利率市场化改革及对银行业影响外文文献翻译最新译文
《利率市场化对商业银行盈利能力的影响研究》范文

《利率市场化对商业银行盈利能力的影响研究》篇一一、引言随着经济全球化和金融市场的不断深化,利率市场化已成为金融改革的重要方向。
利率市场化对商业银行的盈利能力产生了深远的影响,本文旨在探讨利率市场化背景下,商业银行盈利能力的变化及其应对策略。
二、利率市场化的背景及意义利率市场化是指央行放宽对金融机构的利率管制,允许市场供求关系决定利率水平。
这一改革有助于优化资源配置,提高金融市场的竞争性和效率。
然而,对于商业银行而言,利率市场化带来了更大的经营压力和挑战。
三、利率市场化对商业银行盈利能力的影响(一)影响机制1. 竞争加剧:利率市场化使得商业银行之间的竞争更加激烈,为了吸引客户,银行可能降低贷款利率或提高存款利率,导致净息差收窄。
2. 风险增加:利率波动性加大,商业银行面临更大的利率风险和信用风险。
3. 业务结构调整:利率市场化促使商业银行调整业务结构,发展中间业务和表外业务,以降低对传统存贷业务的依赖。
(二)具体表现1. 净息差收窄:在利率市场化的背景下,商业银行的净息差呈现出收窄的趋势。
这是因为银行为了争夺客户,不得不降低贷款利率或提高存款利率,导致存贷利差缩小。
2. 资产质量和盈利能力下降:由于风险增加,商业银行的资产质量和盈利能力受到一定影响。
不良贷款率上升,利润增长速度放缓。
3. 业务结构调整成效显现:随着业务结构的调整,商业银行的中间业务和表外业务收入占比逐渐提高,为银行提供了新的盈利增长点。
四、商业银行应对策略(一)优化资产负债结构1. 调整存贷款结构:商业银行应通过优化存贷款结构,提高高收益资产的占比,降低低效或不良资产的比重。
2. 加强流动性管理:建立健全的流动性风险管理体系,确保资金来源的稳定性和流动性。
(二)发展中间业务和表外业务1. 扩大中间业务收入:通过发展理财、托管、咨询等中间业务,提高非利息收入占比。
2. 拓展表外业务:积极开展担保、承诺等表外业务,拓宽收入来源。
(三)加强风险管理1. 建立完善的风险管理体系:包括风险评估、监测、预警和处置等环节,确保风险得到有效控制。
利率市场化外文文献翻译中文译文字数3240字

文献出处: Ahmed S, Zlate A. A Comparative Study on the Marketing of Interest Rate in the United States and Japan [J]. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2015, 48: 221-248.原文A Comparative Study on the Marketing of Interest Rate in the United States and JapanAhmed S, Zlate A.AbstractInterest rates as one of the most important means of regulating financial markets, more and more attention to by national finance, the development of the national financial markets since the 1970 s and the easing of financial regulation, the interest rate mercerization has gradually become the mainstream of national financial market development trend. Interest rate mercerization emphasize the independence of financial institutions in a market economy, this independence will make financial institutions in the market competition get more profits, but at the same time, with greater risks, therefore, this article is based on market-oriented concept, meaning, significance and the theory in this paper, based on the United States and Japan two studies successfully promote market-oriented interest rate countries, through a smooth transition to complete the process of financial liberalization, then promote the deepening of financial reform in our country. The United States and Japan to promote interest rate mercerization is built on a solid market foundation, in advance, step by step a breakthrough advance step by step, finally achieved success.Key words: Interest rate marketization; Commercial Banks; Financial markets; A comparative study1 A general analysis of interest rate liberalizationFinancial market development cannot leave the financial regulation, financial regulation must use the corresponding adjustment means. In the operation of the financial market and development process, the interest rate is closely related to thefinancial market development adjustment means, only implemented to meet the needs of the financial markets objectively interest rate policy to ensure the sustainable development of financial markets, so the interest rate to discuss how to work in relation to the whole financial market sustainable development effectively, and the current "interest rate mercerization" already became the various countries' financial markets, especially discusses the financial market in China is an important part of reform and development.Interest rate mercerization should at least include the following contents:(1)Financial transactions subject have interest rate decisions. The financial activities were funds of funds between surplus and deficit departments trading activities. Financial transactions subject should have the right to the money transaction scale, price and the way of repayment period, guarantee terms to bargain, bargaining way may be interview, bidding, may also be a money supply and demand both sides repeatedly weigh between different customers or service providers and choice. The interest rate transmission mechanism flexible and effective. In market economy countries, the central bank set the benchmark interest rate; the benchmark interest rate is usually with reference to the interbrain market interest rates, interest rates, relying on the market transaction into the money market and capital market transmission and ultimately affects the economy.(2) The amount of interest rate, term structure and risk structure should be chosen by the market spontaneous. As with any commodity, there is also a financial transaction of wholesale and retail price difference; it’s different, the price of money transactions also there should be a time difference and the risk difference.(3) The government (or central bank) has indirectly influence the power of the financial asset rates. Does not mean interest rate liberalization of interest rate liberalization, not completely rejected the government's financial control ability, the central bank in the relaxation of the direct control of interest rates also need to strengthen the indirect regulation ability, as well as market economy does not reject the government's macroeconomic regulation and control.2 McKinnon and Shaw’s theory of "financial repression" and "financial deepeningtheory"McKinnon and Shaw, through to the developing countries economic condition and examination of the financial system, found that there are developing countries financial repression phenomena, its basic characteristics are low real interest rates and selective credit allocation. Real interest rates are limited by the government of developing countries at very low level; excessively low interest rates lead to low savings and investment needs strong, the government to curb the excessive demand of cheap money and guide the limited funds to the government plan priority department and take the plan to allocate money. Low interest rates are the root of financial repression. Financial repression in the economy, the financial market is divided into two: one is the government regulation of market, the main capital flow into inefficient state-owned enterprises and government agencies. Another is that there is no formal control of the free market; the interest rate is far higher than the former, small and medium-sized private enterprises through internal accumulation or high cost of financing by the market. In such a serious price discrimination and market conditions, market allocation efficiency is low, market behavior and rent-seeking behavior lead to corruption, ultimately affect the economic development of developing countries. Therefore, to get rid of the backward economy must remove financial repression; implement market-based reform of interest rates.3 The significance of implementation of interest rate mercerizationThe condition of the realization of the mercerization of interest rate is the interest rate control breakthrough unceasingly, under the condition of interest rate control, resource allocation lost the important measure of capital price leverage, that should have guiding effect to the investment and financing behavior and public consumption can't according to the market adjustment, the mechanism of the rigid interest rates also make the macroeconomic regulation and control has been curbed, make it difficult to through the control of the money supply in the macro administration and realize the goal of its monetary policy, etc.Situations where conditions permit, therefore, the major countries are trying to promote the mercerization of interest rate. Interest rate mercerization in promoting economic development occupies an important position,especially for commercial Banks.In the process of implementation of market-oriented interest rate, the interest rate risk of commercial Banks and the interest rate management difficulty will gradually increase. Interest rate risk is one of the types of financial risk, is due to fluctuations in interest rates, the asset gains and value relative to the debt cost and value asymmetry changes caused by the bank risk of loss of income and assets. In the process of mercerization of interest rates, many factors that affect interest rates, interest rate fluctuation frequency and amplitude is greatly increased, the term structure of interest rates and more complex, compared with the interest rate under control, the influence of the fluctuations in market interest rates for bank management is bigger, it is harder to identify and control interest rate risk. But also it is because the interest rate risk increase, its profitability also will increase.4 The US-Japan promote the comparative analysis of interest rate liberalizationThe United States and Japan to promote market-oriented interest rate reform in both countries to effectively promote the solution of the problem for the country's financial, from the above analysis, it can be seen that the two countries in advancing this process, there are some commonness and difference, this section is to summarize the commonness and difference.4.1 The US-Japan introduce the effect of interest rate mercerizationBy comparing the United States and Japan in the implementation of market-oriented interest rate, you can see that some of the economic indicators before and after the two countries in promoting interest rate mercerization process showed the biggest characteristic is to maintain the stability of the economic development. First, macroeconomic continue to maintain steady growth. The United States, Japan's GDP growth rate showed more negative after interest rate mercerization and the change trend of relatively stable. Second, the rate of inflation was effective control. Before and after interest rate mercerization small variations in the inflation rate of the two countries, is on the decline but relatively stable. The United States, Japan, in front of the mercerization of interest rate change the rate of inflation was stable, the two countries after interest rate mercerization in inflation downward trend, but the changeis small, stable. Third, the financial markets showed good growth. Before and after the mercerization of interest rate showed a relatively steady growth trend. The United States, Japan's financial deepening rate before and after the mercerization of interest rate showed a steady growth trend.4.2 America and Japan share the common characteristics of interest rate mercerizationFirst of all, the interest rate mercerization is a process of continuous development of new financial products and means.Marketization of interest rate in the United States to the innovation of financial products and means: has allowed Banks to introduce from the interest rate control money market account, can transfer large negotiable certificates of deposit and withdrawal notice account. Japan is by introducing a large negotiable certificates of deposit of mercerization of interest rate as the deposit first, interest rate mercerization is a process of continuous development of new financial products and means.Marketization of interest rate in the United States to the innovation of financial products and means: has allowed Banks to introduce from the interest rate control money market account, can transfer large negotiable certificates of deposit and withdrawal notice account. Japan is by introducing large negotiable certificates of deposit of mercerization of interest rate as its deposit us-Japan bilateral interest rate mercerization can say begins with innovation, to undertake and complete, with every step of interest rate mercerization development innovation.Second, the mercerization of interest rate of the two countries is following the step-by-step process.Interest rate is very important economic lever in a country's economy, with the influence of "holding a launch whole body”. So, in the process of interest rate mercerization, must adopt prudent, step by step. At the same time, pay attention to all kinds of form a complete set of financial system reform.” We want to realize the mercerization of interest rate in managed idea is unrealistic and extremely dangerous, light person lead to social and economic turmoil, serious still can cause huge economic recession. From the above Japan is in the process of mercerization of interest rate, we can see that the United States and Japan adopt the incrementalprocess of interest rate mercerization, and achieved success. First of all, find a proper breakthrough.Marketization of interest rate in the United States from negotiable certificates of CD issuance and trading, while Japan from issuing bonds trading interest rates and interest rates liberalization, then by stages. The time interval between each stage, can make the society has a process of digestion and adapt, can also be found in the process of mercerization need coordinated reform, reform for the next step to lay a good foundation.Once again, choose the appropriate timing of interest rate marketization.From Japan can be seen in the process of market-oriented interest rate reform, interest rate mercerization reform in the United States and Japan are both in the domestic economic situation is stable, and the development of the economy to relax under the background of interest rate regulation put forward the urgent request. Right timing to the success of market-oriented interest rate reform has laid a good foundation. Timing is often is a key factor in the success or failure of the reform. Timing should not only consider the macro factors, and to consider the micro factors. Under the condition of stable macroeconomic situation, many reformers to choose success or progress smoothly, and macroeconomic instability cases, reform more. In the steady economic growth, stable macroeconomic situation, policymakers are initiative to change the government regulation in the financial system is not adapt to the economic development of the local reality, so reform is relatively smooth, easy to succeed.Finally, in the process of interest rate mercerization, the government should strengthen the regulation of financial markets. While in the United States and Japan in the mercerization of interest rates are also some problems have occurred, but in terms of interest rates, it should be said that had been there a wide range of relatively large fluctuations, the competition between each big financial institutions are orderly. The two countries in the financial market regulation as inseparable.译文利率市场化比较研究:美国和日本的案例分析作者:Ahmed S, Zlate A.摘要利率作为金融市场最为重要的调节手段之一,越来越为各国金融界所关注,自20 世纪70 年代各国金融市场的发展和金融管制的放松,利率市场化逐渐成为各国金融市场发展的主流趋势。
利率市场化对我国商业银行经营的影响研究

利率市场化对我国商业银行经营的影响研究
利率市场化是指由市场供求关系决定贷款和储蓄利率的一种利率制度。
在这种制度下,市场利率可以自由浮动,银行不再受到政策性利率的束缚。
利率市场化的推行对商业银行经营产生了深远影响,具体表现如下:
一、资金成本上升
利率市场化的推行使得利率由政策性利率转变为市场利率,银行进行储蓄和借贷的资金成本会随着市场利率的波动而上下浮动。
虽然银行可以通过提高贷款利率以及收紧信贷政策来抵御资金成本上升带来的压力,但也同时会对贷款需求产生一定的冲击。
二、风险管理能力提高
由于利率市场化制度下银行的资金成本易受市场波动影响,商业银行会更加关注资产质量和风险控制。
商业银行会将发放贷款的风险评估得更加严格,并且更加注重贷后管理和风险定价。
这有助于提升商业银行的风险管理能力。
三、利润形成机制调整
利率市场化推行后,银行利润来源会发生变化。
传统上,商业银行通过利差获得利润,但这种利润形成机制会随着市场利率自由浮动而变化。
银行需要通过更加有效的运营和增加多元化经营来维持利润水平。
综上所述,利率市场化对商业银行经营产生了全面影响,商业银行需要加强风险管理、优化资产结构、调整利润形成机制,以适应市场利率的波动和变化。
外文文献翻译(图片版)

本科毕业论文外文参考文献译文及原文学院经济与贸易学院专业经济学(贸易方向)年级班别2007级 1 班学号3207004154学生姓名欧阳倩指导教师童雪晖2010 年 6 月 3 日目录1 外文文献译文(一)中国银行业的改革和盈利能力(第1、2、4部分) (1)2 外文文献原文(一)CHINA’S BANKING REFORM AND PROFITABILITY(Part 1、2、4) (9)1概述世界银行(1997年)曾声称,中国的金融业是其经济的软肋。
当一国的经济增长的可持续性岌岌可危的时候,金融业的改革一直被认为是提高资金使用效率和消费型经济增长重新走向平衡的必要(Lardy,1998年,Prasad,2007年)。
事实上,不久前,中国的国有银行被视为“技术上破产”,它们的生存需要依靠充裕的国家流动资金。
但是,在银行改革开展以来,最近,强劲的盈利能力已恢复到国有商业银行的水平。
但自从中国的国有银行在不久之前已经走上了改革的道路,它可能过早宣布银行业的改革尚未取得完全的胜利。
此外,其坚实的财务表现虽然强劲,但不可持续增长。
随着经济增长在2008年全球经济衰退得带动下已经开始软化,银行预计将在一个比以前更加困难的经济形势下探索。
本文的目的不是要评价银行业改革对银行业绩的影响,这在一个完整的信贷周期后更好解决。
相反,我们的目标是通过审查改革的进展和银行改革战略,并分析其近期改革后的强劲的财务表现,但是这不能完全从迄今所进行的改革努力分离。
本文有三个部分。
在第二节中,我们回顾了中国的大型国有银行改革的战略,以及其执行情况,这是中国银行业改革的主要目标。
第三节中分析了2007年的财务表现集中在那些在市场上拥有浮动股份的四大国有商业银行:中国工商银行(工商银行),中国建设银行(建行),对中国银行(中银)和交通银行(交通银行)。
引人注目的是中国农业银行,它仍然处于重组上市过程中得适当时候的后期。
第四节总结一个对银行绩效评估。
利率市场化对银行的影响

利率市场化对银行的影响
市场化利率是指由市场供求关系决定的利率水平,而非由政府干预或控制的利率。
1. 利润受压力:市场化利率下,银行存贷款利率的浮动范围增大,银行的利润空间变窄。
银行利润主要来自于存贷款利差,利差越大,银行的利润越高。
而市场化利率下,存贷款利率的浮动更加灵活,银行的利润空间被压缩。
这对于以传统存贷款为主要业务的银行来说,利润可能会受到较大的影响。
2. 风险管理能力提升:市场化利率下,银行需要对市场利率的波动进行风险管理,采取合适的对冲措施。
银行需要灵活调整存贷款利率,以应对市场利率的波动。
这要求银行具备较强的风险管理能力和灵活的资金运作能力。
市场化利率的引入对银行的风险管理提出了更高的要求,相关的风险测量和压力测试等工具和方法也需要不断改进和完善。
3. 竞争加剧:市场化利率打破了对利率的统一定价,允许银行自由竞争。
这使得市场上的竞争更加激烈,各家银行之间的利率差异缩小,银行产品和服务的差异化竞争将成为银行获得竞争优势的重要手段。
银行需要通过提供更好的金融产品和服务,降低成本、提高效率、加强创新等方式来提升竞争力,吸引更多的客户和资金。
4. 利率风险增加:市场化利率使利率更加敏感,更受到市场变动的影响。
银行存贷款利率的波动将直接影响银行的利润和资产负债表的风险敞口。
银行需要加强对利率风险的管理,通过利率敞口管理和利率对冲等手段,降低利率风险对银行的影响。
市场化利率对银行既带来了机遇,也带来了挑战。
银行需要适应利率市场化的变革,提高自身的竞争力和风险管理能力,同时也需要面对利润受压力和利率风险等挑战,以适应和应对市场的变化。
论利率市场化对商业银行的影响

论利率市场化对商业银行的影响
利率市场化对商业银行的影响有以下几点:
1. 利润下降:由于利率市场化的实行,商业银行的利息收入将
不再由国家规定的利率和结构所控制,而是由市场供求关系所决定。
这将导致商业银行的利率水平变得更加弹性化,因此可能会导致他
们的利润下降。
2. 风险管理加强:利率市场化将增加银行管理风险,需要加强
监管和风控能力,避免利率变动过大、市场波动过大等市场风险。
3. 竞争加剧:利率市场化将给商业银行带来更大的竞争压力,
商业银行将会在利率战略及产品设计方面加强创新,提高服务质量,以吸引更多的客户。
4. 资源整合加速:利率市场化将促进商业银行之间资金利率、
产品设计、风险管理等方面的合作,资源整合加速。
商业银行需要
考虑如何利用合作来提高综合竞争力。
总之,利率市场化对商业银行带来的影响是深远的,商业银行
们需要积极应对市场变化,制定科学合理的发展战略,提高自身市
场竞争力。
利率市场化对商业银行经营绩效的影响研究

利率市场化对商业银行经营绩效的影响研究摘要:本文旨在研究利率市场化对商业银行经营绩效的影响。
随着金融市场不断发展和改革,利率市场化已成为现代金融体系的重要组成部分。
商业银行作为金融体系的核心机构之一,其经营绩效受到利率市场化影响的程度受到广泛关注。
通过研究已有的文献和数据,本文论述了利率市场化对商业银行经营绩效的影响机制以及实证研究结果。
结果表明,利率市场化对商业银行经营绩效产生了积极影响,但也存在一定的挑战和风险。
因此,商业银行应积极应对利率市场化带来的变化,提高自身的经营能力,以适应市场竞争和推动金融体系的稳健发展。
关键词:利率市场化,商业银行,经营绩效,影响机制,风险引言:利率市场化是指利率的决定由市场供求关系决定,而不再由政府进行干预和控制。
利率市场化改革在许多国家已经进行,也取得了一些显著的成果。
商业银行作为金融体系的重要组成部分,其经营绩效的变化与利率市场化改革密切相关。
因此,研究利率市场化对商业银行经营绩效的影响具有重要的理论和实践意义。
一、利率市场化对商业银行经营绩效的影响机制1. 利率竞争机制利率市场化改革引入了市场竞争机制,使银行间的存贷款利率可以通过市场供求决定,并增加了银行的经营压力。
利率竞争使得商业银行必须提高服务质量和创新能力,以吸引更多的客户和资金流入。
这种竞争机制激发了商业银行的活力,提高了经营绩效。
2. 资金成本优化机制利率市场化使得商业银行可以通过市场利率的浮动进行资金成本的优化。
市场利率的变动使得商业银行更灵活地进行资金配置,降低了融资成本。
因此,商业银行可以更有效地利用资金进行经营和投资,提高经营绩效。
3. 风险管理机制利率市场化改革引入了风险管理机制,商业银行需要更加注重风险管理和控制。
利率的市场化使得商业银行面临更大的利率风险和市场风险,因此需要建立完善的风险管理体系,提高风险防范能力,以保证经营绩效的稳定性和可持续性。
二、利率市场化对商业银行经营绩效的影响实证研究许多学者通过实证研究分析了利率市场化对商业银行经营绩效的影响。
利率市场化对商业银行影响分析10篇

利率市场化对商业银行影响分析10篇第一篇一、农村商业银行实施金融利率市场化的必然性二、农村商业银行实施金融利率市场化的机遇首先,在利率市场化的条件下,农村商业银行拥有自主定价权,通过定价,就可以掌握资金市场供求情况,对资源实现最优配置十分有利。
一方面,农村商业银行要综合考虑经营成本等其它因素,从而制定出科学的价格战略;另一方面,能够促进负债管理和结构的优化,从而降低经营成本,提高经济效益。
其次,利率市场化改革发展到一定阶段,受到利率风险的影响,农村商业银行之间的竞争将会日益激烈,农村商业银行为了占有更多市场份额,实现可持续发展就必须加快创新步伐,从而逐渐取消,而中间业务将会成为农村商业银行获取收益的主要途径,这样就能够有效规避风险,不仅满足了客户的要求,经济效益也得到了快速增长,有利于农村商业银行的健康发展。
我国农村商业银行的起步较晚,中间业务还不是很成熟,在总业务中的比重较小,需要对中间业务进行创新和完善。
农村商业银行为了满足利率市场化的要求没必然会加大计算机技术的投入力度,建立了相关数据库和健全的科技平台,在新形势下,无论是在管理,还是在经营方面,将会得到较大提升。
农村商业银行将更直接的面临市场风险,农村商业银行可以将内部资金转移定价与市场利率有效的结合起来,从而提高绩效考核与内部资源配置的合理性。
同时,积极发展基于信息科技的操作风险计量手段,对相关数据进行分析,风险管控水平得以提高,不良资产比率大大降低。
三、农村商业银行实施金融利率市场化面临的挑战1、传统盈利模式面临挑战2、行业竞争更加激烈3、风险管理水平面临挑战利率市场化后,由市场决定利率的变动,也就是说市场资金供求将直接决定利率的多少,因此,加剧了银行业的竞争,为了占取更多的市场份额,很有可能出现以较高的贷款利率贷给信用等级较低的主体。
面对上述情况,农村商业银行只能将业务重心转向小微业务,以此避免利差的缩小,但是,农村商业银行很难对中小企业以及个人的信用等进行全面掌握,违约率也较高,因此,增加了农村商业银行的贷款风险,信用风险管理难度较大。
利率市场化相关文献

利率市场化相关文献以下是一些关于利率市场化的相关文献:1. Kroszner, R. S., & Strahan, P. E. (2014). Regulation and deregulation of the US banking industry: Causes, consequences, and implications for the future. In Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Volume 2, Part A (pp. 1135-1200). North Holland.2. White, E. N. (1995). The impacts of interest rate deregulation on the banking industry. In Deregulation and Monetary Control: The Federal Reserve and the Economies of the 1980s (pp. 189-211). Brookings Institution Press.3. Anderson, T. W., & Rasche, R. H. (1998). Financial market volatility and the implications for the structure of central banks. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 30(3), 283-298.4. Harchaoui, T., & Tarkhani, F. A. (2003). The software and information technology industry: A review of the empirical literature. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 51(4), 487-521.5. Allen, F., Carletti, E., & Marquez, R. (2011). Credit market competition and capital regulation. Review of Financial Studies, 24(4), 983-1018.6. Gersbach, H., & Sánchez-Páramo, C. (2001). Competition and stability: What's special about banking?. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 10(3-4), 218-245.以上文献提供了对利率市场化的不同方面的经济学和金融学视角的研究,包括市场化的原因、效果以及与银行业和金融稳定性的关系等。
利率市场化对商业银行经营管理的影响与对策

利率市场化对商业银行经营管理的影响与对策随着金融市场的不断发展,利率市场化已成为一个趋势。
商业银行作为金融机构的主要代表,利率市场化对其经营管理有着深刻的影响。
本文将从以下三个方面阐述利率市场化对商业银行的影响以及应对策略。
1. 利润率下降利率市场化后,银行的贷款利率受到市场供需关系的影响,往往较传统银行利率水平要低,而银行存款利率又受制于同业存款竞争,整体利润率会下降,影响银行盈利能力。
2. 风险管理能力提高银行在利率市场化后,面临的市场竞争将更为激烈,银行在资产负债管理、风险管理等方面的能力将得到进一步提升。
银行不仅要关注贷款的利率,还要更加重视风险的控制,合理配置信贷资产、科学定价,从而提升资产盈利能力。
3. 金融产品丰富利率市场化后,商业银行需要根据市场变化不断推陈出新的金融产品,满足不同的投资需求。
银行产品的丰富度也将有助于吸引更多的客户,从而推动银行业务的发展。
二、应对策略1. 加强风险管理商业银行在利率市场化背景下需要从传统的资产配置、风险管理中转型。
要保证银行新业务的稳健性和风险可控性,银行应加强对市场的调研和风险管理的能力,同时推动监管部门对风险管理要求的提高。
2. 科学定价商业银行应对利率市场化的影响,合理配置信贷资产,更加科学、合理的定价,创新贷款产品,优化资金使用效率,盘活存量资源,并从中寻求利润增长之路。
利率市场化下,银行要适应市场需求,不断推出适应市场的多元化金融产品,简单化、高效化的服务能力和质量将成为银行在市场中立于不败之地的重要支撑点。
通过开展理财、信托和保险等多元化金融业务和拓展其他业务来推动银行业务进一步发展。
总之,利率市场化对商业银行的经营管理有着较大的影响,商业银行应适应外部环境的变化,积极推进发展多元化、健康有序的金融服务业务,同时提高资产负债管理、风险管理和定价能力,以确保银行业务的健康稳定发展。
浅析利率市场化对商业银行的影响

浅析利率市场化对商业银行的影响
随着中国的利率市场化进程不断深入,商业银行的经营环境也
面临着不同程度的变化和挑战。
具体来说,利率市场化对商业银行
的影响主要体现在以下几个方面:
1. 利率竞争的加剧:随着利率市场化的推进,银行间利率市场
不断完善,市场上的借贷利率水平逐渐趋于合理。
这意味着商业银
行如今面临更加激烈的利率竞争,需要不断调整自己的贷款利率、
存款利率等各项利率政策,以吸引客户。
2. 风险控制的加强:利率市场化使资金的价格更加透明和及时,商业银行可以通过及时调整贷款和存款利率等手段来控制风险,有
效地避免资金流失和其他风险。
然而,这也需要银行提高自身风险
管理能力。
3. 资产质量的压力加大:利率市场化的推进,从根本上改变了
商业银行经营的利润模式,银行的盈利能力更加依赖于利差的变动。
而市场条件的剧烈变化也会对银行资产质量带来挑战,不良资产的
风险将进一步导致银行经营压力加大。
4. 利润状况的不稳定性:利率市场化的推进给商业银行带来了
更为灵活的利率工具和手段,为增加利润提供了更多的平台和可能。
但与此同时,银行的利润状况也会因市场条件的不确定性而出现周
期性波动。
总之,利率市场化对商业银行的影响是多层次、多方面的,商
业银行在面对利率市场化时应不断加强自身的风险管理,提升盈利
能力和业务创新能力,以应对市场竞争的挑战。
利率市场化对我国商业银行的影响及应对措施

利率市场化对我国商业银行的影响及应对措施利率市场化是指市场利率由市场力量自由形成,利率政策不再直接干预市场利率的形式,是我国的金融改革的一个重要方面。
伴随着利率市场化的推行,我国商业银行面临着诸多挑战,但也有着机遇。
本文将从影响和应对措施两个方面分析利率市场化对我国商业银行的影响。
1、竞争压力增大利率市场化后,市场力量直接推动利率的形成,不再存在由国家主导的利率政策。
银行面对着更为激烈的市场竞争,随之而来的是更为复杂的市场风险和信用风险,同时需要承担更为严格的监管责任。
2、减少存贷差传统的金融模式下,存贷款利率呈现大幅度差异,商业银行靠着这种差异获取盈利。
但利率市场化后,随着利率的逐渐自由化,银行的存贷差将逐渐缩小,银行的盈利能力也将受到影响。
3、削弱传统业务优势银行在传统业务上的优势将逐渐被削弱。
由于利率市场化后,资金成本的变化将直接影响银行的借贷利率和存款利率,因此,银行必须适应市场变化,创新业务模式,开发新的盈利业务,以保持竞争优势。
4、经营管理压力增大利率市场化后,银行面临着更严格的市场监管,需要承担更多的金融风险。
银行需要增强风险管理能力,制定更严格的内部控制制度和风险管理规则,以保障银行的稳健经营。
二、应对措施1、创新业务模式商业银行应该适应市场变化,创新业务模式,探索新的盈利业务。
如加强信用卡业务的推广,拓展理财产品等。
2、提高服务水平商业银行应重视客户服务,提高服务水平和服务质量,为客户提供更为优质的服务和产品。
这样不仅能够提高客户满意度,还能够促进客户的转介绍和再次购买率,从而带动银行的业务增长。
3、提高风险管理能力商业银行应加强风险管理能力,完善内部管理制度和风险管理规则,改进风险管理体系,减少风险事件的发生和影响。
4、江湖化经营商业银行应该探索江湖化经营模式,拓展业务领域,积极管理风险,寻求更多的盈利空间。
如拓展小额贷款、政府采购融资等业务领域,扩大金融服务范围。
同时,整合和优化机构资源,实现分布协作和资源共用。
课题论文:利率市场化对商业银行的影响分析

74874 银行管理论文利率市场化对商业银行的影响分析随着我国金融业的发展,利率市场化改革是我国必经的过程。
利率市场化改革是把双刃剑,它既为商业银行的发展带来了发展机遇,也带来了更多的风险和竞争压力。
所以,商业银行要积极应对,深入分析其背后的有利和不利因素,采取及时有效地措施,趋利避害,提高自己的竞争力。
一、什么是利率市场化所谓的利率市场化是指将利率的决策权交给金融机构,由金融机构自己根据资金状况和对金融市场动向的判断来自主调节利率水平,最终形成以中央银行基准利率为基础,以货币市场利率为中介,由市场供求决定金融结构存贷款利率的市场利率体系和利率形成机制。
一般而言,利率市场化包括两个内容:一是商业银行的存贷款利率的市场化,二是中央银行通过间接的方式影响市场利率。
在市场利率制度下,利率的运行机制存在两大特征:1、利率的变化由市场资金供求决定。
政府解除对利率的管制,通过价格机制达到资金的合理配置,当市场上资金供大于求时,利率下降,反之,利率上升。
2、中央银行对利率进行间接的调控。
中央银行通过间接的手段影响利率,比如,中央银行通过基准利率来调控全社会各种利率,由此来决定基础货币量。
二、利率市场化给商业银行带来的机遇1.利率市场化促使商业银行不断推出新的产品,以提高自己的业务竞争能力。
利率市场化之前,国家当局实行对利率的管制,使得我国的商业银行在相同的业务方面进行竞争,没有创新积极性。
利率市场化之后,商业银行有了自主的定价权,商业银行为了增强自己的竞争优势,不断创新自己的金融产品和扩大业务范围,这也就使得那些不受利率影响的中间业务得到快速发展。
2.利率市场化使得银行间的竞争趋于公平化。
在利率市场化之前,我国的存贷款利率都是由中央银行决定,在利率管制的情况下,各个银行都能获得稳定的利差,使得商业银行的收入大多来自存贷款业务,他们竞争的焦点也仅限于此,然而管制下的价格机制保证了各商业银行在竞争中都能保证自身的安全,使得这种竞争在商业银行中起到的作用微乎其微。
利率市场化对商业银行的影响及应对措施

利率市场化对商业银行的影响及应对措施近年来,改革开放带来了一系列新政策,而利率市场化改革就是其中之一。
作为一种金融制度改革,利率市场化对巩固金融市场秩序,改善金融服务,促进金融稳定和社会经济发展具有十分重要的意义。
然而,利率市场化改革引发的金融结构重组,对商业银行机构的动能、经营风险、优化管理和利润模式等都带来了一定的挑战与风险。
首先,利率市场化改革使政策金融一把手的政策利率失去了控制权。
在以往的利率限制体系下,商业银行可以保持政策利率水平,提供“安全保障”,但利率市场化则将政策利率开放给市场行为,使商业银行失去了利率控制权,使其短期利率波动增大,利润水平进一步降低。
其次,利率市场化改革进一步激活金融市场活力,加大了经营风险。
在利率市场化的制度框架下,市场参与者获得了比以往更多的投资和融资机会,金融市场上的竞争也日趋激烈,特别是面对省行的低成本融资,非金融机构也能竞争到资金,进一步促使商业银行主动降低贷款利率、重新定位金融服务,增加了经营风险。
此外,商业银行经营风险的增加,对内部管理也带来了挑战。
利率市场化改革使政策利率失去了控制权,商业银行的定价和定位权受到了巨大影响,其缺乏自主定价能力进而影响了其资产质量和贷款质量控制,从而带来管理风险。
最后,利率市场化改革使商业银行利润模式受到了影响。
利率市场化改革使商业银行不再仅仅提供贷款利率调整服务,而是要求商业银行拓宽金融交易领域,丰富金融产品结构,以求从其他收入来源以及更高的贷款收益来满足盈利要求,其中不仅包括金融投资、支付和调控服务,还有其他形式的财富管理等,使商业银行的利润模式变得更加复杂,为商业银行带来更大的挑战。
以上所述,可以看出,利率市场化改革给商业银行带来了一定的挑战和风险。
因此,为了妥善应对这些挑战,商业银行可采取以下措施:首先,商业银行要建立和完善有效的市场风险管理体系,加强对金融市场行情的动态监测和分析,及时调整经营策略,并定期审计;其次,商业银行要优化内控管理,加强金融风险管理,完善市场内外信息的收集与处理机制,保障内部核算准确,建立健全的防范控制机制;第三,商业银行要重新定位金融服务,努力提升贷款业务定价精准度和风险管理能力,并丰富和优化金融产品结构,以实现多元化布局和实现利润可持续增长;最后,商业银行可拓宽金融服务范围,提升金融服务质量,加强金融交易能力,完善结构性金融产品和投资服务体系,有助于提高商业银行的利润能力。
浅析利率市场化改革对于我国商业银行的影响

浅析利率市场化改革对于我国商业银行的影响【摘要】自1993年起,我国便开始进行利率市场化改革。
近年来,随着金融改革的全面推进,利率市场化改革也迈入深水区,而这一系列改革对商业银行产生了巨大的影响。
本文通过对我国利率市场化进程的回顾,以及对于一些发达国家商业银行面对利率市场化进程应对方案的梳理,分析了利率市场化可能给我国商业银行带来的影响,并针对这些影响提出了相应的建议和应对措施,以期我国商业银行能成功面对利率市场化带来的挑战。
【关键词】利率市场化、商业银行一、引言我国作为一个银行主导型的金融体系,商业银行在经济运行的作用十分重要。
近几年,我国金融改革全面推进,利率市场化作为金融改革的重要一环逐渐加快。
2019年,央行推出了一系列政策推进利率市场化进程加快,同时,据有关政策文件显示,2020年利率市场化改革将涉足深水区,改革进程的加速推进必然会对各个经济主体产生巨大的影响。
本文将试图探讨,作为利率传导过程中的重要一环,商业银行将会受到怎样的影响以及应该采取什么样的措施去面对这种影响。
二、我国利率市场化进程回顾及展望总体来讲,我国利率市场化借鉴了国外的经验,主要路径是“先外币、后本币;先贷款、后存款;先长期、大额,后短期、小额”的思路,主要分为为三个阶段。
(一)、货币市场利率改革(1993—1999年)在利率市场化进程之中,首先要为市场利率寻找一个参考的均衡点,即人们常说的“锚”。
而货币市场作为流动性最强的金融市场,其利率能够及时、充分地反映资金的供求关系,因此货币市场利率是各国市场化利率的重要的参考指标,我国的利率市场化改革也从此开始。
1996年,取消银行同业拆借利率限制;一年后,放开银行间债券回购利率。
1998年,国开行首次用市场化的方式在银行间债券市场发债,随后,国债也开始进行市场招标。
自此,我国银行间市场利率、国债和政策性金融债发行利率市场化逐渐完成,货币市场均衡利率逐渐形成。
(二)、贷款利率放开管制,存款利率浮动加大(1999—2013年)在第一阶段货币市场利率的改革过程中,我国便同时尝试着扩大了贷款利率浮动区间。
利率市场化对我国商业银行的影响与对策

利率市场化对我国商业银行的影响与对策利率市场化对我国商业银行的影响:
1. 利润压缩:由于市场化利率下行,商业银行的存款利率和贷
款利率受到限制,这会降低商业银行的利润能力。
2. 加强竞争:市场化利率意味着商业银行之间的竞争将更加激烈,因为客户将会更倾向于选择收益率更高的银行产品。
3. 风险管理:市场化利率使得商业银行的风险管理变得更加重要,商业银行需要更加注重对风险涉及的产品和客户的尽职调查。
对策:
1. 发展高附加值的服务:商业银行应发展高附加值的服务来增
加利润,比如信贷服务、投资银行服务、财富管理等。
2. 降低成本:商业银行应通过提高效率和降低成本来增加利润。
比如,通过适当控制运营成本,提高资金利用效率和促进信息化建
设来降低成本。
3. 加强风险管理:商业银行应加强风险管理,包括风险评估、
客户评估、贷款管理等,以降低风险对银行的损害,保证银行的长
期稳健发展。
4. 创新产品:商业银行应不断推出新产品以满足客户需求,提
高客户粘性,增加银行的收益。
这些产品应以差异化为主要特点,
以提供更好的服务为目标。
利率市场化对金融业的影响

利率市场化对金融业的影响作为市场经济体制下的基础金融体系之一,利率市场化的实施对于金融业的发展具有重要意义。
利率市场化是指由市场力量决定利率的形式,与之相对应的是政府干预的利率管制体系。
利率市场化的实施对于金融市场、金融产品、金融机构和金融监管等方面都产生了影响。
一、利率市场化对金融市场的影响利率市场化的实施使得金融市场的竞争更加激烈,助推了金融市场的发展。
由于竞争机制的引入,各家金融机构不得不降低利率来吸引客户,这使得客户能够得到更多的利率优惠,从而增长了金融市场的需求。
同时,利率市场化也使得固定收益证券等金融产品发行更加灵活,随着市场利率的变化而变化,有利于投资者和发行人之间实现更多的投资效益。
二、利率市场化对金融产品的影响利率市场化的实施使得固定收益证券等金融产品更具有市场竞争力,并且更适应投资者的需求。
在利率管制体系下,金融机构只能发行一些固定利率的金融产品,这限制了金融产品的多样性。
而在利率市场化下,金融机构有更多的发行空间,可以根据市场需求推出更多灵活多样的金融产品,满足投资者的需求,也有利于促进金融市场的更好发展。
三、利率市场化对金融机构的影响利率市场化的实施加重了金融机构竞争的程度,并且增加了其风险管理的难度。
尤其是对于那些没有太多经验的小型金融机构来说,市场化竞争的压力更大。
在这种情况下,金融机构需要更多的投资于改进各种内部机制,加强内部风险控制,从而增强其市场竞争力。
四、利率市场化对金融监管的影响利率市场化的实施对监管机构提出了新的要求。
金融监管机构需要扩大自身监管范围,加强对于金融机构的监管及对于金融市场的监管,制定新的规章制度,提高整体的监管水平。
同时,利率市场化的实施还可能使得监管机构面临更大的挑战,因为监管机构需要更加灵活地调整自身监管方式,以适应市场的发展需要。
综上所述,利率市场化对金融业具有很大影响,利用市场力量来调节利率,提高金融机构竞争力,增加金融产品的多样性,然而,同时也加重了金融机构的风险管理难度。
利率市场化对商业银行经营管理的影响与对策

利率市场化对商业银行经营管理的影响与对策随着我国金融改革的推进,利率市场化成为了一个重要的方向。
利率市场化的实施对商业银行经营管理带来了一系列的影响,下面将详细分析并提出对策。
利率市场化对商业银行的经营模式产生了重大影响。
传统上,商业银行在贷款利率上享有较高的定价权,且贷款利率较为稳定。
利率市场化的实施使得贷款利率的浮动成为可能,商业银行在定价时需要更加关注市场利率的变动,灵活调整贷款利率以保持其竞争力。
利率市场化还加大了利率风险,商业银行贷款利率的波动可能直接影响其盈利能力和资产质量。
商业银行需要调整经营模式,采取更加灵活的定价策略,减少利率风险的影响。
利率市场化对商业银行的资金配置和融资成本产生了影响。
市场化利率的实施使得商业银行在资金配置上拥有更多的选择和自主权。
商业银行可以根据市场需求和风险状况调整资金投向,灵活配置存款和贷款。
这样一来,商业银行可以更加准确地满足客户需求,提高资金使用效率。
利率市场化也增加了商业银行的融资成本。
由于市场利率波动较大,商业银行在融资时可能面临较高的融资成本,这对其盈利能力和竞争力造成了一定的压力。
商业银行需要加强资金管理能力,降低融资成本,提高资金使用效率。
利率市场化对商业银行的竞争格局和盈利能力产生了深远影响。
市场化利率的实施使得市场竞争更加激烈,商业银行必须面对更多的竞争对手。
利率市场化还增加了商业银行的风险敞口,增加了经营风险。
在市场竞争激烈和资金成本较高的情况下,商业银行的盈利能力可能下降。
商业银行需要加强竞争意识和创新能力,提高服务质量和产品差异化,寻找新的盈利增长点。
利率市场化对我国商业银行的影响和对策分析

利率市场化对我国商业银行的影响和对策分析,不少于1000字随着我国金融市场的不断发展和开放,利率市场化已经成为我国金融市场改革的主要目标之一。
利率市场化的实施意味着商业银行的生存和发展环境将面临巨大的变化,因此,商业银行必须加强自身的改革,提高自身的核心竞争力,以适应市场的变化。
一、利率市场化对我国商业银行的影响(一)竞争压力加剧利率市场化将改变商业银行的定价方式,市场竞争的压力将加大,商业银行必须适应市场变化,调整服务的质量和价格。
由于市场竞争的加剧,商业银行不得不降低贷款利率和存款利率,以吸引更多的客户。
(二)市场定价机制的改变我国商业银行在过去主要通过政策利率确定贷款和存款利率,但随着利率市场化的逐步实施,市场定价机制将逐渐建立,商业银行需要将贷款和存款利率与市场利率挂钩,商业银行需要了解市场动态,及时调整贷款和存款利率。
(三)风险管理体系的完善随着利率市场化的逐步深入,商业银行将面临更加复杂和多样化的风险,要做好风险管理,必须完善风险管理体系,建立科学合理的风险管理模型,加强内部控制和合规管理,提高风险管理能力和水平。
(四)盈利模式的变革目前,很多商业银行的盈利模式主要是通过利差收入实现的,但随着市场化的推进和竞争的加剧,利差收入将大幅下降,商业银行必须加强资产负债管理,通过增加其他收入项,如手续费收入、信用卡收益等多元化业务实现盈利。
二、利率市场化对我国商业银行的应对策略(一)做好市场调查和信息收集商业银行应该密切关注市场动态,及时调整贷款和存款利率,在市场竞争中保持竞争优势。
同时,要精准把握客户需求,提供符合客户需求的产品和服务。
(二)加强风险管理商业银行要根据市场变化,建立科学的风险管理体系,提高企业风险防范意识和风险评估能力,避免贷款和投资风险,确保商业银行的资产安全,减少经营风险。
(三)提高金融产品的创新能力商业银行要根据市场需求和客户需求,提高金融产品的创新能力,积极推出符合市场需求的金融产品和服务,满足客户的差异化需求,提高金融产品市场占有率,稳定商业银行的市场份额。
利率市场化对商业银行的影响与对策探讨

商展经济利率市场化对商业银行的影响与对策探讨重庆工业职业技术学院 何潇伊摘 要:利率市场化是利用市场来调节利率,以达到资源最优化配置的金融管理模式。
随着国际金融环境的日趋成熟,利率市场化成为推进金融体制改革的重要抓手。
对于商业银行现有运营机制来讲,利率市场化所带来的挑战是客观存在的。
本文着重从积极、消极两个层面展开探讨,从完善利率风险体系、构建金融工具体系,创设同业、跨业间合作体系,完善银行客户体系等方面,对利率市场化改革提出改进建议。
关键词:商业银行;利率市场化;影响要素;完善对策中图分类号:F832 文献标识码:ADOI:10.12245/j.issn.2096-6776.2021.01.14利率市场化体现了商业银行由粗放管理向精益管理的重要转变,打破由政府管制的格局,依托市场调节,来促进金融体系获得最优化配置。
利率市场化设想的提出,体现了金融自由化,更有助于优化商业银行存贷结构,促进商业银行完成多元化业务转型与提升。
但应该看到,利率市场化是一把双刃剑,在增强商业银行市场活力、拓展商业银行利润来源方面具有积极作用,但却加剧了商业银行短期内的经营管理风险,有可能降低商业银行的盈利能力。
深化金融供给侧改革,确保社会金融体系健康稳定发展,利率市场化对商业银行本身的影响是多方面的。
在竞争方面,加大商业银行间的竞争态势,必然对商业银行的盈利能力带来威胁。
再者,利率市场化能够降低银行利差,推动商业银行中间业务的转型和创新。
1 利率市场化对商业银行经营风险的威胁从利率调控实践来看,政府对存贷款利率已经放开,根据金融市场动向由商业银行自己来制定利率,从而实现利率市场化管理。
利率市场化改革,对于商业银行的经营风险影响是多方面的。
1.1 加剧商业银行之间的市场竞争政府一旦放开存贷款利率,商业银行需要根据自身经营需要来调整利率。
与过去相比,政府限定模式下,商业银行拥有3%的利息差,即便不参与探索各类金融业务,就可以确保盈利目标。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
文献出处:Markus A. The research of interest rate marketization reform in USA [J]. Atlantic Economic Journal, 2015, 8 (5): 129-139.原文The research of interest rate marketization reform in USAMarkus AAbstractThis article through to the United States in the 1980 s background and analysis of the process of market-oriented interest rate reform, focuses on its assets and liabilities business of bank, the intermediary business transformation and the influence of industry concentration. In this paper, research shows that interest rate marketization leads to narrowing trend spreads, but as a result of loan assets proportion of ascension, reform is done early to bank net interest margin impact is smaller. But with the improvement of the market-oriented interest rate reform and the deepening of financial disintermediation, net interest margins are still showed a trend of decline. In addition, the marketization of interest rate of bank has obvious promoting effect to the intermediary business transformation, and strengthened the industry competition, and improves the industry concentration.Keywords: Banking; Interest rate marketization; Financial disintermediation1 IntroductionMarket-oriented interest rate reform, namely the official control relaxed lending and deposit rates, remove the protection of bank spreads, make money prices determined by market supply and demand fully. Despite the lending and deposit rates will rise obviously, but the bank spreads is still likely to narrow. On the one hand, the loan interest rate cap already let go, the marketization degree is higher. By bank loan quality customer competition, the economy is still in a downward adjustment stage and local debt restructuring and other factors, the loan interest rate raise co., LTD. On the other hand, in the economic structure adjustment and change of the pattern of economic growth, against the background of overall tight liquidity will show the overall trend of the future society, commercial bank deposit growth will also be a slowing trend. Since 2012 foreign exchange of the change of the situation andtensions of monetary market and in 2013 fully illustrates this point. For a long time, commercial Banks mainly deposits as a source of funds, and bank business transformation needs certain process, future liabilities business competition between Banks will increase further, deposit rates will rise more obvious, the marketization of interest rates on deposits level will gradually rise and close to financial returns. Many countries have successively realized the marketization of interest rate in the past few decades, has a more far-reaching influence on the financial system.2 Background and experience of U.S. interest rate marketization reform2.1 The background of market-oriented interest rate reformThe market-oriented interest rate reform started in the mid 1970 s, is a sign of official start in 1980 the deposit-taking institutions deregulation and monetary control act promulgated. Ease rate control is to adapt to the economic development situation and the inevitable choice of the evolution of financial markets and policies and the improvement of the legislation passed to promote step by step. The process of marketization of interest rate, is actually a constantly of Q regulations issued by the relaxation after a major crisis in the 1930 s, the financial system step by step to realize the process of liberalization. The main purpose of regulation Q is by limiting the bank deposit interest rate cap to control the cost of operation, guarantee bank profits, to avoid collapse. But since the 1960 s, the United States the rate of inflation rising, the two oil crises in the 70 s led to economic slowdown, rising inflation, interest rates control makes the commercial bank cannot cope with high inflation rates of macro economic environment. Us inflation as high as 12.3% by the end of 1974, surged to a record 14.8% in March, 1980, at the same time, market interest rates rise sharply, the three-month Treasury interest rates in the early 1980 s up to 15%.But the high limit is far lower than the market interest rates, bank deposit rates led to bank financing source of tension, the interest rate control has been developed from the early to protect bank profits, a normal business for Banks. Vigorous development of financial innovation to the marketization of interest rate also forms "reversed transmission". In the 1970 s, such as money market mutual funds to avoid interest rate controls the rapid growth of financial instruments, at the same time, commercial paper, such asrapid development of capital market, is the impact of depository institutions funding sources.2.2 The process of market-oriented interest rate reformThe United States until the 1980 s the interest rate control is mainly regulation Q restrictions on deposit interest rate cap, part of the state also provides the loan interest rate upper limit. Market-oriented reform basic follow the following order: cancel the large deposit interest rate cap, cancel the loan interest rate cap, cancel the regular savings rate upper limit in stages, to broaden the scope of business, etc. Since the early 1970 s, the U.S. has cancelled the different lines of large negotiable certificates of deposit and deposit interest rate upper limit control, allowed some deadline of savings deposit interest rates and Treasury yields. In 1980 introduced the deposit-taking institutions deregulation and monetary control act, in the form of law to determine the development direction of the interest rate marketization, the main contents include: as of March 31, 1980, after six years until March 31, 1986, in stages to cancel "regulation Q" for all depository institutions held on a regular basis and the interest rate for the savings account restrictions; Cancel the loan interest rate upper limit; Allow savings institutions across the country to carry out NOW account and ATM account business. But at the beginning of the reform, the bank financing source is still restricted by regulation Q, disintermediation effect has not fundamentally contained. To this end, in October 1982, is introduced the graces. germane deposit-taking institutions act, the legislation, formulate rules for the lift Q steps in detail, depository institutions can offer money market deposit account (MMDA), commercial Banks may issue at market interest rates and interest of super negotiable certificates of deposit (SNOW), these measures greatly speeded up the process of marketization of interest rate. In April 1986, as the passbook savings account interest rate cap to cancel, the entire deposit rate limit was cancelled. Except for a few exceptions, such as home loans, auto loans mortgage rates also unlimited, the interest rate marketization declared to implement in an all-round way.2.3 Reform important experience and characteristicsMarketization of interest rate mechanism is the important basis of establishingthe benchmark interest rate. The benchmark interest rate represents the financial market main body to obtain wholesale funding costs, can timely reflect changes in money supply and demand. Federal funds mechanism is established in the United States, the federal funds rate is the federal reserve official regulation of benchmark interest rates, the fed's open market committee on a regular basis to select a target interest rate level, and then mainly through open market operations to make the goal of the interest rate on a narrow range fluctuations, will affect all sorts of changes in market interest rates. Commercial bank again on the basis of comprehensive consideration of various factors determines the deposit and lending products pricing. The United States market-oriented interest rate reform is a long-term, gradual process. Interest rate marketization is to set a benchmark interest rate, money market yield curve, perfect, high inflation rate under the condition of effective control of propulsion, it at the beginning of the marketization of interest rate is reduced irregular fluctuations in interest rates are likely to adverse impacts on the economy and Banks. In the money market interest rate and loan interest rate is determined by market supply and demand, on the basis of the specific interest rate marketization is sequential, long-term deposit interest rate marketization ahead of short-term deposit interest rate marketization, large deposit interest rate marketization of interest rate marketization ahead of small deposits. Along with the advancement of marketization of interest rate, the transmission mechanism of monetary policy is more effective. Central Banks keep the interest rate control, mainly through money market operations to implement monetary policy intention, and forms the effective indirect regulation of the transmission mechanism. Interest rate liberalization and financial tool innovation and financial system innovation supplement each other, and the innovation embodies the financial institutions to market interest rate sensitivity of financial product development ability and the improvement of bank risk transfer pricing power. Far-reaching impact of the liberalization of the financial system, the bank's risk management, asset liability management ability put forward higher challenge. On the one hand, to promote the commercial bank risk management ability to ascend, and accelerate business transformation is reduce the influence of interest rate fluctuations.On the other hand, greatly promoted the banking competition, accelerated the collapse of a large number of small and medium-sized financial institutions. With the mixed management deregulation, it is triggered a wave of merger integration. In the 80 s savings-and-loan crisis is also one of the 70 s controlled interest rate affect the thrifts deposit-taking skills under high interest rates, while the remaining short and lending long term assets and liabilities of the mismatch, long-term under asylum policies affect their operation and management and risk control level of ascension, eventually led to the collapse of a large amount of savings and loan institutions.3 The impact analysis of Market-based reforms of interest rates on banking3.1 Liberalization of interest rate regulation enhances the flexibility of the bank deposit interest rate changesFrom the Federal deposit insurance company (Federal insurance corporation, the FDIC) average international financial deposit rates, Banks in the whole environment of higher interest rates in the 70 s, conditioned by the highest real interest on deposits and restrictions, the size of the deposit interest rate changes is far less than the change of market interest rate, loan interest rates due to less regulation, more timely with the changes in market interest rates, after entering the 80 s, especially in the early 80 s after the peak of inflation and interest rates, with the advancement of marketization of interest rate, bank deposit rates relative to the market interest rate changes markedly improved elasticity.3.2 Marketization of interest rate to a certain extent, improve the bank's cost of capitalAlthough deposit the liberalization of interest rate control makes the bank deposit market competitiveness, but in the 1980 s financial market gradually perfect investment channels, the backdrop of the financial tool innovation gradually maturing, Banks still face competition in the capital, Banks' funding costs can also be difficult to fully follow the benchmark interest rate. In the 80 s ~ 90 s rate cut cycle, the bank deposit interest rates fell by less than the size of the federal funds rate down. At the same time, in the early 80 s the U.S. economic growth slowed to a small cycle trough, the weak demand for credit affect the pricing level of bank loans, the interest rate marketization accelerating from 1982 to 1983, average interest rate on bank loans fellmore than deposit rates decline, the deposit insurance bank spreads narrowed from 6.35% in 1981 to 5.34% in 1983.Finally, after the completion of marketization of interest rate bank assets and liabilities management level and to further improve pricing power, spreads start to rise. After completion of the interest rate reform, spreads control period of overall level is higher than before, and fluctuates significantly decreased, basically keep the volatility of 50 basis points.3.3 The bank assets and liabilities structure changes after interest rate marketizationInterest rate marketization to finish early is beneficial to the stability of bank deposits. In the last century throughout the 80 s, namely, propulsion, and complete the early stages of the interest rate liberalization, bank deposits, accounts for the proportion of debt remain relatively stable, reversing the declining trend in the 70 s, suggests that opening rate control for bank deposits have played a role in promoting. In the 90 s, the further development, the mixed management in financial markets deregulation under the environment of deposit accounts for the proportion of debt to a significantly lower again. In addition, after the market-oriented interest rate reform in the banking system to keep high efficient use of assets, loan assets proportion rising steadily, increasing loan-to-deposit ratio.译文美国利率市场化改革研究Markus A摘要本文通过对20世纪80年代美国利率市场化改革背景和过程的分析,重点考察了其对银行资产负债业务、向中间业务转型以及行业集中度的影响。