国际经济学习题
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Feb.15,2011~Jun.10,2011
International Economics
Part ⅠInternational trade
relations
Lecture 2 Why nations trade
Lecture 3The commodity composition of trade
Lecture 4 Protection of domestic industries: the tariff
Lecture 5 NTBs to trade
Lecture 6 International Mobility of Productive Factors
Feb.15,2011~Jun.10,2011
International
Economics
Lecture 3 The commodity
composition of trade
During the last century the attention of trade theorists turned from the gain from trade to the commodity composition of
trade.
Factors that determine which country exports what commodity.
Syllabus
The Factor Proportions Theory
Alternative Theories
An Emerging Consensus? Economic Adjustment to Changing
Circumstances
Summary
1.The Factor Proportions Theory •[Factor Price Equalization]
Empirical Testing
•Assumptions :
①two countries: U.S. & Germany
②two goods: wheat & textiles
③two factor of production: labor & capital
④market is completely competitive
⑤factors are not free to move between two countries
⑥each commodity has identical production function, or isoquants
⑦wheat is capital intensive and textiles are labor intensive
⑧U.S. possesses a higher capital to labor ratio than Germany
Contents and conclusions
•If we assumed that the demand conditions are similar in the two nations
•Conclusions:
The United Stated specialized in the production of wheat,and exports wheat and imports textiles;
Germany specialized in the production of textiles, and exports textiles and imports wheat.
•Each country exports the commodities that are relatively intensive in the factor which it is relatively well endowed.
•Income distribution:Owners of a country’s abundant factors gain from trade, but owners of a country’s scarce factors lose.
Significances of this model:
•It is a logically tight structure, where the conclusions follow uniquely and neatly from the assumptions;
It is highly useful in explaining a wide range of
observed phenomena;
The model implies the patterns of service trade;
It provides a possible explanation to an empirical phenomenon: the rise in income inequality in U.S. over
the past 25 years;
The model may also be attractive because it
concentrates solely upon the most elementary
properties of the trading countries;
The process can be reversed to inquire into the effect of international trade on the economic structure.