安乐死英文资料Euthanasia

合集下载

安乐死_英语作文（优秀范文五篇）

安乐死_英语作文（优秀范文五篇）第一篇：安乐死_英语作文The euthanasia The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged.The euthanasia has been becoming the hot topic around the world, and questioned discussion about its legalization occurs at home and abroad.In my opinion, the euthanasia is mercy.It can help hopeless ill patients to dead qucikly，relieve them from the pain , For these people，the quality of life is the foundation value of life.For these patients who can never be cured, death is unavoidable to them, so the euthanasia is the best way to let them away from great pain.And these patients have to suffer from the pain, at the same time, their family members have to stand the expensive medical expenses and the great hurt mentally，“We mustn't delay any longer … swallowing is difficult … and breathing, that's also difficult.Those muscles are weakening too … we mustn't delay any longer.”the words from a Dutchman asked his doctor to help him die.At that time ,he was no longer able to speak clearly and he knew there was no hope of recovery and that his condition was rapidly get worse.Therefore,it's merciful for the doctors to help these patience come to an end of their life with the euthanasia.In addition, to reduce the pain of the patients is one of the doctors' duty, so euthanasia.is moral.To be frank, everyone has the right and freedom to manage their own final destiny, such as refuse any cure.And thus right also includes the freedom of choosing to die as well as the ways of death, even when it's necessary to ask somebody else to end their life.In a word.I want to call on the legitimization of the euthanasia.let the patients get rid of thestruggle between life and death as soon as possible.第二篇：英语作文：安乐死（1）有利于病人的自身利益。

安乐死的英文作文

安乐死的英文作文英文：Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, is a controversial topic that has been debated for decades. Some people believe that individuals who are terminally ill or suffering from unbearable pain should have the right to choose to end their own lives with the help of a physician. Others argue that euthanasia goes against the sanctity of life and can lead to abuse.Personally, I believe that euthanasia should be legalized under certain circumstances. For example, if a patient has a terminal illness and is in constant pain, they should have the right to end their suffering. However, strict regulations and guidelines must be put in place to prevent abuse and ensure that the patient is making an informed decision.In my opinion, the decision to end one's own life is adeeply personal one and should not be made lightly. It is important for the patient to have access to counseling and support to help them make an informed decision. Additionally, the physician who assists with the euthanasia should be well-trained and experienced in end-of-life care.中文：安乐死，也称为协助自杀或慈悲杀死，是一个备受争议的话题，已经争论了几十年。

安乐死

医学伦理学认为，所谓安乐死，就是指医务人员应濒死病人或其家属的自愿请求，通过作为或不作为，消除病人的痛苦或缩短痛苦的时间，使其安详地度过死亡阶段，结束生命。
安乐死与一般的死亡相比，应该具有这样几个特征：
（1）安乐死执行者的动机和意图必须是道德的。安乐死执行者的目的、意图和动机必须是"善意"的，是为了解除病人的痛苦。而且这种痛苦是指不堪等待自然死亡的身体的剧烈的痛苦而言，至于精神上的痛苦，如因失恋而精神沮丧、因贫困而厌世悲观等则除外。
4、阻碍医学科学的发展这是从实施安乐死的后果来考虑安乐死的弊端。反对者认为，医学之所以不断发展、进步，就在于医学家在所谓"绝症"面前不畏艰险，知难而进。而安乐死则会使这些勇于进取的医学家失去研究的对象和动力，从而会阻碍医学科学的发展。
ห้องสมุดไป่ตู้
5、违背了传统的血缘亲情观念"血浓于水"是许多民族都有的传统伦理观念。反对者认为，安乐死会使病人家属不顾亲情孝道，放任自己亲人的死亡，甚至在医师的帮助下参与结束亲人的生命，显然与这种传统美德相悖。
（二）进行死亡教育
安乐死问题之所以显得如此重大而复杂，是因为人们把死亡看作一件重大的事情。不能正确看待死亡是导致许多人盲目拒斥安乐死的主要原因之一。所以，对人们，首先是医务人员和患病人群，进行死亡教育极为重要。死亡教育可以帮助人们树立正确的死亡态度，培养良好的死亡适应心理。这是一个社会能够正确对待安乐死的重要前提条件。
（2）根据安乐死是否由病人本人提出请求，我们可以将安乐死分为自愿安乐死和非自愿安乐死。自愿安乐死是指意识清楚、有行为能力的病人或曾经意识清楚的病人自由表达了安乐死愿望的安乐死。这是在病人本人的请求下实施的安乐死。非自愿安乐死是指不是由自己表示而是由他人代为表示安乐死愿望的安乐死。

安乐死整理资料

Whether we should legalize euthanasia?I. Definition：不知到PM会定义成什么，把几个具体的术语列出来你看一下吧1.V oluntary Euthanasia：The action of a third party,which deliberately ends the life ofan individual,with that individual’s consent.2.Non-voluntary Euthanasia: Where the individual is unable to ask for euthanasia and another person makes the decision on his/her behalf,usually based on previously expressed wishes.3.Assisted Suicide: Where an individual takes his/her own life based on information, guidance and/or medication provided by a third party.4.Physician Assisted Suicide: Where a doctor provides the information,guidance and/or medication with which an individual can take his/her own life.II. Major Clashes1. Whether individuals have the right to end their own life?正方：①It is generally accepted that as an expression of bodily autonomy i.e. one’s right to make independent choices without any external influences, a competent adult can refuse medical treatment,even in situations where this could result in his/her death.②Proponents argue that euthanasia allows terminally ill people to die with dignity and without pain and that decision to end a life of pain and suffering is an expression of one’s right to personal autonomy, which should be respected by one’s family, healthcare providers and society at large. As every individual is entitled to the freedom of choice, they should be free to dictate the time and place of their own death.③Finally, proponents argue that forcing people to live against their wishes violates personal freedoms and human rights and that it is immoral to compel people to continue to live with unbearable pain and suffering.反方：①Opponents of euthanasia, argue that the human beings, as a part of the society, also an extension of their parents’ life, are socially-constructed invention, which means they do not have dominion over life but are stewards of life. Also they contend that the sanctity of human life and the continuation of human existence are the highest principle which can under no circumstances, be violated. The powerful combination of sanctity of life and stewardship is expressed in the foundational ethical principle.②Few decisions are as important as those related to end-of-life healthcare. While an individual might want to express his/her autonomy by deciding to end his/her life, that decision will, in all likelihood, be influenced by the views of third parties i.e.the individual’s doctor, family or friends.③Opponents argue that because we live in an interdependent society, where one’s decisions will impact on others physically, emotionally and financially, limits should be placed on personal autonomy in relation to end-of-life healthcare choices. Opponents have raised concerns about the implications legalizing euthanasia would have for society. They state that governments have a duty to protect society as a whole, as opposed to individual citizens and that allowing euthanasia could harm society. Therefore, they argue that governments should balance an individual’s right to die against potential negative consequences for the wider community. （当个人的freedom of choice 涉及到third part interest 时，政府有权加以限制）2.Does euthanasia devalue life?反方：It has been argued that permitting euthanasia could diminish respect for life. Concerns have been raised that allowing euthanasia for terminally ill individuals’quest could result in a situation where all terminally ill individuals would feel pressured into availing of euthanasia. There are fears that such individuals might begin to view themselves as a burden on their family, friends and society or as a strain on limited health care resources.Opponents of euthanasia also contend that permitting individuals to end their lives may lead to a situation where certain groups within society e.g.the terminally ill,severely disabled individuals or the elderly would be euthanized as a rule.正方：However, proponents of euthanasia argue that legalizing the practice would not devalue life or result in pressure being put on individuals to end their lives but would allow those with no hope of recovery to die with dignity and without unnecessary suffering.They state that it would be imprudent not to implement legislation because this would drive euthanasia underground where it would be unregulated. However proponents argue that there is no value in a life which is inflicted with unbearable agony and doom to end in a short time. They also state that individuals who have no hope of recovery and feel that the overall quality of life has deteriorated should not be obliged to suffer unduly. By granting those terminally ill patients the right die in dignity, the government is actually putting more emphasis on the sanctity of human life.3.Would legalizing euthanasia undermine the level of healthcare provided?反方：There are fears that allowing euthanasia would encourage the practice to become the norm, as it might be easier and cheaper to provide than other forms of end-of-life healthcare.Counterplan: Opponents of euthanasia argue that more resources should be put into palliative care, which allows people to die with dignity and which offers support and comfort to family and friends. Palliative care attempts to improve the quality of life for patients facing a life-threatening or life-limiting illness through the prevention and relief of pain and other symptoms, including physical, psychological, social and spiritual problems.About the role of physicians: A re physicians’ most basic obligations to fight disease and prolong life or to relieve suffering？Opponents of euthanasia argue that if physicians work only to relieve suffering in the quickest way possible, the medical world would lose any incentive to provide better palliative care and find new cures and therapies.slippery slope: While euthanasia is often associated with terminally ill patients, there have been suggestions that voluntary euthanasia might also be relevant to very elderly individuals, individuals with chronic or degenerative illness, individuals with mental health problems and society as a whole. If one day we allow Dr. Kevorkian to drug terminals patients to death, it will only be a matter of time before he pokes a big enough hole in the law that allows him to give lethal injections to patients in comas(昏迷), then to people not terminally ill, such as children with birth defects.正方反驳：However, it has been estimated that in a minority of cases an individual’s pain can not be eased with palliative drug treatment and concerns have been raised regarding the profound spiritual and psychological suffering experienced by individuals faced with their imminent death. When the disease causes intolerable suffering that cannot be relieved by convention interventions and can only lead to a painful death , proponents argue that individuals should have a right to die on their own terms and at a time of their own choice and suggest that euthanasia should be offeredas a viable alternative for those individuals who are not satisfied with palliative care.4.Would the legalization of euthanasia lead to potential abuses?反方① If we legalize euthanasia, we are actually granting a special group of people the right to claim an individual’s life. According to the law, anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer. Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed“mercy killing”by unscrupulous people and it is really hard to draw a clear line between “mercy killing”and “intentional homicide”, which will cause severe disorder in the criminal justice system. Therefore, with the excuse of “assisted killing”, murderers will be exempted from corresponding penalty and the overall deterrence of law will be in a downward trend, posing direct threat to social security and stability.正方：① By providing safeguards against the abuses, and more systematic precautions, we can achieve the legalization of euthanasia without inflicting harm to the social security.Case: Oregon 尊严死亡法案5. Financial burden on families Vs Social Inequality (unfairness on the vulnerable group like the poor, the poorly-educated,etc.)deficiencies in China’s current health care system。

安乐死persentation(英语)

The problem of euthanasia has not been discussed formally yet. • Many examples of active euthanasia have been reported. • China still does not have the conditions to legislate(立法)sia
Use drugs or other methods urge patients go die. that is end the patients‘ life ahead of time.
Euthanasia
It root in Greece ,which including two meanings
Let life be beautiful like summer flowers, and death like autumn leaves
Tagore
If I can't give permission for myself to end my life,then who is the owner of my body?Who is the owner of my life then?
• 68 percent of Americans tend to support euthanasia. But only the Oregon State（俄勒冈州）、Washington State （华盛顿州）Montana State（蒙大拿州）allows euthanasia 。
in China
Hawking: if I think I'm a burden, I'll consider euthanasia

安乐死英文精选全文

But suicide is painful, such as process, commit suicide by hanging, wrist, eating poison, shock, hunger, etc, also is very fear. But he (she) have to choose the only way to release of suffering. But after the implementation of euthanasia, only need to inject an AnDingJi, it will let people in slumber unknowingly leave, so it will relieve the pain and fear, which also reflects the "win" in the ancient words. This is truly humanitarian purposes.
30%
recent years.
20%
10%
0%
1947
1973
1983 recent
years
Part 3:But at the same time there
are many people disagree this
They keesonal
die happily.
Phenomenon
Reasons for support Another attitude Summary
Phenomenon
• Now there are a lot of people have an incurable disease. They want to be part of people with euthanasia over his own life. But it is not allowed ……

安乐死英语小论文Euthanasia

Euthanasia: A Means, Not the End Summary:Euthanasia means "happy death" or "mercy killing", which is sometimes used to help patients die without suffering too much pain. The purpose of euthanasia is kind and benevolent, but as it is related to death, the result may not seem so kind or benevolent when we see anyone die. This is why euthanasia becomes one of the most widely and hotly debated issues in society. Do we have "the right to die"? Should euthanasia be legalized? In what kind of situation will euthanasia be put into practice?(words:87)With the high-speed development of medicine, our life become much longer and more comfortable. Though medicine can usually prevent us from death, we cannot avoid dying throughout life. If your disease were incurable, of course high-level medicine could extend your life more or less, but it would also extend your pain at the same time. In this situation, as death is visible and unavoidable while pain is hard for you to stand, euthanasia is used.Many people around the world are in favor of the idea of euthanasia, the core concept they invoke is "the right to die", which means anyone who has incurable disease with pain beyond suffering can choose to die when they or their family is determined to. People supporting the idea "the right to die" believe that euthanasia is humane, because it helps hasten the death of hopelessly ill patients, relieving them from the fierce pain, which is good for not only the dying patients but their families.Of course, the use of euthanasia has rationality. It's necessary to permit euthanasia in some special situations.However, there are also many disadvantages of euthanasia. First, euthanasia can be abused when doctors is treating disabled people and old people, which leads to crime. Second, when a seriously-ill patient is determined to take euthanasia, he may not make clear-headed decision because his consciousness is probably muddled. Third, too many examples of euthanasia may result in social moral crisis and doctors may not try their best to cure a dying patient once they have the power to practice euthanasia. This conduct is nothing less than murdering.In order to prevent the abuse of euthanasia, we must strictly standard ize the application of euthanasia. So, when can doctor use euthanasia legally? I think it depends on several conditions.First of all, euthanasia can be only practiced on terminally ill patients, when the practice of euthanasia serves only to hasten death. Secondly, we should guarantee the earnest and strictness of euthanasia, so taking euthanasia need the permission of patient himself or his family, the acceptance of doctors and the certificate from court. Thirdly, the method to practice euthanasia must conform to humanitarianism, and only professional and qualified doctor can practice euthanasia. Finally, legal euthanasia can't betray its original purpose. Euthanasia is a merciful way to end patients' life. Doctors practice euthanasia in order that the patients will no longer suffer a fierce pain. Euthanasia can make the patients die peacefully. To some extent, it is a kind of respect to human life.Euthanasia has come into being for a long time, it's impossible and groundless to forbid it completely. I think it won't be long to legalize euthanasia in China, what we should do is to make the law on euthanasia as perfect as possible.Anyhow, we shouldn't regard euthanasia as a painless way to commit suicide, and there is no reason for us to take it for granted that euthanasia is a good way to terminate our life. Y ou cannot expect euthanasia to bring you any relief as it seems, the only thing euthanasia can do is take your pain with your life. After all, life is the most precious treasure we have.In fact, to terminate one's life by taking euthanasia is not only a legal issue but also a moral issue because it refers to a choice between painfully liv ing and comfortably dying. Which one would you choose? Just like what Confucius said: "It's useless talking about death before you understand life clearly."[1]According to Confucius's words, it's useless talking about choosing how to die while we haven't settled the problems of life. So should we pay too much attention on "the right of death" while we still can't guarantee the rights of life? Is it the time for us to focus more on those people who are alive?(words:655) [1] 出自《论语·先进》:孔子云：“未知生，焉知死？”Reference:1.Y e Gaofeng. "A Law View on Euthanasia",The Issues and Disputes of Penal Law . 1(2001): 3992.Zhang Yutang. "Do We Have right to die?" Law. 5(2001): 333.Wu Jing. "Euthanasia Is Not Crime", The Issues and Disputes of Penal Law. 1(2000): 1134.Wang Xiaohui. To Discuss Euthanasia. Jilin People's Press5.Chu Dongping. Euthanasia. Shanghai. Culture Press, 1988。

安乐死

安乐死（希腊语：Ευθανασία，英语：Euthanasia，eu意“好”、thanatos衍生自死神塔那托斯），有“好的死亡”或“无痛苦的死亡”的含意，是一种给予患有不治之症的人以无痛楚、或更严谨而言“尽其量减小痛楚地”致死的行为或措施，一般用于在个别患者出现了无法医治的长期显性病症，因病情到了晚期或不治之症，对病人造成极大的负担，不愿再受病痛折磨而采取的了结生命的措施，经过医生和病人双方同意后进行，为减轻痛苦而进行的提前死亡。

安乐死分主动安乐死和被动安乐死两种，主动安乐死是按病人要求，主动为病人结束生命（例如透过注射方式）；被动安乐死是按病人意愿停止疗程（例如除去病人的维生系统或让病人停止服药），使其自然死亡。

以荷兰为例，目前荷兰要执行安乐死，须出自病人意愿，且有医生证明病人正处于“不能减轻”和“不能忍受”的痛苦中，医生和病人之间也得先达成共识，确认安乐死已经是他们的唯一选择。

安乐死在许多国家引发了很大的争议（例如美国的特丽·夏沃案）。

目前已立法容许安乐死的地方有荷兰、比利时、卢森堡、瑞士和美国的俄勒冈州、华盛顿州和蒙大拿州等地。

德国禁止主动安乐死，允许被动安乐死。

重症病人可以以口头形式或者书面形式要求被动安乐死。

当病人因病重无法表达意愿时，其亲属可以代替他做出决定。

许多人对多年以前发生在西安的一幕记忆犹新：因为无法承受高额的医疗费用，9名尿毒病人集体提出安乐死。

在中国，因为高额的医疗费用，担心连累家人成为提出安乐死的理由。

安乐死的进步性现在媒介已经多有论证，但是在中国，在现在，要实施安乐死必须要突破高额医疗费用这道坎。

或许，安乐死并非只是死亡的自由与尊严。

当有消息说不要让学生因为没有钱而失学的时候，我们能否预期：让每个人不要因为没有钱而自杀或者去安乐死？这将是一个长期的过程。

在我国，很多人提出安乐死，是认为自己是家人和社会的负担，无钱医治或被子女遗弃。

如能加以开导，绝大部分的病人都会回心转意。

支持安乐死的英语作文

支持安乐死的英语作文英文回答：Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is a topic that sparks heated debates worldwide. Proponents of euthanasia argue that individuals should have the right to end their own lives with dignity, especially when faced with terminal illnesses, unbearable pain, or severe mental health conditions. They emphasize the principle of patient autonomy and the importance of respecting individuals' wishes. Additionally, they contend that euthanasia can alleviate suffering and prevent prolonged agony, providing comfort and peace to those who choose it.Opponents of euthanasia, on the other hand, raise concerns about the potential for abuse, coercion, and slippery slopes. They argue that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a devaluation of life and increased pressure on vulnerable individuals to end their lives. Critics also express concerns about the potential for misdiagnosis andmistakes, emphasizing the need for extreme caution and a robust regulatory framework. Furthermore, they argue that euthanasia undermines the role of palliative care and hospice services, which focus on providing comfort and pain management without ending life.In many countries, the legal status of euthanasia varies. Some jurisdictions have legalized euthanasia under strict conditions, while others prohibit it entirely. In the United States, for example, euthanasia is generally illegal, but certain states have legalized physician-assisted suicide under specific circumstances.The debate surrounding euthanasia is complex and involves a range of ethical, legal, medical, and religious considerations. There are valid arguments on both sides of the issue, and it is a matter that requires careful deliberation and compassionate dialogue.中文回答：安乐死。

安乐死英文资料Euthanasia

Euthanasia is to kill people. Life is so important for every one. People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society. If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life. Life is so precious. Patients should cherish their life. They should try their best to prevail incurable disease. Everyone should show basic respect for life. No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder. Nothing is impossible.Euthanasia stops the medicine developing. If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients. The medicine will stop p rogress. If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law. The doctors’ right will be obvious. Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical. Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives. In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide. Miracle cures or recoveries can occur. You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life. In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses. Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others. The most basic commandment is "You shall not kill".Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure. Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death. Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection. Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life. Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue. There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society. Would mercy killing transform itself from the "right to die" to "right to kill"?How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree?As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering. In this psychological requirement under the "Euthanasia", we can say that he is reasonable? "According to the study of suicide, suicide andtreatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression. Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong. Reasons: (a) Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B) under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed. So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal. (C) even if the person'sself-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others. (D) autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence. Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of (i) "secret euthanasia", meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized. (Ii) "forced euthanasia", meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike. (Iii) "Deputy euthanasia" means to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people "proxy decision" to euthanasia. (Iv) "Discrimination against euthanasia," the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be "clever" to force that "euthanasia" requirement, the mercy of others. Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety. The information may be heard: "Death is terrible! Your best choice of euthanasia."of the slip waves, is once the "euthanasia" is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby. . And so on. So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to "euthanasia" in the ranks. Therefore, I agree Frasen say, "human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the" euthanasia. " "。

安乐死的英语作文

安乐死的英语作文安乐死的英语作文安乐死的英语作文一：安乐死（532字）Euthanasia is one of society's most widely and hotly debated moral issues. It has pained and exhausted the courts for entirely toolong, questioning the ethics and morality of the issue. It is a never-ending loop that by no means considers our right, or the victim's right, to freedom.I believe that euthanasia is only debated and kept on the political agenda to keep the courts busy, thereby ensuring the security of political pocket books.The vast majority of the population is in favor of euthanasia. However, their elected candidates don't represent their views. Thuseliminating their power of democracy and right to freedom.安乐死的英语作文二：安乐死（1030字）Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine. As the picture given above depicts, a late-stage cancer patient is terminally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing. But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking. It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing. Some people think thatphysician-assisted suicide can relieve dying patients ofunbearable pain and suffering. They maintain that as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he has done nothing illegal even if the patient uses the drug to hasten death. Others are strongly opposed tophysician-assisted suicide. They contend that a doctor has no right to give a patient sufficient medication to control his pain if that may hasten death. They conclude that it is illegal for doctorsto help the dying end their lives.As far as I’m concerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if they prolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients. In short, I am in favor of mercy killing.安乐死的英语作文三：安乐死（815字）The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged 。

安乐死英文版讲解

I don't think that most of us can understand him.
one hand holding his wife's hand,another hand hold the Infusion switch with lethal anesthetict(装有致命麻醉剂的开关).If he turn on it, he will die gradually
Terry Pratchett: Choosing to Die
Terry Pratchett ：a British famous fantasy novelist
He was diagnosed with Alzheimer's(阿尔茨海默氏症) in 2008. He has visited many families that are suffering from constant chronic illness, and thought about euthanasia.
“NO” Surely ,we will say “no”, a big
!
There are many reasons.
Fortunately,I watched a video about euthanasia in my winter vocation. At the same time, it really make me think of “SOMETHING”.
That's a question of........
Law
emotDiDoiniaaggrraamm 22
morality
: when I see people who have serious illness, it’s quite difficult for me to decide if it's right to go. If I say “no”, you must go home, you can't die.The patient is the only person who can decide which is the right moment. It's easier to who can go than for who stay behind.留下的人才是最痛苦的。

安乐死英文资料Euthanasia

Euthanasia is to kill people. Life is so important for every one. People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society. If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life. Life is so precious. Patients should cherish their life. They should try their best to prevail incurable disease. Everyone should show basic respect for life. No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder. Nothing is impossible.Euthanasia stops the medicine developing. If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients. The medicine will stop progress. If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law. The doctors’ right will be obvious. Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical. Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives. In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide. Miracle cures or recoveries can occur. You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life. In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses. Any loosening of theassisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others. The most basic commandment is "You shall not kill".Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure. Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down. Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by 's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection. Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life. Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue. There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society. Would mercy killing transform itself from the "right to die" to "right to kill"How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agreeAs to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering. In this psychological requirement under the "Euthanasia", we can say that he is reasonable "According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression. Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong. Reasons: (a) Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing. (B) under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed. So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal. (C) even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others. (D) autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence. Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of (i) "secret euthanasia", meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized. (Ii) "forced euthanasia", meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike. (Iii) "Deputy euthanasia" means to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people "proxy decision" to euthanasia. (Iv) "Discrimination against euthanasia," the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be "clever" to force that "euthanasia" requirement, the mercy of others. Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety. The information may be heard: "Death is terrible! Your best choice of euthanasia."of the slip waves, is once the "euthanasia" is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby. . And so on. So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to "euthanasia" in the ranks. Therefore, I agree Frasen say, "human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the" euthanasia. " "。

安乐死的名词解释

安乐死的名词解释安乐死（Euthanasia）是指出于同情而在患有不可逆转的绝症、严重疼痛或不可忍受的生活质量下，通过医学手段帮助患者提早结束生命的行为。

安乐死是一个引起广泛争议的伦理和法律问题，不同国家和文化对其的态度和立法也存在差异。

有些国家允许安乐死，例如荷兰、比利时和瑞士，而其他国家则明确禁止，例如中国和澳大利亚。

无论是否合法，安乐死都是一个备受争议和复杂的议题。

安乐死可以分为两种形式，被动安乐死和积极安乐死。

被动安乐死是指医生根据患者的同意停止采取延长生命的医学手段，例如停止维持生命的治疗或断开呼吸机。

这种形式的安乐死被认为是合法的，因为患者有权利放弃药物和治疗。

积极安乐死则是指医生通过提供药物或其他方式，直接帮助患者结束生命。

这种形式的安乐死在很多地方被视为非法，因为它涉及主动实施死亡。

支持安乐死的主要理由之一是对患者的尊严和控制权的尊重。

反对者则主张人类生命是神圣的，不应该由个人或医生来决定终结。

此外，还有担忧滥用和误杀的问题，如果安乐死合法化会不会导致激进的决策，如何确保患者的自愿和心智健康等。

安乐死的合法化和实践在一些国家经历了漫长的辩论和法律程序。

荷兰是第一个在2002年将安乐死合法化的国家。

根据荷兰的实践，患者需要提出书面申请，最终由至少两名医生审查，并确保患者明确且自愿地做出了决定。

其他国家如比利时、卢森堡和瑞士也采取了类似的程序和规定。

在美国，安乐死只在少数州合法，例如俄勒冈州、华盛顿州和加利福尼亚州。

这些州通过了“死亡与尊严法”（Death with Dignity Act），允许有晚期绝症的患者通过医生提供的药物来结束自己的生命。

但是，即使在合法的州，患者仍然需要满足严格的条件和程序，并经过审查和监督。

总之，安乐死是一个激烈争议的话题，涉及到伦理、法律和人类尊严的多个层面。

无论是否支持安乐死，这个问题都需要严肃的思考和综合考虑，以确保个人的自主权和福祉得到适当的尊重和保护。

安乐死

2002年，比利时步邻国荷兰之后尘宣布“安乐死”合法化，但当年的法律条款只适用于18岁以上的成年人，18岁以下的未成年人无法享有安乐死的权利。
2014年2月13日比利时众议院通过一项“让重症患儿享有安乐死权利”的法案。比利时众议院以 86票赞成、44票反对、12票弃权通过了“让重症患儿享有安乐死权利”的法案。2013年12月，比利时参议院已通过该法案。比利时国王菲利普未来数周内将签署该法案，比利时将在此后成为全球首个对“安乐死”合法年龄不设限的国家。
（1）病人向法院提出申请。
申请一律采用书面形式：当病人表达了选择安乐死的意愿以后，病人的亲属（无亲属时可由病人的朋友）告知医院所在地市的法院（即中级人民法院）。法院及时派工作人员到病房或专门场所主持申请的书写活动。法院必须指定公证机关到场公证。
学术讨论
书写申请之前，法院须指定医师判断病人是否处于神志清醒的状态，神志不清醒的不得进行申请的书写活动。申请书为法定标准格式，病人需要书写的主要内容是表达自己难忍病痛、自愿选择死亡的意愿。病人有书写能力的，必须亲自书写；病人无书写能力的，可自己口述申请内容，请亲属或朋友代书。代书时，公证机关必须认真公证，并制作视听资料；法院工作人员必须认真监督，以确保代书的内容与口述的内容相同。
2016年4月14日，加拿大联邦政府向国会递交允许医助死亡，即安乐死的法案。
加拿大司法部长乔迪·威尔逊-雷布尔德称，该法案将允许能够负责的成年人在难以忍受重病、不治之症带来的痛苦的情况下，选择平静地离开，而不再等待死亡、痛苦和恐惧，当地已有超过 20人根据该法律接受了安乐死。
2017年9月29日，澳大利亚维多利亚州以47票支持，37票反对通过了安乐死法案，并投票决定该法案将于2019年6月19日正式生效。维州州长安德鲁随后表示，法案的通过将使人们能够结束无法忍受的痛苦，并赋予他们“长久以来被剥夺的尊严”。

英文议论文：安乐死 On euthanasia

On euthanasiaEuthanasia is a controversial issue around the world. With people increasing requirements of euthanasia , more and more countries and districts have made euthanasia legal. Different people hold different ideas about it and here the argument it is--Should euthanasia be allowed or not?Let us have a look first to the definition of euthanasia.Euthanasia refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. From the definition we could learn that it is mainly used in people terminally ill, near death or in extreme pain.Many people suppose that those patients who are in such pain should be granted a better way to death instead of being suffered all the time without any hope. There are three points to support the argument. Firstly, as the most famous psychiatrist Norman Cousins says, ‘Death is not the greatest loss of life, but the living d eath’, people who show a little mercy on others in pain may understand the use of euthanasia. When you see those patients with incurable disease lying on the bed are inserted oxygen lines and varies machines in their bodies, will you turn your back upon the request of euthanasia? Euthanasia can help patients relieve their pains so why not be allowed? Secondly, if we insisted in cure, the result of itwould not be so satisfied to some extent. For example, children who suffered from polio~~~(各种后遗症，但这个例子仿佛不太恰当的样子orz)And also, 有些人会将其与人权划勾，但当一个人无法拥有意识，连生和死都决定不了，何来权力？（翻译无能orz）Others hold the opinion that euthanasia should be banned like the majority of countries do. It is reasonable to have such an appeal. Some people against the euthanasia because lives are so valuable that we do not have any right to end other lives at random. As an old saying goes, ‘a living dog is better than a dead lion’. Life is full of opportunities and possibilities, and all we should do is to keep it and never give it up. After all, to live is better than to die. Some people think the use of euthanasia is a kind of ‘murder’ which ends other lives in a subjective way. Although those patients who suffer from severe disease are painful, they may be still optimistic about their situation. It is one-sided and unfair to end others’lives as a bystander. What’s more, since euthanasia is not legalized that is not easy to get, which means it contains enormous business opportunities for the wrong crowd, some patients only buy it through illegal channels, resulting in a series of illegal profit chain. From my perspective, I。

安乐死全英文基础科普

Thanks for your watching
All the No points
1.It is not moral to end the patient's life because he has the right to live longer 2.It is murder 3.Sanctity of life 4.Making the decision for yourself, or others? 5.Voluntary Euthanasia gives doctors too much power
Is that mean our country should pass the bill of enthanasia
Do you know about euthanasia
Whether to support euthanasia
You think the following circumstances can be euthanasia
Your opinion of euthanasia
The expectation of the future development of euthanasia
Do you think our country should be legalized euthanasia
If you have a terminal illness, you will choose to try to extend your lives, or choose euthanasia
The definition of Euthanasia in each country
British: defines euthanasia as "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering".

安乐死亦称安死术

安乐死亦称安死术，是英文“euthanasia”一词的汉译，最早源于希腊文“euthanasia” 一词，本意为“快乐死亡”或“尊严死亡”；在牛津词典中的解释为“（患痛苦的不治之症者之无痛苦的死亡；无痛苦致死之术）”。

（注：《牛津现代高级英汉双解词典》，牛津大学出版社、商务印书馆1998年版，第395页。

）国内目前对安乐死尚无权威统一的定义，有人认为安乐死“是指对身患绝症濒临死亡的病人，为解除其极度的痛苦，由病人本人或亲属要求，经医生鉴定和有关司法部门认可，用医学方法提前终止其生命的过程。

”（注：石文亮：《试论安乐死立法》，《法律与医学》1995年第2期。

）但也有学者持不同意见，认为这是沿用了西方的传统解释，对安乐死的内涵外延界定的不准确，是导致安乐死被误解及引起争议的原因。

安乐死的本质是死亡过程的文明化、科学化，主张“安乐死是对于医学无法挽救的濒临死亡者的死亡过程进行科学调节，以减轻或消除死亡痛苦，使死亡状态安乐化。

”（注：冯秀云：《关于我国安乐死立法的几点思考》，《政法论丛》1998年第2期。

）安乐死其根据实施的方式的不同，可分为主动和被动两种。

主动安乐死是指采取主动措施，如注射或服用药物等加速病人死亡。

被动安乐死则是指对危重病人不给予治疗或撤除支持其生命的医疗措施，而听任其死亡。

根据被实施安乐死的病人是否明确表达其愿望，安乐死又可分为自愿和非自愿两种。

前者系由病人本人通过遗嘱或口头表态方式决定，后者则是因本人无法表达意愿而由亲属或监护人做出决定。

（注：陈霆宇：《安乐死几个相关问题探析》，《政法论丛》1998年第2期。

）从最广泛的意义上讲，安乐死的理论和实践可谓古已有之。

在西方，有些原始部落为了其整体的生存和健康强盛，常把病人、老人击杀或埋葬，以此来减少病弱者的痛苦和部落的负担。

（注：许士凯：《安乐死启示录》，上海科技教育出版社1992年版，第38页。

）古希腊哲学家柏拉图认为，医生延长那些最终仍不免死亡的危重病人痛苦是不合伦理的，并赞同不堪忍受病痛折磨的病人自己结束生命。