one-point plan. And that plan is to make sure that folks at the top play by a different set of rules. That’s been his philosophy in the private sector; that’s been his philosophy as governor; that’s been his philosophy as a presidential candidate. You can make a lot of money and pay lower tax rates than somebody who makes a lot less. You can ship jobs overseas and get tax breaks for it. You can invest in a company, bankrupt it, lay off the workers, strip away their pensions, and you still make money.That’s exactly the philosophy that we’ve seen in place for the last decade. That’s what’s been squeezing middle-class families. And we have fought back for four years to get out of that mess, and the last thing we need to do is to go back to the very same policies that got us there.MS. CROWLEY: Mr. President, the next question is going to be for you here.And Mr. Romney —Governor Romney, there’ll be plenty of chances to go on, but I want to — we have all these folks —MR. ROMNEY: That — that Detroit — that Detroit answer — that Detroit answer and the rest of the answer — way off the mark.MS. CROWLEY: I —OK. We’ll — you certainly will have lots of time here coming up. I —because I want to move you on to something that — sort of connected to cars here, and go over — and we want to get a question from Philip Tricolla.Q: Your energy secretary, Steven Chu, has now been on record three times stating it’s not policy of his department to help lower gas prices. Do you agree with Secretary Chu that this is not the job of the Energy Department?PRESIDENT OBAMA: The most important thing we can do is to make sure we control our own energy.So here’s what I’ve done since I’ve been president. We have increased oil production to the highest levels in 16 years. Natural gas production is the highest it’s been in decades. We have seen increases in coal production and coal employment.But what I’ve also said is we can’t just produce traditional sources of energy; we’ve also got to look to the future. That’s why we doubled fuel efficiency standards on cars. That means that in the middle of the next decade, any car you buy, you’re going to en d up going twice as far on a gallon of gas. That’s why we’ve doubled clean energy productionlike wind and solar and biofuels. And all these things have contributed to us lowering our oil imports to the lowest levels in 16 years.Now, I want to build on that. And that means, yes, we still continue to open up new areas for drilling. We continue to make a —it a priority for us to go after natural gas. We’ve got potentially 600,000 jobs and a hundred years’ worth of energy right beneath our feet with natural gas. And we can do it in an environmentally sound way. But we’ve also got to continue to figure out how we have efficient energy, because ultimately that’s how we’re going to reduce demand, and that’s what’s going to keep gas prices lower.Now, Governor Ro mney will say he’s got an all-of-the-above plan, but basically his plan is to let the oil companies write the energy policies. So he’s got the oil and gas part, but he doesn’t have the clean energy part. And if we are only thinking about tomorrow or the ne xt day and not thinking about 10 years from now, we’re not going to control our own economic future, because China, Germany —they’re making these investments. And I’m not going to cede those jobs of the future to those countries. I expect those new energy sources to be built right here in the United States.So that’s going to help Jeremy get a job, it’s also going to make sure that you’re not paying as much for gas.MS. CROWLEY: Governor, on the subject of gas prices.MR. ROMNEY:Well, let’s look at the president’s policies, all right, as opposed to the rhetoric, because we’ve had four years of policies being played out. And the president’s right in terms of the additional oil production, but none of it came on federal land. As a matter of fact, oil production is down 14 percent this year on federal land, and gas production is down 9 percent. Why? Because the president cut in half the number of licenses and permits for drilling on federal lands and in federal waters. So where’d the increase come from? Well, a lot of it came from the Bakken Range in North Dakota. What was his participation there? The administration brought a criminal action against the people drilling up there for oil, this massive new resource we have. And what was the cost? Twenty or 25 birds were killed, and they brought out a migratory bird act to go after them on a criminal basis.Look, I want to make sure we use our oil, our coal, our gas, our nuclear, our renewables. I believe very much in our renewable capabilities — ethanol, wind, solar will be an important part of our energy mix. But what we don’t need is to have the president keeping us from taking advantage of oil, coal and gas. This has not been Mr. Oil or Mr. Gas or Mr. Coal. Talk to the people that are working in those industries. I was in coal country. People grabbed my arms and say, please, save my job. The head of the EPA said, you can’t build a coal plant. You’ll virtually —it’s virtually impossible, given our regulations. When the president ran for office, he said, if you bui ld a coal plant, you can go ahead, but you’ll go bankrupt. That’s not the right course for America. Let’s take advantage of the energy resources we have, as well as the energy sources for the future. And if we do that, if we do what I am planning on doing, which is getting us energy-independent, North Americanenergy independence within eight years, you’re going to see manufacturing come back jobs because our energy is low-cost.They’re already beginning to come back because of our abundant energy.I’ll get America and North America energy-independent. I’ll do it by more drilling, more permits and licenses. We’re going to bring that pipeline in from Canada. How in the world the president said no to that pipeline, I will never know. This is about bringing good jobs back for the middle class of America, and that’s what I’m going to do.MS. CROWLEY: Mr. President, let me just see if I can move you to the gist of this question, which is are we looking at the new normal? I can tell you that tomorrow morning, a lot of people in Hempstead will wake up and fill up, and they will find that the price of gas is over $4 a gallon. Is it within the purview of the government to bring those prices down, or are we looking at the new normal?PRESIDENT OBAMA:Candy, there’s no doubt that world demand’s gone up. But our production is going up, and we’re using oil more efficiently.And very little of what Governor Romney just said is true. We’ve opened up public lands. We’re actually drilling more on public lands than in the previo us administration. And my —the previous president was an oilman. And natural gas isn’t just appearing magically; we’re encouraging it and working with the industry.And when I hear Governor Romney say he’s a big coal guy — and keep in mind when —Governor, when you were governor of Massachusetts, you stood in front of a coal plant and pointed at it and said, this plant kills, and took great pride in shutting it down. And now suddenly you’re a big champion of coal.So what I’ve tried to do is be consistent. With respect to something like coal, we made the largest investment in clean coal technology to make sure that even as we’re producing more coal, we’re producing it cleaner and smarter. Same thing with oil; same thing with natural gas.And the proof is our oil imports are down to the lowest levels in 20 years, oil production is up, natural gas production is up, and most importantly, we’re also starting to build cars that are more efficient.And that’s creating jobs. That means those cars can be exported, because that’s the demand around the world. And it also means that it’ll save money in your pocketbook. That’s the strategy you need, an all-of-the-above strategy, and that’s what we’re going to do in the next four years.MR. ROMNEY:But that’s not what you done in the last four years. That’s the problem.PRESIDENT OBAMA: Sure it is.MR. ROMNEY: In the last four years, you cut permits and licenses on federal land and federal waters in half.PRESIDENT OBAMA: Not true, Governor Romney.MR. ROMNEY: So how much did you cut them by?PRESIDENT OBAMA:It’s not true.MR. ROMNEY: By how much did you cut them by, then?PRESIDENT OBAMA: Governor, we have actually produced more oil on —MR. ROMNEY: No, no, how much did you cut licenses and permits on federal land and federal waters?PRESIDENT OBAMA:Governor Romney, here’s what we did. There were a whole bunch of oil companies —MR. ROMNEY: No, I had a — I had a — I had a question —PRESIDENT OBAMA: No, you — no, you — you — you want —.MR. ROMNEY:— and the question was how much did you cut them by?PRESIDENT OBAMA:—you want me to answer a question, I’m —MR. ROMNEY: How much did you cut them by?PRESIDENT OBAMA:—I’m happy to answer the question.MR. ROMNEY: All right, and it is?PRESIDENT OBAMA:Here’s what happened. You had a whole bunch of oil companies who had leases on public lands that they weren’t using. So what we said was, you can’t just sit on this for 10, 20, 30 years, decide when you want to drill, when you want to produce, when it’s most profitable for you. These are public lands. So if you want to drill on public lands, you use it or you lose it.MR. ROMNEY: OK — (inaudible) —PRESIDENT OBAMA: And so what we did was take away —MR. ROMNEY:That’s —PRESIDENT OBAMA:— those leases, and we are now reletting them so that we can actually make a profit.MR. ROMNEY: And — and — and production on private — on government lands is down.PRESIDENT OBAMA:And the production is up. No it isn’t.MR. ROMNEY: Production on government land of oil is down 14 percent.PRESIDENT OBAMA: Governor —MR. ROMNEY: And production of gas is down 9 percent.PRESIDENT OBAMA:What you’re saying is just not true. It’s just not true.MR. ROMNEY: I —it’s absolutely true. Look, there’s no question but that the people recognize that we have not produced more oil —PRESIDENT OBAMA:I’ll give you your time. Go ahead.MR. ROMNEY:— and gas on federal lands and in federal waters. And coal — coal production is not up, coal jobs are not up. I was just at a coal facility where some 1,200 people lost their jobs. The right course for America is to have a true all-of-the-above policy.I don’t think anyone really believes that you’re a person who’s going to be pushing for oil and gas and coal.You’ll get your chance in a moment. I’m still speaking.(Chuckles.)PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, Governor, if —if you’re asking me a question, I’m going to answer it.MR. ROMNEY: My —and the answer is I don’t believe people think that’s the case, because I —I’m —that wasn’t a question.PRESIDENT OBAMA: OK. All right.MR. ROMNEY:That was a statement. I don’t think — (chuckles) — the American people believe that. I will fight for oil, coal and natural gas. And the proof — the proof of whether a strategy is working or not is what the price is that you’re paying at the pump. If you’re paying less than you paid a year or two ago, why, then the strategy is working. But you’re paying more. When the president took office, the price of gasoline here in Nassau County was about a buck eighty-six a gallon. Now it’s four bucks a ga llon. Price of electricity is up.If the president’s energy policies are working, you’re going to see the cost of energy come down. I will fight to create more energy in this country to get America energy-secure. And part of that is bringing in a pipeline of oil from Canada, taking advantage of the oil and coal we have here, drilling offshore in Alaska, drilling offshore in Virginia where the people want it.MS. CROWLEY: Let me —MR. ROMNEY: Those things will get us the energy we need.MS. CROWLEY: Mr. President, could you address — because we did finally get to gas prices here — could you address what the governor said, which is: If your energy policy was working, the price of gasoline would not be $4 a gallon here. Is that true?PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, think about what the governor — think about what the governor just said. He said when I took office, the price of gasoline was 1.80 (dollars), 1.86 (dollars). Why is that? Because the economy was on the verge of collapse; because we were about to go through the worst recession since the Great Depression as a consequence of some of the same policies that Governor Romney is now promoting. So it’s conceivable that Governor Romney could bring down gas prices, because with his policies we might be back in that same mess. (Audience murmurs.)What I want to do is to create an economy that is strong and at the same time produce energy. And with respect to this pipeline that Governor Romney keeps on talking about, we’ve —we’ve built enough pipeline to wrap around the entire Earth once. So I’m all for pipelines; I’m all for oil production.What I’m not for is us ignoring the other half of the quotation. So for example, on wind energy, when Governor Romney says these are imaginary jobs, when you’ve got thousands of people right now in Iowa, right now in Colorado who are working, creating wind power, with good- paying manufacturing jobs, and the Republican senator in that —in Iowa is all for it, providing tax credits to help this work and Governor Romney says, I’m opposed, I’d get rid of it, that’s not an energy strategy for the future. And we need to win that future, and I intend to win it as president of the United States.MS. CROWLEY: Mr. President, I got to — I got to move you along. And the next a question is for you —MR. ROMNEY: No, he — he gets the first — he actually got — he actually got the first question. So I get the last question — last answer on that one.MS. CROWLEY: If — actually, in the follow-up. It doesn’t quite work like that.MR. ROMNEY: Actually —MS. CROWLEY:But I’m going to give you a chance here. (Laughter.) I promise you I’m going to.And the next question is for you, so if you want to, you know, continue on, but I don’t want to leave all these guys sitting here and — because —MR. ROMNEY: Candy, Ca ndy, Candy, I don’t have a policy of — of stopping wind jobs in Iowa and that —they’re not phantom jobs. They’re real jobs.MS. CROWLEY: OK.MR. ROMNEY: I appreciate wind jobs in Iowa and across our country. I appreciate the jobs in coal and oil and gas. I’m going to make sure —MS. CROWLEY:So you’re — OK. Thank you, Governor.MR. ROMNEY:— that taking advantage of our energy resources will bring back manufacturing to America. We’re going to get through a very aggressive energy policy, 3.5 million more jo bs in this country. It’s critical to our future.PRESIDENT OBAMA:Candy, it’s OK.MS. CROWLEY:We’re going to move you along to taxes —PRESIDENT OBAMA:I’m used —I’m used to being interrupted. You know, the —MS. CROWLEY:(Chuckles.) We’re going to move you both along to taxes over here and all these folks that have been waiting.Governor, this question is for you. It comes from Mary Pollano — Follano. Sorry.MR. ROMNEY: Hi, Mary.Q: Governor Romney, you have stated that if you’re elected president, you w ould plan to reduce the tax rates for all the tax brackets and that you would work with the Congress to eliminate some deductions in order to make up for the loss in revenue. Concerning the —these various deductions — the mortgage deduction, the charitable deductions, the child tax credit and also the —oh, what’s that other credit?I forgot. (Laughter.)PRESIDENT OBAMA:You’re doing great.Q: Oh, I remember. The education credits, which are important to me because I have children in college. What would be your position on those things, which are important for the middle class?MR. ROMNEY: Thank you very much. And — and let me tell you, you —you’re absolutely right about part of that, which is I want to bring the rates down, I want to simplify the tax code, and I want to get middle-income taxpayers to have lower taxes.And — and the reason I want middle-income taxpayers to have lower taxes is because middle-income taxpayers have been buried over the past four years. You’ve seen, as middle-income people in this country, incomes go down $4,300 a family even as gasoline prices have gone up $2,000. Health insurance premiums — up $2,500. Food prices up, utility prices up. The middle-income families in America have been crushed over the last four years. So I want to get some relief to middle-income families. That’s part —that’s part one.Now, how about deductions? Because I’m going to bring rates down across the board for everybody, but I’m going to limit deductions and exemptions and credits, particularly for people at the high end, because I am not going to have people at the high end pay less than they’re paying now. The top 5 percent of taxpayers will continue to pay 60 percent ofthe income tax the nation collects. So that’ll stay the same. Middle-income people are going to get a tax break.And so in terms of bringing down deductions, one way of doing that would be to say everybody gets —I’ll pick a number — $25,000 of deductions and credits. And you can decide which ones to use, your home mortgage interest deduction, charity, child tax credit and so forth. You can use those as part of filling that bucket, if you will, of deductions. But your rate comes down, and the burden also comes down on you for one more reason.And that is every middle-income taxpayer no longer will pay any tax on interest, dividends or capital gains, no tax on your savings.That makes life a lot easier. If you’re getting interest from a bank, if you’re getting a statement from a mutual fund or any other kind of investments you have, you d on’t have to worry about filing taxes on that, because there will be no taxes for anybody making $200,000 a year and less on your interest, dividends and capital gains.Why am I lowering taxes on the middle class? Because under the last four years, they’ve been buried, and I want to help people in the middle class. And I will not — I will not under any circumstances —reduce the share that’s being paid by the highest-income taxpayers, and I will not under any circumstances increase taxes on the middle class. The president’s spending, the president’s borrowing will cost this nation to have to raise taxes on the American people, not just at the high end.A recent study has shown that people in the middle class will see $4,000 a year higher taxes as a result of the spending and borrowing of this administration. I will not let that happen. I’ll get us on track to a balanced budget, and I’m going to reduce the tax burden on middle-income families. And what’s that going to do? It’s going to help those families, and it’s going to create incentives to start growing jobs again in this country.MS. CROWLEY: Thanks, Governor.PRESIDENT OBAMA: My philosophy on taxes has been simple, and that is, I want to give middle-class families, and folks who are striving to get in the middle class, some relief, because they have been hit hard over the last decade, over the last 15, over the last 20 years. So four years ago I stood on a stage just like this one — actually, it was a town hall — and I said I would cut taxes for middle-cl ass families, and that’s what I’ve done by $3,600. I said I would cut taxes for small businesses, who are the drivers and engines of growth, and we’ve cut them 18 times. And I want to continue those tax cuts formiddle-class families and for small businesses.But what I’ve also said is if we’re serious about reducing the deficit, if this is genuinely a moral obligation to the next generation, then in addition to some tough spending cuts, we’ve also got to make sure that the wealthy do a little bit more.So what I’ve said is your first $250,000 worth of income, no change. And that means 98 percent of American families, 97 percent of small businesses, they will not see a tax。

相关文档
最新文档