时滞马尔科夫跳变系统的分析与综合研究综述

时滞马尔科夫跳变系统的分析与综合研究综述
张保勇;夏卫锋;李永民
【摘要】The study of Markovian jump systems (MJSs)is an important and hot research branch in the control and system area.Over the past 20 years,the analysis and synthesis problems for delayed MJSs have been extensively studied.A great many of important methods and valuable results have been proposed in the literature.The general idea of Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional approach to stability analysis was briefly introduced.Then, the studies of stability analysis,feedback stabilization,and control and filtering with disturbance attenuation performances for different kinds of delayed MJSs were reviewed. Some future possible research topics were also introduced at the end of this paper.%马尔科夫跳变系统研究是控制与系统领域的重点和热点方向.过去20年来,时滞马尔科夫跳变系统的分析与综合问题得到了广泛研究,提出了许多重要的方法,得到了很多有价值的结论.简要介绍稳定性分析的 Lyapunov-Krasovskii泛函方法的一般思想,然后针对不同的时滞马尔科夫跳变系统,概述稳定性分析、反馈镇定以及基于干扰抑制性能指标的控制和滤波的研究现状,最后给出未来可能的研究方向.
【期刊名称】《安徽大学学报（自然科学版）》
【年(卷),期】2018(042)002
【总页数】16页(P3-17,12)
【关键词】马尔科夫跳变系统;时滞系统;Lyapunov-Krasovskii泛函方法;鲁棒控制;鲁棒滤波
【作者】张保勇;夏卫锋;李永民
【作者单位】南京理工大学自动化学院,江苏南京210094;南京理工大学自动化学院,江苏南京210094;湖州师范学院理学院,浙江湖州313000
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】O151
0 Introduction
In a great many of practical systems, such as mechanical systems, electric power systems, flight control systems and networked control systems, there may exist sudden environment changes, random failures and repairs[1-2]. These phenomena make the system structures or parameters changing randomly. Thus, the systems can be modeled as randomly switched systems, where the switching law is described by a finite Markov chain. In references, this class of systems is referred to systems with Markovian/random switching, systems with Markovian jumping parameters (MJPs) and Markovian jump systems (MJSs). Over the past 50 years, the MJSs have been extensively studied and numerous results have been reported. The readers are referred to Refs.[1-8] for fundamental theory and recent developments on MJSs.
On the other hand, time delays are unavoidable when designing control
systems. More importantly, time delays are always the cause of instability and poor performance of control systems. For these reasons, time-delay systems have received considerable attention; see, Refs.[9-14] and the references therein. The study of delayed MJSs started in the middle of 1990s and has made a great progress in the past 20 years.
The pioneer research on linear delayed MJSs was carried out in the late five years of 1990s by Benjelloun and Boukas, who investigated a series of problems on stochastic stabili ty, robust stabilization and H∞ controller design[15-19]. Almost at the same time, Shaikhet studied the asymptotic mean-square stability for a class of stochastic hereditary systems with MJPs and constant delays[20]. In 1999, Cao and Lam addressed the discrete-time MJSs with delays [21]. In 2000, Mao and his collaborators introduced a class of stochastic differential delay equations (SDDEs) with MJPs[22]. Since then, Mao has devoted his research efforts greatly to the analysis of nonlinear delayed MJSs described by SDDEs[2, 23-28]. In 2003, the neutral stochastic differential delay equations with MJPs were introduced by Kolmanovskii[29], which can be regarded as a general expression of the delayed MJSs. The stability of delayed neural networks with MJPs was primarily studied in Refs.[30-31]. In 2005, the study of delayed normal MJSs was extended to the case of singular systems[32-33]. Up to date, the study of delayed MJSs has become an important and hot research branch in the control and system area. A great number of results and methods have been developed in the literature. As more and more researchers, especially PhD and master students, are choosing the delayed
MJSs as their research topics, it is necessary to provide a survey on the analysis and synthesis of delayed MJSs. However, it is impossible to include all the results on delayed MJSs in a single paper. Thus, the emphasis of this paper will be given on the study of stability analysis, feedback stabilization, and control and filtering with disturbance attenuation performances for continuous-time time-delay systems with MJPs. It is worth mentioning that the notations in the mathematical expressions in the context of this paper can be found in every paper related to the delayed MJSs, and thus their explanations are omitted in this paper.
1 Stability
Stability is the prerequisite for designing automatic control systems. Thus, the stability analysis is a fundamental problem in the study of delayed MJSs. In the literature, there are a few of different descriptions of stability concepts for delayed MJSs, among which the stochastic stability[15-18], asymptotic mean-square stability[19-20] and exponential mean-square stability[34-35] have been largely used. It is now known that the Lyapunov-Krasovskii (L-K) functional approach is a powerful tool for analyzing the stability of delayed MJSs. Therefore, in the following we briefly introduce the L-K functional approach.
1.1 Mode-dependent L-K functional approach
In general, the L-K functional approach to stability analysis of delayed MJSs contains two steps. The first step is to construct an appropriate L-K functional V(xt,rt,t). It should be pointed out that the functional must be dependent on the system mode rt, otherwise there is no difference
between the stability analysis of the delayed MJSs and that of deterministic time-delay systems. Therefore, the mode-dependence is the main characteristic of the L-K functional approach for delayed MJSs. The second step of the approach is to compute the weak infinitesimal generator of V(xt,rt,t) when rt=i, which is defined by[2,16,34]
(1)
If we can find conditions that ensure the negative definiteness of the generator defined in (1), then the stability defined in the stochastic and mean-square manner could be guaranteed.
The structure of the mode-dependent L-K functional plays a key role in the conservatism reduction of stability conditions for delayed MJSs. For ease of understanding, it is better for us to start from a simple but important class of retarded-type linear systems, which are described by
(2)
where τ>0 denotes the time delay that can be either constant or time-varying; the mode rt is a right-continuous Markov chain on a probability space taking values in a finite state space S={1,2,…,s}. The definition of transition probability of the modes can be found in every reference related to delayed MJSs, and thus it is omitted here.
For system (2), the simplest mode-dependent L-K functional is of the following form[15-18, 36]
V(x,t,rt)=xT(t)P(rt)x(t)+xT(σ)Qx(σ)dσ,
(3)
where P(rt) and Q are positive-definite matrices. This functional can lead to delay-independent stability conditions, which are quite conservative, especially when the delay is small. In order to reduce the conservatism, it is generally necessary to develop delay-dependent stability conditions. In general, the L-K functional used for developing delay-dependent stability conditions consists of three parts: non-integral terms, single-integral terms and double-integral terms. For system (2), an efficient L-K functional is of the following form[37]
(4)
It is obvious that the integral terms in (4) are independent from the system mode. The mode-independence of the integral terms is a main cause of the conservatism in the corresponding stability conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to make the matrices Q and Z depending on the system mode. By observing this fact, the following mode-dependent L-K functional was constructed in Ref.[38] for system (1) with time-varying delay
V(x,t,rt)=xT(t)P(rt)x(t)+xT(σ)Q(rt)x(σ)dσ+
(5)
In this functional, not only the non-integral term but also the single-integral term are dependent on the system mode. If the last double integral term in (5) is further required to be dependent on the system mode, the following L-K functional is utilizable[39-42]
V(x,t,rt)=xT(t)P(rt)x(t)+xT(σ)Q(rt)x(σ)dσ+
(6)
Clearly, this functional is strongly dependent on the system mode, and thus it has particular efficiency for reducing the conservatism of delay-dependent stability conditions. The advantage of functional (6) in the stability and performance analysis of linear delayed MJSs has been discussed in Refs.[40-42].
In the above, we provide a general idea to construct strongly mode-dependent L-K functionals for system (2). This idea has not been fully applied in the study of complicated MJSs, and thus the idea is expected to get more applications in the future. Next, in the context of L-K functional approach, we will briefly review the recent studies on the stability analysis problem for different kinds of delayed MJSs.
1.2 Stability analysis of linear time-delay systems with MJPs
The delay-independent stability problem for linear time-delay systems with MJPs was primarily studied in Refs.[15-17] based on the L-K functional in (3). The conditions obtained in Refs.[15-17] are expressed in terms of algebraic matrix equations. The functional (3) was also employed in Refs.[18, 36] to derive LMI-based stability conditions. In Ref.[43], the delay-dependent stability analysis for system (2) was firstly studied based on an L-K functional containing one mode-dependent non-integral term and two mode-independent double integrals. Another version of delay-dependent
conditions for system (2) was obtained in Ref.[44], where the Newton-Leibniz formula was applied. In Refs.[37, 45-48], the free-weighting matrix method was applied to derive less conservative stability conditions. Some of these results were further improved in Refs.[38, 49-50] by using the L-K functionals similar to (5). Delay-dependent stability conditions based on the L-K functional (6) were given in Refs.[39-42]. Delay-partitioning techniques were applied in Refs.[51-54] to analyze the stability of system
(2).
A system is called to be neutral if the differential of the system state involves delays. The stability problem for neutral systems with MJPs has been also studied. For example, the stochastic stability analysis for linear neutral MJSs with multiple constant delays was tackled in Ref.[55], where delay-independent conditions were presented. Different versions of delay-dependent stability conditions for linear neutral MJSs with time-varying delays were obtained in Refs.[56-59]. When the transition probability is partially unknown, the stability of neutral MJSs has been analyzed in Refs.[60-61].
1.3 Stability analysis of stochastic time-delay systems with MJPs
In many of works on delayed MJSs, the Brownian motions are involved in the system model. Such systems are called stochastic time-delay systems with MJPs, which are described by It-type delay differential equations. The fundamental theory of general stochastic time-delay systems with MJPs can be found in Mao’s book[2] and the recent journal papers[23-28]. The exponential mean-square stability for linear stochastic systems with MJPs,
constant delays and interval uncertainties was studied in Ref.[34], where a rigorous discussion on the L-K functional with mode-dependent integrals was provided. The delay-dependent conditions for robust stability of stochastic time-delay systems with MJPs and norm-bounded uncertainties were developed in Refs.[62-63]. In Refs.[64-65], the nonlinear uncertainties were taken into account in the stochastic delayed MJSs and delay-dependent conditions of exponential mean-square stability were obtained. The neutral-type stochastic systems with MJPs were investigated in Refs.[66-68], where delay-dependent stability conditions were obtained by using different techniques.
1.4 Stability analysis of delayed neural networks with MJPs
In recent years, the artificial neural networks with time delays and MJPs have been largely studied. It is known that the artificial neural networks are described in mathematics as nonlinear systems with the nonlinear terms satisfying certain bounding conditions. By making the use of the bounding conditions in the stability analysis procedure, LMI-based conditions can be always obtained. For this reason, most of the techniques in the stability study of linear time-delay systems with or without MJPs have been generalized to delay neural networks with MJPs.
For recurrent neural networks with MJPs and time delays, the delay-independent stability conditions were obtained in Refs.[31, 69], while the delay-dependent stability conditions were presented in Refs.[70-75]. The delay-dependent stability problem for delayed Cohen-Grossberg neural networks with MJPs was investigated in Refs.[76-78]. The stochastic
stability problem for delayed BAM neural networks with MJPs was considered in Refs.[79-81]. The Markovian genetic regulatory networks were studied in Refs.[82-84]. Delay-dependent stability results for neutral-type neural networks with MJPs have been also reported; see, for example, Refs.[85-88] and the references therein.
2 Stabilization
In general, the stabilization problem is formulated as designing feedback controllers such that the resulting closed-loop system is stable. When the system states are fully available, the state-feedback controllers are desirable. Otherwise, if the system states are not fully available, then the output-feedback controllers need to be designed by using measured output of the original system. It should be pointed out that, for delayed MJSs, particular attention has been paid to the design of mode-dependent controllers. In the following, we are going to survey some recent studies on the stabilization problem for different delayed MJSs.
The robust stabilization problem for linear MJSs with constant delays was addressed in the pioneer works [15-16], where two kinds of state-feedback controllers, namely linear-type controller and saturation-type controller, were designed. It is noted that the controllers in Refs.[15-16] were designed based on a constructive method. The exponential stabilization using state-feedback controllers for linear MJSs with constant delays was investigated in Refs.[47, 54, 89], where delay-dependent conditions were obtained in terms of LMIs. It is worth mentioning that the conditions obtained in Refs.[47, 54, 89] are dependent not only on the delay size but
also on the decay rate of the exponential stability. When the delays depend on the system mode, the delay-independent and delay-dependent conditions for solving the state-feedback stabilization problems have been given in Refs.[50, 90-91], respectively. The memory state-feedback controller using delayed states was designed in Ref.[52] for linear delayed MJSs. When the system states are not fully available, the output-feedback stabilization problem has been considered in Refs.[45, 92-94] for different kinds of delayed MJSs. In Refs. [95-96], the finite-time stabilization problem was considered for MJSs with constant and time-varying delays, respectively. In Refs.[97-99], the stabilization of delayed MJSs was studied by using sliding-mode control approach. When the transition rates are partially unknown, the stabilization problems have been addressed in Refs.[100-102].
For It-type stochastic systems with time delays and MJPs, there have been a number of results on the stabilization problem. For example, the exponential stabilization problem for a class of stochastic time-delay systems with MJPs was studied in Ref.[103], where both the discrete and distributed mode-dependent delays were considered. The stabilization of stochastic time-delay systems with MJPs and nonlinear uncertainties was investigated in Refs.[104-105]. The robust finite-time stabilization of stochastic MJSs with time-varying delays was addressed in Ref.[106]. The stabilization of neutral-type stochastic systems with MJPs was studied in Refs.[67, 107]. The delayed controllers for stochastic time-delay systems with MJPs were designed in Refs.[108-109].
3 Control and filtering with disturbance attenuation performances
In this section, we are going to review the control and filtering problems for delayed MJSs with external disturbances. These problems are always formulated based on the disturbance attenuation performances such as
H∞ performance, L2-L∞ performance, passivity and dissipativity. Hence, in the following we first give the descriptions of these performances.
3.1 Disturbance attenuation performances
For a dela yed MJS, suppose that z(t) denotes the output and ω(t) denotes the external disturbance. The disturbance ω(t) is assumed to be deterministic and square-integrable; that is, ωT(t)ω(t)dt<∞. The disturbances satisfying this assumption are said to be energy-bounded. This is a standard assumption for investigating the disturbance attenuation performances.
An MJS is said to have an H∞ performance level γ if the following inequality holds[18, 36, 38]
(7)
An MJS is said to have an L2-L∞ performance level γ if the following inequality holds [110-111]
(8)
An MJS is said to be passive if the following inequality holds for all terminal time tp≥0[112]
(9)
An MJS is said to be (Q,S,R)-dissipative if the following inequality holds for some scalar α>0 and for all terminal time tp≥0[113]
(10)
where Q,S,R are prescribed weighting matrices.
It is easy to find that, when the weighting matrices Q,S,R are chosen as special values, the dissipative performance defined by (10) covers the passivity and H∞ performance as special ca ses. However, the L2-L∞ performance cannot be covered by the dissipativity. Regarding this, the so-called extended dissipativity is introduced in Ref.[42]. Specifically, an MJS is said to be extended dissipative if there exists a scalar ρ such that the
fol lowing inequality holds for all terminal time tp≥0
(11)
where Ψ1≤0 is a semi-negative definite matrix, Ψ3≥0 and Φ≥0 are semi-positive definite matrices, and these matrices satisfy (‖Ψ1‖+‖Ψ2‖)‖Φ‖=0. It is worth noting that (11) reduces to (10) when Φ=0, Ψ1=Q, Ψ2=S, Ψ3=R-αI and ρ=0. The inequality (11) also reduces to (8) when Φ=I, Ψ1=0, Ψ2=0, Ψ3=γ2I and ρ=0. Therefore, the extended dissipative performance defined by(11) is quite general since it covers the (Q,S,R)-dissipative performance and the L2-L∞ perfo rmance. More discussions on the definition and efficiency of the extended dissipative performance can be found in Ref.[42].
3.2 Control with disturbance attenuation performances
For delayed MJSs with energy-bounded external disturbances, it is necessary to design state-feedback and output-feedback controllers ensuring both the stability and the disturbance attenuation performances of the resulting closed-loop systems. It seems that the H∞ control problem for delayed linear MJSs was first studied independently in Refs.[18, 36, 114], where state-feedback controllers were designed based on the LMI approach. These results were then improved by using different methods; see, for example, Refs.[37-38, 44, 46, 115]. The H∞ control problem for MJSs with mode-dependent delays was studied in Refs.[116-117]. The H∞ control problem for neutral type MJSs was addressed in Refs.[55-56, 107]. The H∞ control problem for stochastic time-delay systems with MJPs was investigated in Refs.[105, 118-119].
The L2-L∞ control problem f or stochastic systems with time delays and MJPs was studied in Ref.[120]. By taking the passivity into account for
time-delay systems with MJPs, the state-feedback controller design problem was considered in Refs.[121-122], while the output-feedback controllers were designed in Refs.[123-124]. It is also noted that the dissipative control problems for delayed MJSs have been addressed in Refs.[125-126].
3.3 Filtering with disturbance attenuation performances
The H∞ filtering problem has been extensively stud ied for delayed MJSs. For example, The H∞ filtering problem for MJSs with time-varying delays was investigated in Refs.[38, 41, 127-129]. For MJSs with mode-dependent delays, the H∞ filtering problem was studied in Refs.[35, 130]. In context of
stochastic time-delay systems with MJPs, the H∞ filtering problems were studied in Refs.[131-136]. It should be noted that reduced-order H∞ filters for delayed MJSs were designed in Refs.[137-138].
The L2-L∞ filtering problems for retarded and neutral MJSs with time-varying delays were investigated in Refs.[111,139], respectively, where the transition probabilities are assumed to be partially unknown. The exponential L2-L∞ filtering for linear MJSs with distributed delays was studied in Ref.[140] by applying the delay partitioning techniques. The decentralized L2-L∞ filtering problem for a class of interconnected MJSs with constant delays was addressed in Ref.[141]. The exponential L2-L∞ filtering problem for stochastic MJSs with mixed mode-dependent delays was considered in Ref.[142]. For delayed MJSs with nonlinear uncertainties, the L2-L∞ filtering problem was studied in Ref.[143].
In Ref.[42], the filter design problem for linear MJSs with time-varying delays was studied by considering the extended dissipative performance defined by (11). In that work, both mode-dependent and mode-independent filters were designed, and the delay-dependent conditions were given in terms of LMIs. It is noted that the results obtained in Ref.[42] are valid for designing H∞ filters, L2-L∞ filers, passivity-based filters and dissipative filters, respectively. Therefore, the Ref.[42] provides a unified framework for designing filters with different disturbance attenuation performances. The method developed in Ref.[42] is not limited to the filtering problem of delayed MJSs. Actually, the method has been applied in a number of works on different kinds of systems; see, for example,
Refs.[144-148].
4 Conclusions
This paper has surveyed the studies of time-delay systems with MJPs. Since there are many subjects in the research of delayed MJSs, we cannot cover all of them. Thus, our emphasis has been mainly given on the problems of stability analysis, feedback stabilization, robust control and filtering for continuous-time systems. The study of discrete-time systems is not included in this paper. In addition, for delayed neural networks with MJPs, the stability analysis has been reviewed briefly, but the estimation and synchronization problems have not been mentioned, which have also received lots of attention recently. Therefore, this paper only includes a very small amount of references on the delayed MJSs. The readers are encouraged to pay attention to the follow-up researches based on the references provided in this paper.
Although the delay-dependent stability of delayed MJSs has been extensively studied, the results reported in the literature are still conservative to some extent, because they are only sufficient but not necessary. It is of interest to further reduce the conservatism of the stability results. For this purpose, the relaxed L-K functional approach[149-150] and complicated integral inequality techniques[151-153] may be applicable. It is also important research topics that apply the stability conditions derived by using recently developed techniques to control and filtering synthesis.
Recently, a particular attention has been paid to the semi-Markov jump
systems and hidden Markov jump systems; see, for example, Refs.[154-157] and the references therein. In semi-Markov jump systems, the transition rates (or probabilities) are no longer constant, because at each time they involve the past information of elapsed jumping sequences[154-155]. In the design of hidden Markov jump systems, the modes of the original system are not available for controllers. In this case, an estimator (called detector in Refs.[156-157]) needs to be introduced to estimate the system mode. Therefore, the mode estimator and feedback controllers should be designed simultaneously for hidden Markov jump systems. It is obvious that the semi and hidden Markov jump systems generalize the traditional MJSs. However, when time delays are taken into account in the two kinds of generalized systems, the control and filtering problems have not been fully investigated, which is an interesting research topic in the future. References:
[1] MARITON M. Jump linear systems in automatic control[M]. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1990.
[2] MAO X, YUAN C. Stochastic differential equations with Markovian switching[M]. London: Imperial College Press, 2006.
[3] BOUKAS E K. Control of singular systems with random abrupt changes[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2008.
[4] COSTA O L V, FRAGOSO M D, TODOROV M G. Continuous-time Markovian jump linear systems[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2013.
[5] ZHANG L, YANG T, SHI P, et al. Analysis and design of Markov jump systems with complex transition probabilities[M]. Switzerland: Springer,
2016.
[6] MAHMOUDM S, SHI P. Methodologies for control of jump time-delay systems[M]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
[7] HE S, SHEN H. Finite short time control and synthesis for stochastic Marov jump systems[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2018 (in Chinese).
[8] SHI P, LI F. A survey on Markovian jump systems: modeling and design[J]. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 2015, 13 (1): 1-16.
[9] GU K, KHARITONOV V L, CHEN J. Stability of time-delay systems[M]. Boston: Birkhauser, 2003.
[10] KHARITONOV V L. Time-delay systems[M]. New York: Springer, 2013.
[11] FRIDMAN E. Introduction to time-delay systems: analysis and
control[M]. Switzerland: Springer, 2014.
[12] WU M, HE Y, SHE J H. Stability analysis and robust control of time-delay systems[M]. New York: Springer, 2010 (in Chinese).
[13] RICHARD J P. Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems[J]. Automatica, 2003, 39: 1667-1694. [14] XU S, LAM J. A survey of linear matrix inequality techniques in stability analysis of delay systems[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2008, 39 (12): 1095-1113.
[15] BENJELLOUN K, BOUKAS E K, YANG H. Robust stabilizability of uncertain linear time delay systems with Markovian jumping
parameters[C]//Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Washington, 1995: 330-334.
[16] BENJELLOUN K, BOUKAS E K, YANG H. Robust stabilizability of uncertain linear time-delay systems with Markovian jumping parameters[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1996, 118: 776-783.
[17] BENJELLOUN K, BOUKAS E K. Stochastic stability of linear time-delay system with Markovian jumping parameters[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1997, 3: 187-201.
[18] BENJELLOUN K, BOUKAS EK, COSTA L V. H∞ control for linear time-delay systems with Markovian jumping parameters[J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2000, 105 (1): 73-95.
[19] BENJELLOUN K, BOUKAS E K. Mean square stochastic stability of linear time-delay system with Markovian jumping parameters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1998, 43 (10): 1456-1460.
[20] SHAIKHET L. Stability of stochastic hereditary systems with Markov switching[J]. Theory of Stochastic Processes, 1996, 2 (18): 180-184. [21] CAO Y Y, LAM J. Stochastic stabilizability and H∞ control for discrete-time jump linear systems with time delay[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 1999, 336: 1263-1281.
[22] MAO X, MATASOV A, PIUNOVSKIY A B. Stochastic differential delay equations with Markovian switching[J]. Bernoulli, 2000, 6 (1): 73-90. [23] MAO X. Robustness of stability of stochastic differential delay equations with Markovian switching[J]. Stability and Control: Theory and Applications, 2000, 3 (1): 48-61.
[24] MAO X, SHAIKHET L. Delay-dependent stability criteria for stochastic
differential delay equations with Markovian switching[J]. Stability and Control: Theory and Applications, 2000, 3 (2): 87-101.
[25] YUAN C, ZOU J, MAO X. Stability in distribution of stochastic differential delay equations with Markovian switching[J]. Systems & Control Letters, 2003, 50: 195-207.
[26] YUAN C, MAO X. Robust stability and controllability of stochastic differential delay equations with Markovian switching[J]. Automatica, 2004, 40: 343-354.
[27] HUANG L, MAO X. On input-to-state stability of stochastic retarded systems with Markovian switching[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2009, 54 (8): 1898-1902.
[28] FENG L, LI S, MAO X. Asymptotic stability and boundedness of stochastic functional differential equations with Markovian switching[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2016, 353 (18): 4924-4949.
[29] KOLMANOVSKII V, KOROLEVA N, MAIZENBERG T, et al. Neutral stochastic differential delay equations with Markovian switching[J]. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 2003, 21 (4): 839-867.
[30] XIE L. Stochastic robust stability analysis for discrete-time neural networks with Markovian jumping parameters and time
delays[C]//Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Korea, 2004: 1743-1748.
[31] XIE L. Stochastic robust stability analysis for Markovian jumping neural networks with time delays[C]// Proceedings of 2005 Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Tucson, USA, 2005: 923-928.。