Lacosamide的临床研究

合集下载

不同抗癫痫药之间转换使用的潜在风险

不同抗癫痫药之间转换使用的潜在风险

英国警示在不同抗癫痫药之间转换使用的潜在风险2014-01-25 09:30 来源:CFDA英国药品和健康产品管理局(MHRA)在2013年11月发布的第4期《药物安全更新》(DrugSafetyUpdate)中,对在不同抗癫痫药之间转换使用可能产生的风险进行了提示。

MHRA称,不同抗癫痫药的特征有很大的不同,在不同厂商产品之间转换使用抗癫痫药可能导致不良反应发生或癫痫失控。

当根据相关规定和指南证明一种仿制药与原研药具有生物等效性时,可以认为这两种药物临床上等效。

然而,患者和医生提出关于换用不同厂商的口服抗癫痫药可能出现的问题,包括原研药和仿制药之间的换用,以及一种特定药物不同仿制产品之间的换用。

这些问题产生的原因是一些抗癫痫药的治疗指数狭窄,以及治疗失败的潜在严重后果,其他重要的因素为药物相互作用以及一些抗癫痫药的溶解度和/或生物利用度相对低。

人用药品委员会(CHM)回顾MHRA收到的自发不良反应报告和既往接受稳定抗癫痫药原研药的患者换为仿制药后潜在危害升高的文章,并得出结论:产品换用期间癫痫失控和/或副作用加重的报告可解释为偶然联系,但不能排除所有病例中两者的因果关系。

CHM考虑抗癫痫药的特征后建议,根据药物的治疗指数、溶解度和吸收情况,将抗癫痫药分为三类,以帮助医生和患者确定是否有必要维持一种特定厂商的产品。

•第1类:苯妥英、卡马西平、苯巴比妥、扑米酮对于这些药物,建议医生确保患者维持一种特定厂商的产品。

•第2类:丙戊酸盐、拉莫三嗪、吡仑帕奈(perampanel)、瑞替加滨(retigabine)、卢非酰胺(rufinamide)、氯巴占(clobazam)、氯硝西泮、奥卡西平、艾司利卡西平(eslicarbazepine)、唑尼沙胺、托吡酯对于这些药物,应根据临床判断,并与患者和/或监护人商量,考虑如发作频率和治疗史的因素后决定是否需要持续一种特定厂商的产品。

•第3类:左乙拉西坦、拉科酰胺(lacosamide)、噻加宾(tiagabine)、加巴喷丁、普瑞巴林、乙琥胺(ethosuximide)、氨己烯酸(vigabatrin)对于这些药物,通常不需要维持一种特定厂商的产品,除非有特殊原因,如患者焦虑以及有精神错乱或用药错误的风险。

首个功能性消化不良治疗药阿考替胺的研究进展

首个功能性消化不良治疗药阿考替胺的研究进展

描述:消化不良症状较为普遍并显著降低了患者的生活质量,其中大多数患者具有功能性消化不良(FD)。

阿考替胺(acotiamide)是世界上首个获批的功能性消化不良治疗药,本文概述acotiamide的药理作...摘要消化不良症状较为普遍并显著降低了患者的生活质量,其中大多数患者具有功能性消化不良(FD)。

阿考替胺(acotiamide)是世界上首个获批的功能性消化不良治疗药,本文概述acotiamide的药理作用和临床研究,以期为FD患者提供一种新的治疗方法。

功能性消化不良( functional dyspepsia,FD)是指起源于胃和十二指肠区域,并缺乏任何器质性、系统性或代谢性疾病证据的症状[1]。

最新数据显示,西方国家普通人群消化不良症状已接近40%,并显著降低了生活质量。

其中小部分人群由胃溃疡引起,可通过根治幽门螺杆菌进行治疗,约20%的有症状人群属于胃食道逆流疾病,可通过质子泵抑制剂有效治疗,但大多数消化不良人群属于FD,对于FD的治疗目前仍具有挑战性[2]。

2013年6月6日,日本率先批准上市了世界上首个FD治疗药阿考替胺(acotiamide,商品名Acofide),本品被批准用于治疗FD引起的餐后饱胀、上腹胀、早饱,是以acotiamide 盐酸盐三水合物为活性成分的100 mg口服片剂,成人一次1片,一日3次,餐前服用。

acotiamide最早由日本Zeria新药工业株式会社研发,后由Astellas 制药与Zeria药业在日本共同推出。

acotiamide口服片剂在消化道主要是通过抑制乙酰胆碱酯酶的机制起作用,可促进胃动力、改善胃容纳障碍、增强胃底扩张。

1 药理作用多项研究显示,acotiamide有促进胃肠道动力的作用,对狗的餐后胃窦部运动有增强作用,对大鼠胃窦部运动同样有促进作用。

acotiamide以提高胃动力潜能为基础,尤其以胃幽门部位的收缩活性为基础,acotiamide在对大鼠因可乐定(一种α2受体拮抗剂)引起的胃排出延迟显示有改善作用[3-5]。

观察左乙拉西坦在治疗老年癫痫患者中的应用

观察左乙拉西坦在治疗老年癫痫患者中的应用

观察左乙拉西坦在治疗老年癫痫患者中的应用老年人是慢性病发病率高、临床症状更为复杂的人群之一,临床上常见的老年慢性疾病之一即为癫痫。

癫痫是由于脑部神经元过度放电引起的一种慢性神经系统疾病,常常表现为反复发作性的意识障碍、肢体抽搐和异常电活动等。

老年人癫痫的病因多为脑血管疾病、老年性痴呆、感染、药物中毒等,以及部分老年人原发性癫痫病因引起。

由于其生理老化、代谢紊乱等种种因素,老年人药物治疗逐渐成为临床治疗的重要手段。

一种较为新近的抗癫痫药物左乙拉西坦也越来越应用于老年人群体中。

左乙拉西坦(Lacosamide, LC)是一种第三代结构新颖的抗癫痫药物,其在神经元膜钠通道、钙通道、钾通道等多个途径上发挥抗癫痫作用。

研究表明,LC在中枢神经系统上的作用花样相对单一,同时对癫痫发作和感知运动功能有一定的保护作用,相对于一些传统抗癫痫药物使用后副作用发生率低。

因此,虽然LC用于老年癫痫治疗不是很久,但其相对较小的副作用、良好的药效等优点,使得LC在老年癫痫患者中的使用逐渐受到医生关注。

临床试验显示,LC与其他抗癫痫药物相比,在老年癫痫患者治疗中效果较好且基本无明显副作用。

一项LC治疗老年人局灶性癫痫的开放性研究显示,全组患者总有效率为85.7%,而儿童和青少年群体中总有效率为68.9%。

在治疗典型小发作性癫痫方面,LC的临床疗效更加突出。

一项回顾性研究指出,LC治疗老年人小发作性癫痫的总有效率为94.6%,并且无任何重要的不良反应发生。

另外,还有学者对LC在老年人癫痫治疗中的应用进行了meta分析,结果表明,LC安全性高、耐受性好,可以作为老年人癫痫治疗的一种首选药物。

当然,对于老年人而言,药物经常会受到其身体状况、药代动力学变化等种种因素的制约,因此在使用LC治疗老年人癫痫时,还需要特别的注意。

一些临床医师发现,LC中枢抑制作用较强,可能会对老年人的认知能力产生影响,因此在初始治疗过程中需要根据个体情况调整药物剂量。

拉考沙胺注射液在骨科手术中的术后疼痛管理

拉考沙胺注射液在骨科手术中的术后疼痛管理

拉考沙胺注射液在骨科手术中的术后疼痛管

拉考沙胺(Lacosamide)是一种抗癫痫药物,近年来被广泛应用于
骨科手术中的术后疼痛管理。

本文将探讨拉考沙胺注射液在骨科手术
中的应用及其术后疼痛管理的效果和安全性。

骨科手术术后疼痛是患者常见的不适感之一,严重影响患者的生活
质量和康复效果。

因此,有效的术后疼痛管理至关重要。

拉考沙胺作
为一种新型的抗癫痫药物,其镇痛效果备受关注。

研究表明,拉考沙
胺通过调节钠通道活性,抑制神经元兴奋性,从而发挥镇痛作用,且
其与传统镇痛药物的联合应用效果更佳。

在骨科手术中,拉考沙胺注射液常作为术后镇痛治疗的一部分。


给药方式多为静脉注射,能够迅速达到有效浓度,快速缓解患者术后
疼痛。

临床研究显示,拉考沙胺注射液在骨科手术后的镇痛效果显著,能够有效减轻患者的疼痛感,并提高患者的舒适度和满意度。

此外,拉考沙胺注射液在骨科手术中的应用还具有较好的安全性。

临床试验结果显示,拉考沙胺在治疗剂量下的不良反应较轻,常见的
不良反应包括头晕、恶心、疲乏等,且多数不良反应可自行缓解,不
需要特殊处理。

因此,拉考沙胺注射液在骨科手术中的使用是相对安
全可靠的。

综上所述,拉考沙胺注射液作为一种新型的镇痛药物,在骨科手术
中展现出了良好的疼痛管理效果和较好的安全性,对于改善患者术后
疼痛感、促进康复具有重要意义。

然而,仍需进一步开展大规模的临床研究,以验证其长期疗效和安全性,为临床实践提供更为可靠的依据。

近年抗癫痫药物研究进展

近年抗癫痫药物研究进展

近年抗癫痫药物研究进展潘敏翔,陈乾,吴久鸿*中国解放军第306医院药学部 北京 100101摘要:新型抗癫痫药物是针对癫痫发生和发展过程中的一些重要环节进行干预的药物。

其作用主要与提高GABA能、降低谷氨酸能神经传递、抑制电压门控离子通道和细胞内信号传导通路改变有关。

新型抗癫痫药物通过不同于传统药物的作用机制,针对某些特殊的靶点进行干预,为癫痫的药物治疗提供了新的途径。

关键词:癫痫;抗癫痫药物;研究Abstract:Some important progresses of AEDs have been explored.The AEDs consist of a group of heterogenous chemical structures, unrelated to each other, but affecting the same target proteins. Important target molecules, which have been focused upon include voltage gated sodium and calcium channels, proteins associated with exocytosis of neurotransmitters, and receptor molecules for GABA and glutamate. New drugs will hopefully affect pathophysiological processes or altered target proteins more selectively than older drugs.They all provide new hopes to the treatment of epilepsy via the pathways different from traditional ones.Keywords: epilepsy;AEDs;research癫痫是一种临床综合征,它的特征是大脑神经细胞反复发作的异常放电,导致的大脑功能失调。

拉考沙胺与卡马西平治疗成人新诊癫痫的有效性和安全性对比

拉考沙胺与卡马西平治疗成人新诊癫痫的有效性和安全性对比

·药物与临床·拉考沙胺与卡马西平治疗成人新诊癫痫的有效性和安全性对比Δ郭夏青*,李郭飞,孙玉华,郑东琳 #(河南大学淮河医院神经内科一病区,河南 开封 475000)中图分类号 R 742.1;R 969.4 文献标志码 A 文章编号 1001-0408(2024)04-0464-04DOI 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.04.15摘要 目的 比较拉考沙胺(LCM )与卡马西平(CAR )单药治疗成人新诊癫痫患者的有效性和安全性。

方法 采用回顾性分析方法,根据用药方案的不同,将2020年9月-2022年6月河南大学淮河医院神经内科收治的新诊癫痫患者(84例)分为对照组(40例,接受CAR 治疗)和观察组(44例,接受LCM 治疗),比较两组患者的总有效率、癫痫发作频率、血脂水平和不良事件(AEs )发生情况。

结果 治疗后第1个月,观察组患者的总有效率(63.64%)与对照组(55.00%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);两组患者的癫痫发作频率均较治疗前显著减少(P <0.05),但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。

治疗后第3个月,观察组患者的总有效率(90.91%)显著高于对照组(67.50%,P <0.05);两组患者的癫痫发作频率亦较治疗前显著减少,且观察组显著少于对照组(P <0.05)。

治疗后第3个月,对照组患者的TC 、TG 、LDL-C 水平以及观察组患者的LDL-C 水平均较同组治疗前显著升高,且观察组患者的TC 、TG 、LDL-C 水平均显著低于对照组(P <0.05)。

观察组患者的AEs 发生率(15.91%)与对照组(17.50%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。

结论 LCM 和CAR 在成人新诊癫痫患者的治疗中均具有一定效果,均可降低患者的癫痫发作频率,且安全性相当。

同时,LCM 的长期疗效优于CAR ,对患者血脂水平的影响小于CAR 。

拉考沙胺添加治疗小儿不同类型难治性癫痫疗效观察

拉考沙胺添加治疗小儿不同类型难治性癫痫疗效观察

拉考沙胺添加治疗小儿不同类型难治性癫痫疗效观察【摘要】目的:观察拉考沙胺对小儿难治性癫痫的疗效和耐受性。

方法:回顾分析我院及甘肃省儿童医院2019年3月到2020年9月就诊4-16岁难治性癫痫儿童62例,添加拉考沙胺治疗3个月以上,观察其有效性和耐受性。

结果:开始服用拉考沙胺平均年龄为9.2岁。

其中28名儿童患有局灶性癫痫;19名全面性癫痫,15名为慢波睡眠期电持续状态(ESES)。

局灶性癫痫组患儿17例有效,全面性组7例有效,睡眠期电持续状态组8例有效,只有2例SMI减少50%以上。

不良事件4例(9.5%),常见的不良事件是嗜睡、头痛、头晕、恶心和呕吐,均为轻微表现,。

结论:总之拉考沙胺对药物难治性癫痫有效,具有较小的不良反应,可以为儿童难治性癫痫药物治疗提供新的选择。

关键词:儿童;拉考沙胺;难治性癫痫Observation on effect of lacosamine addition in the treatment of refractory epilepsy with different types of drugs in childrenWang Sanping 1 Chen Yongqian 2 Qi Wenying 1 Zhao Shuzhen 1 Luo Xuan 1(1 Department of Pediatrics, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital; 2 Gansu Provincial Children's Hospital 730000)[Abstract]Objective: To observe the efficacy and tolerance of racoxamide in the treatment of intractable epilepsy in children. METHODS: 62 children with refractory epilepsy aged 4-16 years who were admitted to our hospital and Gansu Children's Hospital from March 2019 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and treated with galacoxalamine for more than 3 months to observe its effectiveness and tolerance. Results: The mean age of lacosamine initiation was 9.2years. 28 of the children had focal epilepsy; Nineteen patients had full-scale epilepsy, and 15 had slow-wave hypnotic state (ESES). It was effective in 17 cases of focal epilepsy group, 7 cases of comprehensive epilepsy group and 8 cases of continuous state during sleeping period. Only 2 cases had a 50% reduction in SMI. Adverse events occurred in 4 cases (9.5%), and the common adverse events were somnolence, headache, dizziness, nausea and vomiting, all of which were mild. Conclusion: In conclusion, lakosamide is effective in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy with less adverse reactions, which may provide a new choice for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in children.【Key words】: children; Lacosamine; Refractory epilepsy癫痫为小儿常见的慢性神经系统疾病,大部分癫痫患儿预后较好,然而仍有20%-30%发展为药物难治性癫痫。

抗癫痫新药

抗癫痫新药

抗癫痫新药章悦;朱国行【摘要】Although traditional anti-epilepsy drugs are effective and economic, some patients still have poor control of seizures or can not tolerate drug side-effects. Thus new anti-epilepsy drugs have been continuously developed. Generally speaking, new anti-epilepsy drugs are easy to use because they have better tolerability than traditional ones and can minimize drug interactions. However, the characteristic of each medicine differs. Herein we introduce more than 10 new anti-epilepsy drugs which have been sold in domestic or abroad market.%传统抗癫痫药物尽管有效且价廉,但仍有部分癫痫患者的癫痫发作不能得到有效控制或者不能耐受药物的不良反应,因此需要研发新的抗癫痫药物。

总的来说,抗癫痫新药的不良反应较小、药物相互作用较少,临床使用方便,不过也需要注意每种新药的特点,以免错误使用。

本文介绍近20年间国内、外上市的10余种抗癫痫新药。

【期刊名称】《上海医药》【年(卷),期】2015(000)009【总页数】4页(P8-10,12)【关键词】癫痫;抗癫痫药物;新药【作者】章悦;朱国行【作者单位】复旦大学附属华山医院神经内科上海200040;复旦大学附属华山医院神经内科上海200040【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R971.6章悦*朱国行**(复旦大学附属华山医院神经内科上海 200040)New anti-epilepsy drugsZHANG Yue*, ZHU Guoxing**(Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China)近20年间,国内、外陆续上市了10多种抗癫痫新药,本文简要介绍如下。

拉考沙胺注射液项目分析及技术转让-20200728

拉考沙胺注射液项目分析及技术转让-20200728

拉考沙胺注射液
项目基本信息
中文名称:拉考沙胺注射液
英文名称:Lacosamide Injection
规格:20ml:0.2g
适应症:本品适用于16岁及以上癫痫患者部分性发作的联合治疗。

注册分类:化药4类
项目简介
作为中国市场近十年来首个获批的第三代新型抗癫痫药物,拉考沙胺以其全新和独特的作用点为部分性癫痫发作患者带来全新的治疗选择。

为仍不能实现癫痫发作良好控制的患者带来显著获益。

拉考沙胺是一种新型N-甲基-D-天门冬氨酸(NMDA)受体甘氨酸位点结合拮抗剂。

与目前市场上其他抗癫痫药物作用机制不同的是,其选择性作用于慢失活钠通道,延长钠通道失活状态时间,能够更加有效地减少钠离子内流,降低神经元的兴奋性。

整体上而言,钠离子通道阻滞剂疗效显著,但传统钠离子通道阻滞剂影响失活通道,面临皮疹、加重某些类型癫痫发作等问题。

而拉考沙胺是临床唯一作用于钠离子通道慢失活而不影响快失活的抗癫痫药物,呈线性药代,药物相互作用小。

拉考沙胺治疗癫痫局灶性发作疗效显著,安全性高。

快速应用抗癫痫药物(AED)针剂在癫痫持续状态(Status epilepticus,SE)治疗中具有重要价值。

拉考沙胺针剂是继左乙拉西坦之后第2个获批的新型AED针剂,通过选择性增强钠通道的缓慢失活以及调节collapsin 反应介质蛋白(CRMP)-2活性的双重机制而发挥作用,与其口服制剂具有生物等效性。

由于不存在中枢抑制作用且药物间相互作用的可能性较低,使得左乙拉西坦针剂和拉考沙胺针剂成为了SE治疗的良好选择。

研发进度:待申报
合作方式:委托开发、联合开发
(桐晖药业提供技术转让)
1。

维派特说明书

维派特说明书

核准日期:2018年11月21日修订日期:2019年8月19日;2020年3月09日;2020年9月01日拉考沙胺片说明书请仔细阅读说明书并在医师指导下使用。

【药品名称】通用名称:拉考沙胺片商品名称:维派特®(英文:VIMPAT®)英文名称:Lacosamide tablets汉语拼音:Lakaosha’an Pian【成份】本品主要成份为拉考沙胺。

化学名称:(R)-2-(乙酰基氨基)-N-苯甲基-3-甲氧基丙酰胺化学结构式:分子式:C13H18N2O3分子量:250.30【性状】本品为薄膜衣片,除去包衣后显白色至类白色。

【适应症】本品适用于4岁及以上癫痫患者部分性发作的单药治疗和联合治疗。

【规格】50mg、100mg、150mg和200mg【用法用量】1.剂量信息成人和4岁~17岁儿科患者的推荐剂量见表1。

在4岁~17岁的儿科患者中,推荐的剂量方案取决于体重。

应根据临床反应和耐受性增加剂量,增加频率不超过每周一次。

剂量调整增量不应超过表1所示。

表1:成人和4岁及以上儿科癫痫患者部分性发作的单药治疗和联合治疗的推荐剂量**未说明时,癫痫患者部分性发作的单药治疗与癫痫患者部分性发作的联合治疗的剂量相同在成人癫痫患者部分性发作的联合治疗临床试验中,剂量高于每次200mg、每日二次(每日400mg)并非更有效,并且引起不良反应发生率明显升高(见【不良反应】和【临床试验】)。

成人患者(17岁及以上)的负荷剂量在成人患者中,可以按200mg单次负荷剂量开始拉考沙胺治疗,之后在约12小时后,采用每次100mg,每日二次(每日200mg)剂量。

该维持剂量方案应持续一周。

然后可以按表1中的推荐调整拉考沙胺剂量。

由于中枢神经系统不良反应发生率升高,成人负荷剂量应在医学监督下给药(见【不良反应】和【临床试验】)。

尚未对儿科患者使用负荷剂量进行研究。

2.肾功能受损患者的剂量信息轻至中度肾功能受损患者不需要调整剂量。

拉考沙胺 结构式

拉考沙胺 结构式

拉考沙胺结构式全文共四篇示例,供读者参考第一篇示例:拉考沙胺(Lacosamide)是一种新型的抗癫痫药物,其化学名称为(R)-2-acetamido-N-benzyl-3-methoxypropanamide,其结构式如下所示:拉考沙胺的分子式为C13H18N2O3,分子量为250.29 g/mol。

它是一种白色结晶粉末,可溶于水和乙醇,具有一定的药理作用。

拉考沙胺的主要作用机制是通过增强钠通道的稳定性来调控神经细胞的兴奋性,从而减少癫痫的发作。

与传统的抗癫痫药物相比,拉考沙胺具有较低的毒性和更好的耐受性,是一种有效而安全的抗癫痫药物。

拉考沙胺已经被批准用于治疗部分性癫痫发作,在临床上取得了良好的疗效。

在临床应用中,患者通常会根据医生的建议进行适当的剂量调整,以达到最佳的治疗效果。

除了用于治疗癫痫以外,拉考沙胺还被研究用于治疗其他神经系统疾病,如神经痛、焦虑症等。

它的独特的作用机制和良好的安全性使其有望成为未来神经系统疾病治疗领域的重要药物之一。

拉考沙胺是一种具有潜力的抗癫痫药物,其结构式和作用机制为科学家们研究和开发更多高效的抗癫痫药物提供了重要的参考和启示。

希望在未来的研究中,拉考沙胺能够为更多的患者带来健康和希望。

第二篇示例:拉考沙胺(Levosulpiride)是一种抗精神病药物,也被用于治疗消化系统疾病。

它是一种非典型抗精神病药物,作用机制与传统的抗精神病药物有所不同。

拉考沙胺的化学名称为(+) -5-甲氧基-4-异丙基-2-吡啶乙酰胺,其分子式为C15H23N3O2。

其结构式如下所示:拉考沙胺具有两个手性中心,因此有四种立体异构体,但只有(-) -5-甲氧基-4-异丙基-2-吡啶乙酰胺是药用的活性异构体,即拉考沙胺。

拉考沙胺是一种多巴胺D2受体拮抗剂,它主要通过拮抗多巴胺D2受体来发挥其抗精神病的作用。

多巴胺是一种神经递质,其在神经系统中起着重要的调节作用,与精神疾病的发病机制密切相关。

拉科酰胺对神经病理性疼痛大鼠的镇痛作用解析

拉科酰胺对神经病理性疼痛大鼠的镇痛作用解析
50
min大鼠机械性缩足反射阈值(MWT)和热缩足潜伏期(7ⅣL)。结果
I,7rwLl
10
各时间点B组大鼠MWT
[10min(17.46±0.71)g;20min(18.17±0.61)g;30min(17.21±0.41)g;40rain(17.82±0.53)g;
50 min(18.17±0.37)g 40
机制。 材料与方法 1.材料:雄性sD大鼠,体重180—200 g,由郑州大
点的抗癫痫药物…。研究结果表明,神经病理性疼痛 和癫痫具有共同的病理生理学基础,使得抗癫痫药物
能够被用于治疗神经病理性疼痛心J。拉科酰胺在临
床上已被用于治疗神经病理性疼痛、癌性痛和骨关节 疼痛。但在动物模型上的研究报道尚少。本实验旨在 观察拉科酰胺对神经病理性疼痛大鼠的镇痛作用及其
bP<0.01
2.动物模型制备:参照文献[3]采用坐骨神经慢 性压迫损伤法(CCI)制备神经病理性疼痛模型。腹腔 注射10%水合氯醛0.35
ml/100


g,麻醉后腹卧位固
拉科酰胺作为一种新型抗癫痫药物,有独特的双 重作用机制,动物和临床试验证实它有镇痛作用,并且 不良反应少。但尚无足够的证据认为该药可广泛用于 治疗神经病理性疼痛H J。研究结果表明,拉科酰胺的
王听辉,赵国梁,易红蕾,等.拉科酰胺治疗神经病理性疼痛的研 究进展[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2011,17(4):242-244.
Wang XH,Zhao GL,Yi HL,et a1.Research progress of lacosamide in the treatment of neuropathie pain J 1.Chinese Journal of Pain Medi— cine,2011,17(4):242-244.

LC-MS

LC-MS

·药物与临床·LC-MS/MS 法同时测定拉考沙胺和吡仑帕奈的血浆药物浓度Δ余恒毅*,徐艳娇,向东,刘璐,李喜平,刘东,贡雪芃 #(华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院药学部,武汉 430030)中图分类号 R 917;R 971+.6 文献标志码 A 文章编号 1001-0408(2023)16-1979-05DOI 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.16.11摘要 目的 建立同时测定人血浆中2种第三代抗癫痫药拉考沙胺和吡仑帕奈血浆药物浓度的方法并应用于临床。

方法 10例癫痫患者的血浆样品经乙腈沉淀蛋白并以乙腈-水(20∶80,V /V )稀释后,以氯氮平为内标,采用液相色谱-串联质谱法测定拉考沙胺、吡仑帕奈的质量浓度,再通过稀释倍数换算得血浆药物谷浓度。

以Welch Ultimate XB-C 18为色谱柱,以10 mmol/L 甲酸铵溶液为流动相A 、甲醇-乙腈-异丙醇(0.2%甲酸)混合溶液(7∶1.5∶1.5,V /V /V )为流动相B 进行梯度洗脱,流速为0.4 mL/min ,柱温为40 ℃,进样量为5 μL ;采用电喷雾离子源以多反应监测模式进行正离子扫描,用于定量分析的离子对分别为m /z 251.2→144.1(拉考沙胺)、m /z 350.2→219.2(吡仑帕奈)、m /z 327.2→270.0(内标)。

结果 拉考沙胺、吡仑帕奈检测质量浓度的线性范围分别为0.001 25~0.125 μg/mL (r >0.99)、0.037 5~3.75 ng/mL (r >0.99),定量下限分别为0.001 25 μg/mL 、0.037 5 ng/mL ;批内、批间精密度,准确度,提取回收率,基质效应,稳定性均符合相关要求。

1~5号患者体内拉考沙胺的谷浓度为5.3~12.2 μg/mL ,6~10号患者体内吡仑帕奈的谷浓度为208~510 ng/mL 。

电压门控性钾离子通道相关儿童遗传性癫痫的临床特征与药物疗效评价

电压门控性钾离子通道相关儿童遗传性癫痫的临床特征与药物疗效评价

网络出版时间:2023-06-0816:22:42 网络出版地址:https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/detail/34.1086.R.20230608.1343.022.html◇临床药理学◇电压门控性钾离子通道相关儿童遗传性癫痫的临床特征与药物疗效评价李若茗1,2,张 捷3,陈超阳1,魏 然1,周 颖1,2,崔一民1,2,4,吴 晔3(1.北京大学第一医院药学部,北京 100034;2.北京大学医学部药学院药事管理与临床药学系,北京 100191;北京大学第一医院3.儿科、4.临床药理研究所,北京 100034)收稿日期:2023-01-04,修回日期:2023-03-27基金项目:国家科技重大专项重大新药创制(No2017ZX09304029006 001)作者简介:李若茗(1996-),女,硕士,研究方向:临床药学,E mail:liruoming96@163.com;崔一民(1968-),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:临床药理和临床药学,通信作者,E mail:cuiymzy@126.com;吴 晔(1970-),女,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:小儿科神经系统疾病的诊断与治疗,通信作者,E mail:dryewu@263.netdoi:10.12360/CPB202208032文献标志码:A文章编号:1001-1978(2023)06-1067-07中国图书分类号:R329 24;R394 2;R742 1;R971 6摘要:目的 分析电压门控性钾离子通道(voltage gatedpo tassiumchannels,Kv)基因变异相关遗传性癫痫的基因型—表型特点,评价不同抗癫痫发作药物(anti seizuremedica tions,ASMs)的疗效。

方法 检索PubMed数据库,纳入符合纳排标准的患儿进行分析,并根据临床表现将患儿分为“良性”、“脑病”和其他表型3类。

Lacosamide可减少惊厥14.4%

Lacosamide可减少惊厥14.4%

Lacosamide可减少惊厥14.4%范丽珠(摘)【期刊名称】《国外药讯》【年(卷),期】2007(000)007【摘要】在美国加州圣地亚哥举行的北美地区癫痫会议上,德国Schwarz Pharma公司宣读了其口服lacosamide(Ⅰ)作为成人未控制的部分性惊厥的辅助治疗的Ⅲ期试验中安全性和疗效的阳性资料。

(Ⅰ)200mg/日和(Ⅰ)400mg/日两组都显示比安慰剂组有统计学显著的和临床相关的改善。

在过去用过三种不同的抗癫痫药仍不能控制的患者中同时加用(Ⅰ)后一般能很好耐受。

【总页数】2页(P18-19)【作者】范丽珠(摘)【作者单位】无【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R720.597【相关文献】1.Improved Method for Lacosamide Synthesis with Chemoenzymatic Method [J], WANG Zhi-yuan;XU Li-sheng;LIU Jun-zhong;ZHANG Hong-juan;GAO Ji;LIU Qian;JIAO Qing-cai2.急诊与病房一体化健康教育对减少高热惊厥复发的效果观察 [J], 李水莉;赵丽丽;张培培;唐芳丽3.Radiolabeling of lacosamide using highly purified rhenium-188 as aprospective brain theranostic agent [J], H. A. El-Sabagh;M. I. Aydia;A. M. Amin;K. M. El-Azony4.墨西哥8月份铜产量同比减少14.4% [J],5.绿色通道护理模式用于减少热性惊厥发作效果评价 [J], 陈晓彬因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。

Casodex的临床及成本益处

Casodex的临床及成本益处

Casodex的临床及成本益处
曹菊
【期刊名称】《国外药讯》
【年(卷),期】2005(000)006
【摘要】在《European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy》上发表的一篇文章强调了AstraZeneca公司的Casodex(bicalutamide,比卡鲁胺)(Ⅰ)在英国医疗系统中临床及成本益处。

该药物可延缓局部晚期前列腺癌患者疾病的进展,并因此减少了该类患者终末期治疗所需的医疗资源。

早期前列腺癌试验的结果显示,(I)不仅使接受放疗患者疾病进展的危险性减少42%,随诊观察及根治性前列腺切除患者的相应风险分别减少47%及29%,同时可以提高生活质量。

【总页数】1页(P44)
【作者】曹菊
【作者单位】无
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】R979.1
【相关文献】
1.两种短效口服避孕药物对人流后子宫内膜修复及非避孕益处比较的临床研究 [J], 薛夏;吴晓燕;陈英
2.经皮冠状动脉介入术前他汀类药物应用的临床益处和机制 [J], 崔炜
3.非诺贝特的临床益处 [J], 丛丽;陈晓庆;李强
4."猪圆环病毒病的发病机理及其预防措施"专栏(四)猪Ⅱ型圆环病毒仔猪用疫苗的
成本和益处 [J], David Burch ;高和坤
5.浅谈在医疗保险结算中推行临床路径的益处 [J], 武杰;
因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

LacosamidePamela Doty,*G.David Rudd,*Thomas Stoehr,†and Dirk Thomas†*SCHWARZ BIOSCIENCES,Inc.,Research Triangle Park,North Carolina27709;and†SCHWARZ PHARMA AG,Monheim,GermanySummary:Lacosamide is a new chemical entity being inves-tigated as an adjunctive treatment for epilepsy,as well as monotherapy for diabetic neuropathic cosamide ap-pears to have a dual mode of action:selective enhancement of sodium channel inactivation and modulation of collapsin re-sponse mediator protein-2.Rapidly and completely absorbed after oral administration,lacosamide has an elimination half-life of approximately13hours and a low potential for drug interactions.Additionally,lacosamide exhibits linear,dose-proportional pharmacokinetics with low intra-and interpatient variability.Randomized controlled trials of adjunctive lacos-amide(200,400,and600mg/day)have demonstrated statisti-cally significant reduction in median seizure frequency com-pared with placebo.In addition,50%responder rates for lacosamide(400and600mg/day)were statistically superior to placebo.The most frequently reported adverse events(Ն10% of lacosamide-treated patients)included dizziness,headache, and nausea.A double-blind,double-dummy randomized trial of intravenous lacosamide(30-and60-minute infusion)as re-placement for oral lacosamide showed that the safety and tol-erability profiles were comparable for intravenous and oral lacosamide.The efficacy and safety results from completed clinical trials,as well as the favorable pharmacokinetic profile, suggest that lacosamide may represent a significant advance in antiepileptic drug therapy.Key Words:Lacosamide,antiepi-leptic drugs,anticonvulsants,epilepsy,partial-onset seizures.INTRODUCTIONLacosamide(R-2-acetamido-N-benzyl-3-methoxypro-pionamide;formerly harkoseride)is a member of a series of functionalized amino acid molecules that have been screened for anticonvulsant properties.1–3Studies have shown lacosamide to be an efficacious anticonvulsant in animal models.4Clinically,lacosamide is at present in a late stage of development as an adjunctive treatment for patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures,and has been assessed as monotherapy in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.Results from completed trials sug-gest that an optimal lacosamide dose is in the range of 200to600mg/day.PHARMACOLOGYLacosamide demonstrated broad anticonvulsant ef-fects in murine seizure models for generalized seizures, complex partial-onset seizures,and status epilepticus.In the maximal electroshock seizure(MES)test,lacosamide was more potent than phenytoin or phenobarbital.2,3It has also shown anticonvulsant activity in other in vivo seizure models,such as hippocampal kindling,audio-genic seizures,self-sustaining status epilepticus(SSSE), and amygdala kindling.4–6In SSSE rats,lacosamide re-duced neuronal damage,indicating potential disease-modifying effects.7Recent experimental studies indicate that lacosamide is likely to have a dual mode of cosamide appears to selectively enhance sodium channel slow in-activation,with no effects on fast inactivation.8In con-trast,some antiepileptic drugs(AEDs),such as carbam-azepine,phenytoin,and lamotrigine,affect the fast inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels.9The en-hancement of slow inactivation induced by lacosamide may help normalize activation thresholds and decrease pathophysiological neuronal activity,thus controlling neuronal hyperexcitability.Lacosamide was protective in the psychomotor seizure (6Hz)electroshock test with an ED50of9.99mg/kg, unlike sodium-channel modulating AEDs,which are in-active or only slightly active in this model.4Additionally, modulation of collapsin response mediator protein-2 (CRMP-2)by lacosamide has been demonstrated in in vitro models.10Because CRMP-2is part of the signal transduction cascade of neurotrophic factors and canAddress correspondence and reprint requests to:Pamela Doty,Ph.D.,SCHWARZ BIOSCIENCES,Inc.,P.O.Box110167,Research Trian-gle Park,NC27709.E-mail:pamela.doty@.Neurotherapeutics:The Journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeuticsVol.4,145–148,January2007©The American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics,Inc.145convey neuroprotective effects,11,12this mechanism may contribute to the decreased neuronal loss observed in the SSSE model and the antiepileptogenic effects found in the electrical kindling model.6PharmacokineticsPharmacokinetic studies in healthy adults(Ն18years) indicate that orally administered lacosamide is rapidly and completely absorbed,with negligiblefirst-pass cosamide has a high oral bioavailability(ap-proximately100%)that is not affected by food.3,13Ad-ditionally,intravenous infusion of lacosamide at a dose of200mg with a duration rate of30or60minutes has demonstrated bioequivalence with the same dose of oral lacosamide.14The pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide exhibits low intra-and interpatient variability.After single-dose oral and intravenous administration,the plasma concen-tration of lacosamide increases proportionally with oral doses up to800mg and intravenous doses up to300 mg.3,7,15,16After oral administration of lacosamide,peak plasma levels occur approximately1to4hours after the dose,and elimination half-life is approximately13 hours.3,17A small proportion of lacosamide is demeth-ylated to its primary metabolite,an O-desmethyl metab-olite,which has demonstrated no pharmacological activ-ity in in vivo models(T.S.,unpublished observations, 2006).Lacosamide and its major metabolite are elimi-nated primarily by the kidney.After single doses and at steady-state plasma concen-trations,the pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide shows a low age-related variability.18Furthermore,be-cause lacosamide has minimal protein binding(Ͻ15%), the risk for displacement drug–drug interactions is low.3,19In drug interaction studies,lacosamide has shown no effect on the pharmacokinetics of carbamaz-epine,valproic acid,19,20,21metformin,digoxin,oral contraceptives(ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel),21or omeprazole(D.T.,unpublished observations,2006). Likewise,these drugs have shown no effect on the phar-macokinetics of lacosamide.In clinical studies,lacos-amide has shown no influence on the plasma levels of concomitantly administered AEDs,including carbamaz-epine,levetiracetam,lamotrigine,topiramate,valproate, and phenytoin.3,21,22At present there is no indication that lacosamide acts as an inducer or inhibitor of the cyto-chrome P-450(CYP-450)isoenzymes,except for the inhibition of CYP-2C19in vitro at concentrations more than15-fold higher than therapeutic plasma -cosamide plasma concentrations were comparable in poor and extensive metabolizers of CYP-2C1921and in individuals with inhibited CYP-2C19(D.T.,unpublished observations,2006).Therapeutic profileEarly trials.The initial patient trials of adjunctive lacosamide were multicenter,open-label evaluations of oral lacosamide in patients with partial-onset seizures.In thefirst trial,13patients received doses of lacosamide that were escalated from200to600mg/day in weekly increments of200mg/day.23In the third week of treat-ment,11of the patients achieved a maximum dose of lacosamide(600mg/day).The most common adverse events reported by at least10%of patients during this trial were dizziness,headache,ataxia,and nystagmus. Preliminary data showed a promising safety and seizure reduction profile,which supported the continued devel-opment of lacosamide.In the next trial,the titration rate was decreased to100 mg/day per week.24After a4-week baseline period,the lacosamide dose was increased to the maximum tolerated dose(MTD),up to600mg/day,and then maintained for 4weeks.A total of91patients taking one(21%)or two (79%)concomitant AEDs were exposed to lacosamide. The median MTD was300mg/day;approximately50% of patients had an MTD of400to600mg/day.Among the86evaluable patients,33%had at least a50%reduc-tion in seizure frequency,and10%of patients were seizure-free throughout the4-week maintenance period. The most common adverse events(Ն10%of patients) included dizziness,diplopia,somnolence,fatigue,head-ache,accident not otherwise specified,ataxia,upper re-spiratory tract infection,vision abnormality,tremor,and nausea.Placebo-controlled trials.Two large,multicenter, randomized,placebo-controlled trials of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial-onset seizures have been completed25,26;one trial is currently ongoing. These trials were designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide when administered concomitantly with up to three AEDs in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures with or without secondary gener-alization.Randomized patients were required to have an average of at least four partial-onset seizures per28days, with no seizure-free periods lasting longer than21days during the8-week baseline period.During the titration period of each trial,lacosamide was increased to the randomized dose in100mg/day weekly increments(50 mg twice daily).This titration period was followed by a 12-week maintenance period and an opportunity for tran-sition to an open-label extension trial.In the two com-pleted trials,643patients received lacosamide and260 received placebo.In thefirst randomized controlled trial,25418patients taking one(16%)or two(84%)concomitant AEDs were randomized(1:1:1:1)to placebo or target doses of laco-samide200,400,or600mg/day.During the12-week maintenance period,patients in the lacosamide400-and 600-mg/day dose groups showed statistically significantDOTY ET AL. 146Neurotherapeutics,Vol.4,No.1,2007reduction in median seizure frequency compared with placebo(400mg/day:pϭ0.002;600mg/day:pϭ0.008).In addition,more patients from the lacosamide 400-and600-mg/day dose groups experienced at least a 50%reduction in seizure frequency(400mg/day:pϭ0.004;600mg/day:pϭ0.014)compared with placebo. Although reductions in seizure frequency were observed among patients in the lacosamide200mg/day dose group,these differences were not statistically significant. The most common adverse events in this trial(Ն10%of lacosamide-treated patients)included dizziness,head-ache,nausea,fatigue,ataxia,vomiting,vision abnormal-ity,somnolence,upper respiratory tract infection,and diplopia.In the second randomized controlled trial,a similar design was used,but patients could take up to three concomitant AEDs.26A total of485patients were ran-domized(1:1:1)to either placebo or target doses of la-cosamide200or400mg/pared with patients in the placebo group,lacosamide-treated patients experi-enced a significantly greater reduction in median seizure frequency(200mg/day:pϭ0.029;400mg/day:pϭ0.016)and a significantly larger number of patients ex-perienced at least a50%reduction in seizure frequency in the lacosamide400-mg/day group(pϽ0.001).The most commonly reported adverse events(Ն10%of la-cosamide-treated patients)during this trial were dizzi-ness and headache.An ongoing randomized controlled trial using a simi-lar design has randomized405patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures to placebo or lacosamide400or 600mg/day(1:2:1).Open-label extension trials.After completing an open-label or placebo-controlled trial,patients were of-fered the opportunity to enroll in an open-label extension trial.To date,more than90%of patients who completed a randomized controlled trial opted to continue oral la-cosamide treatment(at doses of100to800mg/day)for up to8years in open-label extension trials.This partic-ipation will permit the evaluation of the long-term safety and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide. Intravenous lacosamide.To evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravenous lacosamide as replacement for oral lacosamide,60patients from an ongoing open-label lacosamide extension trial were enrolled in a multicenter, double-blind,double-dummy,randomized controlled trial.27Patients were randomly assigned(2:1)to receive either lacosamide solution for infusion(at a dose identi-cal to their current oral dose)or intravenous placebo solution.Infusion duration was either60or30min.To maintain the blind,the two patient groups also received placebo tablets or oral lacosamide tablets,respectively. All patients but one received four intravenous infusions of lacosamide over2days.Three patients receiving in-travenous lacosamide reported dizziness,and two pa-tients reported injection site pain.In this trial,lacosamide solution for intravenous infusion was successfully used as short-term replacement for oral lacosamide in patients with partial-onset seizures.The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of intravenous lacosamide after60-and 30-minute infusions were comparable to those of oral lacosamide at the same dose.A multicenter,open-label,inpatient trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravenous lacosamide at doses ranging from200to800mg/day,with twice-daily infusion durations of10,15,or30minutes,has enrolled 160patients and is currently ongoing.Overall safety and tolerability.In completed ran-domized controlled trials,the most frequently reported adverse events(Ն10%of lacosamide-treated patients) were dizziness,headache,and nausea.The events that most often led to trial discontinuation were dizziness and nausea.There were no significant differences in the rate of psychiatric adverse events or in individual psychiatric adverse events between patients receiving lacosamide or placebo.Overall,the rates of psychiatric adverse events were4%or less for any individual adverse event in any treatment group.Chronic administration of lacosamide showed little effect on the plasma concentrations of concomitant cosamide generally had no clinically important effects on laboratory,vital sign,or body weight cosamide produced a small,dose-related in-crease in mean PR interval on the electrocardiogram(4.2 to4.6ms for the400-mg/day dose).In the one completed and three ongoing long-term extension trials in patients with partial-onset seizures,the general safety profile of oral lacosamide to date is similar to that seen in shorter-term trials with lacosamide as well as other newer AEDs.28A comprehensive evaluation of the safety profile of lacosamide(including the frequency of cardiovascular and other adverse events)will be com-pleted once ongoing trials are concluded.The safety and tolerability profile of intravenous laco-samide appeared to be similar to that of oral lacosamide.CONCLUSIONS Pharmacological therapy for patients with uncon-trolled partial-onset seizures is often difficult and can be complicated by drug–drug cosamide is an investigational AED in development for the treatment of partial-onset seizures,which has properties that may be useful for a broad range of patients.Lacosamide possibly offers a dual mode of action with potential disease-modifying effects via CRMP-2modu-lation.Neuroprotective effects have been shown in sev-eral preclinical studies,and further studies are planned to explore the neuroprotective potential of the compound. The effect of lacosamide on sodium channels is differentLACOSAMIDE147Neurotherapeutics,Vol.4,No.1,2007from that of other sodium channel-modulating drugs. Lacosamide selectively enhances sodium channel slow inactivation with no effects on fast inactivation,whereas other sodium channel-modulating drugs show no effect of enhancing sodium channel slow inactivation.In clinical trials to date,lacosamide at doses of200to 600mg/day significantly improved seizure control in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures taking up to three concomitant marketed AEDs.The adverse event profile of lacosamide is similar across trials,and lacosamide is associated with a low rate of psychiatric adverse cosamide provides high oral bioavail-ability unaffected by food,good tolerability with twice-daily dosing,and minimal drug–drug interactions.For patients who are temporarily unable to take oral lacos-amide,the equivalent safety and efficacy of intravenous lacosamide may provide an added benefit.The efficacy and safety results obtained in completed clinical trials combined with the favorable pharmacoki-netic profile of lacosamide suggest that lacosamide may be a significant advance in AED therapy.Acknowledgments:Deana G.Betterton-Lewis and Heather D.Bell,MSc,provided medical writing services and Allison Coppola provided editorial assistance on behalf of SCHWARZ BIOSCIENCES,Inc.,Research Triangle Park,North Carolina.REFERENCES1.Andurkar SV,Stables JP,Kohn H.The anticonvulsant activities ofN-benzyl3-methoxypropionamides.Bioorg Med Chem1999;7: 2381–2389.2.Duncan GE,Kohn H.The novel antiepileptic drug lacosamideblocks behavioral and brain metabolic manifestations of seizure activity in the6Hz psychomotor seizure model.Epilepsy Res 2005;67:81–87.3.Hovinga CA.SPM-927(Schwarz Pharma).IDrugs2003;6:479–485.4.Stohr T,Stables JP,Wilcox K,White HS.The pre-clinical profileof the novel anticonvulsant lacosamide.Epilepsia2005;46(suppl6):373.Abstract.5.LeTiran A,Stables JP,Kohn H.Functionalized amino acid anti-convulsants:synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of confor-mationally restricted analogues.Bioorg Med Chem2001;9:2693–2708.6.Brandt C,Heile A,Potschka H,Stoehr T,Löscher W.Effects ofthe novel antiepileptic drug lacosamide on the development of amygdala kindling in rats.Epilepsia2006;47:1803–1809.7.Bialer M,Johannessen SI,Kupferberg HJ,Levy RH,Loiseau P,Perucca E.Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs:a summary of the Fifth Eilat Conference(EILAT V).Epilepsy Res2001;43: 11–58.8.Errington AC,Coyne L,Stohr T,Selve N,Lees G.Seeking amechanism of action for the novel anticonvulsant lacosamide.Neuropharmacology2006;50:1016–1029.9.Rogawski MA,Loscher W.The neurobiology of antiepilepticdrugs.Nat Rev Neurosci2004;5:553–564.10.Stoehr T,Lees G,Errington A,et cosamide has a dual modeof action:selective enhancement of sodium channel slow inacti-vation and modulation of CRMP-2.Presented at the9th Interna-tional Conference on the Mechanisms and Treatment of Neuropathic Pain;November4,2005;Bermuda.11.Czech T,Yang JW,Csaszar E,Kappler J,Baumgartner C,LubecG.Reduction of hippocampal collapsin response mediated pro-tein-2in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.Neurochem Res2004;29:2189–2196.12.Yoshimura T,Kawano Y,Arimura N,Kawabata S,Kikuchi A,Kaibuchi K.GSK-3␤regulates phosphorylation of CRMP-2and neuronal polarity.Cell2005;120:137–149.13.Cawello W,Kropeit D,Schiltmeyer B,Hammes W,Horstmann R.Food does not affect the pharmacokinetics of SPM927.Epilepsia 2004;45(suppl7):307.Abstract.14.Kropeit D,Schiltmeyer B,Cawello W,Hammes W,Horstmann R.Bioequivalence of short-time infusions compared to oral adminis-tration of SPM927.Epilepsia2004;45(suppl7):123–124.Abstract.15.Bialer M,Johannessen SI,Kupferberg HJ,Levy RH,Loiseau P,Perucca E.Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs:a summary of the Sixth Eilat Conference(EILAT VI).Epilepsy Res2002;51: 31–71.16.Bialer M,Johannessen SI,Kupferberg HJ,Levy RH,Perucca E,Tomson T.Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs:a summary of the Seventh Eilat Conference(EILAT VII).Epilepsy Res2004;61:1–48.17.Horstmann R,Bonn R,Cawello W,Doty P,Rudd D.Basic clinicalpharmacological investigations of the new antiepileptic drug SPM 927.Epilepsia2002;43(suppl7):188.Abstract.18.Schiltmeyer B,Cawello W,Kropeit D,Hammes W,Horstmann R.Pharmacokinetics of the new antiepileptic drug SPM927in human subjects with different age and gender.Epilepsia2004;45(suppl7):313.Abstract.19.Kropeit D,Koch B,Schiltmeyer B,Cawello W,Horstmann R,Scharfenecker U.Low drug-interaction potential of lacosamide.J Pain2005;6(suppl1):S34.Abstract.20.Horstmann R,Bonn R,Cawello W,Doty P,Rudd D.SPM927does not interact with valproic acid and carbamazepine.Epilepsia 2003;44(suppl9):97.Abstract.21.Kropeit D,Scharfenecker U,Schiltmeyer B,et cosamide haslow potential for drug–drug interaction.Presented at the59th Annual Meeting of the American Epilepsy Society;December2, 2005;Washington,DC.22.Jatuzis D,Biton V,Ben-Menachem E,Abou-Khalil B,Doty P,Rudd GD.Evaluation of the effect of oral lacosamide on concom-itant AED plasma concentrations in patients with partial seizures.Epilepsia2005;46(suppl8):170.Abstract.23.Fountain NB,French JA,Privitera MD.Harkoseride:safety andtolerability of a new antiepileptic drug in patients with refractory partial seizures.Epilepsia2000;41(suppl7):169.Abstract.24.Sachdeo R,Montouris G,Beydoun A,et al.An open-label,max-imum tolerated dose trial to evaluate oral SPM927as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures.Neurology2003;60(suppl1):A433.Abstract.25.Ben-Menachem E,Biton V,Jatuzis D,et al.Efficacy and safety ofadjunctive oral lacosamide for the treatment of partial-onset sei-zures in patients with epilepsy.Neurology2005;64(suppl1):A187.Abstract.26.Halasz P,Kalviainen R,Mazurkiewicz-Beldzinska M,Rosenow F,Doty P,Sullivan cosamide:efficacy and safety as oral ad-junctive therapy in adults with partial seizures.Epilepsia2006;47(suppl4):3.Abstract.27.Biton V,Rosenfeld W,Fountain NB,Vaiciene N,Whitesides J,Sommerville K.Safety,tolerability,and pharmacokinetics of in-travenous lacosamide as replacement for oral lacosamide in sub-jects with partial seizures.Neurology2005;64(suppl1):A119.Ab-stract.28.Tatum WO,Galvez R,Benbadis S,Carrazana E.New antiepilepticdrugs:into the new millennium.Arch Fam Med2000;9:1135–1141.DOTY ET AL. 148Neurotherapeutics,Vol.4,No.1,2007。

相关文档
最新文档