TED英语演讲：你的语言习惯暴露了什么
ted演讲高情商的人这样说话谁都会愿意听总结
ted演讲高情商的人这样说话谁都会愿意听总结TED演讲高情商的人这样说话，谁都会愿意听一、引言在当今社会，沟通能力已经被认为是一项非常重要的技能。
在各种场合，无论是在工作中还是在日常生活中，优秀的沟通能力都可以让一个人更加受人欢迎，更容易取得成功。
而TED演讲就是展现沟通能力的绝佳平台，而高情商的人在演讲中的表现常常令人艳羡。
那么，究竟是什么样的人能够在TED演讲中表现出高情商，让谁都愿意听呢？二、主体1. 言之有物高情商的人在演讲中首先会表现得言之有物。
这是指他们的演讲内容丰富，有深度，能够吸引听众的注意力。
他们通常会有很强的知识储备和深刻的见解，能够从多个角度解读问题，给人留下深刻的印象。
他们不会东拉西扯，而是有条不紊地展开自己的观点，给听众以思考的空间。
2. 能言善辩高情商的人在演讲中通常表现出能言善辩的特点。
他们善于运用语言，能够用恰如其分的词语将自己的观点清晰地传达给听众，让人一听就懂。
在表达自己的观点时，他们也善于运用一些修辞手法，如比喻、排比等，使得演讲更加生动有趣。
这样的表达方式往往能够引起听众的共鸣，让他们更愿意倾听。
3. 善于倾听除了表达自己的观点外，高情商的人在演讲中还会表现出善于倾听的品质。
他们会留意听众的反应，根据听众的反馈来调整自己的表达方式，让演讲更加贴近听众的需求。
他们还会给听众留下提问的时间，积极回应听众的问题，与听众建立真诚的沟通，这样的互动能够增强听众的参与感，让他们更愿意长时间地倾听。
4. 总结回顾在演讲的结尾部分，高情商的人通常会对自己的观点进行总结回顾。
他们会简洁地概括自己的观点，给听众留下深刻的印象，同时也让听众更容易记住自己的观点。
通过总结回顾，他们能够让听众更全面、深刻地理解演讲内容，增强感染力，让听众更加认可自己的观点。
三、个人观点和理解高情商的人在TED演讲中能够表现得深入浅出，言之有物，善于倾听，并且运用恰如其分的语言将自己的观点传达给听众，从而让谁都愿意倾听。
TED英语演讲你以为语言只是交流工具
TED英语演讲：你以为语言只是交流工具会第二种语言，就像是有了第二个灵魂，这正是我们学外语的原因之一。
每种语言都带有自己的思维方式，有的语言中每个名词都有指定的性别;而有的语言中没有上下左右只有东南西北。
世界上有7000多种语言，每一种都有自己独特的魅力。
下面是我为大家收集关于TED英语演讲：你以为语言只是交流工具，欢迎借鉴参考。
| 中英文演讲稿|So, Ill be speaking to you using language... because I can. This is one these magical abilities that we humans have. We can transmit really complicated thoughts to one another. So what Im doing right now is, Im making sounds with my mouth as Im exhaling.我们通过语言交流，因为我可以说话。
这是我们人类拥有的一种神奇能力，我们可以互相传递非常复杂的思想。
我现在正在做的是，一边呼气，一边用我的嘴巴发出声音。
Im making tones and hisses and puffs, and those are creating air vibrations in the air. Those air vibrations are traveling to you, theyre hitting your eardrums, and then your brain takes those vibrations from your eardrums and transforms them into thoughts. I hope.我在发出各种语调、嘶嘶声、呼气，而这些引起周边的空气振动。
这些空气振动传到你那里，它们到达你的耳鼓，然后你的大脑会将你耳鼓接收到的振动转化成思想。
别让不会说话成为你的障碍ted演讲稿
别让不会说话成为你的障碍ted演讲稿以别让不会说话成为你的障碍大家好，我是TED演讲者，今天我要和大家分享的主题是“别让不会说话成为你的障碍”。
我们都知道，口头表达是人际交流的重要方式之一，但对于一些人来说，说话可能是一件困难的事情。
然而，我们不能让这成为我们的障碍，我们可以通过其他方式来表达自己。
我们可以利用书面表达来代替口头交流。
写作是一种非常有效的沟通方式，通过文字，我们可以表达自己的思想和感受。
无论是通过邮件、短信还是社交媒体，我们都可以用文字来与他人交流。
虽然这种方式可能没有面对面交流那么直接，但它可以让我们有足够的时间来思考和表达自己的观点，避免了口头交流时的紧张和压力。
我们可以利用非语言交流来表达自己。
身体语言、面部表情和姿势等都是非语言交流的方式，它们可以传达我们的情感和意图。
通过学习和训练，我们可以提高自己的非语言交流技巧，使自己能够更好地与他人交流。
例如，我们可以通过微笑来表达友好和善意，通过肢体动作来表达自信和决心。
这些非语言信号可以让我们在没有说话的情况下，与他人建立起有效的沟通。
我们还可以利用现代科技来帮助我们进行交流。
随着技术的发展，我们有了更多的选择和工具来表达自己。
例如，语音识别技术可以将我们的声音转化为文字，帮助我们进行沟通。
这种技术可以在我们无法说话或不方便说话的情况下，帮助我们与他人进行交流。
虽然不会说话可能会成为我们的障碍，但我们可以通过其他方式来表达自己。
无论是书面表达、非语言交流还是现代科技，我们都可以找到适合自己的方式来与他人交流。
重要的是，我们要相信自己的表达能力，勇敢地去尝试和探索。
只有这样，我们才能充分展示自己的思想和感受，与他人建立起真正的连接。
谢谢大家！。
ted 学习一门新语言的秘诀英语作文感悟
ted 学习一门新语言的秘诀英语作文感悟The Secret to Learning a New LanguageLearning a new language can be a challenging and rewarding experience. It opens up new possibilities for communication, travel, and personal growth. However, many people struggle with the process of language acquisition and may become discouraged or frustrated. In my own experience, I have discovered some secrets that have helped me to effectively learn a new language. In this essay, I will share these secrets and offer some tips for anyone who is embarking on the journey of learning a new language.First and foremost, it's important to have a positive attitude and a willingness to learn. Learning a new language requires dedication and perseverance, so it's important to stay motivated and focused. One way to maintain a positive attitude is to set realistic goals and celebrate smallachievements along the way. For example, if you're learning Spanish, you could set a goal to have a simple conversation with a native speaker within three months. By breaking down the learning process into manageable goals, you can stay motivated and track your progress.Another key secret to learning a new language is to immerse yourself in the language as much as possible. This means surrounding yourself with the language throughactivities such as listening to music, watching movies, and reading books in the target language. You can also seek out native speakers to practice speaking and listening. Immersion allows you to become familiar with the natural rhythms and patterns of the language, which can greatly accelerate the learning process.In addition, it's important to find a learning methodthat works best for you. Some people learn best throughvisual aids, such as flashcards or videos, while others mayprefer auditory methods, such as listening to podcasts or having conversations with native speakers. Experiment with different learning techniques to find out what resonates with you, and don't be afraid to switch things up if you're not seeing results.Consistency is also vital when it comes to language learning. Setting aside a dedicated time each day to practice the language, even if it's just for 20 minutes, can make a significant difference in your progress. Consistent practice helps reinforce what you've learned and allows you to build upon your skills over time.Furthermore, don't be afraid to make mistakes. Language learning is a process, and making errors is a natural part of the journey. Embrace your mistakes as opportunities for growth, and don't let fear of embarrassment hold you back from speaking or writing in the language.Finally, I've found that having a strong support system can make a world of difference in language learning. Whether it's a study group, a language partner, or a supportivefriend or family member, having someone to practice with and share your progress with can be incredibly motivating. It's also helpful to seek out resources such as language learning apps, online forums, and language meetups to connect with others who are also learning the same language.In conclusion, learning a new language is a challenging but rewarding endeavor. By maintaining a positive attitude, immersing yourself in the language, finding a learning method that works for you, being consistent, embracing mistakes, and building a support system, you can greatly enhance your language learning experience. With dedication and perseverance, you can achieve fluency and open up a world of new opportunities through language. Good luck on your language learning journey!。
TED演讲：怎样说话人们才会听
TED演讲：怎样说话⼈们才会听TED演讲：怎样说话⼈们才会听这个演讲旨在回答这样⼀个问题：你有没有曾经感受到你在说但是没⼈在听？演讲讲了⼀些需要说话时需要注意点，来帮助⼈们做到更加有效的沟通，以下是说话的七宗罪：1. 流⾔蜚语：不要在背后说某些⼈的坏话。
2. 评判：不要评判3. 消极：消极让⼈很难继续对话4. 抱怨：抱怨会让⼈很难听进你的话5. 借⼝：⾯对现实，不要抱怨。
抱怨让⼈难以聆听。
6. 吹⽜，逞强：当⼈们很惊讶时，⼜能说什么呢？7. 固执⼰见：把事实和意见混淆，固执⼰见会让⼈们⽆法交流。
以下还有四种⽅法，可以作为我们说话强有⼒的基⽯，让我们的语⾔有⼒，并让世界产⽣变化：1. 诚实：说真话，直截了当并且清楚明⽩2. 真实：做⼀个⾃然⽽然的⾃⼰3. 正⽓：⾔之有信，成为别⼈可以信任的⼈4. 爱：对别⼈有良好的祝愿要记住你说的东西很重要，同时，说的⽅法也是很重要的。
这两者都需要关注。
还有⼀些技巧⽅⾯的分享，⽐喻说话的声⾳：1. ⾳域：⽐如⼈们会把低沉的声⾳和权⼒、权威联系在⼀起2. ⾳⾊：研究显⽰⼈们喜欢丰厚、平滑、温暖，像热巧克⼒⼀样的声⾳。
如果天⽣没有，也可以通过找⼀个⾳⾊教练来训练，通过呼吸，姿势和锻炼，⼀样能获得想要的⾳⾊。
3. 韵律：说话时的声调⾼低如果是枯燥⽆味、⼀成不变的，很难让⼈听进去。
韵律能够成为情感的寄托，传递情感。
4. 语速：语速也是反映情绪的⼀个特征，⽐如⾮常⾮常兴奋的时候，语速就会很快。
想要强调什么的时候，就可以慢下来强调。
⽽且，在谈话中有⼀点沉默是没关系的，我们不需要⽤“嗯”和“啊”来填充，沉默就很有⼒。
5. ⾳调：和语速⼀样，它⽤来指⽰兴奋度，但我们可以仅仅⽤⾳调就显⽰出兴奋度。
6. ⾳量：我们可以⽤⾼⾳量表⽰极端的兴奋，或者⽤轻⾳量让⼈认真注意。
这些技巧是为了让我们在重要谈话时使⽤（⽐如演讲，求婚等等）。
最后，在和他⼈谈话之前，要做以下这些声⾳的预热准备：1. 举起双臂，呼⽓，发出啊哈~的声⾳，活动肺部2. 发出吧吧吧吧吧吧吧吧的声⾳，预热双唇3. brrr~~~~~~~~~4. lalallalal~~~5. rrrrrrr6. we-aw-we-aw。
TED演讲稿-学外语真的可以让你更聪明
TED题⽬：The benefits of a bilingual brain作者: Mia Nacamulli学外语真的可以让你更聪明¿Hablas español? Parlez-vous français? 你会说中⽂吗？ If youanswered, "sí," "oui," or "会" and you're watching this in English, chances are you belong to the world's bilingual and multilingual majority.你会说西班⽛语吗？你会说法语吗？你会说中⽂吗？ 如果你回答 "si" "oui" 或"会" ⽽且⽤英⽂观看这视频，你很可能是属於这世上双语或多语的⼤多数之⼀ 。
And besides having an easier time traveling or watching movies without subtitles, knowing two or more languages means that your brain may actually look and work differently than those of your monolingual friends. So what does it really mean to know a language?除了在旅⾏或观看没有字幕的电影时可以更轻松之外，懂得两种或更多的语⾔意味着你的⼤脑实际上可能与你的单语朋友的⼤脑在外观和⼯作⽅式.上有所不同。
那么，了解⼀种语⾔的真正含义是什么? Language ability is typically measured in two active parts, speaking and writing, and two passive parts, listening and reading. While a balanced bilingual has near equal abilities across the board in two languages, most bilinguals around the world know and use their languages in varying proportions. And depending on their situation and how they acquired each language, they can be classified into three general types.语⾔能⼒通常以说和写⼆个主动部分，和听和读⼆个被动部分来衡量。
怎样说话人们才会听ted观后感英语
怎样说话人们才会听ted观后感英语In today's era of information overload, the ability to communicate effectively and persuade others has become increasingly crucial. TED talks, being a platform that hosts thought-provoking presentations by experts from diverse fields, offer valuable insights into the art of persuasive communication. This article explores the key takeaways from TED talks on the topic of how to speak so that people listen, focusing on the English language perspective.The first and foremost principle is to connect with your audience. As Simon Sinek emphasizes in his TED talk "How Great Leaders Inspire Action," people don't buy what you do; they buy why you do it. It's essential to communicate your message from a perspective that resonates with your listeners' values and beliefs. Use stories and examples to illustrate your points and make them more relatable.Another key aspect is to be authentic and vulnerable. Brene Brown, in her talk "The Power of Vulnerability," talks about the importance of embracing our imperfectionsand insecurities. By being vulnerable, you create a sense of trust and authenticity with your audience, which makes them more likely to engage with your message. Avoid sounding robotic or rehearsed; allow your personality and emotions to shine through.Moreover, use simple and concise language. As Neil Gaiman puts it in his talk "Make Good Art," complex words may impress your peers, but they won't help you reach a wider audience. Stick to language that is easy to understand and avoid jargon or technical language unless necessary. Clear communication helps convey your ideas more effectively.Additionally, speak with passion and conviction. As Sheryl Sandberg notes in her talk "Why We Have Too Few Women Leaders," your tone and body language communicate as much as your words. Speak with enthusiasm and belief in your message, and your audience will be more likely to be persuaded by you.Lastly, be open to feedback and willing to adapt. As Dave Isay emphasizes in his talk "The Way We Listen," true communication is a two-way street. Be willing to listen toyour audience's feedback and adjust your message accordingly. This shows that you value their opinions and are committed to improving your communication skills.In conclusion, persuasive communication is an art that can be honed through practice and reflection. By connecting with your audience, being authentic and vulnerable, using simple language, speaking with passion, and being open to feedback, you can ensure that your message is heard and understood. The insights from TED talks on this topic are invaluable tools for anyone looking to improve their persuasive communication skills.**怎样说话人们才会听：TED观后感**在如今信息爆炸的时代，有效沟通和说服他人的能力变得日益重要。
TED励志演讲稿：怎么讲话别人才更愿意听
人类的声音：是我们所有人都弹奏的乐器。
可能是这个世界上最有力的声音。
它绝无仅有，或能引起战争，或能说我爱你。
然而，很多人有这种经历，当他们说的时候，人们并不在听。
这是为什么呢? 我们怎样有力地说而让世界发生某种改变? 我所提议的是，我们需要改变一些习惯。
在此我为你们收集整理了，说话的七宗罪。
我没打算假装这是一个详细的列表，但这七个，我以为是我们相当容易犯的坏习惯。
第一就是：流言蜚语在背后说某些人的坏话。
这不是一个好习惯，我们都很明白那个说闲话的人在五分钟以后就会在别人跟前说我们的闲话。
第二，评判我们知道有些人在谈话中是这样的，这让人很难听进别人的话，如果你知道你被人评判且被认为不合格。
第三，消极你能陷入这个泥潭。
我的母亲，在她生命的最后几年里，变得非常非常消极，很难让人听她说话。
我记得有一天，我对她说，今天是十月一号，她说，我知道，这不可怕吗? 当某人那么消极的时候是很难让人听进去的。
另外一种消极，就是抱怨这是英国的全国性艺术。
是我们的全国性运动。
我们抱怨天气，体育和政治，几乎每件事，但实际上抱怨是病毒性的悲催，它不会在这个世界上传播太阳和光明。
借口我们都遇上过这个家伙。
也许我们都曾经是这个家伙。
有些人有指责癖好。
他们怪罪任何人而不是对自己的行为负责任，所以，这又是让人难以聆听的一种。
七件里面的老六，倒数第二，浮夸，吹牛它有时贬低了我们的语言，事实上。
比如，如果我看见什么真的很神奇的事情，那我该说什么呢? (笑声) 当然这种夸大后来就变成了说谎。
彻头彻尾的说谎，我们就不想听这种我们知道会说谎的人。
最后是，固执己见把事实和意见混淆。
当这两件事混为一谈，你就像在听风一样。
你知道，有人用他们自己的意见来强迫你。
这很难让我们听讲。
这就是说话的七宗罪。
我认为这些是我们需要避免的。
但有没有比较正面的呢? 的确有。
我想建议四种我们可以牢靠站立的，真正强有力的基石或者基础，如果我们想让我们的言语有力并且让世界产生变化。
The power of introverts 内向性格的力量 Ted演讲中英文
The power of introvertsSusan Cain When I was nine years old, I went off to summer camp for the first time. And my mother packed me a suitcase full of books, which to me seemed like a perfectly natural thing to do. Because in my family, reading was the primary group activity. And this might sound antisocial to you, but for us it was really just a different way of being social. You have the animal warmth of your family sitting right next to you, but you are also free to go roaming around the adventureland inside your own mind. And I had this idea that camp was going to be just like this, but better. (Laughter) I had a vision of 10 girls sitting in a cabin cozily reading books in their matching nightgowns.0:51(Laughter)0:53Camp was more like a keg party without any alcohol. And on the very first day, our counselor gathered us all together and she taught us a cheer that she said we would be doing every day for the rest of the summer to instill camp spirit. And it went like this: "R-O-W-D-I-E, that's the way we spell rowdie. Rowdie, rowdie, let's get rowdie." (Laughter) Yeah. So I couldn't figure out for the life of me why we were supposed to be so rowdy, or why we had to spell this word incorrectly. (Laughter) But I recited a cheer. I recited a cheer along with everybody else. I did my best. And I just waited for the time that I could go off and read my books.1:43But the first time that I took my book out of my suitcase, the coolest girl in the bunk came up to me and she asked me, "Why are you being so mellow?" -- mellow, of course, being the exact opposite of R-O-W-D-I-E. And then the second time I tried it, the counselor came up to mewith a concerned expression on her face and she repeated the point about camp spirit and said we should all work very hard to be outgoing.2:05And so I put my books away, back in their suitcase, and I put them under my bed, and there they stayed for the rest of the summer. And I felt kind of guilty about this. I felt as if the books needed me somehow, and they were calling out to me and I was forsaking them. But I did forsake them and I didn't open that suitcase again until I was back home with my family at the end of the summer.2:30Now, I tell you this story about summer camp. I could have told you 50 others just like it -- all the times that I got the message that somehow my quiet and introverted style of being was not necessarily the right way to go, that I should be trying to pass as more of an extrovert. And I always sensed deep down that this was wrong and that introverts were pretty excellent just as they were. But for years I denied this intuition, and so I became a Wall Street lawyer, of all things, instead of the writer that I had always longed to be -- partly because I needed to prove to myself that I could be bold and assertive too. And I was always going off to crowded bars when I really would have preferred to just have a nice dinner with friends. And I made these self-negating choices so reflexively, that I wasn't even aware that I was making them.3:18Now this is what many introverts do, and it's our loss for sure, but it is also our colleagues' loss and our communities' loss. And at the risk of sounding grandiose, it is the world's loss. Because when it comes to creativity and to leadership, we need introverts doing what they do best. A third to a half of the population are introverts -- a third to a half. So that's one out of every two or three people you know. So even if you're an extrovert yourself, I'm talking about yourcoworkers and your spouses and your children and the person sitting next to you right now -- all of them subject to this bias that is pretty deep and real in our society. We all internalize it from a very early age without even having a language for what we're doing.4:02Now, to see the bias clearly, you need to understand what introversion is. It's different from being shy. Shyness is about fear of social judgment. Introversion is more about, how do you respond to stimulation, including social stimulation. So extroverts really crave large amounts of stimulation, whereas introverts feel at their most alive and their most switched-on and their most capable when they're in quieter, more low-key environments. Not all the time -- these things aren't absolute -- but a lot of the time. So the key then to maximizing our talents is for us all to put ourselves in the zone of stimulation that is right for us.4:40But now here's where the bias comes in. Our most important institutions, our schools and our workplaces, they are designed mostly for extroverts and for extroverts' need for lots of stimulation. And also we have this belief system right now that I call the new groupthink, which holds that all creativity and all productivity comes from a very oddly gregarious place.5:05So if you picture the typical classroom nowadays: When I was going to school, we sat in rows. We sat in rows of desks like this, and we did most of our work pretty autonomously. But nowadays, your typical classroom has pods of desks -- four or five or six or seven kids all facing each other. And kids are working in countless group assignments. Even in subjects like math and creative writing, which you think would depend on solo flights of thought, kids are now expected to act as committee members. And for the kids who prefer to go off by themselves or just to work alone, those kids are seen as outliers often or, worse, as problem cases. And the vastmajority of teachers reports believing that the ideal student is an extrovert as opposed to an introvert, even though introverts actually get better grades and are more knowledgeable, according to research. (Laughter)5:59Okay, same thing is true in our workplaces. Now, most of us work in open plan offices, without walls, where we are subject to the constant noise and gaze of our coworkers. And when it comes to leadership, introverts are routinely passed over for leadership positions, even though introverts tend to be very careful, much less likely to take outsize risks -- which is something we might all favor nowadays. And interesting research by Adam Grant at the Wharton School has found that introverted leaders often deliver better outcomes than extroverts do, because when they are managing proactive employees, they're much more likely to let those employees run with their ideas, whereas an extrovert can, quite unwittingly, get so excited about things that they're putting their own stamp on things, and other people's ideas might not as easily then bubble up to the surface.6:47Now in fact, some of our transformative leaders in history have been introverts. I'll give you some examples. Eleanor Roosevelt, Rosa Parks, Gandhi -- all these peopled described themselves as quiet and soft-spoken and even shy. And they all took the spotlight, even though every bone in their bodies was telling them not to. And this turns out to have a special power all its own, because people could feel that these leaders were at the helm not because they enjoyed directing others and not out of the pleasure of being looked at; they were there because they had no choice, because they were driven to do what they thought was right.7:22Now I think at this point it's important for me to say that I actually love extroverts. I always liketo say some of my best friends are extroverts, including my beloved husband. And we all fall at different points, of course, along the introvert/extrovert spectrum. Even Carl Jung, the psychologist who first popularized these terms, said that there's no such thing as a pure introvert or a pure extrovert. He said that such a man would be in a lunatic asylum, if he existed at all. And some people fall smack in the middle of the introvert/extrovert spectrum, and we call these people ambiverts. And I often think that they have the best of all worlds. But many of us do recognize ourselves as one type or the other.8:05And what I'm saying is that culturally, we need a much better balance. We need more of a yin and yang between these two types. This is especially important when it comes to creativity and to productivity, because when psychologists look at the lives of the most creative people, what they find are people who are very good at exchanging ideas and advancing ideas, but who also have a serious streak of introversion in them.8:29And this is because solitude is a crucial ingredient often to creativity. So Darwin, he took long walks alone in the woods and emphatically turned down dinner-party invitations. Theodor Geisel, better known as Dr. Seuss, he dreamed up many of his amazing creations in a lonely bell tower office that he had in the back of his house in La Jolla, California. And he was actually afraid to meet the young children who read his books for fear that they were expecting him this kind of jolly Santa Claus-like figure and would be disappointed with his more reserved persona. Steve Wozniak invented the first Apple computer sitting alone in his cubicle in Hewlett-Packard where he was working at the time. And he says that he never would have become such an expert in the first place had he not been too introverted to leave the house when he was growing up. 9:16Now, of course, this does not mean that we should all stop collaborating -- and case in point, is Steve Wozniak famously coming together with Steve Jobs to start Apple Computer -- but it does mean that solitude matters and that for some people it is the air that they breathe. And in fact, we have known for centuries about the transcendent power of solitude. It's only recently that we've strangely begun to forget it. If you look at most of the world's major religions, you will find seekers -- Moses, Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad -- seekers who are going off by themselves alone to the wilderness, where they then have profound epiphanies and revelations that they then bring back to the rest of the community. So, no wilderness, no revelations.10:05This is no surprise, though, if you look at the insights of contemporary psychology. It turns out that we can't even be in a group of people without instinctively mirroring, mimicking their opinions. Even about seemingly personal and visceral things like who you're attracted to, you will start aping the beliefs of the people around you without even realizing that that's what you're doing.10:25And groups famously follow the opinions of the most dominant or charismatic person in the room, even though there's zero correlation between being the best talker and having the best ideas -- I mean zero. So -- (Laughter) You might be following the person with the best ideas, but you might not. And do you really want to leave it up to chance? Much better for everybody to go off by themselves, generate their own ideas freed from the distortions of group dynamics, and then come together as a team to talk them through in a well-managed environment and take it from there.11:02Now if all this is true, then why are we getting it so wrong? Why are we setting up our schoolsthis way, and our workplaces? And why are we making these introverts feel so guilty about wanting to just go off by themselves some of the time? One answer lies deep in our cultural history. Western societies, and in particular the U.S., have always favored the man of action over the "man" of contemplation. But in America's early days, we lived in what historians call a culture of character, where we still, at that point, valued people for their inner selves and their moral rectitude. And if you look at the self-help books from this era, they all had titles with things like "Character, the Grandest Thing in the World." And they featured role models like Abraham Lincoln, who was praised for being modest and unassuming. Ralph Waldo Emerson called him "A man who does not offend by superiority."11:58But then we hit the 20th century, and we entered a new culture that historians call the culture of personality. What happened is we had evolved an agricultural economy to a world of big business. And so suddenly people are moving from small towns to the cities. And instead of working alongside people they've known all their lives, now they are having to prove themselves in a crowd of strangers. So, quite understandably, qualities like magnetism and charisma suddenly come to seem really important. And sure enough, the self-help books change to meet these new needs and they start to have names like "How to Win Friends and Influence People." And they feature as their role models really great salesmen. So that's the world we're living in today. That's our cultural inheritance.12:44Now none of this is to say that social skills are unimportant, and I'm also not calling for the abolishing of teamwork at all. The same religions who send their sages off to lonely mountain tops also teach us love and trust. And the problems that we are facing today in fields like science and in economics are so vast and so complex that we are going to need armies of peoplecoming together to solve them working together. But I am saying that the more freedom that we give introverts to be themselves, the more likely that they are to come up with their own unique solutions to these problems.13:20So now I'd like to share with you what's in my suitcase today. Guess what? Books. I have a suitcase full of books. Here's Margaret Atwood, "Cat's Eye." Here's a novel by Milan Kundera. And here's "The Guide for the Perplexed" by Maimonides. But these are not exactly my books. I brought these books with me because they were written by my grandfather's favorite authors. 13:54My grandfather was a rabbi and he was a widower who lived alone in a small apartment in Brooklyn that was my favorite place in the world when I was growing up, partly because it was filled with his very gentle, very courtly presence and partly because it was filled with books. I mean literally every table, every chair in this apartment had yielded its original function to now serve as a surface for swaying stacks of books. Just like the rest of my family, my grandfather's favorite thing to do in the whole world was to read.14:23But he also loved his congregation, and you could feel this love in the sermons that he gave every week for the 62 years that he was a rabbi. He would takes the fruits of each week's reading and he would weave these intricate tapestries of ancient and humanist thought. And people would come from all over to hear him speak.14:43But here's the thing about my grandfather. Underneath this ceremonial role, he was really modest and really introverted -- so much so that when he delivered these sermons, he had trouble making eye contact with the very same congregation that he had been speaking to for 62years. And even away from the podium, when you called him to say hello, he would often end the conversation prematurely for fear that he was taking up too much of your time. But when he died at the age of94, the police had to close down the streets of his neighborhood to accommodate the crowd of people who came out to mourn him. And so these days I try to learn from my grandfather's example in my own way.15:27So I just published a book about introversion, and it took me about seven years to write. And for me, that seven years was like total bliss, because I was reading, I was writing, I was thinking, I was researching. It was my version of my grandfather's hours of the day alone in his library. But now all of a sudden my job is very different, and my job is to be out here talking about it, talking about introversion. (Laughter) And that's a lot harder for me, because as honored as I am to be here with all of you right now, this is not my natural milieu.16:07So I prepared for moments like these as best I could. I spent the last year practicing public speaking every chance I could get. And I call this my "year of speaking dangerously." (Laughter) And that actually helped a lot. But I'll tell you, what helps even more is my sense, my belief, my hope that when it comes to our attitudes to introversion and to quiet and to solitude, we truly are poised on the brink on dramatic change. I mean, we are. And so I am going to leave you now with three calls for action for those who share this vision.16:41Number one: Stop the madness for constant group work. Just stop it. (Laughter) Thank you. (Applause) And I want to be clear about what I'm saying, because I deeply believe our offices should be encouraging casual, chatty cafe-style types of interactions -- you know, the kind where people come together and serendipitously have an exchange of ideas. That is great. It's great forintroverts and it's great for extroverts. But we need much more privacy and much more freedom and much more autonomy at work. School, same thing. We need to be teaching kids to work together, for sure, but we also need to be teaching them how to work on their own. This is especially important for extroverted children too. They need to work on their own because that is where deep thought comes from in part.17:28Okay, number two: Go to the wilderness. Be like Buddha, have your own revelations. I'm not saying that we all have to now go off and build our own cabins in the woods and never talk to each other again, but I am saying that we could all stand to unplug and get inside our own heads a little more often.17:50Number three: Take a good look at what's inside your own suitcase and why you put it there. So extroverts, maybe your suitcases are also full of books. Or maybe they're full of champagne glasses or skydiving equipment. Whatever it is, I hope you take these things out every chance you get and grace us with your energy and your joy. But introverts, you being you, you probably have the impulse to guard very carefully what's inside your own suitcase. And that's okay. But occasionally, just occasionally, I hope you will open up your suitcases for other people to see, because the world needs you and it needs the things you carry.18:32So I wish you the best of all possible journeys and the courage to speak softly.当我九岁的时候我第一次去参加夏令营我妈妈帮我整理好了我的行李箱里面塞满了书这对于我来说是一件极为自然的事情因为在我的家庭里阅读是主要的家庭活动听上去你们可能觉得我们是不爱交际的但是对于我的家庭来说这真的只是接触社会的另一种途径你们有自己家庭接触时的温暖亲情家人静坐在你身边但是你也可以自由地漫游在你思维深处的冒险乐园里我有一个想法野营会变得像这样子，当然要更好些（笑声）我想象到十个女孩坐在一个小屋里都穿着合身的女式睡衣惬意地享受着读书的过程0:51（笑声）0:53野营这时更像是一个不提供酒水的派对聚会在第一天的时候呢我们的顾问把我们都集合在一起并且她教会了我们一种今后要用到的庆祝方式在余下夏令营的每一天中让“露营精神”浸润我们之后它就像这样继续着R-O-W-D-I-E 这是我们拼写“吵闹"的口号我们唱着“噪音，喧闹，我们要变得吵一点”对，就是这样可我就是弄不明白我的生活会是什么样的为什么我们变得这么吵闹粗暴或者为什么我们非要把这个单词错误地拼写（笑声）但是我可没有忘记庆祝。
TED一篇观后感：Yourbodylanguageshapeswhoyouare肢体语言塑造人格
TED一篇观后感：Yourbodylanguageshapeswhoyouare肢体语言塑造人格第一篇：TED一篇观后感：Your body language shapes who you are 肢体语言塑造人格Your body language shapes who you areYour body language shapes who you are.We always make sweeping judgments and inferences from body language.And those judgments can predict really meaningful life outcomes like who we hire or promote, who we ask out on a date.Amy Cuddy, the lecturer, tells us a lot about functions of body language bring to us.It is true across the animal kingdom that when animals make themselves big, they stretch out, take up space, they are basically opening up and expanding.It's not just limited to primates,and humans do the same thing.Amy Cuddy explains this phenomenon physiologically by cortisol, which is the stress hormone.When we feel powerless, we do exactly the opposite.We close up, wrap ourselves up, and make ourselves small.all we have done because of testosterone, which is the dominance hormone.She also stresses that power posing for a few minutes really change your life in meaningful ways.Presenting a example of her childhood experience, she tells us that your body shapes who you are.What you think doesn't mean what you behave, but someone else's opinion of you precisely depends on your performance rather than what you have in mind.That is what the lecture talks about.My favorite TV series is .Although the stories are about crimes, the main idea which the show expresses to us is that your body language may betray your soul.Once one's words are not matched by deeds, his body language tell the truth instead.I know about body languageonly stay at this level:your body language reflects who you are.Through Amy Cuddy's speech, I understand much deeper:your body language not only reflects who you are, but also shapes who you are.Since we have found the body language can accurately reflect our inner emotion condition, we can also make the body language a positive means, which motivates our psychological status to be better.People feel tense when Cortisol level is high, so they may curl up body or dodge themselves as physical reaction.On the contrast, if we pretend to be relax and confident, making body language roused, opening shoulders, and smiling with ease, then our testosterone level will rise while cortisol will be inhibited.T o some extent, once we faked to be relax and confident, one day it will become real.As Amy said, ‘Fake it till you make it.Fake it till you become it.’I cannot agree more about her idea, because I had the same experience before.After graduated from primary school, my character totally changed, which due to a person.She is the one I admired most in primary school because she can be very confident in any occasion.Everyday she raised her head proudly, talked with others in humorous way and acted neither humble nor pushy just like a queen.However, i usually curled up in my seat, looked down as answering questions, dared not contact with the one's eyes.It is cortisol that plays the main role, which leads us to be powerless.When I came to middle school, I started to change.I pretended to be another her though I know I am an impostor, I still tried to appear confident and brave.I faked it till I made it, and finally one day I really became it.Learning to tweak this a little bit, it could significantly change the way your life unfolds.So I want to say, rising your head proudly, opening your shoulder with confidence, holding your hands up to top,answering questions as loudly as you can.You are what you do.You are what you say.You are what your body language expresses, because your body language shapes who you are.第二篇：肢体语言肢体语言在职业学校英语教学中的作用摘要：随着语言教学和语言学习方法改革的持续推进,对于英语教师用英语组织教学创设鲜活的语言学习环境的要求越来越高,然而由于职业学校学生英语基础普遍欠佳,词汇量相对匮乏,这就要求老师必须通过面部表情和肢体语言,来简化教学语言,本文将探讨肢体语言在职业学校英语教学中运用的可行性和效果。
amy cuddy ted演讲稿
三一文库（）〔amy cuddy ted演讲稿〕amycuddyted演讲稿为大家整理哈佛商学院副教授amycuddy 在ted上的精彩演讲《用肢体语言塑造你自己，两分钟改变你的人生》，通过这篇演讲，让我们知道肢体语言的重要性，是如何影响我们的心理的。
下面是这篇amycuddyted演讲稿amycuddyted演讲稿我想要提供给你们一个免费的，非科技的人生窍门首先，我想要提供给你们一个免费的，非科技的人生窍门。
你只需这样做，改变你的姿势二分钟时间，但在我要把它告诉你们之前，我想要请你们，就你们的身体和你们身体的行为做一下自我审查。
那么你们之中有多少人正蜷缩着自己?或许你现在弓着背，还翘着二郎腿，或者双臂交叉。
有时候我们像这样抱住自己，有时候展开双臂，我看到你了。
现在请大家专心在自己的身上，我们等一下就会回溯刚刚的事，希望你们可以稍微改变一下，这会让你的生活变得很不一样。
所以，我们很真的很执着于肢体语言，特别是对别人的肢体语言感兴趣。
你看，我们对尴尬的互动，或一个微笑，或轻蔑的一瞥，或奇怪的眨眼，甚至是握手之类的事情感兴趣。
所以一个握手，或没有握手，我们都可以大聊特聊一番，即使BBC和纽约时报也不例外。
我们说到肢体行为或肢体语言时，我们将之归纳为社会科学，它就是一种语言。
所以我们会想到沟通，当我们想到沟通，我们就想到互动所以你现在的身体语言正在告诉我什么?我的身体又是在向你传达什么?有很多理由让我们相信这些是有效的，社会科学家花了很多时间，求证肢体语言的效果，或其它人的身体语言在判断方面的效应，而我们环视身体语言中的讯息做决定和推论。
这些结论可以预测生活中很有意义的结果，像是我们雇用谁或给谁升职，邀请谁出去约会，举例而言，Tufts大学的研究员，NaliniAmbady表示，人们观赏一部医生和患者互动的30秒无声影片。
进一步来说，普林斯顿的AlexTodorov表示，我们对政治人物脸部的喜好判断，大概可用来对美国参议院和美国州长的竞选结果做70%的预测，甚至就网络上在线聊天时使用的表情符号，可以帮助你从交谈中得到更多信息。
英语演讲稿TED英语演讲：如何在说话时表现出你的专业性
英语演讲稿TED英语演讲：如何在说话时表现出你的专业性TED英语演讲：如何在说话时表现出你的专业性放声说话并不是一件容易的事情，哥伦比亚大学商学院教授Adam Galinsky通过心理研究想出了许多解决这一问题的办法。
下面是小编为大家收集关于TED英语演讲：如何在说话时表现出你的专业性，欢迎借鉴参考。
演说题目：如何在说话时表现出你的专业性?演说者：Adam Galinsky演讲稿Speaking up is hard to do. I understood the true meaning of this phrase exactly one month ago, when my wife and I became new parents. It was an amazing moment. It was exhilarating and elating, but it was also scary and terrifying. And it got particularly terrifying when we got home from the hospital,and we were unsure whether our little baby boy was getting enough nutrients from breastfeeding. And we wanted to call our pediatrician, but we also didn't want to make a bad first impression or come across as a crazy, neurotic parent. So we worried. And we waited. When we got to the doctor's office the next day, she immediately gave him formula because he was pretty dehydrated. Our son is fine now, and our doctor has reassured us we can always contact her. But in that moment, I should've spoken up, but I didn't.But sometimes we speak up when we shouldn't, and I learned thatover 10 years ago when I let my twin brother down. My twin brother is a documentary filmmaker, and for one of his first films, he got an offer from a distribution company. He was excited, and he was inclined to accept the offer. But as a negotiationsresearcher, I insisted he make a counteroffer, and I helped him craft the perfect one.And it was perfect -- it was perfectly insulting. The company was so offended, they literally withdrew the offer and my brother was left with nothing.And I've asked people all over the world about this dilemma of speaking up: when they can assert themselves, when they can push their interests, when they can express an opinion, when they can make an ambitious ask.And the range of stories are varied and diverse, but they also make up a universal tapestry. Can I correct my boss when they make a mistake? Can I confront my coworker who keeps stepping on my toes? Can I challenge my friend's insensitive joke? Can I tell the person I love the most my deepest insecurities?And through these experiences, I've come to recognize that each of us have something called a range of acceptable behavior. Now, sometimes we're too strong; we push ourselves too much. That's what happened with my brother. Even making an offer was outside his range of acceptable behavior.But sometimes we're too weak. That's what happened with my wife and I. And this range of acceptable behaviors --when we stay within our range, we're rewarded. When we step outside that range, we get punished in a variety of ways. We get dismissed or demeaned or even ostracized. Or we lose that raise or that promotion or that deal.Now, the first thing we need to know is: What is my range? But the key thing is, our range isn't fixed;it's actually pretty dynamic. It expands and it narrows based on the context. And there's one thing that determines that range more than anything else, and that's your power. Your power determines your range. What is power? Power comes in lots of forms. In negotiations, itcomes in the form of alternatives. So my brother had no alternatives; he lacked power. The company had lots of alternatives; they had power. Sometimes it's being new to a country, like an immigrant, or new to an organization or new to an experience, like my wife and I as new parents. Sometimes it's at work,where someone's the boss and someone's the subordinate. Sometimes it's in relationships, where one person's more invested than the other person.And the key thing is that when we have lots of power, our range is very wide. We have a lot of leeway in how to behave. But when we lack power, our range narrows. We have very little leeway. The problem is that when our range narrows, that produces something called the low-power double bind.The low-power double bind happens when, if we don't speak up, we go unnoticed, but if we do speak up, we getpunished.Now, many of you have heard the phrase the "double bind" and connected it with one thing, and that's gender. The gender double bind is women who don't speak up go unnoticed, and women who do speak up get punished. And the key thing is that women have the same need as men to speak up,but they have barriers to doing so. But what my research has shown over the last two decades is that what looks like a gender difference is not really a gender double bind, it's a really a low-power double bind. And what looks like a gender difference are really often just power differences in disguise.Oftentimes we see a difference between a man and a woman or men and women, and think, "Biological cause. There's something fundamentally different about the sexes." But in study after study, I've found that a better explanation for many sex differences is really power. And so it'sthe low-power double bind. And the low-power double bind means that we have a narrow range, and we lack power. We have a narrow range, and our double bind is very large.So we need to find ways to expand our range. And over the last couple decades, my colleagues and I have found two things really matter. The first: you seem powerful in your own eyes. The second: you seem powerful in the eyes of others. When I feel powerful, I feel confident, not fearful; I expand my own range. When other people see me as powerful,they grant me a wider range. So we need tools to expand our range of acceptable behavior. And I'm going to give you a set of tools today. Speaking up is risky, but these tools will lower your risk of speaking up.The first tool I'm going to give you got discovered in negotiations in an important finding. On average, women make less ambitious offers and get worse outcomes than men at the bargaining table. But Hannah Riley Bowles and Emily Amanatullah have discovered there's one situation where women get the same outcomes as men and are just as ambitious. That's when they advocate for others.When they advocate for others, they discover their own range and expand it in their own mind. They become more assertive. This is sometimes called "the mama bear effect." Like a mama bear defending her cubs, when we advocate for others, we can discover our own voice.But sometimes, we have to advocate for ourselves. How do we do that? One of the most important tools we have to advocate for ourselves is something called perspective-taking. And perspective-taking is really simple: it's simply looking at the world through the eyes of another person. It's one of the most important tools we have to expand our range. When I take yourperspective, and I think about what you really want, you're more likely to give me what I really want.But here's the problem: perspective-taking is hard to do. So let's do a little experiment. I want you all to hold your hand just like this: yourfinger -- put it up. And I want you to draw a capital letter E on your forehead as quickly as possible. OK, it turns out that we can draw this E in one of two ways, and this was originally designed as a test of perspective-taking. I'm going to show you two pictures of someone with an E on their forehead -- my former student, Erika Hall. And you can see over here,that's the correct E. I drew the E so it looks like an E to another person. That's the perspective-taking E because it looks like an E from someone else's vantage point. But this E over here is the self-focused E. We often get self-focused. And we particularly get self-focused in a crisis.I want to tell you about a particular crisis. A man walks intoa bank in Watsonville, California. And he says, "Give me $2,000, or I'm blowing the whole bank up with a bomb." Now, the bank manager didn't give him the money. She took a step back. She took his perspective, and she noticed something really important. He asked for a specific amount of money.So she said, "Why did you ask for $2,000?"And he said, "My friend is going to be evicted unless I get him $2,000 immediately."And she said, "Oh! You don't want to rob the bank -- you want to take out a loan.""Why don't you come back to my office, and we can have you fill out the paperwork."Now, her quick perspective-taking defused a volatilesituation. So when we take someone's perspective, it allows us to be ambitious and assertive, but still be likable.Here's another way to be assertive but still be likable, and that is to signal flexibility. Now, imagine you're a car salesperson, and you want to sell someone a car. You're going to more likely make the sale if you give them two options. Let's say option A: $24,000 for this car and a five-year warranty. Or option B: $23,000 and a three-year warranty. My research shows that when you give people a choice among options, it lowers their defenses, and they're more likely to accept your offer.And this doesn't just work with salespeople; it works with parents. When my niece was four, she resisted getting dressed and rejected everything. But then my sister-in-law had a brilliant idea. What if I gave my daughter a choice? This shirt or that shirt? OK, that shirt. This pant or that pant? OK, that pant. And it worked brilliantly. She got dressed quickly and without resistance.When I've asked the question around the world when people feel comfortable speaking up, the number one answer is: "When I have social support in my audience; when I have allies." So we want to get allies on our side. How do we do that? Well, one of the ways is be a mama bear. When we advocate for others, we expand our range in our own eyes and the eyes of others, but we also earn strong allies.Another way we can earn strong allies, especially in high places, is by asking other people for advice.When we ask others for advice, they like us because we flatter them, and we're expressing humility.And this really works to solve another double bind. And that's the self-promotion double bind. The self-promotion double bind is that if we don't advertise our accomplishments, no one notices. And if we do, we're not likable.But if we ask for advice about one of our accomplishments, we are able to be competent in their eyes but also be likeable. And this is so powerful it even works when you see it coming. There have been multiple times in life when I have been forewarned that a low-power person has been given the advice to come ask me for advice. I want you to notice three things about this: First, I knew they were going to come ask me for advice. Two, I've actually done research on the strategic benefits of asking for advice. And three, it still worked! I took their perspective, I became more invested in their cause, I became more committed to them because they asked for advice.Now, another time we feel more confident speaking up is when we have expertise. Expertise gives us credibility. When we have high power, we already have credibility. We only need good evidence.When we lack power, we don't have the credibility. We need excellent evidence.And one of the ways we can come across as an expert is by tapping into our passion. I want everyone in the next few days to go up to friendof theirs and just say to them, "I want you to describe a passion of yours to me." I've had people do this all over the world and I asked them, "What did you notice about the other person when they described their passion?" And the answers are always the same."Their eyes lit up and got big." "They smiled a big beaming smile." "They used their hands all over -- I had to duck because their hands were coming at me." "They talk quickly with a little higher pitch.""They leaned in as if telling me a secret."And then I said to them, "What happened to you as you listened to their passion?"They said, "My eyes lit up. I smiled. I leaned in."When we tap into our passion, we give ourselves the courage, in our own eyes, to speak up, but we also get the permission from others to speak up. Tapping into our passion even works when we come across as too weak. Both men and women get punished at work when they shed tears. But Lizzie Wolf has shown that when we frame our strong emotions as passion, the condemnation of our crying disappears for both men and women.I want to end with a few words from my late father that he spoke at my twin brother's wedding. Here's a picture of us. My dad was a psychologist like me, but his real love and his real passion was cinema,like my brother. And so he wrote a speech for my brother'swedding about the roles we play in the human comedy.And he said, "The lighter your touch, the better you become at improving and enriching your performance. Those who embrace their roles and work to improve their performance grow, change and expand the self. Play it well, and your days will be mostly joyful."What my dad was saying is that we've all been assigned ranges and roles in this world. But he was also saying the essence of this talk: those roles and ranges are constantly expanding and evolving.So when a scene calls for it, be a ferocious mama bear and a humble advice seeker. Have excellent evidence and strong allies. Be a passionate perspective taker. And if you use those tools -- and each and every one of you can use these tools -- you will expand your range of acceptable behavior, and your days will be mostly joyful.Thank you.放大声音得说话并不简单。
TED英语演讲别人嘲笑你的英语口音时该怎么办
TED英语演讲：别人嘲笑你的英语口音时该怎么办TED演讲：当别人都在嘲笑你的英语口音时，你该怎么办?I used to have this recurring dream where Id walk into a roomful of people, and Id try not to make eye contact with anyone. Until someone notices me, and I just panic. And the person walks up to me, and says, Hi, my name is So-and-so. And what is your name? And Im just quiet, unable to respond. After some awkward silence, he goes, Have you forgotten your name? And Im still quiet. And then, slowly, all the other people in the room begin to turn toward me and ask, almost in unison, (Voice-over, several voices) Have you forgotten your name? As the chant gets louder, I want to respond, but I dont.Im a visual artist. Some of my work is humorous, and some is a bit funny but in a sad way. And one thing that I really enjoy doing is making these little animations where I get to do the voice-over for all kinds of characters. Ive been a bear.(Video) Bear (Safwat Saleems voice): Hi.Safwat Saleem: Ive been a whale.(Video) Whale (SSs voice): Hi.SS: Ive been a greeting card.(Video) Greeting card (SSs voice): Hi.SS: And my personal favorite is Frankensteins monster.(Video) Frankensteins monster (SSs voice): (Grunts)SS: I just had to grunt a lot for that one.A few years ago, I made this educational video about the history of video games. And for that one, I got to do the voice of Space Invader.(Video) Space Invader (SSs voice): Hi.SS: A dream come true, really,(Laughter) And when that video was posted online, I just sat there on the computer, hitting refresh, excited to see the response. The first comment comes in.(Video) Comment: Great job. SS: Yes! I hit refresh.(Video) Comment: Excellent video. I look forward to the next one.SS: This was just the first of a two-part video. I was going to work on the second one next. I hit refresh.(Video) Comment: Where is part TWO? WHEREEEEE? I need it NOWWWWW!: P SS: People other than my mom were saying nice things about me, on the Internet! It felt like I had finally arrived. I hit refresh.(Video) Comment: His voice is annoying. No offense.SS: OK, no offense taken. Refresh.(Video) Comment: Could you remake this without peanut butter in your mouth?SS: OK, at least the feedback is somewhat constructive. Hit refresh.(Video) Comment: Please dont use this narrator again u can barely understand him.SS: Refresh.(Video) Comment: Couldnt follow because of the Indian accent.SS: OK, OK, OK, two things. Number one, I dont have an Indian accent, I have a Pakistani accent, OK? And number two, I clearly have a Pakistani accent.But comments like that kept coming in, so I figured I should just ignore them and start working on the second part of the video. I recorded my audio, but every time I sat down to edit, I just could not do it. Every single time, it would take me back to my childhood, when I had a much harder time speaking.Ive stuttered for as long as I can remember. I was the kid in class who would never raise his hand when he had a question -- or knew the answer. Every time the phone rang, I would run to the bathroom so I would not have to answer it. If it was for me, my parents would say Im not around. I spent a lot of time in the bathroom. And I hated introducing myself, especially in groups. Id always stutter on my name, and there was usually someone whod go, Have you forgotten your name? And then everybody would laugh. That joke never got old.I spent my childhood feeling that if I spoke, it would become obvious that there was something wrong with me, that I was not normal. So I mostly stayed quiet. And so you see, eventually for me to even be able to use my voice in my work was a huge step for me. Every time I record audio, I fumble my way through saying eachsentence many, many times, and then I go back in and pick the ones where I think I suck the least.(Voice-over) SS: Audio editing is like Photoshop for your voice. I can slow it down, speed it up, make it deeper, add an echo. And if I stutter along the way, and if I stutter along the way, I just go back in and fix it. Its magic.SS: Using my highly edited voice in my work was a way for me to finally sound normal to myself. But after the comments on the video, it no longer made me feel normal. And so I stopped using my voice in my work. Since then, Ive thought a lot about what it means to be normal. And Ive come to understand that normal has a lot to do with expectations.Let me give you an example. I came across this story about the Ancient Greek writer, Homer. Now, Homer mentions very few colors in his writing. And even when he does, he seems to get them quite a bit wrong. For example, the sea is described as wine red, peoples faces are sometimes green and sheep are purple. But its not just Homer. If you look at all of the ancient literature -- Ancient Chinese, Icelandic, Greek, Indian and even the original Hebrew Bible -- they all mention very few colors. And the most popular theory for why that might be the case is that cultures begin to recognize a color only once they have the ability to make that color. So basically, if you can make a color, only then can you see it. A color like red, which was fairly easy for many cultures to make -- they began to see that color fairly early on. But a color like blue, which was much harder to make -- many cultures didnt begin to learn how to make that color until much later. They didnt begin to see it until much later as well. So until then, even though a color might be all around them, they simply did not have the ability to see it. It was invisIble. It was not a part of their normal.And that story has helped put my own experience into context. So when I first read the comments on the video, my initial reaction was to take it all very personally. But the people commenting did not know how self-conscious I am about my voice. They were mostly reacting to my accent, that it is not normal for a narrator to have an accent.But what is normal, anyway? We know that reviewers will find more spelling errors in your writing if they think youre black. We know that professors are lesslikely to help female or minority students. And we know that resumes with white-sounding names get more callbacks than resumes with black-sounding names. Why is that? Because of our expectations of what is normal. We think it is normal when a black student has spelling errors. We think it is normal when a female or minority student does not succeed. And we think it is normal that a white employee is a better hire than a black employee. But studies also show that discrimination of this kind, in most cases, is simply favoritism, and it results more from wanting to help people that you can relate to than the desire to harm people that you cant relate to.And not relating to people starts at a very early age. Let me give you an example. One library that keeps track of characters in the childrens book collection every year, found that in 2021, only about 11 percent of the books had a character of color. And just the year before, that number was about eight percent, even though half of American children today come from a minority background. Half.So there are two big issues here. Number one, children are told that they can be anything, they can do anything, and yet, most stories that children of color consume are about people who are not like them. Number two is that majority groups dont get to realize the great extent to which they are similar to minorities -- our everyday experiences, our hopes, our dreams, our fears and our mutual love for hummus. Its delicious!Just like the color blue for Ancient Greeks, minorities are not a part of what we consider normal, because normal is simply a construction of what weve been exposed to, and how visible it is around us.And this is where things get a bit difficult. I can accept the preexisting notion of normal -- that normal is good, and anything outside of that very narrow definition of normal is bad. Or I can challenge that preexisting notion of normal with my work and with my voice and with my accent and by standing here onstage, even though Im scared shitless and would rather be in the bathroom.(Video) Sheep (SSs voice): Im now slowly starting to use my voice in my work again. And it feels good. It does not mean I wont have a breakdown the next time a couple dozen people say that I talk (Mumbling) like I have peanut butter in my mouth.SS: It just means I now have a much better understanding of whats at stake, andhow giving up is not an option.The Ancient Greeks didnt just wake up one day and realize that the sky was blue. It took centuries, even, for humans to realize what we had been ignoring for so long. And so we must continuously challenge our notion of normal, because doing so is going to allow us as a society to finally see the sky for what it is.(Video) Characters: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Frankensteins monster: (Grunts)SS: Thank you.我以前常常做一个梦，梦到我走进一个满是人的房间，我小心翼翼地避开每个人的眼神。
在公众场合大声说话的危害英语作文
The Detrimental Effects of Loud Talking inPublic PlacesIn today's increasingly interconnected world, the importance of maintaining appropriate decorum and etiquette in public spaces cannot be overstated. One behavior that often stands out as both obnoxious and disruptive is loud talking. This unabashedly noisy conduct not only violates the basic right to peace and quiet enjoyed by others, but also reflects a lack of respect and consideration for one's fellow citizens.The harmful effects of loud talking in public placesare numerous and diverse. Firstly, it disrupts thetranquility and serenity of the environment, making it difficult for others to concentrate, relax, or even conduct necessary tasks. Whether it's in a library, a museum, a park, or any other public space, excessive noise can be a significant annoyance. It can interrupt the flow of thought, disrupt the atmosphere of learning or reflection, and generally detract from the overall experience.Moreover, loud talking can have a negative impact onone's social image and interpersonal relationships. Itoften conveys a sense of arrogance or entitlement, which can be off-putting to others. It can also lead to conflict and disputes, as people may feel compelled to speak up or react to the noise. This, in turn, can create an atmosphere of tension and hostility that is不利于和谐共处的。
如何避免语言灭绝ted演讲观后感
如何避免语言灭绝ted演讲观后感第八个12天已经过去，终于抽出一点时间完成本期的感想，本期的话题也很广泛，有教育、语言、女性、婚姻等话题，根据对于演讲的介绍，选择你感兴趣的，一起学起来。
题目1：语言和思想语言和思想有着紧密关系，语言是思想的外壳，反过来又影响着思想。
演讲者举了英语中两个句子：Give a muffin to a mouse. 和Give a mouse a muffin. 这两句话说话者的关注点不同，前者在muffin, 后者在mouse上。
此外前者含有cause a muffin to go to a mouse的含义，后者是cause a mouse to have a muffin的含义。
也因此我们只能说give sb. a headache, 而不能说give a headache to sb. 因为可以说cause sb. to have a headache, 但不能说cause a headache to go to sb.在语言生成过程中，对于空间，时间，因果，人类意愿的看法，影响着语言的形式，我们通过交流，用句子当做容器，传达着我们的思想。
这是一个很学术的演讲，对于语言和思想关系，我之前思考过，并曾经写过一篇文章, 因为多年接触英语，让我有机会通过两种不同语言看到两种不同文化，在不断认识英语过程中，对母语认识也在加深。
通过对比，我整体感觉汉语是一个比较模糊的语言，不如英语分的细，这也许是受中国整体思维，而西方是一种分析思维的影响。
题目2：真实的你存在吗？现在很流行一句话：找到真实的自己。
这句话暗含着我们有一个真实的自己等待被发现，而演讲者挑战着这种说法。
演讲者认为我们就像手表一样，由很多部分组成，但这种组成部分间内在是有联系的，同时人像瀑布一样不断变化发展，真实的你不仅是去发现，还是去创造。
我一直认为自己是一个等待发现的客体，会想着用各种方式去了解自己，演讲者这种认为自己是可以被创造的观点确实超出了我的认知，现在还无法理解。
amy cuddy ted演讲稿总结
amy cuddy ted演讲稿总结Amy Cuddy的TED演讲主题为“你的身体语言如何影响你的思想”，她在演讲中分享了关于身体语言的重要性和它对我们思维和情绪状态的影响。
以下是对她演讲的总结：Amy Cuddy认为，我们经常忽视身体语言对我们自身和他人的影响。
她指出，我们的身体语言不仅反映出我们的内心状态，也反过来影响我们的思维和情绪。
例如，当我们感到自信和有力时，我们的身体语言会显露出来，我们会站得更直、走得更快，而当我们感到不安和无助时，我们的身体语言也会相应地变得压抑和关闭。
她提供了一个有趣的实验结果支持这一观点。
实验中，参与者被分为“高权势姿势组”和“低权势姿势组”。
高权势姿势组被要求采取一些如伸展、占据空间的身体姿势，而低权势姿势组则被要求采取一些如缩成一团、收缩的姿势。
然后，参与者完成了一些与权势相关的任务。
结果显示，高权势姿势组表现出更高的自信和较低的应激激素水平，相反低权势姿势组则表现出相反的结果。
Amy Cuddy进一步指出，我们可以通过正确使用身体语言来改善自己的思维和情绪状态。
她介绍了一个她称为“力量姿势”的概念，即通过采取自信和放松的身体姿势来帮助我们变得更有自信和冷静。
她建议我们在重要场合前花两分钟以力量姿势进行身体调整，以提升自信和表现。
此外，她还提到了行为准则、认同和指导性问题等其他技巧来帮助我们改变自身和影响他人。
Amy Cuddy的TED演讲引起了广泛的关注和讨论。
她以独特的实验和案例说明了身体语言对我们心理状态的重要影响，并提供了一些实用的改善技巧。
她的演讲给我们带来了重要的思考：我们是否意识到自己的身体语言对我们思维和情绪的影响？我们是否可以通过调整身体姿势来改善自己的自信和表现？这些问题激发了我们对身体语言的更深层次思考和关注。
英语演讲稿 TED英语演讲：如何在说话时表现出你的专业性
TED英语演讲：如何在说话时表现出你的专业性放声说话并不是一件容易的事情，哥伦比亚大学商学院教授Adam Galinsky通过心理研究想出了许多解决这一问题的办法。
下面是小编为大家收集关于TED英语演讲：如何在说话时表现出你的专业性，欢迎借鉴参考。
演说题目：如何在说话时表现出你的专业性?演说者：Adam Galinsky演讲稿Speaking up is hard to do. I understood the true meaning of this phrase exactly one month ago, when my wife and I became new parents. It was an amazing moment. It was exhilarating and elating, but it was also scary and terrifying. And it got particularly terrifying when we got home from the hospital,and we were unsure whether our little baby boy was getting enough nutrients from breastfeeding. And we wanted to call our pediatrician, but we also didn't want to make a bad first impression or come across as a crazy, neurotic parent. So we worried. And we waited. When we got to the doctor's office the next day, she immediately gave him formula because he was pretty dehydrated. Our son is fine now, and our doctor has reassured us we can always contact her. But in that moment, I should've spoken up, but I didn't.But sometimes we speak up when we shouldn't, and I learned thatover 10 years ago when I let my twin brother down. My twin brother is a documentary filmmaker, and for one of his first films, he got an offer from a distribution company. He was excited, and he was inclined to accept the offer. But as a negotiations researcher, I insisted he make a counteroffer, and I helped him craft the perfect one.And it was perfect -- it was perfectly insulting. The company was so offended, they literally withdrew the offer and my brother was left with nothing.And I've asked people all over the world about this dilemma of speaking up: when they can assert themselves, when they can push their interests, when they can express an opinion, when they can make an ambitious ask.And the range of stories are varied and diverse, but they also make up a universal tapestry. Can I correct my boss when they make a mistake? Can I confront my coworker who keeps stepping on my toes? Can I challenge my friend's insensitive joke? Can I tell the person I love the most my deepest insecurities?And through these experiences, I've come to recognize that each of us have something called a range of acceptable behavior. Now, sometimes we're too strong; we push ourselves too much. That's what happened with my brother. Even making an offer was outside his range of acceptable behavior.But sometimes we're too weak. That's what happened with my wife and I. And this range of acceptable behaviors --when we stay within our range, we're rewarded. When we step outside that range, we get punished in a variety of ways. We get dismissed or demeaned or even ostracized. Or we lose that raise or that promotion or that deal.Now, the first thing we need to know is: What is my range? But the key thing is, our range isn't fixed;it's actually pretty dynamic. It expands and it narrows based on the context. And there's one thing that determines that range more than anything else, and that's your power. Your power determines your range. What is power? Power comes in lots of forms. In negotiations, it comes in the form of alternatives. So my brother had no alternatives; he lacked power. The company had lots of alternatives; they had power. Sometimes it's being new to a country, like an immigrant, or new to an organization or new to an experience, like my wife and I as new parents. Sometimes it's at work,where someone's the boss and someone's the subordinate. Sometimes it's in relationships, where one person's more invested than the other person.And the key thing is that when we have lots of power, our range is very wide. We have a lot of leeway in how to behave. But when we lack power, our range narrows. We have very little leeway. The problem is that when our range narrows, that produces something called the low-power double bind.The low-power double bind happens when, if we don't speak up, we go unnoticed, but if we do speak up, we getpunished.Now, many of you have heard the phrase the "double bind" and connected it with one thing, and that's gender. The gender double bind is women who don't speak up go unnoticed, and women who do speak up get punished. And the key thing is that women have the same need as men to speak up,but they have barriers to doing so. But what my research has shown over the last two decades is that what looks like a gender difference is not really a gender double bind, it's a really a low-power double bind. And what looks like a gender difference are really often just power differences in disguise.Oftentimes we see a difference between a man and a woman or men and women, and think, "Biological cause. There's something fundamentally different about the sexes." But in study after study, I've found that a better explanation for many sex differences is really power. And so it's the low-power double bind. And the low-power double bind means that we have a narrow range, and we lack power. We have a narrow range, and our double bind is very large.So we need to find ways to expand our range. And over the last couple decades, my colleagues and I have found two things really matter. The first: you seem powerful in your own eyes. The second: you seem powerful in the eyes of others. When I feel powerful, I feel confident, not fearful; I expand my own range. When other people see me as powerful,they grant me a wider range. So we need tools to expand our range of acceptable behavior. And I'm going to give you a set of tools today. Speaking up is risky, but these tools will lower your risk of speaking up.The first tool I'm going to give you got discovered in negotiations in an important finding. On average, women make less ambitious offers and get worse outcomes than men at the bargaining table. But Hannah Riley Bowles and Emily Amanatullah have discovered there's one situation where women get the same outcomes as men and are just as ambitious. That's when they advocate for others.When they advocate for others, they discover their own range and expand it in their own mind. They become more assertive. This is sometimes called "the mama bear effect." Like a mama bear defending her cubs, when we advocate for others, we can discover our own voice.But sometimes, we have to advocate for ourselves. How do we do that? One of the most important tools we have to advocate for ourselves is something called perspective-taking. And perspective-taking is really simple: it's simply looking at the world through the eyes of another person. It's one of the most important tools we have to expand our range. When I take your perspective, and I think about what you really want, you're more likely to give me what I really want.But here's the problem: perspective-taking is hard to do. So let's do a little experiment. I want you all to hold your hand just like this: yourfinger -- put it up. And I want you to draw a capital letter E on your forehead as quickly as possible. OK, it turns out that we can draw this E in one of two ways, and this was originally designed as a test of perspective-taking. I'm going to show you two pictures of someone with an E on their forehead -- my former student, Erika Hall. And you can see over here,that's the correct E. I drew the E so it looks like an E to another person. That's the perspective-taking E because it looks like an E from someone else's vantage point. But this E over here is the self-focused E. We often get self-focused. And we particularly get self-focused in a crisis.I want to tell you about a particular crisis. A man walks into a bank in Watsonville, California. And he says, "Give me $2,000, or I'm blowing the whole bank up with a bomb." Now, the bank manager didn't give him the money. She took a step back. She took his perspective, and she noticed something really important. He asked for a specific amount of money.So she said, "Why did you ask for $2,000?"And he said, "My friend is going to be evicted unless I get him $2,000 immediately."And she said, "Oh! You don't want to rob the bank -- you want to take out a loan.""Why don't you come back to my office, and we can have you fill out the paperwork."Now, her quick perspective-taking defused a volatile situation. So when we take someone's perspective, it allows us to be ambitious and assertive, but still be likable.Here's another way to be assertive but still be likable, and that is to signal flexibility. Now, imagine you're a car salesperson, and you want to sell someone a car. You're going to more likely make the sale if you give them two options. Let's say option A: $24,000 for this car and a five-year warranty. Or option B: $23,000 and a three-year warranty. My research shows that when you give people a choice among options, it lowers their defenses, and they're more likely to accept your offer.And this doesn't just work with salespeople; it works with parents. When my niece was four, she resisted getting dressed and rejected everything. But then my sister-in-law had a brilliant idea. What if I gave my daughter a choice? This shirt or that shirt? OK, that shirt. This pant or that pant? OK, that pant. And it worked brilliantly. She got dressed quickly and without resistance.When I've asked the question around the world when people feel comfortable speaking up, the number one answer is: "When I have social support in my audience; when I have allies." So we want to get allies on our side. How do we do that? Well, one of the ways is be a mama bear. When we advocate for others, we expand our range in our own eyes and the eyes of others, but we also earn strong allies.Another way we can earn strong allies, especially in high places, is by asking other people for advice.When we ask others for advice, they like us because we flatter them, and we're expressing humility.And this really works to solve another double bind. And that's the self-promotion double bind. The self-promotion double bind is that if we don't advertise our accomplishments, no one notices. And if we do, we're not likable.But if we ask for advice about one of our accomplishments, we are able to be competent in their eyes but also be likeable. And this is so powerful it even works when you see it coming. There have been multiple times in life when I have been forewarned that a low-power person has been given the advice to come ask me for advice. I want you to notice three things about this: First, I knew they were going to come ask me for advice. Two, I've actually done research on the strategic benefits of asking for advice. And three, it still worked! I took their perspective, I became more invested in their cause, I became more committed to them because they asked for advice.Now, another time we feel more confident speaking up is when we have expertise. Expertise gives us credibility. When we have high power, we already have credibility. We only need good evidence.When we lack power, we don't have the credibility. We need excellent evidence.And one of the ways we can come across as an expert is by tapping into our passion. I want everyone in the next few days to go up to friendof theirs and just say to them, "I want you to describe a passion of yours to me." I've had people do this all over the world and I asked them, "What did you notice about the other person when they described their passion?" And the answers are always the same."Their eyes lit up and got big." "They smiled a big beaming smile." "They used their hands all over -- I had to duck because their hands were coming at me." "They talk quickly with a little higher pitch.""They leaned in as if telling me a secret."And then I said to them, "What happened to you as you listened to their passion?"They said, "My eyes lit up. I smiled. I leaned in."When we tap into our passion, we give ourselves the courage, in our own eyes, to speak up, but we also get the permission from others to speak up. Tapping into our passion even works when we come across as too weak. Both men and women get punished at work when they shed tears. But Lizzie Wolf has shown that when we frame our strong emotions as passion, the condemnation of our crying disappears for both men and women.I want to end with a few words from my late father that he spoke at my twin brother's wedding. Here's a picture of us. My dad was a psychologist like me, but his real love and his real passion was cinema,like my brother. And so he wrote a speech for my brother'swedding about the roles we play in the human comedy.And he said, "The lighter your touch, the better you become at improving and enriching your performance. Those who embrace their roles and work to improve their performance grow, change and expand the self. Play it well, and your days will be mostly joyful."What my dad was saying is that we've all been assigned ranges and roles in this world. But he was also saying the essence of this talk: those roles and ranges are constantly expanding and evolving.So when a scene calls for it, be a ferocious mama bear and a humble advice seeker. Have excellent evidence and strong allies. Be a passionate perspective taker. And if you use those tools -- and each and every one of you can use these tools -- you will expand your range of acceptable behavior, and your days will be mostly joyful.Thank you.放大声音得说话并不简单。
语言影响人的作文 英语
语言影响人的作文英语Language has a profound impact on people. It shapes the way we think, communicate, and perceive the world around us. The words we use can convey our emotions, beliefs, and values to others.The language we speak can also influence our behavior and interactions with others. It can determine how we express ourselves, how we form relationships, and how we navigate social situations. Different languages havedifferent cultural nuances and ways of expressing ideas, which can shape our worldview.Moreover, language can be a powerful tool for empowerment or oppression. The words we choose to use can either uplift or marginalize individuals and communities. Language can be a source of unity or division, depending on how it is wielded.In addition, language can influence our sense ofidentity and belonging. The language we speak can connect us to our heritage, culture, and community. It can also shape our sense of self and how we relate to others.Overall, language is a dynamic and complex force that plays a crucial role in shaping our thoughts, behaviors, and relationships. It is important to be mindful of the power of language and how it can impact both ourselves and those around us.。
TED演讲——不要固执于英语英文字幕
不要固执于英语I know what you’re thinking. You think I’ve lost my way, and somebody’s going to come on the stage in a minute and guide me gently back to my seat. I get that all thetime in Dubai. “Here on holiday are you, dear?”“Come to visit the children?”“How long are you staying?”Well actually, I hope for a while longer yet. I have been living and teaching in Gulf for over 30 years. And in that time, I have seen a lot of changes. Now that statistic is quit shocking. And I want to talk to you today about language loss and the globalization of English. I want to tell you about my friend who was teacher English to adults in Abu Dhabi. And one fine day, she decided to take them into the garden to teach them some nature vocabulary. But it was she who ended up learning all the Arabic words for the local plants, as well as their uses, medicinal uses, cosmetics, cooking, herbal. How did those students get all that knowledge? Of course, from their grandparentsand even their great-grandparents. It’s not necessary to tell you how important it is to be able to communicate across generation. But sadly, today, languages are dying at an unprecedented rate. A language dies every 14 days. Now at the same time, English is the undisputed global language. Could there be a connection? We don’t know. But I do knowthat I’ve seen a lot of changes. When I first came out to the Gulf, I came to Kuwait in the days it was still a hardship post. Actually, not that long ago. That is a little bit too early. But nevertheless, I was recruited by the British Council along with about 25 other teachers. And we were the first non-Muslims to teach in the state schools there in Kuwait. We were brought to teach English because the government wanted to modernize the country and empower the citizens through education. And of course, the U.K. benefited from some of that lovely oil wealth.Okay. Now this is the major change that I’ve seen how teaching English has morphed from being a mutually beneficial practice to becoming a massive international business that it is today. No longer just a foreign language on the school curriculum.And no longer the sole domain of mother England. It has become a bandwagon for every English-speaking nation on earth. And why not? After all, the best education according to the latest World University Rankings is to be found in the universities of the U.K. and the U.S. So everybody wants to have an English education, naturally. But if you’re not a native speaker, you have to pass a test. Now can it be right to reject a student on linguistic ability alone? Perhaps you have a computer scientist who’s agenius. Would he need the same language as a lawyer, for example? Well, I don’t think so. We English teachers reject them all the time. We put a stop sign, and we stop them in their tracks.They can’t pursue their dream any longer, till they get English. Now let me put it this way, if I met a monolingual Dutch speakerwho had the cure for cancer, would I stop him from entering my British University? I don’t think so. But indeed, that is exactly what we do. We English teachers are the gatekeepers. And you have to satisfy us first that your English is good enough. Now it can be dangerous to give too much power, to a narrow segment of society. Maybe the barrier would be too university. Okay.“But,”I hear you say, “What about the research? It’s all in English.”So the books are in English, the journals are done in English, but that is self-fulfilling prophecy. It deeds the English requirement. And so it goes on. I ask you, what happened to translation? If you think about the Islamic Golden Age, there was lots of translation then. They translate from Latin and Greek into Arabic, into Persian, and then it was translated on into the Germanic languages of Europe and the Romance languages. And so light shone upon the Dark Ages of Europe. Now don’t get me wrong.I am not against teaching English, all you English teachers out there. I love thatwe have a global language. We need one today more than ever. But I am against using it as a barrier. Do we really want to end up with 600 languages and the main one being English and Chinese? We need more than that. Where do we draw the line? This system equates intelligence with a knowledge of English which is quite arbitrary. And I want to remind you that the giant upon whose shoulders today’s intelligentsia stand did not have to have English, they didn’t have to pass an English test. Case in point, Einstein. He, by the way, was considered remedial at school because he was, in fact, dyslexic. But fortunately for the world, he did not have to pass an English test. Because they didn’t start until 1964 with TOEFL, the AmericanTest of English. Now it’s exploded. There are lots and lots of tests of English. And millions and millions of students take these tests every year. Now you might think, you and me, those fees aren’t bad, they’re okay, but they are prohibitive to so many millions of poor people. So immediately, we’re rejecting them. It brings to mind a headline I saw recently: “Education: The Great Divide.” Now I get it, I understand why people would focus on English. They want to give their children the best chance in the life. And to do that, they need a Western education. Because, of course, the best jobs go to people out of the Western Universities, that I put on earlier. It’s a circular thing.Okay. Let me tell you a story about two scientists, two English scientists. They were doing an experiment to do with genetics and the forelimbs and the hind limbs of animals. But they couldn’t get the results they wanted. They really didn’t know what to do, until along came a German scientist who realized that they were using two words for forelimb and hind limb, whereas genetics does not differentiate and neither does German. So bingo, problem solved. If you can’t think a thought, you are stuck. But if another language can think that thought, then, by cooperating, we can achieve and learn so much more. My daughter, came to England from Kuwait. She had studied science and mathematics in Arabic. It’s an Arabic medium school. She had to translate it into English at her grammar school. And she was the best in the class at those subjects. Which tells us, that when students come to us from abroad, we may not be giving them enough credit for what they know. And they know it in their own language. When a language dies, we don’t know what we lose with that language. This is –I don’t know if you saw it on CNN recently—they give the Heroes Award to a young Kenyan shepherd boy who could n’t study at night in his village like all the village children, because the Kerosene lamp, it had smoke and it damaged his eyes. And anyway, there was never enough kerosene, because what does a dollar a day buy for you? So he invented a cost-free solar lamp. And now the children in his village get the same grades at school as the children who have electricity at home. When he received his award, he said these lovely words: The children can lead Africa from a dark continent, to a light continent. A simple idea, but it could have such fat-reaching consequences.Peoplewho have no light, whether it’s physical or metaphorical, cannot pass our exam, and we can never know what they know. Let us not keep them and ourselves in the dark. Let us celebrate diversity. Mind your language. Use it to spread great ideas.。
TED演讲：窥探学习一门新语言的秘密
TED演讲：窥探学习一门新语言的秘密语言学习是一件很神奇的事情，每当我们面对陌生的语言，总是苦恼无从下手，不知从何学起，但你知道吗？无论哪种语言系统都有一定规律，只要你掌握它的学习规律和窍门就有可能快速的学会甚至掌握一门语言。
今天带来TED演讲：学习一门新语言的秘密。
也许你可以从中一探究竟。
I love learning foreign languages.我喜欢学外语。
In fact, I love it so much that I like to learn a new language every two years, currently working on my eighth one.实际上，这种痴迷让我每两年就想学一门新的外语，现在我正在学第八门外语。
When people find that out about me, they always ask me, 'How do you do that? What's your secret?'当人们得知此事后，总是问我，“你怎么做到的？你的秘诀是什么？”And to be honest, for many years, my answer would be,'I don't know. I simply love learning languages.'说实话，这么多年来，我的回答总是，“我不知道啊。
我只是喜欢学语言。
”But people were never happy with that answer.但是人们从来都不会对这个回答感到满意。
They wanted to know why they are spending years trying to learn even one language,他们想知道为何他们花了多年试着学习哪怕只有一门语言，never achieving fluency, and here I come, learning one lang uage after another.却从未达到流利的程度，而我却能够学了一门再学一门。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
TED英语演讲：你的语言习惯暴露了什么深入了解语言学习，探索语言是通过什么样的排序方式来表达的，甚至有些词语比想象中用的地方更广泛。
只要在学习过程中学会善于归纳总结。
下面是WTT为大家收集关于TED英语演讲：你的语言习惯暴露了什么，欢迎借鉴参考。
演说题目：What our language habits reveal演说者：Steven Pinker照片里的人是Maurice Druon L'Academie francaise的荣誉终身秘书长-- 也就是法兰西学院穿着价值六万八千美元的豪华制服对法兰西学院来说倒很适合因为它规范着法语的正确用法使这门语言永世长存法兰西学院有两个主要任务它编纂官方的法语词典-- 他们目前在编第九部从1930年就开始了，现在编到了P字头。
他们还规范正确的用法比如，电子邮件(email)在法语里的正确说法应该是“courriel” 他们告诉法国人，万维网(WorldWide Web) 应该被叫做“la toile d'araignee modiale”--“环球蜘蛛网” 诸如此类法国人民欣然忽略的建议。
这是语言产生的众多模型之一：也就是说，由一个学院来进行规范但任何懂得语言的人都意识到这是愚蠢的自负语言产生于人类心灵间的互动而在语言的不停变化中，这是显而易见的事实上，当法兰西学院完成他们的词典时它早已经过时了。
我们看到俗语和术语不断产生历史上语言在变化方言在分支新的语言在形成所以语言并不只是创造、塑造人性之物同样是反映人性的窗口我正在写的一本书中我希望能阐明人性的一些方面包括认知机能人们靠这个把世界概念化还有掌管人类互动的各类关系。
今天早上，我将对它们逐一简要介绍。
让我从一个语言中的技术性问题开始我研究这个问题已经有一段时间了希望你们能包涵一下，包涵我对动词，和它们用法的热情问题在于，哪个动词用于哪个构式?动词是句子的基座，其他部分都安在这个基座上。
让我提醒你们一下这是你们早已忘记的东西。
不及物动词，比如“用餐”(dine) 不能带有直接的宾语你得说：“山姆用餐了(Sam dined)“,而不是“山姆用餐了比萨饼(Sam dined the pizza.” 一个及物动词要求必须有宾语：“山姆吞吃比萨饼(Sam devoured the pizza)”。
你不能只是说“山姆吞吃(Sam de voured)”。
有许许多多这类的动词每个都塑造着句子。
所以在解释孩子们如何学习语言时候，有一个问题同样也是教成人学外语语法时的一个问题以及给电脑编使用语言的程序时-- 在哪个构式里该用哪个动词?比如，英语中的与格构式-- 可以说“Givea muffin to a mouse”，前置词与格，或者“Give a mouse a muffin”，双宾语与格，“Promise anything to her“，”Promise heranything“，等等。
上百的动词可以两用。
对于孩子，很容易去做的一个归纳-- 对于大人和电脑来说也一样-- 就是任何可以在下面这个构式中出现的动词“主语-动词-物体-to-a 接受者” 也可以表达成“主语-动词-接受者-东西”。
这是很顺手的事因为语言是无穷的对于你学过的句子不能只是鹦鹉学舌。
你必须得做出归纳这样你才能制造、理解新句子。
这就是这样做的一个例子。
不幸的是，这方面有例外。
你可以说，“Biff drove the car toChicago”。
但不是“Biff drove Chicago the car”。
你可以说：“Sal gave Jason a headache”，但“Sal gave aheadache to Jason”就很别扭了。
原因是这些构式，尽管一开始相似但并不是同义句。
当你搬出显微镜对准在人类认知上，你会看到很多微妙的差别存在于它们的意思里。
所以“Give the X to the Y”-- 这个构式对应的想法是：“Cause X to go to Y”，而“Give the Y the X” 对应的想法是“cause Y to have X”。
许多时候我们都有理解偏差类似于经典的“形象-背景”颠倒的幻术你要么吧注意力放在某个物体上使周围的空间从注意力中退去要么你集中注意观察空间的构造这样前景中的物体就从意识中退去这些理解如何反应在语言当中? 在两种情况里，那个被解释为受影响的东西被表达成了直接宾语：动词之后的名词。
当你想到“使蛋糕去某处”时当你对蛋糕实施动作时你说：“Give the muffin to the mouse.” 当你理解成“使老鼠拥有某物” 你对老鼠实施动作所以你把它表达成：“Give the mouse themuffin.”所以，在哪个构式里用哪个动词我一开始提出的问题取决于动词是否指出某种运动或者某种所有权的变化”给出某物“当中包含“使某物前往” 也包含”使某人拥有“ 开车只能使某物走开因为芝加哥不是那种能拥有某物的东西。
只有人才能拥有东西。
“令人头痛”使人具有头痛但你并不会把头痛从手里给出去让它到另一个人那里去然后再放进对方脑袋里。
你只可能是说话太大声，或者讨人厌或者用其他的方法使对方头疼。
所以这是我工作内容的一个例子。
那为什么有人要在乎这工作呢? 这是因为有许多有趣的结论从这个例子，还有类似的对很多英语动词的分析中可以得出。
首先，存在着一个精细的概念结构我们自动、无意识地计算产生它每当我们想到或者说出一个主导我们对语言的使用的句子你可以把它理解成“思想的语言”，或者“思想语”。
它看上去是建立在一套固定的概念之上这套概念管理着数十个构式和数千个动词不仅仅是英文的，而是所有语言的最基本概念，比如空间时间、因果以及人的意愿比如，什么是手段，什么是目的? 这些跟康德所主张的，构成人类思想的基本框架的那些范畴很相似很有趣的是，我们对语言的无意识的使用好像在折射着这些康德主义的范畴-- 不在乎感官的性质比如颜色、材质、重量和速度上述这些都几乎从不区分动词在不同构式中的用法。
此外，英语中的所有构式不仅仅有字面意义还有准隐喻的用法。
就拿与格来说，不仅用来转移事物，还用来比喻思想的转移，比如，“She told a story to me” 或者“toldme astory” “Max taught Spanish to the student”或者“taught the students Spanish.” 这都是完全一样的构式但里面没有蛋糕或者老鼠。
完全没有运动。
这使人想起语言交流中的“容器隐喻” 在这里面我们把想法理解成实物句子就像容器语言交流就像快递当我们说“gather”(收集)我们的想法，并“'put' them 'into' word”(把它们付诸语言) 如果我们说的话并不“empty”(空)或者“hollow”(空洞) 我们就可以把意思传达“过去”(“across“) 让一个能够”拆解“(”unpack“)我们的语言而提取“内涵”(”content“)诸如此类的修辞法不是个例，而是广泛规则想找到纯抽象的而非实物隐喻的表达的例子难之又难譬如说，你可以用动词”go“ 以及介词”to“和”from“ 来表达字面意思：“信使从巴黎去了伊斯坦布尔。
”(”The messenger went from Paristo Istanbul.“) 你也可以说，”比夫从病中康复。
(”Biffwent from sick towell.“ ) 他哪里都没”去“，而是可能一直呆在床上但是我们说话时仿佛他的健康状况是空间中的点你给它一种动的概念或者，“会从3点一直开到4点，”(”Themeeting went from three tofour,“) 这里我们把时间想成分布在一条直线上与此相似地，我们用力的概念来表示不仅仅是物理的力比如，”Rose forced the door to open,“(罗斯用力把门打开) 也包括人际间的作用力比如，”Rose forced Sadie to go“(罗斯把萨蒂逼走了)--不一定要推推搡搡的而是通过威胁-- 或者”Rose forced Sadie to go&;(罗斯逼她自己离开) 仿佛罗斯的头脑里有两个东西在进行拔河。
第二个结论是用不同方式构思同一事件的能力比如，“使某物到某人那里，” 和“使某人拥有某物，” 我认为这是人类思维的基本特点而且是人类论辩的基础论辩中人们争议的一般不是事实而是应该如何理解它们这里是一些例子：是“终止怀孕”还是“杀死胚胎” “一个细胞聚合的小球”还是“一个尚未出生的孩子” “侵略伊拉克”或是“解放伊拉克” “收入重新分配”抑或“没收财产” 而整个图景中最显著的一部分是要看到一点：就是我们对抽象事件的描述大多都是基于实体的隐喻这反映出人类智能本身是由一整套概念组成比如物体、空间、时间，因果关系与意图-- 对我们这种群居的、知识密集型的种群非常有用我们能想象人类的进化和语言的隐喻抽象化过程齐轨并行慢慢地这些概念里原先的实际内容就淡化了空间、时间和力-- 而它们却被用在全新的抽象领域里如此就使得我们这个原本是进化出来和石头、工具与动物打交道的种群能够形成数学、物理、法律等等概念涉足其他抽象的领域。
我曾说过我要谈谈人性的两扇窗户我们用来概念化世界的知性机能现在我要说说几种人际关系它们支配着人类的社交活动同样，这些都体现在语言里我要从间接话语行为这个谜题开始我相信你们中大多数人都看过《冰血暴》(或译为法哥镇)这部电影你们可能还记得其中的一段：一个警官要绑匪把车开到路边叫他出示驾照绑匪把钱包拿出来有一张50美元的钞票以一个小角度从钱包里伸出来然后绑匪说，“我在想或许在法哥镇这个鬼地方我们俩得共同保管这个”-- 每个人，包括观众都理解为含蓄地提出贿赂这种间接表意在语言中泛滥比如说在礼貌地提要求时如果有人说，“如果你把鳄梨色拉酱递过来就太棒了” 我们太清楚他是什么意思了尽管字面上表达出来是个很别扭的概念。
“您愿意来看一下我的蚀刻版画吗?” 我想大多数人理解这么说的意图同样的，倘若有人说“呦，你的店真不错。
要是发生了点什么事儿可就不好了”-- (笑) 我们知道这是个委婉的威胁而不是在思考假设的可能性所以我们说的谜题就是：为什么贿赂礼貌的要求、恳请、威胁经常要遮遮掩掩的? 没人是傻子双方都知道谈话人说的是什么谈话人也知道听者心里清楚谈话人知道听者心里清楚，等等，等等所以这是在干嘛呢?关键是在于语言是磋商人际关系的一种途径而人际关系分为许多种人类学家AlanFiske给出了一个关于影响力的分类法其中人际关系可以被或多或少地归为“公社性”，它的作用原则是“我的就是你的，你的就是我的”-- 家庭内部的一种心态，例如-- 统治心态，其原则就是“别惹我，” 互惠心态：“你帮我挠背，我帮你挠背，” 性心理：如Cole Porter的不朽名言所说，“来吧”人际关系的类型是可以通过磋商决定的尽管经常有某种默认情况指定了上面心态中的一种人际关类型可以被拉伸、调整比如说“公社性” 在家庭和朋友们中最自然但它可以被用来把分享的心态转移给平时并不习惯于分享的群体-- 例如帮派或者男生联谊会女生联谊会，像“男人之家”这样的表达法这样就让非亲非故的人们能够采用一般都是近亲之间才有的关系类型。