英语辩论-人性本善对人性本恶
人性本善还是人性本恶辩论作文
人性本善还是人性本恶辩论作文英文回答：The debate about whether human nature is inherently good or inherently evil has been ongoing for centuries. Some argue that humans are born with a natural inclination towards goodness, kindness, and compassion, while others believe that people are inherently selfish, greedy, and prone to evil tendencies.Those who believe in the inherent goodness of human nature often point to examples of altruism, empathy, and selflessness as evidence. They argue that acts of kindness and compassion are natural and instinctual, and that humans have an innate desire to help others and make the world a better place.On the other hand, those who believe in the inherent evil of human nature argue that history is rife with examples of war, violence, and cruelty. They point toinstances of greed, corruption, and exploitation as evidence that humans are inherently selfish and prone to destructive behavior.It is important to note that both perspectives have valid points, and human nature is likely a complex combination of both good and evil tendencies. While humans are capable of great acts of kindness and compassion, they are also capable of great acts of cruelty and violence.Ultimately, the debate about human nature is a philosophical and moral one, and there may not be a definitive answer. Perhaps it is more accurate to say that human nature is inherently neutral, and that it is shaped by a combination of genetics, environment, and personal experiences.中文回答：关于人性本善还是人性本恶的辩论已经持续了几个世纪。
人性本善英语演讲稿
人性本善英语演讲稿篇一：英语辩论-人性本善对人性本恶No, I don’t think so really.I disagree with you entirely.I’m afraid I don’t agree.I’m afraid you are wrong there.1.世界的经济制度不平衡与霸权主义太重，一些国家国民连饭都没得吃别的国家吃香喝辣而且对你毫无怜悯迫于无奈武力就成了最好的方法。
一个国家到达很强盛的时期国家领导人野心很大想在历史上留名比如XX统一了全球。
所以世界有了战争。
2.起因和根源很简单：人没有怜悯只顾自己享受，野心太重，想用快捷的方式获得利益。
说白了就是人类的罪恶。
善良的人们变得残暴，保家卫国的战士成了杀人不眨眼的恶魔。
我想说的就这些了Today’s world economy system is out of balance, and the hegemonism serious. people in somecountries are poor don’t have enough food. But people from other countries but eat very well and no mercy to the poor. So the force will become the best method.A country committed to a prosperous period,the leaders very want to leave a good name in the the war appears.To put it simply,the origin of war is very simple:people without pity ,care only about their own enjoyment,would like to obtain the benefit in a quickest ’s the evil of kind-hearted people become violence。
人性本善还是性本恶英语作文
人性本善还是性本恶英语作文Human Nature: Innately Good or Evil?The nature of humanity has been a subject of philosophical debate for centuries, with diametrically opposed schools of thought emerging to espouse opposing views. Two prominent perspectives in this discourse are the theories of innate goodness and innate evil, each asserting a distinct position on the fundamental disposition of human beings.The Case for Innate Goodness.Proponents of the belief in innate goodness argue that humans are inherently benevolent and cooperative creatures. They cite evidence from developmental psychology, which suggests that infants exhibit a natural capacity for empathy and altruism. Researchers have observed that babies as young as six months old display concern for others in distress, even if they do not know them. This innatecompassion is believed to be rooted in our evolutionary history, where cooperation and empathy were essential for survival in social groups.Advocates of this theory also point to the widespread presence of moral sentiments across cultures. Despite variations in societal norms and values, studies have shown that certain moral principles, such as honesty, fairness, and compassion, are universally recognized and endorsed. This suggests that humans possess an innate moral compass that guides their behavior.The philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau is a notable proponent of the innate goodness theory. In his influential work "Emile," Rousseau argues that children are born with a natural innocence and purity, untainted by the corrupting influences of society. According to Rousseau, it is the artificial constraints and inequalities imposed by civilization that lead to the emergence of evil in human nature.The Case for Innate Evil.On the other end of the spectrum, proponents of the theory of innate evil assert that humans are fundamentally flawed and prone to sin and violence. They point to the prevalence of cruelty, aggression, and selfishness in human history. From the atrocities of war to the horrors of genocides, they argue that the evidence suggests an inherent darkness within human nature.They also cite the work of evolutionary biologists, who suggest that humans may have evolved a propensity for aggression and dominance as a means of securing resources and territory. This aggressive instinct, they contend, is an inherent part of our genetic makeup and often manifests in destructive ways.Philosophers like Thomas Hobbes and Friedrich Nietzsche have advanced variations of this theory. Hobbes argued that humans are driven by a fundamental fear of death and a desire for power, which leads them to engage in conflict and competition. Nietzsche, on the other hand, believedthat humans have a "will to power" and are inherentlyhierarchical, with the strong seeking to dominate the weak.Arguments Against Extreme Positions.While proponents of both theories present compelling arguments, it is important to consider the limitations of each perspective. The belief in innate goodness can lead to an overly optimistic view of human nature, ignoring the capacity for evil that exists within all of us. Conversely, the theory of innate evil can be overly pessimistic,failing to account for the positive qualities and moral aspirations that are also part of human nature.A more balanced approach is to acknowledge that human nature is complex and multifaceted. Both good and evil impulses exist within us, and the expression of these impulses is influenced by a variety of factors, including socialization, cultural norms, and personal experiences.The Role of Environment and Nurture.It is crucial to recognize that the environment inwhich we live can have a profound impact on our behavior. While innate predispositions may shape our tendencies, the experiences we have and the values we are taught can either reinforce or mitigate these inclinations.For example, research has shown that children who are raised in nurturing and supportive environments are more likely to develop empathic and prosocial behaviors, while those who are exposed to violence or neglect are morelikely to exhibit aggression and antisocial tendencies.Conclusion.The debate over the nature of humanity is unlikely to be definitively resolved, as it involves fundamental philosophical questions about the origins of human existence and the sources of our moral values. However, by considering the arguments presented by both sides and acknowledging the complexity of human nature, we can develop a more nuanced understanding of ourselves and our place in the world.Ultimately, the question of whether human nature is inherently good or evil is less important than the recognition that we have the capacity for both good and evil and that our choices have a profound impact on the world we live in.。
有关性善论性恶论的英语作文
有关性善论性恶论的英语作文Human beings have been pondering the nature of good and evil for centuries. The debate over whether humans are inherently good or evil has been a source of fascination and controversy. Some believe that people are naturally inclined toward kindness and altruism, while others argue that humans are inherently selfish and malevolent.One school of thought, known as the "blank slate" theory, posits that human beings are born as blank slates, with neither good nor evil tendencies. According to this view, it is the environment and upbringing that shape a person's moral compass. Proponents of this theory argue that with the right nurturing and education, individuals can be guided towards goodness and righteousness.On the other hand, the "original sin" theory contendsthat humans are inherently sinful and wicked. This belief isrooted in religious traditions, which teach that humans are tainted by the sin of Adam and Eve and thus carry a natural proclivity towards evil. According to this perspective, it is only through religious redemption and moral discipline that individuals can aspire towards goodness.In contrast, proponents of the "innate goodness" theory argue that human beings are biologically predisposed towards kindness and compassion. This view is supported by researchin psychology and neuroscience, which suggests that humans possess an innate capacity for empathy and prosocial behavior. Advocates for this theory believe that it is societal influences and external factors that can corrupt and derailan individual's natural inclination towards goodness.Ultimately, the debate over whether humans are inherently good or evil is complex and multifaceted. It is likely that there are elements of both within each person, and that external influences can shape and alter a person's moralcharacter. The interplay between nature and nurture continues to be a topic of great interest and significance in thefields of psychology, philosophy, and ethics. While the question of human nature may never be fully resolved, it remains an important and captivating area of inquiry.。
人性本善四辩稿范文
人性本善四辩稿范文英文回答：Is human nature inherently good or evil? This question has been debated by philosophers and thinkers for centuries. While some argue that human nature is fundamentally good, others believe that it is inherently evil. In my opinion, I believe that human nature is primarily good, although itcan be influenced by external factors.There are numerous examples throughout history that demonstrate the innate goodness of human nature. Take, for instance, the countless acts of kindness and compassionthat individuals display towards one another. Whether it is helping a stranger in need, donating to charity, or volunteering at a local shelter, these actions showcase the inherent goodness that lies within us.Furthermore, studies have shown that infants and young children exhibit a natural inclination towards empathy andcooperation. They display an innate sense of fairness and are often willing to share their resources with others.This suggests that human nature is inherently good and that our capacity for kindness and compassion is ingrainedwithin us from a young age.However, it is important to acknowledge that external factors can also influence human nature. For example, individuals who grow up in environments plagued by violence and poverty may be more inclined towards negative behaviors. This does not mean that their nature is inherently evil,but rather that their circumstances have shaped theiractions and behaviors.In addition, the concept of "nature vs nurture" plays a significant role in shaping human nature. While some individuals may have a natural predisposition towards goodness, their upbringing and life experiences can shape their behavior in different ways. For example, someone who has been repeatedly betrayed or hurt may become more guarded and less trusting of others.中文回答：人性本善还是本恶？这个问题已经被哲学家和思想家们争论了几个世纪。
性善论和性恶论英语作文
性善论和性恶论英语作文The debate between the nature of goodness and evilness in human beings has been a subject of philosophical inquiry for centuries. Some argue that humans are inherently good, while others contend that they are born with a propensity for evil.The concept of innate goodness suggests that people are born with a moral compass, guiding them towards virtuous actions. This perspective is often associated with the idea that we are predisposed to care for one another and seek harmony within our communities.Conversely, the theory of innate evil posits that humans are born with selfish tendencies, and it is through societal structures and moral education that we learn to suppress these instincts and act in the interest of the collective good.One might argue that the environment plays a crucial role in shaping our behavior. A nurturing and supportive environment can foster the inherent goodness in individuals, while a harsh and neglectful one may exacerbate negative tendencies.However, it is also essential to consider the role of personal choice. Even in the most challenging circumstances, individuals can choose to act with kindness and empathy, demonstrating that the capacity for good is not solelydetermined by external factors.The interplay between nature and nurture is complex, and it is unlikely that a single theory can fully explain the spectrum of human behavior. It is through understanding both our innate tendencies and the influence of our upbringingthat we can better comprehend the nature of human goodness and evil.Ultimately, the question of whether humans are inherently good or evil may not have a definitive answer. Instead, it may be more productive to focus on cultivating the virtues we admire and striving to overcome the flaws we recognize in ourselves.In conclusion, the nature of human beings is a multifaceted issue that cannot be reduced to a simple dichotomy of good or evil. It is a reflection of our capacity for growth, change, and the continuous pursuit of moral understanding.。
自古以来就有人性善恶之争英语作文
自古以来就有人性善恶之争英语作文(中英文实用版)The debate over the nature of humanity, whether it is inherently good or evil, has been ongoing since ancient times.This philosophical question has been a subject of contemplation for scholars, theologians, and philosophers throughout history.Some argue that humans are born with a pure and virtuous nature, while others believe that we are inclined towards sin and wickedness.自古以来，关于人性的善恶之争就一直存在。
这一哲学问题，无论是对于学者、神学家还是哲学家来说，都是历史长河中不断思索的主题。
有人认为人类天生具有纯洁和善良的本性，而另一些人则坚信我们倾向于罪恶与邪恶。
Various theories have emerged from this debate, with Confucius advocating for the goodness of human nature, while Freudian psychoanalysis suggests the presence of dark instincts within us.The diversity of opinions reflects the complexity of human nature itself, which cannot be easily categorized as solely good or evil.在这场争论中，各种理论应运而生。
性本善和性本恶的讨论作文
性本善和性本恶的讨论作文英文回答：The debate on whether human nature is inherently good or evil has been a topic of discussion for centuries. Some argue that humans are born with a natural inclination towards goodness, while others believe that humans are inherently evil and selfish.Those who believe in the inherent goodness of human nature argue that humans possess a moral compass that guides them towards doing what is right. They believe that empathy, compassion, and a desire for justice are innate qualities that drive individuals to act in a benevolent manner. They point to examples of selfless acts of kindness and generosity as evidence of the inherent goodness within humans.On the other hand, proponents of the inherent evil nature of humans argue that selfishness and self-interestare the driving forces behind human behavior. They believe that individuals are primarily motivated by their own desires and interests, and are willing to harm others to achieve their goals. They point to acts of violence, greed, and corruption as evidence of the inherent evil within humans.In my opinion, human nature is neither purely good nor purely evil. It is a complex combination of both. Humans are capable of great acts of kindness and compassion, but they are also capable of acts of cruelty and selfishness. It is the circumstances and environment that individuals are exposed to that shape their behavior and determine whether they lean towards goodness or evil.中文回答：关于人性本善还是本恶的辩论已经持续了几个世纪。
性善论与性恶论英语作文
性善论与性恶论英语作文1. I believe in the goodness of human nature. People are inherently kind and compassionate, and they strive to do good in the world.2. On the other hand, there are those who argue that human nature is inherently selfish and evil. They believe that people are driven by their own self-interest and will do whatever it takes to get ahead.3. In my opinion, the idea of "good" and "evil" is subjective and varies from person to person. What one person may see as a selfless act of kindness, another may perceive as a selfish act of manipulation.4. However, it is undeniable that there are instances of both kindness and cruelty in the world. It is up to each individual to choose which path to follow and how to interact with others.5. Some may argue that the presence of evil in theworld is evidence of the inherently selfish and malevolent nature of humanity. They point to acts of violence, greed, and injustice as proof of this.6. On the other hand, proponents of the goodness of human nature may argue that these acts of evil are theresult of external factors such as upbringing, environment, and societal influences, rather than an inherent flaw in human nature.7. Ultimately, whether one believes in the inherent goodness or evil of human nature, it is important to recognize the capacity for both within each individual. Itis through our choices and actions that we define ourselves, rather than any predetermined nature.。
英语辩论-人性本善对人性本恶
英语辩论-人性本善对人性本恶第一篇：英语辩论-人性本善对人性本恶No, I don’t think so really.I disagree with you entirely.I’m afraid I don’t agree.I’m afraid you are wrong there.1.世界的经济制度不平衡与霸权主义太重，一些国家国民连饭都没得吃别的国家吃香喝辣而且对你毫无怜悯迫于无奈武力就成了最好的方法。
一个国家到达很强盛的时期国家领导人野心很大想在历史上留名比如XX统一了全球。
所以世界有了战争。
2.起因和根源很简单：人没有怜悯只顾自己享受，野心太重，想用快捷的方式获得利益。
说白了就是人类的罪恶。
善良的人们变得残暴，保家卫国的战士成了杀人不眨眼的恶魔。
我想说的就这些了Today's world economy system is out of balance, and the heg emonism serious.people in some countries are poor don’t have enough food.But people from other countries but eat very well and no mercy to the poor.So the force will become the best method.A country committed to a prosperous period,the leaders very want to leave a good name in the history.therefore the war appears.To put it simply,the origin of war is very simple:people without pity ,care only about their own enjoyment,would like to obtain the benefit in a quickest way.That’s the evil of human.The kind-hearted people become violence。
人性本恶还是人性本善英语作文
人性本恶还是人性本善英语作文Human nature is a topic that has been debated for centuries. Some believe that human nature is inherently good, while others argue that it is fundamentally evil.人性是一个被争论了几个世纪的话题。
有些人认为人性本善，而另一些人则认为它从根本上是邪恶的。
Those who believe that human nature is inherently good often point to acts of kindness, compassion, and altruism as evidence. They argue that humans have an innate sense of empathy and a desire to help others, which demonstrates the essential goodness of human nature.那些认为人性本善的人经常把善良、同情和无私的行为作为证据。
他们认为人类有一种内在的共情感和帮助他人的愿望，这表明了人性本善的本质。
On the other hand, those who believe that human nature is inherently evil often point to acts of violence, greed, and selfishness as evidence. They argue that humans are inherently self-serving andare willing to harm others in order to benefit themselves, which demonstrates the essential evil of human nature.另一方面，那些认为人性本恶的人经常把暴力、贪婪和自私的行为作为证据。
自古以来就有人性善恶之争英语作文
自古以来就有人性善恶之争英语作文英文回答：Throughout history, there has been an ongoing debate about the nature of human beings whether they areinherently good or evil. Some argue that humans are naturally inclined towards goodness, while others believe that evil is an inherent part of human nature. In my opinion, the question of human nature is a complex one and cannot be answered definitively.On one hand, there is evidence to support the idea that humans are inherently good. Many people are capable of acts of kindness and compassion towards others. We see examples of this in everyday life, such as when strangers help each other in times of need or when individuals donate their time and resources to help those less fortunate. These acts of goodness demonstrate that there is a basic goodness within human beings.However, it is important to acknowledge that humans are also capable of committing acts of evil. History is filled with examples of violence, cruelty, and injustice perpetrated by individuals and groups. Wars, genocide, and acts of terrorism are all stark reminders of the capacityfor evil within humans. This suggests that there is adarker side to human nature that cannot be ignored.Furthermore, human behavior is influenced by various factors such as upbringing, environment, and personal experiences. These factors can shape an individual's values, beliefs, and moral compass. While some individuals may be predisposed towards goodness, others may be influenced by negative experiences or societal pressures to engage in harmful behaviors. This highlights the complexity of human nature and the potential for both good and evil within each individual.In conclusion, the question of whether humans are inherently good or evil is a complex one. While there is evidence to support both perspectives, it is clear that human nature is not black and white. Humans are capable ofacts of kindness and compassion, but also of violence and cruelty. Ultimately, it is the choices and actions of individuals that determine their moral character.中文回答：自古以来，人们对于人性善恶之争存在着持续的辩论。
人性本善还是人性本恶辩论作文
人性本善还是人性本恶辩论作文英文回答：The debate about whether human nature is inherently good or inherently evil has been ongoing for centuries. Some people argue that humans are naturally inclined to do good and help others, while others believe that humans are inherently selfish and driven by their own desires.Those who believe in the inherent goodness of human nature often point to examples of selfless acts of kindness and compassion as evidence. They argue that humans have an innate sense of empathy and altruism, and that these qualities are what drive people to help others in need.On the other hand, those who believe in the inherent evil of human nature often point to examples of greed, violence, and cruelty as evidence. They argue that humans are naturally selfish and will act in their own self-interest, even if it means harming others.In my opinion, human nature is a complex mix of both good and evil. While there are certainly examples of both selfless acts of kindness and selfish acts of cruelty, I believe that humans have the capacity for both good and evil. It is our choices and actions that ultimately determine whether we are perceived as good or evil.中文回答：关于人性本善还是人性本恶的辩论已经持续了几个世纪。
人性本善一辩稿范文
人性本善一辩稿范文英文回答：Is human nature inherently good or evil? This question has been debated by philosophers, psychologists, and thinkers throughout history. While some argue that human nature is fundamentally good, others believe that it is inherently evil. In my opinion, human nature is neither purely good nor purely evil. It is a complex combination of both.On one hand, there is evidence to support the belief that humans are inherently good. For example, we often see acts of kindness and compassion in our daily lives. People donate to charities, help strangers in need, and show empathy towards others. These actions demonstrate the innate goodness within us. Furthermore, studies have shown that infants as young as six months old display a preference for prosocial behavior, suggesting that a natural inclination towards goodness exists from an earlyage.On the other hand, human nature also has a darker side. History is filled with examples of violence, cruelty, and selfishness. Wars, genocides, and acts of terrorism are all manifestations of the evil that can reside within us. Additionally, psychological research has identified traits such as aggression, greed, and envy as part of human nature. These negative aspects can lead individuals to harm others and prioritize their own interests over the well-being of others.Ultimately, human nature is a complex interplay between good and evil. It is influenced by various factorsincluding genetics, upbringing, and societal norms. While some individuals may lean more towards goodness, others may be more inclined towards evil. However, it is important to recognize that human nature is not fixed and can be shaped by external factors. Education, moral guidance, and socialization can all play a role in promoting positive behavior and curbing negative tendencies.中文回答：人性本善还是本恶？这个问题在历史上一直是哲学家、心理学家和思想家们争论不休的话题。
人性本善二辩辩论稿范文
人性本善二辩辩论稿范文英文回答：Introduction:The age-old debate of whether human nature isinherently good or evil has been a subject of philosophical and ethical discourse for centuries. The question has profound implications for our understanding of ourselves, our societies, and our potential for progress.Arguments for the Inherent Goodness of Human Nature:Empathy and Compassion: Proponents of the inherent goodness of human nature argue that humans possess aninnate capacity for empathy and compassion. They citestudies that show infants and young children exhibit altruistic behaviors, such as sharing and comforting others.Prosociality: Research also suggests that humans havea natural inclination towards prosocial behaviors,including cooperation, trust, and helping others in need. These behaviors are not solely driven by self-interest but by a genuine desire to contribute to the well-being of others.Evolutionary Perspective: Some evolutionary psychologists argue that human cooperation and altruism evolved as survival strategies. By working together and supporting each other, individuals could increase their chances of surviving and reproducing.Arguments for the Inherent Evil of Human Nature:Egoism and Selfishness: Many proponents of the inherent evil of human nature cite the prevalence of egoism and selfishness in human behavior. They argue that individuals are primarily motivated by their own desires and interests and that they often engage in harmful or unethical acts to achieve their goals.Violence and Aggression: The history of humanity ismarked by countless acts of violence and aggression. Some argue that these behaviors are evidence of a deep-seated evil within human nature.Psychological Studies: Psychological studies have shown that humans are capable of committing atrocities and engaging in destructive behaviors under certain circumstances. This supports the notion that human nature has the potential for both good and evil.Conclusion:The debate over human nature is complex and multifaceted, and there is no easy answer. However, by considering the evidence and arguments from both sides, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of ourselves and our potential. It is likely that human nature is neither inherently good nor evil but rather a complex mixture of both.中文回答：引言：关于人性本善还是本恶的争论是一个由来已久的哲学和伦理学话题，对于我们理解自身、社会和进步潜力具有深远影响。
人性本恶还是人性本善英语作文
人性本恶还是人性本善英语作文英文回答：The age-old debate of human nature's intrinsic goodness or evil has captivated philosophers, theologians, andsocial scientists for centuries. While diverse perspectives abound, two primary theories dominate the discourse: the doctrine of original sin and the theory of natural goodness.Doctrine of Original Sin.Proponents of the doctrine of original sin, often associated with religious traditions, contend that human nature is fundamentally flawed due to the inherentsinfulness of Adam and Eve's disobedience. This beliefposits that all humans are born with a corrupt and selfish inclination, predisposed to evil thoughts and actions. Augustine of Hippo, a prominent advocate of this view, argued that human beings possess a "concupiscence," a disordered desire that drives them toward sin.Theory of Natural Goodness.In contrast, the theory of natural goodness holds that human beings are inherently kind, compassionate, and cooperative. Rooted in the Enlightenment philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, this perspective suggests that individuals are born with an innate sense of empathy, morality, and a desire for harmony. Proponents of this view argue that societal pressures and environmental influences corrupt human nature over time.Empirical Evidence.Empirical research has provided both support and refutation for both theories. Studies have shown that infants exhibit prosocial behaviors such as helping others, suggesting the presence of innate goodness. However, other research indicates that children are also capable of engaging in aggressive and antisocial acts, supporting the notion of an inherent tendency toward evil.Conclusion.The question of人性本恶还是人性本善 remains a complex and multifaceted one. While philosophical and empirical evidence provides insights into both theories, a definitive answer remains elusive. Whether human nature is inherently good or evil may ultimately be a matter of personal belief and interpretation, as both perspectives offer compelling arguments and evidence.中文回答：人性本恶论。
人性本善辩论稿件范文
人性本善辩论稿件范文英文回答：Is human nature inherently good or evil? This question has been debated for centuries and continues to be a topic of discussion today. Personally, I believe that human nature is fundamentally good.Throughout history, we have seen countless examples of individuals who have shown kindness, compassion, and empathy towards others. These acts of goodness demonstrate that there is an innate goodness within us. For instance, when a stranger helps an elderly person cross the street or when someone donates money to a charitable cause, it shows that humans have a natural inclination to do good.Moreover, children are often seen as the embodiment of innocence and purity. They are born with a sense of curiosity, creativity, and love for others. It is through nurturing and socialization that negative traits may belearned and developed. However, the core essence of achild's nature remains good.Of course, it is important to acknowledge that humans are also capable of committing evil acts. History is filled with examples of wars, violence, and cruelty. However, I believe that these actions are a result of external factors such as societal influences, personal circumstances, or psychological issues. They do not define the inherent nature of humanity.In addition, studies have shown that acts of kindness and altruism have a positive impact on our well-being. When we engage in acts of kindness, our brains release oxytocin, a hormone that promotes feelings of love and happiness. This suggests that our natural inclination is towards goodness and that it brings us joy and fulfillment.中文回答：人性本善还是本恶？这个问题已经争论了几个世纪，而且今天仍然是一个讨论的话题。
自古以来就有人性善恶之争英语作文
自古以来就有人性善恶之争英语作文（中英文版）The controversy over the nature of humanity, whether it is inherently good or evil, has been a subject of debate since ancient times.Philosophers, theologians, and scholars have all weighed in on this matter, presenting various perspectives that often reflect the cultural and moral values of their era.自古以来，关于人性本质是善是恶的争论就一直存在。
哲学家、神学家和学者们纷纷就此问题发表见解，提出了各式各样的观点，这些观点往往体现了他们所处时代的文化和道德价值观。
In the West, the likes of Plato and Aristotle had differing views on the matter.Plato believed in the inherent goodness of the soul, while Aristotle took a more moderate stance, suggesting that humans are capable of both good and evil, and it is through education and virtue that one can cultivate moral excellence.在西方，像柏拉图和亚里士多德这样的思想家对此问题有着不同的看法。
柏拉图相信灵魂具有固有的善良，而亚里士多德则持更为中庸的观点，认为人类既有善也有恶的潜能，通过教育和美德，一个人可以培养道德上的卓越。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
No, I don’t think so really.I disagree with you entirely.I’m afraid I don’t agree.I’m afraid you are wrong there.1.世界的经济制度不平衡与霸权主义太重，一些国家国民连饭都没得吃别的国家吃香喝辣而且对你毫无怜悯迫于无奈武力就成了最好的方法。
一个国家到达很强盛的时期国家领导人野心很大想在历史上留名比如XX统一了全球。
所以世界有了战争。
2.起因和根源很简单：人没有怜悯只顾自己享受，野心太重，想用快捷的方式获得利益。
说白了就是人类的罪恶。
善良的人们变得残暴，保家卫国的战士成了杀人不眨眼的恶魔。
我想说的就这些了Today's world economy system is out of balance, and the hegemonism serious. people in some countries are poor don’t have enough food. But people from other countries but eat very well and no mercy to the poor. So the force will become the best method.A country committed to a prosperous period,the leaders very want to leave a good name in the history.therefore the war appears.To put it simply,the origin of war is very simple:people without pity ,care only about their own enjoyment,would like to obtain the benefit in a quickest way.That’s the evil of human.The kind-hearted people become violence。
The soldiers that protect our home and defends our country become murders killing people without batting an eye.How can you still saywar could sublime of human nature?So myview point is very simple and clear :that the war distorted humanity.That’s all I want to say.Thank you.南京大屠杀中呗屠杀的中国人有三十万。
There are 300,000 Chinese people were slaughtered in Nanjing massacre.How can you still say War could sublime of human nature.和平战争比较In a peaceful age, when seeing small animals die ,we will be sad, and there is no more than man.In the war, t he relationship between the people has become a killing and were killed.Why? The anower is that the war distorted humanity.在二战当中，有两个世界上最优秀的民族遭受了惨绝人寰的大屠杀，一个是犹太教民，遭受希特勒纳粹灭绝性的屠杀600万犹太人，几乎彻底摧毁犹太人在欧洲2000年的文化历史沉淀，另一个就是中华民族，被日本帝国主义屠杀手无寸铁的百姓达2000万人以上，军队伤亡也近300万，只一个南京大屠杀事件的数字就是30万人。
In the world war ii ,there are two of the most excellent national suffered terrible massacre.One is the jewish people. The jews that suffered from the slaughter of Hitler's Nazi were nearly 6 million jews. Almost destroyed 2000 years of cultural history precipitation of the jews.The other one is the Chinese nation.The unarmed people were killed by the Japanese imperialism up to 20 million people or more. The army were also nearly 3 million casualties. Only one of the events of the nanjing massacre is 300000.All of these Numbers show our point of view: the war distorted humanity.我完全同意你所说的，我并不否认在战争中会出现一个两个英雄，但如果某个人人性的升华要牺牲如此多的性命，这代价也太大了。
I agree with you entirely. I don’t deny that there will appear one or two heros in the war,but if somebody’s human nature sublimation needs to sacrifice so many lives,the price is too large.I’m sure you are agree with us.有一点你肯定也十分赞同，那就是为什么现在我们都呼吁要和平解决问题。
战争带来的灾难没有人愿意承受，就像我们从电视上看到的伊拉克战争一样，人们失去亲人，家园毁灭，每天都生活在死亡的恐惧当中，生活没有任何的保障。
你们认为这一切是谁造成的？是没有生命的机器？亦或是上帝？不，正是那些没有人性的操作者！他们也是人，只是战争扭曲了他们的人性。
One point that you must have quite agree, that's why we all now called for a peaceful solution to the problem. No one willing to bear the tragedy of war, as we all saw the Iraq war on TV , people lost their loved ones, their homes, every day they lived in the fear of death, and life without any security.Do you think this is who causes it? Is not life machine? Or a god? No, it is those who have not humanity ! They also is human being, just war distorting their humanity.让我陈述一下我所要表达的，战争不可能升华人性。
你所说的人确实有他们值得尊敬的地方，但他们再伟大也不能等同于千千万万人的性命。
let me repeat what I said.War couldn’t sublimate humanity . The people you say are worthy of respect, but nomatter how great they are ,they do not equal to ten million lives.我始终相信人性本善，但是战争却改变了这种美好。
I always believe in the goodness, but the war changed the good.就像你说的，战争可以升华人性，是不是就代表为了为了升华人性，你甚至会渴望战争的发生呢？As you said, war could sublimate of human nature.Does it represent that in order to sublimate the human nature, you might even be eager to the occurrence of war?对，没有人想要战争，因为你也知道战争给人们带来的只是灾难，所谓的利益，不过只是那些幕后黑手能得到。
你们一再强调战争可以升华人性，可我们都可以看出来，及时人性再升华也不会给人们带来幸福。
Yes, no one wants to war, because you know that war bring people just disaster.The so-called benefit is only those who can get black hand behind the scenes. You repeatedly stressed that the war could sublimate of human nature, but we all can see out in time, no matter how high the human nature sublimated, it won't bring people happiness.我不喜欢反对你，但可能您要失望了。
我真的无法认同你。
人性升华的目的是什么，是为人们带来福利，而不是灾难。
I hate to disagree with you,but maybe you will be disappointed.I really can't agree with you. What is the purpose of the sublimation of human nature.That is to bring people welfare, not the disaster.现在的社会充满了各种问题，比如道德缺失，暴力事件。