选摘的拒信

Thank you for submitting your manuscript "***" to Science. Because your manuscript was not given a high priority rating during the initial screening process, we will not be able to send it out for in-depth review. Although your analysis is interesting, we feel that the scope and focus of your paper make it more appropriate for a more specialized journal. We are therefore notifying you so that you can seek publication elsewhere.
We now receive many more interesting papers than we can publish. We therefore send for in-depth review only those papers most likely to be ultimately published in Science. Papers are selected on the basis of discipline, novelty, and general significance, in addition to the usual criteria for publication in specialized journals. Therefore, our decision is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent space limitations.
We wish you every success when you submit the paper elsewhere.
I regret to inform you that we cannot admit the manuscript into the formal review process in its current state. We strongly recommend you to consult our journal instructions at /wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/522482/authorinstructions. In case you have difficulty with the English language, we encourage you to contact one of the language companies at /wps/find/authorsview.authors/languageediting/
1) A short running title should be provided, as the title exceeds 45 characters.超过45个字母
2) 5-10 keywords should be provided.3个关键词
3) Title page should contain (in the following order) title, authors, affiliations of authors, and
corresponding author information (e-mail address and tele/fax. numbers).按何老师给的模板title page:标题页(我的理解是第一页)
4) In reference list, references should be indicated by numbers in square brackets. In addition, reference list should be prepared strictly according to Guide for Authors. For journal articles, please adhere to the following format: initials followed by surname, article title, abbreviated journal name, volume number, page span, and year in parenthesis.
5) Text layout should be in uniform lettering and sizing throughout the manuscript (including abstract).
6) Keywords provided in the main manuscript should follow the abstract
1、Thank you for your recent submission to Journal of ABC. We have now received the
reviewers’ reports on your manuscript, wh ich are copied below. After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reports, I regret to inform you that we do not find your manuscript suitable for publication in Journal of ABC. The reviewers feel the design and the discussion of the work are not sufficient for publication in this journal. Further details regarding the reason for this decision are given in the reports.
I am sorry not to have better news for you and I hope the outcome of this specific submission
will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts.
语气比较直接的：
2、Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are
advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it.
For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Dear Dr. Zhu,I regret to inform you that, after consideration of our reviewers' comments on your paper (with which I fully agree), I'm unable to accept it for publication.For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.Please note that a great many more papers are submitted to
JPBA than we can possibly publish. The acceptance rate for papers is about 25% and our decision is not a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent requirements.The Editors hope that you do understand the above decision, and we appreciate your continued interest in the Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis.Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. We wish you every success when you submit the paper elsewhere.Yours sincerely,Sándor G?r?gEditorJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical AnalysisReviewers' comments:
This paper is about Identification of major compounds in rat bile, plasma and urine after oral administration of Radix Scutellariae extract by ultra-fast liquid chromatography coupled to ion trap time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in JPBA.1. It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.2. The innovation of this manuscript is weak and the content of experiments is not plentiful.3. The Fig.4 and Fig.4 are not clearly expressed, and the Fig.5 should be deleted. It will be nice if you can add the schematic diagram of the cracking.Based on what was described above this manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of JPBA. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to other journals.
Reviewer #2: I do not recommend the publication of this manuscript due mainly to the lack of scientific novelty and for neglecting the comparison of the authors' method and results with those in the literature. The Guide for Authors of JPBA contains the following restriction: "In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny will be placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. In all submissions to the journal, authors must address the question of how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods."The authors have missed to make reference to closely related papers such asLing Tong, Meixu Wan, Lihua Zhang, Yonghong Zhu, He Sun, Kaishun Bi, Simultaneous determination of baicalin, wogonoside, baicalein, wogonin, oroxylin A and chrysin of Radix scutellariae extract in
rat plasma by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (2012) (from the same university!!!) andChung, H.J., Lim, S., Kim, I.S., Bu, Y., Kim, H., Kim, D.-H., Yoo, H.H., Simultaneous determination of baicalein, baicalin, wogonin, and wogonoside in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS for studying the pharmacokinetics of the standardized extract of scutellariae radix, Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 33 (2012) 177-182.Reference has been made to [23] but real comparison was not made.。