财务杠杆在企业中的应用研究 外文原文 精品
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
DETERMINANTS OF FIRM’S FINANCIAL LEVERAGE:
A CRITICAL REVIEW
By
Rahul Kumar
Abstract
The purpose of this review paper is to critically investigate the underlying factors that affect firm’s financial leverage from t he perspective of theoretical underpinnings. We reviewed 107 papers published from 1991 to 2005 in the core, non-core and other academic journals. On the basis of critical review, this research has identified a number of determinants of financial leverage based upon logical argume nts identified in the literatures. Major findings show that various frameworks like leverage irrelevance, static trade off, pecking order, asymmetric information signaling framework have partly helped us in understanding the under lying factors determining the firm’s financial leverage, there is no consensus and there is no universal factor determining financial leverage. The paper sets out two challenges for future research: one, how to integrate different factors determining firm’s financial leverage into a common framework and second, what are the explanatory factors determining firm’s financial leverage in a network phenomena Keywords : Capital structure, financial leverage
1. Introduction
In general, companies may raise money from internal and external sources. They can raise money from internal sources by plowing back part of their profits, which would otherwise have been distributed as dividend to shareholders. Or, they can raise money from external sources by an issue of debt or equity. When a company issues shares, shareholders hope to receive dividend on their investment. However, the company is not obliged to pay any dividend. Because dividend is discretionary, it is not considered to be a business expense. When a company borrows money by way of debt, it promises to make regular interest payment and to repay the principal (i.e. the original amount borrowed). If profits rise, the debt holders continue to receive a fixed interest payment, so that all the gains go to the shareholders. On the contrary, when the reverse happens and profits fall, shareholders bear all the pain. If times are sufficiently hard, a company that has borrowed heavily may not be able to repay its debt. The company is then become bankrupt and shareholders loose their entire investment. Because debt increases returns to shareholders in good times and reduces them in bad times, it creates “financial leverage”(leverage). An “unlevered firm2” uses only equity capital whereas a “levered firm” uses a mix of equity and various forms of debt. Common ratios such as debt-to-total capital or debt-to-equity quantify this relationship. The importance of leverage in the capital structure3 of the company is that its efficient use reduces the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of the company. Lowering the cost of capital increases the net economic returns which, ultimately increases firm value. In sum, the guiding principle of leverage is to choose the course of action that maximizes the firm value and the value of the firm is maximized when the WACC is minimized.
The firm’s leverage decision centers on the allocation between debt and equity in financing the company. However, how the leverage of a firm is determined in a world in which cash flows are uncertain and in which capital can be obtained by many different media ranging from pure debt instruments to pure equity instruments is an unsettled issue.
A number of researchers have attempted to understand financing choices of the firm and to identify the effect of changes in financial structure on the WACC of the firm and its value. A survey on capital structure theories by Harris and Raviv (1991) provide a summary of determinant of financial leverage of the firm, as identified and discovered by the researchers up to the time. However, in the absence of any review of published papers