学生评价老师 大学英语作文

一、

A great change is now taking place in higher education throughout our country. Teachers are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve their students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade teachers as for teachers to grade students. In some universities students＇rating has even become the only source of information on teaching effectiveness.

一个伟大的变化是现在发生在高等教育在我们的国家。老师正在前所未有的负责他们如何更好地为学生服务。它已经成为常见的高校学生年级教师对于教师年级的学生。在一些大学学生的评级甚至成为唯一的信息来源在教学有效性。

This, however, has caused great controversy. Some are in favor of the rating system. They hold that since students attend the teachers classes everyday, they should have their opinion about their teachers＇effectiveness. Others, on the contrary, are strongly against it. They think that students＇rating is easy to administer and score, but it also is easy to abuse. They believe that there is much more to teaching than what is shown on students＇rating forms. Students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used are up to date or how well the teacher knows about the subject.

These judgments require professional knowledge, which is best left for the teachers＇colleagues.

然而,这已经引起了很大的争议。有些人赞成评级系统。他们认为,由于学生参加教师课程每天,他们应该有他们的意见关于他们的教师的有效性。其他人,相反,强烈反对它。他们认为学生的评级很容易管理和得分,但这也很容易滥用。他们认为有更多的教学比显示在学生的评价形式。学生不应该将判断使用的材料是最新的或老师如何知道这个话题。

这些判断需要专业知识,这是最好的留给了教师的同事。

I think students＇rating of their teachers is necessary, but it should be conducted in a way that can really shed meaningful light on teachers＇performance. Instead of rating the teachers＇knowledge on the subject, students should be asked to estimate what they themselves have leaned in a course, and to report on such things as a teacher＇s ability to communicate with students, his relationship with students, and his ability to arouse interest in the subject.

我认为学生评级的教师是必要的,但是它应该被进行,能真正揭示教师有意义的性能。而不是评级教师的知识,学生应该被要求估计他们自己靠在一门课程,并报告诸如教师与学生交流的能力,他与学生的关系,和他的能力激发兴趣的话题。

二、

Nowadays, it has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade teachers as for teachers to grade students. In some universities students’rating has even become the only source of information on teaching effectiveness. 如今，在高校和大学里学生给老师评分已经变得跟老师给学生评分一样普遍。在一些大学里学生评分甚至是评定教师成果的唯一信息来源。

This, however, has caused great controversy. Some are in favor of the rating system,

They hold that since students attend the teachers’classes every day, they should have their opinion about their teachers’effectiveness. Others, on the contrary, are strongly against it. They believe that there is much more to teaching than what is shown on students’ rating forms. Students should not be expected to judge whether the materials they use are up to date or how well the teacher knows about the subject. These judgments require professional knowledge, which is best left for the teachers’colleagues.

然而，这也引起了很大的争议。一些赞同评定系统的人认为既然学生每天都去上老师的课，他们应该对于教师的教学成果有一定的观点。相反，其他人则强烈的反对，他们认为教师付出的远远多于学生评定系统中显示的结果。让学生去判断他们应用的材料是否是最新的或者教师对科目的掌握程度是不合理的，做出这些判断是需要专业知识的，而这种知识只有教师们才最了解。

I think students’rating of their teachers is necessary, but it should be conducted in

a way that can really shed meaningful light on teachers’performance. Instead of rating the teachers’ knowledge on the subject, students should be asked to estimate what they have le arned in a course, and to report on such things as a teacher’s ability to communicate with students, his or her relationship with students, and his or her ability to arouse students’interest in the subject.

我认为学生给老师评分是必要的，但是应该选定一种确实能够考量教师表现的合适的方式。应该让学生们去回答他们在课堂中学到了什么，说明一些类似于教师与学生的沟通能力，他或她和学生的关系，和他或她激发学生对课程兴趣的能力。而不是让学生来评定教师的专业知识