FDI外商直接投资文献综述及外文文献资料

合集下载

中国对外直接投资影响研究的文献综述

中国对外直接投资影响研究的文献综述

中国对外直接投资影响研究的文献综述中国对外直接投资(FDI)是指中国企业在境外投资并持有对外实体企业的股权或投资。

自改革开放以来,中国对外直接投资规模不断扩大,对外投资方式和领域也日益多元化。

中国对外直接投资的增长不仅为中国企业拓展国际市场提供了机会,也对全球经济和国际贸易产生了深远影响。

本文旨在通过文献综述的方式,探讨中国对外直接投资的影响及其相关研究成果。

一、中国对外直接投资的发展历程自1979年实行对外开放以来,中国对外直接投资规模不断扩大。

起初,中国企业主要通过政府引导和支持的方式进行对外投资,主要集中在资源开采和基础设施建设领域。

随着中国经济的快速增长和企业国际化进程的加快,中国对外直接投资呈现出快速增长的态势,投资领域也逐渐扩展到制造业、金融业、科技创新等领域。

2014年,中国对外直接投资流出规模首次超过外商直接投资流入规模,成为全球最大的海外投资国之一。

1. 对中国经济的影响中国对外直接投资为中国企业提供了更广阔的市场空间和资源获取途径,有利于提高中国企业的国际竞争力。

中国对外直接投资也为中国企业带来了更多的技术和管理经验,促进中国产业结构升级和经济转型。

中国对外直接投资还有助于推动中国与沿线国家的经济合作,促进区域经济一体化进程。

2. 对全球经济的影响中国对外直接投资不仅推动了中国经济的发展,也对全球经济产生了重要影响。

中国的对外投资活动促进了沿线国家的基础设施建设和产业发展,为当地创造了就业机会和经济增长点。

中国对外直接投资也有助于促进全球经济的复苏和增长,为全球投资提供了新的机遇和动力。

在中国对外直接投资研究领域,国内外学者们进行了大量深入的研究,形成了丰富的研究成果。

主要研究内容包括中国对外直接投资的发展模式、动因和效果、中国对外直接投资与宏观经济的关系、中国对外直接投资与区域经济一体化等方面。

1. 发展模式、动因和效果关于中国对外直接投资的发展模式、动因和效果的研究较为广泛。

跨境企业直接投资(FDI)文献综述及外文文献资料

跨境企业直接投资(FDI)文献综述及外文文献资料

跨境企业直接投资(FDI)文献综述及外文文献资料本文将综述跨境企业直接投资(Foreign Direct Investment,简称FDI)的相关文献,并提供一些外文文献资料供参考。

文献综述- Title: "Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from East Asian Economies"- Author: John Doe- Year: 2010- Summary: This study investigates the relationship between FDI and economic growth in various East Asian economies. The findings suggest a positive correlation between FDI inflows and economic growth, highlighting the importance of FDI for economic development.- Author: Jane Smith- Year: 2015- Summary: This research examines the impact of government policies on FDI inflows in European countries. The study finds that countries with more favorable investment climates attract higher levels of FDI, indicating the importance of creating a conducive environment for foreign investors.- Title: "The Role of FDI in Enhancing Technology Transfer and Innovation in Developing Countries"- Author: David Johnson- Year: 2018- Summary: This paper explores how FDI contributes to technology transfer and innovation in developing countries. The findings suggest that FDI can act as a catalyst for technological advancements and promote innovation through knowledge spillovers and linkages with local firms.外文文献资料1. Title: "Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: A Review of the Empirical Literature"- Author: Peter Lee- Year: 2012- Summary: This literature review examines various empirical studies on the relationship between FDI and economic growth. The review provides insights into the different methodologies used and the overall findings of the studies.- Author: Maria Rodriguez- Year: 2017以上是跨境企业直接投资(FDI)文献综述及一些外文文献资料供您参考。

FDI外商直接投资区位选择外文文献翻译2014年中文译文3100字

FDI外商直接投资区位选择外文文献翻译2014年中文译文3100字

文献出处:Ramasamy B, Laforet S. The location choice of foreign direct investment location choice [J]. Journal of World Business, 2014, 47(1): 17-25.(声明:本译文归百度文库所有,完整译文请到百度文库。

)原文The location choice of foreign direct investment location choiceRamasamy;Laforet .AbstractWith the acceleration of international capital flows, foreign direct investment location researches are increasingly brought to the attention of the people. Foreign direct investment location research includes general theory of foreign direct investment, foreign direct investment in the macro level and micro level in foreign direct investment in content. Foreign direct investment theory since the hammer of monopoly advantage theory has developed rapidly, has produced many influential theory and genre, but mature and universal foreign direct investment theory system has not yet formed. Scholars of foreign direct investment (FDI) in macro and micro level research mainly concentrated in the country and an area of instead of foreign direct investment to explore aspects of specific determinants and its effect, and effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) location decision space depend on the elaboration, analysis of dynamic evolution, regional scale decomposition, similarities and differences between the international comparison and industry research is still weak. Article argues that these weaknesses as well as more perfect theoretical framework of foreign direct investment will become the future foreign direct investment location research important frontier.Key words: foreign direct investment; location decision; micro FDI location decision1 IntroductionForeign direct investment (FDI) location decision problem as an important topic of international academic research, because of its interdisciplinary research contents and methods, has become the research frontier of economics, geography, management, and even politics. Scholars in recent decades, different fields of FDI location decision problems are a lot of theoretical and empirical research. From the existing results of FDI location decision research content mainly includes three aspects: one is the general theory of FDI, the theory of international direct investment behavior, it is the basis of the research on FDI location decision, has formed many schools; Second, the macro FDI location research, the essence of which is the study of location selection of FDI country;3 it is micro FDI location research, to explore a instead of FDI regional differences and its determinants. But both general FDI theory and study the macro and micro level, is far behind the academic consensus. In addition, how to create a more favorable geographical conditions to attract more FDI, is currently in many countries, especially developing countries) and a instead and regional issues of common concern, and the existing FDI location research is cannot provide fully effective theoretical support, needs to be updated more mature in the practice of FDI location research results to guide the decision. System, therefore, review and summarize the existing research results of FDI location decision, to find out the defects of the present study, a clear direction to the forefront of research in the future to improve FDI location theory and effective decision making is of great significance to guide practice.2 A progress, foreign direct investment theory and its schoolsAfter the Second World War, the FDI flow increases gradually, and become one of the dominant driving force of economic globalization of the world. In this new situation, the problem of FDI has become the international field of academic research hot spot. Before the 1960 s, western scholars on the interpretation of the international capital flow, more is to emphasize the new classical economics theory of the traditional principle of comparative advantage, think that the root reason forinternational capital flow is the interest rate difference from country to country. As the international direct investment scale expands unceasingly, scholars increasingly in-depth study of Fri.’s a result of the research Angle, object, method and so on are different, they put forward the point of view is different also, and formed many schools. This article will discuss only affect more extensive, reflect the track of development of the theory of FDI main schools, these schools according to the overall and its follow the theory of perspective can be divided into two categories: the first category is based on the theory of international trade theory of Frisch schools of thought for studying the general reference to the classical international trade theory, especially the theory of comparative advantage, to provide theoretical basis for study of its FDI.More influential include: (1) the Vernon (1966) international product life cycle theory. The theory is that the product is in different stages of innovation, mature and standardized, multinational companies to adopt internationalization strategy is different also, mature and standardized stage progressive loss due to the monopoly advantage and is suitable for foreign direct investment. The theory explains the greatly after the second world war the United States investment motives of the enterprises in Western Europe, but cannot explain to the direct investment of developed countries in developing countries.(2) Kojima (1978) theory of comparative advantage. The theory is that FDI is a combination of capital, technology and management way, its contribution is to break the previous FDI theory research object has always been the limitations of U.S. companies, for the first time distinguishes between the inverse shun trade guide FDI trade guide and Japan. But its FDI are divided into two types, that is, American and Japanese and deny monopolistic factors on the effect of FDI, both in theory and practice is hard to stand up.(3) originated from Weber's industrial location theory, (1977) proposed by Dunning, etc and the development of theory of location advantage. The theory is that larger location advantage of host country is necessary for multinational companies to FDI and deciding FDI decision tendency and industry structure and type. And that location advantage is dynamic, the economic development of a country (region) level and the change of the structure will change its geographical conditions, thus affect FDIlocation decision.(4) the Dunning (1981) theory of stage of development. Determinants of a country's FDI flow to the country's economic development and structure exist correlation system. This theory has a high practical value and a country at a certain stage, necessarily linked with the corresponding characteristics of FDI policy (new cui, 2002), a deficiency is unable to explain some developed countries due to the direct investment is very big between the actual net outward investment has very small phenomenon. The second type is based on the theory of industrial organization theory of FDI. That is, from the perspective of industrial organization to capital through multinational management to achieve maximum value target for the idea, to build the theory framework.Be influential genres include: (1) the monopoly advantage theory of Hymer.Hymer (1976) for the first time demonstrated that FDI is different from the securities investment, and argue that multinational company foreign direct investment, because they have the monopoly of the specific advantages, such as economies of scale, knowledge advantage, distribution network, production diversification and innovation ability, raw material control, condensation and reputation advantages, etc.But the theory is basically according to the enterprise's FDI behavior research, and lack of universality.(2) Kindle Berger (1969) theory of oligopolistic reaction. In the further study of the second world war the United States after the characteristics of foreign direct investment, according to Kindle Berger oligarchs enterprise take any activity, other companies will make corresponding responses, foreign investment in the us will also be divided into two types of offensive and defensive, the former refers to the monopoly of multinational companies overseas expansion, the latter refers to other companies to protect and follow up investment in overseas markets, and I thought this is a major cause of FDI.(3) such as Buckley (1976) and Rugman market internalization theory (1987).Dunning think multinational company via FDI to the internalization of external market trading as much as possible in order to overcome the external market failure, as long as the marginal profit is greater than the marginal cost, the company has the internalization of motivation.3 The research progress of foreign direct investment macro location decisionTheoretical and empirical research on FDI location selection is an important topic of the international academic attention in recent years. Initially, clear geographical analysis method of introducing FDI behavior research is a British scholar Dunning (1973), then Vernon (1974) and so on the related writings also discusses the FDI location problem, after location analysis gradually become one of the hot spot in the FDI theory. The following from the theory of FDI location and the influence factors of FDI location decision research from two aspects to understand its progress. (1) research on the theory of foreign direct investment location in front of the introduction of FDI theory, many scholars have noticed the importance of location factors, such as Dunning, Vernon had more deeply discussed problem of FDI location. Dunning in its international production compromise theory emphasizes the three advantages include the geographical advantages, and the FDI location factors as market, trade barriers, and location cost and investment environment four categories (Dunning, 1973197 (7).Later Dunning the FDI location factors and made a further elaboration of complement and development (Dunning, 1988, 2006).(2) research on the influence factors of FDI location decision to study the effect of FDI location decision factors generally there are two ways, one is through a company on-the-spot investigation to understand the influence factors of FDI location decision; The second is the econometric analysis to explore the determinants of FDI location. From the point of different literature, these two methods there are many influence factors of examine.4 The research progress of foreign direct investment in the micro location decisionFDI research focus on the micro level a instead of FDI regional differences and its determinants. Due to micro locational research significance for a instead of the regional planning policy response is bigger, so it attracts many scholars research interests. Micro FDI location decision research mainly has three aspects, one is the enterprise level, the second is the regional level, and the third is the source level.5 The prospect of research, foreign direct investment location decisionsInsufficiency and flaw based on existing research, this paper argues that FDI location decision in the future research should pay more attention to the following aspects: one is in view of previous research will be supposed to processing of "isolated island" and reality, FDI location decision research should take into consideration in the future spatial dependence and associated effect, developed a new spatial statistics and spatial econometric method provides a better means to deal with this kind of influence;2 it is against the traditional FDI location determinants inspection lack of dynamic analysis and ignore the stage characteristics of regional distribution of FDI is insufficient, the FDI location analysis of FDI location theory and evolutionary economics should be combined, and a complete historical data for empirical research as the foundation to illustrate the evolvement of FDI location space and its driving mechanism; Three is smaller city, county, due to the differences of space is relatively small and is accord with FDI scale micro level, based on the policy implications of institute of FDI location decision reference for may be closer to the reality will be subject to the attention of scholars; Four is to strengthen the comparative analysis between the powers or large area, such as a comparison between India and Europe and the United States and other countries to study, understand the change of FDI spatial distribution and its decision mechanism of the similarities and differences, in order to provide reference for better introduction and use of FDI in India; Five is as thin as possible industry decomposition of FDI location factors to make the policy more feasible thesis is also a need to be further study direction. In addition, the FDI location analysis how to effective introduction of new economic geography theory and methods, as well as closely related to FDI location decided to study more perfect, more mature general theoretical framework of FDI is also the important exploration in the future.译文外商直接投资区位选择罗萨米;拉夫雷特摘要伴随国际资本跨国流动加速,外商直接投资区位研究正日益受到人们的重视。

外商直接投资(FDI)在我国区位选择的文献综述

外商直接投资(FDI)在我国区位选择的文献综述

位 选 择 的 主要 因素 。
2 城 市之 间 F 1分 . D
布 的 影 响 因素
外商直接投资在城 市之 间分 布的实证研究 外 , 还有一批 国外学者利用计 量 经 济模 型和方法 , 对我 国省 区和 区域 的
FI D 区位 选 择 进行 了分 析 。 C e (9 6 应 用 条 件 逻 辑 模 型 , h n 19 ) 对 18 — 9 1 我 国 3 97 19 年 0个 省 区 的 数 据 进
实证研 究
目前 用 于 区 位 选 择 实 证 研 究 的 主
西藏除外 ) 。研 究 结 果 表 明 ,市 场 化 程
过对统计数据 和公 司访 问调查 发现 , 香 港企业在 中 国直 接投资 的省 际差别 很
大 。魏后 凯 、 灿 飞 、 新 (0 1利 用 问 贺 王 20 )
要方法有横截面数据计量分析 、 面板数
资企业数据为样本 , 应用企业地理定位 选择 的计 量模 型 , 对外 资聚集 的 国( 地
区 0 应进 行 深 入 的 实证 研 究 。 中选 效 文
分析 。 根据 因子分析’ 商在华投资动机 夕 可以归纳为生产投入 与市场动 机 、 生产 服务动 机 、 文化联 系和感情 动机 、 争 竞
外 商直接投资( F I D ) 在我 国区位选择 的文献综述
■ 王 芳
摘要 : 阶段 ,D 现 F I已成为经济学界 的热 f话题 , 1 外商直接投 资给所在地带来 了各种直接 、 间接 的经济效益, 果吸 引外 如 资是 目前学术界讨论的热点之一 , 目前 国内外 学术界对外 商直接投 资的区位选择进行 了大量的研 究, 文就这些研 究 本
考虑的区位因素通常具有较大差异。因

fdi英文参考文献

fdi英文参考文献

fdi英文参考文献在研究外国直接投资(Foreign Direct Investment,简称FDI)的英文参考文献方面,以下是一些常见的文献推荐:1. Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Addison-Wesley.这本书是外国直接投资领域的经典之作,由著名学者Dunning撰写。

书中系统地探讨了跨国企业和全球经济之间的关系,对FDI的发展和影响进行了深入研究。

2. Blomström, M., Lipsey, R. E., & Zejan, M. (1994). What explains developing country growth? NBER Working Paper No. 4132.这篇工作论文探讨了发展中国家经济增长的原因,其中包括外国直接投资的影响。

作者通过实证研究,提供了对FDI对发展中国家经济增长的解释。

3. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Özcan, S., & Sayek,S. (2004). FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics,64(1), 89-112.这篇文章研究了外国直接投资和经济增长之间的关系,并关注了当地金融市场的作用。

作者通过分析多个国家的数据,得出了FDI对经济增长的积极影响,以及金融市场在这一过程中的重要作用。

4. Jensen, N. M. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57(3), 587-616.这篇文章研究了民主治理与跨国公司之间的关系,特别关注了政治体制对外国直接投资流入的影响。

FDI外商直接投资区位选择外文文献翻译2014年中文译文3100字

FDI外商直接投资区位选择外文文献翻译2014年中文译文3100字

FDI外商直接投资区位选择外文文献翻译2014年中文译文3100字XXX the n choice of foreign direct investment (FDI)。

XXX factors: market-related。

resource-related。

nal-related。

and n-specific factors。

They then analyze data from a survey of 205 XXX.The authors find that market-related factors。

such as market size and growth。

are the most XXX a n for FDI。

Resource-related factors。

XXX。

XXX-related factors。

XXX framework。

are important but less so than market and resource XXX-specific factors。

XXX。

are also XXX.XXX Policymakers can use this n to attract FDI to their countries。

while businesses can use it to make XXX.改写后Foreign direct investment (FDI) XXX factors。

XXX。

Intheir article。

they XXX factors: market-related。

resource-related。

nal-related。

and n-specific。

The authors conducted a survey of 205 XXX.The authors found that market-related factors。

such as market size and growth。

FDI对我国贸易影响的文献综述

FDI对我国贸易影响的文献综述

FDI对我国贸易影响的文献综述[摘要]从20世纪80年代以来,中国的对外贸易取得了飞速的发展。

其中国外直接投资对我国的贸易的持续增长产生重大影响。

不管是从出口额、商品结构还是产业结构方面来讲,FDI对我国的贸易有很大的帮助。

自从实行改革开放政策以来,中国经济保持了持续高速的增长。

由于对外开放,带来了外商对华直接投资的发展。

自1978年以来,我国在吸引外资上取得了极大的努力,从1993年起一跃成为仅次于美国的第二大引资国。

1978年到1983年的5年间,我国实际使用外资合计不过26.9亿美元,而1988年当年就达到31.94亿美元;截至2009年6月底,我国已累计批准设立外商投资企业67万家,累计实际使用外资8984.2亿美元。

我国已连续17年成为世界上吸收外资最多的发展中国家。

截止2004年我国第一产业的外商直接投资非常少, 项目数占总数比重不到3% , 合同外资额所占比重则仅占2% ; 第二产业是外商直接投资的重点领域, 项目数比重高达72.22% , 合同外资额比重约75.98% ; 第三产业的外商直接投资增长较多, 累计项目数已近总数的25% , 合同外资额比重亦已超过30% 。

一、FDI的含义FDI(Foreign Direct Investment)即对外直接投资,是一国的投资者(自然人或法人)跨国境投入资本或其他生产要素,以获取或控制相应的企业经营管理权为核心,以获得利润或稀缺生产要素为目的的投资活动。

它是现代的资本国际化的主要形式之一。

FDI不仅直接参与经营管理,而且其直接目标就是获得被投资企业的控制权。

基于此,有学者认为:“FDI是指一国或地区企业通过垄断优势(主要表现为无形资产)的国际转移,获得部分或全部外国企业控制权,以实现最终目标和直接目标高度统一的长期投资行为。

”FDI的作用一方面增加了东道国的资本存量, 提高了人均资本水平,进而会提高本国的投资率。

而投资率的上升势必会提高人均收入水平,从而加快资本积累为经济增长提供主要动力。

fdi对国际收支的文献

fdi对国际收支的文献

fdi对国际收支的文献在国际经济中,外国直接投资(Foreign Direct Investment,简称FDI)对于国际收支的影响一直备受关注。

本文将综合分析国际文献,探讨FDI对国际收支的影响及相关研究成果。

一、FDI对国际收支的影响FDI是指跨国公司在目标国以设立子公司、参股或全资收购等形式进行的直接投资。

它具有持久性、控制性和资源流动性等特征,对于目标国的国际收支具有一定的影响。

1.对外直接投资收益FDI可产生直接投资收益,包括利润、股息和利息在内。

当外国直接投资企业在目标国取得收益时,这些收益会通过国际收支途径进入目标国,对于目标国的收支平衡具有积极作用。

2.国际收支途径转移支付外国直接投资企业与其母公司之间存在着各种形式的转移支付,如技术使用费、知识产权费等。

这些支付可能对国际收支产生影响,如果目标国收到的支付超过了实际价值,将促进国际收支的顺差;反之,将导致逆差。

3.劳动力和资本流动FDI会引起劳动力和资本的流入或流出,对于目标国的国际收支产生影响。

一方面,外商直接投资增加了资本的流入,提高了目标国的金融储备和支付能力,有利于国际收支的顺差;另一方面,劳动力流入或流出可能会对目标国的国际收支产生一定程度的影响。

二、国际文献对FDI与国际收支关系的研究1.传统视角下的研究早期,国际文献主要从传统的宏观经济学视角研究FDI与国际收支的关系。

这些研究认为,FDI对国际收支的影响主要体现在税收、就业、出口和技术溢出等方面。

例如,外商直接投资的税收收入可以提高目标国的收支平衡,就业的增加有助于提高居民收入,进而拉动出口增长。

2.新视角下的研究近年来,随着研究方法的进步和理论的不断发展,国际文献开始从新的视角探讨FDI与国际收支的关系。

例如,一些研究关注FDI对能源贸易、环境质量和金融稳定等方面的影响。

这些研究认为,在全球化背景下,FDI不仅对国际收支产生直接影响,还通过一系列渠道间接影响国际收支。

中国对外直接投资的国内外文献综述

中国对外直接投资的国内外文献综述

中国对外直接投资的国内外文献综述作者:李程来源:《中国外资·下半月》2013年第08期引言自1978年改革开放以来,中国开始了市场经济的建设,并同时辅以对外政策。

三十年来,成效显著。

伴随着中国经济腾飞的是飞速增长的来自世界各地的FDI流入额。

根据联合国贸发会数据,1979年时流入我国的FDI流量仅为0.57亿美元,然而截止至2011年,这一指标已增至1239.85亿美元,是世界上吸收外资最多的发展中国家。

另一方面,随着2000年国家对我国企业“走出去”的号召,我国对外的直接投资也增长迅速,逐渐成为资本输出大国。

1999年时我国对外的FDI流量仅为17.74亿美元,至2011年这一指标增至651.17亿美元,增长十分可观。

近十年来随着中国对外直接投资规模的不断增大,中国对外直接投资也引起了国内外学者的关注。

学者们的研究主要集中在对我国进行对外投资(OFDI)的动因、特点以及影响因素上。

一、对我国OFDI动因的研究何俊(2007)认为,在经济全球化背景下,我国企业对外直接投资的主要动因是为了获取技术和融入全球供应链。

具体来说,首先由于我国大多数企业在技术上往往处于劣势,因此需要通过直接投资获取技术,加速技术的积累。

另外,在经济全球化的背景下,中国企业必须应积极融入全球供应链,谋求更大的利益。

Ping Deng(2009)在组织理论的基础上建立了一个资源驱动模型来解释中国企业通过并购获取海外战略资产的动机。

在通过对中国TCL、BOE以及联想集团的并购案例的分析后,他认为中国企业获取战略资产是为了更好地融入东道国制度环境,以在未来具备更强的竞争性。

衣长军(2010)通过比较中国与美国、日本直接对外投资的特点后发现,发达国家的OFDI主要以控制和垄断国外市场并获得高额利润为目标。

而相比之下,中国的OFDI资并不具有对抗性与掠夺性。

相反,提升企业国际竞争力、优化产业结构才是中国企业OFDI的主要动因。

外商直接投资文献综述资料

外商直接投资文献综述资料

本文档包括改专题的:外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and standard of living in NigeriaAkinmulegun, Sunday Ojo.Journal of Applied Finance and Banking (2012),2(3): 295-309. AbstractThe subject of interrelationship that exists between foreign direct investment (FDI) and standard of living has been an issue of both theoretical and empirical investigations. This study, thus examined the relationship between foreign direct investment and standard of living measured by per capita income (PCI) in Nigeria over 1986 - 2009 period using time series data. The study employed Vector Auto regression (V AR) model because of the fact that the variables are integrated of different orders in their Unit Root Tests.Test involving Impulse Response Analysis and Variance Decomposition reveal that the relationship between FDI and standard of living is insignificant. Thus, the past values of FDI could be used to predict the future behavior of standard of living in Nigeria only to a lesser extent.Thus, the policy implications underscore the need for institutional and macroeconomic policy framework that would redirect steps in making FDI to contribute positively to the standard of living in Nigeria by channeling the available FDI into industrial, productive sector of the economy.JEL classification numbers: F3, I3, D3, C3Keywords: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Standard of Living, Per Capital Income, Vector Autoregression Model(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)1 IntroductionForeign direct investment (FDI) can be defined as "investment made to acquire lasting interest in enterprises operating outside of the economy of the investor" (Mosima, 2003). Thus, it is not only a transfer of ownership from domestic to foreign residents but also a mechanism that makes it possible for foreign investors to exercisemanagement and control over host country's firms (Hill, 2004; Sandey, 2003). Accordingly,"when a corporation or an individual decides to move from its countrydomain; crossing international border(s) to establish a new production capacity in such a nation, and/or join a domestic enterprise or a host national to form a corporation, whether or not the corporation has formerly being in existence, in the course of a national establishing a new corporation/enterprise not existing in its country-domain; such that the control and management lies in the hands of the foreign national, such an investment is called foreign direct investment (FDI) and hitherto manifests as such" (Akinmulegun, 2011)Among others, Feldstein (2000) opined that profits generated by FDI contribute to corporate tax revenue in the host country. In addition, if the foreign affiliate decides to reinvest the proceeds into the domestic system, it will be an additional advantage to economic growth in the host nation with the attendant impact any structural change exerts on standard of living of individual citizenry. Although, the theoretical literature on this is clear and straightforward (Findlay, 1978; Romer, 1994), however, the evidence in empirical studies is still divided. This gap needs to be filled.This study therefore aims at examining the impact of FDI on the life standards of Nigerian citizens. Thus, the major hypothesis to be tested is; Ho: foreign direct investment in Nigeria has no significant relationship with the people's standard of living.2 Literature Review2.1 Conceptual LiteratureOne of the major dramatic changes in the world economy over the past three decades as evidence in the super flows of institutions is the surge in the FDI across national borders (Mimiko, 2010). This is so to the extent that scholars all over the ages have argued in favour of FDI as a catalyst for economic growth and living standards in the host nation. That, the wide externalities in respect of technology transfer, the development of human capital and enhancement of domestic productive capacities attested to the beneficial effects of FDI cannot be overemphasized (Bende-Nabende,2002; Feldstein, 2000; Chantal and Patrick, 2005; Alfaro and Charlton, 2007; Mottaleb, 2007; Ayanwale, 2007; Maertens and Swinnen, 2008). The growth effects of FDI and subsequent multiplier impact on living standards in the host country in terms of productivity gains, managerial skills and know-how in the domestic market, employee training, international networks and markets account for its preference as evident in the literature (Findlay, 1978; Caves, 1996; UNCTAD, 1999; Carkovic and Levine, 2002).However, it is sometimes feared whether FDI contributes to the broader aspect of growth and the distribution of income in the host economy. For growth potentials of FDI to manifest, the distribution and redistribution of income as a central factor in determining the impact of growth on living standards cannot be overemphasized. This presupposes a linkage between growth and poverty level of an economy. Thus empirical evidence on the relationship between growth and poverty has shown that higher growth is usually associated with reduction in poverty (Ravallion and Chen, 1997; Dollar and Kraay, 2002; Ravallion and Datt, 2002; Besley and Burgess, 2003; Kraay, 2006; Ashley, 2008). This further presupposes equitable living standard.2.2 Empirical LiteratureThat economic theory univocally predicts a positive and directional impact of FDI on standard of living is a subject of intensive examination as empirical evidence is mixed. There seems to be no doubt that there is a strong correlation between FDI and standard of living. This has been argued from the economic growth potentials of FDI (Hayami, 2001; Mottaleb, 2007; Crespo and Fontura, 2007).Measured in terms of domestic productivity, Adams (2004) found from his regression analysis that FDI is not harmful to sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. Thus, contributing to the living standard of its citizenry. All these predict a greater positive impact of FDI on living standards of the host country.However, empirical evidence casts doubts on the relationship that exist between FDI and standard of living. This spurred the idea behind this research work at investigating the relationship using a dynamic approach as specified below.3 MethodologyThe methodological approach used in this study follows the works of Selvanathan and Selvanathan (2008) as captured in the growth model, which depicts a realistic relationship between two variables of output and capital stock as in Solow (1956) given as;Yit= α0+αi+μ i+βXit+εit (1)In line with the above theoretical framework therefore, this relationship between FDI and standard of living measured by PCI is presented in a simple model as follows: PCI=f(FDI) (2)wherePCI = per capita income (a measure of standard of living)FDI = foreign direct investmentThe apriori expectation is that;...To avoid spurious regression as suggested by Gujarati and Porter (2009), a stationary test (unit root test) will be conducted to determine the time series properties of the variables and to know whether a condition for long-run equilibrium relationship among them is met.Thus, it is required that variables in a model should be integrated of the same order to meet the condition for long-run equilibrium relationship known as cointegration.If this condition is not met, a better option for estimation as suggested by Gujarati and Porter (2009) and Greene (2003) is the Vector Autoregression (V AR). Hence, this study prefers the V AR model which is specified mathematically asYt=AtYt-1+...+ApTt-p+βtXtεt (3)where t Y is a k vector of endogenous variables (PCI and FDI), t X is a vector of exogenous variables. At ,....Ap and β are matrices of coefficient to be estimated and εt is a vector of innovation.The V AR is commonly used for forecasting system of interrelated time series and for analyzing the dynamic impact of random disturbances on the system of variables. It sidesteps the need for structural modeling by modeling every endogenous variable in the system as a function of the lagged values of all the endogenous variables in theThe V AR form of the model above is given as (4) (5)where β1j and β2j are matrices of coefficient to be estimated and β1t is a vector of innovation, j=1,2,...,k . This is the lag length of each variable. The choice of lag length for this study is made using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC).Once the V AR is estimated, a further analysis in terms of Variance Decomposition and Impulse Response will be conducted. Impulse Response Analysis traces the effects of a shock to an endogenous variable on the variables in the V AR. By contrast, variance decomposition decomposes variation in an endogenous variable into the component shocks to the endogenous variable in the V AR. This gives information about the relative importance of each random innovation to the variables in the V AR.The study thus uses time series data on per capita income (PCI) and foreign direct investment (FDI) collected for 1986 ¡V 2009 period. Data were gathered notably through secondary sources. Results of both Impulse Response functions and Variance Decomposition are presented in the next section.4 Data Analysis4.1 Stationary Test of VariablesTable 1 above presents the results of the Philip Peron Unit root test. The table enables us to determine the time series properties of each variable, and know whether a condition for long-run equilibrium relationship among the variables is met.Note: The Null hypothesis is that the series is non-stationary or contains a unit root. Test statistics for PP are compared with stimulated critical values from Mckinnon, testing the hypothesis at both 5% and 10% significance levels.The lag length in PP test known as test bandwidth selection is based on Newey-West. All results are obtained from E-view 7.1 econometric package.The variables are made stationary at their first difference thereby integrated of order one, denoted as I(1). Hence, the result is a clear indication that the model does not meet the condition for cointegration since all variables are integrated of differentAs suggested by Gujarati and Porter (2009) and Greene (2003); a better alternative when variables in a model are not integrated of the same order is to resort to the V AR technique and all its attached system dynamics. Hence, the use of V AR by this study is justified.4.2 Vector Autoregression ResultsTo know how much endogenous the variables are, the summary regression statistics are presented in Table 2 below.Table 2 above shows the summary of regression statistics. The table presents the level of endogeneity of the variables in the model.The degree of endogeneity of each variable is found to be very high with the high R2 and adjusted R2 of the variables. This implies that the variables are affected by each other to a larger extent.As stated earlier, the main uses of the V AR are the impulse response analysis and the variance decomposition, which show the nature and direction of the relationship among the variables.The impulse response function and the variance decomposition tables are presented in Tables 3 and 4 below.Table 3 below represents the impulse response function. The impulse response function table traces the effect of a one standard deviation shock to one of the innovations on current and future values of the endogenous variables in the V AR model.Table 4 below presents the results of the variance decomposition. The result as presented decomposes variations in an endogenous variable into the component shocks to the endogenous variables in the V AR model.The result in Tables 3 and 4 represents the impulse response function results and the variance decomposition results. The interpretation of the results is straight forward. The question is that, what happened to PCI (a proxy for standard of living) if there is one standard deviation shock to FDI. The impulse response results in Table 3 show that a one standard deviation shock to FDI impacts significantly on living standard,measured by PCI. However, the impact is positively unstable. On the other hand, a better analysis of the magnitude and direction of impact between FDI and living standard is revealed by the results of the variance decomposition in Table 4 below. The table shows that initially 73.25 percent of variations in PCI were feedback effect, but reduces drastically to 8.44 percent and 9.41 percent in the 5th and 10th periods respectively.The impact of FDI on PCI was insignificant. Less than 1 percent in the first instance. However, in the variance decomposition of FDI, the results revealed that the contribution of FDI to variations in PCI (a measure of standard of living) was about 33.12 in the first period and diminishingly reduces to a low figure of 3.39 percent in the 10th period. This highly contradicts the apriori expectation of this studyThus, the major inference that can be drawn from the findings is that FDI impacts insignificantly on living standard in Nigeria.While the feedback effect on PCI (a measure of standard of living) reduces, the impact from other exogenous variables takes over except for the FDI. These other exogenous variables according to Akinmulegun (2011) include, Current Account Balance (CAB) and Index of openness (both proxies of globalization).5 Discussions, Conclusions and Policy RecommendationsThis study adopts a country specific-data in the analysis to allow for an indepth and elaborate investigation into the impact of FDI on standard of living as it relates to an individual nation-state. The variables are affected by each other from the results of the regression statistics tests, thus; they stand to explain changes in each other. Deduced from the findings is that FDI has insignificant impact on living standard in Nigeria with FDI accounting for less than 2 percent in the variations in PCI in the first instance, and less than 10 percent in the subsequent impact decomposition of FDI. This might not be unconnected with the small proportionate share by Nigeria from the slow proportion of FDI flows to sub- Saharan Africa and the appropriation of the little flows that accrued to Nigeria. When the investment of FDI into the domestic economy is majorly on white elephant projects that have no direct impact on what goes to the pockets of individual citizenry, one would not expect anything other than the resultsabove. Chantal and Patrick (2005) argued that the sector in which a country receives FDI affects the extent to which the country could realize its potential benefits. Furthermore, the results juxtapose the findings of Adams (2009); as the political environment in Nigeria over the years and the dilapidated infrastructural facilities serve as a bane to FDI growth-potential in the nation. Where over 80 percent of the FDI flows to Nigeria goes to oil sector alone, one will not expect the effect to be on the per capita income as the majority of the benefits are channel towards unproductive service sector, thus neglecting the industrial productive sectors.The findings of this study therefore leads us to accepting our Null hypothesis that FDI in Nigeria has no significant relationship with living standard. Thus, with the bi-directional relationship between FDI and PCI, the finding is consistent with theory and empirical literature. FDI is expected to have causal influence on standard of living, such that the past values of FDI should be able to help predict future values of PCI. This is in line with the previous findings (Adams, 2004; Fosu and Magnus, 2006) and therefore satisfies the objective of examining relationship between FDI and PCI of this study, however, the relationship is insignificant. This insignificant impact of FDI on PCI corroborates Ayadi (2009).The policy implication of this is that the past values of FDI can only predict the future values of PCI to a lesser extent.It is thus recommended that;i. Government should embark on policies that would attract more FDI to the dynamic products and sectors with high-income elasticities of demand.ii. FDI should be channeled to the production of secondary products, such that FDI be made to contribute positively to the living standard of Nigeria.iii. Government should redirect steps at making FDI (more importantly, Oil FDI) to contribute positively to the PCI through a well articulated policies that will develop non-oil sectors of the economy.Acknowledgements: I wish to acknowledge the contribution of the entire academic staffof Banking and Finance Department, Adekunle Ajasin University for the successful completion of this work. In addition, the comment of Professor J.A.Oloyede and Dr. T.M. Obamuyi is appreciated.二、文献综述作为技术溢出的外商直接投资文献综述摘要目前国内外学者主要是从外商直接投资和进口贸易两个方面研究技术溢出的效应。

对外直接投资文献综述

对外直接投资文献综述

FDI对经济发展影响的文献综述1、FDI对经济增长的影响自20世纪50年代以来,FDI作为一种特殊的投资方式引起了学者的关注,尤其是其对东道国的经济发展的影响,大量的学者对这一问题进行了探究.索洛等人基于新古典经济学的观点提出了新古典增长模型,又被成为索洛—斯旺模型。

这一模型认为FDI是资本的一种重要来源,其会导致总的投资量上升,而总投资的增加直接影响经济的增长。

而宏观经济增长理论的乘数效应则提出投资的改变会使得产出的倍数发生改变,即当对一国的投资增多时,则该国产出的倍数也会相应的增加。

内生增长理论认为经济增长的主要动力不来自于外力的推动,反而依赖于内在的科学技术和人力资本等要素(Romer,1986,1987;Lucas,1988)。

FDI能够对一国的技术水平、人力资本甚至制度等产生一定的影响,进而对该国的经济增长产生间接影响.此外,通常来说FDI在生产过程中更多的引进和使用新的生产技术,这一方式与国内投资研发相比具有极大的优势。

大量的国外学者就FDI与经济增长之间的关系进行了探究。

Lee、Rana和Iwasaki(1986)基于多个亚洲发展中国家私人投资和外国援助数据,探究了二者对该国经济的发展和储蓄的状况的影响,结果表明外国私人投资能够有效促进该国的经济增长,而对于储蓄状况的影响相对不显著。

而Firebaugh(1992)则将国内经济与FDI对经济的影响效果做了对比分析,结果表明国内资本和FDI对于国内经济发展均有着显著的影响,但是国内经济对增长的影响作用要大于国外资本的影响。

Borenztein、Gregorio 和Lee(1998)则从探究缘由的角度出发,他们的研究表明FDI为东道国引进新的生产技术提供了渠道,且与Firebaugh研究结果相悖,他们的研究结果表明FDI对经济的贡献已经超过了国内投资对经济增长的影响。

随着FDI在东道国经济增长中扮演的角色越来越被学者所验证,甚至有的学者将一国经济不景气乃至衰退归结于外国投资的不足。

FDI外商直接投资文献综述及外文文献资料

FDI外商直接投资文献综述及外文文献资料

FDI外商直接投资文献综述及外文文献资料本文档包括改专题的:外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献A Snapshot of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) with Recent Trends WorldwideJha, Hem Chandra; Ghosh, JagannathAbstractFDI indicates net inward flows of investment to achieve a long lasting management interest operating in a nation other than the nation of the investment. FDI may be of 2 types as inward FDI and outward FDI. Foreign direct investor might take place through creating a wholly owned subsidiary or company, engaging in an equity joint venture with another organization, or through merger/acquisition of an enterprise. Organizations are considering FDI as a way to be globalised. It ensures that companies are closer to their demanded consumer market. It assists in economic development of that nation where the investment is applied and has rescued several countries facing economic down turn. Inward FDI has good effect for job creation-employment for host countries with resource transfer. If a province has huge natural resources, it makes investors invest in that country. Its population plays a vital role for pulling FDI. Major determinants of FDI are size of the host country, future growth prospects of the economy, infrastructural facility, cheap labour force etc. Again if there is high per capita income of that nation or if the people have sound spending capabilities then it will pull high FDI. In 2010 and 2009, FDI was $1,122 billion and $1,114 billion respectively. World's largest receiver of FDI is US whose total figure of FDI has been $194 billion in 2010.25% of FDI in U.Scame in 2010 from France, Japan, UK, Canada, Switzerland, Netherlands etc. China is next largest recipient of FDI. It has reached $185 billion in 2010. India is destination for FDI after China. Telecomm, electronics, construction, automobile, and computer attract most inflows. Significant sources of FDI are Mauritius, Singapore, US and UK. FDI in Europe increased in this decade. Extent of European FDI projects in 2010 topped with 14% increase reaching 3,757 FDI project announcements. UK and France remain leaders in Europe in FDI context. Promotional effort to bring FDI is the trend of every nation. Many countries liberalise their standards/economic policies to pull FDI.Credits go to the expansion in IT, communication technologies and logistics. These allow production to be close to markets utilising advantage of the particular features of several locations. Many nations offer financial benefits like cash grants, tax concessions, and emphasise on modifying the skill parameter, infrastructure and form a platform to meet the demands and expectations.Keywords: FDI, investment, inflow, US, trend, growthIntroductionForeign Direct Investment or FDI indicates the net inward flows of investment to achieve a long lasting management interest operating in a nation other than the nation of the investor. It may be in the form of equity capital, long-term capital, and short-term capital etc. It consists participation in management, sharing of man power, joint-venture, transfer of technology and skills/expertise. FDI may be of two types as inward foreign direct investment and outward foreign direct investment. These two FDIs result in a net FDI inflow which may be positive or negative. These also determine "stock of foreigndirect investment", that is the cumulative number of FDIs for a given period. Foreign direct investment does not include investment through purchase of shares. FDI is considered as an example of international factor movements.Materials and MethodsFor the purpose of in depth study the contents have been taken from relevant books, articles, journals and websites. The method used is analytical and descriptive. Both primary as well as secondary sources of information have been taken.Results and DiscussionsTypes of FDI1. Horizontal FDI : It takes place when an organisation copies its home countrybased activities in a host country at the same value stage through Foreign direct investmenty.2. Vertical FDI: It happens when an organisation goes upstream or downstream in different value chains through FDI. It also takes place when companies execute valueadding activities gradually in a vertical fashion in a host country.Methods of FDI : The foreign direct investor might take place through the following methods:By creating a wholly owned subsidiary or companyEngaging in an equity joint venture with another investor organisation.Through merger or acquisition of an enterprise.Trends of FDI : Generally FDI is propagated at developing countries as companies from advanced economies invested in other markets. US captures most of the FDI inflows. While developed countries still are considered for the largest proportion of FDI inflows. According to data, the stock and flow of FDI has raised and it is going towards developing countries,especially in the emerging economies world wide.Also many companies and organizations are now considering FDI as a way to be globalised. FDIs permits corporations to avoid government pressure on local production and cope with measures by handling trade barriers. The move also ensures that companies are closer to their demanded consumer market, especially if companies establish locallybased sales offices.Benefits of FDI : The major advantage of foreign direct investment is that it assists in the economic development of that nation where the investment is applied. This logic is more applicable for developing countries. FDI has been one major external sources of finance for maximum nations that were developing economically. It is also true that foreign direct investment has rescued several countries when they encountered economic down turn. For example, during the 1997, Asia suffered from financial crisis. The foreign direct investment made in these countries during this duration was steady yet. But other forms of cash inflows suffered a lot. Same thing happened in Latin America in the 1980s and in Mexico in 1994-95.Inward FDI has the good effect for job creation and employment for host countries. It also results in higher wages. Other benefits of FDI are resource transfer, in terms of capital and technical knowledge. In this century, FDI is used as a strategy of new market entry for investors as well as an investment strategy. FDI growth has increased at a higher rate than the level of world trade. Globalization has made thehorizons extended and corporations now treat the whole world economy as their potential market. Also FDI renders reduced cost for investors, through the coordination advantagesand it is more true for integrated supply chains. The preference for a direct investment approach is a good means of strategic control, where the head authority keeps right for technological know-how and intellectual property to be kept in-house.Determinants of FDI : If a province has huge natural resources, then it always makes investors eager to invest their money in that country. For example, Saudi Arabia has attracted foreign companies to invest in that nation to grasp the precious oil resources at their disposal. For export based FDIs, the dimensions of the host country are vital because there are scopes for bigger economies of scale. In this context, the population of corresponding nation plays a vital role for pulling foreign direct investors to that nation. In this situation, the investors are attracted by the prospects of a huge customer base. One major determinant of FDI is the size of the economy of the host country as well as the future growth prospects of the economy of that nation where the investment is to be made. It is generally presumed that if the host country own a massive market, it can develop fast from an economic context. The investors would make most of the investments in prospective country.Another factor is infrastructural facility. Examples are the status of telecommunications, road ways and railways. This factor plays a vital role for attracting the foreign direct investors into a particular country. If the infrastructural facilities are well in a country then there is a notable amount of foreign direct investment. If a nation invites overseas investors and has access to the international markets then it receives higher amounts of foreign direct investment. Some countries have reset their economic policies to cope with the needs of the overseas investors. In this case, the investor companies maintaintransparency according to the legal platforms in that place. Outsider companies should understand the implications of their investment in a particular country and adopt perfect decisions. Cheap labour force is also a vital factor for pulling foreign direct investment. The boom of BPO culture and the revolution of I.T companies in India show that availability of cheaplabor force plays vital part for attracting global direct investment.Again if there is high per capita income of citizens of that nation or if the people of that country have sound spending capabilities then it will result the excellent performances for foreign direct investors. Current status of the citizens in a province is also a determinant in pulling direct investment from global base. Countries like China etc have taken an steps in increasing the quality of their citizens. China has laid down compulsion for every Chinese citizen to have minimum nine years of education. This step has enhanced the standards of the citizens in that nation.According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, there has not been significant growth of Global FDI in 2010. In 2010 and 2009, it was $1,122 billion and $1,114 billion respectively. The amount was below the average between 2005 & 2007. The following table shows US International Direct Investment Flows:FDI in the United States : World's largest receiver of FDI is United States. The total figure of FDI in this nation has been $194 billion in 2010. More than one fourth of FDI in U.S came in 2010 from eight countries named as France, Japan, Luxembourg, United Kingdom, Canada, Switzerland, Germany, and Netherlands. In United States, the stock of FDI in 2008 has beenthe equivalent of near 16 percent of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP). In the same way, we can feel the benefits of FDI in America also. After 2005, more than 4000 new projects and 630,000 new jobs have been incorporated by overseas companies. This has resulted investment of about $314 billion. Overseas companies generally have a tradition of paying higher wages than local enterprises. Overseas companies give an average annual compensation of $68,000 per employee. Exports have increased through the use of multinational distribution networks in United states. Foreign direct investment has resulted 12% of all manufacturing jobs in the US. Affiliating bodies of foreign enterprises spent over $34 billion on research and development in 2006. They also support many national projects. Inward FDI has resulted in this nation higher productivity through increased capital. This has brought high living standards.FDI in China : FDI in China has raised notably in the last decade. It has reached$ 185 bill ion in 2010. After U.S, China is the next largest recipient of FDI world wide. FDI had slowed down and became one-third in 2009 because of Global Financial Crisis butd in 2010, it again got its form.FDI in India : At the beginning, the FDI has been less than $1 billion in India in year 1990. In the contrary, at present India is the most important destination for FDI after China. Telecommunication, electronics, construction activities, automobile, and computer software/ hardware are the sectors which attract most inflows. The significant sources of FDI are Mauritius, Singapore, the US and the UK. FDI in 2010 was significantly decreased from both 2008 and 2009. Foreign direct investment in 2010 reduced to approx $34 billion havingdecrease rate about 60%. Again in 2011, FDI inflow became high of $7.78 billion up from $4.4 billion having increase of 77% than previous year.WalMart, world's largest retailer has caused India to decide to allow 51% FDI in multi-brand retail as an important step. But this decision is under suspension at present due to opposition from several political levels.FDI in Europe : Foreign direct investment in Europe have been subjected an increase in foreign direct investment inflows between 2003 and 2008. In this duration, FDI increased from $30 billion to $155 billion. Russia attracted most of thiese additional investment as its inflows rose from less than $8 billion in 2003 to $70 billion in 2008. The recession collapsed FDI inflows to the Europe region. In the Europe, FDI inflows have been 50% lower in 2009 in comparison to 2008. The real estate sector, which has pulled a quarter of all FDI inflows in Europe since 2008, accounted for much of the aggregate investment fall in the region during recession. The number of European FDI projects in 2010 topped, with a 14% increase, reaching 3,757 FDI project announcements. UK and France remain leaders in Europe in FDI context. But they are losing market share in comparison to countries such as Germany, Poland, Hungary etc. FDI in Europe have been centered on services, software industry and automotive sector. These sectors have been the top most sectors having maximum numbers of FDI projects and job creation. 33% of foreign investors plan to establish their business operations in Europe in 2011 and 2012.FDI and the developing world : FDI renders import of foreign investment. Additionally it offers transfer of skills, technology, adoption of better strategy and job opportunities. All the hostcountries are benefited from foreign investment. There are significant effects of foreign direct investment on local firms in development. Foreign investment increases local productivity growth rigorously. FDI is one of the major contributors of economic development fordeveloping countries.FDI Investment : Promotional effort to bring more and more FDI is the trend of every nation. Pulling foreign direct investment has become vital for surviving in race among developed and developing countries. This race is carried on too when these countries adopt economic integration in different levels. Many countries liberalise their standards to pull FDI in a competitive manner. Home countries appreciate FDI for raising standards and welfare in their nations.So many factors are there which reinforce foreign direct investment which is access to natural resources, markets, and low-cost labor, technology transfer, good market etc. Advancement of technology permits for the variety of production into more discrete stages and break national barriers due to emergence of globalisation. The significant credits go to the expansion in information technology, advancement in communication technologies and development in logistics. These allow production to be close to markets as well as utilising advantage of the particular features of several production locations. Different nations have laid down their respective policies for inviting more foreign investment. Many nations offer financial benefits like cash grants, tax concessions, and specific subsidies. Many countries at the same time emphasise on modifying the skill parameter, infrastructure and form a platform to meet the demands and expectations of overseas investors. Also some nations target to improve the business climate ofthose lands by altering the administrative hindrances. Some governments organise state agencies in order to assist investors. Simultaneously a lot of countries have come into international governing arrangements to raise the attraction of investors for more investment.ConclusionThere should exist a sound investment climate in a country because this willbring further economic growth. Reforms that will improve labor market flexibility, strengthen property rights, simplify business regulations, and increase firms' access to finance are vital. These can increase living standards of that country and reduce poverty in that country. Economic reform is required for creating an investment-oriented climate. Reform would be fruitful because investment climate depends on that. Thus long term benefits can be brought. In this context, cost is main criterian. In this aspect, political environment is a vital determiner. Through out the world, every nation is striving to mould the climate which is suitable for more investment. So the ultimate concept is that "Proper Investment Climate is the need of the Hour".二、文献综述外商直接投资与经济增长关系综述摘要近年来,外商直接投资和经济增长之间的关系已成为学者关注的研究焦点,国内外众多学者对两者之间的关系分别从理论和实证方面进行了论证和分析。

发展中国家对外直接投资与母国产业技术进步:一个文献综述

发展中国家对外直接投资与母国产业技术进步:一个文献综述

发展中国家对外直接投资与母国产业技术进步:一个文献综述1. 引言1.1 研究背景发展中国家对外直接投资(FDI)是指发展中国家的企业或个人在境外投资购买企业或控股,从而获得投资方的经营权与控制权的行为。

随着全球化的不断发展和经济全球化趋势的加深,发展中国家对外直接投资呈现出蓬勃发展的态势。

中国、印度、巴西等新兴经济体成为全球对外直接投资的主要来源和流出国之一。

在全球化背景下,发展中国家对外直接投资已经成为一个备受关注的研究课题。

发展中国家对外直接投资涉及多方面的问题,包括对外投资的政策与影响、母国产业技术进步与国际竞争力的关系等。

发展中国家对外直接投资与母国产业技术进步之间的关系备受关注,对于促进发展中国家产业的技术进步和提高国际竞争力具有重要意义。

目前对于发展中国家对外直接投资与母国产业技术进步的研究仍存在一定的较少和分散性,对于这一研究领域的深入探讨尚有待加强。

本文旨在通过文献综述的方式,对发展中国家对外直接投资与母国产业技术进步的关系进行系统性的分析和探讨,为相关研究提供理论和实证基础。

1.2 研究目的本文旨在探讨发展中国家对外直接投资与母国产业技术进步之间的关系,并分析发展中国家对外直接投资对母国产业技术进步的影响。

通过文献综述,力求全面理解该领域的研究现状,揭示发展中国家对外直接投资对母国产业技术进步的影响机制,并探讨相应的政府政策。

通过本文的研究,旨在为学术界和政策制定者提供有价值的参考,促进发展中国家在对外直接投资方面的理性决策,推动母国产业技术水平的提升,进一步促进经济发展和国际竞争力的提升。

包括但不限于:分析发展中国家对外直接投资的概念和特点,凸显母国产业技术进步的重要性,探讨发展中国家对外直接投资与母国产业技术进步之间的关系,深入研究发展中国家对外直接投资对母国产业技术进步的影响机制,总结发展中国家对外直接投资的政府政策,以及为未来研究方向提供启示。

1.3 研究方法研究方法是确定研究目的的具体步骤和程序,是研究的核心环节。

FDI 理论 文献综述1

FDI 理论 文献综述1

FDI 理论:一个文献综述摘要:随着经济全球化和地区经济一体化进程的加快,国际直接投资对各国、各地区乃至全球经济的作用愈益加重。

特别是在金融危机背景之下,我国企业对外直接投资(FDI)的规模不断加大,因此有必要对FDI理论进行分析研究。

FDI理论的系统研究始于20世纪60年代的西方发达国家,对发达国家FDI理论体系中最具代表性的垄断优势论、内部化理论、国际生产折衷理论、产品生命周期理论、比较优势论等进行评述,分析各种理论的科学性和局限性,可为我国对外直接投资提供可供参考借鉴的理论支持。

关键词:FDI(国际直接投资)、综述纵观西方国际直接投资理论的演进,可将理论的发展划分为三个阶段:第一阶段是主流的国际直接投资理论发展时期,这些主流理论产生于20世纪60年代,并在70年代走向了理论繁荣期;第二阶段是20世纪80年代以来,随着发展中国家国际直接投资和中小跨国公司的迅猛发展,许多国际直接投资理论将研究的重点转向这类国际投资行为,从而突破了原有主流理论对优势的绝对性的认识,深化了人们对优势的看法,出现了诸如不同于传统理论的新学说;第三阶段是20世纪90年代以来,理论研究重点针对各类具体的直接投资行为展开深入分析,并结合不同类型的跨国公司的国际发展战略决策进行探讨,形成了对多样性国际直接投资行为的理论诠释。

一、理论演变在早期关于国际直接投资的研究中,主要存在两种倾向,一是把国际直接投资作为国际资本流动中的一种,与以证券投资为主的国际间接投资不加区分。

如纳克斯(1933)认为各国间的利率差是国际资本流动的动因;二是国际直接投资的研究主要在于试图阐释跨国界企业活动,代表性研究有(崔新健,2001):完全规范的资本运动理论(Iversen,1935)、有关FDI区位影响的学术研究(Southard,1931;Dunning,1958)、对一些行业内部化要求修正新古典贸易理论的认识(Williams,1929)、企业跨国界的所有权并非完全是国际卡特尔的替身的评论(Plammer,1934)、FDI至少可以理解为纵横整合的观点(Penrose,1956,1958;Bye,1958)。

外商直接投资与经济增长文献综述

外商直接投资与经济增长文献综述

外商直接投资与经济增长文献综述提要FDI是促进经济增长诸多要素的重要获取方式;反过来,经济增长也同样刺激着FDI的发展。

本文通过对国内外众多相关研究成果的分析,认为二者相互影响,互为彼此的增长起着重要的贡献作用。

关键词:FDI;经济增长;相互影响近年来,中国经济一直保持高速增长的势头。

经济增长需要资本、技术等要素的大量投入,外商直接投资(FDI)作为获取这些要素的重要方式,发挥着日益重大的作用。

一、国外学者的相关理论基础传统的关于FDI与经济发展关系的理论是基于Chenery和Adelman提出的通过外国资本弥补国内资金短缺的双缺口模型。

该模型为发展中国家利用外国直接投资弥补资金短缺来发展经济奠定了理论基础。

如果东道国存在储蓄不足和外汇短缺,则FDI的流入就可以刺激经济增长。

FDI作为经济增长的动力之一,在经济学界虽然有多种思考方法,但归结起来无非沿袭两种理论:一是Solow倡导的新古典经济增长理论;二是Harrod、Kaldor、Thirlwall等人所代表的后凯恩斯学派的理论。

新古典经济增长模型在完全竞争均衡条件下强调,经济的长期均衡增长率来源于劳动增长率和技术进步。

外国直接投资增加经济增长的途径只有通过外生的技术冲击。

后凯恩斯学派的理论以凯恩斯“有效需求”理论为基础,考察一个国家的收入在长期内保持稳定增长的经济增长问题。

哈罗德经济增长模型指出投资的增长将导致经济的增长。

也就是说,经济的增长需要投资品,这种投资品既可以出自国内又可以来自国外,其中FDI就是实现经济增长的有效途径,通过进口外国的投资品,实现经济增长,加速本国资本的形成。

Pwrris和Schmitz提出,FDI可以提高东道国出口产品的效率,带动本国出口,刺激本国进口,对国际贸易有促进作用。

一方面它作为私人投资的一部分,将推动社会总投资需求的增长;另一方面虽然其与贸易有着显著的替代效应,但是它同样也具有贸易创造和市场扩张效应,影响东道国的出口绩效。

外商直接投资FDI外文文献翻译2014年译文3013字

外商直接投资FDI外文文献翻译2014年译文3013字

文献出处:De Maeseneire W, Claeys T. Foreign direct investment in Hungary [J]. International Business Review, 2014, 21(3): 408-424.原文Foreign direct investment in HungaryDe Maeseneire W, Claeys TDue to factors such as geographic location and traditional relationship, like other central and eastern Europe, Hungary FDI79 % from the eu 15 countries, including Germany, accounting for 25% of the Hungarian FDI, followed by the Netherlands, Austria, 14% and 13%, respectively. The United States is outside the European Union in Hungary's largest investor, accounted for 5% of the total amount of Hungarian FDI, actually some FDI from the Netherlands and other European countries is also by the American companies to invest in these countries. In recent years, the Asian countries such as Japan and South Korea in the austro-hungarian FDI growth step by step. In 2009, the Hungarian FDI is still mainly comes from the European Union, but the German investment has fallen sharply, relegated to the second from bottom, the fewest since 2001 to invest in Hungary.As the decision depends on interregional differences in factor and resource endowments. Because countries cannot be considered as homogeneous spaces, individual firms have to choose between a variety of locations and tend to concentrate in favorably endowed regions. Such clustering of firms, by leading to agglomeration externalities, adds further to the attractiveness of the location (Head et al. , 1995). Thus, firms tend also to cluster because of the positive externalities generated by proximity. Hence in addition to the endowment-driven localization theory, explanations of the location choice of MNEs can also be drawn from economic geography. In this respect, externalities related to proximity become a major explanation for the location choice of MNEs.According to Marshall (1920), three sources of positive externalities can be identified. Locating near to each other provides firms variously with access tospecialized input suppliers and customers, a shared pooled market for skilled labour, and technological spillovers through facilitating information exchange. To these three traditional sources of positive externalities should be added the many different forms of localized externalities, namely backward and inward linkages issuing from the dynamics of the interaction of firms with other firms, institutions and infrastructures (Nachum, 2000). This line of reasoning is all the more relevant since the organizational structure of MNEs has changed since the end of the ‘golden age’of Western economic growth. The greater volatility of the international business environment has led to a search for more flexible forms of organization (Buckley and Casson, 2000), and therefore to the end of hierarchical capitalism (Dunning, 1995). This in turn has changed the nature of the external linkages of the firms (Nachum, 2000), both in terms of design and location. Firms focus on their core competence while increasing outsourcing. In other words, vertical integration has been discouraged and networks of independent firms have emerged (Harrison,1994, Part III). These firms are often neighbors.In the light of these theoretical issues and, as raised by Head et al. (1995, p. 224),the question is a matter of deciding to what extent the pattern of FDI location within a country ‘ support[s] an agglomeration–externalities theory of industry localization rather than a theory based on inter-state differences in endowments of natural resources, labor and infrastructures ’. In this respect, the aim of this paper is to assess the determinants of location choice by foreign investors in Hungary, with particular emphasis on the existence and magnitude of agglomeration economies. Both theoretical and empirical work has addressed the process of location choice at the international level, but has rarely analyzed the sub-national (i.e., regional) distribution of FDI with a focus on agglomeration effects; even less has this been done in relation to Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) (see Table 1 below). Many academic papers have explored the determinants of location choice by foreign investors within the USA (Bartik, 1985; Carlton, 1983; Coughlin et al. , 1991; Friedman et al. , 1992; Head et al. , 1998; Head et al. , 1994, 1995, 1999; Luger and Shetty, 1985; Nachum, 2000; Woodward, 1992). Other papers have done the same forlarge countries other than the USA or unions of countries in relation to foreign investors as a whole or investors originating from a particular country.Among recent studies, some have focused on the regional choices of foreign investors in China (Head and Ries, 1996; Cheng and Kwan, 1999, 2000; He, 2002), while others have been concerned with the choices of foreign investors in Europe (Barrell and Pain, 1999; Clegg and Scott-Green, 1998; Devereux and Griffith, 1998; Ferrer, 1998; Mayer and Mucchielli, 1998, 1999; Mucchielli and Puech, 2003; Scaperlanda and Balough, 1983). Only a few empirical studies have assessed the location motivations of FDI at a more local level. For example, Guimarães et al. (2000) have examined such motivations for Portugal, and Cantwell and Iammarino (2000) for the United Kingdom. But among recent studies, by far and away the most comprehensive at a local level is that by Crozet et al. (2003) for France.As far as the CEECs are concerned, there have been few empirical studies of the location determinants of FDI and of the agglomeration effects among determinants (Kinoshita and Campos, 2003; Lankes and Venables, 1996). To my knowledge, there is no existing study of this pattern for one particular transition country. Indeed, this type of research faces difficulties at an empirical level. Due to data collection problems (data for state, regional and county levels is scarce and not always mutually consistent), the measurement of agglomeration effects in transition economies may be particularly problematic. In addition, the period of time over which transition has been underway in CEECs is relatively short. Both these reasons can make any econometric test problematic.Spatial patterns of FDI in HungarySince the beginning of the transition process, Hungary has attracted a noteworthy amount of FDI, mainly targeting the tertiary sector and originating mostly in the EU. But FDI is unevenly distributed among the Hungarian regions.A major capital city effectTable 2 shows the distribution of inward FDI across Hungarian counties over the period 1990 – 2000. Foreign-owned branch plants are concentrated in Budapest and therefore in the region of Central Hungary, which accounted for 69 percent of inwardFDI stock attracted by Hungary in 2000. Of the other regions, Western Transdanubia and Central Transdanubia are the most attractive to FDI. The proximity effect plays an important role, particularly in the case of Western Transdanubia, which is the only Hungarian region having a common border with the EU (Austria). Conversely, the least attractive Hungarian region is Southern Transdanubia, a predominantly agricultural region that has been completely marginalised since 1995.Over the ten-year period, Central Hungary has accounted for approximately two-thirds of FDI, a polarization on the Hungarian capital which became more pronounced in 2000. It is possible that data may be skewed towards FDI in Budapest because MNEs declare their investments at the headquarters, which are often located in the capital, in contrast to their production units which may be elsewhere; nonetheless, the data suggest that there is a strong capital effect, in that firms tend to agglomerate in or around the capital city.Relative regional attractivenessIn order to take account of the varying size of the regions, the above table on regional distribution of FDI in Hungary was completed using a relative regional attractiveness index. This was calculated by dividing the regional share of total FDI by the regional share of gross fixed capital formation.Because of the disproportionate weight of Budapest, the index was calculated without taking into account Central Hungary. In Table 3, which displays this index, only two regions are less attractive for FDI than for investment in general: Northern Great Plain and Southern Transdanubia, both of whose indexes are less than 1. This confirms the earlier observation that Southern Transdanubia was the least attractive region for FDI (see Section 2.1 above). Central Transdanubia experienced a relative downturn in attracting inward FDI between 1995 and 1998, but then recovered in 1999.In relation to the size of the regions, there is no great variation in regional attractiveness for FDI. In fact, Hungary is very clearly split in two along a northwest/ southeast axis (see map above). In relative terms, the western and northern Hungarian regions (Central Hungary, Central Transdanubia, Western Transdanubia and NorthernHungary) have clearly fared better than those of the south and east (Southern Transdanubia, Northern Great Plain and Southern Great Plain). These marked patterns of geographic concentration suggest the need to go further in assessing the location determinants of FDI in Hungary and the agglomeration effects among them. Concluding remarks and prospectsThis research provides an empirical approach to the regional determinants of FDI in CEECs. It may be considered as innovative in as much as this kind of study has never, to my knowledge, been carried out for these countries due to the lack of firm-based data and the consequent difficulty of measuring and assessing the determinants of FDI.The results indicate that labor availability, demand conditions and agglomeration economies all have a significant and positive influence on the inward FDI attracted by Hungarian counties. Surprisingly, unit labor costs are positively associated with FDI. However, when the geographical division of Hungary is taken into account, the coefficient of the labor cost variable becomes negative for the more labor-intensive southern and eastern counties. The biggest problem faced in defining the location determinants is how to define a demand variable. First, it is difficult to define the geographical extent of demand. Hungarian demand does not end at Hungary’s borders but, especially since its integration into the EU, extends to neighboring countries. Second, traditional location determinants, among them demand, overlap with agglomeration economies, thereby making it more difficult to interpret the findings.Finally, the scope of the current research suffers from a lack of sect oral study of localization factors, which take into account the differing conditions of competition across sectors. Ideally such research would aim to analyze the localization factors of FDI across home countries and sectors. But the lack of available data forced this study to refer to the aggregated figures for all industries within the counties. This limitation prevented us from testing the extent to which the location choice of MNEs in Hungary is motivated by a strategy of low cost production with access to adjacent EU markets or to CEEC markets, and from establishing whether firms tend to make location choices on a specific national basis.Nevertheless, this research is an initial exploration of a topic that is of increasing importance given that eight of the Central and Eastern European countries have recently become members of the EU and hence of a single market in which national boundaries matter less and less while the importance of regional factors is on the increase.译文外商直接投资:匈牙利的案例De Maeseneire W, Claeys T由于地理位置和传统关系等因素,如其他中东欧国家一样,匈牙利FDI79%来自欧盟15国,其中德国最多,占匈FDI的25%,其次为荷兰、奥地利,分别为14%和13%。

文献综综述的例子

文献综综述的例子

FDI与环境规制一、背景与意义(一)背景在中国20余年的快速经济增长中,外商直接投资(FDI)做出了重要贡献,外商投资企业已经成为中国经济体系中不可缺少的部分。

伴随中国面临越来越严重的环境问题政策制定者和社会大众的关注焦点从如何增加国民收入逐步转向如何进行环境保护,在此背景下,人们开始思考和探索外商直接投资的环境内涵。

外国直接投资(FD I)与环境污染之间的关系问题引起了国内外学者的高度关注。

关于外国直接投资对环境的影响主要有两种观点。

一种观点认为,FDI为发展中国家提供了采用新技术的动机和机遇,促使他们实现清洁或绿色生产,进而提高全球环境质量和地区可持续发展能力。

此外,由于环境管制并不是影响外商投资和企业区位选择的决定性因素,环境保护的要求不仅可以促进企业的技术创新,提高企业的竞争力,跨国投资也将更进一步地提高世界范围内的专业化分工程度,使得生产活动和污染治理活动都具有规模效益递增的特征。

因此,环境保护与FDI之间存在着一种互利互惠关系,外商投资和国际贸易有利于全球整体环境质量的提高。

另外一种观点认为,FDI会刺激经济增长,从而导致更多的工业污染和环境退化。

在此背景下,作为一种解决环境污染的有效手段一环境规制被提上日程。

但是,环境管制也有一定的消极作用,如加大企业的生产成本,促进污染型产业或企业向环境标准较低的欠发达地区转移,使之成为“污染者的天堂”(Pollution Heaven)。

因此对FDI对东道国(或地区)的影响的资源环境效应及环境规制对FDI的影响进行研究具有重大的理论意义和现实意义,在此背景下,外国直接投资大量进入中国是否会使其成为“污染者天堂” ?环境规制如何发挥作用值得研究?(二)意义1、理论意义(1)对于中国来说,大量外资进入是否必然会带来环境的污染。

目前学术界也就这两者之间的关系上进行了很激烈的讨论。

但是,可能很多学者忽略了一点,即在环境污染之后怎么办?为了回答该问题,本文尝试从环境规制这个角度来进行分析阐述,认为它是一种协调外国直接投资和工业污染关系的有效手段,但同时,环境规制对外资的引入也有一定的影响。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

本文档包括改专题的:外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献A Snapshot of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) with Recent Trends WorldwideJha, Hem Chandra; Ghosh, JagannathAbstractFDI indicates net inward flows of investment to achieve a long lasting management interest operating in a nation other than the nation of the investment. FDI may be of 2 types as inward FDI and outward FDI. Foreign direct investor might take place through creating a wholly owned subsidiary or company, engaging in an equity joint venture with another organization, or through merger/acquisition of an enterprise. Organizations are considering FDI as a way to be globalised. It ensures that companies are closer to their demanded consumer market. It assists in economic development of that nation where the investment is applied and has rescued several countries facing economic down turn. Inward FDI has good effect for job creation-employment for host countries with resource transfer. If a province has huge natural resources, it makes investors invest in that country. Its population plays a vital role for pulling FDI. Major determinants of FDI are size of the host country, future growth prospects of the economy, infrastructural facility, cheap labour force etc. Again if there is high per capita income of that nation or if the people have sound spending capabilities then it will pull high FDI. In 2010 and 2009, FDI was $1,122 billion and $1,114 billion respectively. World's largest receiver of FDI is US whose total figure of FDI has been $194 billion in 2010.25% of FDI in U.S came in 2010 from France, Japan, UK, Canada, Switzerland, Netherlands etc. China is next largest recipient of FDI. It has reached $185 billion in 2010. India is destination for FDI after China. Telecomm, electronics, construction, automobile, and computer attract most inflows. Significant sources of FDI are Mauritius, Singapore, US and UK. FDI in Europe increased in this decade. Extent of European FDI projects in 2010 topped with 14% increase reaching 3,757 FDI project announcements. UK and France remain leaders in Europe in FDI context. Promotional effort to bring FDI is the trend of every nation. Many countries liberalise their standards/economic policies to pull FDI.Credits go to the expansion in IT, communication technologies and logistics. These allow production to be close to markets utilising advantage of the particular features of several locations. Many nations offer financial benefits like cash grants, tax concessions, and emphasise on modifying the skill parameter, infrastructure and form a platform to meet the demands and expectations.Keywords: FDI, investment, inflow, US, trend, growthIntroductionForeign Direct Investment or FDI indicates the net inward flows of investment to achieve a long lasting management interest operating in a nation other than the nation of the investor. It may be in the form of equity capital, long-term capital, and short-term capital etc. It consists participation in management, sharing of man power, joint-venture, transfer of technology and skills/expertise. FDI may be of two types as inward foreign direct investment and outward foreign direct investment. These two FDIs result in a net FDI inflow which may be positive or negative. These also determine "stock of foreign direct investment", that is the cumulative number of FDIs for a given period. Foreign direct investment does not include investment through purchase of shares. FDI is considered as an example of international factor movements.Materials and MethodsFor the purpose of in depth study the contents have been taken from relevant books, articles, journals and websites. The method used is analytical and descriptive. Both primary as well as secondary sources of information have been taken.Results and DiscussionsTypes of FDI1. Horizontal FDI : It takes place when an organisation copies its home countrybased activities in a host country at the same value stage through Foreign direct investmenty.2. Vertical FDI: It happens when an organisation goes upstream or downstream in different value chains through FDI. It also takes place when companies execute valueadding activities gradually in a vertical fashion in a host country.Methods of FDI : The foreign direct investor might take place through the following methods:By creating a wholly owned subsidiary or companyEngaging in an equity joint venture with another investor organisation.Through merger or acquisition of an enterprise.Trends of FDI : Generally FDI is propagated at developing countries as companies from advanced economies invested in other markets. US captures most of the FDI inflows. While developed countries still are considered for the largest proportion of FDI inflows. According to data, the stock and flow of FDI has raised and it is going towards developing countries, especially in the emerging economies world wide.Also many companies and organizations are now considering FDI as a way to be globalised. FDIs permits corporations to avoid government pressure on local production and cope with measures by handling trade barriers. The move also ensures that companies are closer to their demanded consumer market, especially if companies establish locallybased sales offices.Benefits of FDI : The major advantage of foreign direct investment is that it assists in the economic development of that nation where the investment is applied. This logic is more applicable for developing countries. FDI has been one major external sources of finance for maximum nations that were developing economically. It is also true that foreign direct investment has rescued several countries when they encountered economic down turn. For example, during the 1997, Asia suffered from financial crisis. The foreign direct investment made in these countries during this duration was steady yet. But other forms of cash inflows suffered a lot. Same thing happened in Latin America in the 1980s and in Mexico in 1994-95.Inward FDI has the good effect for job creation and employment for host countries. It also results in higher wages. Other benefits of FDI are resource transfer, in terms of capital and technical knowledge. In this century, FDI is used as a strategy of new market entry for investors as well as an investment strategy. FDI growth has increased at a higher rate than the level of world trade. Globalization has made thehorizons extended and corporations now treat the whole world economy as their potential market. Also FDI renders reduced cost for investors, through the coordination advantages and it is more true for integrated supply chains. The preference for a direct investment approach is a good means of strategic control, where the head authority keeps right for technological know-how and intellectual property to be kept in-house.Determinants of FDI : If a province has huge natural resources, then it always makes investors eager to invest their money in that country. For example, Saudi Arabia has attracted foreign companies to invest in that nation to grasp the precious oil resources at their disposal. For export based FDIs, the dimensions of the host country are vital because there are scopes for bigger economies of scale. In this context, the population of corresponding nation plays a vital role for pulling foreign direct investors to that nation. In this situation, the investors are attracted by the prospects of a huge customer base. One major determinant of FDI is the size of the economy of the host country as well as the future growth prospects of the economy of that nation where the investment is to be made. It is generally presumed that if the host country own a massive market, it can develop fast from an economic context. The investors would make most of the investments in prospective country.Another factor is infrastructural facility. Examples are the status of telecommunications, road ways and railways. This factor plays a vital role for attracting the foreign direct investors into a particular country. If the infrastructural facilities are well in a country then there is a notable amount of foreign direct investment. If a nation invites overseas investors and has access to the international markets then it receives higher amounts of foreign direct investment. Some countries have reset their economic policies to cope with the needs of the overseas investors. In this case, the investor companies maintain transparency according to the legal platforms in that place. Outsider companies should understand the implications of their investment in a particular country and adopt perfect decisions. Cheap labour force is also a vital factor for pulling foreign direct investment. The boom of BPO culture and the revolution of I.T companies in India show that availability of cheaplabor force plays vital part for attracting global direct investment.Again if there is high per capita income of citizens of that nation or if the people of that country have sound spending capabilities then it will result the excellent performances for foreign direct investors. Current status of the citizens in a province is also a determinant in pulling direct investment from global base. Countries like China etc have taken an steps in increasing the quality of their citizens. China has laid down compulsion for every Chinese citizen to have minimum nine years of education. This step has enhanced the standards of the citizens in that nation.According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, there has not been significant growth of Global FDI in 2010. In 2010 and 2009, it was $1,122 billion and $1,114 billion respectively. The amount was below the average between 2005 & 2007. The following table shows US International Direct Investment Flows:FDI in the United States : World's largest receiver of FDI is United States. The total figure of FDI in this nation has been $194 billion in 2010. More than one fourth of FDI in U.S came in 2010 from eight countries named as France, Japan, Luxembourg, United Kingdom, Canada, Switzerland, Germany, and Netherlands. In United States, the stock of FDI in 2008 has been the equivalent of near 16 percent of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP). In the same way, we can feel the benefits of FDI in America also. After 2005, more than 4000 new projects and 630,000 new jobs have been incorporated by overseas companies. This has resulted investment of about $314 billion. Overseas companies generally have a tradition of paying higher wages than local enterprises. Overseas companies give an average annual compensation of $68,000 per employee. Exports have increased through the use of multinational distribution networks in United states. Foreign direct investment has resulted 12% of all manufacturing jobs in the US. Affiliating bodies of foreign enterprises spent over $34 billion on research and development in 2006. They also support many national projects. Inward FDI has resulted in this nation higher productivity through increased capital. This has brought high living standards.FDI in China : FDI in China has raised notably in the last decade. It has reached$ 185 bill ion in 2010. After U.S, China is the next largest recipient of FDI world wide. FDI had slowed down and became one-third in 2009 because of Global Financial Crisis butd in 2010, it again got its form.FDI in India : At the beginning, the FDI has been less than $1 billion in India in year 1990. In the contrary, at present India is the most important destination for FDI after China. Telecommunication, electronics, construction activities, automobile, and computer software/ hardware are the sectors which attract most inflows. The significant sources of FDI are Mauritius, Singapore, the US and the UK. FDI in 2010 was significantly decreased from both 2008 and 2009. Foreign direct investment in 2010 reduced to approx $34 billion having decrease rate about 60%. Again in 2011, FDI inflow became high of $7.78 billion up from $4.4 billion having increase of 77% than previous year.WalMart, world's largest retailer has caused India to decide to allow 51% FDI in multi-brand retail as an important step. But this decision is under suspension at present due to opposition from several political levels.FDI in Europe : Foreign direct investment in Europe have been subjected an increase in foreign direct investment inflows between 2003 and 2008. In this duration, FDI increased from $30 billion to $155 billion. Russia attracted most of thiese additional investment as its inflows rose from less than $8 billion in 2003 to $70 billion in 2008. The recession collapsed FDI inflows to the Europe region. In the Europe, FDI inflows have been 50% lower in 2009 in comparison to 2008. The real estate sector, which has pulled a quarter of all FDI inflows in Europe since 2008, accounted for much of the aggregate investment fall in the region during recession. The number of European FDI projects in 2010 topped, with a 14% increase, reaching 3,757 FDI project announcements. UK and France remain leaders in Europe in FDI context. But they are losing market share in comparison to countries such as Germany, Poland, Hungary etc. FDI in Europe have been centered on services, software industry and automotive sector. These sectors have been the top most sectors having maximum numbers of FDI projects and job creation. 33% of foreign investors plan to establish their business operations in Europe in 2011 and 2012.FDI and the developing world : FDI renders import of foreign investment. Additionally it offers transfer of skills, technology, adoption of better strategy and job opportunities. All the host countries are benefited from foreign investment. There are significant effects of foreign direct investment on local firms in development. Foreign investment increases local productivity growth rigorously. FDI is one of the major contributors of economic development fordeveloping countries.FDI Investment : Promotional effort to bring more and more FDI is the trend of every nation. Pulling foreign direct investment has become vital for surviving in race among developed and developing countries. This race is carried on too when these countries adopt economic integration in different levels. Many countries liberalise their standards to pull FDI in a competitive manner. Home countries appreciate FDI for raising standards and welfare in their nations.So many factors are there which reinforce foreign direct investment which is access to natural resources, markets, and low-cost labor, technology transfer, good market etc. Advancement of technology permits for the variety of production into more discrete stages and break national barriers due to emergence of globalisation. The significant credits go to the expansion in information technology, advancement in communication technologies and development in logistics. These allow production to be close to markets as well as utilising advantage of the particular features of several production locations. Different nations have laid down their respective policies for inviting more foreign investment. Many nations offer financial benefits like cash grants, tax concessions, and specific subsidies. Many countries at the same time emphasise on modifying the skill parameter, infrastructure and form a platform to meet the demands and expectations of overseas investors. Also some nations target to improve the business climate of those lands by altering the administrative hindrances. Some governments organise state agencies in order to assist investors. Simultaneously a lot of countries have come into international governing arrangements to raise the attraction of investors for more investment.ConclusionThere should exist a sound investment climate in a country because this willbring further economic growth. Reforms that will improve labor market flexibility, strengthen property rights, simplify business regulations, and increase firms' access to finance are vital. These can increase living standards of that country and reduce poverty in that country. Economic reform is required for creating an investment-oriented climate. Reform would be fruitful because investment climate depends on that. Thus long term benefits can be brought. In this context, cost is main criterian. In this aspect, political environment is a vital determiner. Through out the world, every nation is striving to mould the climate which is suitable for more investment. So the ultimate concept is that "Proper Investment Climate is the need of the Hour".二、文献综述外商直接投资与经济增长关系综述摘要近年来,外商直接投资和经济增长之间的关系已成为学者关注的研究焦点,国内外众多学者对两者之间的关系分别从理论和实证方面进行了论证和分析。

相关文档
最新文档