雅思小作文

题目解析
本次小作文是一个动态的线图。

注意主要信息点总体趋势，极值和数据的对比。

高分表达
How much a particular government did and will 这个政府花了多少在。

Albeit to varying degrees 尽管程度不同
To be more specific 具体来说
The least funded public service 资助最好的公共服务（同位语结构）
The ...period witnessed ... 某一段时间见证...趋势
范文
The line graph compares how much a particular government did and will provide financial aid to health, education and road as well as railways within the 2000-2025 period. In 2000, this government allocated a similar amount of GDP on all of the, but since then the allocations varied, albeit to varying degrees.
The majority of GDP was spent on education before 2015 or so when its figure was equal with that of health, constituting approximately 6%. To be more specific, exactly 5% GDP funded education and with the peak at up to around 7%，it enjoyed a slight growth before falling slowly until 2025 when it is estimated to hit a low at 4.2%.
There was a stable rise of no less than 7% in health by the year 2025 and in the same year, it is predicted that the proportion of GDP expenditure on it will reach the peak at as much as nearly 7%.
With an initial drop of only 1%, road and railways, the least funded public service, saw a gradual increase to almost 5% in 2016 while the last decade will witness another marginal reduction to 3.8%.
Overall, the government sponsored slightly more on education and health than on road and railway before about 2015 but during the next decade, health will receive a little bit more financial aid.
高分表达
reaching the bottom at 在…达到最低
showed a completely opposite trend 呈现了一个完全相反的趋势peak at 在…达到最高
saw a gradual decrease and ended at 经历逐步上升和最终达到… remained top 保持第一
it is interesting to note that 值得注意的是
gained popularity 受欢迎
significantly outnumbered 远远超过
范文
The line graph compares the average number of people who participated in top-level football matches between1980 and 2004 in Germany, England and Italy.
In 1980, the average number of people who were active participants of football competitions was around 36 in Italy, compared to about 23 of British people and 18 of Germans. The data of people joining in matches in England and Germany declined remarkably over the next 6 years, reaching the bottom at about 18 and 15 respectively in 1986. By contrast, the figures for Italy showed a completely opposite trend with a peak at approximately 42 in the same year.
As for the following years, although the average number of people in Italy remained top at the beginning, it saw a gradual decrease and ended at 28 in 2004.However,it is interesting to note that top-level football matches gained popularity in England and Germany，so the rest years witnessed substantial increase for their figures (35 and 37,separately in 2004) ,which significantly outnumbered Italian counterpart.
Overall, while top-level football matches lost Italians' favor, more British people and Germans were involved in them over this 24-year period.
题目解析
本题为常规多线图，难度系数并不是特别大。

考生在写作时，需要多关注各线条之间相同和不同之处，以及每根线的重点数值（起始点，转折点）。

此外，在描述趋势时，务必注意时态的准确使用以及表示“上升”、“下降”词汇的替换
高分表达
the attendance rate 参与率
increase in popularity 数量增加
range from… to… 从…到…
be predicated to 被预测认为….
rise dramatically 急剧增加
remain climbing 保持上升
be fond of 喜欢
ascend steadily 稳定上升
soar to 激增
范文
The line chart illustrates the attendance rate of gym (once a month or more) for European residents in four different age groups.
Overall, it can be seen that gym had increased in popularity during the period ranging from 1990 to 2010 and more people are likely to do exercise there in the future.
In 1990, there were 15% of people aged 18-23 going to the gym, while the proportion of 24-33 years old people was a little higher, at 17%. Over the next 20 years, the attendance rate for the youngest age group had fluctuated around 18% and is predicated to rise dramatically after 2010; but that for the younger age group had grown stably despite a small decline during 1994 and 1998 and is also expected to remain climbing.
In contrast to 24-33-year-old people who are most fond of going to gym, merely 5% of 44-53 years old people preferred to gym in 1990 and then its trend kept ascending steadily. On the contrary, more middle aged people (34-43 years old) took exercise in gym in the two decades and its percentage tends to soar to 14%
The line chart illustrates how the proportion of workers who were off work due to illness changed in five European countries between 1991 and 2001.
From the graph, it is obvious that there were 4.8% of workers who asked for leave in Netherlands in 1991 and then it rose to 5.5% in the next year. However, over the next four years, its proportion had declined to approximately 4% before it had soared to 5.4% in 2001.
Referring to the absence rate in France and Sweden, in the beginning of this period, 5% and 3% of workers were absent for illness respectively. In the following five years, the rate in France
had dropped considerably while that in Sweden remained stably with a slight increase. In 1996, they both stood at the proportion of 3.2%. After that, more and more workers requested for a sick leave in Sweden; on the contrary, the figure for French workers decreased and kept fairly steady at 3%.
In contrast, the percentage of workers in UK and Germany with a day or more illness absence was much lower, at 2.5% and 1.5% separately and they stayed the same in the remaining years.
Overall, it can be seen that only France witnessed a dramatic reduction in workers’ absence rate and the most fluctuation was seen in the tendency for that in Netherlands.
The line graphs provide information about the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 and the proportion of trains running on time during the same period.
As can be seen from the first line graph, the number of trains’ passengers almost remained stable with some ups and downs within the range of 37 million-47 million from 2000 to 2009.
From the second line graph, we can see that the percentage of trains that ran on time experienced an upward trend from 92% in 2000 to 96% in the middle of 2004, although in the first half period the figure kept below the standard line (95%). Then the proportion of trains running on time declined dramatically to the lowest point of only 92%(the same figure in 2000) in the middle of 2006 before
increasing to the highest point(97%) in the middle of 2008. After that the trend kept steady.
It is clear that the number of train passengers were around 40 million and despite some dramatic fluctuation, the percentage of trains running on time finally reached 97%, which was a little higher than the standard line.。