关于我国反垄断争议的可仲裁性

论我国反垄断争议的可仲裁性中文摘要

论我国反垄断争议的可仲裁性

中文摘要

仲裁制度产生于中世纪，经过了上千年的发展，已经逐步完善，成为与诉讼比肩而立的争议解决方法。在处理跨国商事纠纷中，与诉讼相比，仲裁制度有许多优势。但是，传统理论一般认为，反垄断争议具有强烈的公法性质，因而不具有可仲裁性，各国普遍将反垄断争议提交法院进行司法判决。

近年来，随着国际商事仲裁制度的飞速发展，各国对反垄断争议可仲裁性的态度发生了变化，从一开始的完全否定到逐渐承认，如三菱汽车公司案中美国肯定了反垄断争议的可仲裁性，欧盟的相关司法实践也在一定程度上以间接的方式承认反垄断争议的可仲裁性。但是，我国对反垄断争议可仲裁性的态度却一直模糊不定，这既不符合国际商事仲裁制度的发展趋势，也不利于我国仲裁制度与世界接轨。仲裁解决反垄断争议不仅可以减轻法院和反垄断执法机构的沉重负担、防止反垄断执法机构渎职腐败，对我国对外贸易的发展也具有十分重要的意义，因此确认反垄断争议可仲裁性是大势所趋。我国是典型的成文法国家，不能以判例形式确定反垄断争议的可仲裁性，所以需要完善相关法规，扩大可仲裁事项的范围，在法律中明文规定反垄断争议的仲裁解决机制。域外仲裁解决反垄断争议的立法与相关司法实践可以给我国建立反垄断争议仲裁解决机制提供参考性的范例。

仲裁是一种民间性质的纠纷解决方式，但是不能完全游离于国家权力之外，法院对仲裁解决反垄断争议的监督是非常必要的。因此，我国有必要完善反垄断争议司法监督制度，以此为基础建立一套符合我国国情的反垄断争议仲裁解决机制。

关键词：反垄断争议，可仲裁性，国际商事仲裁

作者：夏敏华

指导老师：张利民

英文摘要论我国反垄断争议的可仲裁性

Study on China’s Antitrust Dispute Arbitrability

Abstract

Arbitration system occurred in the Middle Ages.It had has been gradually improved through thousand years'development,becoming a standing shoulder to shoulder dispute resolution method with the litigation.In dealing with international commercial disputes, compared with litigation,arbitration system has many advantages.However,for traditional theory,it is generally believed that antitrust dispute has a strong character of public law, and therefore is not arbitrable.Countries usually submit antitrust disputes to the court for a judicial decision.

In recent years,with the rapid development of international commercial arbitration system,attitude of countries has changed for antitrust dispute arbitration,from the beginning of a complete denial to gradually admission.For example,during the trial of “Mitsubishi Motors Corp”,the United States affirmed that antitrust disputes were arbitrable,and the European Union to some extent also indirectly recognize antitrust dispute arbitrability through some relevant judicial practices.However,China's attitude of antitrust dispute arbitrability has been vague and uncertain,which neither accords with the development trend of international commercial system nor is in favour of China’s arbitration system with international ing arbitration to resolve antitrust disputes can not only reduce the burden of courts and antitrust enforcement agencies and prevent malfeasance and corruption of anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies,but is of great importance to the development of China's foreign trade.Therefore,the trend of antitrust dispute arbitrability is irreversible.As a typical statute law country,China cannot confirm antitrust dispute arbitrability by means of cases,but need to improve relevant laws and regulations and expands the scope of arbitrable issues and expressly regulates an arbitration settlement mechanism of antitrust dispute.Extraterritorial legislation of antitrust disputes arbitrability and relevant judicial practices can provide references for setting up China’s antitrust dispute arbitration mechanism.

Arbitration is a nongovernmental dispute resolution,but cannot completely be involved in the state power.It is very necessary for the court to supervise antitrust disputes