环球雅思雅思写作范文

Government should pay for the health care and education. Do you agree or disagree?

Health care and education can always attract enough public attention, for they are closely connected with people’s welfare. Some people suppose that it is government’s duty to shoulder the responsibility for those two important aspects. As far as I am concerned, I am in total favor of this opinion.

Initially, the government’s fundamental principle of serving the people justifies this obligation. There is no denying that the significance of government lies in the fact that this organization can better people’s life, and meanwhile the health care and education can best illustrate living standards. Therefore, inevitably, government should pay for those significant fields to fulfill its promise for people.

Moreover, the taxes collected from citizens determine that government should stick to this duty. It is clear that government has levied a large amount of money from its citizens in the hope of striking a balance in society and if poor people fail to enjoy a qualified medical service and receive excellent education, what is the significance of heavy taxation? Consequently, as for health care and education, government ought to take the responsibility, ensuring all the people, especially the needy to be equally treated.

On the other hand, it is highly probable that government has been too overburdened financially. For example, among other responsibilities, traffic jam, poverty and crime are up to national or local authorities to solve, which are usually confronted with budget problem. However, if suitable policies can be pursued and efforts form various fields can

be coordinated, we have good reasons to believe that government can address all the issues concerned.

Overall, despite the fact that it is a challenge for government to pay for the health care and education, inevitably, no one but administration should pay the bill. At the same time, relevant organizations have to be motivated to ensure more satisfactory health and education for individuals.

The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is alarming that violent crimes abound in the present society, so government should take some measures to tackle this severe problem. To ban all the content of violence in films and on television is one of the necessities that government has to take up. As for this choice, I have a different idea.

Admittedly, violent pictures exert a negative impact on people, especially youngsters. Due to vulnerable mentality, the youth are prone to violence and resort to it when they are confronted with troubles in life. And on the mass media such reports of crimes are not exception to the public. As for me, nevertheless, it is more disadvantageous to limit the amount violence for the purpose of the prevention of violent crimes as following reasons.

If government strictly controls what will be broadcast in the programs, the freedom of speech, which is the foundation of the mass media, will be in the danger of intervention. No doubt that nearly every social progress has been achieved by the means of proper supervision of mass media, and for example, corruption of power of public servants has