【备考资料】TPO4综合写作详细解析(听力&阅读)
托福TPO4综合写作阅读原文+听力原文+满分范文
为了帮助大家高效备考托福,为大家带来托福TPO4综合写作阅读原文+听力原文+满分范文,希望对大家备考有所帮助。
托福TPO4综合写作阅读原文文本: Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs were reptiles, and modern reptiles are not endotherms, it was long assumed that dinosaurs were not endotherms. However, dinosaurs differ in many ways from modem reptiles, and there is now considerable evidence that dinosaurs were, in fact, endotherms. Polar dinosaurs One reason for believing that dinosaurs were endotherms is that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in polar regions. Only animals that can maintain a temperature well above that of the surrounding environment could be active in such cold climates. Leg position and movement There is a connection between endothermy and the position and movement of the legs. The physiology of endothermy allows sustained physical activity, such as running. But running is efficient only if an animal's legs are positioned underneath its body, not at the body's side, as they are for crocodiles and many lizards. The legs of all modern endotherms are underneath the body, and so were the legs of dinosaurs. This strongly suggests that dinosaurs were endotherms. Haversian canals There is also a connection between endothermy and bone structure. The bones of endotherms usually include structures called Haversian canals. These canals house nerves and blood vessels that allow the living animal to grow quickly, and rapid body growth is in fact a characteristic of endothermy. The presence of Haversian canals in bone is a strong indicator that the animal is an endotherm, and fossilized bones of dinosaurs are usually dense with Haversian canals. 托福TPO4综合写作听力原文文本: Many scientists have problems with the arguments you read in the passage. They don't think those arguments prove that dinosaurs were endotherms. Take the polar dinosaur argument. When dinosaurs lived, even the polar regions, where dinosaur fossils have been found, were much warmer than today, warm enoughduring part of the year for animals that were not endotherms to live. And during the months when the polar regions were cold, the so-called polar dinosaurs could have migrated to warmer areas or hibernated like many modern reptiles do. So the presence of dinosaur fossils in polar regions doesn't prove the dinosaurs were endotherms. Well, what about the fact that dinosaurs have their legs placed under their bodies, not out to the side like crocodiles. That doesn't necessarily mean dinosaurs were high-energy endotherms built for running. There is another explanation for having legs under the body. This body structure supports more weight, so with the legs under their bodies, dinosaurs can grow to a very large size. Being large had advantages for dinosaurs, so we don't need the idea of endothermy and running to explain why dinosaurs evolved to have their legs under their bodies. Ok, so how about bone structure? Many dinosaur bones do have Haversian canals, that's true. The dinosaur bones also have growth rings. Growth rings are thickening of the bone that indicates periods of time when the dinosaurs weren't rapidly growing. These growth rings are evidence that dinosaurs stopped growing or grew more slowly during cooler periods. This pattern of periodic growth, you know, rapid growth followed by no growth or slow growth, and then rapid growth again, is characteristic of animals that are not endotherms. Animals that maintain a constant body temperature year-round as true endotherms do grow rapidly even when the environment becomes cool. 托福TPO4综合写作满分范文: The professor actually contradicts the statements made in the passage. She is of the view that dinosaurs are not endotherms i.e. they were not able to keep their body temperature at a constant rate. The professor contradicts the issue of dinosaurs being endothers based on the availability of fossils being available in the polar regions, she say that the polar regions in those days were not as cold as they are today i.e at least warm enough for dinosaurs to live. Durin harsh winters she says that there is a possibility of the dinosaurs actually migrating to warmer regions. The issue of leg position and movement being used as a reason to clasify the dinosaurs as endotherms does not please the professor either. She says that dinosaurs had legs under their bodies to support their huge bodies i.e the legs under the body of the dinosaur were actually to support the huge weight of the dinosaur and not to provide it with a body structure like endotherms(which is actually suited for running). The professor acknowledges the presence of haversian canals but also points out that that the fossils show the presence of growth rings. These rings occur due to the thickening of the bone. The thickening indicates that the dinosaurs were’nt。
TPO4听力解析
TPO4 listening 问题解析注:问题中红色标记词汇为解题突破点和关键词。
(编辑整理By Serene蘑菇)1. Why does the man need the woman’s assistance?Click on 2 answers.A. He does not know the publication date of some reviews he needs.B. He does not know the locatio n of the library’s vides collection of plays.C. He does not know how to find out where the play is currently being performed.D. He does not know how to determine which newspaper he should look at.答案:AD解析:(原文中)Yeah, I need to find a review. It‟s for my English class. We have to find reviews of the play we are reading. But they have to be from when the play was first performed, so I n eed to know when that was and I suppose I should start with newspaper reviews and…从第一组对话中得出student来咨询的直接原因有两个一是要找一份review,二是不知道从那份newspaper开始。
BC是无关选项。
2. What does the woman imply about critical reaction to the play Happy Strangers?A. Negative critical reaction led to its content being revised after it premiered.B. The play has always been quite popular among university students.C. Reactions to the play are more positive nowadays than they were in the past.D. The play is rarely performed nowadays because critics have never liked it.答案:C解析:(原文中)Well, that certainly explains why your professor wants you to read some of those old reviews. The critiques really tore the play to pieces when it opened. It‟s so controversial. Nobody had ever seen anything like it on the stage. Oh, sure. Of course the critiques‟ reaction made some people kind of curious about it. They wanted t o see what‟s causing all the fuss.从Women将现在人们的态度与过去作对比可以得知,现在人们的态度已经比以前积极了很多。
新托福写作真经4test15-综合写作解析
新托福写作真经4test15-综合写作解析新托福写作真经4test15-综合写作解析前程百利小编将在这篇文章和大家一起分享新托福写作真经4test15的综合写作部分。
希望大家能够按照以下的备考思路,更好地攻克托福写作题目。
第一部分:阅读文本解析The mystery of whether humans are alone in the universe may have been answered by a 1.9-kilogram meteorite discovered in Antarctica in 1984. After careful analysis, scientists from NASA announced that the meteorite, which they say came from Mars, once contained organic matter that was extraterrestrial in origin.While the meteorite was found in 1984, it was not until 2009 that NASA scientists claimed that it possessed strong evidence that life existed on Mars billions of years in the past. The reason for the delay is that recent advances in electron microscopy made it possible for scientists to see various features on the meteorite that had previously been overlooked. What they found with a high-powered electron microscope was evidence of extremely tiny fossils of bacteria-like organisms on the meteorite. This was a clear indicator that Mars once held life at least on the microscopic level.Scientists believe the meteorite formed on Mars around 3.6 to 4 billion years ago. Then, Mars was much warmer and wetter than it is today. Water likely entered fractures in the rock. Then, living organisms soon followed and made their homes inside these fissures. Scientists defend their theory by citing the carbonate minerals found in the rock. These minerals, they speculate, could only have been formed by living organisms.Further proof of the existence of life is that the meteorite contains magnetite. Studies have determined that roughly onequarter of the magnetite in the meteorite is in the guise of small crystals. These crystals are chemically pure and structurally perfect, and they have unique three-dimensional shapes that could only have been formed by living organisms, not by organic matter. Taken altogether, these scientists are convinced they have proof that life exists—or at least existed—elsewhere in the universe.阅读要点:观点:The meteorite, which they say came from Mars, once contained organic matter that was extraterrestrial in origin.根据从火星掉落的陨石表明,火星上有生物存在。
托福TPO4综合写作阅读+听力原文+满分范文【雷哥托福】
托福TPO4综合写作阅读+听力原文+满分范文【雷哥托福整理】在备考托福写作的过程中,总是将托福的独立作文放在了第一位,但是实际上,综合作文也是占到了作文总分30分里面的50%的分值,不要等到分数出来了,才发现其实是综合作文的limited或者fair极大的影响了自己的分数。
考过的同学会发现托福综合作文分数不高,很大程度上是受我们听力实力的影响,我们很多托福考生的听力分数只有16分上下的时候,对于托福综合作文的听力妥妥的是束手无策,而且很多托福考生还感觉自己都听懂了,那也只能说明你听懂了大意,但是听力里面要的是每一个细节!请注意,是每一个细节!雷哥托福小托君给大家分享TPO1-33综合作文部分的阅读和听力文本全集与综合作文的满分作文,以及满分作文的解析。
如果自己的托福综合作文分数如果可以很给力的话,就已经搞定了15分的分数,可以极大地缓解托福独立作文的压力。
如何使用这个文件呢?TPO4 综合写作听力+阅读原文ReadingEndotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs were reptiles, and modern reptiles are not endotherms, it was long assumed that dinosaurs were not endotherms. However, dinosaurs differ in many ways from modem reptiles, and there is now considerable evidence that dinosaurs were, in fact, endotherms.Polar dinosaursOne reason for believing that dinosaurs were endotherms is that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in Polar Regions. Only animals that can maintain a temperature wellabove that of the surrounding environment could be active in such cold climates.Leg position and movementThere is a connection between endothermy and the position and movement of the legs. The physiology of endothermy allows sustained physical activity, such as running. But running is efficient only if an animal's legs are positioned underneath its body, not at the body's side, as they are for crocodiles and many lizards. The legs of all modern endotherms are underneath the body, and so were the legs of dinosaurs. This strongly suggests that dinosaurs were endotherms.Haversian canalsThere is also a connection between endothermy and bone structure. The bones of endotherms usually include structures called Haversian canals. These canals house nerves and blood vessels that allow the living animal to grow quickly, and rapid body growth is in fact a characteristic of endothermy. The presence of Haversian canals in bone is a strong indicator that the animal is an endotherm, and fossilized bones of dinosaurs are usually dense with Haversian canals.ListeningProfessor: Many scientists have problems with the arguments you read in the passage. They don't think those arguments prove that dinosaurs were endotherms.Take the polar dinosaur argument. When dinosaurs lived, even the polar regions, where dinosaur fossils have been found, were much warmer than today, warm enough during part of the year for animals that were not endotherms to live. And during the months when the polar regions were cold, the so-called polar dinosaurs could have migrated to warmer areas or hibernated like many modern reptiles do. So the presence of dinosaur fossils in polar regions doesn't prove the dinosaurs were endotherms.Well, what about the fact that dinosaurs have their legs placed under their bodies, not out to the side like crocodiles. That doesn't necessarily mean dinosaurs werehigh-energy endotherms built for running. There is another explanation for having legs under the body. This body structure supports more weight, so with the legs under their bodies, dinosaurs can grow to a very large size. Being large had advantages for dinosaurs, so we don't need the idea of endothermy and running to explain why dinosaurs evolved to have their legs under their bodies.Ok, so how about bone structure? Many dinosaur bones do have Haversian canals, that's true. The dinosaur bones also have growth rings. Growth rings are thickening of the bone that indicates periods of time when the dinosaurs weren't rapidly growing. These growth rings are evidence that dinosaurs stopped growing or grew more slowly during cooler periods. This pattern of periodic growth, you know, rapid growth followed by no growth or slow growth, and then rapid growth again, is characteristic of animals that are not endotherms. Animals that maintain a constant body temperature year-round as true endotherms do grow rapidly even when the environment becomes cool.TPO4综合写作范文推荐Sample ResponseThe professor actually contradicts the statements made in the passage. She is of the view that dinosaurs are not endotherms i.e. they were not able to keep their body temperature at a constant rate.The professor contradicts the issue of dinosaurs being endothers based on the availability of fossils being available in the polar regions, she say that the polar regions in those days were not as cold as they are today i.e. at least warm enough for dinosaurs to live. During harsh winters she says that there is a possibility of the dinosaurs actually migrating to warmer regions.The issue of leg position and movement being used as a reason to classify the dinosaurs as endotherms does not please the professor either. She says that dinosaurs had legs under their bodies to support their huge bodies i.e. the legs under the body of the dinosaur were actually to support the huge weight of the dinosaur and not to provide it with a body structure like endotherms (which is actually suited for running).The professor acknowledges the presence of haversian canals but also points out that that the fossils show the presence of growth rings. These rings occur due to the thickening of the bone.The thickening indicates that the dinosaurs weren’t actually growing continuous ly but were experiencing periods of rapid growth and periods of no growth in succession. This pattern, she says is characteristic of non endothermic animals. Thus it can be inferred that the professor challenges the passage by giving reasons as to why she thinks that the dinosaur is not an endotherm.首先,就是在自己做托福TPO模考之后,可以根据这里面的听力的文本,来检验自己的听力内容是否抓的足够好,尤其是要看写的够不够全!很多时候,我们的综合作文之所以分低,就是因为听力写的不全!第二点,也可以用于在托福考试前来做跟读,有不少托福考生跟小托君说,自己的口语实力不够,那么做跟读,仔细地来模仿ETS官方素材,是一个很好的提高自己口语的方式。
综合教程第四单元听力翻译及答案
综合教程第四单元听⼒翻译及答案Unit 4 News 24⁄7Outside viewPart1Keith :I saw Robin Williams come to the patio. I made the run, jumped a couple of sawhorses, climbed up a stairway, got in front of him, and said, “Robin, do you mind if I take a picture?” He goes, “After all that, how could I stop you?”V/O (画外⾳)Keith Sykes has a long career in journalism, photography, and communications.Keith :I’ve taken pictures of a lot of celebrities. Cindy Crawford. I’ve tak en her picture a few times and, I, I think it’s impossible to take a bad picture of her. James Garner. I’ve photographed famous politicians. I stood in the same position for two hours to get this picture. Photographing these people is uh, an exciting thing for me. When I moved to Los Angeles in 1979 to become editor of a weekly newspaper out there, I was really excited when I started getting these invitations to come to this award show, or this benefit show. I was showing up at all these eventsand seeing people that I had seen on the screen and it was, uh, really, uh, a magical moment for me.Part2Keith :The word paparazzi means “the pest” in Italian. Fellini dubbed a character who played a pesky photographer in La Dolce Vita “Paparazzo”. The roots of papa razzi photography were in Europe after World War II. The countries were all subject to many political factions who were deciding what direction their countries would go. This createdawesome political rivalries. And photographers would cover political events, knowing that they would probably turn into violent protests and they’d get newsworthy pictures and be able to sell them. Now at the same time, more and more celebrities were going to the Mediterranean, to Monte Carlo … And these photographers, who had started as political photographers, took pictures of the celebrities and their … those celebrities’ wild lives. There are financial rewards. If I got a photograph of Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt holding hands, then I’d be paid maybe $10,000. If I shot Je nnifer and Brad throwing drinks at each other, I would get $50,000. How much a photograph is worth is often determined by how negative it portrays that celebrity. When, uh, Princess Diana died, I started thinking. I had realized that the business had gone bad, that it was being motivated by money, that it was creating not artists, or even well-meaning photographers who wanted to pursue this craft, but rather, really bounty hunters.Part3Keith :I decided to use the small college town of North Hampton and go up there every Saturday night, and I put on the full uniform, photo vest, and press IDs, and I would lurk in doorways and follow people and jump out in front of them and take their picture. I’ve, you know, walked up with my camera behind me and then just pulled it out and shot it with the flash. We wanted to know what it felt like – as an everyday person, how do you like the idea that someone can take pictures of you on the street? And almost universally, people feel you shouldn’t have the right to invad e their privacy. I think, as consumers of the media, we at least have to look at ourselves occasionally and evaluate what it is we’re consuming. Because whatever we’re consuming, we’re encouraging to spread.Listening inPassage1Phil :Hello.Tony :Hello, is that Phil Taylor?Phil :Speaking.Tony :Hi, Phil, my name’s Tony, and I’m a reporter for SUN.Phil :The uni paper! I suppose you want to talk to me about the fire.Tony :Yes, if it’s OK with you. We’d like to do a piece on the fire for next week’s paper. Canyou tell people how it happened?Phil :Yeah, OK, it probably is a good idea.Tony :So when can I come and see you?Phil :Um … Wednesday afternoon? Three o’clock? I’m in South Block, Room 18.Tony :OK, I’ll be there.…Tony :OK, so let’s get started. When did the fire happen?Phil :Two days ago.Tony :November the 10th. OK, so tell me how it happened.Phil :Um … It was about 11 pm. I decided to fry some chips, I used quite a lot of oil – I wasdeep-frying. Um … And I put the chips in. And then my girlfriend rang.Tony :OK.Phil :We’d had a quarrel, and I was pretty upset, so we started talking, and I completely forgotabout the chips and went back to my room.Tony :You fool!Phil :Thanks. We talked for a quite long time. Next thing I knew, there was this smell of smoke,and someone was shouting, “Fire! Fire!” And I realized immediately of course, it was my chips! And I rushed out of my room –the kitchen was next door –and …well … there were flames all over one wall.Tony :And it was all your fault!Phil :It was. But people were in the kitchen throwing blankets over the flames, and someone had already called the fire brigade and they came – in ten minutes I think – and put it out very quickly.Tony :So what was the damage?Phil :They’re gonna to have to replace the cooker, two kitchen units, repaint one wall. Tony :Sounds pretty bad.Phil :It could have been a lot worse.Tony :Can I take a photo of you for the paper?Phil :Do you have to? Oh, OK.Tony :Thanks. It’ll be front page news.Phil :Oh dear! Haven’t you got anything else to write about?Tony :Not this week. There’s not much happening on campus. I’m joking. You’re on Page2.Phil :Thanks!Passage2Presenter:Today’s discussion is about reality TV programmes, the programmes loved by millions and hated by just as many. We have three people on our panel – Triciaa student at Liverpool University, Rick from Luton, and Karen who is a full-timemum.Panel :Hello.Presenter :So let’s begin with a very obvious question. Do you watch reality TV programmes and if so, why?Tricia :Yes, I do, I love them, I’m addicted to them, I’m afraid.Presenter :Addicted to them?Tricia :Yes, I think all my friends are really. I guess it’s just, you know, fascinating to watch real people put under a bit of pressure and then see how they behave. Presenter :That doesn’t sound very nice exactly.Tricia :No, it isn’t. But reality TV isn’t very nice actually.Presenter :Karen, how about you?Karen :Yes, well I watch them but I’m not like Tricia. I’m definitely not addicted to them.I can take them or leave them. But I do like to watch property programmes. Presenter :Property programmes?Karen :You can learn a lot from them. And it’s –it’s great to see real people buying aproperty and then doing it up, the mistakes they make, that kind of thing. And yes, you know, there’s the human interest factor as well.Presenter :Rick –Rick :I can’t stand reality TV. I mean, OK, if it’s a property programme or a gardening programme, fine, but most of them are just –they’re set up to humiliate people. Tricia :Not always.Rick :I disagree. People are on show. It’s like watching animals in a zoo. I mean, would you appear on a reality show? Tricia :Maybe. I don’t know. Probably not.Rick :There you are you see? You don’t want to be humiliated.Karen :Some people do very well on reality shows. They win a lot of money.Rick :OK, that’s true, but –standards on reality shows can be pretty low, you can’t deny it.Presenter :Tricia, what have you got to say to that?Tricia :Well, it’s true, yes.Karen :I agree with Rick.Presenter :So, next question …。
【托福听力资料】托福TPO4听力文本——Lecture 2
【托福听力资料】托福TPO4听力文本——Lecture 2众所周知,托福TPO材料是备考托福听力最好的材料。
相信众多备考托福的同学也一直在练习这套材料,那么在以下内容中我们就为大家带来托福TPO听力练习的文本,希望能为大家的备考带来帮助。
TPO 4 Lecture 2 LiteratureNarrator:Listen to part of a lecture in a literature class.Professor:All right, so let me close today’s class with some thoughts to keep in mind while you are doing tonight’s assignment. You will be reading one of Ralph Waldo Emerson’s best-known essays ‘Self-Reliance’ and comparing it with his poems and other works.I think this essay has the potential to be quite meaningful for all of you asyoung people who probably wonder about things like truth and where your lives are going - all sorts of profound questions.Knowing something about Emerson’s philosophies will help you when you read ‘Self-Reliance’. And basically, one of the main beliefs that he had was about truth. Not that it’s something that we can be taught, Emerson says it’s foundwithin ourselves. So this truth, the idea that it’s in each one of us, is one ofthe first points that you’ll see Emerson making in this essay. It’s a bit abstract but he’s very into…uh… into each person believing his or her own thought, believing in yourself, the thought or conviction that’s true for you.But actually, he ties that in with a sort of ‘universal truth’– somethingthat everyone knows but doesn’t realize they know. Most of us are in touch withourselves in a way, so we just aren’t capable of recognizing profound truth. Ittakes geniuses, people like, say, Shakespeare, who’re unique because when they have a glimpse of this truth, this universal truth, they pay attention to it and express it and don’t just dismiss it like most people do.So Emerson is really into each individual believing in and trusting him or herself. You’ll see that he writes about, well, first, conformity. He criticizes that people of his time for abandoning their own minds and their own wills for the sake of conformity and consistency. They try to fit in with the rest of the world even though it’s at odds with their beliefs and their identities.Therefore, it’s best to be a non-conformist – to do your own thing, not worrying about what other people think. That’s an important point. He really drives this argument home throughout the essay.When you are reading, I want you to think about that and why that kind of thought would be relevant to the readers of his time. Remember this is1838,‘Self-Reliance’ was a novel idea at the time and the United States citizens were less secure about themselves as individuals and as Americans. The country as a whole was trying to define itself. Emerson wanted to give people something to really think about, help them find their own way and what it meant to be who they were. So that’s something that I think is definitely as relevant today as it was then, probably, um, especially among young adults like yourselves, youknow, uh, college being a time to sort of really think about who you are andwhere you’re going.Now, we already said that Emerson really emphasizes non-conformity, right? Asa way to sort of not lose your own self and identity in the world, to have yourown truth and not be afraid to listen to it.Well, he takes this a step further. Not conforming also means, uh, notconforming with yourself or your past. What does that mean? Well, if you’ve always been a certain way or done a certain thing, but it’s not working for you any more, or you’re not content, Emerson says that it’d be foolish to beconsistent even with our own past.“Focus on the future,” he says, “That’s whatmatters more. Inconsistency is good.”He talks about a ship’s voyage and this is one of the most famous bits of the essay - how the best voyage is made up of zigzag lines. Up close, it seems a little all over the place, but from farther away, the true path shows and in the end it justifies all the turns along the way. So, don’t worry if you are not sure where you’re headed or what your long-term goals are. Stay true to yourself and it’ll make sense in the end. I mean, I can attest to that. Before I was a literature professor, I was an accountant. Before that, I was a newspaper reporter. My life is taking some pretty interesting turns and here I am, very happy with my experiences and where they’ve brought me. If you rely on yourself and trust your own talents, your own interest, don’t worry, your path will makesense in the end.。
综合写作TPO4
TPO 04(生命科学)In this set of materials, the reading passage provide three evidences for verifying that the dinosours are endotherms but the listening passage disagrees with the assertment for three reasons.The first point that the professor casts doubt on is that dinosours not neceesarily to be endotherms to survive in polar regions. The polar region was much warmer before than it is today, so even if the dinosours do not have constant body temperature, they can survive. And even though the weather was cold in polar region, the dinosour could migrate to other areas or hibernate to live on.Second, the professor argues that the legs underneath the dinosaurs' body might not be used for run, rather, they might be used for supporting weight since it is more advantageous for dinosaurs to grow large.Third, in contrary to what claimed in the reading passage, the professor asserts that the growth ring prove that the dinosours are not endotherms. She explanined that the dinosours' growth rings can indicate their growth rate. It was found that the dinosours' growth rings grew rapidly when temperature was high while grew slowly or stopped growing when weather was cooler. While the endotherms grow rapidly even in cold days.。
新托福写作真经4test13-综合写作解析
新托福写作真经4test13-综合写作解析托福综合写作是托福写作部分比较容易的部分,托福综合写作是基于托福阅读和听力的内容,总结两部分的内容进行写作。
阅读部分的内容一般是提出一个观点,然后用2-3个分论点进行论述。
听力部分最红要的就是要学会使用听力笔记。
但是,最重要的一点就是综合写作的范文中我们可以提取出来很多的万能模板。
接下来,前程百利小编为大家整理了新托福写作真经4test13部分的综合写作部分的解析,一起学习吧!第一部分:阅读文本:The bonobo is an endangered species of primates native to the area south of the Congo River in Africa. In recent years, many primatologists have begun studying the bonobo in more detail. What these researchers have learned about bonobos is that they are quite meek in temperament. This is a stark contrast to other primates, such as chimpanzees, which can be rather aggressive and violent, in nature.There is plenty of support for bonobos' gentle demeanors. Experts have studied numerous bonobos in captivity and have witnessed little evidence suggesting that they possess violent tendencies. Bonobos in captivity are typically gentle, kind, and sensitive, and zookeepers report that they experience few problems while handling them. In that regard, bonobos are different from other primates, which sometimes attack their handlers or cause other problems.Bonobos also tend to prevent their young from engaging in violent behavior. For instance, the young of many animal species frequently fight one another or engage in excessive roughhousing. This teaches them how to hunt as well as other survival techniques. However, older bonobos actively quell this behavior in younger bonobos by intervening in fights between their young. As a result, young bonobos neither learn how to fight nor develop aggressive tendencies during their formative years.Bonobos are often contrasted with their more violent cousins, the chimpanzees. Chimpanzees have been observed hunting small animals and even use rocks and sticks as weapons to attack other troops of primates. No such behavior has ever been witnessed among bonobos. Some researchers believe that the fact that bonobos are herbivores reduces any violent impulses they may possess. Since bonobos only eat vegetation, they have no need to hunt or kill anything except in self-defense. Thus they have evolved into more peaceful animals, especially when compared with chimpanzees.阅读要点:观点:These researchers have learned about bonobos is that they are quite meek in temperament. This is a stark contrast to other primates, such as chimpanzees, which can be rather aggressive and violent, in nature.研究人员发现,和其他灵长类动物(黑猩猩)相比,倭黑猩猩性情十分的温和。
TPO阅读1-34汇总【含原文翻译解析答案】
TPO阅读1-34汇总【含原文翻译解析答案】TPO1-34综合写作TPO 1 (1)1. 阅读部分 (1)2. 听力部分 (3)3. 范文赏析 (5)TPO 2 (7)1. 阅读部分 (7)2. 听力部分 (10)3. 范文赏析 (12)TPO 3 (14)1. 阅读部分 (14)2. 听力部分 (16)3. 范文赏析 (17)TPO4 (19)1. 阅读部分 (19)2. 听力部分 (20)3. 范文赏析 (22)TPO5 (24)1. 阅读部分 (24)2. 听力部分 (24)3. 范文赏析 (24)TPO6 (25)1. 阅读部分 (25)2. 听力部分 (25)3. 范文赏析 (25)TPO7 (26)1. 阅读部分 (26)2. 听力部分 (26)3. 范文赏析 (26) TPO8 (27)1. 阅读部分 (27)2. 听力部分 (27)3. 范文赏析 (27) TPO9 (28)1. 阅读部分 (28)2. 听力部分 (28)3. 范文赏析 (28) TPO10 (29)1. 阅读部分 (29)2. 听力部分 (29)3. 范文赏析 (29) TPO11 (30) 1. 阅读部分 (30) 3. 范文赏析 (30) TPO12 (31)1. 阅读部分 (31)2. 听力部分 (32)3. 范文赏析 (34) TPO13 (35)1. 阅读部分 (35)2. 听力部分 (36)3. 范文赏析 (38) TPO14 (39)1. 阅读部分 (39)2. 听力部分 (40)3. 范文赏析 (41) TPO15 (43) 1. 阅读部分 (43)3. 范文赏析 (45) TPO16 (47)1. 阅读部分 (47)2. 听力部分 (48)3. 范文赏析 (49) TPO17 (51)1. 阅读部分 (51)2. 听力部分 (52)3. 范文赏析 (54) TPO18 (55)1. 阅读部分 (55)2. 听力部分 (55)3. 范文赏析 (55) TPO19 (56)1. 阅读部分 (56)2. 听力部分 (56)3. 范文赏析 (56) TPO20 (57)1. 阅读部分 (57)2. 听力部分 (57)3. 范文赏析 (57) TPO21 (58)1. 阅读部分 (58)2. 听力部分 (58)3. 范文赏析 (58) TPO22 (59) 1. 阅读部分 (59) 3. 范文赏析 (59) TPO23 (60)2. 听力部分 (60)3. 范文赏析 (60) TPO24 (61)1. 阅读部分 (61)2. 听力部分 (61)3. 范文赏析 (61) TPO25 (62)1. 阅读部分 (62)2. 听力部分 (62)3. 范文赏析 (62) TPO26 (63)1. 阅读部分 (63)2. 听力部分 (63)3. 范文赏析 (63) TPO27 (64)1. 阅读部分 (64)2. 听力部分 (64)3. 范文赏析 (64) TPO28 (65)1. 阅读部分 (65)2. 听力部分 (65)3. 范文赏析 (65) TPO29 (66)1. 阅读部分 (66)2. 听力部分 (66)3. 范文赏析 (66) TPO30 (67)1. 阅读部分 (67)2. 听力部分 (67)3. 范文赏析 (67)TPO31 (68)1. 阅读部分 (68)2. 听力部分 (68)3. 范文赏析 (68)TPO32 (69)1. 阅读部分 (69)2. 听力部分 (70)3. 范文赏析 (70)TPO33 (71)1. 阅读部分 (71)3. 范文赏析 (71)TPO34 (72)1. 阅读部分 (72)2. 听力部分 (73)3. 范文赏析 (74)TPO 11. 阅读部分In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent) of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option.在美国,职员一般执行的一周五天,每天八小时工作制。
【威学教育】托福口语tpo4综合体听力文本
托福口语T P O41综合体听力文本TPO41Task3Nowlistentotwostudentsdiscussingtheassignment.Idon'tknowaboutthis.Whynot?Soundsokaytome.Thingis:dependingonsomeoneelsemakesmenervous.Myroommatehadtodoaprojectlike thisandtheothergirldidn'tshowuptomeetings,didn'tdoanyresearch.Myroommatehadto doeverythingherself.That'sadrag.Iguessifyourpartnerisirresponsible,youareoutofluck.Exactly.Ithurthergrade.Idon'twantthesamethingtohappentome.Rightnowl'mmore concernedwithgettingagoodgradeeventhoughIknowthat'snotthelessontheprofessorhasinmind.Still,it'llbegoodtolistentoeveryone'sstuff.Well,Idon'tknow.Imean,attheendofthesemester,peoplearefocusedonstudyingforexams.Yeah.Whohastimetoputsomethinglikethistogetherwhenthey'rebusystudying?True.Ican'timagineanyonewillbeabletoreallydoagoodjobwithit.Andeveryonewillbeso preoccupiedbythenthattheyprobablywon'tlistenanyway.Ithinktheprofessor'sgonnabe disappointed.Andstudents…well...we'llalljustbefrustratedbythewholething.Task4Nowlistentopartofalectureonthistopicinapsychologyclass.Here'sanexamplefrommyownlife.BeforeIstartedteaching,Iworkedasaresearchassistantin alaboratoryforayear.Well,duringmyveryfirstweekonthejob,Imadeasuggestiontomybossonhowwecould improvethewaywewererunninganexperiment.Mysuggestionwasagoodone.The experimentwassuccessfulandwegotgreatresults.Anyway,thatfirstweek,becauseofthatoneexperiment,mybossdecided,perhapswithouteven realizingit,hedecidedIwasagreatresearchassistantandheneverchangedhismind.Afterthat firstweek,Iwas...lwasokay,youknow,average.Iwasagoodworker,butIalsomademistakes. Everyonedoes.Butwhenevermybossintroducedmetosomeone,he'dsay,thisisJohn,ourstar researchassistant.Butaco-workerofmine,shewasn'tasfortunate,herfirstweekatthelab,shemadeabig mistakeandthelablostsomeimportantdata.Werecoveredthedata,butitcostofthelabtimeandmoney.Well,ourbossconcludedthatweekthatmyco-workerwasunreliable,incompetent. Andhecontinuedtothinkthat.But,actually,afterthatweek,sheturnedouttobeagood researchassistant,probablybetterthanme.Shemadesomeothersmallmistakes,likeIsaid, everyonedoes.Butourbossthoughtofherasunreliablecuzheonlynoticedhermistakes.Task5Nowlistentoaconversationbetweentwostudentsaboutcampushousing.Hi.Kate.Howisitgoing?Prettygood.Ijustfoundoutl'mgoingtobestayingoncampusduringthesemesterbreak. ProfessorClarkaskedmetohelphimwithsomeresearch.That'saprettybigdeal.Yeah.Iguessitis,buttheproblemis:thedormisalwaysclosed.SoIneedtofindhousingfor abouttwoweeks.Oh,that'srough.Butdidn'tyoumentionthatyouhadacoupleoffriendsthatliveinan apartmentnottoofarfromcampus?Aretheygonnabearound?Yeah.MaryandAlan.Theysaytheyaregonnastickaroundhereduringthebreak.Well,sowhydon'tyoujuststaywiththem?I'vebeenthinkingaboutaskingthem.Andtheyprobablywouldn'tchargeyouanything,right?Justforacoupleofweeks.Yeah.Probablynot.i'msurethey'dbefinewithit.Butsinceit'sbetweenclassesandtheywon't haveclassesandstuff,l'mworriedthat…You'reafraidthattheymightwanttopartytoomuch?Right.They'llbeonvacation,butl'llhavetogetupearlyinthemorningtoworkallday,sowe'llbeoncompletelydifferentschedules.Hmm...well,anotherpossibilityisthatsometimesyoucangetspecialpermissiontostayatthe dorm.Really?Youmeanthey'dletmestayinmyowndormroom?Iwouldn'thavetomove?Well,youwould,actually,becausetheyusuallyonlykeeponeofthedormsopenandit'snotthe oneyou'rein.Hmm...lwonderhowmuchtheycharge.Well,it'snotascheapasstayingwithfriends,but…Butitwouldbequieter…True.Task6Listentopartofalectureinapsychologyclass.Childrenliketoplay.Everybodyknowsthat.Whenkidsplay,theyhavefun.Butthere'smoreto playthanjusthavingfun.Playisalsoimportantifkidsaretodevelopinanemotionallyhealthy way.Fromapsychologicalperspective…well,let'stalkabouttworeasonspsychologistsbelieve playbenefitskids.First,playhelpschildrenfeelmoreincontrol.Why?Well,somepsychologistshavesuggestedthat smallchildrenoftenfeelhelpless.Theyhavetodependonotherpeople,adults,foreverything. They'vegotverylittlecontrolovertheirownlives.Parentsdecidewhentheyeat,whattheyeat, whattheywear.Thisconstantstateofdependencycanmakekidsfeeluneasyandanxious.But whenkidsplay,they'reabletocontroltheirworld ofplay.Theydecide…oh...whichtoythey're gonnaplaywithandhowthey'regonnaplaywithit.Maybetheytakesomebuildingblocksand makeabuildingoutofthem.Theyareconstructingsomethingwithnohelpatall.Soaccordingto thistheory,playinggiveschildrenasenseofbeingincontrolandtheydon'tfeelsohelpless. Andhere'sanotherwayplaycontributestohealthypsychologicaldevelopment.Itgiveschildrena safewaytoexplorecertainurges,desirestheyhave,butonesthatdon'trepresent…well...typicallyacceptablebehavior.Forexample,uh,taketheurgetobedestructive. Allkidshavethisurge,butiftheytrytoactonitandstartactuallybreakingthingsormessing thingsuparoundthehouse,theirparentswillgetupset.Butkidsarenaturallycurious.Theywant toexplorewhatit'sliketobedestructive,buttheydon'twanttheirparentstobeupsetwiththem.Sobyactingoutdestructivebehaviorsduringplay,theproblemissolvedcuzinplay,they' reallowedtobedestructive.Thinkaboutit.Thinkoftheexamplebeforewhereakidbuilds somethingoutofblocks.Isn'titreallycommontoseeakidbuildatowerorsomethingandthen justsmashitalldown?Destructiveinaway,butnoharmdone,right?。
新托福写作真经4test4-综合写作解析
新托福写作真经4test4-综合写作解析新托福写作真经4test4-综合写作解析新托福写作真经4包括24套托福写作题⽬,是在真题的基础上,筛选,重组。
所以,每⼀套托福写作题⽬都更加的详细。
也更有针对性。
正在备考托福考试的考⽣,不妨跟着前程百利⼩编⼀起来解析⼀下吧。
今天和⼤家分享的是托福写作真经4的test4的综合写作题⽬的解析。
⼀起来看⼀下吧!Reading&ListeningReadingMost people sleep every night and sometimes even during the day.One question that researchers in the field of medicine have often tried to answer is why people need sleep.It appears as though there are three reasons for this.The first is that sleep improves people’s memory functions.Next,people sleep in order to conserve energy.And,finally,people sleep to flush the body—particularly the brain—of harmful toxins.For several decades,scientists have conducted experiments focusing on sleep and memory functions. Through these experiments,they have learned that people who sleep regularly and for long enough—usually six or seven hours a night—have much better cognitive abilities and memory retention than those who fail to get enough sleep.Additionally,people who have more dreams,which occur during REM sleep,typically have better memories than those who get less REM sleep. When people sleep,their bodies are restored,and their energy is replenished.Sleep allows a person's body to repair itself while simultaneously letting it conserve energy.When a person is sleeping,his or her body uses less energy;therefore,that individual has more energy upon awaking.This helps explain why some animals,such as bears,hibernate:They can survive on little stored energy for a long period of time.Experiments conducted on humans have proven that,after prolonged periods of sleep,their brains have fewer toxins than when they were awake.By cleansing the brain of toxins,people can think more clearly.Moreover,after getting sufficient sleep,they feel more refreshed upon waking.This permits people to engage in everyday functions with a clearmind.Contrarily,the less sleep a person gets,the more toxins remain in that individual’s brain.As a result,the person is both fuzzy headed and less productive.阅读要点:观点:⼈们为什么要睡觉,有三个原因。
托福TPO4口语Task6题目文本及答案解析
托福TPO4口语Task6题目文本及答案解析TPO对于我们的托福备考特别有用,大家还在苦于找不到资料吗?下面我给大家带来托福TPO4口语Task6题目文本及答案解析,期望可以帮忙到你们。
托福TPO4口语task6题目 Listening Part:Listen to part of a talk in an Art Appreciation class.Professor (female)In order for art to communicate, to appeal to the emotions or the intellect, it has to combine various visual elements to express meaning or emotion. It’s really the visual components of the work, things like color, texture, shape, lines and how these elements work together that tell us something about the work.Artists combine and manipulate these visual elements to express a message or to create a mood. Think about how a painter might use colors, for example. You all know from experience that different colors appeal in different ways to the senses and can convey different meanings. An artist chooses certain colors to evoke a particular mood and make powerful statements. The color red, for example, is a strong color, and can conjure up strong emotions such as extreme joy or excitement or even anger. Blue, on the other hand, is considered a cool color. Blue colors tend to have a calming effect on viewers.Another visual element important to art is texture. By texture I mean surface quality or feel of the work, its smoothness or roughness or softness. Now, of course, in some types of art the texture is physical. It can be actually be touched by the fingers. But in painting, for example, texture can be visual. The way an artist paints certain areas of the painting can create the illusion of texture, an object’s smoothness or roughness or softness. A rough texture can evoke stronger emotions and strength while a smooth texture is more calming and less emotional.As I said earlier, artists often combine elements to convey a message about the work. Take a painting that, say, uses a lot of strong colors like reds and oranges and uses brush stokes that are broad, wide sweeping brush strokes that suggest a rough texture.Well, these elements together can convey a wilder more chaotic emotion in the viewer than, more than say a painting with tiny, smooth brush strokes and soft or pale colors. Artists use these visual effects and the senses they arouse to give meaning to their work.托福TPO4口语task6 答案解析:Using points and examples from the lecture, explain the importance of visual elements in painting.托福TPO4口语task6 答案解析:1. Listening key(1.1) Main idea: how artists use color and texture to express emotions(1.2) Color(1.2.1) Color red: strong emotions like joy or excitement(1.2.2) Color blue: ease and comfort(1.3) Texture(1.3.1) Rough texture: strong emotions and strength(1.3.2) Fine texture: less emotional(1.4) Combined(1.4.1) Red+ wide brush strokes: chaotic and wild(1.4.2) Pale color+ smooth brush strokes: peaceful emotions托福TPO4口语task6 (范文):In the lecture, the professor talks about how artists use two elements to express meaning or emotions. The first is color. For example, the color red can express strong emotions and powerful statement, such as extreme joy or excitement, even anger. A calming color such as blue would give the viewer the feeling of ease and comfort. The other element is texture. Whenusing rough texture, artists can evoke strong emotions and strength, while a smooth texture is less emotional. They can work together too. For example, a wide, rough brush stroke combined with red or orange creates the feeling of chaotic and wild. While a tiny, smooth brush stroke and soft color can express peaceful emotions.托福TPO4口语Task6题目文本及答案解析文档内容到此结束,欢迎大家下载、修改、丰富并分享给更多有需要的人。
精品文档新#托福写作真经4test13-综合写作解析
新托福写作真经4test13-综合写作解析托福综合写作是托福写作部分比较容易的部分,托福综合写作是基于托福阅读和听力的内容,总结两部分的内容进行写作。
阅读部分的内容一般是提出一个观点,然后用2-3个分论点进行论述。
听力部分最红要的就是要学会使用听力笔记。
但是,最重要的一点就是综合写作的范文中我们可以提取出来很多的万能模板。
接下来,前程百利小编为大家整理了新托福写作真经4test13部分的综合写作部分的解析,一起学习吧!第一部分:阅读文本:The bonobo is an endangered species of primates native to the area south of the Congo River in Africa. In recent years, many primatologists have begun studying the bonobo in more detail. What these researchers have learned about bonobos is that they are quite meek in temperament. This is a stark contrast to other primates, such as chimpanzees, which can be rather aggressive and violent, in nature.There is plenty of support for bonobos' gentle demeanors. Experts have studied numerous bonobos in captivity and have witnessed little evidence suggesting that they possess violent tendencies. Bonobos in captivity are typically gentle, kind, and sensitive, and zookeepers report that they experience few problems while handling them. In that regard, bonobos are different from other primates, which sometimes attack their handlers or cause other problems.Bonobos also tend to prevent their young from engaging in violent behavior. For instance, the young of many animal species frequently fight one another or engage in excessive roughhousing. This teaches them how to hunt as well as other survival techniques. However, older bonobos actively quell this behavior in younger bonobos by intervening in fights between their young. As a result, young bonobos neither learn how to fight nor develop aggressive tendencies during their formative years.Bonobos are often contrasted with their more violent cousins, the chimpanzees. Chimpanzees have been observed hunting small animals and even use rocks and sticks as weapons to attack other troops of primates. No such behavior has ever been witnessed among bonobos. Some researchers believe that the fact that bonobos are herbivores reduces any violent impulses they may possess. Since bonobos only eat vegetation, they have no need to hunt or kill anything except in self-defense. Thus they have evolved into more peaceful animals, especially when compared with chimpanzees.阅读要点:观点:These researchers have learned about bonobos is that they are quite meek in temperament. This is a stark contrast to other primates, such as chimpanzees, which can be rather aggressive and violent, in nature.研究人员发现,和其他灵长类动物(黑猩猩)相比,倭黑猩猩性情十分的温和。
新通用大学英语综合教程第四册听力及答案 Unit 4
Unit 4 Looking GoodUnit Goals1. Discuss appropriate dress2. Comment on fashion and style3. Evaluate ways to change one’s appearance4. Describe what makes a person beautiful5. Write a description of peopleLesson 1Lead-inTV Documentary: Selling Them ShortA. The report mentions some problems short men face. What are they?buying clothes, getting a date, seeing around people in elevators, seeing a movie screen, driving carsB. Use words from the box to complete the statement. You will not use all of the words.1. mature and respected2. submissive, childish, weakVideo ScriptLynn Sherr: Imagine a world where nothing fits. Where pants are too long.Craig: The crotches are down to here, the seat’s down to here, the pants are up to there.Lynn Sherr: Where elevators are filled with giants.Rob: You kind of get cramped. And you know, it’s kind of hard to breathe sometimes.Lynn Sherr: Where driving a car means your feet don’t reach the pedals.David: You have to fumble down here, and some have bars underneath and some have these little electronic things on the side you have to figure out.Lynn Sherr: And where you can’t see the movie screen, let alone find a date to there.lst woman: I don’t care hair color, eye color, skin color-they need to be tall. Sorry.Lynn Sherr: Welcome to the world of short men. Ralph Keyes, 5’7”, wrote a book about height.Ralph Keyes: We just assume anybody we’re looking up to has power…has power over us.Lynn Sherr: We put Chris and Debbie, colleagues here at ABC News, in front of our camera, posing at different heights. Half the shots showed Chris as the tallerof the pair.Chris: The air’s kind of thin up here.Lynn Sherr: In the other half, Debbie was taller. Then we gave the photos to students at Fairleigh Dickinson University, and asked them to tell us a story about whatwas going on. When Chris was taller, the adjectives used to describe himwere mature and respected. When Chris was shorter than Debbie, theycalled him submissive, childish, weak. Andrea McGinty, who runs a datingservice in Chicago, knows all the tricks. We asked her to help us constructan experiment to test just how willing women are to date shorter men. Andwe found three brave volunteers. Stu is the shortest. How tall are you?Stu: I’m 5 foot. And 5’5” with the Afro.Lynn Sherr: Rob is 5’3”. He prefers taller women.Rob: I kind of enjoy it. I mean, I think there are some serious advantages to being a little bit, having a woman who’s a little bit taller.Lynn Sherr: David is getting married this fall.David: She is 5 feet tall.Lynn Sherr: And you are?David: I am 5’6”.Lynn Sherr: Oh, well.David: Giant, right.Lynn Sherr: We recruited other men about the same age as David, Stu, and Rob, but taller.We asked them all to dress in jeans and a sweater, then we did somethingcruel. We put them in lineups, five at a time, behind a two-way mirror. Themen couldn’t see or hear what was going on in the next room. That’s wherewe invited groups of women to look at the men and choose a date. In thiscase, we wanted to see if anyone would pick 5’3” Rob. When Andrea told uswomen like doctors, we gave him an M.D. Their choice?2nd woman: Anderw.3rd woman: I would say, Matt.Lynn Sherr: No, Rob. We piled on some more assets. We said, besides being a doctor, he was also a best–selling author and champion skier who just built his own skihouse.Andrea McGinty: Does that affect your choices?4th woman: He’s still short.Lynn Sherr: Then we gave Rob a promotion. We made him chief of at a prestigious hospital.Andrea McGinty: Who would you pick, Kim?5th woman: Andrew’s probably the closest to who I’d pick.6th woman: I’d pick Matt.7th woman: Jeffrey, the pilot.Lynn Sherr: What would it take? Now, we said Rob was also a gourmet cook who loves children.8th woman: Oh, definitely I would take him in a minute, then. Height, no problem.7th woman: I wouldn’t, because I would think I don’t want short, little kids. I was thinking that!Lynn Sherr: Well, at least someone liked Rob. But if it was this harsh for him at 5’3”, what would it take to get a date for Stu at just 5 feet?ListeningPart 1A. Sound BitesRead and listen to a conversation between a couple about dressing up and dressing down.Teaching Suggestions●Have students look only at the photos. Ask:What’s the man wearing in the first photo? (a suit and tie)What’s he wearing in the second one? (jeans and a T-shirt)Where do you think the people are going?●Say You are going to hear a conversation about dressing up and dressing down. AskWhat do you dressing up and dressing down mean?●Have students read and listen to the conversationLanguage note: Students may need help with the following words or expressions:T39B. Pair WorkUse the following words to tell the story of what happened in the conversation. Teaching suggestions●To check comprehension of the words in the box, ask:In which photo is Paul wearing formal clothing? (the first)In which is he wearing casual clothing? (the second)In which photo is Paul overdressed? (the first) Why?Why is he underdressed in the second photo?●In pairs, have students tell the story of what happened in the conversation using thewords in the box.●Circulate to offer help with the new words as needed.●To review, have a volunteer tell the story to the class.Part 2Evaluate Ways to C hange One’s AppearanceA. Listening ComprehensionListen to Part 1 of a radio program about men’s hairstyles. Then read the statements and listen again. Complete the statements, according to the information in the program.1. a2. b3. aScript T44Part 1 [C = Chuck Sims, host; S = Susan Yiga1, Australia]C: Chuck Sims here, and you’re listening to In Style. T oday we welcome Susan Yiga1, a hairstylist who does a lot of work for the film industry. Susan has won numerous awards for her beautiful work.S: Oh, thanks.C: Susan, I love your work. So many movies. So many gorgeous actors.S: Thank you, Chuck. Great to be here.C: Susan is an expert on the history of hairstyles, and today we’re going to focus on men’s hairstyles. Susan, tell us something about how men’s hairstyles changed in the twentieth century.S: Absolutely. But before I do, let’s not forget some of the styles that were in fashion before the twentieth century. Remember that back in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, among the European upper classes, the wig was a fashion must. Everyone wore one.C: Think wigs will ever come back?S: These days, you never know. Do you know why they became so fashionable?C: Not really.S: Well, you see, in the seventeenth century, King Louis XIV of France was going bald –so he had a staff of about forty wig makers working on long curly wigs for him to wear. C: Forty wig makers!S: Yes. And of course it then became the rage for all men to wear long curly wigs – until the nineteenth century. At that time, the style changed, and men stopped wearing wigs by the beginning of the nineteenth century. After that, they generally wore their own hair fair fairly long, and most men wore very long beards or sideburns.C: Which we see in some of the very early photos from that time.S: Right. But by the early twentieth century, that had changed. The norm for men was to wear their hair cut very, very short. And beards were something only grandfathers wore.If a man wore a mustache at all, it was cut very short.C: Until the 1960s and’70s, of course.S: Of course.B. Read the following statements and listen to Part 2 again. Complete the statements, according to the information in the program.1. b2. a3. cScriptPart 2S: By the 1960s, in Europe and throughout the Americas, men began to wear their hair long, and they grew beards and mustaches – pretty much as a protest against decades of what they saw as a very conservative culture.C: I remember that.S: At that time there had been an unwritten fashion code that said any man who didn’t wearhis hair very short – or who had a beard – was a radical.C: That’s hard to believe today.S: But that’s how it was. In the UK and the U.S., rock musicians led the way with hair, and mustaches seeming to get longer each year.C: Men today don’t always realize what an incredible change that was. Isn’t that true?S: Absolutely. How a man wore his hair was a social and political statement. But today,men’s hair fashions are all over the place –which was certainly not true back then.Men can wear their hair either long or short. Anything goes.C: Ponytails. Braids.S: Yup. A short beard or moustache.C: The goatee has been the beard of choice for a number of years now.S: And, of course, the bald look has become very popular now. Who would have thought twenty years ago that men would actually choose to shave off all their hair! No way! C: Any other trends worth looking at?S: Well, we haven’t said anything yet about men dyeing their hair. Over the last decade some men have chosen to dye their hair bright blond, red, yellow –even green or purple.C: Yeah, as a matter of fact, I saw that last time I was in Tokyo.S: That’s right. I’ve heard that in Japan this is a kind of social statement in response to strict school dress codes.C: Well, thank you, Susan, for … ahem … letting your hair down about a very interesting subject.S: Good one, Chuck. Thanks for having me.Teaching suggestionsStep 1Have a volunteer read the statements and answer choices out loud. If necessary, explain the meanings of unfamiliar terms.Step 2Review answers as a class.Step 3To have students support their choices, ask What were man protesting against when they changed their hairstyles? What would it have been considered eccentric? Why do they want to express their individuality?Option:Form small groups. To personalize the activity, have male students tell their group members which styles they have worn or would like to wear.C. DiscussionDo you agree with the hair stylist that “anything goes” today for men’s hairstyles? Are there any hairstyles that you really don’t like on a man? Do you think men’s hairstyles have improved or gotten worse in recent times?Teaching suggestionsStep 1To prepare for the discussion, have students look at the photos depicting hairstyles and decide which they like and which they don’t like on a man.Step 2Have students discuss the questions in small groups.Step 3To review, take a class poll. With a show of hands, determine which hairstyles depicted inthe photos are the least popular on a man. Then have students vote on whether they think hairstyles have improved or gotten worse in recent times. Write the results on the board. Step 4To finish, have volunteers summarize the results of the poll.SpeakingComment on Fashion and StyleA. Conversation snapshotTeaching SuggestionsStep 1Before students read and listen, have them look at the photo. Ask What do the man’s clothes say about him? (Possible response: that he likes fashion; that he wants to attract attention)Step 2After students read and listen, check comprehension by asking What does the first woman think about what the man is wearing?What does the second woman think? (that the man is in style; that his shirt is loud.)Language note:Check out is used in spoken English to tell someone to look at someone or something. Can you believe……? Shows you are surprised or shocked by something.Rhythm and Intonation PracticeTeaching SuggestionsHave students repeat chorally.B. VocabularyDescribing fashion and style. Listen and practice.Teaching SuggestionsStep 1Have students listen to the words and study the definitions. Then have students listen and repeat chorally.Step 2Say Use words that are informal (hot, tacky, flashy) with friends or other people you know well.Step 3To provide practice, have pairs use the words or phrases to give their own opinions of the clothes the man in the conversation snapshot picture is wearing.C. Listening ComprehensionListen to the conversations about fashion and style. Choose the adjective that best summarizes each speaker’s point of view.1. a 2. b 3. c 4. a 5. aScriptConversation 1F1: What magazine are you reading?F2: Metropolitan. Want to have a look?F1: Do you mind?F2: Not at all.F1: These purses are fantastic!F2: Which ones? Oh yeah. Everybody’s getting those now.F1: I’ve got to have one.F2: Better hurry before they go out of style!Conversation 2M1: Hey, Jim.M2: Hey, Carl. Whoa! That’s some jacket you’ve got on.M1: Oh, Yeah. It’s my “Look at me” jacket.M2: It’s very … yellow.M1: Hey, Yellow gets attention.M2: Ok, if you say so.Conversation 3F1: Oh, look at that. I don’t believe it.F2: Where?F1: That kid over there. What on earth on earth has she done to her hair?What is she, thirteen?F2: Sounds about right. Oh, that hair!F1: I just can’t believe it.F2: Me neither.Conversation 4 [M2 = U.S., New York]M1: Mr. Spano! How can I help you today?M2: I want to get my wife something nice, you know, for her birthday.M1: Of course! What did you have in mind?M2: Well, actually I was thinking about-I don’t know-a nice dress.M1: Oh, I see! Are you thinking about a party dress?M2: Sounds good.M1: May I suggest this simple black silk dress?M2: Hmm, nice. very tasteful.M1: Very nice. I think your wife will find it very attractive.M2: Yeah, I like it very much. But I want to look around and see what else you’ve got.Conversation 5 [F2 = U.S., Midwest]F1: Stac y, thanks so much for coming over to help. You’re a real friend.F2: Hey, I understand. It’s hard to clean out your closet alone.F1: Ok. Let’s start with this blouse.F2: All right then. Hold it up so I can see it … Whoa!When did you get that?F1: Must have been a bout … oh, maybe eight years ago.F2: Uh, think that one can go.F1: Toss it?F2: Yup. No one’s wearing that anymore.ReadingText ABackground Information 少Key Words and Expressionsdevious adj.不正当的Achieve success by devious means or get rich by devious ways.Let's take the devious route home to avoid the crowds in the main roads. groom v.使整洁Jack groomed himself carefully in front of the mirror.Xiao Liu cares for hisr appearance and often well groomed.offensive 攻击性的The offensive troops gained ground quickly.The general led a massive military offensive attack.conservative adj.保守的The president always wears a conservative dark suit. We agree with the conservative use of natural resources.Subdue v. 1.克制Subdued my excitement about the upcoming holiday.2.开垦Farmers subdued the arid lands of Australia.self-confidence 自信Without self-confidence we are as babes in the cradle.Jenny showed her self-confidence in fighting against the illegal affairs.. Teaching Suggestions 少Reference Translation从骇人听闻到引人注目纹身获得认同正如时尚的此起彼伏,穿着打扮的标准也在继续改变。
tpo4task真题及答案解析
tpo4task真题及答案解析TPO (Test of English for International Communication) is a widely recognized English proficiency test that measures an individual's ability to communicate effectively in English in a variety of real-life situations. TPO 4 is one of the practice tests available for test takers to familiarize themselves with the format and content of the actual exam. In this article, we will provide an analysis of TPO 4, including the task types and sample answers.TPO 4 consists of three sections: Listening, Reading, and Speaking. In the Listening section, test takers are required to listen to a variety of audio recordings and answer multiple-choice questions based on the content. The topics covered in TPO 4 include academic lectures, conversations, and discussions. It is essential to practice active listening and pay attention to the details in order to answer the questions correctly.Moving on to the Reading section, test takers are presented with academic passages and must answer multiple-choice questions and complete summaries based on the information provided. The passages in TPO 4 cover various subjects such as biology, sociology, and anthropology. It is crucial to develop effective reading strategies such as skimming, scanning, and making use of context clues to comprehend the passages and answer the questions accurately.In the Speaking section of TPO 4, test takers are given prompts and are required to provide spoken responses. They must express their opinions, provide reasons, and support their responses with relevant examples. This section assesses the ability to communicate fluently and coherently in spoken English. It is essential to organize thoughts and ideas before responding and to speak clearly and confidently.Now let's delve into the analysis of the answers for some of the tasks in TPO 4:In the Listening section, there is a task where test takers need to listen to a conversation between two students discussing a course project. The question asks about the purpose of the project. The correct answer is that the purpose is to apply what they have learned in the course. The students mention that the project is a requirement for the course and that they need to demonstrate their understanding of the concepts by applying them in a practical project. Therefore, choosing this option demonstrates a thorough understanding of the conversation.In the Reading section, there is a passage about the “tragedy of the commons.” The passage explains how the overuse and depletion of common resources occur due to individuals pursuing their self-interests. The question asks for the definition of the tragedy of the commons. The correct answer is that it is the degradation of shared resources due to individual exploitation. The passage highlights that when individuals have access to shared resources, they tend to exploit them for their own benefit, leading to depletion.Therefore, selecting this option demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the passage.In the Speaking section, there is a prompt asking test takers about their favorite kind of music. When responding,it is important to provide a clear opinion and support it with relevant examples. A sample response could be: "My favorite kind of music is classical. I find it soothing and relaxing, especially after a long day. I enjoy listening to symphonies by Beethoven and Mozart. The intricate melodies and harmonies transport me to another world and help me unwind. Additionally, classical music has been proven to enhance concentration and cognitive abilities, which is an added benefit. Overall, I find classical music to be a timeless and enriching genre."In conclusion, TPO 4 is a valuable resource for test takers preparing for the TPO exam. By analyzing the tasks and providing sample answers, individuals can gain a deeper understanding of the format and content of the test. It is essential to practice actively listening, develop effective reading strategies, and communicate fluently in spoken English to perform well on the exam. Remember to approach each task with focus and concentration, and to utilize the skills and techniques acquired during preparation. Good luck!。
考满分出品 TPO 综合写作阅读及听力文本
TPO综合写作阅读及听力文本校对:王子睿杨小飞TPO1[Reading Passage]In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent) of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option.The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring more staff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, which would increase company profits.For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate.Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure activities.[Lecture]Professor:Offering employees the option of a four-day workweek won't affect the company profits, economic conditions or the lives of employees in the ways the reading suggests.First, offering a four-day workweek will probably force companies to spend more, possibly a lot more. Adding new workers means putting much more money into providing training and medical benefits. Remember the costs of things like health benefits can be the same whether an employee works four days or five. And having more employees also requires more office space and more computers. These additional costs would quickly cut into company profits.Second, with respect to overall employment, it doesn't follow that once some employees choose a four-day workweek, many more jobs will become available. Hiring new workers is costly, as I argued a moment ago. And companies have other options. They might just choose to ask theiremployees to work overtime to make up the difference. Worse, companies might raise expectations. They might start to expect that their four-day employees can do the same amount of work they used to do in five days. If this happens, then no additional jobs will be created and current jobs will become more unpleasant.Finally, while a four-day workweek offers employees more free time to invest in their personal lives, it also presents some risks that could end up reducing their quality of life. Working a shorter week can decrease employees' job stability and harm their chances for advancing their careers. Four-day employees are likely to be the first to lose their jobs during an economic downturn. They may also be passed over for promotions because companies might prefer to have five-day employees in management positions to ensure continuous coverage and consistent supervision for the entire workweek.TPO2[Reading Passage]In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages.First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge,expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to “shine”, to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team’s overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.[Lecture]ProfessorNow I want to tell you about what one company found when it decided that it would turn over some of its new projects to teams of people, and make the team responsible for planning the projects and getting the work done. After about six months, the company took a look at how well the teams performed.On virtually every team, some members got almost a "free ride" . . . they didn't contribute muchat all, but if their team did a good job, they nevertheless benefited from the recognition the team got. And what about group members who worked especially well and who provided a lot of insight on problems and issues? Well . . . the recognition for a job well done went to the group as a whole, no names were named. So it won't surprise you to learn that when the real contributors were asked how they felt about the group process, their attitude was just the opposite of what the reading predicts.Another finding was that some projects just didn't move very quickly. Why? Because it took so long to reach consensus; it took many, many meetings to build the agreement among group members about how they would move the project along.On the other hand, there were other instances where one or two people managed to become very influential over what their group did. Sometimes when those influencers said "That will never work" about an idea the group was developing, the idea was quickly dropped instead of being further discussed.And then there was another occasion when a couple influencers convinced the group that a plan of theirs was "highly creative." And even though some members tried to warn the rest of the group that the project was moving in directions that might not work, they were basically ignored by other group members. Can you guess the ending to this story? When the project failed, the blame was placed on all the members of the group.TPO3[Reading]Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt.First, there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed. She is wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear-yet the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. Rembrandt, who was known for his attention to the details of his subjects’ clothing, would not have been guilty of such an inconsistency.Second, Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting these elements do not fit together. The face appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below. But below the face is the dark fur collar, which would absorb light rather than reflect it. So the face should appear partially in shadow-which is not how it appears. Rembrandt would never have made such an error.Finally, examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made ofseveral pieces of wood glued together. Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood. For these reasons the painting was removed from the official catalog of Rembrandt’s paintings in the 1930s.[Lecture]ProfessorEverything you just read about "Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet" is true, and yet after a thorough re-examination of the painting, a panel of experts has recently concluded that it's indeed a work by Rembrandt. Here is why.First, the fur collar. X-rays and analysis of the pigments in the paint have shown that the fur collar wasn't part of the original painting. The fur collar was painted over the top of the original painting about a hundred years after the painting was made. Why? Someone probably wanted to increase the value of the painting by making it look like a formal portrait of an aristocratic lady.Second, the supposed error with light and shadow. Once the paint of the added fur color was removed, the original painting could be seen, in the original painting, the woman is wearing a simple collar of light-colored cloth. The light-colored cloth of this collar reflects light that illuminates part of the woman's face. That's why the face is not in partial shadow. So in the original painting, light and shadow are very realistic and just what we would expect from Rembrandt.Finally, the wood panel. It turns out that when the fur collar was added, the wood panel was also enlarged with extra wood pieces glued to the sides and the top to make the painting more grand and more valuable. So the original painting is actually painted on a single piece of wood, as would be expected from a Rembrandt painting. And in fact, researchers have found that the piece of wood in the original form of "Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet" is from the very same tree as the wood panel used for another painting by Rembrandt, his "Self-portrait with a Hat".TPO4[Reading]Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs were reptiles, and modern reptiles are not endotherms, it was long assumed that dinosaurs were not endotherms. However, dinosaurs differ in many ways from modem reptiles, and there is now considerable evidence that dinosaurs were, in fact, endotherms.Polar dinosaursOne reason for believing that dinosaurs were endotherms is that dinosaur fossils have beendiscovered in Polar Regions. Only animals that can maintain a temperature well above that of the surrounding environment could be active in such cold climates.Leg position and movementThere is a connection between endothermy and the position and movement of the legs. The physiology of endothermy allows sustained physical activity, such as running. But running is efficient only if an animal's legs are positioned underneath its body, not at the body's sides, as they are for crocodiles and many lizards. The legs of all modern endotherms are underneath the body, and so were the legs of dinosaurs. This strongly suggests that dinosaurs were endotherms.Haversian canalsThere is also a connection between endothermy and bone structure. The bones of endotherms usually include structures called Haversian canals. These canals house nerves and blood vessels that allow the living animal to grow quickly, and rapid body growth is in fact a characteristic of endothermy. The presence of Haversian canals in bone is a strong indicator that the animal is an endotherm, and fossilized bones of dinosaurs are usually dense with Haversian canals.[Lecture]ProfessorMany scientists have problems with the arguments you read in the passage. They don't think those arguments prove that dinosaurs were endotherms.Take the polar dinosaur argument. When dinosaurs lived, even the Polar Regions, where dinosaur fossils have been found, were much warmer than today, warm enough during part of the year for animals that were not endotherms to live. And during the months when the Polar Regions were cold, the so-called polar dinosaurs could have migrated to warmer areas or hibernated like many modern reptiles do. So the presence of dinosaur fossils in Polar Regions doesn't prove the dinosaurs were endotherms.Well, what about the fact that dinosaurs have their legs placed under their bodies, not out to the side like crocodiles? That doesn't necessarily mean dinosaurs were high-energy endotherms built for running. There is another explanation for having legs under the body. This body structure supports more weight, so with the legs under their bodies, dinosaurs can grow to a very large size. Being large had advantages for dinosaurs, so we don't need the idea of endothermy and running to explain why dinosaurs evolved to have their legs under their bodies.Ok, so how about bone structure? Many dinosaur bones do have Haversian canals, that's true. The dinosaur bones also have growth rings. Growth rings are thickening of the bone that indicates periods of time when the dinosaurs weren't rapidly growing. These growth rings are evidence that dinosaurs stopped growing or grew more slowly during cooler periods. This pattern of periodic growth, you know, rapid growth followed by no growth or slow growth, and then rapid growth again, is characteristic of animals that are not endotherms. Animals that maintain a constant body temperature year-round as true endotherms do grow rapidly even when theenvironment becomes cool.TPO5[Reading]As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses", massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeologists have been trying to determine how the buildings were used. While there is still no universally agreed upon explanation, there are three competing theories.One theory holds that the Chaco structures were purely residential, with each housing hundreds of people. Supporters of this theory have interpreted Chaco great houses as earlier versions of the architecture seen in more recent Southwest societies. In particular, the Chaco houses appear strikingly similar to the large, well-known "apartment buildings" at Taos, New Mexico, in which many people have been living for centuries.A second theory contends that the Chaco structures were used to store food supplies. One of the main crops of the Chaco people was grain maize, which could be stored for long periods of time without spoiling and could serve as a long-lasting supply of food. The supplies of maize had to be stored somewhere, and the size of the great houses would make them very suitable for the purpose.A third theory proposes that houses were used as ceremonial centers. Close to one house, called Pueblo Alto, archaeologists identified an enormous mound formed by a pile of old material. Excavations of the mound revealed deposits containing a surprisingly large number of broken pots. This finding has been interpreted as evidence that people gathered at Pueblo Alto for special ceremonies. At the ceremonies, they ate festive meals and then discarded the pots in which the meals had been prepared or served. Such ceremonies have been documented for other Native American cultures.[Lecture]ProfessorUnfortunately none of the arguments about what the Chaco great houses were used for is convincing.First, sure, from the outside, the great houses look like later and Native American apartment buildings, but the inside of the great houses casts serious doubt on the idea that many people lived there. I'll explain. If hundreds of people were living in the great houses, then there would have to be many fireplaces, where each family did its daily cooking, but there are very few fireplaces. In one of the largest great houses, there were fireplaces for only around ten families. Yet there were enough rooms in the great house for more than a hundred families, so the primary function of the houses couldn't have been residential.Second, the idea that the great houses were used to store grain maize is unsupported by evidence. It may sound plausible that large empty rooms were used for storage, but excavations of the great houses have not uncovered many traces of maize or maize containers. If the great houses were used for storage, why isn't there more spilled maize on the floor? Why aren't there more remains of big containers?Third, the idea that the great houses were ceremonial centers isn't well supported either. You know that mound at Pueblo Alto? It contains lots of other materials besides broken pots, stuff you wouldn't expect from ceremonies. For example, there are large quantities of building materials, sands, stones, even construction tools. This suggests that the mound is just a trash heap of construction material, stuff that was thrown away or not used up when a house was being built. The pots in the pile could be regular trash too, leftover from the meals of the construction workers. So the Pueblo Alto mound is not good evidence that the great houses were used for special ceremonies.TPO 6[Reading]Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, however, is that any Internet user can contribute a new article or make an editorial change in an existing one. As a result, the encyclopedia is authored by the whole community of Internet users. The idea might sound attractive, but the communal online encyclopedias have several important problems that make them much less valuable than traditional, printed encyclopedias.First, contributors to a communal online encyclopedia often lack academic credentials, thereby making their contributions partially informed at best and downright inaccurate in many cases. Traditional encyclopedias are written by trained experts who adhere to standards of academic rigor that nonspecialists cannot really achieve.Second, even if the original entry in the online encyclopedia is correct, the communal nature of these online encyclopedias gives unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers the opportunity to fabricate, delete, and corrupt information in the encyclopedia. Once changes have been made to the original text, an unsuspecting user cannot tell the entry has been tampered with. None of this is possible with a traditional encyclopedia.Third, the communal encyclopedias focus too frequently, and in too great a depth, on trivial and popular topics, which creates a false impression of what is important and what is not. A child doing research for a school project may discover that a major historical event receives as much attention in an online encyclopedia as, say, a single long-running television program. The traditional encyclopedia provides a considered view of what topics toinclude or exclude and contains a sense of proportion that online "democratic" communal encyclopedias do not.[Lecture]Professor:The communal online encyclopedia will probably never be perfect, but that's a small price to pay for what it does offer. The criticisms in the reading are largely the result of prejudice against and ignorance about how far online encyclopedias have come.First, errors. It's hardly a fair criticism that encyclopedias online have errors. Traditional encyclopedias have never been close to perfectly accurate. If you are looking for a really comprehensive reference work without any mistakes, you are not going to find it, on or off line. The real point is that it's easy for errors in factual material to be corrected in an online encyclopedia. But with the printed and bound encyclopedia, the errors remain for decades.Second, hacking. Online encyclopedias have recognized the importance of protecting their articles from malicious hackers. One strategy they started using is to put the crucial facts in the articles that nobody disputes in a read-only format, which is a format that no one can make changes to. That way you are making sure that the crucial facts in the articles are reliable. Another strategy that's being used is to have special editors whose job is to monitor all changes made to the articles and eliminate those changes that are clearly malicious.Third, what's worth knowing about? The problem for traditional encyclopedias is that they have limited space, so they have to decide what's important and what's not. And in practice, the judgments of the group of academics that make these decisions don't reflect the great range of interests that people really have. But space is definitely not an issue for online encyclopedias. The academic articles are still represented in online encyclopedias, but there can be a great variety of articles and topics that accurately reflect the great diversity of users' interests. The diversity of use in topics that online encyclopedias offer is one of their strongest advantages.TPO7[Reading]In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that receive this certification can attract customers by advertising their products as eco-certified. Around the world, many wood companies have adopted new, ecologically friendly practices in order to receive eco-certification. However, it is unlikely that wood companies in the United States will do the same, for several reasons.First, American consumers are exposed to so much advertising that they would not value or even pay attention to the eco-certification label. Because so many mediocre products are labeled 'new" or improved,'' American consumers do not place much trust in advertising claims in general.Second, eco-certified wood will be more expensive than uncertified wood because in order to earn eco-certification, a wood company must pay to have its business examined by a certification agency. This additional cost gets passed on to consumers. American consumers tend to be strongly motivated by price, and therefore they are likely to choose cheaper uncertified wood products. Accordingly, American wood companies will prefer to keep their prices low rather than obtain eco-certificationThird, although some people claim that it always makes good business sense for American companies to keep up with the developments in the rest of the world, this argument is not convincing. Pursuing certification would make sense for American wood companies only if they marketed most of their products abroad. But that is not the case—American wood businesses sell most of their products in the United States, catering to a very large customer base that is satisfied with the merchandise.[Listening]Well, despite what many people say, there is good reason to think that many American wood companies will eventually seek eco-certification for their wood products.First off, consumers in the United States don't treat all advertising the same. They distinguish between advertising claims that companies make about their own products and claims made by independent certification agencies. Americans have a lot of confidence in independent consumer agencies. Thus, ecologically-minded Americans are likely to react very favorably to wood products ecologically certified by an independent organization with an international reputation for trustworthiness.Second point, of course it’s true that American consumers care a lot about price, who doesn't? But studies of how consumers make decisions show that price alone determines consumers' decisions only when the price of one competing product is much higher or lower than another. When the price difference between two products is small, say, less than 5 percent, as is the case with certified wood, Americans often do choose on factors other than price. And Americans are becoming increasingly convinced of the value of preserving and protecting the environment.And third, US Wood companies should definitely pay attention to what’s going on in the wood business internationally. Not because of foreign consumers but because of foreign competition. As I just told you, there is a good chance that many American consumers will be interested in eco-certified products, and guess what? If American companies are slow capturing those customers, you can be sure that foreign companies will soon start crowding into the American market, offering eco-certified wood that domestic companies don't.TPO8[Reading]Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recountinghis life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has become a valuable historical source about European society in the eighteenth century. However, some critics have raised doubts about the accuracy of the memoir. They claim that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the memoir to make his life seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was.For example, in his memoir the Chevalier claims that while living in Switzerland, he was very wealthy, and it is known that he spent a great deal of money there on parties and gambling. However, evidence has recently surfaced that the Chevalier borrowed considerable sums of money from a Swiss merchant. Critics thus argue that if the Chevalier had really been very rich, he would not have needed to borrow money.Critics are also skeptical about the accuracy of the conversations that the Chevalier records in the memoir between himself and the famous writer Voltaire. No one doubts that the Chevalier and Voltaire met and conversed. However, critics complain that the memoir cannot possibly capture these conversations accurately, because it was written many years after the conversations occurred. Critics point out that it is impossible to remember exact phrases from extended conversations held many years earlier.Critics have also questioned the memoir's account of the Chevalier's escape from a notorious prison in Venice, Italy. He claims to have escaped the Venetian prison by using a piece of metal to make a hole in the ceiling and climbing through the roof. Critics claim that while such a daring escape makes for enjoyable reading, it is more likely that the Chevaliers jailers were bribed to free him. They point out that the Chevalier had a number of politically well-connected friends in Venice who could have offered a bribe.[Listening]Professor:No memoir can possibly be correct in every detail, but still, the Chevalier's memoir is pretty accurate overall, and is, by and large, a reliable historical source. Let's look at the accuracy of the three episodes mentioned in the reading.First, the loan from the merchant. Well, that doesn't mean that the Chevalier was poor. Let me explain. We know that in Switzerland, the Chevalier spent huge amounts of money on parties and gambling, and he had wealth. But it was a kind of property you have to sell first to get money. So it usually took a few days to convert his assets into actual money. So when he ran out of cash, he had to borrow some while he was waiting for his money to arrive, but that's not being poor.Second, the conversations with Voltaire. The Chevalier states in his memoir that each night immediately after conversing with Voltaire, he wrote down everything he could remember about that particular night's conversation. Evidently the Chevalier kept his notes of these conversations for many years and referred to them when writing the memoir. Witnesses who lived with the Chevalier in his later life confirm that he regularly consulted notes and journals when composing。
【托福写作】综合写作题型分类
【托福写作】综合写作题型分类生物话题考点:在 TPO 的题目中,最具有代表性的生物类话题分布在 TPO 4, TPO 10, TPO 15,TPO 17, TPO18 和 TPO 26, 它们分别研究的是恒温动物,海獭,蟾蜍,鸟类,某种常青树的濒危灭绝和某类淡水鱼的入侵。
从研究的内容来看,考生们觉得它们之间绝无内容的相似性,更无从谈及什么相关性,但事实上并非如此。
——TPO 4: 阅读和听力争论的焦点是恐龙是不是恒温动物,基于三个方面:climate change, leg position and movement and Haversian canals——TPO10: 这篇谈及的是:whether does the number of sea otters decline attributes to the pollution, their predators and survival location——TPO15: 讨论的是来自北美的 cane toads 本来到了澳洲是消灭那里的害虫的,但是入侵之后带来了许多害处,人们想了诸多方法减少它们:包括设置篱笆,志愿者参与和病毒侵害。
——TPO 17: 辩驳了某种鸟数量下降的原因(人类的增长,频繁的农业活动和大量杀虫剂的使用)。
——TPO 18: 为了挽救某种常青树,人们实施了很多措施:选择适合它生活的环境;迁移到别处(其实这里就有物种入侵的意思了)或在研究中心这个所谓的“温室”环境里成长。
——TPO 26: 介绍某种淡水鱼是否难以阻挡其入侵到别处,及其将会带来的潜在威胁。
从单词的层面上:表示物种数量的下降:Decline / shrink / extinct/ endangered增加:Increase农田:Farmland / cropland / cultivated land科学技术层面的单词:Genetic modification / genetic technology科技与农业的进步:Grain output / grain yield / food production / genetic crossing / interbreed科技如何治理污染:introduce pest / resistant species关于物种入侵:wipe out / crowd out / be aggressive / invade/ invasion / colonize / kill off常出现在综合写作听力部分的考点:objective causes: environment / global warming or climate changes…advanced technologies: pest / resistant speciesman-made approaches: natural fire / eliminate / volunteers /poisonous virus…..potential impact: never protest against disease / poor genetic diversity,……..考题应对:比如在 2013 年 3 月 17 日的考试中,讨论的内容是 the extinction of diprotodon, 最终的原因分析仍然是围绕着我们以上所提到的考点,无论是在词汇方面还是在考点层面-deforestation / hunting / climate change。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
【备考资料】TPO4综合写作详细解析(听力&阅读)
在托福备考的过程中,TPO材料往往是大家的首选。
而想要完全利用好这些材料,最为重要的就是要从点点滴滴的词汇和句型入手进行分类和整理。
那么,在以下内容中我们就为大家带来TPO综合写作文本,希望能为大家的备考带来帮助。
TPO 4
Reading
Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37℃,no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs were reptiles, and modern reptiles are not endotherms, it was long assumed that dinosaurs were not endotherms. However, dinosaurs differ in many ways from modern reptiles, and there is now considerable evidence that dinosaurs were, in fact, endotherms.
Polar dinosaurs
One reason for believing that dinosaurs were endotherms is that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in Polar
Regions. Only animals that can maintain a temperature well above that of the surrounding environment could be active in such cold climates.
Leg position and movement
There is a connection between endothermy and the position and movement of the legs. The physiology of endothermy allows sustained physical activity, such as running. But running is efficient only if an animal’s legs are positioned underneath its body, not at the body’s side, as they are for crocodiles and many lizards. The legs of all modern endotherms are underneath
the body, and so were the legs of dinosaurs. This strongly suggests that dinosaurs were endotherms.
Haversian canals
There is also a connection between endothermy and bone structure. The bones of endotherms usually include structures called Haversian canals. These canals house nerves and blood vessels that allow the living animal to grow quickly, and rapid body growth is in fact a characteristic of endothermy. The presence of Haversian canals in bone is a strong indicator that the animal is an endotherm, and fossilized bones of dinosaurs are usually dense with Haversian canals.
Listening
Professor
Many scientists have problems with the arguments you read in the
passage. They don’t think those arguments prove that dinosaurs were endotherms.
Take the polar dinosaur argument. When dinosaurs lived, even the Polar Regions, where dinosaur fossils have been found, were much warmer than today, warm enough during part of the year for animals that were not
endotherms to live. And during the months when the Polar Regions were cold, the so-called polar dinosaurs could have migrated to warmer areas or hibernated like many modern reptiles do. So the presence of dinosaur
fossils in Polar Regions doesn’t prove the dinosaurs were endotherms.
Well, what about the fact that dinosaurs have their legs placed under their bodies, not out to the side like crocodiles. That doesn’t necessarily mean dinosaurs were high-energy endotherms built for running. There is another explanation for having legs under the body. This body structure supports more weight, so with the legs under their bodies, dinosaurs can grow to a very large
size. Being large had advantages for dinosaurs, so we don’t need the idea of endothermy and running to explain why dinosaurs evolved to have their legs under their bodies.
Ok, so how about bone structure? Many dinosaur bones do have Haversian canals. That’s true. The dinosaur bones also have growth rings. Growth rings are thickening of the bone that indicates periods of time when the dinosaurs weren’t rapidly growing. These growth riings are evidence that dinosaurs stopped growing or grew more slowly during cooler periods. This pattern of periodic growth, you know, rapid growth followed by no growth or slow growth, and then rapid growth again, is characteristic of animals that are not endotherms.
Animals that maintain a constant body temperature year-round as true endotherms do grow rapidly even when the environment becomes cool.。