岩土工程专业翻译英文原文和译文
土木工程岩土外文翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c35e8/c35e8a9b96fee60d63a77a8fbf7fc3bea75b1cd8" alt="土木工程岩土外文翻译"
1 Basic mechanics of soilsLoads from foundations and walls apply stresses in the ground. Settlements are caused by strains in the ground. To analyze the conditions within a material under loading, we must consider the stress-strain behavior. The relationship between a strain and stress is termed stiffness. The maximum value of stress that may be sustained is termed strength.1.1 Analysis of stress and strain1)Special stress and strain states2)Mohr circle construction3)Parameters for stress and strainStresses and strains occur in all directions and to do settlement and stability analyses it is often necessary to relate the stresses in a particular direction to those in other directions.normal stress σ = F n / Ashear stressτ = F s/ A normal strain ε = δz / z oshear strainγ = δh / z oNote that compressive stresses and strains are positive, counter-clockwise shear stress and strain are positive, and that these are total stresses (see effective stress).1.1.1 Special stress and strain statesIn general, the stresses and strains in the three dimensions will all be different.There are three special cases which are important in ground engineering:General case princpal stressesAxially symmetric or triaxial statesStresses and strains in two dorections are equal.σ'x = σ'y and εx = εyRelevant to conditions near relatively small foundations,piles, anchors and other concentrated load s.P lane strain:Strain in one direction = 0εy = 0Relevant to conditions near long foundations,embankments, retaining walls and other long structures.One-dimensional compression:Strain in two directions = 0εx = εy = 0Relevant to conditions below wide foundations orrelatively thin compressible soil layers.Uniaxial compressionσ'x = σ'y = 0This is an artifical case which is only possible for soil isthere are negative pore water pressures.1.1.2 Mohr circle constructionrelate to a particular plane within an element of soil. Ingeneral, the stresses on another plane will be different.To visualise the stresses on all the possible planes,a graph called the Mohr circle is drawn by plotting a(normal stress, shear stress) point for a plane at everypossible angle.There are special planes on which the shearstress is zero (i.e. the circle crosses the normal stressaxis), and the state of stress (i.e. the circle) can be described by the normal stresses acting on these planes; these are called the principal stresses '1 and '3 .1.1.3 Parameters for stress and strainIn common soil tests, cylindrical samples are used in which the axial and radial stresses and strains are principal stresses and strains. For analysis of test data, and to develop soil mechanics theories, it is usual to combine these into mean (or normal) components which influence volume changes, and deviator (or shearing) components which influence shape changes.In the Mohr circle construction t' is the radius of the circle and s' defines its centre. Note: Total and effective stresses are related to pore pressure u:p' = p - u s' = s - u q' = q t' = t1.2 StrengthThe shear strength of a material is most simply described as the maximum shear stress it can sustain: When the shear stress is incre ased, the shear strain increases; there will be a limiting condition at which the shear strain becomes very large and the material fails; the shear stress f is then the shear strength of the material. The simple type of failure shown here is associatedwith ductile or plastic materials. If the material is brittle (like a piece of chalk), the failure may be sudden and catastrophic with loss of strength after failure.1.2.1 Types of failureMaterials can fail under different loading conditions. In each case, however, failure is associated with the limiting radius of the Mohr circle, i.e. the maximum shear stress. The following common examples are shown in terms of total stresses:ShearingShear strength = τfσnf = normal stress at failureUniaxial extensionTensile strength σtf = 2τfUniaxial compressionCompressive strength σcf = 2τfNote:Water has no strength f = 0.Hence vertical and horizontal stresses are equal and the Mohr circle becomes a point.1.2.2 Strength criteriaA strength criterion is a formula which relates the strength of a material to some other parameters: these are material parameters and may include other stresses.For soils there are three important strength criteria: the correct criterion depends on the nature of the soil and on whether the loading is drained or undrained.In General, course grained soils will "drain" very quickly (in engineering terms) following loading. Thefore development of excess pore pressure will not occur; volume change associated with increments of effective stress will control the behaviour and the Mohr-Coulomb criteria will be valid.Fine grained saturated soils will respond to loading initially by generating e xcess pore water pressures and remaining at constant volume. At this stage the Tresca criteria, which uses total stress to represent undrained behaviour, should be used. This is the short term or immediate loading response. Once the pore pressure has dissapated, after a certain time, the effective stresses have incresed and the Mohr-Coulomb criterion will describe the strength mobilised. This is the long term loading response.1.2.2.1 Tresca criterionThe strength is independent of the normal stress since the response to loading simple increases the pore water pressure and not theeffective stress.The shear strength f is a materialparameter which is known as the undrained shearstrength su.τf = (σa - σr) = constant1.2.2.2 Mohr-Coulomb (c'=0) criterionThe strength increases linearly with increasingnormal stress and is zero when the normal stress is zero.'f = 'n tan '' is the angle of frictionIn the Mohr-Coulomb criterion the materialparameter is the angle of friction and materials which meet this criterion are known as frictional. In soils, the Mohr-Coulomb criterion applies when the normal stress is an effective normal stress.1.2.2.3 Mohr-Coulomb (c'>0) criterionThe strength increases linearly with increasingnormal stress and is positive when the normal stress iszero.'f = c' + 'n tan '' is the angle of frictionc' is the 'cohesion' interceptIn soils, the Mohr-Coulomb criterion applies when the normal stress is an effective normal stress. In soils, the cohesion in the effective stress Mohr-Coulomb criterion is not the same as the cohesion (or undrained strength su) in the Tresca criterion.1.2.3Typical values of shear strengthOften the value of c' deduced from laboratory test results (in the shear testing apperatus) may appear to indicate some shar strength at ' = 0. i.e. the particles 'cohereing' together or are 'cemented' in some way. Often this is due to fitting a c', ' l ine to the experimental data and an 'apparent' cohesion may be deduced due to suction or dilatancy.1 土的基本性质来自地基和墙壁的荷载会在土地上产生应力。
岩土工程专业翻译英文原文和译文
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20035/2003529ef63baf53f93cc4a4dfe1bbf3e5e1d602" alt="岩土工程专业翻译英文原文和译文"
According to the yield design (or limit analysis) reasoning, the above structure will remain safe under a given vertical load Q(force per unit length along the Oz axis), if one can exhibit throughout the rock mass a stress distribution which satisfies the equilibrium equations along with the stress boundary conditions,while complying with the strength requirement expressed at any point of the structure. This problem amounts to evaluating the ultimate load Q﹢ beyond which failure will occur, or equivalently within which its stability is ensured. Due to the strong heterogeneity of the jointed rock mass, insurmountable difficulties are likely to arise when trying to implement the above reasoning directly. As regards, for instance, the case where the strength properties of the joints are considerably lower than those of the rock matrix, the implementation of a kinematic approach would require the use of failure mechanisms involving velocity jumps
土木工程专业文献翻译中英文
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9e2e/a9e2e28803a1ab44e8f3bab90b46b770449a3066" alt="土木工程专业文献翻译中英文"
The frame structure anti- earthquake conceptdesignThe disaster has an earthquake dashing forward sending out nature, may forecast nature very low so far, bring about loss for human society is that the natural disaster of all kinds is hit by one of the gravest disaster gravely. In the light of now available our country science level and economy condition, correct the target building seismic resistance having brought forward "three standards " fortification, be that generally, the what be spoken "small earthquake shocks does not but constructs in the dirty trick, big earthquakes do not fall ". That generally, what be talked small shocks in the earthquake, big earthquakes refer to respectively is intensity exceed probability in 50 fortifying for 3%'s 63% , 10% , 2 ~ being more is caught in an earthquake, earthquake , rare Yu earthquake.Since building the astigmatic design complexity, in actual project, anti-knock conceptual design appears especially important right away. It includes the following content mainly: Architectural design should pay attention to the architectural systematic ness; Choose rational building structure system; the tensile resisting inclining force structure and the component is designed.That the ability designs law is the main content that the structure denasality designs includes standard our country internal force adjustment and structure two aspect. It is twenty centuries seventies later stage , reinforced concrete structure brought forward by famous New Zealand scholar T.Paulay and Park has sufficient tonsillitis method under the force designing an earthquake chooses value is prejudiced low situationW.hose core thought is: "The beam cuts organization " or "the beam column cuts organization " by the fact that "the strong weak post beam " guides structure to take form; Avoid structure by "strong weak scissors turn " before reach estimate that shearing happened in the denasality in the ability front destroy; Turn an ability and consume an ability by the fact that necessary structure measure makes the location may form the plasticity hinge have the necessary plasticity. Make structure have the necessary tonsillitis from all above three aspect guarantee. That framed structure is the common structure form, whose senility certainly designs that, is to embody from about this three aspect also mainly.1, Strong pillar weak beamDriving force reaction analysis indicates structure; architectural deformability is connected with to destroying mechanism. Common have three kinds model’s consume energ y organization ", beam hinge organization ““, post hinge organization ““, beam column hinge organization "."Beam hinge organization " and "beam column hinge organization " Lang Xianknuckle under , may let the entire frame have distribution and energy consumption heavier than big internal forces ability, limit tier displacement is big , plasticity hinge quantity is many , the hinge does not lose efficacy but the structure entirety does not lose efficacy because of individual plasticity. The as a result anti-knock function is easy to be that the armored concrete is ideal consume energy organization. Being that our country norm adopts allows a pillar , the shearing force wall puts up the hinge beam column hinge scheme, taking place adopting "strong relative weak post beam " measure , postponing a pillar cuts time. Weak tier of post hinge organization possibility appear on unable complete trouble shooting but , require that the axis pressure restricting a pillar compares as a result, architectural weakness prevents necessary time from appearing tier by the fact that Cheng analysis law judges now and then, post hinge organization.Are that V. I. P. is to enhance the pillar bending resistance , guidance holds in the beam appear first, the plasticity cuts our "strong common weak post beam " adjustment measure. Before plasticity hinge appearing on structure, structure component Yin La District concrete dehiscence and pressure area concrete mistake elasticity character, every component stiffness reduces a reinforced bar will do with the cementation degeneration between the concrete. That stiffness reduces a beam is relatively graver than accepting the pillar pressing on , structure enhances from initial shearing type deformation to curved scissors shape deformation transition , curved post inner regulation proportion really more curved than beam; The at the same time architectural period is lengthened, size affecting the participation modulus shaking a type respectively to structure's; Change happened in the earthquake force modulus , lead to the part pillar bend regulation enhancing, feasible beam reality knuckles under intensity rise , the post inner bends regulation when plasticity hinge appearing on thereby feasible beam enhancing since structure cause and the people who designs the middle reinforced bar's are to enhance.. And after plasticity hinge appearing on structure, same existence having above-mentioned cause, structure knuckles under mistake elasticity in the day after tomorrow process being that process , post that the earthquake enhances strenuously further bend regulation enhancing with earthquake force but enhance. The force arouses an earthquake overturn force moment having changed the actual post inner axis force. We knuckle under the ability lessening than axis pressure in standardizing being limited to be able to ensure that the pillar also can lead to a pillar in big the bias voltage range inner , axis force diminution like value. The anti-knock norm is stipulated: Except that the frame top storey and post axis pressure are compared to the strut beam and frame pillar being smaller than 0.15 person and frame, post holds curved regulation designing that value should accord with differencebeing,that first order takes 1.4 , the two stage takes 1.2 , grade-three takes 1.1. 9 degree and one step of framed structure still responds to coincidence,,intensity standard value ascertains that according to matchingreinforced bar area and material really. The bottom post axis is strenuously big, the ability that the plasticity rotates dispatches, be that pressure collapses after avoiding a foot stall producing a hinge, one, two, three steps of framed structure bottom, post holds cross section constituting curved regulation designing that value takes advantage of that 1.5, 1.25 compose in reply 1.15 in order to enhancing a modulus respectively. Combination of the corner post adjustment queen bends regulation still should take advantage of that not to be smaller than 1.10's modular. Curved regulation designs that value carries out adjustment to one-level anti-knock grade shearing force wall limb cross section combination , force the plasticity hinge to appear to reinforce location in the wall limb bottom, the bottom reinforces location and all above layer of curved regulation designing that value takes wall limb bottom cross section constituting curved regulation designing value , other location multiplies 1.2's by to enhance a modulus. Prop up anti-knock wall structure to part frame, bottom-end , whose curved combination regulation design value respond to one, two steps of frame pillars post upper end and bottom post take advantage of that 1.5 composes in reply 1.25 in order to enhancing a modulus respectively. All above "strong weak post beam” adjustment measure, reaction analysis indicates , big satisfied fundamental earthquakes demand no upside down course nonlinearity driving force. Reinforced bar spending area, the beam in 7 is controlled from gravity load, the post reinforced bar matches’ tendon rates basically from the min imum under the control of. Have enhanced post Liana Xiang all round resisting the curved ability. At the same time, 7 degree of area exactly curved regulation plasticity hinge appears on disaster very much, plays arrive at advantageous role to fighting against big earthquakes. In 9 degree of area, adopt reality to match reinforced bar area and material bending regulation within intensity standard value calculation post, structural beam reinforced bar enhancing same lead to enhancing bending regulation within post designing value, under importing in many waves, the beam holds the plasticity hinge rotating developing greatly, more sufficient, post holds the plasticity hinge developing insufficiency, rotate less. Design demand with the beam. Reaction and 9 degree are about the same to 8 degree of area , whose big earthquake displacement , that post holds the plasticity hinge is bigger than rotating 9 degree much but, the beam holds the plasticity hinge appearing sufficient but rotate small, as a result "strong weak post beam " effect is not obvious , curved regulation enhances a modulus ought to take 1.35 , this waits for improving and perfecting going a step further when the grade suggesting that 8 degree of two stage is anti-knock in connection with the expert.2, Strong shear weak curved"Strong weak scissors turn” is that the plasticity cuts cross section for guarantee on reach anticipate that shearing happened in the mistake elastic-deformation prior to destroy. As far as common structure be concerned, main behaviors holds in the beam, post holds, the shearing force wall bottom reinforces area , shearing force wall entrance to a cave company beam tools , beam column node core area. Show mainly with being not that seismic resistance is compared with each other, strengthening measure in improving the effect shearing force;Aspect adjusting a shear bearing the weight of two forces.1)effect shearing forceOne, two, three-level frame beam and anti-knock wall middle stride over high ratio greater than 2.5 company beam, shearing force design value amongthem, first order choose 1.3, two stage choose 1.2, three-level choose 1.1, first order framed structure and 9 Due Shan respond to coincidence. Coincidence one, two, three steps of frame post and frame pillar , shearing force being designed being worth taking 1.4 among them, one step , taking 1.2, three steps of take 1.1 , one-level framed structure and 9 Due Shank two steps responding to.One, two, three steps of anti-knock walls bottom reinforces location the shearing force designs that value is among them, first order takes 1.6 , the two stage takes 1.4 , grade-three takes 1.2, 9 Dud Shank respond to coincidence. The node core area seismic resistance the beam columnnode , one, two steps of anti-knock grades are carried out is born the weight of force checking calculation by the scissors , should accord with anti-knock structure measure about 3 step, correct 9 degree of fortify and one-level anti-knock grade framed structure, think to the beam end the plasticity hinge already appears , the node shearing force holds reality completely from the beam knuckling under curved regulation decision , hold reality according to the beam matching reinforced bar covering an area of the growing modulus that intensity standard value calculation, takes advantage of that at the same time with 1.15 with material. Other first order holds curved regulation according to the beamdesigning that value secretly schemes against , the shearing force enhances a modulus being1.35 , the two stage is 1.2.2) Shear formulaThe continuous beam of armored concrete and the cantilever beam are born the weight of at home and abroad under low repeated cycle load effect by the scissors the force experiment indicates the main cause pooling efforts and reducing even if tendon dowel force lessening is that the beam is born the weight of a force by the scissors, concrete scissors pressure area lessening shearing an intensity, tilted rift room aggregate bite. Scissors bear the weight of a norm to the concrete accepting descending strenuously being 60% be not anti-knock, the reinforced bar item does not reduce. By the same token, the experiment indicates to insisting to intimidate post with that the force is born the weight of by the scissors, loading makes post the force be born the weight of by the scissors reducing 10% ~ again and again 30%, the itemarouses , adopts practice identical with the beam mainly from the concrete. The experiment is indicated to shearing force wall, whose repeated loading breaks the subtraction modulus up than monotony increases be loaded with force lessening is born the weight of by the scissors 15% ~ 20%, adopts to be not that seismic resistance is born the weight of by the scissors energy times 0.8's. Two parts accept the pressure pole strenuously tilted from the concrete is born the weight of by the scissors and horizontal stirrup of beam column node seismic resistance cutting the expert who bears the weight of force composition , is connected with have given a relevance out formula.Tilted for preventing the beam , post , company beam , shearing force wall , node from happening pressure is destroyed, we have stipulated upper limits force upper limit to be born the weight of by the scissors , have stipulated to match hoop rate’s namely to accepting scissors cross section.Reaction analysis indicates strong weak curved scissors requests; all above measure satisfies basically by mistake elasticity driving force. The plasticity rotates because of anti-knock grade of two stage beam column under big earthquakes still very big , suggest that the shearing force enhances a modulus is bigger than having there is difference between one step unsuitably in connection with the expert, to the beam choose 1.25 is fairly good , ought to take 1.3 ~ to post 1.35. It's the rationality taking value remains to be improved and perfected in going a step further.Require that explanatory being , the beam column node accept a force very complicated , need to ensure that beam column reinforced bar reliability in the node is anchoring , hold occurrence bending resistance at the same time in the beam column destroying front, shearing happened in the node destroy, whose essence should belong to "strong weak curved scissors" categories. The node carries out adjustment on one, two steps of anti-knock grades shearing force and, only, the person enhances a modulus be are minor than post, ratio post also holds structure measure a little weak. As a result ", mor e strong node “statement, is not worth it encourage.3) Structure measureStructure measure is a beam, post, the shearing force wall plasticity cuts the guarantee that area asks to reach the plasticity that reality needs turning ability and consuming ability. Its "strong with "strong weak scissors turn ", weak post beam " correlates, a architectural denasality of guarantee.”Strong weak scissors turn " is a prerequisite for ensuring that the plasticity hinge turns an ability and consumes an ability; Strict "strong weak post beam " degree, the measure affecting corresponding structure, if put strict "strong weak post beam " into practice, ensure that the pillar does not appear than the plasticity hinge, corresponding axis pressure waiting for structure measure to should be a little loose right away except the bottom. Our country adopts "the strong relative weak post beam”, delays a pillar going beyond the hinge time, therefore needing to adopt stricter structure measure.①the beam structure measure beam plasticity hinge cross section senility and manyfactors match tendon rates and the rise knuckling under an intensity but reduce in connection with cross section tensile, with the reinforced bar being pulled; The reinforced bar matches tendon rates and concrete intensity rise but improve with being pressed on, width enhances but enhances with cross section; Plasticity hinge area stirrup can guard against the pressure injustice releasing a tendon , improve concrete limit pressure strain , arrest tilted rift carrying out , fight against a shearing force , plasticity hinge deformation and consume an ability bring into full play, That deck-molding is stridden over is smaller than exceeding , shearing deformation proportion is increasingly big, the gentility destroying , using the tilted rift easy to happen reduces. The beam has led low even if the tendon matches hoop, the reinforced bar may knuckle under after Lang Kai cracks break up by pulling even. As a result, the norm matches tendon rates to the beam even if the tendon maximum matches tendon rates and minimum , the stirrup encryption District length , maximal spacing , minimal diameter , maximal limb lead all have strict regulations from when, volume matches hoop. Being bending regulation , the guarantee cross section denasality , holding to the beam possibly for the end fighting against a beam to pull the pressure reinforced bar area ratio make restrict. Stride over height at the same time, to minimal beam width, than, aspect ratio has done regulation.② the post structure measureFor post bending a type accepting the force component, axis pressure than to the denasality and consuming to be able to, nature effect is bigger. Destroy axis pressure than big bias voltages happened in the pillar hour, component deformation is big , gentility energy nature easy to only consume, reduces; Nature is growing with axis pressure than enhancing , consuming an energy, but the gentility sudden drop, moreover the stirrup diminishes to the gentility help. Readjust oneself to a certain extent to adopt the pillar, main guarantee it's tonsillitis that the low earthquake designs strenuously, but consuming energy sex to second. The pressure ratio has made a norm to the axis restricting, can ensure that within big bias voltages range in general. Stirrup same get the strain arriving at big roles, restraining the longitudinal tendon, improving concrete pressure, deter the tilted rift from developing also to the denasality. Be to match tendon symmetrically like post, the person leads feeling bigger , as big , becoming deformed when the pillar knuckles under more even if the tendon matches tendon , the tensile finishes exceeding. As a result, the tendon minimum matches tendon rates, the stirrup encryption District length, maximal spacing, minimal diameter, maximal limb lead having made strict regulations out from when, and volume matches hoop to the pillar jumping. At the same time, aspect ratio , scissors to the pillar have stridden over a ratio , minimal altitude of cross section , width have done out regulation, to improve the anti-knock function.③ Node structure measureThe node is anchoring beam column reinforced bar area, effect is very big to structure function. Be under swear to act on earthquake and the vertical stroke to load, area provides necessary constraint to node core when node core area cuts pressure low than slanting, keepthe node fundamental shear ability under disadvantageous condition, make a beam column anchoring even if the tendon is reliable, match hoop rates to node core area maximal spacing of stirrup, minimal diameter, volume having done out regulation. The beam column is main node structure measure content even if tendon reliability in the node is anchoring. Have standardized to beam tendon being hit by the node diameter; Release the anchoring length of tendon to the beam column; anchoring way all has detailed regulation.To sum up ,; Framed structure is to pass "the design plan calculating and coming realize structure measure the ability running after beam hinge organization" mainly thereby, realize "the small earth—quake shocks does not but constructs in the dirty trick, big earthquakes do not fall " three standards to-en fortifying target's. References.框架结构抗震概念设计地震灾害具有突发性,至今可预报性很低,给人类社会造成的损失严重,是各类自然灾中最严重的灾害之一。
最新地质岩土英文文献翻译_冶金矿山地质_工程科技_专业资料
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c207f/c207f326ae88332efddfeb5fd7f226d287df1ca5" alt="最新地质岩土英文文献翻译_冶金矿山地质_工程科技_专业资料"
地质岩土英文文献翻译_冶金矿山地质_工程科技_专业资料International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining SciencesAnalysis of geo-structural defects in flexural topplingfailureAbbas Majdi and Mehdi Amini AbstractThe in-situ rock structural weaknesses, referred to herein asgeo-structural defects, such as naturally induced micro-cracks, are extremely responsive to tensile stresses. Flexural toppling failure occurs by tensile stress caused by the moment due to the weight ofthe inclined superimposed cantilever-like rock columns. Hence, geo-structural defects that may naturally exist in rock columns are modeled by a series of cracks in maximum tensile stress plane. The magnitude and location of the maximum tensile stress in rock columns with potential flexural toppling failure are determined. Then, the minimum factor of safety for rock columns are computed by means of principles of solid and fracture mechanics, independently. Next, a new equation is proposed to determine the length of critical crack in such rock columns. It has been shown that if the length of natural crack is smaller than the length of critical crack, then the result based on solid mechanics approach is more appropriate; otherwise, the result obtained based on the principles of fracture mechanics is more acceptable. Subsequently, for stabilization of the prescribed rock slopes, some new analytical relationships are suggested for determination the length and diameter of the required fully grouted rock bolts. Finally, for quick design of rock slopes against flexural toppling failure, a graphical approach along with some design curves are presented by which an admissible inclination of such rock slopes and or length of all required fully grouted rock bolts are determined.In addition, a case study has been used for practical verification of the proposed approaches.Keywords Geo-structural defects, In-situ rock structural weaknesses, Critical crack length1.IntroductionRock masses are natural materials formed in the course ofmillions of years. Since during their formation and afterwards, they have been subjected to high variable pressures both vertically and horizontally, usually, they are not continuous, and contain numerous cracks and fractures. The exerted pressures, sometimes, produce joint sets. Since these pressures sometimes may not be sufficiently high to create separate joint sets in rock masses, they can produce micro joints and micro-cracks. However, the results cannot be considered as independent joint sets. Although the effects of these micro-cracksare not that pronounced compared with large size joint sets, yet they may cause a drastic change of in-situ geomechanical properties ofrock masses. Also, in many instances, due to dissolution of in-situ rock masses, minute bubble-like cavities, etc., are produced, which cause a severe reduction of in-situ tensile strength. Therefore, one should not replace this in-situ strength by that obtained in the laboratory. On the other hand, measuring the in-situ rock tensile strength due to the interaction of complex parameters is impractical. Hence, an appropriate approach for estimation of the tensile strength should be sought. In this paper, by means of principles of solid and fracture mechanics, a new approach for determination of the effect of geo-structural defects on flexural toppling failure is proposed.2. Effect of geo-structural defects on flexural toppling failure2.1. Critical section of the flexural toppling failureAs mentioned earlier, Majdi and Amini [10] and Amini et al. [11] have proved that the accurate factor of safety is equal to that calculated for a series of inclined rock columns, which, by analogy, is equivalent to the superimposed inclined cantilever beams as shown in Fig. 3. According to the equations of limit equilibrium, the moment M and the shearing force V existing in various cross-sectional areas in the beams can be calculated as follows:(5)( 6)Since the superimposed inclined rock columns are subjected to uniformly distributed loads caused by their own weight, hence, the maximum shearing force and moment exist at the v ery fixed end, that is, at x=Ψ:(7)(8)If the magnitude of Ψ from Eq. (1) is substituted into Eqs. (7) and (8), then the magnitudes of shearing force and the maximum moment of equivalent beam for rock slopes are computed as follows:(9)(10)where C is a dimensionless geometrical parameter that is related to the inclinations of the rock slope, the total failure plane and the dip of the rock discontinuities that existin rock masses, and can be determined by means of curves shown in Fig.Mmax and Vmax will produce the normal (tensile and compressive) and the shear stresses in critical cross-sectional area, respectively. However, the combined effect of them will cause rock columns to fail. It is well understood that the rocks are very susceptible to tensile stresses, and the effect of maximum shearing force is also negligible compared with the effect of tensile stress. Thus, for the purpose of the ultimate stability, structural defects reduce the cross-sectional area of load bearing capacity of the rock columns and, consequently, increase the stress concentration in neighboring solid areas. Thus, the in-situ tensile strength of the rock columns, the shearing effect might be neglected and only the tensile stress caused due to maximum bending stress could be used.2.2. Analysis of geo-structural defectsDetermination of the quantitative effect of geo-structural defects in rock masses can be investigated on the basis of the following two approaches.2.2.1. Solid mechanics approachIn this method, which is, indeed, an old approach, the loads from the weak areas are removed and likewise will be transferred to the neighboring solid areas. Therefore, the solid areas of the rock columns, due to overloading and high stress concentration, will eventually encounter with the premature failure. In this paper, for analysis of the geo-structural defects in flexural toppling failure, a set of cracks in critical cross-sectional area has been modeled as shown in Fig. 5. By employing Eq. (9) and assuming that the loads from weak areas are transferred to the solid areas with higher load bearing capacity (Fig. 6), the maximum stresses could be computed by the following equation (see Appendix A for more details):(11)Hence, with regard to Eq. (11), for determination of the factor of safety against flexural toppling failure in open excavations and underground openings including geo-structural defects the following equation is suggested:(12)From Eq. (12) it can be inferred that the factor of safety against flexural toppling failure obtained on the basis of principles of solid mechanics is irrelevant to the length of geo-structuraldefects or the crack length, directly. However, it is related to the dimensionless parameter “joint persistence”, k, as it was defined earlier in this paper. Fig. 2 represents the effect of parameter k on the critical height of the rock slope. This figure also shows the=1) with a potential of limiting equilibrium of the rock mass (Fsflexural toppling failure.Fig. 2. Determination of the critical height of rock slopes with a potential of flexural toppling failure on the basis of principles of solid mechanics.2.2.2. Fracture mechanics approachGriffith in 1924 [13], by performing comprehensive laboratory tests on the glasses, concluded that fracture of brittle materials is due to high stress concentrations produced on the crack tips which causes the cracks to extend (Fig. 3). Williams in 1952 and 1957 and Irwin in 1957 had proposed some relations by which the stress around the single ended crack tips subjected to tensile loading at infinite is determined [14], [15] and [16]. They introduced a new factor in their equations called the “stress intensity factor” whichindicates the stress condition at the crack tips. Therefore if this factor could be determined quantitatively in laboratorial, then, the factor of safety corresponding to the failure criterion based on principles of fracture mechanics might be computed.Fig. 3. Stress concentration at the tip of a single ended crack under tensile loading Similarly, the geo-structural defects exist in rock columns with a potential of flexural toppling failure could be modeled. As it was mentioned earlier in this paper, cracks could be modeled in a conservative approach such that the location of maximum tensile stress at presumed failure plane to be considered as the cracks locations (Fig. 3). If the existing geo-structural defects in a rock mass, are modeled with a series cracks in the total failure plane, then by means of principles of fracture mechanics, an equation for determination of the factor of safety against flexural toppling failure could be proposed as follows:(13)where KIC is the critical stress intensity factor. Eq. (13) clarifies that the factor of safety against flexural toppling failure derived based on the method of fracture mechanics is directly related to both the “joint persistence” and the “length of cracks”. As such the length of cracks existing in the rock columns plays important roles in stress analysis. Fig. 10 shows the influence of the crack length on the critical height of rock slopes. This figure represents the limiting equilibrium of the rock mass with the potential of flexural toppling failure. As it can be seen, an increase of the crack length causes a decrease in the critical height of the rock slopes. In contrast to the principles of solid mechanics, Eq. (13) or Fig. 4 indicates either the onset of failure of the rock columns or the inception of fracture development.Fig. 4. Determination of the critical height of rock slopes with a potential of flexural toppling failure on the basis of principle of fracture mechanics.3. Comparison of the results of the two approachesThe curves shown in Fig. represent Eqs. (12) and (13), respectively. The figures reflect the quantitative effect of the geo-structural defects on flexural toppling failure on the basis of principles of solid mechanics and fracture mechanics accordingly. For the sake of comparison, these equations are applied to one kind of rock mass (limestone) with the following physical and mechanical properties [16]: , , γ=20kN/m3, k=0.75.In any case studies, a safe and stable slope height can be determined by using Eqs. (12) and (13), independently. The two equations yield two different slope heights out of which the minimum height must be taken as the most acceptable one. By equating Eqs. (12) and (13), the following relation has been derived by which a crack length, in this paper called critical length of crack, can be computed:(14a)where ac is the half of the average critical length of the cracks. Since ac appears on both sides of Eq. (14a), the critical length of the crack could be computed by trial and error method. If the lengthof the crack is too small with respect to rock column thickness, then the ratio t/(t−2ac) is slightly greater than one. Therefore one may ignore the length of crack in denominator, and then this ratiobecomes 1. In this case Eq. (14a) reduces to the following equation, by which the critical length of the crack can be computed directly:(14b)It must be born in mind that Eq. (14b) leads to underestimatethe critical length of the crack compared with Eq. (14a). Therefore, for an appropriate determination of the quantitative effect of geo-structural defects in rock mass against flexural toppling failure,the following 3 conditions must be considered: (1) a=0; (2) a<ac; (3) a>ac.In case 1, there are no geo-structural defects in rock columns and so Eq. (3) will be used for flexural toppling analysis. In case 2, the lengths of geo-structural defects are smaller than the critical length of the crack. In this case failure of rock column occurs dueto tensile stresses for which Eq. (12), based on the principles of solid mechanics, should be used. In case 3, the lengths of existing geo-structural defects are greater than the critical length. In this case failure will occur due to growing cracks for which Eq. (13), based on the principles of fracture mechanics, should be used for the analysis.The results of Eqs. (12) and (13) for the limiting equilibrium both are shown in Fig. 11. For the sake of more accurate comparative studies the results of Eq. (3), which represents the rock columnswith no geo-structural defects are also shown in the same figure. Asit was mentioned earlier in this paper, an increase of the crack length has no direct effect on Eq. (12), which was derived based on principles of solid mechanics, whereas according to the principles of fracture mechanics, it causes to reduce the value of factor of safety. Therefore, for more in-depth comparison, the results of Eq. (13), for different values of the crack length, are also shown in Fig. As canbe seen from the figure, if the length of crack is less than the critical length (dotted curve shown in Fig. 11), failure is considered to follow the principles of solid mechanics which results the least slope height. However, if the length of crack increases beyond the critical length, the rock column fails due to high stress concentration at the crack tips according to the principles of fracture mechanics, which provides the least slope height. Hence, calculation of critical length of crack is of paramount importance.4. Estimation of stable rock slopes with a potential of flexural toppling failureIn rock slopes and trenches, except for the soil and rock fills, the heights are dictated by the natural topography. Hence, the desired slopes must be designed safely. In rock masses with the potential of flexural toppling failure, with regard to the length of the cracks extant in rock columns the slopes can be computed by Eqs.(3), (12), and (13) proposed in this paper. These equations caneasily be converted into a series of design curves for selection of the slopes to replace the lengthy manual computations as well. [Fig. 12], [Fig. 13], [Fig. 14] and [Fig. 15] show several such design curves with the potential of flexural topping failures. If the lengths of existing cracks in the rock columns are smaller than the critical length of the crack, one can use the design curves, obtained on the basis of principles of solid mechanics, shown in [Fig. 12] and [Fig. 13], for the rock slope design purpose. If the lengths of the cracks existing in rock columns are greater than the critical length of the crack, then the design curves derived based on principles of fracture mechanics and shown in [Fig. 14] and [Fig. 15] must be used for the slope design intention. In all, these design curves, with knowing the height of the rock slopes and the thickness of the rockcolumns, parameter (H2/t) is computed, and then from the designcurves the stable slope is calculated. It must be born in mind thatall the aforementioned design curves are valid for the equilibrium condition only, that is, when FS=1. Hence, the calculated slopes from the above design curves, for the final safe design purpose must be reduced based on the desired factor of safety. For example, if the information regarding to one particular rock slope are given [17]:k=0.25, φ=10°, σt=10MPa, γ=20kN/m3, δ=45°, H=100m, t=1 m, ac>a=0.1 m, and then according to Fig. 12 the design slope will be 63°, which represents the condition of equ ilibrium only. Hence, the final and safe slope can be taken any values less than the above mentioned one, which is solely dependent on the desired factor of safety.Fig. 5. Selection of critical slopes for rock columns with the potential of flexural toppling failure on the basis of principles of solid mechanics when k=0.25.Fig. 6. Selection of critical slopes for rock columns with the potential of flexural toppling failure based on principles of solid mechanics when k=0.75..Fig. 7. Selection of critical slopes for rock columns with the potential of flexural toppling failure based on principles of fracture mechanics when k=0.25.Fig. 8. Selection of critical slopes for rock columns with the potential of flexural toppling failure based on principles of fracture mechanics when k=0.75.5. Stabilization of the rock mass with the potential of flexural toppling failureIn flexural toppling failure, rock columns slide over each other so that the tensile loading induced due to their self-weighting grounds causes the existing cracks to grow and thus failure occurs. Hence, if these slides, somehow, are prevented then the expected instability will be reduced significantly. Therefore, employing fully grouted rock bolts, as a useful tool, is great assistance in increasing the degree of stability of the rock columns as shown in Fig. 16 [5] and [6]. However, care must be taken into account that employing fully grouted rock bolts is not the only approach to stabilize the rock mass with potential of flexural toppling failure. Therefore, depending up on the case, combined methods such as decreasing the slope inclination, grouting, anchoring, retaining walls, etc., may even have more effective application than fullygrouted rock bolts alone. In this paper a method has been presentedto determine the specification of fully grouted rock bolts tostabilize such a rock mass. It is important to mention that Eqs. (15), (16), (17), (18), (19) and (20) proposed in this paper may also be used as guidelines to assist practitioners and engineers to definethe specifications of the desired fully grouted rock bolts to be used for stabilization of the rock mass with potential of flexuraltoppling failure. Hence, the finalized specifications must also be checked by engineering judgments then to be applied to rock masses. For determination of the required length of rock bolts for the stabilization of the rock columns against flexural toppling failure the equations given in previous sections can be used. In Eqs. (12)and (13), if the factor of safety is replaced by an allowable value, then the calculated parameter t will indicate the thickness of the combined rock columns which will be equal to the safe length of the rock bolts. Therefore, the required length of the fully grouted rock bolts can be determined via the following equations which have been proposed in this paper, based on the following cases.Fig. 9. Stabilization of rock columns with potential of flexural toppling failure withfully grouted rock bolts.Case 1: principles of solid mechanics for the condition when (a<a c):(15)Case 2: principles of fracture mechanics for the condition when(a>a c):(16)Where FSS is the allowable factor of safety, T is the length of the fully grouted rock bolts, and Ω is the angle between rock bolt longitudinal axis and the line of normal to the discontinuities of rock slope.Eqs. (15) and (16) can be converted into some design curves as shown in Fig. In some cases, one single bolt with a length T may not guarantee the stability of the rock columns against flexural toppling failure since it may pass through total failure plane. In such a case, the rock columns can be reinforced in a stepwise manner so that the thickness of the sewn rock columns becomes equal to T [11].Eq. (17) represents the shear force that exists at any cross-sectional area of the rock bolts. Therefore, both shear force and shear stress at any cross-sectional area can be calculated by the following proposed equations:(17)(18)where V is the longitudinal shear force function, τ is theshear stress function, and Q(y) is the first moment of inertia.According to the equations of equilibrium, in each element of a beam, at any cross-sectional area the shear stresses are equal tothat exist in the corresponding longitudinal section [18]. Hence, the total shear force S in the longitudinal section of the beam can be calculated as follows:The inserted shear force in the cross-sectional area of the rock bolt is equal to the total force exerted longitudinally as well. Therefore,the shear force exerted to the rock bolt's cross-section can be computed as follows:7. ConclusionsIn this paper, geo-structural defects existing in the in-situ rock columns with the potential of flexural toppling failure have been modeled with a series of central cracks. Thereafter on the basis of principles of both the solid and fracture mechanics some new equations have been proposed which can be used for stability analysis and the stabilization of such rock slopes. The final outcomes of this research are given as follows:1. Geo-structural defects play imperative roles in the stability of rock slopes, in particular, flexural toppling failure.2. The results obtained on the basis of principles of solid mechanics approach indicate that the length of cracks alone has no influence on the determination of factor of safety, whereas the value of joint persistence causes a considerable change in its value. On the other hand, the factor of safety obtained based on principles of fracture mechanics approach is strongly influenced by both the length of existing cracks in rock columns and joint persistence as well.3. The critical length of cracks represents the equality line of the results obtained from both approaches: solid mechanics and fracture mechanics.4. If the length of the crack is less than the critical length, failure is considered to follow the principles of solid mechanics. However, if the length of crack increases beyond the critical length, the rock column fails due to high stress concentration at the crack tips, according to the principles of fracture mechanics.5. The present proposed equations are also converted into some design graphs that can be used for ease of application and to reduce manual lengthy calculations for determining the critical height of rock slopes with the potential of flexural toppling failure.6. In this paper, on the basis of principles of both solid mechanics and fracture mechanics some equations are proposed to determine the safe length and the diameter of the fully grouted rock bolts for stabilization of rock slopes with the potential of flexural toppling failure.7. For simplicity of computations, some design graphs for determination of the length of the fully grouted rock bolts for stabilization of rock slopes with the potential of flexural toppling failure are also presented.8. Slope stability analysis of the Galandrood mine shows the new approach is well suited for the analysis of flexural toppling failure.国际岩石力学与工程学报地质结构缺陷对弯曲倾倒破坏的影响作者:Abbas Majdi and Mehdi Amini摘要原位岩石弱点,在此统称为地质结构缺陷,如自然诱发的微裂纹,对拉应力有很大影响。
岩土工程中英文对照外文翻译文献
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25657/25657e21187b85807c57add0ce53d821bd9ec9bf" alt="岩土工程中英文对照外文翻译文献"
中英文对照外文翻译(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)原文:Safety Assurance for Challenging Geotechnical Civil Engineering Constructions in Urban AreasAbstractSafety is the most important aspect during design, construction and service time of any structure, especially for challenging projects like high-rise buildings and tunnels in urban areas. A high level design considering the soil-structure interaction, based on a qualified soil investigation is required for a safe and optimised design. Dueto the complexity of geotechnical constructions the safety assurance guaranteed by the 4-eye-principle is essential. The 4-eye-principle consists of an independent peer review by publicly certified experts combined with the observational method. The paper presents the fundamental aspects of safety assurance by the 4-eye-principle. The application is explained on several examples, as deep excavations, complex foundation systems for high-rise buildings and tunnel constructions in urban areas. The experiences made in the planning, design and construction phases are explained and for new inner urban projects recommendations are given.Key words: Natural Asset; Financial Value; Neural Network1.IntroductionA safety design and construction of challenging projects in urban areas is based on the following main aspects:Qualified experts for planning, design and construction;Interaction between architects, structural engineers and geotechnical engineers;Adequate soil investigation;Design of deep foundation systems using the FiniteElement-Method (FEM) in combination with enhanced in-situ load tests for calibrating the soil parameters used in the numerical simulations;Quality assurance by an independent peer review process and the observational method (4-eye-principle).These facts will be explained by large construction projects which are located in difficult soil and groundwater conditions.2.The 4-Eye-PrincipleThe basis for safety assurance is the 4-eye-principle. This 4-eye-principle is a process of an independent peer review as shown in Figure 1. It consists of 3 parts. The investor, the experts for planning and design and the construction company belong to the first division. Planning and design are done accordingto the requirements of the investor and all relevant documents to obtain the building permission are prepared. The building authorities are the second part and are responsible for the buildingpermission which is given to the investor. The thirddivision consists of the publicly certified experts.They are appointed by the building authorities but work as independent experts. They are responsible for the technical supervision of the planning, design and the construction.In order to achieve the license as a publicly certified expert for geotechnical engineering by the building authorities intensive studies of geotechnical engineering in university and large experiences in geotechnical engineering with special knowledge about the soil-structure interaction have to be proven.The independent peer review by publicly certified experts for geotechnical engineering makes sure that all information including the results of the soil investigation consisting of labor field tests and the boundary conditions defined for the geotechnical design are complete and correct.In the case of a defect or collapse the publicly certified expert for geotechnical engineering can be involved as an independent expert to find out the reasons for the defect or damage and to develop a concept for stabilization and reconstruction [1].For all difficult projects an independent peer review is essential for the successful realization of the project.3.Observational MethodThe observational method is practical to projects with difficult boundary conditions for verification of the design during the construction time and, if necessary, during service time. For example in the European Standard Eurocode 7 (EC 7) the effect and the boundary conditions of the observational method are defined.The application of the observational method is recommended for the following types of construction projects [2]:very complicated/complex projects;projects with a distinctive soil-structure-interaction,e.g. mixed shallow and deep foundations, retaining walls for deep excavations, Combined Pile-Raft Foundations (CPRFs);projects with a high and variable water pressure;complex interaction situations consisting of ground,excavation and neighbouring buildings and structures;projects with pore-water pressures reducing the stability;projects on slopes.The observational method is always a combination of the common geotechnical investigations before and during the construction phase together with the theoretical modeling and a plan of contingency actions(Figure 2). Only monitoring to ensure the stability and the service ability of the structure is not sufficient and,according to the standardization, not permitted for this purpose. Overall the observational method is an institutionalized controlling instrument to verify the soil and rock mechanical modeling [3,4].The identification of all potential failure mechanismsis essential for defining the measure concept. The concept has to be designed in that way that all these mechanisms can be observed. The measurements need to beof an adequate accuracy to allow the identification ocritical tendencies. The required accuracy as well as the boundary values need to be identified within the design phase of the observational method . Contingency actions needs to be planned in the design phase of the observational method and depend on the ductility of the systems.The observational method must not be seen as a potential alternative for a comprehensive soil investigation campaign. A comprehensive soil investigation campaignis in any way of essential importance. Additionally the observational method is a tool of quality assurance and allows the verification of the parameters and calculations applied in the design phase. The observational method helps to achieve an economic and save construction [5].4.In-Situ Load TestOn project and site related soil investigations with coredrillings and laboratory tests the soil parameters are determined. Laboratory tests are important and essential for the initial definition of soil mechanical properties of the soil layer, but usually not sufficient for an entire and realistic capture of the complex conditions, caused by theinteraction of subsoil and construction [6].In order to reliably determine the ultimate bearing capacity of piles, load tests need to be carried out [7]. Forpile load tests often very high counter weights or strong anchor systems are necessary. By using the Osterberg method high loads can be reached without install inganchors or counter weights. Hydraulic jacks induce the load in the pile using the pile itself partly as abutment.The results of the field tests allow a calibration of the numerical simulations.The principle scheme of pile load tests is shown in Figure 3.5.Examples for Engineering Practice5.1. Classic Pile Foundation for a High-Rise Building in Frankfurt Clay and LimestoneIn the downtown of Frankfurt am Main, Germany, on aconstruction site of 17,400 m2 the high-rise buildingproject “PalaisQuartier” has been realized (Figure 4). The construction was finished in 2010.The complex consists of several structures with a total of 180,000 m2 floor space, there of 60,000 m2 underground (Figure 5). The project includes the historic building “Thurn-und Taxis-Palais” whose facade has been preserved (Unit A). The office building (Unit B),which is the highest building of the project with a height of 136 m has 34 floors each with a floor space of 1340 m2. The hotel building (Unit C) has a height of 99 m with 24 upper floors. The retail area (Unit D)runs along the total length of the eastern part of the site and consists of eight upper floors with a total height of 43 m.The underground parking garage with five floors spans across the complete project area. With an 8 m high first sublevel, partially with mezzanine floor, and four more sub-levels the foundation depth results to 22 m below ground level. There by excavation bottom is at 80m above sea level (msl). A total of 302 foundation piles(diameter up to 1.86 m, length up to 27 m) reach down to depths of 53.2 m to 70.1 m. above sea level depending on the structural requirements.The pile head of the 543 retaining wall piles (diameter1.5 m, length up to 38 m)were located between 94.1 m and 99.6 m above sea level, the pile base was between 59.8 m and 73.4 m above sea level depending on the structural requirements. As shown in the sectional view(Figure 6), the upper part of the piles is in the Frankfurt Clay and the base of the piles is set in the rocky Frankfurt Limestone.Regarding the large number of piles and the high pile loads a pile load test has been carried out for optimization of the classic pile foundation. Osterberg-Cells(O-Cells) have been installed in two levels in order to assess the influence of pile shaft grouting on the limit skin friction of the piles in the Frankfurt Limestone(Figure 6). The test pile with a total length of 12.9 m and a diameter of 1.68 m consist of three segments and has been installed in the Frankfurt Limestone layer 31.7 m below ground level. The upper pile segment above the upper cell level and the middle pile segment between the two cell levels can be tested independently. In the first phase of the test the upper part was loaded by using the middle and the lower part as abutment. A limit of 24 MN could be reached (Figure 7). The upper segment was lifted about 1.5 cm, the settlement of the middle and lower part was 1.0 cm. The mobilized shaft friction was about 830 kN/m2.Subsequently the upper pile segment was uncoupled by discharging the upper cell level. In the second test phase the middle pile segment was loaded by using the lower segment as abutment. The limit load of the middle segment with shaft grouting was 27.5 MN (Figure 7).The skin friction was 1040 kN/m2, this means 24% higher than without shaft grouting. Based on the results of the pile load test using O-Cells the majority of the 290 foundation piles were made by applying shaft grouting. Due to pile load test the total length of was reduced significantly.5.2. CPRF for a High-Rise Building in Clay MarlIn the scope of the project Mirax Plaza in Kiev, Ukraine,2 high-rise buildings, each of them 192 m (46 storeys)high, a shopping and entertainment mall and an underground parking are under construction (Figure 8). The area of the project is about 294,000 m2 and cuts a 30 m high natural slope.The geotechnical investigations have been executed 70m deep. The soil conditions at the construction site are as follows: fill to a depth of 2 m to 3mquaternary silty sand and sandy silt with a thickness of 5 m to 10 m tertiary silt and sand (Charkow and Poltaw formation) with a thickness of 0 m to 24 m tertiary clayey silt and clay marl of the Kiev and But schak formation with a thickness of about 20 m tertiary fine sand of the But schak formation up to the investigation depthThe ground water level is in a depth of about 2 m below the ground surface. The soil conditions and a cross section of the project are shown in Figure 9.For verification of the shaft and base resistance of the deep foundation elements and for calibration of the numerical simulations pile load tests have been carried out on the construction yard. The piles had a diameter of 0.82 m and a length of about 10 m to 44 m. Using the results of the load tests the back analysis for verification of the FEM simulations was done. The soil properties in accordance with the results of the back analysis were partly 3 times higher than indicated in the geotechnical report. Figure 10 shows the results of the load test No. 2 and the numerical back analysis. Measurement and calculation show a good accordance.The obtained results of the pile load tests and of the executed back analysis were applied in 3-dimensionalFEM-simulations of the foundation for Tower A, taking advantage of the symmetry of the footprint of the building. The overall load of the Tower A is about 2200 MN and the area of the foundation about 2000 m2 (Figure11).The foundation design considers a CPRF with 64 barrettes with 33 m length and a cross section of 2.8 m × 0.8m. The raft of 3 m thickness is located in Kiev Clay Marl at about 10 m depth below the ground surface. The barrettes are penetrating the layer of Kiev Clay Marl reaching the Butschak Sands.The calculated loads on the barrettes were in the range of 22.1 MN to 44.5 MN. The load on the outer barrettes was about 41.2 MN to 44.5 MN which significantly exceeds the loads on the inner barrettes with the maximum value of 30.7 MN. This behavior is typical for a CPRF.The outer deep foundation elements take more loads because of their higher stiffness due to the higher volume of the activated soil. The CPRF coefficient is 0.88 =CPRF . Maximum settlements of about 12 cm werecalculated due to the settlement-relevant load of 85% of the total design load. The pressure under the foundation raft is calculated in the most areas not exceeding 200 kN/m2, at the raft edge the pressure reaches 400 kN/m2.The calculated base pressure of the outer barrettes has anaverage of 5100 kN/m2 and for inner barrettes an average of 4130 kN/m2. The mobilized shaft resistance increases with the depth reaching 180 kN/m2 for outer barrettes and 150 kN/m2 for inner barrettes.During the construction of Mirax Plaza the observational method according to EC 7 is applied. Especially the distribution of the loads between the barrettes and the raft is monitored. For this reason 3 earth pressure devices were installed under the raft and 2 barrettes (most loaded outer barrette and average loaded inner barrette) were instrumented over the length.In the scope of the project Mirax Plaza the new allowable shaft resistance and base resistance were defined for typical soil layers in Kiev. This unique experience will be used for the skyscrapers of new generation in Ukraine.The CPRF of the high-rise building project MiraxPlaza represents the first authorized CPRF in the Ukraine. Using the advanced optimization approaches and taking advantage of the positive effect of CPRF the number of barrettes could be reduced from 120 barrettes with 40 mlength to 64 barrettes with 33 m length. The foundation optimization leads to considerable decrease of the utilized resources (cement, aggregates, water, energy etc.)and cost savings of about 3.3 Million US$.译文:安全保证岩土公民发起挑战工程建设在城市地区摘要安全是最重要的方面在设计、施工和服务时间的任何结构,特别是对具有挑战性的项目,如高层建筑和隧道在城市地区。
最新土力学中英翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f44c/2f44c0aee73724d725a367a84e43310f45b18d5e" alt="最新土力学中英翻译"
土力学中英翻译........................................Soil Mechanics 土力学Geotechnical Engineering 岩土工程Stress 应力,Strain 应变Settlement 沉降,Displacement 位移,Deformation 变形Consolidation 固结,Seepage 渗流Effective Stress 有效应力,Total Stress总应力Excess Pore Water Pressure 超孔隙水压力Shear Strength 抗剪强度,Stability 稳定性Bearing Capacity 承载力Consistency 稠度Coefficient of uniformity, uniformity coefficient 不均匀系数Thixotropy 触变Single-grained structure 单粒结构Honeycomb structure 蜂窝结构Dry unit weight 干重度Plasticity index 塑性指数Water content,moisture content 含水量Gradation,grading 级配Bound water,combined water, held water 结合水Particle size distribution of soils, mechanical composition of soil 颗粒级配Sensitivity of cohesive soil 粘性土的灵敏度Mean diameter,average grain diameter 平均粒径Coefficient of curvature 曲率系数Void ratio 孔隙比Clay粘土Cohesionless soil 无粘性土Cohesive soil 粘性土Activity indexAtterberg limits 界限含水率Liquid limit 液限Plastic limit 塑限Shrinkage limit 缩限Unsaturated soil 非饱和土Secondary mineral 次生矿物Eluvial soil, residual soil 残积土Silty clay 粉质粘土Degree of saturation 饱和度Saturated density 饱和密度Specific gravity 比重Unit weight 重度Coefficient of uniformity 不均匀系数Block/skeletal/three phase diagram 三相图Critical hydraulic gradient 临界水力梯度Seepage 渗流Seepage discharge 渗流量Seepage velocity 渗流速度Seepage force 渗透力Darcy’s law 达西定律Piping 管涌Permeability 渗透性Coefficient of permeability 渗透系数Seepage failure 渗透破坏Phreatic 浸润线Flowing soil 流土Hydraulic gradient 水力梯度Critical hydraulic gradient 临界水力梯度Flow function 流函数Flow net 流网Sand boiling 砂沸Potential function 势函数Capillary water 毛细水Constant/falling head test 常/变水头试验Modulus of deformation 变形模量Poisson’s ratio 泊松比Residual deformation 残余变形Excess pore water pressure 超静孔隙水压力Settlement 沉降Coefficient of secondary consolidation 次固结系数Elastic formula for settlement calculation 地基沉降的弹性力学公式Layerwise summation method 分层总和法Superimposed stress 附加应力Secant modulus 割线模量Consolidation settlement 固结沉降Settlement calculation by specification 规范沉降计算法Rebound deformation 回弹变形Modulus of resilience 回弹模量Coefficient of resilience 回弹系数Swelling index 回弹指数Allowable settlement of building 建筑物的地基变形允许值Corner-points method 角点法Tangent modulus 切线模量。
岩土专业英汉词汇
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e93e6/e93e640e209e01e294afd9e42ae3f98e75352ab2" alt="岩土专业英汉词汇"
R.K.S. Chan Head, Geotechnical Engineering Office July 2004
f Chinese in oral and written communication on geotechnical and related subjects is getting common in Hong Kong. This Glossary contains a comprehensive collection of the Chinese translations of about 6,500 terms frequently met by geotechnical professionals in Hong Kong in their work. In some cases, a geotechnical term may be translated into Chinese in more than one way due to different local usage, language style, or personal preference. The different translations are listed in the Glossary for reference by readers. The Glossary was jointly produced by the Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (Hong Kong) Ltd., the Department of Civil and Structural Engineering of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, the Geotechnical Division of the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, and the Geotechnical Engineering Office of the Civil Engineering and Development Department. A Steering Group, comprising Dr C.K. Lau, Dr Victor K.S. Li, Dr David X.C. Li, Mr H.N. Wong and Professor J.H. Yin, oversaw the compilation of the Glossary. Professor John Wang prepared a glossary for terms used in Geotechnical Manual for Slopes; these terms have also been incorporated in this Glossary. Mr Philip W.K. Chung and Mr Jerry L. P. Ho assisted in the final phase of compilation of the Glossary. Many other geotechnical professionals in Hong Kong and elsewhere have provided invaluable advice, suggestions and assistance. We hope that the Glossary will facilitate the use of Chinese in the geotechnical profession and help standardize the Chinese translation of the commonly used geotechnical terms in Hong Kong. Comments and suggestions for improvement to this Glossary are most welcome. These should be addressed to Chief Geotechnical Engineer/Planning Division of Geotechnical Engineering Office, 11/F, Civil Engineering and Development Building, 101 Princess Margaret Road, Homantin, Kowloon. A proforma to facilitate provision of feedback is given at the end of this report.
吉大岩土工程专业英语翻译第10课
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b0e4/9b0e41e88de46cad18a6d8fa9c8bcbee4092d4b8" alt="吉大岩土工程专业英语翻译第10课"
New wordsprerequisite ['pri:'rekwizit] n. 先决条件earthworks 土方工程insufficient [,insə'fiʃənt] adj. 不足的,n. 不足inadequate [in'ædikwit] adj. 不充分的character of ground 场地特征(特性)request 索取,请求can lead to 必然导致unsatisfactory ['ʌn,sætis'fæktəri] adj. 不令人满意的;不满足的;不符合要求的subsequently ['sʌbsikwəntli] adv. 随后expenditure [iks'penditʃə] n. 支出unfair competition,illicit compelition 不正当竞争additional expenditure 附加费用;追加支出unfavourable adj. 不利的;不适宜的secondary matter 次要问题The general objective of总体目标the suitability of a site 场地的适宜性z evaluatez assess, assessmentz appraisez estimatez valuationz attempt to foreseez forward-lookingz prospectivez program-predictive provide against 预防local condition 当地条件assumption [ə'sʌmpʃən] n. 假定the basic design assumption设计假定proceed with 继续进行proceed from 从...出发proceed against 起诉accordingly [ə'kɔ:diŋli] 相应地map survey (岩土工程*仅限本课)填图literature survey文献调查(包括搜集和查阅已有资料、近似的工程经验和数据,走访调查等)reconnaissance / reconnoissance [ri'kɔnisəns] n. 事先考查;勘测;preliminary reconnaissance 初步考察z site explorationz site visitz on-the-spot surveyz preliminary prospecting in site appertain [,æpə'tein] vi. 属于;和……有关appertaining to 作为一部分;和…有关z ground waterz underground waterz Subterranean waterz soil waterearth pressure 土压力;地压as far as… 就…而言in terms of… 就…而言bearing capacity 承载力foundation rocks 基岩subsidence in mining area 矿区的地面塌陷问题mine workings 矿山巷道,采掘工作面old mine workings 废弃矿山巷道;老矿井topography [tə'pɔɡrəfi] n. 地势;地形学;地志hill [hil] n. 小山;丘陵;斜坡;山冈old shallow mine workings 废弃的浅埋矿井regime [rei'ʒi:m] n.政体;状态z flow regime 流态;水流动态z water regime 水情;水文状况z hydrological regime 水文状况,水分状况subsurface drainage 浅地表排水;地下排水built-up建筑物多的the proposed construction 拟建建(构)筑物existing structure 既有建(构)筑物log core 岩心记录,岩心描述hand auger 手提螺钻butter fly蝶阀取土器pit 基坑adits 平硐trenches 沟槽percussion冲击percussion drilling 冲击钻探有关取样的词汇按比例取样proportional sampling剥层法(取样方法) peeling method,sampling by评价,评估前瞻性的现场踏勘地下水stripping沉落取样器drop sampler衬片取样器foil sampler重复取样repeated sampling, resampling地下取样subsurface sample地下水取样groundwater sampling冻结取样器cryogenic sampler对开式取样器split tube sampler多次取样multisampling二次取样subsample方格法(取样) quadrangle method分层取样stratified sampling固定活塞式取样器fixed piston sampler管式取样器tube sampler海底取样submarine sampling海底取样器kullenberg sampler盒式取样器(开斯顿取样器) kasten corer回转取样器rotary sampler井壁取样lateral coring井壁取样器side sampler; wall sampler井底取样器bottom-hole sample taker; bottom- hole sampler刻糟取样channel sampling刻槽取样法chip- channel method孔底取样器bottom sampler连续取样continuous sampling手动螺旋钻孔取样法auger sampling method泥泵取样器sample thief取岩心running coring取样sample collection; taking of sample; thief取样层位 sample horizon取样位置sample site取样法method of sampling取样格式 sampling dsign取样管bleeder / probe tube; sampling pepe取样厚度sampled thickness取样技术sampling technique取样|间隔sample interval; sample period取样间距interval of sampling取样流程 smpling flowsheet取样瓶 sample botlle取样器(深部) cheese tester取样枪sampling gun取样扰动sampling disturbance取样勺 sampling spoon 取样试验pick-test取样筒sampler barrel. sampling barrel. sampling tube取样系统sampling line取样钻进sample drilling取淤泥样sludge sampling双层取样double tube sampler双重岩心管取样器double tube core; barrelsampler 四分取样铲quartering shovel四分取样法quartering探槽取样pit sampling桶式取样方法barrel sampling外间隙比(取样器) outer clearance ratio无吊索取样管free-draining-fall corer系列取样serial sampling谢尔贝薄壁取样器Shelby tube sampler压力取样器pressure thief压入式取样器 jacker in sampler压人式取样简pressure-type core barrel液压活塞取样[土] hydraulic piston sampler移动式取样器moving machine sampler原地水取样器in-situ liquid sampler原状土取样器samplers for undisturbed samples真空取样器vacuum sampling tube真空岩心取样管vacuum corer重锤岩心取样gravity core sampling自返式取样管free-draining-fall core自由下落取样器free-draining-fall corer钻孔取样器messenger钻探(取样) drilling; bore; probe drilling; prospection drilling; exploralion drilling。
专业英语翻译(岩土系适用)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f090/9f0909770a8d0b112e83448503974df304f15bbb" alt="专业英语翻译(岩土系适用)"
Abstract:The karst mud limestone of Triassic Badong formation (T2 b) is the serious engineering geological problem newly discovered in the population resettlement project in the Three Gorges Reservoir region. There are very complex structures in mud limestone, involving old structures, new structures and surface deformation structures, which coordinately control the karstification. In the old structures, the local structures such as folds and fault zones control the important segments and layers of karstification; and the mini structures such as joint and layer face popularize the karstification. The surface uplift and river cutting in new tectonic period put forward the unload and loose of rock mass, widening of karstification paths. The surface deformation structures densify the karstification paths and intensify the karstification. The mechanism of karst hazards yields to the regulation of structure controlling over karstification in mud limestone terrain, Three Gorges Reservoir region , which brings about hazards with features of broad range , huge scale and complex structure. The types of karst hazards involve uneven subsidence, fissure, landslide, collapse,mudflow and cave in.三峡库区三叠系巴东组(T2b)泥灰质岩石岩溶是移民迁建中发现的重大工程地质问题。
英文文献及翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/364e5/364e5347cf082b167ae153a93c36c9d464e5518f" alt="英文文献及翻译"
Geotextile reinforced by soft soil1. IntroductionGeotextile known, it has high tensile strength, durability, corrosion resistance, texture, flexibility, combined with good sand, to form reinforced composite foundation, effectively increase the shear strength , tensile properties, and enhance the integrity and continuity of soil. Strengthening mechanism for the early 60's in the 20th century, Henri Vidal on the use of triaxial tests found a small amount of fiber in the sand, the soil shear strength can improve the image of more than 4 times in recent years, China's rock Laboratory workers also proved in the reinforced sand can effectively improve the soil's bearing capacity, reduce the vertical ground settlement, effectively overcome the poor soil and continuity of overall poor performance. As with the above properties of reinforced soil and the characteristics of its low price, so the project has broad application prospects.2.1 Project OverviewThe proposed retaining wall using rubble retaining wall of gravity, the wall is 6 meters high, the bearing capacity of foundation soil required to 250kPa, while the basement geology from the top down as follows: ①clay to a thickness of 0.7 to 2 meters saturated, soft plastic; ② muddy soil, about 22 - 24 meters thick, saturated, mainly plastic flow, local soft plastic; ③ sand layer to a thickness of 5 to 10 meters, containing silty soil and organic matter, saturated, slightly wet; ④ gravel layer, the thickness of the uneven distribution points, about 0 to 2.2 meters, slightly dense; ⑤ weathered sandstone. Including clay and silty soil bearing capacity is 70kPa, obviously do foundation reinforcement.2.2 Enhanced Treatment of reinforced foundation cushion Reinforcement replacement method can be used for sand and gravel used forsoil treatment, but due to loose bedding, based on past experience, witha gravel mat to treat a large settlement of the foundation always exist, even the characteristics of poor, often resulting in cracks in the superstructure, differential settlement of the image, this works for6-meter-high rubble retaining walls, height and large, and because the walls are 3 meters high wall, if there is differential settlement of retaining walls, cracks, will result in more serious consequences and thus should be used on the cushion reinforcement through economic and technical analysis, decide on the sand and gravel stratum were reinforced hardening. Reinforcement treatment method: first the design elevation and the basement excavation to 200mm thick layer of gravel bedding, and then capped with a layer of geotextile, and then in the thick sand and gravel on the 200, after leveling with the yellow sand using roller compaction; second with loaded bags of sand and gravel laying of geotextile, the gap filled with slag, geotextile bags capped 100 thick gravel, roller compaction. Its on repeat laying geotextile → → compacted gravel, until the design thickness of the cushion, the bridge is 1 m thick cushion, a total of 4 layers of geotextile, two bags of sand.This method works fast, simple machine, investment, after years of use, that reinforce good effect, building and construction units are satisfied.3 ExperienceTo achieve the reinforced soil reinforcement effect, must be reinforced earth construction technology, construction strict quality control: 1, geotextile should increase the initial pre-stress, and its end should be a reliable anchor to play the tensile strength of geotextile, anchoring more firmly, more capacity to improve, the foundation of the stress distribution more uniform, geotextile side Ministry of fixed length by laying end to ensure the fold, the folded end wrapped sand to increase its bond strength to ensure that the use will not be pulled out duringthe period.Second, the construction process have a significant effect on the reinforcement effect, the construction should be as soon as possible so that geotextile in tension, tensile strength geotextile can be played only when the deformation, so do not allow construction of geotextile crease occurs, the earth Fabric tension leveling as much as possible. Geotextile in order to have enough by the early Dutch strain, according to the following procedure works: ① laying geotextile; ② leveled the tension at both ends; both ends of the folded package gravel and sand filling at both ends; ③ center fill sand; ④ 2 higher end of sand; ⑤ Finally, the center of sand filling. Click here to enable the construction method of forming corrugated geotextile being stretched as soon as possible, to play a role in the early loaded.Third, the construction of geotextile-reinforced cushion should the level of shop using geotextile geotextile and laying of gravel bags cushion the turn to play bag cushion integrated turn out good, flexural rigidity, and dispersion of good and peace bedding layer of the overall continuity of good advantages.4 ConclusionGeotextile reinforced by soft soil is an effective, economical, safe, reliable, simple method, but the literature describes only qualitative, experience more components, yet the lack of rigorous The theoretical formula, reliable test data to be adequate, these are yet to be theoretical workers and the general engineering and technical personnel continue to explore.土工织物加筋垫层加固软土地基1. 引言土工织物又称土工聚合物,它具有高抗拉强度,耐久性、耐腐蚀性,质地柔韧,能与砂土很好地结合,组合成加筋土复合地基,有效地提高土的抗剪强度、抗拉性能,增强土体的整体性和连续性。
岩土工程专业英语 可删减
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05c34/05c34fbc89b1b96b35bbdc0eedd304edd1f46ad0" alt="岩土工程专业英语 可删减"
岩土工程专业外语词汇大全中英翻译1. 综合类大地工程geotechnical engineering临界状态土力学critical state soil mechanics数值岩土力学numerical geomechanics 岩土工程geotechnical engineering应力路径stress path2. 工程地质及勘察变质岩metamorphic rock标准冻深standard frost penetration残积土eluvial soil, residual soil层理beding长石feldspar沉积岩sedimentary rock次生矿物secondary mineral地质图geological map断裂构造fracture structure工程地质勘察engineering geological exploration花岗岩granite化学沉积岩chemical sedimentary rock 解理cleavage矿物硬度hardness of minerals流滑flow slide泥石流mud flow, debris flow粘土矿物clay minerals潜水ground water侵入岩intrusive rock砂岩sandstone深成岩plutionic rock石灰岩limestone 岩层产状attitude of rock岩浆岩magmatic rock, igneous rock岩石风化程度degree of rock weathering 岩石构造structure of rock岩石结构texture of rock页岩shale原生矿物primary mineral造岩矿物rock-forming mineral褶皱fold, folding3. 土的分类饱和土saturated soil超固结土overconsolidated soil冲填土dredger fill冻土frozen soil非饱和土unsaturated soil分散性土dispersive soil粉土silt粉质粘土silty clay红粘土red clay, adamic earth黄土loess粘性土cohesive soil, clayey soil膨胀土expansive soil, swelling soil欠固结粘土underconsolidated soil区域性土zonal soil人工填土fill, artificial soil软粘土soft clay, mildclay, mickle湿陷性黄土collapsible loess, slumping loess素填土plain fill塑性图plasticity chart碎石土stone, break stone, broken stone, channery, chat, crushed stone, deritus未压密土(台)underconsolidated clay 无粘性土cohesionless soil, frictional soil,non-cohesive soil淤泥muck, gyttja, mire, slush淤泥质土mucky soil原状土undisturbed soil正常固结土normally consolidated soil正常压密土(台)normally consolidated soil 自重湿陷性黄土self weight collapse loess4. 土的物理性质饱和度degree of saturation饱和密度saturated density饱和重度saturated unit weight比重specific gravity稠度consistency触变thixotropy干重度dry unit weight干密度dry density塑性指数plasticity index含水量water content, moisture content级配gradation, grading结合水bound water, combined water, held water界限含水量Atterberg limits颗粒级配particle size distribution of soils, mechanical composition of soil可塑性plasticity孔隙比void ratio孔隙率porosity毛细管水capillary water密实度compactionness年粘性土的灵敏度sensitivity of cohesive soil曲率系数coefficient of curvature三相土tri-phase soil湿陷起始应力initial collapse pressure湿陷系数coefficient of collapsibility缩限shrinkage limit 土粒相对密度specific density of solid particles相对密度relative density, density index 相对压密度relative compaction, compacting factor, percent compa ction, coefficient of compaction压密系数coefficient of consolidation压缩性compressibility液限liquid limit液性指数liquidity index游离水(台)free water重力密度unit weight自由水free water, gravitational water, groundwater, phreatic water组构fabric最大干密度maximum dry density最优含水量optimum water content5. 渗透性和渗流浸润线phreatic line临界水力梯度critical hydraulic gradient 流函数flow function渗流seepage渗流量seepage discharge渗透破坏seepage failure渗透系数coefficient of permeability渗透性permeability势函数potential function水力梯度hydraulic gradient6. 地基应力和变形变形deformation变形模量modulus of deformation残余变形residual deformation超静孔隙水压力excess pore water pressure沉降settlement次固结沉降secondary consolidation settlement次固结系数coefficient of secondary consolidation切线模量tangent modulus蠕变creep三向变形条件下的固结沉降three-dimensional consolidation settl ement弹性平衡状态state of elastic equilibrium 体积变形模量volumetric deformation modulus先期固结压力preconsolidation pressure压缩模量modulus of compressibility压缩系数coefficient of compressibility有效应力effective stress自重应力self-weight stress总应力total stress approach of shear strength7. 固结超固结比over-consolidation ratio超静孔隙水压力excess pore water pressure固结度degree of consolidation固结理论theory of consolidation固结曲线consolidation curve固结速率rate of consolidation固结系数coefficient of consolidation固结压力consolidation pressure回弹曲线rebound curve砂井sand drain砂井地基平均固结度average degree of consolidation of sand-drained ground时间对数拟合法logrithm of time fitting method太沙基固结理论Terzaghi s consolidation theory先期固结压力preconsolidation pressure压密度(台)degree of consolidation压缩曲线cpmpression curve一维固结one dimensional consolidation 有效应力原理principle of effective stress 预压密压力(台)preconsolidation pressure 原始压缩曲线virgin compression curve再压缩曲线recompression curve主固结primary consolidation主压密(台)primary consolidationK0固结consolidation under K0 condition8. 抗剪强度单轴抗拉强度uniaxial tension test动强度dynamic strength of soils峰值强度peak strength伏斯列夫参数Hvorslev parameter剪切应变速率shear strain rate抗剪强度shear strength抗剪强度参数shear strength parameter抗剪强度有效应力法effective stress approach of shear strength抗剪强度总应力法total stress approach of shear strength摩尔-库仑理论Mohr-Coulomb theory内摩擦角angle of internal friction粘聚力cohesion破裂角angle of rupture破坏准则failure criterion有效内摩擦角effective angle of internal friction有效粘聚力effective cohesion intercept有效应力破坏包线effective stress failure envelope有效应力强度参数effective stress strength parameter有效应力原理principle of effective stress 真内摩擦角true angle internal friction真粘聚力true cohesion总应力破坏包线total stress failure envelope总应力强度参数total stress strength parameter9. 本构模型本构模型constitutive model边界面模型boundary surface model层向各向同性体模型cross anisotropic model摩尔-库仑屈服准则Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion切线模量tangent modulus屈服面yield surface弹塑性模量矩阵elastoplastic modulus matrix弹塑性模型elastoplastic modulus10. 地基承载力冲剪破坏punching shear failure次层(台)substratum地基subgrade, ground, foundation soil地基承载力bearing capacity of foundation soil地基极限承载力ultimate bearing capacity of foundation soil地基允许承载力allowable bearing capacity of foundation soil地基稳定性stability of foundation soil整体剪切破坏general shear failure11. 土压力被动土压力passive earth pressure被动土压力系数coefficient of passive earth pressure极限平衡状态state of limit equilibrium静止土压力earth pressue at rest静止土压力系数coefficient of earth pressur at rest库仑土压力理论Coulomb s earth pressure theory库尔曼图解法Culmannn construction朗肯土压力理论Rankine s earth pressure theory朗肯状态Rankine state弹性平衡状态state of elastic equilibrium 土压力earth pressure 主动土压力active earth pressure主动土压力系数coefficient of active earth pressure12. 土坡稳定分析边坡稳定安全系数safety factor of slope土坡slope土坡稳定分析slope stability analysis分析土坡稳定极限分析法limit analysis method of slope stability分析土坡稳定极限平衡法limit equilibrium method of slope stability16. 基坑开挖与降水板桩围护sheet pile-braced cuts电渗法electro-osmotic drainage管涌piping基底隆起heave of base基坑降水dewatering基坑失稳instability (failure) of foundation pit基坑围护bracing of foundation pit减压井relief well降低地下水位法dewatering method井点系统well point system喷射井点eductor well point铅直边坡的临界高度critical height of vertical slope砂沸sand boiling深井点deep well point真空井点vacuum well point支撑围护braced cuts19. 地基处理表层压密法surface compaction超载预压surcharge preloading袋装砂井sand wick地工织物geofabric, geotextile地基处理ground treatment, foundation treatment电动化学灌浆electrochemical grouting 电渗法electro-osmotic drainage顶升纠偏法定喷directional jet grouting冻土地基处理frozen foundation improvement短桩处理treatment with short pile堆载预压法preloading粉体喷射深层搅拌法powder deep mixing method复合地基composite foundation干振成孔灌注桩vibratory bored pile高压喷射注浆法jet grounting灌浆材料injection material灌浆法grouting硅化法silicification夯实桩compacting pile化学灌浆chemical grouting换填法cushion灰土桩lime soil pile挤密灌浆compaction grouting锚固技术anchoring锚杆静压桩托换anchor pile underpinning 排水固结法consolidation膨胀土地基处理expansive foundation treatment劈裂灌浆fracture grouting浅层处理shallow treatment强夯法dynamic compaction人工地基artificial foundation软土地基soft clay ground砂井sand drain砂井地基平均固结度average degree of consolidation of sand-drained ground 22. 室内土工试验常水头渗透试验constant head permeability test单剪仪simple shear apparatus单轴拉伸试验uniaxial tensile test 固结排水试验consolidated drained triaxial test固结试验consolidation test含水量试验water content test黄土湿陷试验loess collapsibility test快剪试验quick direct shear test快速固结试验fast consolidation test离心模型试验centrifugal model test连续加荷固结试验continual loading test 慢剪试验consolidated drained direct shear test毛细管上升高度试验capillary rise test密度试验density test扭剪仪torsion shear apparatus膨胀率试验swelling rate test平面应变仪plane strain apparatus三轴伸长试验triaxial extension test三轴压缩试验triaxial compression test砂的相对密实度试验sand relative density test渗透试验permeability test湿化试验slaking test收缩试验shrinkage test塑限试验plastic limit test缩限试验shrinkage limit test土工模型试验geotechnical model test土工织物试验geotextile test无侧限抗压强度试验unconfined compression strength test真三轴仪true triaxial apparatus振动单剪试验dynamic simple shear test 直剪仪direct shear apparatus直接剪切试验direct shear test直接单剪试验direct simple shear test自振柱试验free vibration column testK0固结不排水试验K0 consolidated undrained testK0固结排水试验K0 consolidated drained test23. 原位测试标准贯入试验standard penetration test表面波试验surface wave test超声波试验ultrasonic wave test承载比试验Califonia Bearing Ratio Test 单桩横向载荷试验lateral load test of pile 单桩竖向静载荷试验static load test of pile 动力触探试验dynamic penetration test静力触探试验static cone penetration test 静力载荷试验plate loading test跨孔试验cross-hole test轻便触探试验light sounding test深层沉降观测deep settlement measurement十字板剪切试验vane shear test无损检测nondestructive testing下孔法试验down-hole test现场渗透试验field permeability test原位孔隙水压力量测in situ pore water pressure measurement原位试验in-situ soil test最后贯入度final setgabbro 辉长岩geographical mapping 地理勘察;地理测绘geological condition 地质状况geological map 地质图geological mapping 地质勘察;地质测绘geological profile 地质剖面geological survey 地质调查Geology Society of Hong Kong 香港地质学会geophysical exploration 地球物理勘探geostatic stress 地应力geotechnical 岩土;土力geotechnical appraisal 岩土评估;土力评估Geotechnical Area Study Programme 地区岩土研究计划geotechnical assessment 岩土评估;土力评估geotechnical assessment study 岩土评估研究;土力评估研究geotechnical consultant 岩土工程顾问;土力工程顾问geotechnical control 岩土工程管制geotechnical design assumption 岩土设计假定geotechnical investigation 岩土工程勘察;岩土工程勘探ground feature 地物;地貌ground investigation 土地勘测;土地勘探;探土ground profile 地形;地形剖面;地形切面ground settlement 土地沉降;地陷ground surface 地面ground survey 地面测量grounding electrode 接地电极groundwater catchment 地下水流域groundwater connectivity test 地下水连通实验groundwater discharge 地下水流量;地下水溢流groundwater drainage works 地下水排水工程groundwater flow direction 地下水流向groundwater level 地下水位groundwater monitoring 地下水监测groundwater pressure measurement 地下水水压测试groundwater regime 地下水体系groundwater table fluctuation 地下水位变动karst cave 岩溶洞karst topography 岩溶地形。
土木工程岩土类毕业设计外文翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/325d9/325d99d21148e1c578cd872e3f72c579300e42c3" alt="土木工程岩土类毕业设计外文翻译"
土木工程专业英语复习参考学号: 10447425X X 大学毕业设计(论文)外文翻译(2014届)外文题目Developments in excavation bracing systems译文题目开挖工程支撑体系的发展外文出处Tunnelling and Underground SpaceTechnology 31 (2012) 107–116学生XXX学院XXXX 专业班级XXXXX校内指导教师XXX 专业技术职务XXXXX校外指导老师专业技术职务二○一三年十二月开挖工程支撑体系的发展1.引言几乎所有土木工程建设项目(如建筑物,道路,隧道,桥梁,污水处理厂,管道,下水道)都涉及泥土挖掘的一些工程量。
往往由于由相邻的结构,特性线,或使用权空间的限制,必须要一个土地固定系统,以允许土壤被挖掘到所需的深度。
历史上,许多挖掘支撑系统已经开发出来。
其中,现在比较常见的几种方法是:板桩,钻孔桩墙,泥浆墙。
土地固定系统的选择是由技术性能要求和施工可行性(例如手段,方法)决定的,包括执行的可靠性,而成本考虑了这些之后,其他问题也得到解决。
通常环境后果(用于处理废泥浆和钻井液如监管要求)也非常被关注(邱阳、1998)。
土地固定系统通常是建设项目的较大的一个组成部分。
如果不能按时完成项目,将极大地影响总成本。
通常首先建造支撑,在许多情况下,临时支撑系统是用于支持在挖掘以允许进行不断施工,直到永久系统被构造。
临时系统可以被去除或留在原处。
打桩时,因撞击或振动它们可能会被赶入到位。
在一般情况下,振动是最昂贵的方法,但只适合于松散颗粒材料,土壤中具有较高电阻(例如,通过鹅卵石)的不能使用。
采用打入桩系统通常是中间的成本和适合于软沉积物(包括粘性和非粘性),只要该矿床是免费的鹅卵石或更大的岩石。
通常,垂直元素(例如桩)的前安装挖掘工程和水平元件(如内部支撑或绑回)被安装为挖掘工程的进行下去,从而限制了跨距长度,以便减少在垂直开发弯矩元素。
岩土隧道工程专业外语
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18acf/18acf89557c3c2048cc258829d2ac02ba72a1936" alt="岩土隧道工程专业外语"
Part1General words岩土工程Geotechnical engineering基础工程Foundation engineering土soil,earth`土力学soil mechanics周期荷载cyclic loading卸载再加载reloading粘弹性地基viscoelastic foundation粘滞阻尼viscous damping剪切模量shear modulus土动力学soil dynamics应力路径stress pathPart2Types of soil残积土residual soil地下水groundwater地下水位groundwater level/groundwater table 粘土矿物clay minerals次生矿物secondary minerals滑坡landslide钻孔柱状图bore hole columnar section工程地质勘察engineering geologic investigation漂石boulder卵石cobble砂石gravel砾砂gravelly sand粗砂coarse sand中砂medium sand细砂fine sand粉土silty sand粘性土clayey soil粘土clay粉质粘土silty clay砂质粉土sandy silt粘质粉土clayey silt饱和土saturated soil非饱和土unsaturated soil填土filled soilPart3Permeability and seepage 达西定律Darcy’s law管涌piping流土flowing soil砂沸sand boiling流网flow net渗流seepage渗漏leakage渗透压力seepage(force)pressure渗透性permeability水力梯度hydraulic gradient渗透系数coefficient of permeabilityPart4Deformation and stress of foundation 软土soft soil打入桩(负)摩阻力(negative)skin friction of driven pile有效应力effective stress总应力total stress十字板抗剪强度field vane shear strength低活性low activity灵敏度sensitivity三轴试验triaxial test基础设计foundation design再压缩recompaction承载力bearing capacity土体soil mass接触压力contact pressure集中荷载concentrated load半无限弹性体a semi-infinite elastic solid均质homogeneous各向同性isotropic条基strip footing方形独立基础square spread footing下卧层(土)underlying soil(stratum,strata)恒载/静载dead load持续荷载sustained load活载live load短期瞬时荷载short–term transient load长期荷载long-term transient load折算荷载reduced load沉降settlement变形deformation套管casing堤(防)dike=dyke粘粒粒组clay fraction物理性质physical properties路基subgrade级配良好土well-graded soil级配不良土poorly-graded soil筛子sieve摩尔-库仑破坏条件Mohr-Coulomb failure condition 有限元法FEM=finite element method极限平衡法limit equilibrium method孔隙水压力pore water pressure先期固结压力preconsolidation pressure压缩模量modulus of compressibility压缩系数coefficent of compressibility压缩指数compression index回弹指数swelling index自重应力geostatic stress附加应力additional stress最终沉降final settlement滑移线slip linePart5Excavation and dewatering of foundation开挖excavation降水dewatering基坑失稳failure of foundation基坑围护bracing of foundation pit(基坑)底隆起bottom heave=basal heave挡土墙retaining wall孔压分布pore-pressure distribution降低地下水位法dewatering method井点系统well point system深井点deep well point真空井点vacuum well point支撑围护braced cuts支撑开挖braced excavation支撑挡板braced sheetingPart6Deep foundation桩基础pile foundation灌注桩cast–in-place pile沉管灌注桩diving casting cast-in-place pile 钻孔桩bored pile机控异型灌注桩special-shaped cast-in-place pile 嵌岩灌注桩piles set into rock夯扩桩rammed bulb pile钻孔墩基础belled pier foundation钻孔扩底墩drilled-pier foundation预制混凝土桩precast concrete pile钢桩steel pile钢管桩steel pipe pile钢板桩steel sheet pile预应力混凝土桩prestressed concrete pile预应力混凝土管桩prestressed concrete pipe pile沉井(箱)caisson foundation地下连续墙diaphragm摩擦桩friction pile端承桩end-bearing pile波动方程分析wave equation analysis承台pile cap单桩承载力bearing capacity of single pile单桩横向载荷试验lateral pile load test单桩横向极限承载力ultimate lateral resistance of single pile单桩竖向静荷载试验static load test of pile单桩竖向容许承载力vertical allowable load capacity低桩承台low pile cap高桩承台high-rise pile cap单桩抗拔极限承载力vertical ultimate uplift resistance of single pile 静压桩silent piling抗拔桩uplift pile抗滑桩anti-slide pile群桩pile groups群桩效率系数(η)efficiency factor of pile groups群桩效应efficiency of pile groups桩基动测dynamic pile testing最后贯入度final set桩动荷载试验dynamic load test of pile桩的完整性试验pile integrity test桩头pile head=butt桩端(头)pile tip=pile point=pile toe 桩距pile spacing桩位布置图pile plan桩的布置arrangement of piles=pile layout群桩作用group action桩端阻end bearing=tip resistance桩侧阻skin(side)friction=shaft resistance桩垫pile cushion打桩(振动)pile driving(by vibration)拔桩试验pile pulling test桩靴pile shoe打桩噪音pile noise打桩机pile rigPart7Ground treatment建筑地基处理技术规范technical code for ground treatment of building 垫层法cushion method预压法preloading method强夯法dynamic compaction method强夯置换法dynamic compaction replacement method振冲法vibroflotation method砂石桩sand-gravel pile/pile-stone column水泥粉煤灰碎石桩cement-flyash-gravel pile(CFG)水泥土搅拌桩cement mixing pile水泥桩cement column石灰桩lime pile/lime column高压喷射注浆法jet grouting method夯实水泥土桩rammed-cement-soil pile灰土挤密桩lime-soil compaction pile/lime-soil compacted column化学加固法chemical stabilization method表层压实法surface compaction method超载预压法surcharge preloading method真空预压法vacuum preloading method袋装砂井法sand wick method土工织物geofabric/geotextile复合地基composite foundation加筋法reinforcement method降低地下水固结法dewatering consolidation method冷热处理法freezing and heating method膨胀土地基处理expansive ground treatment山区地基处理ground treatment in mountain area湿陷性黄土地基处理collapsible loess treatment人工地基artificial foundation天然地基natural foundation褥垫pillow软土地基soft clay ground 砂井sand drain树根桩root pile塑料排水带plastic drain碎石桩stone column/gravel pile(复合地基)置换率(composite foundation)replacement ratio Part8固结consolidation太沙基固结理论Terzzaghi’s consolidation theory巴隆固结理论Barraon’s consolidation theory比奥固结理论Biot’s consolidation theory超固结比over consolidation ration(OCR)超固结土overconsolidation soil超孔压力excess pore water pressure多维固结multi-dimensional consolidation一维固结one-dimensional consolidation主固结primary consolidation次固结secondary consolidation固结度degree of consolidation固结试验consolidation test固结曲线consolidation curve时间因子time factor Tv固结系数coefficient of consolidation前期固结压力preconsolidation pressure有效应力原理principle of effective stressK0固结consolidation under K0conditionPart9抗剪强度shear strength不排水抗剪强度undrained shear strength残余强度residual strength长期强度long-term strength峰值强度peak strength剪胀dilatation抗剪强度有效应力法effective stress approach of shear strength 抗剪强度总应力法total stress approach of shear strength莫尔-库仑理论Mohr-Coulomb theory内摩擦角angle of internal friction粘聚力cohesion破坏准则failure criterion十字板抗剪强度vane strength无侧限抗压强度unconfined compression strength有效应力破坏包线effective stress failure envelopePart10Constitutive model弹性模型Elastic model非线性弹性模型Nonlinear elastic model弹塑性模型Elastoplastic model粘弹性模型Viscoelastic model边界面模型Boundary surface model邓肯-张模型Duncan-Chang model刚塑性模型Rigid plastic model帽模型Cap model加工软化Work softening加工硬化Work hardening剑桥模型Cambridge model理想弹塑性模型Ideal elastoplastic model莫尔-库仑屈服准则Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion屈服面Yield surface弹性半空间地基模型Elastic half-space foundation model弹性模量Elastic modulusPart11Bearing capacity of foundation soil冲切破坏Punching shear failure整体剪切破坏General shear failure局部剪切破坏Local shear failure极限平衡状态State of limit equilibrium地基稳定性Stability of soil/rock foundation地基极限承载力Ultimate bearing capacity of soil/rock foundation 地基容许承载力Allowable bearing capacity of soil/rock foundationPart12earth pressure and slope stability analysis主动土压力Active earth pressure被动土压力Passive earth pressure静止土压力Earth pressure at rest休止角Angle of repose边坡稳定安全系数Safety factor of slope条分法Slices methodPart13retaining wall挡土墙稳定性Stability of retaining wall基础墙Foundation wall扶壁式挡土墙Counter retaining wall悬臂式挡土墙Cantilever retaining wall悬臂式板桩墙Cantilever sheet pile wall重力式挡土墙Gravity retaining wall锚定板挡土墙Anchored plate retaining wall锚定板板桩墙Anchored sheet pile wallPart14Soil test高压固结试验High pressure consolidation testK0固结试验Consolidation under K0condition变水头渗透试验Falling head permeability test不固结不排水三轴试验Unconsolidated-undrained triaxial test固结不排水/排水三轴试验Consolidated undrained/drained triaxial test 击实试验Compaction test固结快剪试验Consolidated quick direct shear test快剪试验Quick direct shear test土工模型试验Geotechnical model test离心模型试验Centrifugal model test直剪仪Direct shear apparatusPart15In situ test标准贯入试验Standard penetration test(SPT)表面波试验Surface wave test(SWT)动力触探试验Dynamic penetration test(DPT)静力触探试验Static cone penetration test跨孔试验Cross-hole test螺旋板载荷试验Screw plate test旁压试验Pressuremeter test轻便触探试验Light sounding test深层沉降观测Deep settlement measurement现场渗透试验Field permeability test原位空隙水压量测In-situ pore water pressure measurement 原位(土、岩石)试验In-situ soil/rock test直剪试验Direct shear test直接单剪试验Direct simple shear test动三轴试验Dynamic triaxial test自(共)振柱试验Free(resonance)vibration column test 隧道Tunnel水平隧道Horizontal gallery明挖法Cut and cover沉管法Immersed tube入口隧道或引道隧道Access tunnel竖井shaft斜井Inclined shaft洞室cavern天然洞室Natural cavern人工洞室Artificial cavern地下综合建筑Underground complex 尺寸Size,dimension特小断面Mini section小断面Small section中断面Medium section特大断面Very large section短Short length中长Medium length长大Long length特长大Very long length断面形状Section shape圆形Circular shape马蹄形Horseshoe shape矩形Rectangular shape卵形Egg shape箱形Box shape 内部净空断面形状Inside shape开挖断面形状Outside or excavation shape埋深Tunnel depth明挖回填Cut and cover浅埋Shallow depth中埋Medium depth深埋Deep depth特深埋Very deep depth用途Purpose or use调查investigation地质调查Ground investigation导洞Pilot tunnel调查孔或坑道Pilot bore铁路rail干线Main line地铁metro公路road人行道pedestrian车站Station上水道Water supply水利发电Hydraulic power有压与无压隧洞Pressure or non pressure tunnels分水渠River diversion洪水Storm water排水Drainage水渠Aqueduct冷气cooling air冷却水排水Cooling water outfall航道navigation下水道Sewerage地域暖气District heating电缆cable热水Hot water电力-通信Power-telecommunication 通风Ventilation煤气Gas工厂factory发电所Generating station储藏storage流体和固体储藏Fluids and solids storage 停车parking办公室,商店Office,shop军事Military人防Defence,protection 多目的,多功能Multi service采矿Mining地下建筑物各部分名称Parts of cross section仰拱Invert arch底板floor拱部或拱顶部roof拱顶crown拱脚Springer拱肩shoulders刹尖key边墙wall墙脚feet腿部leg膝部knee开挖面或掌子面face形状shape衬砌lining曲隅部bend交叉部crossing正面部Face,front入口部access洞门portal接头部junction分岔部bifurcation开口部Opening window加宽部enlargement避难洞Recess筛子围岩Surrounding rock地质学geology水文地质学hydrogeology岩石力学Rock mechanics土力学Soil mechanics地震活动Seismicity钻孔或钻探boring地质物理调查Geophysical investigation 室内试验Laboratory test现场试验In situ test事前调查Probing ahead地质勘探Geologic exploration围岩的性质Nature of ground硬岩Hard rock完整岩石Sound rock风化岩Weathered rock破碎岩Fissured rock软弱围岩Soft ground塑性围岩Plastic ground流动围岩Running ground减压区Decompressed zone 混合围岩Mixed ground卵石boulder夹层seam层理bedding节理Joint不透水围岩Impervious ground透水围岩Pervious ground蠕变creep风化,蚀变alteration透水性permeability地下水Ground water湿度moisture岩溶karst断层fault围岩的物理力学性质Ground character密度density比重Specific gravity磨损度abrasivity溶解度solubility可钻性Drillability抗压强度Compressive strength 抗拉强度Tensile strength抗剪强度Shear strength内摩擦力Internal friction粘结力cohesion剪胀swelling收缩shrinkage地压Ground pressure弹性系数Modulus of elasticity 冲击阻力Impact resistance孔隙率Porosity ratio硬度hardness设计design分析Analysis计算calculation经济比较Economic study标准化Standardization计划Plan,planing program 设计数据Design data垂直荷载Vertical load水平荷载Horizontal load 浮力Uplift。
岩土工程外文翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9212b/9212b7ba8c3c5cb40dde5de1ddb32ed29224becb" alt="岩土工程外文翻译"
成都理工大学学生毕业设计(论文)外文译文在市场上可买到的极限平衡的计算机代码在近几年已经有了很大的进步。
这包括:有限元法和地下水应力分析(如GEO-SLOPE’s SIGMA/W, SEEP/W 和 SLOPE/W(6))的二维极限平衡法编码的集成。
三维极限平衡法的发展(例如 CLARA (7); 3D-SLOPE(8))。
概率极限平衡技术的发展。
允许多样的支持和加固的能力。
非饱和土抗剪强度标准的混合。
可视化的高度发展和前处理及后处理的制图学。
这些编码在土坡和高度蚀变岩斜坡的分析中起着至关重要的作用。
而在这些斜坡中,离散明确的表面容易发生滑动。
图2阐明了高岭土化的花岗岩斜坡崩塌的反分析法中的二维极限平衡程序的运用。
包括岩块内部的应力状态和复杂变形及脆性断裂影响是极其重要的。
数值模拟技术也应用其中。
(如图2所示).图 1. SWEDGE 分析(右)建立在DIPS立体图输入的基础上(LEFT).图 2. 用极限平衡法对瓷土边坡进行分析来寻求滑动平面(左)和有线差分来模拟剪应变发展(右)石雨模拟器是另一分析法的传统模式,其中包括用来评估单个坠落方块的危害的工具。
像ROCFALL (2) 的程序用来分析从给定坡面几何上滚动或弹动的岩块在速率发生变水特征; 原位应力状态料、间断运行和液压机械及动态分析);能够评估不稳定性参数变化的影响样;需要注意缩放效果;需要模拟典型间断几何(间距, 持久性等等);节理特性可使用的的数据有限(例如jkn, jks).混合物/耦合模拟列出独立模型的输入参数的组合耦合有限元/离散单元模型能够模拟节理和层状媒介上的完整的裂缝延伸和断裂复杂问题需要高端内存容量;在实践中相对来说有较少的经验;需要持续校准和限制连续统建模连续统建模最适合应用于由大量完整岩石、软弱岩石、类土或严重断裂的岩块构成的斜坡。
大多数连续统代码有含离散断裂的设备,如断层和层面。
但是不适用于不均介质的分析。
石坡稳定性中的连续统方法包括有线差分法和有限元素法。
土力学专业英语
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e0e7/9e0e713bdc6b2839e0c6554f5826b1c4173ad6d7" alt="土力学专业英语"
土力学专业英语English:Soil mechanics, also known as geotechnical engineering, is a branch of civil engineering that deals with the study of the behavior of soils under the influence of loading forces and environmental conditions. This field is crucial for the design and construction of infrastructure such as buildings, foundations, retaining walls, and tunnels, as the behavior of soil directly affects the stability and performance of these structures. Soil mechanics also plays a significant role in geotechnical investigation, where engineers assess and analyze soil properties to ensure the safety and feasibility of construction projects. By understanding the physical and mechanical properties of soils, soil mechanics specialists are able to provide solutions for challenges such as settling, erosion, and soil liquefaction.中文翻译:土力学,又称为岩土工程,是土木工程的一个分支领域,涉及土壤在受到荷载力和环境条件的影响下的行为研究。
岩土工程锚杆中英文对照外文翻译文献
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6f6c/e6f6c4dcb51e6e3bc391e1c7d448bd4020178a37" alt="岩土工程锚杆中英文对照外文翻译文献"
岩土工程锚杆中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)Effect of grout properties on the pull-out load capacity of fullygrouted rock boltAbstractThis paper represents the result of a project conducted with developing a safe, practical and economical support system for engineering workings. In rock engineering, untensioned, fully cement-grouted rock bolts have been used for many years. However, there is only limited information about the action and the pull-out load capacity of rock bolts, and the relationship between bolt–grout or grout–rock and the influence of the grout properties on the pull-out load capacity of a rock bolt. The effect of grout properties on the ultimate bolt load capacity in a pull-out test has been investigated in order to evaluate the support effect of rock bolts. Approximately 80 laboratory rock bolt pull-out tests in basalt blocks have been carried out in order to explain and develop the relations between the grouting materials and untensioned, fully grouted rock bolts. The effects of the mechanical properties of grouting materials on the pull-out loadcapacity of a fully grouted bolt have been qualified and a number of empirical formulae have been developed for the calculating of the pull-out load capacity of the fully cement-grouted bolts on the basis of the shear strength, the uniaxial compressive strength of the grouting material, the bolt length, the bolt diameter, the bonding area and the curing time of the grouting material.Keywords: Rock bolt; Grouting materials; Bolt pull-out load capacity; Bolt geometry; Mortar1. IntroductionIn rock engineering, rock bolts have been used to stabilise openings for many years. The rock bolting system may improve the competence of disturbed rock masses by preventing joint movements, forcing the rock mass to support itself (Kaiser et al., 1992). The support effect of rock bolt has been discussed by many researchers(e.g. Hyett et al., 1992; Ito et al., 2001; Reichert et al., 1991 and Stillborg, 1984). Rock bolt binds together a laminated, discontinued, fractured and jointed rock mass. Rock bolting not only strengthens or stabilizes a jointed rock mass, but also has a marked effect on the rock mass stiffness (Chappell, 1989). Rock bolts perform their task by one or a combination of several mechanisms. Bolts often act to increase the stress and the frictional strength across joints, encouraging loose blocks or thinly stratified beds to bind together and act as a composite beam (Franklin and Dusseault, 1989). Rock bolts reinforce rock through a friction effect, through a suspension effect, or a combination of two. For this reason, rock bolt technique is acceptable for strengthening of mine roadway and tunnelling in all type of rock ( Panek and McCormick, 1973).Generally rock bolts can be used to increase the support of low forces due to the diameter and the strength of the bolt materials. They enable high anchoring velocity to be used at closer spacing between bolts.Their design provides either mechanical clamping or cement grouting against the rock (Aldorfand Exner,1986).Anchorage system of rock bolt is normally made of solid or tube formed steel installed untensioned or tensioned in the rock mass (Stillborg, 1986). Rock bolts can be divided into three main groups according to their anchorage systems (Franklin and Dusseault, 1989;Aldorfand Exner, 1986; Hoek and Wood, 1989; Cybulski and Mazzoni, 1989). First group is the mechanically anchored rock bolts that can be divided into two groups: slit and wedge type rock bolt, expansion shell anchor. They can be fixed in the anchoring part either by a wedge-shaped clamping part or by a threaded clamping part. Second group is the friction-anchored rock bolts that can be simply divided into two groups: split-set and swellex. Friction-anchored rock bolts stabilise the rock mass by friction of the outer covering of bolt against the drill hole side. The last group is the fully grouted rock bolts that can also be divided into twogroups: cement-grouted rock bolts, resin grouted rock bolts.A grouted rock bolt (dowel) is a fully grouted rock bolt without mechanical anchor, usually consisting of a ribbed reinforcing bar, installed in a drill hole and bonded to the rock over its full length (Franklin and Dusseault, 1989). Special attention should be paid to cement-grouted bolts and bolts bonded (glued, resined) by synthetics resins for bolt adjustment. Grouted bolts fix the using of the coherence of the sealing cement with the bolt rod and the rock for fastening the bolts. Synthetic resin (resined bolt) and cement mortar (reinforced-concrete bolt) can be used for this type rock bolt. These bolts may be anchored in all type of rock. Anchoring rods may be manufactured of several materials such as ribbed steel rods, smooth steel bars, cable bolts and other special finish (Aldorfand Exner, 1986).Grouted bolts are widely used in mining for the stabilisation of tunnelling, mining roadway, drifts and shafts for the reinforcing of its peripheries. Simplicity of installation, versatility and relatively low cost of rebars are further benefits of grouted bolts is comparison to their alternative counterparts (Indraratna and Kaiser,1990).Bolts are self-tensioning when the rock starts to move and dilate. They should therefore be installed as soon as possible after excavation, before the rock has started to deform, and before it has lost its interlocking and shear strength.Although several grout types are available, in many applications where the rock has a measure of short term stability, simple Portland cement-grouted reinforcing dowels are sufficient. They can be installed by filling the drill hole with lean, quickly set mortar into which the bar is driven. The dowel is retained in up holes either by a cheap form of end anchor, or by packing the drill hole collar with cotton waste, steel wool, or wooden wedges (Franklin and Dusseault, 1989).Concrete grouted bolts use cement mortar as a bonding medium. In drill holes at minimum of15 8 below the horizontal plane, the mortar can simply poured in, whereas in raising drill holes various design of bolts or other equipment is used to prevent the pumped mortar from flowing out (Aldorfand Exner,1986).The load bearing capacity off ully cement-grouted rock bolts depends on the bolt shape, the bolt diameter, the bolt length, rock and grout strength. The bond strength off ully cement-grouted rock bolts is primarily frictional and depends on the shear strength at the bolt–grout or grout–rock interface. Thus any changes in this interfaces shear strength must affect the bolt bond strength and bolt load capacity.This laboratory testing program was executed to evaluate the shear strength effect on the bond strength of the bolt–grout interface of a threaded bar and the laboratory test results confirm the theory.2. Previous solutionsThe effectiveness of a grouted bolt depends on its length relative to the extent ofthe zone of overstressed rock or yield zone. The shear and axial stress distributions of a grouted bolt are also related to the bolt length because equilibrium must be achieved between the bolt and the surrounding ground (Indraratna and Kaiser,1990).Bearing capacities of cement-grouted rock bolts (P b) and their anchoring forces are a function of the cohesion of the bonding agent and surrounding rock, and the bolting bar. The ultimate bearing capacity of the bolt (P m) is expressed as follows (Aldorf and Exner, 1986):(1)where k b, safety coefficient (usually k b=1.5); C1, cohesion of the bonding material on bolting bar, l d, anchored length of the bolt, d s, bolt diameter.(2)where d v, drill hole diameter;C2,cohesion of the bonding material with surrounding rock(carboniferousrocks and polyester resins C2 =3 MPa).(3)where C3, shearing strength of the bonding material.The maximum (ultimate) bearing capacity of the bolt (P m) will be the lowest value from P1to P111.Bearing capacities of all type bolts must also be evaluated from the view point of the tensile strength of the bolt material (P ms), which must not be lower than the ultimate bearing capacity resulting from the anchoring forces of bolts in drill holes (P m). It holds that(4)where P ms, the ultimate bearing capacity of the bolt with respect of the tensile strength of the bolt material;P m, the ultimate bearing capacity of the bolt.3. Laboratory study3.1. ExperimentsThe pull-out tests were conducted on rebars, grouted into basalt blocks with cement mortar in laboratory. The relations between bolt diameter (d b) and pull-out load of bolt (P b) (Fig. 2), bolt area (A b) and pull-out load of bolt (P b) (Fig. 3), bolt length (L b) and pull-out load of bolt (P b) (Fig. 5), water to cement ratio (w/c) and bolt bond strength (τb) (Fig. 7), mechanical properties of grout material and bolt bond strength (τb) (Fig. 9,Figs. 10 and 11), and curing time (days) and bolt strength (Figs.12 and 13) were evaluated by simple pull-out test programme.The samples consisted of rebars (ranging 10–18 mm diameters two by two) bonded into the basalt blocks. These basalt blocks used have a Youn g’s modulus of27.6 GPa and a uniaxial compressive strength (UCS g) of 133 MPa. Drilling holes which were 10 mm larger than the bolt diameter, having a diameter of 20 –28 mm for installation of bolts, were drilled up to 15–32 cm in depth. The bolt was grouted with cement mortar. The grout was a mixture of Portland cement with a water to cement ratio of 0.34, 0.36, 0.38 and 0.40 cured for 28 days. In order to obtain different grout types that have different mechanical properties, siliceous sand <100μm; 500 μm> and fly ash <10μm; 200μm> were added in a proportion of 10% of cement weight and white cement with a water to cement ratio of 0.40. The sand should be well graded, with a maximum grain size of v2 mm (Schack et al., 1979). The Young’s modulus of the grouts was measured during unconfined compression tests and shear strength was calculated by means of ring shear tests.The test set-up is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1 and the procedure is explained below:1. After filling prepared grout mortar into the hole, bolt is inserted to the centre of drilling hole.2. After curing time, the rebars in the rock were axially loaded and the load was gradually increased until the bolt failed.3. The bond strength (τb)was then calculated by dividing the load (P b)by surface area (A b)of the bolt bar in contact with the grout.4. Pull-out tests were repeated for various grout types, bolt dimensions and curing times.The influence of the bolt diameter and the bond area on the bond strength of a rock bolt can be formulated as follows (Littlejohn and Bruce, 1975):(5)where τb, ultimate bolt bond strength (MPa); P b, maximum pull-out load of bolt (kN); d b, bolt diameter (mm); l b, bolt length (cm); πd b l b , bonded area (cm2).3.2. Analysis of laboratory test results3.2.1. Infl uence of the bolt materialBolt diameters of 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 mm were used in pull-out tests. Typical results are represented in Table 1, Figs. 2 and 3. The most important observationswere:(1)The maximum pull-out load (P b) increases linearly with the section of the bolt while embedment length was constant.(2) Bolt section depends upon bolt diameter. The relation between bolt diameter and bolt bearing capacity can be explained as follow empiric formulae (Fig. 2).(6)(3) The values of bolt bond strength were calculated between 5.68 and 5.96 MPa(Table 1).Bolt lengths of 15.0, 24.7, 27.0, 30.0 and 32.0 cm were used in pull-out tests as seen in Fig. 4. Typical results are represented in Table 2, and Figs. 5 and 6.The most important observations were:(1) The pull-out force of a bolt increases linearly with the embedded length of the bolt.(7)(2) Maximum pull-out strength of a bolt is limited to the ultimate strength of the bolt shank.3.2.2. Influence of grouting materialThe water to cement ratio should be no greater than 0.40 by weight; too much water greatly reduces the long-term strength. Because, part of the mixing water is consumed by the hydration of cement used. Rest of the mixing water evaporates and then capillary porosities exist which results in unhomogenities internal structure of mortar. Thus, this structure reduces the long-term strength by irregular stress distribution (Neville, 1963;Atis, 1997). To obtain a plastic grout, bentonit clay can be added in a proportion of up to 2% of the cement weight. Other additives can accelerate the setting-time, improve the grout fluidity allowing injection at lower water to cement ratios, and make the grout expand and pressurize the drill hole. Additives, if used at all, should be used with caution and in the correct quantities to avoid harmful side effect such as weakening and corrosion (Franklin and Dusseault, 1989).The water to cement ratio (w/c) in grouting materials considerably affects pull-out strength of bolt. As seen in Table 3, UCS g and shear strength (t g) of grout in high w/c ratio show lower values whereas in low w/c ratio higher values. The ratio between 0.34 and 0.40 presents quite good results. Although the w/c ratio of 0.34 gives the best bond strength, groutibility (pumpability) decreases and a number of difficulties in application appear. In high w/c ratio, the pumpability of grouting materials into the drilling hole is easy but the bond strength of bolt decreases (Figs. 7 and 8).The bond strength off ully cement-grouted rock bolts is primarily frictional and depends on the shear strength at the bolt–grout or grout–rock interface. Thus any change in this shear strength of interfaces affects the bolt bond strength and load capacity. The influences of mechanical properties of grouting materials on the bearing capacity of bolt can be described as follows:(1) The uniaxial compressive and shear strength of the grouting materials has an important role on the behaviour of rock bolts. It was observed that increasing shear strength of the grouting material logarithmically increases bolt bond strength as shown in Table 4 and Fig. 9. The relation between grout shear strength and bolt bond strength was formulated as follows:(8)(2) Table 4 and Fig. 10 show that increasing grout compressive strength considerable increases the bond strength of the grouted bolts.(9)(3) In Fig. 11 and Table 4 show that there is another relationship between Young’s modulus of grout and bolt bond strength. Increasing the Young’s modulus increases bolt bond strength.(10)3.2.3. Influence of the curing timeAn important problem in the application of cementgrouted bolts is the setting time of the mortar, which strongly affects the stabilizing ability of bolt. Cementgrouted dowels cannot be used for immediate support because of the timeneeded for the cement to set and harden (Franklin and Dusseault, 1989).In the pull-out tests, eight group ofbolts having same length and mortar with a water to cement ratio of0.4 were used for determining the effects of curing time on the bolt bond strength. Each group ofr ock bolt testing was performed after different setting times (Table 5). As can be seen in Figs. 12 and 13, the strength of bolt bond increases rapidly in 7 days due to curing time. However, the bond strength of bolt continues to increase rather slowly after 7 days.Rock bolts may lose their supporting ability because of yielding of bolt material, failure at the bolt–grout or grout–rock interface, and unravelling of rock between bolts. However, laboratory tests and field observations suggest that the most dominant failure mode is shear at the bolt–grout interface (Hoek and Wood, 1989). So, this laboratory study focussed on the interface between rock bolt and rock and the mechanical properties of grouting materials.4. ConclusionsThe laboratory investigation showed that the bolt capacity depends basically on the mechanical properties of grouting materials which can be changed by water to cement ratio, mixing time, additives, and curing time.Increasing the bolt diameter and length increases the bolt bearing capacity. However, this increase is limited to the ultimate tensile strength of the bolt materials.Mechanical properties of grouting materials have an important role on the boltbearing capacity. It is offered that the optimum water to cement ratio must be 0.34~0.4 and the mortar have to be well mixed before poured into drill hole. Improving the mechanical properties of the grouting material increases the bolt bearing capacity logarithmically. The best relationship was observed between grout shear strength and bolt bond strength.Increasing the curing time increases the bolt bond strength. Bolt bond strength of 19 kg/cm2 in first day,77 kg/cm2in 7 days and 86 kg/cm2in 35 days was determined respectively. The results show that bolt bond strength increases quickly in first 7 days and then the increase goes up slowly.Bond failure in the pull-out test occurred between the bolt and cement grout, of which the mechanical behaviour is observed by shear spring.This explains the development of bolt bond strength and the failure at the bolt–grout interface considering that the bond strength is created as a result of shear strength between bolt and grout. This means that any change at the grout strength causes to the changing of bolt capacity. The failure mechanism in a pull-out test was studied in order to clarify the bond effect of rock bolt. Thus one main bond effect was explained from bond strength of rock bolts.中文翻译水泥浆性能对充分注浆锚杆拉拔承载力的影响A. Kılıc, E. Yasar*, A.G. Celik摘要:本文代表了一项在安全、实用、经济的支持系统指导下的工程结果。
(完整版)土木工程专业英语课文原文及对照翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05a64/05a64965301c518c9998d1a781cdeb51fb4650a3" alt="(完整版)土木工程专业英语课文原文及对照翻译"
Civil EngineeringCivil engineering, the oldest of the engineering specialties, is the planning, design, construction, and management of the built environment. This environment includes all structures built according to scientific principles, from irrigation and drainage systems to rocket-launching facilities.土木工程学作为最老的工程技术学科,是指规划,设计,施工及对建筑环境的管理。
此处的环境包括建筑符合科学规范的所有结构,从灌溉和排水系统到火箭发射设施。
Civil engineers build roads, bridges, tunnels, dams, harbors, power plants, water and sewage systems, hospitals, schools, mass transit, and other public facilities essential to modern society and large population concentrations. They also build privately owned facilities such as airports, railroads, pipelines, skyscrapers, and other large structures designed for industrial, commercial, or residential use. In addition, civil engineers plan, design, and build complete cities and towns, and more recently have been planning and designing space platforms to house self-contained communities.土木工程师建造道路,桥梁,管道,大坝,海港,发电厂,给排水系统,医院,学校,公共交通和其他现代社会和大量人口集中地区的基础公共设施。
土木工程专业英语课文原文及对照翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aeb5/5aeb56347dc7ace64b9fdb79f8eab3f63859e2dc" alt="土木工程专业英语课文原文及对照翻译"
Civil EngineeringCivil engineering, the oldest of the engineering specialties, is the planning, design, construction, and management of the built environment. This environment includes all structures built according to scientific principles, from irrigation and drainage systems to rocket-launching facilities.土木工程学作为最老的工程技术学科,是指规划,设计,施工及对建筑环境的管理。
此处的环境包括建筑符合科学规范的所有结构,从灌溉和排水系统到火箭发射设施。
Civil engineers build roads, bridges, tunnels, dams, harbors, power plants, water and sewage systems, hospitals, schools, mass transit, and other public facilities essential to modern society and large population concentrations. They also build privately owned facilities such as airports, railroads, pipelines, skyscrapers, and other large structures designed for industrial, commercial, or residential use. In addition, civil engineers plan, design, and build complete cities and towns, and more recently have been planning and designing space platforms to house self-contained communities.土木工程师建造道路,桥梁,管道,大坝,海港,发电厂,给排水系统,医院,学校,公共交通和其他现代社会和大量人口集中地区的基础公共设施。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
河北工程大学毕业设计(论文)
achieved by resorting to a micropolar or Cosserat continuum description of the fractured rock mass, through the derivation of a generalized macroscopic failure condition expressed in terms of stresses and couple stresses. The implementation of this model is finally illustrated on a simple example, showing how it may actually account for such a scale effect. Problem Statement and Principle of Homogenization Approach The problem under consideration is that of a foundation (bridge pier or abutment) resting upon a fractured bedrock (Fig. 1), whose bearing
According to the yield design (or limit analysis) reasoning, the above structure will remain safe under a given vertical load Q(force per unit length along the Oz axis), if one can exhibit throughout the rock mass a stress distribution which satisfies the equilibrium equations along with the stress boundary conditions,while complying with the strength requirement expressed at anymounts to evaluating the ultimate load Q﹢ beyond which failure will occur, or equivalently within which its stability is ensured. Due to the strong heterogeneity of the jointed rock mass, insurmountable difficulties are likely to arise when trying to implement the above reasoning directly. As regards, for instance, the case where the strength properties of the joints are considerably lower than those of the rock matrix, the implementation of a kinematic approach would require the use of failure mechanisms involving velocity jumps
河北工程大学毕业设计(论文)
Failure Properties of Fractured Rock Masses as Anisotropic Homogenized Media
Introduction It is commonly acknowledged that rock masses always display discontinuous surfaces of various sizes and orientations, usually referred to as fractures or joints. Since the latter have much poorer mechanical characteristics than the rock material, they play a decisive role in the overall behavior of rock structures,whose deformation as well as failure patterns are mainly governed by those of the joints. It follows that, from a geomechanical engineering standpoint, design methods of structures involving jointed rock masses, must absolutely account for such ‘‘weakness’’ surfaces in their analysis. The most straightforward way of dealing with this situation is to treat the jointed rock mass as an assemblage of pieces of intact rock material in mutual interaction through the separating joint interfaces. Many design-oriented methods relating to this kind of approach have been developed in the past decades, among them,the well-known ‘‘block theory,’’ which attempts to identify potentially unstable lumps of rock from geometrical and kinematical considerations (Goodman and Shi 1985; Warburton 1987; Goodman 1995). One should also quote the widely used distinct element method, originating from the works of Cundall and coauthors (Cundall and Strack 1979; Cundall 1988), which makes use of an explicit finite-difference numerical scheme for computing the displacements of the blocks considered as rigid or deformable bodies. In this context, attention is primarily focused on the formulation of realistic models for describing the joint behavior. Since the previously mentioned direct approach is becoming highly complex, and then numerically untractable, as soon as a very large number of blocks is involved, it seems advisable to look for alternative methods such as those derived from the concept of homogenization. Actually, such a concept is already partially conveyed in an empirical fashion by the famous Hoek and Brown’s criterion (Hoek and Brown 1980; Hoek 1983). It stems from the intuitive idea that from a macroscopic point of view, a rock mass intersected by a regular network of joint surfaces, may be perceived as a homogeneous continuum. Furthermore, owing to the existence of joint preferential orientations, one should expect such a homogenized material to exhibit anisotropic properties. The objective of the present paper is to derive a rigorous formulation for the failure criterion of a jointed rock mass as a homogenized medium, from the knowledge of the joints and rock material respective criteria. In the particular situation where twomutually orthogonal joint sets are considered, a closed-form expression is obtained, giving clear evidence of the related strength anisotropy. A comparison is performed on an illustrative example between the results produced by the homogenization method,making use of the previously determined criterion, and those obtained by means of a computer code based on the distinct element method. It is shown that, while both methods lead to almost identical results for a densely fractured rock mass, a ‘‘size’’ or ‘‘scale effect’’ is observed in the case of a limited number of joints. The second part of the paper is then devoted to proposing a method which attempts to capture such a scale effect, while still taking advantage of a homogenization technique. This is