儿童被忽视量表的初步编制tougao

儿童被忽视量表的初步编制*

杨世昌①②杜爱玲②张亚林①王芙蓉③郭果毅④

【摘要】目的编制一套符合我国文化背景的儿童被忽视量表。由儿童自评，对其被忽视的程度作出定量评估，为研究儿童被忽视提供一个可操作的量化工具。方法通过文献分析和修订既往量表中的相关条目，选用适合我国文化背景的语句表达方式，建立条目库。经相关专家评定，筛选出效价高的条目。在湘潭市某中学初中一、二年级学生及湘潭市某职业技术学院一年级新生中施测，共计902名，有效问卷871份，男性425名，平均年龄14.77±1.89岁，女性446名，平均14.88±2.06岁。通过儿童被忽视量表、父母养育方式评价量表等进行横断面调查。结果儿童被忽视量表总的Cronbach's α系数为0.848,劈半系数为0.810，重测系数为0.897。各分量表的α系数在0.785～0.812之间,劈半系数为0.644～0.793，重测系数在0.819～0.892之间。安全忽视、交流忽视、躯体忽视、情感忽视各个层面的各条目的负荷均在0.30以上。验证性因素分析显示：卡方值与自由度的比值为1.766，拟合优度指数为0.917，Tucker-Lewis指数为0.916，近似误差均方根为0.047。该量表能有效地证明儿童被忽视的程度与父母养育方式存在明显的相关性。结论：儿童被忽视量表条目区分度符合测量学要求，具有较为理想的信度、效度。

【关键词】儿童被忽视量表编制信度效度横断面调查

Child Neglect Scale: Development, Reliability and Validity

Yang Shi-chang,Du Ai-ling Zhang Ya-lin et al.

(1.Mental Health Institute，Xiang-ya Second Hospital，Center South University，Chang-sha，410011，P. R. China;2.The second teaching hospital of Xin-xiang medical college, Xin-xiang 453003 , P.R China) 【Abstract】Objective: To develop a new scale as an assessment instrument for assessing the neglected status of child. To examine the reliability and validity of the child neglect scale (CNS).Methods: Considering the cultural background of China, an item pool was established through revising items in correlative literatures and scales. Then, the first draft of the CNS was developed by reserving effective items which were graded by interrelated experts. The sample consisted of 902 students of the junior high school and the technology and profession college. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to develop and evaluate the structure of the scale. Results: The results of reliability were as follows: the cronbach’s Alpha reliability of the whole child neglect scale was 0.785-0.848, and the split-half reliability was0.644-0.810, and the test-retest reliability was 0.819-0.897. The results of validity were as follows: the item loadings of the neglect scale over 0.30. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the ratio of Chi-square to degrees of freedom was 1.766, the goodness of fit index was 0.917, the Tucker-Lewis index was 0.916, and the root mean square error of approximation was 0.047. Criterion-related validity studies showed that the scores of the CNS were significantly correlative with the rearing styles of their parents as well. Conclusion: The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity of the CNS entirely accorded with psychometric demands.

Key Words:child neglect scale development reliability validity cross-sectional survey

*项目资助: CMB（美国纽约中华医学基金会）资助项目(项目编号: 01-749)

①中南大学湘雅二医院精神卫生研究所, 长沙 410011;②新乡医学院第二附属医院, 453002;③国防科学技术大学人文社科学院长沙410074 ④湘潭市卫生学校心理学教研室湘潭411100