英国议会制辩论(BP)一辩稿
BP英辩whip发言稿
BP英辩whip发言稿尊敬的评委、各位辩友：首先，我想通过一组数据引起我们的思考。
根据最新的统计数据显示，全球每年有超过800万人因饥饿而死亡，而另外7.5亿人却依然忍受着饥饿的折磨。
相比之下，我们每年浪费的食物却超过13亿吨。
这个数据让人深感震撼，因为它揭示了一个现实：全球饥饿问题不是因为没有足够的食物，而是因为资源的不公平分配和浪费。
今天，我们将探讨的议题是关于全球饥饿问题和食物浪费。
在这个问题上，我们需要思考的不仅是如何解决饥饿问题，而且还要思考如何避免食物的浪费。
我所代表的辩方认为，解决全球饥饿问题和减少食物浪费是一体两面，两者应当同等重要。
我们承认，饥饿是一种灾难，但浪费同样也是一种浪费资源和环境的灾难。
因此，我们呼吁全球社会应当联手解决这一严峻的问题。
首先，让我们来看看全球饥饿问题。
根据联合国粮食及农业组织的数据，全球有1/9的人口忍受着饥饿的折磨。
这代表着8.9亿人每天面对饥饿。
这些人无法得到足够的营养，无法获得充足的食物，更不用说营养均衡的饮食了。
他们中的很多人是因为贫穷而无法获得足够的食物，还有一部分是因为战争、自然灾害等原因无法获得稳定的食物来源。
这些人的生活被饥饿困扰着，每天都在为生存而挣扎。
我们也不要忘记，他们中的很多人是儿童，他们是我们未来的希望。
但由于饥饿的困扰，他们无法健康成长，甚至有些人可能会因此而丧命。
这一切都让人感到心痛和愤怒。
其次，让我们来关注食物浪费的问题。
据统计，全球每年浪费的食物数量超过13亿吨，这是惊人的数字。
这其中包括了生产环节的浪费，例如农作物因种植技术不当或者运输问题而损坏，超市和餐饮行业的浪费，以及家庭日常生活的浪费。
食物浪费不仅是对资源的浪费，也是对环境的浪费。
每年浪费的食物会产生大量的温室气体，对环境造成负面影响。
而且，浪费的食物也是对饥饿人口的最大讽刺，因为我们浪费的食物可以满足很多人的需求。
因此，我们需要意识到食物浪费不仅是对环境的不负责任，更是对全球饥饿问题的一种忽视。
英国议会制辩论发言正方一辩稿范文
英国议会制辩论发言正方一辩稿范文下载提示：该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的，希望大家下载后，能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改，请根据实际需要进行调整和使用，谢谢！本店铺为大家提供各种类型的实用资料，如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等，想了解不同资料格式和写法，敬请关注！Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you! In addition, this shop provides you with various types of practical materials, such as educational essays, diary appreciation, sentence excerpts, ancient poems, classic articles, topic composition, work summary, word parsing, copy excerpts, other materials and so on, want to know different data formats and writing methods, please pay attention!一、引言尊敬的评委、各位观众，今天我们围绕议会制度展开辩论。
bp英语辩论正方一辩发言稿模板
bp英语辩论正方一辩发言稿模板English Response:---。
English Response:Certainly! Here's a template for the first affirmative speaker in a British Parliamentary (BP) style debate:Introduction:Start with a captivating hook or a relevant quote to grab the audience's attention.Introduce the motion and provide a clear definition if necessary.State your team's stance and briefly outline your main arguments.Main Arguments:1. Argument 1:Present your first argument clearly and concisely.Provide evidence or examples to support your point.Anticipate and refute potential counterarguments.2. Argument 2:Introduce your second argument, building upon the first one.Use statistics, anecdotes, or expert opinions to strengthen your argument.Address any weaknesses or limitations in your argument.3. Argument 3:Introduce your third argument, ensuring it complements the previous ones.Utilize logic and reasoning to persuade the audience.Summarize the key points of your argument for emphasis.Rebuttals:Briefly address any points made by the opposing team.Refute their arguments using logic, evidence, or counterexamples.Reinforce your team's position while weakening the opposition's arguments.Conclusion:Summarize your main arguments and restate your team's stance.Leave a memorable closing statement or call to action.English Response:---。
BP英国议会制辩论资料
BP英国议会制辩论资料
辩题，是否应该废除英国议会制度？
正方观点，我们认为英国议会制度已经过时，不再适应现代社
会的需求。
议会制度存在着严重的腐败问题，政客们往往为了个人
利益而忽视民众的利益。
同时，议会制度也导致了决策的拖延和僵化，无法有效解决当下的社会问题。
因此，我们认为应该废除英国
议会制度，寻求更加民主和高效的治理方式。
反方观点，我们认为英国议会制度虽然存在着一些问题，但并
不意味着应该完全废除。
议会制度是英国政治体系的核心，它保障
了民众的代表权利，通过议会选举来实现政治平等和参与。
废除议
会制度将导致政治体系的混乱和不稳定，使得政治决策更加难以达成。
因此，我们主张应该对议会制度进行改革和完善，而不是废除。
英国议会制辩论基本知识
英国议会制辩论基本知识
辩题，应该取消英国议会上议院的贵族制度。
尊敬的评委、各位观众，我是今天的辩手，我将就“应该取消
英国议会上议院的贵族制度”这一辩题进行辩论。
首先，我将从历史、民主和效率等方面进行论证。
首先，贵族制度在英国议会上议院的历史根深蒂固，但随着时
代的变迁，这一制度已经不再适应现代社会的发展。
贵族制度的存
在是对平等和民主的一种隐性歧视，它将权力集中在少数特权阶层
手中，而忽视了广大民众的利益和声音。
取消贵族制度可以使议会
更加民主化，让更多普通人有机会参与政治决策，实现真正的民主。
其次，贵族制度在英国议会上议院中可能会影响决策的效率。
贵族议员通常是因为家族地位或遗传而获得议员职位，而非凭借实
际能力和才华。
这样一来，议会的决策可能会受到贵族议员的个人
利益和偏见的影响，而偏离了公共利益。
取消贵族制度可以使议会
更加专业化和高效，让真正具备能力和经验的人才参与政治决策，
为国家的发展和民众的利益服务。
综上所述，取消英国议会上议院的贵族制度是符合时代潮流和
民主发展的需要的，它有利于提高议会的民主化程度和决策的效率，为国家的长远发展和民众的利益谋福祉。
因此，我强烈主张取消英
国议会上议院的贵族制度。
谢谢！。
BP英国议会制辩论资料
BP英国议会制辩论资料
辩题，是否应该禁止BP在英国议会制辩论中提供资料？
正方观点：
1. BP是英国最大的石油和天然气公司，其在议会制辩论中提供的资料具有重要性和权威性。
2. BP在能源领域拥有丰富的经验和专业知识，其提供的资料有助于议会就能源政策和环境保护等议题做出明智的决策。
3. 禁止BP提供资料将剥夺议会对能源问题进行全面了解的机会，不利于制定健全的政策。
反方观点：
1. 由于BP是能源公司，其提供的资料可能存在利益冲突和偏见，不具客观性。
2. BP曾在环境保护等议题上存在丑闻，其提供的资料可能不
可靠，甚至具有误导性。
3. 应该鼓励议会多方面获取信息，而不是依赖于单一公司的资料，以确保决策的客观性和公正性。
结论：
针对BP在英国议会制辩论中提供资料的问题，应该平衡权威性和客观性的要求。
可以考虑限制BP提供资料的范围，并且鼓励议会多方面获取信息，以确保决策的科学性和公正性。
英国会议制度辩论稿模板
尊敬的主持人、各位评委、尊敬的同学们：大家好！今天，我有幸站在这里，与大家一同探讨英国议会制度的优缺点。
首先，请允许我对英国议会制度的基本情况做一个简要介绍。
英国议会制度源于13世纪的《大宪章》，至今已有近800年的历史。
英国议会是英国政治的中心舞台，是英国的最高立法机关。
英国国会为两院制，由上议院和下议院组成。
上议院又称贵族院，主要由王室后裔、世袭贵族、新封贵族、上诉法院法官和教会的重要人物组成。
上议院议员不由选举产生，部分是世袭贵族。
上议院是英国最高司法机关，议长由大法官兼任。
和下议院相比，上议院的权力相对有限，保留着历史上遗留下来的司法权，有权审查下议院通过的法案，并通过必要的修正案，还可以要求推迟它不赞成的立法，最长可达一年。
下议院又称平民院或众议院，其议员由直接选举产生，任期5年。
下院的主要职权是立法、监督财政和政府。
英国全国被划分为多个选民人数基本相同的选区(选区的划分由一个独立的委员会决定)，每个选区选举一名下议院议员。
大多数选区议员是一个政党的成员，但是没有政党背景的人士也可以参加选举。
通常情况下，英国下议院总有一个拥有绝对多数的政党，该党领袖被国王任命为首相。
下议院第二大党的领袖则成为反对党领袖。
接下来，我将从以下几个方面分析英国议会制度的优缺点。
一、英国议会制度的优点1. 分权制衡：英国议会制度实现了立法、行政、司法三权分立，有效地避免了权力的过度集中，保证了政治的稳定和民主。
2. 民主参与：英国议会制度通过直接选举的方式，使广大民众有机会参与政治，行使自己的民主权利。
3. 政策连续性：英国议会制度允许政府在保持多数支持的情况下，连续执掌政权，保证政策的稳定性和连续性。
4. 灵活性：英国议会制度下，法案需要经过两院审议，有利于充分讨论和修改，使立法更加完善。
二、英国议会制度的缺点1. 效率问题：英国议会制度中，法案需要经过两院审议，有时可能导致立法过程变得繁琐，影响政策的实施效率。
BP英国议会制辩论资料
BP英国议会制辩论资料
尊敬的议长，尊敬的各位议员们：
今天我们聚集在这里，是为了就BP英国议会制辩论资料展开讨论。
议会制辩论资料对于英国政治体系的运作至关重要，它不仅反映了议会内部的辩论和决策过程，也直接影响着政府的政策制定和执行。
因此，我们需要认真审视这一议题，以确保议会制辩论资料的公正、透明和民主化。
首先，议会制辩论资料应当确保公正和客观。
议会作为国家的最高立法机构，其辩论资料应当客观记录各方观点和立场，而不应受到政治干预或偏向。
只有在公正的辩论资料基础上，议会才能做出符合国家利益和民意的决策。
其次，议会制辩论资料应当具有透明性和公开性。
公众有权知晓议会辩论的全貌，以便监督议员们的言行和表现。
因此，议会制辩论资料应当及时公开，让公众了解议会的辩论过程和决策依据，从而增强政府的透明度和信任度。
最后，议会制辩论资料应当民主化和参与性。
除了记录议员们
的发言和意见外，辩论资料还应当包括公众的意见和建议，让更多人参与到政治决策中来。
只有通过民主化的辩论资料，议会才能更好地代表人民的利益，实现国家的长远发展目标。
综上所述，我们应当重视BP英国议会制辩论资料的重要性，确保其公正、透明和民主化，以推动英国政治体系的健康发展。
希望各位议员们能够就这一议题展开深入讨论，为议会制辩论资料的完善和改进贡献智慧和力量。
谢谢！。
BP制英语辩论
不能提出新的论点
A
10
二辩—以反方为例 --By 孙宇辰
“Deputy Leader of the Proposition” 反方第二领袖
A
11
• Time Limit: 7 Minutes
• R&R(Role and Responsibility): This speaker should refute the Leader of the Proposition's speech, and further develop the Opening Opposition team's case.
A
13
General Advice
• First, you’d better get prepared physically and psychologically. Otherwise, you will certainly feel afflicted
• Secondly, you have nothing to enjoy except the game itself.
to the extension and makes reply to each team's position in the debate. This speaker should not introduce positive (new) matter. Attention: Do not introduce new arguments!!!
15’ more
3
Prime minister：
1、定义权（解释议题）
2、有条理地铺展开己方的理由与依据（相关事例）
BP英国议会制辩论资料
BP英国议会制辩论资料
尊敬的议长、各位议员：
今天我们聚集在这里，就BP英国议会制辩论资料展开辩论。
这
一议题涉及到英国议会制度的透明度、公开性以及民主性，对于国
家政治体系的健康发展具有重要意义。
首先，我们需要认识到，英国议会制度作为国家政治决策的核
心机构，其决策过程应当是公开透明的。
然而，目前存在的问题是，议会制辩论资料并不完全对公众开放，这导致了决策的不透明性和
公众对政治决策的不信任感。
因此，我们需要对这一现状进行深入
的反思和改革。
其次，议会制辩论资料的不公开也影响了议会内部的民主性。
议员们在进行决策时，往往需要依赖于相关的资料和信息，而如果
这些资料不完全公开，就会影响到议员们的决策权和发言权。
因此，我们需要确保议会制辩论资料的公开透明，以维护议会内部的民主
原则。
最后，议会制辩论资料的公开透明也是对政府行为的一种监督
和制约。
只有当政府的决策过程得到充分的公开和监督，才能保证政府的决策是合法、公正和有效的。
因此，我们需要通过改革和完善议会制辩论资料的公开机制，来加强对政府行为的监督和制约。
综上所述，BP英国议会制辩论资料的公开透明对于国家政治体系的健康发展至关重要。
我们呼吁各位议员支持对议会制辩论资料的改革和完善，以推动英国议会制度的民主化和现代化。
谢谢！。
英国议会制反方一辩发言稿
英国议会制反方一辩发言稿尊敬的主持人、评委、各位观众：大家好！我是英国议会制反方的一辩，我将为大家阐述我们反对英国议会制的理由。
我们认为，英国议会制在现代社会已经不再适用，不利于国家发展和民主进程。
以下是我们的观点：首先，英国议会制存在的最大问题是决策效率低下。
议会制下的政府由多个政党组成，需要进行协商、妥协，以达成共识。
然而，由于意见分歧和利益冲突，政府往往难以迅速做出决策。
这导致了许多重要问题的拖延和解决的困难，如经济发展、社会改革等。
相比之下，行政效能高的专制体制，例如中国的国家主权体制，能够迅速出台决策并迅速实施，有利于国家政策的执行和发展。
其次，英国议会制存在的第二个问题是政治腐败。
议会制下的政府由不同的政党组成，政治家们往往为了保持政权或争取更好的利益，不择手段地进行政治斗争和争权夺利。
这种斗争和利益交换导致了政治环境的腐败，并使政府失去公信力和民众的支持。
相比之下，专制体制下的政府由于权力高度集中，监管机构严密，政治腐败的可能性更小，政府能更好地为人民服务。
第三，英国议会制存在的问题是代表性不足。
议会制下政府由选举产生，但代表人民的政党之间缺乏真正的竞争，选举结果可能偏向特定利益群体。
此外，议会中的议员与选民之间的联系薄弱，议员可能更多地为了自身利益而工作，而不是代表选民的意愿。
与之相比，专制体制下的政府在一定程度上能够更好地代表人民，政府更为稳定，能够制定更有利于广大人民的政策。
第四，英国议会制存在的问题是缺乏长远规划和战略性思维。
议会制下的政府往往受到选举周期的制约，难以做出长远和政策调整的决策。
政府只关注短期的选票和利益，而缺乏对国家长远利益的考虑。
与之相比，专制体制下的政府能够更好地进行长远规划和实施战略性政策，推动国家的发展。
最后，英国议会制的维护成本较高。
议会制下的政府由多个政党组成，政府形成后需要大量的资源和时间用于协调各方利益和制定政策。
与之相比，专制体制下的政府由少数人掌权，决策效率较高，从而节约了大量的时间和资源。
英国议会制辩论赛
1、BP制是British Parliamentary（英国议会制）的简称，是仿照英国议会开会议事模式而设计的一系列辩论赛规则的总称，是全世界范围内使用最广泛的辩论规则，世界大学生辩论赛WUDC（The World Universitie s Debating Championships）及中国辩论公开赛China Open均使用此规则。
2、常见的BP制是四队议会制辩论，每场比赛分正反双方，设“正方上院”、“正方下院”、“反方上院”、“反方下院”四队，每队两人，故可概括为“两方、四队、八人”。
3、胜负评判为排序制，即根据各队表现在四队中排出1、2、3、4名，胜负不以正反方而论，即完全可以出现正方上院第一名而正方下院第四名的情况。
4、BP制的竞赛程序可简单描述为“角色扮演”+“交替演讲”，每位辩手均拥有一个议员角色，均拥有7分钟左右（不同赛事时长不一）发言时长，正反方从上到下交替发言，没有自由辩论等任何快速交替发言环节。
?5、BP制有一种特殊的“质询”规则：Point of Information (“PoI”)。
PoI允许对方辩手在“非保护时间”（每人发言时间中除开第一分钟和最后一分钟之外的所有时间）示意要求提问，经发言者允许后向发言者提问质询。
质询者提问时间计入发言者时长，故针对PoI，发言者有权决定是否接受、何时接受、如何回答等事宜。
?6、BP制区别于常见华语辩论赛制的最大特点在于“角色扮演”，如下表：?正方上院第一位发言者首相(Prime Minister)正方一辩反对党领袖（Leader of the Oppositi反方上院第一位发言者反方一辩on）正方上院第二位发言者副首相（Deputy Prime Minister）正方二辩反对党副领袖（Deputy Leader of the反方上院第二位发言者反方二辩Opposition）正方下院第一位发言者政府阁员（Member of Government）正方三辩反方下院第一位发言者反对党阁员（Member of the Oppositi反方三辩on）正方下院第二位发言者政府党鞭（Government Whip）正方四辩反方下院第二位发言者反对党党鞭（Opposition Whip）反方四辩?7、除一般的“立我方、批对方”的发言责任外，BP制中每个角色还有其独特的角色责任，对该责任的实现程度构成胜负评判的最大因素。
最新英语BP辩论反方一辩辩论稿
最新英语BP辩论反方一辩辩论稿反方一辩：Respected judicators, Ladies and gentlemen, good evening!In the first part of my speech, I would like to make my rebuttal. Patents do not costs lives, they save more.Our government side have proposed a radical solution to their problem: they want to ignore intellectual property, one of our most important constructs to encourage innovation. On the opposition, we believe the status quo of allowing a medicine company to patent something and profit from it is necessary for them to have an incentive and ability to create life-saving medicines now and in the future, and it is saving lives in the long-term that concerns us.Now I’d like to provide my statements. This hous e would not abolish patents for life-saving medicines. For the first reason, it takes away the Incentive to Produce Life-saving medicines.Ron Pollack said,The pharmaceutical industry's repetitious cry that research and development would be curtailed if medicine prices are moderated is extraordinarily misleading.Yes, research and development costs money. Yet only 14% of pharmaceuticals' budgets go to research and development. Reports have linked "high medicine prices to advertising, profits and enormous executive salaries. The report documents that medicine companies are spending more than twice as much on marketing, advertising, and administration.”Firms are incentivized to undertake research in life-saving drugs because now they have a guaranteed return on their R&D investment. Regardless of the course of drug production and distribution they will be profit from their research.In addition , Scientists are principally motivated by the desire for peer recognition and also by the fact that they want to have achieved something more with their lives than reduce some teenager’s pimples by 30%. We are not dissuading research into live-sa ving illnesses we’re invigorating it by offering inciting profit that is tied to results and is cost-effective.Creating a brand new medicine requires enormous amounts of money and failed attempts, and therefore involves a large amount of risk. If a person can't be guaranteed some kind of control or return to that risk and expense, they are unlikely to want to invest in it. In particular, if a medicinecompany can make more money by patenting medicines that cure hair loss, they will take that option.For the second aspect, consequences of the loss of incentives is awful.Medicine companies are trying to develop cures for cancer, diabetes and more, and will likely want to develop more cures for illnesses that come up in the future, as they did for swine flu, if they can get a return on the investment. If there is not a significant return to investment, a company will not bother to continue to research and develop these medicines. Even if the current medicines were released for generic development, lack of future medicines would cost far more lives in the long run, and save money on alternative treatments.Furthermore, most things that cause illness, such as viruses and bacteria, develop so that they can resist medicines. We have seen this in the case of the increased ineffectiveness of antibiotics. Prop wants to change the focus of medicine production from the development of new medicines to the cheaper production of medicines that already exist. This will happen because any start-up company or investor in the medicines industry will see that itis cheaper to simply create the medicines, rather than put money into research and development, which is the most expensive part of the medicines creation process. If there is a greater focus on this, then less new medicines will be created to combat the illnesses. This structure begins to look very flawed as the illnesses develop resistances to old medicines. There needs to be a continuing incentive to create new medicines for any illness, not to simply focus on old medicines being created in larger, cheaper amounts. It is worth slightly more expensive medicines if new innovation is constantly able to happen.In conclusion, if we abolish those patents,no one would continue researching and developing new medicines,thus,abolishing patents for life-saving medicines seems to save more lives at the beginning, it would kill more lives in the long run.。
BP英国议会制辩论资料
BP英国议会制辩论资料
辩题，应该禁止或限制石油和天然气开采吗？
正方观点，我们认为应该禁止或限制石油和天然气开采。
首先，这些化石燃料的开采和使用是导致气候变化的主要原因之一。
随着
全球气温不断上升，我们已经看到了极端天气事件的增加，这对人
类和生态系统都构成了巨大的威胁。
其次，石油和天然气的开采对
环境造成了严重的破坏，包括水和土壤污染，野生动物栖息地破坏等。
最后，我们认为应该加快转型到可再生能源，这不仅可以减少
对化石燃料的依赖，还可以创造更多的就业机会和经济增长。
反方观点，我们认为不应该禁止或限制石油和天然气开采。
首先，这些化石燃料是目前全球能源供应的主要来源，禁止或限制开
采将导致能源短缺和经济衰退。
其次，石油和天然气产业在很多国
家都是重要的经济支柱，禁止或限制开采将导致数以百万计的工作
岗位丧失。
最后，我们认为应该采取技术和管理手段来减少化石燃
料的环境影响，而不是简单地禁止或限制开采。
结论，在这场辩论中，我们听到了双方对于石油和天然气开采
的不同观点。
虽然禁止或限制开采可能会带来一些经济和社会方面
的困难，但我们也不能忽视化石燃料对气候和环境的影响。
我们希望政府和企业能够在保障能源供应的同时，加大对可再生能源的投资，推动能源转型，实现可持续发展。
英语bp辩论首相发言稿模板
英语bp辩论首相发言稿模板English: Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, and fellow debaters, today I stand before you as the Prime Minister to argue in favor of the motion that "social media platforms should be regulated by the government." Social media has undoubtedly transformed the way we communicate, share information, and connect with others, but with this great power comes great responsibility. The unchecked spreadof misinformation, hate speech, and harmful content on social media platforms poses a significant threat to individuals, communities, and society as a whole. Therefore, it is imperative that the government takes a more active role in regulating these platforms to protect the well-being and safety of its citizens. By implementing stricter guidelines, monitoring content more closely, and holding platforms accountable for the dissemination of harmful material, we can create a safer and more responsible online environment for everyone.中文翻译: 女士们先生们，尊敬的评委和各位辩手们，今天我作为首相站在你们面前，支持“社交媒体平台应该受到政府监管”的提案。
BP英国议会制辩论资料
BP英国议会制辩论资料英文回答：I'm a huge fan of British parliamentary procedure. I find it to be a very effective way to conduct debates and make decisions. I've had the opportunity to participate in a few BP debates, and I've always been impressed by the level of civility and respect that is shown by all participants.One of the things I appreciate most about BP is the emphasis on evidence and reason. When debaters make claims, they are expected to back them up with evidence. This helps to ensure that the debate is focused on the facts, rather than on personal attacks or emotional appeals.I also appreciate the way that BP encourages debaters to be respectful of opposing viewpoints. Even when debaters disagree with each other, they are expected to do so in a civil and respectful manner. This helps to create aproductive atmosphere where everyone feels comfortable sharing their ideas.Overall, I believe that BP is a great way to conduct debates and make decisions. It is a system that is based on evidence, reason, and respect. I encourage everyone to learn more about BP and to participate in a debate if they have the opportunity.中文回答：英国议会制辩论（BP）是辩论和决策的一种非常有效的方式。
BP英国议会制辩论资料
BP英国议会制辩论资料
辩题，应该对碳排放实施更严格的限制措施。
尊敬的议员们，今天我们聚集在这里，讨论的是一个至关重要
的议题，是否应该对碳排放实施更严格的限制措施。
随着全球气候
变化的加剧，碳排放已成为我们面临的最严重的环境问题之一。
因此，我们必须采取行动，以减少碳排放并保护我们的地球。
首先，让我们看看碳排放对环境造成的影响。
大量的碳排放导
致了全球气候变暖，引发了极端天气事件，如干旱、洪灾和飓风。
这些事件不仅给人们的生活带来了巨大的影响，还对生态系统造成
了严重破坏。
如果我们不采取行动，这些影响将会进一步恶化，对
我们的子孙后代造成更大的威胁。
其次，我们必须认识到，碳排放的减少并不会对经济造成严重
影响。
相反，采取措施减少碳排放将推动新的清洁能源产业的发展，创造更多的就业机会，并促进经济的可持续发展。
因此，对碳排放
实施更严格的限制措施是有利于经济的。
最后，我们必须认识到，减少碳排放是全球性的挑战，需要全
球范围内的合作。
作为一个发达国家，英国应该在这方面发挥示范
作用，积极采取行动，鼓励其他国家也加入到减排的行列中来。
因此，我呼吁各位议员们支持对碳排放实施更严格的限制措施。
我们必须采取行动，保护我们的地球，保护我们的未来。
谢谢。
BP英国议会制辩论资料
BP英国议会制辩论资料
尊敬的议长、各位尊敬的议员们，今天我们将就BP英国议会制
辩论资料展开讨论。
议会制辩论资料是议会内部辩论的重要工具，
它记录了议员们在辩论中的发言和观点，为议会决策提供了重要的
参考依据。
然而，近年来一些人质疑议会制辩论资料的准确性和公
正性，认为其在一定程度上影响了议会辩论的质量和效果。
首先，我们来看议会制辩论资料的准确性。
一些人认为，议会
制辩论资料可能存在记录不全、篡改或失实的情况，这将严重影响
议会辩论的公正性和客观性。
如果议会制辩论资料的准确性无法得
到保障，那么议会辩论的结果也将难以令人信服。
其次，议会制辩论资料的公开透明度也备受质疑。
一些人认为，议会制辩论资料的公开程度不够，导致公众对议会辩论的了解程度
不够，也无法有效监督议员们的发言和行为。
这将严重影响议会的
民主监督功能，不利于建设一个公正、透明的议会制度。
最后，议会制辩论资料的管理和运用也需要进一步完善。
一些
人认为，议会制辩论资料的管理过程中存在不合理的安排和运用，
导致其在议会决策中的作用受到了一定程度的削弱。
如果议会制辩
论资料的管理和运用不能得到合理规范，那么其在议会决策中的作用也将受到质疑。
综上所述，议会制辩论资料在一定程度上存在着准确性、公开透明度和管理运用等方面的问题。
因此，我们需要进一步完善议会制辩论资料的管理机制，提高其准确性和公开透明度，以确保议会辩论的质量和效果。
希望各位议员们能够就此展开深入讨论，共同寻求解决之道。
谢谢！。
英辩bp正方一辩开场白
英辩bp正方一辩开场白求英文辩论的一辩正方开场白Topic1:Is opportunity and luck important than hard working?开篇陈词正方一辩：We can't deny the importance of hard work.Both of these elements are very important in determining whether a person is successful or not.But luck brings us opportunities to show the value of our hard work.In this sense,luck is important than hard work alone.我们不能否认勤勉的重要性.两者在决定一个人是否成功时都很重要.但运气让我们有机会表现出勤勉的价值.因此运气比勤勉更重要.On one level,luck means‘a good material life'.But adversity is also a kind of luck.This kind of luck is not uncertain.Children growing up in adversity will be stronger.表面看来运气意味着优越的物质生活,但逆境其实也是一种运气,这里的运气就是可确定的.在逆境中成长的孩子往往更坚强.Topic2:Do you think luck and opportunity are important than hard work正方：Good morning,everyone we are the objective part.I am debater1 Han.I am debater 2 Jone反方：We are the negative part.I am debater1 ding.I am debater 2 Li正方立论：We both sides have to seize this opportunity，to pursue our desires for success.Our opinion-the opportunity and luck is the key to success.If there is no opportunity,even though you havetalent you have not demonstrated vision and the opportunity to stage.Mrs.Courier said:\"the weak waits for the opportunity the strong creates opportunity”.We think:Opportunity and Luck are the keys to success!That’s all,thank you.反方立论：Our side insists on that hard working is the key to success.It’s true that hard working and the opportunity are the important factors to success.But we are discussing which is important.First，seeing from the side of philosophy,the inside factor is the most importance to everything developing.The hard working is the inside factor.Second,seeing from the way to success,we must set up a goal in the first instance,and through the personal hard working,we can hold the opportunity and achieve to success.So we believe the hard working is the key to success.That’s all,thank you.英语辩论赛正方一辩的开场白各位同学、今晚的辩论赛即将开始.有请队员入场.首先入场的是正方*,他们的立场是*.他们的辩手是:…现在入场的是反方*,他们的立场是*.他们的辩手是:…今天晚上,我们举行的是:*辩论赛,欢迎各位辩手和同学们的到来，希望双方在今晚的比赛中都有出色的表现。
英国议会制辩论(BP)一辩稿
Thank you chairman! Honorable judges, ladies and gentlemen, good morning! I’m very gland to be the prime minister. Our side firmly believes that The advantages of mobile devices outweigh the disadvantages over interpersonal distance.定义：Mobile device, in this case, means the mobile phone. It’s a kind of intelligent and multiple mobile equipment which covers information, communication, entertainment,internet and so on. There is no doubt that mobile phone is an important tool and plays an indispensable role in our life. Now let’s have a look at the definition of interpersonal distance. Distance, we must admit that it includes the aspects of time, space and emotion. So our group will demonstrate the impact of mobile phones on narrowing the distance between people from these three aspects.观点：（一）情感距离First of all, the mobile phone makes communication between people easier, convenient and fast, directly narrow the emotional distance between the people.As we know, man is the sum of all social relations, and human social relations are maintained by contact. With the development of science and technology, human being has changed from a relatively isolated state to a interrelated and inseparable whole.Since ancient times, writing letters has been the bridge to contact people. The information transmission is very slow and inconvenient, which leads to the lagging of information exchange.In today's information age, people are involved in the fierce competition and tremendous pressure. They spend all day running around the work. There is no time and energy to visit relatives and friends or communicate with them through letters to send greetings and blessings, let alone talking face to face. This will inevitably alienate the distance between people.While the emergence of mobile phones, enrich the way of communicating between people. As a new intelligent device, it has many functions, such as telephone, voice, video and message. So that people's voice can be timely and effective communicated, all kinds of messages can be quickly and easily delivered. 丰富交流方式This powerful function can not only makes life moreconvenient, save your valuable time and reduce costs, but also gives the emotion a magical channel of transmission, from which, the warmth and care can be expressed whenever and wherever possible, naturally closer to the emotional distance between people. 节约时间、降低成本As for me,as a college student, cause Heilongjiang province is far from Changsha, it is hard for me to go back home frequently. However, I can video chat through mobile phone with my mother anytime and anywhere I like, which really ease the miss. I think so do most of you. For example, yesterday is Mother’s Day, and I believe all of you must gave a call to your mother, right? 缓解思念（二）空间/地域距离Secondly, mobile phone fills the shortcomings of other means of communication with its convenience and rapidness, which makes social connections more diversified and enriched. It narrows the geographical distance between people. 互补Mobile phones and letters, face-to-face talk and other traditional ways of communication are mutual complement. They supplement each other. We do not deny the role of other means of communication. All of them are members of the three-dimensional and diversified communication network oftoda y’s modern community, but mobile phone is the most common one. With it, the relationship between people has undergone a fundamental change. So today people always say the earth became smaller and became a global village. 地球村Imagine such a scene: One day, you lie on the sofa at home and chat with a stranger on the other side of the globe just use one small mobile phone, isn’t amazing? 陌生人（三）时间距离What’s more, because speech communication serves as the major form for the order transmission, the use of mobile phone effectively save the time to transmit to above and below and greatly improved work efficiency. That is narrow the time distance.总结：Last but not least, along with the rapid development of communication technology, mobile phones are more and more frequently appear and popular in our daily life.It is an inevitable trend. Whether in terms of time, space, or emotion, mobile phone is able to narrow the distance between people.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Thank you chairman! Honorable judges, ladies and gentlemen, good morning! I’m very gland to be the prime minister. Our side firmly believes that The advantages of mobile devices outweigh the disadvantages over interpersonal distance.
定义：
Mobile device, in this case, means the mobile phone. It’s a kind of intelligent and multiple mobile equipment which covers information, communication, entertainment,internet and so on. There is no doubt that mobile phone is an important tool and plays an indispensable role in our life. Now let’s have a look at the definition of interpersonal distance. Distance, we must admit that it includes the aspects of time, space and emotion. So our group will demonstrate the impact of mobile phones on narrowing the distance between people from these three aspects.
观点：
（一）情感距离
First of all, the mobile phone makes communication between people easier, convenient and fast, directly narrow the
emotional distance between the people.
As we know, man is the sum of all social relations, and human social relations are maintained by contact. With the development of science and technology, human being has changed from a relatively isolated state to a interrelated and inseparable whole.
Since ancient times, writing letters has been the bridge to contact people. The information transmission is very slow and inconvenient, which leads to the lagging of information exchange.
In today's information age, people are involved in the fierce competition and tremendous pressure. They spend all day running around the work. There is no time and energy to visit relatives and friends or communicate with them through letters to send greetings and blessings, let alone talking face to face. This will inevitably alienate the distance between people.
While the emergence of mobile phones, enrich the way of communicating between people. As a new intelligent device, it has many functions, such as telephone, voice, video and message. So that people's voice can be timely and effective communicated, all kinds of messages can be quickly and easily
delivered. 丰富交流方式
This powerful function can not only makes life more convenient, save your valuable time and reduce costs, but also gives the emotion a magical channel of transmission, from which, the warmth and care can be expressed whenever and wherever possible, naturally closer to the emotional distance between people. 节约时间、降低成本
As for me,as a college student, cause Heilongjiang province is far from Changsha, it is hard for me to go back home frequently. However, I can video chat through mobile phone with my mother anytime and anywhere I like, which really ease the miss. I think so do most of you. For example, yesterday is Mother’s Day, and I believe all of you must gave a call to your mother, right? 缓解思念
（二）空间/地域距离
Secondly, mobile phone fills the shortcomings of other means of communication with its convenience and rapidness, which makes social connections more diversified and enriched. It narrows the geographical distance between people. 互补Mobile phones and letters, face-to-face talk and other
traditional ways of communication are mutual complement. They supplement each other. We do not deny the role of other means of communication. All of them are members of the three-dimensional and diversified communication network of today’s modern community, but mobile phone is the most common one. With it, the relationship between people has undergone a fundamental change. So today people always say the earth became smaller and became a global village. 地球村Imagine such a scene: One day, you lie on the sofa at home and chat with a stranger on the other side of the globe just use one small mobile phone, isn’t amazing? 陌生人
（三）时间距离
What’s more, because speech communication serves as the major form for the order transmission, the use of mobile phone effectively save the time to transmit to above and below and greatly improved work efficiency. That is narrow the time distance.
总结：
Last but not least, along with the rapid development of communication technology, mobile phones are more and more
frequently appear and popular in our daily life.It is an inevitable trend. Whether in terms of time, space, or emotion, mobile phone is able to narrow the distance between people.。