审稿意见模板大全,最新,最全
逐条回复审稿意见模板
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6e81/d6e81d6a01fe159b4295360f7f989cc561c9f51f" alt="逐条回复审稿意见模板"
逐条回复审稿意见模板审稿意见一:引言部分需要更加明确和简洁谢谢您的建议。
引言部分确实需要更加明确和简洁,以便让读者更好地理解本文的目的和背景。
我们将对其进行修改,使其更加精炼和聚焦。
审稿意见二:数据部分存在一些错误和遗漏非常感谢您的反馈。
我们将会仔细检查数据部分,并纠正任何错误或遗漏。
为了确保数据的准确性和完整性,我们将进行必要的修改和补充。
审稿意见三:分析方法需要更加详细地描述您的建议非常中肯。
在分析方法部分,我们将增加更多细节和解释,以便读者更好地理解我们所采用的方法和逻辑。
这将有助于增强本文的可信度和可重复性。
审稿意见四:结论部分需要更加深入和具体您的意见很有价值。
结论部分确实需要更加深入和具体,以便更好地总结本文的主要发现和贡献。
我们将对其进行扩展和深化,以提供更加详细和有意义的结论。
审稿意见五:参考文献部分需要更新和补充感谢您的建议。
参考文献部分确实需要更新和补充,以便更好地反映该领域的最新进展和研究成果。
我们将对其进行审查和更新,以确保其完整性和时效性。
审稿意见六:图表和插图需要改进和优化您的意见很有指导意义。
图表和插图的质量对于增强文章的可读性和可视化效果非常重要。
我们将对其进行改进和优化,以提高其清晰度和可理解性。
审稿意见七:语言表达和语法需要更加准确非常感谢您的反馈。
语言表达和语法对于保持文章的一致性和流畅性至关重要。
我们将对其进行审查和修正,以确保其准确性和专业性。
审稿意见八:结构安排需要更加合理和有序您的建议非常有建设性。
结构安排对于文章的逻辑性和可读性具有重要影响。
我们将仔细审视文章的结构,并进行必要的调整和优化,以便使其更加合理和有序。
审稿意见九:小标题和段落划分需要更加清晰您的反馈很有价值。
小标题和段落划分可以使文章更加易于阅读和理解。
我们将仔细审查文章的小标题和段落划分,并进行必要的修改和完善,以提高其清晰度和易读性。
审稿意见十:格式排版需要更加规范和专业感谢您的宝贵意见。
审稿意见模板
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9e69/a9e69e42bb437fe27d0284ce4fe474a2715469fc" alt="审稿意见模板"
审稿意见模板
尊敬的作者:
经过我们的审阅,对您提交的文档,我们提出了一些审稿意见,希望能够对您
的文档进行改进和完善。
首先,我们对您的文档的整体结构和内容进行了审阅。
在审阅过程中,我们发
现您的文档在内容方面较为丰富,但是在结构上存在一些问题。
建议您在文档的开头部分,简要概括全文的内容,突出重点,引起读者的兴趣。
在正文部分,建议您将内容进行逻辑清晰的分段,每一段的内容都应该有一个明确的主题,保持段落间的连贯性。
另外,需要注意文档中的逻辑关系,避免出现跳跃性和不连贯的情况。
其次,对于文档中的语言表达和用词,我们也提出了一些建议。
在审阅过程中,我们发现您的文档语言表达较为生动,但是在一些地方存在表达不够准确和简洁的情况。
建议您在表达内容时,尽量使用准确、简洁的语言,避免使用过于复杂和晦涩的词语,以便读者更好地理解您的观点和内容。
另外,需要注意文档中的语气一致性,避免出现不同语气的混杂情况。
最后,对于文档中的图表和引用部分,我们也提出了一些意见。
在审阅过程中,我们发现您的文档中缺少一些必要的图表和引用,这会影响到文档的可读性和可信度。
建议您在文档中适当添加一些图表,以便更好地展示内容和数据,同时在引用部分,需要注明引用来源,以增加文档的可信度。
综上所述,我们希望您能够认真考虑我们提出的审稿意见,并对您的文档进行
相应的修改和完善。
我们相信,在您的努力下,这份文档一定会更加完美。
期待您的优秀作品早日问世!
祝好!
此致。
敬礼。
审稿意见范文
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67565/67565c83ba36e6dbd7a3402a8d357bd33b4925a9" alt="审稿意见范文"
审稿意见范文
尊敬的作者:
首先,感谢您对我们期刊的投稿。
我们认真审阅了您的稿件,并提出了一些修改意见,希望对您的文章有所帮助。
1. 内容方面。
您的文章在阐述问题的过程中,缺乏一些具体的案例或数据来支撑观点,这样会使得文章的论证不够有说服力。
我们建议您在文章中增加一些相关的案例或数据,以加强论证的有效性。
另外,在文章的结构安排上,建议您对每个段落的逻辑关系进行重新梳理,确保文章的结构清晰,层次分明,便于读者理解和接受。
2. 语言表达。
在语言表达方面,您的文章存在一些词语搭配不够准确,表达不够精准的问题。
我们建议您在修改时,对文章进行逐句逐词的审
查,确保表达的准确性和精炼度。
另外,文章中存在一些语法错误和表达不够流畅的地方,建议您在修改时注意语言的规范性和流畅性,以提升文章的整体质量。
3. 总体印象。
总体来看,您的文章在某些方面已经有了一定的深度和思考,但在论证和语言表达方面还有待加强。
我们鼓励您对文章进行认真的修改和调整,相信在您的努力下,这篇文章一定能够达到我们期刊的发表标准。
再次感谢您对我们期刊的支持,期待您的修改稿。
祝好!
此致。
编辑部。
中文期刊审稿意见模板
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e143/1e14361992a563c07ea9b2829902e6dc84ea1cfc" alt="中文期刊审稿意见模板"
中文期刊审稿意见模板
第一,不论审稿人提了什么意见,你在回复的时候一定要说:谢谢您的建议,您的所有建议都非常的重要,它们对我的论文写作和科研工作都具有重要的指导意义!
第二,如果审稿人提的意见你暂时无法做到(比如,要你增加实验或改进实验等)。
那么,为了论文尽快发表,你必须拒绝这样的要求。
但是,你不要摆出一大堆理由来证明这个意见是不好实现的。
你应该说:“谢谢您的建议,它非常的重要,由于您的建议,我发现了我目前工作中的不足之处,我会在以后的工作中按照您的建议提高科研水平,取得更多成绩!”这样说,等于委婉的拒绝了评审意见,又让评审人觉得你很看重他的意见。
第三,如果审稿人的意见明显有问题,也不说能说审稿人的意见是错误的,可以他的意见发表任何的评论,只需要列出你的理由和证据就可以了,结尾也不要强调自己的观点是正确的。
一句话,就是凭证据说话。
第四,如果审稿人的评价比较傲慢,而且有失公平。
那么,不用客气,直接写信给编辑,痛批审稿人。
(我就遇到过这样的情况,痛批后反而被录用。
)
第五,在回复信的结尾最好写上再次谢谢您的建议,希望能够从您哪里学到更多的知识。
这句话最好用黑体,要显眼。
可以私聊我~。
审稿意见范文
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7d70/e7d70ee99662f283b9004de2cd19bbd94f2d9a36" alt="审稿意见范文"
审稿意见范文
尊敬的作者,
我认真阅读了您的稿件,并就其内容进行了审稿。
以下是我对您的稿件的意见:
1. 语言表达方面:您的文章语言流畅,词汇丰富,整体的语法和拼写都非常准确。
但是,我注意到有一些句子结构可能可以进一步简化,以增强整个文章的可读性和连贯性。
2. 组织结构方面:您的文章整体结构清晰,逻辑性强。
但是,在某些段落中,您可能可以更好地解释和连接您的观点以及提供更多的支持细节,以便更好地支持您的论点。
请确保每个段落都有一个明确的主题,并通过恰当的过渡词汇和句子连接词来确保段落之间的连贯性。
3. 文章内容方面:您的论点比较有说服力,并且通过了合适的支持证据来支持您的观点。
但是,我希望您能够进一步展开您的观点,提供更多的例子或数据来支持您的观点,并确保避免偏离主题或进行不必要的重复。
4. 结论方面:您的结论总结了整篇文章的主要论点,并提供了一些思考。
但是,我认为您可以进一步发展结论部分,提出一些未来研究方向或提供更多的思考问题,以激发读者的思考。
综上所述,您的稿件质量非常高,是一篇有深度和洞察力的文章。
我希望我的审稿意见能对您有所帮助,并使您的文章更加
完美。
请随时与我联系,如果您对我的意见有任何疑问或需要进一步的支持。
再次感谢您的稿件,并期待您的下一篇优秀作品。
祝好!
敬上
审稿人。
中文审稿人意见模板
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e772d/e772d6b26f432eaee068a35305b08b898ce800ee" alt="中文审稿人意见模板"
中文审稿人意见模板
尊敬的作者,
首先,我要感谢您给我评审这篇中文稿件的机会。
在阅读您的稿件后,我有以下几点意见和建议:
1. 语法和拼写错误:我注意到在文章中有一些语法和拼写错误。
我建议您仔细检查并修正这些错误,以确保文章的准确性和流畅度。
2. 文章结构和逻辑:在文章的结构方面,我认为有必要重新组织段落和调整文章的逻辑顺序。
一些观点之间的转换不够流畅,导致文章结构上的混乱和不连贯。
我建议您重新排列观点和段落,使其更加清晰和连贯。
3. 参数和证据支持:在文章中有一些观点和声明,但缺乏足够的参数和证据支持。
我建议您提供更多的具体数据、研究结果或案例分析等,以加强您的论点和提供更有力的论证。
4. 语言表达:在某些地方,文章使用的语言表达不够准确或不够清晰。
我建议您使用更精确和明确的词语来表达您的观点,并避免使用模糊或含糊不清的表达方式。
5. 文章的篇幅和结构:文章的篇幅是否符合期刊的要求?而且,文章的结构是否符合科技论文的一般要求(即引言、方法、结果、讨论和结论)?如果不符合,我建议您进行相应的调整和修改。
总的来说,您的论文在某些方面仍然需要进一步改进和完善。
请您仔细考虑我的建议,并对您的稿件进行相应的修改。
如果您对我的评论有任何疑问或需要进一步的解释,请随时与我联系。
再次感谢您给我评审稿件的机会,并祝贺您的研究取得成功!
此致
审稿人。
小修审稿意见模板
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acf78/acf78b82a096628bb1c93706d0ca997a8eb8c325" alt="小修审稿意见模板"
小修审稿意见模板
感谢您将您的文章提交给我们。
我们已经对您的文章进行了审稿,并提供以下意见以帮助您进一步完善您的文章。
1. 语言表达方面:文章中存在一些措辞不够准确或表达不够清
晰的地方,建议您重新审视并修改。
特别是在描述某些概念或理论时,应该尽可能使用精准的语言,以便读者更好地理解。
2. 文章结构方面:文章的整体结构比较清晰,但在某些段落中
缺乏过渡,导致阅读起来不够流畅。
我们建议您在修改时重新整理文章结构,加强段落之间的连贯性,使其更加易读。
3. 内容方面:文章的主旨清晰,但有一些内容可以进一步拓展
或深化。
特别是在引用相关研究时,应该尽可能详细地阐述其研究方法和结论,并加入自己的思考和分析。
4. 格式方面:文章的格式规范,但可能存在一些细节问题,如
错别字、标点符号等。
我们建议您仔细检查文章,确保格式无误。
以上是我们的审稿意见,希望可以帮助您进一步完善文章并提高其质量。
如果您有任何疑问或意见,请随时与我们联系。
再次感谢您的投稿,期待与您的进一步合作。
- 1 -。
一些优秀的审稿意见
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57dd8/57dd81996ceadca8bba2d5b2057cfcbf4004f6c3" alt="一些优秀的审稿意见"
一些优秀的审稿意见
审稿意见是在评价和修改稿件时提出的建议和反馈。
优秀的审稿意见应该具有指导性、具体性、客观性和建设性。
以下是一些优秀的审稿意见示例:
指导性和具体性:
“建议在引言中更清晰地提出研究问题,以引起读者的兴趣。
”
“请详细说明实验方法,包括使用的仪器和测量步骤。
”
客观性和中肯性:
“在讨论中,需要更全面地考虑现有研究,以确保论文的全面性和深度。
”“结果部分应更加客观,避免使用过于主观的描述。
”
建设性和启发性:
“您可以考虑添加一些实例或案例来支持您的观点,以增强论文的可信度。
”“建议在结论中提出一些建议,以展望未来的研究方向。
”
关注文体和语言:
“请注意文章中的语法错误和拼写错误,以确保整体的语言流畅度。
”
“建议使用更具体和精准的词汇,以提高表达的准确性。
”
深度思考和提问:
“在讨论中,您可以更深入地探讨研究结果的潜在影响,并提出一些关键问题。
”
“请考虑更详细地解释某些结果,以满足读者对研究方法和结果的更深层次的理解。
”
注重结构和逻辑:
“建议在文章开头提供清晰的结构导引,以引导读者更好地理解论文内容。
”“段落之间的逻辑连接需要更加流畅,以确保整篇文章的连贯性。
”
这些审稿意见示例体现了审稿人应该具备的指导性、客观性、建设性和中肯性。
审稿人在提出建议时,应当注重帮助作者进一步完善论文,促使文章在学术质量和表达方式上都得到提升。
完整版审稿意见模板大全最全
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6c13/d6c132085ffef8987f6ba2c11dd683ffed28d202" alt="完整版审稿意见模板大全最全"
The paper presents an application of reassigned wavelet scalogram for rotor system fault diagnosis.It is a topic of interest to the researchers in the related areas but the paper needs verysignificant improvement before acceptance for publication. My detailed comments are as follows:1.The wavelet method (reassigned wavelet scalogram) used in the paper works very well for the underlying fault diagnosis problem. On the other hand, this wavelet method is a well-established method, and the present research is a direct application of this method without new contribution in methodological research.2.For the above reason, the presentation should be focused on the results. Unfortunately, the presentation is far from acceptable for publication. The material was not properly organized and itis strongly suggested that the authors check carefully the English writing and use standard terminologies in the technical area.3.The title of the paper should be more specific since numerous studies have been done on the fault diagnosis of rotor systems using wavelets and time-frequency methods. Also, remove the word "research".4.On Section 1:•This secti on listed many refere nces that are mai niy related to rotor dyn amics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed.-Review on the directly releva nt refs will be more helpful for the reader. Also, time-freque ncy and wavelets are mainly for non-stationary and transient analysis. The author may discuss in more detail what types of transients and non-stationary components would appear in rotor system vibration.•A few sentences on the organization of the paper will be helpful.5.On Section 2:•Since the major method used in the application is reassigned wavelet scalogram, it is not needed to give the details of three other methods (only give a few words and give the refs). Instead, the authors may discuss more on the relationship between traditional wavelet scalogram and the reassigned wavelet scalogram, and explain why the latter is better than the former.•Eq (2): the right-hand-side is wrong and "2" is missed.•The description after Eq (2) is not clear. See Cohen's book for details about the cross-terms.6.On Sections 3 and 4:The description needs to be improved. The material in Section 3 should be organized in several paragraphs.7.On Section 5:The authors did a good experiment and some of the phenomena presented in the time-frequency planes are also very interesting. However, the observations should be described concisely, and the authors should focus more on: 1) whether these phenomena are general characteristics, and 2) if possible, explain the reason of the phenomena and the advantages of reassigned wavelet scalogram over other time-frequency methods.•n fact, it is po ssible to in ter pret most of the phenomena in the time-freque ncy planes using rotor dynamics. For example, shaft rub causes broadband vibration and will result in nearlyhorizontal lines in the phase planes.•Some of the p aragra phs are too long.8.The conclusion should be concise and only summarize the most important contribution of the research.Reviewer #2: This paper presents the results of time-frequency analysis applied to a table top rotating machinery test rig under a set of fault conditions. The title of the paper is very misleading because no automated methods for either fault detection or diagnosis/isolation are discussed in the paper. Rather, under different fault scenarios, several time-frequency methods available in the literature are evaluated for their ability to generate visually discriminating features associated with the fault conditions. Hence, this paper provides a characterization of time-frequency features associated with rotating machinery faults as opposed to the development of any type of fault diagnosis methodology. Hence, the paper must be judged solely on the quality of the experimentation, the presentation of the results, and how the time-frequency features identified in the various fault cases relates to the dynamical operating conditions of the rig.The main problem with the paper is that it is very poorly written, and this makes the evaluation and interpretation of the main contributions of the paper obscure. The paper requires a complete rewrite to improve the grammar, style and readability. Also consider: In equation (1) on page 2, what does it mean that h(t) is centered at t=0 and f=0? h(t) is a windowing function in the time domain!What is the point of the simulation experiments, what do they add to what is already known about the time-frequency techniques from the literature?Since the only contribution of the paper is the time-frequency analysis, the results of these computations need to be explained in detail in the text and the graphical results need to be properly annotated so that readers can comprehend and understand which distinguishing features are associated with the faults. Currently, the graphical results are poorly displayed and it is difficult to correlate the figures with the text. 以下是从一个朋友转载来的,关于英文投稿过程中编辑给出的意见。
审稿意见模板大全最新最全
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a5ca/9a5ca20eb485c7aae0a511ea440f5ad763fc3ede" alt="审稿意见模板大全最新最全"
审稿意见模板大全最新最全一、总体建议1.概述清晰:文章开头应简洁明了,清晰地介绍研究背景、目的、方法和主要结果。
2.结构合理:文章应按照国际期刊的常规结构撰写,包括引言、材料与方法、结果和讨论等章节,并在结构上保持逻辑性和连贯性。
3.内容完整:确保文章中的每个部分都充分介绍,并包含必要的数据、实验和分析步骤。
二、引言部分1.研究背景:详细介绍研究领域的前沿问题和相关研究成果,以及本研究的意义和目标。
2.文献综述:对相关文献进行综述,包括对前人研究的批评和优化空间的指出,揭示自己研究的创新点。
三、材料与方法部分1.方法选择:简要描述采用的方法、实验操作和数据分析方法,并提供足够的细节和特定参数,以便于其他研究者能够复制实验。
2.实验设计:评估实验设计的科学性和可靠性,确保实验结果的准确性和可重复性。
3.数据处理:明确描述数据处理和统计分析方法,确保数据分析和结论的科学性和合理性。
四、结果部分1.数据呈现:使用适当的图表和表格清晰地呈现实验结果,注意图表的标注和标题的准确性。
2.结果解读:对实验结果进行分析和解读,并结合之前的研究和理论,提出可能的解释和讨论。
五、讨论部分1.结果解释:对实验结果进行深入分析和解释,指出与预期结果的差异,并提出可能的原因和机制。
2.研究价值:评估研究结果的创新性和重要性,并讨论其对该领域的贡献及未来的研究方向。
六、结论部分1.研究结论:简明扼要地总结研究的主要结果,并注意结论是否与引言中的研究目标和问题相一致。
2.局限性和展望:提出研究的局限性,并对未来研究的方向和可能的改进给出建议。
(完整版)审稿意见模板大全,最新,最全
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b646/6b64638399390618a99ce729ab2dcf4852e4cd59" alt="(完整版)审稿意见模板大全,最新,最全"
_______________________________________The paper presents an application of reassigned wavelet scalogram for rotor system fault diagnosis. It is a topic of interest to the researchers in the related areas but the paper needs very significant improvement before acceptance for publication. My detailed comments are as follows:1. The wavelet method (reassigned wavelet scalogram) used in the paper works very well for the underlying fault diagnosis problem. On the other hand, this wavelet method is awell-established method, and the present research is a direct application of this method without new contribution in methodological research.2. For the above reason, the presentation should be focused on the results. Unfortunately, the presentation is far from acceptable for publication. The material was not properly organized and it is strongly suggested that the authors check carefully the English writing and use standard terminologies in the technical area.3. The title of the paper should be more specific since numerous studies have been done on the fault diagnosis of rotor systems using wavelets and time-frequency methods. Also, remove the word "research".4. On Section 1:· This section listed many references that are mainly related to rotor dynamics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed.· Review on the directly relevant refs will be more helpful for the reader. Also, time-frequency and wavelets are mainly for non-stationary and transient analysis. The author may discuss in more detail what types of transients and non-stationary components would appear in rotor system vibration.· A few sentences on the organization of the paper will be helpful.5. On Section 2:· Since the major method used in the application is reassigned wavelet scalogram, it is not needed to give the details of three other methods (only give a few words and give the refs). Instead, the authors may discuss more on the relationship between traditional wavelet scalogram and the reassigned wavelet scalogram, and explain why the latter is better than the former.· Eq (2): the right-hand-side is wrong and "2" is missed.· The description after Eq (2) is not clear. See Cohen's book for details about the cross-terms.6. On Sections 3 and 4:The description needs to be improved. The material in Section 3 should be organized in several paragraphs.7. On Section 5:· The authors did a good experiment and some of the phenomena presented in thetime-frequency planes are also very interesting. However, the observations should be described concisely, and the authors should focus more on: 1) whether these phenomena are general characteristics, and 2) if possible, explain the reason of the phenomena and the advantages of reassigned wavelet scalogram over other time-frequency methods.· In fact, it is possible to interpret most of the phenomena in the time-frequency planes usingrotor dynamics. For example, shaft rub causes broadband vibration and will result in nearly horizontal lines in the phase planes.· Some of the paragraphs are too long.8. The conclusion should be concise and only summarize the most important contribution of the research.Reviewer #2: This paper presents the results of time-frequency analysis applied to a table top rotating machinery test rig under a set of fault conditions. The title of the paper is very misleading because no automated methods for either fault detection or diagnosis/isolation are discussed in the paper. Rather, under different fault scenarios, several time-frequency methods available in the literature are evaluated for their ability to generate visually discriminating features associated with the fault conditions. Hence, this paper provides a characterization of time-frequency features associated with rotating machinery faults as opposed to the development of any type of fault diagnosis methodology. Hence, the paper must be judged solely on the quality of the experimentation, the presentation of the results, and how the time-frequency features identified in the various fault cases relates to the dynamical operating conditions of the rig.The main problem with the paper is that it is very poorly written, and this makes the evaluation and interpretation of the main contributions of the paper obscure. The paper requires a complete rewrite to improve the grammar, style and readability. Also consider:In equation (1) on page 2, what does it mean that h(t) is centered at t=0 and f=0? h(t) is a windowing function in the time domain!What is the point of the simulation experiments, what do they add to what is already known about the time-frequency techniques from the literature?Since the only contribution of the paper is the time-frequency analysis, the results of these computations need to be explained in detail in the text and the graphical results need to be properly annotated so that readers can comprehend and understand which distinguishing features are associated with the faults. Currently, the graphical results are poorly displayed and it is difficult to correlate the figures with the text.以下是从一个朋友转载来的,关于英文投稿过程中编辑给出的意见。
审稿意见模板大全,最新,最全
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcd7d/dcd7d7b95f45c0a349e6c0c9cb8b16568f9bde58" alt="审稿意见模板大全,最新,最全"
_______________________________________The paper presents an application of reassigned wavelet scalogram for rotor system fault diagnosis. It is a topic of interest to the researchers in the related areas but the paper needs very significant improvement before acceptance for publication. My detailed comments are as follows:1. The wavelet method (reassigned wavelet scalogram) used in the paper works very well for the underlying fault diagnosis problem. On the other hand, this wavelet method is awell-established method, and the present research is a direct application of this method without new contribution in methodological research.2. For the above reason, the presentation should be focused on the results. Unfortunately, the presentation is far from acceptable for publication. The material was not properly organized and it is strongly suggested that the authors check carefully the English writing and use standard terminologies in the technical area.3. The title of the paper should be more specific since numerous studies have been done on the fault diagnosis of rotor systems using wavelets and time-frequency methods. Also, remove the word "research".4. On Section 1:· This section listed many references that are mainly related to rotor dynamics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed.· Review on the directly relevant refs will be more helpful for the reader. Also, time-frequency and wavelets are mainly for non-stationary and transient analysis. The author may discuss in more detail what types of transients and non-stationary components would appear in rotor system vibration.· A few sentences on the organization of the paper will be helpful.5. On Section 2:· Since the major method used in the application is reassigned wavelet scalogram, it is not needed to give the details of three other methods (only give a few words and give the refs). Instead, the authors may discuss more on the relationship between traditional wavelet scalogram and the reassigned wavelet scalogram, and explain why the latter is better than the former.· Eq (2): the right-hand-side is wrong and "2" is missed.· The description after Eq (2) is not clear. See Cohen's book for details about the cross-terms.6. On Sections 3 and 4:The description needs to be improved. The material in Section 3 should be organized in several paragraphs.7. On Section 5:· The authors did a good experiment and some of the phenomena presented in thetime-frequency planes are also very interesting. However, the observations should be described concisely, and the authors should focus more on: 1) whether these phenomena are general characteristics, and 2) if possible, explain the reason of the phenomena and the advantages of reassigned wavelet scalogram over other time-frequency methods.· In fact, it is possible to interpret most of the phenomena in the time-frequency planes usingrotor dynamics. For example, shaft rub causes broadband vibration and will result in nearly horizontal lines in the phase planes.· Some of the paragraphs are too long.8. The conclusion should be concise and only summarize the most important contribution of the research.Reviewer #2: This paper presents the results of time-frequency analysis applied to a table top rotating machinery test rig under a set of fault conditions. The title of the paper is very misleading because no automated methods for either fault detection or diagnosis/isolation are discussed in the paper. Rather, under different fault scenarios, several time-frequency methods available in the literature are evaluated for their ability to generate visually discriminating features associated with the fault conditions. Hence, this paper provides a characterization of time-frequency features associated with rotating machinery faults as opposed to the development of any type of fault diagnosis methodology. Hence, the paper must be judged solely on the quality of the experimentation, the presentation of the results, and how the time-frequency features identified in the various fault cases relates to the dynamical operating conditions of the rig.The main problem with the paper is that it is very poorly written, and this makes the evaluation and interpretation of the main contributions of the paper obscure. The paper requires a complete rewrite to improve the grammar, style and readability. Also consider:In equation (1) on page 2, what does it mean that h(t) is centered at t=0 and f=0? h(t) is a windowing function in the time domain!What is the point of the simulation experiments, what do they add to what is already known about the time-frequency techniques from the literature?Since the only contribution of the paper is the time-frequency analysis, the results of these computations need to be explained in detail in the text and the graphical results need to be properly annotated so that readers can comprehend and understand which distinguishing features are associated with the faults. Currently, the graphical results are poorly displayed and it is difficult to correlate the figures with the text.以下是从一个朋友转载来的,关于英文投稿过程中编辑给出的意见。
中文期刊审稿意见模板
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2221e/2221e452f98773b5aa60da3355552fa2a623d079" alt="中文期刊审稿意见模板"
中文期刊审稿意见模板尊敬的审稿专家:感谢您抽出宝贵的时间对本文进行审阅,并提出宝贵意见。
在您的指导下,我对文章进行了认真的修改,现将修改意见汇总如下:一、总体印象。
您对本文的审阅工作非常细致,提出的修改意见也非常中肯,对于文章的结构和内容进行了深入的分析和指导,使我受益匪浅。
二、文章结构。
您提到的文章结构不够清晰,确实是我在写作过程中没有充分考虑到的问题。
在您的指导下,我重新梳理了文章结构,对各部分进行了重新调整和编排,使得整个文章的逻辑结构更加清晰,条理更加清楚。
三、语言表达。
您指出了文章中存在的一些语言表达不够准确、生动的问题,我在您的指导下对这些问题进行了仔细的修改,采用更加精准、生动、简洁的语言表达,使得文章更具有说服力和吸引力。
四、论据支持。
您认为文章的论据支持不够充分,这也是我在写作过程中没有注意到的问题。
在您的指导下,我对文章的论据进行了重新梳理和补充,增加了一些新的案例和数据,使得文章的论据更加充分、有力。
五、逻辑推理。
您提到文章的逻辑推理不够严密,确实是我在写作过程中存在的不足。
在您的指导下,我对文章的逻辑进行了重新推敲和调整,使得整个文章的逻辑更加清晰、严密,各部分之间的联系更加紧密。
六、结尾部分。
您认为文章的结尾部分不够有力,这也是我在写作过程中没有注意到的问题。
在您的指导下,我对文章的结尾部分进行了重新修改和增补,使得整个文章的结尾更加有力,给人留下深刻的印象。
最后,再次感谢您对本文的审阅工作,您的指导对我在学术写作方面有着非常重要的指导意义。
我会认真对待您提出的修改意见,对文章进行进一步的修改和完善,使得文章在学术水平和表达能力上都得到提升。
希望在不久的将来,能够再次向您呈交修改后的文章,期待您的再次审阅和指导。
衷心感谢!此致。
敬礼!。
论文审稿评语
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ec59/7ec59474d65ec2971c2f9603976340928d4f8c40" alt="论文审稿评语"
二、在您的审稿评语中,对本文的创新性、学术价值、论据支持等方面提出了一些指导性意见。在此,我将结合您的意见和建议,对本文进行进一步修改和完善。
三、首先,针对您提到的创新性方面,我将进一步梳理相关领域的研究现状,找出本文的创新点,并丰富其创新性,使其更具有独特性和前瞻性。
四、其次,关于学术价值,我将重新审视本文的论证思路和结论,提高其学术研究水平,确保其具有较高的学术价值和学术影响力。
五、针对您提到的论据支持不足的问题,我将进一步补充相关的研究数据和案例,加强论证的可信度和说服力,确保本文观点的权威性和可靠性。
六、另外,在您的审稿意见中,还提到了本文在研究方法、实证分析等方面存在的问题。我将结合您的意见,重新审视本文的研究方法,优化实证分析的过程,确保研究方法的科学性和合理性。
七、最后,再次感谢您的审稿意见和建议。我会认真对待每一条意见,不断完善本文,使其具有更高的学术水准和学术价值。期待在不久的将来,再次向您呈上修改后的论文,谢谢。
此致,敬礼。
审稿意见模板大全,最新,最全
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99417/99417efe3799dc637ce6cfd1e70c5f043bc4b842" alt="审稿意见模板大全,最新,最全"
审稿意见模板大全,最新,最全XXX。
While this topic is of interest to researchers in related fields。
XXX:1.XXX method used in the article is effective for XXX。
this method is already well-established and the article does not XXX.2.Given the lack of new methodology。
the article should XXX。
XXX their English writing and use standard technical XXX.The title of the paper needs to be more specific。
as there have been many XXX and time-frequency methods。
nally。
the word "research" should be removed from the title.In n 1.the authors have XXX be included。
XXX to the present research。
It would be more XXX。
wavelets and time-frequency methods are XXX.A brief overview of XXX.Moving on to n 2:XXX method in their n。
thus only XXX for the other three methods。
Instead。
the authors should delve into the comparison XXX。
XXX.XXX (2)。
the right-hand-side contains an error and the value "2" is missing.XXX (2) XXX regarding cross-terms。
中文审稿意见怎么写
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d19d/3d19d670aa87f19a0c940ae2aef09082420855f7" alt="中文审稿意见怎么写"
中文审稿意见怎么写【篇一:审稿意见例文(化学)】整篇文中思路清晰,所列数据能够很好的支持相应问题。
建议修改后同意接收。
【篇二:审稿意见模板】如何学习审稿专家学者为什么愿意拿出大量的时间审稿呢?为期刊审稿是义务,也是一份荣耀,更是自我价值的实现,那就是为进步做出了一份贡献。
审稿人都是志愿提供服务而不计报酬。
当然,通过审稿还会得到其他好处,(1)首先是精神上的收获,能够增加科学知识,体验科学交流和论争的乐趣;(2)最新的研究进展在发表之前就有机会看到(不亦快哉!);(3)通过对照其他审稿人的评论和编辑的稿件处理意见,可提高自己的审稿技能;(4)通过发现论文中的错误,可以学习如何写出更有竞争力的稿件;(5)会得到编辑的尊敬,甚或有机会被邀请加入学会或编委会;例如美国呼吸与危重监护杂志(ajrccm)编委会的任命,就是完全根据审稿人的审稿是否中肯、严谨、及时。
一个优秀的审稿人又有什么特征呢? black等曾对英国杂志(bmj)的审稿人进行过评价,其目的是想明确高水平审稿人的特征,特别是在审稿花费时间和审回时间方面。
他们对bmj的420份稿件的审稿人进行了调查,2位编辑和稿件的责任作者对审稿质量进行独立评估。
结果编辑和论文作者的评估都显示,经过流行病学或统计学培训是提供高质量评阅的审稿人的唯一显著性相关因素。
在编辑的质量评估中,年轻是高质量评阅的独立预测因素。
评审花费的时间与审稿质量的提高相关,但超过3小时则无更大意义。
通常认为,正在从事研究工作的人员、拥有学术职位者、科研资助团体成员,应该会提供更高质量的审稿,但令人意外的是,这项研究并没有发现审稿质量与上述特征相关。
这一结果对于编辑的意义是,要发现优秀的审稿人,只有不断试用新人,评估他们的表现,然后决定是否继续用他们。
建议征集接受过流行病学和统计学训练的、年龄在40岁左右的审稿人。
那么年轻学者如何学习、提高审稿技能呢?最重要的是在实践中提高,就是通过审稿提高审稿水平。
审稿意见模板大全,最新,最 全
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6806f/6806f368f662226b2e37529fb2731684261af97f" alt="审稿意见模板大全,最新,最 全"
_______________________________________The paper presents an application of reassigned wavelet scalogram for rotor system fault diagnosis. It is a topic of interest to the researchers in the related areas but the paper needs very significant improvement before acceptance for publication. My detailed comments are as follows:1. The wavelet method (reassigned wavelet scalogram) used in the paper works very well for the underlying fault diagnosis problem. On the other hand, this wavelet method is a well-established method, and the present research is a direct application of this method without new contribution in methodological research.2. For the above reason, the presentation should be focused on the results. Unfortunately, the presentation is far from acceptable for publication. The material was not properly organized and it is strongly suggested that the authors check carefully the English writing and use standard terminologies in the technical area.3. The title of the paper should be more specific since numerous studies have been done on the fault diagnosis of rotor systems using wavelets and time-frequency methods. Also, remove the word "research".4. On Section 1:· This section listed many references that are mainly related to rotor dynamics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed.· Review on the directly relevant refs will be more helpful for the reader. Also, time-frequency and wavelets are mainly for non-stationary and transient analysis. The author may discuss in more detail what types of transients and non-stationary components would appear in rotor system vibration.· A few sentences on the organization of the paper will be helpful. 5. On Section 2:· Since the major method used in the application is reassigned wavelet scalogram, it is not needed to give the details of three other methods (only give a few words and give the refs). Instead, the authors may discuss more on the relationship between traditionalwavelet scalogram and the reassigned wavelet scalogram, and explain why the latter is better than the former.· Eq (2): the right-hand-side is wrong and "2" is missed.· The description after Eq (2) is not clear. See Cohen's book for details about the cross-terms.6. On Sections 3 and 4:The description needs to be improved. The material in Section 3 should be organized in several paragraphs.7. On Section 5:· The authors did a good experiment and some of the phenomena presented in the time-frequency planes are also very interesting. However, the observations should be described concisely, and the authors should focus more on: 1) whether these phenomena are general characteristics, and 2) if possible, explain the reason of the phenomena and the advantages of reassigned wavelet scalogram over other time-frequency methods.· In fact, it is possible to interpret most of the phenomena in the time-frequency planes using rotor dynamics. For example, shaft rub causes broadband vibration and will result in nearly horizontal lines in the phase planes.· Some of the paragraphs are too long.8. The conclusion should be concise and only summarize the most important contribution of the research.Reviewer #2: This paper presents the results of time-frequency analysis applied to a table top rotating machinery test rig under a set of fault conditions. The title of the paper is very misleading because no automated methods for either fault detection or diagnosis/isolation are discussed in the paper. Rather, under different fault scenarios, several time-frequency methods available in the literature are evaluated for their ability to generate visually discriminating features associated with the fault conditions. Hence, this paper provides a characterization of time-frequency features associated with rotating machinery faults as opposed to the development of any type of fault diagnosis methodology. Hence, the paper must be judged solely on the quality of the experimentation, the presentation of the results, and how thetime-frequency features identified in the various fault cases relates to the dynamical operating conditions of the rig.The main problem with the paper is that it is very poorly written, and this makes the evaluation and interpretation of the main contributions of the paper obscure. The paper requires a complete rewrite to improve the grammar, style and readability. Also consider:In equation (1) on page 2, what does it mean that h(t) is centered att=0 and f=0? h(t) is a windowing function in the time domain!What is the point of the simulation experiments, what do they add to what is already known about the time-frequency techniques from the literature?Since the only contribution of the paper is the time-frequency analysis, the results of these computations need to be explained in detail in the text and the graphical results need to be properly annotated so that readers can comprehend and understand which distinguishing features are associated with the faults. Currently, the graphical results are poorly displayed and it is difficult to correlate the figures with the text.以下是从一个朋友转载来的,关于英文投稿过程中编辑给出的意见。
审稿意见 语言
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea15c/ea15c9806f6e3cb848b2c7a22e18b488bf7038a5" alt="审稿意见 语言"
审稿意见语言
审稿意见的语言应当专业、准确、客观,并且尽可能地详细和具体。
以下是一些建议,可以帮助您写出有用的审稿意见:
1. 开头先表达对稿件的总体印象,例如“这篇文章在研究方向和方法上具有创新性”或“这篇文章存在一些问题,需要进一步改进”。
2. 具体地指出文章中的优点和亮点,例如“该研究的数据分析部分做得非常出色,值得赞扬”。
3. 详细地提出文章中的问题和不足之处,例如“该研究的实验设计部分存在一些问题,需要进一步改进和完善”。
4. 给出具体的建议和意见,例如“建议作者进一步加强对相关文献的综述,以便更好地支持其研究结论”。
5. 在结尾处再次强调审稿意见的主要观点,例如“综上所述,作者需要对实验设计部分进行更深入的改进和完善,以提高研究的可靠性和说服力”。
需要注意的是,审稿意见应当尽可能地客观、中肯,避免过于主观或情绪化的语言。
同时,审稿意见也应当注重细节和具体内容,避免过于笼统或空洞。
中文审稿意见怎么写
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d19d/3d19d670aa87f19a0c940ae2aef09082420855f7" alt="中文审稿意见怎么写"
中文审稿意见怎么写【篇一:审稿意见例文(化学)】整篇文中思路清晰,所列数据能够很好的支持相应问题。
建议修改后同意接收。
【篇二:审稿意见模板】如何学习审稿专家学者为什么愿意拿出大量的时间审稿呢?为期刊审稿是义务,也是一份荣耀,更是自我价值的实现,那就是为进步做出了一份贡献。
审稿人都是志愿提供服务而不计报酬。
当然,通过审稿还会得到其他好处,(1)首先是精神上的收获,能够增加科学知识,体验科学交流和论争的乐趣;(2)最新的研究进展在发表之前就有机会看到(不亦快哉!);(3)通过对照其他审稿人的评论和编辑的稿件处理意见,可提高自己的审稿技能;(4)通过发现论文中的错误,可以学习如何写出更有竞争力的稿件;(5)会得到编辑的尊敬,甚或有机会被邀请加入学会或编委会;例如美国呼吸与危重监护杂志(ajrccm)编委会的任命,就是完全根据审稿人的审稿是否中肯、严谨、及时。
一个优秀的审稿人又有什么特征呢? black等曾对英国杂志(bmj)的审稿人进行过评价,其目的是想明确高水平审稿人的特征,特别是在审稿花费时间和审回时间方面。
他们对bmj的420份稿件的审稿人进行了调查,2位编辑和稿件的责任作者对审稿质量进行独立评估。
结果编辑和论文作者的评估都显示,经过流行病学或统计学培训是提供高质量评阅的审稿人的唯一显著性相关因素。
在编辑的质量评估中,年轻是高质量评阅的独立预测因素。
评审花费的时间与审稿质量的提高相关,但超过3小时则无更大意义。
通常认为,正在从事研究工作的人员、拥有学术职位者、科研资助团体成员,应该会提供更高质量的审稿,但令人意外的是,这项研究并没有发现审稿质量与上述特征相关。
这一结果对于编辑的意义是,要发现优秀的审稿人,只有不断试用新人,评估他们的表现,然后决定是否继续用他们。
建议征集接受过流行病学和统计学训练的、年龄在40岁左右的审稿人。
那么年轻学者如何学习、提高审稿技能呢?最重要的是在实践中提高,就是通过审稿提高审稿水平。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
_______________________________________The paper presents an application of reassigned wavelet scalogram for rotor system fault diagnosis. It is a topic of interest to the researchers in the related areas but the paper needs very significant improvement before acceptance for publication. My detailed comments are as follows:1. The wavelet method (reassigned wavelet scalogram) used in the paper works very well for the underlying fault diagnosis problem. On the other hand, this wavelet method is awell-established method, and the present research is a direct application of this method without new contribution in methodological research.2. For the above reason, the presentation should be focused on the results. Unfortunately, the presentation is far from acceptable for publication. The material was not properly organized and it is strongly suggested that the authors check carefully the English writing and use standard terminologies in the technical area.3. The title of the paper should be more specific since numerous studies have been done on the fault diagnosis of rotor systems using wavelets and time-frequency methods. Also, remove the word "research".4. On Section 1:· This section listed many references that are mainly related to rotor dynamics and are not directly related to rotor system diagnosis. If the authors would like to keep these references, some discussions on the relevance of these refs to the present research are needed.· Review on the directly relevant refs will be more helpful for the reader. Also, time-frequency and wavelets are mainly for non-stationary and transient analysis. The author may discuss in more detail what types of transients and non-stationary components would appear in rotor system vibration.· A few sentences on the organization of the paper will be helpful.5. On Section 2:· Since the major method used in the application is reassigned wavelet scalogram, it is not needed to give the details of three other methods (only give a few words and give the refs). Instead, the authors may discuss more on the relationship between traditional wavelet scalogram and the reassigned wavelet scalogram, and explain why the latter is better than the former.· Eq (2): the right-hand-side is wrong and "2" is missed.· The description after Eq (2) is not clear. See Cohen's book for details about the cross-terms.6. On Sections 3 and 4:The description needs to be improved. The material in Section 3 should be organized in several paragraphs.7. On Section 5:· The authors did a good experiment and some of the phenomena presented in thetime-frequency planes are also very interesting. However, the observations should be described concisely, and the authors should focus more on: 1) whether these phenomena are general characteristics, and 2) if possible, explain the reason of the phenomena and the advantages of reassigned wavelet scalogram over other time-frequency methods.· In fact, it is possible to interpret most of the phenomena in the time-frequency planes usingrotor dynamics. For example, shaft rub causes broadband vibration and will result in nearly horizontal lines in the phase planes.· Some of the paragraphs are too long.8. The conclusion should be concise and only summarize the most important contribution of the research.Reviewer #2: This paper presents the results of time-frequency analysis applied to a table top rotating machinery test rig under a set of fault conditions. The title of the paper is very misleading because no automated methods for either fault detection or diagnosis/isolation are discussed in the paper. Rather, under different fault scenarios, several time-frequency methods available in the literature are evaluated for their ability to generate visually discriminating features associated with the fault conditions. Hence, this paper provides a characterization of time-frequency features associated with rotating machinery faults as opposed to the development of any type of fault diagnosis methodology. Hence, the paper must be judged solely on the quality of the experimentation, the presentation of the results, and how the time-frequency features identified in the various fault cases relates to the dynamical operating conditions of the rig.The main problem with the paper is that it is very poorly written, and this makes the evaluation and interpretation of the main contributions of the paper obscure. The paper requires a complete rewrite to improve the grammar, style and readability. Also consider:In equation (1) on page 2, what does it mean that h(t) is centered at t=0 and f=0? h(t) is a windowing function in the time domain!What is the point of the simulation experiments, what do they add to what is already known about the time-frequency techniques from the literature?Since the only contribution of the paper is the time-frequency analysis, the results of these computations need to be explained in detail in the text and the graphical results need to be properly annotated so that readers can comprehend and understand which distinguishing features are associated with the faults. Currently, the graphical results are poorly displayed and it is difficult to correlate the figures with the text.以下是从一个朋友转载来的,关于英文投稿过程中编辑给出的意见。