公司理财精要第十版(全)

公司理财精要版第10版Chap0304

（一）短期偿债能力与流动性指标
对债权人，尤其是诸如供货商之类的短期债权人来说，流动比率越高越好。对公司而言，高的流动性比率意味着流动性不错，也可能意味着现金和其他短期资产的运用效率低下。一般情况，流动比率至少要达到1。注意：如果一家公司通过长期债务筹集资金，则现金和长期负债会增加，而流动负债不变，从而导致流动比率上升。
公司理财精要版第10版Chap0304
（三）资产管理或资金周转指标
这说明，每一美元的资产产生了0.64美元的收入
公司理财精要版第10版Chap0304
（三）资产管理或资金周转指标
净营运资本周转率： NWC Turnover = Sales / NWC
2,311 / (780 – 540) = 13.8 times
Net FA
3,138
3,358 C/S
2,556
2,167
Total Assets
5,394
5,033 Total Liab. & Equity
5,394
5,033
公司理财精要版第10版Chap0304
Sample Income Statement
Revenues
XYZ Corporation January 1 – December 31, 201X ( Figures in millions of dollars)
Net Cash from Investments
104
公司理财精要版第10版Chap0304
3.2 财务报表分析
福特
资产规模相对较小
规模不同
通用
资产规模相对较大
美元编制财务报表
丰田日元编制财务报表
公司理财精要版第10版Chap0304

公司理财精要版第十版课后答案

CHAPTER 18VALUATION AND CAPITAL BUDGETING FOR THE LEVERED FIRM Answers to Concepts Review and Critical Thinking Questions1.APV is equal to the NPV of the project (i.e. the value of the project for an unlevered firm) plus theNPV of financing side effects.2. The WACC is based on a target debt level while the APV is based on the amount of debt.3.FTE uses levered cash flow and other methods use unlevered cash flow.4.The WACC method does not explicitly include the interest cash flows, but it does implicitly includethe interest cost in the WACC. If he insists that the interest payments are explicitly shown, you should use the FTE method.5. You can estimate the unlevered beta from a levered beta. The unlevered beta is the beta of the assetsof the firm; as such, it is a measure of the business risk. Note that the unlevered beta will always be lower than the levered beta (assuming the betas are positive). The difference is due to the leverage of the company. Thus, the second risk factor measured by a levered beta is the financial risk of the company.Solutions to Questions and ProblemsNOTE: All end-of-chapter problems were solved using a spreadsheet. Many problems require multiple steps. Due to space and readability constraints, when these intermediate steps are included in this solutions manual, rounding may appear to have occurred. However, the final answer for each problem is found without rounding during any step in the problem.Basic1. a.The maximum price that the company should be willing to pay for the fleet of cars with all-equity funding is the price that makes the NPV of the transaction equal to zero. The NPV equation for the project is:NPV = –Purchase Price + PV[(1 –t C )(EBTD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield)If we let P equal the purchase price of the fleet, then the NPV is:NPV = –P + (1 – .35)($175,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (.35)(P/5)PVIFA13%,5Setting the NPV equal to zero and solving for the purchase price, we find:0 = –P + (1 – .35)($175,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (.35)(P/5)PVIFA13%,5P = $400,085.06 + (P)(.35/5)PVIFA13%,5P = $400,085.06 + .2462P.7538P = $400,085.06P = $530,761.93b.The adjusted present value (APV) of a project equals the net present value of the project if itwere funded completely by equity plus the net present value of any financing side effects. In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of the cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt, so:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)So, the NPV of each part of the APV equation is:NPV(All-Equity)NPV = –Purchase Price + PV[(1 – t C )(EBTD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield)The company paid $480,000 for the fleet of cars. Because this fleet will be fully depreciated over five years using the straight-line method, annual depreciation expense equals:Depreciation = $480,000/5Depreciation = $96,000So, the NPV of an all-equity project is:NPV = –$480,000 + (1 – .35)($175,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (.35)($96,000)PVIFA13%,5NPV = $38,264.03NPV(Financing Side Effects)The net present value of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt, so:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Payments)Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt R B. So, the NPV of the financing side effects are:NPV = $390,000 – (1 – .35)(.08)($390,000)PVIFA8%,5– $390,000/1.085NPV = $43,600.39So, the APV of the project is:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)APV = $38,264.03 + 43,600.39APV = $81,864.422.The adjusted present value (APV) of a project equals the net present value of the project if it werefunded completely by equity plus the net present value of any financing side effects. In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of the cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt, so:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)So, the NPV of each part of the APV equation is:NPV(All-Equity)NPV = –Purchase Price + PV[(1 –t C)(EBTD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield)Since the initial investment of $1.7 million will be fully depreciated over four years using thestraight-line method, annual depreciation expense is:Depreciation = $1,700,000/4Depreciation = $425,000NPV = –$1,700,000 + (1 – .30)($595,000)PVIFA13%,4 + (.30)($425,000)PVIFA9.5%,4NPV (All-equity) = –$52,561.35NPV(Financing Side Effects)The net present value of financing side effects equals the aftertax present value of cash flowsresulting from the firm’s debt. So, the NPV of the financing side effects are:NPV = Proceeds(Net of flotation) – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Payments) + PV(Flotation Cost Tax Shield)Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt, R B.Since the flotation costs will be amortized over the life of the loan, the annual flotation costs that will be expensed each year are:Annual flotation expense = $45,000/4Annual flotation expense = $11,250NPV = ($1,700,000 – 45,000) – (1 – .30)(.095)($1,700,000)PVIFA9.5%,4– $1,700,000/1.0954 + .30($11,250) PVIFA9.5%,4NPV = $121,072.23So, the APV of the project is:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)APV = –$52,561.35 + 121,072.23APV = $68,510.883. a.In order to value a firm’s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, discount the cash flowsavailable to equity holders at the cost of the firm’s levered equity. The cash flows to equity holders will be the firm’s net income. Remembering that the company has three stores, we find:Sales $3,900,000COGS 2,010,000G & A costs 1,215,000Interest 123,000EBT $ 552,000Taxes 220,800NI $ 331,200Since this cash flow will remain the same forever, the present value of cash flows available tothe firm’s equity holders is a perpetuity. We can discount at the levered cost of equity, so, thevalue of the company’s equity is:PV(Flow-to-equity) = $331,200 / .19PV(Flow-to-equity) = $1,743,157.89b.The value of a firm is equal to the sum of the market values of its debt and equity, or:V L = B + SWe calculated the value of the company’s equity in part a, so now we need to calculate the value of debt. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of .40, which can be written algebraically as:B / S = .40We can substitute the value of equity and solve for the value of debt, doing so, we find:B / $1,743,157.89 = .40B = $697,263.16So, the value of the company is:V = $1,743,157.89 + 697,263.16V = $2,440,421.054. a.In order to determine the cost of the firm’s debt, we need to find the yield to maturity on itscurrent bonds. With semiannual coupon payments, the yield to maturity of the company’s bonds is:$1,080 = $35 (PVIFA R%,40) + $1,000(PVIF R%,40)R = .03145, or 3.145%Since the coupon payments are semiannual, the YTM on the bonds is:YTM = 3.145%× 2YTM = 6.29%b.We can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to find the return on unlevered equity. Accordingto the Capital Asset Pricing Model:R0 = R F+ βUnlevered(R M–R F)R0 = 4% + .85(11% – 4%)R0 = 9.95%Now we can find the cost of levered equity. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxesR S = R0 + (B/S)(R0–R B)(1 –t C)R S = .0995 + (.40)(.0995 – .0629)(1 – .34)R S = .1092, or 10.92%c.In a world with corporate taxes, a firm’s weighted average cost of capital is equal to:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SThe problem does not provide either the debt-value ratio or equity-value ratio. However, the firm’s debt-equity ratio is:B/S = .40Solving for B:B = .4SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get:B/V = .4S / (.4S + S)B/V = .4 / 1.4B/V = .29And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or:S/V = 1 – .29S/V = .71So, the WACC for the company is:R WACC = .29(1 – .34)(.0629) + .71(.1092)R WACC = .0898, or 8.98%5. a.The equity beta of a firm financed entirely by equity is equal to its unlevered beta. Since eachfirm has an unlevered beta of 1.10, we can find the equity beta for each. Doing so, we find:North PoleβEquity = [1 + (1 –t C)(B/S)]βUnleveredβEquity = [1 + (1 – .35)($2,900,000/$3,800,000](1.10)βEquity = 1.65South PoleβEquity = [1 + (1 –t C)(B/S)]βUnleveredβEquity = [1 + (1 – .35)($3,800,000/$2,900,000](1.10)βEquity = 2.04b.We can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to find the required return on each firm’s equity.Doing so, we find:North Pole:R S = R F+ βEquity(R M–R F)R S = 3.20% + 1.65(10.90% – 3.20%)R S = 15.87%South Pole:R S = R F+ βEquity(R M–R F)R S = 3.20% + 2.04(10.90% – 3.20%)R S = 18.88%6. a.If flotation costs are not taken into account, the net present value of a loan equals:NPV Loan = Gross Proceeds – Aftertax present value of interest and principal paymentsNPV Loan = $5,850,000 – .08($5,850,000)(1 – .40)PVIFA8%,10– $5,850,000/1.0810NPV Loan = $1,256,127.24b.The flotation costs of the loan will be:Flotation costs = $5,850,000(.025)Flotation costs = $146,250So, the annual flotation expense will be:Annual flotation expense = $146,250 / 10Annual flotation expense = $14,625If flotation costs are taken into account, the net present value of a loan equals:NPV Loan = Proceeds net of flotation costs – Aftertax present value of interest and principalpayments + Present value of the flotation cost tax shieldNPV Loan = ($5,850,000 – 146,250) – .08($5,850,000)(1 – .40)(PVIFA8%,10)– $5,850,000/1.0810 + $14,625(.40)(PVIFA8%,10)NPV Loan = $1,149,131.217.First we need to find the aftertax value of the revenues minus expenses. The aftertax value is:Aftertax revenue = $3,200,000(1 – .40)Aftertax revenue = $1,920,000Next, we need to find the depreciation tax shield. The depreciation tax shield each year is:Depreciation tax shield = Depreciation(t C)Depreciation tax shield = ($11,400,000 / 6)(.40)Depreciation tax shield = $760,000Now we can find the NPV of the project, which is:NPV = Initial cost + PV of depreciation tax shield + PV of aftertax revenueTo find the present value of the depreciation tax shield, we should discount at the risk-free rate, and we need to discount the aftertax revenues at the cost of equity, so:NPV = –$11,400,000 + $760,000(PVIFA3.5%,6) + $1,920,000(PVIFA11%,6)NPV = $772,332.978.Whether the company issues stock or issues equity to finance the project is irrelevant. Thecompany’s optimal capital structure determines the WACC. In a world with corporate taxes, a firm’s weighted average cost of capital equals:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SR WACC = .80(1 – .34)(.069) + .20(.1080)R WACC = .0580, or 5.80%Now we can use the weighted average cost of capital to discount NEC’s unlevered cash flows. Doing so, we find the NPV of the project is:NPV = –$45,000,000 + $3,100,000 / .0580NPV = $8,418,803.429. a.The company has a capital structure with three parts: long-term debt, short-term debt, andequity. Since interest payments on both long-term and short-term debt are tax-deductible, multiply the pretax costs by (1 –t C) to determine the aftertax costs to be used in the weighted average cost of capital calculation. The WACC using the book value weights is:R WACC = (X STD)(R STD)(1 –t C) + (X LTD)(R LTD)(1 –t C) + (X Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = ($10 / $19)(.041)(1 – .35) + ($3 / $19)(.072)(1 – .35) + ($6 / $19)(.138)R WACC = .0650, or 6.50%ing the market value weights, the company’s WACC is:R WACC = (X STD)(R STD)(1 –t C) + (X LTD)(R LTD)(1 –t C) + (X Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = ($11 / $40)(.041)(1 – .35) + ($10 / $40)(.072)(1 – .35) + ($26 / $40)(.138)R WACC = .1005, or 10.05%ing the target debt-equity ratio, the target debt-value ratio for the company is:B/S = .60B = .6SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get:B/V = .6S / (.6S + S)B/V = .6 / 1.6B/V = .375And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or:S/V = 1 – .375S/V = .625We can use the ratio of short-term debt to long-term debt in a similar manner to find the short-term debt to total debt and long-term debt to total debt. Using the short-term debt to long-term debt ratio, we get:STD/LTD = .20STD = .2LTDSubstituting this in the short-term debt to total debt ratio, we get:STD/B = .2LTD / (.2LTD + LTD)STD/B = .2 / 1.2STD/B = .167And the long-term debt to total debt ratio is one minus the short-term debt to total debt ratio, or: LTD/B = 1 – .167LTD/B = .833Now we can find the short-term debt to value ratio and long-term debt to value ratio bymultiplying the respective ratio by the debt-value ratio. So:STD/V = (STD/B)(B/V)STD/V = .167(.375)STD/V = .063And the long-term debt to value ratio is:LTD/V = (LTD/B)(B/V)LTD/V = .833(.375)LTD/V = .313So, using the target capital structure weights, the company’s WACC is:R WACC = (X STD)(R STD)(1 –t C) + (X LTD)(R LTD)(1 – t C) + (X Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = (.063)(.041)(1 – .35) + (.313)(.072)(1 – .35) + (.625)(.138)R WACC = .1025, or 10.25%d.The differences in the WACCs are due to the different weighting schemes. The company’sWACC will most closely resemble the WACC calculated using target weights since futureprojects will be financed at the target ratio. Therefore, the WACC computed with targetweights should be used for project evaluation.Intermediate10.The adjusted present value of a project equals the net present value of the project under all-equityfinancing plus the net present value of any financing side effects. In the joint venture’s case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the aftertax present value of cash flows resulting from the firms’ debt. So, the APV is:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)The NPV for an all-equity firm is:NPV(All-Equity)NPV = –Initial Investment + PV[(1 –t C)(EBITD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield)Since the initial investment will be fully depreciated over five years using the straight-line method, annual depreciation expense is:Annual depreciation = $80,000,000/5Annual depreciation = $16,000,000NPV = –$80,000,000 + (1 – .35)($12,100,000)PVIFA13%,20 + (.35)($16,000,000)PVIFA13%,5NPV = –$5,053,833.77NPV(Financing Side Effects)The NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt. The coupon rate on the debt is relevant to determine the interest payments, but the resulting cash flows should still be discounted at the pretax cost of debt. So, the NPV of the financing effects is:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Repayments)NPV = $25,000,000 – (1 – .35)(.05)($25,000,000)PVIFA8.5%,15– $25,000,000/1.08515NPV = $10,899,310.51So, the APV of the project is:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)APV = –$5,053,833.77 + $10,899,310.51APV = $5,845,476.7311.If the company had to issue debt under the terms it would normally receive, the interest rate on thedebt would increase to the company’s normal cost of debt. The NPV of an all-equity project would remain unchanged, but the NPV of the financing side effects would change. The NPV of the financing side effects would be:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Repayments)NPV = $25,000,000 – (1 – .35)(.085)($25,000,000)PVIFA8.5%,15– $25,000,000/1.08515NPV = $6,176,275.95Using the NPV of an all-equity project from the previous problem, the new APV of the project would be:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)APV = –$5,053,833.77 + $6,176,275.95APV = $1,122,442.18The gain to the company from issuing subsidized debt is the difference between the two APVs, so: Gain from subsidized debt = $5,845,476.73 – 1,122,442.18Gain from subsidized debt = $4,723,034.55Most of the value of the project is in the form of the subsidized interest rate on the debt issue.12.The adjusted present value of a project equals the net present value of the project under all-equityfinancing plus the net present value of any financing side effects. First, we need to calculate the unlevered cost of equity. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0–R B)(1 –t C).16 = R0 + (.50)(R0– .09)(1 – .40)R0 = .1438 or 14.38%Now we can find the NPV of an all-equity project, which is:NPV = PV(Unlevered Cash Flows)NPV = –$18,000,000 + $5,700,000/1.1438 + $9,500,000/(1.1438)2 + $8,800,000/1.14383NPV = $124,086.62Next, we need to find the net present value of financing side effects. This is equal the aftertax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt. So:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Payments)Each year, an equal principal payment will be made, which will reduce the interest accrued during the year. Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt, so the NPV of the financing effects is:NPV = $9,300,000 – (1 – .40)(.09)($9,300,000) / 1.09 – $3,100,000/1.09– (1 – .40)(.09)($6,200,000)/1.092– $3,100,000/1.092– (1 – .40)(.09)($3,100,000)/1.093– $3,100,000/1.093NPV = $581,194.61So, the APV of project is:APV = NPV(All-equity) + NPV(Financing side effects)APV = $124,086.62 + 581,194.61APV = $705,281.2313. a.To calculate the NPV of the project, we first need to find the company’s WACC. In a worldwith corporate taxes, a firm’s weighted average cost of capital equals:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SThe market value of the company’s equity is:Market value of equity = 4,500,000($25)Market value of equity = $112,500,000So, the debt-value ratio and equity-value ratio are:Debt-value = $55,000,000 / ($55,000,000 + 112,500,000)Debt-value = .3284Equity-value = $112,500,000 / ($55,000,000 + 112,500,000)Equity-value = .6716Since the CEO believes its current capital structure is optimal, these values can be used as the target w eights in the firm’s weighted average cost of capital calculation. The yield to maturity of the company’s debt is its pretax cost of debt. To find the company’s cost of equity, we need to calculate the stock beta. The stock beta can be calculated as:β = σS,M / σ2Mβ = .0415 / .202β = 1.04Now we can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to determine the cost of equity. The Capital Asset Pricing Model is:R S = R F+ β(R M–R F)R S = 3.4% + 1.04(7.50%)R S = 11.18%Now, we can calculate the company’s WACC, which is:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SR WACC = .3284(1 – .35)(.065) + .6716(.1118)R WACC = .0890, or 8.90%Finally, we can use the WACC to discount the unlevered cash flows, which gives us an NPV of: NPV = –$42,000,000 + $11,800,000(PVIFA8.90%,5)NPV = $4,020,681.28b.The weighted average cost of capital used in part a will not change if the firm chooses to fundthe project entirely with debt. The weighted average cost of capital is based on optimal capital structure weights. Since the current capital structure is optimal, all-debt funding for the project simply implies that the firm will have to use more equity in the future to bring the capital structure back towards the target.14.We have four companies with comparable operations, so the industry average beta can be used as thebeta for this project. So, the average unlevered beta is:βUnlevered = (1.15 + 1.08 + 1.30 + 1.25) / 4βUnlevered = 1.20A debt-to-value ratio of .40 means that the equity-to-value ratio is .60. This implies a debt-equityratio of .67{=.40/.60}. Since the project will be levered, we need to calculate the levered beta, which is:βLevered = [1 + (1 –t C)(Debt/Equity)]βUnleveredβLevered = [1 + (1 – .34)(.67)]1.20βLevered = 1.72Now we can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to determine the cost of equity. The Capital Asset Pricing Model is:R S = R F+ β(R M–R F)R S = 3.8% + 1.72(7.00%)R S = 15.85%Now, we can calculate the company’s WACC, which is:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SR WACC = .40(1 – .35)(.068) + .60(.1585)R WACC = .1130, or 11.30%Finally, we can use the WACC to discount the unlevered cash flows, which gives us an NPV of: NPV = –$4,500,000 + $675,000(PVIFA11.30%,20)NPV = $770,604.48Challenge15. a.The company is currently an all-equity firm, so the value as an all-equity firm equals thepresent value of aftertax cash flows, discounted at the cost of the firm’s unlevered cost of equity. So, the current value of the company is:V U = [(Pretax earnings)(1 –t C)] / R0V U = [($21,000,000)(1 – .35)] / .16V U = $85,312,500The price per share is the total value of the company divided by the shares outstanding, or:Price per share = $85,312,500 / 1,300,000Price per share = $65.63b.The adjusted present value of a firm equals its value under all-equity financing plus the netpresent value of any financing side effects. In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the aftertax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt. Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows can be discounted at the pretax cost of debt, so the NPV of the financing effects are:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments)NPV = $30,000,000 – (1 – .35)(.09)($30,000,000) / .09NPV = $10,500,000So, the value of the company after the recapitalization using the APV approach is:V = $85,312,500 + 10,500,000V = $95,812,500Since the company has not yet issued the debt, this is also the value of equity after the announcement. So, the new price per share will be:New share price = $95,812,500 / 1,300,000New share price = $73.70c.The company will use the entire proceeds to repurchase equity. Using the share price wecalculated in part b, the number of shares repurchased will be:Shares repurchased = $30,000,000 / $73.70Shares repurchased = 407,045And the new number of shares outstanding will be:New shares outstanding = 1,300,000 – 407,045New shares outstanding = 892,955The value of the company increased, but part of that increase will be funded by the new debt.The value of equity after recapitalization is the total value of the company minus the value of debt, or:New value of equity = $95,812,500 – 30,000,000New value of equity = $65,812,500So, the price per share of the company after recapitalization will be:New share price = $65,812,500 / 892,955New share price = $73.70The price per share is unchanged.d.In order to value a firm’s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, we must discount the cashflows available to equity holders at the cost of the firm’s levered equity. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes, the required return of levered equity is: R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0–R B)(1 –t C)R S = .16 + ($30,000,000 / $65,812,500)(.16 – .09)(1 – .35)R S = .1807, or 18.07%After the recapitalization, the net income of the company will be:EBIT $21,000,000Interest 2,700,000EBT $18,300,000Taxes 6,405,000Net income $11,895,000The firm pays all of its earnings as dividends, so the entire net income is available toshareholders. Using the flow-to-equity approach, the value of the equity is:S = Cash flows available to equity holders / R SS = $11,895,000 / .1807S = $65,812,50016. a.If the company were financed entirely by equity, the value of the firm would be equal to thepresent value of its unlevered after-tax earnings, discounted at its unlevered cost of capital.First, we need to find the company’s unlevered cash flows, which are:Sales $17,500,000Variable costs 10,500,000EBT $7,000,000Tax 2,800,000Net income $4,200,000So, the value of the unlevered company is:V U = $4,200,000 / .13V U = $32,307,692.31b.According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes, the value of levered equityis:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0–R B)(1 –t C)R S = .13 + (.35)(.13 – .07)(1 – .40)R S = .1426 or 14.26%c.In a world with corporate taxes, a firm’s weighted average cost of capital equals:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SSo we need the debt-value and equity-value ratios for the company. The debt-equity ratio forthe company is:B/S = .35B = .35SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get:B/V = .35S / (.35S + S)B/V = .35 / 1.35B/V = .26And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or:S/V = 1 – .26S/V = .74So, using the capital structure weights, the company’s WACC is:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SR WACC = .26(1 – .40)(.07) + .74(.1426)R WACC = .1165, or 11.65%We can use the weighted average cost of capital to discount the firm’s unlevered aftertax earnings to value the company. Doing so, we find:V L = $4,200,000 / .1165V L = $36,045,772.41Now we can use the debt-value ratio and equity-value ratio to find the value of debt and equity, which are:B = V L(Debt-value)B = $36,045,772.41(.26)B = $9,345,200.25S = V L(Equity-value)S = $36,045,772.41(.74)S = $26,700,572.16d.In order to value a firm’s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, we can discount the cashflows available to equity holders at the cost of the firm’s levered equity. First, we need to calculate the levered cash flows available to shareholders, which are:Sales $17,500,000Variable costs 10,500,000EBIT $7,000,000Interest 654,164EBT $6,345,836Tax 2,538,334Net income $3,807,502So, the value of equity with the flow-to-equity method is:S = Cash flows available to equity holders / R SS = $3,807,502 / .1426S = $26,700,572.1617. a.Since the company is currently an all-equity firm, its value equals the present value of itsunlevered after-tax earnings, discounted at its unlevered cost of capital. The cash flows to shareholders for the unlevered firm are:EBIT $118,000Tax 47,200Net income $70,800So, the value of the company is:V U = $70,800 / .14V U = $505,714.29b.The adjusted present value of a firm equals its value under all-equity financing plus the netpresent value of any financing side effects. In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of cash flows resulting from debt. Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt, so:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest payments)NPV = $235,000 – (1 – .40)(.08)($235,000) / .08NPV = $94,000So, using the APV method, the value of the company is:APV = V U + NPV(Financing side effects)APV = $505,714.29 + 94,000APV = $599,714.29The value of the debt is given, so the value of equity is the value of the company minus the value of the debt, or:S = V–BS = $599,714.29 – 235,000S = $364,714.29c.According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes, the required return oflevered equity is:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0–R B)(1 –t C)R S = .14 + ($235,000 / $364,714.29)(.14 – .08)(1 – .40)R S = .1632, or 16.32%d.In order to value a firm’s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, we can discount the cashflows available to equity holders at the cost of the firm’s levered equity. First, we need to calculate the levered cash flows available to shareholders, which are:EBIT $118,000Interest 18,800EBT $99,200Tax 39,680Net income $59,520。

公司理财精要版第十版课后答案

CHAPTER 18VALUATION AND CAPITAL BUDGETING FOR THE LEVERED FIRM Answers to Concepts Review and Critical Thinking Questions1.APV is equal to the NPV of the project (i.e. the value of the project for an unlevered firm) plus theNPV of financing side effects.2. The WACC is based on a target debt level while the APV is based on the amount of debt.3.FTE uses levered cash flow and other methods use unlevered cash flow.4.The WACC method does not explicitly include the interest cash flows, but it does implicitly includethe interest cost in the WACC. If he insists that the interest payments are explicitly shown, you should use the FTE method.5. You can estimate the unlevered beta from a levered beta. The unlevered beta is the beta of the assetsof the firm; as such, it is a measure of the business risk. Note that the unlevered beta will always be lower than the levered beta (assuming the betas are positive). The difference is due to the leverage of the company. Thus, the second risk factor measured by a levered beta is the financial risk of the company.Solutions to Questions and ProblemsNOTE: All end-of-chapter problems were solved using a spreadsheet. Many problems require multiple steps. Due to space and readability constraints, when these intermediate steps are included in this solutions manual, rounding may appear to have occurred. However, the final answer for each problem is found without rounding during any step in the problem.Basic1. a.The maximum price that the company should be willing to pay for the fleet of cars with all-equity funding is the price that makes the NPV of the transaction equal to zero. The NPV equation for the project is:NPV = –Purchase Price + PV[(1 –t C )(EBTD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield)If we let P equal the purchase price of the fleet, then the NPV is:NPV = –P + (1 – .35)($175,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (.35)(P/5)PVIFA13%,5Setting the NPV equal to zero and solving for the purchase price, we find:0 = –P + (1 – .35)($175,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (.35)(P/5)PVIFA13%,5P = $400,085.06 + (P)(.35/5)PVIFA13%,5P = $400,085.06 + .2462P.7538P = $400,085.06P = $530,761.93b.The adjusted present value (APV) of a project equals the net present value of the project if itwere funded completely by equity plus the net present value of any financing side effects. In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of the cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt, so:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)So, the NPV of each part of the APV equation is:NPV(All-Equity)NPV = –Purchase Price + PV[(1 – t C )(EBTD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield)The company paid $480,000 for the fleet of cars. Because this fleet will be fully depreciated over five years using the straight-line method, annual depreciation expense equals:Depreciation = $480,000/5Depreciation = $96,000So, the NPV of an all-equity project is:NPV = –$480,000 + (1 – .35)($175,000)PVIFA13%,5 + (.35)($96,000)PVIFA13%,5NPV = $38,264.03NPV(Financing Side Effects)The net present value of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt, so:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Payments)Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt R B. So, the NPV of the financing side effects are:NPV = $390,000 – (1 – .35)(.08)($390,000)PVIFA8%,5– $390,000/1.085NPV = $43,600.39So, the APV of the project is:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)APV = $38,264.03 + 43,600.39APV = $81,864.422.The adjusted present value (APV) of a project equals the net present value of the project if it werefunded completely by equity plus the net present value of any financing side effects. In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of the cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt, so:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)So, the NPV of each part of the APV equation is:NPV(All-Equity)NPV = –Purchase Price + PV[(1 –t C)(EBTD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield)Since the initial investment of $1.7 million will be fully depreciated over four years using thestraight-line method, annual depreciation expense is:Depreciation = $1,700,000/4Depreciation = $425,000NPV = –$1,700,000 + (1 – .30)($595,000)PVIFA13%,4 + (.30)($425,000)PVIFA9.5%,4NPV (All-equity) = –$52,561.35NPV(Financing Side Effects)The net present value of financing side effects equals the aftertax present value of cash flowsresulting from the firm’s debt. So, the NPV of the financing side effects are:NPV = Proceeds(Net of flotation) – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Payments) + PV(Flotation Cost Tax Shield)Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt, R B.Since the flotation costs will be amortized over the life of the loan, the annual flotation costs that will be expensed each year are:Annual flotation expense = $45,000/4Annual flotation expense = $11,250NPV = ($1,700,000 – 45,000) – (1 – .30)(.095)($1,700,000)PVIFA9.5%,4– $1,700,000/1.0954 + .30($11,250) PVIFA9.5%,4NPV = $121,072.23So, the APV of the project is:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)APV = –$52,561.35 + 121,072.23APV = $68,510.883. a.In order to value a firm’s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, discount the cash flowsavailable to equity holders at the cost of the firm’s levered equity. The cash flows to equity holders will be the firm’s net income. Remembering that the company has three stores, we find:Sales $3,900,000COGS 2,010,000G & A costs 1,215,000Interest 123,000EBT $ 552,000Taxes 220,800NI $ 331,200Since this cash flow will remain the same forever, the present value of cash flows available tothe firm’s equity holders is a perpetuity. We can discount at the levered cost of equity, so, thevalue of the company’s equity is:PV(Flow-to-equity) = $331,200 / .19PV(Flow-to-equity) = $1,743,157.89b.The value of a firm is equal to the sum of the market values of its debt and equity, or:V L = B + SWe calculated the value of the company’s equity in part a, so now we need to calculate the value of debt. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of .40, which can be written algebraically as:B / S = .40We can substitute the value of equity and solve for the value of debt, doing so, we find:B / $1,743,157.89 = .40B = $697,263.16So, the value of the company is:V = $1,743,157.89 + 697,263.16V = $2,440,421.054. a.In order to determine the cost of the firm’s debt, we need to find the yield to maturity on itscurrent bonds. With semiannual coupon payments, the yield to maturity of the company’s bonds is:$1,080 = $35 (PVIFA R%,40) + $1,000(PVIF R%,40)R = .03145, or 3.145%Since the coupon payments are semiannual, the YTM on the bonds is:YTM = 3.145%× 2YTM = 6.29%b.We can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to find the return on unlevered equity. Accordingto the Capital Asset Pricing Model:R0 = R F+ βUnlevered(R M–R F)R0 = 4% + .85(11% – 4%)R0 = 9.95%Now we can find the cost of levered equity. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxesR S = R0 + (B/S)(R0–R B)(1 –t C)R S = .0995 + (.40)(.0995 – .0629)(1 – .34)R S = .1092, or 10.92%c.In a world with corporate taxes, a firm’s weighted average cost of capital is equal to:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SThe problem does not provide either the debt-value ratio or equity-value ratio. However, the firm’s debt-equity ratio is:B/S = .40Solving for B:B = .4SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get:B/V = .4S / (.4S + S)B/V = .4 / 1.4B/V = .29And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or:S/V = 1 – .29S/V = .71So, the WACC for the company is:R WACC = .29(1 – .34)(.0629) + .71(.1092)R WACC = .0898, or 8.98%5. a.The equity beta of a firm financed entirely by equity is equal to its unlevered beta. Since eachfirm has an unlevered beta of 1.10, we can find the equity beta for each. Doing so, we find:North PoleβEquity = [1 + (1 –t C)(B/S)]βUnleveredβEquity = [1 + (1 – .35)($2,900,000/$3,800,000](1.10)βEquity = 1.65South PoleβEquity = [1 + (1 –t C)(B/S)]βUnleveredβEquity = [1 + (1 – .35)($3,800,000/$2,900,000](1.10)βEquity = 2.04b.We can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to find the required return on each firm’s equity.Doing so, we find:North Pole:R S = R F+ βEquity(R M–R F)R S = 3.20% + 1.65(10.90% – 3.20%)R S = 15.87%South Pole:R S = R F+ βEquity(R M–R F)R S = 3.20% + 2.04(10.90% – 3.20%)R S = 18.88%6. a.If flotation costs are not taken into account, the net present value of a loan equals:NPV Loan = Gross Proceeds – Aftertax present value of interest and principal paymentsNPV Loan = $5,850,000 – .08($5,850,000)(1 – .40)PVIFA8%,10– $5,850,000/1.0810NPV Loan = $1,256,127.24b.The flotation costs of the loan will be:Flotation costs = $5,850,000(.025)Flotation costs = $146,250So, the annual flotation expense will be:Annual flotation expense = $146,250 / 10Annual flotation expense = $14,625If flotation costs are taken into account, the net present value of a loan equals:NPV Loan = Proceeds net of flotation costs – Aftertax present value of interest and principalpayments + Present value of the flotation cost tax shieldNPV Loan = ($5,850,000 – 146,250) – .08($5,850,000)(1 – .40)(PVIFA8%,10)– $5,850,000/1.0810 + $14,625(.40)(PVIFA8%,10)NPV Loan = $1,149,131.217.First we need to find the aftertax value of the revenues minus expenses. The aftertax value is:Aftertax revenue = $3,200,000(1 – .40)Aftertax revenue = $1,920,000Next, we need to find the depreciation tax shield. The depreciation tax shield each year is:Depreciation tax shield = Depreciation(t C)Depreciation tax shield = ($11,400,000 / 6)(.40)Depreciation tax shield = $760,000Now we can find the NPV of the project, which is:NPV = Initial cost + PV of depreciation tax shield + PV of aftertax revenueTo find the present value of the depreciation tax shield, we should discount at the risk-free rate, and we need to discount the aftertax revenues at the cost of equity, so:NPV = –$11,400,000 + $760,000(PVIFA3.5%,6) + $1,920,000(PVIFA11%,6)NPV = $772,332.978.Whether the company issues stock or issues equity to finance the project is irrelevant. Thecompany’s optimal capital structure determines the WACC. In a world with corporate taxes, a firm’s weighted average cost of capital equals:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SR WACC = .80(1 – .34)(.069) + .20(.1080)R WACC = .0580, or 5.80%Now we can use the weighted average cost of capital to discount NEC’s unlevered cash flows. Doing so, we find the NPV of the project is:NPV = –$45,000,000 + $3,100,000 / .0580NPV = $8,418,803.429. a.The company has a capital structure with three parts: long-term debt, short-term debt, andequity. Since interest payments on both long-term and short-term debt are tax-deductible, multiply the pretax costs by (1 –t C) to determine the aftertax costs to be used in the weighted average cost of capital calculation. The WACC using the book value weights is:R WACC = (X STD)(R STD)(1 –t C) + (X LTD)(R LTD)(1 –t C) + (X Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = ($10 / $19)(.041)(1 – .35) + ($3 / $19)(.072)(1 – .35) + ($6 / $19)(.138)R WACC = .0650, or 6.50%ing the market value weights, the company’s WACC is:R WACC = (X STD)(R STD)(1 –t C) + (X LTD)(R LTD)(1 –t C) + (X Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = ($11 / $40)(.041)(1 – .35) + ($10 / $40)(.072)(1 – .35) + ($26 / $40)(.138)R WACC = .1005, or 10.05%ing the target debt-equity ratio, the target debt-value ratio for the company is:B/S = .60B = .6SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get:B/V = .6S / (.6S + S)B/V = .6 / 1.6B/V = .375And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or:S/V = 1 – .375S/V = .625We can use the ratio of short-term debt to long-term debt in a similar manner to find the short-term debt to total debt and long-term debt to total debt. Using the short-term debt to long-term debt ratio, we get:STD/LTD = .20STD = .2LTDSubstituting this in the short-term debt to total debt ratio, we get:STD/B = .2LTD / (.2LTD + LTD)STD/B = .2 / 1.2STD/B = .167And the long-term debt to total debt ratio is one minus the short-term debt to total debt ratio, or: LTD/B = 1 – .167LTD/B = .833Now we can find the short-term debt to value ratio and long-term debt to value ratio bymultiplying the respective ratio by the debt-value ratio. So:STD/V = (STD/B)(B/V)STD/V = .167(.375)STD/V = .063And the long-term debt to value ratio is:LTD/V = (LTD/B)(B/V)LTD/V = .833(.375)LTD/V = .313So, using the target capital structure weights, the company’s WACC is:R WACC = (X STD)(R STD)(1 –t C) + (X LTD)(R LTD)(1 – t C) + (X Equity)(R Equity)R WACC = (.063)(.041)(1 – .35) + (.313)(.072)(1 – .35) + (.625)(.138)R WACC = .1025, or 10.25%d.The differences in the WACCs are due to the different weighting schemes. The company’sWACC will most closely resemble the WACC calculated using target weights since futureprojects will be financed at the target ratio. Therefore, the WACC computed with targetweights should be used for project evaluation.Intermediate10.The adjusted present value of a project equals the net present value of the project under all-equityfinancing plus the net present value of any financing side effects. In the joint venture’s case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the aftertax present value of cash flows resulting from the firms’ debt. So, the APV is:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)The NPV for an all-equity firm is:NPV(All-Equity)NPV = –Initial Investment + PV[(1 –t C)(EBITD)] + PV(Depreciation Tax Shield)Since the initial investment will be fully depreciated over five years using the straight-line method, annual depreciation expense is:Annual depreciation = $80,000,000/5Annual depreciation = $16,000,000NPV = –$80,000,000 + (1 – .35)($12,100,000)PVIFA13%,20 + (.35)($16,000,000)PVIFA13%,5NPV = –$5,053,833.77NPV(Financing Side Effects)The NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt. The coupon rate on the debt is relevant to determine the interest payments, but the resulting cash flows should still be discounted at the pretax cost of debt. So, the NPV of the financing effects is:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Repayments)NPV = $25,000,000 – (1 – .35)(.05)($25,000,000)PVIFA8.5%,15– $25,000,000/1.08515NPV = $10,899,310.51So, the APV of the project is:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)APV = –$5,053,833.77 + $10,899,310.51APV = $5,845,476.7311.If the company had to issue debt under the terms it would normally receive, the interest rate on thedebt would increase to the company’s normal cost of debt. The NPV of an all-equity project would remain unchanged, but the NPV of the financing side effects would change. The NPV of the financing side effects would be:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Repayments)NPV = $25,000,000 – (1 – .35)(.085)($25,000,000)PVIFA8.5%,15– $25,000,000/1.08515NPV = $6,176,275.95Using the NPV of an all-equity project from the previous problem, the new APV of the project would be:APV = NPV(All-Equity) + NPV(Financing Side Effects)APV = –$5,053,833.77 + $6,176,275.95APV = $1,122,442.18The gain to the company from issuing subsidized debt is the difference between the two APVs, so: Gain from subsidized debt = $5,845,476.73 – 1,122,442.18Gain from subsidized debt = $4,723,034.55Most of the value of the project is in the form of the subsidized interest rate on the debt issue.12.The adjusted present value of a project equals the net present value of the project under all-equityfinancing plus the net present value of any financing side effects. First, we need to calculate the unlevered cost of equity. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0–R B)(1 –t C).16 = R0 + (.50)(R0– .09)(1 – .40)R0 = .1438 or 14.38%Now we can find the NPV of an all-equity project, which is:NPV = PV(Unlevered Cash Flows)NPV = –$18,000,000 + $5,700,000/1.1438 + $9,500,000/(1.1438)2 + $8,800,000/1.14383NPV = $124,086.62Next, we need to find the net present value of financing side effects. This is equal the aftertax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt. So:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments) – PV(Principal Payments)Each year, an equal principal payment will be made, which will reduce the interest accrued during the year. Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt, so the NPV of the financing effects is:NPV = $9,300,000 – (1 – .40)(.09)($9,300,000) / 1.09 – $3,100,000/1.09– (1 – .40)(.09)($6,200,000)/1.092– $3,100,000/1.092– (1 – .40)(.09)($3,100,000)/1.093– $3,100,000/1.093NPV = $581,194.61So, the APV of project is:APV = NPV(All-equity) + NPV(Financing side effects)APV = $124,086.62 + 581,194.61APV = $705,281.2313. a.To calculate the NPV of the project, we first need to find the company’s WACC. In a worldwith corporate taxes, a firm’s weighted average cost of capital equals:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SThe market value of the company’s equity is:Market value of equity = 4,500,000($25)Market value of equity = $112,500,000So, the debt-value ratio and equity-value ratio are:Debt-value = $55,000,000 / ($55,000,000 + 112,500,000)Debt-value = .3284Equity-value = $112,500,000 / ($55,000,000 + 112,500,000)Equity-value = .6716Since the CEO believes its current capital structure is optimal, these values can be used as the target w eights in the firm’s weighted average cost of capital calculation. The yield to maturity of the company’s debt is its pretax cost of debt. To find the company’s cost of equity, we need to calculate the stock beta. The stock beta can be calculated as:β = σS,M / σ2Mβ = .0415 / .202β = 1.04Now we can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to determine the cost of equity. The Capital Asset Pricing Model is:R S = R F+ β(R M–R F)R S = 3.4% + 1.04(7.50%)R S = 11.18%Now, we can calculate the company’s WACC, which is:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SR WACC = .3284(1 – .35)(.065) + .6716(.1118)R WACC = .0890, or 8.90%Finally, we can use the WACC to discount the unlevered cash flows, which gives us an NPV of: NPV = –$42,000,000 + $11,800,000(PVIFA8.90%,5)NPV = $4,020,681.28b.The weighted average cost of capital used in part a will not change if the firm chooses to fundthe project entirely with debt. The weighted average cost of capital is based on optimal capital structure weights. Since the current capital structure is optimal, all-debt funding for the project simply implies that the firm will have to use more equity in the future to bring the capital structure back towards the target.14.We have four companies with comparable operations, so the industry average beta can be used as thebeta for this project. So, the average unlevered beta is:βUnlevered = (1.15 + 1.08 + 1.30 + 1.25) / 4βUnlevered = 1.20A debt-to-value ratio of .40 means that the equity-to-value ratio is .60. This implies a debt-equityratio of .67{=.40/.60}. Since the project will be levered, we need to calculate the levered beta, which is:βLevered = [1 + (1 –t C)(Debt/Equity)]βUnleveredβLevered = [1 + (1 – .34)(.67)]1.20βLevered = 1.72Now we can use the Capital Asset Pricing Model to determine the cost of equity. The Capital Asset Pricing Model is:R S = R F+ β(R M–R F)R S = 3.8% + 1.72(7.00%)R S = 15.85%Now, we can calculate the company’s WACC, which is:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SR WACC = .40(1 – .35)(.068) + .60(.1585)R WACC = .1130, or 11.30%Finally, we can use the WACC to discount the unlevered cash flows, which gives us an NPV of: NPV = –$4,500,000 + $675,000(PVIFA11.30%,20)NPV = $770,604.48Challenge15. a.The company is currently an all-equity firm, so the value as an all-equity firm equals thepresent value of aftertax cash flows, discounted at the cost of the firm’s unlevered cost of equity. So, the current value of the company is:V U = [(Pretax earnings)(1 –t C)] / R0V U = [($21,000,000)(1 – .35)] / .16V U = $85,312,500The price per share is the total value of the company divided by the shares outstanding, or:Price per share = $85,312,500 / 1,300,000Price per share = $65.63b.The adjusted present value of a firm equals its value under all-equity financing plus the netpresent value of any financing side effects. In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the aftertax present value of cash flows resulting from the firm’s debt. Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows can be discounted at the pretax cost of debt, so the NPV of the financing effects are:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest Payments)NPV = $30,000,000 – (1 – .35)(.09)($30,000,000) / .09NPV = $10,500,000So, the value of the company after the recapitalization using the APV approach is:V = $85,312,500 + 10,500,000V = $95,812,500Since the company has not yet issued the debt, this is also the value of equity after the announcement. So, the new price per share will be:New share price = $95,812,500 / 1,300,000New share price = $73.70c.The company will use the entire proceeds to repurchase equity. Using the share price wecalculated in part b, the number of shares repurchased will be:Shares repurchased = $30,000,000 / $73.70Shares repurchased = 407,045And the new number of shares outstanding will be:New shares outstanding = 1,300,000 – 407,045New shares outstanding = 892,955The value of the company increased, but part of that increase will be funded by the new debt.The value of equity after recapitalization is the total value of the company minus the value of debt, or:New value of equity = $95,812,500 – 30,000,000New value of equity = $65,812,500So, the price per share of the company after recapitalization will be:New share price = $65,812,500 / 892,955New share price = $73.70The price per share is unchanged.d.In order to value a firm’s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, we must discount the cashflows available to equity holders at the cost of the firm’s levered equity. According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes, the required return of levered equity is: R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0–R B)(1 –t C)R S = .16 + ($30,000,000 / $65,812,500)(.16 – .09)(1 – .35)R S = .1807, or 18.07%After the recapitalization, the net income of the company will be:EBIT $21,000,000Interest 2,700,000EBT $18,300,000Taxes 6,405,000Net income $11,895,000The firm pays all of its earnings as dividends, so the entire net income is available toshareholders. Using the flow-to-equity approach, the value of the equity is:S = Cash flows available to equity holders / R SS = $11,895,000 / .1807S = $65,812,50016. a.If the company were financed entirely by equity, the value of the firm would be equal to thepresent value of its unlevered after-tax earnings, discounted at its unlevered cost of capital.First, we need to find the company’s unlevered cash flows, which are:Sales $17,500,000Variable costs 10,500,000EBT $7,000,000Tax 2,800,000Net income $4,200,000So, the value of the unlevered company is:V U = $4,200,000 / .13V U = $32,307,692.31b.According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes, the value of levered equityis:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0–R B)(1 –t C)R S = .13 + (.35)(.13 – .07)(1 – .40)R S = .1426 or 14.26%c.In a world with corporate taxes, a firm’s weighted average cost of capital equals:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SSo we need the debt-value and equity-value ratios for the company. The debt-equity ratio forthe company is:B/S = .35B = .35SSubstituting this in the debt-value ratio, we get:B/V = .35S / (.35S + S)B/V = .35 / 1.35B/V = .26And the equity-value ratio is one minus the debt-value ratio, or:S/V = 1 – .26S/V = .74So, using the capital structure weights, the company’s WACC is:R WACC = [B / (B + S)](1 –t C)R B + [S / (B + S)]R SR WACC = .26(1 – .40)(.07) + .74(.1426)R WACC = .1165, or 11.65%We can use the weighted average cost of capital to discount the firm’s unlevered aftertax earnings to value the company. Doing so, we find:V L = $4,200,000 / .1165V L = $36,045,772.41Now we can use the debt-value ratio and equity-value ratio to find the value of debt and equity, which are:B = V L(Debt-value)B = $36,045,772.41(.26)B = $9,345,200.25S = V L(Equity-value)S = $36,045,772.41(.74)S = $26,700,572.16d.In order to value a firm’s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, we can discount the cashflows available to equity holders at the cost of the firm’s levered equity. First, we need to calculate the levered cash flows available to shareholders, which are:Sales $17,500,000Variable costs 10,500,000EBIT $7,000,000Interest 654,164EBT $6,345,836Tax 2,538,334Net income $3,807,502So, the value of equity with the flow-to-equity method is:S = Cash flows available to equity holders / R SS = $3,807,502 / .1426S = $26,700,572.1617. a.Since the company is currently an all-equity firm, its value equals the present value of itsunlevered after-tax earnings, discounted at its unlevered cost of capital. The cash flows to shareholders for the unlevered firm are:EBIT $118,000Tax 47,200Net income $70,800So, the value of the company is:V U = $70,800 / .14V U = $505,714.29b.The adjusted present value of a firm equals its value under all-equity financing plus the netpresent value of any financing side effects. In this case, the NPV of financing side effects equals the after-tax present value of cash flows resulting from debt. Given a known level of debt, debt cash flows should be discounted at the pre-tax cost of debt, so:NPV = Proceeds – Aftertax PV(Interest payments)NPV = $235,000 – (1 – .40)(.08)($235,000) / .08NPV = $94,000So, using the APV method, the value of the company is:APV = V U + NPV(Financing side effects)APV = $505,714.29 + 94,000APV = $599,714.29The value of the debt is given, so the value of equity is the value of the company minus the value of the debt, or:S = V–BS = $599,714.29 – 235,000S = $364,714.29c.According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II with corporate taxes, the required return oflevered equity is:R S = R0 + (B/S)(R0–R B)(1 –t C)R S = .14 + ($235,000 / $364,714.29)(.14 – .08)(1 – .40)R S = .1632, or 16.32%d.In order to value a firm’s equity using the flow-to-equity approach, we can discount the cashflows available to equity holders at the cost of the firm’s levered equity. First, we need to calculate the levered cash flows available to shareholders, which are:EBIT $118,000Interest 18,800EBT $99,200Tax 39,680Net income $59,520。

公司理财第十版PPTChap007

Coupons
• Suppose a bond with a 10% coupon rate and semiannual coupons, has a face value of $1,000, 20 years to maturity and is selling for $1,197.93.
Is the YTM more or less than 10%? What is the semiannual coupon payment? How many periods are there? N = 40; PV = -1,197.93; PMT = 50; FV = 1,000;
PPT文档演模板
公司理财第十版PPTChap007
•7-4
Present Value of Cash Flows as Rates Change
• Bond Value = PV of coupons + PV of par • Bond Value = PV of annuity + PV of lump
▪ Short-term bonds have more reinvestment rate risk than long-term bonds
▪ High coupon rate bonds have more reinvestment rate risk than low coupon rate bonds
PPT文档演模板
公司理财第十版PPTChap007
•7-3
Bond Definitions
• Bond • Par value (face value) • Coupon rate • Coupon payment • Maturity date • Yield or Yield to maturity

公司理财精要版原书第十版教学反思

公司理财精要版原书第十版教学反思背景公司理财是一门关于企业财务管理的课程，是商科学生学习的重点。

其中，公司理财精要版原书第十版是较为常用的教材之一，本文主要对这本教材的教学进行反思。

教学反思缺乏真正的案例剖析公司理财一课程往往会对企业的财务管理进行梳理，并给出很多管理工具和方法。

然而，这种理论性的教学只能准备学生进入职场后通过实践累积来具体化和应用。

为了协助更好地将理论转化为实践，我们需要加入更生动、实际和有兴趣的案例来配合学生的学习和讲解，以便理解企业财务管理的核心目标和实际运作。

缺乏互动及讨论企业财务管理的课程应该是一个互动和探究型的过程。

在这种课程中，师生之间应该进行更多深刻的思想交流以及智力碰撞，而不是快速简单的介绍和讲解。

当一门课程缺少互动和讨论时，就会让学生缺乏参与感，更难以从中获得实际的收获。

数值理论化过于单一在教学过程中，我们需要将数学理论与现实世界相联系结合，这是一门成功的财务管理课程必不可少的部分，但是，我们教学过度强调数学运算，而忽视了实际应用的阐述，导致学生不易理解。

因此，我们需要增强实际应用的剖析，供学生更真实、更生动地进行理解和操作。

对企业财务管理未来趋势的讨论和展望不足企业财务管理是一个充满变迁又朝气蓬勃的领域。

在教材和教学过程中，应该有足够的关注于如何利用最新技术和方法及适应市场经济的变革发展。

一份优秀的教材应该在这些问题上提供有远见的指导和展望，促进新的思考和实验。

缺乏高质量讲师讲师的知识水平和教学能力对课程的教学质量有很大的影响。

一位出色的讲师能够让学生在课堂上真正地参与讨论，并指导学生如何运用所学知识进行实践。

而一个缺乏经验和知识的讲师则会使课程缺乏灵活性和实用性。

因此，鼓励培训和招聘高质量讲师以提高课程的教学质量。

结论在这篇文章中，我们回顾了教学过程中，公司理财精要版原书第十版的缺点。

通过在以上几个方面加以改进，我们可以使企业财务管理的课程更生动、实际、充满未来发展动力和应用性。

公司理财精要版第10版Chap09

NPV法：例子
0
1
2
3
4
初始支出收入 ($1,100) 费用
现金流量
$1,000 500
$500
收入费用
现金流量
– $1,100.00 1
$500 x 1.10
+454.54
+578.51
1 $700 x
1.10 2
-375.66
+819.62
+$377.02 = NPV
$2,000 1,300
优点:
易于理解偏向于短期项目，对流动性考虑比较充分
公司理财精要版第10版Chap09
9.2 回收期法
项目A、B、C的预期现金流量
年份 0 1 2 3 4
回收期（年）
A -100
20 30 50 60
3
B -100
50 30 20 60
3
C -100
50 30 20 60000
3
公司理财精要版第10版Chap09
问题1：多重收益率问题
非常规现金流量：项目的现金流量改变符号两次以上。非常规现金流量的项目可能拥有多个内部收益率。（若现
金流量变号N次，那么就可能会有最多达N个正的内部收益率。）对于非常规现金流量的项目，内部收益率法则无效。当项目的现金流量只有一次变号时，内部收益率是唯一的。
公司理财精要版第10版Chap09
公司理财精要版第10版 Chap09
2020/11/6
公司理财精要版第10版Chap09
第9章
净现值和其他投资准则
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Copyright © 2010 by th公e 司M理cG财ra精w-要Hi版ll C第o1m0p版anCiehsa, pIn0c9. All rights reserved.