教你审稿意见回复信怎么写

二审小修如何写审稿回复信

二审小修如何写审稿回复信尊敬的作者：您好！我是您提交的论文《XXX》，作为审稿人之一，我已经对您的论文进行了认真审阅，现将我的审稿意见反馈给您，请您参考并进行修订。

我要对您的论文表示肯定，您在论文中提出的研究问题具有一定的学术价值，并对相关文献进行了系统的综述。

然而，在审阅过程中，我也发现了一些需要改进的地方，希望您能够认真对待。

一、论文结构及篇章安排在论文结构方面，建议您在引言部分明确表达研究目的和意义，同时提供一些背景信息，以便读者更好地理解您的研究。

此外，您可以考虑在论文的开头部分给出一个总体的研究框架，以便读者能够更清晰地了解您的研究思路。

二、语言表达和逻辑结构在语言表达方面，建议您对论文中的一些表述进行修改，以使其更加准确和流畅。

同时，您可以适当增加一些论据和实例，以加强论文的可信度和说服力。

此外，在逻辑结构方面，建议您按照论文的主题和论证过程进行组织，确保每一部分之间的衔接自然流畅。

三、数据和方法论如果您的研究涉及到数据和方法论，建议您在论文中对其进行详细的介绍和说明，确保读者能够清楚地了解您的研究方法和数据来源。

此外，您也可以在论文中对数据进行充分的分析和解读，以便读者能够更好地理解您的研究结果。

四、结论和展望在结论部分，建议您对研究结果进行简明扼要的总结，并提出一些进一步的研究方向和展望，以激发读者的兴趣和思考。

同时，您可以对您的研究成果进行一定的评价和归纳，以便读者对您的研究有一个更全面的认识。

我希望您能够认真对待我的审稿意见，进行适当的修改和完善。

如果您对我的意见有任何疑问或不理解的地方，可以随时与我联系，我将非常乐意与您进一步讨论和交流。

再次感谢您对本期期刊的投稿，希望您能够在修订后的论文中进一步提升质量，期待能够看到您更加优秀的研究成果。

祝您研究工作顺利！此致敬礼！。

逐条回复审稿意见模板

逐条回复审稿意见模板审稿意见一：引言部分需要更加明确和简洁谢谢您的建议。

引言部分确实需要更加明确和简洁，以便让读者更好地理解本文的目的和背景。

我们将对其进行修改，使其更加精炼和聚焦。

审稿意见二：数据部分存在一些错误和遗漏非常感谢您的反馈。

我们将会仔细检查数据部分，并纠正任何错误或遗漏。

为了确保数据的准确性和完整性，我们将进行必要的修改和补充。

审稿意见三：分析方法需要更加详细地描述您的建议非常中肯。

在分析方法部分，我们将增加更多细节和解释，以便读者更好地理解我们所采用的方法和逻辑。

这将有助于增强本文的可信度和可重复性。

审稿意见四：结论部分需要更加深入和具体您的意见很有价值。

结论部分确实需要更加深入和具体，以便更好地总结本文的主要发现和贡献。

我们将对其进行扩展和深化，以提供更加详细和有意义的结论。

审稿意见五：参考文献部分需要更新和补充感谢您的建议。

参考文献部分确实需要更新和补充，以便更好地反映该领域的最新进展和研究成果。

我们将对其进行审查和更新，以确保其完整性和时效性。

审稿意见六：图表和插图需要改进和优化您的意见很有指导意义。

图表和插图的质量对于增强文章的可读性和可视化效果非常重要。

我们将对其进行改进和优化，以提高其清晰度和可理解性。

审稿意见七：语言表达和语法需要更加准确非常感谢您的反馈。

语言表达和语法对于保持文章的一致性和流畅性至关重要。

我们将对其进行审查和修正，以确保其准确性和专业性。

审稿意见八：结构安排需要更加合理和有序您的建议非常有建设性。

结构安排对于文章的逻辑性和可读性具有重要影响。

我们将仔细审视文章的结构，并进行必要的调整和优化，以便使其更加合理和有序。

审稿意见九：小标题和段落划分需要更加清晰您的反馈很有价值。

小标题和段落划分可以使文章更加易于阅读和理解。

我们将仔细审查文章的小标题和段落划分，并进行必要的修改和完善，以提高其清晰度和易读性。

审稿意见十：格式排版需要更加规范和专业感谢您的宝贵意见。

回复审稿意见,模板

回复审稿意见,模板篇一：SCI 审稿意见回复范文论文题目：Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B （一种病毒）所投杂志：Life Sciences投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表编辑信内容（注：有删节）：Dear Mr. XXX,Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below.If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised paper. A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review procedures.A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the resubmission.You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files area.We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 days. After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new manuscript.To submit a revision, go to and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerely,Joseph J. Bahl, PhDEditorLife SciencesFormat Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your article. Pay particular attention to our References style.Reviewers' comments:Reviewer #1:XXXXX （略）Reviewer #2:XXXXX （略）Editors note and suggestions: （注：编辑的建议）Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English>>>Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.A, an alkaloid isolated from C (注：一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B. Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral activity. The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was measured by HPLC. Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of viruses. From the similarity of theserum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to bioinactivation. The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Introduction: some sentences can be made less passive. example 1st paragraph >>>> A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig 1. ... While it produced a general inhibition of antibody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997). These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and animals.>>>The authors should check the entire manuscriptfor spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid)>>>The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., XX)and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., XX)>>>>>The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion section.>>>>>>Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend thewording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.>>>>> reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE.Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for errors. If you have questions or do not know how to respond to any of the points raised please contact me at bahl@ Joseph Bahl, PhD Editor 2 Life Sciences作者回复信原稿：Dear Dr. Bahl,I’m （注：正式信函不要简写）very appreciate （注：不适合作为给编辑回信的开始，同时有语法错误）for your comments and suggestions.I （注：实际上是学生做的）have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again （注：要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作）. Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection. Death rate, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic slices （注：用词错误）were calculated（注：用词不当）. Production of mRNA of IL-10, IFN-γand TNF-αwere （注：语法错误）measured by RT-PCR.I have revised this manuscript and especially paid much attention to your comments and suggestions. I would like to re-submit it to LIFE SCIENCE. Title of manuscript has been changed to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth.Answers to Reviewers’ questions were as follows: （注：可附在给编辑的回复信后）Reviewer #1:XXXXXReviewer #2:XXXXXEditors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth（注：多处语法错误）.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.Answer: I have revise the abstract carefully to make it more smooth and informative（注：语法错误）.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Answer: I have paid attention to this question and it is clearer （注：不具体）. Introduction:some sentences can be made less passive.Answer: I have revise the whole paper to make sentences less passive and obtained help of my colleague proficient in English （注：语法错误，句子不通顺）.The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errorsAnswer: I’m very sorry to give you so much trouble for those spelling errors （注：不必道歉，按建议修改即可）. I have carefully corrected them.The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in theguideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., XX) and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., XX)Answer: I changed the style of references.Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.Answer: （注：作者请编辑公司帮回答）reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE. Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Answer: Thank you for your suggestions. I have supplemented pictures of cardiac pathologic slices in the paper (Fig2).I have to apologize for giving you so much trouble because of those misspelling and confusing statements （注：一般不是延误或人为失误，不必轻易道歉，按建议修改即可）. Your comments and suggestions really helpedme a lot. I have put great efforts to this review. I wish it can be satisfactory.If there’s （注：正式信函不要简写）any information I can provide, please don’t hesitate to contact me.Thank you again for your time and patience. Look forward to hear （注：语法错误）from you.Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)建议修改稿：Dear Dr. Bahl,Thanks you very much for your comments and suggestions.As suggested, we have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments. Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection with virus B. Mortality, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic scores were determined. In addition, mRNA expression of IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α were measured by RT-PCR.We have revised the manuscript, according to thecomments and suggestions of reviewers and editor, and responded, point by point to, the comments as listed below. Since the paper has been revised significantly throughout the text, we feel it is better not to highlight the amendments in the revised manuscript （正常情况最好表明修改处）.The revised manuscript has been edited and proofread by a medical editing company in Hong Kong.I would like to re-submit this revised manuscript to Life Sciences, and hope it is acceptable for publication in the journal.Looking forward to hearing from you soon.With kindest regards,Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)Replies to Reviewers and EditorFirst of all, we thank both reviewers and editor for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions.Replies to Reviewer #1:Xxxxx （略）Replies to Reviewer #2:Xxxxx （略）Replies to the Editors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contmeporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of Sophoridine against Coxsackievirus B3 and its pharmacokinetics in rats” to make it more clear and read more smoothly.篇二：教你审稿意见回复信怎么写教你审稿意见回复信怎么写来源：医学论文——达晋医学编译达晋医学编译小编知道大多数的稿件在被期刊接受前需要经历至少一次修稿，作者在收到大修或小修的决定后，必须根据审稿意见修改论文，然后将修改稿重新递交给期刊，同时附上逐点回复，在返还修改稿的时候，还需要递交cover letter，这封信通常称为 response letter(回复信)或 rebuttal letter(反驳信)。

审稿意见修改回复

审稿意见修改回复
一、表示感谢
哎呀，审稿老师呀，看到您的审稿意见啦，真的特别感谢您这么认真地看我的稿子呢。

您给的这些意见对我来说就像是宝藏一样，能让我的文章变得更好。

二、针对意见的回应
1. 关于内容部分的意见
您说有部分内容表述不够清晰，我也发现这个问题啦。

就像我在解释那个概念的时候，可能用了一些比较复杂的句子，我现在已经重新写了，用特别直白的话来说，就像和朋友聊天一样解释这个概念，让读者一看就懂。

您提到有些例子有点老套，我也觉得是呢。

所以我就到处找新的例子，找的时候可费劲啦，不过最后还是找到了一些特别有趣又新鲜的例子，把之前的老例子都替换掉啦。

2. 关于格式方面的意见
您说我的段落排版有点乱，我自己看了看，确实是这样。

我就重新调整了一下段落，让每个段落的主题都更明确，就像给每个段落都穿上了整齐的衣服一样。

对于引用部分的格式，我之前可能没太注意，现在按照要求都规范好啦，还仔细核对了引用的文献，确保没有错误。

三、整体的改进方向
我知道我的文章还有很多需要改进的地方呢。

我会继续努力的，在以后写文章的时候也会更加注意这些问题。

我会让文章的逻辑更加清晰，内容更加丰富有趣，就像把文章打造成一个充满惊喜的小世界一样。

而且我也会多参考一些优秀的文章，学习人家的写作方法，争取让自己的写作水平蹭蹭往上涨。

再次感谢审稿老师您的宝贵意见哦。

专家审稿意见回复范文如何回复中文审稿人意见结尾如何写

专家审稿意见回复范文如何回复中文审稿人意见结尾如何写专家审稿意见回复范文如何回复中文审稿人意见结尾如何写第一，不论审稿人提了什么意见，你在回复的时候一定要说：谢谢您的建议，您的所有建议都非常的重要，它们对我的论文写作和科研工作都具有重要的指导意义！第二，如果审稿人提 ___你暂时无法做到（比如，要你增加实验或改进实验等）。

那么，为了论文尽快发表，你必须拒绝这样的要求。

但是，你不要摆出一大堆理由来证明这个意见是不好实现的。

你应该说：“谢谢您的建议，它非常的重要，由于您的建议，我发现了我目前工作中的不足之处，我会在以后的工作中按照您的建议提高科研水平，取得更多成绩！”这样说，等于委婉的拒绝了评审意见，又让评审人觉得你很看重他 ___。

第三，如果审稿人___明显有问题，也不说能说审稿人___是错误的，可以他 ___发表任何的评论，只需要列出你的理由和证据就可以了，结尾也不要强调自己的观点是正确的。

一句话，就是凭证据说话。

第四，如果审稿人的评价比较傲慢，而且有失公平。

那么，不用客气，直接写信给，痛批审稿人。

（我就遇到过这样的情况，痛批后反而被录用。

）第五，在回复信的结尾最好写上再次谢谢您的建议，希望能够从您哪里学到更多的知识。

这句话最好用黑体，要显眼。

保持正确的语调，做出回应。

说明（1）在回复审稿人意见的时候，除了写明修改内容外，还有一些话是必须要写的。

这个其实也可以归纳为礼貌用语，大家一般也都会注意到。

但是，有些时候还是容易“放飞自我”。

实验室的一位师兄，花了很长的时间搞出来一个很有idea的文章。

（2）在回复审稿意见的时候，前面还是客客气气的回复，一读到关于自己核心idea的时候，立马心态就炸了，言辞什么的就有点过激了，最后当然直接被拒了。

其实能作为审稿人，一般都是这个领域的专家或者有一定贡献的人，既然能指出你的问题，就说明还是存在不合理的地方，那就认认真真去修改就好了，千万不要太持才傲物。

（3）里很多人都会轻易犯错，尤其是刚发论文的时候，总觉得自己一定要根据审稿人的每一条意见都做出修改。

有效回复审稿人的意见模板

有效回复审稿人的意见模板一、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）: On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Th ank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号).Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Respond s to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。

审稿意见回复信模板 -回复

审稿意见回复信模板-回复尊敬的审稿人：首先，我要感谢您在审阅我的文章时提供的宝贵意见和建议。

在此回信中，我将一一回答您提出的问题并逐步解释我的观点。

[审稿意见1: 该文章缺乏一个明确的中心思想。

建议作者为文章确定一个核心主题，并贯穿始终。

]我认识到文章在中心思想的表达上存在欠缺的问题。

为了具体指导读者，我将在文章的引言中明确陈述我的中心思想，同时在每个段落的结尾重新强调这一主题。

我会采取一种逻辑有序的方式来展示观点，并确保每个段落都与中心思想保持一致。

此外，我还会使用恰当的过渡词来确保文章的连贯性。

[审稿意见2: 文章的结构有些混乱，需要更清晰地组织段落和思路。

建议作者使用标题、段落小结等来进行分段。

]非常感谢您指出文章结构上的混乱之处。

我会在文章中使用标题和子标题来分隔不同的段落，并在每个段落开始之前写出一个小结，以明确该段的主要内容和论点。

这样，读者将会更容易理解文章的脉络和逻辑关系。

[审稿意见3: 文章中的观点需要更多的论据和支持。

建议作者引用相关研究、数据和例子来支持自己的观点。

]非常感谢您对文章观点支持不够的指出。

为了增强对观点的支持，我会引用相关研究、数据和例子，以增加文章的可信度和说服力。

同时，我还会提供更多的解释和分析，以确保读者对我的观点有更深入的理解。

[审稿意见4: 文章中的语言表达有些不准确，需要进一步修改。

建议作者仔细检查文章中的拼写、语法和使用词汇的准确性。

]感谢您对文章语言表达的反馈。

我会花更多的时间仔细审查文章中的拼写、语法和使用词汇的准确性。

另外，我会尽量使用更精确、清晰的语言来表达我的观点，以避免产生歧义或引起误解。

最后，我再次感谢您对我的文章提出的宝贵意见和建议。

我会认真对待您的每一条指导，并努力改进我的文章。

如果您还有任何其他建议，我将非常高兴能听到。

再次感谢您的帮助和支持。

诚挚的问候，[您的名字]。

审稿意见回复信模板 -回复

审稿意见回复信模板-回复审稿意见回复信模板- 回答审稿意见尊敬的审稿专家，感谢您对我所提交的论文的审稿工作，我对审稿意见表示衷心的感谢。

通过认真阅读并深入思考，我已就您提出的问题进行了全面的检查和修订。

下面我将一一回答您的审稿意见，并对我对修订后的论文进行了相应的解释和补充。

一、对于问题一的回答：[按此回答第一个审稿意见，解释修订的原因和方法]二、对于问题二的回答：[按此回答第二个审稿意见，解释修订的原因和方法]三、对于问题三的回答：[按此回答第三个审稿意见，解释修订的原因和方法]四、对于问题四的回答：[按此回答第四个审稿意见，解释修订的原因和方法]五、对于问题五的回答：[按此回答第五个审稿意见，解释修订的原因和方法]六、对于问题六的回答：[按此回答第六个审稿意见，解释修订的原因和方法]七、对于问题七的回答：[按此回答第七个审稿意见，解释修订的原因和方法]八、对于问题八的回答：[按此回答第八个审稿意见，解释修订的原因和方法]九、对于问题九的回答：[按此回答第九个审稿意见，解释修订的原因和方法]十、对于问题十的回答：[按此回答第十个审稿意见，解释修订的原因和方法]通过对您提出的问题进行修订，我相信论文已经得到了大幅度的改善。

我的修订主要包括但不限于以下几个方面：首先，我对论文中的错误引用和参考文献引用格式进行了仔细检查和修改。

对于每个引用，我核对了作者、出版年份、文章标题等信息，确保其准确无误。

同时，我对每个参考文献的格式进行了观察，确保其符合您的要求和学术规范。

其次，我重新组织了论文的结构和逻辑，对各章节之间的连贯性和衔接进行了进一步的调整。

通过重新编排章节的顺序以及添加过渡句和段落，我提高了整体结构的合理性和清晰度，使得读者更容易理解和跟随论文的思路。

此外，基于您的建议，我对论文中的实验设计、数据采集以及结果分析进行了深入检查和修改。

通过重新回顾实验过程和分析方法，我提出了更加详细和准确的描述，并且对结果图表进行了重新绘制，以增强其可读性和科学性。

审稿意见回复信模板

审稿意见回复信模板
尊敬的审稿专家：
感谢您对我们的稿件进行审阅并提出宝贵的意见。

我们非常重视您的反馈，并对您的专业建议表示由衷的感谢。

我们已经仔细研究了您的审稿意见，并对稿件进行了相应的修改和完善。

以下是我们对修改内容的简要说明：
1. 针对您提出的关于文章结构的问题，我们重新审视了整个文章的组织框架，并进行了调整和优化，以确保逻辑更加清晰、连贯。

2. 关于数据分析部分，我们根据您的建议，对数据进行了进一步的验证和补充，增加了更多详细的数据分析和解释，以增强文章的可信度和可靠性。

3. 对于文中一些表述不够准确或不够清晰的地方，我们进行了仔细的修改和润色，以提高文章的可读性和易懂性。

4. 我们还根据您的意见，对参考文献进行了检查和更新，确保引用的文献准确、权威。

通过以上修改，我们希望能够更好地满足学术要求，并使文章更加完善。

再次感谢您对我们工作的支持和帮助，您的意见对我们的研究非常重要。

如果您还有任何其他问题或建议，请随时与我们联系。

我们期待着您的回复，并愿意根据您的指导进行进一步的修改。

致以诚挚的敬意！
作者：XXX
XX 年 XX 月 XX 日。

回复审稿意见,模板

回复审稿意见,模板篇一：SCI 审稿意见回复范文论文题目：Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B （一种病毒）所投杂志：Life Sciences投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表编辑信内容（注：有删节）：Dear Mr. XXX,Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below.If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised paper. A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review procedures.A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the resubmission.You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files area.We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 days. After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new manuscript.To submit a revision, go to and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerely,Joseph J. Bahl, PhDEditorLife SciencesFormat Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your article. Pay particular attention to our References style.Reviewers' comments:Reviewer #1:XXXXX （略）Reviewer #2:XXXXX （略）Editors note and suggestions: （注：编辑的建议）Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English>>>Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.A, an alkaloid isolated from C (注：一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B. Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral activity. The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was measured by HPLC. Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of viruses. From the similarity of theserum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to bioinactivation. The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Introduction: some sentences can be made less passive. example 1st paragraph >>>> A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig 1. ... While it produced a general inhibition of antibody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997). These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and animals.>>>The authors should check the entire manuscriptfor spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid)>>>The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., XX)and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., XX)>>>>>The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion section.>>>>>>Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend thewording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.>>>>> reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE.Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for errors. If you have questions or do not know how to respond to any of the points raised please contact me at bahl@ Joseph Bahl, PhD Editor 2 Life Sciences作者回复信原稿：Dear Dr. Bahl,I’m （注：正式信函不要简写）very appreciate （注：不适合作为给编辑回信的开始，同时有语法错误）for your comments and suggestions.I （注：实际上是学生做的）have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again （注：要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作）. Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection. Death rate, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic slices （注：用词错误）were calculated（注：用词不当）. Production of mRNA of IL-10, IFN-γand TNF-αwere （注：语法错误）measured by RT-PCR.I have revised this manuscript and especially paid much attention to your comments and suggestions. I would like to re-submit it to LIFE SCIENCE. Title of manuscript has been changed to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth.Answers to Reviewers’ questions were as follows: （注：可附在给编辑的回复信后）Reviewer #1:XXXXXReviewer #2:XXXXXEditors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth（注：多处语法错误）.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.Answer: I have revise the abstract carefully to make it more smooth and informative（注：语法错误）.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Answer: I have paid attention to this question and it is clearer （注：不具体）. Introduction:some sentences can be made less passive.Answer: I have revise the whole paper to make sentences less passive and obtained help of my colleague proficient in English （注：语法错误，句子不通顺）.The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errorsAnswer: I’m very sorry to give you so much trouble for those spelling errors （注：不必道歉，按建议修改即可）. I have carefully corrected them.The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in theguideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., XX) and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., XX)Answer: I changed the style of references.Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.Answer: （注：作者请编辑公司帮回答）reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE. Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Answer: Thank you for your suggestions. I have supplemented pictures of cardiac pathologic slices in the paper (Fig2).I have to apologize for giving you so much trouble because of those misspelling and confusing statements （注：一般不是延误或人为失误，不必轻易道歉，按建议修改即可）. Your comments and suggestions really helpedme a lot. I have put great efforts to this review. I wish it can be satisfactory.If there’s （注：正式信函不要简写）any information I can provide, please don’t hesitate to contact me.Thank you again for your time and patience. Look forward to hear （注：语法错误）from you.Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)建议修改稿：Dear Dr. Bahl,Thanks you very much for your comments and suggestions.As suggested, we have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments. Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection with virus B. Mortality, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic scores were determined. In addition, mRNA expression of IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α were measured by RT-PCR.We have revised the manuscript, according to thecomments and suggestions of reviewers and editor, and responded, point by point to, the comments as listed below. Since the paper has been revised significantly throughout the text, we feel it is better not to highlight the amendments in the revised manuscript （正常情况最好表明修改处）.The revised manuscript has been edited and proofread by a medical editing company in Hong Kong.I would like to re-submit this revised manuscript to Life Sciences, and hope it is acceptable for publication in the journal.Looking forward to hearing from you soon.With kindest regards,Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)Replies to Reviewers and EditorFirst of all, we thank both reviewers and editor for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions.Replies to Reviewer #1:Xxxxx （略）Replies to Reviewer #2:Xxxxx （略）Replies to the Editors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contmeporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of Sophoridine against Coxsackievirus B3 and its pharmacokinetics in rats” to make it more clear and read more smoothly.篇二：教你审稿意见回复信怎么写教你审稿意见回复信怎么写来源：医学论文——达晋医学编译达晋医学编译小编知道大多数的稿件在被期刊接受前需要经历至少一次修稿，作者在收到大修或小修的决定后，必须根据审稿意见修改论文，然后将修改稿重新递交给期刊，同时附上逐点回复，在返还修改稿的时候，还需要递交cover letter，这封信通常称为 response letter(回复信)或 rebuttal letter(反驳信)。

SCI审稿意见回复模板

精品文档List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds t o the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××......逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：We are v ery sorry for our negligence of ……...We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s su ggestionAs Reviewer suggested that……Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Special thanks to you for your good comments.Reviewer #2:同上述Reviewer #3:××××××Other changes:1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”2. Line 107, “……” was added3. Line 129, “……” was deleted××××××We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions..。

回复sci审稿意见模板

回复sci审稿意见模板
在回复SCI审稿意见时，以下是一个模板，可以帮助您组织和回应审稿人的意见：
回复审稿意见模板
标题: 对审稿意见的回应
引言:
简要感谢审稿人提供的宝贵意见，并表达对审稿人付出的时间和努力的感激之情。

审稿意见概述:
简要总结审稿人的主要意见和建议。

回应审稿意见:
1. 审稿意见1:
* 描述审稿人的意见。

* 回应和解释您的观点、改进或调整。

* 提供证据或数据支持您的回应（如果适用）。

2. 审稿意见2:
* 描述审稿人的意见。

* 回应和解释您的观点、改进或调整。

* 针对审稿人的建议，说明您如何修改或完善相关内容。

3. 审稿意见3:
* (依此类推，回应所有审稿人的意见)
结论:
感谢审稿人的意见和建议对提升稿件质量的重要贡献。

总结您的回应，并强调您如何根据审稿人的意见改进和完善了稿件。

如果还有其他遗留问题或需要进一步讨论的内容，请在此处进行说明。

致谢:
再次表达对审稿人工作的感谢，并感谢编辑部给予的机会和考虑。

请注意，以上模板是一个基本的指导，您可以根据具体情况进行适当的调整和修改。

回应审稿人时，保持礼貌、尊重和专业的态度非常重
要。

确保充分理解并认真对待审稿人的意见，提供清晰、有逻辑和准确的回应。

中文审稿意见答复信模板

中文审稿意见答复信模板英文回答：Dear Editor,。

Thank you for your thoughtful and constructive comments on our manuscript entitled "Title of Manuscript." We appreciate the time and effort you have taken to review our work, and we believe that your suggestions will help us to improve the quality of our manuscript.We have carefully considered your comments and have revised the manuscript accordingly. Below, we provide a point-by-point response to each of your comments.Comment 1: The introduction lacks sufficient background information on the topic.Response: We have added a new paragraph to the introduction that provides more background information onthe topic. We have also included references to relevant literature to support our claims.Comment 2: The methods section is not clear and concise.Response: We have revised the methods section to makeit more clear and concise. We have also added more detailto the experimental procedures and provided moreinformation about the statistical analyses that we used.Comment 3: The results section is difficult to follow.Response: We have reorganized the results section to make it more logical and easier to follow. We have also added more descriptive text to the figures and tables.Comment 4: The discussion section does not adequately address the implications of the findings.Response: We have revised the discussion section to address the implications of our findings in more detail. We have also included a new paragraph that discusses thelimitations of our study and suggests directions for future research.Comment 5: The manuscript is not well-written and contains several grammatical errors.Response: We have carefully proofread the manuscript and corrected all grammatical errors. We have also improved the overall clarity and flow of the writing.We believe that the revised manuscript is now of higher quality and more suitable for publication in your journal. We thank you again for your helpful comments and look forward to hearing from you soon.Sincerely,。

审稿意见回复信模板 -回复

审稿意见回复信模板-回复[审稿意见回复信模板]尊敬的编辑/审稿人，感谢您对我们的文章提供审稿意见。

我们非常感谢您对我们的工作提出的宝贵建议，并且我们对您的高度评价感到非常满意。

根据您的意见，我们对文章做出了相应的修改和改进。

下面是对每个意见的详细回复。

1. 意见一：在文章中，我们缺乏对相关文献的引用和参考。

建议增加引用和参考的论文数量和种类，以加强文章的可信度和研究基础。

回复：非常感谢您的建议。

我们认可您的观点，并已在文章中增加了相关文献的引用和参考。

我们研究了更多的文献，并引用了来自不同领域和角度的研究结果，以增强我们的立论基础和可信度。

这次修改后，文章的参考文献数量和种类得到了显著的提高，我们相信这样做能更好地支持我们的观点。

2. 意见二：文章的结构和逻辑需要更清晰。

建议对段落进行重组和优化，使其更连贯和易于阅读。

回复：非常感谢您对文章结构和逻辑的指导。

我们重新整理了段落，并进行了优化，以提高文章的连贯性和易读性。

我们修订了段落之间的过渡句，使得文章的结构更加清晰和流畅。

此外，我们还添加了更多的副标题，以帮助读者更好地理解文章的脉络和内容。

希望这些修改能满足您对结构和逻辑的要求。

3. 意见三：在方法和实验部分，我们建议提供更多的细节，以便读者能够重现研究。

回复：非常感谢您的意见。

我们对方法和实验部分进行了详细的修改和补充，以便读者能够更好地理解和重现我们的研究。

我们添加了更多的实验细节，包括实验设备、实验条件和实验过程等方面的信息。

我们还提供了相关数据和结果的分析方法，以便读者能够更准确地理解我们的实验结果。

我们相信这些修改将使读者能够更好地理解我们的研究过程和结果。

4. 意见四：文章中存在一些语法和拼写错误，建议重新审查和修改。

回复：非常感谢您指出文章中的语法和拼写错误。

我们对文章进行了仔细的审查和修改，以确保语法和拼写的准确性。

我们使用了专业的校对软件和工具，并请专业的编辑进行了最后的审查。

(完整版)如何回复国内杂志编辑的模板信件

如何回复国内杂志编辑的模板信件编辑提出的一般意见：1.文中的题目请修改2.中英文摘要写的一般3.请通读全文，文中很多语句不通，文字错误：***4.文中符号请注意上下标和正斜体，k表示千用小写，s(KWm-2)4/3写的不规范5.文中的”作者“二字出现频率太大，请润色上下文语句，减少使用频率6.参考文献请按照要求修改7.补充中英对照的通信作者简介以下是我的文章的审稿意见，以及我对审稿意见的回复。

***先生您好！您的稿件已通过专家审查，我刊同意对原稿进行修改后刊用。

请按专家意见、我刊投稿须知修改。

专家意见如下：1. 题目太大。

水稻基因型的筛选指标有多种。

本文主要涉及到性状指标、营养指标。

建议对题目作些限定。

2. 关键词中英文顺序不一致。

3. 文中存在部分错别字4. 讨论水培4周的干物重相对值与收获期各相对值之间的相关系数达不到显著的原因。

除了作者提出的水稻根系对土壤磷可利用性的影响之外，不同品种生育期的差异也可能影响对磷的吸收利用，由于文中未列出品种生育期，所以很难核对，建议作者作进一步的思考和核实分析。

如果是事实，可以补充。

5. 请注意引用我刊文章。

看了这个审稿意见，其实第2，3，5是小问题，主要是针对第1和第4条我的回复如下：******编辑部编辑先生、女士：您好！非常感谢编辑和审稿人对“********”一文的大力斧正，作者已按照贵刊的要求作了详细修改，尚有不妥之处敬请指正。

现将贵刊所提的问题回答如下：1) 关于题目太大的问题。

的确，正如审稿意见上所说的那样，耐低磷水稻基因型的筛选指标有很多种，除了本文涉及到的性状指标和营养指标以外，还有其它的生理生化指标。

然而，目前在筛选耐低磷水稻基因型的工作中一般还是用性状指标和营养指标来作筛选的。

另外，也很难找到一个非常恰当的名词来代替文中所讨论到的所有指标。

因此文中的题目才用了“筛选指标”这个范围稍微有点大的词。

2) 关于不同水稻品种生育期的差异也可能影响水稻对磷的吸收利用问题。

审稿意见回复模板

审稿意见回复模板
您好，
非常感谢您在百忙之中对本文章做出审稿意见，我们非常重视您的反馈意见。

在接受审稿意见的基础上，我们为本篇文章做了如下改动：
（一）
相比原版，该文章将总体结构进行了调整，使其从各个角度、全面地论述了分析主题，突出了文章的主题思路。

为了体现文章的权威性，在审稿意见的基础上，我们还特别增加
了一些相关文献参考，以进一步增强本文的权威性和可信性。

在行文表达方面，文章比原版进行了更深入地改进，明确指出前言、主体内容，以及
结论的轮廓，更加一致、清楚地表述了文章的主要观点。

根据审稿的意见，本文中的专业
术语更加普遍和清晰，能更加有效地传达文章的观点，使文章的理论框架更规范化。

在改进的基础上，本文中的文献参考也做了相应的改进，以回应审稿意见，补充本文
的完整性。

最后，我们再次对您作出审稿意见表示诚挚的感谢，衷心希望通过审稿意见的持续贡献，能够使本文更加完美。

此致
敬礼
xxx。

二审小修如何写审稿回复信

二审小修如何写审稿回复信尊敬的作者：您好！非常感谢您对我们期刊的投稿，并对我们的审稿意见给予了重视。

在您的修订稿中，我们注意到了您对我们的建议进行了认真的修改和回应，这让我们对您的工作充满了信心。

我们认为您在回复中对我们提出的问题进行了非常清晰和详细的解答。

您不仅对每个问题进行了逐一回应，还补充了相关的论据和解释，使得整个回复更加全面和有说服力。

这样的回复能够帮助我们更好地理解您的观点和研究，对于后续的审稿过程非常有帮助。

我们注意到您在修订稿中对我们的意见进行了有针对性的修改。

您不仅对文中存在的问题进行了修正，还对论文的结构、语言和表达进行了进一步的优化。

这些修改不仅提高了文章的可读性和逻辑性，还更好地突出了您的研究成果和贡献。

我们对您在这方面的努力表示充分的认可和赞赏。

我们还注意到您在修订稿中对文中的各个部分进行了适当的调整和补充。

您在文献综述、方法论、结果分析等方面进行了详细的说明和论证，充分展示了您的学术能力和研究水平。

这样的修改让整篇文章更加完整和有条理，读者能够更加清晰地理解您的研究内容和思路。

我们希望您能再次对文中的语法错误、拼写错误和标点符号等细节进行仔细的检查和修改。

虽然这些细节错误在整体上对文章的理解没有太大影响，但对于提升文章质量和学术形象仍然非常重要。

我们相信您能够在这方面做出相应的调整和改进。

总的来说，您的修订稿在内容和结构上都得到了明显的提升和完善。

我们非常满意您在回复和修改中所展现出的认真态度和学术素养。

我们相信，在您的努力下，这篇文章将能够在我们的期刊上发表，并对相关领域的学术研究做出积极的贡献。

再次感谢您对我们期刊的投稿，并对我们的审稿意见给予了重视。

希望您能够按照我们的建议对文章进行进一步的修改，并在修订稿中强调您的贡献和创新点。

我们期待着收到您的最终修订稿，并将尽快进行终审，争取早日发表您的优秀研究成果。

祝好！此致敬礼。

如何回复国内杂志编辑的模板信件

编辑提出的一般意见：1.文中的题目请修改2.中英文摘要写的一般3.请通读全文，文中很多语句不通，文字错误：***4.文中符号请注意上下标和正斜体，k表示千用小写，s(KWm-2)4/3写的不规范5.文中的”作者“二字出现频率太大，请润色上下文语句，减少使用频率6.参考文献请按照要求修改7.补充中英对照的通信作者简介以下是我的文章的审稿意见，以及我对审稿意见的回复。

***先生您好！您的稿件已通过专家审查，我刊同意对原稿进行修改后刊用。

请按专家意见、我刊投稿须知修改。

专家意见如下：1. 题目太大。

水稻基因型的筛选指标有多种。

本文主要涉及到性状指标、营养指标。

建议对题目作些限定。

2. 关键词中英文顺序不一致。

3. 文中存在部分错别字4. 讨论水培4周的干物重相对值与收获期各相对值之间的相关系数达不到显著的原因。

除了作者提出的水稻根系对土壤磷可利用性的影响之外，不同品种生育期的差异也可能影响对磷的吸收利用，由于文中未列出品种生育期，所以很难核对，建议作者作进一步的思考和核实分析。

如果是事实，可以补充。

5. 请注意引用我刊文章。

看了这个审稿意见，其实第2，3，5是小问题，主要是针对第1和第4条我的回复如下：******编辑部编辑先生、女士：您好！非常感谢编辑和审稿人对“********”一文的大力斧正，作者已按照贵刊的要求作了详细修改，尚有不妥之处敬请指正。

现将贵刊所提的问题回答如下：1) 关于题目太大的问题。

的确，正如审稿意见上所说的那样，耐低磷水稻基因型的筛选指标有很多种，除了本文涉及到的性状指标和营养指标以外，还有其它的生理生化指标。

然而，目前在筛选耐低磷水稻基因型的工作中一般还是用性状指标和营养指标来作筛选的。

另外，也很难找到一个非常恰当的名词来代替文中所讨论到的所有指标。

因此文中的题目才用了“筛选指标”这个范围稍微有点大的词。

2) 关于不同水稻品种生育期的差异也可能影响水稻对磷的吸收利用问题。

笔者同意审稿人的观点，也认为不同水稻生育期的差异会对水稻吸收利用磷素造成一定的影响。

审稿意见回复模板

审稿意见回复模板
尊敬的审稿人：
首先，非常感谢您对我们文档的审阅和提出的宝贵意见。

我们针对您提出的审
稿意见，进行了认真的思考和修改，现将回复如下：
一、对于您提出的文档结构不够清晰的意见，我们已经对文档进行了重新调整
和优化。

我们重新梳理了文档的逻辑结构，对各个部分进行了重新排版和编排，使得整个文档的结构更加清晰明了，便于读者阅读和理解。

二、关于文档中存在的一些细节性错误和不准确之处，我们已经进行了仔细的
校对和修正。

在修改过程中，我们对文档中的数据和信息进行了再次核实，确保其准确性和可靠性。

同时，我们也对文档中存在的一些语言表达不够精准的地方进行了修改，力求用更加准确、生动、简洁的语言表达文意。

三、对于您提出的建议和补充意见，我们也进行了认真的考虑和采纳。

在文档中，我们增加了一些案例分析和实际操作步骤，以便读者更加直观地理解和掌握文档中的内容。

同时，我们也对文档中的一些观点和结论进行了进一步的阐释和补充，以丰富文档的内容和提升其可读性。

最后，再次感谢您对我们文档的审阅和指导。

我们会认真对待您提出的意见和
建议，不断完善和提升文档的质量。

希望我们的修改能够符合您的期待，也期待您能够对我们的文档再次进行审阅，谢谢！
此致。

礼敬！
百度文库文档创作者敬上。