国际杂志审稿方法-

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

For security reasons, your session will time out in 10 minutes (at 9:34 AM, 1:34 AM GMT). Please save your work to avoid potential loss. To refresh your session, close this message and save your work or return to your main menu. You may then continue working as normal.

Click the "HTML" button to view the online version of the manuscript; click the "PDF" button to view a printer-friendly version of the manuscript.

∙ Be sure to read the reviewer instructions on the "Instructions" tab.

Navigate to the "Score Sheet" tab to access the reviewer form. Be sure to click "Save" at the bottom of the scoresheet to retain your work in the system.

To submit your review, click the "Submit" button at the bottom of the score sheet.

Title:

Relevance and

Effectiveness of Case Studies in Achieving Assured Performance

Manuscript ID: IJQRM-Feb-2010-0025 Authors: blinded Manuscript Type: Reliability Paper Date Submitted: blinded

Total Time in Review: 292 days, 10 hours

Status: AE: Not Assigned

EIC: Madu, Christian PUB: Not Assigned

1. Originality: Does the paper contain new and significant information adequate to justify publication?

2. Relationship to Literature: Does the paper demonstrate an adequate understanding of the relevant literature in the field and cite an appropriate range of literature sources? Is any significant work ignored?

3. Methodology: Is the paper's argument built on an appropriate base of theory, concepts, or other ideas? Has the research or equivalent intellectual work on which the paper is based been well designed? Are the methods employed appropriate?

4. Results: Are results presented clearly and analysed appropriately? Do the conclusions adequately tie together the other elements of the paper?

5. Practicality and/or Research implications: Does the paper identify clearly any implications for practice and/or further research? Are these implications consistent with the findings and conclusions of the paper?

6. Quality of Communication: Does the paper clearly express its case, measured against the technical language of the field and the expected knowledge of the journal's readership? Has attention been paid to the clarity of expression and readability, such as sentence structure, jargon use, acronyms, etc.

Recommendation

Accept

Minor Revision

Major Revision

Reject

Comments

Confidential Comments to the Editor-in-Chief

Comments to the Author

Attach a File Files attached

No files have been uploaded.

ScholarOne Manuscripts TM v4.5.0 (patent #7,257,767 and #7,263,655). © ScholarOne, Inc., 2010. All Rights Reserved.

ScholarOne Manuscripts is a trademark of ScholarOne, Inc. ScholarOne is a registered trademark of ScholarOne, Inc.

Follow ScholarOne on Twitter

Terms and Conditions of Use - ScholarOne Privacy Policy - Get Help Now

相关文档
最新文档