不同大强度间歇训练对公路自行车优秀运动员最大摄氧量和输出功率的影响

对公路自行车优秀运动员的训练效果更佳。
关键词：冲刺间歇训练；高强度间歇训练；公路自行车；最大摄氧量；输出功率
中图分类号：G 808.1
学科代码:040303
文献标识码：A
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two different interval training modalities on
Training duration was 3 weeks. A graded exercise test was administered pre-and post-training. Work output,
oxygen uptake, minute pulmonary ventilation, heart rate and stroke volume were determined during the test.
maximal oxygen uptake and work output of elite road cyclists. Methods: Participants of 15 well-trained road
cyclists were divided into three groups. The first group (Group S) was trained using sprint interval training with
DOI:10.14036/11-4513.2019.05.012
首都体育学院学报
第4438～1 卷453
不同大强度间歇训练对公路自行车优秀运动员最大摄氧量和输出功率的
影响 Effects of Different Intensive Intermittent Training on Maximum Oxygen Uptake and Output Power of Elite Road Cyclists
Results: After 3 weeks, S group Pmax, V O2max, V O2max /kg, V E, HRmax, SV were significantly improved (P<0.05), the H group only V O2max /kg had significant improvement (P<0.05). The index increment (驻) of S group was significantly higher than that in Group H and Group C, the S group 驻V E, 驻HRmax, 驻V O2max and 驻V O2max /kg showed significant difference compared with Group H (P<0.05). and the S group compared with Group C, V O2max showed extremely significant difference (P<0.01), V O2max/kg, 驻V Eand 驻HRmax all showed significant differences (P<0.05). The 驻Pmax, V O2max/kg and 驻V E of H were slightly larger than Group C, but not statistically significant (P ＞0.05). There was a significant decrease in HRmean and BLA end in group S, and there was a significant difference (P<0.05), and the HRmean and BLA end in Group H decreased, but there was no statistically significant (P＞0.05). In the same stage before and after training, s group HRmean and BlA end were significantly higher than Group H, and showed very significant difference (P<0.01). Conclusions: 3 weeks training with SIT combined
为对照组，进行传统耐力性训练；训练持续 3 周，S 组和 H 组共进行 SIT 和 HIIT 训练 6 次。采用训练后
即刻血乳酸（BLA end）和训练过程平均心率（HRmean）监控训练负荷强度；训练前后进行递增负荷测试，测 试指标包括最大有氧输出功率（Pmax）、最大摄氧量绝对值（V O2max）、最大摄氧量相对值（V O2max/kg）、每分 通气量（V E）和最大心率（HRmax），并通过公式计算每搏输出量（SV）。结果：1）3 周训练后，S 组运动员 Pmax、V O2max、V O2max/kg、V E、HRmax、SV 均显著提高（P<0.05）；H 组仅有 V O2max/kg 有显著性提高（P<0.05）；C 组各项指标无明显变化。2）S 组各项指标增量（驻）明显高于 H 组和 C 组。S 组 驻VE、驻HRmax、驻V O2max、 驻V O2max/kg 较 H 组呈显著性差异 （P<0.05）。S 组与 C 组比较，V O2max 呈现极其显著性差异 （P<0.01）， V O2max/kg、驻V E、驻HRmax 均呈现显著性差异（P<0.05）。3）3 周训练后，S 组 HRmean 与 BLA end 均明显下降，且 呈现显著性差异（P<0.05）。训练前后相同阶段 S 组 HRmean 与 BLA end 均显著高于 H 组，且存在非常显著 性差异（P<0.01）。结论：相比 HIIT 结合耐力训练和传统耐力训练，3 周 SIT 结合耐力训练的训练计划
屈成刚，唐一丹 QU Chenggang, ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱANG Yidan
448
摘 要：比较 2 种大强度间歇训练对公路自行车优秀运动员最大摄氧量和输出功率的影响。方法：将
15 名云南省公路自行车优秀男子运动员随机分为 3 组，第 1 组（S 组）采用冲刺间歇训练结合耐力训
练（SIT+耐力训练），第 2 组（H 组）采用高强度间歇训练结合耐力训练（HIIT+耐力训练），第 3 组（C 组）
endurance training; the second group (Group H) was trained using high intensity interval training with
endurance training; the third group (Group C) was the control group, which used traditional endurance training.