论《失乐园》中撒旦的形象

合集下载

浅析_失乐园_中反抗者撒旦的英雄气概

浅析_失乐园_中反抗者撒旦的英雄气概
弥尔顿在作品中故意不突出其中的英雄,这一模棱两可 性过于通透而不可能是无心之举。而看起来这更像是弥尔顿 希望通过带领读者在每一个人物的意识中作一番旅行,将这 样一首史诗构建于其英语和基督教文化之上,开发出自由和
责任感的每一个层面。作为叙述者,弥尔顿这样对圣子说: “我如今又大胆地鼓翼重来寻访你,我虽然久被拘留在幽暗 里面,歌咏‘混沌’和‘永恒的夜’,翱翔着,先向下方幽 冥界降落,再向上方返航升起,冒险飞进。”(3:3-20)弥尔 顿将他这种寓言式的在天国和地球上的跋涉描述为跟阿涅俄 斯,奥德赛或阿溪里的旅行十分相识的“模糊的逗留”。虽 然他双目失明,他以叙述者的身份像其他盲人预言家那样解 释说他被赐予了别的天赋可以弥补他的身体缺陷。
理,那么,任何幻想或虚构都必须切近真实。
注释:
贺拉斯文艺创作的三原则,是对亚里士多德思想的定型 ①多米尼克·塞克里坦.艾小明译.古典主义[M].北京:昆
化和系统化,不但传播了亚里士多德的古典现实主义理论, 仑出版社,1989.
而且他所表达的古典艺术理想和制定的一套古典艺术原则, ②王焕生.古罗马文学批评史纲[ M ] .南京:译林出版社,
不着形迹到井然有序的演变过程。 尽管这一描述刻画了世界 隽语更好的总结了这一点:“我们最终的希望就是彻底的绝
的构造,但其终点似乎在于魔鬼的现身,因为弥尔顿将他视 望” (II:142-143)。
60 为一个自由,有理性的、完全的意识主体。从这一点上说,
人和撒旦的不同随着情节的铺开而逐渐显露出来。亚当
是一套12卷本的素体无韵诗,大概写于1658—1663,1657年 方的迷失是永恒的。随着对于他的堕落了解的深入,亚当对
出版,它以史诗一般的磅礴气势揭示了人的原罪与堕落并评 夏娃的安慰深表哀叹并予以摒弃。 夏娃没有放弃并最终让他

《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性论析

《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性论析

《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性论析作者:董亚楠来源:《青年文学家》2019年第23期摘; 要:弥尔顿的作品《失乐园》完成在十七世纪的英国,那时的英国宗教信仰色彩非常浓厚,人们都信奉上帝是完美的、不容置疑的。

《失乐园》中撒旦的形象却是要与上帝斗争到底的一个神灵,在失败之后不反省自己,还继续与上帝抗争,最后把灾难带去人间。

但是对于撒旦形象的认识很多人的观点都不一致,有称赞其抗争精神的,也有反对其对抗上帝行为的,因此撒旦的形象是很复杂的,很难有统一的定论。

本文就《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性进行论析。

关键词:《失乐园》;撒旦;形象;复杂[中图分类号]:I106; [文献标识码]:A[文章编号]:1002-2139(2019)-23-0-02弥尔顿,英国的政治家和学者,著有史诗《失乐园》,和荷马的《荷马史诗》、但丁的《神曲》并列称为西方的三大诗歌。

弥尔顿生长在一个生活富足的家庭里,父母也都是清教徒。

这样的成长环境为弥尔顿的文学作品提供了很多灵感,让他对文学充满热爱,对宗教文学更是迷恋,他的文学作品里都包含着宗教的成分。

在他的史诗作品《失乐园》里面主要描述了撒旦先是聚集一部分天使来对抗上帝,失败后被逐出天堂。

随后又通过各种手段潜入伊甸园,通过诱骗,成功使得亚当与夏娃偷吃了伊甸园里知识树上面的禁果,导致亚当和夏娃被上帝责罚赶出伊甸园的故事。

还有撒旦与上帝强烈的对抗行为也是《失乐园》中的精彩部分,最后撒旦的结局就是和其同伙一起被变成了蛇,受到了应有的惩罚。

在作品里,撒旦的形象塑造是非常复杂与多面性的,我们要全面分析才能更好地来解读这一人物形象。

一、弥尔顿《失乐园》中的撒旦形象撒旦在《失乐园》里的形象不能从一个角度进行单一的定论,不同的人就有不同的理解角度,有人持肯定态度,有人持否定态度,也有人保持中立。

从肯定的角度来看,撒旦身上散发着一种贵族气概,有一定的领袖精神,带领着众人开启革命的道路,也许不一定会有收获,但是也能够笼络人心,有着很强的斗争反抗的精神,可以描述为一个英雄的形象。

撒旦在《失乐园》中的形象:反叛的英雄和堕落的魔鬼

撒旦在《失乐园》中的形象:反叛的英雄和堕落的魔鬼

2021-05文艺生活LITERATURE LIFE撒旦在《失乐园》中的形象:反叛的英雄和堕落的魔鬼曹宸源(对外经济贸易大学,北京100029)摘要:本文将从弥尔顿本人的角度来研究《失乐园》中撒旦的形象。

传统研究将撒旦归类为叛逆的英雄或邪恶的魔鬼。

本文从弥尔顿的视角和他所要表达的内容出发,阐述了撒旦同时作为叛逆的英雄和堕落的魔鬼的形象,而不是把撒旦划分为单一的好的或坏的形象。

关键词:弥尔顿;《失乐园》;撒旦形象中图分类号:I561.072文献标识码:A文章编号:1005-5312(2021)15-0058-02DOI:10.12228/j.issn.1005-5312.2021.15.027一、介绍约翰·弥尔顿是英国诗人和知识分子,曾在英联邦国务委员会,在奥利弗·克伦威尔领导下担任公务员。

他以《失乐园》而闻名,这部作品被广泛认为是英国最伟大的史诗。

弥尔顿的《失乐园》中的撒旦是文学史上最具活力、最复杂的人物之一。

要分析撒旦,关注弥尔顿是至关重要的。

《失乐园》讲述大天使长撒旦因为反抗上帝的权威被打入地狱,他并没有屈服,而是在地狱建起万魔殿,商议推翻上帝的统治。

为了复仇,他决定进入伊甸园,变成一条蛇引诱亚当和夏娃,他们受被撒旦附身的蛇的引诱,偷吃了上帝明令禁吃的知识树上的果子。

最终,亚当与夏娃被逐出了伊甸园,离开了乐园,这也是名称失乐园的由来。

撒旦形象的复杂性使其成为其中主要人物。

与扁平人物不同,撒旦的立体性使其很难被定义为一个正面人物或是负面人物。

他身上的反叛精神构成了他正面形象最有力的支点,像反抗君主制的弥尔顿一样,其笔下的撒旦也反抗着上帝的强权,他坚韧,虽堕入地狱仍不改其志,在万魔殿中鼓舞人心,最终在伊甸园达到了目的。

同时,他是恶魔的本质也是不可忽视的一点。

他没有直接对抗上帝,而是以诱骗的形式侵扰无辜的人类。

研究撒旦的形象已经成为重要的学术话题之一。

二、复杂的撒旦形象弥尔顿的撒旦一直为评论家们所讨论。

弥尔顿笔下的撒旦形象

弥尔顿笔下的撒旦形象

弥尔顿笔下的撒旦形象如下是有关弥尔顿笔下的撒旦形象:弥尔顿的代表性长篇诗作《失乐园》创造性地借用了《圣经》中的故事,表达了符合时代发展和个人价值追求的新思想。

弥尔顿笔下的撒旦颠覆了传统的撒旦形象,塑造了一个崭新的撒旦,这主要表现在:(1)撒旦的反叛英雄形象弥尔顿笔下的撒旦首先是位英雄,代表着弥尔顿的革命思想。

其英雄气魄在于他具有敢于向最高权威抗争的精神:为争取平等和自由,推翻上帝的独裁统治,他领导反叛天使与上帝进行斗争。

在诗中是撒旦敢于首先怀疑毫无道理却非让人盲目服从不可的绝对命令,率部反抗,大闹天宫。

第一个回合失败了,他不服气,不认输,不气馁,似有远见预谋地创造出排炮来,险些儿使得天兵天将对阵中措手不及,万分狼狈,连上帝在天国也预言有可能丢掉山头。

被打落地狱后,撒旦心里明白,不能力敌,但装腔作势,放不下架子,不愿意失去领导地位,只求破坏上帝的计划,求间接报复。

但是他崇尚自由,他让反对者押比叠争辩而去,地狱议会上他也征求大家的意见。

历经千辛万苦在新创造的居伊甸乐园中找到人类先祖双亲的是他,利用时机促成全诗主题的展现的也是他。

(2)撒旦的堕落者形象撒旦虽然是一位天使,但却被赋予人一般的复杂感情和欲望,使他具有强烈的人性色彩。

他虽豪迈,但也有内心悔恨和绝望之时。

他恨太阳,因为阳光让他想起了昔日的辉煌。

与此同时,他也利欲熏心,妄图取代上帝,建立自己作威作福的权势。

他还骄傲的认为自己是“衡量万物的标准”,是宇宙的中心,从而认为对于他“一切都可容许”。

在地狱,他为自己建立了金碧辉煌的万魔殿。

当他看到人类始祖仪容俊秀、生活幸福时便心生妒忌,处心积虑的引诱他们犯罪,以此来报复上帝,毁掉他所创造的福境——人类始祖居住的伊甸园,使人类受到上帝的惩罚,从而达到自己不可告人的目的。

撒旦在极端个人主义的驱使下,一步步走向堕落,以致到了暴虐和放荡的地步。

尤其是当他引诱人类始祖的计谋得逞时,便向新世界传播“罪恶”和“死亡”,违抗“自然法规”,致人于死地。

简述失乐园中撒旦的形象外国文学

简述失乐园中撒旦的形象外国文学

简述失乐园中撒旦的形象外国文学有人认为,撒旦是人类失去乐园的祸根,最终受到上帝的惩罚。

但作为一个魔鬼,撒旦不是一个击即溃、头脑简单的傻瓜,否则耶稣所受的考验就称不上奇迹了。

对付人类,撒旦一计不成又升一计,所以人类上了他的当。

在天堂,他也同样不甘寂寞,首次谋反被打入地狱仍不甘心,甚至更加疯狂地鼓动再次造反,向“独揽大权,肆虐天庭”的上帝“进行一场永不调和的战争”。

的确,撒旦的演说慷慨激昂,非常精彩,制造出一派不战不休的气势。

如果我们把它与其创作时的历史背景联系起来,上帝才是一个专制、施暴者的化身。

因此作者从撒旦的形象上隐藏着作者对革命势力的悲哀,以及对暴君者们的嘲笑和讽刺。

在诗歌中,塑造了撒旦这一叛逆者的革命形象,作者以撒旦为资产阶级革命的代言人,颂扬了反叛专制暴政的资产阶级革命思想,而最终撒旦在对上帝的对抗中失败,从而失去天堂的乐园,寓意着资产阶级革命的失败和封建势力的复辟。

作者在感情上对撒旦的失败和受到的惩罚表达了同情之心,因为撒旦的失败和受到的惩罚,很像资本主义受封建权威的压迫。

但是由于诗人是一个虔诚的教徒,在理智上并不允许他对撒旦持肯定态度,这就造就了撒旦矛盾形象的另一面,也就是撒旦本性里恶的一面的表现。

撒旦的英雄形象主要表现在前两部,那是叛逆者的英雄气概。

诗人的宗教信仰决定了撒旦最后的命运,凡是违抗上帝旨意者,最终都会受到惩罚的。

人类也是如此,亚当和夏娃受到撒旦的诱惑,违背了上帝的旨意,最终被赶出了伊甸园,但是人类的被驱逐和撒旦的被驱逐也是有区别的。

亚当和夏娃在走出伊甸园时,他们对于自己的行为怀着深深的忏悔之心,圣子给予了他们启示,天使为他们指点未来,只要他们诚心忏悔,最终是会得到上帝的原谅的,他们是满怀着希望地走向了另一个世界。

而撒旦的结局却是迥然不同的,那是他罪有应得的,这是因为撒旦选择了孤注一掷的卑劣的报复,并且没有为他的报复行为产生悔恨之意。

在成功地诱惑了人类,使无辜的人类受到上帝的惩罚时,撒旦欢呼自己的胜利,但是此时他却发现,他以及他的徒众都变成了令人厌恶的蛇,也使我们最终认清了撒旦的真实面目,他依旧是一个邪恶的魔鬼,这也是撒旦在《失乐园》中最后的形象。

失乐园中撒旦形象

失乐园中撒旦形象

试析《失乐园》中撒旦的形象车家玲(安阳师范学院人文管理学院,河南安阳 455000)摘要:撒旦是《失乐园》中颇具有争议性的人物,他既是一位为了平等和自由敢于向最高权威进行不屈不饶抗争的反叛英雄,又是一个权欲熏心、骄矜狂妄的堕落者同时他还是祢尔顿关于自由意志与理性原则并存的思想观念的艺术载体,即人为了自由和理想而奋斗,但同时人的行为得受到真理的约束。

关键字:撒旦;双重人格;自由与理性一、引言约翰·弥尔顿(1608-1674)是十七世纪英国著名的诗人、思想家、政治家和政论家。

他出身于伦敦一个公证人家庭,青少年时代起思想进步,厌恶封建思想,痛恨教会腐败。

革命爆发后他积极投身革命,参加了革命政府的工作,并撰写政论,先后发表了《论出版自由》、《论国王和官吏的权力》等文章而轰动整个欧洲。

王朝复辟后他虽然遭监禁,著作被焚烧,但仍然坚持革命立场,在双目失明,经济拮据的情况下完成了三大史诗《失乐园》、《复乐园》、《力士参孙》。

1674年诗人与世长辞。

弥尔顿的长篇史诗《失乐园》( Paradise Lost, 1667)深邃、高贵、整饬、优美,一直被誉为“英语中最伟大的诗作”,是英国文学史上不可多得的鸿篇巨制,在世界文学史上可与《神曲》和《浮士德》相媲美。

弥尔顿的长篇史诗《失乐园》,以《圣经·旧约·创世记》第二、三章关于人类始祖亚当、夏娃在撒旦引诱下偷食禁果犯下原罪,被上帝逐出伊甸园的故事为蓝本,成功地将诗人—作为一个清教徒,所相信的人类重返上帝的乐园的回归之路极为完整、生动地展现在读者面前。

这条路发端于人类始祖的原罪,转折于耶稣基督道成肉身的救赎,作结于自由意志选择下的灵魂的忏悔和回归。

诗人满怀豪情的诗意书写,所展现的是诗人的人生理想、人生信念。

就全诗而论,从太初谈起,开天辟地,创造世界,创造人类;借《圣经》故事,虽涉及全人类原罪赎罪的悲剧,但实质上说的是人类求知求生,追求自由人权,反对盲目迷信,反对封建专制,建立人类社会理想的大同世界。

从文艺心理学视角解读《失乐园》中的人物形象

从文艺心理学视角解读《失乐园》中的人物形象

从文艺心理学视角解读《失乐园》中的人物形象《失乐园》是约翰·密尔顿的史诗诗歌作品,被誉为英国文学史上最伟大的作品之一。

全诗以上帝和撒旦为主题,展现了人性和道德的冲突,同时也展现了作者对于宗教和政治的思考。

从文艺心理学的视角来解读《失乐园》中的人物形象,我们可以更深入地理解作品中的人物形象、行为和内心世界。

我们来看主要人物亚当和夏娃。

亚当代表了人类的理性与自由意志,夏娃则代表了人性的感性与情感。

在史诗中,亚当和夏娃被描绘成最完美的地上情侣,在伊甸园里享受天堂般的生活。

撒旦的诱惑使得他们违背上帝的命令,导致他们被驱逐出伊甸园。

在这一过程中,亚当和夏娃的内心世界发生了巨大的变化,他们的理性和感性纠缠在一起,产生了心灵的痛苦和矛盾。

从文艺心理学的角度来看,亚当和夏娃的形象代表了人类内心冲突的状况,也体现了人类思想和情感的复杂性。

主要人物撒旦也是《失乐园》中一个极具代表性的形象。

撒旦原本是上帝的天使长,但因为嫉妒上帝而背叛,最终被驱逐到地狱。

在史诗中,撒旦展现了复杂的内心世界,他对上帝的憎恨和对人类的怜悯交织在一起,形成了一种矛盾的心理状态。

从文艺心理学的角度来看,撒旦的形象代表了人性中黑暗与光明的交织,也体现了人类欲望和道德的冲突。

上帝的形象也是《失乐园》中一个重要的人物形象。

上帝被描绘为至高无上的存在,他的意志是宇宙的规律,他对人类的怜悯与正义也体现了他的慈悲与公正。

从文艺心理学的角度来看,上帝的形象代表了人类对至善至美的追求,也体现了人类对神的信仰和崇敬。

《失乐园》中的人物形象在文艺心理学的视角下展现了人类内心世界的复杂性,也反映了人性中光明与黑暗的矛盾。

亚当和夏娃代表了理性与感性的冲突,撒旦代表了欲望与道德的冲突,上帝代表了至善至美的追求。

通过对这些人物形象的深入解读,我们可以更好地理解史诗作品《失乐园》中所表达的宗教、哲学和道德的思考,也更好地理解人类内心世界的复杂性。

弥尔顿《失乐园》中的撒旦形象及长诗主题

弥尔顿《失乐园》中的撒旦形象及长诗主题

长 诗 主题 的 撒 旦 是 一 个 自 由 的 勇 者 ,透 过 对 上帝 的反叛 ,为 了追逐 自 由 , 将 这 种 反 叛 进 行 到 底 ,在 他 的 部 是 撒 旦 内 心 不 断 地 扭 曲 ,是 一 个
诗人 、政 论家 以及 民主斗 士 ,英 国文学史 上最伟大 的六大 诗人之
点。

自由的不屈精 神 。绝不 屈服 ,就 算永在 地狱 ,也 要斗争 到底 的坚 决意 志 。这样崇 尚 自由 、高 大独
立 的英 雄 形 象 ,彻 底 颠 覆 了 经》 中撤旦 的 “ 罪 恶 ” 形 象 ,此 时 的 撒 旦 隐 约 中 凸 显 着 天 使 般 的
从 本 质 上 看 ,弥 尔 顿 塑 造 的
是 亚 当与 夏 娃 的故 事 ,二 是 撒 旦 对 抗 上 帝 的 故 事 。 其 中引 用 了 大 量 圣 经 中 的 人 物 ,通 过 丰 富 的 语 言描 述 将 各 个 人 物 刻 画 得 更 为 生
主 义的快 速 发展 。在 《 失乐 园》 中 ,撒旦 与上帝 的对 战喻 示着资
撒旦形象
( 一 ) 悲 情 英 雄 ,抗 争 的 反 叛者 ?
索 ,这便 是 《 失乐 园》 长 诗的 主
题所 在 。
在 《 失乐 园》 中 ,开篇 撒旦 以革 命失败 后 的悲 情英雄 形象开 始 ,从撒旦反 叛上 帝的故 事情节 来 看 ,不 仅 反映 出撒 旦 的野 心 ,
产 主义 对封 建 主义 的最 后反 抗 , 突 出 两 级 内 战 的 属 性 与 必 然 结 果。 同时 , 《 失 乐 园》 中 ,弥 尔 顿 通 过 刻 画 亚 当 与 夏 娃 的 角 色 来 折 射 历 史 事 件 ,人 民 群 众 作 为 历

解析《失乐园》中撒旦人性特征

解析《失乐园》中撒旦人性特征

解析《失乐园》中撒旦的人性特征摘要:长时期以来,《失乐园》中的撒旦一直是人们关注的焦点,其形象的复杂性激发人们从不同角度进行阐释。

在初步了解约翰弥尔顿的基础上,本文逐步对撒旦的人性色彩进行分析。

从而给人以一个有着人的特性,但却是一个为了自己私欲而引诱人类始祖犯罪的卑鄙形象。

关键词:撒旦《失乐园》约翰·弥尔顿人性一、简介约翰·弥尔顿(1608-1674)是十七世纪英国最著名的诗人、思想家、政治家和政论家,是欧洲十七世纪进步文化的基石,是文艺复兴和启蒙思想的最初启发者。

《失乐园》是他的主要作品。

《失乐园》的争论由来己久,其焦点几乎都集中在这部史诗的一位主人公撒旦身上,他被不同的评论家们阐释成罪恶的化身或史诗英雄,典型的清教徒革命家或是对被处以绞形的英国查理一世的影射。

威廉·布莱克甚至于说弥尔顿“成为魔鬼的同党而不自觉”。

哈兹里特也说:“撒旦是诗歌作品中最具有英雄主义的题材,不仅他的性格刻画完美无缺,而且其整个构思也崇高无比。

”且不论作者意欲将撒旦刻画成反抗暴政的英雄或是背叛上帝又引诱我们人类始祖犯罪的卑鄙小人,作者将这个人物刻画的却是非常成功。

让人看到了属于撒旦的人性。

二、基督自由和人类理性弥尔顿受文艺复兴的影响,他从小接了受人文主义的教育,反对封建礼教。

捍卫民主,肯定人的价值,推崇自由。

基督教人文主义是在对柏拉图主义和中世纪的基督教新教义的综合下形成的。

以人为衡量一切事物的标准,注重人对于真和善的追求,启发人们认识自身的价值,以人性反对神权,用个性解放反对禁欲主义,用理性反对蒙昧。

弥尔顿的《失乐园》中表现出了基督教人文主义:基督自由和人类理性。

诗中的撒旦毫无疑问是一个悲剧的角色,但也不失为一个另类英雄,他宣称自己是自由的捍卫者,反抗上帝的绝对权力,他认为上帝是:“独揽大权,在天上掌握虐政呢。

”于是同自己的生存环境中做斗争,敢于反抗。

当撒旦为了其自由从高高在上的天使坠落成地狱的恶魔,在反抗上帝时,他说:“你们必也自知都是天上的子民,本来不从属于谁,即使不完全平等,却都自由,平等的自由,因为地位和等级,跟自由不相予盾,可以和谐地共存。

《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性论析

《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性论析

文学评论·外国文学《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性论析董亚楠 郑州职业技学院摘 要:弥尔顿的作品《失乐园》完成在十七世纪的英国,那时的英国宗教信仰色彩非常浓厚,人们都信奉上帝是完美的、不容置疑的。

《失乐园》中撒旦的形象却是要与上帝斗争到底的一个神灵,在失败之后不反省自己,还继续与上帝抗争,最后把灾难带去人间。

但是对于撒旦形象的认识很多人的观点都不一致,有称赞其抗争精神的,也有反对其对抗上帝行为的,因此撒旦的形象是很复杂的,很难有统一的定论。

本文就《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性进行论析。

关键词:《失乐园》;撒旦;形象;复杂作者简介:董亚楠(1987-),女,汉族,河南省郑州市荥阳人,郑州职业技术学院助教,研究方向:语言文学。

[中图分类号]:I106 [文献标识码]:A[文章编号]:1002-2139(2019)-23-088-02弥尔顿,英国的政治家和学者,著有史诗《失乐园》,和荷马的《荷马史诗》、但丁的《神曲》并列称为西方的三大诗歌。

弥尔顿生长在一个生活富足的家庭里,父母也都是清教徒。

这样的成长环境为弥尔顿的文学作品提供了很多灵感,让他对文学充满热爱,对宗教文学更是迷恋,他的文学作品里都包含着宗教的成分。

在他的史诗作品《失乐园》里面主要描述了撒旦先是聚集一部分天使来对抗上帝,失败后被逐出天堂。

随后又通过各种手段潜入伊甸园,通过诱骗,成功使得亚当与夏娃偷吃了伊甸园里知识树上面的禁果,导致亚当和夏娃被上帝责罚赶出伊甸园的故事。

还有撒旦与上帝强烈的对抗行为也是《失乐园》中的精彩部分,最后撒旦的结局就是和其同伙一起被变成了蛇,受到了应有的惩罚。

在作品里,撒旦的形象塑造是非常复杂与多面性的,我们要全面分析才能更好地来解读这一人物形象。

一、弥尔顿《失乐园》中的撒旦形象撒旦在《失乐园》里的形象不能从一个角度进行单一的定论,不同的人就有不同的理解角度,有人持肯定态度,有人持否定态度,也有人保持中立。

从肯定的角度来看,撒旦身上散发着一种贵族气概,有一定的领袖精神,带领着众人开启革命的道路,也许不一定会有收获,但是也能够笼络人心,有着很强的斗争反抗的精神,可以描述为一个英雄的形象。

弥尔顿的失乐园

弥尔顿的失乐园

弥尔顿的《失乐园》中撒旦形象分析约翰·弥尔顿是17世纪英国最著名的诗人、思想家、政治家和政论家,是欧洲17世纪进步文化的基石。

他从小受人文主义的教育,反对封建礼教,反对不彻底的英国宗教改革,同时他又鼓吹自由、平等、博爱,强调弑君无罪论,被称为启蒙思想的先驱者。

在新旧思想的搏斗中,在困苦艰难中写出诗作《失乐园》。

全部诗长达万行,分十二卷,是一部以圣经为题材的史诗。

通过《失乐园》一诗作者从作品思想内容出发,赋予这个古老的故事以新的内容。

艺术再现了英国资产阶级革命的进程。

同时弥尔顿通过对主宰宇宙的上帝、魔鬼撒旦和人类始祖亚当、夏娃等不同人物的塑造以及对他们的褒贬毁誉,体现了诗人创造史诗的深邃寓意。

值得我们从各个角度去研究、去讨论。

有关《失乐园》的长期争论几乎都集中在对于撒旦这一人物的看法上。

因此,对于撒旦这个人物的正确理解是如何欣赏弥尔顿这部史诗的关键。

现在我们就探索一下撒旦这个人物性格的不同侧面。

人们一直以来从不同的角度对撒旦的艺术形象进行阐释,认为撒旦是一个非常复杂的人物形象。

所以关于撒旦的形象研究在西方有“撒旦主义派”、“正统派”和“调和派”。

他们有的研究撒旦形象的革命性,有的研究撒旦形象的宗教性。

首先,撒旦是魔鬼的化身,教唆人类堕落的元凶。

因为在诗中撒旦是神的对立者,他嫉妒神子在天上的地位,要求凌驾于一切法律和权利之上,享受绝对自由,于是率同叛逆的天使反抗上帝,战败被打入地狱之后仍设计报复。

当他意识到自己不是上帝的对手后,转而偷入上帝创造的伊甸园百般引诱亚当、夏娃违背神的旨意,偷食禁果使其开始沉沦,把人类作为报复的工具。

阴谋得逞之后得意而去,留下灾难和痛苦让人类的先祖独自承受,他为了自私的目的毁灭了他人。

在弥尔顿看来谁侵犯了他人的自由,那个人便首先失去自由,变成一个奴隶。

撒旦正是这样的人,因此他将是自己罪恶的奴隶,必定要坠入罪恶的深渊。

从这个意义上说,撒旦的失败与堕落体现的不是上帝的万能,而是弥尔顿的思想。

《失乐园》中撒旦形象分析

《失乐园》中撒旦形象分析

2021-06文艺生活LITERATURE LIFE世界文艺《失乐园》中撒旦形象分析王宁(河南师范大学,河南新乡453007)摘要:作为一部宏伟史诗,弥尔顿的《失乐园》主要是对恶魔撒旦堕落史的讲述,其所描写的就是堕天使带领反叛天使来对抗上帝,希望能够获取自由。

这一部史诗所表现的是激进革命者与清教徒之间的一种冲突,其本身也是表达了对于独裁统治的厌恶,对于自由平等的一种渴望,以此来产生无限启迪与思考,其本身的研究价值非常可观。

本文主要就《失乐园》中的撒旦形象进行分析,希望能进一步加深对《失乐园》的理解和认识。

关键词:《失乐园》;撒旦;形象中图分类号:I561.072文献标识码:A文章编号:1005-5312(2021)18-0052-02DOI:10.12228/j.issn.1005-5312.2021.18.026一、前言阅读弥尔顿《失乐园》时发现撒旦这一人物形象仿佛与之前人们对于撒旦形象的认知有一定差异,主要是因为对于撒旦的感情存在一定的变化。

所以,本文重点分析撒旦的形象,从英雄与恶魔两个层面阐述,对弥尔顿笔下的撒旦形成更清晰的认识。

二、《失乐园》和撒旦不管是在学术界还是在读者心目中,弥尔顿的《失乐园》的地位是其他作品无法超越的,无论是刻画人物方面,还是对于情节的具体安排,都是让后人难以企及的。

整部作品之中对于上帝、撒旦、亚当夏娃等人物的塑造,让人们对此产生了浓郁的兴趣。

在这几个人物之中,对撒旦的争议是最大的。

撒旦的文学形象主要包含了两个方面:一个是评价的悲剧英雄,另一个是评价的恶魔形象①。

《失乐园》最后的结局是亚当夏娃失去了伊甸园,很多人都认为这属于一个喜剧结局,主要是因为虽然他们失去了伊甸园,但是心中却已经发到了自己希望的伊甸园。

如果基于撒旦的角度来进行分析,那么可以将其看成悲剧,原本一个单纯的、善良的天使,因为各种因素的影响,最终变成了恶魔,导致最后被上帝直接贬为一条蛇。

作为一个悲剧人物,撒旦的经历与结局是让读者同情的,这也使得撒旦形象具有悲剧英雄的色彩。

浅谈《失乐园》中撒旦形象

浅谈《失乐园》中撒旦形象

浅谈《失乐园》中撒旦形象【摘要】约翰·弥尔顿(1608-1674)是英国伟大的诗人和思想家,是继莎士比亚后最杰出的诗人,活跃于被暴力与激情所充斥的动荡的17世纪。

他本出生于伦敦一个富裕的清教徒家庭,由于目睹当时国教日趋反动,放弃了当教会牧师的念头,一心攻读文学,想写出能传世的伟大诗篇。

【关键词】失乐园撒旦形象弥尔顿在这部伟大的史诗中对魔鬼撒旦一改前人所描述的那种恶魔的化身的形象,而赋予撒旦有史以来最崇高和辉煌的地位,使撒旦的形象具有了积极的意义。

弥尔顿对撒旦形象的刻画与当时的社会背景、宗教政治等是密切相关的,我们把撒旦称为弥尔顿本人的代言人,是弥尔顿在英国资产阶级革命中反抗暴政、不公平以及权威的具体表现,弥尔顿对于革命的热情,造就了撒旦的英雄形象。

这一形象根植于英格兰社会和文化,以其独到的方式反映了英国历史和文化的变迁,挑战了当时统治地位的社会、道德、宗教秩序和权威信仰体系。

但是由于弥尔顿是一个虔诚的基督教徒,使得他在根本上对于反抗上帝、诱骗亚当和夏娃的撒旦持否定态度,撒旦本质上恶的一面在史诗后面部分得以体现,于是在整部诗作中形成了撒旦矛盾冲突的、鲜明复杂的人物形象。

说起基督,我们可以发现这样一句话:“别人打你的左脸,你把右脸也伸给他”。

以此断定,宗教意味着忍受无条件的屈辱。

但他们却不曾留意《马太福音》第二十一章及《路加福音》第十九章都记载过这样一个“沾净圣殿”的故事:耶稣进了神殿,看见人们在那里做生意,兑换银币,非常愤怒。

于是推倒他们的桌子、凳子,驱赶他们出殿。

并对他们说:“我的殿比称为祈祷的殿,你们倒使它成为贼窝啦。

”看来,耶稣并不是对任何事情都能无限容忍和顺从的。

更何况,《旧约》中的上帝更是一个威力无比、嫉恶如仇的形象,其程度常常到了极其残酷的程度。

自基督教被确立为西方权威宗教后,它就统治着西方的意识形态和道德体系。

撒旦式的人物正是挑战基督这样的“权利意志”的支配,超越所谓的“奴隶道德”,旨在保护基督统治下弱者的道德违反和权力意志,打击让欧洲人堕落的根源。

(英语毕业论文)弥尔顿《失乐园》中撒旦形象的双重性(开题报告 论文)

(英语毕业论文)弥尔顿《失乐园》中撒旦形象的双重性(开题报告 论文)

弥尔顿《失乐园》中撒旦形象的双重性引言弥尔顿的史诗诗作《失乐园》被誉为英国文学史上的经典之作。

该作品以创世纪中所描述的亚当和夏娃的堕落故事为蓝本,探讨了人类的自由意志与上帝的主权之间的关系。

然而,在这个史诗中,撒旦的形象却备受关注。

本文将以撒旦形象的双重性为研究对象,探讨他在《失乐园》中的角色与意义,揭示其中所蕴含的深刻思想。

1. 撒旦的自由意志和反叛精神撒旦是《失乐园》中的主要角色,他起源于圣经中的撒旦,代表着邪恶与诱惑。

然而,在《失乐园》中,撒旦不再是一个简单的反派角色,而是具有复杂性的人物形象。

弥尔顿通过描绘撒旦坚定的自由意志和反叛精神,传达了他对自由和个体意识的强烈追求。

撒旦在《失乐园》中的形象展示了他对于上帝的统治的不满和宣扬个人选择的权利。

他拒绝了上帝的权威,坚信人类应该拥有自由的意志,能够决定自己的命运。

这种反叛精神使得撒旦成为史诗中的一个重要角色,引发了读者对于人类自由意志与上帝主权之间冲突的思考。

2. 撒旦的矛盾性格与动机然而,撒旦的形象并非完全正面。

虽然他试图推翻上帝的统治,但他的目的为何,却是一个复杂的问题。

一方面,撒旦可以被视为英雄,他为人类带来了知识和自由。

另一方面,撒旦也是陷害亚当和夏娃堕落的凶手,使他们失去了乐园中的美好生活。

这种矛盾性格和动机使得撒旦的形象更加复杂、深入人心。

他既是诱惑与邪恶的象征,同时也是对人类权利与自由的维护者。

撒旦的形象在《失乐园》中呈现出一种多层次的双重性,引发了读者对于道德、正义和自由的思考。

3. 撒旦的双重性与现实世界撒旦的双重性不仅仅体现在《失乐园》的故事情节中,它也反映了现实世界中的人性和社会问题。

弥尔顿通过撒旦的形象表达了对于权力和压迫的反思,探讨了个体在集体中的地位和权利。

正如撒旦试图推翻上帝的统治,人类社会中的个体也时常面临着权威与自由的冲突。

撒旦的形象提醒我们,个体不仅仅是被动接受集体意识的主体,也应该有权利去追求自己的梦想和理想。

《失乐园》中的撒旦形象

《失乐园》中的撒旦形象

2014.11英国诗人弥尔顿(John Mil-ton,1608-1674)的长篇史诗《失乐园》(Paradise Lost,1667)深邃、高贵、整饬、优美,一直被誉为“英语中最伟大的诗作”,是英国文学史上不可多得的鸿篇巨制,在世界文学史上可与《神曲》、《浮士德》相媲美。

对于其作品中的撒旦形象,国内学界一直以来也较为关注,且一般认同《失乐园》中的撒旦是作为一个悲情英雄形象出现;也有学者认为《失乐园》中的撒旦拥有双重性性格,一方面是一位悲情英雄,另一方面是丑恶恶魔;除此之外,也有学者认为,弥尔顿笔下不同面的撒旦的描写,是为了用前文的崇高来衬托出后文中撒旦的猥琐,即揭露撒旦在其坚强高大的外衣下,隐藏的那一个虚伪、狡诈的恶魔形象,从而达到更深层次的批判,借此来彰显上帝的权威。

本文将用发展的眼光来看待《失乐园》中的撒旦形象,审视撒旦的形象是如何从悲情英雄堕落为猥琐恶魔,将撒旦形象融入到不同的时空环境当中去考虑、分析。

撒旦在西方传统文化中是地狱的君王和主宰,但他最初却是上帝座前的六翼天使,负责在人间放置诱惑,以检验地上的人对于上帝的信仰是否忠诚且坚定。

直到后来他在野心的驱使下,率领天堂中三分之一的天使反叛上帝,失败后被放逐地狱,堕落成为魔鬼,被看作与光明力量相对的邪恶、黑暗之源,并且逐渐演变成了“魔鬼”的代名词。

在《圣经·旧约》当中,撒旦曾与上帝约赌,检验信徒约伯对神的信仰是否真的那么坚定且忠诚。

质疑上帝,这是撒旦最终敢于起兵反叛上帝的原因之一。

同时,撒旦在《圣经》还有着“古蛇”的形象,“古蛇”的形象出现于“蛇引诱夏娃吃智慧树的果子”一段中,普遍的研究都认为,《旧约》这里出现的蛇的形象,也即寓意着堕落为魔鬼后的撒旦。

撒旦从天使堕落为恶魔,具有不同的表现形象,《圣经·旧约》中的撒旦形象也由此化身在弥尔顿的《失乐园》中。

如果说《圣经》中的撒旦形象还是典型化的,那么在《失乐园》中,撒旦形象经历了一个发展变化的过程。

弥尔顿《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性研究

弥尔顿《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性研究

弥尔顿《失乐园》中撒旦形象的复杂性研究撒旦是弥尔顿《失乐园》中最具争议的人物,几百年来唯撒旦派和反撒旦派就为撒旦的形象争论不休,至今也没得到共识。

两派各执撒口.形象的一方面而争论,唯撒旦派认为撒旦是个敢于反抗上帝暴政的反叛英雄,而反撒口.派把撒口.认作是一个诱惑人类堕落、彻头彻尾的恶魔。

这两派各执一词有走了极端之嫌,此后应运而生的两重撒旦派虽说顾及了撒旦形象的矛盾性,但是总不能令人信服,因为他们通常是把弥尔顿在创作时有意识和无意识两种互逆流向引入到评论,认为弥尔顿有意识的把撒旦写成恶魔,但是无意识的加入自己感情把撒口旦写成了英雄。

作者已作占,这种说法再无法得证。

亦或是把整部史诗分成英雄史诗和人类堕落两部分来评论,认为在前一部反抗上帝时撒旦是英雄,而在后一部引诱人类堕落时撒口.是恶魔,这种人为的把整部史诗断裂成两部的行为也让人难以接受。

诸多对撒口.形象的争论,都没有把撒旦作为一个统一的整体来解读,这就成了本文所要弥补的欠缺和尝试解决的问题。

本文从系统论的整体性原则分析研究撒旦的形象,力图把撒旦这个形象的复杂性作个深入的分析,体现出多面的撒旦这个形象的艺术价值。

撒旦是个很丰满、复杂、多面的圆形人物,其多面性和复杂性体现在诡辩的撒旦、多变的撒旦、反复无常的撒旦、矛盾的撒旦等方面。

导论部分简述了唯撒旦、反撒旦、两重撒旦派对《失乐园》中这个极具争议的撒旦形象的不同理解,分析了这些评论家对撒旦形象进行的文献综述。

并简要介绍了系统论的整体性原则,并在其基础上提出了本文的研究视角。

正文的第一章分析有着非凡口才的诡辩的撒旦形象,基于撒旦在史诗中所做的儿次讲话。

撒旦是个语言大师,既能讲豪言壮语鼓舞士气的语言,也擅长甜言蜜语诱惑人类堕落的谎言。

在追随他的天使们面前,撒旦的豪言壮语能够鼓舞他们振作精神重新起来战斗,不乏英雄气;而在诱惑夏娃吃禁果时,撒旦所讲的甜言蜜语充满了欺骗,全显的是奸诈狡猾骗子的嘴脸。

这截然不同的诡辩的语言使得撒旦这个形象极显复杂性。

【撒旦形象下的艺术:谈《失乐园》】 失乐园撒旦形象分析

【撒旦形象下的艺术:谈《失乐园》】 失乐园撒旦形象分析

17世纪英国伟大的诗人约翰·弥尔顿的代表作《失乐园》经常被人们拿来与鸿篇巨制《荷马史诗》相提并论。

在《失乐园》这部作品中,有一个饱受人们关注与争议的人物形象——撒旦。

很多人都觉得撒旦形象是反抗专制强权与追求自由独立的化身,但不少人也认为作者结合了圣经中的一些形象——堕落和高贵这两种贯穿了整部作品的情感,塑造出了撒旦复杂的性格。

本文探讨的主要话题是撒旦形象艺术之下的艺术——《失乐园》。

一、撒旦形象的复杂性产生的历史背景《失乐园》是作者弥尔顿借用了圣经里面的故事,利用史诗一般的形式将人类最初的演变以及历史上出现的各种变革斗争刻画得淋漓尽致,相当精彩。

作者弥尔顿是一个虔诚的基督教徒,基督教所信仰的就是上帝的绝对权威,因此在弥尔顿的意识里是不会允许有任何亵渎上帝的语言和行为的,他们始终认为上帝是公平而且正义的。

可是,与此同时弥尔顿又是一个主张民主自由的革命者,他倡导民主共和,最终等来的却是王政复辟,这对他内心是很大的打击。

他需要用文字的形式去寄托自己对现实的愤怒,去宣泄内心的愤慨。

可在17世纪的英国,由于长期受到基督教文化的熏陶与渲染,人们是不能很好地接受将撒旦纯粹地刻画成一个反对上帝的英雄这样一个社会现实。

因而,在一定程度上这也为撒旦这样一个形象的悲剧结尾埋下了伏笔。

与此同时,对于中国的不少读者而言,由于受到传统文化的影响,我们一般都会把撒旦这样一个形象比喻成反对专制独裁的英雄。

虽然撒旦这样一个形象有太多的不确定性与争议性,但是拨开层层迷雾,弥尔顿刻画的这样一个形象始终是魔鬼的化身。

二、结合《失乐园》浅谈撒旦形象之下的艺术(一)撒旦艺术形象的本质上文已经有所涉及,尽管世界各国对撒旦这样一个形象存在着不同的理解,而这各种各样的观点也间接导致了其形象的复杂性。

但是,从本质上讲,撒旦这样一个形象依旧是魔鬼。

《失乐园》作品开篇不久,作者就描述了撒旦向所有的魔鬼宣布不管是做事还是受苦,但有一条我们是相当明确的,那就是行善绝对不是我们的任务,作恶才是我们唯一的乐事。

论《失乐园》中satan的形象

论《失乐园》中satan的形象

园》中,弥尔顿在前六卷中具体详尽的描述了上帝与撒旦的 不一样的生机与活力,所以说其笔下撒旦所具有的这种斗争精
矛盾与斗争,并在第六卷中描述了上帝与撒旦长达三天三夜 神正是弥尔顿希望自己在生活中所具有的,并且能够通过这种
的大战过程 ;而在后半部分中则讲述了上帝创造人类万物的 精神来对社会做出真正的改变。所以与其说撒旦是邪恶的象征,
的邪恶的代表,大部分的读者对其理解一直禁锢于邪恶与黑 集团的打击,但无疑这种行为是极度卑鄙和值得批判的,在失
暗,所以其负面形象一直大于正面形象。而在《失乐园》中, 败之后不能积极面对结果,并对这样的结果采取了不理智与不
撒旦的形象则不完全局限于邪恶的一面,相反的,其拥有着 光明的解决办法,这是撒旦在《失乐园》中所具有的阴暗一面,
则是故事叙述的必然,也是人物设定的需要。所以在文中的后
二、对撒旦的人物形象的分析
半部分,撒旦在斗争失败之后,由于不能接受失败的打击渐渐
(一)撒旦其人
在地狱之中萌生了报复上帝的想法,所以把目标投向了上帝所
首先,撒旦是所有人眼中的恶魔与魔鬼,是世俗所公认 创造的产物——人类。撒旦想通过这种方法来实现对上帝统治
旦作为具有反抗精神的代表,其不但拥有着自由主义的斗争
(三)撒旦的负面影响
精神也具有着人性中的阴暗面,而作者对这一角色的态度也
虽说失乐园中的撒旦据有着与其他文学形象中撒旦不一样
具有着矛盾性,一方面在前半部分体现着撒旦所具有的积极 的形象和意义,但是不可避免的,撒旦仍旧是整部失乐园中较
精神,这体现着作者的不屈奋斗意识 ;而在后半部分又对撒 为负面的形象。作为虔诚的基督教徒,诗人弥尔顿不能够将上
作品《失乐园》中的撒旦形象具有太多争议,有人说他是自由 活,撒旦的形象被诗人刻画的十分精彩,下面将就此做出详
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

An Analysis of Satan in Paradise Lost 论《失乐园》中撒旦的形象An analysis of Satan in Paradise Lost摘要约翰·弥尔顿是英语文化历史上非常有名的一位作家。

他的著作—《失乐园》是英语文化史上的一座里程碑。

在约翰·弥尔顿所有的著作中,《失乐园》是最复杂,最难理解的一部作品,并为他赢得了永久的荣誉。

他的史诗使得撒旦的形象更加生动,更加具有人性,并且使其在某些方面成为了一名特殊的英雄。

弥尔顿用了很多的语句来描写撒旦对他的追随者所做的雄辩。

撒旦追求自由,但是却不能用暴力手段得到他想要的。

这就是撒旦在弥尔顿的著作中具有一种矛盾性。

尽管弥尔顿用了一种积极的态度来描写撒旦,但是撒旦邪恶的本性却从未改变。

他的矛盾情感鲜明地遍及整个诗篇。

这种矛盾的情感吸引了众多批评家的目光,引起了几个世纪的争论。

本文通过分析撒旦在《失乐园》中的形象,使得人们获得一种不同的视角来重新审视邪恶的撒旦。

他的字句反映了他毕生所挚爱的自由,同时暗示通过暴力方式所进行的革命终将会失败,这也体现了弥尔顿自己的意志与精神。

关键词:撒旦;自由;英雄;失败AbstractJohn Milton was a very famous writer during the history of English literature. His masterpiece Paradise Lost was undoubtedly a milestone in the history of English literature. Among all of John Milton’s great works,Paradise Lost was the most complicated and most profound one, which won him endless honor. His epic made Satan more vivid more humanized and made him a special hero in some aspects. Milton wrote a lot of sentences to describe Satan’s defense for his followers. Satan sought for freedom, but he couldn’t get what he wanted by violence. That’s why Satan in Milton’s masterpiece had a kind of contradiction. Although Milton adopted a positive attitude to describe Satan, his evil characteristic didn’t change at all. His ambivalence was obviously throughout the whole poem. This kind of ambivalence caught all critics’ eyes and led to centuries’ disputes.By analyzing Satan in Paradise Lost,the author of this paper aims to make people obtain a different angle to revisit the evil one, Satan. His words showed his lifelong love for freedom, and implied that the revolution would be failed by violence, which also reflected Milton’s own idea and spirit.Key Words:Satan; freedom; hero; failure安阳师范学院人文管理学院本科毕业论文Contents摘要 (I)Abstract (II)1. Introduction (1)2. The Realistic Significance of Paradise Lost (1)2.1 The Presentation of Every Image of Different Classes (1)2.2 The Theme of the Whole Book (2)2.3 The Doomed Ending of Satan (2)3. The Changes of Satan (3)3.1 Satan in the Bible (3)3.1.1 The Congregation of All the Sins in Bible (3)3.1.2 Satan’s Wisdom and Emotion (3)3.2 Satan in Paradise Lost (4)3.2.1 Satan as an Independent Image (6)3.2.2 Satan’s Contradiction (7)3.2.3 The Eloquent Satan (7)4. The Reasons of Satan’s Heroic Image (8)4.1 The Heroic Image of Satan (8)4.2 The More Humanized Satan (9)5. Conclusion (10)Bibliography (11)Acknowledgements (12)1. IntroductionWhile Shakespeare was still writing his great plays, another excellent English poet was born in London. He was John Milton. John Milton, one of the greatest poets of the English language, was a political commentator of the English Bourgeois Revolution, whose importance was acknowledged around the world. Although Milton’s father was a puritan, he was a music and book lover. Puritans refer to the people who assert themselves the most rigid believers of God. What’s more he taught little Milton to enjoy music and books. Milton has received humanistic thoughts from 16th century and accepted the great science achievements of the 17th century, at the same time he had a critical attitude towards his life. He thought that science was not everything. Without justice and science, people couldn’t get peace and real happiness. Milton’s literary ambition was to write an epic and he wanted his epic to be read by people in different countries. It took Milton seven years to finish the great epic Paradise Lost. Among all of John Milton’s great works, paradise Lost was the most complex and most impressive one, which won him everlasting honor. This book told the story of how Satan fought against God and how Adam and Eve were banished from the Eden. Satan was the major character in Paradise Lost. His images were impressive and powerful. The main character of this book was intricate and contradictory. After finishing his famous poem, John Milton wrote Paradise Regained and a play telling the story of Samson.2. The Realistic Significance of Paradise Lost2.1 The Presentation of Every Image of Different ClassesIn this epic, Milton gave detailed description of every image, and as we know, the epic reflected the society Milton lived, so each image had its own presentation.Milton was a puritan, who was very loyal to his beliefs. From this book, we can sense the strong will of freedom from Milton. Obviously, God was on behalf of the authority, and he was another best description of Milton’s personalities. Some peopleagreed with Satan and regarded God as a tyrant and egoist. While other people who condemned Satan, took God as a merciful, just and lenient authority. The author also told us something from Abdiel’s mouth that the compliance with God was not servility, but the only way of getting freedom. These people who defied their superiors and stirred up a new rebellion were not servile and inferior. And as to Adam and Eve, they were tempted by Satan and punished by God, like all the common people, all the civilian class, they didn’t have the power or courage to fight against the authority, so they chose to adapt themselves to it. Because of the prominent background, the story in Paradise Lost and the Bible had a lot in common. That’s a very important reason why Paradise Lost became so popular.2.2 The Theme of the Whole BookIf you have known Milton very well, you may find out that before he wrote this epic his life was not that positive. When he lived in this world, he loved freedom very much and tried his best to get freedom. Freedom as a topic is throughout the whole masterpiece.The book has something to do with Milton’s own life experience. He was a tough guy, who never gave up his own belief and would stick to his will forever. Milton didn’t agree with the old way of teaching, which reflected his disobedience to feudalistic force, just as Satan’s rebellion against God and the conflict from heaven. “We may with more successful hope resolve to wage by force or guide eternal war, irreconcilable to our grand foe, who now triumphs, and in the excess of joy. Sole reigning holds the tyranny of heaven.”(Milton, 1667:1608)Instead of withdrawing from society, Milton still played an active role in political affairs. Although he was not going to take part in politics directly, he continued to work with friends and colleagues closely. Satan’s rebellious and heroic images were presented in Milton’s thoughts. He always sought for freedom, like Satan always took some measures to get rid of God’s control.2.3 The Doomed Ending of SatanMilton was a loyal puritan and he knew that freedom was the only way to gethappiness. And revolution was a good way to get freedom. But at last, Milton realized that the revolution at that time couldn’t get real freedom. So, to some degree, the revolution must be a failure in his opinion. What’s more, from this book we can see that Satan was the typical representative of the revolutionary class, so we can say that failure was the doomed ending of Satan. By studying English history, we knew that the puritan revolution was a failure just like Milton implied in Paradise Lost. Violence is not a good way to solve problems. Milton was a puritan. Although he was not satisfied with the Crown, he didn’t agree to use the violence way to solve the conflict, either.Maybe this point of view was not that right in reader’s eyes, but in fact, we all know that war will never bring happiness.3. The Changes of Satan3.1 Satan in the Bible3.1.1 The Congregation of All the Sins in the BibleThere were two major reasons which made Satan a complete monster in Bible. The first reason was that he seduced good people into doing evil things. The second one was his betrayal of God. If we didn’t know something about Satan and his forces, we would not have a clear understanding of basic spiritual realities of the universe. The reason why Satan became the biggest enemy of God was that he was against the foundation of the earth. His main purpose was to get the worship that only belonged to the originator, God. To most people, Satan’s major work was to be against human beings. He would try his best to destroy the mankind. What’s more, he would do it for good and without specific reasons. Fear and pride were the major motivations in Satan’s kingdom. That’s why Bible directed people to regard Satan as a devil in this universe.3.1.2 Satan’s Wisdom and EmotionSatan’s wisdom as an important aspect was worthy to be mentioned. To temptAdam and Eve to eat apple from the tree of knowledge, which was forbidden by god, Satan disguised himself as a snake. He waited silently for a good time. Once Eve worked by herself and Adam wasn’t around her, Satan would come out and approach her. Satan knew what women prefer to hear, so he normally started the conversation with praise for Eve’s beauty. Then he could get what he wanted and made the emotional Eve lose her last line of protection and couldn’t wait to eat the fruit. What’s more, Satan was also emotional. For example, when he found out Adam and Eve were in love, he was moved by their pure feelings. And he would burst into tears at the sight of the suffering of his followers. After reading this epic, we could also sense that Satan had the dream to share happiness and tears together with his beloved followers.3.2 Satan in Paradise LostJohn Milton was a great poet, thinker and political commentator of Englandin the 17th century. His masterpiece Paradise Lost was a long epic with 12 books, written in blank verse. These stories were taken from the Old Testament, such as the making of the earth, the love stories between Adam and Eve, the fallen angelsin hell plotting against God, Satan’s temptation of Eve, and the leasing of Adam and Eve from Eden. Although Satan and his adherents were driven out of heaven into hell, Satan and his followers were not discouraged. The miserable punishment, instead of rubbing off their will, makes them much angrier. The purpose of this poem was to tell people to justify the manner of God towards people. This outstanding work was the product of Puritanism, which has shown Milton’s own will and beliefs of freedom. Satan in his masterpiece was not the same as the one in the Bible and other books.In Paradise Lost, Satan was an independent image which can be studied and be discussed from a different perspective. I think the unique image of Satan was the reflection of the writer, who loved freedom and at the same time, expressed a kind of contradiction, and also the representation of the society at that time. This kind of idea has appeared in lots of articles written by Chen Weihong and professor XiaoMinghan’s two articles. (1999&2011) They both think that:1. The Satan in Paradise Lost was full of heroism, because of his defiant personality and the pursuit of freedom.2. These characteristics made Satan an eclectic image, and made God a little bit pessimistic.Xiao’s two articles showed that the unique image didn’t come from the Bible, but came from Milton himself. The words and actions Satan did in the hell and the main reason of his betrayal were the distinctive characteristics which helped Milton to describe Satan into a personalized image. The most important point in Satan’s characteristic was his strong will. No matter what kind of situation he was in, he had never changed his nature.Another writer’s composition also expressed this kind of idea, which showed that the image of Satan in Paradise Lost was vivid and impressive. Satan’s betrayal, in other words, was the indomitable will to seek for freedom, and rejection of God’s slavery. And the contradiction was also shown by him. His image was the mixture of optimism and pessimism. We all thought that the most evil person in the Bible was Satan or we can say that Satan was the aggregate of all the sins. In the Bible, Satan’s name meant obstruction and separation. He was the public enemy number one of God and he was a pervert in God’s eyes. Something like this has mentioned in Paradise Lost. According to this epic, we knew that Satan wasn’t born with sins. His sins and his resentment were coming from his free choice.Adam and Eve’s betrayal was the result of the wish for knowledge. After the punishment, they realized how to distinguish right from wrong, and started to beg the forgiveness of God. It was after the baptism of evil that the good would be more valuable. The last part was about Milton’s own idea, which has combined with Satan. Every image he had created was a reflection of different classes in the society of that time. In the paper of Huang Delin (2004), he has pointed out that Satan was Milton’s own presentation, and also, in Chen Jinxi’s article (2008), he said that the epic was thereflection of the People’s spiritual condition. Milton combined his epic with thepuritan revolution. God presented the Cromwell government or the dictatorship of England; Satan presented the force of revolution. It was Milton, who was a loyal puritan and had realized that freedom must be the basis to get the freedom, but the revolution couldn’t get the real freedom. From Milton’s point of view, the revolution must be a failure. That’s why Satan had a kind of contradiction, he loved and sought for freedom, but he couldn’t get what he wanted by the means of violence. These opinions have appeared at the beginning of a translation version which was translated by Jin Fashen.Lots of researches have been conducted on the images of Satan in Paradise Lost. It has left a profound and impressive influence on literature history. The author of this thesis will do a lot of stuff to do an analysis on this famous epic.3.2.1 Satan as an Independent ImageIn this masterpiece, the image of Satan was the most controversial image. The disputation about the image of Satan in Paradise Lost related to the inner nature of Satan was whether he was the hero in the epic or not. During all the literature history, tons of people thought Satan in Paradise Lost was a different image. In the first two volumes of Paradise Lost, some of Satan’s words showed he was a hero from time to time. John Milton’s Paradise Lost had a vivid description of a defiant Satan. He was banished from heaven and driven into the hell. Later, the image of Satan in Paradise Lost had been popular among people. The reason Satan could be an independent image in the epic, mostly due to his courage to show his indomitable will. After reading this masterpiece, we felt that Satan was like a hero in the earlier part of the epic. We could sense that through majesty in Satan’s appearance and fearless in his personality. However, with the story developed Satan’s image changed greatly. The most impressive nature of Satan was his contradiction. This element made the image of Satan glitter from the whole book, and became an actual part which is worth being studied.3.2.2 Satan’s ContradictionThere was a very interesting point in the whole personality of Satan, which washis contradiction, combined with wickedness and the strong will of freedom. Although Satan showed the positive character of his image, he still had some intrinsically evil genes. A leopard cannot change his spots. In this epic, although Milton was in favor of some traits of Satan, he had never tried to change Satan from a monster into a real hero: a monster is a monster.To readers, after reading the first several books of Paradise Lost, they could sense that the writer tried to describe Satan into a sympathy and friendly character. On the content of this epic, besides the analysis of God’s and Satan’s personalities, there were also two points from the content of this book, which may reflect the aspects of disagreement in reader’s opinion. In the first two books of Paradise Lost, although Satan has made a good impression of hero on readers, he was still a monster as the initial story had told us. Adam and Eve made a mistake under the seduction Satan, and they suffered a lot from their mistake. The reason made Satan become such a kind of evil angle was his indomitable courage of chasing freedom.3.2.3 The Eloquent SatanIn Paradise Lost, Satan was written as a hero who insisted on his own belief and he had the courage to seek for his beloved freedom. These pro-Satanists admired Satan’s high superior nature and regarded him as the actual hero of this masterpiece.At the beginning of Paradise Lost, Satan made a wonderful speech which attracted many readers for a very long time. “That glory never shall his wrath or might. Extort from me. To bow and sue for grace with supplicant knee, and deify his power who, from the terror of his arm. Doubled his empire: that were low indeed. That was an ignominy and shame beneath. This downfall, since, by fate, the strength of God. And this substance cannot fail.”(Milton, 1667:1608)These words were powerful and clear which made Satan’s ambition became so apparent, and also reflected his fighting spirit and independent personality.Puritanism and the English Revolution were the distinguishing features of the seventeenth century. Milton realized it and he cleverly put political ideas to his pieces of art and also the images he created. Milton’s own life experiences and his pursuit of freedom caused him to endow Satan more or less with revolutionary spirit. Milton’s passion and feelings for revolution were reflected in the description of Satan and his rebellion.4. The Reasons of Satan’s Heroic ImageThe reason why people thought Satan in Paradise Lost as sort of a hero was due to his fearless. What’s more, he dared to fight against God. He always stuck to his own will, just like Milton himself. John Milton was born in a puritan family. What’s more, his childhood and the society that time gave him energy and resistance in his character, which was also easy to find from the words of Satan: “Princes, potentates, the flower of heaven, once yours, now lost. If such astonishment as this can seize eternal spirits! Awake, arise, or be forever fallen.”Though failed, Satan never gave up his unconquerable will. Here, Satan was more than just a leader in military accepting the rebel angles from angelic state, but also a smart politician using the powerful language of resistance as his weapon to fight against God.4.1 The Heroic Image of SatanPeople normally thought Satan in Paradise Lost has given a heroic impression to them. But it was a little bit of misunderstanding because of the words that Satan said in the following epic. “In The Odyssey, Homer lets Odysseus give a speech that would convince anyone they could survive the journey to the strait of Messina. Then we die with our eyes open, if we are going to die, or know what death we baffle if we can.” (Paradise Lost: 1243-1245)“Odysseus again lifts their spirits with this speech, Garcia 2 friends, have we ever been in danger before this? More fearsome, is it now, than when the Cyclops penned us in his cave? What power he had! Did I not keep my nerve, and use my witsto find a way out for us? We must now obey orders as I give them.”( Milton, 1667:1294-1302 ) Here Odysseus expressed the real capability of a hero to lead in the face of adversity.Satan as any other leaders would do, quickly reduced his partners’fear with much more powerful speeches. During the speeches, Satan talked his doubts about God’s supremacy and daringly stated they were better off where they were. “Here at least we shall be free. Here we may reign secure. Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven.’’ (Milton, 1667: 258-263)These were the most powerful nature points of Satan in the whole masterpiece. What’s more he always insisted on his personalities, such as tough bosom, independent spirit, intelligence, and the power of his own. These four points all took effectiveness on Satan, which made Satan look like a hero.4.2 The More Humanized SatanIn Bible, and from most people’s points of view, Satan was the aggregate of all the sins, but in Paradise lost, Satan became a vivid image. What he said or did touched the readers profoundly. Milton wrote Paradise Lost to show people the source of misfortune. He thought the reason why Adam and Eve made a huge mistake and lost their beautiful home was that they were not strong enough to withstand the temptation of strangers. At the end of the story, we could know that, since Adam and Eve were lured into breaking the rules of Eden by Satan and they were all published by God and were driven out of Eden, Satan began to think about what he had done to the people, and he felt so sorry about what he had done. He blamed himself for a very long time. This kind of description made Satan look not that bad, but more humanized than the Bible said.From what we have read or learned in Paradise Lost, Satan may be a devil. But he had ambitious and dreams, even sometimes he was a hero. He was a person with strong will and he delivered some powerful speeches to his followers from time to time. Undoubtedly, the image of Satan in Paradise Lost was more vivid than ever before. To sum up, the image of Satan was of dual personality. By learning from thismasterpiece, Satan’s evil behaviors and heroism were crossed. On the one hand, he tried his best to fight bravely for freedom and liberty with his wisdom and passion. On the other hand, he had a wrong opinion of freedom and power even though he expressed his ambition and satisfaction.5. ConclusionThe words in Milton’s Paradise Lost reflected the Bible not only as a source of literature in western countries, but also influenced Milton greatly. we can learn something through the words of Milton. As a matter of fact, the Bible was often used to back up points of view on controversial things by poets. Since the Bible was studied by most of the people. And they used it as an authoritative source. Milton quoted a lot of things from the Bible and put them into his pamphlets.Through the history, John Milton’s Paradise Lost, particularly his description of the image of Satan has been studied by lots of people and understood in many different ways. Until now, it has been developed into all kinds of new interpretations. On the one hand, some people say that Satan was the true hero of the epic and Milton was on the monster’s side secretly. On the other hand, there are those who said Satan was a monster and Milton showed deep sympathy for God and the angels. There are also some people who interweave the two interpretations.But from the analysis of the above chapters, the changes of Satan’s character were obvious to see. And these changes make us get a much more different and much clearer picture of Milton’s own attitudes toward Satan. Milton spent all his life putting his political purpose into action.From my point of view, although Satan was a heroic image, he was not a hero. The spirit he expressed through the everlasting fighting against God made him a real fighter. And the love for freedom was the main theme which I have learned from this book. It is more than just a passage or a kind of study, but in the end, a sympathetic chord appeared during the reading. To sum up, the image of Satan in Paradise Lost was vivid, ambivalent and complex, overshadowing all the other characters.Bibliography[1] Grant, N. History of literature. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Press, 2004.[2] John, Milton. Paradise Lost. England: Penguin Classics Press, 1667.[3]陈敬玺.论失乐园对西方史诗传统的继承与发展[J].世界文学评论,2008,21(5):58-60.[4]陈薇红.失乐园中撒旦性格的探析[J].北京科技大学学报,1997,5(4):18-23.[5]黄德林.失乐园中撒旦形象的重新审视[J].上海大学外国语学院学报,2004,6(9):33-35.[6]李颖.雄辩与双重撒旦[M].云南:云南师范大学出版社,2006:31-34.[7]刘雯.失乐园中的撒旦形象对圣经原型的变异[J].文学评析,2008,3(12):22-23.[8]陶丹玉.失乐园中的撒旦形象浅析[J].高等函授学报,1997,6(2):52-55.[9]王朝杰.浅析失乐园中撒旦的英雄气概[J].外国文学研究,1999,11(9):13-15.[10] 肖明翰.失乐园中的自由意志与人的堕落与再生[J].外国文学评论1999,5(1):13-15.[11] 朱维之.失乐园译本[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1984:57-59.AcknowledgementsI would like to express my gratitude to all those who helped me during the writing of this thesis. I gratefully acknowledge the help of my supervisor, XXX, who has offered me valuable suggestions in the academic studies. In the preparation of the thesis, she has spent much time reading through each draft and provided me with inspiring advice. Without her patient instruction, insightful criticism and expert guidance, the completion of this thesis would not have been possible.I also owe a special debt of gratitude to all the teachers in Foreign Languages Institute, from whose devoted teaching and enlightening lectures I have benefited a lot and academically prepared for the thesis.I would finally like to express my gratitude to my beloved parents who have always been helping me out of difficulties and supporting me without a word of complaint.。

相关文档
最新文档