跆拳道录像审议难点问题典型案例辨析

跆拳道录像审议难点问题典型案例辨析
吴建忠;蔡利敏;王丹;吴素英
【期刊名称】《成都体育学院学报》
【年(卷),期】2015(41)4
【摘要】运用文献资料、访谈、录像分析等方法，对第十二届全运会跆拳道比赛
中录像审议的典型案例进行分析。

结果研究发现：跆拳道竞赛规则对旋转技术无认定标准；裁判员对双方同时犯规、犯规与得分先后和多技术审议进行不关联审议存在判罚难点；运动员与教练员存在审议申请配合难点。

因此对临界旋转技术得分与不得分的录像审议应以“我方击头得分或对方击头无效”为申请内容；教练员应准确理解与把握双方运动员犯规行为的先后、主次、故意与否、是否获利的判罚依据；对犯规与得分先后的以犯规与攻击腿的起点和落点为判罚标准；针对一个以上技术的审议，教练员应根据赛况需要即时判断审议内容；审议申请以运动员的配合和提示为辅，形成默契配合。

%Depending on the methods of literature,interview and video analysis,the study analyzes the typical cases video replay deliberation of the 12th National Taekwondo Tournament. Results:the Taekwondo rule has no af-firmation criterion for rotation technology. The referee has judging difficulties in the case of double fouls,a foul and a score successively and unrelated deliberation through multi - technological means. There exists applying difficulty between Taekwondoers and coaches. Conclusion:the application of video reply deliberation for the critical rotation technology should be focused on the content of score by striking the head or the invalid opposite head strike.
Coaches should correctly understand the sequence of two Taekwondoers’fouls to determine their primary and secondary factors,their purposes and profit factors. The case of foul and score successively should be based on the start and placement of the attacking legs. For multi - technological applying cases,the coaches should judge the applying contents timely upon the need of match. The research is conducive to improving Chi-nese coaches’instructing performance and their success ratio for applying as well as providing theoretic refer-ence for Chinese Taekwondoers performance in the world tournaments.
【总页数】5页(P97-101)
【作者】吴建忠;蔡利敏;王丹;吴素英
【作者单位】北京体育大学，北京 100084;华北电力大学体育部，北京102206;中国地质大学北京体育课部 100083;中国石油大学体育部，北京 102249
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】G886.9
【相关文献】
1.跆拳道录像审议的发展方向探索 [J], 杨小芳
2.2015年江西省青少年跆拳道锦标赛录像审议情况研究 [J], 张双庆;贺捷;肖舒鹏
3.2018全国青年跆拳道锦标赛第二站录像审议情况 [J], 段海鹏
4.2018全国青年跆拳道锦标赛第二站录像审议情况 [J], 段海鹏;
5.2017年江西省青少年跆拳道锦标赛录像审议情况分析与研究 [J], 刘晓珊
因版权原因，仅展示原文概要，查看原文内容请购买。