外文文献及翻译:在全球经济中竞争:创新挑战

合集下载

用竞争对抗来激发创新 中英对照

用竞争对抗来激发创新 中英对照
欣赏差异。在文艺复兴时期,绘画作品被并排摆放,使观赏者能够进行比较和欣赏,其他艺术家可以从中借鉴。采用同样的办法,我们可以将各个团队开发的各种不同的解决方案放在一起,比较它们之间的优缺点。在许多情况下,一方可以吸收来自于另一方的思想理念。或者可以将最终被淘汰的解决方案送回实验室,沿着新的方向再次进行开发。
在文艺复兴时期,与制定研发指导方针等同的是委托书——比如,一幅画或一座建筑的委托书。合同中会规定如下内容:绘画的主题,由谁来完成绘画作品的哪一部分,绘画的尺寸和方法,时间表,以及支付的资金数量。尽管有时这些合同会非常具体,但在文艺复兴时期,艺术家在社会中的声望和地位都有了很大的提高,所以他们谈判的能力也不断增强,能够在合同中为在创造性的演绎和风格的灵活性争取到空间。
一种更具成效的竞争对抗
竞争对抗可能意味着完全彻底的较量——一种零和式的比赛,在这种比赛中,两个人或两个团队针锋相对,其中一个人或一个团队会胜出,而代价是另一方的失败。但是,在文艺复兴时期,竞争对抗则有第二种含义,我们称之为“帕拉贡”(paragone)7。果直接翻译,“帕拉贡”的意思是“比较”。在文艺复兴时期,该词指的是将两位艺术家或其作品,并排放在一起,进行评价、比较、区别和鉴赏。通过“帕拉贡”,人们对两个旗鼓相当的竞争对手的相关成就进行比较和欣赏。采用这种方法,对两个或多个作品进行比较,并不会褒奖一方而贬低另一方。实际上,有时会委托多位艺术家,同时实施相类似的项目,每一方都利用自己独特的才华,来表现一个主题。
但是竞争对抗未必一定就排除协作;我们相信,研发管理人员将会寻求使二者在更深层次相互结合——简而言之,实施现代版的“帕拉贡”。这样做的最佳方法是让两个或多个团队同时开展相同的项目。但这也并不是什么新点子:我们可以回忆一下20世纪60年代初,IBM公司系统360大型计算机与8000系列之间著名的竞争9。正如通用电气公司全球研究集团总监Mark Little在后面的文章(参见“通用电气公司全球研究集团的竞争与协作””)中所阐述的,其企业广泛但有节制地利用竞争。我们要提倡的是竞争的理念——特别是“帕拉贡”——应该成为更多企业日常研发流程的一部分。这似乎代价高昂,但安排多个团队处理相同的问题,如果能够产生更好的解决方案,并不一定就是低效果或低效率的。对于有兴趣利用“帕拉贡”威力的高管,我们奉送三条原则:

关于创新的双语文章

关于创新的双语文章

关于创新的双语文章1.引言1.1 概述概述创新是一种推动社会进步和经济发展的重要力量。

在当今全球化和竞争激烈的时代,创新已成为企业和个人取得成功的关键因素之一。

然而,创新并不仅限于科技领域,它也包括了商业模式、管理方式、产品设计等方方面面。

本文将探讨创新的定义、重要性以及影响因素和条件,希望能够为读者提供一些关于如何培养和鼓励创新的建议。

在过去,创新常常被认为是科学家、工程师或发明家们独有的特质,是一种突破传统的能力。

然而,如今创新更被看作是一种开放和协作的过程,它要求不同领域的人才和观念相互碰撞和融合。

创新有助于打破常规思维模式和传统观念的束缚,为问题解决提供全新的视角和方法。

创新的重要性无可否认。

首先,创新可以提高效率和竞争力。

通过创新,企业可以开发出新产品、开辟新市场,从而获得更多的利润和更高的市场份额。

其次,创新有助于解决社会问题。

例如,在能源领域,创新可以帮助我们找到更清洁、可持续的能源解决方案,应对全球变暖等环境挑战。

此外,创新还能够促进社会进步和改善人们的生活质量。

然而,要培养和鼓励创新并非易事。

创新必须有良好的环境和条件支持。

组织应该鼓励员工的创造性思维和实验精神,为他们提供自由的工作氛围和资源支持。

同时,政府也应该提供创新政策和法律保护,鼓励企业和个人进行创新实践。

此外,教育和培训也是培养创新能力的重要途径,学校和社会应该注重培养学生的创新思维和实践能力。

综上所述,创新是推动社会发展和经济繁荣的重要推动力。

我们应该认识到创新的重要性,并共同努力,为创新提供有利的环境和条件。

通过不断培养和鼓励创新,我们将能够迎接未来的挑战,并创造出更加美好的社会和未来。

1.2文章结构在文章结构部分,我们将介绍整篇论文的组织结构和每个部分的内容。

文章结构如下:1. 引言部分:提出关于创新的问题和主题,并介绍整篇文章的目的和结构。

由于引言部分非常朴素而又起到了承上启下的作用,因此它对于整篇文章的成功撰写非常重要。

竞争全球位置英文作文

竞争全球位置英文作文

竞争全球位置英文作文英文:Competition for global positioning has become increasingly fierce in recent years. As more and more countries develop and modernize, they are also striving to establish themselves as key players in the global market. This has led to a race to acquire resources, technology, and talent, as well as to establish strategic partnerships with other countries.One example of this competition can be seen in thefield of artificial intelligence. Countries such as the United States, China, and Russia are investing heavily in this area, as they believe that it will be a key driver of economic growth and innovation in the future. They are also competing to attract top talent in this field, by offering incentives such as high salaries and research funding.Another area of competition is in the development ofrenewable energy sources. Countries such as Germany, Denmark, and China are investing heavily in wind and solar power, as they believe that this will be a key area of growth in the future. They are also competing to establish themselves as leaders in this field, by developing new technologies and establishing partnerships with other countries.Overall, the competition for global positioning islikely to continue in the coming years, as countries seekto establish themselves as key players in the global market. This will require a combination of investment in key areas such as technology and talent, as well as strategic partnerships with other countries.中文:近年来,全球位置的竞争越来越激烈。

经济转型英文作文

经济转型英文作文

经济转型英文作文英文:As the world evolves, economies must adapt in order to remain competitive and thrive. Economic transformation is the process of shifting from one economic system to another in response to changing circumstances. This can involve changes in industries, technologies, or even political systems.One example of economic transformation is the shift from an industrial economy to a service-based economy. In the past, many countries relied heavily on manufacturing and agriculture to drive their economies. However, as technology has advanced and globalization has increased, many of these industries have become less profitable. In response, many countries have shifted their focus to service-based industries such as finance, healthcare, and education.Another example of economic transformation is the shift towards a knowledge-based economy. This involves a focus on creating, acquiring, and utilizing knowledge andinformation in order to drive economic growth. This can involve investments in research and development, education, and technology.Overall, economic transformation is a necessary process for countries to remain competitive in a rapidly changing world. However, it can also be a challenging process that requires significant investment and planning. 。

企业服务营销策略外文文献翻译最新2016年

企业服务营销策略外文文献翻译最新2016年

企业服务营销策略外文文献翻译最新2016年XXX market。

simply offering high-quality products is not XXX customer service and create a strong brand image in order to XXX marketing strategies。

including customer nship management。

service n。

and service recovery。

and provides examples of XXX.摘要本文探讨了企业开发有效的服务营销策略的重要性。

作者认为,在当今竞争激烈的市场中,仅仅提供高质量的产品是不足以的。

企业必须还提供优秀的客户服务,并创建强大的品牌形象,以吸引和留住客户。

本文研究了各种服务营销策略,包括客户关系管理、服务创新和服务恢复,并提供了成功实施的示例。

作者得出结论,优先考虑服务营销的企业将更好地为长期成功做好准备。

nXXX market。

XXX simply providing high-quality productsis no XXX success。

In order to stand out from the n。

XXX astrong brand image。

This requires the development of effective service marketing XXX.介绍在当今全球化和高度竞争的市场中,企业面临前所未有的挑战。

仅仅提供高质量的产品的传统方法已经不足以保证成功。

为了在竞争中脱颖而出,企业还必须专注于提供优秀的客户服务和创建强大的品牌形象。

这需要开发有效的服务营销策略,帮助企业区别于竞争对手,吸引和留住客户。

XXXXXX new field that has emerged in response to the growing importance of services in the global XXX marketing。

竞争的技术介绍英文作文

竞争的技术介绍英文作文

竞争的技术介绍英文作文英文:Competition in the technology industry is fierce. With new innovations and advancements constantly being developed, companies must stay ahead of the game in order to succeed. One way to do this is through strategic partnerships and collaborations. By working with other companies, businesses can combine their strengths and resources to create something even better.Another key aspect of competition in the tech industryis staying up-to-date with the latest trends and developments. This means investing in research and development, as well as keeping a close eye on what competitors are doing. For example, when Apple released the iPhone, other companies had to quickly adapt and release their own smartphones in order to stay competitive.In addition to partnerships and staying current,companies must also focus on creating a unique and user-friendly experience for their customers. This can be achieved through intuitive design, personalized recommendations, and exceptional customer service. For example, Amazon's recommendation algorithm and fastshipping options have helped them stay ahead of the competition in the e-commerce space.Overall, competition in the technology industry is all about innovation, collaboration, and creating a superior customer experience.中文:科技行业的竞争非常激烈。

竞争和挑战作文英语

竞争和挑战作文英语

竞争和挑战作文英语标题,Competition and Challenge。

Competition and challenge are two inseparable aspects of life that drive individuals and societies towards progress and excellence. In today's rapidly changing world, where globalization and technological advancements have reshaped the dynamics of various fields, competition has become more intense and challenges more complex. In this essay, we will delve into the significance of competition and challenge, exploring how they contribute to personal growth, societal development, and the advancement of humanity.Firstly, competition stimulates individuals to push beyond their limits and strive for excellence. Whether it's in academics, sports, or professional fields, competition fosters a culture of continuous improvement. When individuals compete against each other, they are motivated to enhance their skills, knowledge, and abilities tooutperform their rivals. This drive for excellence not only benefits the individual but also contributes to the overall advancement of society by fostering innovation and progress.Moreover, competition instills valuable qualities such as resilience, perseverance, and determination. In the face of challenges and setbacks, individuals learn to overcome obstacles and emerge stronger. The journey of competing teaches invaluable lessons about grit and tenacity,essential traits for navigating the complexities of life.By confronting challenges head-on, individuals develop the resilience to adapt to changing circumstances and thrive in adverse conditions.Furthermore, competition fosters collaboration and teamwork. While competition often emphasizes individual achievement, it also necessitates cooperation among peers, teammates, or colleagues. In team sports, for example, success relies not only on individual skill but also on effective communication, coordination, and synergy among team members. Similarly, in professional settings, competition encourages collaboration and knowledge sharing,leading to collective growth and success.On a societal level, competition drives economic growth and innovation. In a competitive market environment, businesses are compelled to innovate, improve efficiency, and offer better products and services to stay ahead of their competitors. This continuous cycle of innovation and improvement fuels economic progress, creates job opportunities, and enhances the standard of living for society as a whole.However, while competition brings numerous benefits, it also presents challenges that must be addressed. One of the primary challenges is the pressure and stress it places on individuals, particularly in highly competitive environments such as academics or professional sports. The relentless pursuit of success can lead to burnout, anxiety, and mental health issues, highlighting the importance of fostering a healthy balance between competition and well-being.Moreover, competition can sometimes foster a cutthroatmentality where individuals prioritize winning at all costs, disregarding ethical considerations and fairness. This underscores the importance of promoting values such as integrity, sportsmanship, and respect for competitors, ensuring that competition remains a constructive force for personal and societal growth.In conclusion, competition and challenge are integral components of life that drive individuals and societies towards excellence and progress. While competition fuels innovation, fosters personal growth, and spurs economic development, it also presents challenges that must be navigated with resilience, integrity, and a commitment to holistic well-being. By embracing competition while upholding core values, we can harness its transformative power to build a brighter future for ourselves and generations to come.。

在竞争中创新作文

在竞争中创新作文

在竞争中创新作文英文回答:In the competitive world we live in, innovation is key to staying ahead of the game. It is important to constantly come up with new ideas and ways of doing things in order to stand out from the crowd. One example of this is the smartphone industry. Companies like Apple and Samsung are constantly innovating and coming up with new features and designs to attract customers. For instance, Apple's introduction of the iPhone X with facial recognition technology was a game changer in the industry. This kind of innovation not only attracts new customers but also keeps existing ones loyal.Another example of the importance of innovation in competition is in the automotive industry. Tesla's innovative approach to electric cars has disrupted the traditional automotive market. Their focus onsustainability and cutting-edge technology has set themapart from other car manufacturers. This has forced traditional car companies to innovate in order to keep up with the changing market demands.In my own experience, I have seen how innovation can make a difference in a competitive environment. In my previous job, I was part of a team that was tasked with coming up with new marketing strategies to attract customers. We had to constantly brainstorm and come up with innovative ideas to stay ahead of our competitors. One of the ideas we came up with was a social media campaign that went viral and attracted a lot of attention to our brand.中文回答:在竞争激烈的世界中,创新是保持领先地位的关键。

电子商务外文文献

电子商务外文文献

电子商务外文文献Title: E-commerce: A Review of the Literature and Perspectives for Future ResearchE-commerce, or electronic commerce, has become a fundamental aspect of business and economic activity in the globalized digital age. The交易研究领域的一个重要组成部分。

在这个日益数字化的时代,电子商务已经成为全球商业和经济活动的一个重要组成部分。

本文旨在回顾和分析电子商务领域的研究现状,探讨未来可能的研究方向和挑战。

The literature on e-commerce has been extensive, covering a range of topics from online retailing to global supply chain management. The Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO) and Journal of Electronic Commerce Research (JECR) are two of the leading journals in the field, publishing high-quality research on various aspects ofe-commerce. Additionally, several books and conference proceedings provide valuable insights into the development and evolution of e-commerce.E-commerce research has examined the impact of technology on business processes, explored innovative business models, andanalyzed the role of e-commerce in global trade and development. The literature has addressed a range of important issues, including security and privacy, electronic payment systems, and the impact of social media on e-commerce.Despite the significant progress made in e-commerce research, several areas for future exploration remn. These include the development of new e-commerce technologies, such as blockchn and artificial intelligence, and their potential impact on global trade and supply chns. Additionally, research on the role of e-commerce in sustnable development, particularly in terms of environmental sustnability and social inclusivity, represents an important area for future investigation.In conclusion, e-commerce has become a fundamental aspect of business and economic activity in the digital age. The literature on e-commerce has provided valuable insights into its development and evolution, but there remn several areas for future exploration. Future research should address these unexplored areas and contribute to the development ofe-commerce as a transformative force in global trade and development.商学院电子商务外文文献Title: E-commerce in Business Schools: A Critical Analysis of Curriculum, Teaching Methods, and Future TrendsThe rise of e-commerce in recent years has revolutionized business education, with business schools across the globe scrambling to keep up with the latest trends and prepare students for the digital economy. This article delves into the world of e-commerce education in business schools, exploring curriculum, teaching methods, and predicting future trends. E-commerce has become an integral part of modern business, and business schools are responding to this trend by incorporating e-commerce courses into their curriculum. The primary objective of these courses is to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of the e-commerce industry, including the latest trends, tools, and techniques. In addition to fundamental topics such as online marketing and web design, today's e-commerce courses also cover more specialized topics such as cloud computing, big data analysis, and social media marketing.Business schools are adopting a variety of teaching methods to impart knowledge on e-commerce, ranging from traditional classroom lectures to more innovative hands-onbs and simulations. These experiential learning opportunities allow students to gain practical experience in real-world settings, providing them with a deeper understanding of the dynamics and challenges of the e-commerce industry.With the continuous evolution of the internet and e-commerce landscape, it is essential to track and predict future trends in this field. Business schools are playing a crucial role in this regard by staying abreast of industry developments and incorporating relevant content into their courses. The trend towards more personalized and interactive learning experiences is likely to continue, with business schools tloring their teaching methods to suit the needs of individual students. Additionally, the integration of technology into every aspect of business will continue to drive changes in e-commerce education, with an increasing focus on areas such as cybersecurity and artificial intelligence.In conclusion, business schools have responded to the rise of e-commerce with a comprehensive approach that includes updating curriculum, adopting innovative teaching methods, and predicting future trends. However, there are still challengesahead, such as keeping up with the rapidly changing landscape and providing all students with equal opportunities to access e-commerce education. By continuing to adapt and innovate, business schools can help shape a brighter future fore-commerce and prepare students to thrive in the digital economy.电子商务外文翻译文献电子商务的发展及其影响:外文翻译文献随着全球互联网的迅速普及,电子商务在全球范围内得到了前所未有的发展。

技术创新面临的障碍外文文献翻译2019-2020

技术创新面临的障碍外文文献翻译2019-2020

技术创新面临的障碍外文翻译2019-2020英文Barriers to the international diffusion of technological innovationsSanjesh Kumar,Baljeet SinghAbstractThis paper examines the role of diffusion barriers in explaining differences in technological innovation across countries through an index of economic complexity. The barriers are captured by genealogical distance from the world’s technology frontier. We hypothesize that greater the genetic distance between a country’s population and the technology innovator the lower will be levels of technological innovations. Utilizing data for 100 countries, our empirical estimates offer solid support for the negative influence of genetic distance from the global frontier on innovation. A number of sensitivity checks also confirm that our findings are robust. Overall, the evidence lends strong support to the barriers effect of genetic distance from the frontier whereby it prevents the diffusion of productivity enhancing innovations across countries by affecting the country’s capability to imi tate and adopt frontier innovations and technologies.Keywords:Genetic distance,Innovation,Economic complexity IntroductionThis paper seeks to bring forth empirical evidence to highlight thesignificance of barriers that hold back technological innovations from spreading across countries. In particular, it focuses on human barriers which are measured using genetic distance between a laggard country and the global technology frontier. To this end, the study analyses the influence that genetic distance has on country specific economic complexity index (ECI). Following Sweet and Eterovic Maggio (2015), we used ECI as proxy of innovation because an improvement in ECI implies that a country is improving its production capacity as well as creating innovation that is essential for its prosperity (Hausmann et al., 2013). More importantly, innovation is an accumulative process, which is obtained by accumulation of both “tacit” and “explicit” knowledge; using patent as an indicator of innovation reflects only the “explicit” component of innovative activities (Nelson, 2005; Sweet and Eterovic Maggio, 2015). On the contrary, genetic links promotes progressive accumulation of “tacit” knowledge through a series of social relationships and networks. Hence, the impact of genetic distance on innovation could be more effectively captured through ECI as a measure of technological progress compared to any other indicator.Technological innovation is essential for supporting economic growth and development (Romer, 1986; Lucas, 1988). Recently, a number of studies have tried to explore the determinants of innovation in developed as well as developing countries (Aghion and Howitt,1998; Guloglu et al., 2012; Ang and Kumar, 2014; Chen et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2019). Some of these studies suggest that factors such as organizational ability of a firm, resources available for research purpose and spillover across business entities and nations as well as quality of institutions are crucial for innovation. While other studies argue that factors such as interest rates, foreign capital, and domestic income are important determinant of innovation. Despite the extensive literature, there is lack of consensus on what limits the diffusion and adaptation of productivity-improving technologies across different societies.More recently, a stream of researchers on innovation, such as Lundvall (1988) and Alvarez et al. (2013) argue that creative and innovative learning takes place through interactive activities. Studies such as Jovanovic and Rob (1989), Ang (2018) and Azis (2019) attribute formulation of new innovation to interaction between agents with diverse prior knowledge. Cattani and Ferriani (2008) and Buera and Oberfield (2016)argue that social networks shape an individual’s ability to generate creative outcomes. Mejia (2018) using a case study of Colombia demonstrates that individuals that have better capacity to engage with different components of social web have better chances of emerging as industrial entrepreneurs in the initial stage of industrialization. Likewise, Dudley (2012) finds similar evidence for the British industries. However, a series of literature identify genetic link as an important factorin formulation of a social network among individuals. According to the inclusive fitness theory (Hamilton, 1964), people are generally able to detect those who have similar traits as themselves and prefer to interact with those that resemble themselves. Individuals and societies prefer to form social networks and they are willing to cooperate with other people or groups that share similar genetics. This literature highlights that genetics and a series of social relationships are highly related.Moreover, there is ample evidence to show that some countries share close genetic links while there is significant genetic distances among other countries. In line with inclusive fitness theory, countries that share similar genetic links with frontier countries will most probably have high levels of social interaction and collaboration with frontier countries which is likely to transfer innovation more easily to laggard countries. Moreover, genetically linked countries are expected to cooperate more because of similar language, comparable commercial operation, common economic and social interest (Chaudhry and Ikram, 2015). In contrast, populations which are very different genetically from each other incline to differ in many of these attributes, which can potentially hold back the free flow of technology and knowledge because it imposes costs on adaptation and imitation. Moreover, a laggard country which is not genetically close to a frontier country is likely to receive less social interaction and cooperation from firms and citizens of a frontier country, and hence their overallinnovation will be less. Generally, there can be a lack of trust between firms and citizens of frontier country and laggard country whose citizens do not share similar cultural and genetic traits.Using the insight from the above literature, we hypothesize that dissimilarities in these genetic attributes between societies limit the sharing and communication of new ideas. Limited flow of ideas lowers the prospects for learning, copying and embracing new technology, thereby serving as an obstacle to the dissemination of technology from the frontier to laggard countries. Contrarily, countries that share similar genetic characteristics with the technology leader can facilitate the dissemination of knowledge more effectively as there is more significant interaction between genetically similar countries due to common ethnic and cultural characteristics, languages, beliefs and practices. Effective social interaction between frontier and laggard countries facilitate greater flow of ideas and innovation from the frontier country which increases product innovation in the laggard country.Using data on the index of economic complexity from 2000 to 2015 for 100 countries, we find genetic distance from the technological frontier (that is, USA) exerts a significant negative influence on innovations across countries. Our results hold even after controlling for many other variables which are found influential in the literature on innovation. Moreover, additional analysis using cross-country panel data furtherconfirm the consistency of the evidence provided. In general, our results lend strong support to the notion that the diffusion barrier effect of genetic distance from the frontier reduces innovation.Literature reviewGenetic distance and technological innovationA growing number of studies investigate the underlying drivers of technological innovation. The initial studies suggest that increasing investment in new technology is vital to ensure continuous improvement in country’s technological advancement (Schumpeter, 1942; Abramovitz, 1956; Solow, 1956; Romer, 1990; Jones, 2002; Rath and Hermawan, 2019). Few studies have recently examined the capacity of nations to create and market a series of new innovation over the years (e.g., Wu et al., 2017; Furman et al., 2002; Furman and Hayes, 2004; Hu and Mathews, 2005). The insight from this strand of literature is that in addition to financial and human resources invested in innovation, factors such as innovative environment in a country’s industrial sector, the linkage between common innovative infrastructure and strength of relationships between a nation’s industri al sector are essential for improving a country’s creativity and technological advances (Porter and Stern, 2002; Furman and Hayes, 2004).On the other hand, scholars such as Lundvall (1988) and Sweet and Eterovic (2019)highlight that innovation partly takes place through thetacit learning process. These studies further emphasize that collaboration, a series of social relationships and social networks are essential drivers of the tacit learning process. Cattani and Ferriani (2008) argue that social networks shape individuals ability to generate creative outcomes. However, there is conclusive evidence in the literature that genetic link is a critical determinant of the strength of social relationships between individuals. According to Kin-selection theory, animals improve their wellbeing more by cooperating with their relations than to non-relations. Hamilton (1964) in an animal study shows that individual animals identify close relations through a number of channels such as familiarity and imprinting self on others. Hamilton (1975) extended his study to humans and deduced that level of cooperation between persons is to a large extent determined by genetic relatedness. Hamilton’s theory is generally known as “inclusive-fitness theory.” More recently, some studies applied inclusive-fitness theory to human studies and broadly find conclusive evidence that individuals maximize their inclusive fitness by engaging with those that have similar genetic traits. For instance, Rushton et al. (1984) find that individuals maximize their benefit by marrying others similar to themselves and by assisting neighbors who are most similar to them. Similarly, DeBruine (2002), Bereczkei et al. (2004) and DeBruine et al. (2008) noted that people turn to trust other people more when they have a similar face as theirs. Likewise, Malat andHamilton (2006)noted that individuals have a preference for health workers from their own race. In other related literature, Ang and Kumar (2014) examine the influence of cultural barriers due to genetic distance relative to the global frontier on cross-country financial development and demonstrate that genetic distance reduces financial development by impeding the diffusion of cross border financial technology from the global frontier. Similarly, Kodila-Tedika and Asongu (2016) suggest that genetic distance relative to the technology frontiers negatively influences human capital levels across countries. However, there are very few studies which have examined direct effects of genetic distance between fro ntier countries and laggard countries on laggard countries’ technological innovation, and evidence is mostly inconclusive. Hence, a further analysis is required to uncover the direct effects of genetic distance on technological innovation.Technological innovationMost of the studies working to identify factors explaining innovation use patent and disbursement on R&D as indicators of innovation. The shortcomings of these two measures are well known. Innovation is an accumulative process, which is obtained b y accumulation of both “tacit” and “explicit” knowledge; using patent as an indicator of innovation reflects only the explicit component of innovative activities (Nelson, 2005; Sweet and Eterovic Maggio, 2015). Moreover, given stringentcriteria for patenting and high application and enforcement cost of patent, many patentable innovations are not patented. Studies on innovation argue that recent evidence on patents suggest that “firms” use of patents has shifted to encompass far more complex tasks than merely protecting the right of the innovators” (Sweet and Eterovic, 2019, pg80).Similarly, the critics of disbursement on R&D to innovation argue that quality of domestic institutions will most likely affect the effectiveness and efficiency of same resources. Economies with good institutions and effective firm management is likely to use resources more efficiently then economies with poor institutions. Moreover, there is lack of R&D data from small firms and thus understates some of the innovation realized by small firms. Similarly, there is lack of reliable data from small countries. Given the limitations of patent and disbursement on R&D, we examine the effects of genetic distance on innovation by using “economic complexity index” (ECI) to capture innovation. ECI indicates a country’s export sophistication. Calculation of ECI is based on diversity and ubiquity of the output of a country (Hausmann et al., 2013). The diversity reflects different kinds of goods produced by a country. A country’s production of man y distinct products reflects its embedded knowledge and its ability to use tacit and explicit bundle of creative knowledge across its production assembly. In other words, the quantity of knowledge possessed by a country is reflected by its production diversity.Ubiquity can be measured by the proportion of countries that process a product. A lower ubiquity implies that product is processed by only few countries. A complex product requires a large bundle of tacit and explicit knowledge; its production is limited to a few countries that possess required knowledge for production of the product. For instance, products like medical imaging devices require large bundle of specialist and organizational skills and as a result, it is manufactured in a few countries only. On the other hand, goods such as wood logs and coffee require less specialist skills and therefore they can be provided by a larger number of countries. Increasing economic complexity expresses a country’s ability to advance new knowledge and apply it across its production structure.Moreover, Sweet and Eterovic Maggio (2015) observed that ECI is closely correlated with disbursement on R&D and patent. They argued that ECI provides a measure of innovation that captures not only tangible innovative output or input, but intangible inputs and advancements are reflected. An increase in complexity index reflects an economy’s ability to combine enormous quantities of knowledge across individuals and societies to create number of innovative products. In contrast, laggard countries possess fewer creative ideas and generate less sophisticated output. In light of the above literature, this study uses ECI as a proxy for innovation.ConclusionsUsing data on 100 developing and developed countries, this study uses economic complexity index to measure innovation and offers an empirical evidence on the influence of genetic distance from the frontier on innovation, with ordinary least squares, two-stage least squares and panel data techniques.Estimation of the effects of genetic distance on innovation shows that a country’s genetic distance from the frontier country is critical to explain that country’s innovation. Countries that share common genetic characteristics with the frontier country are likely to benefit more in terms of any innovation taking place in the frontier country. On the other hand, countries which are genetically more distance from the frontier country are expected to gain the least from innovation taking place in the frontier country. The difference in genetic attributes between individuals and societies acts as a diffusion barrier and therefore impedes the sharing and adaptation of “tacit” and “explicit” bundle of knowledge across the border.Although it is rather difficult to reduce genetic distance between frontier and laggard country within the short term, enhancing formal and informal social interaction between the countries can potentially reduce information flow barriers between groups. Putnam (2001) argues that development schemes must promote association activity through practical and refined means such as team sports. Similarly, Beretta et al.(2018) argue that development policies should take account of assortativity levels to ascertain several objectives that encompass the entire span of cultural diversity, and thus reduce barriers to information sharing among groups. Moreover, laggard countries would probably gain more from investment channeled into improving formal interaction and communication between laggard and frontier country. Improving formal interaction between genetically distant countries can possibly complement social interaction. There can be more educational exchange programs between frontier countries and developing countries.中文技术创新在国际上传播的障碍摘要本文研究了扩散障碍在通过经济复杂性指标解释各国技术创新差异中的作用。

[英语作文]新时代在竞争中创新英语作文

[英语作文]新时代在竞争中创新英语作文

[英语作文]新时代在竞争中创新英语作文新时代在竞争中创新英语作文创新的英语作文Life will have different people to do the same thing, some people will be in the ordinary mind to think about it, and why do some people just one more, and more successful than other people. Ruban, for example, before the ban, there will be many people encounter hands are wild mo through similar circumstances, why only ruban inspired, invented the saw, it is worth our thinking. Most people just think this is a small life, is not surprising that they often after cure the wound forgot this thing. But there is a strong curiosity and ban the right idea, pay attention to the life of some small events of observation, thought and study, find the methods and ideas to solve the problem, and even get some creative invention.From one year ban took a the task of building a large palace. The palace needs a lot of wood, he and his disciples had to up the hill wood with an axe and weren't saws, efficiency is very low. A mountain, because he accidentally, inadvertently caught a long a grass on the mountain, but all of a sudden the hand cut. Ban is very strange, why a piece of grass so sharp? So he picked a leaf to careful observation, found on both sides with many small serrated leaves, gently touched with the hand, these small serration very sharp. He understood that his hand was by these small serrated cut. Later, ruban and see a big locusts in one individual plant grass eating the leaves, two front teeth are very sharp, an open one, eat a big soon. This also caused the ruban curiosity, he seized a locust, carefully observe the locusts tooth structure, found that two of the locusts die also lined with many small serration, locust was bite by these small serrated blade of grass. These two things gave ruban much inspiration. So he made a big bamboo bamboo with many small serrated, and then in the experiment, the result was good, a few following draws a deep groove, the tree stem ruban was very happy. But because bamboo is soft, strength is bad, can not be used for a long time, for a moment, little saw some broken, some dull, need to replace the bamboo. Ruban thought of iron, the blacksmith, please help create with a small serrated iron. Ruban, and apprentice to pull each end to a tree to pull up, and see their way a pass, and in a short time to cut through the tree, fast and save Labour, saw just invented.It tells us a truth, pay attention to the many small things in life, often dry thinking, increase of many wisdom.参考翻译:生活中会有不同的人去做同一件事,有些人就会以普通的头脑去想,而有些人就多出一个为什么,从而比其他的人更加成功。

创新才可持续竞争力作文

创新才可持续竞争力作文

创新才可持续竞争力作文英文回答:Innovation: The Keystone of Sustainable Competitiveness.In today's rapidly evolving business landscape, the ability to innovate has become paramount for organizations seeking to maintain a competitive edge. Innovation fosters growth, adaptability, and relevance, ensuring that businesses can navigate the complexities of the 21st-century market.Driving Technological Advancements:Innovation often translates into technological advancements that transform industries. From the advent of the internet to the rise of artificial intelligence, groundbreaking technologies have revolutionized the way we live, work, and interact with the world. By embracing innovation, businesses can leverage these advancements tostreamline operations, optimize efficiency, and create entirely new products and services.Adapting to Market Shifts:The business environment is constantly in flux, and only those who can adapt quickly can thrive. Innovation enables organizations to stay abreast of changing market trends, customer preferences, and competitive pressures. By fostering a culture of experimentation and continuous learning, businesses can develop innovative solutions that meet the evolving needs and demands of the market.Enhancing Customer Value:Innovation is not solely about creating new products or services. It is also about enhancing the customer experience. By understanding customer pain points and identifying opportunities for improvement, businesses can develop innovative solutions that address unmet needs and increase customer satisfaction. This, in turn, drives brand loyalty and repeat purchases.Fostering a Culture of Creativity:Innovation thrives in an environment that values creativity and outside-the-box thinking. Organizations that promote a culture of collaboration, open communication, and risk-taking are more likely to foster innovative ideas and bring them to fruition. Encouraging diversity of perspectives and empowering employees to experiment and explore new approaches can lead to transformative solutions.Maintaining Relevance and Market Share:In today's hypercompetitive environment, businesses cannot afford to rest on their laurels. Innovation is the key to staying relevant and maintaining market share. By continuously developing innovative products, services, and business models, organizations can stay ahead of the competition and secure their position in the market.中文回答:创新,可持续竞争力的基石。

仓储物流外文文献翻译中英文原文及译文2023-2023

仓储物流外文文献翻译中英文原文及译文2023-2023

仓储物流外文文献翻译中英文原文及译文2023-2023原文1:The Current Trends in Warehouse Management and LogisticsWarehouse management is an essential component of any supply chain and plays a crucial role in the overall efficiency and effectiveness of logistics operations. With the rapid advancement of technology and changing customer demands, the field of warehouse management and logistics has seen several trends emerge in recent years.One significant trend is the increasing adoption of automation and robotics in warehouse operations. Automated systems such as conveyor belts, robotic pickers, and driverless vehicles have revolutionized the way warehouses function. These technologies not only improve accuracy and speed but also reduce labor costs and increase safety.Another trend is the implementation of real-time tracking and visibility systems. Through the use of RFID (radio-frequency identification) tags and GPS (global positioning system) technology, warehouse managers can monitor the movement of goods throughout the entire supply chain. This level of visibility enables better inventory management, reduces stockouts, and improves customer satisfaction.Additionally, there is a growing focus on sustainability in warehouse management and logistics. Many companies are implementing environmentally friendly practices such as energy-efficient lighting, recycling programs, and alternativetransportation methods. These initiatives not only contribute to reducing carbon emissions but also result in cost savings and improved brand image.Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have become integral parts of warehouse management. AI-powered systems can analyze large volumes of data to optimize inventory levels, forecast demand accurately, and improve operational efficiency. Machine learning algorithms can also identify patterns and anomalies, enabling proactive maintenance and minimizing downtime.In conclusion, warehouse management and logistics are continuously evolving fields, driven by technological advancements and changing market demands. The trends discussed in this article highlight the importance of adopting innovative solutions to enhance efficiency, visibility, sustainability, and overall performance in warehouse operations.译文1:仓储物流管理的当前趋势仓储物流管理是任何供应链的重要组成部分,并在物流运营的整体效率和效力中发挥着至关重要的作用。

外文文献及翻译_在全球经济中竞争_创新挑战

外文文献及翻译_在全球经济中竞争_创新挑战

外文资料商管031 梅文飞0364027Competing in the global economy: the innovation challengeRt. Hon. Tony Blair, Lord Sainsbury. Innovation Report.2003.12: 17-31,52-65.Chapter 1 The innovation challengeSummaryGlobal competition is increasing as a result of trade liberalization, technological change and reductions in transport and communication costs. UK based businesses will find it increasingly difficult to compete on low costs alone in labour intensive industries exposed to international competition. The challenge for businesses is to compete on the basis of unique value.We have defined innovation as the successful exploitation of new ideas and it is central to meeting this challenge. It involves investments in new products, processes or services and in new ways of doing business. Measures to develop the skills and creativity of the workforce are often an essential prerequisite. The speed of technological change and market responses make the challenge to innovate urgent and continuous.Overall UK innovation performance appears to be, at best, average compared to our major competitors. This is reflected in the large productivity gap that exists between the UK and its major competitors. Innovation performance accounts for a significant proportion of this gap. On the whole, UK firms face a challenge: how to raise their rate of innovation?Innovation is a complex process so understanding why the UK has a relatively modest innovation performance is not straightforward. We drew on an extensive review of the international innovation literature and consulted with a group of leading experts in the field.As a result we have identified seven critical success factors for innovation performance. They are:Sources of new technological knowledge;Capacity to absorb and exploit new knowledge;Access to finance;Competition and entrepreneurship;Customers and suppliers;The Regulatory environment;Networks and collaboration.They help us to identify current strengths and weaknesses of the UK innovation system. A highly abridged summary is provided in this chapter but the more detailedanalysis is contained in an accompanying economic report.Our vision is of the UK as a key knowledge hub in the global economy. A country that will have maintained its outstanding tradition in the advance of scientific and technological knowledge while developing a similar level of performance in turning knowledge into exciting and novel products and services.The Report complements the Lambert Review of University-Business links as well as the cross-Government Skills Strategy. It makes proposals to strengthen UK performance against all the success factors building upon initiatives that have gone before.What is innovation?1.1. Innovation in this Report is defined as the successful exploitation of new ideas. Ideas may be entirely new to the market or involve the application of existing ideas that are new to the innovating organization or often a combination of both. Innovation involves the creation of new designs, concepts and ways of doing things, their commercial exploitation, and subsequent diffusion through the rest of the economy and society. It is this last–diffusion–phase from which the bulk of the economic benefits flow. Most innovations are incremental–a succession of individually modest improvements to products or services over their life cycle. But a few will be dramatic, creating entirely new industries or markets.1.2. Innovation involves experimentation and risk taking. Some attempts to innovate will fail, but across the economy the successes outweigh the failures. And the failures themselves generate new knowledge, which if evaluated correctly, can improve the chances for future success. The risk of failure justifies the potentially high returns from successes, which provide the incentive to innovate in the first place. Successful innovation-led companies have a number of common characteristics (Box 1.1).Characteristics of innovation-led companies:A worldwide focus, often requiring early expansion overseas;A balanced growth strategy, based on organic growth and targeted acquisitions to enter new markets or acquire critical expertise;A balanced investment strategy;Above average investment in market led research and development;A focus on what really matters to the customer;An innovation culture with corporate leadership that expects growth through development of new products and services.Why is it important now?1.3. Innovation is vital to most businesses operating in the UK if they are to survive and grow in the long term. But there are five reasons why innovation matters more for businesses and the people who work in them today.Markets around the world are being liberalised. This brings opportunities from expanding trade. And firms can locate all or part of the production process or service wherever the economic advantage is greatest. But UK-based firms also face competition from firms in countries with relatively low labour costs and where education and skills levels are high. For example, hourly labour costs in South Koreaare just over half UK levels, but the proportion of graduates in the working age population is almost identical.Long-term reductions in the costs of transportation and communication have also opened up new markets and faster global communications mean that consumers learn about new fashions, ideas and products faster than ever before. The cost of sea freight has fallen by two-thirds since 1920, air transport by five-sixths since 1930. Transatlantic telephone calls are now almost free on the Internet.Science and Technology are providing new opportunities for businesses to compete based on exploiting knowledge, skills and creativity to produce more valuable goods and services. Industries are being created, such as Biotechnology, and traditional ones are being transformed (e.g. growth of technical textiles). Because they rely on knowledge and skills, they provide areas where high wage, developed economies can maintain a competitive advantage over low wage, unskilled ones.Services, accounting for over 70% of the economy, are becoming more technology intensive. Technology is being used to improve business processes and customer service in sectors such as retail, hotels and banking, and to develop new products combining creative strengths with the latest technology, such as computer games. Many high technology manufacturers now make more money from services than they do from manufacturing.Increasing environmental concerns are acting as a stimulus to innovation. Demand for environmental improvements– for example, reducing CO2 emissions and volumes of waste – may require changes in the economy and to the way we live. To deliver these changes the market has to generate innovative uses of technology, new ways of doing business and new consumer attitudes.1.4.The speed of changing technology and the extent to which new products and services can change market conditions mean that the challenge to innovate is urgent and continuous. UK-based businesses will find it increasingly difficult to compete on low costs alone in labour intensive industries exposed to international competition. The challenge for businesses is to compete on the basis of unique value.1.5. The UK is not alone in facing this challenge. European leaders agreed at Lisbon in sprin g 2000 to make the EU “the most dynamic, knowledge-driven economy in the world by 2010”. Innovation is integral to achieving this vision.How is the UK doing?1.6.We have consulted a distinguished panel of leading academic experts in drawing up the analysis underpinning this Report. This analysis has been published separately. The main points concerning the UK’s innovation performance are set out below.The latest international comparisons of data on business R&D show the UK well behind the US and roughly equal to the EU average. However, it is encouraging that after a steady period of decline from 1.5% of GDP in 1981 to 1.16% in 1997, we have seen a move in the right direction, to 1.24% in 2002.Adjusting for size of economy, UK firms’ patenting activity a t patent offices in Europe, Japan and the US lies well behind firms in Japan, Germany and the US and is just below the European average.Although systematic data is lacking, it appears that the UK lags behind the US and major Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) economies in the take- up of best practice improvements such as lean manufacturing.Data from surveys, which rely on broader measures of innovation, paint a similar picture with UK performance weaker than its international peers.1.7.The analysis suggests that UK business faces a challenge: how to raise its rate of innovation?How did we try to explain the causes of UK performance?1.8. Innovation is a complex process so understanding why the UK has a relatively modest innovation performance is not straightforward. To help us do this we drew on an extensive review of the international innovation literature, aided by a panel of experts. We also drew heavily on analysis by the AIM Management Research Forum and the OECD.As a result we have identified seven critical success factors for innovation performance. They help us to identify current strengths and weaknesses of the UK innovation system and to develop proposals to improve its performance.Success factors for UK innovation performance1.9.What follows is a highly abridged version of the supporting analysis, summarizing the UK’s performance against the seven factors:Sources of new technological knowledge play an important role in shaping innovation systems. Science-based technologies are increasing in importance. New products and services tend to embody a wider range of technologies, increasing the complexity faced by individual firms. UK-based firms make extensive use of customers and suppliers as knowledge sources. The UK Science, Engineering and Technology (SET) base is highly productive and the UK has world-class design expertise.The capacity to absorb and exploit knowledge defines a firm’s ability to turn knowledge into new products, processes or services. Fundamentally it is people who create knowledge, manage businesses and innovate. Poor skills amongst managers and the workforce more generally have hindered performance. The culture within UK-owned firms appears to place less emphasis on creativity.All investments in innovation need access to finance. Relatively lower levels of innovation spend are probably more due to a lack of incentives and capacity than a shortage of funds, although some financing gaps exist.Competition provides a stimulus to innovation and helps determine the intensity of competition and the ability of firms to spot opportunities and manage risks.Customers and suppliers put pressure on firms to deliver better quality goods and services and provide opportunities for innovation. Many UK-based firms compete in global markets and the UK is an attractive market for innovative firms from abroad.The regulatory environment affects the possibilities and incentive structures for innovation. OECD comparisons show the UK to be relatively lightly regulated, although there are continuing business concerns about the impact of new regulations.And networks and collaboration are important means of accessing knowledge. Businesses are increasingly looking outside their sectors for opportunities tocollaborate.Figure 1.4Areas of Government influence1.10.Ultimately innovation depends on the knowledge, skills and creativity of those working in businesses. But Government has an important role in creating the right environment for innovation. Figure 1.4 sets out the main mechanisms and channels through which Government –at various levels –influences business innovation.1.11.The Government has already laid the foundations of an innovation-driven economy in areas such as macro-economic policy, fiscal policy, competition policy, trade policy and education and skills.1.12. Since 1997 we have produced three White Papers, “Our competitive future–Building a k nowledge driven economy”(1998), “Excellence and Opportunity–a Science and Innovation Policy for the 21st Century” (2000) and “Opportunity for All in a World of Change–Enterprise, Skills and Innovation” (2001). In these we set in motion a series of micro-economic measures to stimulate innovation, such as increased investment in the science base, incentives to encourage research institutions and universities to commercialize their research, and measures to encourage more small businesses to start up and innovate.1.13. Policies and programmers affecting innovation are determined at a variety of levels. In some cases, the role of the UK Government is to influence developments on a European or global scale.Chapter 3 Technology innovationSummaryDeveloped countries around the world have recognized that success in the future will come from businesses increasing the added value from their products, processes and services. Government action to encourage businesses to develop and implement new products and services has become a high priority. Given this, the UK Government needs to harness its resources more effectively in promoting technological innovation.The need to improve the take-up of new technologies3.1.The end of the 20th century witnessed a wave of scientific discovery and technology innovation in a range of areas that have only just begun to change the way we work and interact with our physical, natural and social environments. For example, the developments of the Internet and mobile communications have transformed people’s access to information.3.2.The pace of change is often quicker than anticipated and the impacts are fundamental. The growth of completely new industries such as biotechnology, software and the digital content industry in the UK, as well as the decline of more traditional sectors, bear very real testimony to this. For example during the 10 year period 1992-2002 the number of biotechnology businesses in the UK has increased from some 165 to 425, and turnover has increased by over six fold (from £0.5 billion to £3.2 billion).3.3.The UK has a strong indigenous knowledge source available to business through the Science, Engineering and Technology (SET) base and we do have a strong presence in some science-based technologies such as pharmaceuticals, telecommunications and aerospace.Promoting knowledge transfer3.4. The SET base makes a major contribution to knowledge transfer through the publication of research results and the supply of highly skilled people capable of transferring and adapting codified and tacit knowledge. However, there is an additional role that Government can play in providing the opportunities and incentives for translating quality UK science into commercially successful applications.3.5.To simplify arrangements for universities, Higher Education Institutions (HEIF)is to be consolidated into a permanent third stream of knowledge transfer funding to universities, alongside that for teaching and research. More money will be put into the second round of HEIF. The aim is to simplify the funding landscape and ensure that HEIs in England have greater discretion and the flexibility to develop their capacity in a way that best suits their needs and the needs of business.In future, support for technological innovation will be available through five products:Collaborative R&D support is available to meet some of the costs and risks associated with research and technology development, by facilitating collaboration between different businesses and between business and the SET base across the UK.Knowledge Transfer Networks will encourage the diffusion of new and existing technology.Grant for R&D from June 2003 this has been available for individuals and SMEs, and it enables them to meet some of the costs of investing in technology innovation.Grant for Investigating an Innovative Idea – this is a pilot, offering help to SMEs in England to look objectively at their ideas for innovative products, services or processes and to draw up an action plan to take the idea forward.Knowledge Transfer Partnerships provide direct support for knowledge transfer by enabling universities and others in the SET base across the UK to work with businesses using recently qualified people, like graduates, to undertake specific knowledge transfer projects in firms of all sizes.Technology IntermediariesTo complement the above actions, we will work more closely with technology intermediaries, whose role in technology development and transfer has been undervalued in recent years in both policy development and implementation. Technology intermediaries also have an important role to play at regional level.The principal members of the technology intermediaries’ community are the Research and Technology Organizations. They are a private sector community of effective knowledge-transfer companies. Their objective is knowledge transfer to industry to fill knowledge gaps and to stimulate innovation leading to higher value added products and services.译文商管031 梅文飞0364027在全球经济中竞争:创新挑战第一章创新挑战综述全球的竞争使贸易自由化的结果增加,技术变革以及运输和通讯费用减少。

当今世界的竞争与合作英语作文

当今世界的竞争与合作英语作文

当今世界的竞争与合作英语作文英文回答:Competition and cooperation are fundamental aspects of modern human society. In a world driven by economic globalization and technological advancements, individuals, businesses, and nations strive to succeed in a highly competitive environment. However, cooperation also plays a crucial role in fostering innovation, progress, and mutual benefit.Competition.Competition is a process in which individuals or entities strive to achieve a goal, often with limited resources. It can take various forms, from economic rivalry to scientific research. While competition often leads to efficiency and innovation, it can also create conflicts, inequality, and environmental degradation.In the business world, competition drives companies to innovate, improve their products and services, and reduce their costs. This leads to lower prices for consumers and a wider variety of choices. Competition also stimulates economic growth and prosperity.In the academic and scientific realm, competition encourages researchers to push the boundaries of knowledge and develop new ideas and technologies. It drives the pursuit of excellence and leads to breakthroughs that benefit society.Cooperation.Cooperation, on the other hand, involves working together to achieve a common goal. It is essential for overcoming challenges that cannot be solved by individuals or entities acting alone. Cooperation can take the form of alliances, joint ventures, international organizations, and social networks.In business, cooperation can enable companies to shareresources, reduce risks, and access new markets. Joint ventures, for example, allow businesses to combine their strengths and expertise to pursue new opportunities.In the international arena, cooperation is crucial for addressing global challenges such as climate change, poverty, and terrorism. International organizations like the United Nations provide a platform for nations to work together on issues that affect the entire world.Balance between Competition and Cooperation.While both competition and cooperation are importantfor human progress, it is essential to find the right balance between the two. Excessive competition can lead to conflict, inequality, and the erosion of social values. On the other hand, too much cooperation can stifle innovation and reduce the motivation to excel.In the business world, governments and regulatory agencies play a role in fostering a competitive environment while preventing the emergence of monopolies and otheranti-competitive practices.In society as a whole, education, cultural norms, and social institutions can promote cooperation and encourage individuals to work together for the common good.Conclusion.Competition and cooperation are inseparable aspects of modern human society. While competition drives efficiency and innovation, cooperation enables us to overcome challenges and achieve mutual benefit. By finding the right balance between these two forces, we can create a worldthat is both prosperous and sustainable.中文回答:竞争与合作。

敢于挑战不断创新的英语作文800字

敢于挑战不断创新的英语作文800字

敢于挑战不断创新的英语作文800字Dare to Challenge, Strive for Innovation.In the tapestry of human progress, innovation stands as an iridescent thread, weaving together advancements that shape our world. History is replete with tales of those who dared to challenge convention, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and imagination to create transformative solutions. From the wheel to the computer, from the telescope to the microscope, each breakthrough owes its existence to the indomitable spirit of those who dared to question, to experiment, and to envision a better future.Innovation is not merely an act of chance or inspiration; it is a conscious choice, a deliberatedecision to venture beyond the familiar. It requires a willingness to embrace uncertainty, to confront the unknown, and to persevere in the face of setbacks. Those who dare to challenge the status quo are often met with resistance and skepticism, for they challenge established norms anddisrupt entrenched interests. Yet, they are undeterred, driven by an unwavering belief in their ideas and aprofound sense of purpose.Throughout history, countless individuals have exemplified the spirit of innovation. In the realm of science, Marie Curie fearlessly delved into the uncharted territory of radioactivity, making groundbreakingdiscoveries that revolutionized our understanding of the atom. Albert Einstein, defying the prevailing scientific orthodoxy, developed his revolutionary theory of relativity, forever altering our perception of time and space. In the world of technology, Steve Jobs and his team at Apple dared to challenge the dominance of personal computers,introducing the iPhone and iPad, devices that transformed the way we communicate, learn, and entertain ourselves.Innovation is not confined to the realm of scientific and technological breakthroughs. It is also found in the arts, in social movements, and in the way we live our lives. From Vincent van Gogh's vibrant paintings that challenged traditional artistic conventions to Mahatma Gandhi'snonviolent resistance against British colonialism, history is replete with examples of individuals who dared to challenge the established order and inspire change.In today's rapidly evolving world, the need for innovation has never been more pressing. As we face complex global challenges such as climate change, poverty, and inequality, we must look to innovation to provide solutions that are both effective and sustainable. This requires a collective effort, a willingness to collaborate across disciplines and sectors, and a commitment to investing in research and development.Educational institutions have a critical role to play in fostering a culture of innovation. By providing students with opportunities for hands-on learning, problem-solving, and creative expression, they can ignite the spark of curiosity and nurture the skills that are essential for future innovators. Governments also have a responsibility to create an environment that encourages innovation, by providing financial support for research, protecting intellectual property rights, and promoting collaborationbetween academia and industry.Furthermore, innovation is not solely the domain of large corporations or well-funded institutions. Individuals from all walks of life can make meaningful contributions, by challenging assumptions, experimenting with new ideas, and sharing their knowledge with others. Open source software, crowdsourced innovation platforms, and the rise of citizen science all demonstrate the democratizing effect of technology in empowering individuals to participate in the innovation ecosystem.As we look to the future, it is imperative that we embrace the spirit of innovation. By daring to challenge the status quo, by embracing uncertainty, and by working collaboratively, we can unlock the potential for transformative solutions to the challenges of our time. Let us draw inspiration from the pioneers of the past andstrive to be the innovators of tomorrow, creating a world where progress, prosperity, and human well-being flourish for generations to come.。

敢于创新和挑战的作文

敢于创新和挑战的作文

敢于创新和挑战的作文英文回答:I believe that being daring and innovative is essential in today's fast-paced world. When we are willing to take risks and think outside the box, we open ourselves up to new opportunities and possibilities. For example, when I was working on a project at my previous job, I suggested a new approach that was different from the traditional methods. Although it was met with some skepticism at first, it ended up being a great success and was even adopted as the new standard for similar projects.Being willing to challenge the status quo and try new things can be intimidating, but it's also how we grow and learn. In my personal life, I have always been open to trying new activities and experiences, even if they were outside of my comfort zone. This has led to some amazing adventures and memories that I wouldn't have had if I had played it safe.中文回答:我相信在当今快节奏的世界中,敢于创新和挑战至关重要。

创新在经济发展中的作用英文作文

创新在经济发展中的作用英文作文

创新在经济发展中的作用Innovation, as a powerful driving force for social progress, plays a crucial role in economic development. It not only injects new vitality into economic growth, but also provides competitive advantages for enterprises, promoting the upgrading and transformation of industrial structure.Firstly, innovation is an important source of economic growth. With the continuous progress of technology, new technologies, products, and services are constantly emerging, and these innovative achievements provide a continuous source of power for economic growth. They not only improve production efficiency and reduce production costs, but also create new market demands and promote sustained and healthy economic development.Secondly, innovation is the core of a company's competitiveness. In the context of globalization, enterprises are facing fierce competition. Only through continuous innovation can enterprises stand invincible in the market. By developing new technologies, launching new products, and optimizing services, enterprises can continuously enhance their core competitiveness and win the favor of more consumers.Furthermore, innovation contributes to the upgrading and transformation of industrial structure. With the development of the economy and technological progress, traditional industries are gradually losing their competitiveness, while emerging industries are gradually rising. Innovation is the key to upgrading and transforming industrial structure. Through innovation, traditional industries can achieve technological transformation and upgrading, enhance added value and competitiveness; Emerging industries can continue to emerge and become new drivers of economic growth.In addition, innovation can also promote social progress and development. Innovative achievements not only improve people's quality of life, but also enhance their cultural literacy and technological level. At the same time, innovation can also solve some social problems, such as environmental pollution, resource scarcity, etc., and contribute to the sustainable development of society.In short, innovation plays an irreplaceable role in economic development. It can not only inject new vitality into economic growth, but also provide competitive advantages for enterprises, promote the upgrading and transformation of industrial structure. Therefore, we should attach greatimportance to the importance of innovation, strengthen technological innovation and talent cultivation, and provide strong guarantees for the sustained and healthy development of the economy.创新,作为推动社会进步的强大动力,在经济发展中扮演着至关重要的角色。

唯有自主创新才能融入国际市场作文

唯有自主创新才能融入国际市场作文

唯有自主创新才能融入国际市场作文In today's globalized economy, it is crucial for countries to innovate in order to stay competitive. 当今全球化经济中,创新对于国家保持竞争力至关重要。

Innovation plays a significant role in helping a country integrate into the international market. 创新在帮助一个国家融入国际市场方面发挥着重要作用。

By developing new technologies, products, and ideas, a country can enhance its competitiveness on the global stage. 通过开发新技术、产品和理念,一个国家可以提升其在全球舞台上的竞争力。

Moreover, innovation can drive economic growth and create employment opportunities. 此外,创新可以推动经济增长,创造就业机会。

When businesses and industries innovate, they often need to hire skilled workers to develop and implement new ideas. 当企业和行业进行创新时,他们通常需要招聘熟练的工人来开发和实施新的想法。

In addition, innovation can lead to the development of new industries and the transformation of existing ones. 此外,创新可以引领新产业的发展,改造现有产业。

[英语作文]2021创新与竞争英语作文

[英语作文]2021创新与竞争英语作文

[英语作文]2021创新与竞争英语作文2021创新与竞争英语作文创新的英语作文The world in the development of the rapid change, the rapid development of science and technology rapidly, continuously in the historical civilization to refresh, the great scale of breakthrough. After come, the world's development and prosperity without the human learning spirit and competitive consciousness.90 after generation, we are happy because we grow motherland is prosperous; We are fortunate generation after 90, because we are entering an era of competition atmosphere thick; Study lead the human progress and competition consciousness, promoting the development of the world. A content with now, is not destined to he who knows the competition was eliminated by the society; A stuck in the past, no innovation ability of country and will be left in the world.As an after 90, we are the creator of the future better world and owners, more should study hard, dare to compete. The 21st century is full of challenge and competition, to adjust to this century, received the recognition from the society. Us 90 afternoon the master of the future, we are all the same bright star in the sky, want to be more bright, the only constant energy, have the courage to compete in the study. Competition means new and breakthrough, the mean energy, means development. Dare to competition, we must be able to create a better future! She won the first prize in the national aerobics ningxia division, won the first prize in "national youth civilization etiquette popularization activity, the 13th" national top ten young pioneers "she with own strength, in the" future star "ningxia oral English contest, won thespecial award, 06 years she won CCTV" baby hope English show "ningxia conference" award for best baby "in October the same year she won the national English talent selection of bronze, 07 years won the finals CCTV" hope thatthe baby show "year" hope the baby award ", in the same year, in June by CCTV "star of hope" English talent competition division primary sections in ningxia third prize, the honor belongs to a person at the same time, weird, but italso shows that: as a 90 after we are in a great era of rapid development ofthe motherland, it is our time of growth for the social elite, so, we mustconstantly enrich oneself shouldering the important historical responsibilityof rich Chinese in the future!参考翻译:世界在发展这日新月异的变化,科技发展飞速迅猛,人类不断地在历史文明的伟大尺标上奋力刷新、突破着。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

外文文献及翻译:在全球经济中竞争:创新挑战外文资料商管031 梅文飞 0364027Competing in the global economy: the innovation challengeRt. Hon. Tony Blair, Lord Sainsbury. Innovation Report.2003.12: 17-31,52-65.Chapter 1 The innovation challengeSummaryGlobal competition is increasing as a result of trade liberalization, technological change and reductions in transport and communication costs. UK based businesses will find it increasingly difficult to compete onlow costs alone in labour intensive industries exposed to international competition. The challenge for businesses is to compete on the basis of unique value.We have defined innovation as the successful exploitation of newideas and it is central to meeting this challenge. It involves investments in new products, processes or services and in new ways of doing business. Measures to develop the skills and creativity of the workforce are often an essential prerequisite. The speed oftechnological change and market responses make the challenge to innovate urgent and continuous.Overall UK innovation performance appears to be, at best, average compared to our major competitors. This is reflected in the largeproductivity gap that exists between the UK and its major competitors. Innovation performance accounts for a significant proportion of this gap. On the whole, UK firms face a challenge: how to raise their rate of innovation?Innovation is a complex process so understanding why the UK has a relatively modest innovation performance is not straightforward. We drew on an extensive review of the international innovation literature and consulted with a group of leading experts in the field.As a result we have identified seven critical success factors for innovation performance. They are:Sources of new technological knowledge;Capacity to absorb and exploit new knowledge;Access to finance;Competition and entrepreneurship;Customers and suppliers;The Regulatory environment;Networks and collaboration.They help us to identify current strengths and weaknesses of the UK innovation system. A highly abridged summary is provided in this chapter but the more detailed1analysis is contained in an accompanying economic report.Our vision is of the UK as a key knowledge hub in the global economy.A country that will have maintained its outstanding tradition in theadvance of scientific and technological knowledge while developing a similar level of performance in turning knowledge into exciting and novel products and services.The Report complements the Lambert Review of University-Businesslinks as well as the cross-Government Skills Strategy. It makes proposals to strengthen UK performance against all the success factors building upon initiatives that have gone before.What is innovation?1.1. Innovation in this Report is defined as the successful exploitation of new ideas. Ideas may be entirely new to the market or involve the application of existing ideas that are new to the innovating organization or often a combination of both. Innovation involves the creation of new designs, concepts and ways of doing things, their commercial exploitation, and subsequent diffusion through the rest of the economy and society. It is this last–diffusion–phase from which the bulk of theeconomic benefits flow. Most innovations are incremental–a succession ofindividually modest improvements to products or services over their life cycle. But a few will be dramatic, creating entirely new industries or markets.1.2. Innovation involves experimentation and risk taking. Some attempts to innovate will fail, but across the economy the successes outweigh the failures. And the failures themselves generate newknowledge, which if evaluated correctly, can improve the chances for future success. The risk of failure justifies the potentially high returns from successes, which provide the incentive to innovate in the first place. Successful innovation-led companies have a number of common characteristics (Box 1.1).Characteristics of innovation-led companies:A worldwide focus, often requiring early expansion overseas;A balanced growth strategy, based on organic growth and targeted acquisitions to enter new markets or acquire critical expertise;A balanced investment strategy;Above average investment in market led research and development;A focus on what really matters to the customer;An innovation culture with corporate leadership that expects growth through development of new products and services.Why is it important now?1.3. Innovation is vital to most businesses operating in the UK if they are to survive and grow in the long term. But there are five reasons why innovation matters more for businesses and the people who work in them today.Markets around the world are being liberalised. This brings opportunities from expanding trade. And firms can locate all or part of the production process or service wherever the economic advantage is greatest. But UK-based firms also face competition from firms incountries with relatively low labour costs and where education andskills levels are high. For example, hourly labour costs in South Korea2are just over half UK levels, but the proportion of graduates in the working age population is almost identical.Long-term reductions in the costs of transportation and communication have also opened up new markets and faster global communications mean that consumers learn about new fashions, ideas and products faster than ever before. The cost of sea freight has fallen by two-thirds since 1920, air transport by five-sixths since 1930. Transatlantic telephone calls are now almost free on the Internet.Science and Technology are providing new opportunities for businesses to compete based on exploiting knowledge, skills andcreativity to produce more valuable goods and services. Industries are being created, such as Biotechnology, and traditional ones are being transformed (e.g. growth of technical textiles). Because they rely on knowledge and skills, they provide areas where high wage, developed economies can maintain a competitive advantage over low wage, unskilled ones.Services, accounting for over 70% of the economy, are becoming more technology intensive. Technology is being used to improve business processes and customer service in sectors such as retail, hotels and banking, and to develop new products combining creative strengths with the latest technology, such as computer games. Many high technologymanufacturers now make more money from services than they do from manufacturing.Increasing environmental concerns are acting as a stimulus to innovation.for example, reducing CO emissions and Demand for environmental improvements–2volumes of waste – may require changes in the economy and to the way we live. To deliver these changes the market has to generate innovative uses of technology, new ways of doing business and new consumer attitudes.1.4.The speed of changing technology and the extent to which new products and services can change market conditions mean that the challenge to innovate is urgent and continuous. UK-based businesses will find it increasingly difficult to compete on low costs alone in labour intensive industries exposed to international competition. The challenge for businesses is to compete on the basis of unique value.1.5. The UK is not alone in facing this challenge. European leaders agreed at Lisbon in spring 2000 to make the EU “the most dynamic, knowledge-driveneconomy in the world by 2010”. Innovation is integral to achieving this vision.How is the UK doing?1.6.We have consulted a distinguished panel of leading academic experts in drawing up the analysis underpinning this Report. Thisanalysis has been published separately. The main points concerning the UK’s innovation performance are set out below.The latest international comparisons of data on business R&D showthe UK well behind the US and roughly equal to the EU average. However, it is encouraging that after a steady period of decline from 1.5% of GDP in 1981 to 1.16% in 1997, we have seen a move in the right direction, to 1.24% in 2002.Adjusting for size of eco nomy, UK firms’ patenting activity at patent offices inEurope, Japan and the US lies well behind firms in Japan, Germany and the US and is just below the European average.3Although systematic data is lacking, it appears that the UK lags behind the US and major Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) economies in the take- up of best practice improvements such as lean manufacturing.Data from surveys, which rely on broader measures of innovation, paint a similar picture with UK performance weaker than itsinternational peers.1.7.The analysis suggests that UK business faces a challenge: how to raise its rate of innovation?How did we try to explain the causes of UK performance?1.8. Innovation is a complex process so understanding why the UK hasa relatively modest innovation performance is not straightforward. Tohelp us do this we drew on an extensive review of the international innovation literature, aided by a panel of experts. We also drew heavily on analysis by the AIM Management Research Forum and the OECD.As a result we have identified seven critical success factors for innovation performance. They help us to identify current strengths and weaknesses of the UK innovation system and to develop proposals to improve its performance.Success factors for UK innovation performance1.9.What follows is a highly abridged version of the supporting analysis, summarizing the UK’s performance against the seven factors: Sources of new technological knowledge play an important role in shaping innovation systems. Science-based technologies are increasing in importance. New products and services tend to embody a wider range of technologies, increasing the complexity faced by individual firms. UK-based firms make extensive use of customers and suppliers as knowledge sources. The UK Science, Engineering and Technology (SET) base is highly productive and the UK has world-class design expertise.The capacity to absorb and exploit knowledge defines a firm’sability to turn knowledge into new products, processes or services. Fundamentally it is people who create knowledge, manage businesses and innovate. Poor skills amongst managers and the workforce more generally have hindered performance. The culture within UK-owned firms appears to place less emphasis on creativity.All investments in innovation need access to finance. Relatively lower levels of innovation spend are probably more due to a lack of incentives and capacity than a shortage of funds, although some financing gaps exist.Competition provides a stimulus to innovation and helps determinethe intensity of competition and the ability of firms to spot opportunities and manage risks.Customers and suppliers put pressure on firms to deliver better quality goods and services and provide opportunities for innovation. Many UK-based firms compete in global markets and the UK is anattractive market for innovative firms from abroad.The regulatory environment affects the possibilities and incentive structures for innovation. OECD comparisons show the UK to be relatively lightly regulated, although there are continuing business concerns about the impact of new regulations.And networks and collaboration are important means of accessing knowledge. Businesses are increasingly looking outside their sectors for opportunities to4collaborate.Figure 1.4How Government policies influence innovationEnablers Advice and support for business Intellectual property framework Best practice programmers Measurement system OpportunitiesSupport for developing new lluyreyryreyt Standards Public procurement technology Bu Regulations Help accessing financeR&D tax creditsBusiness Innovation Support for inward investmentAccess to global knowledge baseBuilding blocks of innovation: a supportive climateMacroeconomic stability Education and training policy Trade policy Competition policy Physical and IT infrastructure Science policy Areas of Government influence1.10.Ultimately innovation depends on the knowledge, skills and creativity of those working in businesses. But Government has an important role in creating the right environment for innovation. Figure 1.4 sets out the main mechanisms and channels through whichGovernment – at various levels – influences businessinnovation.1.11.The Government has already laid the foundations of aninnovation-driven economy in areas such as macro-economic policy, fiscal policy, competition policy, trade policy and education and skills.1.12. Since 1997 we have produced three White Papers, “Our competitive future–Building a knowledge driven economy”(1998), “Excellence andOpportunity–a Science and Innovation Policy for the 21st Century” (2000) and “Opportunity for All in a World of Change–Enterprise,Skills and Innovation” (2001). In these we set in motion a series ofmicro-economic measures to stimulate innovation, such as increased investment in the science base, incentives to encourage research institutions and universities to commercialize their research, and measures to encourage more small businesses to start up and innovate.1.13. Policies and programmers affecting innovation are determinedat a variety of levels. In some cases, the role of the UK Government is to influence developments on a European or global scale.Chapter 3 Technology innovationSummary5Developed countries around the world have recognized that success in the future will come from businesses increasing the added value from their products, processes and services. Government action to encourage businesses to develop and implement new products and services has become a high priority. Given this, the UK Government needs to harness its resources more effectively in promoting technological innovation.The need to improve the take-up of new technologies3.1.The end of the 20th century witnessed a wave of scientific discovery and technology innovation in a range of areas that have only just begun to change the way we work and interact with our physical, natural and social environments. For example, the developments of the Internet and mobile communications have transformed people’s access to information.3.2.The pace of change is often quicker than anticipated and the impacts are fundamental. The growth of completely new industries such as biotechnology, software and the digital content industry in the UK, as well as the decline of more traditional sectors, bear very real testimony to this. For example during the 10 year period 1992-2002 the number of biotechnology businesses in the UK has increased0.5 from some 165 to 425, and turnover has increased by over sixfold (from ,billion to ,3.2 billion).3.3.The UK has a strong indigenous knowledge source available to business through the Science, Engineering and Technology (SET) base and we do have a strong presence in some science-based technologies such as pharmaceuticals, telecommunications and aerospace.Promoting knowledge transfer3.4. The SET base makes a major contribution to knowledge transfer through the publication of research results and the supply of highly skilled people capable of transferring and adapting codified and tacit knowledge. However, there is an additional role that Government can play in providing the opportunities and incentives for translating quality UK science into commercially successful applications.3.5.To simplify arrangements for universities, Higher Education Institutions(HEIF) is to be consolidated into a permanent third stream of knowledge transfer funding to universities, alongside that for teaching and research. More money will be put into the second round ofHEIF. The aim is to simplify the funding landscape and ensure that HEIsin England have greater discretion and the flexibility to develop their capacity in a way that best suits their needs and the needs of business.In future, support for technological innovation will be available through five products:Collaborative R&D support is available to meet some of the costs and risks associated with research and technology development, byfacilitating collaboration between different businesses and between business and the SET base across the UK.Knowledge Transfer Networks will encourage the diffusion of new and existing technology.Grant for R&D from June 2003 this has been available for individuals and SMEs, and it enables them to meet some of the costs of investing in technology innovation.6Grant for Investigating an Innovative Idea – this is a pilot,offering help to SMEsin England to look objectively at their ideas for innovative products, services or processes and to draw up an action plan to takethe idea forward.Knowledge Transfer Partnerships provide direct support for knowledge transfer by enabling universities and others in the SET base across the UK to work with businesses using recently qualified people, likegraduates, to undertake specific knowledge transfer projects in firms of all sizes.Technology IntermediariesTo complement the above actions, we will work more closely with technology intermediaries, whose role in technology development and transfer has been undervalued in recent years in both policy development and implementation. Technology intermediaries also have an importantrole to play at regional level.The principal members of the technology intermediaries’ community are the Research and Technology Organizations. They are a private sector community of effective knowledge-transfer companies. Their objective is knowledge transfer to industry to fill knowledge gaps and to stimulate innovation leading to higher value added products and services.7译文商管031 梅文飞 0364027在全球经济中竞争:创新挑战第一章创新挑战综述全球的竞争使贸易自由化的结果增加,技术变革以及运输和通讯费用减少。

相关文档
最新文档