2014 美国老年急诊指南

合集下载

美国成人高血压指南(JNC)概述

美国成人高血压指南(JNC)概述

2014美国成人高血压指南(JNC8)概述美国JNC8委员会于2013年12月发布了2014美国高血压管理指南,12月17日晚北京阜外心血管病医院心内科张宇清教授率先通过微信发布这一消息,指南“全文14页,45篇文献;回答了3个问题,做了9个推荐。

”【新指南内容简介】(1)60岁以上人群的目标血压为150/90mmHg,60岁以下人群目标值为140/90mmHg,包括糖尿病和肾脏病患者。

(2)噻嗪类利尿剂、CCB、ACEI和ARB四大类药物作为初始治疗药物(一线治疗药物,黑人仅利尿剂与CCB),可单独或联合使用;β受体阻滞剂退出一线,降至四线,与螺内酯同等地位。

(3)新指南强调了达标和维持目标(长期达标)[The main objective of hypertension treatment is toattain and maintain goal BP]。

(4)新指南不是那么强烈推荐起始联合了[Some committee members recommend],而是“起始单药再单药加量”、“起始单药再加第二种”、“起始两种联合”三种策略都可以。

(5)肾病患者首选RAS阻断剂;糖尿病患者没有优先推荐RAS阻断剂,而是四种都可以;CCB减少卒中优于ACEI(中国的主要问题是卒中)。

【新指南的变化】河北省人民医院的郭艺芳教授对备受关注的2014年美国高血压治疗指南与旧版指南(JNC7)进行了相比(见图1),新指南的主要变化包括以下几个方面:1.降压治疗目标值在JNC7指南中,分别为无合并症的高血压患者(目标血压<140/90mmHg)与糖尿病和慢性肾病等心血管高危人群(目标血压<130/80 mmHg)推荐了不同的目标值。

但JNC8指南认为,旧版指南中的上述建议缺乏充分依据,为心血管风险水平增高的高血压患者进行更为严格的血压控制可能不会使患者更多获益。

JNC7指南中建议将老年高血压患者控制在<140/90 mmHg同样存在此问题。

2014美国高血压JNC,答疑(5篇可选)

2014美国高血压JNC,答疑(5篇可选)

2014美国高血压JNC,答疑(5篇可选)第一篇:2014美国高血压JNC,答疑2014年美国成人高血压治疗指南美国预防、检测、评估与治疗高血压联合委员会第八次报告(简称JNC 8)于近日在JAMA杂志发表,正式颁布了2014年美国成人高血压治疗指南(2014 Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults),新指南建立了高血压治疗的临床证据条款和推荐,包含九条新推荐和一项高血压患者治疗流程图来帮助医师治疗高血压患者,以满足更多高血压医务工作者的需要,强调使用最佳的临床证据资料与改善患者临床预后为目标。

与JNC7相比,新指南的证据级别更高。

JNC8新指南的证据均来自于随机对照(RCT)研究,所有证据级别和推荐均根据临床研究对于人体健康的影响程度进行了评估。

美国JNC8新指南的制定对于提高高血压医师诊疗效果、改善高血压患者健康具有极其重要意义。

美国JNC8新指南主要有九条新推荐和三个常见临床问题解答。

临床问题解答如下:(1)、高血压患者开始治疗的时间点。

专家组对需要开始治疗的血压水平进行明确。

指南推荐,60岁以上老年人,血压达到150/90 mm Hg即应开始降压治疗。

但新指南规定的这一血压界值并不是重新定义高血压。

血压处于这一范围的人群,均应通过生活方式进行干预。

(2)、降压目标值。

60岁以上老年高血压患者的高血压治疗目标值应为 150/90 mm Hg;30-59岁高血压患者舒张压应低于90mmHg;30岁以下高血压患者治疗目标应低于140/90 mm Hg。

此外,对于60岁以下高血压合并糖尿病或非糖尿病性慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者,指南推荐的治疗目标值和60岁以下普通高血压人群一致。

(3)、高血压治疗起始用药。

对于非黑人的高血压群体(包括合并糖尿病的高血压患者),指南推荐起始用药包括ACEI、ARB、CCB及噻嗪类利尿剂;对于黑人高血压群体(包括合并糖尿病的高血压患者),推荐起始用药为CCB或噻嗪类利尿剂。

2014年美国成人高血压治疗指南(JNC8)要点

2014年美国成人高血压治疗指南(JNC8)要点

赵晓晖,周媛,陈翠荣,等.:1220 - 1221.
蛋白和颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的影响[ J ] . 中 国 基层 医 药,2010 ,
邱晓迪 . 多普勒超声对颈动脉狭窄的诊断价值及阿托伐他汀对动 脉粥样硬化影响的临床观察[ D] . 西安:第四军医大学,2010.
48 146. 37 ʃ 8. 78 128. 24 ʃ 6. 38 97. 23 ʃ 6. 83 82. 36 ʃ 4. 28 2. 16 ʃ 0. 36 1. 73 ʃ 0. 19
阿托伐他汀,高剂量阿托伐他汀能更有效地改善患者血脂、血 压及 IMT,从而减少脂质在血管内皮的沉积,缩小颈动脉硬化 要指标,其数值大小与颈动脉硬化斑块病变严重程度呈正相 显差异,说明小剂量和大剂量阿托伐他汀均在用药安全范围 内,安全可靠。但临床上仍有不少患者由于担心药物的不良反 应而未采用大剂量阿托伐他汀进行治疗,其最佳用药剂量仍需 进一步深入研究。 斑块,延缓颈动脉硬化进程。IMT 是反映颈动脉硬化斑块的重 关。本研究结果还显示,两组治疗期间不良反应发生率间无明
· 52·
31. 25% ( 15 / 48 ) 。两组 患 者 均 为 轻 微 症 状,停 药 后 自 行 恢 复,不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义( P ﹥ 0. 05 ) 。
表2 两组患者治疗前后血压及 IMT 比较( x ʃ s) fore and after treatment 例数 收缩压 ( mm Hg) 治疗前 治疗后 Table 2 组别 观察组 对照组 t值 P值 Comparison of blood pressure and IMT between the two groups be舒张压 ( mm Hg) 治疗前 治疗后 IMT ( mm) 治疗前 治疗后

2014年美国ASA_AHA缺血性卒中二级预防指南解读

2014年美国ASA_AHA缺血性卒中二级预防指南解读
卒中或TIA患者,如有糖尿病,推荐用现有的 指南进行血糖控制和心血管风险因素管理(Ⅰ 类,B级证据)
2013 急性缺血性卒中早期 治疗指南血糖建议:
急性缺血性卒中患者的低血糖(血糖<60 mg/dL) 〔 < 3.3mmol/L〕应该治疗(I 类,证据水平 C) 。以达到正常 血糖为目标 有证据表明,在卒中后最初 24 h 内持续高血糖(> 140mg/dL)〔>7.8mmol/L〕提示结局不良。因此,治疗 高血糖,使血糖水平在 140-180mg/dL (7.8~10.3mmol/L〕 ,并密切监测以避免低血糖,是合理 的(IIa 类,证据水平 C)
绝对的目标血压水平和降低程度不确定,应当个体化,但血压平均 降低大约10/5 mmHg可以获益,JNC-7认为正常血压水平是 < 120/80mmHg(Ⅱa类,B级)
2013 急性缺血性卒中早期 治疗指南血压建议:
1. 对于血压显著增高但不溶栓的患者,合理的目标是在卒 中后最初 24 h 内将血压降低大约15%。血压多高应当 用药尚未可知。但共识是,只有当收缩压>220 mmHg 或舒张压>120mmHg 才使用降压药(I 类,C级) 2. 一项临床试验的证据表明, 在卒中发生后的 24 h 内开 始降压治疗相对安全。 除非有特殊禁忌,以前有高血 压的患者,如神经情况稳定,在发病 24h 后重新开始使 用降血压药物是合理的(IIa 类,B级)
一、睡眠呼吸暂停和主动脉弓粥样硬化斑块 部分,而糖尿病部分扩展到糖尿病前期。新 版本强调了生活方式以及肥胖作为潜在靶点 的重要性,支持生活方式的修正可以降低血 管风险 二、新增营养部分内容
三、新版指南认为临床无症状的脑卒中是二次
预防的关键切入点以及预防点,而脑成像是鉴 定临床无症状性脑卒中的证据。临床医生进行 无症状脑卒中常规诊断时,应询问患者是否实 行了二级预防措施。尽管对无症状脑卒中患者 管理方法的数据有限,指南编写委员会委员们 仍同意将这些数据进行总结并且将其纳入本指 南相关章节中

JNC8

JNC8
治疗主要原理
血压相关作用因子 降压药物 β 受体阻滞剂
心输出量
心脏
心肌收缩力,心律
血容量
血 = × 压
血管阻力
水钠储留
利尿剂
大血管 交感神经系统 外周血管 RAAS系统 α 受体阻滞剂
ACEI ARB
钙离子拮抗剂
血管壁
基于证据的降压药物剂量表
药物类别
药物名称 卡托普利 依那普利 赖诺普利
⑤对≥18岁伴DM者 , SBP≥140 mm Hg 或DBP≥90 mm Hg 启动降压药物治 疗, 目标血压<140/90 mm Hg (E级推荐)
JNC8 推荐 6
In the general nonblack population, including those with diabetes, initial antihypertensive treatment should include a thiazidetype diuretic, calcium channel blocker (CCB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Moderate Recommendation – Grade B
MAPHY研究: 美托洛尔®显著降低高血压患者心血管事件
有效降低高血压患者心率
100
P<0.001
高血压患者死亡率显著下降
100
80
78.2 64.1
77.3
基线 最后一次随访
74.1
80
(P=0.028)
22%
利尿剂
(83/1625)

美国外科协会(ACS)老年创伤处理指南

美国外科协会(ACS)老年创伤处理指南

美国外科协会(ACS)老年创伤处理指南背景与介绍创伤在老年群体中的发生率越来越高,而且和年轻人相比,老年创伤的死亡率以及并发症的发生率相对要高。

正是由于老年人的生理潜能降低、存在各种各样的基础疾病而且还存在一些老年人特有的并发症,促进了在多学科创伤救治模式下形成老年人特有的创伤救治规范。

目的是使用最佳的风险评估,严格遵守预防策略,积极的监控,意识到并治疗并发症从而降低老年创伤患者的死亡率和并发症的发生率。

创伤团队的启动老年患者在受伤机制较轻的情况下,也会发生较为严重的创伤。

因为生命体征是随着年龄,受伤前的疾病(高血压)、受伤前使用的药物(贝塔受体阻滞剂)而变化的,所以老年人对创伤的生理反应和青年人是不同的。

老年痴呆和谵妄同样可以导致意识障碍,从而导致识别休克和创伤性颅脑损伤的时间延迟,这些因素很容易导致EMS或者急诊室医师分流不当(undertriage)。

Undertriage已有研究证实会增加老年创伤患者2倍的死亡率。

所以为了降低识别老年严重创伤的时间延迟,应该降低创伤团队启动的标准。

在一些案例,需要根据年龄对启动标准进行调整。

推荐:确保满足创伤标准(1或2级)的所有老年创伤患者启动创伤团队。

初始评估老年创伤患者的早期评估与所有的创伤患者没有区别,但是再次评估时,应该注意以下:判断影响初始评估和治疗的药物:华法林、氯吡格雷、其他抗凝药、阿司匹林、Beta阻滞剂以及ACE抑制剂。

考虑常见的、急性的、非创伤的会使得老年创伤症状复杂的事件:急性冠脉综合征、低血容量/脱水、尿路感染、肺炎、急性肾功能衰竭、脑血管事件以及晕厥。

实验室评估老年创伤患者灌注不足常常得不到正确的评估。

对于隐匿性休克、需要简化评估流程、需要入住ICU的患者,都应该评估BD。

对于以下的实验室检查,所有的老年创伤患者都应该进行评估:乳酸/血气、PT/PTT/INR、肾功能(BUN/Cr/GFR)、血液酒精水平、尿液毒理学、血清电解质。

20141222美国医疗急救服务体系情况介绍

20141222美国医疗急救服务体系情况介绍

美国医疗急救服务体系情况介绍一、美国医疗急救服务体系(EMSS)基本情况美国从20世纪50年代起,就开始有急救专业人员进行科学、规范的现场救治。

1966年制定了两项急救法规,一项是国家公路安全法,该法授权美国运输部资助救护车、急救通讯和院前医疗服务转运,责成运输部门建立急诊医疗服务体系,以提高一旦发生灾祸时的应急能力和现场急救水平;另一项是美国心脏协会开始提倡在公众中普及心肺复苏初级救生术。

1973年,美国国会通过了《急救医疗服务体系EMSS法案》,并开始采用“911”作为全国通用的急救电话号码,它极大地方便了公众获取急诊医疗服务。

1976年完成了立法程序,形成了全国急救医疗网,之后,又相继建立了院前急救、现场和途中救护以及重症ICU、CCU监护体系。

美国政府还制定了联邦标准作为救护车建设的规范。

BLS救护车上的设备可供EMT-B救护人员使用。

ALS救护车上有为EMT-P或其他可以使用药物治疗和高级医疗手段的救护人员提供的装备。

急救人员通常需要完成急诊医士(EMT)课程。

国家规定了3种急救医士级别:初级(EMT-B),中级(EMT-I),高级(EMT-P),不同级别的急救医士使用的救护技术的权限也不同。

这一措施不仅能迅速提高救治能力,而且节省了大量培训经费,急救医师只在必要时才随车出诊。

同时该服务体系还设置了非专业人员的救护课程对第一目击者进行基本的急救知识培训。

美国EMSS以不仅局限于医院急诊科的范围,而是在政府和主管部门的管理与协调下,依靠医务人员的技术力量,发挥院前急救人员的积极性,同时涉及多部门与多行业的综合性系统工程。

美国阿姆斯特朗救护服务正大力推行的社区保健计划,是对人群健康状况进行早干预的一种有效途径。

救护服务已经从单纯的院前急救、转送伤病员、突发事件紧急救援等,延伸为专门定制的教育、指导、保障等初级卫生保健。

通过全民急救知识普及、应急自救互救能力养成,以及专业医疗团队早干预、早介入对社区人群的健康状态进行有效的管理。

2014年美国成人高血压管理指南(JNC8)引发的争议

2014年美国成人高血压管理指南(JNC8)引发的争议
患者也不能获益”。其次,虽然JATOS(Japanese
trial
to
压目标以及是否所有患者均可从降压治疗中获 益都存在争议,目前国内已启动了降压理想目标 的前瞻性研究——EsH—CHL—SHOT(欧洲高血压 学会一中国高血压联盟关于脑卒中患者最佳血压 控制目标)研究,以期为临床工作提供相关证据。

压(syst01ic 压(diastolic
blood pressure,SBP)150 blood
Society
of
Hypenension,ASH)/国际高血压学会
society of
(Intemational
Hypertension,IsH)《社区
高血压管理临床实践指南》与JNC8仅仅相隔数 小时先后发布。同年的6月及11月欧洲高血压
to
JNc7推荐多数患者联合应用2种或2种以 上的降压药物;而JNC8做了如下调整: 初始治疗可选择下列三种方案中的任意一 种:单药增至最大剂量,若不达标则联合第2种 药物;单药起始治疗未能达标即开始联合第2种 药物;若基线血压超过160/100 mmHg或超出阈 值20/10 mmHg,可直接联合应用两种药物(自 由处方联合或单片固定剂量复方制剂)。 若初始治疗方案未能使血压达标,应强化改 善生活方式,并酌情增加上述四类药物的种类或 剂量(不建议ACEI/ARB联合用药)。若此种情 况仍未达标,可考虑BB,醛固酮受体拮抗剂等,
75
AsH/IsH、英国国家健康与临床优化研究所
clinical
mmHg开始,随着人群血压水平升高,cVD风
Excellence,NIcE)及ESH/欧洲心脏病学会
(european society of cardiology,ESC)制定的指南

美国AHA心肺复苏指南

美国AHA心肺复苏指南

美国心脏学会(AHA)10月15日在网站上公布了2015版心肺复苏及心脏急救指南。

下面分为两部分,着重强调新旧版的区别及变更理由,并附重要图表方便大家记忆。

第一部分:2015AHA心肺复苏指南更新要点第一部分非专业施救者心肺复苏1、关键问题和重大变更的总结2015《指南更新》建议中,有关非专业施救者实施成人心肺复苏的关键问题和重大变更包括下列内容:1.院外成人生存链的关键环节和2010年相同,继续强调简化后的通用成人基础生命支持(BLS)流程。

2.成人基础生命支持流程有所改变,反映了施救者可以在不离开患者身边的情况下启动紧急反应(即通过手机)的现实情况。

3.建议在有心脏骤停风险人群的社区执行公共场所除颤(PAD)方案。

4.鼓励迅速识别无反应情况,启动紧急反应系统,及鼓励非专业施救者在发现患者没有反应且没有呼吸或呼吸不正常(如喘息)时开始心肺复苏的建议得到强化。

5.进一步强调了调度人员需快速识别可能的心脏骤停,并立即向呼叫者提供心肺复苏指导(即调度员指导下的心肺复苏)。

6.确定了单一施救者的施救顺序的建议:单一施救者应先开始胸外按压再进行人工呼吸(C-A-B而非A-B-C),以减少首次按压的时间延迟。

单一施救者开始心肺复苏时应进行30次胸外按压后做2次人工呼吸。

7.继续强调了高质量心肺复苏的特点:以足够的速率和幅度进行按压,保证每次按压后胸廓完全回弹,尽可能减少按压中断并避免过度通气。

8.建议的胸外按压速率是100至120次/分钟(此前为“至少”100次/分钟)。

9.建议的成人胸外按压幅度是至少厘米,但不超过6厘米。

10.如果有疑似危及生命的、与阿片类药物相关的紧急情况,可以考虑由旁观者给予纳洛酮。

这些变更是为了对简化非专业施救者的培训,并强调对突发心脏骤停患者进行早期胸外按压的重要性。

在之后的话题中,对非专业施救者和医护人员类似的变更或强调重点用星号(*)标注2、社区非专业施救者使用自动体外除颤器方案2015(更新):建议在很可能有目击者的院外心脏骤停发生率相对较高的公共场所,实施公共场所除颤(PAD)方案(如机场、赌场、运动设施等)。

美国《2014成人高血压循证管理指南》解读—探讨高血压的合理治疗

美国《2014成人高血压循证管理指南》解读—探讨高血压的合理治疗

KE Y W ORDS h y p e r t e n s i o n ; t a r g e t b l o o d l e v e l ; 1 3 - b l o c k e r
I n t e r pr e t a t i o n f o r“ 2 0 1 4 e v i de nc e — ba s e d g ui de l i ne or f t he ma na g e me nt o f hi g h bl o o d
pr e s s ur e i n a dul t s ’ ’ i n t he Uni t e d St a t e s :di s c us s i o n o f t he r a t i o na l t r e a t me n t 0 f
量临床随机对 照试验 的研 究证据重新修订而成 ,带来诸 多新理念和新观 点,值得 I 临床借 鉴。然而 ,我 国高血 压流行病 学
特点与欧 美国家之 间存在 差异 ,所以必须在符合我 国国情 的基础上 ,萃取其精髓 ,才能进 一步有效推进我 国临床 高血 压
的 防 治工 作 。
关 键 词 高血 压 治疗 目标 B 受体 阻滞 剂 中图分类号 : R 5 4 4 . 1 文献标识码 : A 文章编号 : 1 0 0 6 - 1 5 3 3( 2 0 1 5) 0 2 — 0 0 0 3 — 0 4
AB S TRA CT Hype r t e ns i o n i s ha r mf ul t o h um a n h ea l t h i n t he wo r l d wi de ,whi c h s hou l d be e fe c t i ve l y c o nt r o l l e d. Ba s e d o n

JNC8

JNC8

Recommendation 4
In the population aged 18 years with chronic kidney disease
(CKD), initiate pharmacologic treatment to lower BP at SBP ≥ 140mmHg or DBP ≥ 90mmHg and treat to goal SBP<140mmHg and goal DBP<90mmHg. (Expert Opinion – Grade E)
treatment to lower BP at DBP ≥90mmHg and treat to a goal DBP <90mmHg. (For ages 30-59 years, Strong Recommendation – Grade A; For ages 18-29 years, Expert Opinion – Grade E)
若≥60岁的一般人群中,经过药物治疗后收缩压控制在较低
值(如<140mmHg ),患者能够耐受,并无合并 不良反应 ,则无需调整治疗方案。(专家意见——E级)
Recommendation 2
In the general population <60 years, initiate pharmacologic
对除黑人外的一般人群(包括糖尿病患者),初始降压治疗
方案应包括噻嗪类利尿剂、CCB、ACEI或ARB。(中等推荐 ——B级)
LIFE研究结果表明,β受体阻滞剂与ARB相比显著增加心脑血管事件。此外,其他临床试 验结果表明,β受体阻滞剂的疗效与其他药物类似或者是证据不足以给出明确结论。对糖 尿病患者而言,无可靠证据支持 ACEI 或 ARB 在改善糖尿病患者心血管预后方面显著优于 其他类药物,故上述推荐的四类药物均可作为糖尿病患者降压首选。

浅读2014美国成人高血压指南(JNC8)

浅读2014美国成人高血压指南(JNC8)

指南发表前 的文献回顾
由美国国家高血压教育计划协作委员会 (NHBPEP)联合39个主要专业、公共和志
由来自专业和公共组织以及联邦机构的专家完成
新旧指南有何不同?
新指南制定专家组指出:与旧指南相比, 新指南的证据级别更高。 新指南的证据均来自于随机对照研究, 所有证据级别和推荐均根据它们对于人体健康 的影响程度进行了评分。 专家组指出,新指南在为高血压人群建 立一个相同的治疗目标。
(二) JNC8与JNC7 新旧指南对比表
主题
JNC7
JNC8(2014高血压指南)
方法
1、由专家小组在方法学团队的支持下,确定要解决的关键问 1、由专家委员会进行非系统性文献回顾, 献回顾标准 包括一系列研究设计 2、由方法学家进行最初的系统回顾,内容限定为随机对照试 2、推荐意见基于共识 3、接下来对RCT证据进行回顾分析,专家组根据标准草案拟 见 明确了高血压和高血压前期 对单纯高血压患者和有复杂合并症(和 CKD)的高血压患者分别制定降压目标 基于文献回顾和专家意见提出修改建议 1、推荐5类药物用于起始治疗,但是推荐 噻嗪类利尿剂作为多数患者的起始治疗药 物并没有令人信服的证据 2、对合并有强适应症的患者(如糖尿病、 CKD、心力衰竭、心肌梗死、卒中和心血 管疾病高危患者),规定了特定类别的降 压药物 3、给出了完整的口服降压药表格,包括 药物名称和常规剂量范围
浅读2014美国成人高血压指南 ( JNC8 )
黄山市人民医院老年科张新元
14-03-28
姗姗来迟的JNC8
经过漫长的等待,《2014美国成人高血压
管理指南(JNC8)》于12月18日在《美国医学
会杂志》(JAMA)成功在线发布。
JNC8 新指南

解析2014年美国成人高血压治疗指南

解析2014年美国成人高血压治疗指南

第一,该指南是由美国学术机构针对美国人群
所制定,不能照搬到我国,更不能将其推荐建议直接
JNC8指南另一个重要变化是对糖尿病患者降 压药物的推荐。很多专家相信ACEI或ARB在有 效降压的同时可能会对糖代谢产生有益的影响,并
对患者肾脏具有保护作用,因而既往指南曾建议糖 尿病患者首选ACEI或ARB治疗。但JNC8指南专 家组在认真研读现有研究之后认为,并无可靠证据 支持此类药物在改善糖尿病患者心血管预后方面显 著优于其他种类药物。因此,JNC8指南建议噻嗪类 利尿剂、ACEI、ARB或CCB均可以用于糖尿病患者 降压治疗的首选。
组对符合纳入标准的RCT进行分析,认为将老年人 血压降至<150/90 mmHg显著减少卒中、心力衰竭
JNC8指南放宽对老年人、糖尿病、慢性肾病以 及其他心血管高危人群的血压目标值并不是对积极 降压治疗的否定,而是对现有研究证据的充分尊重,
与冠心病的发生;血压进一步降低至<140/90
mmHg并无更多获益。因此专家组认为JNC7指南
中所推荐的目标值证据不足,故JNC8指南建议将
<150/90
是理性的回归。卒中以及冠心病与心力衰竭是老年 高血压患者最常见的并发症,心血管疾病也是糖尿
病和/或慢性肾病患者致死致残的主要原因。大量
mmHg作为老年高血压患者的血压控制
目标。JNC8指南同时指出,在药物治疗过程中若患 者血压降低至<140/90 mmHg且患者耐受良好、无
主堡内型盘壶!!!堡生垒月筮!!鲞筮垒塑堕也』!!塑堡丛塑:△E堕!!!!垒:!!!:!!:塑!:垒
.专论.
解析2014年美国成人高血压治疗指南
郭艺芳胡大一
2014年美国预防、检测、评估与治疗高血压全 国联合委员会(JNC)第8次报告成人高血压治疗指 南(简称JNC8指南)…颁布后,在国内外引起了广 泛关注与争议。该指南虽然针对美国人群制定,但

美国《2014成人高血压循证管理指南》解读-探讨高血压的合理治疗

美国《2014成人高血压循证管理指南》解读-探讨高血压的合理治疗

美国《2014成人高血压循证管理指南》解读-探讨高血压的合理治疗张磊;姜红【摘要】Hypertension is harmful to human health in the worldwide, which should be effectively controlled. Based on the results of high-quality randomized controlled trials, the“2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults”(JNC8) in the United States brought us new ideas and perspectives that may be helpful in clinical practice. Because of the differences in epidemiological characteristics of hypertension between China and the United States or Europe, the characteristics of hypertensive patients in China should be taken into account in following the instruction of JNC8, so that we can promote the development in treatment of hypertension in China.%高血压严重危害全球人类健康,亟待有效控制。

美国《2014成人高血压循证管理指南》(JNC8)是根据高质量临床随机对照试验的研究证据重新修订而成,带来诸多新理念和新观点,值得临床借鉴。

2014 美国成人高血压管理指南介绍

2014 美国成人高血压管理指南介绍

推荐9
• 降压治疗的主要目的是获得并维持目标血压。如果治疗1 月后血压未能达标,应将初始治疗药物加量或增加另一种 药物(推荐⑥中任意一种药物,包括噻嗪类利尿剂、CCB、 ACEI 或ARB)。 • 临床医生应不断评估血压水平并调整治疗直至血压达标。 如2 个月仍未达标,增加推荐⑥中的第3 种药物并滴定剂 量。不要联合使用ACEI 和ARB 类药物。 • 如果只应用推荐⑥的药物血压不能达标(由于禁忌证或需 要3 种以上的药物),可考虑应用其他种类的降压药物。 • 采用上述策略后血压仍不能达标,或病情复杂需要临床会 诊者,可转诊到高血压专科医生(E 级推荐)
推荐2
• < 60 岁,DBP 升高:DBP ≥ 90 mmHg • 时启动降压药物治疗, 目标DBP < 90 mmHg ; • 30 ~ 59 岁(A 级推荐) • 18 ~ 29 岁(E 级推荐)
推荐3
• < 60 岁,SBP 升高:SBP ≥ 140mmHg 时启动降压药物治疗,目标 SBP < 140 mmHg(E级推荐)
全部种族
非黑人 初始噻嗪类利尿剂或ACEI 或ARB 或CCB 单药或联合用药 初始ACEI 或ARB 单药治疗或联合 其他类型降压药物治疗
选择药物治疗的滴定策略 A. 起始药物增加至最大剂量后再增加第2 种药物B. 在起始药物达最大剂量前增加第2 种药物C. 起始处方联合或单片固定复方联合治疗
是 否
推荐4
• ≥ 18 岁,CKD :SBP ≥ 140 mmHg 或 • DBP ≥ 90 mmHg 时需启动降压药物治疗, 目标血压< 140/90 mmHg(E 级推荐)
推荐5
• ≥ 18 岁, 伴糖尿病:SBP ≥ 140mmHg 或DBP ≥ 90 mmHg 时需启动降压药物治 疗,目标血压< 140/90 mmHg(E 级推 荐)

美国成人高血压指南(jnc8)概述

美国成人高血压指南(jnc8)概述

2014美国成人高血压指南(JNC8)概述美国JNC8委员会于2013年12月发布了2014美国高血压管理指南,12月17日晚北京阜外心血管病医院心内科张宇清教授率先通过微信发布这一消息,指南“全文14页,45篇文献;回答了3个问题,做了9个推荐。

”【新指南内容简介】(1)60岁以上人群的目标血压为150/90mmHg,60岁以下人群目标值为140/90 mmHg,包括糖尿病和肾脏病患者。

(2)噻嗪类利尿剂、CCB、ACEI和ARB四大类药物作为初始治疗药物(一线治疗药物,黑人仅利尿剂与CCB),可单独或联合使用;β受体阻滞剂退出一线,降至四线,与螺内酯同等地位。

(3)新指南强调了达标和维持目标(长期达标)[The main objective of hypertension treatment is toattain and maintain goal BP]。

(4)新指南不是那么强烈推荐起始联合了[Some committee members recommend],而是“起始单药再单药加量”、“起始单药再加第二种”、“起始两种联合”三种策略都可以。

(5)肾病患者首选RAS阻断剂;糖尿病患者没有优先推荐RAS阻断剂,而是四种都可以;CCB减少卒中优于ACEI(中国的主要问题是卒中)。

【新指南的变化】河北省人民医院的郭艺芳教授对备受关注的2014年美国高血压治疗指南与旧版指南(JNC7)进行了相比(见图1),新指南的主要变化包括以下几个方面:1.降压治疗目标值在JNC7指南中,分别为无合并症的高血压患者(目标血压<140/90mmHg)与糖尿病和慢性肾病等心血管高危人群(目标血压<130/80mmHg)推荐了不同的目标值。

但JNC8指南认为,旧版指南中的上述建议缺乏充分依据,为心血管风险水平增高的高血压患者进行更为严格的血压控制可能不会使患者更多获益。

JNC7指南中建议将老年高血压患者控制在<140/90 mmHg同样存在此问题。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines 0196-0644/$-see front matterCopyright©2014by the American College of Emergency Physicians./10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.008SEE RELATED ARTICLE,P.e1.This document is the product of two years of consensus-based work that included representatives from the American College of Emergency Physicians,The American Geriatrics Society, Emergency Nurses Association,and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.Approved by the ACEP Board of Directors October2013;by The American Geriatrics Society October2013;by the Emergency Nurses Association January2014;and by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine October2013 INTRODUCTIONAccording to the2010Census,more than40million Americans were over the age of65,which was“more people than in any previous census.”In addition,“between2000and2010, the population65years and over increased at a faster rate than the total U.S.population.”The census data also demonstrated that the population85and older is growing at a rate almost three times the general population.The subsequent increased need for health care for this burgeoning geriatric population represents an unprecedented and overwhelming challenge to the American health care system as a whole and to emergency departments (EDs)specifically.1-4Geriatric EDs began appearing in the United States in2008and have become increasingly common.5 The ED is uniquely positioned to play a role in improving care to the geriatric population.6As an ever-increasing access point for medical care,the ED sits at a crossroads between inpatient and outpatient care(Figure1).7,8Specifically,the ED represents57%of hospital admissions in the United States,of which almost70%receive a non-surgical diagnosis.9The expertise which an ED staff can bring to an encounter with a geriatric patient can meaningfully impact not only a patient’s condition,but can also impact the decision to utilize relatively expensive inpatient modalities,or less expensive outpatient treatments.10,11Emergency medicine experts recognize similar challenges around the world.12Geriatric ED core principles have been described in the United Kingdom.13Furthermore,as the initial site of care for both inpatient and outpatient events,the care provided in the ED has the opportunity to“set the stage”for subsequent care provided. More accurate diagnoses and improved therapeutic measures can not only expedite and improve inpatient care and outcomes,but can effectively guide the allocation of resources towards a patient population that,in general,utilizes significantly more resources per event than younger populations.9,14Geriatric ED patients represent43%of admissions,including48%admitted to the intensive care unit(ICU).15,16On average,the geriatric patient has an ED length of stay that is20%longer and they use50% more lab/imaging services than younger populations.17,18In addition,geriatric ED patients are400%more likely to require social services.Despite the focus on geriatric acute care in the ED manifest by disproportionate use of resources,these patients frequently leave the ED dissatisfied and optimal outcomes are not consistently attained.19-21Despite the fact that the geriatric patient population accounts for a large,and ever increasing,proportion of ED visits,the contemporary emergency medicine management model may not be adequate for geriatric adults.7,8A number of challenges face emergency medicine to effectively and reliably improve post-ED geriatric adult outcomes.22Multiple studies demonstrate emergency physicians’perceptions about inadequate geriatric emergency care model training.14,23Many common geriatric ED problems remain under-researched leaving uncertainty in optimal management strategies.24-26In addition,quality indicators for minimal standard geriatric ED care continue to evolve.27Older adults with multiple medical co-morbidities,often multiple medications,and complex physiologic changes present even greater challenges.28,29Programs specifically designed to address these concerns are a realistic opportunity to improve care.7,8 Similar programs designed for other age groups(pediatrics)or directed towards specific diseases(STEMI,stroke,and trauma) have improved care both in individual EDs and system-wide, resulting in better,more cost effective care and ultimately better patient outcomes.30-32GERIATRIC ED-PURPOSEPurposeThe purpose of these Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines is to provide a standardized set of guidelines that can effectively improve the care of the geriatric population and which is feasible to implement in the ED.These guidelines create a template for staffing,equipment,education,policies and procedures,follow-up care,and performance improvement measures.When implemented collectively,a geriatric ED can expect to see improvements in patient care,customer service,and staff satisfaction.7,11Improved attention to the needs of this challenging population has the opportunity to more effectively allocate health care resources,optimize admission and readmission rates,while simultaneously decreasing iatrogenic complications and the resultant increased length of stay and decreased reimbursement.POLICY STATEMENTA goal of the geriatric ED is to recognize those patients who will bene fit from inpatient care,and to effectively implementoutpatient care to those who do not require inpatient resources.To implement most effectively,the geriatric ED will utilize the resources of the hospital,ED and inpatient,as well asoutpatient resources.Making effective and expedient outpatient arrangements available to the geriatric population is of critical importance to the care of this population,recognizing that acute inpatient events are often accompanied by functional decline,increased dependency and increased morbidity.33,34By using providers,including nurse practitioners,nurses,social workers,physician assistants,and physicians to coordinate care in the ED,the inpatient units,and during the immediate post-ED discharge period,the geriatric ED creates the opportunity to care for geriatric patients in the environment most conducive to a positive outcome.The bene fits of the geriatric ED to the geriatric patient population are multiple and clear.By focusing attention and resources on the most common needs of the geriatric ED patient,care can be optimized.The bene fit of a geriatric ED to ahosting hospital can be multiple as well.These improved patient care standards can become a signi ficant marketing tool for hospitals looking to reach out to the Medicare population and partner with extended care facilities.A geriatric ED can market the ED to attract a patient population that may also utilize higher reimbursing hospital-based programs,including cardiac,orthopedic,and neurologic care.Further,with Medicare reimbursements decreasing and payment for iatrogeniccomplications such as wounds,catheter associated infections,etc.impacting hospital reimbursement;the need for special attention to geriatric needs has become even more pressing.The term “geriatric ”has had different de finitions over the past decades.In 1985,the term “oldest old ”was coined to identify those 85years of age and ter Fries,et al de fined three groups by dividing the older adult population into the young old (often 65-74),the middle old (75-85)and the oldest old(>85).35,36The World Health Organization de fined the older population starting at age 60.37Our guidelines used theconstruct that age 65and older would be the geriatric population served by the geriatric ED.Many hospitals may find that using the age 65and older does not match the needs of theirpopulation and available resources.It may be most appropriate that each hospital identify the age for patients to be seen in their geriatric ED.Through the continuum of physiologic aging complexity of health care issues increase and as such,the bene fits of a geriatric ED increase concurrently.The age range to be a patient in the geriatric ED can be based on the literature,meaning age 60or 65,or can be de fined by the speci fic hospital community.One hospital uses age 55based on when resources are available;another uses 65years of age and another uses 75years of age as the beginning age range for their geriatric ED.The recommendations found in this packet represent research and consensus-based best practices from the perspectives of the American College of Emergency Physicians,Society forAcademic Emergency Medicine,American Geriatrics Society,and Emergency Nurses Association.With implementation of the following recommendations,hospitals,regardless of size,will positively impact the care of the geriatric emergency patients.STAFFING/ADMINISTRATIONThe geriatric ED staff and administration provides a multi-disciplinary team of care providers focused on the varying needs of the geriatric population.By providing trained staff in the ED,as well as readily available staff for inpatient care andoutpatientFigure 1.The central role of the ED in geriatric health care in contemporary medicine (reproduced with permission from TeamHealth ’s Patient Care Continuum Model.)SNF ,Skilled Nursing Facilities.Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelinesfollow up,the geriatric ED can optimize ED visits,effectively deliver and/or coordinate care in a less costly and more comfortable outpatient setting when appropriate,and coordinate inpatient resources for high-risk patients.An effective program will involve hospital site-specific staff as well as overall local coordination resources.BackgroundAlthough published studies have not been clear on outcomes resulting from staffing modifications for the care of geriatric patients,they have demonstrated high levels of endorsement for ED staffing enhancements in general(94%),for the availability of specialized nurses(85%),pharmacists(74%),social workers (88%),geriatric consults(79%)and a designated professional to coordinate geriatric services(91%).There were moderate levels of endorsement for the availability of physical therapy(59%)and occupational therapy(53%).38One common approach to enhanced older adult ED staffing in the literature is the use of geriatric consultation services in the ED.39-42Yuen et al found that over26months,there were2202 geriatric consultations(85per month),with admission avoided in 85%(47%discharged home,38%admitted to a“convalescent hospital”).42Foo and colleagues evaluated geriatric assessment and intervention prior to discharge of geriatric patients from an ED observation unit.In the intervention group,72%of patients had unrecognized needs requiring intervention.This group had fewer ED revisits(IRR0.59)and hospital admissions(IRR0.64) at12months.41However,results are not consistent across studies.Sinoff et al also evaluated an ED geriatric consult service and found a significantly higher admission rate(64%),with a 2-year mortality of34%and institutionalization rate of52%.40 Social workers and case managers are essential to efficient geriatric ED management.Effective geriatric case management strategies continue to evolve.43Innovative models using volunteers to assess geriatric ED patients have also been evaluated and are acceptable to ED nurses and physicians.29 RecommendationsThe geriatric ED will have staffing protocols in place to provide for geriatric-trained providers,including physician and nurse leadership and ancillary services.These protocols shouldinclude plans for times when such services may not be available. Staff members of the geriatric ED will participate in educational/training to ensure high-quality geriatric care.Although departments may differ in the availability of staffing resources,departments should have available the following positions either as part of a hospital-based Acute Care ofElders(ACE)team or specific for the ED.Geriatric Emergency Department Medical Director.Qualifications:B Best practiced by a board-certified emergency physicianwith training in geriatricsB Completion of eight hours of geriatric-appropriate CMEevery two years Responsibilities:B Member of hospital ED and Medicine committeeB Oversight of geriatric performance improvement programB Liaison with Medical Staff for geriatric care concernsB Liaison with outpatient care partners including SkilledNursing Facilities(SNFs),Board and Care facilities,home health providers,etc.B Identify needs for staff education and implementeducational programs when appropriate.B Review,approve,and assist in the development of allhospital geriatric policies and proceduresGeriatric Emergency Department Nurse ManagerQualifications:B At least two years of experience in geriatrics(or in an EDthat sees geriatric patients)within the previousfive yearsB Experience with quality improvement programs isrecommendedB Completion of eight hours of Board of Registered Nursing(BRN)approved continuing education units(CEU)ingeriatric topics every two years.Responsibilities:B Participate in the development and maintenance of ageriatric performance improvement programB Liaison with outpatient care partners including,but notlimited to SNFs,Board and Care facilities,home healthproviders,etc.B Member of selected hospital-based ED and/or medicinecommitteesB Identify needs for staff education and implementeducational programs when appropriate.Staff Physicians.Provide twenty-four-hour ED coverage or directly supervised by physicians functioning as emergency physicians.This includes senior residents practicing at their respective hospitals only.Staff physicians are encouraged to participate in geriatric specific education with a goal of4hours of CME annually specifically focused on the care of geriatric patients.Staff Nurses.Nursing staff is encouraged to participate in geriatric-specific education.Medical Staff Specialists.Specialists will be available for consultation either by established medical staff policies or by pre-arranged transfer arrangements.Although each hospital’s medical staff willsupport different specialist services,it is recommended that the geriatric ED have access to:B GeriatricsB CardiologyB General SurgeryB GastrointestinalB NeurologyGeriatric Emergency Department GuidelinesB OrthopedistsB Psychiatry,preferably with a geriatric specialtyB RadiologyAncillary Services.Case management and social servicesMid-level provider/physician extenders(optional,but recommended)Occupational/Physical therapistsPharmacistsFOLLOW-UP AND TRANSITION OF CARE Acute hospitalization is associated with increased rates of acute delirium,nosocomial infections,iatrogenic complications, and functional declines in the geriatric adult.44Thus,one of the main goals of the geriatric ED is to decrease hospital admissions.Making effective and expedient outpatient arrangements available to the geriatric population is of critical importance to the care of this population.However,discharge from the ED to the community presents significant challenges to the geriatric population.BackgroundPublished studies on ED-based interventions with improved access to community resources have had mixed results.Most demonstrate little effect of these interventions on either ED utilization or prevention of complications.45-48However, effective transition of care is clearly required to facilitate outpatient care after an ED evaluation.This transition process presents many challenges.In an era of daily ED crowding,effective,reliable discharge instructions are a challenge to all populations,particularly for the geriatric population.49 Older ED patients identify misinformation as a primary course of dissatisfaction with their emergency care,a problem confounded and magnified by ongoing under-recognition of cognitive dysfunction,lower health literacy,andfinancial impediments for prescriptions and recommended outpatient follow-up.50-52RecommendationsThe geriatric ED will have discharge protocols in place that facilitate the communication of clinically relevantinformation to the patient/family and outpatient careproviders,including nursing homes.Essential information to optimize continuity of care at the time of dischargeshould include the following data elements:B Presenting complaintsB Test results and interpretationB ED therapy and clinical responseB Consultation Notes(in person or via telephone)in EDB Working discharge diagnosisB Emergency physician note,or copy of dictationB New prescriptions and alterations with long-termmedicationsB Follow-up plan Clinical information will be presented in a format in a way best suited for elder adults:B Large font discharge instructionsB Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act(HIPAA)-compliant copied discharge instructions shouldbe provided to family and care providers.The geriatric ED will have a process in place that effectively provides appropriate outpatient follow-up either via provider-to-patient communication or the provision of direct follow-up clinical evaluation.B Although telephone follow-up is the most commonly used,the use of newer technology,including telemedicinealternatives is recommended.The geriatric ED will maintain relationships and resources in the community that can be used by patients on discharge to facilitate care.B Medical follow-upB Primary MD or“medical home”B Case Manager to assist with compliance with follow-upB Safety AssessmentsB MobilityB Access to care and medical transportation resourcesB Medical equipmentB Prescription assistance and educationB Home health,including outpatient nursing resourcesB Activities of daily living resources including mealprograms,etc.Although a goal of the geriatric ED should be to maintain older adults in their own homes whenever possible,some patients will require either short term or long term placement into facilities when care cannot be provided appropriately at home. Thus,the geriatric ED should have available community resources for the placement of patients to the appropriate level of care,including nursing homes or rehab facilities.EDUCATIONThe success of the geriatric ED program rests largely on the education of a multi-disciplinary staff directed toward the needs of the geriatric population.Residency and continuing medical education must take into account the unique physiology, atypical disease presentations,and psychosocial needs of older persons.14,23,53Education and training evaluation of emergency personnel should be competency based.The curriculum should contain interdisciplinary content, and learners should be assessed for interdisciplinary core competencies.Effective instructional methods include a mix of didactic lectures,case conferences,case simulations,clinical audits,journal clubs,Web-based materials,and supervised patient care.Hands-on training is strongly preferred by many cation may be effectively organized around the assessment of common and important geriatric chief complaints.Geriatric Emergency Department GuidelinesA geriatric ED educational program is expected to include an initial initiative directed towards program implementation, increasing staff awareness of the geriatric population’s needs, and specific policy and procedure initiatives.54Educational programs can be created and implemented internally(specific for each hospital),as part of a larger CME program,or through participation in externally created programs.An educational program should include:Initial“go-live”implementation sessionsInvolvement of multi-disciplinary teams including hospital-based leadership and outpatient resourcesGeriatric emergency medicine didactic sessions for physician,nursing,and multidisciplinary staff focused ongeriatric care issues to be assessed and managed in thegeriatric EDIn-service education on geriatric-specific equipmentProgram introduction for community-based organizations caring for geriatric patients with opportunity for input.Community awareness,involvement,and outreachEmergency Medical Services(EMS)personnel perceive a deficit in their training as it relates to care of older patients,particularly in the areas of education and psychosocial issues.55The geriatric ED should provide training for EMS personnel who rescue and transport older persons to their facilities.56,57The geriatric ED should also provide educational self-management materials for older adults and their families. Regular educational assessment and implementation of site-specific educational needsQuality improvement data review with process improvement implementationPeriodic education/re-education of disease-specific presentations with updates on policy/procedure changes,community care programs,etc.An important educational goal is to provide familiarity with use of quick,bedside assessment tools.Educational needs will be assessed on an ongoing basisby the Geriatric Medical Director and Geriatric Liaison nurse and implemented as needed based on staff needs.Asthe program grows and the competency of staff changesover time,it is expected that educational needs will change.It is highly recommended that education be coordinatedwith peer review cases,based on cases experienced in the local ED.Although educational content should be tailored to individual department needs,recommended content includes the following:Atypical presentations of disease23,58-62Trauma,including falls and hip fracture23,58,62-66Cognitive and behavioral disorders23,58-60,62,66-72Modifications for older patients of emergent interventions23 Medication management23,58-62,66-69,71Transitions of care and referrals to services23,60,61,67-69,71,73 Pain management and palliative care23,66,74Effect of comorbid conditions23,58Functional impairments and disorders58-61,71 Management of the group of diseases peculiar to the geriatric adult,including conditions causing abdominalpain58-60,62,66-68,75Weakness and dizziness58,60,63,76Iatrogenic injuries67,68,77Cross-cultural issues involving older patients in the emergency setting63Elder abuse and neglect58,61,66,71Ethical issues,including advance directives58,61,62,69,78QUALITY IMPROVEMENTImplement an effective quality improvement program with the goal to collect and monitor data(Figure2)in a manner conducive to staff education and program success.Geriatric Program Quality Improvement PlanA geriatric program shall be developed and monitored by theGeriatric Medical Director and Geriatric Nurse Manager. A geriatric report shall be generated and delivered to the EDcommittee no less than quarterly by the Geriatric Medical Director.The program shall include an interface with out-of-hospital care,ED,trauma,critical care,alternative level care facilities and hospital-wide quality improvement activities.A mechanism shall be established to easily identify geriatricpatient(65years&older)visits to the ED.The geriatric quality improvement program will include identification of the indicators,methods to collect data,results and conclusions,recognition of improvement,action(s)taken, and assessment of effectiveness of actions and communication process for participants.A mechanism to document and monitor the geriatriceducation of the geriatric ED staff shall be established.The geriatric quality improvement program shall include reviews of the following geriatric patients seen in the ED:B Geriatric volumeB Admission rateB Readmission rateB DeathsB Suspected abuse or neglectB Transfers to another facility for higher level of careB Admissions requiring upgrading of level of care to ICUwithin24hours of admissionB Return visits to the ED within72hoursB Completion of at-risk screening tool79B Completion of follow-up reevaluation for dischargedpatientsIn addition to the above,individual disease-specific entities that facilities may also monitor include:B Falls in the geriatric adult-Prevalence-Prevalence of traumatic injuries associated with falls❖Hip fractures❖Traumatic intracranial hemorrhageGeriatric Emergency Department Guidelines❖Blunt abdominal injuries ❖Death-Poly-pharmacy screening in patients with falls -Screening of those at-risk of falls❖Physical therapy evaluation completed on at-risk patients.-Referral patterns after fall (visual screening,gait rehab,etc)BCatheter use and catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs)-Foley insertion and indication checklist usage data -Days of catheter use in hospital-Automatic discontinuation orders utilized -Total catheter days -ED CAUTI prevalenceBMedication reconciliation/pharmacy oversight -Documentation of high-risk medications-Usage of high-risk medication in ED (See Geriatric Medication Management below)-Percentage of revisits for medication adverse reaction or noncompliance BRestraint-Indication documented-Chemical restraint attempted and with which medicationEQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIESGeriatric patient care requires equipment designed for a patient population with speci fic needs.Challenges involving mobility,incontinence,behavioral needs,etc are best met with equipment designed for the effective and comfortableevaluation and treatment of geriatric patients,while minimizing iatrogenic complications.The physical plant of a geriatric ED should focus on structural modi fications that promoteimprovements in safety,comfort,mobility,memory cues,and sensorial perception both with vision and hearing for elders in the mon key features are those that enhance lighting,colors,enhanced signage –all of these are better,not only for older adults,but for everyone.Although a separate space within an ED,or a separate ED entirely,devoted to geriatrics may be bene ficial,most hospitals will be more capable of effectively implementing a program in which any ED bed can be made “geriatric friendly ”with the presence of the equipment and supplies listed.The list below is a suggested starting point for the design and equipping of a geriatric ED.7,11,80 Furniture improvements:B Exam chairs/reclining chairs –may be more comfortable for some geriatric patients and facilitate transfer processes.81Figure 2.Sample Geriatric ED Quality Assessment Instrument (Dashboard).ICH ,Intracerebral hemorrhage.Geriatric Emergency Department GuidelinesB Furniture should be selected with sturdy armrests and EDbeds at levels that allow patients to rise more easily for safe transferring.Furniture should be selected using theEvidence-Based Design Checklist.Some studies show that patients often fall when trying to get out of bedunsupervised or unassisted.They also show that bedrails do not reduce the number of falls and may increase the severity of the fall.B Extra thick/soft gurney mattress–decreases possibledevelopment of skin break down and decubitus ulcerformation.82B Choice of upholstery should be soft and moisture proofto protect the fragile skin of older patients’.Should alsobe selected to reduce surface contamination linked to health-care-associated infections.“Surfaces are easily cleaned,with no surface joints or seams,”“materials for upholstery areimpervious,”“surfaces are nonporous and smooth.”Thisshould hold true especially in the ED where there is a high turnover with a large variety of diseases potentially present.B Economic evidence supports early prevention of pressureulcers in ED patients by the use of pressure-redistributing foam mattresses.83Another alternative that has beenshown to reduce pain and improve patient satisfaction isthe use of reclining chairs in the ED instead of EDgurney beds.81Special equipmentB Body warming devices/warm blanketsB Fluid warmerB Non-slip fall mats84B Bedside commodes–where necessary to minimize fall riskB Walking aids/devices85B Hearing aids86B Monitoring equipmentB Respiratory equipment to include afiberoptic intubationdeviceB Restraint devicesB Urinary catheters to include condom catheters–minimizerisk of CAUTIVisual Orientation improvements:B Lighting–soft light is recommended,but exposure tonatural light is also shown to be beneficial for recoverytimes and decreasing delirium-Light-colored walls with a matte sheen and lightflooringwith a low-glarefinish should be used to optimizelighting and reduce glare.While older adults requirethree to four times as much light as young adults forvisual clarity,light scatter also increases with aging eyes.Simply increasing the level of lighting can improveacuity,and it is recommended that lighting consist of acombination of ambient and spot lighting.In contrast,glare and shine along with difficulty seeing the edges ofpale-colored objects have been shown to be impedimentsfor older adults in their ability to function and confusingfor those with cognitive impairments.Thus,improvements that increase lighting while reducing glarecan include shielding of illuminatingfixtures above theupper visualfield.Fixtures that bounce light off theceiling or off walls increase overall room lighting whileglare can be reduced with the use of matte surfaces.Uniform indirect light.-Patients should have control of the lighting in their spaceif they wish to sleep at a time when the other lights areon,allowing for fewer sleep disturbances.B PATTERNS-Contrast sensitivity in aging vision can be bothconfusing and hinder movement in geriatric patients,especially with reduced depth perception.Patterns thathave dominant contrasts may create a sense of vertigo oreven seem to vibrate for older adults.Others maymisperceive patterns as obstacles or objects(eg,leafpatterns onflooring may be seen as real live leaves toavoid when walking).B COLORS-Secondary to vision and perception changes,colorchoice for facilities and structure should be considered.Color can be used to enhance visual function anddepth perception.Avoid monochromatic color schemesand allow for colors to contrast between horizontaland vertical surfaces.Similar colors look the same forthose with poor vision.Older adults experience a decreasein the ability to differentiate cool colors(greens,blues)asopposed to warm colors(yellows,oranges).In poorly litareas,yellow is the most visible.Orange and reds areattention grabbing.Blues appear hazy and indistinct andmay appear gray due to yellowing of the lens.Acoustic Orientation Improvements–private rooms or acoustically enhanced drapes,if necessary,for bettercommunication and decrease levels of anxiety anddeliriumB An enhanced acoustical environment may facilitatecommunication between patients and staff and betweenstaff.While older adults may have decreased ability to hear certain words secondary to a loss of hearing in high-frequency ranges,they also have increased sensitivity toloud sounds.The use of sound-absorbing materials(eg,carpet,curtains,ceiling tiles)may reduce background noise and can also increase patient privacy.The use of portable hearing assist devices for patients may also enhancecommunication.Loud noise sources in the hospital should be reduced(eg,overhead paging,machines).There is anincrease in the number of studies showing how musiccan decrease anxiety,heart rate and blood pressure.87,88Patients could be provided with a way to listen tomusic and choose their programming without disturbingothers.B An enhanced acoustical environment can also increasepatient privacy and safety.One study performed in an ED found that“percent of the patients in curtained spacesreported they withheld portions of their medical historyand refused parts of their physical examination because ofGeriatric Emergency Department Guidelines。

相关文档
最新文档