必修unitmakingthenews课文原文
高二英语必修五第4单元课文翻译
高二英语必修五Unit 4课文翻译Unit 4 Making the newsReadingMY FIRST WORK ASSIGNMENT"Unforgettable", says new journalist我的第一项工作任务“难以忘怀,”新闻记者说Never will Zhou Yang (ZY) forget his first assignment at the office of a popular English newspaper. His discussion with his new boss, Hu Xin (HX), was to strongly influence his life as a journalist.周阳永远不会忘记他在一家畅销英文报纸的第一项工作任务。
他同新上司胡欣的讨论对他的记者生涯必将产生强烈的影响。
HX: Welcome. We're delighted you're coming to work with us. Your first job here will be an assistant journalist. Do you have any questions?胡:欢迎你,非常高兴你来参加我们的工作,你来这里首先就是当助理记者。
有什么问题吗?ZY: Can I go out on a story immediately?周:我可以马上去采访吗?HX: (laughing) That' s admirable, but I' m afraid it would be unusual ! Wait till you' re more experienced. First we'll put you as an assistant to an experienced journalist. Later you can cover a story and submit the article yourself.胡:(笑)真是勇气可嘉!不过恐怕这不太合乎常规,还是等到你比较有经验以后吧。
高考英语复习课件:必修5Unit4《Making_the_news》(新人教版)
4.He denied taking money but we were skeptical.
[翻译]他不承认拿走了我的电脑。 He denied taking away my computer.
5.It was a dilemma because the footballer could have
I was employed to assist the manager with his duties.我受雇协
助经理工作。
My father assisted in building our new house.我的父亲帮助我
们盖新房子。
句型assist sb.in doing sth.帮助某人做某事assist sb.to do sth.帮助
Unit 4
课前10分钟
概括大意
Making the news
Wall Street in Manhattan is the financial heart of the USA. It is also the most important banking center in the world.It is a street of “skyscrapers.” These are those incredible,high buildings,which Americans invented,and built faster and higher than anyone else.Perhaps the two most spectacular skyscrapers in New York are the two towers of the New York World Trade Center.When the sun sets,their 110 floors shine like pure gold. 此段落的大意是:The Financial Center of USA.
必修unitmakingthenews课文原文完整版
必修u n i t m a k i n g t h e n e ws课文原文HUA system office room 【HUA16H-TTMS2A-HUAS8Q8-HUAH1688】My first work assignment“Unforgettable”, says new journalistNever will I Zhou Yang(ZY) forget his first assignment at the office of a popular English newspaper. His discussion with his new boss, Hu Xin(HX), was to strongly influence his life as a journalist.HX: Welcome. We’re delighted you’re coming to work with us. Your first job here will be an assistant journalist.Dou you have any questions?ZY: Can I go out on a story immediately?HX: (laughing) That’s admirable, but I’m afraid it would be unusual! Wait till you’re more experienced. First we’ll put you as an assistant to an experience journalist. Later you can cover a story and submit the article yourself.ZY: Wonderful! What do I need to take with meI already have a notebook and camera.HX: No need for a camera. You’ll have a professional photography with you to take photographs. Yo u’ll find your colleagues very eager to assist you, so you may be able to concentrate on photography later if you’reinterested.ZY: Thank you. Not only am I interested in photography, but I took an amateur course at university to update my skills.HX: Good.ZY: what do I need to remember when I go out to cover a story?HX: You need to be curious. Only if you ask as many different questions will you acquire all the information you need to know. We say a good journalist must have a good “noose” for a story. That means you must be able to assess when people are not telling the whole truth and then try to discover it. They must use research to inform themselves of the missing parts of the story.ZY: What should I keep in mind?HX: Here comes my list of dos and don’ts: don’t miss your deadline, don’t be rude, don’t talk too much, but make sure you listen to the interviewee carefully.ZY: Why is listening so important?HX: Well, you have to listen for detailed facts. Meanwhile you have to prepare the next question depending on what the person says.ZY: But how can I listen carefully while taking notes?HX: That is a trick of the trade. If the interviewee agrees, you can use a recorder to get the facts straight. It’s also useful if a person wants to challenge you. You have the evidence to support your story.ZY: I see! Have you ever had a case where someone accused your journalist of getting the wrong end of the stick?HX: Yes, but it was a long time ago. This is how the story goes. A footballer was accused of taking money or deliberately not scoring goals so as to let the other team win. We went to interview him. He denied taking money but we were skeptical. So we arranged an interview between the footballer and the man supposed to bribe him. When we saw them together we guessed from the footballer’s body language that he was nottelling the truth. So we wrote an article suggesting he was guilty. It was a dilemma because the footballer could have demanded damages if we were wrong. He tried to stop us publishing it but later we were proved right.ZY: Wow! That was a real “scoop”. I’m looking forward to my first assignment now. Perhaps I’ll get a scoop too! HX: Perhaps you will. You never know.。
人教高中英语高三必修5 Unit 4 Making the news
02
to express progressive relationship
What’s more, What’s worse, Even, Especially… Besides, In addition, Not only …but also
Sentence is the king!
check the sentences
check the spelling
check the phrases
check the punctuation check the grammar
organize the passage
01
to express sequence
Writing Steps
2. draw up an outline
3. check the sentences
1.analyze the requirements
4. organize the passage
Homework1源自2Finish your news articles and share them with your classmates.
headline lead body
summary
Colorful riding in the city Bike-sharing is booming in China in recent years. Colorful bikes like Mobike and OFO can be seen here and there. Shared bikes bring great convenience to people. Compared to other means of transportation, its greatest advantage is that you can easily find one and never worry about where to park it. It is becoming a new trend for people to go out, which relieves the traffic pressure and does good to the environment as well. However, bad things happen. Some people damage the QR code on purpose, or use their own lock, which causes trouble to other users. In general, we should use shared bikes correctly. Those who damage the bike should pay for their actions. It’s a good way to connect the usage to one’s personal credit.
必修五 4.2《Unit 4 Making the news》
Step 4 lay out
Step 5 print the newspaper
What are the qualities a good news reporter needs to have?
• ①higher level of education • ②work experience • ③good communication skills • ④curious, active personality • ⑤hard-working • ⑥enthusiasm for the job • ⑦prepared to work long hours • ⑧ability to work in a team
4
Photographers take
photographs (D)
Printer prints the newspaper (E)
How to make the newspaper ?
C
D
E
A
B
Step1/2 interview
Step 1/2 take photographs
Step 3 make sure the writing is clear
• To protect a story from accusations (I can
see --- You never know!)
How to become a successful reporter?
go
The skills needed
① work in a team (work with colleagues) ② research a story (have a “nose” for a story) ③ be accurate (get all our facts straight) ④ protect a story from accusations
必修makingthenews课文原文
必修m a k i n g t h e n e w s课文原文集团档案编码:[YTTR-YTPT28-YTNTL98-UYTYNN08]M y f i r s t w o r k a s s i g n m e n t“Unforgettable”, says new journalistNever will I Zhou Yang(ZY) forget his first assignment at the office of a popular English newspaper. His discussion with his new boss, Hu Xin(HX), was to strongly influence his life as a journalist.HX: Welcome. We’re delighted you’re coming to work with us. Your first job here will be an assistant journalist. Dou you have any questions?ZY: Can I go out on a story immediately?HX: (laughing) That’s admirable, but I’m afraid it would be unusual! Wait till you’re more experienced. First we’ll put you as an assistant to an experience journalist.Later you can cover a story and submit the article yourself.ZY: Wonderful! What do I need to take with me? I already have a notebook and camera.HX: No need for a camera. You’ll have a professional photography with you to take photographs. Yo u’ll find your colleagues very eager to assist you, so you may be able to concentrate on photography later if you’re interested.ZY: Thank you. Not only am I interested in photography, but I took an amateur course at university to update my skills.HX: Good.ZY: what do I need to remember when I go out to cover a story?HX: You need to be curious. Only if you ask as many different questions will you acquire all the information you need to know. We say a good journalist must have a good “noose”for a story. That means you must be able to assess when people are not telling thewhole truth and then try to discover it. They must use research to inform themselves of the missing parts of the story.ZY: What should I keep in mind?HX: Here comes my list of dos and don’ts: don’t miss your deadline, don’t be rude, don’t talk too much, but make sure you listen to the interviewee carefully.ZY: Why is listening so important?HX: Well, you have to listen for detailed facts. Meanwhile you have to prepare the next question depending on what the person says.ZY: But how can I listen carefully while taking notes?HX: That is a trick of the trade. If the interviewee agrees, you can use a recorder to get the facts straight. It’s also useful if a person wants to challenge you. You have the evidence to support your story.ZY: I see! Have you ever had a case where someone accused your journalist of getting the wrong end of the stick?HX: Yes, but it was a long time ago. This is how the story goes. A footballer was accused of taking money or deliberately not scoring goals so as to let the other team win. We went to interview him. He denied taking money but we were skeptical. So we arranged aninterview between the footballer and the man supposed to bribe him. When we saw them together we guessed from the footballer’s body language that he was not telling the truth. So we wrote an article suggesting he was guilty. It was a dilemma because thefootballer could have demanded damages if we were wrong. He tried to stop us publishing it but later we were proved right.ZY: Wow! That was a real “scoop”. I’m looking forward to my first assignment now. Perhaps I’ll get a scoop too!HX: Perhaps you will. You never know.。
英语人教必修五Unit 4 Making the news
英语人教必修五Unit 4 Making the newsgodmother or helpful mice, nor was there mention of a horse and carriage.The stepsisters were cruel: they always threw Cinderella's food into the ashes of the fire, and made her sleep on the ashes on the floor, hence(因此)her name.In the original story, the king's ball actually lasted for three days. With the help of the birds, the girl, beautifully dressed, danced with the prince on all three nights and the prince fell in love with her. However, she broke away from him to rush back home each night. On the last night, the prince placed something sticky on the stairs; as Cinderella made her escape, a shoe got stuck on it.Here now is where the story becomes unpleasant: when the prince went to the house looking for the girl whose foot fit the shoe, the wicked(邪恶的) stepmother told one of her two daughters to cut off her big toe to fit into theshoe. The daughter did as told. So the prince took her away to be his bride. But, when they passed the tomb of Cinderella's mother, the birds called out to the prince,“Turn and peep, there's blood within the shoe;The shoe is too small, the true bride waits for you.”Realizing he had been tricked, the prince returned the daughter to her mother. The other then had to cut off part of her heel in order to fit into the shoe, with the same result. Only Cinderella's foot fit perfectly and so the prince chose to marry her. The story ends with the wedding day; as Cinderella's two stepsisters followed her, pretending to be devoted to her so that they could enjoy the king's riches, two birds flew by and plucked(啄) out their eyes. Because of their wickedness and falsehood, they had to spend the rest of their days blind.The original Cinderella is so different from the Disney version. Thank goodness Disney made such changes; it indeed was a wise move.21.What does the underlined word “They” in the first paragraph refer to? ________A.Such wonderful things. B.Other well-loved characters.C.Old fables. D.Cartoon movies.22.How did Cinderella get her name?_A.The birds came up with it.B.It was given by Disney.C.It came from the word “ash”.D.She got it from her mother.23.The moral of the original story is that _ __.A.a wicked person cannot escape punishmentB.a devoted person certainly deservesrespectC.a well-behaved child earns a great rewardD.a dishonest child cannot get mother love 24.What does the author think of the Disney version? __A.Excellent. B.Ordinary C.Dull. D.Ridiculous.BMichelle Kwan was born on July 7, 1980, in Torrance, California. The daughter of Hong Kong immigrants (移民), Kwan watched her older brother play ice hockey as a kid. She began skating when she was five, and entered and won her first figure skating competition at seven. She won the world title in the 1994 World Championships at the age of 13, and earned a spot as an alternate (候补者) for the 1994 Olympic Games. Kwan went on to capture theworld title in 2019, 2019, 2019, 2019 and 2019.At the Nagano Winter Olympics in 2019, Kwan was believed to win gold, but ended up with a disappointing silver medal when fellow US skater Tara Lipinski surprisingly took first place. Shortly before the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics in 2019, Kwan, who was then the reigning world champ, surprisingly fired both her choreographer (编舞者), Lori Nichol, and longtime coach, Frank Carroll. Once again, she failed to get the gold medal when she finished third behind Irina Slutskaya of Russia and US skater Sarah Hughes, who took first.As a student at the University of California at Los Angeles, Kwan has continued to compete since her defeat (战败) in Salt Lake City. In February 2019, she was unable to take part in the Olympic Games in Torino, Italy because of a serious injury. Though Michelle Kwan did not compete during the 2019-2019 figure skatingseason, she has turned down an offer to work for NBC Sports and says she is not retiring.25.The underlined word “capture” in the first paragraph means “ __”.A.enter B.win C.learn D.find 26.What happened to Michelle Kwan in 2019?_ __A.Her coach didn't want to train her any longer.B.She went to study at the University of California.C.She failed to take part in the Olympic Games in Torino, Italy.D.She failed to win the gold medal in the Olympics again.27.Which of the following may NOT be a world champ? _ _A.Lori Nichol. B.Michelle Kwan.C.Tara Lipinski. D.Sarah Hughes.CWhat are you going to do if you are in a burning house? How will you escape? Do you know how to save yourself? Please read the following passage.Escaping a fire is a serious matter. Knowing what to do during a fire can save your life. It is important to know the ways you can use and show them to everyone in the family, such as stairways and fire escapes, but not lifts.From the lower floors of the buildings, escaping through windows is possible. Learn the best way of leaving by windows with the least chance of serious injury.The second floor window is usually not very high from the ground. An average person,hanging by the finger-tips will have a drop of about six feet to the ground. It is about the height of an average man. Of course, it is safer to jump as hort way than to stay in a burningbuilding.Windows are also useful when you are waiting for help. Be sure to keep the door closed. Or smoke and fire may be drawn into the room. Keep your head low at the window to be sure you get fresh air rather than smoke that may leak(渗漏) into the room.On a second or third floor, the best windows for escape are those that open onto a roof. From the roof a person can drop to the ground more safely. Dropping onto cement (水泥) might end in injury. Bushes(灌木丛) and grass can help to break a fall.28.It is important to _______.A. put out the fire in the burning houseB. know the ways to escape the fireC. jump off a burning houseD. keep the door closed29.It is possible to escape through thewindows if__________A. there are some bushes on the groundB. you are strong enoughC. you live on a lower floorD. you have a long rope30.Which of the following escaping ways is NOT right? ________A. You can escape though stairways.B. You can choose fire escapes.C. Escape from the windows that open onto a roof.D. Use a lift to come down at once.31.Open the window so that________ if the building is on fire.A. you can get fresh airB. you can call for helpC. you can easily jump offD. you can be seen firstDBad news sells .If it bleeds, it leads. No newsis good news, and good news is no news. Those are the classic rules for the evening broadcasts and the morning papers. But now that information is being spread and monitored(监控) in different ways, researchers are discovering new rules. By tracking people's e-mails and online posts, scientists have found that good news can spread faster and farther than disasters and sob stories.“The ‘if it bleeds’ rule works for mass media,” says Jonah Berger, a scholar at th e University of Pennsylvania.“They want your eyeballs and don't care how you're feeling. But when you share a story with your friends, you care a lot more how they react. You don't want them to think of you as a Debbie Downer.”Researchers analyzing word-of-mouth communication—e-mails,Web posts and reviews, face-to-face conversations—foundthat it tended to be more positive than negative(消极的), but that didn't necessarily mean people preferred positive news. Was positive news shared more often simply because people experienced more good things than bad things? To test for that possibility, Dr. Berger looked at how people spread a particular set of news stories: thousands of articles on The New York Times' website. He and a Penn colleague analyzed the “most e-mailed” list for six months. One of his first finds was that articles in the science section were much more likely to make the list than non-science articles. He found that science amazed Times' readers and made them want to share this positive feeling with others.Readers also tended to share articles that were exciting or funny, or that inspired negative feelings like anger or anxiety, but not articles that left them merely sad. They needed to bearoused(激发) one way or the other, and they preferred good news to bad. The more positive an article, the more likely it was to be shared, as Dr. Berger explains in his new book, “Contagious: Why Things Catch On.”32.What do the classic rules mentioned in the text apply to?_ _A.News reports.B.Research papers.C.Private e-mails. D.Daily conversations.33.What can we infer about people like Debbie Downer?_ __A.They're socially inactive.B.They're good at telling stories.C.They're inconsiderate of others.D.They're careful with their words.34.Which tended to be the most e-mailed according to Dr. Berger's research?_ __A.Sports news. B.Science articles.C.Personal accounts. D.Financial reviews.35.What can be a suitable title for the text?_ _A.Sad Stories Travel Far and Wide.B.Online News Attracts More People.C.Reading Habits Change with the Times.D.Good News Beats Bad on Social Networks.◆从短文后的选项中选出能填入空白处的最佳选项根据短文内容,从短文后的选项中选出能填入空白处的最佳选项。
高中英语新人教版必修5 Unit4《Making the news》reading
1 higher level of 2 education
very
important not very
important
important
∨
2 work experience 3 good communication skills ∨
4 curious / active personality ∨
Lays out the article and photos
Prints all the newspaper
Pre – reading
➢What are the qualities a good news reporter needs to have ? Discuss in groups and tick the boxes below . Please add more qualities if you like .
Fast reading
Read the text and answer the questions :
1. Where did the conversation happen?Who were talking?
Zhou Yang talked with his boss, Hu Xin, at the office of China Daily
Editors __c_h_e_c_k__ the report.
The newspapers are _d_e_l_iv_e_r_e_d_.
by train and truck.
Editors write the__h_e_a_d_l_in__e_s______. The newspapers are_p_r_i_n_t_e_d_.____.
2017人教版高中英语必修五Unit 4《Making the news》
1) It shows the students the skills necessary to become a good journalist. 2).It wants to show how to conduct a good interview.
What a new reporter should do on the first day
the stick
properly
6. how the story goes this is the story
7. get a scoop
a piece of hot news
Summary
To the reporters,it’s _u__n_n_e_c_es_s_a_r_y_for them to take a camera because they have p_r_o_f_e_s_si_o_n_a_l_p_h_o_t_o_g_r_a_p_h_e_rs with them. The reporters should be _c_u_r_i_o_u_s_ and they must have a _n_o_s_e_ for a story.They know how to _a_c_q_u_i_re_the information they need.While interviewing, they won’tb_e__r_u_d_e_,_t_h_e_y_w_o_n_’_t _ta_l_k_to_o__m_u_c_h_t_h_e_m_s_e_lv_e,s ___an_d__th_e_y_l_is_t_en__to__th_e__in_t_er_v_i_ew__ee__ca_r_e_fu_l_ly_. They will listen to the _d_e_t_ai_l_ed_ facts and ask new questions.There is a trick of the_t_r_a_d_e_,that is ,with the permission of the interviewer, they would use __r_e_c_o_r_d_e_r_s which could keep the evidence to help __su__p_p_o_r_t__their story.
必修五 4.2《Unit 4 Making the news》
Be able to “smell” when sb is trying to hide a good story .
Get the wrong end of the stick A real “scoop” Go and interview sb about an incident or happening
• To protect a story from accusations (I can
see --- You never know!)
How to become a successful reporter?
go
The skills needed
① work in a team (work with colleagues) ② research a story (have a “nose” for a story) ③ be accurate (get all our facts straight) ④ protect a story from accusations
新课标人教版课件系列
《高中英语》
必修5-4.2
Making the news
How to make the Editor checks the newspaper facts (A)
1
5 4 2 3
Designer lays out the article (B) Reporter interviews people or find out the events (C)
Stages in researching a story
①ask many questions (acquire all the information) ②note reactions (when people answer questions) ③check facts (tell when people are telling the truth) ④do research (discover the truth)
人教高中英语必修5 Unit4 Making the news[背景文章]
HOW A NEWSPAPERIS PRODUCEDEvery morning, the newspaper chief editor holds a meeting with the journalists. They discuss the main events of the day. Reporters are then sent to cover the events.As soon as the reporters know what to write about, they get down to work. They telephone people and fix a time for a face-to-face interview with them. Sometimes they do telephone interviews. Checking information is very important. They go to the newspaper's own library to look up any information that they need. This is called "doing one's homework".At the same time, the picture editor decides which photographs are needed for the next day's paper. Photographers are then sent to take the pictures. Sometimes old ones are used from the newspaper's own picture library. Doing this can save a lot of time and money.All the people who work on a newspaper must be able to work fast. For example, there might be a big fire, or an important person might die. In this situation, everyone has to move fast. Journalists have to stop working on one story and start working immediately on the important new one. They must find out the new information as quickly as possible. A photographer is sent immediately to take photographs.Later in the day, everything is put together at the news desk. Reporters return, type their stories into the computer and hand them to the editor. Photographers return and the photos are quickly developed.The chief editor decides which will be the most important story on the front page. Sometimes this will have to be changed if something more important happens late in the day. Other editors read the stories which the reporters have written and make any necessary changes. They also write the headlines for each story. Doing this is more difficult in English than in Chinese. In English the letter M is wider than the letter I, so editors must check that there is enough space for the headlines they have written.Finally, there is no more time left for adding new stories, and the time for printing the newspaper has come. This is done on fast-moving printing machines. Thenewspapers are then delivered by lorry, plane or rail. Speed is important. People want to buy the latest newspaper; nobody wants to buy yesterday's.。
Unit 4 Making the news
________ sb. 向某人提交某物
4.eager adj. 渴望的;热切的→be eager ________.../to do...渴望得到„„/去做„„ 5.________ vt. 获得;取得;学到→inquire vt. 询问, 打听→________ v. 要求(强制性的);规定→________ v. 要 求;请求 6.inform v t. 告知;通知→inform sb. that从句
4.________ vt. 更新;使现代化 5.________ vt. 评估;评定→________ n. 6.________ n. 记者,新闻工作者→________ n. 日 报;期刊→________ n. 新闻业;新闻工作 7.________ adj. 技术(上)的;技巧方面的→________ adv. 技术上;工艺上 8.________ adj. 彻底的;详尽的→__________ adv. 完 全;彻底
必修五
Unit 4 Making the news
话题诵读
3
基础回顾
考题对接
4
精讲点拨
话题诵读
早读一刻 情感体验
Xi's address to the media
Ladies and gentlemen, friends, good morning. It's a great pleasure to meet you, friends from the press. The 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China came to a successful conclusion yesterday. During the past week, you have extensively covered the Party congress and let the world hear China's voice. On behalf of the secretariat of the 18th Party Congress, I wish to express our sincere thanks to you for your professionalism, dedication(敬业)and hard work.
(完整版)必修5unit4makingthenews课文原文
My first work assignment“Unforgettable”, says new journalistNever will I Zhou Yang(ZY) forget his first assignment at the office of a popular English newspaper. His discussion with his new boss, Hu Xin(HX), was to strongly influence his life as a journalist.HX: Welcome. We’re delighted you’re coming to work with us. Your first job here will be an assistant journalist.Dou you have any questions?ZY: Can I go out on a story immediately?HX: (laughing) That’s admirable, but I’m afraid it would be unusual! Wait till you’re more experienced. First we’ll put you as an assistant to an experience journalist. Later you can cover a story and submit the article yourself.ZY: Wonderful! What do I need to take with me? I already have a notebook and camera.HX: No need for a camera. You’ll have a professional photography with you to take photographs. Yo u’ll find your colleagues very eager to assist you, so you may be able to concentrate on photography later if you’re interested.ZY: Thank you. Not only am I interested in photography, but I took an amateur course at university to update my skills.HX: Good.ZY: what do I need to remember when I go out to cover a story?HX: You need to be curious. Only if you ask as many different questions will you acquire all the information you need to know. We say a good journalist must have a good “noose” for a story. That means you must be able to assess when people are not telling the whole truth and then try to discover it. They must use research to inform themselves of the missing parts of the story.ZY: What should I keep in mind?HX: Here comes my list of dos and don’ts: don’t miss your deadline, don’t be rude, don’t talk too much, but make sure you listen to the interviewee carefully.ZY: Why is listening so important?HX: Well, you have to listen for detailed facts. Meanwhile you have to prepare the next question depending on what the person says.ZY: But how can I listen carefully while taking notes?HX: That is a trick of the trade. If the interviewee agrees, you can use a recorder to get the facts straight. It’s also useful if a person wants to challenge you. You have the evidence to support your story.ZY: I see! Have you ever had a case where someone accused your journalist of getting the wrong end of the stick? HX: Yes, but it was a long time ago. This is how the story goes. A footballer was accused of taking money or deliberately not scoring goals so as to let the other team win. We went to interview him. He denied taking money but we were skeptical. So we arranged an interview between the footballer and the man supposed to bribe him. When we saw them together we guessed from the footballer’s body language that he was not telling the truth. So we wrote an article suggesting he was guilty. It was a dilemma because the footballer could have demanded damages if we were wrong. He tried to stop us publishing it but later we were proved right.ZY: Wow! That was a real “scoop”. I’m looking forward to my first assignment now. Perhaps I’ll get a scoop too! HX: Perhaps you will. You never know.。
必修五 Unit 4 Making the news
[信息提取] be to do在句中表示后来发生的事,常译为:
“注定会„„,一定„„”。
[例句仿写] 他们注定以后永远不会再见面了。
They never again.
答案:were;to meet
4.So we arranged an interview between the footballer and the man supposed to bribe him. [信息提取] supposed to bribe him为过去分词短语作后置定 语。相当于who was supposed to bribe him。 [例句仿写] 他正是被认为获得头奖的人。 He is the right person 答案:supposed to win the first prize.
It is thought that the sailing is a milestone of the mainland and Taiwan's relationship and the cooperation between the mainland and Taiwan is expected to be strengthened in the future.
A driver should concentrate on the road when driving.
开车时驾驶员的注意力要集中在路上。 ①He hasconcentrated his efforts on his work this year. 今年他集中精力工作。 ②We must concentrate our efforts on improving education. 我们必须致力于改进教育工作。 We must apply our minds to finding a solution.
必修五 4.2《Unit 4 Making the news》
Step 4 lay out
Step 5 print the newspaper
What are the qualities a good news reporter needs to have?
• ①higher level of education • ②work experience • ③good communication skills • ④curious, active personality • ⑤hard-working • ⑥enthusiasm for the job • ⑦prepared to work long hours • ⑧ability to work in a team
• To protect a story from accusations (I can
see --- You never know!)
How to become a successful reporter?
go
The skills needed
① work in a team (work with colleagues) ② research a story (have a “nose” for a story) ③ be accurate (get all our facts straight) ④ protect a story from accusations
• Use small recorders to get all the facts straight
• Find out the truth • Prove oneself right
Paraphrase (explain English words and
phrases in h ) Cover a story
人教高中英语必修5 Unit4 Making the news[背景文章] Newton
Newton N.Minow:"Television and the Public Interest"Thank you for this opportunity to meet with you today. This is my first public address since I took over my new job. When the New Frontiersmen rode into town, I locked myself in my office to do my homework and get my feet wet. But apparently I haven't managed to stay out of hot water. I seem to have detected a certain nervous apprehension about what I might say or do when I emerged from that locked office for this, my maiden station break.First, let me begin by dispelling a rumor. I was not picked for this job because I regard myself as the fastest draw on the New Frontier. Second, let me start a rumor. Like you, I have carefully read President Kennedy's messages about the regulatory agencies, conflict of interest, and the dangers of ex parte contacts. And, of course, we at the Federal Communications Commission will do our part. Indeed, I may even suggest that we change the name of the FCC to The Seven Untouchables!It may also come as a surprise to some of you, but I want you to know that you have my admiration and respect. Yours is a most honorable profession. Anyone who is in the broadcasting business has a tough row to hoe. You earn your bread by using public property. When you work in broadcasting you volunteer for public service, public pressure, and public regulation. You must compete with other attractions and other investments, and the only way you can do it is to prove to us every three years that you should have been in business in the first place.I can think of easier ways to make a living.But I cannot think of more satisfying ways.I admire your courage -- but that doesn't mean I would make life any easier for you.Your license lets you use the public's airwaves as trustees for 180 million Americans. The public is your beneficiary. If you want to stay on as trustees, you must deliver a decent return to the public -- not only to your stockholders. So, as a representative of the public, your health and your product are among my chief concerns.As to your health: let's talk only of television today. 1960 gross broadcast revenues of the television industry were over $1,268,000,000; profit before taxes was $243,900,000, an average return on revenue of 19.2 per cent. Compared with 1959, gross broadcast revenues were $1,163,900,000, and profit before taxes was $222,300,000, an average return on revenue of 19.1 per cent. So, the percentage increase of total revenues from 1959 to 1960 was 9 per cent, and the percentage increase of profit was 9.7 per cent. This, despite a recession. For your investors, the price has indeed been right.I have confidence in your health.But not in your product.It is with this and much more in mind that I come before you today.One editorialist in the trade press wrote that "the FCC of the New Frontier is going to be one of the toughest FCC's in the history of broadcast regulation." If he meant that we intend to enforce the law in the public interest, let me make it perfectly clear that he is right --we do. If he meant that we intend to muzzle or censor broadcasting, he is dead wrong. It would not surprise me if some of you had expected me to come here today and say in effect, "Clean up your own house or the government will do it for you." Well, in a limited sense, you would be right -- I've just said it.But I want to say to you earnestly that it is not in that spirit that I come before you today, nor is it in that spirit that I intend to serve the FCC. I am in Washington to help broadcasting, not to harm it; to strengthen it, not weaken it; to reward it, not punish it; to encourage it, not threaten it; to stimulate it, not censor it. Above all, I am here to uphold and protect the public interest.What do we mean by "the public interest?"Some say the public interest is merely what interests the public. I disagree. So does your distinguished president, Governor Collins. In a recent speech he said,Broadcasting to serve the public interest, must have a soul and a conscience, a burning desire to excel, as well as to sell; the urge to build the character, citizenship and intellectual stature of people, as well as to expand the gross national product. ...By no means do I imply that broadcasters disregard the public interest. ...But a much better job can be done, and should be done.I could not agree more.And I would add that in today's world, with chaos in Laos and the Congo aflame, with Communist tyranny on our Caribbean doorstep and relentless pressure on our Atlantic alliance, with social and economic problems at home of the gravest nature, yes, and with technological knowledge that makes it possible, as our President has said, not only to destroy our world but to destroy poverty around the world -- in a time of peril and opportunity, the old complacent, unbalanced fare of action-adventure and situation comedies is simply not good enough.Your industry possesses the most powerful voice in America. It has an inescapable duty to make that voice ring with intelligence and with leadership. In a few years, this exciting industry has grown from a novelty to an instrument ofoverwhelming impact on the American people. It should be making ready for the kind of leadership that newspapers and magazines assumed years ago, to make our people aware of their world.Ours has been called the jet age, the atomic age, the space age. It is also, I submit, the television age. And just as history will decide whether the leaders of today's world employed the atom to destroy the world or rebuild it for mankind's benefit, so will history decide whether today's broadcasters employed their powerful voice to enrich the people or debase them.If I seem today to address myself chiefly to the problems of television, I don't want any of you radio broadcasters to think we've gone to sleep at your switch -- we haven't. We still listen. But in recent years most of the controversies and cross-currents in broadcast programming have swirled around television. And so my subject today is the television industry and the public interest.Like everybody, I wear more than one hat. I am the chairman of the FCC. I am also a television viewer and the husband and father of other television viewers. I have seen a great many television programs that seemed to me eminently worthwhile and I am not talking about the much bemoaned good old days of "Playhouse 90" and "Studio One."I am talking about this past season. Some were wonderfully entertaining, such as "The Fabulous Fifties," "The Fred Astaire Show," and "The Bing Crosby Special"; some were dramatic and moving, such as Conrad's "Victory" and "Twilight Zone"; some were marvelously informative, such as "The Nation's Future," "CBS Reports," and "The Valiant Years." I could list many more -- programs that I am sure everyone here felt enriched his own life and that of his family. When television is good, nothing -- not the theater, not the magazines or newspapers -- nothing is better.But when television is bad, nothing is worse. I invite you to sit down in front of your television set when your station goes on the air and stay there without a book, magazine, newspaper, profit and loss sheet or rating book to distract you -- and keep your eyes glued to that set until the station signs off. I can assure you that you will observe a vast wasteland.You will see a procession of game shows, violence, audience participation shows, formula comedies about totally unbelievable families, blood and thunder, mayhem, violence, sadism, murder, western bad men, western good men, private eyes, gangsters, more violence, and cartoons. And, endlessly, commercials --many screaming, cajoling, and offending. And most of all, boredom. True, you will see a few things you will enjoy. But they will be very, very few. And if you think I exaggerate, try it.Is there one person in this room who claims that broadcasting can't do better?Well, a glance at next season's proposed programming can give us little heart. Of 73 and 1/2 hours of prime evening time, the networks have tentatively scheduled 59 hours to categories of action-adventure, situation comedy, variety, quiz, and movies.Is there one network president in this room who claims he can't do better?Well, is there at least one network president who believes that the other networks can't do better?Gentlemen, your trust accounting with your beneficiaries is overdue.Never have so few owed so much to so many.Why is so much of television so bad? I have heard many answers: demands ofyour advertisers; competition for ever higher ratings; the need always to attract a mass audience; the high cost of television programs; the insatiable appetite for programming material --these are some of them. Unquestionably, these are tough problems not susceptible to easy answers.But I am not convinced that you have tried hard enough to solve them.I do not accept the idea that the present over-all programming is aimed accurately at the public taste. The ratings tell us only that some people have their television sets turned on and of that number, so many are tuned to one channel and so many to another. They don't tell us what the public might watch if they were offered half-a-dozen additional choices. A rating, at best, is an indication of how many people saw what you gave them. Unfortunately, it does not reveal the depth of the penetration, or the intensity of reaction, and it never reveals what the acceptance would have been if what you gave them had been better --if all the forces of art and creativity and daring and imagination had been unleashed. I believe in the people's good sense and good taste, and I am not convinced that the people's taste is as low as some of you assume.My concern with the rating services is not with their accuracy. Perhaps they are accurate. I really don't know. What, then, is wrong with the ratings? It's not been their accuracy -- it's been their use.Certainly, I hope you will agree that ratings should have little influence where children are concerned. The best estimates indicate that during the hours of 5 to 6 P.M. sixty per cent of your audience is composed of children under twelve. And most young children today, believe it or not, spend as much time watching television as they do in the schoolroom. I repeat --let that sink in -- most young children today spend as much time watching television as they do in the schoolroom. It used to be said that there were three great influences on a child: home, school, and church. Today,there is a fourth great influence, and you ladies and gentlemen control it.If parents, teachers, and ministers conducted their responsibilities by following the ratings, children would have a steady diet of ice cream, school holidays, and no Sunday school. What about your responsibilities? Is there no room on television to teach, to inform, to uplift, to stretch, to enlarge the capacities of our children? Is there no room for programs deepening their understanding of children in other lands? Is there no room for a children's news show explaining something about the world to them at their level of understanding? Is there no room for reading the great literature of the past, teaching them the great traditions of freedom? There are some fine children's shows, but they are drowned out in the massive doses of cartoons, violence, and more violence. Must these be your trademarks? Search your consciences and see if you cannot offer more to your young beneficiaries whose future you guide so many hours each and every day.What about adult programming and ratings? You know, newspaper publishers take popularity ratings too. The answers are pretty clear: it is almost always the comics, followed by the advice to the lovelorn columns. But, ladies and gentlemen, the news is still on the front page of all newspapers; the editorials are not replaced by more comics; the newspapers have not become one long collection of advice to the lovelorn. Yet newspapers do not need a license from the government to be in business --they do not use public property. But in television, where your responsibilities as public trustees are so plain, the moment that the ratings indicate that westerns are popular there are new imitations of westerns on the air faster than the old coaxial cable could take us from Hollywood to New York. Broadcasting cannot continue to live by the numbers. Ratings ought to be the slave of the broadcaster, not his master. And you and I both know that the rating services themselves would agree.Let me make clear that what I am talking about is balance. I believe that the public interest is made up of many interests. There are many people in this greatcountry and you must serve all of us. You will get no argument from me if you say that, given a choice between a western and a symphony, more people will watch the western. I like westerns and private eyes too, but a steady diet for the whole country is obviously not in the public interest. We all know that people would more often prefer to be entertained than stimulated or informed. But your obligations are not satisfied if you look only to popularity as a test of what to broadcast. You are not only in show business; you are free to communicate ideas as well as relaxation. You must provide a wider range of choices, more diversity, more alternatives. It is not enough to cater to the nation's whims; you must also serve the nation's needs.And I would add this: that if some of you persist in a relentless search for the highest rating and the lowest common denominator, you may very well lose your audience. Because, to paraphrase a great American who was recently my law partner, the people are wise, wiser than some of the broadcasters -- and politicians -- think.As you may have gathered, I would like to see television improved. But how is this to be brought about? By voluntary action by the broadcasters themselves? By direct government intervention? Or how?Let me address myself now to my role not as a viewer but as chairman of the FCC. I could not if I would, chart for you this afternoon in detail all of the actions I contemplate. Instead, I want to make clear some of the fundamental principles which guide me.First: the people own the air. They own it as much in prime evening time as they do at six o'clock Sunday morning. For every hour that the people give you -- you owe them something. I intend to see that your debt is paid with service.Second: I think it would be foolish and wasteful for us to continue any worn-out wrangle over the problems of payola, rigged quiz shows, and other mistakes of thepast. There are laws on the books which we will enforce. But there is no chip on my shoulder. We live together in perilous, uncertain times; we face together staggering problems; and we must not waste much time now by rehashing the clichés of past controversy.To quarrel over the past is to lose the future.Third: I believe in the free enterprise system. I want to see broadcasting improved, and I want you to do the job. I am proud to champion your cause. It is not rare for American businessmen to serve a public trust. Yours is a special trust because it is imposed by law.Fourth: I will do all I can to help educational television. There are still not enough educational stations, and major centers of the country still lack usable educational channels. If there were a limited number of printing presses in this country, you may be sure that a fair proportion of them would be put to educational use. Educational television has an enormous contribution to make to the future, and I intend to give it a hand along the way. If there is not a nation-wide educational television system in this country, it will not be the fault of the FCC.Fifth: I am unalterably opposed to governmental censorship. There will be no suppression of programming which does not meet with bureaucratic tastes. Censorship strikes at the tap root of our free society.Sixth: I did not come to Washington to idly observe the squandering of the public's airwaves. The squandering of our airwaves is no less important than the lavish waste of any precious natural resource. I intend to take the job of chairman of the FCC very seriously. I believe in the gravity of my own particular sector of the New Frontier. There will be times perhaps when you will consider that I take myself or my job too seriously. Frankly, I don't care if you do. For I am convinced that eitherone takes this job seriously -- or one can be seriously taken.Now, how will these principles be applied? Clearly, at the heart of the FCC's authority lies its power to license, to renew or fail to renew, or to revoke a license. As you know, when your license comes up for renewal, your performance is compared with your promises. I understand that many people feel that in the past licenses were often renewed pro forma. I say to you now: renewal will not be pro forma in the future. There is nothing permanent or sacred about a broadcast license.But simply matching promises and performance is not enough. I intend to do more. I intend to find out whether the people care. I intend to find out whether the community which each broadcaster serves believes he has been serving the public interest. When a renewal is set down for hearing, I intend -- wherever possible -- to hold a well-advertised public hearing, right in the community you have promised to serve. I want the people who own the air and the homes that television enters to tell you and the FCC what's been going on. I want the people -- if they are truly interested in the service you give them -- to make notes, document cases, tell us the facts. For those few of you who really believe that the public interest is merely what interests the public, hope that these hearings will arouse no little interest.The FCC has a fine reserve of monitors --almost 180 million Americans gathered around 56 million sets. If you want those monitors to be your friends at court, it's up to you.Some of you may say, "Yes, but I still do not know where the line is between a grant of a renewal and the hearing you just spoke of." My answer is: Why should you want to know how close you can come to the edge of the cliff? What the Commission asks of you is to make a conscientious, good-faith effort to serve the public interest. Everyone of you serves a community in which the people would benefit by educational, religious, instructive or other public service programming. Every one ofyou serves an area which has local needs -- as to local elections, controversial issues, local news, local talent. Make a serious, genuine effort to put on that programming. When you do, you will not be playing brinkmanship with the public interest.What I've been saying applies to broadcast stations. Now a station break for the networks:You know your importance in this great industry. Today, more than one half of all hours of television station programming comes from the networks; in prime time, this rises to more than three quarters of the available hours.You know that the FCC has been studying network operations for some time. I intend to press this to a speedy conclusion with useful results. I can tell you right now, however, that I am deeply concerned with concentration of power in the hands of the networks. As a result, too many local stations have foregone any efforts at local programming, with little use of live talent and local service. Too many local stations operate with one hand on the network switch and the other on a projector loaded with old movies. We want the individual stations to be free to meet their legal responsibilities to serve their communities.I join Governor Collins in his views so well expressed to the advertisers who use the public air. I urge the networks to join him and undertake a very special mission on behalf of this industry: you can tell your advertisers, "This is the high quality we are going to serve -- take it or other people will. If you think you can find a better place to move automobiles, cigarettes and soap-go ahead and try."Tell your sponsors to be less concerned with costs per thousand and more concerned with understanding per millions. And remind your stockholders that an investment in broadcasting is buying a share in public responsibility. The networks can start this industry on the road to freedom from the dictatorship of numbers.But there is more to the problem than network influences on stations or advertiser influences on networks. I know the problems networks face in trying to clear some of their best programs -- the informational programs that exemplify public service. They are your finest hours --whether sustaining or commercial, whether regularly scheduled or special -- these are the signs that broadcasting knows the way to leadership. They make the public's trust in you a wise choice.They should be seen. As you know, we are readying for use new forms by which broadcast stations will report their programming to the Commission. You probably also know that special attention will be paid in these reports to public service programming. I believe that stations taking network service should also be required to report the extent of the local clearance of network public service programming, and when they fail to clear them, they should explain why. If it is to put on some outstanding local program, this is one reason. But, if it is simply to carry some old movies, that is an entirely different matter. The Commission should consider such clearance reports carefully when making up its mind about the licensee's over-all programming.We intend to move -- and as you know, indeed the FCC was rapidly moving in other new areas before the new Administration arrived in Washington. And I want to pay my public respects to my very able predecessor, Fred Ford, and my colleagues on the Commission who have welcomed me to the FCC with warmth and cooperation.We have approved an experiment with pay TV, and in New York we are testing the potential of UHF broadcasting. Either or both of these may revolutionize television. Only a foolish prophet would venture to guess the direction they will take, and their effect. But we intend that they shall be explored fully - for they are part of broadcasting's New Frontier. The questions surrounding pay TV are largely economic. The questions surrounding UHF are largely technological. We are going to give theinfant pay TV a chance to prove whether it can offer a useful service; we are going to protect it from those who would strangle it in its crib.As for UHF, I'm sure you know about our test in the canyons of New York City. We will take every possible positive step to break through the allocations barrier into UHF. We will put this sleeping giant to use and in the years ahead we may have twice as many channels operating in cities where now there are only two or three. We may have a half dozen networks instead of three.I have told you that I believe in the free enterprise system. I believe that most of television's problems stem from lack of competition. This is the importance of UHF to me: with more channels on the air, we will be able to provide every community with enough stations to offer service to all parts of the public. Programs with a mass market appeal required by mass product advertisers certainly will still be available. But other stations will recognize the need to appeal to more limited markets and to special tastes. In this way, we can all have a much wider range of programs.Television should thrive on this competition -and the country should benefit from alternative sources of service to the public. And -- Governor Collins -- I hope the NAB will benefit from many new members.Another and perhaps the most important frontier: television will rapidly join the parade into space. International television will be with us soon. No one knows how long it will be until a broadcast from a studio in New York will be viewed in India as well as in Indiana, will be seen in the Congo as it is seen in Chicago. But as surely as we are meeting here today, that day will come - and once again our world will shrink.What will the people of other countries think of us when they see our western badmen and good men punching each other in the jaw in between the shooting? What will the Latin American or African child learn of America from our greatcommunications industry? We cannot permit television in its present form to be our voice overseas.There is your challenge to leadership. You must reexamine some fundamentals of your industry. You must open your minds and open your hearts to the limitless horizons of tomorrow.I can suggest some words that should serve to guide you:Television and all who participate in it are jointly accountable to the American public for respect for the special needs of children, for community responsibility, for the advancement of education and culture, for the acceptability of the program materials chosen, for decency and decorum in production, and for propriety in advertising. This responsibility cannot be discharged by any given group of programs, but can be discharged only through the highest standards of respect for the American home, applied to every moment of every program presented by television.Program materials should enlarge the horizons of the viewer, provide him with wholesome entertainment, afford helpful stimulation, and remind him of the responsibilities which the citizen has towards his society.These words are not mine. They are yours. They are taken literally from your own Television Code. They reflect the leadership and aspirations of your own great industry. I urge you to respect them as I do. And I urge you to respect the intelligent and farsighted leadership of Governor LeRoy Collins, and to make this meeting a creative act. I urge you at this meeting and, after you leave, back home, at your stations and your networks, to strive ceaselessly to improve your product and to better serve your viewers, the American people.I hope that we at the FCC will not allow ourselves to become so bogged down inthe mountain of papers, hearings, memoranda, orders, and the daily routine that we close our eyes to the wider view of the public interest. And I hope that you broadcasters will not permit yourselves to become so absorbed in the chase for ratings, sales, and profits that you lose this wider view. Now more than ever before in broadcasting's history the times demand the best of all of us.We need imagination in programming, not sterility; creativity, not imitation; experimentation, not conformity; excellence, not mediocrity. Television is filled with creative, imaginative people. You must strive to set them free.Television in its young life has had many hours of greatness --its "Victory at Sea," its Army-McCarthy hearings, its "Peter Pan," its "Kraft Theaters," its "See It Now," its "Project 20," the World Series, its political conventions and campaigns, the Great Debates --and it has had its endless hours of mediocrity and its moments of public disgrace. There are estimates that today the average viewer spends about 200 minutes daily with television, while the average reader spends 38 minutes with magazines and 40 minutes with newspapers. Television has grown faster than a teenager, and now it is time to grow up.What you gentlemen broadcast through the people's air affects the people's taste, their knowledge, their opinions, their understanding of themselves and of their world. And their future.The power of instantaneous sight and sound is without precedent in mankind's history. This is an awesome power. It has limitless capabilities for good -- and for evil. And it carries with it awesome responsibilities, responsibilities which you and I cannot escape.In his stirring inaugural address our President said, "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
My first work assignment
“Unforgettable”, says new journalist
Never will I Zhou Yang(ZY) forget his first assignment at the office of a popular English newspaper. His discussion with his new boss, Hu Xin(HX), was to strongly influence his life as a journalist.
HX: Welcome. We’re delighted you’re coming to work with us. Your first job here will be an assistant journalist.
Dou you have any questions?
ZY: Can I go out on a story immediately?
HX: (laughing) That’s admirable, but I’m afraid it would be unusual! Wait till you’re more experienced. First we’ll put you as an assistant to an experience journalist. Later you can cover a story and submit the article yourself.
ZY: Wonderful! What do I need to take with me? I already have a notebook and camera.
HX: No need for a camera. You’ll have a professional photography with you to take photographs. Yo u’ll find your colleagues very eager to assist you, so you may be able to concentrate on photography later if you’re interested.
ZY: Thank you. Not only am I interested in photography, but I took an amateur course at university to update my skills.
HX: Good.
ZY: what do I need to remember when I go out to cover a story?
HX: You need to be curious. Only if you ask as many different questions will you acquire all the information you need to know. We say a good journalist must have a good “noose” for a story. That means you must be able to assess when people are not telling the whole truth and then try to discover it. They must use research to inform themselves of the missing parts of the story.
ZY: What should I keep in mind?
HX: Here comes my list of dos and don’ts: don’t miss your deadline, don’t be rude, don’t talk too much, but make sure you listen to the interviewee carefully.
ZY: Why is listening so important?
HX: Well, you have to listen for detailed facts. Meanwhile you have to prepare the next question depending on what the person says.
ZY: But how can I listen carefully while taking notes?
HX: That is a trick of the trade. If the interviewee agrees, you can use a recorder to get the facts straight. It’s also useful if a person wants to challenge you. You have the evidence to support your story.
ZY: I see! Have you ever had a case where someone accused your journalist of getting the wrong end of the stick? HX: Yes, but it was a long time ago. This is how the story goes. A footballer was accused of taking money or deliberately not scoring goals so as to let the other team win. We went to interview him. He denied taking money but we were skeptical. So we arranged an interview between the footballer and the man supposed to bribe him. When we saw them together we guessed from the footballer’s body language that he was not telling the truth. So we wrote an article suggesting he was guilty. It was a dilemma because the footballer could have demanded damages if we were wrong. He tried to stop us publishing it but later we were proved right.
ZY: Wow! That was a real “scoop”. I’m looking forward to my first assignment now. Perhaps I’ll get a scoop too! HX: Perhaps you will. You never know.。