FINANCIAL ECONOMICS (金融经济学大纲)
金融经济学 Financial_Economics_2
Economic functions
• Primitive societies: investment financed by own savings • Modern societies: investment financed by others’ savings • Without financial markets and intermediaries, most investment would be unintended inventory accumulation
2. The future is uncertain
• Savers expect to earn interest, but are not certain to do so. • The greater the uncertainty, the less likely they are to save • In other words, the greater the uncertainty, the higher the interest rate needed to persuade them to save.
Asset A Price (A + B )
Asset B
Time
ห้องสมุดไป่ตู้
4.Risk taking (speculation)
• Some risks cannot be diversified away.
• But they can be transferred to speculators • For example, an airline can undertake a swap agreement on the price of jet fuel.
金融经济学 Financial_economics_1
(3) (4) (5) (6) (7)=(1)(2)
2000 1000 200 1000 4200
3700 600 300 200 4800
10000 1000 500 1000 12500
15700 2600 1000 2200
21500
21500
The simplified circular flow
JARGON
• A «closed » economy is one that has no relations with the rest of the world. • An «open » economy has exports, imports or capital flows with the rest of the world.
Balance of Payments Accounting
The balance of payments
• Is a record of all transactions between residents and non-residents (foreigners) during a given time period.
Total Output
=
Total Total Expenditure = Income
Industry Agriculture
Services
Consumption Investment
Wages
Interest
Gov’t purchases
Profits Rent
National Income Accounting
• The balance of payments is a flow concept.
金融经济学(最全面的课程内容)
(一)20世纪50年代以前:金融经济学的启蒙时期
Crammer(1728)、Bernoulli (1738)对不确定性下 的行为决策研究 Bachelier(1900)对股票价格随机过程的研究,其结论 是:股票价格变化是一个呈现出布朗运动特征的随机游走 过程,买者和卖者在交易股票时对股票价格变化的数学期 望值都为零 Fisher(1930)的分离定理:企业的投资决策与企业家的 偏好无关;企业的投资决策与融资决策无关 Von Neumann-Morgenstern (1944):《博弈论与经 济行为》中建立了不确定性下经济主体决策的期望效用理 论,奠定了不确定环境下经济主体的偏好及效用函数的基 本理论体系。
(三)20世纪70年代:快速发展和形成时期
1.Black-Scholes(1973)、Merton(1973)的期权定价理论奠 定了现代衍生金融工具和公司债券定价的基础。 2.Ross(1976)的APT理论克服了CAPM中的模型检验的局限性。 3.Black(1972)的“零—βCAPM”、Rubinstein(1974, 1976)、Kraus and Litzenberger(1978)的离散时间CAPM。 Merton(1969,1971,1973)的连续时间CAPM(ICAPM) 等极大的发展了CAPM理论。 5.Harrison and Kreps(1979)发展的证券定价鞅理论对EMH的 检验产生了深刻的影响。 6.Grossman and Stiglitz(1980)提出的关于EMH的“悖论” 将信息不对称问题引入经典金融理论的分析框架之中。 7.Jensen and Meckling(1976)、Mayers(1984)、Ross (1977)、Leland and Pyle(1977)等在代理理论和信息经济 学框架下发展了公司金融理论。
《金融经济学》教学内容与大纲探微
《金融经济学》教学内容与大纲探微摘要:金融经济学在金融学科体系中处于基础地位,已经成为我国金融学专业硕士、博士生项目的基础课程。
本文通过“人大经济论坛”和“中国经济学教育科研网”收集相关资料梳理《金融经济学》课程的主流教学内容与大纲,以餐读者。
关键词:金融经济学教学内容教学大纲一、金融经济学的起源和建立金融经济学的研究可追朔至贝努里(d.bernoulli)1738年发表的拉丁论文,距今已有近300年。
贝努里提出的边际效用递减概念为后来经济学家发展风险决策理论有一定作用。
最早以现代研究方法对股票价格行为进行理论研究的是法国数学博士(bachelier,1900). 他的博士论文“theory of speculation”对法国股票市场以新颖的方法进行了研究。
但 bachelier 1914出版的,到1954年才被savage无意中发现。
这一发现对samuelson研究股票价格行为有重大影响。
马柯维兹(1952,1959)的资产组合理论彻底改变了传统金融学仅用描述性语言来表达金融学思想的方法,被称作金融学的第一次革命。
被称为现代证券组合理论或投资理论的创始人马柯维兹的贡献既是资产定价理论的奠基石,也是整个现代金融理论的奠基石。
这标志着现代金融(经济)学的发端。
金融经济学发展的三阶段包括:(1)pre-1950s,传统金融经济学;(2)1950s 现代金融经济学的诞生;(3)金融经济学研究的黄金时期在二十世纪的六、七十年代,具有标志性的理论包括capm和期权定价理论。
二、金融经济学的新发展:行为金融传统金融理论面临着没有实证证据支持的尴尬局面。
在对学科进行审视和反思的过程中,行为金融学便成为了学界关注的焦点。
行为金融学真正迎来其发展还是在二十世纪九十年代以后,在主流金融学模型与实证证据出现背离的困境中,伴随着这一时期由普林斯顿大学的卡尼曼(kahneman)教授和斯坦福大学的特维尔斯基(tversky)所创立的预期理论(prospect theory),金融学家们期望在行为金融学上寻找金融理论发展的突破口。
《金融经济学导论》教学大纲
北京市高等学校精品课程申报文件之四《金融经济学导论》教学大纲《金融经济学导论》教学大纲项目负责人: 林桂军教授对外经济贸易大学金融学院《金融经济学导论》课题组二零零五年六月课程名称 《金融经济学导论》 Introduction of Financial Economics林桂军 教 授郭 敏 副教授余 湄 讲 师吴卫星 讲 师办公地点 博学楼908 接待时间 周四下午3:00-4:50任课教师联系电话 64495048 E-MAIL minguo992002@yumei@wxwu@课程性质 金融学院专业基础课学分学时 3学分, 3学时(18周),共54学时授课对象 金融学院本科生及全校各年级本科生先修课程 微观经济学 宏观经济学 金融市场:机构与工具 微积分 概率论与数理统计 平时作业计成绩。
考试方式期中、期末考试均为闭卷考试。
考试成绩 平时作业占20%,期中占20%,期末占60%,考勤要求教师可根据作业、考勤情况确定是否允许参加考试和扣减成绩。
教学目标 通过该课程的学习,将实现如下教学目标1.使学生了解金融经济学的基本思想和基本理论框架,为进一步学习现代金融理论打下基础;2.介绍资本市场的基本理论模型,包括马科维茨投资组合模型、资本资产定价模型、套利定价模型、MM模型、有效市场假说等;3. 从经济学和金融学角度了解金融商品相对于一般实际商品的特殊性,以及金融市场均衡的形成过程,掌握金融市场均衡机制相对于一般商品市场的均衡机制的共性与差异。
4.掌握金融经济学的基本分析方法,如金融商品的未来回报的不确定性的刻划方法、处理风险和收益之间关系的定量方法、证券投资组合方法、资本资产定价的原理和无套利均衡方法等。
教学方法 本课程属理论性较强的专业基础课,教学以讲授为主,辅以讨论.为在实证角度上增强学生对理论模型的深入了解,在部分章节安排了上机试验课。
课程简介 参见本课《课程介绍》。
教材 指定参考教材和授课教案结合《金融经济学》毛二万 编著,辽宁教育出版社,2002年。
金融经济学教学大纲
金融经济学教学大纲《金融经济学》教学大纲一、课程目的与任务:金融经济学是关于金融市场的经济学,主要研究金融市场的均衡条件下金融资产的定价问题。
微观经济学解决了一般商品市场均衡的存在性和惟一性问题,而金融经济学则解决了具有不确定性特性的金融市场均衡的存在性和惟一性。
所以,金融经济学属于理论经济学的范畴,是金融学的经济学理论基础,在金融学科体系层次中具有经济学教学层次中微观经济学的地位。
通过本课程学习,要求学生理解金融市场存在的意义,掌握确定现金流和不确定现金流的金融资产的利率决定理论,也就是利率的期限结构理论、资本资产定价理论、套利定价理论、期权定价理论等现代金融理论。
二、教学内容:包括导言、第1至7章。
导言:1、金融经济学的研究对象金融资产的定价公式2、金融经济学课程结构第一章:资本市场、消费和投资金融市场存在的意义。
(1.1~1.2)1)两时期(现在和将来)纯交换经济分析框架:现在的货币与未来的货币的交换(生产投资、证券投融资) 2)经济行为主体的效用最大化下的消费策略问题第二章:固定收入证券和利率的期限结构给未来现金流确定的证券(即国债)定价。
1、国债的价格,到期收益率,名义年化利率 2、现货利率与远期利率现货利率曲线3、利率的期限结构理论:无偏期望、易变性偏好、市场分割第3~7章,给未来现金流不确定的证券定价第三章:不确定下的选择理论 3.1~3.61、不确定条件下的偏好关系与期望效用函数期望效用表达定理及阿莱悖论2、个体风险厌恶与效用函数的形式第四章:均值――方差分析均值―方差分析框架的由来。
(4.1~4.4) 1、一些基本定义1)证券的收益向量、证券收益矩阵、证券回报率矩阵 2)证券组合的收益、证券组合的价格、证券组合的回报率3)证券及证券组合的期望回报率、回报率的方差 2、二次效用函数或金融资产回报率服从正态分布下的经济行为主体期望效用最大化的决定因素3、均值-标准差平面上证券组合的可行集和证券组合前沿4、风险厌恶者的最优投资组合的集合――有效集第五章:资产均衡定价理论推导出单个证券由其风险决定的期望回报率,即资本资产定价模型CAPM。
《金融经济学》教学大纲(4P)
《金融经济学》教学大纲(4P)《金融经济学》课程教学大纲课程代码: 205193课程负责人:课程中文名称:金融经济学课程英文名称:Economics of Finance 课程类别:专业必修课课程学分数:3课程学时数:54授课对象:金融学、金融工程本课程的前导课程:公司理财、投资学一、教学目的本课程通过理论讲解,使学生全面了解和掌握不确定性条件下资本市场的行为主体跨期资源最优配置的行为决策理论,以及作为资本市场行为主体决策结构的资本资产定价和衍生金融资产定价理论,以此达到能够运用现代金融经济学基础理论分析现实资本市场行为主体投资和融资决策行为的目的。
二、教学要求熟悉不确定性条件下经济主体的投资决策和资产选择理论,掌握期望效用理论、资本组合理论、资产定价理论以及有效市场理论等内容,重点掌握不确定性条件下的决策行为理论、资产组合理论、资产定价理论和有效市场理论等。
三、课程内容与学时分配课程内容与学时分配表内容学时 1.导论:理解金融经济学 3 2期望效用理论 3 3.个体风险态度极其度量 6 4.资产组合理论 3 5.均值-方差偏好下的投资组合选择 6 6.资本资产定价模型 3 7.套利定价理论 3 8.Arrow-Debreu经济 3 9.套利与资产定价 3 10.期权定价理论及其应用 3 11.完全市场中的资源配置与资产价格 3 12.不完全市场中的资源配置与资产价格 3 13.完全市场下的公司财务理论 3 14(不完全市场下的公司财务理论 3 15.资本市场理论(一) 3 16.资本市场理论(二) 3课程主要内容:第一章导论1.1 金融与金融系统1.2 金融经济学的研究对象1.3 金融经济学发展的历史演进 1.4 金融经济学与其他学科的关联第二章期望效用理论2.1 个体行为决策准则2.2 VNM期望效用函数第三章个体的风险态度极其度量3.1 风险态度3.2 风险厌恶的度量3.3 风险厌恶度度量的性质3.4 几种常用的效用函数3.5 随机占优第四章资产组合理论4.1 两资产模型下的最优资产组合选择4.2 最优资产组合的性质—比较静态分析4.3 多资产模型下的最优资产组合的性质第五章均值-方差偏好下的投资组合选择5.1 均值-方差分析的假设条件5.2 资产收益与风险的度量5.3 两资产模型下的有效组合前沿5.4 加入无风险资产的均值-方差有效组合前沿5.5 有效组合前沿的性质5.6 两基金分离定理第六章资本资产定价模型6.1 无风险借贷及其对投资组合有效集的影响6.2 标准的资本资产定价模型6.3 特征线模型6.4 资本资产定价模型的扩展第七章套利定价理论7.1 资产收益风险的因子模型7.2 精确因子模型与套利定价理论7.3 极限套利与APT7.4 极限套利与均衡7.5 作为套利结果的APT第八章 Arrow-Debreu经济8.1 Arrow-Debreu证券市场8.2 状态价格8.3 市场的完全化8.4 参与者的优化8.5 市场均衡第九章套利与资产定价9.1 一般市场结构9.2 套利9.3 无套利原理9.4 资产定价基本原理9.5 风险中性定价与鞅第10章期权定价理论及其应用10.1 期权10.2 期权价格的性质与界10.3 美式期权以及提前执行10.4 完全市场中的期权定价10.5 期权与市场完全化第11章完全市场中的资源配置与资产定价11.1 完全市场中的均衡11.2 最优配置与风险分担11.3 代表性参与者11.4 加总11.5 基于消费的资本资产定价模型第12章不完全市场中的资源配置与资产定价12.1 消费与证券价格12.2 约束下的最优配置12.3 实质完全市场第13章完全市场下的公司财务理论13.1 存在生产机会的Arrow-Debreu经济13.2 公司的投资决策13.3 融资决策13.4 基本框架外的公司财务第14章不完全市场下的公司财务理论14.1公司融资中的代理成本14.2 信息不对称与公司融资14.3 公司财务的金融契约理论第15章资本市场理论(一)15.1 市场有效性15.2 有效市场的类型15.3 市场有效性检验第16章资本市场理论(二)16.1 资本市场之谜16.2 资本市场之谜的经典理论解释16.3 资本市场之谜的行为金融解释四、教材与参考书教材:王江著《金融经济学》,中国人民大学出版社,2006年版。
金融经济学教学大纲
(5)Cochrane,《Asset Pricing》
(6)Duffie,《dynamic Asset Pricing Theory》
(7)Merton,《Continuous-time Finance》,Blackwell,1990.
(8)《金融经济学》毛二万编著,辽宁教育出版社,2002年。
教学要求:
课后完成布置习题,积极参与课堂讨论,踊跃提出问题,完成相关论文的阅读任务,每人至少在课堂内做一次论文读后报告或者案例分析报告。
课
程
概
述
金融经济学(Financial Economics)产生于20世纪50年代,但是直到90年代才真正成为一门独立的学科。1990年诺贝尔经济学奖授予了三位金融经济学家,这表明金融经济学作为一门学科具有重要的地位。迄今为止,要弄清金融经济学的内涵和外延仍然很困难。
3.从经济学和金融学角度了解金融商品相对于一般实际商品的特殊性,以及金融市场均衡的形成过程,掌握金融市场均衡机制相对于一般商品市场的均衡机制的共性与差异。
4.掌握金融经济学的基本分析方法:金融商品的未来回报的不确定性的刻划方法、处理风险和收益之间关系的定量方法、证券投资组合方法、资本资产定价的原理和无套利均衡方法、期权与期货的定价方法(包括无套利方法、风险中性定价方法、状态定价方法、随机微分方程方法)与套期保值方法等。
(2)案例式教学
就是授课过程中收集和制作相关的案例,把有关素材完整地提供给学生,而后运用基本原理进行启发、引导,要求学生在查阅资料和独立思考的基础上进行讨论分析,然后由教师进行总结或点评,或进行补充性、提高性的讲解,以学生提交的案例分析报告作为考核方式,通过自我评价、同学互评、教师打分相结合的方法决定考核成绩。
金融经济学课程大纲
《金融经济学》课程大纲 4
《金融经济学》课程基本结构
中心问题: 中心问题:不确定的金融市场环境下对金融资产定价
一般经济均衡框架 有效市场理论 无套利假设 (正线性定价) 资产定价基本定理 线性定价法则 证券组合选择理论 资本资产定价模型 CAPM 套利定价理论 APT 期权定价理论 利率期限结构 (债券定价理论)
Cochrane, John H., Asset Pricing, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001, 2005.
《金融经济学》课程大纲 12
《金融经济学》参考书(续)
Bernstein, Peter L., Capital Ideas, The Improbable Origins of Modern Wall Street, Simon & Schster, New York, 1992 (中译本:《投资革命,源自象牙塔的华尔 街理论》,上海远东出版社,2001)。
Financial Economics Ch4__ 2007-12-21
Ch t4T F d Chapter 4 Two Fund Separation and Linear Separation and Linear a uat oValuation4.1 The main content41The main contentTwo Fund Separation (TFS)C it l A t P i i M d l(CAPM) Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)Arbitrage Pricing Model (APT)(TFS)Separation Fund Two 4.2h d f d t l i t t th ti f do exhibit tw to said is }~{~ returns of rate asset of vector A: Definition 1N j j r r == that such scalar a exists there portfolio any for that such and fund mutual exist two there if separation fund 21q λααR u(.)concave all for )],~([)]~)1(~([ 21qO r u E r r u E λλαα≥−+~~~)1(~ 21q SSDr r r λλαα≥−+])[(:Note qr E λλ=th i b t ~~~~~FPthe in be must )1(21r r ααλλ==−+Q FP be ~ ,1])[(],[][ 11must r r E E r E when qqαλγ∴,0])~[(],~[]~[ when 2r E E r E q q ααλγ==FPbe ~ 2must r α4.3The necessary and sufficient The necessary and sufficient conditions for TFSthat must it obtains Whenever t .portfolios separating be can portfolios frontier distinct two any that be must it obtains,separation fund wo Whenever t •Define •pqp p zc qp qp r r Q ~~)1()(~)(βββ+−≡4.6 One Fund Separation (OFS)p ()separation fund one exhibits ~ returns asset of vector A :Definition •r )]~~()for , portfolio any for that such portfolio feasible a exists there if q αand ] ~ E[] ~ E[ implies This )].E[u()]E[u((.), concave all for =≥q qr r r r u αα~~~~write ) ~ var( ) ~ var( =+=≤qr r α0][ With write can we ,Thus q q q E r r εεαte multivaria are only not assets on return of rates the Suppose OFS•portfolio ~Let .ns expectatio identical have also but d,distribute normally [ writecan we , portfolio feasible any For portfolio.variance minimum the on return the denote Let mvpq r0.) ~ ,~cov( :So 0]~E[, ~~ ~ ==+=mvp qq mvp q r r r εεε~~~ then,~ and ~,~ of normality te multivaria the From q mvp p p q r r ε.0][]|[ ==qmvp q E r E εε•4.8wealthinitial s i' individual : Supposei W by security - the in invested wealth initial the of proportion the : ij wwealth total the :iindividual by security th 0m W j market 100I i i m W W ∑==portfoliomarket of weights portfolio the :mj wrisky any for (4.9.3) ])~[(]~[)1(]~[ :assets risky any for So )(+−=r E r E r E m jmm zc jm j ββN, 1,2,all for …=j on n restrictio linear a places which follows,(4.9.3) relation then variance,minimum of not is portfolio market the if word,a In m.equilibriu in returns asset expected p ,()4.10 Security Market Line :follows as rewritten be can (4.9.3)ythtf li ffi i t i tf li k t th ])~[]~[(]~[]~[ ())()(r E r E r E r E m zc m jm m zc j −+=β . 0]~[]~[ then portfolio,efficient an is portfolio market the If )(r E r E m zc m >−which line feasible all on and assets risky all on return of rates expected The 4.10.1)(Figure (SML). the termed is which line,a along lie portfolios arket Line Security MSecurity Market Line y]~[j r E ]~[)(m zc r E ]~[]~[)(m zc m r E r E −jmβFigure 4.10.1: A Security Market LineSecurity Market Line yt,inefficien is portfolio market the when Also,:follows as rewritten be can (4.9.3)then ,0]~[]~[ )(m zc m r E r E <−(4.10.2) ])~[]~[(]~[]~[ ())()(m m zc m jzc m j r E r E r E r E −+=βSecurity Market Line y]~[j r E ]~[m r E ]~[]~[)(m m zc r E r E −)(m jzc βFigure 4.10.2: A Security Market Line4.11 CAPM modelAssume]~[]~[,,,~}~{ )1(1r E r E j i normal r j i N j j ≠∃=in market the concavestrictly and increasing are u(.), )2(i ∀m equilibriu in is market the (3)portfolio.efficient an is portfolio market the then,Figure 4.11.1 Indifference Curves when Asset Returns Are Normally DistributedE]~[rmvpσ)~(rceindifferens i'individualcurvesinstandardthe-deviationmeanpositivelyslopedareplaneany for Therefore,(4.11.6) ])~[]~[(]~[]~[portfolio,feasible any for )()(r E r E r E r E m zc m qm m zc q −+=β(4.11.7) 0]~[]~[ )(r E r E and m zc m >−b d l d hi h d l i i A C i l the as known are (4.11.7) and (4.11.6) Relations zero-beta(1969).Lintner and (1972)Black by developed was which Model Pricing Asset CapitalSuppose:1. investors have strictly increasing utility functionsfunctions2. the risky assets are in strictly positive supply3. TFS3.TFSThen the risky premium of the market portfolio must be strictly positive.portfolio must be strictly positivenet zero in are assets risky the , / if because /knowwe 4.23, section and 2 assumption From •C A r C A r =≠amount strictly investor •supply.f f that must it m clearing.market nt with inconsiste are These portfolio.market the of amount positive strictly a holds investor no ,/ if So C A r f >h d f li i ffi i h ld i di id l hi positive.strictly is portfolio market of premium risk the and /that case the be must it m,equilibriu in Thus •C A r f < space return of rate expected -deviation standard the in line half the and portfolios t inefficien hold individual no event, this In •(CML).the termed is asset riskless the and portfolios frontier efficient of composed rket Line Capital Ma4.14 Constrained borrowing versions of the CAPMf li i k f ibl f h l i i strictly in is asset riskless the and portfolios frontier efficient hold to choose investors and allowed,not is borrowing When ∗(4144)d (4.14.3) ])~[]~[(]~[]~[:portfolio risky feasible any for then supply, positive )()(r E r E r E r E q m zc m qm m zc q −+=βhi h i l ll d i b i i kl h h (4.14.4) ]~[and 0]~[]~[ )()(r r E r E r E fm zc m zc m≥>−t i tl i i t i kl th d tf li f ti ffi i t hold to choose investors and ),( rate lending riskless the than higher strictly )(rate a at allowed is borrowing riskless the When r r L b ∗(4145)~~~~:portfolio risky feasible any for then supply, positive strictly in is asset riskless the and portfolios frontier efficient q (4.14.6)]~[ and 0]~[]~[ (4.14.5) ])[][(][][)()()()(r r E r r E r E r E r E r E r E Lm zc bm zc mm zc m qm m zc q ≥≥>−−+=βm.equilibriu in assets risky of portfolio market the is :Note mlemmas stein' :Note •~~(~~~(hthen d,distribute normally bivariate be ~and ~Let X Y .conditions regularity some satisfies and able differenti is )cov()]([))(cov( : have we g Y ,X X g E Y ,X g ′=。
金融经济学 教学大纲
金融经济学一、课程说明课程编号:160518Z10课程名称:金融经济学/Financal Economics课程类别:专业课程学时/学分:48/3先修课程:西方经济学适用专业:金融学教材、教学参考书:1.王江主编.金融经济学.北京:中国人民大学出版社.2006.6;2.宋逢明主编.金融经济学. 北京:高等教育出版社.2006年。
二、课程设置的目的意义金融经济学旨在用经济学的一般原理和方法来分析金融问题。
本课程是金融专业的主干课程,是金融学的微观经济学理论基础。
它着重从金融市场均衡来讨论金融资产的估值与定价,以及金融资产的风险管理。
因此是金融学其他重要领域如金融工程、投资学、公司财务、金融机构管理学等必不可缺的理论基础。
三、课程的基本要求知识:本课程要求学生掌握有关金融经济学的基本理论和知识,在了解金融经济学的基本概念和意义的基础上,以建立理性金融的行为基础和基本的均衡模型为基础,了解均衡模型框架下的金融资产的套利与定价;投资组合选择理论和基金分离定理以及资产定价模型——资本资产定价模型(CAPM)。
从而使学生完整地了解金融经济学基本定理,建立对整体金融理论的认识。
能力:从对金融经济学基本理论和知识的学习,提高对社会经济和金融发展规律的认识能力、分析能力和把握能力;从对均衡模型框架下金融资产的套利与定价以及投资组合选择理论和基金分离定理等相关知识的学习和掌握,建立和提高对金融领域投资选择、金融产品开发与定价等问题深层次成因探析和把握的能力。
素质:建立在金融经济学基本理论框架下运用金融经济学基本概念、一般原理分析金融问题的思维模式,具备理解和分析金融决策的基本素质,提高对实际金融问题进行自主判断和运用的专业素质。
四、教学内容、重点难点及教学设计五、实践教学内容和基本要求无六、考核方式及成绩评定。
Financial Economics (3)
The Cash-Flow Statement
• Show the cash that flowed into and from a firm in during a time period
– Focuses attention on a firm’s cash situation
• A firm may be profitable and short of cash
Reviewing Published Accounts
• Usual order
– feel quality of the paper, review pictures – read Chair’s report – review accounts
Net income + Depreciation - Increase in acc rec - Increase in invent + Increase in acc pay *Total cash from operations - Invest in new ppe *Cash flow invest' activities -Div paid + Inc short-term debt *Cash flow from financing **Chng cash & mkt securities 23.4 30.0 (10.0) (30.0) 12.0 25.4 (90.0) (90.0) (10.0) 94.6 84.6 20.0
– Unlike the balance sheet and income statement, cash flow statements are independent of accounting methods
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Ignacio Palacios-Huerta E CONOMICS244MWEconomics8:30-9:50 ofDepartment2002 University SpringBrownFINANCIAL ECONOMICSThis course is intended for Ph.D. students interested in economics and finance. The course presumes previous exposure to undergraduate economics, econometrics and statistics. The accent and intent of this course is to take the student to the frontier of our knowledge in theoretical and, especially, empirical asset pricing finance and to let him/her understand and enjoy the exciting time that academic researchers and high-tech practitioners in this area are enjoying right now. Over the last decade much progress has been made to answer the fundamental questions in macroeconomics and finance. However, the central task of absolute asset pricing finance, which is to understand and measure the sources of aggregate or macroeconomic risk that drive asset prices, is unfinished. Although much empirical work has documented tantalizing stylized facts and links between economic variables and finance, the theory lags behind and we do not have yet a complete model that explains, as opposed to describes, the rich body of empirical evidence. Novel theories and empirical work are subject to a great demand in this field.The course is stated mostly in a discount factor language and is often translated in the traditional expected return-beta or mean-variance language. The major advantages of this approach, common in current academic research, are its universality and simplicity. The accent of the course is on understanding statements of theory, and working with that theory to applications, rather than rigorous or general proofs. The course focuses, in its second part, on current academic research and thus offers a fertile ground of ideas for students that are or may be interested in doing graduate thesis in finance, microeconomics (preference formation), macroeconomics, international economics and applied econometrics dissertation topics. The course goes very lightly over many parts of asset pricing theory that have faded from current applications and are not a cornerstone of modern asset pricing, although they occupied large amounts of attention in the past.Lecture Notes and Readings. The initial part of the course is based on lecture notes. I will distribute most of my own notes. The rest of the course is highly intensive in reading and evaluating several academic papers. Those marked with an asterisk (*) in the enclosed list are required readings for a complete understanding of all material covered in the course. All others are suggested and intended to be additional references to various parts of the course. As the course goes along other relevant papers may be distributed either as required or suggested readings.No single book covers the material in this course. However, various chapters of the book by John Campbell, Andrew Lo and A.C. MacKinlay, The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton University Press, 1997, are directly related to various parts of the course. In any event, it is an excellent book worth owning. The book Asset Pricing, by John Cochrane, Princeton University Press, 2001, is highly recommended. It will be particularly useful for the first part of the course.SYLLABUSThe accent of the course is on understanding the fundamental implications of finance theory, and working with that theory to applications, rather than rigorous or general proofs. Applications and empirical evidence will be emphasized. Basic fundamentals (especially in parts I and II) are thoroughly discussed in lectures notes that will be distributed during the course. The structure of the course is the following:Part I. DISCRETE TIME ASSET PRICING THEORY - WEEKS 1-21. Consumption-Based Modela. Basic Pricing Equationb. Marginal Rate of Substitution / Stochastic Discount Factorc. Consumption-Based Model in Practiced. Alternative Asset Pricing Models: Overview2. The Discount Factora. Contingent Claimsb. Law of One Pricec. No-Arbitrage and Positive Discount Factors3. Mean-Variance Frontier and Beta Representationsa. Expected Return - Beta Representationsb. Mean-Variance frontiersc. Relation between p = E(mx), beta and mean-variance frontiers4. Implications of Existence and Equivalence Theoremsa. Discount Factors vs. Mean, Variance and Beta5. Conditioning Informationa. Conditioning Information in Returnsb. Adding Scaled returnsc. Conditional and Unconditional Models6. Factor Pricing Stories (*)a. Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)b. Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model (ICAPM)c. Comments on CAPM and ICAPMd. Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)e. ICAPM vs. APTPart II. INITIAL EMPIRICAL SURVEY -- WEEK 31. Return Predictability2. Present Value Tests3. Factor Pricing Modelsa. The CAPMb. Chen-Roll-Ross Modelc. Investment and Macroeconomic Factorsd. Book to Market4. Consumption-Based Model Testsa. CRRA Utilityb. Durable Goods and Habitsc. State-nonseparabilitiesPart III. HANSEN-JAGANNATHAN BOUNDS FOR DIAGNOSING ASSETPRICING MODELS – WEEK 41. The Basic HJ Bound2. Many Returns-Formulas. Results4. Beyond Mean and Variance5. Diagnostic Tests. Comments7. HJ Bounds with Frictions8. The Comparison of HJ boundsPart IV. ESTIMATING AND TESTING DISCRETE-TIME MODELS –WEEK 51. General Method of Moments (GMM) Estimation and Testing of Asset Pricing Modelsa. GMM in Explicit Discount Factor Modelsb. Applying GMM to Linear Factor Modelsc. Other Uses of GMM2. Diagnostic and Specification Calculations (*)a. Horse Racesb. Prespecified Weighing Matricesc. Testing Moments3. Regression-Based Tests (*)Part V. ASSET PRICING PUZZLES -- WEEKS 6-91. The Returns of Stocks and Bonds2. The Equity Premium Puzzle3. The Risk-Free Rate Puzzle4. The Stockholding Puzzle5. Home Bias and the International Diversification Puzzle6. Some “Partial” Solutions:a. “Preference” Solutions (Habits and Durability, “Catching-Up with the Joneses,”“The Spirit of Capitalism,” Epstein-Zin Recursive Preferences, Campbell-Cochrane “moving” habits)b. “Budget Constraints” Solutions (Liquidity Constraints, Borrowing Constraints,Short-Sale Constraints, Transaction Costs and Incomplete Markets)c. Individual Heterogeneityd. The Role of other Assets7. Some Important Considerationsa. The Horizon of the Analysisb. Who Holds Financial Assets?c. The Consumption and Assets of Stockholdersd. Who should hold financial assets (and which ones)?Part VI. CURRENT AND RECENT TOPICS IN ASSET PRICING FINANCE– WEEKS 10-121. Human Capital Risk and Returnsa. Measurement and Pricing of Human Capital Assetsb. Human Capital and the Market Returnc. Jagannathan-Wang Conditional CAPM with Human Capitale. Campbell’s Risk and Returne. Human Capital and Asset Pricing Puzzles2. Behavioral Financea. Behavioral Anomalies, Paradoxes and Human Natureb. Loss Aversion, Disappointment Aversion, Knightian Uncertainty Aversionc. Hyperbolic vs. Exponential vs. Endogenous Time Discountingd. Behavioral Anomalies and Asset Pricing Puzzlese. Prospect Theory and Asset Prices3. Robustness in Macroeconomics and Finance.Part VII. OTHER TOPICS (*)For example:1. Financial Structure and Risk Sharing2. Endogenous Risk and Financial Innovations3. Globalization and Stock Exchange Competition(*) Some of these topics may be covered if time allows.READING LIST*Abel, Andrew B., “Asset prices under habit formation and catching up with the Joneses,” AmericanEconomic Review Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 80, No. 2, May 1990, pp. 38-42.Aiyagari, S. Rao and Mark Gertler. “Asset Returns With Transactions Costs And Uninsured Individual Risk,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 1991, 27(3), 311-332.*Allais, Maurice “Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critiques des Postulats et Axioms de l’Ecole Americaine,” Econometrica 21, 503-546.Allen, F. and D. Gale, 1994, “Limited Market Participation and Volatility of Asset Prices,” American Economic Review 84, 4, 933-955.*Attanasio, O. P. and G. Weber, 1995, “Is Consumption Growth Consistent with Intertemporal Optimization? Evidence from the Consumer Expenditure Survey,” Journal of Political Economy, 103, 6, 1121-1157.Bakshi, G., and Z. Chen, 1994, “Baby Boom, Population Aging, and Capital Markets,” Journal of Business, 67, 165-202.*Bakshi, G., and Z. Chen, 1996, “The Spirit of Capitalism,” American Economic Review, March, 133-157. *Brav, A. and C. Geczy, 1996, “An Empirical Resurrection of the Simple Consumption CAPM with Power Utility,” working paper, University of Chicago.Burnside, C., 1994, “Hansen-Jagannathan Bounds as Classical Tests of Asset-Pricing Models,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1994, 12, 1, 57-79.Barberis, Nicholas, “Investing for the long run when returns are predictable,” University of Chicago,Center for Research on Security Prices, working paper, No. 439, 1997.Barberis, Nicholas, 1996, “How Big Are Hedging Demands? Evidence from Long-Horizon Asset Allocation,” unpublished paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.*Barberis, N., Huang, M. and J. Santos, 1999, “Prospect Theory and Asset Prices,” Forthcoming QJE.*Barsky, Robert B., Miles S. Kimball, F. Thomas Juster, and Matthew D. Shapiro, “Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement survey,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1997.*Basak, S. and D. Cuoco, 1997, “An Equilibrium Model with Restricted Stock Market Participation,”Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, Working Paper 001-97.*Baxter, Marianne, and Jermann, Urban. “The International Diversification Puzzle Is Worse than YouThink.” American Economic Review, March 1997, 87(1), pp. 170-80.*Benartzi, S. and R. Thaler, “Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 75-92.*Blanchard, O. J., 1993, “Movements in the Equity Premium,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 1993, 75-138.*Bertaut, Carol C. “Who Holds Stock in the U.S.?: An Empirical Investigation,” University of Maryland, Revised December 1992.*Blume, Marshall E., and Stephen P. Zeldes, “The Structure of Stockownership in the U.S.”, Manuscript, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, March 1993.Bodie, Zvi, Robert C. Merton and William F. Samuelson. “Labor Supply Flexibility and Portfolio Choice InA Life Cycle Model,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1992, v16 (3/4), 427-450. Breeden, Douglas T. “An Intertemporal Asset Pricing Model with Stochastic Consumption and Investment Opportunities.” Journal of Financial Economics 7 (September 1979): 265-96.Campbell, John Y.,“Stock returns and the term structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 18, June 1987, pp. 373-399.*________, “Understanding risk and return,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 104, April 1996, pp. 298 -345.________. “A Variance Decomposition for Stock Returns.” Economic Journal 101 (March 1991): 157-79. ________. “Intertemporal Asset Pricing without Consumption Data,” American Economic Review, vol. 83, no. 3, 487-512.________. “Asset Prices, Consumption and the Business Cycle,” paper prepared from the Handbook on Macroeconomics, edited by J. B. Taylor and M. Woodford.*Campbell, John Y., and Cochrane, John H. “By Force of Habit: A Consumption-Based Explanation of Aggregate Stock Market Behavior.” December 1999.*Campbell, John Y., and Mankiw, N. Gregory. “Consumption, Income, and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1989, edited by Olivier J. Blanchard and Stanley Fischer. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1989.*Campbell, John Y., and Shiller, Robert J. “Stock Prices, Earnings, and Expected Dividends.” Journal of Finance 43 (July 1988): 661-76.Campbell, John Y., and Robert J. Shiller, “The Dividend-Price Ratio and Expectations of Future Dividends and Discount Factors,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 1, 1988, pp. 195-227.*Campbell, J. Y., A. W. Lo and A. C. MacKinlay, 1997, The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Campbell, J. Y. and L. M. Viceira, 1996, “Consumption and Portfolio Decisions When Expected Returns are Time Varying,” NBER Working Paper 5857. Forthcoming QJE 2000.*Campbell, J. Y. and L. M. Viceira, 1997, “Who Should Buy Long-Term Bonds?,” Mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.*Canner, N., N. G. Mankiw and D. N. Weil, 1997, “An Asset Allocation Puzzle,” American Economic Review, vol. 87, no. 1, 181-191.Cecchetti, S. G., P. Lam, and N. C. Mark, 1993, “The Equity Premium and the Risk-Free Rate,” Journal of Monetary Economics 31, 21-45.Chen, Nai-fu; Roll, Richard; and Ross, Stephen A. “Economic Forces and the Stock Market.” Journal of Business 59 (July 1986): 383-403.Cochrane, John H. “A Cross-Sectional Test of a Production-Based Asset Pricing Model.” Working Paper no. 4025. Cambridge, Mass.” NBER, March 1992.________. “Permanent and Transitory Components of GNP and Stock Prices.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (February 1994): 241-65.Cochrane, John H., “Volatility Tests and Efficient Markets: A Review Essay,” Journal of MonetaryEconomics, Vol. 27, June 1991a, pp. 463-485.________, “Explaining the variance of price-dividend ratios,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 15,1991b, pp. 243-280.*________, “Production-Based Asset Pricing and the Link between Stock Returns and EconomicFluctuations” Journal of Finance, Vol. 41, March 1991, pp. 207-234.________, “The Sensitivity of Tests of the Intertemporal Allocation of Consumption to Near Rational Alternatives.” American Economic Review 79, 1989, 319-337.*________, Asset Pricing, Princeton University Press, 2001.*Cochrane, John H., and Lars Peter Hansen, “Asset Pricing Lessons for Macroeconomics,” in 1992 NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Olivier Blanchard and Stanley Fischer (eds.), 1992, pp. 1115-1165. Constantinides, George M., “Theory of Valuation: Overview,” in Theory of Valuation: Frontiers ofModern Financial Theory, Volume I, Sudipto Bhattahcharya and George M. Constantinides (eds.), Totowa NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1989, pp. 1-23.*________, “Habit formation: A Resolution of the Equity Premium Puzzle,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, June 1990, pp. 519-543.*Constantinides, George M., and Darrell Duffie, “Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Consumers,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 104, April 1996, pp. 219-240.*Daniel, Kent and Marshall, David. “The Equity Premium Puzzle and the Risk-Free Rate Puzzle at Long Horizons,” Macroeconomic Dynamics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1997, pp. 452-484.Deaton, Angus S., 1991, “Saving and Liquidity Constraints,” Econometrica vol. 59, no. 5, 1221-1248. Deaton, Angus S., Understanding Consumption, New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Deaton, Angus, and Christina Paxson, “Intertemporal Choice and Inequality,” Journal of PolilticalEconomy, Vol. 102, June 1994, pp. 437-467.De Santis, Giorgio. “Volatility Bounds for Stochastic Discount Factors: Tests and Implicationsfor International Financial Markets.” Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, 1993.*Epstein, Larry G., and Stanley E. Zin, “Substitution, Risk Aversion and the Temporal Behavior of Asset Returns,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, April 1991, pp. 263-286.Epstein, Larry G., and Zin, Stanley E. “Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework.” Econometrica 57 (July 1989): 937-69. Estrella, Arturo, and Hardouvelis, Gikas A. “The Term Structure as a Predictor of Real Economic Activity.”Journal of Finance 46 (June 1991): 555-76.Fama, Eugene F. “Multiperiod Consumption-Investment Decisions.” American Economic Review 60 (March 1970): 163-74.________. “Efficient Capital Markets: II.” Journal of Finance 46 (December 1991): 1575-1617.Fama, Eugene F., and French, Kenneth R. “Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics 22 (October 1988): 3-25.________. “Permanent and Temporary Components of Stock Prices.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (April 1988): 246-73.________. “Business Conditions and Expected Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics 25 (November 1989): 23-49.*________. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance 47 (June 1992): 427-65. ________. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Econ. 33 (February 1993): 3-56.Fama, Eugene F., and Schwert, G. William. “Asset Returns and Inflation.” Journal of Financial Economics5 (November 1977): 115-46.________. “Human Capital and Capital Market Equilibrium.” Journal of Financial Economics 4 (January 1977): 95-125.Ferson, Wayne E., 1993, Theory and Empirical Testing of Asset Pricing Models, manuscript in preparation for Finance, North Holland.Ferson, Wayne E., and Harvey, Campbell R. “The Variation of Economic Risk Premiums.” Journal of Political Economy 99 (April 1991): 385-415.*Ferson, Wayne E., and George Constantinides, “Habit Persistence and Durability in AggregateConsumption: Empirical tests,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 29, October 1991, pp. 199-240. *Gallant, Ronald A., Lars P. Hansen and George Tauchen, 1990, “Using Conditional Moments of Asset Payoffs to Infer the Volatility of Intertemporal Marginal Rates of Substitution,” Journal ofEconometrics 45, 141-179.Friedman, Milton, 1957, A Theory of the Consumption Function, Princeton University Press, New Jersey. Friend, Irwin, and Marshall E. Blume, “The Demand for Risky Assets,” American Economic Review, Vol. 55, December 1975, pp. 900-922.Grossman, S. J., and G. Laroque, 1990, “Asset Pricing and Optimal Portfolio Choice in the Presence of Illiquid Durable Consumption Goods,” Econometrica, Vol. 58, No. 1.Grossman, S. J., A. Melino & R. J. Shiller (1987) Estimating the continuous-time consumption-based asset-pricing model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics5, 315-327Grossman, Sanford J., and Shiller, Robert J. “The Determinants of the Variability of Stock Market Prices.”American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 71 (May 1981): 222-27.*Guiso, L., T. Jappelli and D. Terlizzese, 1996, “Income Risk, Borrowing Constraints, and Portfolio Choice,” American Economic Review vol. 86, no. 1, 158-172.*Gul, Faruk, “A Theory of Disappointment Aversion,” Econometrica 59, 1991, 667-686.Hagiwara, M. and M. A. Herce, 1997, “Risk Aversion and Stock Price Sensitivity to Dividends,” American Economic Review, 87, 4, 738-745.*Haliassos. M. and C. C. Bertaut, 1995, “Why Do So Few Hold Stocks?,” Economic Journal, 1110-1129. *Hall, Robert E. “Intertemporal Substitution in Consumption.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (April 1988): 339-57.*Hansen, Lars Peter. “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators.”Econometrica 50 (July 1982): 1029-54.*Hansen, Lars Peter, and Singleton, Kenneth J. “Stochastic Consumption, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Asset Returns.” Journal of Political Economy 91 (April 1983): 249-65.Hansen, L. P. and K. J. Singleton, 1982, “Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models,” Econometrica, 50, 5, 1269-1286.*Hansen, Lars P. and Scott F. Richard, 1987, “The Role of Conditioning Information in Deducing Testable Restrictions Implied by Dynamic Asset Pricing Models,” Econometrica 55, 587-613.Hansen, Lars Peter; Heaton, John; and Jagannathan, Ravi. “Assesing Specification Errors in Stochastic Discount Factor Models.” Journal of Finance, 52(2), June 1997, 557-590.*Hansen, Lars Peter, and Jagannathan, Ravi. “Implications of Security Market Data for Models of Dynamic Economies.” Journal of Political Economy 99 (April 1991): 225-62.*He, Hua and David M. Modest (1995) “Market Frictions and Consumption-Based Asset Pricing.” Journal of Political Economy 103, 94-117.*Heaton, John C., “An Empirical Investigation of Asset Pricing with Temporally Dependent PreferenceSpecifications,” Econometrica, Vol. 63, May 1995, pp. 681-717.Heaton, J. and D. Lucas, 1995, “The Importance of Investor Heterogeneity and Financial Market Imperfections for the Behavior of Asset Prices” Carnegie-Rochester Series in Public Policy, 1-38. Heaton, J. and D. Lucas, 1997, “Savings Behavior and Portfolio Choice; Which Risks Matter?,”manuscript, Northwestern University Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Evanston, IL.*Heaton, John, and Deborah J. Lucas, “Evaluating the Effects of Incomplete Markets on Risk Sharing and Asset Pricing,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 104, June 1996, pp. 443-487.*Jagannathan, R. and N. Kocherlakota, 1996, “Why Should Older People Invest Less in Stocks Than Younger People?,” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 11-23. *Jagannathan, Ravi, and Z. Wang, “The Conditional CAPM and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns,”Journal of Finance, Vol. 51, March 1996, pp. 3-53. [Updated in Staff Report, No. 208, FederalReserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1997.]*Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica 47, 1979, 263-291.Kennickell, A. B. and J. Shack-Marquez, “Changes in Family Finances from 1983 to 1989: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, January 1992.Kennickell, A. B., M. Starr-McCluer, and A. E. Sunden, 1997, “Family Finances in the U.S.: Recent Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, January, 1-24.*Kocherlakota, Narayanna R., “The Equity Premium: It’s Still a Puzzle,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 34, March 1996, pp. 42-71.Kocherlakota, Narayana R. “On Tests of Representative Consumer Asset Pricing Models.” Journal of Monetary Economics 26 (October 1990): 285-304.*Laibson, David I. “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112,1997, 443-477.Lintner, John. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics 47 (February 1965): 13-37.Lucas, Deborah J., “Asset Pricing with Undiversifiable Income Risk and Short-Sale Constraints: Deepening the Equity Premium Puzzle,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 34, December 1994, pp. 325-341. *Lucas, Robert E., “Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy.” Econometrica 46, November 1978, 1429-45. *Luttmer, Erzo G.J. “Asset Pricing in Economies with Frictions.” Econometrica, 1996.*Luttmer, Erzo G.J. “What Level of Fixed Costs Can Reconcile Consumption and Stock Returns?” Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming, 2000.*Machina, Mark J. “Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1, 1987, 121-154.Mankiw, N. Gregory, and Shapiro, Matthew D. “Risk and Return: Consumption Beta versus Market Beta.”Review of. Economics and Statistics. 68 (August 1986): 452-59.Mankiw, N. Gregory, “The Equity Premium and the Concentration of Aggregate Shocks,” Journal ofFinancial Economics, Vol. 17, September 1986, pp. 211-219.*Mankiw, N. Gregory, and Stephen P. Zeldes, “The Consumption of Stockholders and Non-stockholders,”Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 29, March 1991, pp. 97-112.Mayers, David. “Nonmarketable Assets and Capital Market Equilibrium under Uncertainty.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, edited by Michael C. Jensen. New York: Praeger, 1972.*Mehra, Rajnish, and Edward Prescott, “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 15, March 1985, pp. 145-161.*Melamed, N. and K.M. Lim, 2001. “Prospect Theory and Asset Allocation,” mimeo, Brown University. Merton, R. C., 1969, “Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 247-257.Merton, Robert C., “An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model,” Econometrica, Vol. 41, September1973, pp. 867-887.*Merton, R. C. (1971) “Optimum Consumption an Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model.” Journal of Economic Theory3, 373-413.Ogaki, Masao. “Generalized Method of Moments: Econometric Applications.” In Econometrics, edited byG. S. Maddala, C. R. Rao, and H. D. Vinod. Handbook of Statistics, vol. 11. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1993.Newey, Whitney K. and Kenneth D. West, 1987, “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Cinsistent Covariance Matrix,” Econometrica 55, 703-708*Palacios-Huerta, I. “An Empirical Analysis of the Risk Properties of Human Capital Assets,” American Economic Review, forthcoming, 2002.________. 2000, “What Determines the Size of the Human Capital Premium?,” Mimeo, Brown University. ________. 1999, “The Aversion to the Sequential Resolution of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk andUncertainty 18, 1999, 249-69.________. 2001, “The Human Capital of Stockholders and the International Diversification Puzzle,”Journal of International Economics, forthcoming.Poterba, James, and Lawrence J. Summers, “Mean Reversion in Stock Prices: Evidence and Implications,”Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 22, October 1988, pp. 27-59.Porterba, J. M. and A. A. Samwick, “Stock Ownership Patterns, Stock Market Fluctuations, and Consumption,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995:2, 295-372.*Rabin, Matthew, 1998, “Psychology and Economics,” Journal of Economics Literature 36, 11-46.*Rabin M. and J. Scharg, 1999, “First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias,” QuarterlyJournal of Economics 114, 37-82.*Rietz, Thomas A., “The Equity Risk Premium: A Solution,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22,July 1988, pp. 117-131.*Roll, Richard R. “A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory’s Tests: Part I: On Past and Potential Testability of the Theory.” Journal of. Financial Economics 4 (March 1977): 129-76.Roll, Richard R., and Ross, Stephen A. “An Empirical Investigation of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory.”Journal of Finance 35 (December 1980): 1073-1103.Ross, Stephen A. “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing.” Journal of Economic Theory 13 (December 1976): 341-60.*Samuelson, Paul A. “Risk and Uncertainty: A Fallacy of the Large Numbers,” Scientia 98, 108-163.*Scheinkman, Jose A., and Weiss, Laurence. “Borrowing Constraints and Aggregate Economic Activity.”Econometrica 54 (January 1986): 23-45.Sharpe, William. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.”Journal of Finance 19 (September 1964): 425-42.*Shiller, Robert J., “Consumption, Asset Markets, and Macroeconomic Fluctuations,” Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 17, Autumn 1982, pp. 203-238.Sundaresan, Suresh M. “Intertemporally Dependent Preferences and the Volatility of Consumption and Wealth.” Review Financial Studies 2, no. 1 (1989): 73-89.Telmer, Chris I., “Asset pricing puzzles and incomplete markets,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, December 1993, pp. 1803-1832.*Tesar, Linda L. and Ingrid M. Werner, 1992 “Home Bias and the Globalization of Security Markets,”NBER Working Paper No. 1224.*Vissing-Jorgensen, Annette, “Limited Stock Market Participation,” Department of Economics, MITand University of Chicago, 1998.*Weil, Philippe, “The Equity Premium Puzzle and the Risk-Free Rate Puzzle,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 24, November 1989, pp. 401-421.*Zeldes, Stephen P. “Consumption and Liquidity Constraints: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Political Economy 97 (April 1989): 305-46.。