投稿过程中常见的英文

英语作文关于投稿经常用的句子

英语作文关于投稿经常用的句子Sure, here are some common sentences used when submitting a manuscript or article for publication:
1. Thank you for considering my manuscript for publication.
2. I believe that my article would be a great fit for your publication.
3. I have attached my manuscript for your review.
4. I would appreciate any feedback or suggestions for improvement.
5. I am excited about the possibility of having my work published in your esteemed journal.
6. Please let me know if there are any specific formatting or submission guidelines that I need to follow.
当投稿时，常用的句子包括：
1. 感谢您考虑发表我的稿件。

2. 我相信我的文章会很适合发表在您的刊物上。

3. 我已经附上了我的稿件供您审阅。

4. 我会感激任何反馈或改进建议。

5. 我对我的作品有可能在贵刊上发表感到非常兴奋。

6. 请告诉我是否有任何特定的格式或投稿指南需要遵循。

投稿常用语

一、投稿时的Cover latter1). Here within enclosed is our paper for consideration to be published on "(Journal name)".The further information about the paper is in the following:The Title: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXThe Authors: XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXThe authors claim that none of the material in the paper has been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere.I am the corresponding author and my address and other information is as follows:Address: Department of XXXXXXXXX,College of Chemistry and Enviromental Science, Henan Normal UniversityXinxiang City, Henan Province, 453007,P.R.ChinaE-mail:Tel: +86-XXX-XXXXXXXFax: +86-XXX-XXXXXXXThank you very much for consideration!Sincerely Yours,Dr. XXX2). Dear Dr. A:I am sending a manuscript entitled “ ” by –which I should like to submit for possiblepublication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely3). Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.4). Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the ref eree’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have s tudied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concern ing Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees本贴摘自地址：/viewthread.php?tid=4708投稿ＳＣＩ，需经历哪些状态才发表，请看－学术期刊投稿术语解释-第一次投稿必看★★melody(金币+2,VIP+0):3x满意不要忘记评价一下啊1. Submitted to Journal刚提交的状态2. Manuscript received by Editorial Office就是你的文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功3. With editor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。

论文投稿的十种状态

以下是英文投稿过程中的十种状态，楼主已经走到第4步了。
1. Submitted to Journal
当上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal，这个状态是自然形成的无需处理。
2. With editor
如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那里，主编会分派给别的编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态：
① Editor assigned 编辑分派
② Editor Declined Invitation 编辑拒绝邀请，这时主编不得不将投稿文章重新分派给其它编辑。
3. Reviewer(s) invited
说明编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。有时该过程会持续很长时间，如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找到合适的审稿人，这时投稿者可以向编辑推荐审稿人。
7. Minor revision/Major revision
小修/大修，这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，因为有修改就有可能。具体怎么改就不多说了，谦虚谨慎是不可少的（因为修改后一般会再发给审稿人看，所以一定要细心的回答每一个审稿人的每一个问题，态度要谦逊，要让审稿人觉得他提不能修改的给出理由，而且都要列出来，文章的哪一段哪一行修改了最好都说出来，记住：给审稿人减少麻烦就是给你自己减少麻烦！另注：有时，审稿人会在修改意见里隐讳里说出要你仔细阅读某几篇文献，这时可要注意了，其中某些文章可能就是评审者自己发表的，这时你最好在你的修改稿中加以引用），修改后被拒绝的例子也多不胜数的。
8. Revision Submitted to Journal
修改后重新提交，等待编辑审理。
9. Accepted
如果不要再审，只是小修改，编辑看后会马上显示这个状态，但如果要再审也会有上面的部分状态。一步会比较快，但也有慢的。看杂志的。

SCI论文投稿常见状态

SCI论文投稿常见状态1. Submitted to Journal 刚提交的状态2. Manuscript received by Editorial Office 就是你的文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功3. With editor 如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。

这当中就会有另两个状态：（1）.Awaiting Editor Assignment指派责任编辑Editor assigned是把你的文章分给一个编辑处理了。

（2）.technical check in progress 检查你的文章符不符合期刊投稿要求（3）.Editor Declined Invitation 如果编辑接手处理了就会邀请审稿人了。

4. 随后也会有2种状态（1）. Decision Letter Being Prepared 就是编辑没找审稿人就自己决定了，那根据一般经验，对学生来说估计会挂了1）英文太差，编辑让修改。

2）内容太差，要拒了。

除非大牛们直接被接收。

（2）. Reviewer(s) invited 找到审稿人了，就开始审稿5. Under review这应该是一个漫长的等待。

当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。

如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。

6. Required Reviews Completed审稿人的意见已上传，审稿结束，等待编辑决定7. Evaluating Recommendation评估审稿人的意见，随后你将收到编辑给你的decision8. Minor revision/Major revision这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，问题不大了，因为有修改就有可能。

具体怎么改就不多说了，谦虚谨慎是不可少的。

9. Revision Submitted to Journal 又开始了一个循环。

10. Accepted 恭喜了11. Transfer copyright form 签版权协议12. uncorrected proof 等待你校对样稿13. In Press, Corrected Proof 文章在印刷中，且该清样已经过作者校对14. Manuscript Sent to Production 排版15 in production 出版中另外的一些常见英文词汇：minor revision小修，这个基本上是接收了，但是要按要求做一些修改major revision大修，文章要做大的修改，文章要增加或是删除部分内容。

英文投稿里的classification

英文投稿里的classification在英文投稿中，"classification" 通常指的是对文章或研究的分类。

它是将文章或研究按照特定的标准或主题进行归类的过程。

分类有助于读者更好地理解文章的内容和特点，并方便学术期刊或数据库对文章进行组织和索引。

在投稿时，作者通常需要选择一个或多个合适的分类来描述他们的文章。

这些分类通常是由学术期刊或数据库提供的，并且会根据不同的学科领域和研究主题进行划分。

常见的分类包括但不限于：1. 学科领域：如计算机科学、生物学、医学、社会学等。

2. 研究方法：如实证研究、理论研究、案例研究等。

3. 研究主题：如人工智能、机器学习、数据挖掘、健康科学等。

通过选择适当的分类，作者可以确保他们的文章被正确地归类，并提高被目标读者发现和阅读的机会。

同时，分类也有助于学术交流和知识的组织。

在英文投稿中，常用的缩写有很多，以下是一些常见的缩写：1. et al.：表示“等人”或“等”，用于引用多作者的文献。

2. i.e.：表示“即”或“也就是说”，用于解释或澄清某个概念。

3. e.g.：表示“例如”，用于举例说明。

4. etc.：表示“等等”，用于表示未列出的其他事物。

5. vs.：表示“与……相对”或“与……相比”，用于比较两个事物。

6. Ltd.：表示“有限公司”，用于公司名称中。

7. Inc.：表示“股份有限公司”，用于公司名称中。

8. Dr.：表示“博士”，用于称呼拥有博士学位的人。

9. Mr.：表示“先生”，用于称呼男性。

10. Ms.：表示“女士”，用于称呼女性，无论其婚姻状况如何。

11. Prof.：表示“教授”，用于称呼教授或其他高级学术职位的人。

12. Fig.：表示“图”，用于指代插图或图表。

13. Table：表示“表”，用于指代表格。

14. Abbreviation：表示“缩写”，用于表示缩写词或缩写形式。

这些缩写在英文投稿中经常使用，但具体使用情况可能因学科领域、期刊要求等因素而有所不同。

英文投稿常用(自己收集、整理、总结)

英文投稿常用信件1、Covering latter（附信，一般是作为单独文档提交）Covering letter 经常是国外求职者简历里的一部分，一般在求职信中简要介绍自己的情况，以及你要申请的职位。

在投稿时主要是介绍一下文章的整体情况，要求短小精悍，应该包括题目，署名作者及次序，文章类别，要说明说所有作者都同意在该刊物发表，并强调之前未被其他刊物发表或者录用；还有一点很重要，要强调文章的可读性（即使自己觉得没什么也要写的稍微玄乎点，老外看法和中国专家不太一样）；最后就是要说明联系作者的联系方式，并感谢。

下面是自己投稿的实例（也是在找到其他前辈的资料后改进的）Dear Editor and Reviewer,This is a manuscript entitled “Y our manuscript’s title”by Yan Wei, *** ***,*** ****,……. It is submitted to be considered for publication a s an “Article”in your journal.All authors have read and approved this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. Neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere. It is not being submitted to any other journal.We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal as （as 后写你的文章能够吸引读者的原因）it is the first time investigating the……and put forward some new ideas. (后面可以再写1,2点新意)Correspondence should be addressed to Yan Wei at the following address, phone and fax number, and email address.Fuxue road 18#,Changping District,Beijing,China.102249(Faculty of Petroleum Engineering ,China University of Petroleum,Beijing)Phone:+86 ***********Fax number:+86 010********Email address:yanwei289@(我的邮箱，大家有什么好的材料希望一并分享)Thank you very much for your attention to our paper.Sincerely yours,2、Research Highlights（文章亮点，一般是作为单独文档提交）Research Highlights of “your manuscript’s title”Dear Editors and reviewer,This paper entitled “your manuscript’s title”,and it has three research highlights:亮点实际上就是将摘要和结论的一些语句综合起来提炼个三四点左右。

投稿过程中常见的英文

以下总结的是投稿过程中常见的英文（上传者注：来源于卓虎学术）1．Cover Letter 投稿信，一般包括一段文字，说明文章的重要性2．Submitted to Journal 刚提交的状态3．Manuscript received by Editorial Office 或者Notification of Manuscript Receipt就是你的文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功4．With editor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。

这当中就会有另两个状态：3.1 Awaiting Editor Assignment指派责任编辑Editor assigned是把文章分给一个编辑处理。

3.2. Editor Declined Invitation 如果编辑接手处理了就会邀请审稿人了。

5．The Editors have determined that your manuscript does not fall within the scope of the journal.在编辑的初步筛选就没通过了。

6．随后也会有2种状态4.1. Decision Letter Being Prepared 如果投稿后很快就出现这个状态，就是编辑不找审稿人就自己决定了，一般来说，可能是：1）英文太差，编辑让修改。

2）内容太差，要拒了。

4.2. Reviewer(s) invited /with referees文章已经交给审稿人审稿了。

7．Under review 这应该是一个漫长的等待。

当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。

如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。

8．Required Reviews Completed 审稿人的意见已上传，审稿结束，等待编辑决定9．Evaluating Recommendation 评估审稿人的意见，随后你将收到编辑给你的decision 10．Revision and subsequent reevaluation of the manuscript 有机会修改总是好事！一般有两种情况：Minor revision/Major revision，这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，问题不大了，因为有修改就有可能。

投稿专用术语

国外期刊投稿中常见的术语(来自小木虫)2008-01-20 11:311. Submitted to Journal，刚提交的状态2. Manuscript received by Editorial Office，就是你的文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功3. With editor，如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。

这当中就会有另两个状态：3.1. Awaiting Editor Assignment指派责任编辑；Editor assigned是把你的文章分给一个编辑处理了。

3.2. Editor Declined Invitation 如果编辑接手处理了就会邀请审稿人了。

4.随后也会有2种状态4.1. Decision Letter Being Prepared 就是编辑没找审稿人就自己决定了，那根据一般经验，对学生来说估计会挂了1）英文太差，编辑让修改。

2）内容太差，要拒了。

除非大牛们直接被接收。

4.2. Reviewer(s) invited 找到审稿人了，就开始审稿5. Under review，这应该是一个漫长的等待。

当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。

如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。

6. Required Reviews Completed，审稿人的意见已上传，审稿结束，等待编辑决定7. Evaluating Recommendation，评估审稿人的意见，随后你将收到编辑给你的decision8. Minor revision/Major revision这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，问题不大了，因为有修改就有可能。

具体怎么改就不多说了，谦虚谨慎是不可少的（博主加：有过几次的经历，因为修改的revision会发再给审稿人看的，所以一定要细心的回答每一个审稿人的每一个问题，态度要谦逊，要让审稿人觉得他提的每个问题都是很有水准的，然后针对他的问题，一个一个的做出答复（point to point），能修改的就修改，不能修改的给出理由，而且都要列出来，文章的哪一段哪一行修改了最好都说出来，记住：给审稿人减少麻烦就是给你自己减少麻烦！由于有些审稿人对你的研究不是很熟悉，也没有用太多的时间来看，有些问题可能是错误的，在你看来是幼稚的，此时千万不要意气用事回信大骂审稿人一通，说他根本不懂啊，没有认真看什么的，除非你确实不想再在这个杂志发了。

论文投稿稿件状态说明中英文对照

10. Accepted 恭喜了
11. Transfer copyright form 签版权协议
12. uncorrected proof 等待你校对样稿
13. In Press, Corrected Proof 文章在印刷中，且该清样已经过作者校对
14. Manuscript Sent to Production 排版
1. Submitted to JouManuscript received by Editorial Office
就是你的文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功
3. With editor 如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态：
4.随后也会有2种状态
4.1. Decision Letter Being Prepared 就是编辑没找审稿人就自己决定了，那根据一般经验，对学生来说估计会挂了 1）英文太差，编辑让修改。 2）内容太差，要拒了。除非大牛们直接被接收。
4.2. Reviewer(s) invited 找到审稿人了，就开始审稿
3.1. Awaiting Editor Assignment指派责任编辑
Editor assigned是把你的文章分给一个编辑处理了。
3.2. technical check in progress 检查你的文章符不符合期刊投稿要求
3.3. Editor Declined Invitation 如果编辑接手处理了就会邀请审稿人了。
15 in production
出版中
另外的一些常见英文词汇：
minor revision
小修，这个基本上是接收了，但是要按要求做一些修改

投稿英文文章审稿的一些术语

EIC－Editor in Chief 主编, 对稿件有最终决定权。

ADM- (可能是)Administrator 协助主编日常工作的。

相当于编辑部的执行编辑（Managing Editor），你会发现编辑部给你的信大都是他写给你的。

他是编辑部里和你最接近的人，给你分配稿件号（Edit the manuscript ID number），修改各种投稿状态和日期（Edit the submission date）。

AE－Associated Editor 副编辑（文章发表后在首页第一栏下方的contributing editor）。

此人非常重要，他会在审稿人意见的基础上对文章作个综合评价后，给主编一个recommendation。

一般主编都会按照AE的意见写最终的decision letter。

Reviewer--审稿人。

（Article要求两个审稿人＋AE，总共三个人审。

Article submitted后1、awaiting admin. procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。

2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。

主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。

一般在一周以内。

看审稿人回复速度。

3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿意见。

一般要求审稿人三周内给审稿意见。

但是审稿人觉得时间时间不够，可以写信给主编要求延长审稿期限。

这个时间长短要取决于审稿人是否有空看你的文章，还要看他是否守时。

一般三周左右。

4、awaiting AE assignment 等待AE的指派。

编辑部在选择/联系AE。

一般1－3天左右。

5。

awaiting AE recommendation 等待AE的推荐。

一般要求AE三周内给结果。

6。

awaiting EIC decision －激动人心的时刻。

等待主编的决定。

一般3－4天。

decision 分为五挡1－Accept 2－accept after minor revision(without re-review不需要再送审)3－reconsideration after major revision.(要再送审，即要再经过审稿流程3－6) 4－reject and resubmit (论文现在状态不能接受，但可以修改后重新再投。

投稿常用英语

一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submitfor possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb.All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due carehas been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There aregiven below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and donot advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publicationin PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra datawere added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - . 6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correctionat the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those partsof the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to saythat –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. Iadmit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscriptis acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factoris not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to thecontents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 resultfrom a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control,if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clearfrom the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are gratefulto the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laseraction on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitablefor publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。

英文投稿过程中的十种状态

英文投稿过程中的十种状态1. Submitted to Journal当上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal，这个状态是自然形成的无需处理。

2. With editor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那里，主编会分派给别的编辑。

这当中就会有另两个状态：① Editor assigned编辑分派② Editor Declined Invitation编辑拒绝邀请，这时主编不得不将投稿文章重新分派给其它编辑。

3. Reviewer(s) invited说明编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。

有时该过程会持续很长时间，如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找到合适的审稿人，这时投稿者可以向编辑推荐审稿人。

4. Under review审稿人的意见已上传，说明审稿人已接受审稿，正在审稿中，这应该是一个漫长的等待（期刊通常会限定审稿人审稿时间，一般为一个月左右）。

当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。

如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。

5. required review completed审稿结束，等编辑处理，该过程短则几天，长则无期，科学堂有一篇文章出现required review completed状态已近一个月了，还是没有消息。

6. Decision in Process到了这一步就快要有结果了，编辑开始考虑是给修改还是直接拒，当然也有可能直接接受的，但可能性很小，呵呵。

7. Minor revision/Major revision小修/大修，这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，因为有修改就有可能。

具体怎么改就不多说了，谦虚谨慎是不可少的（因为修改后一般会再发给审稿人看，所以一定要细心的回答每一个审稿人的每一个问题，态度要谦逊，要让审稿人觉得他提的每个问题都很有水准的，然后针对他的问题，一个一个的做出答复，能修改的就修改，不能修改的给出理由，而且都要列出来，文章的哪一段哪一行修改了最好都说出来，记住：给审稿人减少麻烦就是给你自己减少麻烦！另注：有时，审稿人会在修改意见里隐讳里说出要你仔细阅读某几篇文献，这时可要注意了，其中某些文章可能就是评审者自己发表的，这时你最好在你的修改稿中加以引用），修改后被拒绝的例子也多不胜数的。

SCI论文准备写作投稿技巧常用英文词汇汇总

SCI论文准备写作投稿技巧常用英文词汇汇总1. Introduction:- Abstract: 摘要- Literature review: 文献综述- Research question: 研究问题- Objectives: 目标- Significance: 重要性- Hypothesis: 假设2. Methodology:- Experimental design: 实验设计- Variables: 变量- Data collection: 数据收集- Sampling method: 抽样方法- Statistical analysis: 统计分析- Ethical considerations: 道德考虑3. Results:- Findings: 结果- Statistical significance: 统计显著性- Data interpretation: 数据解释- Figures and tables: 图表- Correlation analysis: 相关分析4. Discussion:- Interpretation: 解释- Limitations: 限制- Implications: 含义- Future research: 未来研究5. Conclusion:- Summary: 总结- Contributions: 贡献- Closing remarks: 结束语6. References:- In-text citations: 文中引用- Peer-reviewed journal: 同行评审的期刊7. Formatting:- Font size: 字体大小- Line spacing: 行间距- Margins: 边距- Title page: 标题页- Abstract word count: 摘要字数注：本回答主要列举了一些在科学论文写作中常用的词汇，但具体使用词汇还需根据文章的主题和内容进行选择。

英文投稿状态一览

14. Manuscript Sent to Production 排版
15 in production
出版中
另外的一些常见英文词汇：
minor revision
小修，这个基本上是接收了，但是要按要求做一些修改
major revision
大修，文章要做大的修改，文章要增加或是删除部分内容。这个修改后接收的几率为50%
9. Revision Submitted to Journal
又开始了一个循环。
10. Accepted 恭喜了
11. Transfer copyright 等待你校对样稿
13. In Press, Corrected Proof 文章在印刷中，且该清样已经过作者校对
3. With editor 如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态：
3.1. Awaiting Editor Assignment指派责任编辑
Editor assigned是把你的文章分给一个编辑处理了。
3.2. technical check in progress 检查你的文章符不符合期刊投稿要求
4.2. Reviewer(s) invited 找到审稿人了，就开始审稿
5. Under review
这应该是一个漫长的等待。当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。
如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。
6. Required Reviews Completed
Response to reviewers
对reviewers的疑问point-to-point回答即可。

英文投稿过程中的十种状态解析

英文投稿过程中的十种状态解析1. Submitted to Journal当上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal，这个状态是自然形成的无需处理。

2. With editor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那里，主编会分派给别的编辑。

这当中就会有另两个状态：①Editor assigned编辑分派/ Editor Invited②Editor Declined Invitation编辑拒绝邀请，这时主编不得不将投稿文章重新分派给其它编辑。

3. Reviewer(s) invited说明编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。

有时该过程会持续很长时间，如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找到合适的审稿人，这时投稿者可以向编辑推荐审稿人。

4. Under review审稿人的意见已上传，说明审稿人已接受审稿，正在审稿中，这应该是一个漫长的等待（期刊通常会限定审稿人审稿时间，一般为一个月左右）。

当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。

如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。

5. required review completed审稿结束，等编辑处理，该过程短则几天，长则无期，科学堂有一篇文章出现required review completed状态已近一个月了，还是没有消息。

6. Decision in Process到了这一步就快要有结果了，编辑开始考虑是给修改还是直接拒，当然也有可能直接接受的，但可能性很小，呵呵。

7. Major revision/ Minor revision大修/小修，这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，因为有修改就有可能。

具体怎么改就不多说了，谦虚谨慎是不可少的（因为修改后一般会再发给审稿人看，所以一定要细心的回答每一个审稿人的每一个问题，态度要谦逊，要让审稿人觉得他提的每个问题都很有水准的，然后针对他的问题，一个一个的做出答复，能修改的就修改，不能修改的给出理由，而且都要列出来，文章的哪一段哪一行修改了最好都说出来，记住：给审稿人减少麻烦就是给你自己减少麻烦！另注：有时，审稿人会在修改意见里隐讳里说出要你仔细阅读某几篇文献，这时可要注意了，其中某些文章可能就是评审者自己发表的，这时你最好在你的修改稿中加以引用），修改后被拒绝的例子也多不胜数的。

论文投稿的十种状态

英文投稿过程中的十种状态1. Submitted to Journal当上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal，这个状态是自然形成的无需处理。

2. With editor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那里，主编会分派给别的编辑。

这当中就会有另两个状态：① Editor assigned编辑分派② Editor Declined Invitation编辑拒绝邀请，这时主编不得不将投稿文章重新分派给其它编辑。

3. Reviewer(s) invited说明编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。

有时该过程会持续很长时间，如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找到合适的审稿人，这时投稿者可以向编辑推荐审稿人。

4. Under review审稿人的意见已上传，说明审稿人已接受审稿，正在审稿中，这应该是一个漫长的等待（期刊通常会限定审稿人审稿时间，一般为一个月左右）。

当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。

如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。

5. required review completed审稿结束，等编辑处理，该过程短则几天，长则无期，科学堂有一篇文章出现required review completed状态已近一个月了，还是没有消息。

6. Decision in Process到了这一步就快要有结果了，编辑开始考虑是给修改还是直接拒，当然也有可能直接接受的，但可能性很小，呵呵。

7. Minor revision/Major revision小修/大修，这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，因为有修改就有可能。

具体怎么改就不多说了，谦虚谨慎是不可少的（因为修改后一般会再发给审稿人看，所以一定要细心的回答每一个审稿人的每一个问题，态度要谦逊，要让审稿人觉得他提的每个问题都很有水准的，然后针对他的问题，一个一个的做出答复，能修改的就修改，不能修改的给出理由，而且都要列出来，文章的哪一段哪一行修改了最好都说出来，记住：给审稿人减少麻烦就是给你自己减少麻烦！另注：有时，审稿人会在修改意见里隐讳里说出要你仔细阅读某几篇文献，这时可要注意了，其中某些文章可能就是评审者自己发表的，这时你最好在你的修改稿中加以引用），修改后被拒绝的例子也多不胜数的。

英文投稿过程中的十种状态解析

英文投稿过程中的十种状态解析当上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal，这个状态是自然形成的无需处理。

2. With editor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那里，主编会分派给别的编辑。

这当中就会有另两个状态：① Editor assigned 编辑分派/ Editor Invited② Editor Declined Invitation 编辑拒绝邀请，这时主编不得不将投稿文章重新分派给其它编辑。

3. Reviewer(s) invited说明编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。

有时该过程会持续很长时间，如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找到合适的审稿人，这时投稿者可以向编辑推荐审稿人。

4. Under review审稿人的意见已上传，说明审稿人已接受审稿，正在审稿中，这应该是一个漫长的等待（期刊通常会限定审稿人审稿时间，一般为一个月左右）。

当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。

如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。

5. required review completed审稿结束，等编辑处理，该过程短则几天，长则无期，科学堂有一篇文章出现required review completed状态已近一个月了，还是没有消息。

6. Decision in Process到了这一步就快要有结果了，编辑开始考虑是给修改还是直接拒，当然也有可能直接接受的，但可能性很小，呵呵。

7. Major revision/ Minor revision大修/小修，这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，因为有修改就有可能。

具体怎么改就不多说了，谦虚谨慎是不可少的（因为修改后一般会再发给审稿人看，所以一定要细心的回答每一个审稿人的每一个问题，态度要谦逊，要让审稿人觉得他提的每个问题都很有水准的，然后针对他的问题，一个一个的做出答复，能修改的就修改，不能修改的给出理由，而且都要列出来，文章的哪一段哪一行修改了最好都说出来，记住：给审稿人减少麻烦就是给你自己减少麻烦！另注：有时，审稿人会在修改意见里隐讳里说出要你仔细阅读某几篇文献，这时可要注意了，其中某些文章可能就是评审者自己发表的，这时你最好在你的修改稿中加以引用），修改后被拒绝的例子也多不胜数的。

英文投稿文章类型

英文投稿文章类型
英文投稿文章类型指的是在学术界、出版界、商业界等领域中，常见的英文投稿文章的类型。

以下是几种常见的类型：
1. 研究论文（Research paper）：以研究为基础，阐述作者的研究结果、理论、观点等。

通常包括摘要、引言、方法、结果、讨论、结论等部分。

研究论文是学术界最常见的投稿类型。

2. 综述文章（Review article）：对某一领域的研究现状、发展趋势、争议点等进行综合性的介绍和分析。

通常包括对已有研究的评价、建议和展望等内容。

3. 评论文章（Commentary）：对某一事物、观点、研究成果等进行评价、批判或评论。

通常比较短小，以简洁、明了的语言表达作者的观点。

4. 专题文章（Feature article）：对某一特定话题进行深入的探讨、分析。

通常在内容上比较自由，可以采用多种文体。

5. 报告（Report）：对某一事件、研究成果等进行客观、详实的描述，通常包括研究背景、研究方法、结果、分析和结论等部分。

以上几种类型并不是绝对的，实际上它们有时会有交叉和重叠。

在投稿之前，需要根据自己的研究对象、研究方法和研究结果等因素，选择适合的投稿类型。

- 1 -。

SCI投稿常见的英文

11．Revision Submitted to Journal 又开始了一个循环。
12．I am sorry to have to convey this negative decision to you./ I regret to inform you that…/I am
sorry we could not be of further assistance on this occasion.很不幸！
另外的一些常见英文词汇：
camera-ready paper 可以付印的正式稿件
graphical abstract/illustrated synopsis图文摘要：一个能够突出你文章特色的图，配上一两句
话的摘要
running head 就是发表文章里显示在你页眉上的（一般论文偶数页显示RUNNING HEAD，
13．Accepted 恭喜了，一般看到：We are pleased to inform you that…后面不看都知道是好消息
了。
14．The manuscript is more suitable for a journal dealing with…这是很婉转的拒稿方式了。
15．Transfer copyright form 签版权协议
情况。如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。
8． Required Reviews Completed 审稿人的意见已上传，审稿结束，等待编辑决定
9． Evaluating Recommendation 评估审稿人的意见，随后你将收到编辑给你的decision
自己决定了，一般来说，可能是：
1）英文太差，编辑让修改。

SCI投稿信件的一些常用语

SCI投稿信件的一些常用语一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Plea se find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whetheryou have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes hadbeen made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comme nts very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。

投稿过程中常见的英文

英语作文关于投稿经常用的句子

投稿常用语

论文投稿的十种状态

SCI论文投稿常见状态

英文投稿里的classification

英文投稿常用(自己收集、整理、总结)

投稿过程中常见的英文

投稿专用术语

论文投稿稿件状态说明中英文对照

投稿英文文章审稿的一些术语

投稿常用英语

英文投稿过程中的十种状态

SCI论文准备写作投稿技巧常用英文词汇汇总

英文投稿状态一览

英文投稿过程中的十种状态解析

论文投稿的十种状态

英文投稿过程中的十种状态解析

英文投稿文章类型

SCI投稿 常见的英文

SCI投稿信件的一些常用语

SCI投稿常见的英文