夹具设计-英外文翻译
拨叉加工工艺及夹具设计 英文
拨叉加工工艺及夹具设计英文Title: Process and Fixture Design for Turning OperationsAbstract:This paper explores the process of turning operations using a lathe and the design of fixtures to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the process. The use of acutting tool on a rotating workpiece allows for the creation of cylindrical shapes, grooves, and threads. The process of turning is widely used in manufacturing industries to produce a variety of components with high precision and surface finish.One of the key components in the turning process is the tool holder, which secures the cutting tool in place and provides the necessary rigidity and stability during the cutting operation. The design of the tool holder iscritical in achieving high-quality results, and the selection of the appropriate cutting tool and tool material is equally important.Another important aspect of the turning process is the design of the fixture that holds the workpiece in place. The fixture must provide secure clamping of the workpiece,while also allowing for easy loading and unloading. The design of the fixture must also ensure that the workpiece is positioned accurately and securely to prevent any movement during the cutting operation.In this paper, we will discuss the various types of turning operations and the design considerations for both the tool holder and the fixture. We will also provide examples of fixture designs for specific turning operations, as well as the selection of appropriate cutting tools and tool materials. Ultimately, the goal of this paper is to provide insights and practical guidelines for the successful implementation of turning operations in manufacturing processes.。
夹具设计外文翻译
Application and developmentOf case based reasoning in fixture designFixtures are devices that serve as the purpose of holding the workpiece securely and accurately, and maintaining a consistent relationship with respect to the tools while machining. Because the fixture structure depends on the feature of the product and the status of the process planning in the enterprise, its design is the bottleneck during manufacturing, which restrains to improve the efficiency and leadtime. And fixture design is a complicated process, based on experience that needs comprehensive qualitative knowledge about a number of design issues including workpiece configuration, manufacturing processes involved, and machining environment. This is also a very time consuming work when using traditional CAD tools (such as Unigraphics, CATIA or Pro/E), which are good at performing detailed design tasks, but provide few benefits for taking advantage of the previous design experience and resources, which are precisely the key factors in improving the efficiency. The methodology of case based reasoning (CBR) adapts the solution of a previously solved case to build a solution for a new problem with the following four steps: retrieve, reuse, revise, and retain [1]. This is a more useful method than the use of an expert system to simulate human thought because proposing a similar case and applying a few modifications seems to be self explanatory and more intuitive to humans .So various case based design support tools have been developed for numerous areas[2-4], such as in injection molding and design, architectural design, die casting die design, process planning, and also in fixture design. Sun used six digitals to compose the index code that included workpiece shape, machine portion, bushing, the 1st locating device, the 2nd locating device and clamping device[5]. But the system cannot be used for other fixture types except for drill fixtures, and cannot solve the problem of storage of the same index code that needs to be retained, which is very important in CBR[6].1. Construction of a Case Index and Case Library1.1 Case indexThe case index should be composed of all features of the workpiece, which are distinguished from different fixtures. Using all of them would make the operation in convenient. Because the forms of the parts are diverse, and the technology requirements of manufacture in the enterprise also develop continuously, lots of features used as the case index will make the search rate slow, and the main feature unimportant, for the reason that the relative weight which is allotted to every feature must diminish. And on the other hand, it is hard to include all the features in the case index.1.2 Hierarchical form of CaseThe structure similarity of the fixture is represented as the whole fixture similarity, components similarity and component similarity. So the whole fixture case library, components case library, component case library of fixture are formedcorrespondingly. Usually design information of the whole fixture is composed of workpiece information and workpiece procedure information, which represent the fixture satisfying the specifically designing function demand. The whole fixture case is made up of function components, which are described by the function components’ names and numbers. The components case represents the members. (function component and other structure components，main driven parameter, the number, and their constrain relations.) The component case (the lowest layer of the fixture) is the structure of function component and other components. In the modern fixture design there are lots of parametric standard parts and common non standard parts. So the component case library should record the specification parameter and the way in which it keeps them.2. Strategy of Case RetrievalIn the case based design of fixtures ,the most important thing is the retrieval of the similarity, which can help to obtain the most similar case, and to cut down the time of adaptation. According to the requirement of fixture design, the strategy of case retrieval combines the way of the nearest neighbor and knowledge guided. That is, first search on depth, then on breadth; the knowledge guided strategy means to search on the knowledge rule from root to the object, which is firstly searched by the fixture type, then by the shape of the workpiece, thirdly by the locating method. For example, if the case index code includes the milling fixture of fixture type, the search is just for all milling fixtures, then for box of workpiece shape, the third for 1plane+ 2pine of locating method. If there is no match of it, then the search stops on depth, and returns to the upper layer, and retrieves all the relative cases on breadth.2.1 Case adaptationThe modification of the analogical case in the fixture design includes the following three cases:1) The substitution of components and the component;2) Adjusting the dimension of components and the component while the form remains;3) The redesign of the model.If the components and component of the fixture are common objects, they can be edited, substituted and deleted with tools, which have been designed.2.2 Case storageBefore saving a new fixture case in the case library, the designer must consider whether the saving is valuable. If the case does not increase the knowledge of the system, it is not necessary to store it in the case library. If it is valuable, then the designer must analyze it before saving it to see whether the case is stored as a prototype case or as reference case. A prototype case is a representation that can describe the main features of a case family. A case family consists of those cases whose index codes have the same first 13 digits and different last three digits in the case library. The last three digits of a prototype case are always “000”. A reference case belongs to the same family as the prototype case and is distinguished by the different last three digits.From the concept that has been explained, the following strategies are adopted:1) If a new case matches any existing case family, it has the same first 13 digits as an existing prototype case, so the case is not saved because it is represented well by the prototype case. Or is just saved as a reference case (the last 3 digits are not “000”, and not the same with others) in the case library.2) If a new case matches any existing case family and is thought to be better at representing this case family than the previous prototype case, then the prototype case is substituted by this new case, and the previous prototype case is saved as a reference case.3) If a new case does not match any existing case family, a new case family will be generated automatically and the case is stored as the prototype case in the case library.3. ConclusionCBR, as a problem solving methodology, is a more efficient method than an expert system to simulate human thought, and has been developed in many domains where knowledge is difficult to acquire. The advantages of the CBR are as follows: it resembles human thought more closely; the building of a case library which has self learning ability by saving new cases is easier and faster than the building of a rule library; and it supports a better transfer and explanation of new knowledge that is more different than the rule library. A proposed fixture design framework on the CBR has been implemented by using Visual C ++, UG/Open API in U n graphics with Oracle as database support, which also has been integrated with the 32D parametric common component library, common components library and typical fixture library. The prototype system, developed here, is used for the aviation project, and aids the fixture designers to improve the design efficiency and reuse previous design resources.基于事例推理的夹具设计研究与应用夹具是以确定工件安全定位准确为目的的装置，并在加工过程中保持工件与刀具或机床的位置一致不变。
模具夹具类中英文表述
模具夹具类中英文表述(总34页)-CAL-FENGHAI.-(YICAI)-Company One1-CAL-本页仅作为文档封面，使用请直接删除模具/夹具的相关中英文表述dowel pin 定位梢draft 拔模锥度draw bead 张力调整杆drive bearing 传动轴承ejection pad 顶出衬垫ejector 脱模器ejector guide pin 顶出导梢ejector leader busher 顶出导梢衬套ejector pad 顶出垫ejector pin 顶出梢ejector plate 顶出板ejector rod 顶出杆ejector sleeve 顶出衬套ejector valve 顶出阀eye bolt 环首螺栓filling core 椿入蕊film gate 薄膜形浇口finger pin 指形梢finish machined plate 角形模板finish machined round plate 圆形模板fixed bolster plate 固定侧模板flanged pin 带凸缘销flash gate 毛边形浇口flask 上箱floating punch 浮动冲头gate 浇口gate land 浇口面gib 凹形拉紧楔goose neck 鹅颈管guide bushing 引导衬套guide pin 导梢guide post 引导柱guide plate 导板guide rail 导轨head punch 顶头冲孔headless punch 直柄冲头heavily tapered solid 整体模蕊盒hose nippler 管接头impact damper 缓冲器injection ram 压射柱塞inlay busher 嵌入衬套inner plunger 内柱塞inner punch 内冲头insert 嵌件insert pin 嵌件梢king pin 转向梢king pin bush 主梢一、入水：gate进入位：gate location水口形式：gate type大水口：edge gate细水口： pin-point gate水口大小：gate size转水口：switching runner/gate 唧嘴口径：sprue diameter二、流道: runner热流道：hot runner,hot manifold热嘴冷流道: hot sprue/cold runner唧嘴直流: direct sprue gate圆形流道：round(full/half runner流道电脑分析：mold flow analysis流道平衡:runner balance热嘴：hot sprue热流道板：hot manifold发热管：cartridge heater探针: thermocouples插头：connector plug插座： connector socket密封/封料： seal三、运水：water line喉塞：line lpug喉管：tube塑胶管：plastic tube快速接头：jiffy quick connector plug/socker 四、模具零件：mold components三板模：3-plate mold二板模：2-plate mold边钉/导边：leader pin/guide pin边司/导套：bushing/guide bushing中托司：shoulder guide bushing中托边L：guide pin顶针板：ejector retainner plate托板：support plate螺丝： screw管钉：dowel pin开模槽：ply bar scot内模管位：core/cavity inter-lock顶针：ejector pin司筒：ejector sleeve司筒针：ejector pin推板：stripper plate缩呵：movable core,return core core puller 扣机（尼龙拉勾）：nylon latch lock斜顶：lifter模胚（架）： mold base上内模：cavity insert下内模：core insert行位（滑块）： slide镶件：insert压座/斜鸡：wedge耐磨板/油板：wedge wear plate压条：plate撑头: support pillar唧嘴： sprue bushing挡板：stop plate定位圈：locating ring锁扣：latch扣鸡：parting lock set推杆：push bar栓打螺丝：S.H.S.B顶板：eracuretun活动臂：lever arm分流锥：spure sperader水口司:bush垃圾钉：stop pin隔片：buffle弹弓柱：spring rod弹弓:die spring中托司：ejector guide bush中托边：ejector guide pin镶针：pin销子：dowel pin波子弹弓：ball catch喉塞: pipe plug锁模块：lock plate斜顶：angle from pin斜顶杆：angle ejector rod尼龙拉勾：parting locks活动臂：lever arm复位键、提前回杆：early return bar气阀：valves斜导边：angle pin术语：terms承压平面平衡：parting surface support balance 模排气：parting line venting回针碰料位：return pin and cavity interference 模总高超出啤机规格：mold base shut hight顶针碰运水：water line interferes withejector pin料位出上/下模：part from cavith (core) side模胚原身出料位：cavity direct cut on A-plate,core direct cut on B-plate. 不准用镶件： Do not use (core/cavity) insert用铍铜做镶件： use beryllium copper insert初步（正式）模图设计：preliinary (final) mold design反呵：reverse core弹弓压缩量：spring compressed length稳定性好：good stability,stable强度不够：insufficient rigidity均匀冷却：even cooling扣模：sticking热膨胀：thero expansion公差：tolorance铜公(电极）：copper electrodedowel pin 定位梢draft 拔模锥度draw bead 张力调整杆drive bearing 传动轴承ejection pad 顶出衬垫ejector 脱模器ejector guide pin 顶出导梢ejector leader busher 顶出导梢衬套ejector pad 顶出垫ejector pin 顶出梢ejector plate 顶出板ejector rod 顶出杆ejector sleeve 顶出衬套ejector valve 顶出阀eye bolt 环首螺栓filling core 椿入蕊film gate 薄膜形浇口finger pin 指形梢finish machined plate 角形模板finish machined round plate 圆形模板fixed bolster plate 固定侧模板flanged pin 带凸缘销flash gate 毛边形浇口flask 上箱floating punch 浮动冲头gate 浇口gate land 浇口面gib 凹形拉紧楔goose neck 鹅颈管guide bushing 引导衬套guide pin 导梢guide post 引导柱guide plate 导板guide rail 导轨head punch 顶头冲孔headless punch 直柄冲头heavily tapered solid 整体模蕊盒hose nippler 管接头impact damper 缓冲器injection ram 压射柱塞inlay busher 嵌入衬套inner plunger 内柱塞inner punch 内冲头insert 嵌件insert pin 嵌件梢king pin 转向梢king pin bush 主梢difference quantity差异量cause analysis原因分析raw materials原料materials物料finished product成品semi-finished product半成品packing materials包材good product/accepted goods/ accepted parts/good parts良品defective product/non-good parts不良品disposed goods处理品warehouse/hub仓库on way location在途仓oversea location海外仓spare parts physical inventory list备品盘点清单spare molds location模具备品仓skid/pallet栈板tox machine自铆机wire EDM线割EDM放电机coil stock卷料sheet stock片料tolerance工差score=groove压线cam block滑块pilot导正筒trim剪外边pierce剪内边drag form压锻差pocket for the punch head挂钩槽slug hole废料孔feature die公母模expansion dwg展开图radius半径shim(wedge)楔子torch-flame cut火焰切割set screw止付螺丝form block折刀stop pin定位销round pierce punch=die button圆冲子shape punch=die insert异形子stock locater block定位块under cut=scrap chopper清角active plate活动板baffle plate挡块cover plate盖板male die公模female die母模groove punch压线冲子air-cushion eject-rod气垫顶杆spring-box eject-plate弹簧箱顶板bushing block衬套insert 入块club car高尔夫球车capability能力parameter参数factor系数phosphate皮膜化成viscosity涂料粘度alkalidipping脱脂main manifold主集流脉bezel斜视规blanking穿落模dejecting顶固模demagnetization去磁;消磁high-speed transmission高速传递heat dissipation热传rack上料degrease脱脂rinse水洗alkaline etch龄咬desmut剥黑膜D.I. rinse纯水次Chromate铬酸处理Anodize阳性处理seal封孔revision版次part number/P/N料号good products良品scraped products报放心品defective products不良品finished products成品disposed products处理品barcode条形码flow chart流程窗体assembly组装stamping冲压molding成型spare parts=buffer备品coordinate坐标dismantle the die折模auxiliary fuction辅助功能poly-line多义线heater band 加热片thermocouple热电偶sand blasting喷沙grit 砂砾derusting machine除锈机degate打浇口dryer烘干机induction感应induction light感应光response=reaction=interaction感应ram连杆edge finder巡边器concave 凹convex凸short射料不足nick缺口speck瑕疪shine亮班splay 银纹gas mark焦痕delamination起鳞cold slug冷块blush 导色gouge沟槽;凿槽satin texture段面咬花witness line证示线patent专利grit沙砾granule=peuet=grain细粒grit maker抽粒机cushion缓冲magnalium镁铝合金magnesium镁金metal plate钣金lathe车mill锉plane刨grind磨drill钻boring镗blinster气泡fillet镶;嵌边through-hole form通孔形式voller pin formality滚针形式cam driver铡楔shank摸柄crank shaft曲柄轴augular offset角度偏差velocity速度production tempo生产进度现状torque扭矩spline=the multiple keys花键quenching淬火tempering回火annealing退火carbonization碳化alloy合金tungsten high speed steel钨高速的moly high speed steel钼高速的organic solvent有机溶剂bracket小磁导liaison联络单volatile挥发性resistance电阻ion离子titrator滴定仪beacon警示灯coolant冷却液crusher破碎机模具工程类plain die简易模pierce die冲孔模forming die成型模progressive die连续模gang dies复合模shearing die剪边模riveting die铆合模pierce冲孔forming成型(抽凸,冲凸) draw hole抽孔bending折弯trim切边emboss凸点dome凸圆semi-shearing半剪stamp mark冲记号deburr or coin压毛边punch riveting冲压铆合side stretch侧冲压平reel stretch卷圆压平groove压线blanking下料stamp letter冲字(料号) shearing剪断tick-mark nearside正面压印tick-mark farside反面压印冲压名称类extension dwg展开图procedure dwg工程图die structure dwg模具结构图material材质material thickness料片厚度factor系数upward向上downward向下press specification冲床规格die height range适用模高die height闭模高度burr毛边gap间隙weight重量total wt.总重量punch wt.上模重量五金零件类inner guiding post内导柱inner hexagon screw内六角螺钉dowel pin固定销coil spring弹簧lifter pin顶料销eq-height sleeves=spool等高套筒pin销lifter guide pin浮升导料销guide pin导正销wire spring圆线弹簧outer guiding post外导柱stop screw止付螺丝located pin定位销outer bush外导套模板类top plate上托板（顶板）top block上垫脚punch set上模座punch pad上垫板punch holder上夹板stripper pad脱料背板up stripper上脱料板male die公模(凸模)feature die公母模female die母模(凹模)upper plate上模板lower plate下模板die pad下垫板die holder下夹板die set下模座bottom block下垫脚bottom plate下托板(底板) stripping plate内外打(脱料板) outer stripper外脱料板inner stripper内脱料板lower stripper下脱料板零件类punch冲头insert入块(嵌入件)deburring punch压毛边冲子groove punch压线冲子stamped punch字模冲子round punch圆冲子special shape punch异形冲子bending block折刀roller滚轴baffle plate挡块located block定位块supporting block for location 定位支承块air cushion plate气垫板air-cushion eject-rod气垫顶杆trimming punch切边冲子stiffening rib punch = stinger 加强筋冲子ribbon punch压筋冲子reel-stretch punch卷圆压平冲子guide plate定位板sliding block滑块101个热处理常用英文词汇1. indication 缺陷2. test specimen 试样3. bar 棒材4. stock 原料5. billet 方钢，钢方坯6. bloom 钢坯,钢锭7. section 型材8. steel ingot 钢锭9. blank 坯料，半成品10. cast steel 铸钢11. nodular cast iron 球墨铸铁12. ductile cast iron 球墨铸铁13. bronze 青铜14. brass 黄铜15. copper 合金16. stainless steel不锈钢17. decarburization 脱碳18. scale 氧化皮19. anneal 退火20. process anneal 进行退火21. quenching 淬火22. normalizing 正火23. Charpy impact text 夏比冲击试验24. fatigue 疲劳25. tensile testing 拉伸试验26. solution 固溶处理27. aging 时效处理28. Vickers hardness维氏硬度29. Rockwell hardness 洛氏硬度30. Brinell hardness 布氏硬度31. hardness tester硬度计32. descale 除污，除氧化皮等33. ferrite 铁素体34. austenite 奥氏体35. martensite马氏体36. cementite 渗碳体37. iron carbide 渗碳体38. solid solution 固溶体39. sorbite 索氏体40. bainite 贝氏体41. pearlite 珠光体42. nodular fine pearlite/ troostite屈氏体43. black oxide coating 发黑44. grain 晶粒45. chromium 铬46. cadmium 镉47. tungsten 钨48. molybdenum 钼49. manganese 锰50. vanadium 钒51. molybdenum 钼52. silicon 硅53. sulfer/sulphur 硫54. phosphor/ phosphorus 磷55. nitrided 氮化的56. case hardening 表面硬化，表面淬硬57. air cooling 空冷58. furnace cooling 炉冷59. oil cooling 油冷60. electrocladding /plating 电镀61. brittleness 脆性62. strength 强度63. rigidity 刚性,刚度64. creep 蠕变65. deflection 挠度66. elongation 延伸率67. yield strength 屈服强度68. elastoplasticity 弹塑性69. metallographic structure 金相组织70. metallographic test 金相试验71. carbon content 含碳量72. induction hardening 感应淬火73. impedance matching 感应淬火74. hardening and tempering 调质75. crack 裂纹76. shrinkage 缩孔，疏松77. forging 锻（件）78. casting 铸（件）79. rolling 轧（件）80. drawing 拉（件）81. shot blasting 喷丸（处理）82. grit blasting 喷钢砂（处理）83. sand blasting 喷砂（处理）84. carburizing 渗碳85. nitriding 渗氮86. ageing/aging 时效87. grain size 晶粒度88. pore 气孔89. sonim 夹砂90. cinder inclusion 夹渣91. lattice晶格92. abrasion/abrasive/rub/wear/wearing resistance (property) 耐磨性93. spectrum analysis光谱分析94. heat/thermal treatment 热处理95. inclusion 夹杂物96. segregation 偏析97. picking 酸洗，酸浸98. residual stress 残余应力99. remaining stress 残余应力100. relaxation of residual stress 消除残余应力101. stress relief 应力释放机械类常用英语：冲压模具-零件类punch冲头insert入块(嵌入件)deburring punch压毛边冲子groove punch压线冲子stamped punch字模冲子round punch圆冲子special shape punch异形冲子bending block折刀roller滚轴baffle plate挡块located block定位块supporting block for location定位支承块air cushion plate气垫板air-cushion eject-rod气垫顶杆trimming punch切边冲子stiffening rib punch = stinger 加强筋冲子ribbon punch压筋冲子reel-stretch punch卷圆压平冲子guide plate定位板sliding block滑块sliding dowel block滑块固定块active plate活动板lower sliding plate下滑块板upper holder block上压块upper mid plate上中间板spring box弹簧箱spring-box eject-rod弹簧箱顶杆spring-box eject-plate弹簧箱顶板bushing bolck衬套cover plate盖板guide pad导料块landed plunger mold 有肩柱塞式模具burnishing die 挤光模landed positive mold 有肩全压式模具button die 镶入式圆形凹模loading shoe mold 料套式模具center-gated mold 中心浇口式模具loose detail mold 活零件模具chill mold 冷硬用铸模loose mold 活动式模具clod hobbing 冷挤压制模louvering die 百叶窗冲切模composite dies 复合模具manifold die 分歧管模具counter punch 反凸模modular mold 组合式模具double stack mold 双层模具multi-cavity mold 多模穴模具electroformed mold 电铸成形模multi-gate mold 复式浇口模具expander die 扩径模offswt bending die 双折冷弯模具extrusion die 挤出模palletizing die 叠层模family mold 反套制品模具plaster mold 石膏模blank through dies 漏件式落料模porous mold 通气性模具duplicated cavity plate 复板模positive mold 全压式模具fantail die 扇尾形模具pressure die 压紧模fishtail die 鱼尾形模具profile die 轮廓模flash mold 溢料式模具progressive die 顺序模gypsum mold 石膏铸模protable mold 手提式模具hot-runner mold 热流道模具prototype mold 雏形试验模具ingot mold 钢锭模punching die 落料模lancing die 切口模aising(embossing) 压花起伏成形re-entrant mold 倒角式模具sectional die 拼合模runless injection mold 无流道冷料模具sectional die 对合模具segment mold 组合模semi-positive mold 半全压式模具shaper 定型模套single cavity mold 单腔模具solid forging die 整体锻模split forging die 拼合锻模split mold 双并式模具sprueless mold 无注道残料模具squeezing die 挤压模stretch form die 拉伸成形模sweeping mold 平刮铸模swing die 振动模具three plates mold 三片式模具trimming die 切边模unit mold 单元式模具universal mold 通用模具unscrewing mold 退扣式模具yoke type die 轭型模塑料成形模具 mould for plastics热塑性塑料模 mould for thermoplastics热固性塑料模 mould for thermosets压缩模 compression mould压注模、传递模 transfer mould注射模 injection mould热塑性塑料注射模 injection mould for thermoplastics热固性塑料注射模 injection mould for thermoses成形零件定模 stationary mould fixed half动模 movable mould moving half定模座板 fixed clamp plate, top clamping plate. top plate动模座板 moving clamp plate. bottom clamping plate. bottom plate 上模座板 upper clamping plate下模座板 lower clamping plate凹模固定板 cavity-retainer plate型芯固定板 core-retainer plate凸模固定板 punch-retainer plate模套 chase. bolster. frame支承板 backing plate. supprr plate垫块 spacer parallel支架 ejector housing. mould base leg模具工程常用词汇英汉对照die 模具figure file, chart file图档cutting die, blanking die冲裁模progressive die, follow (-on)die连续模compound die复合模punched hole冲孔panel board镶块to cutedges=side cut=side scrap切边to bending折弯to pull, to stretch拉伸Line streching, line pulling线拉伸engraving, to engrave刻印upsiding down edges翻边to stake铆合designing, to design设计design modification设计变化die block模块folded block折弯块sliding block滑块location pin定位销lifting pin顶料销die plate, front board模板padding block垫块stepping bar垫条upper die base上模座lower die base下模座upper supporting blank上承板upper padding plate blank上垫板spare dies模具备品spring 弹簧bolt螺栓document folder文件夹file folder资料夹to put file in order整理资料spare tools location手工备品仓first count初盘人first check初盘复棹人second count 复盘人second check复盘复核人equipment设备waste materials废料work in progress product在制品casing = containerazation装箱quantity of physical invetory second count 复盘点数量quantity of customs count会计师盘,点数量the first page第一联filed by accounting department for reference会计部存查end-user/using unit(department)使用单位summary of year-end physical inventory bills年终盘点截止单据汇总表bill name单据名称This sheet and physical inventory list will be sent to accounting department together (Those of NHK will be sent to financial department)本表请与盘点清册一起送会计部－(NHK厂区送财会部)Application status records of year-end physical inventory List and physical inventory card 年终盘点卡与清册使用－状况明细表blank and waste sheet NO.空白与作废单号plate电镀mold成型material for engineering mold testing工程试模材料not included in physical inventory不列入盘点sample样品incoming material to be inspected进货待验description品名steel/rolled steel钢材material statistics sheet物料统计明细表meeting minutes会议记录meeting type 会别distribution department分发单位location地点chairman主席present members出席人员subject主题conclusion结论decision items决议事项responsible department负责单位pre-fixed finishing date预定完成日approved by / checked by / prepared by核准/审核/承办PCE assembly production schedule sheetPCE组装厂生产排配表model机锺work order工令revision版次remark备注production control confirmation生产确认checked by初审approved by核准department部门stock age analysis sheet库存货龄分析表on-hand inventory现有库存available material良品可使用obsolete material良品已呆滞to be inspected or reworked待验或重工total合计cause description原因说明part number/ P/N 料号type形态item/group/class类别quality品质prepared by制表notes说明year-end physical inventory difference analysis sheet年终盘点差异分析表physical inventory盘点数量physical count quantity帐面数量difference quantity差异量cause analysis原因分析raw materials原料materials物料finished product成品semi-finished product半成品packing materials包材good product/accepted goods/ accepted parts/good parts良品defective product/non-good parts不良品disposed goods处理品warehouse/hub仓库on way location在途仓oversea location海外仓spare parts physical inventory list备品盘点清单spare molds location模具备品仓skid/pallet栈板tox machine自铆机wire EDM线割EDM放电机coil stock卷料sheet stock片料tolerance工差score=groove压线cam block滑块pilot导正筒trim剪外边pierce剪内边drag form压锻差pocket for the punch head挂钩槽slug hole废料孔feature die公母模expansion dwg展开图radius半径shim(wedge)楔子torch-flame cut火焰切割set screw止付螺丝form block折刀stop pin定位销round pierce punch=die button圆冲子shape punch=die insert异形子stock locater block定位块under cut=scrap chopper清角active plate活动板baffle plate挡块cover plate盖板male die公模female die母模groove punch压线冲子air-cushion eject-rod气垫顶杆spring-box eject-plate弹簧箱顶板bushing block衬套insert 入块club car高尔夫球车capability能力parameter参数factor系数phosphate皮膜化成viscosity涂料粘度alkalidipping脱脂main manifold主集流脉bezel斜视规blanking穿落模dejecting顶固模demagnetization去磁;消磁***********************************************************。
夹具设计英文文献
A review and analysis of current computer-aided fixture design approachesIain Boyle, Yiming Rong, David C. BrownKeywords:Computer-aided fixture designFixture designFixture planningFixture verificationSetup planningUnit designABSTRACTA key characteristic of the modern market place is the consumer demand for variety. To respond effectively to this demand, manufacturers need to ensure that their manufacturing practices are sufficiently flexible to allow them to achieve rapid product development. Fixturing, which involves using fixtures to secure work pieces during machining so that they can be transformed into parts that meet required design specifications, is a significant contributing factor towards achieving manufacturing flexibility. To enable flexible fixturing, considerable levels of research effort have been devoted to supporting the process of fixture design through the development of computer-aided fixture design (CAFD) tools and approaches. This paper contains a review of these research efforts. Over seventy-five CAFD tools and approaches are reviewed in terms of the fixture design phases they support and the underlying technology upon which they are based. The primary conclusion of the review is that while significant advances have been made in supporting fixture design, there are primarily two research issues that require further effort. The first of these is that current CAFD research is segmented in nature and there remains a need to provide more cohesive fixture design support. Secondly, a greater focus is required on supporting the detailed design of a fixture’s physical structure.2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents1. Introduction (2)2. Fixture design (2)3. Current CAFD approaches (4)3.1 Setup planning (4)3.1.1 Approaches to setup planning (4)3.2 Fixture planning (4)3.2.1 Approaches to defining the fixturing requirement (6)3.2.2 Approaches to non-optimized layout planning (6)3.2.3 Approaches to layout planning optimization (6)3.3 Unit design (7)3.3.1 Approaches to conceptual unit design (7)3.3.2 Approaches to detailed unit design (7)3.4 Verification (8)3.4.1 Approaches to constraining requirements verification (8)3.4.2 Approaches to tolerance requirements verification (8)3.4.3 Approaches to collision detection requirements verification (8)3.4.4 Approaches to usability and affordability requirements verification (9)3.5 Representation of fixturing information (9)4. An analysis of CAFD research (9)4.1 The segmented nature of CAFD research (9)4.2 Effectively supporting unit design (10)4.3 Comprehensively formulating the fixturing requirement (10)4.4 Validating CAFD research outputs (10)5. Conclusion (10)References (10)1. IntroductionA key concern for manufacturing companies is developing the ability to design and produce a variety of high quality products within short timeframes. Quick release of a new product into the market place, ahead of any competitors, is a crucial factor in being able to secure a higher percentage of the market place and increased profit margin. As a result of the consumer desire for variety, batch production of products is now more the norm than mass production, which has resulted in the need for manufacturers to develop flexible manufacturing practices to achieve a rapid turnaround in product development.A number of factors contribute to an organization’s ability to achieve flexible manufacturing, one of which is the use of fixtures during production in which work pieces go through a number of machining operations to produce individual parts which are subsequently assembled into products. Fixtures are used to rapidly, accurately, and securely position work pieces during machining such that all machined parts fall within the design specifications for that part. This accuracy facilitates the interchangeability of parts that is prevalent in much of modern manufacturing where many different products feature common parts.The costs associated with fixturing can account for 10–20% of the total cost of a manufacturing system [1]. These costs relate not only to fixture manufacture, assembly, and operation, but also to their design. Hence there are significant benefits to be reaped by reducing the design costs associated with fixturing and two approaches have been adopted in pursuit of this aim. One has concentrated on developing flexible fixturing systems, such as the use of phase-changing materials to hold work pieces in place [2] and the development of commercial modular fixture systems. However, the significant limitation of the flexible fixturing mantra is that it does not address the difficulty of designing fixtures. To combat this problem, a second research approach has been to develop computer-aided fixture design (CAFD) systems that support and simplify the fixture design process and it is this research that is reviewed within this paper.Section 2 describes the principal phases of and the wide variety of requirements driving the fixture design process. Subsequently in Section 3 an overview of research efforts that havefocused upon the development of techniques and tools for supporting these individual phases of the design process is provided. Section 4 critiques these efforts to identify current gaps in CAFD research, and finally the paper concludes by offering some potential directions for future CAFD research. Before proceeding, it is worth noting that there have been previous reviews of fixturing research, most recently Bi and Zhang [1] and Pehlivan and Summers [3]. Bi and Zhang, while providing some details on CAFD research, tend to focus upon the development of flexible fixturing systems, and Pehlivan and Summers focus upon information integration within fixture design. The value of this paper is that it provides an in-depth review and critique of current CAFD techniques and tools and how they provide support across the entire fixture design process.2. Fixture designThis section outlines the main features of fixtures and more pertinently of the fixture design process against which research efforts will be reviewed and critiqued in Sections 3 and 4, respectively. Physically a fixture consists of devices that support and clamp a work piece [4,5]. Fig.1 represents a typical example of a fixture in which the work piece rests on locators that accurately locate it. Clamps hold the work piece against the locators during machining thus securing the work piece’s location. The locating units themselves consist of the locator supporting unit and the locator that contacts the work piece. The clamping units consist of a clamp supporting unit and a clamp that contacts the work piece and exerts a clamping force to restrain it.Typically the design process by which such fixtures are created has four phases: setup planning, fixture planning, unit design, and verification, as illustrated in Fig. 2 , which is adapted from Kang et al. [6]. During setup planning work piece and machining information is analyzed to determine the number of setups required to perform all necessary machining operations and the appropriate locating datums for each setup. A setup represents the combination of processes that can be performed on a work piece without having to alter the position or orientation of the work piece manually. To generate a fixture for each setup the fixture planning, unit design, and verification phases are executed.During fixture planning, the fixturing requirements for a setup are generated and the layout plan, which represents the first step towards a solution to these requirements is generated. This layout plan details the work piece surfaces with which the fixture’s locating and clamping units will establish contact, together with the surface positions of the locating and clamping points. The number and position of locating points must be such that a work piece’s six degrees of freedom (Fig. 3 ) are adequately constrained during machining [7] and there are a variety of conceptual locating point layouts that can facilitate this, such as the 3-2-1 locating principle [4]. In the third phase, suitable unit designs (i.e., the locating and clamping units) are generated and the fixture is subsequently tested during the verification phase to ensure that it satisfies the fixturing requirements driving the design process. It is worth noting that verification of setups and fixture plans can take place as they are generated and prior to unit design.Fixturing requirements, which although not shown in Kang et al.[6] are typically generated during the fixture planning phase, can be grouped into six class es ( Table 1 ). The ‘‘physical’’requirements class is the most basic and relates to ensuring the fixture can physically support the work piece. The ‘‘tolerance’’requirements relate to ensuring that the locating tolerances aresufficient to locate the work piece accurately and similarly the‘‘constraining’’ requirements focus on maintaining this accuracy as the work piece and fixture are subjected to machining forces. The ‘‘affordability’’ requirements relate to ensuring the fixture represents value, for example in terms of material, operating, and assembly/disassembly costs.The ‘‘collision detection’’ requirements focus upon ensuring that the fixture does not collide with the machining path, the work piece, or indeed itself. The ‘‘usability’’ requirements relate to fixture ergonomics and include for example needs related to ensuring that a fixture features error-proofing to prevent incorrect insertion of a work piece, and chip shedding, where the fixture assists in the removal of machined chips from the work piece.As with many design situations, the conflicting nature of these requirements is problematic. For example a heavy fixture can be advantageous in terms of stability but can adversely affect cost (due to increased material costs) and usability (because the increased weight may hinder manual handling). Such conflicts add to the complexity of fixture design and contribute to the need for the CAFD research reviewed in Section 3.Table 1Fixturing requirements.Generic requirement Abstract sub-requirement examplesPhysical ●The fixture must be physically capable of accommodatingthe work piece geometry and weight.●The fixture must allow access to the work piece features tobe machined.Toleranc e ●The fixture locating tolerances should be sufficient to satisfypart design tolerances.Constraining●The fixture shall ensure work piece stability (i.e., ensure thatwork piece force and moment equilibrium are maintained).●The fixture shall ensure that the fixture/work piece stiffness issufficient to prevent deformation from occurring that could resultin design tolerances not being achieved.Affordabilit y ●The fixture cost shall not exceed desired levels.●The fixture assembly/disassembly times shall not exceeddesired levels.●The fixture operation time shall not exceed desired levels. CollisionPrevention●The fixture shall not cause tool path–fixture collisions to occur.●The fixture shall cause work piece–fixture collisions to occur(other than at the designated locating and clamping positions).●The fixture shall not cause fixture–fixture collisions to occur(other than at the designated fixture component connectionpoints).Usabilit y ●The fixture weight shall not exceed desired levels.●The fixture shall not cause surface damage at the workpiece/fixture interface.●The fixture shall provide tool guidance to designated workpiece features.●The fixture shall ensure error-proofing (i.e., the fixture shouldprevent incorrect insertion of the work piece into the fixture).●The fixture shall facilitate chip shedding (i.e., the fixture shouldprovide a means for allowing machined chips to flow awayfrom the work piece and fixture).3. Current CAFD approachesThis section describes current CAFD research efforts, focusing on the manner in which they support the four phases of fixture design. Table 2 provides a summary of research efforts based upon the design phases they support, the fixture requirements they seek to address (boldtext highlights that the requirement is addressed to a significant degree of depth, whilst normal text that the degree of depth is lesser in nature), and the underlying technology upon which they are primarily based. Sections 3.1–3.4 describes different approaches for supporting setup planning, fixture planning, unit design, and verification, respectively. In addition, Section 3.5 discusses CAFD research efforts with regard to representing fixturing information.3.1. Setup planningSetup planning involves the identification of machining setups, where an individual setup defines the features that can be machined on a work piece without having to alter the position or orientation of the work piece manually. Thereafter, the remaining phases of the design process focus on developing individual fixtures for each setup that secure the work piece. From a fixturing viewpoint, the key outputs from the setup planning stage are the identification of each required setup and the locating datums (i.e., the primary surfaces that will be used to locate the work piece in the fixture).The key task within setup planning is the grouping or clustering of features that can be machined within a single setup. Machining features can be defined as the volume swept by a cutting tool, and typical examples include holes, slots, surfaces, and pockets [8]. Clustering of these features into individual setups is dependent upon a number of factors (including the tolerance dependencies between features, the capability of the machine tools that will be used to create the features, the direction of the cutting tool approach, and the feature machining precedence order), and a number of techniques have been developed to support setup planning. Graph theory and heuristic reasoning are the most common techniques used to support setup planning, although matrix based techniques and neural networks have also been employed.3.1.1. Approaches to setup planningThe use of graph theory to determine and represent setups has been a particularly popular approach [9–11]. Graphs consist of two sets of elements: vertices, which represent work piece features, and edges, which represent the relationships that exist between features and drive setup identification. Their nature can vary, for example in Sarma and Wright [9] consideration of feature machining precedence relationships is prominent, whereas Huang and Zhang [10] focus upon thetolerance relationships that exist between features. Given that these edges can be weighted in accordance with the tolerance magnitudes, this graph approach can also facilitate the identification of setups that can minimize tolerance stack up errors between setups through the grouping of tight tolerances. However, this can prove problematic given the difficulty of comparing the magnitude of different tolerance types to each other thus Huang [12] includes the use of tolerance factors [13] as a means of facilitating such comparisons, which are refined and extended by Huang and Liu [14] to cater for a greater variety of tolerance types and the case of multiple tolerance requirements being associated with the same set of features.While some methods use undirected graphs to assist setup identification [11] , Yao et al. [15] , Zhang and Lin [16] , and Zhang et al. [17] use directed graphs that facilitate the determination and explicit representation of which features should be used as locating datums ( Fig. 4 ) in addition to setup identification and sequencing. Also, Yao et al. refine the identified setups through consideration of available machine tool capability in a two stage setup planning process.Experiential knowledge, in the form of heuristic reasoning, has also been used to assist setup planning. Its popularity stems from the fact that fixture design effectiveness has been considered to be dependent upon the experience of the fixture designer [18] .To support setup planning, such knowledge has typically been held in the form of empirically derived heuristic rules, although object oriented approaches have on occasion been adopted [19] . For example Gologlu [20] uses heuristic rules together with geometric reasoning to support feature clustering, feature machining precedence, and locating datum selection. Within such heuristic approaches, the focus tends to fall upon rules concerning the physical nature of features and machining processes used to create them [21, 22]. Although some techniques do include feature tolerance considerations [23], their depth of analysis can be less than that found within the graph based techniques [24]. Similarly, kinematic approaches [25] have been used to facilitate a deeper analysis of the impact of tool approach directions upon feature clustering than is typically achieved using rule-based approaches. However, it is worth noting that graph based approaches are often augmented with experiential rule-bases to increase their overall effectiveness [16] .Matrix based approaches have also been used to support setup planning, in which a matrix defining feature clusters is generated and subsequently refined. Ong et al. [26] determine a feature precedence matrix outlining the order in which features can be machined, which is then optimized against a number of cost indicators (such as machine tool cost, change over time, etc.) in a hybrid genetic algorithm-simulated annealing approach through consideration of dynamically changing machine tool capabilities. Hebbal and Mehta [27] generate an initial feature grouping matrix based upon the machine tool approach direction for each feature which is subsequently refined through the application of algorithms that consider locating faces and feature tolerances.Alternatively, the use of neural networks to support setup planning has also been investigated. Neural networks are interconnected networks of simple elements, where the interconnections are ‘‘learned’’ from a set of example data. Once educated, these networks can generate solutions for new problems fed into the network. Ming and Mak [28] use a neural network approach in which feature precedence, tool approach direction, and tolerance relationships are fed into a Kohonen self-organizing neural network to group operations for individual features into setups.3.2. Fixture planningFixture planning involves the comprehensive definition of a fixturing requirement in terms ofthe physical, tolerance, constraining, affordability, collision prevention, and usability requirements listed in Table 1 , and the creation of a fixture layout plan. The layout plan represents the first part of the fixture solution to these requirements, and specifies the position of the locating and clamping points on the work piece. Many layout planning approaches feature verification, particularly with regard to the constraining requirements. Typically this verification forms part of a feedback loop that seeks to optimize the layout plan with respect to these requirements. Techniques used to support fixture planning are now discussed with respect to fixture requirement definition, layout planning, and layout optimization.Fig. 4. A work piece (a) and its directed graphs showing the locating datums (b) (adapted from Zhang et al. [17] ).3.2.1. Approaches to defining the fixturing requirementComprehensive fixture requirement definition has received limited attention, primarily focusing upon the definition of individual requirements within the physical, tolerance, and constraining requirements. For example, Zhang et al. [17] under-take tolerance requirement definition through an analysis of work piece feature tolerances to determine the allowed tolerance at each locating point and the decomposition of that tolerance into its sources. The allowed locating point accuracy is composed of a number of factors, such as the locating unit tolerance, the machine tool tolerance, the work piece deformation at the locating point, and so on. These decomposed tolerance requirements can subsequently drive fixture design: e.g., the tolerance of the locating unit developed in the unit design phase cannot exceed the specified locating unit tolerance. In a similar individualistic vein, definition of the clamping force requirements that clamping units must achieve has also received attention [29,30].In a more holistic approach, Boyle et al. [31] facilitate a comprehensive requirement specification through the use of skeleton requirement sets that provide an initial decomposition of the requirements listed in Table 1, and which are subsequently refined through a series of analyses and interaction with the fixture designer. Hunter et al. [32,33] also focus on functional requirement driven fixture design, but restrict their focus primarily to the physical and constraining requirements.3.2.2. Approaches to non-optimized layout planningLayout planning is concerned with the identification of the locating principle, which defines the number and general arrangement of locating and clamping points, the work piece surfaces they contact, and the surface coordinate positions where contact occurs. For non-optimized layoutplanning, approaches based upon the re-use of experiential knowledge have been used. In addition to rule-based approaches [20,34,35] that are similar in nature to those discussed in Section 3.1, case-based reasoning has also been used. CBR is a general problem solving technique that uses specific knowledge of previous problems to solve new ones. In applying this approach to layout planning, a layout plan for a work piece is obtained by retrieving the plan used for a similar work piece from a case library containing knowledge of previous work pieces and their layout plans [18,36,37]. Work piece similarity is typically characterized through indexing work pieces according to their part family classification, tolerances, features, and so on. Lin and Huang [38] adopt a similar work piece classification approach, but retrieve layout plans using a neural network. Further work has sought to verify layout plans and repair them if necessary. For example Roy and Liao [39] perform a work piece deformation analysis and if deformation is too great employ heuristic rules to relocate and retest locating and clamping positions.3.2.3. Approaches to layout planning optimizationLayout plan optimization is common within CAFD and occurs with respect to work piece stability and deformation, which are both constraining requirements. Stability based optimization typically focuses upon ensuring a layout plan satisfies the kinematic form closure constraint (in which a set of contacts completely constrain infinitesimal part motion) and augmenting this with optimization against some form of stability based requirement, such as minimizing forces at the locating and/or clamping points [40–42] . Wu and Chan [43] focused on optimizing stability (measuring stability is discussed in Section 3.4) using a Genetic Algorithm (GA), which is a technique frequently employed in deformation based optimization.GAs, which are an example of evolutionary algorithms, are often used to solve optimization problems and draw their inspiration from biological evolution. Applying GAs in support of fixture planning, potential layout plan solutions are encoded as binary strings, tested, evaluated, and subjected to ‘‘biological’’ modification through reproduction, mutation, and crossover to generate improved solutions until an optimal state is reached. Typically deformation testing is employed using a finite element analysis in which a work piece is discretized to create a series of nodes that represent potential locating and clamping contact points, as performed for example by Kashyap and DeVries [44] . Sets of contact points are encoded and tested, and the GA used to develop new contact point sets until an optimum is reached that minimizes work piece deformation caused by machining and clamping forces [45,46]. Rather than use nodes, some CAFD approaches use geometric data (such as spatial coordinates) in the GA, which can offer improved accuracy as they account for the physical distance that exists between nodes [47,48].Pseudo gradient techniques [49] have also been employed to achieve optimization [50,51]. Vallapuzha et al. [52] compared the effectiveness of GA and pseudo gradient optimization, concluding that GAs provided higher quality optimizations given their ability to search for global solutions, whereas pseudo gradient techniques tended to converge on local optimums.Rather than concentrating on fixture designs for individual parts, Kong and Ceglarek [53] define a method that identifies the fixture workspace for a family of parts based on the individual configuration of the fixture locating layout for each part. The method uses Procrustes analysis to identify a preliminary workspace layout that is subjected to pairwise optimization of fixture configurations for a given part family to determine the best superposition of locating points for a family of parts that can be assembled on a single reconfigurable assembly fixture. This buildsupon earlier work by Lee et al. [54] through attempting to simplify the computational demands of the optimization algorithm.3.3. Unit designUnit design involves both the conceptual and detailed definition of the locating and clamping units of a fixture, together with the base plate to which they are attached (Fig. 5). These units consist of a locator or clamp that contacts the work piece and is itself attached to a structural support, which in turn connects with the base plate. These structural supports serve multiple functions, for example providing the locating and clamping units with sufficient rigidity such that the fixture can withstand applied machining and clamping forces and thus result in the part feature design tolerances being obtained, and allowing the clamp or locator to contact the work piece at the appropriate position. Unit design has in general received less attention than both fixture planning and verification, but a number of techniques have been applied to support both conceptual and detailed unit design.3.3.1. Approaches to conceptual unit designConceptual unit design has focused upon the definition of the types and numbers of elements that an individual unit should comprise, as well as their general layout. There are a wide variety of locators, clamps, and structural support elements, each of which can be more suited to some fixturing problems than others. As with both setup planning and fixture layout planning, rule-based approaches have been adopted to support conceptual unit design, in which heuristic rules are used to select preferred elements from which the units should be constructed in response to considerations such as work piece contact features (surface type, surface texture, etc.) and machining operations within the setup [35,55–58]. In addition to using heuristic rules as a means of generating conceptual designs, Kumar et al.[59] use an inductive reasoning technique to create decision trees from which such fixturing rules can be obtained through examination of each decision tree path.Neural network approaches have also been used to support conceptual unit design. Kumar et al. [60] use a combined GA/neural network approach in which a neural network is trained with a selection of previous design problems and their solutions. A GA generates possible solutionswhich are evaluated using the neural network, which subsequently guides the GA. Lin and Huang[38] also use a neural network in a simplified case-based reasoning (CBR) approach in which fixturing problems are coded in terms of their geometrical structure and a neural network used to find similar work pieces and their unit designs. In contrast, Wang and Rong[37] and Boyle et al.[31] use a conventional CBR approach to retrieve units in which the fixturing functional requirements form the basis of retrieval, which are then subject to refinement and/or modification during detailed unit design.3.3.2. Approaches to detailed unit designMany, but not all systems that perform conceptual design also perform detailed design, where the dominant techniques are rule, geometry, and behavior based. Detailed design involves the definition of the units in terms of their dimensions, material types, and so on. Geometry, in particular the acting height of locating and clamping units, plays a key role in the design of individual units in which the objective is to select and assemble defined unit elements to provide a unit of suitable acting height [61,62]. An et al. [63] developed a geometry based system in which the dimensions of individual elements were generated in relation to the primary dimension of that element (typically its required height) through parametric dimension relationships. This was augmented with a relationship knowledge base of how different elements could be configured to form a single unit. Similarly, Peng et al. [64] use geometric constraint reasoning to assist in the assembly of user selected elements to form individual units in a more interactive approach.Alternatively, rule-based approaches have also been used to define detailed units, in which work piece and fixture layout information (i.e., the locating and clamping positions) is reasoned over using design rules to select and assemble appropriately sized elements [32,55,56] . In contrast, Mervyn et al. [65] adopt an evolutionary algorithm approach to the development of units, in which layout planning and unit design take place concurrently until a satisfactory solution is reached.Typically, rule and geometry based approaches do not explicitly consider the required strength of units during their design. However for a fixture to achieve its function, it must be able to withstand the machining and clamping forces imposed upon it such that part design tolerances can be met. To address this, a number of behaviorally driven approaches to unit design have been developed that focus upon ensuring units have sufficient strength. Cecil [66] performed some preliminary work on dimensioning strap clamps to prevent failure by stress fracture, but does not consider tolerances or the supporting structural unit. Hurtado and Melkote [67] developed a model for the synthesis of fixturing configurations in simple pin-array type flexible machining fixtures, in which the minimum number of pins, their position, and dimensions are determined that can achieve stability and stiffness goals for a work piece through consideration of the fixture/work piece stiffness matrix, and extended this for modular fixtures [68] . Boyle et al. [31] also consider the required stiffness of more complex unit designs within their case-based reasoning method. Having retrieved a conceptual design that offers the correct type of function, this design’s physical structure is then adapted using dynamically selected adaptation strategies until it offers the correct level of stiffness.3.4. VerificationVerification focuses upon ensuring that developed fixture designs (in terms of their setup plans, layout plans, and physical units) satisfy the fixturing requirements. It should be noted from。
夹具设计中英文对照
Optimization of fixture design with consideration of thermal deformation inface milling考虑端铣中热变形的最佳化夹具设计Huang, YingAbstract摘要Effective methods of fixture design are proposed to reduce machining error caused by cutting heat in face milling. Experiments show that thermal effect is critical to final error in the finish cut and that it dominates cutting accuracy. Therefore, a mathematical model is structured of the cutting heat source on behalf of the cutting tool, and the flatness error generation process in face finishing is demonstrated by computational simulation based on the moving cutting heat source model with FEW Concerning surface flatness due to the moving cutting heat source for relatively thin plate-shaped workpieces, different methodologies have been proposed to reduce flatness error, namely, the application of additional supports and optimization of the fixturing support layout. Cutting experiments and computational analyses show the effectiveness of the additional supports and the optimization methodology applied on the fixture design in view of flatness error due to cutting heat. The proposed methodologies are applicable and beneficial to improve cutting accuracy not only of plate-shaped workpieces but also of other geometry workpieces.用于减小端铣中因切削热而引起的加工误差的有效的夹具设计方法已经被提出。
车床机床夹具类外文文献翻译、中英文翻译、外文翻译
中北大学信息商务学院本科毕业设计英文参考资料题目 Lathes系名专业姓名学号指导教师2016年6 月2 日译文标题车床简介原文标题Lathes作者(Serope kalpakjian)译名卡尔帕基安国籍美国原文出处/原文：LathesLathes are machine tools designed primarily to do turning, facing and boring, Very little turning is done on other types of machine tools, and none can do it with equal facility. Because lathes also can do drilling and reaming, their versatility permits several operations to be done with a single setup of the work piece. Consequently, more lathes of various types are used in manufacturing than any other machine tool.The essential components of a lathe are the bed, headstock assembly, tailstock assembly, and the leads crew and feed rod.The bed is the backbone of a lathe. It usually is made of well normalized or aged gray or nodular cast iron and provides s heavy, rigid frame on which all the other basic components are mounted. Two sets of parallel, longitudinal ways, inner and outer, are contained on the bed, usually on the upper side. Some makers use an inverted V-shape for all four ways, whereas others utilize one inverted V and one flat way in one or both sets, They are precision-machined to assure accuracy of alignment. On most modern lathes the way are surface-hardened to resist wear and abrasion, but precaution should be taken in operating a lathe to assure that the ways are not damaged. Any inaccuracy in them usually means that the accuracy of the entire lathe is destroyed.The headstock is mounted in a foxed position on the inner ways, usually at the left end of the bed. It provides a powered means of rotating the word at various speeds . Essentially, it consists of a hollow spindle, mounted in accurate bearings, and a set of transmission gears-similar to a truck transmission—through which the spindle can be rotated at a number of speeds. Most lathes provide from 8 to 18 speeds, usually in a geometric ratio, and on modern lathes all the speeds can be obtained merely by moving from two to four levers. An increasing trend is to provide a continuously variable speed range through electrical or mechanical drives.Because the accuracy of a lathe is greatly dependent on the spindle, it is of heavyconstruction and mounted in heavy bearings, usually preloaded tapered roller or ball types. The spindle has a hole extending through its length, through which long bar stock can be fed. The size of maximum size of bar stock that can be machined when the material must be fed through spindle.The tailsticd assembly consists, essentially, of three parts. A lower casting fits on the inner ways of the bed and can slide longitudinally thereon, with a means for clamping the entire assembly in any desired location, An upper casting fits on the lower one and can be moved transversely upon it, on some type of keyed ways, to permit aligning the assembly is the tailstock quill. This is a hollow steel cylinder, usually about 51 to 76mm(2to 3 inches) in diameter, that can be moved several inches longitudinally in and out of the upper casting by means of a hand wheel and screw.The size of a lathe is designated by two dimensions. The first is known as the swing. This is the maximum diameter of work that can be rotated on a lathe. It is approximately twice the distance between the line connecting the lathe centers and the nearest point on the ways, The second size dimension is the maximum distance between centers. The swing thus indicates the maximum work piece diameter that can be turned in the lathe, while the distance between centers indicates the maximum length of work piece that can be mounted between centers.Engine lathes are the type most frequently used in manufacturing. They areheavy-duty machine tools with all the components described previously and have power drive for all tool movements except on the compound rest. They commonly range in size from 305 to 610 mm(12 to 24 inches)swing and from 610 to 1219 mm(24 to 48 inches) center distances, but swings up to 1270 mm(50 inches) and center distances up to3658mm(12 feet) are not uncommon. Most have chip pans and a built-in coolant circulating system. Smaller engine lathes-with swings usually not over 330 mm (13 inches ) –also are available in bench type, designed for the bed to be mounted on a bench on a bench or cabinet.Although engine lathes are versatile and very useful, because of the time required for changing and setting tools and for making measurements on the work piece, thy are not suitable for quantity production. Often the actual chip-production tine is less than 30% of the total cycle time. In addition, a skilled machinist is required for all the operations, and such persons are costly and often in short supply. However, much of the operator’s time is consumed by simple, repetitious adjustments and in watching chips being made. Consequently, to reduce or eliminate the amount of skilled labor that is required, turret lathes, screw machines, and other types of semiautomatic and automatic lathes have been highly developed and are widely used in manufacturing.2 Numerical ControlOne of the most fundamental concepts in the area of advanced manufacturing technologies is numerical control (NC). Prior to the advent of NC, all machine tools ere manually operated and controlled. Among the many limitations associated with manual control machine tools, perhaps none is more prominent than the limitation of operator skills. With manual control, the quality of the product is directly related to and limited to the skills of the operator. Numerical control represents the first major step away from human control of machine tools.Numerical control means the control of machine tools and other manufacturing systems through the use of prerecorded, written symbolic instructions. Rather than operating a machine tool, an NC technician writes a program that issues operational instructions to the machine tool. For a machine tool to be numerically controlled, it must be interfaced with a device for accepting and decoding the programmed instructions, known as a reader.Numerical control was developed to overcome the limitation of human operators, and it has done so. Numerical control machines are more accurate than manually operated machines, they can produce parts more uniformly, they are faster, and the long-run tooling costs are lower. The development of NC led to the development of several other innovations in manufacturing technology:Electrical discharge machining,Laser cutting,Electron beam welding.Numerical control has also made machine tools more versatile than their manually operated predecessors. An NC machine tool can automatically produce a wide of parts, each involving an assortment of widely varied and complex machining processes. Numerical control has allowed manufacturers to undertake the production of products that would not have been feasible from an economic perspective using manually controlled machine tolls and processes.Like so many advanced technologies, NC was born in the laboratories of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The concept of NC was developed in the early 1950s with funding provided by the U.S. Air Force. In its earliest stages, NC machines were able to made straight cuts efficiently and effectively.However, curved paths were a problem because the machine tool had to be programmed to undertake a series of horizontal and vertical steps to produce a curve. The shorter the straight lines making up the steps, the smoother is the curve, Each line segment in the steps had to be calculated.This problem led to the development in 1959 of the Automatically Programmed Tools (APT) language. This is a special programming language for NC that uses statementssimilar to English language to define the part geometry, describe the cutting tool configuration, and specify the necessary motions. The development of the APT language was a major step forward in the fur ther development from those used today. The machines had hardwired logic circuits. The instructional programs were written on punched paper, which was later to be replaced by magnetic plastic tape. A tape reader was used to interpret the instructions written on the tape for the machine. Together, all of this represented a giant step forward in the control of machine tools. However, there were a number of problems with NC at this point in its development.A major problem was the fragility of the punched paper tape medium. It was common for the paper tape containing the programmed instructions to break or tear during a machining process. This problem was exacerbated by the fact that each successive time a part was produced on a machine tool, the paper tape carrying the programmed instructions had to be rerun through the reader. If it was necessary to produce 100 copies of a given part, it was also necessary to run the paper tape through the reader 100 separate tines. Fragile paper tapes simply could not withstand the rigors of a shop floor environment and this kind of repeated use.This led to the development of a special magnetic plastic tape. Whereas the paper carried the programmed instructions as a series of holes punched in the tape, the plastic tape carried the instructions as a series of magnetic dots. The plastic tape was much stronger than the paper tape, which solved the problem of frequent tearing and breakage. However, it still left two other problems.The most important of these was that it was difficult or impossible to change the instructions entered on the tape. To made even the most minor adjustments in a program of instructions, it was necessary to interrupt machining operations and make a new tape. It was also still necessary to run the tape through the reader as many times as there were parts to be produced. Fortunately, computer technology became a reality and soon solved the problems of NC associated with punched paper and plastic tape.The development of a concept known as direct numerical control (DNC) solved the paper and plastic tape problems associated with numerical control by simply eliminating tape as the medium for carrying the programmed instructions. In direct numerical control, machine tools are tied, via a data transmission link, to a host computer. Programs for operating the machine tools are stored in the host computer and fed to the machine tool an needed via the data transmission linkage. Direct numerical control represented a major step forward over punched tape and plastic tape. However, it is subject to the same limitations as all technologies that depend on a host computer. When the host computer goes down, the machine tools also experience downtime. This problem led to the development of computernumerical control.3 TurningThe engine lathe, one of the oldest metal removal machines, has a number of useful and highly desirable attributes. Today these lathes are used primarily in small shops where smaller quantities rather than large production runs are encountered.Th e engine lathe has been replaced in today’s production shops by a wide variety of automatic lathes such as automatic of single-point tooling for maximum metal removal, and the use of form tools for finish on a par with the fastest processing equipment on the scene today.Tolerances for the engine lathe depend primarily on the skill of the operator. The design engineer must be careful in using tolerances of an experimental part that has been produced on the engine lathe by a skilled operator. In redesigning an experimental part for production, economical tolerances should be used.Turret Lathes Production machining equipment must be evaluated now, more than ever before, this criterion for establishing the production qualification of a specific method, the turret lathe merits a high rating.In designing for low quantities such as 100 or 200 parts, it is most economical to use the turret lathe. In achieving the optimum tolerances possible on the turrets lathe, the designer should strive for a minimum of operations.Automatic Screw Machines Generally, automatic screw machines fall into several categories; single-spindle automatics, multiple-spindle automatics and automatic chucking machines. Originally designed for rapid, automatic production of screws and similar threaded parts, the automatic screw machine has long since exceeded the confines of this narrow field, and today plays a vital role in the mass production of a variety of precision parts. Quantities play an important part in the economy of the parts machined on the automatic screw machine. Quantities less than on the automatic screw machine. The cost of the parts machined can be reduced if the minimum economical lot size is calculated and the proper machine is selected for these quantities.Automatic Tracer Lathes Since surface roughness depends greatly on material turned, tooling , and feeds and speeds employed, minimum tolerances that can be held on automatic tracer lathes are not necessarily the most economical tolerances.In some cases, tolerances of 0.05mm are held in continuous production using but one cut . groove width can be held to 0.125mm on some parts. Bores and single-point finishes can be held to 0.0125mm. On high-production runs where maximum output is desirable, a minimum tolerance of 0.125mm is economical on both diameter and length of turn。
专业夹具设计全英文介绍
21
Fixture design
CLAMPING FORCES Mechanical
low cost, relatively low forces Pneumatic
higher cost, relatively low forces, large components
Hydraulic higher initial cost, high forces, reliable, small components
28
50 MPa Threaded Cylinder 42-0010-06 (page F-4)
3.4 kN 30 MPa 5.7 kN 50 MPa
Force diagram
50 MPa 30 MPa
29
Workpieces Sequence valve opens
Oil pressure
Movement of cylinder
the coefficient of
friction (µ) is
normally calculated at 0.1
18
Clamping force F
Total clamping force =Fxµ
Reaction force
Reaction force
TotaPlrcelfaemrapbilneg force =F
24
Force comparison
Standard clamping strap M20 thread
Max. recommended torque 223Nm Max. clamping force 28kN
Hydraulic swing clamp 6951F-11-21 (page 63, metric catalogue) Ø 22 rod, clamping strap Max. oil pressure 35 MPa Clamping force 13.7kN
泵体(II)零件机械加工工艺和专用夹具设计-外文翻译
本科生毕业设计 (论文)
外文翻译
原文标题An intelligent fixture design method based on
smart modular fixture unit
译文标题基本的加工工序—切削，镗削和铣削
作者所在系别机电工程学院
作者所在专业机械设计制造及自动化
作者所在班级
作者姓名
作者学号
指导教师姓名
指导教师职称
完成时间
注：1. 指导教师对译文进行评阅时应注意以下几个方面：①翻译的外文文献与毕业设计（论文）的主题是否高度相关，并作为外文参考文献列入毕业设计（论文）的参考文献；②翻译的外文文献字数是否达到规定数量（3 000字以上）；③译文语言是否准确、通顺、具有参考价值。
2. 外文原文应以附件的方式置于译文之后。
专业夹具设计外文翻译.doc
译文标题精密机械加工工艺原文标题Precision Machining Technology作者Peter J. Hoffman 译名彼得·J·霍夫曼国籍美国原文出处Cengage Learning译文：在机械加工过程中，工件受到切削力、离心力、惯性力等的作用，为了保证在这些外力作用下，工件仍能在夹具中保持已由定位元件确定的加工位置，而不致发生振动或位移、夹具结构中应设置夹紧装置将工件可靠夹牢。
一、夹紧装置的组成夹紧装置的种类很多，但其结构均由两部分组成。
1 ．动力装置夹紧力的来源，一是人力；二是某种装置所产生的力。
能产生力的装置称为夹具的动力装置。
常用的动力装置有：气动装置、液压装置、电动装置、电磁装置、气—液联动装置和真空装置等。
由于手动夹具的夹紧力来自人力，所以它没有动力装置。
2 ．夹紧部分接受和传递原始作用力使之变为夹紧力并执行夹紧任务的部分，一般由下列机构组成：1 ）接受原始作用力的机构。
如手柄、螺母及用来连接气缸活塞杆的机构等。
2）中间递力机构。
如铰链、杠杆等。
3 ）夹紧元件。
如各种螺钉压板等。
其中中间递力机构在传递原始作用力至夹紧元件的过程中可以起到诸如改变作用力的方向、改变作用力的大小以及自锁等作用。
二、夹紧装置的基本要求在不破坏工件定位精度，并保证加工质量的前提下，应尽量使夹紧装置做到：1．夹紧力的大小适当。
既要保证工件在整个加工过程中其位置稳定不变、振动小，又要使工件不产生过大的夹紧变形。
2 ．工艺性好。
夹紧装置的复杂程度应与生产纲领相适应，在保证生产效率的前提下，其结构应力求简单，便于制造和维修。
3 ．使用性好。
夹紧装置的操作应当方便、安全、省力。
三、基本夹紧机构原始作用力转化为夹紧力是通过夹紧机构来实现的。
在众多的夹紧机构中以斜楔、螺旋、偏心以及由它们组合而成的夹紧机构应用最为普遍。
（一）紧机构 采用斜传力元紧元紧机斜楔 机构。
直接采用，斜楔条件是：斜楔的升角小于斜楔与工 件、斜 具的摩擦角之和。
中英文文献翻译-切削加工工序和夹具设计
英文原文Cutting process and fixture designMachine tools have evolved from the early foot-powered lathes of the Egyptians and John Wilkinson's boring mill. They are designed to provide rigid support for both the workpiece and the cutting tool and can precisely control their relative positions and the velocity of the tool with respect to the workpiece. Basically, in metal cutting, a sharpened wedge-shaped tool removes a rather narrow strip of metal from the surface of a ductile workpiece in the form of a severely deformed chip. The chip is a waste product that is considerably shorter than the workpiece from which it came but with a corresponding increase in thickness of the uncut chip. The geometrical shape of workpiece depends on the shape of the tool and its path during the machining operation.Most machining operations produce parts of differing geometry. If a rough cylindrical workpiece revolves about a central axis and the tool penetrates beneath its surface and travels parallel to the center of rotation, a surface of revolution is produced, and the operation is called turning. If a hollow tube is machined on the inside in a similar manner, the operation is called boring. Producing an external conical surface uniformly varying diameter is called taper turning, if the tool point travels in a path of varying radius, a contoured surface like that of a bowling pin can be produced; or, if the piece is short enough and the support is sufficiently rigid, a contoured surface could be produced by feeding a shaped tool normal to the axis of rotation. Short tapered or cylindrical surfaces could also be contour formed.Flat or plane surfaces are frequently required. They can be generated by radial turning or facing, in which the tool point moves normal to the axis of rotation. In other cases, it is more convenient to hold the workpiece steady and reciprocate the tool across it in a series of straight-line cuts with a crosswise feed increment before each cutting stroke. This operation is called planning and is carried out on a shaper. For larger pieces it is easier to keep the tool stationary and draw the workpiece under it as in planning. The tool is fed at each reciprocation. Contoured surfaces can be produced by using shaped tools.Multiple-edged tools can also be used. Drilling uses a twin-edged fluted tool for holes with depths up to 5 to 10 times the drill diameter. Whether thedrill turns or the workpiece rotates, relative motion between the cutting edge and the workpiece is the important factor. In milling operations a rotary cutter with a number of cutting edges engages the workpiece. Which moves slowly with respect to the cutter. Plane or contoured surfaces may be produced, depending on the geometry of the cutter and the type of feed. Horizontal or vertical axes of rotation may be used, and the feed of the workpiece may be in any of the three coordinate directions.Basic Machine ToolsMachine tools are used to produce a part of a specified geometrical shape and precise I size by removing metal from a ductile material in the form of chips. The latter are a waste product and vary from long continuous ribbons of a ductile material such as steel, which are undesirable from a disposal point of view, to easily handled well-broken chips resulting from cast iron. Machine tools perform five basic metal-removal processes: I turning, planning, drilling, milling, and grinding. All other metal-removal processes are modifications of these five basic processes. For example, boring is internal turning; reaming, tapping, and counter boring modify drilled holes and are related to drilling; bobbing and gear cutting are fundamentally milling operations; hack sawing and broaching are a form of planning and honing; lapping, super finishing. Polishing and buffing are variants of grinding or abrasive removal operations. Therefore, there are only four types of basic machine tools, which use cutting tools of specific controllable geometry: 1. lathes, 2. planers, 3. drilling machines, and 4. milling machines. The grinding process forms chips, but the geometry of the abrasive grain is uncontrollable.The amount and rate of material removed by the various machining processes may be I large, as in heavy turning operations, or extremely small, as in lapping or super finishing operations where only the high spots of a surface are removed.A machine tool performs three major functions: 1. it rigidly supports the workpiece or its holder and the cutting tool; 2. it provides relative motion between the workpiece and the cutting tool; 3. it provides a range of feeds and speeds usually ranging from 4 to 32 choices in each case.Speed and Feeds in MachiningSpeeds, feeds, and depth of cut are the three major variables for economical machining. Other variables are the work and tool materials, coolant and geometry of the cutting tool. The rate of metal removal and power required for machining depend upon these variables.The depth of cut, feed, and cutting speed are machine settings that must be established in any metal-cutting operation. They all affect the forces, the power, and the rate of metal removal. They can be defined by comparing them to the needle and record of a phonograph. The cutting speed (V) is represented by the velocity of- the record surface relative to the needle in the tone arm at any instant. Feed is represented by the advance of the needle radially inward per revolution, or is the difference in position between two adjacent grooves. The depth of cut is the penetration of the needle into the record or the depth of the grooves.Turning on Lathe CentersThe basic operations performed on an engine lathe are illustrated. Those operations performed on external surfaces with a single point cutting tool are called turning. Except for drilling, reaming, and lapping, the operations on internal surfaces are also performed by a single point cutting tool.All machining operations, including turning and boring, can be classified as roughing, finishing, or semi-finishing. The objective of a roughing operation is to remove the bulk of the material as rapidly and as efficiently as possible, while leaving a small amount of material on the work-piece for the finishing operation. Finishing operations are performed to obtain the final size, shape, and surface finish on the workpiece. Sometimes a semi-finishing operation will precede the finishing operation to leave a small predetermined and uniform amount of stock on the work-piece to be removed by the finishing operation.Generally, longer workpieces are turned while supported on one or two lathe centers. Cone shaped holes, called center holes, which fit the lathe centers are drilled in the ends of the workpiece-usually along the axis of the cylindrical part. The end of the workpiece adjacent to the tailstock is always supported by a tailstock center, while the end near the headstock may be supported by a headstock center or held in a chuck. The headstock end of the workpiece may be held in a four-jaw chuck, or in a type chuck. This method holds the workpiece firmly and transfers the power to the workpiece smoothly; the additional support to the workpiece provided by the chuck lessens the tendency for chatter to occur when cutting. Precise results can be obtained with this method if care is taken to hold the workpiece accurately in the chuck.Very precise results can be obtained by supporting the workpiece between two centers. A lathe dog is clamped to the workpiece; together they are driven by a driver plate mounted on the spindle nose. One end of the Workpiece is mecained;then the workpiece can be turned around in the lathe to machine the other end. The center holes in the workpiece serve as precise locating surfaces as well as bearing surfaces to carry the weight of the workpiece and to resist the cutting forces. After the workpiece has been removed from the lathe for any reason, the center holes will accurately align the workpiece back in the lathe or in another lathe, or in a cylindrical grinding machine. The workpiece must never be held at the headstock end by both a chuck and a lathe center. While at first thought this seems like a quick method of aligning the workpiece in the chuck, this must not be done because it is not possible to press evenly with the jaws against the workpiece while it is also supported by the center. The alignment provided by the center will not be maintained and the pressure of the jaws may damage the center hole, the lathe center, and perhaps even the lathe spindle. Compensating or floating jaw chucks used almost exclusively on high production work provide an exception to the statements made above. These chucks are really work drivers and cannot be used for the same purpose as ordinary three or four-jaw chucks.While very large diameter workpieces are sometimes mounted on two centers, they are preferably held at the headstock end by faceplate jaws to obtain the smooth power transmission; moreover, large lathe dogs that are adequate to transmit the power not generally available, although they can be made as a special. Faceplatejaws are like chuck jaws except that they are mounted on a faceplate, which has less overhang from the spindle bearings than a large chuck would have.I ntroduction of MachiningMachining as a shape-producing method is the most universally used and the most important of all manufacturing processes. Machining is a shape-producing process in which a power-driven device causes material to be removed in chip form. Most machining is done with equipment that supports both the work piece and cutting tool although in some cases portable equipment is used with unsupported workpiece.Low setup cost for small Quantities. Machining has two applications in manufacturing. For casting, forging, and press working, each specific shape to be produced, even one part, nearly always has a high tooling cost. The shapes that may he produced by welding depend to a large degree on the shapes of raw material that are available. By making use of generally high cost equipment but without special tooling, it is possible, by machining; to start with nearly any form of raw material, so tong as the exterior dimensions are great enough, and produce any desired shape from any material. Therefore .machining is usually the preferred method for producing one or a few parts, even when the design of the part would logically lead to casting, forging or press working if a high quantity were to be produced.Close accuracies, good finishes. The second application for machining is based on the high accuracies and surface finishes possible. Many of the parts machined in low quantities would be produced with lower but acceptable tolerances if produced in high quantities by some other process. On the other hand, many parts are given their general shapes by some high quantity deformation process and machined only on selected surfaces where high accuracies are needed. Internal threads, for example, are seldom produced by any means other than machining and small holes in press worked parts may be machined following the press working operations.Primary Cutting ParametersThe basic tool-work relationship in cutting is adequately described by means of four factors: tool geometry, cutting speed, feed, and depth of cut.The cutting tool must be made of an appropriate material; it must be strong, tough, hard, and wear resistant. The tool s geometry characterized by planes and angles, must be correct for each cutting operation. Cutting speed is the rate at which the work surface passes by the cutting edge. It may be expressed in feet per minute.For efficient machining the cutting speed must be of a magnitude appropriate to the particular work-tool combination. In general, the harder the work material, the slower the speed.Feed is the rate at which the cutting tool advances into the workpiece. "Where the workpiece or the tool rotates, feed is measured in inches per revolution. When the tool or the work reciprocates, feed is measured in inches per stroke, Generally, feed varies inversely with cutting speed for otherwise similar conditions.The depth of cut, measured inches is the distance the tool is set into the work. It is the width of the chip in turning or the thickness of the chip in a rectilinear cut. In roughing operations, the depth of cut can be larger than for finishing operations.The Effect of Changes in Cutting Parameters on Cutting TemperaturesIn metal cutting operations heat is generated in the primary and secondary deformation zones and these results in a complex temperature distribution throughout the tool, workpiece and chip. A typical set of isotherms is shown in figure where it can be seen that, as could be expected, there is a very large temperature gradient throughout the width of the chip as the workpiece material is sheared in primary deformation and there is a further large temperature in the chip adjacent to the face as the chip is sheared in secondary deformation. This leads to a maximum cutting temperature a short distance up the face from the cutting edge and a small distance into the chip.Since virtually all the work done in metal cutting is converted into heat, it could be expected that factors which increase the power consumed per unit volume of metal removed will increase the cutting temperature. Thus an increase in the rake angle, all other parameters remaining constant, will reduce the power per unit volume of metal removed and the cutting temperatures will reduce. When considering increase in unreformed chip thickness and cutting speed the situation is more complex. An increase in undeformed chip thicknesstends to be a scale effect where the amounts of heat which pass to the workpiece, the tool and chip remain in fixed proportions and the changes in cutting temperature tend to be small. Increase in cutting speed; however, reduce the amount of heat which passes into the workpiece and this increase the temperature rise of the chip m primary deformation. Further, the secondary deformation zone tends to be smaller and this has the effect of increasing the temperatures in this zone. Other changes in cutting parameters have virtually no effect on the power consumed per unit volume of metal removed and consequently have virtually no effect on the cutting temperatures. Since it has been shown that even small changes in cutting temperature have a significant effect on tool wear rate it is appropriate to indicate how cutting temperatures can be assessed from cutting data.The most direct and accurate method for measuring temperatures in high -speed-steel cutting tools is that of Wright &. Trent which also yields detailed information on temperature distributions in high-speed-steel cutting tools. The technique is based on the metallographic examination of sectioned high-speed-steel tools which relates microstructure changes to thermal history.Trent has described measurements of cutting temperatures and temperature distributions for high-speed-steel tools when machining a wide range of workpiece materials. This technique has been further developed by using scanning electron microscopy to study fine-scale microstructure changes arising from over tempering of the tempered martens tic matrix of various high-speed-steels. This technique has also been used to study temperature distributions in both high-speed -steel single point turning tools and twist drills.Wears of Cutting ToolDiscounting brittle fracture and edge chipping, which have already been dealt with, tool wear is basically of three types. Flank wear, crater wear, and notch wear. Flank wear occurs on both the major and the minor cutting edges. On the major cutting edge, which is responsible for bulk metal removal, these results in increased cutting forces and higher temperatures which if left unchecked can lead to vibration of the tool and workpiece and a condition where efficient cutting can no longer take place. On the minor cutting edge, which determines workpiece size and surface finish, flank wear can result in an over sized product which has poor surface finish. Under most practical cutting conditions, the tool will fail due to major flank wear before the minor flank wear is sufficiently large to result in the manufacture of an unacceptable component.Because of the stress distribution on the tool face, the frictional stress in the region of sliding contact between the chip and the face is at a maximum at the start of the sliding contact region and is zero at the end. Thus abrasive wear takes place in this region with more wear taking place adjacent to the seizure region than adjacent to the point at which the chip loses contact with the face. This result in localized pitting of the tool face some distance up the face which is usually referred to as catering and which normally has a section in the form of a circular arc. In many respects and for practical cutting conditions, crater wear is a less severe form of wear than flank wear and consequently flank wear is a more common tool failure criterion. However, since various authors have shown that the temperature on the face increases more rapidly with increasing cutting speed than the temperature on the flank, and since the rate of wear of any type is significantly affected by changes in temperature, crater wear usually occurs at high cutting speeds.At the end of the major flank wear land where the tool is in contact with the uncut workpiece surface it is common for the flank wear to be more pronounced than along the rest of the wear land. This is because of localised effects such as a hardened layer on the uncut surface caused by work hardening introduced by a previous cut, an oxide scale, and localised high temperatures resulting from the edge effect. This localised wear is usually referred to as notch wear and occasionally is very severe. Although the presence of the notch will not significantly affect the cutting properties of the tool, the notch is often relatively deep and if cutting were to continue there would be a good chance that the tool would fracture.If any form of progressive wear allowed to continue, dramatically and the tool would fail catastrophically, i. e. the tool would be no longer capable of cutting and, at best, the workpiece would be scrapped whilst, at worst, damage could be caused to the machine tool. For carbide cutting tools and for all types of wear, the tool is said to have reached the end of its useful life long before the onset of catastrophic failure. For high-speed-steel cutting tools, however, where the wear tends to be non-uniform it has been found that the most meaningful and reproducible results can be obtained when the wear is allowed to continue to the onset ofcatastrophic failure even though, of course, in practice a cutting time far less than that to failure would be used. The onset of catastrophic failure is characterized by one of several phenomena, the most common being a sudden increase in cutting force, the presence of burnished rings on the workpiece, and a significant increase in the noise level.Mechanism of Surface Finish ProductionThere are basically five mechanisms which contribute to the production of a surface which have been machined. These are:(l) The basic geometry of the cutting process. In, for example, single point turning the tool will advance a constant distance axially per revolution of the work price and the resultant surface will have on it, when viewed perpendicularly to the direction of tool feed motion, a series of cusps which will have a basic form which replicates the shape of the tool in cut.(2) The efficiency of the cutting operation. It has already been mentioned that cutting with unstable built-up-edges will produce a surface which contains hard built-up-edge fragments which will result in a degradation of the surface finish. It can also be demonstrated that cutting under adverse conditions such as apply when using large feeds small rake angles and low cutting speeds, besides producing conditions which lead to unstable built-up-edge production, the cutting process itself can become unstable and instead of continuous shear occurring in the shear zone, tearing takes place, discontinuous chips of uneven thickness are produced, and the resultant surface is poor. This situation is particularly noticeable when machining very ductile materials such as copper and aluminum.(3) The stability of the machine tool. Under some combinations of cutting conditions; workpiece size, method of clamping ,and cutting tool rigidity relative to the machine tool structure, instability can be set up in the tool which causes it to vibrate. Under some conditions this vibration will reach and maintain steady amplitude whilst under other conditions the vibration will built up and unless cutting is stopped considerable damage to both the cutting tool and workpiece may occur. This phenomenon is known as chatter and in axial turning is characterized by long pitch helical bands on the workpiece surface and short pitch undulations on the transient machined surface.(4)The effectiveness of removing swarf. In discontinuous chip production machining, such as milling or turning of brittle materials, it is expected that the chip (swarf) will leave the cutting zone either under gravity or with the assistance of a jet of cutting fluid and that they will not influence the cut surface in any way. However, when continuous chip production is evident, unless steps are taken to control the swarf it is likely that it will impinge on the cut surface and mark it. Inevitably, this marking besides looking.(5)The effective clearance angle on the cutting tool. For certain geometries of minor cutting edge relief and clearance angles it is possible to cut on the major cutting edge and burnish on the minor cutting edge. This can produce a good surface finish but, of course, it is strictly a combination of metal cutting and metal forming and is not to be recommended as a practical cutting method. However, due to cutting tool wear, these conditions occasionally arise and lead to a marked change in the surface characteristics.Limits and TolerancesMachine parts are manufactured so they are interchangeable. In other words, each part of a machine or mechanism is made to a certain size and shape so will fit into any other machine or mechanism of the same type. To make the part interchangeable, each individual part must be made to a size that will fit the mating part in the correct way. It is not only impossible, but also impractical to make many parts to an exact size. This is because machines are not perfect, and the tools become worn. A slight variation from the exact size is always allowed. The amount of this variation depends on the kind of part being manufactured. For examples part might be made 6 in. long with a variation allowed of 0.003 (three-thousandths) in. above and below this size. Therefore, the part could be 5.997 to 6.003 in. and still be the correct size. These are known as the limits. The difference between upper and lower limits is called the tolerance.A tolerance is the total permissible variation in the size of a part.The basic size is that size from which limits of size arc derived by the application of allowances and tolerances.Sometimes the limit is allowed in only one direction. This is known as unilateral tolerance.Unilateral to learning is a system of dimensioning where the tolerance (that is variation) is shown in only one direction from the nominal size. Unilateral to learning allow the changing of tolerance on a hole or shaft without seriously affecting the fit.When the tolerance is in both directions from the basic size it is known as a bilateral tolerance (plus and minus).Bilateral to learning is a system of dimensioning where the tolerance (that is variation) is split and is shown on either side of the nominal size. Limit dimensioning is a system of dimensioning where only the maximum and minimum dimensions arc shown. Thus, the tolerance is the difference between these two dimensions.Surface Finishing and Dimensional ControlProducts that have been completed to their proper shape and size frequently require some type of surface finishing to enable them to satisfactorily fulfill their function. In some cases, it is necessary to improve the physical properties of the surface material for resistance to penetration or abrasion. In many manufacturing processes, the product surface is left with dirt .chips, grease, or other harmful material upon it. Assemblies that are made of different materials, or from the same materials processed in different manners, may require some special surface treatment to provide uniformity of appearance.Surface finishing may sometimes become an intermediate step processing. For instance, cleaning and polishing are usually essential before any kind of plating process. Some of the cleaning procedures are also used for improving surface smoothness on mating parts and for removing burrs and sharp corners, which might be harmful in later use. Another important need for surface finishing is for corrosion protection in a variety of: environments. The type of protection procedure will depend largely upon the anticipated exposure, with due consideration to the material being protected and the economic factors involved.Satisfying the above objectives necessitates the use of main surface-finishing methods that involve chemical change of the surface mechanical work affecting surface properties, cleaning by a variety of methods, and the application of protective coatings, organic and metallic.In the early days of engineering, the mating of parts was achieved by machining one part as nearly as possible to the required size, machining the mating part nearly to size, and then completing its machining, continually offering the other part to it, until the desired relationship was obtained. If it was inconvenient to offer one part to the other part during machining, the final work was done at the bench by a fitter, who scraped the mating parts until the desired fit was obtained, the fitter therefore being a 'fitter' in the literal sense. J It is obvious that the two parts would have to remain together, and m the event of one having to be replaced, the fitting would have to be done all over again. In these days, we expect to be able to purchase a replacement for a broken part, and for it to function correctly without the need for scraping and other fitting operations.When one part can be used 'off the shelf' to replace another of the same dimension and material specification, the parts are said to be interchangeable. A system of interchangeability usually lowers the production costs as there is no need for an expensive, 'fiddling' operation, and it benefits the customer in the event of the need to replace worn parts.Automatic Fixture DesignTraditional synchronous grippers for assembly equipment move parts to the gripper center-line, assuring that the parts will be in a known position after they arc picked from a conveyor or nest. However, in some applications, forcing the part to the center-line may damage cither the part or equipment. When the part is delicate and a small collision can result in scrap, when its location is fixed by a machine spindle , or when tolerances are tight, it is preferable to make a gripper comply with the position of the part, rather than the other way around. For these tasks, zaytran Inc. Of Elyria, Ohio, has created the GPN series of non- synchronous, compliant grippers. Because the force and synchronizations systems of the grippers are independent, the synchronization system can be replaced by a precision slide system without affecting gripper force. Gripper sizes range from 51b gripping force and 0.2 in. stroke to 40Glb gripping force and 6in stroke. Grippers。
曲轴的加工工艺及夹具设计外文翻译
毕业设计外文翻译题目曲轴的加工工艺及夹具设计学院航海学院专业轮机工程学生佟宝诚学号********指导教师彭中波重庆交通大学2014年Proceedings of IMECE20082008 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and ExpositionOctober 31-November 6, 2008, Boston, Massachusetts, USAIMECE2008-67447MULTI-OBJECTIVE SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION OF ENGINE CRANKSHAFTS USINGAN INTEGRATION APPROACHAlbert Albers/IPEK Institute of Product DevelopmentUniversity of Karlsruhe GermanyNoel Leon/CIDyT Center for Innovation andDesignMonterrey Institute of Technology,MexicoHumberto Aguayo/CIDyT Center forInnovation and Design,Monterrey Institute ofTechnology, MexicoThomas Maier/IPEK Institute of Product DevelopmentUniversity of Karlsruhe GermanyABSTRACTThe ever increasing computer capabilities allow faster analysis in the field of Computer Aided Design and Engineering (CAD & CAE). CAD and CAE systems are currently used in Parametric and Structural Optimization to find optimal topologies and shapes of given parts under certain conditions. This paper describes a general strategy to optimize the balance of a crankshaft, using CAD and CAE software integrated with Genetic Algorithms (GAs) via programming in Java. An introduction to the groundings of this strategy is made among different tools used for its implementation. The analyzed crankshaft is modeled in commercial parametric 3D CAD software. CAD is used for evaluating the fitness function (the balance) and to make geometric modifications. CAE is used for evaluating dynamic restrictions (the eigenfrequencies). A Java interface is programmed to link the CAD model to the CAE software and to the genetic algorithms. In order to make geometry modifications toour case study, it was decided to substitute the profile of the counterweights with splines from its original “arc-shaped” design. The variation of the splined profile via control points results in an imbalanceresponse. The imbalance of the crankshaft was defined as an independent objective function during a first approach, followed by a Pareto optimization of the imbalance from both correction planes, plus the curvature of the profile of the counterweights as restrictions for material flow during forging. The natural frequency was considered as an additional objective function during a second approach. The optimization process runs fully automated and the CAD program is on hold waiting for new set of parameters to receive and process, saving computing time, which is otherwise lost during the repeated startup of the cad application.The development of engine crankshafts is subject to a continuous evolution due to market pressures. Fast market developments push the increase of power, fuel economy, durability and reliability of combustion engines, and calls for reduction of size, weight, vibration and noise, cost, etc. Optimized engine components are therefore required if competitive designs must be attained. Due to this conditions, crankshafts, which are one of the most analyzed engine components, are required to be improved [1]. One of these improvements relies on material composition, as companies that develop combustion engines have expressed their intentions to change actual nodular steel crankshafts from their engines, to forged steel crankshafts. Another important direction of improvement is the optimization of its geometrical characteristics. In particular for this paper is the imbalance, first Eigen-frequency and the forge-ability. Analytical tools can greatly enhance the understanding of the physical phenomena associated with the mentioned characteristics and can be automated to do programmed tasks that an engineer requires for optimizing a design [2].The goals of the present research are: to construct a strategy for the development of engine crankshafts based on the integration of: CAD and CAE (Computer Aided Design &Engineering) software to model and evaluate functionalparameters, Genetic Algorithms as the optimization method, the use of splines for shape construction and Java language programming for integration of the systems. Structural optimization under these conditions allows computers to work in anautomated environment and the designer to speed up and improve the traditional design process. The specific requirements to be satisfied by the strategies are: Approach the target of imbalance of a V6 engine crankshaft, without affecting either its weight or itsmanufacturability.Develop interface programming that allows integration of the different software: CAD for modeling and geometric evaluations, CAE for simulation analysis and evaluation ,Genetic Algorithms for optimization and search for alternatives .Obtain new design concepts for the shape of the counterweights that help the designer to develop a better crankshaft in terms of functionality more rapidly than with the use of a “manual” approachShape optimization with genetic algorithmsGenetic Algorithms (GAs) are adaptive heuristic search algorithms (stochastic search techniques) based on the ideas of evolutionary natural selection and genetics [3]. Shape optimization based on genetic algorithm (GA), or based on evolutionary algorithms (EA) in general, is a relatively new area of research. The foundations of GAs can be found in a few articles published before 1990 [4]. After 1995 a large number of articles about investigation and applications have been published, including a great amount of GA-based geometrical boundary shape optimization cases. The interest towards research in evolutionary shape optimization techniques has just started to grow, including one of the most promising areas for EA-based shape optimization applications: mechanical engineering. There are applications for shape determination during design of machine components and for optimization of functional performance of these the components, e.g. antennas [5], turbine blades [6], etc. In the ield of mechanical engineering, methods for structural and topological optimization based on evolutionary algorithms are used to obtain optimal geometric solutions that were commonly approached only by costly and time consuming iterative process. Some examples are the computer design and optimization of cam shapes for diesel engines [7]. In this case the objective of the cam design was to minimize the vibrations of the system and to make smooth changes to a splined profile.In this article the shape optimization of a crankshaft is discussed, with focus on the geometrical development of the counterweights. The GAs are integrated with CAD and CAE systems that are currently used in Parametric and Structural Optimization to find optimal topologies and shapes of givenparts under certain conditions. Advanced CAD and CAE software have their own optimization capabilities, but are often limited to some local search algorithms, so it is decided to use genetic algorithms, such as those integrated in DAKOTA (Design Analysis Kit for Optimization Applications) [8] developed at Sandia Laboratories. DAKOTA is an optimization framework with the original goal ofproviding a common set of optimization algorithms for engineers who need to solve structural and design problems, including Genetic Algorithms. In order to make such integration, it is necessary to develop an interface to link the GAs to the CAD models and to the CAE analysis. This paper presents an approach to this task an also some approaches that can be used to build up a strategy on crankshaft design anddevelopment.Multi-objective considerations of crankshaft performanceThe crankshaft can be considered an element from where different objective functions can be derived to form an optimization problem. They represent functionalities and restrictions that are analyzed with software tools during the design process. These objective function are to be optimized (minimized or maximized) by variation of the geometry. The selected goal of the crankshaft design is to reach the imbalance target and reducing its weight and/or increasing its first eigenfrequency. The design of the crankshaft is inherently a multiobjective optimization (MO) problem. The imbalance is measured in both sides of the crankshaft so the problem is to optimize the components of a vector-valued objective function consisting of both imbalances [9]. Unlike the single-objective optimization, the solution to this problem is not a single point, but a family of points known as the Pareto-optimal set. Each point in this set is optimal in the sense that no improvement can be achieved in one objective component that does not lead to degradation in at least one of the remaining components [10].The objective functions of imbalance are also highly nonlinear. Auxiliaryinformation, like the derivatives of the objective function, is not available. The fitness-function is available only in the form of a computer model of the crankshaft, not in analytical form. Since in general our approach requires taking the objective function as a black box, and only the availability of the objective function value can be guaranteed, no further assumptions were considered. The Pareto-based optimization method, known as the Multiple Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) [11], is used in the present MO problem, to finding the Pareto front among these two fitness functions.In GA’s, the natural parameter se t of the optimization problem is coded as afinite-length string. Traditionally, GA’s use binary numbers to represent such strings: a string has a finite length and each bit of a string can be either 0 or 1. By maintaining a population of solutions, GA’s c an search for many Pareto-optimal solutions in parallel. This characteristic makes GA’s very attractive for solving MO problems. The following two features are desired to solve MO problems successfully:1) the solutions obtained are Pareto-optimal and2) they are uniformly sampled from the Pareto-optimal set.NOMENCLATURECAD: Computer Aided Design; GAs: Genetic Algorithms; EA: Evolutionary Algorithms; MO: Multi-objective; MOGA: Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm; CW: Counterweight; FEM: Finite Element Method.OPTIMIZATION OF BALANCE WITH GEOMETRICALFig. 1: Imbalance graph from the original crankshaft DesignCrankshaft shape parameterizationIn order to make geometry modifications it is decided to substitute the current shape design of the crankshaft under analysis, from the original “arc-shaped” design representation of the counterweight’s profile, to a profile using spline curvesThe figure 2 shows a counterweight profile of the crankshaft.Fig. 2: Profile of a counterweight represented by a splineOptimization StrategiesThe general procedure of the strategy is described below. During the optimization loop the CAD software is automatically controlled by an optimization algorithm, i.e. by a Genetic Algorithms (GA). The y coordinates of the control points that define the splined profile of the crankshaft can be parametrically manipulated thanks to an interface programmed in JAVA. The splined profiles allow shapes to be changed by genetic algorithms because the codified control points of the splines play the role of genes. The Java interface allows the CAD software to run continually with the crankshaft model loaded in the computer memory, so that every time an individual is generated the geometry automatically adapts to the new set of parameters.Fig. 3: Profile Shapes of CW1, CW2, CW8 and CW9 from an individual in the Pareto FrontierA corresponding constraint to the optimization strategy is formulated next. An additional objective function was added: the measure of the curvature of all the splines from the profiles of counterweights. As it is known, the curvature is theinverse of the radius of an inscribed circle of the curve. In this case it was decided to integrate into the geometry the required inscribed circles and analysis features to extract the maximum curvature along the profiles of the four varyingFig. 4: Curvature in CW9 profile showing an improvedCurvatureIn the second part of this paper an additional evaluation is going to be introduced: the dynamic response of the crankshaft in order to control the first eigen frequency, with the aim of not affecting the weight. As in this first approach, the GA is going to be used to produce automatically alternative crankshaft shapes for the FEM simulator program, to run the simulator, and finally to e valuate the counterweight’s shapes on the basis of the FEM output data.SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONSThe use of the Java interface allowed the integration of the genetic algorithm to the CAD software, in the first part of the paper, an optimization of the imbalance of a crankshaft was performed. It was possible the development of a Pareto frontier to find the closest-to-target individual. But the shapes of the counterweights were not so suitable for forging, for that reason it was necessary to introduce an additional objective function to improve the curvature of the counterweights profile. A further integration with the CAE software, as described in the second part, was performed. It was possible to improve some shapes of the crankshaft but with not so good imbalance results. The development of a new graph with the additional firsteigen-frequency objective was plotted, from which important conclusions were extracted: It is necessary to prevent the sharp edges of the counterweight’s shape byadding extra restrictions as curvature of shapes.Simulation of the forging process is required in order to define a relationship between good shapes-curvature and manufacturability. This becomes significantly important when a proposed design outside the initial shape restrictions needs to be justified in order not to affect forge ability.This paper defined the basis and the beginning of a strategy for developing crankshafts that will include the manufacturability and functionality to compile a whole Multiobjective System Optimization.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors acknowledge the support received from Tecnológico de Monterrey through Grant No. CAT043 to carry out the research reported in this paper.REFERENCES[1] Z.P. Mourelatos, “A crankshaft system model for structural dynamic analysis of internal combustion engines,” Computers & Structures, vol. 79, 2001, pp.2009-2027.[2] P. Bentley, Evolutionary Design by Computers, USA:Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.[3] D.E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search ,Optimization and Machine Learning, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., 1989.[4] C.A. Coello Coello, “A Comprehensive Survey of Evolutionary-Based Multi-objective Optimization Techniques,” Knowledge and Information Systems, vol.1, 1999, pp. 129-156.[5] B.E. Cohanim, J.N. Hew itt, and O. de Weck, “TheDesign of Radio Telescope Array Configurations using Multiobjective Optimization: Imaging Performance versus Cable Length,” astro-ph/0405183, 2004, pp. 1-42;[6] M. Olhofer, Yaochu Jin, and B. Sendh off, “Adaptiveen coding for aerodynamic shape optimization using evolution strategies,” Evolutionary Computation, Seoul: 2001, pp. 576-583.[7] J. Lampinen, “Cam shape optimization by genetical gorithm,” Computer-Aided Design, vol. 35, 2003, pp.727-737.[8] M. Eldred et al., DAKOTA, A Multilevel ParallelObject-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, andSensitivity Analysis. Reference Manual, USA: Sandia Laboratories, 2002.[9] Y. Kang et al., “An accuracy improvement for balanci ng crankshafts,” Mechanism andMachine Theory, vol. 38,2003, pp. 1449-1467.[10] S. Obayashi, T. Tsukahara, and T. Nakamura,“Multiobjective genetic algorithm applied toaerodynamic design of cascade airfoils,” Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 47, 2000, pp.211-216.[11] C.M. Fonseca and P.J. Fleming, “An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 3, 1995,pp. 1-16[12] - ., “Comparison of Strategies forthe Optimization/Innovation o f Crankshaft Balance,”T rends in Computer Aided Innovation, USA: Springer,2007, pp. 201-210.[13] S. Rao, M echanical vibrations, USA: Addison-Wesley,1990.[14] C.A. Coello Coello, A n empirical study of evolutionary techniques for multi-objective optimization in engineering design, USA: Tulane University, 1996.[15] N. Leon-Rovira et al., “Automatic Shape Variations in3d CAD Environments,” 1st IFIP-TC5 Working Conference on Computer Aided Innovation, Germany:2005, pp. 200-210.[16] R.E. Smith, B.A. Dike, and S.A. Stegmann, “Fitness inheritance in genetic algorithms,”A CM symposium on Applied computing, USA: ACM, 1995, pp. 345-350.IMECE2008学报2008年ASME国际机械工程国会和博览会2008年10月31-11月6日，波斯顿，马赛诸塞州，美国IMECE2008-67447适用于多目标系统优化发动机曲轴（阿尔伯特·阿尔伯斯/ IPEK产品开发研究所，德国卡尔斯鲁厄大学；诺埃尔利昂/ CIDyT创新中心和设计，墨西哥蒙特雷理工学院；温贝托Aguayo / CIDyT创新中心和设计，墨西哥蒙特雷理工学院；托马斯•迈尔/ IPEK产品开发研究所，德国卡尔斯鲁厄大学）随着计算机的功能不断增加，计算机辅助设计与工程(CAD和CAE)也不断加强。
汽车焊接夹具设计外文文献翻译
汽车焊接夹具设计外文文献翻译汽车焊接夹具设计外文文献翻译(含：英文原文及中文译文)文献出处：Semjon Kim.Design of Automotive Welding Fixtures [J]. Computer-Aided Design, 2013, 3(12):21-32.英文原文Design of Automotive Welding FixturesSemjon Kim1 AbstractAccording to the design theory of car body welding fixture, the welding fixture and welding bus of each station are planned and designed. Then the fixture is modeled and assembled. The number and model of the fixture are determined and the accessibility is judged. Designed to meet the requirements of the welding fixture.Keywords: welded parts; foundation; clamping; position1 IntroductionAssembly and welding fixtures are closely related to the production of high-quality automotive equipment in automotive body assembly and welding lines. Welded fixtures are an important part of the welding process. Assembly and welding fixtures are not only the way to complete the assembly of parts in this process, but also as a test and calibration procedure on the production line to complete the task of testing welding accessories and welding quality. Therefore, the design and manufacture ofwelding fixtures directly affect the production capacity and product quality of the automobile in the welding process. Automotive welding fixtures are an important means of ensuringtheir manufacturing quality and shortening their manufacturing cycle. Therefore, it is indispensable to correctly understand the key points of welding fixture design, improve and increase the design means and design level of welding fixtures, and improve the adjustment and verification level of fixtures. It is also an auto manufacturing company in the fierce competition. The problem that must be solved to survive.The style of the car is different from that of the car. Therefore, the shape of the welding jig is very different. However, the design, manufacture, and adjustment are common and can be used for reference.2. Structural design of welding fixtureThe structure design of the welding fixture ensures that the clip has good operational convenience and reliable positioning of the fixture. Manufacturers of welding fixtures can also easily integrate adjustments to ensure that the surfaces of the various parts of the structure should allow enough room for adjustments to ensure three-dimensional adjustment. Of course, under the premise of ensuring the accuracy of the welding jig, the structure of the welding jig should be as simple as possible. The fixture design is usually the position of all components on the fixture is determined directly based on the design basis, and ultimately ensure thatthe qualified welding fixture structure is manufactured. According to the working height, the height of the fixture bottom plate can be preliminarily determined, that is, the height of the fixture fixing position. The welding fixture design must first consider the clamping method. There are two types, manual and pneumatic. Manual clamping is generally suitable for small parts, external parts, and small batches of workpieces. For large bodyparts, planning in the production line, automation High-demand welding fixtures should be pneumatically clamped. Automobile production is generally pneumatically clamped, and manual mass clamping can be used as auxiliary clamping. This can reduce costs accordingly. Some manual clamping products already have standard models and quantities, which can be purchased in the market when needed. For some devices, pneumatic clamping is specified, but if pneumatic clamping is used, the workpiece may be damaged. Therefore, it is possible to manually press the place first to provide a pneumatic clamping force to clamp the workpiece. This is manual-pneumatic. . The fixture clamping system is mounted on a large platform, all of which are fixed in this welding position to ensure that the welding conditions should meet the design dimensions of the workpiece coordinate system positioning fixture, which involves the benchmark.3. Benchmarks of assembly and welding fixtures and their chosen support surfaces3.1 Determination of design basisIn order to ensure that the three-dimensional coordinates of the automatic weldment system are consistent, all welding fixtures must have a common reference in the system. The benchmark is the fixture mounting platform. This is the X, Y coordinate, each specific component is fixed at the corresponding position on the platform, and has a corresponding height. Therefore, the Z coordinate should be coordinated, and a three-dimensional XYZ coordinate system is established. In order to facilitate the installation and measurement of the fixture, the mounting platform must have coordinates for reference. There are usually three types. The structure is as follows:3.1.1 Reference hole methodThere are four reference holes in the design of the installation platform, in which the two directions of the center coordinates of each hole and the coordinates of the four holes constitute two mutually perpendicular lines. This is the collection on the XY plane coordinate system. The establishment of this benchmark is relatively simple and easy to process, but the measurements and benchmarks used at the same time are accurate. Any shape is composed of spatial points. All geometric measurements can be attributed to measurements of spatial points. Accurate spatial coordinate acquisition is therefore the basis for assessing any geometric shape. Reference A coordinated direction formed by oneside near two datums.3.1.2 v-type detection methodIn this method, the mounting platform is divided into two 90-degree ranges. The lines of the two axes make up a plane-mounted platform. The plane is perpendicular to the platform. The surface forms of these two axis grooves XY plane coordinate system.3.1.3 Reference block methodReference Using the side block perpendicular to the 3D XYZ coordinate system, the base of a gage and 3 to 4 blocks can be mounted directly on the platform, or a bearing fixing fixture platform can be added, but the height of the reference plane must be used to control the height , must ensure the same direction. When manufacturing, it is more difficult to adjust the previous two methods of the block, but this kind of measurement is extremely convenient, especially using the CMM measurement. This method requires a relatively low surface mount platform forthe reference block, so a larger sized mounting platform should use this method.Each fixture must have a fixed coordinate system. In this coordinate system, its supporting base coordinate dimensions should support the workpiece and the coordinates correspond to the same size. So the choice of bearing surface in the whole welding fixture system 3.2When the bearing surface is selected, the angle between the tangentplane and the mounting platform on the fixed surface of the welding test piece shall not be greater than 15 degrees. The inspection surface should be the same as the welded pipe fittings as much as possible for the convenience of flat surface treatment and adjustment. The surface structure of the bearing should be designed so that the module can be easily handled, and this number can be used for the numerical control of the bearing surface of the product. Of course, designing the vehicle body coordinate point is not necessarily suitable for the bearing surface, especially the NC fixture. This requires the support of the fixture to block the access point S, based on which the digital surface is established. This surface should be consistent with the supported surface. So at this time, it is easier and easier to manufacture the base point S, CNC machining, precision machining and assembly and debugging.3.2 Basic requirements for welding fixtureIn the process of automobile assembly and production, there are certain requirements for the fixture. First, according to the design of the automobile and the requirements of the welding process, the shape, size and precision of the fixture have reached the design requirements and technical requirements. This is a linkthat can not be ignored, and the first consideration in the design of welding fixture is considered. When assembling, the parts or parts of the assembly should be consistent with the position of the design drawings of the car and tighten with the fixture.At the same time, the position should be adjusted to ensure that the position of the assembly parts is clamped accurately so as to avoid the deformation or movement of the parts during the welding. Therefore, this puts forward higher requirements for welding jig. In order to ensure the smooth process of automobile welding and improve the production efficiency and economic benefit, the workers operate conveniently, reduce the strength of the welder's work, ensure the precision of the automobile assembly and improve the quality of the automobile production. Therefore, when the fixture design is designed, the design structure should be relatively simple, it has good operability, it is relatively easy to make and maintain, and the replacement of fixture parts is more convenient when the fixture parts are damaged, and the cost is relatively economical and reasonable. But the welding fixture must meet the construction technology requirements. When the fixture is welded, the structure of the fixture should be open so that the welding equipment is easy to close to the working position, which reduces the labor intensity of the workers and improves the production efficiency.4. Position the workpieceThe general position of the workpiece surface features is determined relative to the hole or the apparent positioning reference surface. It is commonly used as a locating pin assembly. It is divided into two parts: clamping positioning and fixed positioning. Taking into account thewelding position and all welding equipment, it is not possibleto influence the removal of the final weld, but also to allow the welding clamp or torch to reach the welding position. For truly influential positioning pins and the like, consider using movable positioning pins. In order to facilitate the entry and exit of parts, telescopic positioning pins are available. The specific structure can be found in the manual. The installation of welding fixtures should be convenient for construction, and there should be enough space for assembly and welding. It must not affect the welding operation and the welder's observation, and it does not hinder the loading and unloading of the weldment. All positioning elements and clamping mechanisms should be kept at a proper distance from the solder joints or be placed under or on the surface of the weldment. The actuator of the clamping mechanism should be able to flex or index. According to the formation principle, the workpiece is clamped and positioned. Then open the fixture to remove the workpiece. Make sure the fixture does not interfere with opening and closing. In order to reduce the auxiliary time for loading and unloading workpieces, the clamping device should use high-efficiency and quick devices and multi-point linkage mechanisms. For thin-plate stampings, the point of application of the clamping force should act on the bearing surface. Only parts that are very rigid can be allowed to act in the plane formed by several bearing points so that the clamping force does not bend the workpiece or deviate from the positioning reference. In addition, it must be designed so that it does not pinch the hand when the clamping mechanism is clamped to open.5. Work station mobilization of welding partsMost automotive solder fittings are soldered to complete in several processes. Therefore, it needs a transmission device.Usually the workpiece should avoid the interference of the welding fixture before transmission. The first step is to lift the workpiece. This requires the use of an elevator, a crane, a rack and pinion, etc. The racks and gears at this time Structure, their structural processing, connection is not as simple as the completion of the structure of the transmission between the usual connection structure of the station, there are several forms, such as gears, rack drive mechanism, transmission mechanism, rocker mechanism, due to the reciprocating motion, shake The transfer of the arm mechanism to the commissioning is better than the other one, so the common rocker arm transfer mechanism is generally used.6 ConclusionIn recent years, how to correctly and reasonably set the auxiliary positioning support for automotive welding fixtures is an extremely complicated system problem. Although we have accumulated some experience in this area, there is still much to be learned in this field. Learn and research to provide new theoretical support for continuous development and innovation in the field of welding fixture design. Withthe development of the Chinese automotive industry, more and more welding fixtures are needed. Although the principle of the fixture is very simple, the real design and manufacture of a high-quality welding fixture system is an extremely complicated project.中文译文汽车焊接夹具的设计Semjon Kim1摘要依据车体焊装线夹具设计理论, 对各工位焊接夹具及其焊装总线进行规划、设计, 之后进行夹具建模、装配, 插入焊钳确定其数量、型号及判断其可达性,最终设计出符合要求的焊接夹具。
外文翻译--铣床夹具设计特点
外文原文Milling fixture design featuresFirst, the main types of milling machine fixture and structure of the formMilling fixture for machining parts on the main plane, groove, keyway, spline, and the gap as well as face shape. Usually as a result of milling fixture table together with the feed movement, in different ways according to the feed milling fixture can be divided into straight-line feed type, feed circular mode and rely on three types of feed-type. 1. Linear feed-type milling fixtureThis type of milling machine with the most. Fixture installed in the milling machine table, the processing in a straight line with the feed table by way of movement. According to the workpiece quality, structure and production quantities will be designed as a one-piece fixture points more than the parallel and more than a row followed by clamping of the linkage approach, sometimes the use of sub-degree institutions, both to improve production efficiency.2. Circle-type milling machine fixture feedCircle feed milling in the case of non-stop loading and unloading the workpiece, the general is a multi-tasking, and in the milling machine rotary table use.This fixture is compact and easy to operate, mobile time and auxiliary time overlap is high-performance milling fixture, for use in high-volume production.3. By mold milling fixtureThis module depends on the milling machine with a fixture used in dedicated or universal milling machines on the processing of various non-circular surface. On the role of mold is to make access to supplementary motor workpiece to form a profile campaign. Movement by way of the main feed through mode can be divided into straight-line milling machine fixture and circle into the feed to the two.Second, the design features of milling fixtureAs a result of milling and cutting force cutting more and more intermittent cutting edge, easy processing of vibration, so they should pay attention to the design of milling machine fixture: clamping force to be sufficient self-locking and anti-stroke; fixture installation to be accurate and reliable , that is, when the processing installation and the proper use of directional keys on the knife device; specific folder have sufficient stiffness and stability, the structure must be reasonable.As a result of milling and cutting force cutting more and more intermittent cutting edge, easy processing of vibration, so they should pay attention to the design of milling machine fixture: clamping force to be sufficient self-locking and anti-stroke;fixture installation to be accurate and reliable , that is, when the processing installation and the proper use of directional keys on the knife device; specific folder have sufficient stiffness and stability, the structure must be reasonable.1. Directional keysDirectional key position, also known as keys, installed on the bottom of the vertical slot fixture, generally with two, an in a straight line, the farther the distance, the higher the precision-oriented, with screw fastening in the specific folder. Directional keys work with the milling machine with table-shaped slot in the machine tool fixture to determine the correct position; can absorb part of the cutting torque, reducing the load on clamping bolt to increase the stability of the fixture, so flat and some special drilling jig boring machine fixture is also frequently used.Directional keys are rectangular and round two.2. Of the knife deviceDevices on the knife block and knife by the side of the foot of the fixture and tool used to determine the relative position. The structure of the form of a knife depends on the shape of the surface processing.Directional high-precision fixture should not be used or heavy directional keys, but in the specific folder on one elongated side processing as a base to look for is the installation location calibration fixture.Knife block on the pin and screw fastener commonly used in the specific folder, its location should be easy-to-use plug-foot on the knife, without prejudice to the workpiece loading and unloading. On the knife when the knife cutter block with a plug in between the feet with the knife tool to avoid direct contact block or cause damage to the knife blade block premature wear. Cypriot Cypriot feet are flat feet and two-foot cylindrical plug, the thickness and diameter of 3 ~ 5mm, manufacturing tolerance h6.Side of the knife block and feet have been standardized (the design can be found in the relevant manual), use the total fixture Sedat map scale should be marked on the knife block size and the work surface and positioning the location between the components. Devices should be installed on the blade of the knife and is easy to cut one end of the workpiece.3. Folder specific designTo improve the milling fixture installed in the machine tool stability, reduce its intermittent cutting may be caused by vibration, not only in the specific folder have sufficient stiffness and strength, their height and width ratio should also beappropriate, a general H / B ≤ 1 ~ 1.25, in order to reduce the fixture cente r of gravity, so that as close as possible to the workpiece surface countertops. In addition, we must set a reasonable and ear blocks to strengthen the tendons.If the folder specific wide, can be set up in the same side of two T-slot milling machine table equidistant between the ears Block; of heavy-duty milling fixtures, specific folders should also be set up at both ends of the rings, such as lifting holes or to carry.In the milling process, the often installed in the milling fixture table, together with the jig with the workpiece feed table for movement.In the milling process, the often installed in the milling fixture table, together with the jig with the workpiece feed table for movement. According to the workpiece feed means of general milling fixture can be divided into the following two types:1. Linear feed-type milling fixture 。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
基于案例学习的夹具设计石奇，杨海成，李元，国家重点实验室计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造，西北工业大学西安710072，中国【摘要】：夹具是生产活动中不可或缺的一部分。
本文提出了一个基于案例推理的夹具设计系统。
提出的一种新方法的基础上，案例的情况表示是由工件加工特征的知识，处理功能知识和夹具特征知识构成。
运行原型系统的知识表示方法，使用的情况下，是一个更好的方式来改造和解释的设计知识。
【关键词】：基于案例的推理，夹具设计，知识表示，案例检索1.引言工件夹持装置用于在大部分的制造操作，如机加工，装配，检查等。
作为制造规划的一部分，夹具设计的制造可以是一个主要因素。
夹具设计是一个可以在制造，交货时间和产品的成本上的主要贡献者。
由于种类繁多的零部件和制造业务，夹具设计的过程变得更加复杂和不加控制。
此外，设计一个夹具在很大程度上依赖于专业设计师和经验，以及生产，加工，技术，和零件的数据。
计算机辅助夹具设计（CAFD）技术的CAD/ CAM集成的一部分已经得到开发。
如今，CAFD柔性制造系统（FMS）和计算机集成制造系统（CIMS）在其中起着重要的作用。
在夹具设计中采用计算机必须考虑的第一件事情是建立一个合适的设计规划模型。
同时也必须建立一个成功的夹具设计系统的知识表示方法，来用于设计和设计师的经验。
相对于经典的以规则为基础的推理和基于模型的推理，基于案例的推理（CBR）尝试使用以前的情况下，从案例库和适应的解决方案中类似的问题，根据新形势下的参数，解决新问题。
多以规则为基础的推理或基于模型的推理这种方法的主要优点是将减少规则或模型，设计中采用的多是比较复杂的知识。
解决机械设计问题的方法占有重要的好处。
有系统已设计系统CBR文献记载。
一个系统，称为DEJA VU使用基于案例的推理，以协助机械设计。
另一种的系统称为CADSYM是一个混合的情况为基础的设计模型，它建议将特定领域知识。
在本文中，案例主要来阐述专业知识和设计经验。
夹具设计的基础上灯具功能的情况下表示的方法的建议。
第2节介绍了基于案例推理的概念。
第3节提供夹具的设计和结构的情况下基体的情况下表示。
第4节提出的基于案例的夹具设计系统的体系结构的详细信息。
后面是结论。
2.基于案例推理基于案例的推理依赖于存储解决方案以及问题和适应这些新的类似问题的解决方案。
设计是一个结构不良的问题。
设计经验和启发式在设计过程中扮演着重要的角色。
然而，大多数的经验是难以阐明作为编制和制定的，所以在一个以规则为基础的系统，知识的获取将是一个障碍。
一个系统，与此相反，解决问题，直接利用获得的经验，解决类似的问题在过去而不是通过编写和推广。
一个案例不仅记录结果，还会记录下这个结果是如何获得的，如在什么情况下，根据什么样的条件等一些的工程师率先推出基于案例的推理作为一种替代传统的基于规则和基于模型的推理技术。
一个典型的推理过程包括步骤如图1所示。
首先，这个问题应要被确定和给出描述，然后这个描述信息用于从一个案例库中检索一个或多个类似的案件。
案例检索可以基于某些算法来提高精度。
检索的结果会显示给设计师。
所选择的案例调整时，需要满足新的问题的要求。
最后的解决方案，以及新的问题是作为一种新的情况存储在个案基础里。
图1 基于案例的设计系统3.代表性的设计实例和案例库的组织3.1夹具设计的特点在制造系统中，夹具设计包含三个方面：设置规划，夹具规划，和夹具配置的设计，如图2所示。
设置规划的目的是建立确定的操作序列，对其工件的位置和方向在每个位置和数量的调校。
夹具规划确定的定位和夹紧点在工件表面。
夹具配置设计的任务是决定如何定位，如何钳制。
夹具元件也被选来放入适当位置，以定位和夹持工件。
夹具设计图2 夹具设计过程设置规划和夹具规划的主要目的，是完成夹具配置。
设置和夹具的规划工作过程中需要两种信息。
一个是工件信息，另一个是其他的处理信息。
这两种信息都来自原始的CAD模型和产品的工艺规划模型。
一个CBR夹具设计系统的案例结合了工件的结构信息，处理信息，和夹具配置信息。
3.2摘要功能特点基于案例推理的最重要的问题是信息描述的设计案例。
基于特征的技术被用于描绘零件的形状，功能和结构。
传统上，由于CAD系统的几何模型的局限性，它只能描述零件的几何信息，而不是设计经验。
而基于特征的技术，可以描述两种知识；数据关系的知识形态，如形状，功能，精度，材料，等等和数据之间的关系，如设计领域的知识，设计者的经验和公式的知识。
此类案例具有这一组功能。
对于案例库的设计问题和设计规划的说明，必须保持两部分的知识。
设计问题的描述包括一系列案件在设计问题中的特点。
设计规划是从方案中提取特征。
在夹具设计中，夹具模型集成了三种类型的知识：夹具的解决方案，工件信息和处理信息。
根据减少人工智能问题的方法，复杂的设计问题可以分成几个不太复杂的问题，可以分为更简单的子子问题等。
在这个系统中，一个设计案例的组织有三种不同的特征信息：夹具的特征，工件的特征，和处理特征，夹具的特征在系统中可以分为功能特征，行为特征，和结构特征。
夹具的行为特征体现了夹具的功能和结构之间的关系。
夹具功能特征可以进一步分为定位特征，夹紧特征，辅助特征和导向特征。
夹具实例模型的信息显示在表1。
案件特点的重要性是指控制系统知识库。
案例表示只总结设计特点，其中的重要性和相互关系不需要考虑。
有两个优点：（1）它简化了存储在数据库中的案例结构与案例，（2）可以建立一个基于组织的新的独立的推理策略案例。
3.3案例表示基于案例的知识表示的方法，通常不是一个新方法，而是更高级的抽象的知识表示，如一阶逻辑，规则，框架和语义网络。
执行案件的代表是基于这些共同的知识表示方法。
本文提出了一种面向对象的知识表示法是用来描述夹具设计案例。
本质上，就面向对象的技术方面而言，面向对象的知识表达结合了一套共同的知识表示方法。
案例知识可以分为两个部分：一个是特征值对特定的元组，另一个是其他的设计经验和规则。
类的概念，在面向对象技术的情况是类似的表示。
特征值对中的属性类，它包含前提和解决方案的信息。
设计经验和极大似然估计是类的方法。
面向对象技术的说明内容如下。
Class <CASE_NAME){ [ (FEATURE_VALUE_PAIR_LIST> ]/ *名单案例特征值对* /结构[ (STATIC_STRUCTURESJMPL) ] / *静态结构用来描述特定的设计功能*/方法[ (CASE_FUNCT101VS_LIST) ] / *名单的情况*/}；地方(CASE_NAME):: =(CASE_NAME BY DEFAULT) |(CASE_NAME BY USER) (FEATURE_VALUE_PAIR_LIST ):: ={( FEATURE _TYPE) (FEATURE_NAME)(FEATURE_VALUE)}(STATIC_STRUCTURESJMPL> :: = {STRUCTURE( STRUCTURE_NAME)( STRUCTURE_VARIABLES_LIST)} *( CASE_FUNCTIONS_LIST) :: = {(FUNCTION_NAME)(FUNCT10N_C0NDITI0N)(FUNCTION_CONCLUSION) }功能列表中包含设计经验和设计规则的方法。
应考虑的另一个问题是基体的结构。
案例库可以作为内衬结构具有层次结构的列表或一个框架。
我们选择了后者，它使用关系数据库来存储。
关系型数据库管理的优势有三点：（1）先进的数据管理能力;（2）高性能的数据检索和数据维护;（3）直接关系演算和逻辑演算之间的关系。
4.夹具设计系统在上述实例的表示模型的基础上，基于案例的夹具设计系统建立了，其结构如图3所示。
该系统主要由四部分组成，系统控制模块，基于案例的推理，夹具设计的记忆和设计评价模块。
基于案例的推理是系统的核心，它执行案例检索，案例的选择和改造。
图4是一个屏幕的工作过程。
这个系统的输入有三种信息：工件的一般信息，如名称，类型，材料等工件的加工信息，如加工信息，精度和机器类型；夹具特征信息，如钳制条件下，接触类型，电源类型等。
系统模块包含以下内容：控制模块：用于监控和管理其他模块之间的数据流和信息流;案例推理模块：可以分为六个子模块：重生产，功能相似的判断，判断结构相似性，检索模块，适应夹具的情况下，和该情况下的储存;案例库：用于夹具实例存储，建立索引，并进行实例维护；设计评价：评价推理结果并提交解决方案。
5.结论CBR技术是更接近人类思维的。
本文描述了夹具设计系统使用的技术。
新方法的情况下表示的固定功能的基础由表示构成的工件知识，处理功能的知识和夹具特征知识构成。
原型系统运行表明，知识表示方法使用的情况下是一个更好的方式来改造和解释的设计知识。
参考文献：【1】Y.C Chou.R. A. Srinivas and S. Sujit,自动设计加工设备•概念设计。
先进制造技术国际杂志9号，页3 - 12，1994【2】A. J. Trappey and C. R. Liu文献调查的夹具设计自动化。
先进制造技术国际杂志，5卷，3号，页240 - 255，1990【3】W. Ma, J. Li and Y. Rong, 发展自动化夹具规划系统。
国际先进制造技术，卷15：171-181，1999【4】Theodore Bardasz, Ibrahim Zeid, DEJAVU:基于案例推理的机械设计。
，1，2，pp.111 - 124，1993【5】Mary Lou Maher, D. M. Zhang,基于一个案例设计的过程模型。
1，2，pp.97 - 110，1993【6】Y. Rong and Y. Bai,自动生成模块化夹具结构设计。
交易制造科学与技术学报，119卷，pp.208 - 219。
【7】B. Kumar and B. Raphael, CADREM:基于案例系统的概念结构设计。
计算机与工程，13卷，153页~ 164，1997英文原文：《Study on Case-Based Fixture Design》需要此英文原文的朋友可以通过百度文库，或者万方数据库以及cnki 数据库（中国知网）下载。
将英文名字复制搜索即可～～。