桥梁论文中英译文

合集下载

桥梁工程英文作文

桥梁工程英文作文

桥梁工程英文作文英文:Bridge engineering is a fascinating field that requires a combination of technical knowledge and creativity. As a civil engineer, I have always been interested in designing and constructing bridges that not only serve their functional purpose but also add beauty to the surrounding landscape.One of the most important aspects of bridge engineering is choosing the right materials. Bridges can be made from a variety of materials, including steel, concrete, and wood. Each material has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of material depends on factors such as the location of the bridge, the expected load, and the budget.For example, if the bridge is located in an area with high seismic activity, steel may be the best choice as itis more flexible and can withstand the vibrations caused byearthquakes. On the other hand, if the bridge is located in a coastal area, concrete may be a better choice as it is more resistant to corrosion caused by saltwater.Another important aspect of bridge engineering is designing the structure to withstand the forces that act upon it. Bridges are subjected to a variety of forces, including the weight of the structure itself, the weight of the vehicles that pass over it, and environmental forces such as wind and water.To ensure the safety and stability of the bridge, engineers use a variety of techniques such as computer simulations and physical testing to determine the stresses and strains that the bridge will experience. Based on this analysis, they can design the bridge with the appropriate strength and stiffness to withstand these forces.In addition to technical considerations, bridge engineering also involves aesthetic considerations. Bridges can be works of art that enhance the beauty of the surrounding landscape. For example, the Golden Gate Bridgein San Francisco is not only a functional structure butalso a symbol of the city and a popular tourist attraction.In conclusion, bridge engineering is a complex and challenging field that requires a combination of technical knowledge and creativity. By carefully choosing materials, designing structures to withstand forces, and considering aesthetic factors, engineers can create bridges that arenot only functional but also beautiful.中文:桥梁工程是一个既需要技术知识又需要创造力的迷人领域。

桥梁毕业设计外文翻译5

桥梁毕业设计外文翻译5

附录附录A 外文翻译第一部分英文原文4.2.2 Model that Failed in Punching ShearIt was realized that complete restraint in both the longitudinal and transversedirections is necessary for the development of the internal arching system in the deck slab. With this realization,another half-scale model of a two-girder bridge was built. This model also had a deck slab reinforced only by polypropylene fibres, and was very similar to the previous one, the main difference being that the top flangesof the girders were now interconnected by transverse steel straps lying outside the deck slab. A view of the steel work of this model can be seen in Fig. 4.7.These straps were provided so as to serve as transverse ties to the internal arch in the slab.The 100 mm thick slab of the model with transverse straps failed under a central load of 418 kN in a punching-shear failure mode. As can be seen in Fig. 4.8, the damaged area of the slab was highly localized. It can be appreciated that with such a high failure load, the thin deck slab of the half-scale model could have easily withstood the weights of even the heaviest wheel load of commercial vehicles.The model tests described above and in sub-section 4.2.1 clearly demonstrate that an internal arching action will indeed develop in a deck slab, but only if it is suitably restrained.4.2.3 Edge StiffeningA further appreciation of the deck slab arching action is provided by tests on a scale model of a skew slab-on-girder bridge. As will be discussed in sub-section 4.4.2, one transverse free edge of the deck slab of this model was stiffened by a composite steel channel with its web in the vertical plane. The other free edge was stiffened by a steel channel diaphragm with its web horizontal and connected to the deck slab through shear connectors. The deck slab near the former transverse edge failed in a mode that was a hybrid between punching shear and flexure. Tests near the composite diaphragm led to failure at a much higher load in punching shear (Bakht and Agarwal, 1993).The above tests confirmed yet again that the presence of the internal arching action in deck slabs induces high in-plane force effects which in turn demand stiffer restraint in the plane of the deck than in the out-of-plane direction.4.3 INTERNALLY RESTRAINED DECK SLABSDeck slabs which require embedded reinforcement for strength will now be referred to as internally restrained deck slabs. The state-of-art up to 1986 relating to the quantification and utilization of the beneficial internal arching action in deck slabs with steel reinforcement has been provided by Bakht and Markovic (1986). Their conclusions complemented with up-to-date information are presented in this chapter in a generally chronological order which, however, cannot be adhered to rigidlybecause of the simultaneous occurrence of some developments.4.3.1 Static Tests on Scale ModelsAbout three decades ago, the Structures Research Office of the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO), Canada, sponsored an extensive laboratory-based research program into the load carrying capacity of deck slabs; this research program was carried out at Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. Most of this research was conducted through static tests on scale models of slab-on-girder bridges. This pioneering work is reported by Hewitt and Batchelor (1975) and later by Batchelor et al. (1985), and is summarized in the following.The inability of the concrete to sustain tensile strains, which leads to cracking, has been shown to be the main attribute which causes the compressive membrane forces to develop. This phenomenon is illustrated in Fig. 4.9 (a) which shows the part cross-section of slab-on-girder bridge under the action of a concentrated load.The cracking of the concrete, as shown in the figure, results in a net compressive force near the bottom face of the slab at each of the two girder locations. Midway between the girders, the net compressive force moves towards the top of the slab. It can be readily visualized that the transition of the net compressive force from near the top in the middle region, to near the bottom at the supports corresponds to the familiar arching action. Because of this internal arching action, the failure mode of a deck slab under a concentrated load becomes that of punching shear.If the material of the deck slab has the same stress-strain characteristics in both tension and compression, the slab will not crack and, as shown in Fig. 4.9 (b), will not develop the net compressive force and hence the arching action.In the punching shear type of failure, a frustum separates from the rest of the slab, as shown in schematically in Fig. 4.10. It is noted that in most failure tests, the diameter of the lower end of the frustrum extends to the vicinity of the girders.From analytical and confirmatory laboratory studies, it was established that the most significant factor influencing the failure load of a concrete deck slab is the confinement of the panel under consideration. It was concluded that this confinement is provided by the expanse of the slab beyond the loaded area; its degree was founddifficult to assess analytically. A restraint factor, η, was used as an empirical measure of the confinement; its value is equal to zero for the case of no confinement and 1.0 for full confinement.The effect of various parameters on the failure load can be seen in Table 4.1, which lists the theoretical failure loads for various cases. It can be seen that an increase of the restraint factor from 0.0 to 0.5 results in a very large increase in the failure load. The table also emphasizes the fact that neglect of the restraint factor causes a gross underestimation of the failure load.It was concluded that design for flexure leads to the inclusion of large amounts of unnecessary steel reinforcement in the deck slabs, and that even the minimum amount of steel required for crack control against volumetric changes in concrete is adequate to sustain modern-day, and even future, highway vehicles of North America.It was recommended that for new construction, the reinforcement in a deck slab should be in two layers, with each layer consisting of an orthogonal mesh having the same area of reinforcement in each direction. The area of steel reinforcement in each direction of a mesh was suggested to be 0.2% of the effective area of cross-section of the slab. This empirical method of design was recommended for deck slabs with certain constraints.4.3.2 Pulsating Load Tests on Scale ModelsTo study the fatigue strength of deck slabs with reduced reinforcement, five small scale models with different reinforcement ratios in different panels were tested at the Queen's University at Kingston. Details of this study are reported by Batchelor et al. (1978).Experimental investigation confirmed that for loads normally encountered in North America deck slabs with both conventional and recommended reducedreinforcement have large reserve strengths against failure by fatigue. It was confirmed that the reinforcement in the deck slab should be as noted in sub-section 4.3.1. It is recalled that the 0.2% reinforcement requires that the deck slab must have a minimum restraint factor of 0.5.The work of Okada, et al. (1978) also deals with fatigue tests on full scale models of deck slabs and segments of severely cracked slab removed from eight to ten year old bridges. The application of these test results to deck slabs of actual bridges is open to question because test specimens were removed from the original structures in such a way that they did not retain the confinement necessary for the development of the arching action.4.3.3 Field TestingAlong with the studies described in the preceding sub-section, a program of field testing of the deck slabs of in-service bridges was undertaken by the Structures Research Office of the MTO. The testing consisted of subjecting deck slabs to single concentrated loads, simulating wheel loads, and monitoring the load-deflection characteristics of the slab. The testing is reported by Csagoly et al. (1978) and details of the testing equipment are given by Bakht and Csagoly (1979).Values of the restraint factor, η, were back-calculated from measured deflections.A summary of test results, given in Table 4.2, shows that the average value of η in composite bridges is greater than 0.75, while that for non-composite bridges is 0.42. It was concluded that for new construction, the restraint factor, η, can be assumed to have a minimum value of 0.5.Bakht (1981) reports that after the first application of a test load of high magnitude on deck slabs of existing bridges, a small residual deflection was observed in most cases. Subsequent applications of the same load did not result in further residual deflections. It is postulated that the residual deflections are caused by cracking of the concrete which, as discussed earlier, accompanies the development of the internal arching action. The residual deflections after the first cycle of loading suggest that either the slab was never subjected to loads high enough to cause cracking, or the cracks have 'healed' with time.第二部分汉语翻译4.2.2 在冲切剪应力下的实效模型我们已经知道在桥面板内部拱形系统的形成中,不仅纵向而且横向也被完全约束限制是完全必要的。

钢结构桥梁中英文对照外文翻译文献

钢结构桥梁中英文对照外文翻译文献

中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)Recent Research and Design Developments in Steel and Composite Steel-concrete Structures in USAThe paper will conclude with a look toward the future of structural steel research.1. Research on steel bridgesThe American Association of State Transportation and Highway Officials (AASTHO) is the authority that promulgates design standards for bridges in the US. In 1994 it has issued a new design specification which is a Limit States Design standard that is based on the principles of reliability theory. A great deal of work went into the development of this code in the past decade, especially on calibration and on the probabilistic evaluation of the previous specification. The code is now being implemented in the design office, together with the introduction of the SystemeInternationale units. Many questions remain open about the new method of design, and there are many new projects that deal with the reliability studies of the bridge as a system. One such current project is a study to develop probabilistic models, load factors, and rational load-combination rules for the combined effects of live-load and wind; live-load and earthquake; live-load, wind and ship collision; and ship collision, wind, and scour. There are also many field measurements of bridge behavior, using modern tools of inspection and monitoring such as acoustic emission techniques and other means of non-destructive evaluation. Such fieldwork necessitates parallel studies in the laboratory, and the evolution of ever more sophisticated high-technology data transmission methods.America has an aging steel bridge population and many problems arise from fatigue and corrosion. Fatigue studies on full-scale components of the Williamsburg Bridge in New York have recently been completed at Lehigh University. A probabilistic AASTHO bridge evaluation regulation has been in effect since 1989, and it is employed to assess the future useful life of structures using rational methods that include field observation and measurement together with probabilistic analysis. Such an activity also fosters additional research because many issues are still unresolved. One such area is the study of the shakedown of shear connectors in composite bridges. This work has been recently completed at the University of Missouri.In addition to fatigue and corrosion, the major danger to bridges is the possibility of earthquake induced damage. This also has spawned many research projects on the repair and retrofit of steel superstructures and the supporting concrete piers. Many bridges in the country are being strengthened for earthquake resistance. One area that is receiving much research attention is the strengthening of concrete piers by "jacketing" them by sheets of high-performance reinforced plastic.The previously described research deals mainly with the behavior of existing structures and the design of new bridges. However, there is also a vigorous activity on novel bridge systems. This research is centered on the application of high-performance steels for the design of innovative plate and box-girder bridges, such as corrugated webs, combinations of open and closed shapes, and longer spansfor truss bridges. It should be mentioned here that, in addition to work on steel bridges, there is also very active research going on in the study of the behavior of prestressed concrete girders made from very high strength concrete. The performance and design of smaller bridges using pultruded high-performance plastic composite members is also being studied extensively at present. New continuous bridge systems with steel concrete composite segments in both the positive moment and the negative moment regions are being considered. Several researchers have developed strong capabilities to model the three-dimensional non-linear behavior of individual plate girders, and many studies are being performed on the buckling and post-buckling characteristics of such panion experimental studies are also made,especially on members built from high-performance steels. A full-scale bridge of such steel has been designed, and will soon be constructed and then tested under traffic loading. Research efforts are also underway on the study of the fatigue of large expansion joint elements and on the fatigue of highway sign structures.The final subject to be mentioned is the resurgence of studies of composite steel concrete horizontally curved steel girder bridges. A just completed project at the University of Minnesota monitored the stresses and the deflections in a skewed and curved bridge during all phases of construction, starting from the fabrication yard to the completed bridge.~ Excellent correlation was found to exist between the measured stresses and deformations and the calculated values. The stresses and deflections during construction were found to be relatively small, that is, the construction process did not cause severe trauma to the system. The bridge has now been tested under service loading, using fully loaded gravel trucks, for two years, and it will continue to be studied for further years to measure changes in performance under service over time. A major testing project is being conducted at the Federal Highway Administration laboratory in Washington, DC, where a half-scale curved composite girder bridge is currently being tested to determine its limit states. The test-bridge was designed to act as its own test-frame, where various portions can be replaced after testing. Multiple flexure tests, shear tests, and tests under combined bending and shear, are thus performed with realistic end-conditions and restraints. The experiments arealso modeled by finite element analysis to check conformance between reality and prediction. Finally design standards will be evolved from the knowledge gained. This last project is the largest bridge research project in the USA at the present time.From the discussion above it can be seen that even though there is no large expansion of the nation's highway and railroad system, there is extensive work going on in bridge research. The major challenge facing both the researcher and the transportation engineer is the maintenance of a healthy but aging system, seeing to its gradual replacement while keeping it safe and serviceable.2. Research on steel members and framesThere are many research studies on the strength and behavior of steel building structures. The most important of these have to do with the behavior and design of steel structures under severe seismic events. This topic will be discussed later in this paper. The most significant trends of the non-seismic research are the following: "Advanced" methods of structural analysis and design are actively studied at many Universities, notably at Cornell, Purdue, Stanford, and Georgia Tech Universities. Such analysis methods are meant to determine the load-deformation behavior of frames up to and beyond failure, including inelastic behavior, force redistribution, plastic hinge formation, second-order effects and frame instability. When these methods are fully operational, the structure will not have to undergo a member check, because the finite element analysis of the frame automatically performs this job. In addition to the research on the best approaches to do this advanced analysis, there are also many studies on simplifications that can be easily utilized in the design office while still maintaining the advantages of a more complex analysis. The advanced analysis method is well developed for in-plane behavior, but much work is yet to be done on the cases where bi-axial bending or lateraltorsional buckling must be considered. Some successes have been achieved, but the research is far from complete.Another aspect of the frame behavior work is the study of the frames with semirigid joints. The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) has published design methods for office use. Current research is concentrating on the behavior ofsuch structures under seismic loading. It appears that it is possible to use such frames in some seismic situations, that is, frames under about 8 to 10 stories in height under moderate earthquake loads. The future of structures with semi-rigid frames looks very promising, mainly because of the efforts of researchers such as Leon at Georgia Tech University, and many others.Research on member behavior is concerned with studying the buckling and post buckling behavior of compact angle and wide-flange beam members by advanced commercial finite element programs. Such research is going back to examine the assumptions made in the 1950s and 1960s when the plastic design compactness and bracing requirements were first formulated on a semi-empirical basis. The non-linear finite element computations permit the "re-testing" of the old experiments and the performing of new computer experiments to study new types of members and new types of steels. White of Georgia Tech is one of the pioneers in this work. Some current research at the US military Academy and at the University of Minnesota by Earls is discussed later in this report. The significance of this type of research is that the phenomena of extreme yielding and distortion can be efficiently examined in parameter studies performed on the computer. The computer results can be verified with old experiments, or a small number of new experiments. These studies show a good prospect fornew insights into old problems that heretofore were never fully solved.3. Research on cold-formed steel structuresNext to seismic work, the most active part of research in the US is on cold-formed steel structures. The reason for this is that the supporting industry is expanding, especially in the area of individual family dwellings. As the cost of wood goes up, steel framed houses become more and more economical. The intellectual problems of thin-walled structures buckling in multiple modes under very large deformations have attracted some of the best minds in stability research. As a consequence, many new problems have been solved: complex member stiffening systems, stability and bracing of C and Z beams, composite slabs, perforated columns, standing-seam roof systems, bracing and stability of beams with very complicatedshapes, cold-formed members with steels of high yield stress-to-tensile strength ratio, and many other interesting applications. The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) has issued a new expanded standard in 1996 that brought many of these research results into the hands of the designer.4. Research on steel-concrete composite structuresAlmost all structural steel bridges and buildings in the US are built with composite beams or girders. In contrast, very few columns are built as composite members. The area of composite Column research is very active presently to fill up the gap of technical information on the behavior of such members. The subject of steel tubes filled with high-strength concrete is especially active. One of the aims of research performed by Hajjar at the University of Minnesota is to develop a fundamental understanding of the various interacting phenomena that occur in concrete-filled columns and beam-columns under monotonic and cyclic load. The other aim is to obtain a basic understanding of the behavior of connections of wide-flange beams to concrete filled tubes.Other major research work concerns the behavior and design of built-up composite wide-flange bridge girders under both positive and negative bending. This work is performed by Frank at the University of Texas at Austin and by White of Georgia Tech, and it involves extensive studies of the buckling and post-buckling of thin stiffened webs. Already mentioned is the examination of the shakedown of composite bridges. The question to be answered is whether a composite bridge girder loses composite action under repeated cycles of loads which are greater than the elastic limit load and less than the plastic mechanism load. A new study has been initiated at the University of Minnesota on the interaction between a semi-rigid steel frame system and a concrete shear wall connected by stud shear connectors.5. Research on connectionsConnection research continues to interest researchers because of the great variety of joint types. The majority of the connection work is currently related to the seismic problems that will be discussed in the next section of this paper. The most interest in non-seismic connections is the characterization of the monotonic moment-rotationbehavior of various types of semi-rigid joints.6. Research on structures and connections subject to seismic forcesThe most compelling driving force for the present structural steel research effort in the US was the January 17, 1994 earthquake in Northridge, California, North of Los Angeles. The major problem for steel structures was the extensive failure of prequalified welded rigid joints by brittle fracture. In over 150 buildings of one to 26 stories high there were over a thousand fractured joints. The buildings did not collapse, nor did they show any external signs of distress, and there were no human injuries or deaths. A typical joint is shown in Fig. 2.2.1.In this connection the flanges of the beams are welded to the flanges of the column by full-penetration butt welds. The webs are bolted to the beams and welded to the columns. The characteristic features of this type of connection are the backing bars at the bottom of the beam flange, and the cope-holes left open to facilitate the field welding of the beam flanges. Fractures occurred in the welds, in the beam flanges, and/or in the column flanges, sometimes penetrating into the webs.Once the problem was discovered several large research projects were initiated at various university laboratories, such as The University of California at San Diego, the University of Washington in Seattle, the University of Texas at Austin, Lehigh University at Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, and at other places. The US Government under the leadership of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) instituted a major national research effort. The needed work was deemed so extensivethat no single research agency could hope to cope with it. Consequently three California groups formed a consortium which manages the work:(1) Structural Engineering Association of California.(2) Applied Technology Council.(3) California Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering.The first letters in the name of each agency were combined to form the acronym SAC, which is the name of the joint venture that manages the research. We shall read much from this agency as the results of the massive amounts of research performed under its aegis are being published in the next few years.The goals of the program are to develop reliable, practical and cost-effective guidelines for the identification and inspection of at-risk steel moment frame buildings, the repair or upgrading of damaged buildings, the design of new construction, and the rehabilitation of undamaged buildings.~ As can be seen, the scope far exceeds the narrow look at the connections only. The first phase of the research was completed at the end of 1996, and its main aim was to arrive at interim guidelines so that design work could proceed. It consisted of the following components:~ A state-of-the-art assessment of knowledge on steel connections.~ A survey of building damage.~ The evaluation of ground motion.~ Detailed building analyses and case studies.~ A preliminary experimental program.~ Professional training and quality assurance programs.~ Publishing of the Interim Design Guidelines.A number of reports were issued in this first phase of the work. A partial list of these is appended at the end of this paper.During the first phase of the SAC project a series of full-scale connection tests under static and, occasionally, dynamic cyclic tests were performed. Tests were of pre-Northridge-type connections (that is, connections as they existed at the time of the earthquake), of repaired and upgraded details, and of new recommendedconnection details. A schematic view of the testing program is illustrated in Fig.2.2.2 Some recommended strategies for new design are schematically shown in Fig. 2.2.3.Fig. 2.2.3 some recommended improvements in the interim guidelinesThe following possible causes, and their combinations, were found to have contributed to tile connection failures:~ Inadequate workmanship in the field welds.~ Insufficient notch-toughness of the weld metal.~ Stress raisers caused by the backing bars.~ Lack of complete fusion near the backing bar.~ Weld bead sizes were too big.~ Slag inclusion in the welds.While many of the failures can be directly attributed to the welding and thematerial of the joints, there are more serious questions relative to the structural system that had evolved over the years mainly based on economic considerations.' The structural system used relatively few rigid-frames of heavy members that were designed to absorb the seismic forces for large parts of the structure. These few lateral-force resistant frames provide insufficient redundancy. More rigid-frames with smaller members could have provided a tougher and more ductile structural system. There is a question of size effect: Test results from joints of smaller members were extrapolated to joints with larger members without adequate test verification. The effect of a large initial pulse may have triggered dynamic forces that could have caused brittle fracture in joints with fracture critical details and materials. Furthermore, the yield stress of the beams was about 30% to 40% larger than the minimum specified values assumed in design, and so the connection failed before the beams, which were supposed to form plastic hinges.As can be seen, there are many possible reasons for this massive failure rate, and there is blame to go around for everyone. No doubt, the discussion about why and how the joints failed will go on for many more years. The structural system just did not measure up to demands that were more severe than expected. What should be kept in mind, however, is that no structure collapsed or caused even superficial nonstructural damage, and no person was injured or killed. In the strictest sense the structure sacrificed itself so that no physical harm was done to its users. The economic harm, of course, was enormous.7. Future directions of structural steel research and conclusionThe future holds many challenges for structural steel research. The ongoing work necessitated by the two recent earthquakes that most affected conventional design methods, namely, the Northridge earthquake in the US and the Kobe earthquake in Japan, will continue well into the first decade of the next Century. It is very likely that future disasters of this type will bring yet other problems to the steel research community. There is a profound change in the philosophy of design for disasters: We can no longer be content with saving lives only, but we must also design structures which will not be so damaged as to require extensive repairs.Another major challenge will be the emergence of many new materials such as high-performance concrete and plastic composite structures. Steel structures will continually have to face the problem of having to demonstrate viability in the marketplace. This can only be accomplished by more innovative research. Furthermore, the new comprehensive limit-states design codes which are being implemented worldwide, need research to back up the assumptions used in the theories.Specifically, the following list highlights some of the needed research in steel structures:Systems reliability tools have been developed to a high degree of sophistication. These tools should be applied to the studies of bridge and building structures to define the optimal locations of monitoring instruments, to assess the condition and the remaining life of structures, and to intelligently design economic repair and retrofit operations.New developments in instrumentation, data transfer and large-scale computation will enable researchers to know more about the response of structures under severe actions, so that a better understanding of "real-life" behavior can be achieved.The state of knowledge about the strength of structures is well above the knowledge about serviceability and durability. Research is needed on detecting and preventing damage in service and from deterioration.The areas of fatigue and fracture mechanics on the one hand, and the fields of structural stability on the other hand, should converge into a more Unified conceptual entity.The problems resulting from the combination of inelastic stability and low-cycle fatigue in connections subject to severe cyclic loads due to seismic action will need to be solved.The performance of members, connections and connectors (e.g., shear connectors) under severe cyclic and dynamic loading requires extensive new research, including shakedown behavior.The list could go on, but one should never be too dogmatic about the future ofsuch a highly creative activity as research. Nature, society and economics will provide sufficient challenges for the future generation of structural engineers.近期美国在钢结构和钢筋混凝土结构研究和设计方面的发展这篇文章将总结对钢结构的研究展望.1.钢结构桥梁的研究美国国家运输和公路官员协会(AASTH0)是为美国桥梁发布设计标准的权威。

(完整版)桥梁毕业设计外文翻译

(完整版)桥梁毕业设计外文翻译

外文资料The Tenth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and ConstructionAugust 3-5, 2006, Bangkok, ThailandStructural Rehabilitation of Concrete Bridges with CFRPComposites-Practical Details and ApplicationsRiyad S. ABOUTAHA1, and Nuttawat CHUTARAT2 ABSTRACT: Many old existing bridges are still active in the various highway transportation networks, carrying heavier and faster trucks, in all kinds of environments. Water, salt, and wind have caused damage to these old bridges, and scarcity of maintenance funds has aggravated their conditions. One attempt to restore the original condition; and to extend the service life of concrete bridges is by the use of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. There appear to be very limited guides on repair of deteriorated concrete bridges with CFRP composites. In this paper, guidelines for nondestructive evaluation (NDE), nondestructive testing (NDT), and rehabilitation of deteriorated concrete bridges with CFRP composites are presented. The effect of detailing on ductility and behavior of CFRP strengthened concrete bridges are also discussed and presented.KEYWORDS: Concrete deterioration, corrosion of steel, bridge rehabilitation, CFRP composites.1 IntroductionThere are several destructive external environmental factors that limit the service life of bridges. These factors include but not limited to chemical attacks, corrosion of reinforcing steel bars, carbonation of concrete, and chemical reaction of aggregate. If bridges were not well maintained, these factors may lead to a structural deficiency, which reduces the margin of safety, and may result in structural failure. In order to rehabilitate and/or strengthen deteriorated existing bridges, thorough evaluation should be conducted. The purpose of the evaluation is to assess the actual condition of any existing bridge, and generally to examine the remaining strength and load carry capacity of the bridge.1 Associate Professor, Syracuse University, U.S.A.2 Lecturer, Sripatum University, Thailand.One attempt to restore the original condition, and to extend the service life of concrete bridges is by the use of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites.In North America, Europe and Japan, CFRP has been extensively investigated and applied. Several design guides have been developed for strengthening of concrete bridges with CFRP composites. However, there appear to be very limited guides on repair of deteriorated concrete bridges with CFRP composites. This paper presents guidelines for repair of deteriorated concrete bridges, along with proper detailing. Evaluation, nondestructive testing, and rehabilitation of deteriorated concrete bridges with CFRP composites are presented. Successful application of CFRP composites requires good detailing as the forces developed in the CFRP sheets are transferred by bond at the concrete-CFRP interface. The effect of detailing on ductility and behavior of CFRP strengthened concrete bridges will also be discussed and presented.2 Deteriorated Concrete BridgesDurability of bridges is of major concern. Increasing number of bridges are experiencing significant amounts of deterioration prior to reaching their design service life. This premature deterioration considered a problem in terms of the structural integrity and safety of the bridge. In addition, deterioration of a bridge has a considerable magnitude of costs associated with it. In many cases, the root of a deterioration problem is caused by corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete structures. Concrete normally acts to provide a high degree of protection against corrosion of the embedded reinforcement. However, corrosion will result in those cases that typically experience poor concrete quality, inadequate design or construction, and harsh environmental conditions. If not treated a durability problem, e.g. corrosion, may turn into a strength problem leading to a structural deficiency, as shown in Figure1.Figure1 Corrosion of the steel bars is leading to a structural deficiency3 Non-destructive Testing of Deteriorated Concrete Bridge PiersIn order to design a successful retrofit system, the condition of the existing bridge should be thoroughly evaluated. Evaluation of existing bridge elements or systems involves review of the asbuilt drawings, as well as accurate estimate of the condition of the existing bridge, as shown in Figure2. Depending on the purpose of evaluation, non-destructive tests may involve estimation of strength, salt contents, corrosion rates, alkalinity in concrete, etc.Figure2 Visible concrete distress marked on an elevation of a concrete bridge pier Although most of the non-destructive tests do not cause any damage to existing bridges, some NDT may cause minor local damage (e.g. drilled holes & coring) that should be repaired right after the NDT. These tests are also referred to as partial destructive tests but fall under non-destructive testing.In order to select the most appropriate non-destructive test for a particular case, thepurpose of the test should be identified. In general, there are three types of NDT to investigate: (1) strength, (2) other structural properties, and (3) quality and durability. The strength methods may include; compressive test (e.g. core test/rebound hammer/ ultrasonic pulse velocity), surface hardness test (e.g. rebound hammer), penetration test (e.g. Windsor probe), and pullout test (anchor test).Other structural test methods may include; concrete cover thickness (cover-meter), locating rebars (rebar locator), rebar size (some rebar locators/rebar data scan), concrete moisture (acquameter/moisture meter), cracking (visual test/impact echo/ultrasonic pulse velocity), delamination (hammer test/ ultrasonic pulse velocity/impact echo), flaws and internal cracking (ultrasonic pulse velocity/impact echo), dynamic modulus of elasticity (ultrasonic pulse velocity), Possion’s ratio (ultrasonic pulse velocity), thickness of concrete slab or wall (ultrasonic pulse velocity), CFRP debonding (hammer test/infrared thermographic technique), and stain on concrete surface (visual inspection).Quality and durability test methods may include; rebar corrosion rate –field test, chloride profile field test, rebar corrosion analysis, rebar resistivity test, alkali-silica reactivity field test, concrete alkalinity test (carbonation field test), concrete permeability (field test for permeability).4 Non-destructive Evaluation of Deteriorated Concrete Bridge PiersThe process of evaluating the structural condition of an existing concrete bridge consists of collecting information, e.g. drawings and construction & inspection records, analyzing NDT data, and structural analysis of the bridge. The evaluation process can be summarized as follows: (1) Planning for the assessment, (2) Preliminary assessment, which involves examination of available documents, site inspection, materials assessment, and preliminary analysis, (3) Preliminary evaluation, this involves: examination phase, and judgmental phase, and finally (4) the cost-impact study.If the information is insufficient to conduct evaluation to a specific required level, then a detailed evaluation may be conducted following similar steps for the above-mentioned preliminary assessment, but in-depth assessment. Successful analytical evaluation of an existing deteriorated concrete bridge should consider the actual condition of the bridge and level of deterioration of various elements. Factors, e.g. actual concrete strength, level of damage/deterioration, actual size of corroded rebars, loss of bond between steel and concrete, etc. should be modeled into a detailed analysis. If such detailed analysis is difficult to accomplish within a reasonable period of time, thenevaluation by field load testing of the actual bridge in question may be required.5 Bridge Rehabilitation with CFRP CompositesApplication of CFRP composite materials is becoming increasingly attractive to extend the service life of existing concrete bridges. The technology of strengthening existing bridges with externally bonded CFRP composites was developed primarily in Japan (FRP sheets), and Europe (laminates). The use of these materials for strengthening existing concrete bridges started in the 1980s, first as a substitute to bonded steel plates, and then as a substitute for steel jackets for seismic retrofit of bridge columns. CFRP Composite materials are composed of fiber reinforcement bonded together with a resin matrix. The fibers provide the composite with its unique structural properties. The resin matrix supports the fibers, protect them, and transfer the applied load to the fibers through shearing stresses. Most of the commercially available CFRP systems in the construction market consist of uniaxial fibers embedded in a resin matrix, typically epoxy. Carbon fibers have limited ultimate strain, which may limit the deformability of strengthened members. However, under traffic loads, local debonding between FRP sheets and concrete substrate would allow for acceptable level of global deformations before failure.CFRP composites could be used to increase the flexural and shear strength of bridge girders including pier cap beams, as shown in Figure3. In order to increase the ductility of CFRP strengthened concrete girders, the longitudinal CFRP composite sheets used for flexural strengthening should be anchored with transverse/diagonal CFRP anchors to prevent premature delamination of the longitudinal sheets due to localized debonding at the concrete surface-CFRP sheet interface. In order to prevent stress concentration and premature fracture of the CFRP sheets at the corners of concrete members, the corners should be rounded at 50mm (2.0 inch) radius, as shown in Figure3.Deterioration of concrete bridge members due to corrosion of steel bars usually leads in loss of steel section and delamination of concrete cover. As a result, such deterioration may lead to structural deficiency that requires immediate attention. Figure4 shows rehabilitation of structurally deficient concrete bridge pier using CFRP composites.Figure3 Flexural and shear strengthening of concrete bridge pier with FRP compositesFigure4 Rehabilitation of deteriorated concrete bridge pier with CFRP composites6 Summary and ConclusionsEvaluation, non-destructive testing and rehabilitation of deteriorated concrete bridges were presented. Deterioration of concrete bridge components due to corrosion may lead to structural deficiencies, e.g. flexural and/or shear failures. Application of CFRP composite materials is becoming increasingly attractive solution to extend the service life of existing concrete bridges. CFRP composites could be utilized for flexural and shear strengthening, as well as for restoration of deteriorated concrete bridge components. The CFRP composite sheets should be well detailed to prevent stress concentration and premature fracture or delamination. For successful rehabilitation of concrete bridges in corrosive environments, a corrosion protection system should be used along with the CFRP system.第十届东亚太结构工程设计与施工会议2006年8月3-5号,曼谷,泰国碳纤维复合材料修复混凝土桥梁结构的详述及应用Riyad S. ABOUTAHA1, and Nuttawat CHUTARAT2摘要:在各式各样的公路交通网络中,许多现有的古老桥梁,在各种恶劣的环境下,如更重的荷载和更快的车辆等条件下,依然在被使用着。

桥梁论文中英译文

桥梁论文中英译文

附录A译文桥梁桥梁是人类征服空间的象征。

当日落时你在太平洋中看到深红色网格的金门大桥时,或者耀武扬威的在深谷上滑翔,你会感到惊奇并钦佩它们建造者的艺术。

它们是人类在追求更好更自由的世界,移除堡垒的决心的持久的证明。

他们的设计和建筑计划是像在梦里一样的想象,但是构想和决心都还不够,各种力如重力等的具体数据必须靠数学模型精确计算,这需要艺术的灵感和工匠的技术。

科学关于材料和结构的行为的知识已经明显地扩大,并且计算技术现在可广泛便捷地应用在操作复杂的理论,工程师们实际上在过去十年已经彻底改革桥设计和建设方法。

这些发展应用于短、中、长跨桥。

对于耐久的桥,最普通的材料就是用钢筋和混凝土。

不同种类的桥都是用这些材料的。

木材都是用于水上的暂时的建筑,木制短跨度桥不可设置在水平面下,现在美国已经在实验一些铝制的短跨度桥。

一座桥的主要部分可以据说是“基础”和“上层建筑”。

因为在很多桥里没有清楚的在这两个之间划分,这个划分被仅仅为了方便起见在这里使用。

基础的一般要素是桥台和墩台,它们经常分别建造基础,例如混凝土扩展基础,这些基础是基础的一部分。

偶尔有些基础是桩基础,桩伸到水平线以上,顶部有桩帽,这样可以支持主要的上部结构。

这种形式经常被用来做长的、低的、跨水的结构。

附录B英文文献BridgesBridges are great symbols of mankind’s conquest of space. The sight of the crimson tracery of the Golden Gate Bridge against a setting sun in the Pacific Ocean, or the atch of the Garabit Biaduct soaring triumphantly above the deep gorge. F ills one’s heart with wonder and admiration for the art of their builders[11]. They are the enduring expressions of mankind’s determination to remove all barriers in its pursuit of a better and freer world. Their design and building schemes are conceived in dream-like bisions. But vision and determination are not enough. All the physical forces of nature and gravity must be understood with mathematical precision and such forces have to be resisted by manipulating the right materials in the right pattern. This requires both the inspiration of an artist and the skill of an artisan.Scientific knowledge about materials and structural behavior has expanded tremendously, and computing techniques are now widely available to manipulate complex theories in innumerable ways very quickly. Engineers have virtually revolutionized bridge design and construction methods in the past decade. The advances apply to short-medium and long-span bridges.For permanent bridge,the most commonly used materials are steel and concrete. Bridge of many different type are built with these materials,used singly or in combination. Timber may be used for temporary above-water construction, for the elements of a structure that lie below the waterline (particularly timber pile s), or for short-span bridges located on secondary roads. A few short-span aluminum bridges have been built in the United States on an experimental basis.The principal portions of a bridge may be said to be the “substructure” and the “superstructure.” This division is used here simply for convenience, since in many bridges there is no clear dividing lint between the two.Common elements of the substructure are abutments (usually at the bridge ends) and piers (between the abutments).Piers and abutments often rest on separately constructed foundations such as concrete spread footings or groups of bearing piles; these foundations are part of the substructure. Occasionally a bridge substructure comprises a series of pile bents in which the piles extend above the waterline and are topped by a pile cap that, in turn, supports the major structural elements of the superstructure. Such bents often are used in arepetitive fashion as part of along, low, over-water crossing.In recent years, the dividing lines between short-medium and long-span bridge have blurred somewhat. Currently, spans of 20 to 100 ft (6.1 to 30.5m) are regarded as short by many designers, who have developed many standardized designs to handle these spans economically.Medium spans range up to, per-haps, 400ft (121.9m) in modern bridge practice, depending on the organization involved and the materials used. Long spans range up to 4000ft (1219.2m) or more, but a clear span above 1000ft (304.8m)is comparatively rare.。

道路与桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献

道路与桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献

中英文对照外文翻译(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)Bridge research in EuropeA brief outline is given of the development of the European Union, together with the research platform in Europe. The special case of post-tensioned bridges in the UK is discussed. In order to illustrate the type of European research being undertaken, an example is given from the University of Edinburgh portfolio: relating to the identification of voids in post-tensioned concrete bridges using digital impulse radar.IntroductionThe challenge in any research arena is to harness the findings of different research groups to identify a coherent mass of data, which enables research and practice to be better focused. A particular challenge exists with respect to Europe where language barriers are inevitably very significant. The European Community was formed in the 1960s based upon a political will within continental Europe to avoid the European civil wars, which developed into World War 2 from 1939 to 1945. The strong political motivation formed the original community of which Britain was not a member. Many of the continental countries saw Britain’s interest as being purelyeconomic. The 1970s saw Britain joining what was then the European Economic Community (EEC) and the 1990s has seen the widening of the community to a European Union, EU, with certain political goals together with the objective of a common European currency.Notwithstanding these financial and political developments, civil engineering and bridge engineering in particular have found great difficulty in forming any kind of common thread. Indeed the educational systems for University training are quite different between Britain and the European continental countries. The formation of the EU funding schemes —e.g. Socrates, Brite Euram and other programs have helped significantly. The Socrates scheme is based upon the exchange of students between Universities in different member states. The Brite Euram scheme has involved technical research grants given to consortia of academics and industrial partners within a number of the states— a Brite Euram bid would normally be led by an industrialist.In terms of dissemination of knowledge, two quite different strands appear to have emerged. The UK and the USA have concentrated primarily upon disseminating basic research in refereed journal publications: ASCE, ICE and other journals. Whereas the continental Europeans have frequently disseminated basic research at conferences where the circulation of the proceedings is restricted.Additionally, language barriers have proved to be very difficult to break down. In countries where English is a strong second language there has been enthusiastic participation in international conferences based within continental Europe —e.g. Germany, Italy, Belgium, The Netherlands and Switzerland. However, countries where English is not a strong second language have been hesitant participants }—e.g. France.European researchExamples of research relating to bridges in Europe can be divided into three types of structure:Masonry arch bridgesBritain has the largest stock of masonry arch bridges. In certain regions of the UK up to 60% of the road bridges are historic stone masonry arch bridges originally constructed for horse drawn traffic. This is less common in other parts of Europe as many of these bridges were destroyed during World War 2.Concrete bridgesA large stock of concrete bridges was constructed during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. At the time, these structures were seen as maintenance free. Europe also has a large number of post-tensioned concrete bridges with steel tendon ducts preventing radar inspection. This is a particular problem in France and the UK.Steel bridgesSteel bridges went out of fashion in the UK due to their need for maintenance as perceived in the 1960s and 1970s. However, they have been used for long span and rail bridges, and they are now returning to fashion for motorway widening schemes in the UK.Research activity in EuropeIt gives an indication certain areas of expertise and work being undertaken in Europe, but is by no means exhaustive.In order to illustrate the type of European research being undertaken, an example is given from the University of Edinburgh portfolio. The example relates to the identification of voids in post-tensioned concrete bridges, using digital impulse radar.Post-tensioned concrete rail bridge analysisOve Arup and Partners carried out an inspection and assessment of the superstructure of a 160 m long post-tensioned, segmental railway bridge in Manchester to determine its load-carrying capacity prior to a transfer of ownership, for use in the Metrolink light rail system..Particular attention was paid to the integrity of its post-tensioned steel elements. Physical inspection, non-destructive radar testing and other exploratory methods were used to investigate for possible weaknesses in the bridge.Since the sudden collapse of Ynys-y-Gwas Bridge in Wales, UK in 1985, there has been concern about the long-term integrity of segmental, post-tensioned concrete bridges which may b e prone to ‘brittle’ failure without warning. The corrosion protection of the post-tensioned steel cables, where they pass through joints between the segments, has been identified as a major factor affecting the long-term durability and consequent strength of this type of bridge. The identification of voids in grouted tendon ducts at vulnerable positions is recognized as an important step in the detection of such corrosion.Description of bridgeGeneral arrangementBesses o’ th’ Barn Bridge is a 160 m long, three span, segmental, post-tensionedconcrete railway bridge built in 1969. The main span of 90 m crosses over both the M62 motorway and A665 Bury to Prestwick Road. Minimum headroom is 5.18 m from the A665 and the M62 is cleared by approx 12.5 m.The superstructure consists of a central hollow trapezoidal concrete box section 6.7 m high and 4 m wide. The majority of the south and central spans are constructed using 1.27 m long pre-cast concrete trapezoidal box units, post-tensioned together. This box section supports the in site concrete transverse cantilever slabs at bottom flange level, which carry the rail tracks and ballast.The center and south span sections are of post-tensioned construction. These post-tensioned sections have five types of pre-stressing:1. Longitudinal tendons in grouted ducts within the top and bottom flanges.2. Longitudinal internal draped tendons located alongside the webs. These are deflected at internal diaphragm positions and are encased in in site concrete.3. Longitudinal macalloy bars in the transverse cantilever slabs in the central span .4. Vertical macalloy bars in the 229 mm wide webs to enhance shear capacity.5. Transverse macalloy bars through the bottom flange to support the transverse cantilever slabs.Segmental constructionThe pre-cast segmental system of construction used for the south and center span sections was an alternative method proposed by the contractor. Current thinking suggests that such a form of construction can lead to ‘brittle’ failure of the ent ire structure without warning due to corrosion of tendons across a construction joint,The original design concept had been for in site concrete construction.Inspection and assessmentInspectionInspection work was undertaken in a number of phases and was linked with the testing required for the structure. The initial inspections recorded a number of visible problems including:Defective waterproofing on the exposed surface of the top flange.Water trapped in the internal space of the hollow box with depths up to 300 mm.Various drainage problems at joints and abutments.Longitudinal cracking of the exposed soffit of the central span.Longitudinal cracking on sides of the top flange of the pre-stressed sections.Widespread sapling on some in site concrete surfaces with exposed rusting reinforcement.AssessmentThe subject of an earlier paper, the objectives of the assessment were:Estimate the present load-carrying capacity.Identify any structural deficiencies in the original design.Determine reasons for existing problems identified by the inspection.Conclusion to the inspection and assessmentFollowing the inspection and the analytical assessment one major element of doubt still existed. This concerned the condition of the embedded pre-stressing wires, strands, cables or bars. For the purpose of structural analysis these elements、had been assumed to be sound. However, due to the very high forces involved,、a risk to the structure, caused by corrosion to these primary elements, was identified.The initial recommendations which completed the first phase of the assessment were:1. Carry out detailed material testing to determine the condition of hidden structural elements, in particularthe grouted post-tensioned steel cables.2. Conduct concrete durability tests.3. Undertake repairs to defective waterproofing and surface defects in concrete.Testing proceduresNon-destructi v e radar testingDuring the first phase investigation at a joint between pre-cast deck segments the observation of a void in a post-tensioned cable duct gave rise to serious concern about corrosion and the integrity of the pre-stress. However, the extent of this problem was extremely difficult to determine. The bridge contains 93 joints with an average of 24 cables passing through each joint, i.e. there were approx. 2200 positions where investigations could be carried out. A typical section through such a joint is that the 24 draped tendons within the spine did not give rise to concern because these were protected by in site concrete poured without joints after the cables had been stressed.As it was clearly impractical to consider physically exposing all tendon/joint intersections, radar was used to investigate a large numbers of tendons and hence locate duct voids within a modest timescale. It was fortunate that the corrugated steel ducts around the tendons were discontinuous through the joints which allowed theradar to detect the tendons and voids. The problem, however, was still highly complex due to the high density of other steel elements which could interfere with the radar signals and the fact that the area of interest was at most 102 mm wide and embedded between 150 mm and 800 mm deep in thick concrete slabs.Trial radar investigations.Three companies were invited to visit the bridge and conduct a trial investigation. One company decided not to proceed. The remaining two were given 2 weeks to mobilize, test and report. Their results were then compared with physical explorations.To make the comparisons, observation holes were drilled vertically downwards into the ducts at a selection of 10 locations which included several where voids were predicted and several where the ducts were predicted to be fully grouted. A 25-mm diameter hole was required in order to facilitate use of the chosen horoscope. The results from the University of Edinburgh yielded an accuracy of around 60%.Main radar sur v ey, horoscope verification of v oids.Having completed a radar survey of the total structure, a baroscopic was then used to investigate all predicted voids and in more than 60% of cases this gave a clear confirmation of the radar findings. In several other cases some evidence of honeycombing in the in site stitch concrete above the duct was found.When viewing voids through the baroscopic, however, it proved impossible to determine their actual size or how far they extended along the tendon ducts although they only appeared to occupy less than the top 25% of the duct diameter. Most of these voids, in fact, were smaller than the diameter of the flexible baroscopic being used (approximately 9 mm) and were seen between the horizontal top surface of the grout and the curved upper limit of the duct. In a very few cases the tops of the pre-stressing strands were visible above the grout but no sign of any trapped water was seen. It was not possible, using the baroscopic, to see whether those cables were corroded.Digital radar testingThe test method involved exciting the joints using radio frequency radar antenna: 1 GHz, 900 MHz and 500 MHz. The highest frequency gives the highest resolution but has shallow depth penetration in the concrete. The lowest frequency gives the greatest depth penetration but yields lower resolution.The data collected on the radar sweeps were recorded on a GSSI SIR System 10.This system involves radar pulsing and recording. The data from the antenna is transformed from an analogue signal to a digital signal using a 16-bit analogue digital converter giving a very high resolution for subsequent data processing. The data is displayed on site on a high-resolution color monitor. Following visual inspection it is then stored digitally on a 2.3-gigabyte tape for subsequent analysis and signal processing. The tape first of all records a ‘header’ noting the digital radar settings together with the trace number prior to recording the actual data. When the data is played back, one is able to clearly identify all the relevant settings —making for accurate and reliable data reproduction.At particular locations along the traces, the trace was marked using a marker switch on the recording unit or the antenna.All the digital records were subsequently downloaded at the University’s NDT laboratory on to a micro-computer.(The raw data prior to processing consumed 35 megabytes of digital data.)Post-processing was undertaken using sophisticated signal processing software. Techniques available for the analysis include changing the color transform and changing the scales from linear to a skewed distribution in order to highlight、突出certain features. Also, the color transforms could be changed to highlight phase changes. In addition to these color transform facilities, sophisticated horizontal and vertical filtering procedures are available. Using a large screen monitor it is possible to display in split screens the raw data and the transformed processed data. Thus one is able to get an accurate indication of the processing which has taken place. The computer screen displays the time domain calibrations of the reflected signals on the vertical axis.A further facility of the software was the ability to display the individual radar pulses as time domain wiggle plots. This was a particularly valuable feature when looking at individual records in the vicinity of the tendons.Interpretation of findingsA full analysis of findings is given elsewhere, Essentially the digitized radar plots were transformed to color line scans and where double phase shifts were identified in the joints, then voiding was diagnosed.Conclusions1. An outline of the bridge research platform in Europe is given.2. The use of impulse radar has contributed considerably to the level of confidence in the assessment of the Besses o’ th’ Barn Rail Bridge.3. The radar investigations revealed extensive voiding within the post-tensioned cable ducts. However, no sign of corrosion on the stressing wires had been found except for the very first investigation.欧洲桥梁研究欧洲联盟共同的研究平台诞生于欧洲联盟。

介绍桥梁英文作文

介绍桥梁英文作文

介绍桥梁英文作文英文:Bridges are an essential part of our infrastructure, connecting people and places and enabling transportation and commerce. There are many different types of bridges, each with their unique design and purpose.One type of bridge is the suspension bridge, which is held up by cables that are anchored to towers. The Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco is an example of a suspension bridge. Another type of bridge is the beam bridge, which is supported by piers or abutments at each end. The Brooklyn Bridge in New York City is an example of a beam bridge.Bridges can also be classified by their materials. Some bridges are made of concrete, while others are made ofsteel or wood. The materials used depend on factors such as the bridge's location, purpose, and budget.Bridges are not only functional but also beautiful. They have inspired many artists and photographers, and some bridges have become iconic landmarks. For example, the Tower Bridge in London is a popular tourist attraction and a symbol of the city.In addition to their practical and aesthetic value, bridges also have cultural significance. They can represent connections between people and communities, as well as the ingenuity and engineering prowess of human beings.中文:桥梁是我们基础设施中不可或缺的一部分,连接着人与地方,使得交通和商业得以实现。

桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献

桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献

桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)BRIDGE ENGINEERING AND AESTHETICSEvolvement of bridge Engineering,brief reviewAmong the early documented reviews of construction materials and structu re types are the books of Marcus Vitruvios Pollio in the first century B.C.The basic principles of statics were developed by the Greeks , and were exemplifi ed in works and applications by Leonardo da Vinci,Cardeno,and Galileo.In the fifteenth and sixteenth century, engineers seemed to be unaware of this record , and relied solely on experience and tradition for building bridges and aqueduc ts .The state of the art changed rapidly toward the end of the seventeenth cent ury when Leibnitz, Newton, and Bernoulli introduced mathematical formulatio ns. Published works by Lahire (1695)and Belidor (1792) about the theoretical a nalysis of structures provided the basis in the field of mechanics of materials .Kuzmanovic(1977) focuses on stone and wood as the first bridge-building materials. Iron was introduced during the transitional period from wood to steel .According to recent records , concrete was used in France as early as 1840 for a bridge 39 feet (12 m) long to span the Garoyne Canal at Grisoles, but r einforced concrete was not introduced in bridge construction until the beginnin g of this century . Prestressed concrete was first used in 1927.Stone bridges of the arch type (integrated superstructure and substructure) were constructed in Rome and other European cities in the middle ages . Thes e arches were half-circular , with flat arches beginning to dominate bridge wor k during the Renaissance period. This concept was markedly improved at the e nd of the eighteenth century and found structurally adequate to accommodate f uture railroad loads . In terms of analysis and use of materials , stone bridges have not changed much ,but the theoretical treatment was improved by introd ucing the pressure-line concept in the early 1670s(Lahire, 1695) . The arch the ory was documented in model tests where typical failure modes were considered (Frezier,1739).Culmann(1851) introduced the elastic center method for fixed-e nd arches, and showed that three redundant parameters can be found by the us e of three equations of coMPatibility.Wooden trusses were used in bridges during the sixteenth century when P alladio built triangular frames for bridge spans 10 feet long . This effort also f ocused on the three basic principles og bridge design : convenience(serviceabili ty) ,appearance , and endurance(strength) . several timber truss bridges were co nstructed in western Europe beginning in the 1750s with spans up to 200 feet (61m) supported on stone substructures .Significant progress was possible in t he United States and Russia during the nineteenth century ,prompted by the ne ed to cross major rivers and by an abundance of suitable timber . Favorable e conomic considerations included initial low cost and fast construction .The transition from wooden bridges to steel types probably did not begin until about 1840 ,although the first documented use of iron in bridges was the chain bridge built in 1734 across the Oder River in Prussia . The first truss completely made of iron was in 1840 in the United States , followed by Eng land in 1845 , Germany in 1853 , and Russia in 1857 . In 1840 , the first ir on arch truss bridge was built across the Erie Canal at Utica .The Impetus of AnalysisThe theory of structures ,developed mainly in the ninetheenth century,foc used on truss analysis, with the first book on bridges written in 1811. The Wa rren triangular truss was introduced in 1846 , supplemented by a method for c alculating the correcet forces .I-beams fabricated from plates became popular in England and were used in short-span bridges.In 1866, Culmann explained the principles of cantilever truss bridges, an d one year later the first cantilever bridge was built across the Main River in Hassfurt, Germany, with a center span of 425 feet (130m) . The first cantileve r bridge in the United States was built in 1875 across the Kentucky River.A most impressive railway cantilever bridge in the nineteenth century was the Fir st of Forth bridge , built between 1883 and 1893 , with span magnitudes of 1711 feet (521.5m).At about the same time , structural steel was introduced as a prime mater ial in bridge work , although its quality was often poor . Several early exampl es are the Eads bridge in St.Louis ; the Brooklyn bridge in New York ; and t he Glasgow bridge in Missouri , all completed between 1874 and 1883.Among the analytical and design progress to be mentioned are the contrib utions of Maxwell , particularly for certain statically indeterminate trusses ; the books by Cremona (1872) on graphical statics; the force method redefined by Mohr; and the works by Clapeyron who introduced the three-moment equation s.The Impetus of New MaterialsSince the beginning of the twentieth century , concrete has taken its place as one of the most useful and important structural materials . Because of the coMParative ease with which it can be molded into any desired shape , its st ructural uses are almost unlimited . Wherever Portland cement and suitable agg regates are available , it can replace other materials for certain types of structu res, such as bridge substructure and foundation elements .In addition , the introduction of reinforced concrete in multispan frames at the beginning of this century imposed new analytical requirements . Structures of a high order of redundancy could not be analyzed with the classical metho ds of the nineteenth century .The importance of joint rotation was already dem onstrated by Manderla (1880) and Bendixen (1914) , who developed relationshi ps between joint moments and angular rotations from which the unknown mom ents can be obtained ,the so called slope-deflection method .More simplification s in frame analysis were made possible by the work of Calisev (1923) , who used successive approximations to reduce the system of equations to one simpl e expression for each iteration step . This approach was further refined and int egrated by Cross (1930) in what is known as the method of moment distributi on .One of the most import important recent developments in the area of analytical procedures is the extension of design to cover the elastic-plastic range , also known as load factor or ultimate design. Plastic analysis was introduced with some practical observations by Tresca (1846) ; and was formulated by Sa int-Venant (1870) , The concept of plasticity attracted researchers and engineers after World War Ⅰ, mainly in Germany , with the center of activity shifting to England and the United States after World War Ⅱ.The probabilistic approa ch is a new design concept that is expected to replace the classical determinist ic methodology.A main step forward was the 1969 addition of the Federal Highway Adim inistration (F HWA)”Criteria for Reinforced Concrete Bridge Members “ that co vers strength and serviceability at ultimate design . This was prepared for use in conjunction with the 1969 American Association of State Highway Offficials (AASHO) Standard Specification, and was presented in a format that is readil y adaptable to the development of ultimate design specifications .According to this document , the proportioning of reinforced concrete members ( including c olumns ) may be limited by various stages of behavior : elastic , cracked , an d ultimate . Design axial loads , or design shears . Structural capacity is the r eaction phase , and all calculated modified strength values derived from theoret ical strengths are the capacity values , such as moment capacity ,axial load ca pacity ,or shear capacity .At serviceability states , investigations may also be n ecessary for deflections , maximum crack width , and fatigue .Bridge TypesA notable bridge type is the suspension bridge , with the first example bu ilt in the United States in 1796. Problems of dynamic stability were investigate d after the Tacoma bridge collapse , and this work led to significant theoretica l contributions Steinman ( 1929 ) summarizes about 250 suspension bridges bu ilt throughout the world between 1741 and 1928 .With the introduction of the interstate system and the need to provide stru ctures at grade separations , certain bridge types have taken a strong place in bridge practice. These include concrete superstructures (slab ,T-beams,concrete box girders ), steel beam and plate girders , steel box girders , composite const ruction , orthotropic plates , segmental construction , curved girders ,and cable-stayed bridges . Prefabricated members are given serious consideration , while interest in box sections remains strong .Bridge Appearance and AestheticsGrimm ( 1975 ) documents the first recorded legislative effort to control t he appearance of the built environment . This occurred in 1647 when the Cou ncil of New Amsterdam appointed three officials . In 1954 , the Supreme Cou rt of the United States held that it is within the power of the legislature to de termine that communities should be attractive as well as healthy , spacious as well as clean , and balanced as well as patrolled . The Environmental Policy Act of 1969 directs all agencies of the federal government to identify and dev elop methods and procedures to ensure that presently unquantified environmenta l amentities and values are given appropriate consideration in decision making along with economic and technical aspects .Although in many civil engineering works aesthetics has been practiced al most intuitively , particularly in the past , bridge engineers have not ignored o r neglected the aesthetic disciplines .Recent research on the subject appears to lead to a rationalized aesthetic design methodology (Grimm and Preiser , 1976 ) .Work has been done on the aesthetics of color ,light ,texture , shape , and proportions , as well as other perceptual modalities , and this direction is bot h theoretically and empirically oriented .Aesthetic control mechanisms are commonly integrated into the land-use re gulations and design standards . In addition to concern for aesthetics at the sta te level , federal concern focuses also on the effects of man-constructed enviro nment on human life , with guidelines and criteria directed toward improving quality and appearance in the design process . Good potential for the upgradin g of aesthetic quality in bridge superstructures and substructures can be seen in the evaluation structure types aimed at improving overall appearance .Lords and lording groupsThe loads to be considered in the design of substructures and bridge foun dations include loads and forces transmitted from the superstructure, and those acting directly on the substructure and foundation .AASHTO loads . Section 3 of AASHTO specifications summarizes the loa ds and forces to be considered in the design of bridges (superstructure and sub structure ) . Briefly , these are dead load ,live load , iMPact or dynamic effec t of live load , wind load , and other forces such as longitudinal forces , cent rifugal force ,thermal forces , earth pressure , buoyancy , shrinkage and long t erm creep , rib shortening , erection stresses , ice and current pressure , collisi on force , and earthquake stresses .Besides these conventional loads that are ge nerally quantified , AASHTO also recognizes indirect load effects such as fricti on at expansion bearings and stresses associated with differential settlement of bridge components .The LRFD specifications divide loads into two distinct cate gories : permanent and transient .Permanent loadsDead Load : this includes the weight DC of all bridge components , appu rtenances and utilities, wearing surface DW nd future overlays , and earth fill EV. Both AASHTO and LRFD specifications give tables summarizing the unit weights of materials commonly used in bridge work .Transient LoadsVehicular Live Load (LL) Vehicle loading for short-span bridges :considera ble effort has been made in the United States and Canada to develop a live lo ad model that can represent the highway loading more realistically than the H or the HS AASHTO models . The current AASHTO model is still the applica ble loading.桥梁工程和桥梁美学桥梁工程的发展概况早在公元前1世纪,Marcus Vitrucios Pollio 的著作中就有关于建筑材料和结构类型的记载和评述。

桥梁工程英文作文

桥梁工程英文作文

桥梁工程英文作文Bridge engineering is a fascinating field that combines creativity and precision. Engineers must consider factors such as materials, design, and location when constructing a bridge. The end result is a structure that not only serves a practical purpose but also adds beauty to the surrounding landscape.The construction of a bridge requires careful planning and coordination. Engineers must work closely with architects, contractors, and government officials to ensure that the project is completed on time and within budget. Safety is also a top priority, as bridges must be able to withstand the elements and heavy traffic.One of the most important aspects of bridge engineering is the use of innovative technologies. Engineers are constantly developing new materials and construction techniques to improve the durability and longevity of bridges. From steel cables to precast concrete segments,the possibilities are endless when it comes to building a strong and reliable bridge.In addition to technical skills, bridge engineers must also possess strong problem-solving abilities. They must be able to think quickly on their feet and come up with creative solutions to unexpected challenges. Whether it's a change in weather or a design flaw, engineers must be prepared to adapt and overcome any obstacles that cometheir way.Overall, bridge engineering is a dynamic and rewarding field that offers endless opportunities for growth and innovation. Engineers play a crucial role in shaping the infrastructure of our cities and communities, and their work will continue to have a lasting impact for generations to come.。

道桥工程中英文对照外文翻译文献

道桥工程中英文对照外文翻译文献

中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)英文:1.1Approach for analyzing the ultimate strength of concrete filled steel tubular arch bridges with stiffening girderAbstract:A convenient approach is proposed for analyzing the ultimate load carrying capacity of concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) arch bridge with stiffening girders. A fiber model beam element is specially used to simulate the stiffening girder and CFST arch rib. The geometric nonlinearity, material nonlinearity。

influenceoftheconstruction process and the contribution of prestressing reinforcement are all taken into consideration. The accuracy of this method is validated by comparing its results with experimental results. Finally, the ultimate strength of an abnormal CFST arch bridge withstiffening girders is investigated and the effect of construction method is discussed. It is concluded that the construction process has little effect on the ultimate strength of the bridge.Key words: Ultimate strength, Concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) arch bridge, Stiffening girder, Fiber model beam element, Construction processdoi:10.1631/jzus.2007.A0682NTRODUCTIONWith the increasing applications of concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) structures in civil engi-neering in China, arch bridges have become one of the competitive styles in moderate span or long span bridges. Taking the Fuxing Bridge in Hangzhou (Zhao et al., 2004), and Wushan Bridge in Chongqing (Zhang et al., 2003), China, as representatives, the structural configuration, the span and construction scale of such bridges have surpassed those of existing CFST arch bridges in the world. Therefore, it is of great importance to enhance the theoretical level in the design of CFST arch bridges for safety and economy.he calculation of ultimate bearing capacity is a significant issue in design of CFST arch bridges. As an arch structure is primarily subjected to compres-sive forces, the ultimate strength of CFST arch bridge is determined by the stability requirement. A numberof theoretical studies were conducted in the past to investigate the stability and load-carrying capacity of CFST arch bridges. Zeng et al.(2003) studied the load capacity of CFST arch bridge using a composite beam element, involving geometric and material nonlin-earity. Zhang et al.(2006) derived a tangent stiffness matrix for spatial CFSTpole element to consider the geometric and material nonlinearities under largedisplacement by co-rotational coordinate method. Xie et al.(2005) proposed a numerical method to determine the ultimate strength of CFST arch bridges and revealed that the effect of the constitutive relation of confined concrete is not significant. Hu et al.(2006) investigated the effect of Poisson’s ratio of core concrete on the ultimate bearing capacity of a long span CFST arch bridge and found that the bearing capacity is enhanced by 10% if the Poisson’s ratio is variable. On the other hand, many experimental studies on the ultimate strength of naked CFST arch rib or CFST arch bridge model hadbeenconducted. Experimental studies on CFST arch rib under in-plane andout-of-plane loads were carried out by Chen and Chen 2000) and Chen et almetrical nonlinearity was significant for the out-of-plane strength and less significant for the in-plane strength. Cui et al.(2004) introduced a global model test of a CFST arch bridge with span of 308 m, and suggested that the influence of initial stress should be considered.The above papers mainly focused on the ultimate strength of CFST naked arch ribs or CFST arch bridges with floating deck. No attempt was made to study the ultimate strength of CFST arch bridges with stiffening girders whose nonlinear behavior and CFST arch should be simulated due to the redistribution of inner forces between arch ribs and stiffening girders. In general, stiffening girders can be classified into steel girder, PC (prestressing concrete) girder and teel-concrete combination girder. It is most difficult to simulate the nonlinear behavior of PC girder, due to the influence of prestressing reinforcement. In contrast to steel or steel-concrete combination beam, the prestressing reinforcements in PC girders not only offer strength and stiffnessdirectly, but their tension greatly affects the stiffness and distribution of the initial forces in the structure. The aims of this paper are (1) to present an elas-tic-plastic analysis of the ultimate strength of CFST arch bridge with arbitrary stiffening girders;(2) to study the ultimate load-carrying capacity of a complicated CFST arch bridge with abnormal arch ribs and PC stiffening girders; and (3) to investigate the effect of construction methods on the ultimate strength of the structure. ANALYTICAL THEORYElasto-plastic large deformation of PC girder element The elasto-plasic large deformation analysis of PC beam elements is based on the following fundamental assumptions:(1) A plane section originally normal to the neutral axis always remains a plane and normal to the neutral axis during deformation;(2) The shear deformation due to shear stress isneglected;(3)The Saint-Venant torsional principle holds in(4) The effect of shear stress on the stress-strain relationship is ignored. The cross-section of a PC box girder with onesymmetric axis is depicted in Fig.1, where, G and s denote the geometry center and the shear center re-spectively. According to the first and the third as-sumptions listed above, the displacement increments of point A(x,y) in the section can be expressed in terms of the displacement increments at the geometry center and the shear center aswhere Ktoris the coefficient factor which is related to the geometry shape of the girder cross-section.Similar to 3D elastic beam theory, the displacement increment of the girder can be expressed in terms of the nodal displacement increments asin which L denotes the element length, and z is the axial coordinate of the local coordinate system of an element. Then, the displacement vector of any section of the element can be written aswhere ∆u is the displacement vector of any section of the beam element, N is the shape function matrix and ∆ue is the displacement vector of the element node. They are respectively expressed asAccording to Eq.(2), the linear strain can be ex-pressed asin which BL is the linear strain matrix of the element Correspondingly, the nonlinear strain may be expressed aswhere BNL is the nonlinear strain matrix of the ele-mentThe stress increment ∆σ can be approximatedusing the linear strain increment aswhere D is the material property matrix. Neglecting the influence of the shear strain, D can be expressedwhere E(ε) is the tangent modulus of the material which is dependent on the strain state, and G is the elastic shearing modulus regarded as a constant. According to the principle of virtual work, we have in which σ and ∆σ are the stress vector and stress increment of the current state, q and P are the dis-tributed load and concentrated load vector, ∆q and ∆P are the increments of distributed load and concen-trated load, δ∆u and δ∆ε are the virtual displacement and virtual strain, and V isthe volume of the element. Substitute Eqs.(9), (11) and (14) into Eq.(16) and ignore the infinitesimal variable ∆σ∆εN, we have where ∆Fe is the increment of element load vectorcorresponding to ∆ue, the element displacement vec-tor. Kepand Kσare the elasto-plastic and geometric stiffness matrixes of the beam element respectively as followsThe distribution of elastic and plastic zones is non-uniform in the element, and varies during de-formation. It is very difficult to present an explicit expression of the property matrix D for the whole section. Hence, the section is divided into many subareas, as shown in Fig.2, and the fiber model is adopted to calculate the element’s stiffness matrix, i.e.Obviously, if the number of subareas is suffi-ciently large, the result of Eq.(19) will approach the exact solution. The value of Kep is calculated using numerical integration, with Di being regarded as i. To compute the geometric stiffness matrix Kσ, the normal stress should be expressed in terms of axial force and bending moment, which actually has very little contribution to the geometric stiffness, so where N is the axial force, and A is the sectional area. Prestressing reinforcement element The reinforced bars parallel to the beam axis may be regarded as fibers, whose contributions to the stiffness could be readily accounted for in Eq.(19). The contributions to the stiffness from those not par-allel to the beam and the prestressing reinforcement (PR), will however be calculated in the following section. The displacement increment of two ends of the prestressing reinforcement in Fig.3 can be expressed by Eq.(21):n which kep and kσare respectively the elasto-plastic and the geometric stiffness matrixes, ∆δis the nodal displacement vector, and ∆f is the nodal force vector of the prestressingreinforcementelement in the local coordinate system. According to Fig.4, ∆δand ∆f can be written in the form Then the stiffness matrix ep( k + k)σof the rein-accordingly. CFST arch rib, steel girder or steel-concrete girder element The fiber model mentioned above can also be used to simulate the CFST arch rib, steel stiffening girder or steel-concrete composite stiffening girder, with similar elasto-plastic stiffness matrix and stiff-ness equation. The detailed description of the deduction can be found in (Xie et al., 2005). However, for the CFST arch rib, the stress-strain relation of structure is very complex due to the com-bined influence of the confined concrete and outer steel tube. In this paper, the following stress-strain relation considering the confinement effect of the steel tube ring (Han, 2000) is adopted: where σytand σycare the yield strengths of the tension and compression sides of the steel tube respectively, βt and βc are the corresponding coefficients. Fig.5b depicted the bilinear stress-strain relationship con-The secondary modulus of the steel tube tendency of local buckling of the steel tube, is assumed to be 1% of the initial elastic modulus. Hanger element The mechanical behavior of cables such as that of hangers and tie bars, is similar to that of truss ele-ments, except that cables cannot bear compressive elasto-plastic computation theory of flexible cable considering the effect of sag was presented by (Xie eal., 1998). In most bridges, however, sag has little fect on the mechanical behavior of hangers. Hence, hangers of arch bridges are treated as elasto-plastic trusses with no compression strength, and the stiff-ness equation is expressed by Eq.(22). PROGRAM SCHEME FOR ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATIOerection without brackets, and consists of many construction stages. Thus, the func-tion of simulating the construction process mustbe taken into account in the developed program for cal-culating ultimate bearing capacity, including the gradual action of load, the step-by-step formation of the structure, the influence of initial displacement and initial stress. The scheme for the program is indicated in Fig.6. The modified arc-length increment tecnique is adopted to solve the resulting nonlinear equation (Crisfield, 1981). VALIDATION OF THE METHOD FOR A PC GIRDER The accuracy of computation of the ultimate strength for CFST element has been confirmed in (Xie et al., 2005). In this paper, the precision of the present theory is checked for a PC girder by comparison with the experimental result. Fig.7 shows the cross-section and reinforcements of the girder, which spans 13 m, with 9 bundles of prestressing reinforcements and 11 branches of nonprestressing reinforced bars. The design strength of the concrete is 22.4 MPa, and those of nonprestressing reinforced bars A and B depicted in Fig.7a are 195 MPa and 280 MPa respectively of which the diameters are 12 mm and 8 mm. The prestressing reinforcement is high-strength low-rela- xation steel strand with design strength of 1860 MPa and the control force of each bundle is Nk=195 kN. More detailed information about the experiment on this PC girder is available in (Chen, 2005). Comparison of the deflection at the midspan is depicted in Fig.8, showing good consistency between he numerical simulation and experimental result. Fig.5 Stress-strain curves of steel tube (a) Yield condition; (b) Stress-strain relationship APPLICATION IN BRIDGE DESIGNThe ultimate strength of Fenghuajiang Bridge in Ningbo, Zhejiang, China is studied involving the effect of construction process to demonstrate the applicability of the present approach in bridge design. Fig.9 shows the design scheme of Fenghuajiang Bridgewhich is a girder and arch combination bridgewith central span of 138 m. The central span of the stiffening girder is made up of steel and PC composite box. The side span of the stiffening girder is made up of PC box. The abnormal CFST arch in the central span is composed of three arches, with one main archrib in the center and two secondary arch ribs. The diameter of the main arch rib is 1.8 m, and those of the other two are 1.5 m. The design strength of the concrete used in the bridge is 22.4 MPa. The arch ribs are linked with steel pipes and I-steel bearing members, forming a truss arch bridge. The main arch and the deck are connected with vertical hangers. The secondary arches and the deck are connected with inclined hangers. To take into account the effect of the construction method on the ultimate bearing capacity, it is assumed that the bridge is constructed by two kinds of methods. In Case I, there is only a construction process, the supporting frames for construction falling once after the completion of the whole bridge. In Case II, there are two construction processes, as shown in Fig.10. The first process is construction ofthe PC girder on the supporting frames. The second process is to fix the steel girder, assemble the arch rib, and tension the tie-bar and hangers to separate the steel girder from the frame. Prestressing reinforcements in the girder are properly simulated in construction stages, but the reinforced bars are not modelled due to their large number. The elasto-plastic mechanical behaviors of CFST arch ribs, hanger, bearing member, steel pipe, tie-bar, etc. are analyzed.The ultimate strength analysis process is shown in Fig.11. First,the initial stress of the established bridge is calculated under dead load and prestressing force including initial tension of the hangers, the tie and prestressing reinforcements. Then the stress and isplacement under live load are computed. At last,The out-of-plane deformation curves at the quarter points of the main arch rib are shown in Fig.14. The vertical axis denotes the load coefficient µ which does not contain the original dead load and live load exerted in Figs.11a and 11b. When 3.1≤µ≤3.2, the nonlinear behavior of the arch rib becomes obvious in the lateral direction. As shown in the figure, the buckling modes in both cases are antisymmetric out-of-plane, and the buckling load factor of the arch rib is about 4.1 considering the initial dead and live load.A comparison of the lateral and vertical deforMations at the quarter point of the main arch between two cases is shown in Fig.15, showing that the deviation of the load-displacement curves of the two cases is very small, indicating that the influence of the construction method on the stability strength is very slight. Besides, when out-of-plane buckling occurs, the bridge still has certain vertical stiffness.CONCLUSIONIn analyzing the ultimate strength of the CFST arch bridges with stiffening girders, simulating the nonlinear behavior of stiffening girders is as impor-tant as that of the CFST arch rib due to the redistribution of inner force between arch ribs and stiffening girders. In this paper, an analytical approach for estimating the ultimate bearing capacity of CFST arch bridge with stiffening girder is proposed, which takes account of the effects of material and geometric nonlinearity and the contribution of prestressing reinforcement. Based on the fiber beam element theory,the degrees of freedom of the whole structure can be reduced, making it very feasible to predict the ultimate strength of the complex structure. The accuracy of the present method was examined by comparison with the experimental results for a PC girder.To demonstrate the applicability of the present approach in bridge design, the ultimate strength of an abnormal CFST arch bridge with stiffening girder is studied considering the effect of construction process. The result shows that the construction process influences the initial internal force of the bridge significantly. But it has little effect on the ultimate strength of the bridge. Therefore, the relatively accurate stability strength can be obtained by ignoring the influence of the construction process.ReferencesChen, H.Z., 2005. Research of Calculation and Analysis of PCBox Girder Structure with Long Span. Ph.D Thesis,Zhejiang University (in Chinese).Chen, B.C., Chen, Y.J., 2000. Experimental study on me-chanic behaviors of concrete-filled steel tubular rib archunder in-plane loads. Engineering Mechanics,17(2):44-50 (in Chinese).Chen, B.C., Wei, J.G., Lin, J.Y., 2006. Experimental study on concrete filled steel tubular (single tube) arch with onerib under spatial loads. Engineering Mechanics,23(5):99-106 (in Chinese).Crisfield, M.A., 1981. A fast incremental iterative solution procedure that handles “snap through”. Computer and Structures, 13(1-3):55-62. [doi:10.1016/0045-7949(81) 90108-5]Cui, J., Sun, B.N., Lou, W.J., Yang, L.X., 2004. Model test study on concrete-filled steel tube truss arch bridge.Engineering Mechanics, 21(5):83-86 (in Chinese).e, X., Chen, H.Z., Li, H., Song, S.R., 2005. Numerical analysis of ultimate strength of concrete filled steel tu- bular arch bridges. Journal of Zhejiang University SCI-ENCE, 6A(8):859-868. [doi:10.1631/jzus.2005.A0859]Zeng, G.F., Fan, L.C., Zhang, G.Y., 2003. Load capacity analysis of concrete filled steel tube arch bridge with the composite beam element. Journal of the China RailwaySociety, 25(5):97-102 (in Chinese).Zhang, Z.A., Sun, Y., Wang, M.Q., 2003. Key technique in theerection process of the rib steel pipe truss segments forWushan Yangze River bridge. Highway, 12:26-32 (in Chinese).Zhang, Y., Shao, X.D., Cai, S.B., Hu, J.H., 2006. Spatial nonlinear finite element analysis for long-span trussedCFST arch bridge. China Journal of Highway andTransport, 19(4):65-70 (in Chinese).Zhao, L.Q., Xu, R.H., Zheng, X.Z., 2004. Overall design of thefourth Qiantangjiang River Bridge in Hangzhou. BridgeConstruction, 1:27-30 (in Chinese).翻译:分析钢管混凝土拱桥与加劲梁的极限强度的方法摘要:提出的方法是分析和研究负载承载能力的终极钢管混凝土钢管混凝土(加劲梁与钢管混凝土拱桥)。

桥梁文献中英文翻译(中文)Quick fix

桥梁文献中英文翻译(中文)Quick fix

桥梁的快速修复——圣彼得堡一座旧木桥的更换工作在今年年初完成在俄罗斯的圣彼得堡,崛起的交通水平和发展要求促使一个旧的电车轨道桥被改造为一个斜拉桥。

新的Lazarevsky大桥横跨马来亚内芙卡,并与今年早些时候建成通车,取代了一座本来供有轨电车通行但是现在只供行人行走的旧木质桥。

这座桥坐落于彼得格勒区,并且沿着Pionerskaya和Sportivnaya街道将Krestovsky和Petrogradsky群岛连接了起来,这两者都是当地的交通枢纽。

它始建于1949年,当时被称为Koltovsky桥,相邻马来亚内芙卡河堤。

但在1952年,为了纪念传说中的俄罗斯海军上将米哈伊尔拉扎列夫,路堤及桥梁被易名为拉扎列夫海军上将路堤和Lazarevsky桥。

这座桥由VV Blazhevich工程师设计,最初桥有11跨,中央一个是单叶。

它最初是设计用于电车,并且是当时该市唯一的一座电车轨道桥。

总长度为141m,总宽度为11m,层面由金属和木质材料组成。

木材支柱支撑的码头建在钢管桩基础上。

但是在2002年时,电车轨道被关闭,从那时起,这座桥只供行人使用。

这座桥梁的位置就意味着它服务这座城市的西部——包括Krestovsky岛的彼得格勒区。

所有到Krestovsky岛的车辆都用主要这个岛的Krestovsky桥,这自然导致该桥大大超载。

由于Lazarevsky桥并没有承受车辆荷载,所以它不被认为是彼得格勒区的交通网络的一部分。

但是,Krestovsky岛上计划在victory 公园里兴建一个体育场,离海边仅有3公里,这意味着城市的其余部分需要一个可靠的连接方式。

当地政府认为解决这个问题最好的办法就是重建Lazarevsky 桥。

新桥的规模取决于现有交通水平,并且考虑到了该地区未来的发展。

据预测,到2025年,Lazarevsky桥的全年平均日交通量将上升至16000车次。

车流高峰发生在体育场馆举行重大赛事时,此时该桥须能在一小时内纾缓这个地段的交通。

桥梁文献中英文翻译(英文原文)Quick fix

桥梁文献中英文翻译(英文原文)Quick fix

Quick fix: replacement of an old wooden bridge in St Petersburg was completed earlier this year.Rising traffic levels and development demands led to an old tramway bridge being rebuilt as a cable-stayed crossing in the Russian city of St Petersburg. The new Lazarevsky Bridge across the Malaya Nevka was opened to traffic earlier this year, replacing an old wooden structure which was built for trams but recently had only been used by pedestrians.The bridge is located in Petrograd district and connects Krestovsky and Petrogradsky Islands along Pionerskaya and Sportivnaya Streets, both of which are importanat links for local traffic. When it was built in 1949, the crossing was called the Koltovsky Bridge, after the adjacent Malaya Nevka river embankment. But in 1952, it was renamed to commemorate the legendary Russian admiral Mikhail Lazarev. The embankment and the bridge were redesignated the Admiral Lazarev Embankment and Lazarevsky Bridge respectively.Built to the design of engineer VV Blazhevich, the original bridge had 11 spans, the central one being a single-leaf drawspan. It was originally designed for trams and was the only tramway bridge in the city at that time. Its total length was 141m and its width was 11m, the deck consisting of metal baulks and wooden plank flooring. The timber post piers rested on piled foundations of steel pipes. But in 2002 the tramway was closed and since then, the bridge has only been used by pedestrians.Its location meant that Lazarevsky Bridge served the western part of the city--the Petrograd districts including Krestovsky island. All the road traffic to Krestovsky island used the main Krestovsky Bridge which as a consequence was considerably overloaded. Since the Lazarevsky Bridge carried no vehicular traffic it was not considered part of the road network of the district. But plans to build a new stadium at the Seaside Victory Park on Krestovsky Island just 3km from the bridge site meant that a reliable transport connection to the rest of the city was required. The local authority decided that reconstruction of the Lazarevsky Bridge was the best way to provide this.The size of new bridge was determined based on the predicted traffic levels, taking into account the prospective development of the district. According to the forecast, the annual average daily traffic intensity on Lazarevsky Bridge will rise to 16,000 vehicles per day by 2025. Peak loads occur during major sporting events at the stadium when the bridge will be required to help relieve the area of traffic within one hour. This traffic flow includes 4,500 to 5,000 cars, so even if the Petrovsky Bridge were to be rebuilt, the Lazarevsky Bridge needed two lanes of traffic in both directions in order to do this.Taking into consideration the fact that the timber structures of the bridge had been in use for more than 55 years, if the bridge reconstruction had been restricted to the widening and strengthening of the existing superstructure and piers, it would not have ensured the longevity of the fixed bridge and might have led to high operation costs. Another consideration was that the appearance of a multi-span structure with bulky piers would not have fitted into the architectural style that is emerging with construction of modern buildings on Krestovsky Island and the adjacentembankments.As a result, the decision was taken to completely demolish the existing bridge and replace it with a new structure on the same alignment. As part of the project, some of Sportivnaya Street on the right bank had to be widened, and improvement of the adjacent area was also included.The history of the project dates back more than a decade to 1998, when JSC Institute Strojproect won the tender to carry out a feasibility study into the reconstruction of Lazarevsky Bridge and its approaches.Even at this time, the architect Igor Serebrennikov had developed an original architectural concept of the bridge which involved use of a cable-stayed system. This concept was approved by the city's committee for development but financial problems meant that the design was suspended for seven years before it resumed.In 2003, the project was included in the target programme of design and survey works, and the tender for design development was officially announced. Again these works were awarded to JSC Institute Strojproect. The reconstruction design was completed in 2007 and was received positively by the State Expert Review Board; construction began at the end of that year.The structural concept of the bridge was approved based on the comparison of technical and economical options. One of the main restrictions was the strict limitation on the superstructure construction depth. On the one hand, it was limited by the need to maintain underbridge clearance for navigation, while on the other hand the deck level was governed by the height of Admiral Lazarev Embankment, which could not be raised, according to the requirements of the committee for protection of monuments.To meet these almost incompatible conditions it was necessary to make the longitudinal profile of the deck with a vertical curve of radius 1,000m, a radius which is allowable only for very constrained conditions. But even with this minimum vertical curve radius, the limitation for the deck construction depth remained fairly strict--it had to be 1.4m at the maximum. This condition could be met either by a classic five-span continuous beam scheme or by a cable-stayed system. The costs of both options are practically the same but the cable-stayed option was preferred as it was considered more attractive from the architectural point of view. Another benefit was that it would take less time for construction as there was no need for intermediate piers to be built in the river bed.The unconventional appearance of the structure, particularly the shape of the tower and its asymmetric arrangement with its single span, put demands on the design abilities of the engineers from JSC Institute Strojproect, requiring them to cope with non-standard problems. One such problem was the need to provide the required rigidity to the deck while at the same time minimising its weight in order to decrease the moments in the tower elements and balance the system. Hence a single-span cable-stayed bridge with steel deck, orthotropic carriageway slab and a steel tower was selected for construction. The deck is supported by two rows of stays, with five stays in each row. The cable stays pass through the tower and are anchored in the reinforced concrete slab of the counterweight which is located beyond the bridgeabutment on Krestovsky Island. The front arch of the tower, which is inclined towards the riverbed, carries the dead anchorages by which means the cable stays and backstays are secured. Tensioning of both sets of cables was carried out by means of active anchors located at the deck and in the counterweight slab. To minimise the total width of the deck, the anchorages are removed to the front surfaces of the main beams. The optimum force distribution in the tower elements was obtained by means of the arch shape that became sharper and elongated in the transverse section of the bridge.The deck consists of a system of longitudinal and transverse H-beams connected via the orthotropic slab with its U-shape stiffeners. The anchorages are located along the transverse beams. At the tower, the deck is rigidly fixed and at pier one it rests on Maurer spherical bearings. The steel part of the deck is made of low-alloy steel grade 10 and 15 and the tower of steel grade 10 (400MPa).The cable stays are VSL standard monostrands and each one is made up of from 50 to 73 strands. The total length of strand used in the bridge is about 31km. Meanwhile the bridge deck pavement consists of two layers of asphalt/concrete 40mm and 50mm placed over the Technoelastomost-S membrane waterproofing layer.The pier foundations are formed of high pile caps resting on bored piles driven deep into the bearing stratum of firm clay. Above the foundation top, the piers are made of cast in situ concrete and faced with granite.Construction was carried out by Mostootryad No 75, a branch of OAO Mostotrest No 6, while the steel deck structure was manufactured by JSC Zavod Metallokonstruktsiy and the steel tower structure was manufactured by NPO Mostovik.For development of the detail design the specialists of automation division of the Institute prepared complex 3-D models of the tower and cable stay anchorages in PRO-E software which were used for analysis and as a basis for the fabrication of the structures by NPO Mostovik. The use of this successful PRO-E modelling enabled the complicated tower structures to be manufactured within a relatively short time.Taking into consideration the constraints imposed on the bridge construction, JSC Institute Strojproect suggested some modifications to the detailed design. One such proposal was to replace the cable backstays of the tower with rigid ties made of low-alloy steel grade 10 which would be fixed rigidly at the tower arches and counterweight. Temporary supports would be installed under the deck anchorages These modifications allowed the erection of the back-stays to be considerably simplified, and would also eliminate the need to tension the backstays, cutting in half the time for the cable-stay installation.In addition it meant that the cable-stays supporting the deck could be tensioned in a single operation, once the asphalt and concrete pavement had been installed on the bridge. Analysis included successive tensioning of cable-stay pairs from the longest pair down to the shortest pair with the subsequent final tensioning of the two longest pairs. Apart from the forces, the vertical displacements of the deck at the 'breakaway' points on the temporary supports had to be controlled. The actual tensioning works were carried out in compliance with the design solutions. The data on the forces and displacements at each stage were handed over by the general contractor to thedesigners, and if necessary, the required corrections were introduced to the design. On the whole, the calculated data showed a high correlation with the actual parameters.In fact it took the general contractor only 17 months to complete construction of all the works involved in the bridge construction. The new cable-stayed bridge has fitted harmoniously into the surrounding landscape. By avoiding placement of intermediate piers in the riverbed it was possible to open up views along the Malaya Nevka. The arch tower acts as a symbolic gateway to the island and stands out distinctly against its background of sky and trees. The architectural expressiveness of the bridge is determined by the general asymmetrical composition and the dynamic shape of the tower formed by two inclined arches, a light and gently-curved deck, and the elegant outline of the cable stay arrangement. At night time, the appearance of the bridge is highlighted by architectural lighting.Tatiana Gurevich is project manager and Yuri Krylov is head of the structural steel department at JSC Institute Strojproect。

桥梁工程英文作文范文

桥梁工程英文作文范文

桥梁工程英文作文范文英文:Bridge engineering is a fascinating field that requires a combination of technical knowledge, creativity, and problem-solving skills. As a bridge engineer, I am responsible for designing, building, and maintaining bridges that are safe, functional, and aesthetically pleasing.One of the most challenging aspects of bridge engineering is dealing with the forces that act on the structure. Bridges are constantly subjected to forces such as gravity, wind, and traffic, and it is crucial to design them in such a way that they can withstand these forces without collapsing or becoming damaged.Another important aspect of bridge engineering is ensuring that the bridge is accessible and meets the needs of the community it serves. This involves taking intoaccount factors such as traffic flow, pedestrian access, and environmental impact.In addition to technical skills, bridge engineers also need to have good communication and teamwork skills. They must be able to work effectively with other engineers, architects, and construction workers to ensure that the bridge is designed and built to the highest standards.Overall, bridge engineering is a challenging and rewarding field that requires a combination of technical knowledge, creativity, and problem-solving skills.中文:桥梁工程是一个迷人的领域,需要结合技术知识、创造力和解决问题的能力。

土木工程 桥梁 毕业设计 外文文献翻译 中英文

土木工程 桥梁 毕业设计 外文文献翻译 中英文

文献翻译Bridge Maintenance TechniquesEssential maintenance generally involves strengthening or replacement of bridge elements . Strengthening techniques include welding , plate bonding and external post-tensioning which increase the stiffness of bridge decks . Replacement of elements has been used for deck slabs and beams, piers and columns. The primary purpose of essential maintenance is to increase the load carrying capacity and the reason for the inadequate capacity is secondary . If the reason is simply increased loading the maintenance can be limited to increasing the capacity , but if the reason is deterioration then maintenance must also include repairs and preventative maintenance.The selection of the maintenance method for repairs prevention depends primarily on the cause of deterioration . For steel construction the main cause of deterioration is corrosion and regular maintenance painting should be carried out to prevent the steel from corroding . If corrosion does occur then the only repair option is to grit blast back to shiny metal before repainting . An assessment of load carrying capacity should be carried out if corrosion has resulted in a significant reduction of steel section .The selection of repair and prevention methods for concrete construction is more complex because there are numerous causes of concrete deterioration .The deterioration of reinforced concrete can be conveniently sub-divided into deterioration of the concrete and deterioration of the steel reinforcement . The main causes of concrete deterioration are sulphates , free-thaw cycles and alkali-silica reaction(ASR). Deterioration can also be related to poor mix design and construction process such as compaction and curing . These types of deterioration can only be prevented by actions taken at the time of construction ; there are no effective preventative actions that can be taken after construction. For example where the environment is known to contain significant quantities of sulphide it is sensible to consider the use of sulphate resisting Portland cement . In regions experiencing large numbers of freeze-thaw cycles frost damage to concrete can be prevented by adding air entraining agent to the concrete mix . Frost damage is worse in concrete that is saturated with salty water so techniques such as waterproofing membranes and silane treatments may be helpful . Alkali-silica reaction between aggregates and the alkali in cement can be prevented by avoiding the most reactive types of aggregate and by keeping the alkali content of the cement below the designated limit . To set up damaging stresses in concrete the ASR requires water so procedures to reduce the water content such as waterproofing membranes and silane treatments may help . If these forms of concrete deterioration take place the only viable repair method is concrete replacement which may be extensive especially for ASR where entire sections can be affected . Sulphate and freeze-thaw damage normally occur only in the coverzone of the concrete . It is important to note that deterioration of the concrete will increase the risk of corrosion to the reinforcement because steel depassivators , like chlorides and carbon dioxide , will be able to move more easily through the concrete to the reinforcement .Deterioration of the reinforcing steel is caused by corrosion and can be prevented by actions taken at the time of construction and for a period after construction . Preventative techniques that can be applied at construction include the use of epoxy coated mild steel , stainless steel of carbon or glass fibre reinforcement , inhibitors , cathodic protection , anti-carbonation coatings , silane treatments and waterproofing membranes . All of these techniques , except the last three , directly protect the reinforcement against corrosion and to date , have been used only occasionally largely on grounds of cost . Waterproofing membranes , silane treatments , and anti-carbonation coatings are applied to the concrete and are designed to slow down the ingress of carbon dioxide and chlorides into the concrete thereby increasing the age of the structure when the reinforcement begins to corrode . These techniques can be used after construction because they are applied to the concrete surface and they should be effective , providing corrosion of the reinforcement has not already begun . It is important not to overlook the importance of well compacted and cured, low water : cement ratio concrete in preventing reinforcement corrosion.When corrosion of the reinforcement occurs it result in a loss of steel section and/or cracking, spalling and delamination of concrete due to the stresses produced as a result of the low density of rust compared with density of the steel . Reinforcement corrosion repair methods have two main functions , to crete replacement ; cathodic protection ; desalination ; realkalization.Concrete replacement has to be used to repair the damage caused by corrosion regardless of which technique is used to stop corrosion . Concrete replacement can also be used to stop corrosion although this involves the removal of all the carbonated and chloride contaminated concrete even though it is physically sound . This often means that concrete repairs to stop corrosion are not economically viable . Cathodic protection can be applied at any time to stop corrosion caused by carbonation or chlorides . It functions by making the reinforcing steel cathodic with respect to an external anode system . Cathodic protection requires a permanent electrical installation . Desalination can be used to stop corrosion caused by chlorides and it works by migrating chloride ions towards an external anode and away from the reinforcing steel in an electric field ; this process takes about 6 weeks . Realkalization stops corrosion caused by carbonation and it works by migrating sodium ions from an external anolyte into the concrete where in combination with the hydroxyl ions generated on the reinforcing steel due to the electric field , the alkalinity is raised to a level where the steel re-passivates . Realkalization takes about 4 weeks . Desalination ,realkalization and concrete repair are not normally used in conjunction with a preventative treatment such as silane or an anti-carbonation coating to increase the life of the repair .Cathodic protection does not requireadditional preventative measures because it is a permanent installation , but the anodes do require periodic replacement.大桥维修技术大桥的基本的维修大体上包括加强和更换桥的基本元素。

毕设必备道路桥梁专业毕业设计英文翻译(英文原文+中文翻译)

毕设必备道路桥梁专业毕业设计英文翻译(英文原文+中文翻译)

Accident Analysis and PreventionThis paper describes a project undertaken to establish a self-explaining roads (SER) design programmeon existing streets in an urban area. The methodology focussed on developing a process to identifyfunctional road categories and designs based on endemic road characteristics taken from functionalexemplars in the study area. The study area was divided into two sections, one to receive SER treatments designed to maximise visual differences between road categories, and a matched control area to remainuntreated for purposes of comparison. The SER design for local roads included increased landscaping andcommunity islands to limit forward visibility, and removal of road markings to create a visually distinctroad environment. In comparison, roads categorised as collectors received increased delineation, additionof cycle lanes, and improved amenity for pedestrians. Speed data collected 3 months after implementationshowed a significant reduction in vehicle speeds on local roads and increased homogeneity of speeds onboth local and collector roads. The objective speed data, combined with r esidents’ speed choice ratings,indicated that the project was successful in creating two discriminably different road categories.2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.1. Introduction1.1. BackgroundChanging the visual characteristics of roads to influencedriver behaviour has come to be called the self-explaining roads(SER) approach (Theeuwes, 1998; Theeuwes and Godthelp, 1995;Rothengatter, 1999). Sometimes referred to as sustainable safety,as applied in the Netherlands, the logic behind the approach isthe use of road designs that evoke correct expectations and drivingbehaviours from road users (Wegman et al., 2005; Weller etal., 2008). The SER approach focuses on the three key principlesof functionality, homogeneity, and predictability (van Vliet andSchermers, 2000). In practice, functionality requires the creation ofa few well-defined road categories (e.g., through roads, distributorroads, and access roads) and ensuring that the use of a particularroad matches its intended function. Multifunctional roadslead to contradictory design requirements, confusion in the mindsof drivers, and incorrect expectations and inappropriate drivingbehaviour. Clearly defined road categories promote homogeneity intheir use and prevent large differences in vehicle speed, direction,and mass. Finally, predictability, or recognisability, means keepingthe road design and layout within each category as uniform as possibleand clearly differentiated from other categories so that thefunction of a road is easily recognised and will elicit the correctbehaviour from road users. The SER approach has been pursued tothe largest extent in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom but ithas also been of some interest inNewZealand. In 2004, the NationalRoad Safety Committee and the Ministry of Transport articulateda new National Speed Management Initiative which stated “Theemphas is is not just on speed limit enforcement, it includes perceptualmeasures that influence the speed that a driver feels is appropriatefor the section of road upon which they are driving–in effect the ‘selfexplainingroad”’ (New Zealand Ministry of Transport, 2004).In cognitive psychological terms, the SER approach attempts toimprove road safety via two complementary avenues. The first is toidentify and use road designs that afford desirable driver behaviour.Perceptual properties such as road markings, delineated lane width,and roadside objects can function as affordances that serve as builtininstructions and guide driver behaviour, either implicitly orexplicitly (Charlton, 2007a; Elliott et al., 2003; Weller et al., 2008).This work is more or less a direct development of work on perceptualcountermeasures, perceptual cues in the roading environmentthat imply or suggest a particular speed or lane position, eitherattentionally or perceptually (Charlton, 2004, 2007b; Godley et al.,1999).A second aspect of the SER approach is to establish mentalschemata and scripts, memory representations that will allowroad users to easily categorise the type of road on which they are.1.2. Localised speed managementThe traditional approaches to improving speed management,traffic calming and local area traffic management (LATM) havefocussed on treating specific problem locations or “black spots”in response to crash occurrences or complaints from the public(Ewing, 1999). A potential disadvantage of these approaches is thataddressing the problem with localised treatments can lead to are-emergence of the problem at another location nearby. Further,when applied inappropriately, localised approaches may addressthe problem from only one perspective, without considering theimpact on other types of road users or residents. When traffic calmingtreatments rely on physical obstacles such as speed humpsthey can be very unpopular with bothresidents and road users andcan create new problems associated with noise, maintenance, andvandalism (Martens et al., 1997).From an SER perspective, treatments that are highly localizedor idiosyncratic may do more harm than good by adding to themultiplicity of road categories and driver uncertainty, rather thanbuilding driver expectations around a few uniform road types.Instead of considering a single location in isolation, SER roaddesigns are considered within a hierarchy of road functions; e.g.,access roads, collector roads, and arterial roads. Although SERschemes may employ physical design elements used in trafficcalming schemes (e.g., road narrowing with chicanes and accesscontrols) they also employ a range of more visually oriented featuressuch as median and edge line treatments, road markings,pavement surfaces, and roadside furniture. For an effective SERscheme it is important to select the combination of features that will afford the desired driver speeds and to ensure their consistentuse to form distinct categories of road types (van der Horst andKaptein, 1998; Wegman et al., 2005).road category that would meet the three SER principles of functional use, homogeneous use, and predictable use. Herrstedt (2006)reported on the use of a standardised catalogue of treatments compiledfrom researcher and practitioner advice. Goldenbeld and vanSchagen (2007) used a survey technique to determine road characteristicsthat minimise the difference between drivers’ ratingsof preferred speed and perceived safe speed and select road featuresthat make posted speeds “credible”. Aarts and Davidse (2007)used a driving simulator to verify whether the “essential recognisabilitycharacteristics” of different road classes conformed to theexpectations of road users. Weller et al. (2008) employed a range of statistical techniques, including factor analysis and categoricalclustering to establish the road characteristics that drivers use tocategorise different road types.The practical difficulties of implementing an SER system thusbecome a matter of finding answers to a series of questions. Howdoes one create a discriminable road hierarchy for an existingroad network? What road characteristics should be manipulatedto establish category-defining road features? How can SER roadfeatures and selection methods be made relevant and appropriatefor a local context? (Roaddesigns appropriate for The Netherlandswould not be suitable in New Zealand, in spite of its name.) A surveyof national and international expert opinion in order establishcategory-defining road features for New Zealand roads revealedthat the regional character and local topography of roads oftenundercut the usefulness of any standardised catalogue of designcharacteristics (Charlton and Baas, 2006).1.4. Goals of the present projectThe project described in this paper sought to develop anddemonstrate an SER process based on retrofitting existing roadsto establish a clear multi-level road hierarchy with appropriatedesign speeds, ensuring that each level in the hierarchy possesseda different “look and feel”. Rather than transferring SER designs already in use internationally, the project attempted to develop amethod that would build on the features of roads in the local area;extending road characteristics with desirable affordances to otherroads lacking them and creating discriminable road categories inthe process. Of interest was whether such a process could producecost-effective designs and whether those designs would be effectivein creating different road user expectations and distinct speedprofiles for roads of different categories.2. MethodsThe research methodology/SER design process developed forthis project progressed through a series of five stages: (1) selectionof study area; (2) identification of the road hierarchy; (3) analysisof the road features; (4) development of a design template; and (5)implementation and evaluation of the SER treatments. Each of thestages is described in the sections that follow.2.1. Selection of study areaThe study area for this project (Pt England/Glen Innes in Auckland)was selected in consultation with a project steering groupcomprised of representatives from the Ministry of Transport, NewZealand Transport Agency, New Zealand Police, and other localtransport and urban agencies. The study area was an establishedneighbourhood contained amix of private residences, small shops,schools, and churches, and was selected, in part, because of its historyof cyclist, pedestrian and loss of controlcrashes, almost twicethe number。

桥梁设计外文翻译文献

桥梁设计外文翻译文献

桥梁设计外文翻译文献(文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译) 原文:A Bridge For All CenturiesAn extremely long-and record setting-main span was designed for the second bridge to across the Panama Canal in order to meet the owner’s requirement that no piers be placed in the water.Because no disruption of canal traffic was permitted at any time,the cable-stayed bridge of cast-in-place cancrete was carefully constructed using the balanced-cantilever method.In 1962 ,the Bridge of Americas(Puente de las America) opened to traffic,serving as the only fixed link across the Panama Canal .The bridge was designed to carry 60,000 vehicles per day on four lanes, but it has beenoperating above its capacity for many years.Toalleviate bottlenecks on the route that the bridge carries over the canal-the Pan-AmericanHighway(Inter-American Highway)-and promotegrowth on the western side of Panama,the country’s Ministry of Public Works(Ministerio de Obras Publicas,or MOP )decided to build a new highway systerm linking the northern part of Panama City,on the eastern side of the canal, to the town of Arraijan,located on the western side of the canal.The Centennial Bridge –named to commemorate 100 years of Panamanian independence-has noe been constructed and, when opend, will carry six lanes of traffic. This cable-stayed bridge of cast-in-place cancrete features a main span of 420m,the longest such span for this type of bridge in the Western Hemisphere.In 200 the MOP invited international bridge design firms to compete for the design of the crossing, requesting a two-package proposal:one techinical, the other financial. A total of eight proposals were received by December 2000 from established bridge design firms all over the world. After short-listing three firms on the basis of the technical merits of their proposals, the MOP selected T.Y.Lin International, of San Francisco, to prepare the bridge design and provide field construction support based on the firm’s financial package.The Centennial Bridge desige process was unique and aggressive,incorporating concepts from the traditional design/build/bid method, the design/build method , and the sa-called fast-track design process.To complete the construction on time-that is ,within just 27 months-the design of the bridge was carried out to a level of 30 percent before construction bidding began, in December 2001.The selected contractor-the Wiesbaden,Germany,office of Bilfinger Berger,AG-was brought on board immediately after being selected by the MOP ,just as would be the case in a fast-track approach. The desige of the bridge was then completed in conjunction with construction , a process that id similan to desige/build.The design selected by the client features two single-mast towers,each supporting two sets of stay cables that align in one vertical plane.Concrete was used to construct both the towers and the box girder deck,as well as the approach structures.The MOP , in conjunction with the Panama Canal Authority,established the following requirements for the bridge design :A 420m,the minimum length for the main span to accommodate the recently widened Gaillard Cut,a narrow portion of the canal crossing the Continental Divide that was straightened and widened to 275m in 2002;A navigational envelope consisting of 80m of vertical clearance and 70mof horizontal clearance to accommodate the safe passage of a crane of World War 11 vintage-a gift from the ernment that is used by the Panama Canal Authority to maintain the canal gates and facilities;A roadway wide enough to carry six lanes of traffic, three in each direction;A deck able to accommodate a 1.5m wide pedestrian walkway;A design that would adhere to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official standard for a 100-year service life and offer HS-25 truck loading;A structure that could carry two 0.6m dianeter water lines;A construction method that would not cross the canal at any time or interrupt canal operationa in any way.Because of the bridge’s long main span and the potential for strong seismic activity in the area,no single building code covered all aspects of the project.Therefore the team from T.Y. Lin International determinded which portions of several standard bridge specifications were applicable and which were not.The following design codes were used in developing the design criteria for the bridge,it is standard specifications for highway bridge ,16th ed,1996It was paramount that the towers of the cable-stayed structucture be erected on land to avoid potential ship collision and the need to construct expensive deep foundation in water. However, geological maps and boring logs produced during the preliminary design phrase revealed that the east and west banks of the canal, where the towers were to be located, featured vastly different geologicaland soil conditions. On the east side of the canal, beneath shallow layers of overburden that rangs in consistency from soft to hard, lies a block of basalt ranging from medium hard to hard with very closely spaced joint.The engineers determined that the basalt would provide a competent platform for the construction of shallow foundation for tower, piers, and approach structures on this side of bridge.The west side, however,featured the infamous Cucaracha Formation, which is a heterogeneous conglomerate of clay shale with inclusions of sandstone, basalt,and ash that is prone to landslide. As a sudsurface stratum the Cucaracha Formation is quite stable,but it quickly erodes when exposed to the elements. The engineers determined that deep foundations would therefore be needed for the western approach structure,the west tower,and the western piers.Before a detailed design of the foundationa could be developed,a thorough analysis of the seismic hazards at the site was required,The design seismic load for the project was developed on the basis of a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment that considered the conditions at the site.Such an assessment establishes the return period for a given earthquake and the corresponding intensity of ground shaking in the horizontal directtion in terms of an acceleration response spectrum.The PSHA determined two dominant seismic sources: a subduction source zone associated with the North Panama Deformed Belt capable of producing a seimic event as strong as 7.7MW,and the Rio Gatun Fault, capable of producing an event as strong as 6.5MW.The 7.7MW NPDB event was used as the safety evluation earthquake,that is,the maximum earthquake that could strike without putting the bridge out of service.The damage to the bridge would be minor but would require some closures of the bridge.The 6.5MWRio Gatun Fault event was used as the foundational evaluation earthquake,a lower-level temblor that would cause minimal damage to the bridge and would not require closures.For the FEE load case,the SEE loading was scaled back by two-thirds.The FEE is assumed to have a peak acceleration of 0.21g and a return period of 500 years; the probability that it will be exceeded within 50 years is 10 pencent and within 100 years,18 persent.The SEE is assumed to have a peak acceleration of 1.33g and a return period of 2,500 years;the probability that it will be exceeded within 50 years is 2 pencent and within 100 years,4 persent.Because of uncertainty about the direction from which the seismic waves would approach the site, a single response spectrum-a curve showing the mathematically computed maximum response of a set of simple damped harmonic oscillators of different natural frequencies to a particular earthquake ground acceleration-was used to characterize mitions in two mutually orthogonal directions in the horizontal plane.To conduct a time-history analysis of the bridge’s multiple supports,a set of synthetic motions with three components-longitudinal,transverse,and vertical-was developd using an iterative technique.Recorded ground motions from an earthquake in Chile in 1985 were used as “seed”motions for the sythesis process.A time delay estimate-that is,an estimate of the time it would take for the motions generated by the SEEand FEE earthquakes to travel from one point to the next-was create using the assumed seismic wave velocity and the distance between the piers of the ing an assumed was velocity of approximately 2.5km/s,a delay on the order of half a second to a secondis appropriate for a bridge 1 to 2km long.Soil-foundation interaction studies were performed to determine the stiffness of the soil and foundation as well as the seismic excitation measurement that would be used in the dynamic analyses.The studieswere conducted by means of soil-pile models using linear and nonlinear soil layera of varying depths.The equivalent pile lengths in the studies-that is, the lengths representing the portions of a given pile that would actually be affected by a given earthquake-induced ground motion-ranged from2to10m.In such a three-dimensional model,there are six ways in which the soil can resist the movement of the lpile because of its stiffness:throngh axial force in the three directions and through bending moments in three directions.Because the bridge site contains so many layers of varying soil types,each layer had to be represented by a different stiffness matrix and then analyzed.Once the above analyses were completed,the T.Y.Lin International engineers-taking into consideration the project requirements developedby the owener-evaluated several different concrete cable-stayed designs.A number of structural systems were investigated,the main variables,superstructure cross sections,and the varying support conditions described above.The requirement that the evevation of the deck be quite high strongly influenced the tower configuration.For the proposed deck elevation of more than 80m,the most economical tower shapes included single-and dual-mast towers as well as “goal post”towers-that is,a design in which the two masts would be linked to each other by crossbeams.Ultimately the engineers designd the bridge to be 34.3m wide with a 420mlong cable-stayd main span,two 200mlong side spans-one on each side of the main span-and approach structures at the ends of the side spans.On the east side there is one 46m long concrete approach structure,while on the west side there are three,measuring 60,60,and 66m,for a total bridge length of 1,052m.The side spans are supported by four piers,referred to,from west to east,as P1.P2,P3,and P4.The bridge deck is a continuous single-cell box girder from abutment to abutment; the expansion joints are located at the abutments only. Deck movements on the order of 400 mm are expected at these modular expansion joints Multidirectional pot bearings are used at the piers and at the abutments to accommodate these movements.The deck was fixed to the two towers to facilitate the balanced-cantilevermethod of construction and to provide torsional rigidity and lateral restraint to the deck.. Transverse live loads, seismic loads, and wind loads are proportionally distributed to the towers and the piers by the fixity of the deck to the towers and by reinforced-concrete shear keys located at the top of P1, P3, and P4. The deck is allowed to move longitudinally over the abutments and piers. The longitudinal, seismic, live, and temperature loads are absorbed by what is known as portal frame structural behavior, whereby the towers and the deck form a portal-much like the frame of a door in a building-that acts in proportion to the relative stiffness of the two towers.As previously mentioned, the presence of competent basalt on the east side of the site meant that shallow foundations could be used there; in particular, spread footings were designed for the east tower, the east approach structure, and the east abutment. The west tower, the west approach structure, and the western piers (P2 and P3), however, had to be founded deep within the Cucaracha Formation. A total of 48 cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) shafts with 2 m outer diameters and lengths ranging from 25 to 35 m were required. A moment curvature analysis was performed to determine the capacity of the shafts with different amounts of longitudinal steel rebar. The results were plotted against the demands, and on the basis of the results the amount of required longitudinal reinforcing steel was determined to be 1 percent of the amount of concrete used in the shafts. The distribution of the longitudinal reinforcing steel was established by following code requirements, with consideration also given to the limitations of constructing CIDH piles with the contractor’s preferred method, which is the water or slurry displacement method.A minimum amount of transverse steel had to be determined for use in the plastic regions of the shaft-that is, those at the top one-eighth of eighth of each shaft and within the shaft caps, which would absorb the highest seismic demands. Once this amount was determined, it was used as the minimum for areas of the shafts above their points of fixity where large lateral displacements were expected to occur. The locations of the transverse steel were then established by following code requirements and by considering the construction limitations of CIDH piles. The transverse steel was spiral shaped.Even though thief foundation designs differed, the towers themselves were designed to be identical. Each measures 185.5 m from the top of its pile cap and is designed as a hollow reinforced-concrete shaft with a truncated elliptical cross section (see figure opposite). Each tower’s width in plan varies along its height, narrowing uniformly from 9.5 m at the base of the tower to 6 m at the top. In the longitudinal direction, each pylon tapers from 9.5 m at the base to about 8 m right below the deck level,which is about 87 m above the tower base. Above the deck level the tower’s sections vary from 4.6 m just above the deck to 4.5 m at the top. Each tower was designed with a 2 by 4 m opening for pedestrian passage along the deck, a design challenge requiring careful detailing.The towers were designed in a accordance with the latest provisions of the ATC earthquake design manual mentioned previously (ATC-32). Owing to the portal frame action along the bridge’s longitudinal axis, special seismic detailing was implemented in regions with the potential to develop plastic hinges in the event of seismic activity-specifically, just below the deck and above the footing. Special confining forces and alternating open stirrups-with 90 and 135 degree hooks-within the perimeter of the tower shaft.In the transverse direction, the tower behaves like a cantilever, requiring concrete-confining steel at its base. Special attention was needed at the joint between the tower and the deck because of the central-plane stay-cable arrangement, it was necessary to provide sufficient torsional stiffness and special detailing at the pier-to-deck intersection. This intersection is highly congested with vertical reinforcing steel, the closely spaced confining stirrups of the tower shaft, and the deck prestressing and reinforcement.The approach structures on either side of the main span are supported on hollow reinforced-concrete piers that measure 8.28 by 5 m in plan. The design and detailing of the piers are consistent with the latest versions of the ATC and AASHTO specifications for seismic design. Capacity design concepts were applied to the design of the piers. This approach required the use of seismic modeling with moment curvature elements to capture the inelastic behavior of elements during seismic excitation. Pushover analyses of the piers were performed to calculate the displacement capacity of the piers and to compare them with the deformations computed in the seismic time-history analyses. To ensure an adequate ductility of the piers-an essential feature of the capacity design approach-it was necessary to provide adequate concrete-confining steel at those locations within the pier bases where plastic hinges are expected to form.The deck of the cable-stayed main span is composed of single-cell box girders of cast-in-place concrete with internal, inclined steel struts and transverse posttensioned ribs, or stiffening beams, toward the tops. Each box girder segment is 4.5 m deep and 6 m long. To facilitate construction and enhance the bridge’s elegant design, similar sizes were used for the other bridge spans. An integral concrete overlay with a thickness of 350 mm was installed instead of an applied concrete overlayon the deck. In contrast to an applied overlay, the integral overlay was cast along with each segment during the deck erection. Diamond grinding equipment was used to obtain the desired surface profile and required smoothness. The minimum grinding depth was 5 mm.A total of 128 stay cables were used, the largest comprising 83 monostrands. All cables with a length of more than 80 m were equipped at their lower ends with internal hydraulic dampers. Corrosion protection for the monostrands involved galvanization of the wires through hot dipping, a tight high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sheath extruded onto each strand, and a special type of petroleum wax that fills all of the voids between the wires.The stays are spaecd every 6 m and are arranged in a fan pattern.They are designed to be stressed from the tower only and are anchored in line with a continuous stiffening beam at the centerline of the deck.The deck anchorage system is actually a composite steel frame that encapsulates two continous steel plates that anchor the stays and transfer the stay forces in a continuous and repetitive system-via shear studs-throuthout the extent of the cable-supported deck (see figure above).A steel frame was designed to transfer the stays’horizontal forces to the box girders through concrete-embedded longitudinal steel plates and to transfer the boxes’ vertical forces directly through the internal steel struts.This innovative and elegant load transfer system made rapid construction of the concrete deck segments-in cycles of three to five days-possible.In addition to the geotechnical and seismic analyses,several structural analyses were performed to accurately capture the behavior of this complex bridge.For the service-load analysis,which includes live,temperature,and wind loads,the engineers used SAP2000, a computer program created and maintained by Computers &Structrures,Inc.(CSI), of Berkeley, California.This program was selected for its ability to easily model the service loads and to account for tridimensional effects.For correct SAP2000 modeling, it was necessary to define a set of initial stresses on the cables, deck, and tower elements to capture the state of the structure at the end of construction.For the calculation of those initial stresses, a series of iterations on the basic model were performed to obtain the stay forces in the structure that balance both the bridges’s self-weight and the superimposed dead loads. Once the correct cable stiffness and stress distribution were obtained, all subsequent service-load analyses were performed to account for the geometric stiffness and P-deltaeffects, which consider the magnitude of an applied load (P) versus the displacement(delta).The seismic analysis of the structure was conducted using the SADSAP structural analysis program, also a CSI product, based on the differences in seismic motions that will be experienced at the different piers based on their distance from one another.This sophisticated program has the capability to model inelastic behavior in that flexural plastic hinges can readily be simulated.Plastic hinge elements were modeled at varous locations along the structure where the results from a preliminary response spectrum analysis in SAP2000 indicated that inelastic behavior might be expected.The time-history records pertaining to the site were used in conjunction with the SADSAP model to botain a performace-based design of the piers and towers and to verifh the design of several deck stctions.As previously mentioned,the construction contractor was brought on board early in the process;the company’s bid of $93 million was accepted and the project was awarded in March 2002.To guarantee unimpeded canal traffic,the bridge had to be constructed without the use of the canal waters.To accomplish this, the cast-in-place main-pain superstructure was erected using the balanced-cantilever method.Form travelers were used to accomplish this, and they were designed in such a way that they could be used as an integral part of the pier tables’falsework.After assembly on the ground, two 380 Mg form travelers were raised independently into the pier table casting position and connected to each other.After an initial learning period, the contractor was able to achieve a four-day cycle for the casting of the cantilevered deck segments, an achievement that greatly enhanced the ability of the team to construct the project on time.Once the side-span and mai-span closures were cast, the travelers had to be removed from locations adjacent to the towers rather than over water so as to avoid any influence on canal traffic.To save time, the towers approach structure, and piers were built simultaneously.The approach viaducts were designed and built using the span-by-span erection method by means of an underslung suupport truss.The east viaduct span was built first and the support truss was then removed and transferred to the west side so that it could be used to build the three spans of the west viaduct, one span at a time.The bridge construction was completeed in Auguse 2004 at a cost of approximately $2,780 per square meter.Its opening awaits the completion of the rest of the highway it serves.跨越世纪之桥1962年,横跨巴拿马运河的美国大桥作为仅有的固定连接开放交通车。

桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献

桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献

桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)BRIDGE ENGINEERING AND AESTHETICSEvolvement of bridge Engineering,brief reviewAmong the early documented reviews of construction materials and structu re types are the books of Marcus Vitruvios Pollio in the first century B.C.The basic principles of statics were developed by the Greeks , and were exemplifi ed in works and applications by Leonardo da Vinci,Cardeno,and Galileo.In the fifteenth and sixteenth century, engineers seemed to be unaware of this record , and relied solely on experience and tradition for building bridges and aqueduc ts .The state of the art changed rapidly toward the end of the seventeenth cent ury when Leibnitz, Newton, and Bernoulli introduced mathematical formulatio ns. Published works by Lahire (1695)and Belidor (1792) about the theoretical a nalysis of structures provided the basis in the field of mechanics of materials .Kuzmanovic(1977) focuses on stone and wood as the first bridge-building materials. Iron was introduced during the transitional period from wood to steel .According to recent records , concrete was used in France as early as 1840 for a bridge 39 feet (12 m) long to span the Garoyne Canal at Grisoles, but r einforced concrete was not introduced in bridge construction until the beginnin g of this century . Prestressed concrete was first used in 1927.Stone bridges of the arch type (integrated superstructure and substructure) were constructed in Rome and other European cities in the middle ages . Thes e arches were half-circular , with flat arches beginning to dominate bridge wor k during the Renaissance period. This concept was markedly improved at the e nd of the eighteenth century and found structurally adequate to accommodate f uture railroad loads . In terms of analysis and use of materials , stone bridges have not changed much ,but the theoretical treatment was improved by introd ucing the pressure-line concept in the early 1670s(Lahire, 1695) . The arch the ory was documented in model tests where typical failure modes were considered (Frezier,1739).Culmann(1851) introduced the elastic center method for fixed-e nd arches, and showed that three redundant parameters can be found by the us e of three equations of coMPatibility.Wooden trusses were used in bridges during the sixteenth century when P alladio built triangular frames for bridge spans 10 feet long . This effort also f ocused on the three basic principles og bridge design : convenience(serviceabili ty) ,appearance , and endurance(strength) . several timber truss bridges were co nstructed in western Europe beginning in the 1750s with spans up to 200 feet (61m) supported on stone substructures .Significant progress was possible in t he United States and Russia during the nineteenth century ,prompted by the ne ed to cross major rivers and by an abundance of suitable timber . Favorable e conomic considerations included initial low cost and fast construction .The transition from wooden bridges to steel types probably did not begin until about 1840 ,although the first documented use of iron in bridges was the chain bridge built in 1734 across the Oder River in Prussia . The first truss completely made of iron was in 1840 in the United States , followed by Eng land in 1845 , Germany in 1853 , and Russia in 1857 . In 1840 , the first ir on arch truss bridge was built across the Erie Canal at Utica .The Impetus of AnalysisThe theory of structures ,developed mainly in the ninetheenth century,foc used on truss analysis, with the first book on bridges written in 1811. The Wa rren triangular truss was introduced in 1846 , supplemented by a method for c alculating the correcet forces .I-beams fabricated from plates became popular in England and were used in short-span bridges.In 1866, Culmann explained the principles of cantilever truss bridges, an d one year later the first cantilever bridge was built across the Main River in Hassfurt, Germany, with a center span of 425 feet (130m) . The first cantileve r bridge in the United States was built in 1875 across the Kentucky River.A most impressive railway cantilever bridge in the nineteenth century was the Fir st of Forth bridge , built between 1883 and 1893 , with span magnitudes of 1711 feet (521.5m).At about the same time , structural steel was introduced as a prime mater ial in bridge work , although its quality was often poor . Several early exampl es are the Eads bridge in St.Louis ; the Brooklyn bridge in New York ; and t he Glasgow bridge in Missouri , all completed between 1874 and 1883.Among the analytical and design progress to be mentioned are the contrib utions of Maxwell , particularly for certain statically indeterminate trusses ; the books by Cremona (1872) on graphical statics; the force method redefined by Mohr; and the works by Clapeyron who introduced the three-moment equation s.The Impetus of New MaterialsSince the beginning of the twentieth century , concrete has taken its place as one of the most useful and important structural materials . Because of the coMParative ease with which it can be molded into any desired shape , its st ructural uses are almost unlimited . Wherever Portland cement and suitable agg regates are available , it can replace other materials for certain types of structu res, such as bridge substructure and foundation elements .In addition , the introduction of reinforced concrete in multispan frames at the beginning of this century imposed new analytical requirements . Structures of a high order of redundancy could not be analyzed with the classical metho ds of the nineteenth century .The importance of joint rotation was already dem onstrated by Manderla (1880) and Bendixen (1914) , who developed relationshi ps between joint moments and angular rotations from which the unknown mom ents can be obtained ,the so called slope-deflection method .More simplification s in frame analysis were made possible by the work of Calisev (1923) , who used successive approximations to reduce the system of equations to one simpl e expression for each iteration step . This approach was further refined and int egrated by Cross (1930) in what is known as the method of moment distributi on .One of the most import important recent developments in the area of analytical procedures is the extension of design to cover the elastic-plastic range , also known as load factor or ultimate design. Plastic analysis was introduced with some practical observations by Tresca (1846) ; and was formulated by Sa int-Venant (1870) , The concept of plasticity attracted researchers and engineers after World War Ⅰ, mainly in Germany , with the center of activity shifting to England and the United States after World War Ⅱ.The probabilistic approa ch is a new design concept that is expected to replace the classical determinist ic methodology.A main step forward was the 1969 addition of the Federal Highway Adim inistration (F HWA)”Criteria for Reinforced Concrete Bridge Members “ that co vers strength and serviceability at ultimate design . This was prepared for use in conjunction with the 1969 American Association of State Highway Offficials (AASHO) Standard Specification, and was presented in a format that is readil y adaptable to the development of ultimate design specifications .According to this document , the proportioning of reinforced concrete members ( including c olumns ) may be limited by various stages of behavior : elastic , cracked , an d ultimate . Design axial loads , or design shears . Structural capacity is the r eaction phase , and all calculated modified strength values derived from theoret ical strengths are the capacity values , such as moment capacity ,axial load ca pacity ,or shear capacity .At serviceability states , investigations may also be n ecessary for deflections , maximum crack width , and fatigue .Bridge TypesA notable bridge type is the suspension bridge , with the first example bu ilt in the United States in 1796. Problems of dynamic stability were investigate d after the Tacoma bridge collapse , and this work led to significant theoretica l contributions Steinman ( 1929 ) summarizes about 250 suspension bridges bu ilt throughout the world between 1741 and 1928 .With the introduction of the interstate system and the need to provide stru ctures at grade separations , certain bridge types have taken a strong place in bridge practice. These include concrete superstructures (slab ,T-beams,concrete box girders ), steel beam and plate girders , steel box girders , composite const ruction , orthotropic plates , segmental construction , curved girders ,and cable-stayed bridges . Prefabricated members are given serious consideration , while interest in box sections remains strong .Bridge Appearance and AestheticsGrimm ( 1975 ) documents the first recorded legislative effort to control t he appearance of the built environment . This occurred in 1647 when the Cou ncil of New Amsterdam appointed three officials . In 1954 , the Supreme Cou rt of the United States held that it is within the power of the legislature to de termine that communities should be attractive as well as healthy , spacious as well as clean , and balanced as well as patrolled . The Environmental Policy Act of 1969 directs all agencies of the federal government to identify and dev elop methods and procedures to ensure that presently unquantified environmenta l amentities and values are given appropriate consideration in decision making along with economic and technical aspects .Although in many civil engineering works aesthetics has been practiced al most intuitively , particularly in the past , bridge engineers have not ignored o r neglected the aesthetic disciplines .Recent research on the subject appears to lead to a rationalized aesthetic design methodology (Grimm and Preiser , 1976 ) .Work has been done on the aesthetics of color ,light ,texture , shape , and proportions , as well as other perceptual modalities , and this direction is bot h theoretically and empirically oriented .Aesthetic control mechanisms are commonly integrated into the land-use re gulations and design standards . In addition to concern for aesthetics at the sta te level , federal concern focuses also on the effects of man-constructed enviro nment on human life , with guidelines and criteria directed toward improving quality and appearance in the design process . Good potential for the upgradin g of aesthetic quality in bridge superstructures and substructures can be seen in the evaluation structure types aimed at improving overall appearance .Lords and lording groupsThe loads to be considered in the design of substructures and bridge foun dations include loads and forces transmitted from the superstructure, and those acting directly on the substructure and foundation .AASHTO loads . Section 3 of AASHTO specifications summarizes the loa ds and forces to be considered in the design of bridges (superstructure and sub structure ) . Briefly , these are dead load ,live load , iMPact or dynamic effec t of live load , wind load , and other forces such as longitudinal forces , cent rifugal force ,thermal forces , earth pressure , buoyancy , shrinkage and long t erm creep , rib shortening , erection stresses , ice and current pressure , collisi on force , and earthquake stresses .Besides these conventional loads that are ge nerally quantified , AASHTO also recognizes indirect load effects such as fricti on at expansion bearings and stresses associated with differential settlement of bridge components .The LRFD specifications divide loads into two distinct cate gories : permanent and transient .Permanent loadsDead Load : this includes the weight DC of all bridge components , appu rtenances and utilities, wearing surface DW nd future overlays , and earth fill EV. Both AASHTO and LRFD specifications give tables summarizing the unit weights of materials commonly used in bridge work .Transient LoadsVehicular Live Load (LL) Vehicle loading for short-span bridges :considera ble effort has been made in the United States and Canada to develop a live lo ad model that can represent the highway loading more realistically than the H or the HS AASHTO models . The current AASHTO model is still the applica ble loading.桥梁工程和桥梁美学桥梁工程的发展概况早在公元前1世纪,Marcus Vitrucios Pollio 的著作中就有关于建筑材料和结构类型的记载和评述。

桥梁的作文

桥梁的作文

桥梁的作文英文回答:Bridges are remarkable feats of engineering thatconnect people, places, and economies. They span rivers, valleys, and other obstacles, enabling transportation, trade, and communication.Bridges are designed to withstand various loads and environmental factors. They must be strong enough tosupport their own weight, as well as the weight of vehicles, pedestrians, and other forces. Bridges must also be able to resist wind, rain, snow, and other elements.The design of a bridge depends on several factors, including the span length, the type of traffic it will carry, and the environmental conditions it will be exposed to. Bridges can be classified into several types, including beam bridges, arch bridges, suspension bridges, and cable-stayed bridges.Beam bridges are the most common type of bridge. They consist of a horizontal beam supported by piers or abutments. Arch bridges are characterized by their curved shape, which helps distribute the weight of the bridge. Suspension bridges are supported by cables that are suspended from towers. Cable-stayed bridges are similar to suspension bridges, but they use cables that are anchored to the deck of the bridge.Bridges are essential infrastructure components that play a vital role in facilitating transportation, trade, and economic development. They are also iconic structures that can enhance the beauty and character of a city or landscape.中文回答:桥梁是卓越的工程壮举,它连接着人、地方和经济。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

毕业设计(论文)外文资料翻译系别:专业:班级:姓名:学号:外文出处:土木工程网附件: A.英文文献; B. 译文附录A英文文献BridgesBridges are great symbols of mankind’s conquest of space.The sight of the crimson tracery of the Golden Gate Bridge against a setting sun in the Pacific Ocean, or the atch of the Garabit Biaduct soaring triumphantly above the deep gorge. Fills one’s heart with wonder and admiration for the art of their builders[11]. They are the enduring expressions of mankind’s determination to remove all barriers in its pursuit of a better and freer world. Their design and building schemes are conceived in dream-like bisions. But vision and determination are not enough. All the physical forces of nature and gravity must be understood with mathematical precision and such forces have to be resisted by manipulating the right materials in the right pattern. This requires both the inspiration of an artist and the skill of an artisan.Scientific knowledge about materials and structural behavior has expanded tremendously, and computing techniques are now widely available to manipulate complex theories in innumerable ways very quickly. Engineers have virtually revolutionized bridge design and construction methods in the past decade. The advances apply to short-medium and long-span bridges.For permanent bridge,the most commonly used materials are steel and concrete. Bridge of many different type are built with these materials, used singly or in combination. Timber may be used for temporary above-water construction, for the elements of a structure that lie below the waterline (particularly timber pile s), or for short-span bridges located on secondary roads. A few short-span aluminum bridges have been built in the United States on an experimental basis.The principal portions of a bridge may be said to be the “substructure” and the “superstructure.” This division is used here simply for convenience, since in many bridges there is no clear dividing lint between the two.Common elements of the substructure are abutments (usually at the bridge ends) and piers (between the abutments).Piers and abutments often rest on separately constructed foundations such as concrete spread footings or groups of bearing piles;these foundations are part of the substructure. Occasionally a bridge substructure comprises a series of pile bents in which the piles extend above the waterline and are topped by a pile cap that, in turn, supports the major structural elements of the superstructure. Such bents often are used in arepetitive fashion as part of along, low, over-water crossing.In recent years, the dividing lines between short-medium and long-span bridge have blurred somewhat. Currently, spans of 20 to 100 ft (6.1 to 30.5m) are regarded as short by many designers, who have developed many standardized designs to handle these spans economically. Medium spans range up to, per-haps, 400ft (121.9m) in modern bridge practice, depending on the organization involved and the materials used. Long spans range up to 4000ft (1219.2m) or more, but a clear span above 1000ft (304.8m)is comparatively rare.In the United States, highway bridges generally must meet loading, design, and construction requirements of the AASHTO Specification. The design and construction of railway bridges are governed by provisions of the AREA Manual for Railway Engineering. Design requirements for pedestrian crossings and bridges serving other purposes may be established by local or regional codes and specifications. ACI Code provisions are often incorporated by reference, and in most cases serve as model provisions for other governing documents.Bridge spans to about 100 ft often consist of pre-cast integral-deck units. These units offer low initial cost, minimum maintenance, and fast easy constrction, with traffic interruption. Such girders are generally pretensioned, the units are placed side by side, and are often post-tensioned laterally at intermediate diaphragm lacations, After which shear keys between adjacent units are filled with non-shrinking mortar. For highway spans, an asphalt wearing surface may be applied directly to the top of the pre-cast concrete. In some cases, a cast-in-place slab is placed to provide composite action.For medium-span highway bridges, to about 120 ft, AASHTO standard I beams are generally used. he are intended for use with a composite cast-in-place roadway slab. Such girders often combine pre-tensioning of the pre-cast member withpost-tensioning of the composite beam after the deck is placed.Pre-cast girders may not be used for spans much in excess of 120 ft because of the problems of transporting and erecting large, heavy units. On the other hand, there is a clear trend toward the use of longer spans for bridges. Highway safety is improved by eliminating central piers and moving outer piers away from the edge of divided highways. For elevated urban expressways, long spans facilitate access and minimize obstruction to activities below. Concern for environmental damage has led to the choice of long spans for continuous viaducts. For river crossing, intermediate piers may be impossible because of requirements of navigational clearance.Such requirements have led to the development in Europe, and more recently in the western hemisphere, of long span segmental pre-stressed concrete box girder bridges. In typical construction of this type, piers are cast-in-place, often using the slip-forming technique. A “hammerhead” section of box girder is then cast at the top of the pier, and construction proceeds in each direction by the balanced cantilever method. The construction is advanced using either cast-in-place or pre-cast segments, each post-tensioned to the previously completed construction. Finally, after the closing cast-in-place joint is made at mid-span, the structure is further post-tensioned for full continuity.Bridge may also be classed as “deck” or “through” types. In the deck type of bridge, the roadway is above the supporting structure; that is, the load-carrying elements of the superstructure are below the roadway. In the through type of bridge, the roadway passes between the elements of the super-structure, as in a through steel-truss bridge. Deck structures predominate: they have a clean appearance, provide the motorist with a better view of the surrounding area, and are easier to widen if future traffic requires it.Examples of short-span concrete bridges include cast-in-lace, reinforced concrete beam (and slab);simple-span, pre-stressed (this type incorporates pre-cast, pre-stressed I-girders or box girders topped by a cast-in-place deck);and cast-in place box girder.The designer of each medium-and long-span bridge tries to devise a structurethat is best suited to the conditions encountered at that particular location. The result is an almost bewildering variety of structures that differ either in basic design principles or in design details.General categories of steel bridge are briefly described in the following paragraphs.Girder bridges come in two basic varieties-plate and box girders.Plate girders are used in the United States for medium spans. They generally are continuous structures with maximum depth of girder over the piers and minimum depth at mid-span. The plate girders generally have an I cross section; they are arranged in lines that support stringers, floor-beams, and, generally, a cast-in-lace concrete deck. The girders are shop-fabricated by welding; field connections generally are by high-strength bolts.Welded-steel box girder structures are generally similar to plate girder spans except for the configuration of the bridge cross section.Rigid frames are used occasionally, most often for spans in the range of 75 to 100 ft (22.9 to 30.5 m) and for grade0separation structures.Arch bridges are used for longer spans at locations where intermediate piers cannot be used and where good rock is available to withstand the thrusts at the arch abutments.Variations in the arch bridge are specially suited in the span range of 200 to 500m and thus provide a transition between the continuous box girder bridge and the stiffened suspension cable. The cables provided above the deck and connected to the towers would permit elimination of intermediate piers facilitating a larger width for purposes of navigation. Because of the damping effect of inclined cables, the cable-stayed decks are less prone to wind-induced oscillations than suspension bridges.Suspension bridges are used for very long spans or for shorter spans where intermediate piers cannot be built. An example is the Verrazano Narrows Bridge which was completed in 1964.The $305 million,4260ft(1298.5m)structure spans the entrance to New York Harbor to join Staten Island and Brooklyn.Concrete bridges come in nearly as great a variety as do steel bridges.The bridge construction in France benefits by a strong growth in rail and highway infrastructures. For the time being the competition with other material turns to the advantage of composite bridge solutions. Before presenting any features concerning the recent trends in composite bridge design it is important to clarify, the bridge market, through the analysis of some statistical data.In France, there is a very limited market for long span bridges. In the recent construction, the demand for bridges of span length higher than 200m is rather exceptional. The main market is for bridges of span length (or multi span length) less than 100m.In France 800 to 1200 bridges are built every year, which represent about 300,000m to 500,000m of deck surface. However the majority of bridges being erected each year are of small span length. Less than 10% of the bridge patrimony have span. Length greater than 30m and deck surface greater than 1000 m2. Now that the market has been identified lets have an idea, in term of competitiveness, of the French market situation between several bridge types. In 1977 less than 2.5%.Of bridges were steel or composite bridges. The steel-concrete composite construction has continued to grow steadily over the last 15 years. This trend is mainly attributable to the gain in competitiveness of composite bridges against reinforcedand prestressed concrete bridges.For short span length the majority of steel bridges is of concrete type. Bridges composed of steel beams encased in concrete are very often used for railway bridges of small span length in order to meet stiffness requirements.The recent statistical evaluation, performed by SETRA [1] on the bridges recently built in France between 1990 to 1993 by various owners (State, Highway concession companies, Departments and Communities, SNCF) shows that the competitive span length range for steel and concrete composite bridges is between 30 and 110 m with a very distinctive peak for the interval 60 to 80 m. In that range of spans length it is noticed that 85% of bridges being built belong to the composite category (Fig. 4).The statistical analysis of the deck cost per square metre of surface confirms that the average price for a composite bridge is less than the price for a concrete bridge for spans length within intervals of 40 to 60 m and 60 to 80 m. The difference being of 1 500 FF/m2 over a total cost of 8 200 FF/m2 (VAT excluded) in favour of the composite bridge. It means that an 18% cost difference represents a great shift in terms of competition.The last 15 years have seen a great simplification of composite bridges for both roadway and railway bridges, which have made them, as previously indicated, very competitive compared to prestressed and reinforced bridges. These composite bridges, that we will name them as classical, have however several features which are described hereafter. Then, from these classical features, improvements have been constantly brought to the design and execution of composite bridges, which will be depicted later on.The traditional composite roadway bridge is composed of two longitudinal girders which are connected to the concrete slab by shear connectors (usually welded stud are mostly met; however steel angle connectors are still used). A limited number of transverse cross beams joining the two longitudinal girders, usually not connected to the slab — see half cross section (a) are welded to the vertical stiffeners. The main girders have a few numbers of horizontal stiffeners, if any which are mostly needed to resist the stress state in the girder webs occurring at the launching phase.Plain concrete is formed form a hardened mixture of cement, water, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate (crushed stone or gravel), air, and often other admixtures. The plastic mix is placed and consolidated in the formwork, then cured to facilitate the acceleration of the chemical hydration reaction of the cement/water mix, resulting in hardened concrete. The finished product has high compressive strength, and low resistance to tension, such that its tensile strength is approximately one-tenth of its compressive strength. Consequently, tensile and shear reinforcement in the tensile regions of sections has to be provided to compensate for the weak-tension regions in the reinforced concrete element.It is this deviation in the composition of a reinforced concrete section from thehomogeneity of standard wood or steel sections that requires a modified approach to the basic principles of structural design. The two components f the heterogeneous reinforced concrete section are to be so arranged and proportioned that optimal use is made of the materials involved. That is possible because concrete can easily be given any desired shape by placing and compacting the wet mixture of the constituent ingredients into suitable forms in which the plastic mass hardens. If the various ingredients are properly proportioned, the finished product becomes strong, durable, and, in combination with the reinforcing bars, adaptable for use as main members of any structural system.The techniques necessary for placing concrete depend on the type of member to be cast: that is, whether it is a column, a beam, a wall, a slab, a foundation, amass concrete dam, or an extension of previously placed and hardened concrete. For beams, columns, and walls, the forms should be well oiled after cleaning them, and the reinforcement earth should be compacted and thoroughly moistened to about 6 in. in depth to avoid absorption of the moisture present in the wet concrete. Concrete should always be placed in horizontal layers which are compacted by means of high-prequency power-driven vibrators of either the immersion or external type, as the case requires, unless it is placed by pumping. It must be kept in mind, however, that over vibration can be harmful since it could cause segregation of the aggregate and bleeding of the concrete.Hydration of the cement takes place in the presence of moisture at temperatures above F50. It is necessary to maintain such a condition in order that the chemical hydration reaction can take place. If drying is too rapid, surface cracking takes place. This would result in reduction of concrete strength due to cracking as well as the failure to attain full chemical hydration.It is clear that a large number of parameters have to be dealt with in proportioning a reinforced concrete element, such as geometrical width, depth, area of reinforcement, steel strain, concrete strain, steel strees, and so on. Consequently, trial and adjustment is necessary in the choice of concrete sections, with assumptionsbased on conditions at site, availability of the constituent materials, particular demands of the owners, architectural and headroom requirements, the applicable codes, and environmental conditions. Such an array of parameters has to be considered because of the fact that reinforced concrete is often a site-constructed composite, in contrast to the standard mill-fabricate beam and column sections in steel structures.A trial section has to be chosen for each critical location in a structural system. The trial section has to be analyzed to determine if its nominal resisting strength is adequate to carry the applied factored load. Since more than one trial is often necessary to arrive at the required section, the first design input step generates into a series of trial-and-adjustment analyses.The trial-and-adjustment procedures for the choice of a concrete section lead to the convergence of analysis and design. Hence every design is an analysis once a trial section is chosen. The availability of approach as a more efficient, compact, and speedy instructional method compared with the traditional approach of treating the analysis of reinforced concrete separately from pure design.The rapid growth from 1945 onwards in the prestressing of concrete shows that there was a real need for this high-quality material. The quality must be high because the worst conditions of loading normally occur at the beginning of the life of the member, at the transfer of stress later, when the concrete has become stronger and the stress in the steel has decreased because of creep in the steel and the concrete, and shrinkage of the concrete. Faulty members are therefore observed and thrown out early, before they enter the structure, or at least before it becomes inconvenient and expensive to remove them.The main advantages of prestressed concrete in comparison with reinforced concrete are:(a) The whole concrete cross-section resists load. In reinforced concrete about half the section, the cracked area below the neutral axis, does no useful work. Working deflections are smaller.(b) High working stresses are possible. In reinforced concrete they are notusually possible because hey result in severe cracking which is always ugly and may be dangerous if it causes rusting of the steel.(c) Cracking is almost completely avoided in prestressed concrete.The main disadvantage of prestressed concrete is that much more care is needed to make it than reinforced concrete and it is therefore more expensive, but because it is of higher quality less of it needs to be used.It can therefore happen that a solution of a structural problem may be cheaper in prestressed concrete than in reinforced concrete, and it does often happen that a solution is possible with prestressing but impossible without it.Prestressing of the concrete means that it is placed under compression before it carries any working load. This means that the section can be designed so that it takes no tension or very little under the full design load. It therefore has theoretically no cracks and in practice the concrete in which it is embedded has hardened. After the concrete has hardened enough to take the stress from the steel, some of the stress is transferred from the steel to the concrete. In a bridge with abutments able to resist thrust, the prestress can be applied without steel in the concrete. It is applied by jacks forcing the bridge inwards from the abutments. This method has the advantage that the jacking force, or prestress, can be varied during the life of the structure as required.In the ten years from 1950 to 1960 prestressed concrete ceased to be an experimental material and engineers won confidence in its use. With this confidence came an increase in the use of precast prestressed concrete particularly for long-span floors or the decks of motorways. Wherever the 500 m long, provided that most of the spans could be made the same and not much longer than 18 m, it became economical to use factory-precast prestressed beams, at least in industrial areas near a precasting factory. Most of these beams are heat-cured so as to free the forms quickly or reuse.In this period also, in the United States, precast prestressed roof beams and floor beams were used in many school buildings, occasionally 32 m long or more. Such long beams over a single span could not possibly be successful in reinforced concrete unless they were cast on site because they would have to be much deeper and muchheavier than prestressed concrete beams. They would certainly be less pleasing to the eye and often more expensive than the prestressed concrete beams. These school buidings have a strong, simple architectural appeal and will be a pleasure to look at for many years.The most important parts of a precast prestressed concrete beam are the tendons and the concrete. The tendons, as the name implies, are the cables, rods or wires of steel which are under tension in the concrete. Before the concrete has hardened (before transfer of stress), the tendons are either unstressed (post-tensioned prestressing) or are stressed and held by abutments outside the concrete (pre-tensioned prestressing). While the concrete is hardening it grips each tendon more and more tightly by bond along its full length. End anchorages consisting of plates or blocks are placed on the ends of the tendons of post-tensioned prestressed units, and such tendons are stressed up at the time of transfer, when the concrete has hardened sufficiently. In the other type of presstressing, with pre-tensioned tondons, the tendons are released from external abutments at the moment of transfer, and act on the concrete through bond or anchorage or both, shortening it by compression, and themselves also shortening and losing some tension.Further shortening of the concrete (and therefore of the steel) takes place with time. The concrete is said to creep. This means that it shortens permanently under load and spreads the stresses more uniformly and thus more safely across its section. Steel also creeps, but rather less. The result of these two effects (and of the concrete shrinking when it dries) is that prestressed concrete beams are never more highly stressed than at the moment of transfer.The factory precasting of long prestressed concrete beams is likely to become more and more popular in the future, but one difficulty will be road transport. As the length of the beam increases, the lorry becomes less and less manoeuvrable until eventually the only suitable time for it to travel is in the middle of the night when traffic is at a minimum. The limit of length for road transport varies tith the traffic in the district and the route, whether the roads are straight or curved. Precasting at the site avoids these difficulties; it may be expensive, but it has often been used for largebridge beams.Materials for building must have certain physical properties to be structurally useful. Primarily, they must be able to carry a load, or weight, without changing shape per- manently. When a load is applied to a structure member, it will deform; that is, a wire will stretch or a beam will bend. However, when the load is removed, the wire and the beam come back to the original positions. This material property is called elasticity. If a material were not elastic and a deformation were present in the structure after removal of the load, repeated loading and unloading eventually would increase the deformation to the point where the structure would become useless .All materials used in architect- tural structures, such as stone and brick, wood, steel, aluminum, reinforced concrete, and plastics, behave elastically within a certain defined range of loading. If the loading is increased above the range, two types of behavior can occur: brittle and plastic. In the former, the material will break suddenly. In the latter, the material begins to flow at a certain load (yield strength), ultimately leading to fracture. As examples, steel exhibits plastic behavior, and stone is brittle. The ultimate strength of a material is measured by the stress at which failure (fracture) occurs.A second important property of a building material is its stiffness. This property is defined by the elastic modulus, which is the ratio of the stress (force per unit area), to the strain (deformation per unit length). The elastic modulus, therefore, is a measure of the resistance of a material to deformation under load. For two materials of equal area under the same load, the one with the higher elastic modulus has the smaller deforma- tion. Structural steel, which has an elastic modulus of 30 million pounds per square in- ch (psi), or 2 100 000 kilograms per square centimeter, is 3 time as stiff as aluminum, 10 times as stiff as concrete, and 15 times as stiff as wood.Masonry consists of natural materials, such as stone, or manufactured products, such as brick and concrete blocks. Masonry has been used since ancient times; mud bricks were used in the city of Babylon for secular buildings, and stone was used for the great temples of the Nile Valley. The Great Pyramid in Egypt, standing 481 feet (147 meters) high, is the most spectacular masonry construction. Masonry units origin- nally were stacked without using any bonding agent, but all modern masonryconstruc- tion uses a cement mortar as a bonding material. Modern structural materials include stone, brick of burnt clay or slate, and concrete blocks.Masonry is essentially a compressive material; it cannot withstand a tensile force, that is, a pull. The ultimate compressive strength of bonded masonry depends on the strength of the masonry unit and the mortar. The ultimate strength will vary from 1 000 to 4 000 psi (70 to 280 kg/sq cm), depending on the particular combination of masonry unit and mortar used.Timber is one of the earliest construction materials and one of the few natural ma- terials with good tensile properties. Hundreds of different species of wood are found throughout the world, and each species exhibits different physical characteristics. Only a few species are used structurally as framing members in building construction. In the United States, for instance, out of more than 600 species of wood, only 20 species are used structurally. These are generally the conifers, or softwoods, both because of their abundance and because of the ease with which their wood can be shaped. The species of timber more commonly used in the United States for construction are Douglas fir, Southern pine, sqruce, and redwood. The ultimate tensile strength of these species varies from 5 000 to 8 000 psi (350 to 560 kg/sq cm). Hardwoods are used primarily for cabinetwork and for interior finishes such as floors.Because of the cellular nature of wood, it is stronger along the grain than across the grain. Wood is particularly strong in tension and compression parallel to the grain. And it has great bending strength. These properties make it ideally suited for columns and beams in structures. Wood is not effectively used as a tensile member in a truss, however, because the tensile strength of a truss member depends upon connections between members. It is difficult to devise connections which do not depend on the shear or tearing strength along the grain, although numerous metal connectors have been produced to utilize the tensile strength of timbers.Steel is an outstanding structural material. It has a high strength on a pound-for- pound basis when compared to other materials, even though its volume-for-volume weight is more than ten times that of wood. It has a high elastic modulus, which results in small deformations under load. It can be formed by rolling into variousstructural shapes such as I-beams, plates, and sheets; it also can be cast into complex shapes; and it is also produced in the form of wire strands and ropes for use as cables in suspension bridges and suspended roofs, as elevator ropes, and as wires for prestressing concrete. Steel elements can be joined together by various means, such as bolting, riveting, or welding. Carbon steels are subject to corrosion through oxidation and must be protected from contact with the atmosphere by painting them or embedding them in concrete. Above temperatures of about 700F (3710C), steel rapidly loses its strength, and there- fore it must be covered in a jacket of a fireproof material (usually concrete) to increase its fire resistance.The addition of alloying elements, such as silicon or manganese, results in higher strength steels with tensile strengths up to 250 000 psi (17 500 kg/sq cm). These steels are used where the size of a structural member becomes critical, as in the case of co- lumns in a skyscraper.Aluminum is especially useful as a building material when lightweight, strength, and corrosion resistance are all important factors. Because pure aluminum is extremely soft and ductile, alloying elements, such as magnesium, silicon, zinc, and copper, must be added to it to impart the strength required for structural use. Structural aluminum alloys behave elastically. They have an elastic modulus one third as great as steel and therefore deform three times as much as steel under the same load. The unit weight of an aluminum alloy is one third that of steel, and therefore an aluminum member will be lighter than a steel member of comparable strength. The ultimate tensile strength of aluminum alloys ranges from 20 000 to 60 000 psi (1 400 to 4 200 kg/sq cm).Aluminum can be formed into a variety of shapes; it can be extruded to form I- beams, drawn to form wire and rods, and rolled to form foil and plates. Aluminum members can be put together in the same way as steel by riveting, bolting, and (to a lesser extent) by welding. Apart from its use for framing members in buildings and prefabricated housing, aluminum also finds extensive use for window frames and for the skin of the building in curtain-wall construction.Concrete is a mixture of water, sand and gravel, and portland cement. Crushed。

相关文档
最新文档