英文论文审稿常用套话
英文审稿人常用语大全
英文审稿人常用语大全英文审稿人在审阅稿件时常用的一些语言包括：1. "The manuscript is well-written and the arguments are clearly presented."2. "The author has effectively addressed the reviewers' comments and concerns."3. "The paper would benefit from a more thorough discussion of the methodology."4. "The conclusions drawn in the manuscript are well supported by the data."5. "The author should consider revising theintroduction to provide a clearer context for the study."6. "The language and grammar used in the manuscript need to be improved for clarity."7. "The paper would benefit from additional referencesto support the arguments."8. "The results presented in the manuscript are consistent with previous findings in the field."9. "The manuscript would benefit from a more in-depth analysis of the results."10. "The organization of the paper could be improved to enhance the flow of the arguments."这些是审稿人在审阅稿件时常用的一些语言，用于表达对文章内容、结构、语言表达等方面的评价和建议。
英文投稿客套语
英文投稿客套语Greetings and salutations to the esteemed reader. I am delighted to present this comprehensive guide on the art of crafting English submission cover letters. As we delve into this topic, let us embark on a journey to explore the nuances and best practices that will elevate your professional correspondence.The cover letter is often the first point of contact between you and the prospective publisher, editor, or organization. It serves as a concise yet impactful introduction to your work, highlighting your qualifications, expertise, and the unique value you bring to the table. Crafting an effective cover letter requires a delicate balance of professionalism, personalization, and persuasion.One of the fundamental elements of a successful cover letter is to personalize it to the specific recipient. Avoid the temptation of using a generic, one-size-fits-all approach. Instead, research the organization, the publication, or the individual you are addressing, and tailor your letter accordingly. Demonstrate your understanding of their mission, values, and the type of content they typically feature. This personalization will instantly grab the reader's attention and convey your genuine interest in the opportunity.Another crucial aspect of the cover letter is to clearly articulate the purpose of your submission. Whether you are pitching a feature article, a research paper, a creative piece, or a guest post, be direct and concise in stating your intent. Provide a brief overview of the work you are submitting, highlighting its relevance, timeliness, and the unique perspective or insights it offers. This will help the reader quickly grasp the essence of your submission and evaluate its fit for their publication or organization.In addition to the purpose of your submission, it is essential to showcase your qualifications and expertise. Carefully curate the information you include, focusing on the most relevant and impactful aspects of your background. This may include your educational credentials, professional experience, awards, publications, or any other achievements that demonstrate your credibility and suitability for the opportunity. Remember to strike a delicate balance between confidence and humility, allowing your accomplishments to speak for themselves.One often overlooked but highly valuable element of a cover letter is the personalization of the closing. Avoid generic sign-offs like "Sincerely" or "Best regards." Instead, consider crafting a more tailored and genuine conclusion that resonates with the reader. This could be a statement of your enthusiasm for the opportunity, areiteration of your unique value proposition, or even a specific call-to-action that encourages the reader to engage further with your submission.Throughout the cover letter, it is essential to maintain a professional and polished tone. Ensure that your language is clear, concise, and free of grammatical or spelling errors. Proofread your letter meticulously, and consider having a trusted colleague or mentor review it as well. Remember, the cover letter is a reflection of your attention to detail and your ability to communicate effectively in a professional setting.Finally, it is crucial to adhere to any specific guidelines or requirements provided by the organization or publication. This may include word count limitations, formatting preferences, or submission instructions. Carefully follow these guidelines to demonstrate your attention to detail and your respect for the recipient's preferences.In conclusion, crafting an effective English submission cover letter is a nuanced art that requires a combination of personalization, professionalism, and persuasion. By following the principles outlined in this guide, you can elevate your correspondence and increase the likelihood of capturing the reader's attention and securing the desired opportunity. Remember, the cover letter is your chance tomake a lasting impression and showcase your unique value proposition. Embrace this opportunity, and let your words be the catalyst for your next professional success.。
(完整版)一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板(可编辑修改word版)
一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个 major revision 后接收吧。
呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.3、对于研究设计的 rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对 hypothesis 的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。
(完整版)一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板
一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision后接收吧。
呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar， spelling，and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader。
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study。
Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided。
3、对于研究设计的rationale：Also， there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design。
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated。
For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。
（完整版）一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板（可编辑修改word版）
（完整版）一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板（可编辑修改word版）一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision 后接收吧。
呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.3、对于研究设计的 rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对 hypothesis 的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。
审稿意见回稿用语
论文返修（response letter)一些很有用的套话1、According to the associate editor and reviewers’comments, we have made extensive modifications to our manuscript and supplemented extra data to make our results convincing.2、In this revised version, changes to our manuscript were all highlighted within the document by using red colored text.3、Thank you for your nice comments on our article. According to your suggestions, we have supplemented several data here and corrected several mistakes in our previous draft. Based on your comments, we also attached a point-by-point letter to you and the other two reviewers. We have made extensive revisions to our previous draft. The detailed point-by-point responses are listed below.4、Thanks for your help. We feel really sorry for our carelessness.5、Thank you for your reminding. You and the other two reviewers’comments are all of great importance to our article. All of these comments have contributed a lot to improve the quality of our article. After this revision, we have written a point-by-point response letter to you as you can see above. Meanwhile, we also wrote a point-by-point response letter to the other two nice reviewers to acknowledge their helps and denote where we made revisions.6、We feel great thanks for your professional review work on our article. As you are concerned, there are several problems that need to be addressed. According to your nice suggestions, we have made extensive corrections to our previous draft. We have added necessary data to supplement our results and edited our article extensively. The detailed corrections are listed below.7、We feel sorry that we did not provide enough information about XXXX.8、it is really a giant mistake to the whole quality of our article. We feel sorry for our carelessness. We have corrected it and we also feel great thanks for your point out.9、thanks for your suggestions. We feel sorry for our poor writings, however, we do invite a friend of us who is a native English speaker from USA help polish our article. Due to our friend’s help, the article wasedited extensively. And we hope the revised manuscript could be acceptable for you.10、thanks for your careful checks. We are sorry for our carelessness. Based on your comments, we have made the corrections to make the unit harmonized within the whole manuscript.11、your suggestion really means a lot to us. Yes, it would be more understandable if we XXX.12、According to your suggestion, we have corrected the “XXX”into “XXX”.13、 thanks for your correction. It was indeed a serious grammatical error. And we have corrected it according to your suggestion.14、thanks for your suggestions. We feel sorry for the improper wording. We have used “XXXX” as you suggested.15、According to the reviewer’s comments, we have revised the manuscript extensively. If there are any other modifications we could make, we would like very much to modify them and we really appreciate your help. “xxxx”is a journal of great popularity and prestige. We hope that our manuscript could be considered for publication in your journal. Thank you very much for your help.欢迎您的下载，资料仅供参考！致力为企业和个人提供合同协议，策划案计划书，学习资料等等打造全网一站式需求。
SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板
SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板(From Internet)一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript. entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript. entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original researc h article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript. to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript,again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript. (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest.A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript. is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style. of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript. entitled “”. We have studie d their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript. which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript. according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript.7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript. is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerni ng Figures 1 and 2 result froma misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript. is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript. is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。
sci审稿人常用话术
sci审稿人常用话术
尊敬的作者，
非常感谢您将您的研究成果提交到我们的期刊。
我们非常重视您的工作，并将会认真审阅您的稿件。
以下是我们审稿人常用的话术，希望对您有所帮助。
我们注意到您的研究方法和数据分析是非常可靠和严谨的，这些都是非常重要的因素。
您的研究结果对于我们的学术界和相关领域都有着重要的意义。
我们希望您能就研究目的、方法和结果进行更详细的描述，以便读者更好地理解您的研究。
同时，我们也鼓励您在文章中使用一些实例或案例来支持您的观点，以使读者更容易理解您的研究。
我们建议您在讨论和结论部分对您的研究结果进行深入的分析和解释。
您可以从不同的角度和维度来解读您的发现，并与已有的研究进行比较和对比。
这样可以增加您的研究的学术价值和原创性。
我们还注意到您在文献综述中对已有研究的引用非常充分。
但是我们建议您对这些引用进行进一步的解释和分析，以使读者更好地理解这些研究对您的研究的贡献。
我们希望您能够在文中使用准确且简洁的语言来描述您的研究。
避免使用过多的专业术语和复杂的句子结构，以确保读者能够轻松理解您的研究。
同时，我们也鼓励您使用一些形象生动的词汇，以使
读者更容易产生共鸣和理解您的研究。
非常感谢您对我们期刊的信任和支持。
我们期待您对我们提出的修改意见的回复，并期待您的修订稿。
祝好！。
SCI投稿时的一些套话
一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for pu blication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them.If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferablenative speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have r ead the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。
(完整word版)一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板
一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision后接收吧。
呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.3、对于研究设计的rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。
一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板
一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。
幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个majorrevision后接收吧。
呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。
2345、对678、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview: Thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification: Thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossible tojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.10、严谨度问题：MNQiseasierthantheprimitivePNQS,howtoprovethat.11、格式（重视程度）：Inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.Itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.Ihavea ttachedapdffilewith"InstructionsforAuthors"whichshowsexamples. Beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted.Ifyouar eunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenunderthe"Instructio nsandForms"buttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：有关语言的审稿人意见：ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglis heditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothat thegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.个人认为文章还是有一些创新的，所以作为审稿人我就给了66分，（这个分正常应该足以发表），提了一些修改意见，望作者修改后发表！登录到编辑部网页一看，一个文章竟然有六个审稿人，详细看了下打的分数，60分大修，60分小修，66分（我），25分拒，（好家伙，竟然打25分，有魄力），拒但没有打分（另一国人审），最后一个没有回来！两个拒的是需要我们反思和学习的！（括号斜体内容为我注解）Reviewer4ReviewerRecommendationTerm:Rejectm.eraturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion),-ithastobeaddedinthemanuscriptwhatkindofXXXXXXbyothermethodscomparedtothisnovelone(IN TRODUCTION-literaturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion),-ithastobeoutlinedwhatisthebenefitofthismethod(ABSTRACT,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION,CONCLUSI ONS).（很多人不会写这个地方，大家多学习啊）2.WhendiscussingXRDdataXXXauthors-statethatXXXXX-statethatXXXX-Thisusuallyhappenswithincreasingsinteringtime,butarethereanydatatopresent,density,pa rticlesize?（很多人用XRD，结果图放上去就什么都不管了，这是不应该的）3.Whendiscussingluminescencemeasurementsauthorswrite"XXXXXIfthereissecondharmonicinex4.Name:Deareditor:Thankyouforinvitingmetoevaluatethearticletitled"XXXX“.Inthispaper,theauthorsinvestig atedtheinfluencesofsinteringconditiononthecrystalstructureandXXXXXX，However,itisdifficultforustounderstandthemanuscriptbecauseofpoorEnglishbeingused.Thetextisnotwellarrangedandthelogicisnotclear.ExceptEnglishwriting,therearemanymistak esinthemanuscriptandtheexperimentalresultsdon'tshowgoodandnewresults.SoIrecommendtoyo uthatthismanuscriptcannotbeaccepted.Thefollowingarethequestionsandsomemistakesinthism anuscript:（看看总体评价，不达标，很多人被这样郁闷了，当然审稿人也有他的道理）1.TheXXXXXXX.However,thiskindmaterialhadbeeninvestigatedsince1997asmentionedintheauth or'smanuscript,andsimilarworkshadbeenpublishedinsimilarjournals.Whatarethenovelfindin gsinthepresentwork?Thesynthesismethodandluminescencepropertiesreportedinthismanuscrip tdidn'tsupplyenoughevidencetosupporttheprimenoveltystatement.（这位作者好猛，竟然翻出自己1997年的中文文章翻译了一边就敢投国际知名杂志，而且没有新的创新！说实不说了）好东西原文地址：对英文审稿意见的回复作者：海天奥博一篇稿子从酝酿到成型历经艰辛，投出去之后又是漫长的等待，好容易收到编辑的回信，得到的往往又是审稿人不留情面的一顿狂批。
sci审稿人常用话术
sci审稿人常用话术
作为一名SCI审稿人，常用的话术包括：
1. "您的研究问题是否与现有文献有所重复？"
2. "您的研究设计和方法是否科学合理，符合学术规范？"
3. "您的研究结果是否能够得出鲜明的结论，对学术界和实际应用有何意义？"
4. "您的参考文献是否充分、恰当，并且包含最新的研究进展？"
5. "您的数据是否可靠、准确，并且进行了适当的统计分析？"
6. "您的论文是否遵循了学术写作的规范，包括格式、语法和语言表达等方面？"
7. "您的研究是否存在一些局限性，您是否对这些局限性进行了充分的讨论和解释？"
8. "您的研究是否能够为相关领域的学术研究和实践工作提供有益的启示和指导？"
9. "您的论文是否具有创新性，是否能够对学术界产生积极影响？"
10. "您的论文是否适合发表在本期刊，是否能够吸引读者的关注和兴趣？"
这些话术可以帮助审稿人对论文进行全面、客观的评价，并提供有针对性的建议和意见，以促进论文的质量提升和学术交流的进展。
SCI论文回复评审意见专用套话
审稿意见回复中建议使用的句型以下是几个可以帮助你在回信时解说你如何修改论文的句型开头Thank you for providing these insights.Thank you for your precious useful helpful suggestion.Thank you for your valuable advice.Thank you for your careful work.Your comments are very helpful for us.Your correction really means a lot to us.That is an interesting query.This is an interesting perspective.We agree with you. We agree with your point of view.We agree with your assessment.You have raised an important question.You have asked an interesting question.We feel great thanks for your professional review work on our article.We are sorry for these language and grammar mistakes.同意审稿或期刊编辑意见It is real a giant mistake for publication of our paper,We agree with you and have incorporated this suggestion throughout our paper.We have reflected this comment by… (p. #, lines #-#).We have incorporated your comments by… (p. #, lines #-#).We agree that…We have now [X] (p. #, lines #-#) and [Y] (p. #, lines #-#). We think these changes now better [Z]. We hope that you agree.不同意评审或期刊编辑意见You have raised an important point; however, we believe that [X] would be outside the scope of our paper because…This is a valid assessment of…; however, we believe that [X] would be more appr opriate because…We agree that…; however, due to [X], we believe that…In our revisions, we have attempted to [X] (p. #, lines #-#); however, we have retained some of our arguments because…We acknowledge that [X] has certain limitations; however,…Your comments are very helpful for us.解释澄清We are sorry for mistakes in descriptions of "linearWe have clarified that… means… (p. #, lines #-#) throughout the paper.We have redrafted the [X] section (p. #, lines #-#) to establish a clearer focus.We have revised the text (p. #, lines #-#) to reflect…We removed [X] (from p. #, lines #-#) and hope that the deletion clarifies the points we attempted to make.We have replaced the term [X] throughout the paper with [Y] to use more precise terms.We have rewritten [X] (p. #, lines #-#) to be more in line with your comments. We hope that the edited section clarifies…We have elaborated on [X] (p. #, lines #-#) and expanded our consideration of [Y]. We hope these revisions provide a more [balanced][thorough] discussion.额外的信息与解释We have included a new Figure # (p. #) to further illustrate…We have added a new Table # (p. #), which outlines…We have supplemented the [X] section with explanations of [Y] (p. #, lines #-#). There are multiple reasons/approac hes to…, including [our scenario]. We have included an acknowledgment regarding this point in the [X] section (p. #, lines #-#). We have not done… However, we believe that [doing X] (p. #, lines #-#) would address this issue because…We have not done…; however, our sense is that…回答多题(当你的一个回复回答许多问题时) Please see point # above.。
英文论文审稿常用套话
编辑一般会发给审稿人一个提纲，类似于这样的：文章编号题目对文章一个概括性的描述及审稿人自己的决定（接受，拒，大修，小修等）审稿意见：1、XX2、XX3、XX...审稿意见的一些套话1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?1/ 11/ 1。
审稿意见回稿用语
论文返修（response letter)一些很有用的套话1、According to the associate editor and reviewers’ comments, we have made extensive modifications to our manuscript and supplemented extra data to make our results convincing.2、In this revised version, changes to our manuscript were all highlighted within the document by using red colored text.3、Thank you for your nice comments on our article. According to your suggestions, we have supplemented several data here and corrected several mistakes in our previous draft. Based on your comments, we also attached a point-by-point letter to you and the other two reviewers. We have made extensive revisions to our previous draft. The detailed point-by-point responses are listed below.4、Thanks for your help. We feel really sorry for our carelessness.5、Thank you for your reminding. You and the other two reviewers’ comments are all of great importance to our article. All of these comments have contributed a lot to improve the quality of our article. After this revision, we have written apoint-by-point response letter to you as you can see above. Meanwhile, we also wrote a point-by-point response letter to the other two nice reviewers to acknowledge their helps and denote where we made revisions.6、We feel great thanks for your professional review work on our article. As you are concerned, there are several problems that need to be addressed. According to your nice suggestions, we have made extensive corrections to our previous draft. We have added necessary data to supplement our results and edited our article extensively. The detailed corrections are listed below.7、We feel sorry that we did not provide enough information about XXXX.8、it is really a giant mistake to the whole quality of our article. We feel sorry for our carelessness. We have corrected it and we also feel great thanks for your point out.9、thanks for your suggestions. We feel sorry for our poor writings, however, we do invite a friend of us who is a native English speaker from USA help polish our article. Due to our friend’s help, the article was edited extensively. And we hope the revised manuscript could be acceptable for you.(10、thanks for your careful checks. We are sorry for our carelessness. Based on your comments, we have made the corrections to make the unit harmonized within the whole manuscript.11、your suggestion really means a lot to us. Yes, it would be more understandable if we XXX.12、According to your suggestion, we have corrected the “XXX” into “XXX”.13、thanks for your correction. It was indeed a serious grammatical error. And we have corrected it according to your suggestion.14、thanks for your suggestions. We feel sorry for the improper wording. We have used “XXXX” as you suggested.15、According to the reviewer’s comments, we have revised the manuscript extensively. If there are any other modifications we could make, we would like very much to modify them and we really appreciate your help. “xxxx” is a journal of great popularity and prestige. We hope that our manuscript could be considered for publication in your journal. Thank you very much for your help.：。
英文审稿意见汇总最新修正版
1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
◆In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.◆Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experimentsshould be provided.3、对于研究设计的rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?7、对研究问题的定义：Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,write one section to define the problem8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification:There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.10、严谨度问题：MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.11、格式（重视程度）：◆In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with "Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.◆Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：有关语言的审稿人意见：◆It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.◆The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service before submission; only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not complete sentences.◆As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There areproblems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction.◆The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-versed in English or whose native language is English.◆Please have someone competent in the English language and the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?◆the quality of English needs improving.来自编辑的鼓励：Encouragement from reviewers:◆I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth once it has been edited because the subject is interesting.◆There is continued interest in your manuscript titled "……" which you submitted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B - AppliedBiomaterials.◆The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.∙The paper is very annoying to read as it is riddled with grammatical errors and poorly constructed sentences. Furthermore, the novelty and motivation of the work is not well justified. Also, the experimental study is shallow. In fact, I cant figure out the legends as it is too small! How does your effort compares with state-of-the-art?∙The experiment is the major problem in the paper. Not only the dataset is not published, but also the description is very rough. It is impossible to replicate the experiment and verify the claim of the author. Furthermore, almost no discussion for the experimental result is given. E.g. why the author would obtain this result? Which component is the most important? Any further improvement?∙the author should concentrated on the new algorithm with your idea and explained its advantages clearly with a most simple words.∙it is good concept, but need to polish layout, language.∙The authors did a good job in motivating the problem studied in theintroduction. The mathematic explanation of the proposed solutions is also nice. Furthermore, the paper is accompanied by an adequate set of experiments for evaluating the effectiveness of the solutions the authors propose.Apparently，Obviously ,Innovation ,refine ,In my humble opinion 如果仍然有需要修改的小毛病，一般你可以用you paper has been conditionally accepted. Please revise .....according to review comments.如果是接受，你可以用We are very pleased to inform you that your paper "xxxxx" has been accepted by [journal name]. Please prepare your paper by journal template...............At a first glance, this short manuscript seems an interesting piece of work, reporting on ×××. Fine, good quality, but all this has been done and published, and nearly become a well-known phenomenon. Therefore, there is insufficient novelty or significance to meet publication criteria. Also, I did not see any expermental evidence how the ** is related with **, except for the hand-waving qualitative discussion. Therefore, I cannot support its publication in JPD in its present form. It should be rejected.建议去小木虫问问，那里有一些资源。
论文返修（responseletter）一些很有用的套话III
论文返修（responseletter）一些很有用的套话III总结了一部分万能的套话，以体现我们对杂志社编辑和审稿人的尊重。
1、Thank you foryour email dated xxxxxx[[1 June 2016]] enclosing the reviewers’ comments. We have carefully reviewed the comments and have revised the manuscript accordingly.Our responses are given in a point-by-pointmanner below. Changes to the manuscript are shown in underline/red/bold.2、I very much appreciate the time and effort you’ve put into your comments. Your advice aboutthe formatting, structure and referencing style of my paper is most helpful.3、Further to ourcorrespondence a couple of weeks ago, I’m attaching the revised version of my articleentitled “XXXX”I have now completed all of the changes you requested: （改格式）The numerical style of in-text referencinghas been changed to author-date referencing in APA style.The list of references has been arrangedalphabetically by the last names of authors instead of numerically, and otherchanges to conform to APA style have been made to the references.The article has been restructured toinclude separate Limitations and Conclusions sections.All headings and subheadings have beenadjusted to conform to the requirements indicated in the Journal of ChangingWeather author guidelines, including the removal of numbers.All nonstandard abbreviations and acronymsused in the paper have been defined on first use and used consistentlythereafter.Abbreviations used in each table have beendefined in a note at the bottom of the table.The vertical rules/lines have been removedfrom all three tables.The tables are now attached as a separatefile instead of embedded in the paper.4、I hope that the changes I’ve made resolve all your concerns about the article. I’m more thanhappy to make an y further changes that will improve the paper and/or facilitatesuccessful publication.5、Thank you once again for your time and interest. I look forward to hearing from you.6、We thank reviewers fortheir constructive criticism, and time spent to analyze this manuscript, Theresponses, and explanations related to their comments are listed below:7、We agree with the reviewer’s comment concerningthis issue. However, …….8、As a response to the reviewer’s comment we ……..9、We thank the reviewer for the kind comments.10、we thank the reviewer for pointing this out. We havecorrected it to “XXXXX”11、We agree with the reviewer. In respond to thiscomment and to a comment raised by the other reviewer, we have revised the textas follows.12、Based on these comments and suggestions, we have made careful modifications to the original manuscript,and carefully proof-read the manuscript to minimize typographical andgrammatical errors. We believe that the manuscript has been greatly improved and hope it has reached you r magazine’s standard.13、Once again, weacknowledge your comments very much, which are valuable in improving thequality of our manuscript.14、We are verygrateful to your comments on the manuscript.15、We thank youvery much for your comments for pointing out this omission. Now, in the revisedmanuscript, we have corrected……16、We are verygrateful to your comments and thoughtful suggestions. In the revisedmanuscript, we have modified……17、In conclusion, according to the comments, we give a detailedrevision on the original manuscript. At the same time, we have thoroughlyrevised the manuscript in order to express the idea more clearly. The majorrevision are listed in the following.We believe the manuscript has beengreatly improved. Once again, thank you for the kind advice.18、thanks for your suggestions. We feel sorry for our poor writings, however, we do invite a friend of us who is a native English speaker from USA help polish our article. Due to our friend’s help, the article was edited extensively. And we hope the revised manuscript could be acceptable for you.好啦今天就策到这里吧，希望对大家有帮助。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
编辑一般会发给审稿人一个提纲，类似于这样的：
文章编号
题目
对文章一个概括性的描述及审稿人自己的决定（接受，拒，大修，小修等）
审稿意见：
1、XX
2、XX
3、XX
...
审稿意见的一些套话
1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.
2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.
3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –
4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.
5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .
6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.
7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.
9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.
10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?。