CCER 计量经济学 第三次作业和答案
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Intermediate Econometrics Class 1
Problem Set 3 with Answers
Handout Date: Dec. 4th, 2011
Due Date: Dec. 9th, 2011 (Hand in BEFORE class)
1.An estimated equation is
with
, and SSR = 1.5
Use F-statistic to test the following
(1).
(2).
(3).
(Hint: The tests involve only the sub-matrix in the lower-right corner of .
Refer to TA materials for the formula of inverses of partitioned matrices.)
(1).
equals the single element at the lower right-hand corner of
,which is 2.5.
Then the F-statistic is calculated as
It falls well short of any usually critical value for . So we cannot reject .
(2).
only involves the elements in the sub-matrix in the lower
right-hand corner of
The F-statistic equals
From the tables of F distribution, , so we cannot reject the null at
5% significance level.
(3).
Thus the test statistic becomes
Again, the test statistic falls well short of any usually critical value for . So we
cannot reject .
2. A four-variable regression using quarter data from 1958 to 1976 inclusive gave an estimated
equation
The explained sum of squares was 109.6, and the residual sum of squares, 18.48.
(1).When the equation was re-estimated with three seasonal dummies added to the
specification, the explained sum of squares rose to 114.8. Test for the presence of seasonality.
To test for the presence of seasonality we test the joint significance of the three seasonal dummy variables. The restricted is 18.48, while the unrestricted is
The rule-of-thumb F-statistic is calculated as
The 5% critical value is (is usually not given in statistic tables,
so here we use the instead). We can reject the hypothesis of no seasonality at 5%
significance level.
(2).Two further regressions based on the original specification were run for the sub-periods
1958.1 to 1968.4 and 1969.1 to 1976.4, yielding residual sums of squares of 9.32 and 7.46, respectively. Test for the constancy of the relationship over the two sub-periods.
To test the parameter consistency over the two sub-samples, consider the Chow test,
The 5% critical value is . Hence we cannot reject the hypothesis of
parameter constancy at 5% significance level.
3.Survey records for a large sample of families show the following weekly consumption
expenditure (Y) and weekly income (X):
Y 70 76 91 …… 120 146 135 X 80 95 105 …… 155 165 175
* * *
Families with an asterisk (*) reported that their income is higher than in the previous year.
(1).To examine the impact of weekly income on weekly consumptions, one sets up the
following model
He is concerned that the error terms may have heterogeneous variance. Derive the robust standard error of .
Under HSK, the large sample distribution of is
The sample estimate of is
where
The robust standard error of is the 2nd diagonal element of the estimated covariance
matrix of
(2).If he wants to estimate directly the elasticity of consumption with respect of income, how
should he modify the model in (1).
(3).If he wants to test whether the event of an increase in income, holding the level of income
unchanged, helps to explain the consumption behavior, how should he extend the model in (1)?
(4).If he wants to test whether the marginal propensity to consume (the slope coefficient) of
families experiencing an increase in income is different from that of families who did not experience an increase, how should he extend the model in (3)?