外文翻译---美国现代景观建筑学发展的回顾与思索
现代建筑发展趋势外文文献翻译+中文
【此文档为word版本可任意编辑】外文文献:Modern ArchitectureModern architecture, not to be confused with 'contemporary architecture', is a term given to a number of building styles with similar characteristics, primarily the simplification of form and the elimination of ornament. While the style was conceived early in the 20th century and heavily promoted by a few architects, architectural educators and exhibits, very few Modern buildings were built in the first half of the century. For three decades after the Second World War, however, it became the dominant architectural style for institutional and corporate building.1. OriginsSome historians see the evolution of Modern architecture as a social matter, closely tied to the project of Modernity and hence to the Enlightenment, a result of social and political revolutions.Others see Modern architecture as primarily driven by technological and engineering developments, and it is true that the availability of new building materials such as iron, steel, concrete and glass drove the invention of new building techniques as part of the Industrial Revolution. In 1796, Shrewsbury mill owner Charles Bage first used his ‘fireproof’ design, which relied on cast iron and brick with flag stone floors. Such construction greatly strengthened the structure of mills, which enabled them to accommodate much bigger machines. Due to poor knowledge of iron's properties as a construction material, a number of early mills collapsed. It was not until the early 1830s that Eaton Hodgkinson introduced the section beam, leading to widespread use of iron construction, this kind of austere industrial architecture utterly transformed the landscape of northern Britain, leading to the description, "Dark satanic mills" of places like Manchester and parts of West Yorkshire. The Crystal Palace by Joseph Paxton at the Great Exhibition of 1851 was an early example of iron and glass construction; possibly the best example is the development of the tall steel skyscraper in Chicago around 1890 by William Le Baron Jenney and Louis Sullivan. Early structures to employ concrete as the chief means ofarchitectural expression (rather than for purely utilitarian structure) include Frank Lloyd Wright's Unity Temple, built in 1906 near Chicago, and Rudolf Steiner's Second Goetheanum, built from 1926 near Basel, Switzerland.Other historians regard Modernism as a matter of taste, a reaction against eclecticism and the lavish stylistic excesses of Victorian Era and Edwardian Art Nouveau.Whatever the cause, around 1900 a number of architects around the world began developing new architectural solutions to integrate traditional precedents (Gothic, for instance) with new technological possibilities. The work of Louis Sullivan and Frank Lloyd Wright in Chicago, Victor Horta in Brussels, Antoni Gaudi in Barcelona, Otto Wagner in Vienna and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Glasgow, among many others, can be seen as a common struggle between old and new.2. Modernism as Dominant StyleBy the 1920s the most important figures in Modern architecture had established their reputations. The big three are commonly recognized as Le Corbusier in France, and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and Walter Gropius in Germany. Mies van der Rohe and Gropius were both directors of the Bauhaus, one of a number of European schools and associations concerned with reconciling craft tradition and industrial technology.Frank Lloyd Wright's career parallels and influences the work of the European modernists, particularly via the Wasmuth Portfolio, but he refused to be categorized with them. Wright was a major influence on both Gropius and van der Rohe, however, as well as on the whole of organic architecture.In 1932 came the important MOMA exhibition, the International Exhibition of Modern Architecture, curated by Philip Johnson. Johnson and collaborator Henry-Russell Hitchcock drew together many distinct threads and trends, identified them as stylistically similar and having a common purpose, and consolidated them into the International Style.This was an important turning point. With World War II the important figures of the Bauhaus fled to the United States, to Chicago, to the Harvard Graduate School of Design, and to Black Mountain College. While Modern architectural design never became a dominant style in single-dwelling residential buildings, in institutional and commercial architecture Modernismbecame the pre-eminent, and in the schools (for leaders of the profession) the only acceptable, design solution from about 1932 to about 1984.Architects who worked in the international style wanted to break with architectural tradition and design simple, unornamented buildings. The most commonly used materials are glass for the facade, steel for exterior support, and concrete for the floors and interior supports; floor plans were functional and logical. The style became most evident in the design of skyscrapers. Perhaps its most famous manifestations include the United Nations headquarters (Le Corbusier, Oscar Niemeyer, Sir Howard Robertson), the Seagram Building (Ludwig Mies van der Rohe), and Lever House (Skidmore, Owings, and Merrill), all in New York. A prominent residential example is the Lovell House (Richard Neutra) in Los Angeles.Detractors of the international style claim that its stark, uncompromisingly rectangular geometry is dehumanising. Le Corbusier once described buildings as "machines for living", but people are not machines and it was suggested that they do not want to live in machines. Even Philip Johnson admitted he was "bored with the box." Since the early 1980s many architects have deliberately sought to move away from rectilinear designs, towards more eclectic styles. During the middle of the century, some architects began experimenting in organic forms that they felt were more human and accessible. Mid-century modernism, or organic modernism, was very popular, due to its democratic and playful nature. Alvar Aalto and Eero Saarinen were two of the most prolific architects and designers in this movement, which has influenced contemporary modernism.Although there is debate as to when and why the decline of the modern movement occurred, criticism of Modern architecture began in the 1960s on the grounds that it was universal, sterile, elitist and lacked meaning. Its approach had become ossified in a "style" that threatened to degenerate into a set of mannerisms. Siegfried Giedion in the 1961 introduction to his evolving text, Space, Time and Architecture (first written in 1941), could begin "At the moment a certain confusion exists in contemporary architecture, as in painting; a kind of pause, even a kind of exhaustion." At the Metropolitan Museum of Art, a 1961 symposium discussed the question "Modern Architecture: Death or Metamorphosis?" In New York, the coup d'état appeared to materialize in controversy around the Pan Am Building that loomed over Grand Central Station, taking advantage of the modernist real estate concept of "air rights",[1] In criticism by AdaLouise Huxtable and Douglas Haskell it was seen to "sever" the Park Avenue streetscape and "tarnish" the reputations of its consortium of architects: Walter Gropius, Pietro Belluschi and the builders Emery Roth & Sons. The rise of postmodernism was attributed to disenchantment with Modern architecture. By the 1980s, postmodern architecture appeared triumphant over modernism, including the temple of the Light of the World, a futuristic design for its time Guadalajara Jalisco La Luz del Mundo Sede International; however, postmodern aesthetics lacked traction and by the mid-1990s, a neo-modern (or hypermodern) architecture had once again established international pre-eminence. As part of this revival, much of the criticism of the modernists has been revisited, refuted, and re-evaluated; and a modernistic idiom once again dominates in institutional and commercial contemporary practice, but must now compete with the revival of traditional architectural design in commercial and institutional architecture; residential design continues to be dominated by a traditional aesthetic.中文译文:现代建筑现代建筑,不被混淆与'当代建筑' , 是一个词给了一些建筑风格有类似的特点, 主要的简化形式,消除装饰等. 虽然风格的设想早在20世纪,并大量造就了一些建筑师、建筑教育家和展品,很少有现代的建筑物,建于20世纪上半叶. 第二次大战后的三十年, 但最终却成为主导建筑风格的机构和公司建设.1起源一些历史学家认为进化的现代建筑作为一个社会问题, 息息相关的工程中的现代性,从而影响了启蒙运动,导致社会和政治革命.另一些人认为现代建筑主要是靠技术和工程学的发展, 那就是获得新的建筑材料,如钢铁, 混凝土和玻璃驱车发明新的建筑技术,它作为工业革命的一部分. 1796年, shrewsbury查尔斯bage首先用他的'火'的设计, 后者则依靠铸铁及砖与石材地板. 这些建设大大加强了结构,使它们能够容纳更大的机器. 由于作为建筑材料特性知识缺乏,一些早期建筑失败. 直到1830年初,伊顿Hodgkinson预计推出了型钢梁, 导致广泛使用钢架建设,工业结构完全改变了这种窘迫的面貌,英国北部领导的描述, "黑暗魔鬼作坊"的地方如曼彻斯特和西约克郡. 水晶宫由约瑟夫paxton的重大展览, 1851年,是一个早期的例子,钢铁及玻璃施工; 可能是一个最好的例子,就是1890年由William乐男爵延长和路易沙利文在芝加哥附近发展的高层钢结构摩天楼. 早期结构采用混凝土作为行政手段的建筑表达(而非纯粹功利结构) ,包括建于1906年在芝加哥附近,劳埃德赖特的统一宫, 建于1926年瑞士巴塞尔附近的鲁道夫斯坦纳的第二哥特堂,.但无论原因为何, 约有1900多位建筑师,在世界各地开始制定新的建筑方法,将传统的先例(比如哥特式)与新的技术相结合的可能性.路易沙利文和赖特在芝加哥工作,维克多奥尔塔在布鲁塞尔,安东尼高迪在巴塞罗那, 奥托瓦格纳和查尔斯景mackintosh格拉斯哥在维也纳,其中之一可以看作是一个新与旧的共同斗争.2现代主义风格由1920年代的最重要人物,在现代建筑里确立了自己的名声. 三个是公认的柯布西耶。
美国景观规划历程18801940
万方数据
风景园林200B第二期079
History and Theory
图01堪萨斯的城市绿地系统 Fig 01 Urban Green System of Kansas 图02拉德本社区 Fig 02 Radburn Commun¨ 图03绿带城格林代尔 Fig 03 Greendale
纳姆(Daniel H Burnham)的芝加哥规划提出整治交通 运输、密歇根湖岸、城市道路网络和城市中心区。该 规划的成就之一就是认识到滨水区域对城市发展的 重要性,并试图建立滨水公共开放空间体系,并与城 市外围的水系沟通。1912年,格里芬(Walter Burley Griffin)的堪培拉规划则是巴洛克与自然景观完美结 合的典范。
思想和实践早已有之,可以追溯到人类早期文明时代为农业及其他社会需求服务的有目的的土地利用和规
划。景观规划不但与人类的生产生活直接相关,同时又要对景观形成的自然过程和作用规律深刻理解,伴
随着地理学对景观研究的深入和生态学等相关学科的渗入,景观的概念范畴越来越广泛,景观规划日益成
为一个多学科的综合性应用领域,连接地质学、地理学、景观生态学、城市规划等不同学科。
罗宾逊(Charles Mulford Robinson)分析城市美化运动包括:市政艺术、市政设施完善、室外艺术三方 面,因此,景观规划师也常常在城市总体规划和设计中担任重要甚至是负责角色[4]。1900年华盛顿麦克米伦规 划延续朗方(P.C.Enfant)方案的同时,形成一个相对自足内向、却更加稳定的布局。1903年小奥姆斯特德 的西雅图城市规划以城市的河谷、台地、山脊为依托,形成比较自然舒展的城市布局体系。l 909年丹尼尔·伯
景观建筑学的发展状况与思考
综合性、地域性、实践性。
景观建筑学的历史与发展
古代
中世纪
古希腊、古罗马时期,景观建筑学开始萌 芽,主要应用于园林设计。
欧洲的修道院、城堡和教堂开始引入景观 设计元素。
19世纪
21世纪
随着工业革命的发展,城市环境恶化,景 观建筑学逐渐受到重视,美国奥姆斯特德 父子开创了现代景观建筑学的先河。
随着可持续发展理念的普及,景观建筑学 在生态保护、城市更新等领域发挥越来越 重要的作用。
景观建筑学的创新与发展
创新
景观建筑学的创新主要体现在设计理念、技术手段和材料应用等方面。例如,采 用生态设计理念,运用绿色建筑材料和可再生能源,以及通过数字化技术进行设 计和施工等。
发展
景观建筑学的发展需要不断汲取其他相关学科的成果,如环境科学、社会学、心 理学等,以丰富和完善自身的理论和实践体系。同时,景观建筑学还需要关注全 球化和地域化的发展趋势,以适应不同国家和地区的需求。
风景区规划设计
风景区是自然与人文景观的有机结合 体,景观建筑学在风景区规划设计中 注重生态保护、资源利用、旅游开发 等方面的规划。
公共空间景观设计
校园景观设计
校园是学生学习和生活的重要场 所,景观建筑学在校园景观设计 中注重空间布局、绿化配置、文
化展示等方面的规划。
商业区景观设计
商业区是城市经济活动的重要载 体,景观建筑学在商业区景观设 计中注重空间布局、环境营造、
料和技术。
人文关怀
强调景观设计的人文关 怀,关注社区参与和居
民需求。
03
景观建筑学的实践与应用
城市景观设计
城市公园设计
城市公园是城市居民休闲、娱乐和健身的重要场所,景观 建筑学在城市公园设计中注重空间布局、绿化配置、水景 设计等方面的规划。
从美国景观设计的实践看我们的风景园
浅谈从美国景观设计的实践看我们的风景园摘要:如今,景观设计的应用范围十分广泛,从大地的生态规划、流域规划到区域景观规划;从国家的生态保护到国家公园建设;从城市绿地系统规划到城市广场、步行街规划;从城市公园建设到私家花园建设;从局部环境建设到街头城市小品、雕塑设计等都纳入景观设计体系。
关键词:区域;景观设计;趋势1景观设计概说现代意义上的景观设计产生于19世纪末的美国,并以奥姆斯特德于1900年成立哈佛大学la学院为标志。
景观设计一词是由英文landscape翻译而来,landscape意为有关于大地景观的规划设计。
事实上,景观设计在中西方都有悠久的发展历史,也都曾创造了灿烂的园林文化。
英国的自然式风景园林、中国的风景区规划与古典园林都是景观设计的优秀例证。
美国的景观设计继承了传统的景观设计、园林植物配置设计,并从其肇始之初就同城市建设紧密结合,逐渐发展成为包含风景设计、植物设计、城市设计、环境艺术设计等多学科复合的设计体系。
特别是在二次大战以后,城市的大发展导致了自然破坏、环境污染等一系列社会问题,同时人文主义的复归以及公众环境意识的增强使得已有的景观设计更加深入到城市生活的各个方面。
进入20世纪90年代,在维护生态、可持续发展等思想的推动下,景观设计在美国和加拿大有了更大的发展,并以其在人与自然和谐方面所取得的成就受到从政府到公众的广泛赞扬。
它已不再是“可以用简单词汇描述的学科”,而是具有极大包容性和发展潜力的专业。
环境设计——这是美国景观设计专业的核心问题。
涉及到居住区、商业、工业、各机构的室内空间以及公共空间等室外空间的细部设计。
它把场地作为艺术研究的对象来看待,综合平衡室内与室外的软、硬表面,建筑物与植物的材料选择以及灌溉、栽培等基础设施建设和详细的构筑物的规划说明与准备等。
2景观设计环境因素1)场地规划以某一地块内的建筑和自然元素的协调与安排为基础,场地规划项目涉及单幢建筑的土地设计,办公区公园设计、购物中心或整个居住社区的地块设计等。
现代之后——美国建筑教育发展(二)
B e y o n d Mo d e r n i s m: D e v e l o p me n t o f Ar c h i t e c t u r a l E d u c a t i o n i n A me r i c a( 2 )
高度发 达与精 神危 机的矛盾 更加 突 出,各类 社会 问 St u d y o f E d u c a t i o n f o r E nv i r o n me n t a l De s i g n)
美国建 筑教育发 展 的步伐 不断加 快 ,教 育体 系越来
越开 放 ,而 建 筑 教 育 思 想 则越 来 越 多 元 。
1 开放与 多元
1 . 1社 会 、环 境 与 城 市
自1 9 6 0年 代 始 ,针 对 包豪 斯 为代 表 的现 代主 义建筑教育 模式的质疑 越来越 多。1 9 6 1年 .简 ・ 雅 书 出版 。对 以现代 主义理 念建 成的城 市空 间进行
学来看 建筑 学的思 想 引发 了一 系列基 于社 会学 的建 筑研 究 。也 正是在 这一 时期 ,出现 了大量 有关 于建 究。 伴 随 着 对 于 外在 社 会 与 环 境 问 题 的 关 注 。有 关如 何将 建 筑设 计系 统化 的 问题 也在 被 不断 阐 释 。
1 只爆炸 、物质 空间增长与 社会问题 凸显的时代需 求 , 并通过提 出 “ 环境设计 ”来超 越传统 建筑学的范 畴 ,
从更 广泛的 视角来 研究 建筑学 问题 。这一 突破 建筑
a nd s u m ma r i z e s i t s b a s i c di r e c t i o ns a n d ma i n c o n t e n t s
景观建筑学的发展状况与思考
景观建筑学的发展状况与思考
景观建筑学是将园林设计与建筑设计相结合的学科,发展至今已经有数百年的历史,它与自然、文化及人类活动的关系密不可分。
在全球城市化进程的推动下,景观建筑学的发展也愈加迅速。
现代景观建筑学的发展大体可以分为三个阶段:第一阶段是19世纪末期至20世纪初期的“城市美化”时期,当时建筑师和城市规划师开始注重公共空间的设计和使用,既强调实用性,又强调美观性。
第二阶段是20世纪40-60年代的“现代主义”时期,建筑师们开始强调对自然环境的尊重与保护,同时,更加追求科技感和精细化的建筑表现手法。
第三阶段是20世纪70
年代至今的“后现代主义”时期,这个阶段将社会变革和文化差
异作为设计的出发点,强调个性和表现性,同时注重生态环境、和谐与可持续性的设计。
在当前的背景下,景观建筑学的思考也逐渐变得复杂。
全球气候变化的威胁和城市人口的不断增长,需要景观建筑师在规划和设计时更加注重环境保护和可持续性,以创造更加良好的城市生活环境。
此外,人口老龄化和居住空间的短缺也将进一步推动景观建筑学的发展。
未来的设计思考不仅需要将建筑、自然及文化融合在一起,而且还需要考虑到人类生活的诉求。
商品化、低成本化的规划与设计思维仍然占据着大多数设计师的思维导向,因此,品质、人性、文化背景与自然环境融合的思考应成为设计师们长期的思考议题。
相信未来的景观建筑学在更加注重环境保护和可持续性的基础上,还将具有更加广阔、更加开放的格局,更加注重本土性的设计。
对于景观建筑学的研究与探索,也需要不断地拓宽思维边界,多维度的反思,与相关领域的学科融合,从而在建筑、自然与人类之间创造出足够大的磁场,以吸引更多雄心万丈的设计人才的加入。
景观建筑学的发展状况与思考
3. 科技景观建筑:借助 先进科技手段,提升建 筑的智能化、节能化等 性能。例如,智能照明 、空调系统等高科技设 备的运用,实现建筑的 节能减排和智能化管理 。
05
结论与展望
总结景观建筑学的发展状况与思考
01
景观建筑学作为一门跨学科的综合性 学科,近年来得到了越来越多的关注 和发展。在不断探索和实践的过程中 ,景观建筑学逐渐形成了较为完善的 知识体系和理论框架,为人类创造美 好的生态环境和空间提供了重要的指 导。
未来景观建筑学的发展将更加注重跨学科的合作与交流。随着相关学科的不断发展和交叉融合,景观建筑学将进一步拓展其 研究领域和范围,涉及更多领域如环境科学、生态学、文化学等。通过多学科的协同创新,未来景观建筑学将为人类创造更 加美好的生态环境和空间提供更加全面和有效的指导。
感谢您的观看
THANKS
03
技术创新与数字化发展
当代景观建筑学需要更多地关注技术创新和数字化发展,运用先进的技
术手段和数字化工具来提高设计的效率和精准度,同时也为景观建筑的
维护和管理提供便利。
03
景观建筑学的思考
景观建筑学的未来发展趋势
绿色生态
景观建筑学将更加注重绿色生态,强调可持续发展和环境保护,通过绿色植被、雨水收集 、节能设计等手段,实现城市与自然的和谐共生。
中国景观建筑学实践案例
详细描述 1. 案例一:苏州园林博物馆 • 设计理念:以传承和发扬中国古典园林文化为宗旨,体现“人与自然和谐共生”的思想。
中国景观建筑学实践案例
• 创新点
将传统园林元素与现代建筑手法相结合,展现了独特的中国园林 魅力。
• 应用范围
为中国传统园林文化的传承和发展提供了有力支持,同时也为世界 园林史增添了新的篇章。
景观设计思想发展史
景观设计的思想发展史
至此,景观设计的思想发展史就简短的概括完毕了。
在20 世纪 20~30 年代, 景观规划的方法发生了重大变化 。这场变革是由英国学者 G·E·赫特金斯(G.E. Hutchings)和 C·C·法格 (C.C.Fagg)领导的。他们并不是 景观设计师,而只是测量师和地 理学家。他们编写磷钏 D贡献在 于认识到景观是一个由许多复杂 要素相联系而构成的系统。
景观设计的思想发展史
在这对大约30个重要的景观设计师的生平介绍,来 对整个景观设计的思想发展史进行简短概括。 关于我们这个学科好的定义是赫勃特·西(Herbert Simon)在 1968 年所写的《工艺科学(The Science of Artificial)》中提出的,他写道:“所谓设计,就是找到 一个能够改善现状的途径”。(这里侧重于大尺度上的景观 规划)
景观设计的思想发展史
19 世纪,英国正处在工业化时期,埃比尼泽·霍华德 (Ebenezer Howard,1850~1928)雷蒙·温翁(Raymond Unwin,1863~1940)以及其他一些人开始对当时恶劣的居住 环境不满。为此提出了很多主意,其中最著名的当属霍华德 提出的花园城市概念。其主要想法是要减小主要城市规模, 降低主要城市的人口密度,而以郊区环带包围中心城市,并 将人口安置在小型的近郊区新城镇里。所有的这些地区用高 效的公共交通系统连接起来。。随着时代进步,这个思想促 使了对建设近郊区的重视,今天,这个“新城市主义”再次 得到体现。花园城市思想对那些生活在城市近郊区的人们来 说是个很好的思想,但也造成了中心城市的衰退。
景观设计的思想发展史
派特里克·盖迪斯(Patrick Geddes,1854~1932)他提 出了两个重要思想,其中一个就是他所提出的“流域垂直分 区”思想。,他用“流域垂直分区图”来表达这些种关系。 第二个思想是。他认为城市的最基本结构是受到园林绿地和 文化设施的设计的影响而形成的,而工业区、商业区和居住 区则是次重要的。
现代西方景观赏析
.
.
.
.
纽约亚克博.亚维茨广场
玛莎.施瓦茨 1987西雅图监狱庭院
.
.
1991加州科莫思的城堡
德国的生态景观设计欣赏
.
简 介 篇
.
作 品 篇
.
港口岛公园中废弃碎石构成的方格网
港
口
作
岛 公
园
中
品
建 筑 废
料
构
篇
筑 的
小
径
.
港口岛公园中下沉露天剧场花园
.
港
口
岛
公
园
中
作
的 新
设
施
现代西方景观赏析
Contemporary Landscape Architecture
.
现代景观产生的契机
① 社会生产力的巨大进步、城市的无序和 迅猛扩张、人居环境恶化——促成“城市 美化运动”形成。
② 英国“风景园”园林形式提供了城市公 园学习蓝本。
③ “科学主义”理性哲学构成时代的精神 支柱。
.
莎顿庄园中的伊甸园
.
托马斯.丘奇和“加州花园”
20世纪40年代 加州花园:带有露天木制平台、游泳池、
不规则种植区域和动态平面的小花园。 为人们创造了户外生活的新方式。
.
1948 唐纳花园 .
.
.
哈佛革命
20世纪30到40年代,主要艺术中心从巴 黎转到纽约。
“哈佛三杰”探求现代艺术和现代建筑 理论在景观设计上应用的可能性。
品
材 料
和
颜
篇
色 与
原
有
设
施
的
处
.
理
作 品 篇
欧美现代主义建筑的发展与展望
欧美现代主义建筑的发展与展望20世纪初,欧美现代主义建筑开始崛起,这是一种全新的建筑风格,舍弃了传统建筑的装饰与装饰,注重简约、实用以及大量运用钢铁等新材料,推陈出新。
随着科技和艺术发展的不断推进,现代主义建筑逐渐成为国际范围内的主流建筑风格。
本文将就欧美现代主义建筑的发展进行探讨,并展望其未来发展趋势。
一、欧美现代主义建筑的起源欧美现代主义建筑要追溯到20世纪初的欧洲。
在热爱自然主义和工艺美术风格的带领下,现代主义建筑呈现出了一种脱胎于随从自然规律的极简风格。
1908年,德国建筑师彼得·贝伦斯(Peter Behrens)在德国达姆施塔特成立了工艺美术学校,率领着建筑师组成了“新手工艺运动”,开创了现代建筑运动的先河。
此后,建筑师们不断试图摆脱传统建筑的束缚,追求极简、实用、高效的设计理念,如德国包豪斯派、荷兰“德斯标识”等。
二、欧美现代主义建筑的核心价值观现代主义建筑的核心价值观是实用性、简洁明了和结构合理。
在这种理念指导下,建筑师们放弃了繁琐的装饰和精雕细琢的细节,将建筑材料的纹理和质感表达出来,来强化建筑的外观效果。
现代主义建筑的设计将结构与美学融为一体,建筑构件经过仔细的设计和计算,因此更加合理。
此外,现代主义建筑注重社会公益性,强调人性化和生态友好性。
这种人性化和生态友好性的设计理念,已经成为现代建筑发展趋势的核心。
三、欧美现代主义建筑的发展随着时间的推移,现代主义建筑的设计理念越来越受到人们的关注和追捧。
20世纪80年代后,建筑材料和建筑技术不断进步,使得现代主义建筑更具创新性和实用性。
现代主义建筑在发展中也不断涌现新的思路,例如:主流趋势从狭窄的钢筋混凝土结构发展到了玻璃幕墙结构,并且还有越来越多的建筑材料变得更加环保和生态友好。
同时,它也开始融合起文化、艺术、科技等因素,使得建筑的设计更加多元化和富有创新性。
四、欧美现代主义建筑的未来展望随着全球化和移民导致的文化多样性,建筑风格和审美也变得多元化。
专业资讯美国建筑学专业的发展史
专业资讯美国建筑学专业的发展史专业资讯美国建筑学专业的发展史Architecture一词,作为过程来讲,指的是由人或电脑来设计和建造建筑物。
更广义的定义包括设计总的建筑环境,从宏观层面根据周围景观来设计整合,到微观层面的建筑或建造细节,例如家具。
建筑师主要为群体提供空间和住房需求。
他们将材料和部件在土地上或城市中组织起来,处理与大众、空间、形式、数量、质地、结构、光、影、材料、程序和成本、技术等问题。
这些将建筑与工程设计区别开来。
美国建筑学专业诞生于19世纪之初。
1817年,经美国总统托马斯•杰弗逊的倡议,美国弗吉尼亚大学数学系在全美率先开设了建筑类专业课程。
杰弗逊总统提出这一倡议的动因大致可以从他就任总统前所从事的职业获得解答:他是美国历史上迄今为止唯一出身于建筑师的总统。
但是,美国真正意义上的现代建筑学专业直到1865年才由美国麻省理工学院(Massachusetts Institute of Technology,MIT)创办。
继MIT之后,伊利诺伊大学(University of Illinois)和康奈尔大学(Cornell University)也相继于1867年和1871年建立了现代建筑学专业。
1897年,宾夕法尼亚大学(University of Pennsylvania)建筑系首先开设了研究生课程。
到21世纪初,美国共有120多所大学设置了现代建筑学专业,一些实力雄厚的学校还在建筑系的基础上成立了设计学院或建筑学院。
美国大学早期建筑学专业的教学和课程设置受到了欧洲一些大学、特别是法国巴黎艺术学院和德国建筑学院的影响。
1938-1952年,哈佛大学建筑系主任一直由德国现代建筑学派的代表人物担任,其它名校的建筑学系也大多由欧洲现代建筑学的大师们担当领军人物,欧洲现代建筑学理论和实践对美国大学的建筑学专业产生了深远的影响。
美国大学早期的建筑学专业本科学制为4年。
1922年,康奈尔大学开创了建筑系本科专业五年制的先河,以加强建筑系本科毕业生的基本功。
建筑学Modern-Architecture现代建筑大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文
毕业设计(论文)外文文献翻译文献、资料中文题目:现代建筑文献、资料英文题目:Modern Architecture文献、资料来源:文献、资料发表(出版)日期:院(部):专业:班级:姓名:学号:指导教师:翻译日期: 2017.02.14建筑学毕业设计的外文文献及译文文献、资料题目:《Advanced Encryption Standard》文献、资料发表(出版)日期:2004.10.25外文文献:Modern ArchitectureModern architecture, not to be confused with 'contemporary architecture', is a term given to a number of building styles with similar characteristics, primarily the simplification of form and the elimination of ornament. While the style was conceived early in the 20th century and heavily promoted by a few architects, architectural educators and exhibits, very few Modern buildings were built in the first half of the century. For three decades after the Second World War, however, it became the dominant architectural style for institutional and corporate building.1. OriginsSome historians see the evolution of Modern architecture as a social matter, closely tied to the project of Modernity and hence to the Enlightenment, a result of social and political revolutions.Others see Modern architecture as primarily driven by technological and engineering developments, and it is true that the availability of new building materials such as iron, steel, concrete and glass drove the invention of new building techniques as part of the Industrial Revolution. In 1796, Shrewsbury mill owner Charles Bage first used his ‘fireproof’ design, which relied on cast iron and brick with flag stone floors. Such construction greatly strengthened the structure of mills, which enabled them to accommodate much bigger machines. Due to poor knowledge of iron's properties as a construction material, a number of early mills collapsed. It was not until the early 1830s that Eaton Hodgkinson introduced the section beam, leading to widespread use of iron construction, this kind of austere industrial architecture utterly transformed the landscape of northern Britain, leading to the description, "Dark satanic mills" of places like Manchester and parts of West Yorkshire. The Crystal Palace by Joseph Paxton at the Great Exhibition of 1851 was an early example of iron and glass construction; possibly the best example is the development of the tall steel skyscraper in Chicago around 1890 by William Le Baron Jenney and Louis Sullivan. Early structures to employ concrete as the chief means of architectural expression (rather than for purely utilitarian structure) include Frank Lloyd Wright's Unity Temple, built in 1906 near Chicago, and Rudolf Steiner's Second Goetheanum, built from1926 near Basel, Switzerland.Other historians regard Modernism as a matter of taste, a reaction against eclecticism and the lavish stylistic excesses of Victorian Era and Edwardian Art Nouveau.Whatever the cause, around 1900 a number of architects around the world began developing new architectural solutions to integrate traditional precedents (Gothic, for instance) with new technological possibilities. The work of Louis Sullivan and Frank Lloyd Wright in Chicago, Victor Horta in Brussels, Antoni Gaudi in Barcelona, Otto Wagner in Vienna and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Glasgow, among many others, can be seen as a common struggle between old and new.2. Modernism as Dominant StyleBy the 1920s the most important figures in Modern architecture had established their reputations. The big three are commonly recognized as Le Corbusier in France, and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and Walter Gropius in Germany. Mies van der Rohe and Gropius were both directors of the Bauhaus, one of a number of European schools and associations concerned with reconciling craft tradition and industrial technology.Frank Lloyd Wright's career parallels and influences the work of the European modernists, particularly via the Wasmuth Portfolio, but he refused to be categorized with them. Wright was a major influence on both Gropius and van der Rohe, however, as well as on the whole of organic architecture.In 1932 came the important MOMA exhibition, the International Exhibition of Modern Architecture, curated by Philip Johnson. Johnson and collaborator Henry-Russell Hitchcock drew together many distinct threads and trends, identified them as stylistically similar and having a common purpose, and consolidated them into the International Style.This was an important turning point. With World War II the important figures of the Bauhaus fled to the United States, to Chicago, to the Harvard Graduate School of Design, and to Black Mountain College. While Modern architectural design never became a dominant style in single-dwelling residential buildings, in institutional and commercial architecture Modernism became the pre-eminent, and in the schools (for leaders of the profession) the only acceptable, design solution from about 1932 to about 1984.Architects who worked in the international style wanted to break with architectural tradition and design simple, unornamented buildings. The most commonly used materials are glass for the facade, steel for exterior support, and concrete for the floors and interior supports; floor plans were functional and logical. The style became most evident in the design of skyscrapers. Perhaps its most famous manifestations include the United Nations headquarters (Le Corbusier, Oscar Niemeyer, Sir Howard Robertson), the Seagram Building (Ludwig Mies van der Rohe), and Lever House (Skidmore, Owings, and Merrill), all in New York. A prominent residential example is the Lovell House (Richard Neutra) in Los Angeles.Detractors of the international style claim that its stark, uncompromisingly rectangular geometry is dehumanising. Le Corbusier once described buildings as "machines for living", but people are not machines and it was suggested that they do not want to live in machines. Even Philip Johnson admitted he was "bored with the box." Since the early 1980s many architects have deliberately sought to move away from rectilinear designs, towards more eclectic styles. During the middle of the century, some architects began experimenting in organic forms that they felt were more human and accessible. Mid-century modernism, or organic modernism, was very popular, due to its democratic and playful nature. Alvar Aalto and Eero Saarinen were two of the most prolific architects and designers in this movement, which has influenced contemporary modernism.Although there is debate as to when and why the decline of the modern movement occurred, criticism of Modern architecture began in the 1960s on the grounds that it was universal, sterile, elitist and lacked meaning. Its approach had become ossified in a "style" that threatened to degenerate into a set of mannerisms. Siegfried Giedion in the 1961 introduction to his evolving text, Space, Time and Architecture (first written in 1941), could begin "At the moment a certain confusion exists in contemporary architecture, as in painting; a kind of pause, even a kind of exhaustion." At the Metropolitan Museum of Art, a 1961 symposium discussed the question "Modern Architecture: Death or Metamorphosis?" In New York, the coup d'état appeared to materialize in controversy around the Pan Am Building that loomed over Grand Central Station, taking advantage of the modernist real estate concept of "air rights",[1] In criticism by Ada Louise Huxtable and Douglas Haskell it was seen to "sever" the Park Avenue streetscape and "tarnish" the reputations of its consortium of architects: Walter Gropius, Pietro Belluschi and thebuilders Emery Roth & Sons. The rise of postmodernism was attributed to disenchantment with Modern architecture. By the 1980s, postmodern architecture appeared triumphant over modernism, including the temple of the Light of the World, a futuristic design for its time Guadalajara Jalisco La Luz del Mundo Sede International; however, postmodern aesthetics lacked traction and by the mid-1990s, a neo-modern (or hypermodern) architecture had once again established international pre-eminence. As part of this revival, much of the criticism of the modernists has been revisited, refuted, and re-evaluated; and a modernistic idiom once again dominates in institutional and commercial contemporary practice, but must now compete with the revival of traditional architectural design in commercial and institutional architecture; residential design continues to be dominated by a traditional aesthetic.中文译文:现代建筑现代建筑,不被混淆与'当代建筑' , 是一个词给了一些建筑风格有类似的特点, 主要的简化形式,消除装饰等. 虽然风格的设想早在20世纪,并大量造就了一些建筑师、建筑教育家和展品,很少有现代的建筑物,建于20世纪上半叶. 第二次大战后的三十年, 但最终却成为主导建筑风格的机构和公司建设.1起源一些历史学家认为进化的现代建筑作为一个社会问题, 息息相关的工程中的现代性,从而影响了启蒙运动,导致社会和政治革命.另一些人认为现代建筑主要是靠技术和工程学的发展, 那就是获得新的建筑材料,如钢铁, 混凝土和玻璃驱车发明新的建筑技术,它作为工业革命的一部分. 1796年, shrewsbury查尔斯bage首先用他的'火'的设计, 后者则依靠铸铁及砖与石材地板. 这些建设大大加强了结构,使它们能够容纳更大的机器. 由于作为建筑材料特性知识缺乏,一些早期建筑失败. 直到1830年初,伊顿Hodgkinson预计推出了型钢梁, 导致广泛使用钢架建设,工业结构完全改变了这种窘迫的面貌,英国北部领导的描述, "黑暗魔鬼作坊"的地方如曼彻斯特和西约克郡. 水晶宫由约瑟夫paxton的重大展览, 1851年,是一个早期的例子,钢铁及玻璃施工; 可能是一个最好的例子,就是1890年由William乐男爵延长和路易沙利文在芝加哥附近发展的高层钢结构摩天楼. 早期结构采用混凝土作为行政手段的建筑表达(而非纯粹功利结构) ,包括建于1906年在芝加哥附近,劳埃德赖特的统一宫, 建于1926年瑞士巴塞尔附近的鲁道夫斯坦纳的第二哥特堂,.但无论原因为何, 约有1900多位建筑师,在世界各地开始制定新的建筑方法,将传统的先例(比如哥特式)与新的技术相结合的可能性.路易沙利文和赖特在芝加哥工作,维克多奥尔塔在布鲁塞尔,安东尼高迪在巴塞罗那, 奥托瓦格纳和查尔斯景mackintosh格拉斯哥在维也纳,其中之一可以看作是一个新与旧的共同斗争.2现代主义风格由1920年代的最重要人物,在现代建筑里确立了自己的名声. 三个是公认的柯布西耶在法国, 密斯范德尔德罗和瓦尔特格罗皮乌斯在德国. 密斯范德尔德罗和格罗皮乌斯为董事的包豪斯, 其中欧洲有不少学校和有关团体学习调和工艺和传统工业技术.赖特的建筑生涯中,也影响了欧洲建筑的现代艺术,特别是通过瓦斯穆特组合但他拒绝被归类与他们. 赖特与格罗皮乌斯和Van der德罗对整个有机体系有重大的影响.在1932年来到的重要moma展览,是现代建筑艺术的国际展览,艺术家菲利普约翰逊. 约翰逊和合作者亨利-罗素阁纠集许多鲜明的线索和趋势, 内容相似,有一个共同的目的,巩固了他们融入国际化风格这是一个重要的转折点. 在二战的时间包豪斯的代表人物逃到美国,芝加哥,到哈佛大学设计黑山书院. 当现代建筑设计从未成为主导风格单一的住宅楼,在成为现代卓越的体制和商业建筑, 是学校(专业领导)的唯一可接受的, 设计解决方案,从约1932年至约1984年.那些从事国际风格的建筑师想要打破传统建筑和简单的没有装饰的建筑物。
美国风景园林史及其专业拓展
中图分类号 TU-098.4 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1003-739X (2019)10-0100-04 收稿日期 2018-07-04摘 要 美国的风景园林有着复杂的进化史,目前很难确定从哪里开始起源。
它与其他学科有着紧密的联系,如伴随着人类发展的园林(LG:Landscape Gardening )。
实际上,“风景园林”或建筑师在美国乃至全世界都是非常新的术语。
LG是指通过花卉及其色彩构成的具有美学特质的自然景观。
最初的目的是展示一种文明的生活方式或和社会地位。
风景园林的演替是从这种美学形式向实际功能的改变,通过风和光照的适宜性调控实现美学设计策略,改善了使用者的日常生活。
美国的现代园林由每个州政府单独管理,制定各种不同的法律法规和伦理准则。
国家风景园林设计考试由风景园林注册局理事会实施。
风景园林行业一直在不断成长,并被列为过去五年美国的最佳职业之一。
该文从美国的“风景园林”这一术语的第一次介绍与应用开始,阐述了目前的专业现状。
关键词 风景园林 历史 美国 美国风景园林师协会Abstract Landscape architecture in the United States of America has a very complex history which has made it very difficult for historians to identify the actual beginning of the profession within the country. It borders the history of other types of professions, such as landscape gardening, which has been presented since the existence of humans. The actual term landscape architecture or architect is very new within the United States, and the world generally. Landscape gardening refers natural landscape with aesthetic characteristics via beauty in nature through the use of flowers and bright colors. The original intention is to show a civilized lifestyle or a higher status. The transition of landscape architecture is a change from this aesthetic form to an actual function, which realizes the aesthetic design strategy through the suitability regulation of wind and illumination, and improves the daily life of the user. Modern landscape architecture is regulated individually by each state government, which produces different regulations and ethics for each state. The regulation of the national landscape architecture exam is done by the Council of Landscape Architecture Registration Boards. The profession has been consistently growing and has been listed as one of the best professions in the United States for the past five years. Starting with the first introduction and application of the term "landscape architecture" in the United States, we expound the current professional situation.Keywords Landscape architecture, History, USA, ASLA张德顺 | Zhang Deshun 孙 力 | Sun Li科里·马修·阿尔布雷特 | Corey Matthew Albrecht 胡瑜倩 | Hu Yuqian美国风景园林史及其专业拓展The History of Landscape Architecture in the United States of America and the Ongoing Effort to Expand its Reaches1 早期美国风景园林1.1 美国风景园林的起源19世纪之前,欧洲认为园林(Landscape G a r d e n i n g)是总体规划中的一个专项规划。
景观建筑学的发展
二、景观建筑学的发展(development of landscapearchitecture)主要内容:景观建筑的发展定义了更多广义的内容,资源、人文历史等不同层面上的相互交融带来了新的理念与实践。
新技术手段的更新,是适应景观建筑设计发展的必然。
纵观景观建筑学的发展历程,自然一直被看作满足人类需求的资源,”改造自然”是为了让自然为人类服务,而非人类从属于自然。
虽然生态学的发展曾一度为景观建筑学专业发展提供了新的发动机,然而近来生态的伦理内涵及其与美学的辩证联系,也成为景观建筑学的研究内容。
景观建筑应当更多地发挥建筑及其外部空间的生态交流特性、资源的再利用能力;增进建筑与外部空间设计的完整性与动态交互特性的联系:提升没落城市空间的活力;重视社区尺度下的景观与建筑空间设计的有机融合等等。
景观建筑学既不是艺术,也不是纯技术,它体现了自然中个体与群体经验,应当是艺术与技术的结合体。
1、发展趋向与实践资源利用对今后景观建筑设计的影响随着工业社会以及世界人口的不断发展,大自然的资源不再显得取之不尽、用之不竭。
无论在视觉上、触觉上还是在心理上,人类可望接触水、地、绿这些原生或次生的自然环境。
这种理念引发了景观建筑设计的新发展。
的确,近年来”可持续发展”的观念在多学科、多领域的发展中起着越来越多的作用。
这方面的例子,包括景观设计师赫伯特·德莱斯特与建筑大师伦佐·皮阿诺在柏林波士坦广场中所作的设计。
在这个大胆的实践中,建筑、生态、景观有机地融合在一起;在办公楼屋顶花园收集并过滤雨水,并将过滤的雨水储存在水箱中;水箱中的收集的水缓慢顺着建筑中跌落的绿化平台流向地面,最终与整个波士坦广场区域内的雨水一起被收集到的人工湖中,湖中的芦苇丛对水又起着初步的物理及生化的过滤作用,另外,还有机械的辅助过滤设施,使湖水清澈见底。
平静的水面上,齐人高的芦苇丛与丰富的建筑背景形成了犹如”都市的村庄”般独有的景观特色。
美国建筑设计发展
Reviewing the Development ofModern Landscape Architecture in America1 IntroductionThe new century came in the end, turn of the century, a century or even millennium replace actually replaced in a flash, in this moment, the United States Modern Landscape Architecture profession has gone through an extraordinary century. In the passing away of hundred years, the United States the emergence of modern landscape architecture and development to guide the direction of modern landscape architecture, and covers almost all of the exploration. Therefore, we hope that through their review and thinking, can and enlightenment.2 DevelopmentIndustrial revolution has brought about tremendous and far-reaching changes to the 19th century, known as the "father of American landscape architecture" of the FL Olmsted and Vaux designed by British architect, New York's Central Park (1858) the construction, marking the ordinary living landscape to come. As a starting point, thelandscape architecture from the path of independence, and with modern American society and the democratic process, moving from a very small selection of traditional professional into the world of human life for almost all the scales involved in the subject; in the short shorts bar for more than a century, the landscape of human experience in several dimensions greatly expanded.2.1 The expansion of the field of professional practiceAnd ideal as a symbol of a series of city parks (1865 Thurmond Philadelphia Park, Jin Shan Park, 1870 San Francisco, Chicago, 1871 South Park, etc.) and the beginning of modern landscape architecture practice, such as a pioneer in the Olmstead imitative, adhere to the whole land from the city and the perspective of the modern landscape architecture professional practice areas of the start location; including urban parks and green space systems, urban and rural landscape road system, residential areas, schools, real estate development and national parks planning and design management in the broad field. With the social development and understanding of human naturecontinues to expand, the practice of landscape architecture and further extend to the entire field of human settlements conditions. Modern Landscape Architecture in Perspective increasingly clear that completely changed the concept of practice, of course, the traditional small-scale private gardens and garden design continue, and ecology, such as land planning, landscape protection and planning, investigation and assessment of land resources and landscape protection management of these professional practice to make the landscape architecture in a more general level and more public scale operation. Today, as a human society gradually away from the natural environment to answer, landscape architecture, construction yard will no longer be enlarged version, but a practical subject, covering almost 10,000 people and the natural environment aspects of the relationship between the practice of subject area, its theoretical methods and social responsibility also will expand and change. 2.2 clients and professional practitioners to expandAmerican Modern Landscape Architecture from the Central Park, the already small number of people is no longer a luxury for admiration, but the general public space for physical and mental regeneration. Landscape into the lives of ordinary people, to meet the aspirations of ordinary people, it should be said that it was given to modern society and democracy. Modern landscape architecture enables modern landscape architecture, social life with real roots, with continuous vitality and dynamism. With human beings the process of industrialization and urbanization make the deteriorating natural environment, the survival and continuation of human beings also under threat. To environmental issues in contemporary society to highlight the status of the point of view, the modern landscape architecture services is no longer limited to a group of man-made object, but as a human interdependence with other species with itself has a multi-cultural existence of natural systemsin part, to expand the vision of modern landscape architecture to the cultural circle of the entire humaninteraction with the natural biosphere and sustainable development.Broad areas of professional practice to make the necessary professional knowledge landscape architects increasingly present a comprehensive and integrated features. Today, many landscape architects will be required for landscape architecture practice, extensive knowledge and feel a bit embarrassed. Correspondingly, with a variety of different professional backgrounds to participate in the practice of landscape architecture to, of which both traditional gardener, there are architects, urban planners, botanists, geographers, environmental and even painters and artistssculptor. They have their own unique knowledge and the professional advantages of modern landscape architecture makes the richness of the multi-scene, to explore a variety of professional landscape architecture in modern science and art both in deepening and expand the experience of landscape architectural design and methods.2.3 design elements and design practices to expandWas used as a multi-purpose practice professional, modern landscape design palette of material also extends to traditional landscape design can not imagine the situation. Landscape Design Plant is no longer the dominant element of the dominant, but rather an alternative landscape materials, land, rocks, water, concrete, bricks, wood, tile, steel, plastic and glass and many naturalartificial material in the modern landscape design can be used, even the local hardware store in a form element plated frog also appears in the modern landscape works. Avant-garde in the small-scale urban garden design, almost no natural landscape materials greatly challenges the traditional definition of the limitations of the landscape.3 EvolutionAs the landscape is a living, changing organism, like the growth of the modernlandscape architecture in the past more than a century as the development of American society as changing, reflecting the social reality of a particular time.3.1 naturalistic style swing beginning withThe vast territory the United States, changing the natural landscape to landscape design has almost natural pursuit of naturalism, Olmsted and his followers in a city park system planning and design to promote naturalism, against the pursuit of dignity andclear structure of classicism. Park-style attractions and beautiful natural environment was poor cities in stark contrast to a return to nature to meet the needs of society. However, after the U.S. landscape architecture through the flashy veneer of The Late Victorian Eclectic Landscape, City Beautiful Movement and the revival of classical neo-classical trends and so transform the style of decades and did not get out swinging in the modern society to adapt their own way.3.2 ModernismBefore and after World War II, modern art and modern architecture in theory and works under the influence of American modernist landscape architecture in the so-called "Harvard Revolution" after forming. Modernist landscape architecture is not the most positive contribution to the use of new materials, but that function should be the starting point of this concept design, modern landscape architecture and thus out of a beautiful design or landscape type Transcendentalism, to the venue and the realityof the times fit, given the rational application of landscape architecture and greater creative freedom. As Harvard Revolution "James Rose said:" We can not live in the painting, but as a group to design the landscape paintings of our daily lives plundering the region's use of the opportunity."He is most concerned about the use of space, rather than planning the landscape design or so-called order. The leaders of Thomas Church, California school works is not really encouraging the order form, but free design language as well asdesign itself, the venues and the delicate balance between employer requirements. Another master Garrett Eckbo Modern Landscape Design Landscape design is more emphasis on the social scale, emphasizing landscape architecture's role in public life. In his view, "If the designonly consider beautiful, is the lack of inherent rationality of the luxury community. "geometric sense of order most of his works of Dan Kiley also that the mapping design is life itself, the pursuit of the function will produce real art. the best symbol of thisa period of landscape design and environmental care for the landscape architect is Lawrence Halprin, his work reflects the progress of modernism in all aspects of landscape architecture, including the design of the social role of natural systems to adapt to stress, as well as function and process of the formits importance and so on. He's a natural place as a dramatic landscape inspired urban planning of public landscape design, urban landscape is not only beautiful but also recreational place for people to become the city's open space human. 60 years since the 20th century, social democracy, brought about the promotion of public participation in decision-making system changes in all aspects of American society, landscape architecture is also true, but Harpring is a direct supporter of this change and advocates, areHarpring made his company is the design process to adapt to new social realities, through seminars and information feedback, etc. to achieve the wishes of the public involved in the design so that the community was able to landscape design set-up. modern doctrine of the communitythrough landscape architecture designfactors and features to further stress and social realities embarked on the road simultaneously.3.3 Ecological Ethics70 years before, increasingly concerned about the ecological environment, landscape architecture, University of Pennsylvania Professor Lan McHarg proposed to include landscape as a geology, topography, hydrology, land use, plants, wildlife and climate and other decisive factors interrelated whole to look atpoint ofview.Stressed the landscape plan should comply with the intrinsic value of nature and natural processes, and improved in order to factor stratified analysis and map overlay technology as the core of the Ecological Planning, Macharg called "Qian Cengbing model."The theory and method of landscape architecture to a certain extent given the scientific nature of the landscape as you can experience all kinds of objective analysis and conclusion, with clearly defined subjects.Macharg scope of the study focused on large-scale landscape and environmental planning, but for any scale of landscape architecture practice, this meant that an important message. That is in addition to an aesthetic landscape outside the system or an ecosystem, and those are just the art of the arrangement of plants and landscape design methods, more detailed design is the concept of environmental ethics. Although the landscape architectural practice in a pluralistic exploration, the natural determinism of the ideas are only one kind of assumptions Ji, but vulnerable when the critical state of the environment when there Macharg and Pennsylvania School of the most significant yes Cujinlandscape architecture as the ideological foundation of the professional work of the new criteria, the broad information landscape designers the potential structure of thinking laid an indelible mark. For the modernist landscape architects, the concept of eco-ethics to tell them, in addition to social ties between people, all people are born with the Earth's ecological systems closely associated with.3.4 Post-modernism and the art of landscape to exploreWhen large-scale ecological landscape planning and rational method of turning at the same time, small-scale landscape architectural design by 60 environmental art since noon, and postmodern film incentives, art and landscape linkages have done a lot of new exploration. A new generation of landscape architect Peter Walker combines minimalism, classical and modernist minimalism to create a unique landscape. Full of mystery in his landscape design work, Walker used a simple form, repetition, geometric structure of the natural materials from the material in a natural structure of the original million-style together, bringing a new structureproduced new means of visual integrated experience. Mystery of general features of nature, human contact with nature has a mysterious atmosphere by a metaphor out of the art scene, landscape architecture in the function and esthetics were given on the basis of meaningful artistic temperament. And Martha Schwartz Landscape Design works are denied the authenticity of the material, instead of a serious banter. Complex instead of simple, modernist landscape of dull and discard the reason was the designer. Designers to express artistic ideas and new understanding of the landscape: the landscape is a man-made or artificial modification of the set of the space, which is the basis and background of public life, is related to art and life. Post-modernist novel materials with almost eerie and staggered hybrid system reflects the composition of post-modern American society complex and contradictory social reality to the image of diverse social values embodied multi-source, expressed in this complex society tovulnerable groups, speech power of the social ideals of postmodernism. In the performance style, these active experiments with neo-classical 19th century landscape architecture are similar, the same inspiration for the visual arts, also emphasized theuse of circular geometry rather than the so-called naturalistic style. But here, the individual imagination combines the functions of caring modernist sound art to think about the social elements of the modern landscape as a creative opportunity, rather than constraints, and create a unique landscape art in the role of the environment re-established and deepened But this time the art is designed to encourage, rather than a priori form of domination.4 ConclusionAfter a century in both the arts and sciences extension and development of modern American landscape architecture has its own characteristics in their social and ecological scale and traditional garden set aside the watershed, in the constant expansion and change has become the values of a diverse multi-professional practice.However, the nature of human perception of the media, three potential concern for landscape architecture - aesthetic, environmental and social, in the United States in the development of modern landscape architecture, and not weakened over time, on the contrary, emphasized the human landscapeharmony with nature, emphasizing social justice embodied in the landscape, emphasizing the spiritual landscape in the joy of the people want more and more clear as the cornerstone of which constitute its value system. From small scale to large garden courtyard and street-scale national parks, the care of their value in practice may be different emphasis, but each design is a good balance of these three values and comprehensive, not just design-orienteda simple form or function to meet. Today, as China's economic development, our city building and landscape design and practice into a high-speed development period, but the competent departments of landscape architecture education, integrated with the mess and ignored the separation of landscape architectural practice so that we kaleidoscope reality that cannot be sure what we are or how we should call ourselves architects, landscape architects, environmental designers? Shallow emerging formalized, the lack of real concern for people and the environment arbitrary landscape design, landscape architecture, deeply reflects the value of our concern for poor and pale, in our landscape architecture are still full of confusion and chaos when U.S. founder of modern landscape architecture, Olmsted, and many American pioneer of modern landscape architecture theme insists - to create sustainable, and his life and just the landscape, and give a clear idea as to imagine that form, may be able to give us much encouragement and inspiration. The thrust of modern landscape architecture in the United States to pursue a century, may be the same with us into the modern landscape architecture in the next century.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
本科毕业设计外文文献及译文文献题目:Reviewing the Development of ModernLandscape Architecture in America文献来源:期刊文献发表日期:2008.10.25院(部):艺术学院专业:园林外文文献:Reviewing the Development ofModern Landscape Architecture in America1 IntroductionThe new century came in the end, turn of the century, a century or even millennium replace actually replaced in a flash, in this moment, the United States Modern Landscape Architecture profession has gone through an extraordinary century.In the passing away of hundred years, the United States the emergence of modern landscape architecture and development to guide the direction of modern landscape architecture, and covers almost all of the exploration.Therefore, we hope that through their review and thinking, can and enlightenment.2 DevelopmentIndustrial revolution has brought about tremendous and far-reaching changes to the 19th century, known as the "father of American landscape architecture" of the FL Olmsted and Vaux designed by British architect, New York's Central Park (1858) the construction, marking the ordinaryliving landscape to come.As a starting point, the landscape architecture from the path of independence, and with modern American society and the democratic process, moving from a very small selection of traditional professional into the world of human life for almost all the scales involved in the subject; in the shortshort bar for more than a century, the landscape of human experience in several dimensions greatly expanded.2.1 The expansion of the field of professional practiceAnd ideal as a symbol of a series of city parks (1865 Thurmond Philadelphia Park, Jinshan Park, 1870 San Francisco, Chicago, 1871 South Park, etc.) and the beginning of modern landscape architecture practice, such as a pioneer in the Olmsteadinitiative, adhere to the whole land from the city and the perspective of the modern landscape architecture professional practice areas of the start location; including urban parks and green space systems, urban and rural landscape road system, residential areas, schools, real estate development and nationalparksplanning and design management in the broad field.With the social development and understanding of human nature continues to expand, the practice of landscape architecture and further extend to the entire field of human settlements conditions.Modern Landscape Architecture in Perspective increasingly clear that completely changed the concept of practice, of course, the traditional small-scale private gardens and garden design continue, and ecology, such as land planning, landscape protection and planning, investigation and assessment of land resources and landscape protectionmanagement of these professional practice to make the landscape architecture in a more general level and more public scale operation.Today, as a human society gradually away from the natural environment to answer, landscape architecture, construction yard will no longer be enlarged version, but a practical subject, covering almost 10,000 people and the natural environment aspects of the relationship between the practice of subject area, itstheoretical methods and social responsibility also will expand and change.2.2 clients and professional practitioners to expandAmerican Modern Landscape Architecture from the Central Park, the already small number of people is no longer a luxury for admiration, but the general public space for physical and mental ndscape into the lives of ordinary people, to meet the aspirations of ordinary people, it should be said that it was given to modern society and democracy.Modern landscape architecture enables modern landscape architecture, social life with real roots, with continuous vitality and dynamism.With human beings the process of industrialization and urbanization make the deteriorating natural environment, the survival and continuation of human beings also under threat.To environmental issues in contemporary society to highlight the status of the point of view, the modern landscape architecture services is no longer limited to a group of man-made object, but as a human interdependence with other species with itself has amulti-cultural existence of natural systemsin part, to expand the vision of modern landscape architecture to the cultural circle of the entire human interaction with the natural biosphere and sustainable development.Broad areas of professional practice to make the necessary professional knowledge landscape architects increasingly present a comprehensive and integrated features.Today, many landscape architects will be required for landscape architecture practice, extensive knowledge andfeel a bit embarrassed.Correspondingly, with a variety of different professional backgrounds to participate in the practice of landscape architecture to, of which both traditional gardener, there are architects, urban planners, botanists, geographers, environmental and even painters and artistssculptor.They have their own unique knowledge and the professional advantages of modern landscape architecture makes the richness of the multi-scene, to explore a variety of professional landscape architecture in modern science and art both in deepening and expand the experience of landscape architectural design and methods.2.3 design elements and design practices to expandWas used as a multi-purpose practice professional, modern landscape design palette of material also extends to traditional landscape design can not imagine the ndscape Design Plant is no longer the dominant element of the dominant, but rather an alternative landscape materials, land, rocks, water, concrete, bricks, wood, tile, steel, plastic and glass and many naturalartificial material in the modern landscape design can be used, even the local hardware store in a form element plated frog also appears in the modern landscapeworks.Avant-garde in the small-scale urban garden design, almost no natural landscape materials greatly challenges the traditional definition of the limitations of the landscape.Landscape design materials with rich phase reflect the diversity of modern landscape design practices, from large-scale landscape planning and design of the SAD (Survey - Analysis - Design), highway planning and conservation planning projects in the "Qian Cengbing" modeand "patch - corridor - matrix" model to the modern minimalist garden courtyard design, many rational functionalism, ecology, and art design techniques and the environment beyond the traditional rules of style and design techniques of naturalThe debate, the scope and scale to adapt to a variety of landscape design practice, to meet different design requirements, and created a different landscape image.3 EvolutionAs the landscape is a living, changing organism, like the growth of the modern landscape architecture in the past more than a century as the development of American society as changing, reflecting the social reality of a particular time.3.1 naturalistic style swing beginning withThe vast territory the United States, changing the natural landscape to landscape design has almost natural pursuit of naturalism, Olmsted and his followers in a city park system planning and design to promote naturalism, against the pursuit of dignity andclear structure of classicism.Park-style attractions and beautiful natural environment was poor cities in stark contrast to a return to nature to meet the needs of society.However, after the U.S. landscape architecture through the flashy veneer of The Late Victorian Eclectic Landscape, City Beautiful Movement and the revival of classical neo-classical trends and so transform the style of decades and did not get out swinging in the modern society to adapttheir own way.3.2 ModernismBefore and after World War II, modern art and modern architecture in theory and works under the influence of American modernist landscape architecture in the so-called "Harvard Revolution" after forming.Modernist landscape architecture is not the most positive contribution to the use of new materials, but that function should be the starting point of this concept design, modern landscape architecture and thus out of a beautiful design or landscape type Transcendentalism, to the venue and the reality of the times fit, given the rational application of landscape architecture and greater creative freedom.As Harvard Revolution "James Rose said:" We can not live in the painting, but as a group to design the landscape paintings of our daily lives plundering the region's use of the opportunity."He is most concerned about the use of space, rather than planning the landscape design or so-called order. The leaders of Thomas Church, California school works is not really encouraging the order form, but free design language as well asdesign itself, the venues and the delicate balance between employer requirements. Another master Garrett Eckbo Modern Landscape Design Landscape design is more emphasis on the social scale, emphasizing landscape architecture's role in public life. In his view, "If the designonly consider beautiful, is the lack of inherent rationality of the luxury community. "geometric sense of order most of his works of Dan Kiley also that the mapping design is life itself, the pursuit of the function will produce real art. the best symbol of thisa period of landscape design and environmental care for the landscape architect is Lawrence Halprin, his work reflects the progress of modernism in all aspects of landscape architecture, including the design of the social role of natural systems to adapt to stress, as well as function and process ofthe formits importance and so on. He's a natural place as a dramatic landscape inspired urban planning of public landscape design, urban landscape is not only beautiful but also recreational place for people to become the city's open space human. 60 years since the 20th century, social democracy, brought about the promotion of public participation in decision-making system changes in all aspects of American society, landscape architecture is also true, but Harpring is a direct supporter of this change and advocates, areHarpring made his company is the design process to adapt to new social realities, through seminars and information feedback, etc. to achieve the wishes of the public involved in the design so that the community was able to landscape design set-up. modern doctrine of the community through landscape architecture designfactors and features to further stress and social realities embarked on the road simultaneously.3.3 Ecological Ethics70 years before, increasingly concerned about the ecological environment, landscape architecture, University of Pennsylvania Professor Lan McHarg proposed to include landscape as a geology, topography, hydrology, land use, plants, wildlife and climate and other decisive factors interrelated whole to look atpoint of view.Stressed the landscape plan should comply with the intrinsic value of nature and natural processes, and improved in order to factor stratified analysis and map overlay technology as the core of the Ecological Planning, Macharg called "Qian Cengbing model."The theory and method of landscape architecture to a certain extent given the scientific nature of the landscape as you can experience all kinds of objective analysis and conclusion, with clearly defined subjects.Macharg scope of the study focused on large-scale landscape and environmental planning, but for any scale of landscape architecture practice, this meant that an important message.That is in addition to an aesthetic landscape outside the system or an ecosystem, and those are just the art of the arrangement of plants and landscape design methods, more detailed design is the concept of environmental ethics.Although the landscape architectural practice in a pluralistic exploration, the natural determinism of the ideas are only one kind of assumptions Ji, but vulnerable when the critical state of the environment when there Macharg and Pennsylvania School of the most significant yes Cujinlandscape architecture as the ideological foundation of the professional work of the new criteria, the broad informationlandscape designers the potential structure of thinking laid an indelible mark.For the modernist landscape architects, the concept of eco-ethics to tell them, in addition to social ties between people, all people are born with the Earth's ecological systems closely associated with.3.4 Post-modernism and the art of landscape to exploreWhen large-scale ecological landscape planning and rational method of turning at the same time, small-scale landscape architectural design by 60 environmental art since noon, and postmodern film incentives, art and landscape linkages have done a lot of new exploration.A new generation of landscape architect Peter Walker combines minimalism, classical and modernist minimalism to create a unique landscape.Full of mystery in his landscape design work, Walker used a simple form, repetition, geometric structure of the natural materials from the material in a natural structure of the original million-style together, bringing a new structureproduced new means of visual integrated experience.Mystery of general features of nature, human contact with nature has a mysterious atmosphere by a metaphor out of the art scene, landscape architecture in the function and esthetics were given on the basis of meaningful artistic temperament.And Martha Schwartz Landscape Design works are denied the authenticity of the material, instead of a serious plex instead of simple, modernist landscape of dull and discard the reason was the designer.Designers to express artistic ideas and new understanding of the landscape: the landscape is a man-made or artificial modification of the set of the space, which is the basis and background of public life, is related to art and life.Post-modernist novel materials with almost eerie and staggered hybrid system reflects the composition of post-modern American society complex and contradictory social reality to the image of diverse social values embodiedmulti-source, expressed in this complex society tovulnerable groups, speech power of the social ideals of postmodernism.In the performance style, these active experiments with neo-classical19th century landscape architecture are similar, the same inspiration for the visual arts, also emphasized the use of circular geometry rather than the so-called naturalistic style.But here, the individual imagination combines the functions of caring modernist sound art to think about the social elements of the modern landscape as a creative opportunity, rather than constraints, and create a unique landscape art in the role of the environment re-established and deepenedBut this time the art is designed to encourage, rather than a priori form of domination.4 ConclusionAfter a century in both the arts and sciences extension and development of modern American landscape architecture has its own characteristics in their social and ecological scale and traditional garden set aside the watershed, in the constant expansion and change has becomethe values of a diverse multi-professional practice.However, the nature of human perception of the media, three potential concern for landscape architecture - aesthetic, environmental and social, in the United States in the development of modern landscape architecture, and not weakened over time, on the contrary, emphasized the human landscapeharmony with nature, emphasizing social justice embodied in the landscape, emphasizing the spiritual landscape in the joy of the people want more and more clear as the cornerstone of which constitute its value system.From small scale to large garden courtyard and street-scale national parks, the care of their value in practice may be different emphasis, but each design is a good balance of these three values and comprehensive, not just design-orienteda simple form or function to meet.Today, as China's economic development, our city building and landscape design and practice into a high-speed development period, but the competent departments of landscape architecture education, integrated with the mess and ignored the separation of landscape architectural practice so that we kaleidoscopereality that can not be sure what we are or how we should call ourselves architects, landscape architects, environmental designers?Shallow emerging formalized, the lack of real concern for people and the environment arbitrary landscape design, landscape architecture, deeply reflects the value of our concern for poor and pale, in our landscape architecture are still full of confusion and chaos whenU.S. founder of modern landscape architecture, Olmsted, and many American pioneer of modern landscape architecture theme insists - to create sustainable, and his life and just the landscape, and give a clear idea as to imagine thatform, may be able to give us much encouragement and inspiration.The thrust of modern landscape architecture in the United States to pursue a century, may be the same with us into the modern landscape architecture in the next century.中文译文:美国现代景观建筑学发展的回顾与思索1引言新世纪到底来了,世纪之交,百年替换乃至千年替换其实都在一瞬间,在这一瞬之后,美国现代景观建筑学专业也走过了一个不平凡的世纪。