商业银行财务报表分析外文文献翻译
财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献
中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)原文：ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTSWe need to use financial ratios in analyzing financial statements.—— The analysis of comparative financial statements cannot be made really effective unless it takes the form of a study of relationships between items in the statements. It is of little value, for example, to know that, on a given date, the Smith Company has a cash balance of $1oooo. But suppose we know that this balance is only -IV per cent of all current liabilities whereas a year ago cash was 25 per cent of all current liabilities. Since the bankers for the company usually require a cash balance against bank lines, used or unused, of 20 per cent, we can see at once that the firm's cash condition is exhibiting a questionable tendency.We may make comparisons between items in the comparative financial statements as follows:1. Between items in the comparative balance sheeta) Between items in the balance sheet for one date, e.g., cash may be compared with current liabilitiesb) Between an item in the balance sheet for one date and the same item in the balance sheet for another date, e.g., cash today may be compared with cash a year agoc) Of ratios, or mathematical proportions, between two items in the balance sheet for one date and a like ratio in the balance sheet for another date, e.g., the ratio of cash to current liabilities today may be compared with a like ratio a year ago and the trend of cash condition noted2. Between items in the comparative statement of income and expensea) Between items in the statement for a given periodb) Between one item in this period's statement and the same item in last period's statementc) Of ratios between items in this period's statement and similar ratios in last period's statement3. Between items in the comparative balance sheet and items in the comparative statement of income and expensea) Between items in these statements for a given period, e.g., net profit for this year may be calculated as a percentage of net worth for this yearb) Of ratios between items in the two statements for a period of years, e.g., the ratio of net profit to net worth this year may-be compared with like ratios for last year, and for the years preceding thatOur comparative analysis will gain in significance if we take the foregoing comparisons or ratios and; in turn, compare them with:I. Such data as are absent from the comparative statements but are of importance in judging a concern's financial history and condition, for example, the stage of the business cycle2. Similar ratios derived from analysis of the comparative statements of competing concerns or of concerns in similar lines of business What financialratios are used in analyzing financial statements.- Comparative analysis of comparative financial statements may be expressed by mathematical ratios between the items compared, for example, a concern's cash position may be tested by dividing the item of cash by the total of current liability items and using the quotient to express the result of the test. Each ratio may be expressed in two ways, for example, the ratio of sales to fixed assets may be expressed as the ratio of fixed assets to sales. We shall express each ratio in such a way that increases from period to period will be favorable and decreases unfavorable to financial condition.We shall use the following financial ratios in analyzing comparative financial statements:I. Working-capital ratios1. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities2. The ratio of cash to total current liabilities3. The ratio of cash, salable securities, notes and accounts receivable to total current liabilities4. The ratio of sales to receivables, i.e., the turnover of receivables5. The ratio of cost of goods sold to merchandise inventory, i.e., the turnover of inventory6. The ratio of accounts receivable to notes receivable7. The ratio of receivables to inventory8. The ratio of net working capital to inventory9. The ratio of notes payable to accounts payableIO. The ratio of inventory to accounts payableII. Fixed and intangible capital ratios1. The ratio of sales to fixed assets, i.e., the turnover of fixed capital2. The ratio of sales to intangible assets, i.e., the turnover of intangibles3. The ratio of annual depreciation and obsolescence charges to the assetsagainst which depreciation is written off4. The ratio of net worth to fixed assetsIII. Capitalization ratios1. The ratio of net worth to debt.2. The ratio of capital stock to total capitalization .3. The ratio of fixed assets to funded debtIV. Income and expense ratios1. The ratio of net operating profit to sales2. The ratio of net operating profit to total capital3. The ratio of sales to operating costs and expenses4. The ratio of net profit to sales5. The ratio of net profit to net worth6. The ratio of sales to financial expenses7. The ratio of borrowed capital to capital costs8. The ratio of income on investments to investments9. The ratio of non-operating income to net operating profit10. The ratio of net operating profit to non-operating expense11. The ratio of net profit to capital stock12. The ratio of net profit reinvested to total net profit available for dividends on common stock13. The ratio of profit available for interest to interest expensesThis classification of financial ratios is permanent not exhaustive. -Other ratios may be used for purposes later indicated. Furthermore, some of the ratios reflect the efficiency with which a business has used its capital while others reflect efficiency in financing capital needs. The ratios of sales to receivables, inventory, fixed and intangible capital; the ratios of net operating profit to total capital and to sales; and the ratios of sales to operating costs and expenses reflect efficiency in the use of capital.' Most of the other ratios reflect financial efficiency.B. Technique of Financial Statement AnalysisAre the statements adequate in general?-Before attempting comparative analysis of given financial statements we wish to be sure that the statements are reasonably adequate for the purpose. They should, of course, be as complete as possible. They should also be of recent date. If not, their use must be limited to the period which they cover. Conclusions concerning 1923 conditions cannot safely be based upon 1921 statements.Does the comparative balance sheet reflect a seasonable situation? If so, it is important to know financial conditions at both the high and low points of the season. We must avoid unduly favorable judgment of the business at the low point when assets are very liquid and debt is low, and unduly unfavorable judgment at the high point when assets are less liquid and debt likely to be relatively high.Does the balance sheet for any date reflect the estimated financial condition after the sale of a proposed new issue of securities? If so, in order to ascertain the actual financial condition at that date it is necessary to subtract the amount of the security issue from net worth, if the. issue is of stock, or from liabilities, if bonds are to be sold. A like amount must also be subtracted from assets or liabilities depending upon how the estimated proceeds of the issue are reflected in the statement.Are the statements audited or unaudited? It is often said that audited statements, that is, complete audits rather than statements "rubber stamped" by certified public accountants, are desirable when they can be obtained. This is true, but the statement analyst should be certain that the given auditing film's reputation is beyond reproach.Is working-capital situation favorable ?-If the comparative statements to be analyzed are reasonably adequate for the purpose, the next step is to analyze the concern's working-capital trend and position. We may begin by ascertaining the ratio of current assets to current liabilities. This ratioaffords-a test of the concern's probable ability to pay current obligations without impairing its net working capital. It is, in part, a measure of ability to borrow additional working capital or to renew short-term loans without difficulty. The larger the excess of current assets over current liabilities the smaller the risk of loss to short-term creditors and the better the credit of the business, other things being equal. A ratio of two dollars of current assets to one dollar of current liabilities is the "rule-of-thumb" ratio generally considered satisfactory, assuming all current assets are conservatively valued and all current liabilities revealed.The rule-of-thumb current ratio is not a satisfactory test ofworking-capital position and trend. A current ratio of less than two dollars for one dollar may be adequate, or a current ratio of more than two dollars for one dollar may be inadequate. It depends, for one thing, upon the liquidity of the current assets.The liquidity of current assets varies with cash position.-The larger the proportion of current assets in the form of cash the more liquid are the current assets as a whole. Generally speaking, cash should equal at least 20 per cent of total current liabilities (divide cash by total current liabilities). Bankers typically require a concern to maintain bank balances equal to 20 per cent of credit lines whether used or unused. Open-credit lines are not shown on the balance sheet, hence the total of current liabilities (instead of notes payable to banks) is used in testing cash position. Like the two-for-one current ratio, the 20 per cent cash ratio is more or less a rule-of-thumb standard.The cash balance that will be satisfactory depends upon terms of sale, terms of purchase, and upon inventory turnover. A firm selling goods for cash will find cash inflow more nearly meeting cash outflow than will a firm selling goods on credit. A business which pays cash for all purchases will need more ready money than one which buys on long terms of credit. The more rapidly the inventory is sold the more nearly will cash inflow equal cash outflow, other things equal.Needs for cash balances will be affected by the stage of the business cycle. Heavy cash balances help to sustain bank credit and pay expenses when a period of liquidation and depression depletes working capital and brings a slump in sales. The greater the effects of changes in the cycle upon a given concern the more thought the financial executive will need to give to the size of his cash balances.Differences in financial policies between different concerns will affect the size of cash balances carried. One concern may deem it good policy to carry as many open-bank lines as it can get, while another may carry only enough lines to meet reasonably certain needs for loans. The cash balance of the first firm is likely to be much larger than that of the second firm.The liquidity of current assets varies with ability to meet "acid test."- Liquidity of current assets varies with the ratio of cash, salable securities, notes and accounts receivable (less adequate reserves for bad debts), to total current liabilities (divide the total of the first four items by total current liabilities). This is the so-called "acid test" of the liquidity of current condition. A ratio of I: I is considered satisfactory since current liabilities can readily be paid and creditors risk nothing on the uncertain values of merchandise inventory. A less than 1:1 ratio may be adequate if receivables are quickly collected and if inventory is readily and quickly sold, that is, if its turnover is rapid andif the risks of changes in price are small.The liquidity of current assets varies with liquidity of receivables. This may be ascertained by dividing annual sales by average receivables or by receivables at the close of the year unless at that date receivables do not represent the normal amount of credit extended to customers. Terms of sale must be considered in judging the turnover of receivables. For example, if sales for the year are $1,200,000 and average receivables amount to $100,000, the turnover of receivables is $1,200,000/$100,000=12. Now, if credit terms to customers are net in thirty days we can see that receivables are paid promptly.Consideration should also be given market conditions and the stage of the business cycle. Terms of credit are usually longer in farming sections than in industrial centers. Collections are good in prosperous times but slow in periods of crisis and liquidation.Trends in the liquidity of receivables will also be reflected in the ratio of accounts receivable to notes receivable, in cases where goods are typically sold on open account. A decline in this ratio may indicate a lowering of credit standards since notes receivable are usually given to close overdue open accounts. If possible, a schedule of receivables should be obtained showing those not due, due, and past due thirty, sixty, and ninety days. Such a, schedule is of value in showing the efficiency of credits and collections and in explaining the trend in turnover of receivables. The more rapid the turnover of receivables the smaller the risk of loss from bad debts; the greater the savings of interest on the capital invested in receivables, and the higher the profit on total capital, other things being equal.Author(s): C. O. Hardy and S. P. Meech译文：财务报表分析A.财务比率我们需要使用财务比率来分析财务报表，比较财务报表的分析方法不能真正有效的得出想要的结果，除非采取的是研究在报表中项目与项目之间关系的形式。
财务报告分析双语(3篇)
第1篇Executive SummaryThis analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the financial performance of XYZ Corporation over the past fiscal year. By examining the financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, we can gain insights into the company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and overall financial health. This report will be presented in both English and Chinese, with key findings and conclusions translated for clarity.I. IntroductionXYZ Corporation, a leading company in the technology industry, has released its financial report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. The report provides a detailed account of the company's financial activities, performance, and position during the period. This analysis will focus on the key financial indicators and ratios, highlighting the company's strengths and weaknesses, and offering recommendations for improvement.II. Financial Statements AnalysisA. Balance SheetThe balance sheet provides a snapshot of the company's financialposition at a specific point in time. The following analysis will focus on the key components of the balance sheet:1. Assets: XYZ Corporation's total assets increased by 15% from the previous fiscal year, driven by a 20% growth in current assets and a 10% increase in non-current assets. This indicates that the company has been successful in expanding its asset base.2. Liabilities: The total liabilities of XYZ Corporation also increased by 12%, with current liabilities growing by 15% and non-currentliabilities by 10%. This suggests that the company has taken on additional debt to finance its growth.3. Equity: The equity of XYZ Corporation increased by 18% over thefiscal year, reflecting the company's profitability and reinvestment in the business.B. Income StatementThe income statement shows the company's revenue, expenses, and net income over a specific period. The following points highlight the key aspects of the income statement:1. Revenue: XYZ Corporation's revenue increased by 20% from the previous fiscal year, driven by strong sales in the technology sector.2. Expenses: The company's expenses increased by 15%, with cost of goods sold (COGS) increasing by 18% and selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A) increasing by 12%. This indicates that the company has been able to control its cost of goods sold but has experienced some increases in SG&A expenses.3. Net Income: XYZ Corporation's net income increased by 25% over the fiscal year, reflecting the company's strong operational performance.C. Cash Flow StatementThe cash flow statement provides insights into the company's cashinflows and outflows. The following analysis focuses on the key components of the cash flow statement:1. Operating Cash Flow: XYZ Corporation's operating cash flow increased by 30% over the fiscal year, indicating strong cash-generating capabilities.2. Investing Cash Flow: The company's investing cash flow decreased by 5%, primarily due to lower capital expenditures.3. Financing Cash Flow: Financing cash flow increased by 20%, driven by higher dividends paid to shareholders and an increase in long-term debt.III. Financial Ratios AnalysisA. Liquidity Ratios1. Current Ratio: XYZ Corporation's current ratio increased from 1.5 to 1.8, indicating improved short-term liquidity.2. Quick Ratio: The quick ratio improved from 1.2 to 1.5, suggestingthat the company has a strong ability to meet its short-term obligations.B. Solvency Ratios1. Debt-to-Equity Ratio: The debt-to-equity ratio decreased from 1.2 to 1.0, indicating a more conservative financial structure.2. Interest Coverage Ratio: The interest coverage ratio improved from 5.0 to 6.0, reflecting the company's ability to cover its interest expenses.C. Profitability Ratios1. Gross Profit Margin: The gross profit margin remained stable at 40%, indicating efficient cost management.2. Net Profit Margin: The net profit margin increased from 15% to 20%, reflecting the company's improved profitability.IV. ConclusionXYZ Corporation has demonstrated strong financial performance over the past fiscal year, with significant growth in revenue, net income, and operating cash flow. The company's liquidity and solvency ratios are also healthy, indicating a strong financial position. However, there are areas of concern, such as the increase in SG&A expenses and the need to manage long-term debt.V. Recommendations1. Cost Control: XYZ Corporation should focus on managing SG&A expenses to improve profitability.2. Debt Management: The company should consider strategies to manage long-term debt, such as refinancing or paying down existing debt.3. Investment in Research and Development: Investing in research and development can help the company stay competitive in the technology industry.VI. 中文摘要本报告旨在全面分析XYZ公司过去一个财年的财务表现。
财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献
文献信息文献标题: The Need Of Financial Statement Analysis In A Firm or0 rgnization(企业或机构财务报表分析的必要性)国外作者: Suneetha G 文献出处:《International Journal of Science Engineering and Advancel Technology (.JSEAT)) 2017, 5(6): 731-735字数统计:2541单词,15110字符;中文4377汉字外文文献:The Need Of Financial Statement AnalysisIn A Firm Or An Orgnization Abstract Financial statement analysis play a dominate role in setting the frame watt of managerial decisions through analysis and interpretation of financial statement This paper discusses about financial , strength and weakness of the company by properly establishing relationship between the items of balance shed and profit and loss account. In order to judge the profitability and financial soundness of the company horizontal, and vertical analyze or done. The various technique used in analyzing financial statement included 'comparative statement, common size statement, trend analysis and ratio analysis. The results suggest that the ratio approach is a highly useful tool in financial statement analysis, especially when a set of ratios is used to evaluate a firm's performanceKey words: Financial statement analysis, to evaluate a firm's performance Comparative statement. Common size statement, trend analysis and ratio analysis1 Introductionhe basis for financial analysis planning and decision making is financiainformation/a business firm has to prepares its financial accounts viz.. balance sheet profit and loss account which provides useful financial information for the purpose of decision making Financial information is needed to predict. Compare and evaluate the fin's earnings ability. The formers statements viz. profit and loss account shows that operating activities of the concern and the later balance sheet depicts the balance value of the acquired assets and of liabilities at a particular point of time. However these statements don't disclose all of the necessary for ascertaining the financial strengths and weaknesses of an enterprise. it is necessary to analyze the data depicted n the financial statements. The finance manager has certain analytical tools which helps is financial analysis and planning. [Doron nissim, stephen h. Penman, (2003) Financialstatement Analysis of Leverage and How it Informs About Profitability and Price-to-book Ratios. Survey of Accounting Studies. Kluwer Academic PublishersAs per examine by Dissim. StephePenman' on Financia proclamation investigation of Leverage and how it illuminates about gainfulness and cost to book proportions, money related explanation examination that recognizes use that emerges in financing exercises from use that emerges in operations. The examination yields two utilizing conditions. one for getting to back operations and one for obtaining over the span of operations. This examination demonstrates that the budgetary explanation investigation clarifies cross-sectional contrasts in present and future rates of return and additionally cost to-snare proportions, which depend onexpected rates of profit for value. This investigation helps in understandorkins influence contrasts in productivity in the cross-areas. changes in future productivity from current benefit and legally binding working liabilities from evaluated liabilities Yating Van, HW. Chuang, (2010) Financial Ratio Adjustment Process: Evidence from Taiwan and North America, ISSN 1450-2887 Issue 43 (2010)0 Euro Journa Publishing Inc. 20102. Financial statements analysisprocess of identifying the financial strengths and weaknesses of a firm from the available accounting data and financial statements. The analysis is done by properly establishing the relationship between the items of balance sheet and profitnd loss account. The first task of the financial analyst is to determine the information relevant the decision under consideration from the total information contained in financial statement. The second step is to arrange information in a way to highlightsignificant relationships. The final step is interpretation and drawing of infed conclusions. Thus financial analysis is the process of selection, relating and evaluation of the accounting data or informationPurpose of financial statements analysis Financial statements analysis is the meaningful interpretation of 'financial statements for panics demanding financial information. It is not necessary for the proprietors alone. In general, the purpose of financial statements analysis is to aidmaking between the users of accounts To evaluate past performance and financial position To predict future performance Tools and techniques of financial analysis Comparative balance sheet common size balance shee Trend analysis Ratio analysis Comparative balance sheet Comparative financial statements is a statement of the financial position of a business so designed as to facilitate comparison of different accounting variables for drawing useful inferences. Financial statements of two or more business enter prices may be compared over period of years. This is known as inter firm comparison Financial statements of the particular business enter pries may be compared over two periods of years. This is known inter period comparisonCommon size statements It facilities the comparison of two or more business entities with a commonbase .in case of balance sheet, total assets or liabilities or capital can be taken ascommon base. These statements are called common measurements or components percentage or 100 percent statements. Since each statement is representated as a %ofthe total of 100 which in variably serves as the baseIn this manner the announcements arranged to draw out the proportion of every benefit of risk to the aggregate of the monetary record and the proportion of every thing of cost or incomes to net deals known as the basic size articulationsPattern investigation Even examination of money related explanations can likewise be completed by figuring pattern rates. Pattern rate expresses quite a long while's budgetary formation as far as a base year. The base year rises to 100 % with every single other year expressed in some rate of this baseProportion investigation Proportion investigation is the technique or process by which the relationship of things or gatherings of things in the budgetary proclamations are registered. decided and introduced. Proportion investigation is an endeavor to determine quantitative measures or aides concerning the money related wellbeing and benefit of the business nture. Proportion investigation can be utilized both in pattern and static examinationhere are a few proportions at the examiner yet the gathering of proportions he wouincline toward relies upon the reason and the destinations of the investigationBookkeeping proportions are viable apparatuses of examination; they are pointers of administrative and over all operational productivity. Proportions, when appropriately utilized are fit for giving valuable data. proportion examination characterized as the deliberate utilization of proportions to decipher the money related explanations with the goal that the qualities and shortcomings of a firm and in addition its chronicled execution and current monetary condition can be resolved the term proportion alludes to the numerical or quantitative connection between things factors this relationship can be communicated as (Fraction (2)Percentages (3)Proportion of numbers These option strategies for communicating things which are identified with eacstigation,examination. It ought to be seen that processing the proportion does not include data in the figures of benefit or deals. What the proportions do is that they uncover the relationship in a more important manner in order to empower us to reach inferences from th As indicated by look into by the Yating yang and 11. W. Chuang. on 'Monetary Ratio Adjustment Process: Evidence from Taiwan and North America. measurable legitimacy of the proportion strategy in monetary articulation examination is researched. The outcomes hence recommend that the proportion approach is a valuable instrument in monetary explanation investigation, particularly when an arrangement of proportions is utilized to assess an association's execution. The straightforwardness of this strategy additionally underpins the utilization of proportions in money related basic leadership3.Money related proportions in perspective of GAAGAAP is the arrangement of standard systems for recording business exchanges and detailing accounting report passages. The components of GAAP incorporatethings onetaryd. and how to ascertain exceptional offer estimations. The models fused into (MAP give general consistency in assumes that are thusly used to ascertain imperative money related proportions that financial specialists and investigators use to assess the organization. Indeed, even agreeable monetary records can be trying to unravel, yet without a framework characterizing every class of section, corporate money related articulations would be basically dark and uselessThere are seven fundamental rule that guide the foundation of the Generall Accepted Accounting Principles. The standards of normality, consistency, perpetuality and genuineness go towardsurging organizations to utilize the legitimate bookkeeping hones quarter after quarter in a decent confidence push to demonstrate the genuine money related state of the organization. None remuneration judiciousness and progression build up rules for how to set up a monetary record, by and large to report the budgetary status of the organization as it is without treatin resources in irregular ways that distort the operations of the organization just to balance different sections. The rule of periodicity basic implies that salary to be gotten extra time ought to be recorded as it is booked to be gotten, not in a singular amountThe brought together arrangement of bookkeeping in this manner has various advantages. Not exclusively does it give a specific level of straightforwardness into an organization's funds. it likewise makes for generally simple examinations between organizations. Subsequently, GAAPempowers venture by helping financial specialists pick shrewdly. GAAP gives America organizations preference over remote ones where financial specialists, unless they have a cozy comprehension of the business may have a great deal more trouble figuring the potential dangers and prizes of a venture. GAAP applies to U.S.-based enterprises just, however every other real nation has bookkeeping measures set up for their local organizations. Now and again remote bookkeeping is genuinely like U.S. GAAP, changing in just minor and fectively represented ways. In different cases, the models change fundamentally aking direct examinations questionable, best case scenarioAdvantages and Limitations of Financial Ratio Analysis Financial ratio analysis is a useful tool for users of financial statement. It hasFocal pointselated proclamations It helps in contrasting organizations of various size and each other. It helps in drift examination which includes looking at a solitary organization over a period It highlights imperative data in basic frame rapidly. A client can judge an organization by simply taking a gander at few number as opposed to perusing of the entire monetary explanationsRestrictions Regardless of convenience, finance.ial proportion examination has a few burdens Some key faults of budgetary proportion examination areDifferent organizations work in various enterprises each having distinctive natural conditions, for example, control, showcase structure, and so on. Such factors curve so huge that a correlation of two organizations from various ventures may beecelvilFinancial bookkeeping data is influenced by assessments and presumptions Bookkeeping principles permit diverse bookkeeping arrangements, which disables likeness and subsequently proportion examination is less helpful in suchcircumstancesRatio investigation clarifies connections between past data while clients are more worried about present and future datThe investigation helps for breaking down the alteration procedure of moneelated proportionsmodel states three impacts which circular segment an association's interior impact, expansive impact, and key administration. It encourages(That a company's budgetary proportions reflect unforeseen changes in the business(2)Active endeavors to accomplish the coveted focus by administration and (3)An individual association's money related proportion developmentMonetary proclamations investigation is the way toward looking at connections among components of the organization's "bookkeeping articulations" or money related explanations (accounting report, salary articulation. proclamation of income and the announcement of held profit) and making correlations with pertinent data. It is a significant instrument utilized by financial specialists. leasers, monetary investigators proprietors. administrators and others in their basic leadership handle The most well known sorts of money related explanations examination curveHorizontal Analysis: monetary data are thought about for at least two years for a solitary organizationVertical anaery thing on a solitary monetary explanation is figured as a rate of an aggregate for a solitary organizationRatio Analysis: analyze things on a solitary budgetary articulation or look at the connections between things on two monetary proclamationsMoney related proportions examination is the most widely recognized type o budgetary explanations investigation. Monetary proportions delineate connections between various parts of an organization's operations and give relative measures of the company's conditions and execution. Monetary proportions may give intimationsand side effects of the money related condition and signs of potential issue regionsby and large holds no importance unless they are looked at against something else, as past execution, another organization/contender or industry normal. In this way, the proportions of firms in various enterprises, which confront distinctive conditions, are generally difficult to analyzeMoney related proportions can be a critical instrument for entrepreneurs and dministrators to gauge their advance toward achieving organization objectives, an toward contending with bigger organizations inside an industry; likewise, followin different proportions after some time is an intense approach to recognize patterns Proportion examination, when performed routinely after some time, can likewise give assistance independent ventures perceive and adjust to patterns influencing their operationsMoney related proportions are additionally utilized by financiers. Speculators and business experts to survey different traits of an organization's monetary quality or working outcomes, this is another motivation behind why entrepreneurs need to comprehend money related proportions in light of the fact that, all the time, a business' capacity to get financing or value financing will rely upon the organization's budgetary proportions. Money related proportions are ordered by the monetary part of he business which the proportion measures. Liquidity proportions look at the ccessibility of organization's money to pay obligation. Productivity proportions measure the organization's utilization of its benefits and control of its costs to create a satisfactory rate of return. Use proportions look at the organization's techniques for financing and measure its capacity to meet budgetary commitments. Productivity proportions measure how rapidly a firm changes over non-money resources for money resources. Market proportions measure financial specialist reaction to owning an organization's stock and furthermore the cost of issuing stockProportion Analysis is a type of Financial Statement Analysis that is utilized acquire a snappy sign of an association's money related execution in a few key territories. Proportion investigation is utilized to assess connections among money related proclamation things. The proportions are utilized to distinguish inclines after some time for one organization or to look at least two organizations at one point in ime. Money related explanation proportion investigation concentrates on three key parts of a business: liquidity, benefit, and dissolvability The proportions are sorted as Short-term Solvency Ratios, Debt MaRatios and Asset management Ratios. Productivity Ratios, and Market Value ratios Proportion Analysis as an instrument has a few vital elements. The information, which are given by budgetary proclamations. are promptly accessible. The calculation of proportions encourages the examination of firms which contrast in measure oportions can be utilized to contrast anassociation's money related execution and industry midpoints. What's more, proportions can be utilized as a part of a type of ttern investigation to recognize zones where execution has enhanced or crumbled after some time. Since Ratio Analysis depends on bookkeeping data, its adequacy is restricted by the bends which emerge in budgetary explanations because of such things as Historical Cost Accounting and swelling. Thusly, Ratio Analysis should just be utilized as an initial phase in money related examination, to get a snappy sign of an association's execution and to distinguish territories which should be explored further.中文译文:企业或机构财务报表分析的必要性摘要财务报表分析在制定管理决策框架方面起着主导作用,其方法是通过对财务报表进行分析和解释。
银行金融数据分析中英文对照外文翻译文献
银行金融数据分析中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)Banks analysis of financial dataAbstractA stochastic analysis of financial data is presented. In particular we investigate how the statistics of log returns change with different time delays t. The scale-dependent behaviour of financial data can be divided into two regions. The first time range, the small-timescale region (in the range of seconds) seems to be characterised by universal features. The second time range, the medium-timescale range from several minutes upwards can be characterised by a cascade process, which is given by a stochastic Markov process in the scale τ. A corresponding Fokker–Planck equation can be extracted from given data and provides a non-equilibrium thermodynamical description of the complexity of financial data.Keywords:Banks; Financial markets; Stochastic processes;Fokker–Planck equation1.IntroductionFinancial statements for banks present a different analytical problem than manufacturing and service companies. As a result, analysis of a bank’s financial statements requires a distinct approach that recognizes a bank’s somewhat unique risks.Banks take deposits from savers, paying interest on some of these accounts. They pass these funds on to borrowers, receiving interest on the loans. Their profits are derived from the spread between the rate they pay forfunds and the rate they receive from borrowers. This ability to pool deposits from many sources that can be lent to many different borrowers creates the flow of funds inherent in the banking system. By managing this flow of funds, banks generate profits, acting as the intermediary of interest paid and interest received and taking on the risks of offering credit.2. Small-scale analysisBanking is a highly leveraged business requiring regulators to dictate minimal capital levels to help ensure the solvency of each bank and the banking system. In the US, a bank’s primary regulator could be the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision or any one of 50 state regulatory bodies, depending on the charter of the bank. Within the Federal Reserve Board, there are 12 districts with 12 different regulatory staffing groups. These regulators focus on compliance with certain requirements, restrictions and guidelines, aiming to uphold the soundness and integrity of the banking system.As one of the most highly regulated banking industries in the world, investors have some level of assurance in the soundness of the banking system. As a result, investors can focus most of their efforts on how a bank will perform in different economic environments.Below is a sample income statement and balance sheet for a large bank. The first thing to notice is that the line items in the statements are not the same as your typical manufacturing or service firm. Instead, there are entries that represent interest earned or expensed as well as deposits and loans.As financial intermediaries, banks assume two primary types of risk as they manage the flow of money through their business. Interest rate risk is the management of the spread between interest paid on deposits and received on loans over time. Credit risk is the likelihood that a borrower will default onits loan or lease, causing the bank to lose any potential interest earned as wellas the principal that was loaned to the borrower. As investors, these are the primary elements that need to be understood when analyzing a bank’s financial statement.3. Medium scale analysisThe primary business of a bank is managing the spread between deposits. Basically when the interest that a bank earns from loans is greater than the interest it must pay on deposits, it generates a positive interest spread or net interest income. The size of this spread is a major determinant of the profit generated by a bank. This interest rate risk is primarily determined by the shape of the yield curve.As a result, net interest income will vary, due to differences in the timing of accrual changes and changing rate and yield curve relationships. Changes in the general level of market interest rates also may cause changes in the volume and mix of a bank’s balance sheet products. For example, when economic activity continues to expand while interest rates are rising, commercial loan demand may increase while residential mortgage loan growth and prepayments slow.Banks, in the normal course of business, assume financial risk by making loans at interest rates that differ from rates paid on deposits. Deposits often have shorter maturities than loans. The result is a balance sheet mismatch between assets (loans) and liabilities (deposits). An upward sloping yield curve is favorable to a bank as the bulk of its deposits are short term and their loans are longer term. This mismatch of maturities generates the net interest revenue banks enjoy. When the yield curve flattens, this mismatch causes net interest revenue to diminish.4.Even in a business using Six Sigma® methodology. an “optimal” level of working capital management needs to beidentified.The table below ties together the bank’s balance sheet with the income statement and displays the yield generated from earning assets and interest bearing deposits. Most banks provide this type of table in their annual reports. The following table represents the same bank as in the previous examples: First of all, the balance sheet is an average balance for the line item, rather than the balance at the end of the period. Average balances provide a better analytical frame work to help understand the bank’s financial performance. Notice that for each average balance item there is a correspondinginterest-related income, or expense item, and the average yield for the time period. It also demonstrates the impact a flattening yield curve can have on a bank’s net interest income.The best place to start is with the net interest income line item. The bank experienced lower net interest income even though it had grown average balances. To help understand how this occurred, look at the yield achieved on total earning assets. For the current period ,it is actually higher than the prior period. Then examine the yield on the interest-bearing assets. It is substantially higher in the current period, causing higher interest-generating expenses. This discrepancy in the performance of the bank is due to the flattening of the yield curve.As the yield curve flattens, the interest rate the bank pays on shorter term deposits tends to increase faster than the rates it can earn from its loans. This causes the net interest income line to narrow, as shown above. One way banks try o overcome the impact of the flattening of the yield curve is to increase the fees they charge for services. As these fees become a larger portion of the bank’s inco me, it becomes less dependent on net interest income to drive earnings.Changes in the general level of interest rates may affect the volume ofcertain types of banking activities that generate fee-related income. For example, the volume of residential mortgage loan originations typically declines as interest rates rise, resulting in lower originating fees. In contrast, mortgage servicing pools often face slower prepayments when rates are rising, since borrowers are less likely to refinance. Ad a result, fee income and associated economic value arising from mortgage servicing-related businesses may increase or remain stable in periods of moderately rising interest rates.When analyzing a bank you should also consider how interest rate risk may act jointly with other risks facing the bank. For example, in a rising rate environment, loan customers may not be able to meet interest payments because of the increase in the size of the payment or reduction in earnings. The result will be a higher level of problem loans. An increase in interest rate is exposes a bank with a significant concentration in adjustable rate loans to credit risk. For a bank that is predominately funded with short-term liabilities, a rise in rates may decrease net interest income at the same time credit quality problems are on the increase.5.Related LiteratureThe importance of working capital management is not new to the finance literature. Over twenty years ago. Largay and Stickney (1980) reported that the then-recent bankruptcy of W.T. Grant. a nationwide chain of department stores. should have been anticipated because the corporation had been running a deficit cash flow from operations for eight of the last ten years of its corporate life. As part of a study of the Fortune 500’s financ ial management practices. Gilbert and Reichert (1995) find that accounts receivable management models are used in 59 percent of these firms to improve working capital projects. while inventory management models were used in 60 percent of the companies. More recently. Farragher. Kleiman andSahu (1999) find that 55 percent of firms in the S&P Industrial index complete some form of a cash flow assessment. but did not present insights regarding accounts receivable and inventory management. or the variations of any current asset accounts or liability accounts across industries. Thus. mixed evidence exists concerning the use of working capital management techniques.Theoretical determination of optimal trade credit limits are the subject of many articles over the years (e.g.. Schwartz 1974; Scherr 1996). with scant attention paid to actual accounts receivable management. Across a limited sample. Weinraub and Visscher (1998) observe a tendency of firms with low levels of current ratios to also have low levels of current liabilities. Simultaneously investigating accounts receivable and payable issues. Hill. Sartoris. and Ferguson (1984) find differences in the way payment dates are defined. Payees define the date of payment as the date payment is received. while payors view payment as the postmark date. Additional WCM insight across firms. industries. and time can add to this body of research.Maness and Zietlow (2002. 51. 496) presents two models of value creation that incorporate effective short-term financial management activities. However. these models are generic models and do not consider unique firm or industry influences. Maness and Zietlow discuss industry influences in a short paragraph that includes the observation that. “An industry a company is located i n may have more influence on that company’s fortunes than overall GNP” (2002. 507). In fact. a careful review of this 627-page textbook finds only sporadic information on actual firm levels of WCM dimensions. virtually nothing on industry factors except for some boxed items with titles such as. “Should a Retailer Offer an In-House Credit Card” (128) and nothing on WCM stability over time. This research will attempt to fill thisvoid by investigating patterns related to working capital measures within industries and illustrate differences between industries across time.An extensive survey of library and Internet resources provided very few recent reports about working capital management. The most relevant set of articles was Weisel and Bradley’s (2003) arti cle on cash flow management and one of inventory control as a result of effective supply chain management by Hadley (2004).6.Research MethodThe CFO RankingsThe first annual CFO Working Capital Survey. a joint project with REL Consultancy Group. was published in the June 1997 issue of CFO (Mintz and Lezere 1997). REL is a London. England-based management consulting firm specializing in working capital issues for its global list of clients. The original survey reports several working capital benchmarks for public companies using data for 1996. Each company is ranked against its peers and also against the entire field of 1.000 companies. REL continues to update the original information on an annual basis.REL uses the “cash flow from operations” value loc ated on firm cash flow statements to estimate cash conversion efficiency (CCE). This value indicates how well a company transforms revenues into cash flow. A “days of working capital” (DWC) value is based on the dollar amount in each of the aggregate. equally-weighted receivables. inventory. and payables accounts. The “days of working capital” (DNC) represents the time period between purchase of inventory on acccount from vendor until the sale to the customer. the collection of the receivables. and payment receipt. Thus. it reflects the company’s ability to finance its core operations with vendor credit. A detailed investigation of WCM is possible because CFO also provides firmand industry values for days sales outstanding (A/R). inventory turnover. and days payables outstanding (A/P).7.Research FindingsAverage and Annual Working Capital Management Performance Working capital management component definitions and average values for the entire 1996 – 2000 period . Across the nearly 1.000 firms in the survey. cash flow from operations. defined as cash flow from operations divided by sales and referred to as “cash conversion efficiency” (CCE). averages 9.0 percent. Incorporating a 95 percent confidence interval. CCE ranges from 5.6 percent to 12.4 percent. The days working capital (DWC). defined as the sum of receivables and inventories less payables divided by daily sales. averages 51.8 days and is very similar to the days that sales are outstanding (50.6). because the inventory turnover rate (once every 32.0 days) is similar to the number of days that payables are outstanding (32.4 days). In all instances. the standard deviation is relatively small. suggesting that these working capital management variables are consistent across CFO reports.8.Industry Rankings on Overall Working Capital Management PerformanceCFO magazine provides an overall working capital ranking for firms in its survey. using the following equation:Industry-based differences in overall working capital management are presented for the twenty-six industries that had at least eight companies included in the rankings each year. In the typical year. CFO magazine ranks 970 companies during this period. Industries are listed in order of the mean overall CFO ranking of working capital performance. Since the best average ranking possible for an eight-company industry is 4.5 (this assumes that the eight companies are ranked one through eight for the entire survey). it is quite obvious that all firms in the petroleumindustry must have been receiving very high overall working capital management rankings. In fact. the petroleum industry is ranked first in CCE and third in DWC (as illustrated in Table 5 and discussed later in this paper). Furthermore. the petroleum industry had the lowest standard deviation of working capital rankings and range of working capital rankings. The only other industry with a mean overall ranking less than 100 was the Electric & Gas Utility industry. which ranked second in CCE and fourth in DWC. The two industries with the worst working capital rankings were Textiles and Apparel. Textiles rank twenty-second in CCE and twenty-sixth in DWC. The apparel industry ranks twenty-third and twenty-fourth in the two working capital measures9. Results for Bayer dataThe Kramers–Moyal coefficients were calculated according to Eqs. (5) and (6). The timescale was divided into half-open intervalsassuming that the Kramers–Moyal coefficients are constant with respect to the timescaleτin each of these subintervals of the timescale. The smallest timescale considered was 240 s and all larger scales were chosen such that τi ＝0.9*τi+1. The Kramers–Moyal coefficients themselves were parameterised in the following form:This result shows that the rich and complex structure of financial data, expressed by multi-scale statistics, can be pinned down to coefficients with a relatively simple functional form.10. DiscussionCredit risk is most simply defined as the potential that a bank borrower or counter-party will fail to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed terms. When this happens, the bank will experience a loss of some or all of the credit it provide to its customer. To absorb these losses, banks maintain anallowance for loan and lease losses. In essence, this allowance can be viewed as a pool of capital specifically set aside to absorb estimated loan losses. This allowance should be maintained at a level that is adequate to absorb the estimated amount of probable losses in the institution’s loan portfolio.A careful review of a bank’s financial statements can highlight the key factors that should be considered becomes before making a trading or investing decision. Investors need to have a good understanding of the business cycle and the yield curve-both have a major impact on the economic performance of banks. Interest rate risk and credit risk are the primary factors to consider as a bank’s financial performance follows the yield curve. When it flattens or becomes inverted a bank’s net interest revenue is put under greater pressure. When the yield curve returns to a more traditional shape, a bank’s net interest revenue usually improves. Credit risk can be the largest contributor to the negative performance of a bank, even causing it to lose money. In addition, management of credit risk is a subjective process that can be manipulated in the short term. Investors in banks need to be aware of these factors before they commit their capital.银行的金融数据分析摘要财务数据随机分析已经被提出，特别是我们探讨如何统计在不同时间τ记录返回的变化。
财务报表分析外文文献及翻译
财务报表分析外⽂⽂献及翻译Review of accounting studies,2003,16(8):531-560 Financial Statement Analysis of Leverage and How It Informs About Protability and Price-to-Book RatiosDoron Nissim, Stephen. PenmanAbstractThis paper presents a ?nancial statement analysis that distinguishes leverage that arises in ?nancing activities from leverage that arises in operations. The analysis yields two leveraging equations, one for borrowing to ?nance operations and one for borrowing in the course of operations. These leveraging equations describe how the two types of leverage affect book rates of return on equity. An empirical analysis shows that the ?nancial statement analysis explains cross-sectional differences in current and future rates of return as well as price-to-book ratios, which are based on expected rates of return on equity. The paper therefore concludes that balance sheet line items for operating liabilities are priced differently than those dealing with ? nancing liabilities. Accordingly, ?nancial statement analysis that distinguis hes the two types of liabilities informs on future pro?tability and aids in the evaluation of appropriate price-to-book ratios.Keywords: financing leverage; operating liability leverage; rate of return on equity; price-to-book ratioLeverage is traditiona lly viewed as arising from ?nancing activities: Firms borrow to raise cash for operations. This paper shows that, for the purposes of analyzing pro?tability and valuing ?rms, two types of leverage are relevant, one indeed arising from ?nancing activities b ut another from operating activities. The paper supplies a ?nancial statement analysis of the two types of leveragethat explains differences in shareholder pro?tability and price-to-book ratios.The standard measure of leverage is total liabilities to equity. However, while some liabilities—like bank loans and bonds issued—are due to ?nancing, other liabilities—like trade payables, deferred revenues, and pension liabilities—result from transactions with suppliers, customers and employees in conducting operations. Financing liabilities are typically traded in well-functioning capital markets where issuers are price takers. In contrast, ?rms are able to add value in operations because operations involve trading in input and output markets that are less perfect than capital markets. So, with equity valuation in mind, there are a priori reasons for viewing operating liabilities differently from liabilities that arise in ?nancing.Our research asks whether a dollar of operating liabilities on the balance sheet is priced differently from a dollar of ?nancing liabilities. As operating and ?nancing liabilities are components of the book value of equity, the question is equivalent to asking whether price-to-book ratios depend on the composition of book values. The price-to-book ratio is determined by the expected rate of return on the book value so, if components of book value command different price premiums, they must imply different expected rates of return on book value. Accordingly, the paper also investigates whether the two types of liabilities are associated with differences in future book rates of return.Standard ?nancial statement analysis distinguishes shareholder pro?tability that arises from operations from that which arises from borrowing to ?nance opera tions. So, return on assets is distinguished from return on equity, with the difference attributed to leverage. However, in the standard analysis, operating liabilities are not distinguished from ?nancing liabilities. Therefore, to develop the speci?cation s for the empirical analysis, the paper presents a ?nancial statement analysis that identi?es the effects of operating and ?nancing liabilities on rates of return on book value—andso on price-to-book ratios—with explicit leveraging equations that explain when leverage from each type of liability is favorable or unfavorable.The empirical results in the paper show that ?nancial statement analysis that distinguishes leverage in operations from leverage in ?nancing also distinguishes differences in contemporaneous and future pro?tability among ?rms. Leverage from operating liabilities typically levers pro?tability more than ?nancing leverage and has a higher frequency of favorable effects.Accordingly, for a given total leverage from both sources, ?rms with hig her leverage from operations have higher price-to-book ratios, on average. Additionally, distinction between contractual and estimated operating liabilities explains further differences in ?rms’ pro?tability and their price-to-book ratios.Our results are of consequence to an analyst who wishes to forecast earnings and book rates of return to value ?rms. Those forecasts—and valuations derived from them—depend, we show, on the composition of liabilities. The ?nancial statement analysis of the paper, supported by the empirical results, shows how to exploit information in the balance sheet for forecasting and valuation.The paper proceeds as follows. Section 1 outlines the ?nancial statements analysis that identi?es the two types of leverage and lays out expres sions that tie leverage measures to pro?tability. Section 2 links leverage to equity value and price-to-bookratios. The empirical analysis is in Section 3, with conclusions summarized in Section 4.1. Financial Statement Analysis of LeverageThe following ?nancial statement analysis separates the effects of ?nancing liabilities and operating liabilities on the pro? tability of shareholders’ equity. The analysis yields explicit leveraging equations from which the speci?cations for the empirical analysis are developed.Shareholder pro?tability, return on common equity, is measured asReturn on common equity (ROCE) = comprehensive net income ÷common equity (1) Leverage affects both the numerator and denominator of this pro?tability measure. Appropriate ?nancial statement analysis disentangles the effects of leverage. The analysis below, which elaborates on parts of Nissim and Penman (2001), begins by identifying components of the balance sheet and income statement that involve operating and ?nancing activities. The pro?tability due to each activity is then calculated and two types of leverage are introduced to explain both operating and ?nancing pro?tability and overall shareholder pro?tability.1.1 Distinguishing the Protability of Operations from the Protability of Financing ActivitiesWith a focus on common equity (so that preferred equity is viewed as a ?nancial liability), the balance sheet equation can be restated as follows:Common equity =operating assets＋financial assets－operating liabilities－Financial liabilities (2)The distinction here between operating assets (like trade receivables, inventory and property,plant and equipment) and ? nancial assets (the deposits and marketable securities that absorb excess cash) is made in other contexts. However, on the liability side, ?nancing liabilities are also distinguished here from operating liabilities. Rather than treating all liabilities as ? nancing debt, only liabilities that raise cash for operations—like bank loans, short-term commercial paper and bonds—are classi?ed as such. Other liabilities—such as accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue, restructuring liabilities and pension liabilities—arise from operations. The distinction is not as simple as current versus long-term liabilities; pension liabilities, for example, are usually long-term, and short-term borrowing is a current liability.Rearranging terms in equation (2),Common equity = (operating assets－operating liabilities)－(financial liabilities－financial assets)Or,Common equity = net operating assets－net financing debt (3) This equation regroups assets and liabilities into operating and nancing activities. Net operating assets are operating assets less operating liabilities. So a rm might invest in inventories, but to the extent to which the suppliers of those inventories grant credit, the net investment in inventories is reduced. Firms pay wages, but to the extent to which the payment of wages is deferred in pension liabilities, the net investment required to run the business is reduced. Net ?nancing debt is ?nancing debt (including preferred stock) minus?nancial assets. So, a ?rm may issue bonds to raise cash for operations but may also buy bonds with excess cash from operations. Its net indebtedness is its net position in bonds. Indeed a ?rm may be a net creditor (with more ?nancial assets than ?nancial liabilities) rather than a net debtor.The income statement can be reformulated to distinguish income that comes from operating and ?nancing activities: Comprehensive net income = operating income－net financing expense (4) Operating income is produced in operations and net ?nancial expense is incurred in the ?nancing of operations. Interest income on ?nancial assets is netted against interest expense on ?nancial liabilities (including preferred dividends) in net ?nancial expense. If interest i ncome is greater than interest expense, ?nancing activities produce net ?nancial income rather than net ?nancial expense. Both operating income and net ?nancial expense (or income) are after tax.3Equations (3) and (4) produce clean measures of after-tax o perating pro?tability and the borrowing rate:Return on net operating assets (RNOA) = operating income ÷net operating assets (5) andNet borrowing rate (NBR) = net financing expense ÷net financing debt (6) RNOA recognizes that pro?tabilit y must be based on the net assets invested in operations. So ?rms can increase their operating pro?tability by convincing suppliers, in the course of business, to grant or extend credit terms; credit reduces the investment that shareholders would otherwise have to put in the business. Correspondingly, the net borrowing rate, by excluding non-interest bearing liabilities from the denominator, gives the appropriate borrowing rate for the ?nancing activities.Note that RNOA differs from the more common return on assets (ROA), usually de?ned as income before after-tax interestexpense to total assets. ROA does not distinguish operating and ?nancing activities appropriately. Unlike ROA, RNOA excludes ?nancial assets in the denominator and subtracts operating liabilities. Nissim and Penman (2001) report a median ROA for NYSE and AMEX ?rms from 1963–1999 of only 6.8%, but a median RNOA of 10.0%—much closer to what one would expect as a return to business operations.1.2 Financial Leverage and its Effect on Shareholder ProtabilityFrom expressions (3) through (6), it is straightforward to demonstrate that ROCE is a weighted average of RNOA and the net borrowing rate, with weights derived from equation (3): ROCE= [net operating assets ÷common equity× RNOA]－[net financ ing debt÷common equity ×net borrowing rate (7) Additional algebra leads to the following leveraging equation:ROCE = RNOA＋[FLEV× ( RNOA－net borrowing rate )] (8) where FLEV, the measure of leverage from ?nancing activities, isFinancing leverage (FLEV) =net financing debt ÷common equity (9) The FLEV measure excludes operating liabilities but includes (as a net against ?nancing debt) ?nancial assets. If ?nancial assets are greater than ?nancial liabilities, FLEV is negative. The leveraging equation (8) works for negative FLEV (in which case the net borrowing rate is the return on net ? nancial assets).This analysis breaks shareholder pro?tability, ROCE, down into that which i s due to operations and that which is due to ? nancing. Financial leverage levers the ROCE over RNOA, with the leverage effect determined by the amount of ?nancial leverage (FLEV) and the spread between RNOA and the borrowing rate. The spread can be positive (favorable) or negative (unfavorable). 1.3 Operating Liability Leverage and its Effect on Operating ProtabilityWhile ?nancing debt levers ROCE, operating liabilities lever the pro?tability of operations, RNOA. RNOA is operating income relative to net operating assets, and net operating assets are operating assets minus operating liabilities. So, the more operating liabilities a ?rm has relative to operating assets, the higher its RNOA, assuming no effect on operating income in the numerator. The intensity of the use of operating liabilities in the investment base is operating liability leverage: Operating liability leverage (OLLEV) =operating liabilities ÷net operating assets (10) Using operating liabilities to lever the rate of return from operations may not come for free, however; there may be a numerator effect on operating income. Suppliers provide what nominally may be interest-free credit, but presumably charge for that credit with higher prices for the goods and services supplied. This is the reason why operating liabilities are inextricably a part of operationsrather than the ?nancing of operations. The amount that suppliers actually charge for this credit is dif?cult to identify. But the market borrowing rate is observable. The amount that suppliers would implicitly charge in prices for the credit at this borrowing rate can be estimated as a benchmark: Market interest on operating liabilities= operating liabilities×market borrowing ratewhere the market borrowing rate, given that most credit is short term, can be approximated by the after-tax short-term borrowing rate. This implicit cost is benchmark, for it is the cost that makes suppliers indifferent in supplying cred suppliers are fully compensated if they charge implicit interest at the cost borrowing to supply the credit. Or, alternatively, the ?rm buying the goods o r services is indifferent between trade credit and ?nancing purchases at the borrowin rate.To analyze the effect of operating liability leverage on operating pro?tability, w e d e?ne:Return on operating assets (ROOA) =(operating income＋market interest on operating liabilities)÷operating assets(11)The numerator of ROOA adjusts operating income for the full implicit cost of trad credit. If suppliers fully charge the implicit cost of credit, ROOA is the return of operating assets that would be earned had the ?rm no operating liability leverage. suppliers do not fully charge for the credit, ROOA measures the return fro operations that includes the favorable implicit credit terms from suppliers.Similar to the leveraging equation (8) for ROCE, RNOA can be expressed as:RNOA = ROOA＋[ OLLEV ×(ROOA－market borrowing rate )] (12) where the borrowing rate is the after-tax short-term interest rate.Given ROOA, the effect ofleverage on pro?tability is determined by the level of operating liability leverage and the spread between ROOA and the short-term after-tax interest rate. Like ?nancing l everage, the effect can be favorable or unfavorable: Firms can reduce their operating pro?tability through operating liability leverage if their ROOA is less than the market borrowing rate. However, ROOA will also be affected if the implicit borrowing cost on operating liabilities is different from the market borrowing rate. 1.4 Total Leverage and its Effect on Shareholder ProtabilityOperating liabilities and net ?nancing debt combine into a total leverage measure:Total leverage (TLEV) = ( net financing debt＋operating liabilities)÷common equityThe borrowing rate for total liabilities is:Total borrowing rate = (net financing expense＋market interest on operating liabilities) ÷net financing debt＋operating liabilitiesROCE equals the weighted average of ROOA and the total borrowing rate, where the weights are proportional to the amount of total operating assets and the sum of net ?nancing debt and operating liabilities (with a negative sign), respectively. So, similar to the leveraging equations (8) and (12):ROCE = ROOA ＋[TLEV×(ROOA －total borrowing rate)](13)In summary, ?nancial statement analysis of operating and ?nancing activities yields three leveraging equations, (8), (12), and (13). These equations are based on ?xed accounting re lations and are therefore deterministic: They must hold for a given ? rm at a given point in time. The only requirement in identifying the sources of pro?tability appropriately is a clean separation betweenoperating and ?nancing components in the ?nancial statements.2. Leverage, Equity Value and Price-to-Book RatiosThe leverage effects above are described as effects on shareholder pro?tability. Our interest is not only in the effects on shareholder pro?tability, ROCE, but also in the effects on shareholder value, which is tied to ROCE in a straightforward way by the residual income valuation model. As a restatement of the dividend discount model, the residual income model expresses the value of equity at date 0 (P0) as:B is the book value of common shar eholders’ equity, X is comprehensive income to common shareholders, and r is the required return for equity investment. The price premium over book value is determined by forecasting residual income, Xt –rBt-1. Residual income is determined in part by income relative to book value, that is, by the forecasted ROCE. Accordingly, leverage effects on forecasted ROCE (net of effects on the required equity return) affect equity value relative to book value: The price paid for the book value depends on the expect ed pro?tability of the book value, and leverage affects pro?tability. So our empirical analysis investigates the effect of leverage on both pro?tability and price-to-book ratios. Or, stated differently, nancing and operating liabilities are distinguishable components of book value, so the question is whether the pricing of book values depends on the composition of book values. If this is the case, the different components of book value must imply different pro?tability. Indeed, the two analyses (of pro?tab ility and price-to-book ratios) are complementary.Financing liabilities are contractual obligations for repayment of funds loaned. Operatingliabilities include contractual obligations (such as accounts payable), but also include accrual liabilities (such as deferred revenues and accrued expenses). Accrual liabilities may be based on contractual terms, but typically involve estimates. We consider the real effects of contracting and the effects of accounting estimates in turn. Appendix A provides some examples of contractual and estimated liabilities and their effect on pro?tability and value.2.1 Effects of Contractual liabilitiesThe ex post effects of ?nancing and operating liabilities on pro?tability are clear from leveraging equations (8), (12) and (13). These expressions always hold ex post, so there is no issue regarding ex post effects. But valuation concerns ex ante effects. The extensive research on the effects of ?nancial leverage takes, as its point of departure, the Modigliani and Miller (M&M) (1958) ?nancing irrelevance proposition: With perfect capital markets and no taxes or information asymmetry, debt ?nancing has no effect on value. In terms of the residual income valuation model, an increase in ?nancial leverage due to a substitution of debt for equity may increase expected ROCE according to expression (8), but that increase is offset in the valuation (14) by the reduction in the book value of equity that earns the excess pro?tability and the increase in the required equity return, leaving total value (i.e., the value of equity and debt) unaffected. The required equity return increases because of increased ? nancing risk: Leverage may be expected to be favorable but, the higher the leverage, the greater the loss to shareholders should the leverage turn unfavorable ex post, with RNOA less than the borrowing rate.In the face of the M&M proposition, research on the value effects of ?nancial leverage has proceeded to relax the conditions for the proposition to hold. Modigliani and Miller (1963) hyp othesized that the tax bene?ts of debt increase after-tax returns to equity and so increase equityvalue. Recent empirical evidence provides support for the hypothesis (e.g., Kemsley and Nissim, 2002), although the issue remains controversial. In any case, since the implicit cost of operating liabilities, like interest on ?nancing debt, is tax deductible, the composition of leverage should have no tax implications.Debt has been depicted in many studies as affecting value by reducing transaction and contracting costs. While debt increases expected bankruptcy costs and introduces agency costs between shareholders and debtholders, it reduces the costs that shareholders must bear in monitoring management, and may have lower issuing costs relative to equity. One might expect these considerations to apply to operating debt as well as ?nancing debt, with the effects differing only by degree. Indeed papers have explained the use of trade debt rather than ?nancing debt by transaction costs (Ferris, 1981), differentia l access of suppliers and buyers to ?nancing (Schwartz,1974), and informational advantages and comparative costs of monitoring (Smith, 1987; Mian and Smith, 1992; Biais and Gollier, 1997). Petersen and Rajan (1997) provide some tests of these explanations.In addition to tax, transaction costs and agency costs explanations for leverage, research has also conjectured an informational role. Ross (1977) and Leland and Pyle (1977) characterized ?nancing choice as a signal of pro?tability and value, and subseque nt papers (for example, Myers and Majluf, 1984) have carried the idea further. Other studies have ascribed an informational role also for operating liabilities. Biais and Gollier (1997) and Petersen and Rajan (1997), for example, see suppliers as having mo re information about ?rms than banks and the bond market, so more operating debt might indicate higher value. Alternatively, high trade payables might indicate dif?culti es in paying suppliers and declining fortunes.Additional insights come from further relaxing the perfect frictionless capital markets assumptions underlying the original M&M nancing irrelevance proposition. When it comes to operations, the product and input markets in which rms trade are typically less competitive than capital markets. In deed, ?rms are viewed as adding value primarily in operations rather than in nancing activities because of less than purely competitive product and input markets. So, whereas it is difficult to ‘‘make money off the debtholders,’’ ?rms can be seen as ‘‘mak ing money off the trade creditors.’’ In operations, ?rms can exert monopsony power, extracting value from suppliers and employees. Suppliers may provide cheap implicit ?nancing in exchange for information about products and markets in which the ?rm operates. They may also bene?t from ef?ciencies in the ?rm’s supply and distribution chain, and may grant credit to capture future business.2.2 Effects of Accrual Accounting EstimatesAccrual liabilities may be based on contractual terms, but typically involve estimates. Pension liabilities, for example, are based on employment contracts but involve actuarial estimates. Deferred revenues may involve obligations to service customers, but also involve estimates that allocate revenues to periods. While contractual liabilities are typically carried on the balance sheet as an unbiased indication of the cash to be paid, accrual accounting estimates are not necessarily unbiased. Conservative accounting, for example, might overstate pension liabilities or defer more revenue than required by contracts with customers.Such biases presumably do not affect value, but they affect accounting rates of return and the pricing of the liabilities relative to their carrying value (the price-to-book ratio). The effect of accounting estimates on operating liability leverage is clear: Higher carrying values for operatingliabilities result in higher leverage for a given level of operating assets. But the effect on pro?tability is also clear from leveraging equation (12): While conservative accounting for operating assets increases the ROOA, as modeled in Feltham and Ohlson (1995) and Zhang (2000), higher book values of operating liabilities lever up RNOA over ROOA. Indeed, conservative accounting for operating liabilities amounts to leverage of book rates of return. By leveraging equation (13), that leverage effect ?ows through to shareholder pro?tability, ROCE.And higher anticipated ROCE implies a higher price-to-book ratio.The potential bias in estimated operating liabilities has opposite effects on current and future pro?tability. For example, if a ? rm books higher deferred revenues, accrued expenses or other operating liabilities, and so increases its operating liability leverage, it reduces its current pro?tability: Current revenues must be lower or expenses higher. And, if a ?rm reports lower operating assets (by a write down of receivables, inventories or other assets, for example), and so increases operating liability leverage, it also reduces current pro?tability: Current expense s must be higher. But this application of accrual accounting affects future operating income: All else constant, lower current income implies higher future income. Moreover, higher operating liabilities and lower operating assets amount to lower book value of equity. The lower book value is the base for the rate of return for the higher future income. So the analysis of operating liabilities potentially identi?es part of the accrual reversal phenomenon documented by Sloan (1996) and interprets it as affecting leverage, forecasts of pro?tability, and price-to-book ratios.3. Empirical AnalysisThe analysis covers all ?rm-year observations on the combined COMPUSTAT (Industry and Research) ?les for any of the 39 years from 1963 to 2001 that satisfy the following requirements: (1)the company was listed on the NYSE or AMEX; (2) the company was not a ?nancial institution (SIC codes 6000–6999), thereby omitting ?rms where most ?nancial assets and liabilities are used in operations; (3) the book value of common equity is at least $10 million in 2001 dollars; and (4) the averages of the beginning and ending balance of operating assets, net operating assets and common equity are positive (as balance sheet variables are measured in the analysis using annual averages). T hese criteria resulted in a sample of 63,527 ?rm-year observations.Appendix B describes how variables used in the analysis are measured. One measurement issue that deserves discussion is the estimation of the borrowing cost for operating liabilities. As most operating liabilities are short term, we approximate the borrowing rate by the after-tax risk-free one-year interest rate. This measure may understate the borrowing cost if the risk associated with operating liabilities is not trivial. The effect of such measurement error is to induce a negative correlation between ROOA and OLLEV. As we show below, however, even with this potential negative bias we document a strong positive relation between OLLEV and ROOA.4. ConclusionTo ?nance operations, ?rms borrow in the ?nancial markets, creating ?nancing leverage. In running their operations, ?rms also borrow, but from customers, employees and suppliers, creating operating liability leverage. Because they involve trading in different types of markets, the two types of leverage may have different value implications. In particular, operating liabilities may re?ect contractual terms that add value in different ways than ?nancing liabilities, and so they may be priced differently. Operating liabilities also involve accrual accounting estimates that may further affect their pricing. This study has investigated the implications of the two types of leverage for pro?tability and equity value.The paper has laid out explicit leveraging equations that show how shareholder p ro?tability is related to ?nancing leverage and operating liability leverage. For operating liability leverage, the leveraging equation incorporates both real contractual effects and accounting effects. As price-to-book ratios are based on expected pro?tab ility, this analysis also explains how price-to-book ratios are affected by the two types of leverage. The empirical analysis in the paper demonstrates that operating and ?nancing liabilities imply different pro?tability and are priced differently in the stock market.Further analysis shows that operating liability leverage not only explains differences in pro?tability in the cross-section but also informs on changes in future pro?tability from current pro?tability. Operating liability leverage and changes in operating liability leverage are indicators of the quality of current reported pro?tability as a predictor of future pro?tability.Our analysis distinguishes contractual operating liabilities from estimated liabilities, but further research might examine operating liabilities in more detail, focusing on line items such as accrued expenses and deferred revenues. Further research might also investigate the pricing of operating liabilities under differing circumstances; for example, where ?rms have ‘‘market power’’ over their suppliers.会计研究综述，2003,16(8):531-560财务报表分析的杠杆左右以及如何体现盈利性和值⽐率摘要本⽂提供了区分⾦融活动和业务运营中杠杆作⽤的财务报表分析。
财务报表分析(英文版)
A. Measuring Business Incomea. explain why financial statements are prepared at the end of the regular accounting period.Major Financial Statements:∙The balance sheet: provides a "snapshot" of the firm's financial condition.∙The income statement: reports on the "performance" of the firm.∙The statement of cash flows: reports the cash receipts and cash outflows classified according to operating, investment and financing activities.∙The statement of stockholder's equity: reports the amounts and sources of changes in equity from transactions with owners.∙The footnotes of the financial statements: allow uses to improve assessment of the amount, timing and uncertainty of the estimates reported in the financial statements.The most accurate way to measure the results of enterprise activity would be to measure them at the time of the enterprise's eventual liquidation. Business, government, investors, and various other user groups, however, cannot wait indefinitely for such information. If accountants did not provide financial information periodically, someone else would.The periodicity or time period assumption simply implies that the economic activities of an enterprise can be divided into artificial time periods. These time periods vary, but the most common are monthly, quarterly, and yearly.The information must be reliable and relevant. This requires that information must be consistent and comparable over time and also be provided on a timely basis. The shorter the time period, the more difficult it becomes to determine the proper net income for the period. A month's results are usually less reliable than a quarter's results, and a quarter's results are likely to be less reliable than a year's results. Investors desire and demand that information be quickly processed and disseminated; yet the quicker the information is released, the more it is subject to error. This phenomenon provides an interesting example of the trade-off between relevance and reliability in preparing financial data.In practice, financial reporting is done at the end of the accounting period.Accounting periods can be any length in time. Firms typically use the year as the primary accounting period. The 12-month accounting period is referred to as the fiscal year. Firms also report for periods less than a year(e.g. quarterly) on an interim basis.∙Accounting period must be of equal length. Financial statements are prepared at the end of the regular accounting period to allow comparison across time.User CommentsPosted by Jeanette @ 2003-10-25 14:15:45.same period --- allow comparisionbasic assumption in preparing financial statements is ---- the firm will continue in operation,--- going concern,'assigning revenue - expenses ---- base on matching principlePosted by GiGi @ 2004-01-29 06:25:01.remember that there are 4 types of financial statementsb. explain why the accounts must be adjusted at the end of each period.Why?∙Most external transactions are recorded when they occur. The employment of an accrual system means that numerous adjustments are necessary before financial statements are prepared because certain accounts are not accurately stated.∙Some external transactions might not even seem like transactions and are recognized only at the end of the accounting period. Examples include unrecorded revenues and credit purchase.∙Some economic activities do not occur as the result of external transactions. Examples include depreciation and the expiration of prepaid expenses.∙Timing: Often a transaction affects the revenue or expenses of two or more accounting periods. The related cash inflow or outflow does not always coincide with the period in which these revenue or expense items are recorded. Thus, the need for adjusting entries results from timing differences between the receipt or disbursement of cash and the recording of revenue or expenses. For example, if we handle transactions on a cash basis, only cash transactions during the year are recorded. Consequently, if a company's employees are paid every two weeks and the end of an accounting period occurs in the middle of these two weeks, neither liability nor expense has been recorded for the last week. To bring the accounts up to date for the preparation of financial statements, both the wage expense and the wage liability accounts need to be increased.A necessary step in the accounting process, then, is the adjustment of all accounts to an accrual basis and their subsequent posting to the general ledger.Adjusting entries are therefore necessary to achieve a proper matching of revenues and expenses in the determination of net income for the current period and to achieve an accurate statement of the assets and equities existing at the end of the period.Adjustment principles∙The revenue recognition principle∙The matching principleWhat to adjust?Each adjusting entry affects both a real account (assets, liability, or owner's equity) and a nominal or income statement account (revenue or expense). The four basic types of adjusting entries are:1.deferred expenses that benefits more than one period: for example,prepaid expenses (e.g. prepaid insurance, rent) are expenses paid in advance and recorded as assets before they are used or consumed.When these assets are consumed, expenses should be recognized: a debit to an expense account and a credit to an asset account. Another example is depreciation. The cost of a long-term asset is allocated as anexpense over its useful life. At the end of each period depreciation expense is recorded through an adjusting entry: a debit to a depreciation expense account and a credit to an accumulated depreciation account (a contra account used to total the past depreciation expenses on specific long-term assets).2.accrued expenses that incurred but not yet paid or recorded: examplesare employee salaries and interest on borrowed money. At the end of the accounting period, the accrued expense is recorded through an adjusting entry: a debit to an expense account (i.e. Salaries Expense) and a credit to a liability account (i.e. Salaries Payable).3.accrued revenues that earned but not yet received or recorded: also calledunrecorded revenues. Examples include interest revenues, rent revenues, etc. Such revenues accumulate with the passing of time, but the firm may have not received the payment or billed the client. An adjusting entry should be: a debit to an asset account (i.e. Accounts Receivable) and a credit to a revenue account (i.e. Interest Revenue).4.unearned revenues that are revenues received in cash before delivery ofgoods/services: examples are magazine subscription fees, customer deposits for services. These "revenues" are not earned yet and thus should be recorded as liabilities. An adjusting entry should be: a debit to a liability account (i.e. Unearned Revenue) and a credit to a revenue account (i.e. Revenue).User CommentsPosted by GiGi @ 2004-01-29 06:26:22.accrual system!!! definitionPosted by Gina @ 2004-02-03 22:17:33.accrual based accounting recognizes the impact of a business event as it occurs, regardless of whether transaction affected cashPosted by Gina @ 2004-02-03 22:20:20.Revenue Principle: basis for recording revenues (ie tells when to record revenue and the amounts).Matching Principle: basis for recording expensis (ie direction to ID all expenses during the period, measure them, and match them against the revenues earned in that period).c. explain why the accrual basis of accounting produces more useful income statements and balance sheets than the cash basis.Revenue is something earned through the sale of goods or services. Not all cash receipts are revenues; for example, cash received through a loan is not revenue. Expenses are the cost of goods or services used to generate revenues. Not all cash payments are expenses; for example, cash dividends paid to stockholders are not expenses. Net income is the difference between revenues and expenses. It is reported on the income statement, and is the focus in evaluating a firm's profitability.Most companies use the accrual basis accounting, recognizing revenue when it is earned (the goods are sold or the services performed) and recognizing expenses in the period incurred, without regard to the time of receipt or payment of cash. Net income is revenue earned minus expenses incurred.Under the strict cash basis accounting, revenue is recorded only when the cash is received and expenses are recorded only when the cash is paid. Net income is cash revenue minus cash expenses. The matching principle is ignored here, resulting inconformity with generally accepted accounting principles.Today's economy is considerably more lubricated by credit than by cash. And the accrual basis, not the cash basis, recognizes all aspects of the credit phenomenon. Investors, creditors, and other decision makers seek timely information about an enterprise's future cash flows. Accrual basis accounting provides this information by reporting the cash inflows and outflows associated with earnings activities as soon as these cash flows can be estimated with an acceptable degree of certainty. Receivables and payables are forecasters of future cash inflows and outflows. In other words, accrual basis accounting aids in predicting future cash flows by reporting transactions and other events with cash consequences at the time the transactions and events occur, rather than when the cash is received and paid. Accrual accounting generally provides a better indication of performance than cash basis of accounting since it increases the comparability of income statements and balance sheets across periods.B. Financial Reporting and Analysisa. define each asset and liability category on the balance sheet and prepare a classified balance sheet.Think of the balance sheet as a photo of the business at a specific point in time. It presents the assets, liabilities, and the equity ownership of a business entity as of a specific date.∙Assets are the economic resources controlled by the firm.∙Liabilities are the financial obligations that the firm must fulfill in the future.Liabilities are typically fulfilled by payment of cash. They represent the source of financing provided to the firm by the creditors.∙Equity Ownership is the owner's investments and the total earnings retained from the commencement of the firm. Equity represents the source of financing provided to the firm by the owners.Balance sheet accounts are classified so that similar items are grouped together to arrive at significant subtotals. Furthermore, the material is arranged so that important relationships are shown.The table below indicates the general format of balance sheet presentation: Balance Sheet ClassificationsAssets Liabilities and Owner's EquityCurrent Assets Current liabilitiesLong-term investments Long-term debtProperty, plan and equipment Owner's equityIntangible assets Capital stockOther assets Additional paid-in capitalRetained earningsCurrent Assets:They are cash and other assets expected to be converted into cash, sold, or consumed either in one year or in the operating cycle, whichever is longer. The operating cycle is the average time between the acquisition of materials and supplies and the realization of cash through sales of the product for which the materials and supplies were acquired. The cycle operates from cash through inventory, production, and receivables back to cash. Where there are several operating cycles within one year, the one-year period is used. If the operating cycle is more than one year, the longer period is used.Current assets are presented in the balance sheet in order of liquidity. The five major items found in the current asset section are:∙Cash:valued at its stated value. Cash restricted for purpose other than payment of current obligations or for use in current operations should be excluded from the current asset section.∙Marketable securities: Also referred to as marketable securities. Valued at cost or lower of cost and market.∙Accounts receivables:amounts owed to the firm by its customers for goods and services delivered. Valued at the estimated amount collectible.∙Inventories: Products that will be sold in the normal course of business.∙Prepaid expenses: they are expenditures already made for benefits (usually services) to be received within one year or the operating cycle, whichever is longer. Typical examples are prepaid rent, advertising, taxes, insurance policy, and office or operating supplies. They are reported at the amount of un-expired or unconsumed cost.Long-Term Investments:Often referred to simply as investments, they are to be held for many years, and are not acquired with the intention of disposing of them in the near future.∙Investments in securities such as bonds, common stock, or long-term notes that management does not intend to sell within one year.∙Investments in tangible fixed assets not currently used in operations, such as land held for speculation.∙Investments set aside in special funds such as a sinking fund, pension fund, or plant expansion fund. The cash surrender value of life insurance is included here.∙Investments in non-consolidated subsidiaries or affiliated companies. Property, Plant, and Equipment:They are properties of a durable nature used in the regular operations of the business. With the exception of land, most assets are either depreciable (such as building) or consumable.Intangible Assets:They lack physical substance and usually have a high degree of uncertainty concerning their future benefits. They include patents, copyrights, franchises, goodwill, trademarks, trade names, secret processes, and organization costs. Generally, all of these intangibles are written off (amortized) to expense over 5 to 40 years.Other Assets:They vary widely in practice. Examples include deferred charges (long-term prepaid expenses), non-current receivables, intangible assets, assets in special funds, and advances to subsidiaries.Current Liabilities:They are obligations that are reasonably expected to be liquidated either through the use of current assets or the creation of other current liabilities within one year or within the operating cycle, whichever is longer. They are not reported in any consistent order. A typical order is: Notes payable, accounts payable, accrued items (e.g. accrued warranty costs, compensation and benefits) income taxes payable, current maturities of long-term debt, etc.The excess of total current assets over total current liabilities is referred to as working capital. It represents the net amount of a company's relatively liquid resources; that is, it is the liquid buffer, or margin of safety, available to meet the financial demands of the operating cycle.Long-Term LiabilitiesThey are obligations that are not reasonably expected to be liquidated within the normal operating cycle but, instead, at some date beyond that time. Bonds payable, notes payable, deferred income taxes, lease obligations, and pensionobligations are the most common long-term liabilities. Generally they are of three types:∙Obligations arising from specific financing situations, such as issuance of bonds, long-term lease obligations, and long-term notes payable.∙Obligations arising from the ordinary operations of the enterprise such as pension obligations and deferred income tax liabilities.∙Obligations that are dependent upon the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more future events to confirm the amount payable, or the payee, or the date payable, such as service or product warranties and other contingencies.Owner's Equity:The complexity of capital stock agreements and the various restrictions on residual equity imposed by state corporation laws, liability agreements, and boards of directors make the owner's equity section one of the most difficult sections to prepare and understand. The section is usually divided into three parts:∙Capital stock: the par or stated value of the shares issued.∙Additional paid-in capital: the excess of amounts paid in over the par or stated value.∙Retained earnings: the corporation's undistributed earnings.b. define each component of a multi-step income statement and prepare a multi-step income statement.The income statement measures the success of business operations for a given period of time. A single-step income statement groups revenues together and expenses together, without further classifying each of the groups. A multi-step income statement makes further classifications to provide additional important revenue and expense data. These classifications make the income statement more informative and useful. It is recommended because:∙it recognizes a separation of operating transactions from non-operating transactions;∙it matches costs and expenses with related revenues;∙it highlights certain intermediate components of income that are used for the computation of ratios used to assess the performance of the enterprise.Components:∙Operating section: a report of the revenues and expenses of the company's principal operations.o Sales or revenue section: a subsection presenting sales, discounts, allowances, returns, and other related information, and to arrive atthe net amount of sales revenue.o Cost of goods sold section:a subsection that shows the cost of goods that were sold to product the sales.o Selling expense: a subsection that lists expenses resulting from the company's efforts to make sales.o Administrative or general expenses: a subsection reporting expenses of general administration.Non-operating section: a report of revenues and expenses resulting from secondary or auxiliary activities of the company. In addition, special gains and losses that are infrequent or unusual, but not both, are normally reported in this section. Generally these items break down into two main subsections:o Other revenues and gains: A list of the revenues earned or gains incurred, generally net of related expenses, from non-operatingtransactions.o Other expenses and losses: A list of the expenses or losses incurred, generally net of any related incomes, from non-operatingtransactions.∙Income taxes: A short section reporting federal and state taxes levied on income from continuing operations.∙Discontinued operations: material gains or losses resulting from the disposition of a segment of the business.∙Extraordinary items: Unusual AND infrequent material gains and losses.∙Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.∙Earnings per share.C. Short-Term Liquid Assetsa. describe how to choose the appropriate accounting method for investment securities and explain how fair (market) value gains and losses on such investments are reported.Short-term investments, also called marketable securities,ordinarily consist of short-term paper (certificates of deposit, treasury bills, and commercial paper), marketable debt securities (government and corporate bonds), and marketable equity securities (preferred and common stock) acquired with cash not immediately needed in operations.They must be:∙readily marketable: can be sold quite easily.∙intended to be converted into cash as needed within one year or the operating cycle, whichever is longer.Securities that are intended to be held for more than one year are called long-term investments.There are two types of gains and losses:∙Realized gains and losses: the difference between the fair market value and the cost of the securities when they are sold.∙Unrealized holding gains and losses:the difference between the fair market value and the cost of the securities when they are still held by the firm. The gains and losses are unrealized because securities have not been sold.In general:∙When securities are purchased, they are recorded at cost. The cost of the securities includes purchase price and any broker's fees or fees paid to acquire securities.∙Interest and dividends generally are recognized as revenue when they are received.∙When securities are sold, the cost is compared to the sales price, and the difference is recorded as a gain or a loss.∙At the end of each accounting period, the balance of the controlling account is adjusted to reflect the current market value of the securities owned.However, different categories of investment securities have different treatment on unrealized holding gains and losses.∙Held-to-maturity securities:Debt securities that management intends to hold to their maturity date. At year end, they are reported at cost adjusted for the effect of interest (debit the securities account and credit interest income account), and unrealized holding gains and losses are not recognized.Trading securities: Debt and equity securities bought and held mainly for sale in the near term to generate income on price changes. At year end, they are reported at their fair market value. Any unrealized holding gains or losses are recognized on the firm's income statement as part of the net income. When they are sold, the realized gains or losses will also appear on the income statement. Realized gains and losses are not affected by any unrealized gains or losses recognized before.Example:1.12/1/2002, 100 shares purchased at $80 per share for tradingpurposes:Entry: Trading Securities 8000(Debit) | Cash 8000 (Credit)2.12/31/2002, the price is $60 per share.Entry: Unrealized Loss on Investments 2000 (Debit) | Allowance to Adjust Short-Term Investments to Market 2000 (Credit).The allowance account is shown on the balance sheet as a contra-asset account:Trading Securities (at cost) 8000Allowance Account (2000)Trading Securities (at market) 6000The $2000 unrealized loss is reported in the income statement for 2002.3.06/12/2003, 100 shares sold at $120 per share.Entry: Cash 12000 (Debit) | Trading Securities 8000 (Credit) | Realized Gain on Investment 4000 (Credit)The $4000 realized gain is reported in the income statement of 2003.Available-for-sale securities:Debt and equity securities not classified as held-to-maturity or trading securities. The unrealized gains and losses are reported in the balance sheet as an adjustment to the shareholders' equity (in contrast, the unrealized gains or losses of trading securities are reported in the income statement as part of the net income). Other than that, they are accounted for in the same way as trading securities. Example:1.12/1/2002, 100 shares purchased at $80 per share for tradingpurposes:Entry: Available-for-Sale Securities 8000(Debit) | Cash 8000 (Credit)2.12/31/2002, the price is $60 per share.Entry: Unrealized Loss on Investments 2000 - Equity (Debit) | Allowance to Adjust Short-Term Investments to Market 2000 (Credit).The allowance account is shown on the balance sheet as a contra-asset account:Available-for-Sale Securities (at cost) 8000Allowance Account (2000)Available-for-Sale Securities (at market) 6000The $2000 unrealized loss is reported in the balance sheet for 2002 as a component of stockholder's equity.3.06/12/2003, 100 shares sold at $120 per share.Entry: Cash 12000 (Debit) | Trading Securities 8000 (Credit) | Realized Gain on Investment 4000 (Credit)The $4000 realized gain is reported in the income statement of 2003. User CommentsPosted by shasha @ 2003-11-15 04:02:09.AFS (available-for-sale) is kind of short-term investment, however, its market value change should be adjusted to the equity as well.Posted by Gina @ 2004-02-12 01:51:11.AFS can be short or long-term. Since they are reported on the balance sheet at market value, this reporting needs to be adjusted from their last carrying amount to current market value.The unrealized gain or loss is reported in 2 places:(1) Income statement - under 'Other comprehensive income' (net of tax) [but not as part of net income];(2) OE - prehensive income - unrealized gain on investments (net of tax).善待自己，学会放弃，得而不喜，失而不烦，弃而不悔，多一份执着和自信，添一份洒脱和从容，才是潇洒快乐的人生！善待自己，学会原谅。
The-analysis-and-use-of-financial-statement财务报表分析与运用毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文
毕业设计（论文）外文文献翻译文献、资料中文题目：财务报表分析与运用文献、资料英文题目：The analysis and use of financial statement 文献、资料来源：文献、资料发表（出版）日期：院（部）：专业：班级：姓名：学号：指导教师：翻译日期： 2017.02.14The analysis and use of financial statementChapter 1 FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSISNEED FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSISThe United Sates has the most complex financial reporting system in the word. .Detailed ac-counting principles are augmented by extensive disclosure requirements .The financial state-ments of large multinationals add up to dozens of pages, and many of these firms voluntarily publish additional “fact books”for dissemination to financial analysis and other interested users.Financial reporting in other major developed countries and many emerging markets has also evolved substantially in recent years .with an increasing emphasis on providing information useful to both domestic and foreign creditors and equity investors. International Accounting Standards have become a credible rival to U.S. standards.In an ideal word, the user of financial statements could focus only on the bottom lines financial reporting: net income and stockholders’ equity. If financial statements were comparable among companies (regardless of country),consistent over time , and always fully reflecting the economic position of firm , financial statement analysis would be simple , and this text a very short one.The financial reporting system is not perfect. Economic events and accounting entries do not correspond precisely; they diverge across the dimensions of timing, recognition, and measurement. Financial analysis and investment decisions are further complicated by variations in accounting treatment among countries in each of these dimensions.Economic events and accounting recognition of those events frequently take place at different times. One example of phenomenon is the recognition of capital gains and losses only upon sale in most cases. Appreciation of a real estate investment, which took place over a period of many years, for example, receives income statement recognition only in the period management chooses for its disposal.Similarly, long-lived assets are written down. Most of time. In the fiscal period of management’s choice. The period of recognition may be neither the period in which the impairment took place nor the period of sale or disposal. Accounting for discontinued operations. In the same manner. Results in recognition of loss in a period different from when the loss occurred or the disposal is consummated.In addition, many economic events do not receive accounting recognition at all. Most contracts, for example, are not reflected in financial statements when entered into, despite significant effects on financial condition and operating and financial risk .Some contracts, such asleases and hedging activities, are recognized in the financial statements by some companies, but disclosed only in footnotes by others. Disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedging activities are in place in many jurisdictions, but recognition and measurement is only recently required in the United Stated.Further, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States and elsewhere permit economic events that do receive accounting recognition to be recognized in different ways by different financial statement prepares. Inventory and depreciation of fixed assets are only two of the significant areas where comparability may be lacking.Financial reports often contain supplementary data that, although not included in the statements themselves, help the financial statement user to interpret the statements or adjust measures of corporate performance (such as financial ratios) to make them more comparable, consistent over time, and more representative of economic reality. When making adjustments to financial statements, we will seek to discern substance from form and exploit the information contained in footnotes and supplementary schedules of data in the annual report and SEC filings. The analytic treatment of “off-balance-sheet” financing activities is a good example of this process. We also illustrate the use of reconciliations to U.S. GAAP in foreign registrants’Form 20-F filings.Finally, information from outside the financial reporting process can be used to make financial data more useful. Estimating the effects of changing prices on corporate performance, for example, may require the use of price data from outside sources.FOCUS ON INVESTMENT DECISIONSThis book is concerned with the concepts and techniques of financial analysis employed by users of financial statements who are external to the company. Principal emphasis is on the financial statements of companies whose securities are publicly traded. The techniques described are generally applicable to the analysis of financial statements prepared according to U.S. GAAP. However, we will also discuss the pronouncements of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and standard setters in other countries, compare them to U.S. GAAP, and analyze financial statements prepared in accordance with these other reporting standards.Classes of UsersExternal users of financial information encompass a wide range of interests but can be classified into three general groups:Credit and equity investorsGovernment (executive and legislative branches), regulatory bodies, and tax authoritiesThe general public and special interest groups, labor unions , and consumer groupsEach of these user groups has a particular objective in financial statement analysis, but, as the FASB stated, the primary user are equity investors and creditors. However, the information supplied to investors and creditors is likely to be generally useful to other user groups as well. Hence, financial accounting standards are geared to the purposes and perceptions of investors and creditors. That is the group for whom the analytical techniques in this book are intended.The underlying objective of financial analysis is the comparative measurement of risk and return to make investment or credit decisions. These decisions require estimates of the future, be it a mouth, a year, or a decade. General-purpose financial statements, which describe the past, provide one basis for projecting future earnings and cash flows. Many of the techniques used in this analytical process are broadly applicable to all types of decisions, but there are also specialized techniques concerned with specific investment interests or, in other words, risks and returns specific to one class of investors or securities.The equity investor is primarily interested in the long-term power of the company, its ability to grow, and, ultimately, its ability to pay dividends and increase in value. Since the equity investor bears the residual risk in an enterprise, the largest and most volatile risk, the require analysis is the most comprehensive of any user and encompasses techniques employed by all other external user.Creditors need somewhat different analytical approaches. Short-term creditors, such as banks and trade creditors, place more emphasis on the immediate liquidity of the business because they seek an early payback of their investment. Long-term earning power of the company investors in bonds, such as insurance companies and pension funds, are primarily concerned with the long-term asset position and earning power of the company. They seek assurance of the payment of interest and the capability of retiring or refunding the obligation at maturity. Credit risks are usually smaller than equity risks and may be more easily quantifiable.More subordinated or junior creditors, especially owners of “high-yield” debt, however, bear risk similar to those of equity investors and may find analytic techniques normally applied to equity investments more relevant than those employed by creditors.Financial Information and Capital MarketsThe usefulness of accounting information in the decision-making processes of investors and creditors has been the subject of much academic research over the last 35 years. That research has examined the interrelationship of accounting information and reporting standards in financial markets in great detail. At times, the research conclusions are highly critical of the accounting standard-setting process and of the utility of financial analysis. This criticism is based on researchperformed in a capital market setting. These findings do not negate the usefulness of financial analysis of individual securities that may be mispriced or of decisions made outside a capital market setting.PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe Balance SheetThe balance sheet (statement of financial position) reports major classes and amounts of assets (resources owned or controlled by the firm), liabilities (external claims on those assets), and stockholder’ equity (owners’ capital contributions and other internally generated sources of capital) and their interrelationships at specific points in time.Assets reported on the balance sheet are either purchased buy the firm or generated through operations: they are, directly or indirectly, finances by the creditors and stockholders of the firm. The fundamental accounting relationship provides the basis for recording all transactions in financial reporting and is expressed as the balance sheet equation:Assets (A) = Liabilities (L) + Stockholders’ Equity (E)In the United States firm issue balance sheets at the end of each quarter and the end of the fiscal. Annual or semiannual reporting in the norm in most other countries.Elements of the Balance SheetSFAC 6 discusses the elements of financial statements. Although this statement also deals with nonprofit organizations, we restrict our comments to business enterprises.Assets are defined in SFAC 6 asProbable future economic benefits obtained or controlled by a particular entity as a result of past transactions or events.This definition seems to be noncontroversial. Its weakness is its lack of reference to risk. It seems to us that an enterprise that retains the risk of ownership still “owns” the asset. This issue is important, for example, as it relates to the sale of assets (such as accounts receivable, loans, and mortgages; see chapter 11) when the seller retains some risk of loss.Liabilities are defined, similarly asProbable future sacrifices of economic benefits arising from present obligations of particular entity to transfer assets or provide services to other entities in the future as a result of pa transactions or events.Again, the definition reads well. Yet it permits the nonrecognition of contractual obligation such as operating leases (see chapter11). The interpretation of “present obligation” and “result of past transactions or events”is key to accounting for all such contracts; some believe that only payments immediately due as a consequence of completed transactions create liabilities. Othersbelieve that all long-term contacts should be recognized as long-term liabilities. Another important problem area is the derecognition of liabilities that have been prefunded but remain outstanding.As required by the fundamental accounting equation. Stockholder’ equity is thereforeThe residual interest in the net assets of an entity that remains after deducting its liabilities.In practice, some financial instruments have characteristics of both liabilities and equities, making them difficult to categorize. Convertible debt and redeemable preferreds are two common examples examined in chapter 10. That chapter also discusses the FASB Exposure Draft (ED) on recognition and measurement of instruments with equity and liability characteristics.The Income StatementThe income statement (statement of earnings) reports on the performance of the firm, the result of its operating activities. It explains some but all of the changes in the assets, liabilities, and equity of the firm between two consecutive balance sheet dates. Use of the accrual concept means that income and the balance sheet are interrelated.The preparation of the income statement is governed by the matching principle, which states that performance can be measured only if revenues and related costs are accounted for during the same time period. This requires the recognition of expenses incurred to generate revenues in the same period as the related revenues. For example, the cost of a machine is recognized as an expense (it is depreciated) over its useful life (as it is used in production) rather than as an expense in the period it is purchased.Elements of the Income StatementRevenues are defined in SAFC 6 asInflows … of an entity… from delivering or producing goods, rendering services, or other activities that constitute the entity’s ongoing major or central operationsExpense are defined asOutflows…from delivering or producing goods, rendering services, or carrying out other activities that constitute the entity’s ongoing major or central operations.These definitions explicitly exclude gains (and losses), defined asIncreases (decreases) in equity (net assets) from peripheral or incidental transactions…Gains or losses are, therefore, nonoperating events. Examples would include gains and losses from asset sales, lawsuits, and changes in market values (including currency rates).These definitions are, like the other in SFAC 6, easy to accept as stated. The difficulties come in practice. For example, investment activities may be “central”to a financial institution but “peripheral”to manufacturing company. Similarly, sales of assets such as automobiles may be “incidental”to retailer but “central”to a car rental firm. The write-down of inventories due toobsolescence is more difficult to characterize: is this an operating expense or a loss? To some extent, the distinction between revenue and expense on the one hand and gains and losses on the other is a precursor of the controversies over the characterizations of “recurring versus nonrecurring activities,”“operating versus nonoperating activities,”and “extraordinary items,”. From the analyst point of view, disclosure is more important than classification; analysts prefer to make their own distinctions between operating and nonoper-ating events in many instances. From the point of view of database user, however, the outcome of the debate is important.Even more important is the decision on when to recognize revenues and expenses. The recognition decision can be a major determinant of reported income, especially for technology and other “new economy” enterprises.财务报表分析与运用第一章财务报表分析的框架财务报表分析的重要性美国有着世界上最复杂的财务报告系统，广泛披露的要求扩大了详细的会计原则。
财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献编辑
财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献编辑Introduction:Financial statement analysis is an essential tool used by businesses and investors to evaluate the financial performance and position of a company. It involves the examination of financial statements such as the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement to assess the company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency. In this document, we will provide a detailed analysis and translation of foreign literature related to financial statement analysis.1. Importance of Financial Statement Analysis:Financial statement analysis provides valuable insights into a company's financial health and helps stakeholders make informed decisions. It enables investors to assess the profitability and growth potential of a company before making investment decisions. Additionally, it helps creditors evaluate the creditworthiness and repayment capacity of a company before extending credit. Furthermore, financial statement analysis assists management in identifying areas of improvement and making strategic decisions to enhance the company's performance.2. Key Elements of Financial Statement Analysis:a) Balance Sheet Analysis:The balance sheet provides a snapshot of a company's financial position at a specific point in time. It presents the company's assets, liabilities, and shareholders' equity. By analyzing the balance sheet, stakeholders can assess the company's liquidity, solvency, and financial stability.b) Income Statement Analysis:The income statement, also known as the profit and loss statement, presents the company's revenues, expenses, and net income over a specific period. It helps stakeholders evaluate the company's profitability, revenue growth, and cost management.c) Cash Flow Statement Analysis:The cash flow statement details the inflows and outflows of cash during a specific period. It provides insights into the company's operating, investing, and financing activities. By analyzing the cash flow statement, stakeholders can assess the company's ability to generate cash, meet its financial obligations, and fund its growth.3. Financial Ratios for Analysis:Financial ratios are essential tools used in financial statement analysis to assess a company's performance and compare it with industry benchmarks. Some commonly used financial ratios include:a) Liquidity Ratios:- Current Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet short-term obligations.- Quick Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet short-term obligations without relying on inventory.b) Solvency Ratios:- Debt-to-Equity Ratio: Measures the proportion of debt to equity in a company's capital structure.- Interest Coverage Ratio: Measures a company's ability to meet interest payments on its debt.c) Profitability Ratios:- Gross Profit Margin: Measures the profitability of a company's core operations.- Net Profit Margin: Measures the profitability of a company after all expenses, including taxes.d) Efficiency Ratios:- Inventory Turnover Ratio: Measures how quickly a company sells its inventory.- Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio: Measures how quickly a company collects cash from its customers.4. Translation of Foreign Literature:In this section, we will provide a translation of key points from foreign literature related to financial statement analysis. The literature emphasizes the importance of accurate financial reporting, the use of financial ratios for analysis, and the interpretation of financial statements to make informed decisions.Conclusion:Financial statement analysis is a crucial process for evaluating a company's financial performance and position. It provides valuable insights into a company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency. By analyzing financial statements and using financial ratios, stakeholders can make informed decisions regarding investments, credit extension, and strategic planning. Accurate translation and understanding of foreign literature related to financial statement analysis can further enhance the effectiveness of this process.。
财务报表分析的外文文献
Does International Financial Reporting Standards Adoption Matter?The Effects on Financial TransparencyandEarnings ManagementYen Tze—YUNational Chung Cheng University，Chiayi，TaiwanChang Ming—LeiYuan Ze University，Taoyuan，TaiwanYeh Hsiao—ChianNational Chung Cheng University，Chiayi，TaiwanThis paper aims to examine whether or not the adoption of fair value accounting(FVA)has an effect on the level ofinformation transparency and the degree of earnings management，to identify whether the legal institutions havepowers to explain those effects of the adoption of FVA，and to explore the relationship between the effects of theadoption of FVA and several specific characteristics of the banking industry．By investigating the banking sectorsof four Asian countries／regions including China，Hong Kong，the Philippines，and Singapore which have adoptedIntemational Financial Reporting Standards(IFRS)，this paper finds that after the application of FVA，the estimatedcost of equity of the sampled banks significantly decreases and the relationship between banks’loan loss provisions(LLP)and earnings before provisions and tax(EBPT)becomes irrelevant．The evidence suppo~s the effects ofFVA adoption on the enhancement of accounting quali~．In addition，sound legal／extra-legal systems are closelylinked to the degree of accounting quality and still have a strong influence on FVA．Keywords．"earnings management，fair value accounting(FVA)，information transparency，legal institutionsIntroductionWith the globalization of capital markets，multinational enterprises have rapidly grown in recent years．Togain the confidence of internationalinvestors and access capital from overseas funds，it is necessary for theseenterprises’financial statements to confo·rm to intemational standards．However，the workinvolved to meetthese standards is obviously costly，and the delays that result from preparing various versions of the statementsfor international enterprises affect the firms’eficiency．As a result，the harmonization of local withinternational accounting standards has been duly noted and discussed for many years．Most legislators，regulators，and researchers agree that efforts to standardize financial statements will directly help the firms，shareholders，analysts，accountants，auditors，and SO on(Tarca，2004；Barth，Landsman，&Lang，2008；Cai，Rahman．&Courtenay，2008；Wang，2009)．THE EFFECTS ON FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT 757Not only for the above considerations but also in order to have relevant and reliable corporate reportinginformation，the two accounting standards bodies，namely，the International Accounting Standards Board(IASB)and the Financial Accounting Standards Board(FASB)，have committed themselves to developing a setof high—quality financ ial reporting standards based on a“performance—style reporting system’’instead of thetraditional financial reporting system．As a consequence，following the full adoption of International FinancialReporting Standards(IFRS)in the European Union(EU)since 2005，there are now more than 1 1 5 countries，including Australia，New Zealand，Hong Kong，and South Africa requiring that their own businesses acceptIFRS as their accounting standards．Other countries，such as Canada，Korea，Brazil，and India，have drawn upschedules and are expected to gradually adopt IFRS by 20 1 2．Currently，among the global top 1 0 capitalmarkets，only Japan and the United States(US)have not yet made a final decision to adopt IFRS．Bothcountries are，however，inclined to work on a plan to converge their own existing accounting standards with theIFRS standards．It is predictable that IFRS will soon become the most important and common language inglobal capital markets．The fundamental scheme of IFRS is the introduction of fair value accounting(FVA)．FVA，also referred toas“mark．to—market”．is a financial reporting approach in which companies are required or permited to measureand report，on an ongoing basis，certain assets and liabilities at estimates of the prices they would receive ifthey were to sell the assets or would pay if they were to be relieved of the liabilities．Most prior studies pointout that the mark．to。
英文版文献财务报告分析(3篇)
第1篇Financial reporting analysis is a crucial aspect of assessing the financial health and performance of a company. This review delves into various aspects of financial reporting analysis, including its significance, methodologies, and challenges. By examining the existing literature, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject.IntroductionFinancial reporting is a process through which companies communicate their financial performance and position to stakeholders. Financial reporting analysis involves the examination and interpretation of financial statements to assess the company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and overall financial health. This analysis is vital for investors, creditors, and other stakeholders to make informed decisions.Significance of Financial Reporting Analysis1. Investor Decision-Making: Financial reporting analysis helps investors evaluate the profitability, stability, and growth prospects of a company. By analyzing financial statements, investors can determine the fair value of stocks and make informed investment decisions.2. Credit Risk Assessment: Financial reporting analysis is crucial for creditors in assessing the creditworthiness of a company. By analyzing financial ratios and trends, creditors can determine the likelihood of default and set appropriate interest rates.3. Regulatory Compliance: Financial reporting analysis ensures that companies comply with regulatory requirements. By analyzing financial statements, auditors and regulators can verify the accuracy and completeness of financial reports.4. Performance Evaluation: Financial reporting analysis enables managers to evaluate the performance of their company and identify areas for improvement. By comparing financial ratios and trends over time, managers can assess the effectiveness of their strategies and operations.Methodologies of Financial Reporting Analysis1. Horizontal Analysis: Horizontal analysis involves comparing financial statements over multiple periods to identify trends and patterns. This method helps in assessing the growth rate and stability of a company's financial performance.2. Vertical Analysis: Vertical analysis involves expressing each item ina financial statement as a percentage of a base figure, typically total assets or total liabilities and equity. This method helps in understanding the composition and structure of a company's financial position.3. Ratio Analysis: Ratio analysis involves calculating and interpreting various financial ratios to assess a company's profitability, liquidity, solvency, and efficiency. Common ratios include current ratio, debt-to-equity ratio, return on assets, and return on equity.4. Cash Flow Analysis: Cash flow analysis involves examining a company's cash inflows and outflows to assess its liquidity and financial stability. This analysis helps in understanding the sources and uses of cash and identifying potential cash flow issues.Challenges in Financial Reporting Analysis1. Complexity of Financial Statements: Financial statements can be complex and contain technical jargon, making it challenging for individuals without a financial background to understand them.2. Earnings Manipulation: Companies may manipulate their financial statements to portray a better financial position than reality. This can be done through various accounting practices, such as aggressive revenue recognition or deferred expenses.3. Volatility of Financial Markets: Financial markets can be volatile, making it difficult to assess the long-term performance of a company based on short-term results.4. Limited Access to Information: Some companies may not providesufficient information in their financial reports, making it challenging to conduct a comprehensive analysis.ConclusionFinancial reporting analysis is a vital tool for assessing the financial health and performance of a company. By examining financial statements, stakeholders can make informed decisions regarding investment, credit, and regulatory compliance. However, the complexity of financial statements, potential earnings manipulation, and market volatility pose challenges to effective financial reporting analysis. It is essentialfor individuals to stay updated with the latest methodologies and techniques to conduct a thorough and accurate analysis.References1. Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(1), 159-178.2. Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends: Implications for valuation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2), 293-324.3. Dechow, P. M., Hwang, W., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1995). The value relevance of accounting information: Price and return effects ofearnings announcements. The Accounting Review, 70(1), 59-82.4. Beaver, W. H. (1968). Financial reporting and control. Prentice-Hall.5. Ohlson, J. A., & Ohlson, L. A. (2005). Earnings management: A behavioral view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 3-28.第2篇Abstract:This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the literature on financial report analysis. It explores various methodologies, tools, and techniques used in the analysis of financial reports, including ratio analysis, horizontal analysis, vertical analysis, and cash flow analysis.The paper also discusses the importance of financial report analysis in decision-making processes, the challenges faced by analysts, and the impact of technology on the field. Furthermore, it examines the ethical considerations involved in financial reporting and analysis.Introduction:Financial report analysis is a critical tool for stakeholders, including investors, creditors, and management, to assess the financial health and performance of an organization. It involves the examination of financial statements, such as the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, to extract meaningful insights. This literature review aims to synthesize the existing research on financial report analysis, highlighting key methodologies, challenges, and future directions.Methodology:The review is based on a comprehensive search of academic databases, including Google Scholar, JSTOR, and ScienceDirect, using keywords such as "financial report analysis," "financial statement analysis," "ratio analysis," "horizontal analysis," "vertical analysis," and "cash flow analysis." The selected articles are categorized based on their methodologies, focus areas, and contributions to the field.Literature Review:1. Ratio Analysis:Ratio analysis is one of the most widely used tools in financial report analysis. It involves the calculation of various ratios, such asliquidity ratios, solvency ratios, profitability ratios, and efficiency ratios, to assess the financial performance and stability of a company (Hickman & Warren, 2003). According to research by Ball & Brown (1968), ratio analysis can be a powerful tool for predicting future financial performance.2. Horizontal Analysis:Horizontal analysis, also known as trend analysis, involves comparing financial data over multiple periods to identify trends and patterns(Shannon, 2004). This methodology is particularly useful for identifying changes in financial performance over time and for assessing the effectiveness of management decisions (Hillson, 2001).3. Vertical Analysis:Vertical analysis, or common-size analysis, involves expressingfinancial statement items as a percentage of a base figure, typically total assets or total sales (Dunstan & Hyett, 1997). This approach allows for the comparison of financial statements across different companies or over time, providing a clearer picture of the relative importance of different items (Friedman, 1986).4. Cash Flow Analysis:Cash flow analysis is essential for understanding the cash-generating ability of a company. It involves examining the cash inflows and outflows from operating, investing, and financing activities (Harvey, 2003). According to research by Solt, 2001, cash flow analysis iscrucial for assessing the financial sustainability of a company and for making investment decisions.5. Technological Advancements:The advent of technology has significantly impacted financial report analysis. Advanced software and tools, such as Excel, SAP, and Oracle, have made it easier to perform complex analyses and generate accurate reports (Smith & Watson, 2010). Moreover, the rise of big data analytics has enabled analysts to extract more meaningful insights from large datasets (Davenport & Patil, 2012).6. Ethical Considerations:Ethical considerations play a crucial role in financial report analysis. Analysts must ensure the accuracy and reliability of their analyses, avoid conflicts of interest, and maintain confidentiality (Ott & Mace, 2007). The ethical implications of financial reporting and analysis are further emphasized by research by Dechow et al. (1996).7. Challenges and Future Directions:Despite the advancements in financial report analysis, severalchallenges remain. These include the complexity of financial reporting standards, the availability of quality data, and the need for continuous learning and adaptation (Baker & Nair, 2006). Future research should focus on developing new methodologies, improving data quality, and addressing ethical concerns (Atrill & McLaney, 2016).Conclusion:Financial report analysis is a vital tool for stakeholders to assess the financial health and performance of an organization. This literature review has explored various methodologies, tools, and techniques used in financial report analysis, highlighting the importance of ratio analysis, horizontal analysis, vertical analysis, and cash flow analysis. The review also discusses the impact of technology, ethical considerations, and challenges in the field. As the financial landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial for researchers and practitioners to stay informed about the latest developments and advancements in financial report analysis.References:- Atrill, P., & McLaney, E. (2016). Financial management for non-financial managers. Financial Times/Prentice Hall.- Baker, R. C., & Nair, V. (2006). Challenges in financial reporting and analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(5), 747-765.- Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Business, 41(2), 71-91.- Davenport, T. H., & Patil, D. J. (2012). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Harvard Business Review Press.- Dechow, P. M., Hermalin, B., & Welch, I. (1996). The quality of accounting information and the cost of capital. Journal of Accountingand Economics, 21(1), 1-33.- Dunstan, P., & Hyett, C. (1997). Vertical analysis: A forgotten tool? Accounting and Business Research, 27(4), 259-268.- Friedman, M. (1986). A monetary history of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton University Press.- Harvey, C. R. (2003). The cash flow statement: An analysis and interpretation guide. John Wiley & Sons.- Hillson, D. (2001). Financial analysis: An introduction to concepts, tools, and techniques. Financial Times/Prentice Hall.- Hickman, K. C., & Warren, J. D. (2003). Financial accounting. John Wiley & Sons.- Ott, C. M., & Mace, T. E. (2007). Ethical decision-making in accounting. John Wiley & Sons.- Shannon, D. (2004). Financial statement analysis. John Wiley & Sons.- Solt, G. T. (2001). Cash flow statement analysis: A comprehensive guide to interpreting cash flow statements. John Wiley & Sons.- Smith, J., & Watson, D. (2010). Management accounting. Financial Times/Prentice Hall.第3篇IntroductionFinancial reporting is a crucial aspect of corporate governance and transparency. It provides stakeholders with essential information about an organization's financial performance, position, and cash flows. This literature review aims to analyze various aspects of financial reports, including their structure, content, and the impact they have on investors, creditors, and other stakeholders. The review will cover key theories, methodologies, and findings from existing literature.Structure and Content of Financial ReportsFinancial reports typically consist of several key components, including the balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement, and notes tothe financial statements. These components provide a comprehensive overview of an organization's financial health and performance.1. Balance Sheet: The balance sheet presents a snapshot of an organization's financial position at a specific point in time. It lists the organization's assets, liabilities, and equity. Assets representwhat the organization owns, liabilities represent what it owes, and equity represents the owners' claim on the assets.2. Income Statement: The income statement provides information about an organization's revenues, expenses, and net income over a specific period. It shows how much revenue the organization generated and how much it spent to generate that revenue.3. Cash Flow Statement: The cash flow statement tracks the inflows and outflows of cash within an organization over a specific period. It is divided into three sections: operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities. This statement helps stakeholders understand the organization's liquidity and cash-generating ability.4. Notes to the Financial Statements: These notes provide additional information and explanations to the financial statements. They include details about accounting policies, significant accounting estimates, and other relevant information that is not presented in the primaryfinancial statements.Theoretical FrameworkSeveral theories have been developed to explain the purpose and impactof financial reporting. The following are some of the key theories:1. Information Asymmetry Theory: This theory suggests that there is a significant information gap between managers and investors. Financial reporting is seen as a mechanism to reduce this information asymmetryand provide investors with better decision-making information.2. Agency Theory: Agency theory focuses on the relationship between principals (investors) and agents (managers). Financial reporting isseen as a way to monitor and control the actions of managers to ensure they act in the best interest of the owners.3. Stakeholder Theory: Stakeholder theory emphasizes the importance of considering the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the community. Financial reporting is seen as a means to communicate with these stakeholders and demonstrate social responsibility.Methodologies for Analyzing Financial ReportsSeveral methodologies can be used to analyze financial reports, including:1. Horizontal Analysis: This method involves comparing financial data over different periods to identify trends and patterns. It helps stakeholders understand how an organization's financial performance has changed over time.2. Vertical Analysis: This method involves expressing each item in the financial statements as a percentage of a base figure, such as total assets or total revenues. This allows stakeholders to compare the relative importance of different items within the financial statements.3. Ratio Analysis: This method involves calculating various financial ratios to assess an organization's financial performance and stability. Common ratios include liquidity ratios, profitability ratios, and solvency ratios.Impact of Financial Reports on StakeholdersFinancial reports have a significant impact on various stakeholders:1. Investors: Investors use financial reports to evaluate the financial health and performance of potential investments. They rely on this information to make informed decisions about buying, holding, or selling stocks and bonds.2. Creditors: Creditors use financial reports to assess the creditworthiness of a borrower. They analyze the financial statements todetermine the likelihood of repayment and the risk associated with lending money.3. Regulatory Bodies: Regulatory bodies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), require organizations to file financial reports to ensure compliance with financial reporting standards and regulations.4. Employees: Employees may use financial reports to assess thefinancial stability and growth prospects of their employer. This information can influence their decision to join, stay with, or leave the organization.5. Community and Environment: Financial reports can also provideinsights into an organization's impact on the community and environment. This information can be used to evaluate the organization's social and environmental responsibility.ConclusionFinancial reports play a critical role in providing stakeholders with essential information about an organization's financial performance and position. This literature review has explored the structure and content of financial reports, the theoretical framework underlying them, methodologies for their analysis, and their impact on various stakeholders. Understanding the importance of financial reporting is crucial for effective decision-making and governance in organizations.References- Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(1), 159-178.- DeFond, M. L., & Francis, J. (2000). The role of accounting information in capital markets: Some implications of the economic theory of information. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 3-37.- FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board). (2018). Accounting standards codification. Norwalk, CT: FASB.- Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends: Implications for valuation. Journal of Accounting Research, 33(1), 1-36.- Van Der Stede, W. A. (2014). Financial accounting theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.。
银行财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献
中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)Banks analysis of financial dataAbstractA stochastic analysis of financial data is presented. In particular we investigate how the statistics of log returns change with different time delays t. The scale-dependent behaviour of financial data can be divided into two regions. The first time range, the small-timescale region (in the range of seconds) seems to be characterised by universal features. The second time range, the medium-timescale range from several minutes upwards can be characterised by a cascade process, which is given by a stochastic Markov process in the scale τ. A corresponding Fokker–Planck equation can be extracted from given data and provides a non-equilibrium thermodynamical description of the complexity of financial data.Keywords:Banks; Financial markets; Stochastic processes;Fokker–Planck equation1.IntroductionFinancial statements for banks present a different analytical problem than manufacturing and service companies. As a result, analysis of a bank’s financial statements requires a distinct approach that recognizes a bank’s somewhat unique risks.Banks take deposits from savers, paying interest on some of these accounts. They pass these funds on to borrowers, receiving interest on the loans. Their profits are derived from the spread between the rate they pay forfunds and the rate they receive from borrowers. This ability to pool deposits from many sources that can be lent to many different borrowers creates the flow of funds inherent in the banking system. By managing this flow of funds, banks generate profits, acting as the intermediary of interest paid and interest received and taking on the risks of offering credit.2. Small-scale analysisBanking is a highly leveraged business requiring regulators to dictate minimal capital levels to help ensure the solvency of each bank and the banking system. In the US, a bank’s primary regulator could be the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision or any one of 50 state regulatory bodies, depending on the charter of the bank. Within the Federal Reserve Board, there are 12 districts with 12 different regulatory staffing groups. These regulators focus on compliance with certain requirements, restrictions and guidelines, aiming to uphold the soundness and integrity of the banking system.As one of the most highly regulated banking industries in the world, investors have some level of assurance in the soundness of the banking system. As a result, investors can focus most of their efforts on how a bank will perform in different economic environments.Below is a sample income statement and balance sheet for a large bank. The first thing to notice is that the line items in the statements are not the same as your typical manufacturing or service firm. Instead, there are entries that represent interest earned or expensed as well as deposits and loans.As financial intermediaries, banks assume two primary types of risk as they manage the flow of money through their business. Interest rate risk is the management of the spread between interest paid on deposits and received on loans over time. Credit risk is the likelihood that a borrower will default onits loan or lease, causing the bank to lose any potential interest earned as wellas the principal that was loaned to the borrower. As investors, these are the primary elements that need to be understood when analyzing a bank’s financial statement.3. Medium scale analysisThe primary business of a bank is managing the spread between deposits. Basically when the interest that a bank earns from loans is greater than the interest it must pay on deposits, it generates a positive interest spread or net interest income. The size of this spread is a major determinant of the profit generated by a bank. This interest rate risk is primarily determined by the shape of the yield curve.As a result, net interest income will vary, due to differences in the timing of accrual changes and changing rate and yield curve relationships. Changes in the general level of market interest rates also may cause changes in the volume and mix of a bank’s balance sheet products. For example, when economic activity continues to expand while interest rates are rising, commercial loan demand may increase while residential mortgage loan growth and prepayments slow.Banks, in the normal course of business, assume financial risk by making loans at interest rates that differ from rates paid on deposits. Deposits often have shorter maturities than loans. The result is a balance sheet mismatch between assets (loans) and liabilities (deposits). An upward sloping yield curve is favorable to a bank as the bulk of its deposits are short term and their loans are longer term. This mismatch of maturities generates the net interest revenue banks enjoy. When the yield curve flattens, this mismatch causes net interest revenue to diminish.4.Even in a business using Six Sigma® methodology. an “optimal” level of working capital manageme nt needs to beidentified.The table below ties together the bank’s balance sheet with the income statement and displays the yield generated from earning assets and interest bearing deposits. Most banks provide this type of table in their annual reports. The following table represents the same bank as in the previous examples: First of all, the balance sheet is an average balance for the line item, rather than the balance at the end of the period. Average balances provide a better analytical framework to help understand the bank’s financial performance. Notice that for each average balance item there is a correspondinginterest-related income, or expense item, and the average yield for the time period. It also demonstrates the impact a flattening yield curve can have on a bank’s net interest income.The best place to start is with the net interest income line item. The bank experienced lower net interest income even though it had grown average balances. To help understand how this occurred, look at the yield achieved on total earning assets. For the current period ,it is actually higher than the prior period. Then examine the yield on the interest-bearing assets. It is substantially higher in the current period, causing higher interest-generating expenses. This discrepancy in the performance of the bank is due to the flattening of the yield curve.As the yield curve flattens, the interest rate the bank pays on shorter term deposits tends to increase faster than the rates it can earn from its loans. This causes the net interest income line to narrow, as shown above. One way banks try o overcome the impact of the flattening of the yield curve is to increase the fees they charge for services. As these fees become a larger portion of the bank’s income, it b ecomes less dependent on net interest income to drive earnings.Changes in the general level of interest rates may affect the volume ofcertain types of banking activities that generate fee-related income. For example, the volume of residential mortgage loan originations typically declines as interest rates rise, resulting in lower originating fees. In contrast, mortgage servicing pools often face slower prepayments when rates are rising, since borrowers are less likely to refinance. Ad a result, fee income and associated economic value arising from mortgage servicing-related businesses may increase or remain stable in periods of moderately rising interest rates.When analyzing a bank you should also consider how interest rate risk may act jointly with other risks facing the bank. For example, in a rising rate environment, loan customers may not be able to meet interest payments because of the increase in the size of the payment or reduction in earnings. The result will be a higher level of problem loans. An increase in interest rate is exposes a bank with a significant concentration in adjustable rate loans to credit risk. For a bank that is predominately funded with short-term liabilities, a rise in rates may decrease net interest income at the same time credit quality problems are on the increase.5.Related LiteratureThe importance of working capital management is not new to the finance literature. Over twenty years ago. Largay and Stickney (1980) reported that the then-recent bankruptcy of W.T. Grant. a nationwide chain of department stores. should have been anticipated because the corporation had been running a deficit cash flow from operations for eight of the last ten years of its corporate life. As part of a study of the Fortune 500’s financial management practices. Gilbert and Reichert (1995) find that accounts receivable management models are used in 59 percent of these firms to improve working capital projects. while inventory management models were used in 60 percent of the companies. More recently. Farragher. Kleiman andSahu (1999) find that 55 percent of firms in the S&P Industrial index complete some form of a cash flow assessment. but did not present insights regarding accounts receivable and inventory management. or the variations of any current asset accounts or liability accounts across industries. Thus. mixed evidence exists concerning the use of working capital management techniques.Theoretical determination of optimal trade credit limits are the subject of many articles over the years (e.g.. Schwartz 1974; Scherr 1996). with scant attention paid to actual accounts receivable management. Across a limited sample. Weinraub and Visscher (1998) observe a tendency of firms with low levels of current ratios to also have low levels of current liabilities. Simultaneously investigating accounts receivable and payable issues. Hill. Sartoris. and Ferguson (1984) find differences in the way payment dates are defined. Payees define the date of payment as the date payment is received. while payors view payment as the postmark date. Additional WCM insight across firms. industries. and time can add to this body of research.Maness and Zietlow (2002. 51. 496) presents two models of value creation that incorporate effective short-term financial management activities. However. these models are generic models and do not consider unique firm or industry influences. Maness and Zietlow discuss industry influences in a short paragraph that includes the observation that. “An industry a company is located in may ha ve more influence on that company’s fortunes than overall GNP” (2002. 507). In fact. a careful review of this 627-page textbook finds only sporadic information on actual firm levels of WCM dimensions. virtually nothing on industry factors except for some boxed items with titles such as. “Should a Retailer Offer an In-House Credit Card” (128) and nothing on WCM stability over time. This research will attempt to fill thisvoid by investigating patterns related to working capital measures within industries and illustrate differences between industries across time.An extensive survey of library and Internet resources provided very few recent reports about working capital management. The most relevant set of articles was Weisel and Bradley’s (2003) article on c ash flow management and one of inventory control as a result of effective supply chain management by Hadley (2004).6.Research MethodThe CFO RankingsThe first annual CFO Working Capital Survey. a joint project with REL Consultancy Group. was published in the June 1997 issue of CFO (Mintz and Lezere 1997). REL is a London. England-based management consulting firm specializing in working capital issues for its global list of clients. The original survey reports several working capital benchmarks for public companies using data for 1996. Each company is ranked against its peers and also against the entire field of 1.000 companies. REL continues to update the original information on an annual basis.REL uses the “cash flow from operations” value located on firm cash flow statements to estimate cash conversion efficiency (CCE). This value indicates how well a company transforms revenues into cash flow. A “days of working capital” (DWC) value is based on the dollar amount in each of the aggregate. equally-weighted receivables. inventory. and payables accounts. The “days of working capital” (DNC) represents the time period between purchase of inventory on acccount from vendor until the sale to the customer. the collection of the receivables. and payment receipt. Thus. it reflects the company’s ability to finance its core operations with vendor credit. A detailed investigation of WCM is possible because CFO also provides firmand industry values for days sales outstanding (A/R). inventory turnover. and days payables outstanding (A/P).7.Research FindingsAverage and Annual Working Capital Management Performance Working capital management component definitions and average values for the entire 1996 – 2000 period . Across the nearly 1.000 firms in the survey. cash flow from operations. defined as cash flow from operations divided by sales and referred to as “cash conversion efficiency” (CCE). averages 9.0 percent. Incorporating a 95 percent confidence interval. CCE ranges from 5.6 percent to 12.4 percent. The days working capital (DWC). defined as the sum of receivables and inventories less payables divided by daily sales. averages 51.8 days and is very similar to the days that sales are outstanding (50.6). because the inventory turnover rate (once every 32.0 days) is similar to the number of days that payables are outstanding (32.4 days). In all instances. the standard deviation is relatively small. suggesting that these working capital management variables are consistent across CFO reports.8.Industry Rankings on Overall Working Capital Management PerformanceCFO magazine provides an overall working capital ranking for firms in its survey. using the following equation:Industry-based differences in overall working capital management are presented for the twenty-six industries that had at least eight companies included in the rankings each year. In the typical year. CFO magazine ranks 970 companies during this period. Industries are listed in order of the mean overall CFO ranking of working capital performance. Since the best average ranking possible for an eight-company industry is 4.5 (this assumes that the eight companies are ranked one through eight for the entire survey). it is quite obvious that all firms in the petroleumindustry must have been receiving very high overall working capital management rankings. In fact. the petroleum industry is ranked first in CCE and third in DWC (as illustrated in Table 5 and discussed later in this paper). Furthermore. the petroleum industry had the lowest standard deviation of working capital rankings and range of working capital rankings. The only other industry with a mean overall ranking less than 100 was the Electric & Gas Utility industry. which ranked second in CCE and fourth in DWC. The two industries with the worst working capital rankings were Textiles and Apparel. Textiles rank twenty-second in CCE and twenty-sixth in DWC. The apparel industry ranks twenty-third and twenty-fourth in the two working capital measures9. Results for Bayer dataThe Kramers–Moyal coefficients were calculated according to Eqs. (5) and (6). The timescale was divided into half-open intervalsassuming that the Kramers–Moyal coefficients are constant with respect to the timescaleτin each of these subintervals of the timescale. The smallest timescale considered was 240 s and all larger scales were chosen such that τi ＝0.9*τi+1. The Kramers–Moyal coefficients themselves were parameterised in the following form:This result shows that the rich and complex structure of financial data, expressed by multi-scale statistics, can be pinned down to coefficients with a relatively simple functional form.10. DiscussionCredit risk is most simply defined as the potential that a bank borrower or counter-party will fail to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed terms. When this happens, the bank will experience a loss of some or all of the credit it provide to its customer. To absorb these losses, banks maintain anallowance for loan and lease losses. In essence, this allowance can be viewed as a pool of capital specifically set aside to absorb estimated loan losses. This allowance should be maintained at a level that is adequate to absorb the estimated amount of probable losses in the institution’s loan portfolio.A careful review of a bank’s financial statements can highlight the key factors that should be considered becomes before making a trading or investing decision. Investors need to have a good understanding of the business cycle and the yield curve-both have a major impact on the economic performance of banks. Interest rate risk and credit risk are the primary factors to consider as a bank’s financial performance follows the yield curve. When it flattens or becomes inverted a bank’s net interest revenue is put under greater pressure. When the yield curve returns to a more traditional shape, a bank’s net interest revenue usually improves. Credit risk can be the largest contributor to the negative performance of a bank, even causing it to lose money. In addition, management of credit risk is a subjective process that can be manipulated in the short term. Investors in banks need to be aware of these factors before they commit their capital.银行的金融数据分析摘要财务数据随机分析已经被提出，特别是我们探讨如何统计在不同时间τ记录返回的变化。
XXX财务分析体系外文文献翻译最新译文
XXX财务分析体系外文文献翻译最新译文XXX the use of DuPont financial analysis system in XXX DuPont system breaks down the return on equity (ROE) into three components: net profit margin。
asset turnover。
and financial leverage。
Using data from a sample of listed companies。
the study finds that the DuPont system is effective in XXX。
the XXX that it should be used in n with other financial analysis tools.In recent years。
there has been a growing interest in using financial analysis tools to XXX financial analysis system is one such tool that has XXX in the 1920s to analyze the performance of its own ns。
Since then。
it has been widely used in the financial XXX.The DuPont system breaks down the ROE into three components: net profit margin。
asset XXX。
and financial leverage。
The net profit margin measures the XXX efficiency of the company's use of its assets to generate sales。
财务报表分析中英文对照外文翻译文献
中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)原文：ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTSWe need to use financial ratios in analyzing financial statements.—— The analysis of comparative financial statements cannot be made really effective unless it takes the form of a study of relationships between items in the statements. It is of little value, for example, to know that, on a given date, the Smith Company has a cash balance of $1oooo. But suppose we know that this balance is only -IV per cent of all current liabilities whereas a year ago cash was 25 per cent of all current liabilities. Since the bankers for the company usually require a cash balance against bank lines, used or unused, of 20 per cent, we can see at once that the firm's cash condition is exhibiting a questionable tendency.We may make comparisons between items in the comparative financial statements as follows:1. Between items in the comparative balance sheeta) Between items in the balance sheet for one date, e.g., cash may be compared with current liabilitiesb) Between an item in the balance sheet for one date and the same item in the balance sheet for another date, e.g., cash today may be compared with cash a year agoc) Of ratios, or mathematical proportions, between two items in the balance sheet for one date and a like ratio in the balance sheet for another date, e.g., the ratio of cash to current liabilities today may be compared with a like ratio a year ago and the trend of cash condition noted2. Between items in the comparative statement of income and expensea) Between items in the statement for a given periodb) Between one item in this period's statement and the same item in last period's statementc) Of ratios between items in this period's statement and similar ratios in last period's statement3. Between items in the comparative balance sheet and items in the comparative statement of income and expensea) Between items in these statements for a given period, e.g., net profit for this year may be calculated as a percentage of net worth for this yearb) Of ratios between items in the two statements for a period of years, e.g., the ratio of net profit to net worth this year may-be compared with like ratios for last year, and for the years preceding thatOur comparative analysis will gain in significance if we take the foregoing comparisons or ratios and; in turn, compare them with:I. Such data as are absent from the comparative statements but are of importance in judging a concern's financial history and condition, for example, the stage of the business cycle2. Similar ratios derived from analysis of the comparative statements of competing concerns or of concerns in similar lines of business What financialratios are used in analyzing financial statements.- Comparative analysis of comparative financial statements may be expressed by mathematical ratios between the items compared, for example, a concern's cash position may be tested by dividing the item of cash by the total of current liability items and using the quotient to express the result of the test. Each ratio may be expressed in two ways, for example, the ratio of sales to fixed assets may be expressed as the ratio of fixed assets to sales. We shall express each ratio in such a way that increases from period to period will be favorable and decreases unfavorable to financial condition.We shall use the following financial ratios in analyzing comparative financial statements:I. Working-capital ratios1. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities2. The ratio of cash to total current liabilities3. The ratio of cash, salable securities, notes and accounts receivable to total current liabilities4. The ratio of sales to receivables, i.e., the turnover of receivables5. The ratio of cost of goods sold to merchandise inventory, i.e., the turnover of inventory6. The ratio of accounts receivable to notes receivable7. The ratio of receivables to inventory8. The ratio of net working capital to inventory9. The ratio of notes payable to accounts payableIO. The ratio of inventory to accounts payableII. Fixed and intangible capital ratios1. The ratio of sales to fixed assets, i.e., the turnover of fixed capital2. The ratio of sales to intangible assets, i.e., the turnover of intangibles3. The ratio of annual depreciation and obsolescence charges to the assetsagainst which depreciation is written off4. The ratio of net worth to fixed assetsIII. Capitalization ratios1. The ratio of net worth to debt.2. The ratio of capital stock to total capitalization .3. The ratio of fixed assets to funded debtIV. Income and expense ratios1. The ratio of net operating profit to sales2. The ratio of net operating profit to total capital3. The ratio of sales to operating costs and expenses4. The ratio of net profit to sales5. The ratio of net profit to net worth6. The ratio of sales to financial expenses7. The ratio of borrowed capital to capital costs8. The ratio of income on investments to investments9. The ratio of non-operating income to net operating profit10. The ratio of net operating profit to non-operating expense11. The ratio of net profit to capital stock12. The ratio of net profit reinvested to total net profit available for dividends on common stock13. The ratio of profit available for interest to interest expensesThis classification of financial ratios is permanent not exhaustive. -Other ratios may be used for purposes later indicated. Furthermore, some of the ratios reflect the efficiency with which a business has used its capital while others reflect efficiency in financing capital needs. The ratios of sales to receivables, inventory, fixed and intangible capital; the ratios of net operating profit to total capital and to sales; and the ratios of sales to operating costs and expenses reflect efficiency in the use of capital.' Most of the other ratios reflect financial efficiency.B. Technique of Financial Statement AnalysisAre the statements adequate in general?-Before attempting comparative analysis of given financial statements we wish to be sure that the statements are reasonably adequate for the purpose. They should, of course, be as complete as possible. They should also be of recent date. If not, their use must be limited to the period which they cover. Conclusions concerning 1923 conditions cannot safely be based upon 1921 statements.Does the comparative balance sheet reflect a seasonable situation? If so, it is important to know financial conditions at both the high and low points of the season. We must avoid unduly favorable judgment of the business at the low point when assets are very liquid and debt is low, and unduly unfavorable judgment at the high point when assets are less liquid and debt likely to be relatively high.Does the balance sheet for any date reflect the estimated financial condition after the sale of a proposed new issue of securities? If so, in order to ascertain the actual financial condition at that date it is necessary to subtract the amount of the security issue from net worth, if the. issue is of stock, or from liabilities, if bonds are to be sold. A like amount must also be subtracted from assets or liabilities depending upon how the estimated proceeds of the issue are reflected in the statement.Are the statements audited or unaudited? It is often said that audited statements, that is, complete audits rather than statements "rubber stamped" by certified public accountants, are desirable when they can be obtained. This is true, but the statement analyst should be certain that the given auditing film's reputation is beyond reproach.Is working-capital situation favorable ?-If the comparative statements to be analyzed are reasonably adequate for the purpose, the next step is to analyze the concern's working-capital trend and position. We may begin by ascertaining the ratio of current assets to current liabilities. This ratioaffords-a test of the concern's probable ability to pay current obligations without impairing its net working capital. It is, in part, a measure of ability to borrow additional working capital or to renew short-term loans without difficulty. The larger the excess of current assets over current liabilities the smaller the risk of loss to short-term creditors and the better the credit of the business, other things being equal. A ratio of two dollars of current assets to one dollar of current liabilities is the "rule-of-thumb" ratio generally considered satisfactory, assuming all current assets are conservatively valued and all current liabilities revealed.The rule-of-thumb current ratio is not a satisfactory test ofworking-capital position and trend. A current ratio of less than two dollars for one dollar may be adequate, or a current ratio of more than two dollars for one dollar may be inadequate. It depends, for one thing, upon the liquidity of the current assets.The liquidity of current assets varies with cash position.-The larger the proportion of current assets in the form of cash the more liquid are the current assets as a whole. Generally speaking, cash should equal at least 20 per cent of total current liabilities (divide cash by total current liabilities). Bankers typically require a concern to maintain bank balances equal to 20 per cent of credit lines whether used or unused. Open-credit lines are not shown on the balance sheet, hence the total of current liabilities (instead of notes payable to banks) is used in testing cash position. Like the two-for-one current ratio, the 20 per cent cash ratio is more or less a rule-of-thumb standard.The cash balance that will be satisfactory depends upon terms of sale, terms of purchase, and upon inventory turnover. A firm selling goods for cash will find cash inflow more nearly meeting cash outflow than will a firm selling goods on credit. A business which pays cash for all purchases will need more ready money than one which buys on long terms of credit. The more rapidly the inventory is sold the more nearly will cash inflow equal cash outflow, other things equal.Needs for cash balances will be affected by the stage of the business cycle. Heavy cash balances help to sustain bank credit and pay expenses when a period of liquidation and depression depletes working capital and brings a slump in sales. The greater the effects of changes in the cycle upon a given concern the more thought the financial executive will need to give to the size of his cash balances.Differences in financial policies between different concerns will affect the size of cash balances carried. One concern may deem it good policy to carry as many open-bank lines as it can get, while another may carry only enough lines to meet reasonably certain needs for loans. The cash balance of the first firm is likely to be much larger than that of the second firm.The liquidity of current assets varies with ability to meet "acid test."- Liquidity of current assets varies with the ratio of cash, salable securities, notes and accounts receivable (less adequate reserves for bad debts), to total current liabilities (divide the total of the first four items by total current liabilities). This is the so-called "acid test" of the liquidity of current condition. A ratio of I: I is considered satisfactory since current liabilities can readily be paid and creditors risk nothing on the uncertain values of merchandise inventory. A less than 1:1 ratio may be adequate if receivables are quickly collected and if inventory is readily and quickly sold, that is, if its turnover is rapid andif the risks of changes in price are small.The liquidity of current assets varies with liquidity of receivables. This may be ascertained by dividing annual sales by average receivables or by receivables at the close of the year unless at that date receivables do not represent the normal amount of credit extended to customers. Terms of sale must be considered in judging the turnover of receivables. For example, if sales for the year are $1,200,000 and average receivables amount to $100,000, the turnover of receivables is $1,200,000/$100,000=12. Now, if credit terms to customers are net in thirty days we can see that receivables are paid promptly.Consideration should also be given market conditions and the stage of the business cycle. Terms of credit are usually longer in farming sections than in industrial centers. Collections are good in prosperous times but slow in periods of crisis and liquidation.Trends in the liquidity of receivables will also be reflected in the ratio of accounts receivable to notes receivable, in cases where goods are typically sold on open account. A decline in this ratio may indicate a lowering of credit standards since notes receivable are usually given to close overdue open accounts. If possible, a schedule of receivables should be obtained showing those not due, due, and past due thirty, sixty, and ninety days. Such a, schedule is of value in showing the efficiency of credits and collections and in explaining the trend in turnover of receivables. The more rapid the turnover of receivables the smaller the risk of loss from bad debts; the greater the savings of interest on the capital invested in receivables, and the higher the profit on total capital, other things being equal.Author(s): C. O. Hardy and S. P. Meech译文：财务报表分析A.财务比率我们需要使用财务比率来分析财务报表，比较财务报表的分析方法不能真正有效的得出想要的结果，除非采取的是研究在报表中项目与项目之间关系的形式。
财务报表分析的外文文献
毕业设计(论文)外文资料翻译系别管理信息系专业财务管理班级姓名学号外文出处附件2021年3月1.原文Financial statement analysis - the use of financial accountinginformation.Many years. Reasonable minimum current ratio was confirmed as 2.00. Until the mid-1960s, the typical enterprise will flow ratio control at 2.00 or higher. Since then, many companies the current ratio below 2.00 now, many companies can not control the current ratio over 2.00. This shows that the liquidity of many companies on the decline.In the analysis of an enterprise's liquidity ratio, it is necessary to average current ratio with the industry to compare. In some industries, the current ratio below 2.0 is considered normal, but some industry current ratio must be big 2.00. In general, the shorter the operating cycle, the lower the current ratio: the longer the operating cycle, the higher the current ratio.The current ratio compared to the same enterprise in different periods, and compared with the industry average, will help to dry to determine the high or low current ratio. This comparison does not explain why or why low. We can find out the reasons from the by-point analysis of the current assets and current liabilities. The main reason for the exception of the current ratio should be to find out the results of a detailed analysis of accounts receivable and inventory.Flow ratio better than working capital performance of enterprise short-term solvency. Working capital reflect only current assets and current liabilities, the absolute number of differences. The current ratio is also considered the relationship between the current asset size and the size of the current liabilities, make the indicators more comparable. For example, the current ratio between General Motors and Chrysler Motors Corporation. The comparison between the two companies working capital is meaningless, because the two companies of different sizes.Inventory using LIFO France will flow ratio cause problems, this is because the stock is undervalued. The result will be to underestimate the current ratio. Therefore, when compared to using the LIFO method businesses and other costs of the enterprise should pay particular attention to this.Compare the current ratio, analysts should calculate the accounts receivable turnover rate and commodity inventory turnover. This calculation enables the analysis of proposed liquidity problems exist in shouldReceived the views of the accounts and (or) Inventories. Views or opinions on the current ratio of accounts receivable and the deposit will affect the analyst. If the receivables I receivable and liquidity problems, require current ratio higher.Third, the acid test ratio (quick ratio)The current ratio is the evaluation of the liquidity conditions in the current assets and current liabilities. Often, people expect to get more immediate than the current ratio reflect the situation. The acid test ratio (liquid rate) on the relationship of current assets to current liabilities.To calculate the acid test (quick) ratio. From the current assets excluding inventory part. This is because of the slow flow of inventory, the inventory may be obsolete inventory may also be used as a specific creditor's security. For example, the winery's products to Tibet for a long period of time before sold. If you calculate the acid test (liquid) to including wine obstruct inventory will overestimate the enterprise mobility. Inventory valuation, because the cost data may be related to the current price level difference ...Section VI analytical screening proceduresAuditing Standards Description No. 23. Analytical screening procedures, provides guidance for the use of this procedure in the audit. Analytical inspection program goal is to identify significant changes from the business statistics and unusual items.Analytical screening procedures during the audit can run a different number of times, including the planning phase, the audit of the implementation phase and the completion of the audit stage. Analytical inspection procedures can lead to a special audit procedures, such as:Transverse the same type of analysis of the income statement shows an item, such as cost of sales during that period abnormal. This will lead to a careful review of the project cost of sales. The income statement vertical the same type of analysis by comparison with the previous saddle, can be found already for sale to the harmonious proportions of the amount of commodity costs and sales revenue.Accounts receivable turnover ratio and industry data comparison may show the typical speed of the accounts receivable turnover rate is far below the industry. This shows that a careful analysis of the response to accounts receivable.4 and debt compared to cash flow has significantly decreased ability to repay the debt with internally generated cash flow is essentially dropped.5 aldehyde test ratio decreased significantly, indicating that the ability to repay current liabilities with current assets other than inventory outside is essentially droppedWhen the auditors found that the report or an important trend than the string, the next procedure should be carried out to determine why this trend. This study (survey) can often lead to important discoveries.......Section VI analytical screening proceduresAuditing Standards Description No. 23. Analytical screening procedures, provides guidance for the use of this procedure in the audit. Analytical inspection program goal is to identify significant changes from the business statistics andunusual items.Analytical screening procedures during the audit can run a different number of times, including the planning phase, the audit of the implementation phase and the completion of the audit stage. Analytical inspection procedures can lead to a special audit procedures, such as:Transverse the same type of analysis of the income statement shows an item, such as cost of sales during that period abnormal. This will lead to a careful review of the project cost of sales. The income statement vertical the same type of analysis by comparison with the previous saddle, can be found already for sale to the harmonious proportions of the amount of commodity costs and sales revenue.Accounts receivable turnover ratio and industry data comparison may show the typical speed of the accounts receivable turnover rate is far below the industry. This shows that a careful analysis of the response to accounts receivable.4 and debt compared to cash flow has significantly decreased ability to repay the debt with internally generated cash flow is essentially dropped.5 aldehyde test ratio decreased significantly, indicating that the ability to repay current liabilities with current assets other than inventory outside is essentially droppedWhen the auditors found that the report or an important trend than the string, the next procedure should be carried out to determine why this trend. This study (survey) can often lead to important discoveries.2.译文财务报表分析——利用财务会计信息。
财务报表分析外文文献及翻译
财务报表分析外文文献及翻译LNTU---Acc附录A财务报表分析的杠杆左右以及如何体现盈利性和值比率摘要关键词:财政杠杆;运营债务杠杆;股本回报率;值比率传统观点认为，杠杆效应是从金融活动中产生的:公司通过借贷来增加运营的资金。
杠杆作用的衡量标准是负债总额与股东权益。
然而，一些负债——如银行贷款和发行的债券，是由于资金筹措，其他一些负债——如贸易应付账款，预收收入和退休金负债，是由于在运营过程中与供应商的贸易，与顾客和雇佣者在结算过程中产生的负债。
融资负债通常交易运作良好的资本市场其中的发行者是随行就市的商人。
与此相反，在运营中公司能够实现高增值。
因为业务涉及的是与资本市场相比，不太完善的贸易的输入和输出的市场。
因此，考虑到股票估值，运营负债和融资负债的区别的产生有一些先验的原因。
我们研究在资产负债表上，运营负债中的一美元是否与融资中的一美元等值这个问题。
因为运营负债和融资负债是股票价值的组成部分，这个问题就相当于问是否股价与账面价值比率是否取决于账面净值的组成。
价格与账面比率是由预期回报率的账面价值决定的。
所以，如果部分的账面价值要求不同的溢价，他们必须显示出不同的账面价值的预期回报率。
因此，标准的财务报表分析的能够区分股东从运营中和借贷的融资业务中产生的利润。
因此，资产回报有别于股本回报率，这种差异是由于杠杆作用。
然而，在标准的分析中，经营负债不区别于融资负债。
因此，为了制定用于实证分析的规范，我们的研究结果是用于愿意分析预期公司的收益和账面收益率。
这些预测和估值依赖于负债的组成。
这篇文章结构如下。
第一部分概述并指出了了能够判别两种杠杆作用类型，连接杠杆作用和盈利的财务报表分析第二节将杠杆作用，股票价值和价格与账面比率联系在一起。
第三节中进行实证分析，第四节进行了概述与结论。
1 杠杆作用的财务报表分析以下财务报表分析将融资债务和运营债务对股东权益的影响区别开。
这个分析从实证的详细分析中得出了精确的杠杆效应等式普通股产权资本收益率=综合所得?普通股本(1) 杠杆影响到这个盈利等式的分子和分母。
财务报表分析论文英文参考文献(精选94个最新)
随着资本市场的火热发展，财务报表分析也成为了当今炙手可热的话题。
投资者通过对企业财务报表的会计资料进行分析，可以了解识别企业的优劣，预测企业的未来以及企业的经营业绩，为决策提供有用的信息。
下面是搜索整理的财务报表分析论文英文参考文献，欢迎借鉴参考。
财务报表分析论文英文参考文献一： [1]Jon D. Cromer,JoAnne Brewster,Kethera Fogler,Michael Stoloff. 911 Calls in Homicide Cases: What Does the Verbal Behavior of the Caller Reveal?[J]. Journal of Police and CriminalPsychology,2019,34(2). [2]Matthias Demmer,Paul Pronobis,Teri Lombardi Yohn. Mandatory IFRS adoption and analyst forecast accuracy: the role of financial statement-based forecasts and analyst characteristics[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2019,24(3). [3]Jean Turlington,Stephan Fafatas,Elizabeth Goad Oliver. Is it U.S. GAAP or IFRS? Understanding how R&D costs affect ratioanalysis[J]. Business Horizons,2019,62(4). [4]Ana Je?ovita. Accounting Information in a Business Decision-Making Process – Evidence from Croatia[J]. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business,2015,18(1). [5]Nino Veskovi?. Financial Analysis of Serbian Companies Undergoing Privatization[J]. The European Journal of Applied Economics,2016,13(1). [6]Jerzy Ró?ański,Pawe?Kopczyński. The influence of the recent financial crisis on the financial situation of Polish listed companies[J]. e-Finanse,2017,13(4). [7]Anna Mazurczak-M?ka,Monika Turek-Radwan. Cost Analysis in the Audit of Selected Companies in Poland[J]. Financial Sciences. Nauki o Finansach,2019,24(1). [8]Yue Qi,Junqi Huang,Xiaofeng Peng. Does supply-demand law work for the ICBC stock price?[J]. Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies,2014,4(2). [9]Souhir Neifar,Khamoussi Halioui,Fouad Ben Abdelaziz. The motivations of earnings management and financial aggressiveness in American firms listed on the NASDAQ 100[J]. Journal of Applied Accounting Research,2016,17(4). [10]Mark P. Bauman. Forecasting operating profitability with DuPont analysis[J]. Review of Accounting and Finance,2014,13(2). [11]Susan Smith,Hans van der Heijden. Analysts’ evaluation of KPI usefulness, standardisation and assurance[J]. Journal of Applied Accounting Research,2017,18(1). [12]Guendalina Capece,Francesca Di Pillo,Nathan Levialdi. Measuring and comparing the performances of energy retailcompanies[J]. International Journal of Energy SectorManagement,2013,7(4). [13]Emie Famieza Zainudin,Hafiza Aishah Hashim. Detecting fraudulent financial reporting using financial ratio[J]. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting,2016,14(2). [14]Robert Houmes,Charlie Chulee Jun,Kim Capriotti,Daphne Wang. Evaluating the long-term valuation effect of efficient asset utilization and profit margin on stock returns[J]. Meditari Accountancy Research,2018,26(1). [15]Anuar Nawawi,Ahmad Saiful Azlin Puteh Salin. Capital statement analysis as a tool to detect tax evasion[J]. International Journal of Law and Management,2018,60(5). [16]Levent BORAN,Mehmet ?ZKAN. Usage of Data Mining at Financial Decision Making[J]. ?ank?r? Karatekin ?niversitesi ?ktisadi ve ?dari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,2014,4(1). [17]Bogus?awa Bek-Gaik. Prezentacja innych dochodów ca?kowitych w sprawozdaniach finansowych wybranych spó?ek publicznych w Polsce w latach 2009–2011[J]. Zeszyty TeoretyczneRachunkowo?ci,2013,2013(866031). [18]Paula Bez Birolo,Andréia Cittadin,Cleyton de Oliveira Ritta. Análise de crédito por meio de modelos de previs?o de insolvência: um estudo de caso na Empresa Cer?mica Alfa S.A.=Credit analysis through models for the forcasting of insolvency of the companyCer?mica Alfa S.A.[J]. Revista Catarinense da CiênciaContábil,2011,10(29). [19]Ludmila PROFIR. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS BASED ON THE PROFIT AND LOSS STATEMENT[J]. Law, Society & Organisations,2017,II(2 (1/201). [20]Nino Veskovi?. Financial analysis of Serbian companies undergoing privatization[J]. European Journal of AppliedEconomics,2016,13(1). [21]Bernardino Benito López,Isabel Martínez Conesa. Análisis de las Administraciones Públicas a Través de IndicadoresFinancieros[J]. Revista de Contabilidad: Spanish AccountingReview,2002,5(09). [22]Karen Wong,Mahesh Joshi. The Impact of Lease Capitalisation on Financial Statements and Key Ratios: Evidence from Australia[J]. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal,2015,9(3). [23]Juan Monterrey,Amparo Sánchez-Segura. Persistencia y capacidad predictiva de márgenes y rotaciones. Un análisisempírico.[J]. Revista de Contabilidad: Spanish AccountingReview,2011,14(1). [24]Roberto Braga,Valcemiro Nossa,José Augusto Veiga da Costa Marques. Uma proposta para a análise integrada da liquidez e rentabilidade das empresas[J]. Revista Contabilidade &Finan?as,2004,15(spe). [25]Rosane Maria Pio da Silva,Pedro Maia Ximenes,Adilson de Lima Tavares,Rodrigo de Souza Gon?alves. BEHAVIOR OF THE TEN LARGEST BRAZILIAN BANKS DURING THE SUBPRIME CRISIS: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON FINANCIAL INDICATORS[J]. Revista de Educao e Pesquisa em Contabilidade,2012,6(2 Englis). [26]Brindescu-Olariu Daniel,Golet Ionut, . PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY IN ROMANIA THROUGH THE USE OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION[J]. Annals of the University of Oradea: Economic Science,2013,22(1). [27]MARIA DANIELA BONDOC,MARIAN ?AICU. EXPENSES ANALYSIS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT –COMPANY PERFORMANCE DIAGNOSIS STAGE[J]. Annals of the University of Petrosani: Economics,2013,XIII(1). [28]Carmen Pineda González,Amparo Sánchez Segura,Juan Monterrey Mayoral. Una Estrategia Docente para el Análisis de Estados Financieros[J]. Revista de Contabilidad: Spanish AccountingReview,2001,4(08). [29]Marco G. P. van Veller,D.J. Kornet,M. Zandee. Methods in Vicariance Biogeography: Assessment of the Implementations of Assumptions 0, 1, and 2[J]. Cladistics,2000,16(3). [30]Ken Ishibashi,Takuya Iwasaki,Shota Otomasa,Katsutoshi Yada. Model Selection for Financial Statement Analysis: Variable Selection with Data Mining Technique[J]. Procedia Computer Science,2016,96. [31]Viktorija Bobinaite. Financial sustainability of wind electricity sectors in the Baltic States[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2015,47. 财务报表分析论文英文参考文献二： [32]Juan Monterrey. Persistencia y capacidad predictiva demárgenes y rotaciones. un análisis empírico[J]. Revista de Contabilidad,2011,14(1). [33]Marco G.P. van Veller,D.J. Kornet,M. Zandee. A Posteriori anda Priori Methodologies for Testing Hypotheses of Causal Processes in Vicariance Biogeography[J]. Cladistics,2002,18(2). [34]Juan Monterrey Mayoral,Amparo Sánchez Segura. Una evaluación empírica de los métodos de predicción de la rentabilidad y surelación con las características corporativas[J]. Revista de Contabilidad,2016. [35]Irfan Safdar. Industry competition and fundamentalanalysis[J]. Journal of Accounting Literature,2016,37. [36]Timo Salmi,Ilkka Virtanen,Paavo Yli-Olli. The generalized association between financial statements and securitycharacteristics[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management,1997,13(2). [37]C. Serrano Cinca,C. Mar Molinero,J.L. Gallizo Larraz. Country and size effects in financial ratios: A European perspective[J]. Global Finance Journal,2005,16(1). [38]Slo-Li Chu,Tsung-Chuan Huang. SAGE: an automatic analyzing system for a new high-performance SoC architecture––processor-in-memory[J]. Journal of Systems Architecture,2004,50(1). [39]Stephanie Dehning Grimm,Janell L. Blazovich. Developing student competencies: An integrated approach to a financial statement analysis project[J]. Journal of AccountingEducation,2016,35. [40]Erkki K. Laitinen. Financial statement data in assessing the future potential of a technology firm: The case of Nokia[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis,2005,15(3). [41]Marianna Botika. The use of DuPont Analysis in Abnormal Returns Evaluation: Empirical Study of Romanian Market[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2012,62. [42]Pantelis Longinidis,Michael C. Georgiadis,Panagiotis Tsiakis. Integration of financial statement analysis in the optimal design and operation of supply chain networks[J]. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering,2011,29. [43]Agus Gunawan,Jaap van den Herik,Mohamed A. Wahdan,Bartel Van de Walle,Asdi Athuri Aulia. The Design and Evaluation of a Knowledge-intensive System[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2012,65. [44]Charles E. Boynton,Jeffery P. Boone,Teddy L. Coe. Evaluating the exploration efficiency of oil and gas firms using SFAS 69 supplemental disclosures[J]. Journal of Energy Finance and Development,1999,4(1). [45]Hong-Yi Chen,Cheng-Few Lee,Wei K. Shih. Technical, fundamental, and combined information for separating winners from losers[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,2016,39. [46]Patricia M. Fairfield,Teri Lombardi Yohn. Using Asset Turnover and Profit Margin to Forecast Changes in Profitability[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2001,6(4). [47]Robert Breitkreuz. Latente Steuern und EarningsManagement[J]. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft,2012,82(11). [48]Messod D. Beneish,Charles M. C. Lee,Robin L. Tarpley. Contextual Fundamental Analysis Through the Prediction of Extreme Returns[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2001,6(2-3). [49]Yaniv Konchitchki,Yan Luo,Mary L. Z. Ma,Feng Wu. Accounting-based downside risk, cost of capital, and the macroeconomy[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2016,21(1). [50]David Matsumoto,Hyisung C. Hwang,Lisa G. Skinner,Mark G. Frank. Positive Effects in Detecting Lies from Training to Recognize Behavioral Anomalies[J]. Journal of Police and CriminalPsychology,2014,29(1). [51]Andreas Scholze. A Simple Accounting-Based Valuation Modelfor the Debt Tax Shield[J]. BuR - Business Research,2010,3(1). [52]James M. Wahlen,Matthew M. Wieland. Can financial statement analysis beat consensus analysts’ recommendations?[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2011,16(1). [53]Pedro Santa-clara. Discussion of “Implied Equity Duration: A New Measure of Equity Risk”[J]. Review of AccountingStudies,2004,9(2-3). [54]Kenton K. Yee. A Bayesian framework for combining valuation estimates[J]. Review of Quantitative Finance andAccounting,2008,30(3). [55]Marco G. P. Veller,D.J. Kornet,M. Zandee. Methods in Vicariance Biogeography: Assessment of the Implementations of Assumptions 0, 1, and 2[J]. Cladistics,2000,16(3). [56]Carlos Serrano‐Cinca. From financial information to strategic groups: a self‐organizing neural network approach[J]. Journal of Forecasting,1998,17(5钬?). [57]Michael J. Krause,Michael S. Wilson. Is Polaris a HOG ? A Case Study*[J]. Accounting Perspectives,2013,12(1). [58]CLAUS JACOB. Statement Analysis in Chemistry[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,2003,988(1). [59]GONZALO RODR?GUEZ‐P?REZ,JOHN SLOF,MAGDA SOL?,MARGARITA TORRENT,IMMACULADA VILARDELL. Assessing the Impact of Fair‐Value Accounting on Financial Statement Analysis: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach[J]. Abacus,2011,47(1). [60]Hyisung C. Hwang,David Matsumoto,Vincent Sandoval. Linguistic Cues of Deception Across Multiple Language Groups in a Mock Crime Context[J]. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling,2016,13(1). [61]Marco G.P. Veller,D.J. Kornet,M. Zandee. A Posteriori and a Priori Methodologies for Testing Hypotheses of Causal Processes in Vicariance Biogeography[J]. Cladistics,2002,18(2). [62]Patricia M. Fairfield,Scott Whisenant,Teri Lombardi Yohn. The Differential Persistence of Accruals and Cash Flows for Future Operating Income versus Future Profitability[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2003,8(2-3). 财务报表分析论文英文参考文献三： [63]David Matsumoto,Hyisung C. Hwang,Vincent A. Sandoval. Ethnic Similarities and Differences in Linguistic Indicators of Veracity and Lying in a Moderately High Stakes Scenario[J]. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology,2015,30(1). [64]Joseph D. Piotroski. Discussion of “Separating Winners from Losers among Low Book-to-Market Stocks using Financial Statement Analysis”[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2005,10(2-3). [65]David Matsumoto,Hyisung C. Hwang,Vincent A. Sandoval. Cross-Language Applicability of Linguistic Features Associated with Veracity and Deception[J]. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology,2015,30(4). [66]Partha S. Mohanram. Separating Winners from Losers among LowBook-to-Market Stocks using Financial Statement Analysis[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2005,10(2-3). [67]Doron Nissim,Stephen H. Penman. Ratio Analysis and Equity Valuation: From Research to Practice[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2001,6(1). [68]Hay Y. Chung,Jeong-Bon Kim. A Structured Financial Statement Analysis and the Direct Prediction of Stock Prices in Korea[J].Asia-Pacific Financial Markets,2001,8(2). [69]Patricia M. Dechow,Richard G. Sloan,Mark T. Soliman. Implied Equity Duration: A New Measure of Equity Risk[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2004,9(2-3). [70]Stephen Porter,John C. Yuille. Credibility assessment of criminal suspects through statement analysis[J]. Psychology, Crime & Law,1995,1(4). [71]Juho Soirinsuo,Pekka Makinen. Importance of the financial situation for the growth of a forest machine entrepreneur[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research,2009,24(3). [72]Jose Luis Arquero Montano,Sergio Manuel Jimenez Cardoso,John Joyce. Skills development, motivation and learning in financial statement analysis: an evaluation of alternative types of case studies[J]. Accounting Education,2004,13(2). [73]José Luis Zafra-Gómez,Isabel Román-Martínez,María ElenaGómez-Miranda. Measuring the impact of inquiry-based learning on outcomes and student satisfaction[J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,2015,40(8). [74]Rebecca M. Willén,Leif A. Str?mwall. Offenders' lies and truths: an evaluation of the Supreme Court of Sweden's criteria for credibility assessment[J]. Psychology, Crime & Law,2012,18(8). [75]Juan Monterrey Mayoral,Amparo Sánchez Segura. Persistencia de la rentabilidad. Un estudio de sus factores determinantes[J]. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Espa?ola de Financiación y Contabilidad,2011,40(150). [76]Acerete,Gasca,Stafford,Stapleton. A Comparative Policy Analysis of Healthcare PPPs: Examining Evidence from Two Spanish Regions from an International Perspective[J]. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice,2015,17(5). [77]Chau Duong,Gioia Pescetto,Daniel Santamaria. How value–glamour investors use financial information: UK evidence of investors’ confirmation bias[J]. The European Journal ofFinance,2014,20(6). [78]Fernando Caio Galdi,Alexsandro Broedel Lopes. Limits to Arbitrage and Value Investing: Evidence From Brazil[J]. Latin American Business Review,2013,14(2). [79]Jaume Masip,Eugenio Garrido,Carmen Herrero. ?Existe un patrón general expresivo en la detección de la mentira? Reconsideraciones acerca de Becerra, Sánchez y Carrera (1989)[J]. Estudios dePsicología,2000,21(67). [80]Daoshan Ma,Dong’ao Lin. Statement Analysis of Deception Detection[J]. Open Access Library Journal,2015,02(10). [81]Siti Sakira Kamaruddin,Azuraliza Abu Bakar,Abdul Razak Hamdan,Fauzias Mat Nor,Mohd Zakree Ahmad Nazri,Zulaiha AliOthman,Ghassan Saleh Hussein. A text mining system for deviation detection in financial documents[J]. Intelligent DataAnalysis,2015,19(s1). [82]Bar-Lev, Ronen,Geri, Nitza,Raban, Daphne R. DEVELOPING A FINANCIAL STATEMENT-BASED EFFECTIVENESS MEASURE OFINTERORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS' CONTRIBUTION[J]. The Journal of Computer Information Systems,2015,56(1). [83]Hawariah Dalnial,Amrizah Kamaluddin,Zuraidah MohdSanusi,Khairun Syafiza Khairuddin. Accountability in Financial Reporting: Detecting Fraudulent Firms[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2014,145. [84]Arti Chandani,Mita Mehta,K.B. Chandrasekaran. A Working Paper on the Impact of Gender of Leader on the Financial Performance ofthe Bank: A Case of ICICI Bank[J]. Procedia Economics andFinance,2014,11. [85]Smith, Becky,Hurst, Susan,Hahn, Ed,Freeman,Valerie,Gessinger, Brittany,Lederer, Naomi,McGuigan, Glenn,Plungis, Joan,Scott, Penny,Sweeney, Suzanne. Outstanding Business Reference Sources 2013[J]. Reference & User Services Quarterly,2013,53(2). [86]Hofmann, Erik,Lampe, Kerstin. Financial statement analysis of logistics service providers: ways of enhancing performance[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,2013,43(4). [87]Beth B. Kern. Structuring financial statement analysis projects to enhance critical thinking skills development[J]. Journal of Accounting Education,2001,18(4). [88]Barbara Clemenson,R.D. Sellers. Hull House: An autopsy ofnot-for-profit financial accountability[J]. Journal of Accounting Education,2013,31(3). [89]Kimmo Kiviluoto. Predicting bankruptcies with the self-organizing map[J]. Neurocomputing,1998,21(1). [90]Bernardino Benito López,Isabel Martínez Conesa. Análisis de las Administraciones Públicas a Través de IndicadoresFinancieros[J]. Revista de Contabilidad : Spanish Accounting Review,2002,5(09). [91]Juan Monterrey Mayoral,Amparo Sánchez Segura,Carmen Pineda González. Una Estrategia Docente para el Análisis de Estados Financieros[J]. Revista de Contabilidad : Spanish Accounting Review,2001,4(08). [92]E. B. James,D. P. Partridge. Adaptive correction of program statements[J]. Communications of the ACM,1973,16(1). [93]Anwer S. Ahmed,Irfan Safdar. Dissecting stock price momentum using financial statement analysis[J]. Accounting & Finance,2018,58. [94]Matthew Bamber. A New World Order for the Beer Industry: A Review of the Acquisition of SABMiller by Anheuser‐Busch AB InBev[J]. Accounting Perspectives,2019,18(2). 以上就是关于财务报表分析论文英文参考文献的分享，希望对你有所帮助。
银行的财政分析 英文
Analysis of Bank financial statementsA case study approachAn example of U.S.A urban commercial banks1. IntroductionAnalysis and Interpretation of the financial statements of banks will face some of the financial statements accounts and analytical ratios that are different from other industries, because banks generate profits by earning more their assets, including loans and investments than they pay in interest to depositors. Although the differences that result from the nature of a bank’s operations, the fundamental concepts of evaluating a bank’s financial condition and performance are essentially similar because of banking institutions also attempt to effectively manage the trade-off between return and risk in order to improve the overall return on equity.2. The major aspects of evaluation of bank financial statementsThe first major positive aspect about the evaluation of bank financial statements is that all commercial banks required prepare their financial statements in a uniform reporting format, and this information is available to banks and to the general public on both a quarterly and annual basis. The income statement and balance sheet for each bank are compiled and published in a standardized document that also includes financial ratios and other analytical dada as well as peer group comparisons.The second, the format and contents of banking information that is provide in the Uniform Bank performance Report will form the basis for the material presented in this case study material (such as table 1, Income statement, table 2 Balance sheet). There are only two financial statements because of the cash flow statement is less important to the analysis of banks and depository institutions, and the nature of its assets (loans and investments) and liabilities (deposits).3. Case material overviewThe case study material is a large urban bank in the U.S A. The reporting format is a condensed version of the statements prepared in the Uniform bank Performance Report. The analytical ratios and peer group dada are drawn from the report.The financial ratios and analytical approach used for this bank will also apply to smaller banks and rural banks. Like the analysis of any other industry business firm,the analyst would need to be aware of the characteristics of the bank in its particular operating environment, economic conditions, and the issues, such as the quality of financial reporting and the need to consider intangible, unquantifiable information. The case studies on banks also need to pay attention to any changes in accounting principles that affect banking institutions.4.Analysis of banks’ income statementIn table 1 shows the income statement for the bank for three years ending December 31,2008.Because loans are the largest category of assets for most banks, the interest on loans is the major source of income.Net interest income is the difference between total interest income and total interest expense.Non-interest income includes trust activities, service charges, gains or losses o n trading account activities, and foreign transactions.5. Analysis of banking balance sheetIn table 2 shows the bank’s balance sheet and an urban bank in a peer group of banks with total assets in excess of 10 billion.(1)Assets analysis: for most banks, loans are the largest asset category andwould be the inventory and accounts receivable for a retail firm. Loan account listed by type. Such as real estate, commercial, individual, and agricultural.(2)Unearned income is income, the amount deducted from a discounted notethat will be recognized on the income statement over the life of a loan. The loan and lease allowance account is comparable to a nonblank business firm’s allowance for doubtful accounts, but it is generally much more significant for banks because loan losses are the major source of risk and loss at bank institutions.The adequacy of this account is directly relevant to any assessment of bank risk.Bank management, with certain guidelines from the regulatory authorities, estimates amount for un-collectible loans and leases; losses are charged against this account, and any recoveries are added to it. This allowance account is counted as primary capital in meeting a banks’ capital requirement for regulation.(3)Investments for banks consist primarily of debt securities because banks aregenerally prohibited from investing in equity securities.(4)Net loans and lease and total investments comprise a bank’s earning assets.(5)The cash and non-interest balances due from other depository institutions;and any other long-term assets.(6)In addition to total assets, a figure for average assets is provided in the report.(7)Liabilities: The major liabilities for banks are different types of depositaccounts that are used to fund lending and investing. These accounts vary according to interest payment, maturity, checking writing, and insurability.(8)Capital includes notes and debentures, actually debt, are counted as capitalbecause this type of long-term debt, with claims subordinated to the claims of depositors, has the maturity and permanence of capital and can qualify as capital in meeting regulatory requirements.(9)One weakness area of the Uniformed Bank Performance Report is that theremaining capital accounts (common and preferred stock, additional paid in capital, retained earnings, and other categories) are lumped together as one reported item, making it difficult to trace changes in the capital account from period to period.6. Financial ratio analysis of bank financial statementsIn Table 3 shows the financial ratios based on the financial statements. These ratios can be classified as (1) Summary ratios; (2) Profitability ratios; (3) risk ratios.(1)Summary ratios:①ROE = Net income / average equity. An overall measure of the bank’s abilityto generate return to its shareholders.②ROA= Net income/ average assets. Return on investment or return on totalassets reveals the bank’s effectiveness in earning a profit from its lending, investing, and other income-generating activities.③Equity capital/ assets ratio is a summary measure of bank risk. The higher theproportion of capital relative to assets, the less is overall risk.(2)Profitability ratios①Interest income/ average assets②Interest expense /average assets③Net interest income/ average assets④Non-interest income/ average assets⑤Overhead expense/ average assets⑥Provision for loan and leas loss / average assetsThe above are ratios that consider the proportion of a bank’s major categories ofrevenues and expense in relation to a common denominator of average assets.These ratios provide perspective on specific sources of revenue, and expense over time and in comparison with the bank’s peer group.(3)Risk ratios①Growth rate of assets: In general, the higher the proportion of assets relativeto capital, the greater is a bank’s risk. Because of the importance of this relationship between assets and capital, it is helpful to compare the growth rate of assets and capital over time. If a bank’s assets are growing rapidly, there is a potential that the growth may be coming from the extension of riskier loans. Because core deposits generally increase at steady rates, volatile liabilities likely provide the funding sources for this asset growth, thus adding risk. This increased risk would be moderated by a comparable growth in capital.②Growth rate of primary capital.③Cash dividends/ net operating income. The relationship between dividendsand income provides information about how much capital will remain for the bank’s internal growth; the higher the dividend payout; the lower is the potential for internal capital growth.(4)Elements of credit risk①Net loss/ total loans and leases. Loan losses are a major cause of bank failures,underscoring the importance of assessing credit risk.②Earnings coverage of net loss (expressed in Times). The net loss is gross loanand lease charge-offs, less gross recoveries. Looking at the net loss relative to total loan and leases shows the proportion of a bank’s loan-lease portfolio that have been written off during the period.Earnings coverage of net loss is a measure of the bank’s ability to cover its loan losses from operating income.③Loss reserves/ total loans and leases. Loss reserves relative to total loans andleases considers the adequacy of the provision for potential losses(5)Measure of liquidity ratios①Net loans and leases / assets. Because loan and leases hold the greatestpotential for bank losses, their proportion relative to assets helps evaluate the degree of liquidity in base (loans are primary source of bank profitability).(6)Measure of interest rate gap. Interest rate risk is the effect on bank profitabilityof changes in interest rates. Banks earning interest on loans and investments; they pay interest to depositors. When the interest rate changed, there may be an effect on income if a bank holds rate sensitive assets and liabilities. For example, if a bank hold s more rate sensitive assets than liabilities when interest rates rise, profits will be improved because the bank will receive more in increased interest revenue than it will pay out in rising costs. The reverse would be true during a period of falling interest rates. The interest rate gap is the difference between rate-sensitive assets and liabilities; holding more rate-sensitive assets than liabilities is called a positive gap, and an excess of rate- sensitive liabilities over assets results in a negative gap.7. Summary of financial ratios for five years periods Table 3prehensive analysis of the bank financial ratiosBased on the income statement and balance sheet, compare the bank’s financial ratios with peer group, analyst can make a note of any significant trends in the figures presented in table 3 and give explain those trends, and point out the bank’s strengths and weaknesses.(1)First looking at the three summary ratios,it shows that the bank,though still far below its peer group, has increased overallperformance. Both over the five-year period and in the recent year, asmeasured by the return on equity and return on assets, the bankaccomplished the improvement in ROE while simultaneouslyreducing its overall level of risk, as indicated by the increase inequity/assets. This means that profitability has increased by relativelymore than the reduction in risk.Table 4 Trends for summary ratios for the bank(2) Secondly, the gains in profitability are not the result of improvement in net interest income. Although interest income relative to average assets has risen, interest expenses have risen more rapidly. The year 2008 was a year of increasing interest rates in the economy. The interest rate gap is negative for the bank, which means that the bank has more interest-rate sensitive liabilities than assets. A negative gap will impair profitability during a period of rising interest rates, and this was the case for the bank.Table 5 Comparison of Profitability ratios for the bank(3) Thirdly, the bank achieves its overall gains partly through an increase in Non-interest income. For many banks, these traditionally less significant income sources, such as trust activities, various types of service charges, and trading account profits or loss, have become increasingly important during the era of deregulation. Banks have sought new sources of income as competition has increased pricing pressures on interest earning assets and liabilities. Apparently the bank is benefiting from such activities. (See table 6)Table 6 Non-interest of average assets(4) Fourth, Another main reason for the bank improve its overall income is thenet income increased bi 15.6 million gain from securities transactions. (Looking at income statement). As an analyst, you have to point out that this is not a part of normal banking operation.(5) Fifth, Considering the various measures of risk, the bank has decreased its assets basedue to a reduction in all categories of loans expect loans to individuals, while accomplishing internal capital growth as the result of a reduction in the dividend payout ratio. Note that in 2007 the bank paid out more in dividends that it generated in income. (See table 7).Table 7 Cash dividends / Net income ratio(6) Sixth, The bank’s credit risk measures indicate that an increase in loan and lease losses relative to the loan-lease base and a reduction in earnings coverage of loan losses. The bank shows improvement in the loss allowance relative to the loan-lease base because gross loans and leases have decreased by more than the loan and lease loss allowance. The bank has reduced the provision for loan lease/average assets at a potential problem for the bank. From the information presented it is difficult to assess why the bank is experiencing the increased losses, but it is certainly an issue that would warrant further scrutiny by the analyst. It is evidenced that the major source of losses is real estate loans, which may continue to be a problem for the bank because real estate loans comprise more than 20% of the loan portfolio (See table 8).Table 8 Elements of credit risk ratios(7)Seventh, thee bank appears to be improving its liquidity. The percentage of the loans and leaseto assets has declined and is substantially below the peer group. If the problems associated with credit risk, this trend is probably a positive one for the bank. (See table 9).Table 9 Measure of liquidity ratios(8)Summary for analysis of strength and weakness of the bank.①The strengths of the bank are improved profitability; the reduction of overallrisk achieved largely through internal capital growth, and improved liquidity.②The weaknesses of the bank are credit risk, evidenced by problems with loan-lease losses; a negative interest rate gap in a period of increasing interest rate; and the fact that much of the improvement in income production was the result of securities gains, a potentially nonrecurring activity.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
文献信息标题：The Research of Commercial Banking Financial Statement Analysis作者：Jimmy H期刊：Global Journal of Management and Business Research，第1卷，第2期，页码：32-41.年份：2016原文The Study on the Financial Statement Analysis of Commercial BankingJimmy H1 IntroductionIn the economic globalization, the earth is becoming a global village today, accounting as a business analysis system of a "language of business" in the economic and social status has been more and more obvious, the world is more and more attention to it all the more powerful function. Because of financial statements can record the economic business of the enterprises and institutions, so as the international accounting financial statements of general carrier of the "language of business", has become the focus of the enterprise information users rushed to. World investment guru warren buffet once said: "to invest in a company, I basically see the financial statements of the enterprise. “In addition, more information on the financial statements of the user, such as creditors, government and the public when making decisions, and basically to must carry on the analysis of financial statements, and then make a relevant conclusion. The current society, the analysis of financial statements, there are many analysis perspective, and enterprise value perspective is just one of them. Itself in the global market economy condition, enterprises can be treated as a commodity trading, the enterprise itself can be treated as a kind of commodities can be traded in the property market, for the goods from the various stakeholders, if interested in this product of the enterprise, will want to know the value of the enterprise. Therefore, the enterprise's financial statements will be regarded as a kind of to each relevant information users interested in enterprise's help, help them to make economic decisions related tools, i.e., the financial statements of the enterprise can beseen as reflecting a kind of carrier of enterprise value, at the same time is to analysis enterprise's financial statements can be thought of as a tool of enterprise value.2 Literature reviewWatkins (2009) proposed to focus on an analysis of the financial information and financial measures to consolidate the traditional hospital, used to reveal the relationship between hospital of non-financial information, to enhance the comprehensive analysis of the company, should focus on the analysis of non-financial information; Miguel (2010) pointed out that if is analyzed from the perspective of the creditors, just use the financial data index in the financial statements to calculate, to predict the strength enterprise's solvency, it is not accurate, need use credit risk at the same time the calculation result is analyzed, so as to effectively help the oblige. Isabel (2013) pointed out that when it comes to analyze the Banks and other creditors, if the financial statement analysis, to predict the solvency of the company, credit risk and so on to provide reliable reference; David (2014) pointed out that the current accounting information, if it can't completely and fully meet your analysis all the needs of the decisions, then you should be facing the other analysis to the company, with additional information analysis; Eustachio (2010) pointed out that can use the method of data mining to analyze the financial statements of the enterprise, make false statements to disclose to the company. In addition, Jose (2013) put forward from the perspective of financial statement analysis, should be to analyze the structure of financial ratio analysis, to analysis the company's financial statements; Drancy (2014) for the analysis of enterprise financial report is never should not is the ratio of single mechanical calculation, should be a combination of qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis to the integrated system., he argues, can be analyzed from the perspective of accounting policy choice, also can be done from the perspective of enterprise financial strategic analysis, of course not to say that may not be the Angle of financial ratios, even from the perspective of revenue and the enterprise developmental enterprises can analyze financial statements of the enterprise; Marcus (2014) pointed out that the future of the enterprise business process may encounter unforeseen various types of pressure and risk, through the scientific framework shouldarrange, analysis of the financial statements of the original, find in the financial statements have been able to significantly prompt inadaptability of enterprise, to build a new financial analysis framework, the value creation, strategy, value chain, such as ecological into the new system of financial analysis. Should expand new analysis framework for the development of later with the analysis of the enterprise value objectives, with the starting point of the analysis of the strategic analysis, value driving factors analysis as the main body, which is forms a new analysis framework.3 Commercial Banks, financial statement analysisThe upgrade of a financial statement is a kind of contract, as investors make investment decisions, Banks credit decisions, acquisition decisions of enterprise, evaluation of audit risk of certified public accountants, use financial statement analysis, is a kind of important carrier transmission of accounting information. Financial statements are to the enterprise in a certain period of the financial position and operating results in writing of the relevant information such as the summary of the documents. Its main function has the following two points: first of all, is the enterprise's revenue, cost structure, the size of the profits and dividends to investors, the daily operating results of an enterprise. The second is the enterprise capital chain information, enterprise's financing situation, enterprise's solvency and the future development potential and other relevant information, these can all be statements reflect the enterprise's financial position of the enterprise. Is the analysis of financial statements, financial statements and the related information as a starting point of the enterprise, in some special way, to the enterprise's operating results, financial condition, and so on and so forth were analyzed, and the purpose is to understand the past, the evaluation now, predict the future, to help enterprises to make decisions related to the interests of body. And under the condition of market economy, the enterprise itself is a kind of commodities can be traded in the property market, as the goods from the stakeholders, such as investors, creditors, managers, etc., it is necessary to evaluate the value of the enterprise, the most common is oriented to the way the world is the analysis of financial statements, but due to the accounting standards of commercial Banks and general manufacturing enterprises is not the same,want to evaluate the value of commercial Banks, if still use the original analysis method, the conclusion must be inaccurate. In financial statement analysis is needed to adopt to the financial statements of the general analysis method for analysis, but also to specific issues specific analysis, different from the general enterprise's financial statement analysis method. But no matter what kind of financial statement analysis method, the ultimate goal is to provide the interests of enterprises related body helps them to make economic decision-making information, namely the financial statement analysis itself can be regarded as an effective way to reflect the enterprise value of commercial bank.4 The enterprise value analysis theory and methodValues and price theory is a classical economics and modern economics have to mention a theory, is both ancient and modern, both basic theory and reality. Historically, there have been many famous economist, has carried on the thorough positive exploration on this issue. In this article, the use of enterprise value is a broad sense and narrow sense. Generalized enterprise value refers to the enterprise's own business value, analysis and evaluation on the enterprise itself, using all the collected information on the market, based on the analysis of independent cognitive level of the above analysis platform, the management circumstance of the enterprise to carry on the summary, and hope to the future of the enterprise a certain period of production and business operation activities of predict cash flows, and thus to calculate how much business can create in the fixed number of year of the expected value. In the narrow sense definition of enterprise value, Copeland and others in the 1998 book "evaluation" pointed out: the shareholders value by the value of the value of enterprises is focused on the profitability and development potential; investors can for existing shareholders want companies or is to provide a better profitability potential investment. Shareholder value is how much of a future can obtain benefits, if the future can get more profits, shareholders will now give up capital liquidity, namely shareholders if they could get more value-added part of the future capital, the shareholders will only be for the current liquidity of sacrifice in his hands. So, investors will be investment is valued enterprise future profitability, investors want togain more cash flow from investment returns, not only is the enterprise current assets generate future cash flows and excess profit ability to bring the cash flow to investors.5 The financial statement analysis can reveal the enterprise valueEnterprise financial statements, financial statement analysis to the enterprise can be regarded as a kind of can reveal an effective means of enterprise value. Financial statement is a reflection of the daily business activities of the enterprise; reflect the statements of the enterprise value. Usually when an enterprise is analyzed using three statements, respectively, the balance sheet, income statement and statement of cash flows. The balance sheet can be seen as points on a particular day accounting personnel to the enterprise value taken a snapshot, use at a specific date financial status to reflect the enterprise value. The income statement is to measure performance of enterprise in a certain period of time, is through reflect the performance of enterprises in a certain period to reflect the enterprise value of the report. The cash flow statement reflects through the inflows and outflows of cash flow of the enterprise actual situation reveal the enterprise value. Thus, analysis of financial statements of the enterprise value can be revealed, namely the enterprise financial statements reflect the enterprise value of the carrier, financial statement analysis is an effective tool of enterprise value.译文商业银行财务报表分析研究Jimmy H1 引言当今世界，正逐步经济全球化，会计作为商业分析体系中的一门“商业语言”在经济社会中的地位已经越来越明显了，世人对它越发强大的功能越来越关注。