寂静的春天英文读书报告(1000 words)
寂静的春天英语读后感50字
寂静的春天英语读后感50字英文回答："Silent Spring" by Rachel Carson is a seminal work in the environmental movement. Published in 1962, it served as a wake-up call to the public about the dangers of uncontrolled pesticide use. Carson meticulously documented the widespread ecological devastation caused by synthetic chemicals like DDT, providing a scientific foundation for concerns about environmental pollution. The book's compelling narrative and irrefutable evidence ignited a national outcry, leading to the eventual ban of DDT and other harmful pesticides.Carson's work also raised awareness about the interconnectedness of the natural world and the need for responsible stewardship. By exposing the devastating impacts of human activities on the environment, "Silent Spring" fostered a new era of environmental consciousness and helped shape modern environmental policies. It remainsa poignant reminder of the fragility of our planet and the importance of protecting its ecosystems.中文回答：《寂静的春天》读后感。
Book_Review_on_Silent_Spring_《寂静的春天》读后感
Book Review on Silent Spring《寂静的春天》读后感◎江苏省徐州七中 朱奕霏 指导教师：彭向梅and the animals’ simple, unhurried lives encourage children to value the beauty of the natural world. This theme is particularly pertinent in today’s fast-paced, technology-driven society, reminding children to slow down and appreciate the world around them.The book also explores the concept of social class and the consequences of reckless behavior (鲁莽行为), as seen in Toad’s obsession with motor cars and his subsequent failure.However, the book’s old-fashioned language and leisurely pace may pose a challenge for some junior students.In conclusion, The Wind in the Willows is a classic that continues to influence us today. Its themes of friendship, respect for nature, and personal responsibility are conveyed through a charming tale that not only entertains but also offers valuable life lessons. It’s a book that junior students will enjoy and learn from, making it a worthy addition to their reading list.Rachel Carson, a famous American marine biologist and conservationist, wrote the environmental science book Silent Spring in 1962. The book has raised public awareness of the bad effects of indiscriminate pesticide (杀虫剂) use and the need for better environmental protection.Carson showed how pesticides were destroying the ecosystem, leading to the death of many bird species and potentially posing serious health risks to humans. The book’s title is a metaphor (隐喻) for the possible terrible result. The book(初中天地）75Copyright ©博看网. All Rights Reserved.Island of the Blue Dolphins writtenby American author Scott O’Dell, is ahistorical novel for children that has sold more than 6 million copies in the UnitedStates alone since it was published in1960. It was awarded by the AmericanAssociation as one of the 10 greatestchildren’s literature works (儿童文学作品) since 1776 and won two highest honors of the international prize for children’s literature — the Newbury Medal (纽伯瑞儿童文化奖) and the Hanss Christian Andersen Award (安徒生奖).In the story, the main character Karana lived alone on the island for 18 years. Before the arrival of the rescue ships, she built a shelter alone, made weapons and stresses the importance of maintaining a balance with nature and recognizing the long-term consequences of our actions. In today’s world, Carson’s message still matters a lot.Personally, Silent Spring left a profound impact on me. Carson’s ability to convey scientific concepts in a clear way was awe-inspiring. I was moved by her plea (请求) for us to become better stewards of the natural world.In conclusion, Silent Spring is not merely a book, it’s a wake-up call to humanity. Despite being written over 60 years ago, its messages are timeless and hold critical significance for our current and future generations.Book Review on Island of the Blue Dolphins 《蓝色的海豚岛》读后感◎江苏省徐州新元中学 吴 优 指导教师：于 洁/校园派Campus 76Crazy English Copyright ©博看网. All Rights Reserved.。
寂静的春天英文版
SILENT SPRINGBy RACHEL CARSON(ONE SINGLE BOOK WHICH BROUGHT THE ISSUE OF PESTICIDES CENTERSTAGE. WITH MASS SCALE POISONING OF THE LAND WITH PESTICIDES AND WITH THOUSANDS OF FARMERS COMMITTING SUICIDE. THIS BOOK IS ESSENTIAL FOR PUBLIC RESEARCH IN INDIA.)ContentsAcknowledgments ixForeword xi1 A Fable for Tomorrow 12 The Obligation to Endure 53 Elixirs of Death 154 Surface Waters and Underground Seas 395 Realms of the Soil 536 Earth’s Green Mantle 637 Needless Havoc 858 And No Birds Sing 1039 Rivers of Death 12910 Indiscriminately from the Skies 15411 Beyond the Dreams of the Borgias 17312 The Human Price 18713 Through a Narrow Window 19914 One in Every Four 21915 Nature Fights Back 24516 The Rumblings of an Avalanche 26217 The Other Road 277List of Principal Sources 301Index 357AcknowledgmentsIN A LETTER written in January 1958, Olga Owens Huckins told me of her own bitter experience of a small world made lifeless, and so brought my attention sharply back to a problem with which I had long been concerned. I then realized I must write this book.During the years since then I have received help and encouragement from so many people that it is not possible to name them all here. Those who have freely shared with me the fruits of many ye ars’ experience and study represent a wide variety of government agencies in this and other countries, many universities and research institutions, and many professions. To all of them I express my deepest thanks for time andthought so generously given.In addition my special gratitude goes to those who took time to read portions of the manuscript and to offer comment and criticism based on their own expert knowledge. Although the final responsibility for the accuracy and validity of the text is mine, I could not have completed the book without the generous help of these specialists: L. G. Bartholomew, M.D., of the Mayo Clinic, John J. Biesele of the University of Texas, A. W.A. Brown of the University of Western Ontario, Morton S. Biskind, M.D., of Westport, Connecticut, C. J. Briejer of the Plant Protection Service in Holland, Clarence Cottam of the Rob and Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation, George Crile, Jr., M.D., of the Cleveland Clinic, Frank Egler of Norfolk, Connecticut, Malcolm M. Hargraves, M.D., of the Mayo Clinic, W.C. Hueper, M.D., of the National Cancer Institute, C. J. Kerswill of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Olaus Murie of the Wilderness Society, A. D. Pickett of the Canada Department of Agriculture, Thomas G. Scott of the Illinois Natural History Survey, Clarence Tarzwell of the Taft Sanitary Engineering Center, and George J. Wallace of Michigan State University. Every writer of a book based on many diverse facts owes much to the skill and helpfulness of librarians. I owe such a debt to many, but especially to Ida K. Johnston of the Department of the Interior Library and to Thelma Robinson of the Library of the National Institutesof Health. As my editor, Paul Brooks has given steadfast encouragement over the years and has cheerfully accommodated his plans to postponements and delays. For this, and for his skilled editorial judgment, I am everlastingly grateful. I have had capable and devoted assistance in the enormous task of library research from Dorothy Algire, Jeanne Davis, and Bette Haney Duff. And I could not possibly have completed the task, under circumstances sometimes difficult, except for the faithful help of my housekeeper, Ida Sprow.Finally, I must acknowledge our vast indebtedness to a host of people, many of them unknown to me personally, who have nevertheless made the writing of this book seem worthwhile. These are the people who first spoke out against the reckless and irresponsible poisoning of the world that man shares with all other creatures, and who are even now fighting the thousands of small battles that in the end will bring victory for sanity and common sense in our accommodation to the world that surrounds us.ForewordIN 1958, when Rachel Carson undertook to write the book that becameSilent Spring, she was fifty years old. She had spent most of her professional life as a marine biologist and writer with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. But now she was a world-famous author, thanks to the fabulous success of The Sea Around Us, published seven years before. Royalties from this book and its successor, The Edge of the Sea, had enabled her to devote full time to her own writing.To most authors this would seem like an ideal situation: an established reputation, freedom to choose one’s own subjec t, publishers more than ready to contract for anything one wrote. It might have been assumed that her next book would be in a field that offered the same opportunities, the same joy in research, as did its predecessors. Indeed she had such projects in mind. But it was not to be.While working for the government, she and her scientific colleagues had become alarmed by the widespread use of DDT and other long-lasting poisons in so-called agricultural control programs. Immediately after the war, when these dangers had already been recognized, she had tried in vain to interest some magazine in an article on the subject. A decade later, when the spraying of pesticides and herbicides (some of them many times as toxic as DDT) was causing wholesale destruction of wildlife and its habitat, and clearly endangering human life, she decidedshe had to speak out. Again she tried to interest the magazines in an article. Though by now she was a well-known writer, the magazine publishers, fearing to lose advertising, turned her down. For example, a manufacturer of canned baby food claimed that such an article would cause “unwarranted fear” to mothers who used his product. (The one exception was The New Yorker, which would later serialize parts of Silent Spring in advance of book publication.)So the only answer was to write a book—book publishers being free of advertising pressure. Miss Carson tried to find someone else to write it, but at last she decided that if it were to be done, she would have to do it herself. Many of her strongest admirers questioned whether she could write a salable book on such a dreary subject. She shared their doubts, but she went ahead because she had to. “There would be no peace for me,” she wrote to a friend, “if I kept silent.”Silent Spring was over four years in the making. It required a very different kind of research from her previous books. She could no longer recount the delight s of the laboratories at Woods Hole or of the marine rock pools at low tide. Joy in the subject itself had to be replaced by a sense of almost religious dedication. And extraordinary courage: during the final years she was plagued with what she termed “a wholecatalogue of illnesses.”Also she knew very well that she would be attacked by the chemical industry. It was not simply that she was opposing indiscriminate use of poisons but—more fundamentally—that she had made clear the basic irresponsibility of an industrialized, technological society toward the natural world. When the attack did come, it was probably as bitter and unscrupulous as anything of the sort since the publication of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species a century before. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent by the chemical industry in an attempt to discredit the book and to malign the author—she was described as an ignorant and hysterical woman who wanted to turn the earth over to the insects.These attacks fortunately backfired by creating more publicity than the publisher possibly could have afforded. A major chemical company tried to stop publication on the grounds that Miss Carson had made a misstatement about one of their products. She hadn’t, and publication proceeded on schedule.She herself was singularly unmoved by all this furor狂热；激怒. Meanwhile, as a direct result of the message in Silent Spring, President Kennedy set up a special panel of his Science Advisory Committee to study theproblem of pesticides. The panel’s report, when it appeared some months later, was a complete vindication of her thesis.Rachel Carson was very modest about her accomplishment. As she wrote to a close friend when the manuscript was nearing completion: “The beauty of the living world I was trying to save has always been uppermost in my mind—that, and anger at the senseless, brutish things that were being done.... Now l can believe I have at least helped a little.” In fact, her book helped to make ecology, which was an unfamiliar word in those days, one of the great popular causes of our time. It led to environmental legislation at every level of government.Twenty-five years after its original publication, Silent Spring has more than a historical interest. Such a book bridges the gulf between what C. P. Snow called “the two cultures.” Rachel Carson was a realistic, well-trained scientist who possessed the insight and sensitivity of a poet. She had an emotional response to nature for which she did not apologize. The more she learned, the greater grew what she termed “the sense of wonder.” So she succeeded in making a book about death a celebration of life.Rereading her book today, one is aware that its implications are farbroader than the immediate crisis with which it dealt. By awaking us to a specific danger—the poisoning of the earth with chemicals—she has helped us to recognize many other ways (some little known in her time) in which mankind is degrading the quality of life on our planet. And Silent Spring will continue to remind us that in our overorganized and overmechanized age, individual initiative and courage still count: change can be brought about, not through incitement煽动，刺激to war or violent revolution, but rather by altering the direction of our thinking about the world we live in.1. A Fable for T omorrowTHERE WAS ONCE a town in the heart of America where all life seemed to live in harmony with its surroundings. The town lay in the midst of a checkerboard of prosperous farms, with fields of grain and hillsides of orchards where, in spring, white clouds of bloom drifted above the green fields. In autumn, oak and maple（枫树）and birch set up a blaze of color that flamed and flickered across a backdrop of pines. Then foxes barked in the hills and deer silently crossed the fields, half hidden in the mists of the fall mornings.Along the roads, laurel, viburnum and alder, great ferns and wildflowers delighted the traveler’s eye through much of the year. Even in winter theroadsides were places of beauty, where countless birds came to feed on the berries and on the seed heads of the dried weeds rising above the snow. The countryside was, in fact, famous for the abundance and variety of its bird life, and when the flood of migrants was pouring through in spring and fall, people traveled from great distances to observe them. Others came to fish the streams, which flowed clear and cold out of the hills and contained shady pools where trout lay. So it had been from the days many years ago when the first settlers raised their houses, sank their wells, and built their barns.Then a strange blight crept over the area and everything began to change. Some evil spell had settled on the community: mysterious maladies swept the flocks of chickens; the cattle and sheep sickened and died. Everywhere was a shadow of death. The farmers spoke of much illness among their families. In the town the doctors had become more and more puzzled by new kinds of sickness appearing among their patients. There had been several sudden and unexplained deaths, not only among adults but even among children, who would be stricken suddenly while at play and die within a few hours.There was a strange stillness. The birds, for example—where had they gone? Many people spoke of them, puzzled and disturbed. The feedingstations in the backyards were deserted. The few birds seen anywhere were moribund; they trembled violently and could not fly. It was a spring without voices. On the mornings that had once throbbed with the dawn chorus of robins, catbirds, doves, jays, wrens, and scores of other bird voices there was now no sound; only silence lay over the fields and woods and marsh.On the farms the hens brooded, but no chicks hatched. The farmers complained that they were unable to raise any pigs—the litters were small and the young survived only a few days. The apple trees were coming into bloom but no bees droned among the blossoms, so there was no pollination and there would be no fruit.The roadsides, once so attractive, were now lined with browned and withered vegetation as though swept by fire. These, too, were silent, deserted by all living things. Even the streams were now lifeless. Anglers no longer visited them, for all the fish had died.In the gutters（排水沟）under the eaves（屋檐）and between the shingles of the roofs, a white granular（颗粒状的）powder still showed a few patches; Some weeks before it had fallen like snow upon the roofs and the lawns, the fields and streams. No witchcraft, no enemy actionhad silenced the rebirth of new life in this stricken world. The people had done it themselves.This town does not actually exist, but it might easily have a thousand counterparts in America or elsewhere in the world. I know of no community that has experienced all the misfortunes I describe. Yet every one of these disasters has actually happened somewhere, and many real communities have already suffered a substantial number of them. A grim specter has crept upon us almost unnoticed, and this imagined tragedy may easily become a stark reality we all shall know.What has already silenced the voices of spring in countless towns in America? This book is an attempt to explain.2. The Obligation to EndureTHE HISTORY OF LIFE on earth has been a history of interaction between living things and their surroundings. To a large extent, the physical form and the habits of the earth’s vegetation and its animal life have been molded by the environment. Considering the whole span of earthly time, the opposite effect, in which life actually modifies its surroundings, has been relatively slight. Only within the moment of timerepresented by the present century has one species—man—acquired significant power to alter the nature of his world.During the past quarter century this power has not only increased to one of disturbing magnitude but it has changed in character. The most alarming of all man’s assaults upon the environment is the contamination of air, earth, rivers, and sea with dangerous and even lethal (d e a d l y) materials. This pollution is for the most part irrecoverable; the chain of evil it initiates not only in the world that must support life but in living tissues is for the most part irreversible. In this now universal contamination of the environment, chemicals are the sinister and little-recognized partners of radiation in changing the very nature of the world—the very nature of its life. Strontium 90, released through nuclear explosions into the air, comes to earth in rain or drifts down as fallout(放射性尘埃), lodges in soil, enters into the grass or corn or wheat grown there, and in time takes up its abode in the bones of a human being, there to remain until his death. Similarly, chemicals sprayed on croplands or forests or gardens lie long in soil, entering into living organisms, passing from one to another in a chain of poisoning and death. Or they pass mysteriously by underground streams until they emerge and, through the alchemy (magic) of air and sunlight, combine into new forms that kill vegetation, sicken cattle, and work unknownharm on those who drink from once pure wells. As Albert Schweitzer has said, ‘Man can hardly even recognize the devils of his own creation.’It took hundreds of millions of years to produce the life that now inhabits the earth—eons of time in which that developing and evolving and diversifying life reached a state of adjustment and balance with its surroundings. The environment, rigorously shaping and directing the life it supported, contained elements that were hostile as well as supporting. Certain rocks gave out dangerous radiation; even within the light of the sun, from which all life draws its energy, there were short-wave radiations with power to injure. Given time—time not in years but in millennia—life adjusts, and a balance has been reached. For time is the essential ingredient; but in the modern world there is no time.The rapidity of change and the speed with which new situations are created follow the impetuous (rude, violent) and heedless pace of man rather than the deliberate pace of nature. Radiation is no longer merely the background radiation of rocks, the bombardment of cosmic rays, the ultraviolet (紫外线) of the sun that have existed before there was any life on earth; Radiation is now the unnatural creation of man’s tampering (intervene) with the atom. The chemicals to which life is asked to make its adjustment are no longer merely the calcium and silica and copperand all the rest of the minerals washed out of the rocks and carried in rivers to the sea; they are the synthetic creations of man’s inventiv e mind, brewed in his laboratories, and having no counterparts in nature.To adjust to these chemicals would require time on the scale that is nature’s; it would require not merely the years of a man’s life but the life of generations. And even this, were it by some miracle possible, would be futile, for the new chemicals come from our laboratories in an endless stream; almost five hundred annually find their way into actual use in the United States alone. The figure is staggering and its implications are not easily grasped—500 new chemicals to which the bodies of men and animals are required somehow to adapt each year, chemicals totally outside the limits of biologic experience.Among them are many that are used in man’s war against nature. Since the mid-1940s over 200 basic chemicals have been created for use in killing insects, weeds, rodents(n. 啮齿动物，啮齿类),and other organisms described in the modern vernacular as ‘pests’; and they are sold under several thousand different brand names.These sprays, dusts, and aerosols (气雾剂, 喷雾)are now applied almost universally to farms, gardens, forests, and homes—nonselectivechemicals that have the power to kill every insect,the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’, to still the song of birds and the leaping of fish in the streams, to coat the leaves with a deadly film, and to linger on in soil—all this though the intended target may be only a few weeds or insects. Can anyone believe it is possible to lay down such a barrage of poisons on the surface of the earth without making it unfit for all life? They should not be called ‘insecticides’, but ‘biocides’.The whole process of spraying seems caught up in an endless sp iral.Since DDT was released for civilian use, a process of escalatio n (n. 增加；扩大；逐步上升) has been going on in which ever more toxic materials must be found. This has happened because insects, in a triumphant vindication of Darwin’s principle of the survival of the fittest, have evolved super races immune to the particular insecti cide used, hence a deadlier one has always to be developed—and then a deadlier one than that. It has happened also because, for reasons to be described later, destructive insects often undergo a ‘flareback’, or resurgence, after spraying, in numbers greater than before. Thus the chemical war is never won, and all life is caugh t in its violent crossfire.Along with the possibility of the extinction of mankind by nuclear war,the central problem of our age has therefore become the contamination of man’s total environment with such substances of incredible potential for harm—substances that accumulate in the tissues of plants and animals and even penetrate the germ cells to shatter or alter the very material of heredity upon which the shape of the future depends. Some would-be architects of our future look toward a time when it will be possible to alter the human germ plasm by design. But we may easily be doing so now by inadvertence, for many chemicals, like radiation, bring about gene mutations. It is ironic to think that man might determine his own future by something so seemingly trivial as the choice of an insect spray.All this has been risked—for what? Future historians may well be amazed by our distorted sense of proportion. How could intelligent beings seek to control a few unwanted species by a method that contaminated the entire environment and brought the threat of disease and death even to their own kind? Yet this is precisely what we have done. We have done it, moreover, for reasons that collapse the moment we examine them. We are told that the enormous and expanding use of pesticides is necessary to maintain farm production. Yet is our real problem not one of overproduction? Our farms, despite measures to remove acreages from production, and to pay farmers notto produce, have yielded such a staggering excess of crops that the American taxpayer in 1962 is paying out more than one billion dollars a year as the total carrying cost of the surplus-food storage program. And is the situation helped when one branch of the Agriculture Department tries to reduce production while another states, as it did in 1958, ‘It is believed generally that reduction of crop acreages under provisions of the Soil Bank will stimulate interest in use of chemicals to obtain maximum pro duction on the land retained in crops.’All this is not to say there is no insect problem and no need of control. I am saying, rather, that control must be geared to realities, not to mythical situations, and that the methods employed must be such that they do not destroy us along with the insects.The problem whose attempted solution has brought such a train of disaster in its wake is an accompaniment of our modern way of life. Long before the age of man, insects inhabited the earth—a group of extraordinarily varied and adaptable beings. Over the course of time since man’s advent (n. 到来；出现；基督降临；基督降临节), a small percentage of the more than half a million species of insects have come into conflict with human welfare in two principal ways: as competitors for the food supply and as carriers of human disease.Disease-carrying insects become important where human beings are crowded together, especially under conditions where sanitation is poor, as in time of natural disaster or war or in situations of extreme poverty and deprivation. Then control of some sort becomes necessary. It is a sobering fact, however, as we shall presently see, that the method of massive chemical control has had only limited success, and also threatens to worsen the very conditions it is intended to curb (restrain).Under primitive agricultural conditions the farmer had few insect problems. These arose with the intensification of agriculture—the devotion of immense acreages to a single crop. Such a system set the stage for explosive increases in specific insect populations. Single-crop farming does not take advantage of the principles by which nature works; it is agriculture as an engineer might conceive it to be. Nature has introduced great variety into the landscape, but man has displayed a passion for simplifying it. Thus he undoes the built-in checks and balances by which nature holds the species within bounds.One important natural check is a limit on the amount of suitable habitat for each species. Obviously then, an insect that lives on wheat can build up its population to much higher levels on a farm devoted to wheat than onone in which wheat is intermingled with other crops to which the insect is not adapted.The same thing happens in other situations. A generation or more ago, the towns of large areas of the United States lined their streets with the noble elm tree (榆树). Now the beauty they hopefully created is threatened with complete destruction as disease sweeps through the elms, carried by a beetle that would have only limited chance to build up large populations and to spread from tree to tree if the elms were only occasional trees in a richly diversified planting.Another factor in the modern insect problem is one that must be viewed against a background of geologic and human history: the spreading of thousands of different kinds of organisms from thei r native homes to invade new territories. This worldwide migratio n has been studied and graphically described by the British ecolog ist Charles Elton in his recent book The Ecology of Invasions. Duri ng the Cretaceous(n. 白垩纪；白垩系adj. 白垩纪的；似白垩的)Period, some hun dred million years ago, flooding seas cut many land bridges betwe en continents and living things found themselves confined in what Elton calls ‘colossal separate nature reserves’. There, isolated from others of their kind, they developed many new species. When some of the land masses were joined again, about 15 million years ago, these species began to move out into new territories—a mov ement that is not only still in progress but is now receiving consi derable assistance from man.The importation of plants is the primary agent in the modern sp read of species, for animals have almost invariably gone along wi th the plants, quarantine (n. 检疫；隔离；检疫期；封锁vt. 检疫；隔离；使隔离vi. 实行隔离) being a comparatively recent and not completely effective inno vation. The United States Office of Plant Introduction alone has int roduced almost 200,000 species and varieties of plants from all ov er the world. Nearly half of the 180 or so major insect enemies of plants in the United States are accidental imports from abroad, and most of them have come as hitchhikers on plants.In new territory, out of reach of the restraining hand of the natural enemies that kept down its numbers in its native land, an invading plant or animal is able to become enormously abundant. Thus it is no accident that our most troublesome insects are introduced species.These invasions, both the naturally occurring and those dependent on human assistance, are likely to continue indefinitely. Quarantine andmassive chemical campaigns are only extremely expensive ways of buying time. We are faced, according to Dr. Elton, ‘with a life-and-death need not just to find new technological means of suppressing this plant or that animal’; i nstead we need the basic knowledge of animal populations a nd their relations to their surroundings that will ‘promote an even balance and damp down the explosive power of outbreaks and new invasions.’Much of the necessary knowledge is now available but we do not use it. We train ecologists in our universities and even employ them in our governmental agencies but we seldom take their advice. We allow the chemical death rain to fall as though there were no alternative, whereas in fact there are many, and our ingenuity could soon discover many more if given opportunity.Have we fallen into a mesmerized (adj. 着迷的v. 施催眠术，迷住，迷惑）state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detr imental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?Such thinking, in the words of the ecologist Paul Shepard, ‘idealizes life with only its head out of water, inches above the limits of toleration of the corruption of its own enviro nment...Why should we tolerate a diet of weak poisons, a home in insipid surroundings, a circle of acquaintances who are not quite our enemies, the noise of motors with just enough relief to preve nt insanity? Who would want to live in a world which is just no t quite fatal?’Yet such a world is pressed upon us. The crusade to create a che mically sterile, insect-free world seems to have engendered a fanat ic zeal on the part of many specialists and most of the so-called control agencies. On every hand there is evidence that those enga ged in spraying operations exercise a ruthless power. ‘The regulato ry entomologists (n.昆虫学者)function as prosecutor(n. 检察官；公诉人；[法] 起诉人；实行者), judge and jury, tax assessor and collector and sheriff to enforce their own orders,’ said Connecticut entomologist Neely Tu rner. The most flagrant (declared公然的；notorious) abuses go unche cked in both state and federal agencies.It is not my contention that chemical insecticides must never be used. I do contend that we have put poisonous and biologically potent chemicals indiscriminately into the hands of persons largely or wholly ignorant of their potentials for harm. We have subjected enormous numbers of people to contact with these poisons, without their consent and often without their knowledge. If the Bill of Rights contains。
寂静的春天20字读后感
寂静的春天20字读后感(中英文实用版)"The silent spring, a wake-up call to humanity, poignantly reveals the destructive power of our actions on nature."《寂静的春天》，对人类的一次深刻警醒，尖锐地揭示了我们对大自然造成的破坏力。
"Through its vivid portrayal of a spring devoid of life, the book emphasizes the urgent need for environmental conservation."通过生动描绘一个毫无生命力的春天，这本书强调了环境保护的紧迫性。
"Each page echoes with the cry of the Earth, reminding us of the consequences of our indifference."每一页都回荡着地球的哭泣，提醒我们对待环境的冷漠将带来的后果。
"Reading this book, one cannot help but feel the weight of responsibility to protect our delicate ecosystem."阅读这本书，人们不禁感受到保护我们脆弱生态系统的重任。
"In just 20 words, the essence of "Silent Spring" is captured: a compelling testament to the fragility of life and the importance of our choices."仅仅20字，便捕捉到了《寂静的春天》的精髓：对生命脆弱性的有力证明，以及我们选择的重要性。
《寂静的春天》读后感 英文500字
《寂静的春天》读后感英文500字Reading the novel “Silent Spring” has had a profound impact on me and has greatly changed my views on the environment. The story follows the life of Rachel Carson, an environmental activist who fought for the protection of the natural environment against the deleterious effects of chemical pesticides. Her work was largely responsible for the creation of the US Environmental Protection Agency in 1970.The novel starts off with a post-apocalyptic world where the environment has been almost completely destroyed by the misuse of chemical pesticides. Through her vivid descriptions of the countryside and its wildlife, Carson draws a contrast between the paradise that once was and the wasteland that now exists. This desolate picture of a dead and broken planet serves as a powerful reminder of the danger of misusing technology to harm nature.Carson also highlights the importance of scientific research and the need for responsible regulation of industry to protect nature. Science alone cannot solve the problem of environmental destruction, but it can be used to identify the issues and help to develop solutions.Carson’s writing style is poetic yet powerful, making her point clear without relying on scientific jargon. Her passionate commitment to protecting nature shines through the entire book, encouraging readers to think about their own roles in protecting the environment.The novel “Silent Spring” serves as a strong warning from Carsonabout the devastating consequences of human interaction with the environment. The message of the novel is clear, that we must take responsibility for our actions and protect the environment, or risk destroying it. Carson’s prophetic words have resonated with me and I am more determined than ever to do what I can to help protect the environment.。
《寂静的春天》的读后感英文
《寂静的春天》的读后感英文Silent Spring is a beautifully written and thought-provoking book that explores the impacts of human activities on the environment. Written by Rachel Carson, this book provides a critical analysis of the use of pesticides and chemicals and its impact on wildlife, human health, and the environment.The book is both informative and engaging, as it delves into the history of pesticide use and how it has become an integral part of modern agriculture. The author highlights the devastating effects of chemicals, such as DDT, on wildlife populations and how these chemicals have seeped into the food chain, affecting humans as well. The book is a sobering reminder that our actions have consequences not just for ourselves, but for the delicate balance of the natural world.One of the most striking aspects of the book is Carson's ability to weave together poetry and science. The reader is transported to the wilderness, where the beauty and fragility of the environment are brought to life. Carson's writing is lyrical and evocative, but never sentimental. Her writing is full of hope and the belief that we can turn things around if we act before it's too late.Silent Spring is a call to action, urging readers to take responsibility for their impact on the environment. Carson argues that we must acknowledge the dangers of our actions and make changes if we want a healthy and sustainable future. Her message is clear: we are responsible for the world we live in, and we have the power to change it.In many ways, the themes Carson explores in Silent Spring are still relevant today. The book's warnings about the dangers of chemical pesticide use are still relevant, and the need for sustainable practices in agriculture is even more pressing. The book's message of personal responsibility is also more urgent than ever.In conclusion, Silent Spring is a masterpiece of environmental literature that is both informative and inspiring. Rachel Carson's writing is powerful and poetic, and her message is one that we should all take to heart. This book is a must-read for anyone concerned about the environment and the impact of human activities on the natural world.Silent Spring is not just a book, it is a movement. It sparked a global conversation about the impact of human activities on the environment, heralding the beginning of the modern environmental movement. The book is often credited with influencing the policies of the US government, leading to the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other environmental regulations.Reading Silent Spring today, it is staggering to see how prescient Carson's warnings were. The world has since witnessed the devastating consequences of human-made disasters like oil spills, deforestation, and the extinction of numerous species. The warnings from Silent Spring are even more critical now as we face the effects of climate change.Carson's work has also inspired generations of scientists and environmental activists. She showed that one person's message can make a difference, and that individuals have the power to effect change. Her legacy continues to inspire new generations of eco-warriors who strive to protect and preserve the natural world.The book is a reminder that we are all connected, and our actions have far-reaching consequences. It compels us to take a hard look at our lifestyles and to make changes to protect the health of the planet. The book has become more than just an environmental document, it is a symbol of hope and a call to action.In conclusion, Silent Spring is a masterpiece of environmental literature that has stood the test of time. It is an essential read for anyone concerned about the environment and the impact of human activities on the natural world. The book has ignited a movement that continues to inspire and motivate people all over the world to take action for a better future.。
寂静的春天读书心得
寂静的春天读书心得篇一：《寂静的春天》读后感>读后感经济学***班*******《寂静的春天》，英文名：Silent Spring，是由美国作家蕾切尔·卡逊生态文学和生态伦理学的代表作，于1962年问世，一经出版便引起轰动。
这本书在人们的头脑中深深地刻入“生态”的两个字，并引导人们思考人与自然关系，此后在全球范围内引发了一系列的绿色变革，让人们开始真正的关注自然界的平衡，关注生态环境，关注人类赖以生存的地球。
春天本该是鲜花盛开、百鸟齐鸣的季节，春天里不应是寂静无声，尤其是在春天的田野。
可是并不是人人都会注意到，从某一个时候起，突然地，在春天里就不再听到燕子的呢喃、黄莺的啁啾，田野里变得寂静无声了。
《寂静的春天》向社会公众深刻地揭露人类滥用杀虫剂而导致灾难的具体事件。
书中详细阐述了杀虫剂，尤其是DDT对野生生物的危害，这也是是造成鸟类灭绝的主要元凶。
像DDT这样的脂溶性的化学品，能够在动物的脂肪组织中进行富集，即使每次摄入的量很低，时间长了也能累积到很高的浓度。
而且这些药剂在喷洒时在空气、风的作用下，使受影响的范围不断地扩大；在雨水的作用下，会使药剂溶于水中，随着雨水流入河流或渗透到地下水，水的地表径流使污染的范围越来越大。
在鱼、鸟、蚯蚓等许多的昆虫、动物体内检测到化学药剂的成分。
大量的杀虫剂由生态链的底端摄入并蓄积，同时通过这些基础生物体的代谢繁衍而在其后代体内累积为所谓“安全浓度”的两倍、三倍、几十倍。
更具讽刺意味的是随着能量向高阶迁移，位居生物链高端的生物——人类体内的毒物含量将远远超过大自然内的平均浓度的数百倍。
这一恐怖的后果已经得到无数残酷现实的佐证，人类作为破坏自然的始作俑者，最终还是不得不自食其果。
书中大量的事实对此进行了论证：在佛罗里达州，两个小孩发现了一只空袋子，就用它来修补了一下秋千，其后不久两个孩子都死去了，她们的三个小伙伴都患病，因为这个袋子曾用来装过一种农药，叫做对硫磷的有机磷酸酯。
寂静的春天鸟儿不再歌唱读后感
寂静的春天鸟儿不再歌唱读后感英文回答："Silent Spring" is a thought-provoking book that left a deep impact on me. The book, written by Rachel Carson, explores the detrimental effects of pesticides on the environment and the consequences of human actions on nature. Carson's powerful writing style and meticulous research make this book a must-read for anyone interested in environmental issues.One of the main themes in "Silent Spring" is the lossof biodiversity and the disappearance of birdsong. Carson highlights how the use of pesticides, specifically DDT, has led to a decline in bird populations. The title itself, "Silent Spring," symbolizes the absence of the beautiful melodies of birds in the springtime due to the harmful effects of pesticides.The book made me realize the interconnectedness of allliving beings and the delicate balance of ecosystems. Carson's vivid descriptions of the devastating effects of pesticides on wildlife, particularly birds, left me deeply saddened. It made me reflect on the importance of preserving and protecting our natural environment.Carson's use of language and storytelling is captivating. She skillfully weaves together scientific facts, personal anecdotes, and poetic language to engage the reader. One example that stood out to me was when she described the decline of the bald eagle population. She wrote, "The bald eagle, once soaring high in the sky, now struggles to find a safe place to build its nest. Its majestic call, once a symbol of freedom, is now a rare sound in the wilderness." This imagery painted a vivid picture in my mind and evoked a strong emotional response.Another aspect of the book that resonated with me was Carson's call to action. She not only raises awareness about the negative impacts of pesticides but also advocates for responsible and sustainable practices. Her message is clear: we need to take action to protect our environmentbefore it's too late. This inspired me to make changes in my own life, such as reducing my use of harmful chemicals and supporting organizations that promote environmental conservation.中文回答：《寂静的春天鸟儿不再歌唱》是一本发人深省的书籍，给我留下了深刻的印象。
寂静的春天英语读后感
寂静的春天英语读后感第一篇：寂静的春天英语读后感There was a strange stillness.The birds, for examplewhere had they gone? The feeding stations in the backyards were deserted.The few birds seen anywhere were moribund;they trembled violently and could not fly.It was spring without voices.On the farms the hens brooded, but no chicks hatched.The roadsides, once so attractive, were now lined with browned and withered vegetation as though swept by fire.These, too, were silent, deserted by all living things.Even the streams were now lifeless.This is a strange scene described by Rachel Carson, who is regarded as the mother of modern environmental protection movement。
Silent Spring is her representative work which lighted the fire of environmental protection in America and the whole world.Before 1960s, no books or magazines talked about things like environment and ecosystem.Such a phenomenon means that environmental protection had not come to people’s mind and the social consciousness.Indeed, the main opinion in human society from the very past about nature is to set war against or conquer it.In fact, many of human’s progresses are made on the base of such opinion.Rachel Carson was the first person who doubted the correctness of the belief and brought the topic under focus.In Silent Spring, Carson described a miserable village which was dying under the using of DDT.The village used to be prosperous and beautiful.In spring, white clouds of bloom drifted above the green fields.In autumn, oak and maple and birch set up a blaze of color that flamed and flickered across a backdrop of pines.Then foxed barked in the hillsand deer silently crossed the fields, half hidden in the mists of the fall mornings.She thought that with the using of variety kinds of pesticide, especially DDTs, the village suffered enormous and irreversible damage and gradually withered and died.Soon it became just like the one described in the beginning.From her fine and smooth describing, I can even feel the groan of the town.Moreover Carson also sharply pointed out that the deep-seated cause for the environmental problem is the human’s arrogance and ignorance.So she asked people to correct the attitude toward the nature and reconsidered the developing path of human being.Carson thought that because of the antibody and differentiation, pesticides would never be completely useful.On the contrary, those more and more poisonous medicines, because of the enrichment effect, would accumulate in humans’ body.It’s qu ite sarcastic that we hurt ourselves much badly while hurting the others.Then she analyzed many poisonous components in pesticides.Those are all unfamiliar names except DDT, such as chlordane, chloronaphthalene, compound 497, etc.Those things really make me feel scared.We are on the top of the food chain, and it is such a perfect and fragile system.We human beings are just part of it and we depend on all of the creatures who stay on the lower positions.It is so hard and ridiculous to try to match the nature.Only in the state does man have a rational existence.Every species have their value to be on this world.Then no one knows what would happened if we force them to disappear.For example, let’s imagine the food chain as a meticulously made castle built by billions of little blocks and we human beings are the top one.There might be several tiny blocks on the bottom which you think is useless and dispensable.But what would happen if we take them away?Perhaps nothing happened, and perhaps the whole castle ruined.Destruction is always much easier than recovery, not counting those incurable ones.Humans always think that we are much cleverer than the other animals, so we become more and more conceited and firmly believe that we are the king.We didn’t see that the n ature is so magical and knows how to revenge.The pay back is much more violent and cruel.We need balance and order.The nature has its own rule.Our aim is to use it and live in harmony with it.The ecosystem is so delicate that even a tiny disturbance could lead an unexpected consequence, just like the butterfly effect.At the last chapter, some scientists came up with other ways to solve the pest problem----biotic control.There is now a bly running tide of interest in chemical sterility.Those sterile insects are released and mate the normal ones so that they won’t have any larva and get extinct gradually.This solution seems to be reasonable and helpful, but thinking about it carefully, you’ll find that it is just another way to ruin the food chain castle.Not only spring, but also summer and autumn would be still and silent in the future.It is lucky that Rachel still kept her mind clear.She didn’t agree with the way of conquering the nature.At the very end of the book, she wrote, The ‘control of nature’ is a phr ase conceived in arrogance, born of the Neanderthal age of biology and philosophy, when it was supposed that nature exists for the convenience of man.This sentence can be regarded as the book’s theme topic which is widely quoted in all kinds of articles about environmental protection.Carson is a great woman and fighter.When writing the book, she was suffering from huge pain of the operation for mammary cancer.After the book was published, the widely affect brought her not honor and fortune, but fierce attack from thechemical estate.She died only one year after the book’s publishing.On the spring of 1964, the great woman passed away, but Silent Spring made her voice never silent.The 20st century was a time that technology and economy developed rapidly, especially the 40 years after Silent Spring was published.But every spring, when flowers bloom, trees sprout, and water begins to flow, we used to recall a woman and her enduring works.We opened the window, and wonder if the spring is silent today, if it will be silent tomorrow.第二篇：读后感寂静的春天[范文模版]读后感寂静的春天读完这篇文章，我不禁想起了两句富有哲理的话语：we have more knowledge,but less judgment；we have multiplied out possessions,but reduced out values…...我们沉浸于自己创造了前人所无法企及的知识时代的辉煌之中，可我们真的知道自己在做什么吗，我们想过我们所做的一切将带来的后果吗？我们在短短几十年的时间，创造的过去几千年才能创造的物质文明，但我们的生活质量真的提高了吗？面对这两个发人深省的问题，我们不能不承认自己在行事之前是多么欠缺思考，我们在无法预知自己行为后果的情况下轻率地采取了许多看似高明实则愚蠢的行动，我们引以为豪的创造在某种程度上讲就是作茧自缚、自掘坟墓。
寂静的春天英语读后感50字
寂静的春天英语读后感50字英文回答："Silent Spring" is a thought-provoking and eye-opening book that explores the detrimental effects of pesticides on the environment. Through vivid descriptions and compelling evidence, Rachel Carson paints a grim picture of a world where nature's delicate balance is disrupted, and the consequences are dire. As I read through the pages, I couldn't help but feel a sense of urgency to take action and protect our planet.One of the most impactful aspects of the book is Carson's ability to connect the scientific research with real-life examples. She tells the story of a small town where the bird population declines drastically after the use of pesticides. This example not only illustrates the immediate consequences of pesticide use but also highlights the interconnectedness of ecosystems. It made me realize the importance of considering the long-term effects of ouractions on the environment.Furthermore, Carson's writing style is both informative and engaging. She uses vivid imagery and descriptive language to bring the natural world to life. For example, she describes the beauty of springtime in a way that captures the reader's imagination. This not only adds depth to the book but also makes it more relatable and accessible to a wider audience.Overall, "Silent Spring" is a powerful book that raises awareness about the devastating impact of pesticides on our environment. It serves as a wake-up call to the dangers of blindly relying on chemicals without considering the long-term consequences. It has inspired me to be more mindful of my own actions and to advocate for sustainable and eco-friendly practices.中文回答：《寂静的春天》是一本发人深省、令人惊叹的书，探讨了农药对环境的有害影响。
英语介绍寂静的春天作文
英语介绍寂静的春天作文Title: The Tranquil Spring: A Serene Portrait。
Spring, a season of rebirth and renewal, brings forth a sense of tranquility like no other. As nature awakens from its wintry slumber, a serene atmosphere envelops the surroundings, captivating hearts and minds with its quiet charm. In this essay, we delve into the essence of the tranquil spring, exploring its quiet beauty and profound significance.First and foremost, the tranquility of spring manifests in the gentle whispers of nature. As the buds unfurl and blossoms bloom, a subtle symphony of rustling leaves and chirping birds fills the air. Each sound, soft and melodious, contributes to the serene ambiance, soothing the soul and inviting contemplation. In the midst of this natural orchestra, one finds solace and peace, away from the hustle and bustle of everyday life.Moreover, the stillness of spring extends beyondauditory sensations to encompass visual delights. Picture-perfect landscapes adorned with vibrant hues of green, pink, and yellow paint a tranquil panorama that captivates the eye. From the delicate petals of cherry blossoms to thelush foliage of budding trees, every element of nature exudes a quiet elegance that speaks to the heart. Amidstthis picturesque scene, one cannot help but marvel at the beauty of simplicity and the power of silence.Furthermore, the tranquility of spring transcends the physical realm to touch the depths of the human spirit. In the midst of nature's renewal, individuals find themselves drawn to introspection and reflection. Whether strolling through a blooming garden or sitting beneath a blossoming tree, there exists a profound sense of inner calm and clarity. In these moments of solitude, amidst the serenityof spring, one discovers the beauty of self-discovery and the wisdom of silent contemplation.In addition to its intrinsic tranquility, spring holds profound significance in various cultural and spiritualtraditions. Across the globe, this season symbolizes renewal, hope, and the promise of new beginnings. From the festivities of Easter to the celebrations of Nowruz, springtime rituals reflect a collective reverence for nature's cyclical rhythms and the eternal cycle of life. Thus, the tranquility of spring transcends individual experience to unite humanity in a shared appreciation for the beauty of existence.In conclusion, the tranquil spring embodies a sense of peace and serenity that transcends words. From the gentle whispers of nature to the profound depths of the human spirit, this season invites us to pause, reflect, and appreciate the quiet beauty that surrounds us. In the midst of life's chaos and clamor, let us embrace the tranquility of spring and find solace in its silent embrace.。
读书报告-寂静的春天
寂静的春天》读书报告作者简介：雷切尔•卡逊(Rachel Carson , 1907 年 5 月 27 日- 1964 年 4 月 14 日), 美国海洋生物学家，但她是以她的小说《寂静的春天》 ( Silent Spring )引发了美国以至于全世界的环境保护事业。
蕾切尔•卡逊1907年5月27日生于宾夕法尼亚州泉溪镇，并在那儿度过童年。
她 1935年至 1952年间供职于美国联邦政府所属的鱼类及野生生物调查所，这使她有机会接触到许多环境问题。
在此期间，她曾写过一些有关海洋生态的著作，如《在海风下》，《海的边缘》和《环绕着我们的海洋》，这些著作使她获得了第一流作家的声誉。
内容简介：《寂静的春天》 1962 年在美国问世时，是一本很有争议的书，是标志着人类首次关注环境问题的著作。
它那惊世骇俗的关于农药危害人类环境的预言，不仅受到与之利害攸关的生产与经济部门的猛烈抨击，而且也强烈震撼了社会广大民众。
你若有心去翻阅上世纪 60 年代以前的报纸或书刊，你将会发现几乎找不到“环境保护”这个词。
这就是说，环境保护在那时并不是一个存在于社会意识和科学讨论中的概念。
确实，回想一下长期流行于全世界的口号——“向大自然宣战”、“征服大自然”，在这儿，大自然仅仅是人们征服与控制的对象，而非保护并与之和谐相处的对象。
人类的这种意识大概起源于洪荒的原始年月，一直持续到 20 世纪。
没有人怀疑它的正确性，因为人类文明的许多进展是基于此意识而获得的，人类当前的许多经济与社会发展计划也是基于此意识而制定的。
蕾切尔•卡逊(Rachel Carson )第一次对这一人类意识的绝对正确性提出了质疑。
这位瘦弱、身患癌症的女学者，她是否知道她是在向人类的基本意识和几千年的社会传统挑战《寂静的春天》出版两年之后，她心力交瘁，与世长辞。
作为一个学者与作家，卡逊所遭受的诋毁和攻击是空前的，但她所坚持的思想终于为人类环境意识的启蒙点燃了一盏明亮的灯。
寂静的春天读后感1000字(精选10篇)
寂静的春天读后感1000字《寂静的春天》是法国作家埃米尔·桑东于1952年出版的小说。
故事发生在法国一个偏僻的小镇上，讲述了一位中年男子米尔波先生在改变自己的生活前，经历了内心的困惑和反思。
小说以平静的节奏展示了米尔波先生的心灵历程，描绘了他对生活的思考和对自由的追求。
读完《寂静的春天》，我沉浸在文字中的寂静与思索中。
可以说，这本书给我留下了深刻的印象。
作者以细腻的笔触，勾勒出米尔波先生的内心世界，使我能够深入地感受到他的困惑和迷茫。
我仿佛置身于小说中，与米尔波先生一同经历他的一切。
这本书真正打动我的地方在于它对生活的深刻思考。
米尔波先生长时间以来过着一种不真实的生活，他感到生活缺少激情和意义。
然而，当他开始思考自己的困境时，他逐渐认识到命运并非完全操纵在他的手中，而是受到环境和社会的制约。
这使我不禁思考，我们所处的世界是否真的给予我们足够的自由，又是否存在着我们无法控制的力量？这本书无疑对我产生了重要的影响。
首先，它激发了我对自由的追求。
在书中，米尔波先生勇敢地踏出了固定的生活轨道，开始追求自己真正想要的生活。
这使我明白，只有勇于突破常规，才能真正找到自己的价值和意义。
其次，这本书教会了我如何审视生活。
米尔波先生以一种审慎而深刻的方式思考自己的人生，让我明白了思考的重要性。
我们应该反思自己的行为和选择，以便更好地面对生活中的困境和挑战。
《寂静的春天》给了我创新的思考和观点。
虽然小说中的故事发生在上世纪，但其中探讨的问题在今天依然有着重要的意义。
随着社会的改变和发展，我们需要重新审视自己的生活，并思考自由和选择的真正含义。
这本书引发了我对社会和生活的思考，使我更加关注当下的现实和自己的内心。
总而言之，《寂静的春天》是一本非常重要的书籍。
它以真实而深入的方式描绘了一个人的内心历程，引发了读者对生活和自由的思考。
这本书不仅给予我深刻的阅读体验，还启发了我的创新思考。
我相信，无论时间如何推移，这本书的价值都会一直存在下去。
寂静的春天读书笔记1000字（精选19篇）
寂静的春天读书笔记1000字（精选19篇）寂静的春天读书笔记1000字（精选19篇）读完一本名著以后，想必你一定有很多值得分享的心得，让我们好好写份读书笔记，把你的收获和感想记录下来吧。
到底应如何写读书笔记呢？以下是小编收集整理的寂静的春天读书笔记1000字，仅供参考，大家一起来看看吧。
寂静的春天读书笔记1000字篇1当鸟儿不再歌唱，当森林脱去了绿色的纱衣，当海洋毫无波纹，一切都是那么寂静，这个世界又将会怎样？《寂静的春天》是一本关于环境保护的书，书中描述了人类可能将面临一个没有鸟、蜜蜂和蝴蝶的世界。
春天应该是生机盎然、鸟语花香的季节，不应该是寂静无声的。
这本书引发了公众对环境的注意，各种环境保护组织纷纷成立，从而使各国签署了“人类环境宣言”，促进了环境保护事业的健康发展。
《寂静的春天》播下了新行动主义的种子，并且已经深深植根于广大人民群众中。
本书的作者蕾切尔·卡逊告诉我们：杀虫剂的过分利用与基本价值不协调，最坏的是它们制造了她所说的"死亡之河"，最好的情况是它们引起相对较长期的、缓慢的危害。
她告诫我们，关注环境不仅是工业界和政府的事情，也是民众的分内之事。
中国的环境保护事业也是从停止沙城农药厂的DDT 生产开始的，而后全面禁止了DDT的生产和使用。
在读《寂静的春天》时，我对其中的两句话印象深刻。
它们是这样写的：“可以说在很大程度上，地球上植物和动物的自然形态和习性都是由环境塑成的，就地球上时间的整个阶段而言，生命改造环境的反作用实际上一直是相对微小的，仅仅在出现了生命新种人类之后，生命才具有了改造其周围大自然的异常能力。
当人类向着他所宣告的征服大自然的目标前进时，他已写下了一部令人痛心的破坏大自然的记录，这种破坏不仅仅直接危害了人们所居住的大地，而且也危害了与人类共享大自然的其他生命。
”这两句话说明了人类对大自然界的改造具有能动性，同时自然界又反作用人类，良好的自然环境对于人类的发展是极其重要的。
寂静的春天 英文版
寂静的春天英文版Silent SpringBy Rachel CarsonIn the early days of spring, the world awakens from its slumber. Birdsong fills the air, and blossoms adorn the trees. But in the quiet corners, a sinister threat lurks, a threat that silently undermines the very foundation of life.Rachel Carson, a pioneering marine biologist and conservationist, sounded the alarm in her groundbreaking 1962 book "Silent Spring." This seminal work exposed the devastating consequences of the indiscriminate use of pesticides, particularly DDT, on the environment.The Silent WorldCarson's narrative begins with a haunting descriptionof a world gone silent, a world where the songs of birdshave been extinguished. This grim prophecy served as astark warning that the silent spring was not merely a metaphor but a very real possibility.The culprit, Carson argued, was the widespread use of synthetic pesticides like DDT. These chemicals, designed to kill insects, had unintended and far-reaching consequences. They accumulated in the environment, poisoning wildlife and harming human health.Bioaccumulation and BiomagnificationDDT, a persistent and bioaccumulative substance, accumulates in the fatty tissues of organisms. As organisms are consumed by higher-level predators, the DDT concentration increases, a process known as biomagnification. Birds, at the top of the food chain, were particularly vulnerable to the effects of biomagnification.Carson's research revealed alarming evidence of DDT's impact on bird populations. She documented the thinning of eggshells in eagles and other predatory birds, leading toreproductive failure and population decline. This discovery sent shockwaves through the scientific community and sparked widespread concern.Environmental ContaminationCarson's book also highlighted the pervasive nature of environmental contamination. DDT and other pesticides were drifting far beyond their intended targets, contaminating waterways, soil, and even food supplies. Thisindiscriminate pollution threatened not only wildlife but also human health.Carson warned of potential human health risks associated with DDT exposure, including cancer, neurological disorders, and reproductive problems. She advocated for a precautionary approach, urging a ban on the use of persistent pesticides until their safety could be fully assessed.A Call to Action"Silent Spring" became a catalyst for environmental activism. It galvanized public opinion, forcing governments and industries to confront the dangers of pesticide misuse. The book played a pivotal role in the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1970 and the subsequent ban on DDT and other persistent pesticides in many countries.Legacy and Impact"Silent Spring" remains an enduring testament to the power of science and citizen engagement. It transformed the way we think about environmental pollution and ignited a global movement for environmental protection. Carson's legacy continues to inspire generations of scientists, conservationists, and policymakers to work towards a more sustainable and healthy future for our planet.The Resilience of NatureWhile "Silent Spring" exposed the devastating consequences of unchecked pollution, it also hinted at theresilience and adaptability of the natural world. Despite the severe impacts ofDDT, bird populations have gradually recovered in many areas, demonstrating nature's remarkable ability to heal when given the opportunity.Carson's work taught us that we are inextricably connected to the environment and that our actions have far-reaching consequences. By understanding these connections, we can make informed choices that protect our air, water, and wildlife for generations to come."Silent Spring" remains a timeless masterpiece, a clarion call to safeguard the intricate web of life that sustains us. Its message is as urgent today as it was when it was first published, reminding us that we have a responsibility to be stewards of the environment and to ensure that the springs of our future are filled with birdsong and not silence.。
寂静的春天读书报告
寂静的春天读书报告Company Document number：WUUT-WUUY-WBBGB-BWYTT-1982GT《Silent Spring》读书报告作者简介：蕾切尔·卡逊（Rachel Carson，1907年5月27日—1964年4月14日），生于宾夕法尼亚州泉溪镇，从小爱好文学，10岁时就在儿童刊物上发表作品。
1929年卡逊以优异成绩获得约翰霍布金斯大学动物学硕士学位，其后在马里兰大学教了几年动物学。
1936年卡逊被聘为美国渔业局的海洋生物学家，同时在《巴尔的摩太阳报》兼职撰写有关海洋生物的专题文章。
1962年6月卡逊的醒世之作《寂静的春天》(Silent Spring)开始在《纽约客》摘要连载，同年该书出版，引发了美国以至于全世界的环境保护事业。
她1935年至1952年间供职于美国联邦政府所属的鱼类及野生生物调查所，这使她有机会接触到许多环境问题。
在此期间，她曾写过一些有关海洋生态的着作，如《在海风下》，《海的边缘》和《环绕着我们的海洋》，这些着作使她获得了第一流作家的声誉。
内容简介：《寂静的春天》于1962年在美国问世，该书包括17个章节。
在书中，卡逊主要向我们讲述了化学制剂，特别是杀虫剂对环境的污染问题。
作者称杀虫剂为杀生剂，因为在它杀死害虫的同时，也侵害着居民的健康、动植物的生长、周围的环境。
书中主要介绍了化学药剂包括狄式杀虫剂、对硫磷、七氯和马拉息昂等等。
许多这类化学杀虫剂都属于“持久性有机污染物”，它们的降解速度缓慢，危害持久。
还有一些脂溶性的化学品，比如DDT，能够在动物的脂肪组织中进行富集，即使每次摄入的量很低，时间长了也能累积到很高的浓度。
而且，这些药剂在喷洒时在空气、风的作用下，使受影响的范围不断地扩大；在雨水的作用下，会使药剂溶于水中，随着雨水流入河流或渗透到地下水，水的地表径流使污染的范围越来越大……书中大量列举了在鱼、鸟、蚯蚓等许多的昆虫、动物体内检测到化学药剂的成分，且检测出的含量呈现出放射性的扩大倍数，很难想象长此以往我们周围的环境是怎样的情景作者在书的结尾处强调，我们必须与其他生物共同分享我们的地球，为了解决这个问题，我们发明了许多新的、富于想象力和创造性的方法；随着这一形势的发展，一个要反复提及的话题是：我们是在与生命——活的群体、它们经受的所有压力和反压力、它们的兴盛与衰败——打交道。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
We Have Only One Earth------Book report of Silent Spring Man is a part of nature, and his war against nature is inevitable a war against himself.-----Rachel Carson If we scan those newspapers or books written by 1960s, we will find it difficult to find something about environmental protection. In other words, environmental protection was not a meaningful concept in social cognition and was not valued in academic experiments at that time. As a matter of fact, tho se slogans such as “conquer nature” were prevalent in the world, which meant that nature was only the object to be controlled not to be protected or to live with in peace. The concept may derive from primitive society when people did not have sufficient materials to exist in harsh environment, and all of their wishes were to conquer nature and develop the economy regardless of the possible outcomes derived from environmental problems. Rachel Carson may be the first person to doubt the correctness of the idea which had existed in human society for thousands of years.Silent spring is a book which leads to a heated discussion about environmental protection. Even those people who disgust Rachel Carson also have to acknowledge that Rachel Carson did contribute a lot in environment protection promoting. In her book, she described a world without birds, bees or butterflies because of the use of pesticides. It was she, a weak woman with mammary cancer, woke nearly each person to concern about the future of the earth. After that, thousands of organizations aim to protect environment were founded, The 1st United Nations Conference on the human environment was convened in 1972, on which, a declaration was signed to promote environment protection.The overriding theme of Silent Spring is the powerful—and often negative—effect humans have on the natural world. Carson's main argument is that pesticides have detrimental effects on the environment. In Silent Spring, Carson described a miserable village which was dying under the using of DDT. The village used to be prosperous andbeautiful. “I n spring, white clouds of bloom drifted above the green fields. In autumn, oak and maple and birch set up a blaze of color that flamed and flickered across a backdrop of pines. Then foxed barked in the hills and deer silently crossed the fields, half hidde n in the mists of the fall mornings.”[1]However, with the use of pesticides, especially DDT, the village suffered enormous and irreversible damage and gradually withered and died. The use of DDT in other areas has also had major unanticipated affects since it is persistent and poisonous to many forms of life. Pesticides would never be completely useful since targeted pests may develop resistance to pesticides and weakened ecosystems fall prey to unanticipated invasive species. On the contrary, those more and more poisonous medicines, because of the enrichment effect, would accumulate in humans’ body.After the discussion of the pesticides, she start to discuss the importance of animals, especially wildlife. “Every species have their value to be on this worl d. Then no one knows what would happened if we force them to disappear… Only in the state does man have a rational existence…There might be several tiny blocks on the bottom, which you think is useless and dispensable. But what would happen if we take them away? Perhaps nothing happened, and perhaps the whole castle ruined” [2] we are on the top of the food chain, and it is such a perfect and fragile system, and we are just a small part of it and we depend on all of the creatures who stay on the lower posit ions. ”Not One Less” will be appropriate in describing the nature.If Rachel Carson had stopped here, Silent Spring would only have to be a successful science reading. But after that, she pointed out that the cause for the environmental problem is the huma n’s arrogance and ignorance. So she asked people to correct the attitude toward the nature and reconsidered the developing path of human being. In the primitive society, even though people did not have the awareness to protect the environment, their ability to transform the nature was so weak that the nature would recover soon. However, with the development of science and technology, people have much bigger ability to confront the nature, some people even declared that people have “conquered” nature. But they forget that we are only a small part of nature, conquering nature is a way to suicide. Nature does not have sufficient ability to recover from thedestruction, so it will take revenge on humans, all of its need is time. So if we do not change, we will be never forgiven by next generation.In my opinion, nature is an integral nature. We should promote our knowledge of relation of chemical and ecology. Before we use chemicals, we should know clearly about their effect on environment, it is necessary to bring a healthy caution to the use of chemicals. An ignoring of the environment protection has brought harm to people in the past and could cause unprecedented harm in the future.After all, we have only one earth. Protect it, not only for ourselves, but for future generations as well.[1][2] Source: “Silent Spring” Rachel Carson 1962.。