Research_on_Innovative_Teaching_Mode_of_Architectu

Saibai JIANG
Shandong Urban Construction Vocational College
Abstract: With the continuous development of society, more and more attention is paid to the application of green environmental protection in the current architectural design. Based on this, this paper first studies the problems existing in the current green building education, and puts forward the construction scheme of green building curric-ulum design from four aspects for reference of relevant people.
Key words: green building; architectural design; innovative teaching
1. Introduction
In the course of China’s economic development, The sustainable development of the society is the ultimate goal and result. There is some pollution in the tradi-tional construction industry. In order to strengthen the integration of architectural design and environment and maintain the sustainable development of the environ-ment, we should construct new architectural concept and production concept in the teaching, perfect the curriculum system design and promote the sustainable devel-opment of our country.
(1) Problems Existing in Current Green Building Design
1) Unclear teaching goal of green building
With the rapid development of China’s economic level, the construction industry has a bright development trend, the number and quality of buildings are constantly im-proving. The building aesthetic design, functional design and other aspects are also gradually becoming diversified, the scale of the building is constantly increasing. How-About the author: Saibai JIANG (1980.09), Female, Han, Shandong zibo, Lecturer, Master, Architectural design and theory/Green building design/Architectural vocational education.
127
Journal of International Education and Development Vol.3 No.2 2019
USA ever, in the process of education and teaching at this stage, in colleges and universities, the design of green building teaching objectives is not clear enough, the construction of students’ building curriculum system is not reasonable, and the professional level of per-sonnel training is insufficient. In the course design of architectural education, it is diffi-cult to unify and concretize the teaching content because of the unclear educational goal, and it is difficult to cultivate students’ professional and technical ability in the course de-sign. The vague teaching objectives make the quality of personnel training worse, and lack of professional ability in the work of green innovative design of buildings. In teach-ing, teachers usually explain according to the textbooks provided by the school, and teach according to the catalogue of the textbooks, without a clear training plan. In teach-ing, they only pay attention to the mastery of students' knowledge and content, ignoring the establishment of students’ green building concept and the cultivation of students’ practical ability.
2) Lack of professional teacher resources
In many architectural colleges and universities, the composition of the teaching staff is mainly by the relevant professional teachers, green building professional teachers are relatively scarce. Specialized green building design instructors can integrate curriculum design and professional content design with the development of green building projects in the society. But because of the shortage of professional teachers, there is a lack of comprehensive consideration of the syllabus, key and difficult issues, depth and breadth, and the degree of integration with the actual work of architecture is low. Many students don’t have a thorough understanding of many knowledge points after learning relevant courses, and it is difficult to have a good understanding of the relationship between the course content and architectural design engineering. Most of the teachers come from professional normal colleges and universities, the professional skills they learn are mainly teaching skills, and the understanding of the professional knowledge of the con-struction industry is low. Especially some young teachers lack the necessary construction work experience, and their ability in engineering practice teaching needs to be improved. At the same time, there is a lack of “double-creation” teachers in the teaching, the teach-ing of architectural technology and the cultivation of students’ professional ability appear a certain disconnection phenomenon. The cultivation of excellent architectural designers only depends on students’ learning of theoretical knowledge. And they do not recognize the importance of architectural ability for students in teaching.
3) Less teaching of practical courses
Practical teaching is an important aspect of cultivating students’ ability, but there are many problems in the current teaching, such as less time, less practice strength and low quality of practice. The practice course teaching is the main course in the construction industry, which is of great significance to the training of outstanding architects. In the 128
Research on Innovative Teaching Mode of Architectural Design Course Based on the Goal
of Green Building Education process of practical teaching of architecture major, we pay attention to the students’ abil-ity of using architectural design to express, but the curriculum design of this ability training is poor, and the students’ practice time is insufficient. The amount of curriculum for practical teaching is small, so it is difficult for students to really master professional skills in learning. Most of them can only understand the specific process of operation, and lack of proficiency. The quality of practical teaching is poor, teachers do not pay at-tention to the control of students’ practical teaching quality, the assessment of students’ practical effect is insufficient, and students are relatively lax in the process of learning [1].
2. Innovative Design Scheme of Architectural Design Course Aiming at Green Building Education
(1)Establishing an interdisciplinary integrated green building education platform
In the process of architecture education, we should carry out teaching accord-ing to the talent training plan, technical ability and practice, construct multi-faceted curriculum system of personnel training, and strengthen the systematic design of related specialties and the mutual integration of different disciplines. In the setting of teaching plan, we should carry out in-depth curriculum design in accordance with architectural design concept, architectural design ecological principle, energy conservation and emission reduction pian, architectural configuration and green environmental protection, and other aspects. At the same time, we should make clear the main teaching design of the course, and integrate professional courses, basic courses and elective courses through the integration of the main and branch courses. The university should pay attention to the mutual integration of different majors, combine architectural engineering major with environmental and energy major, and integrate the relevant professional knowledge, so that students can apply different professional knowledge to the design in practice, and improve the green environmental protection of the architectural design in China [2].
(2) Integration of architectural design concepts and architectural technolo-gy courses
In the course teaching of architectural design, the teaching is mainly in the form of drawing, focusing on the cultivation of thinking awareness, and in the teaching of architectural technology, the teaching of practice course is mainly emphasized. Teach-ers should carefully study the composition system of teaching content, integrate archi-tectural design and architectural technology, explain technical knowledge such as ar-chitectural space and architectural environment through theoretical knowledge in de-sign, and construct the basic knowledge system and practice system with the help of
129
Journal of International Education and Development Vol.3 No.2 2019
USA architectural curriculum application between different grades. Teachers should perfect the courses of architectural design and architectural technology, construct the basic knowledge framework under the guidance of the green building consciousness, so that students can comprehensively grasp the basic knowledge of the construction industry, and cultivate students to have unified comprehensive ability of knowledge application[3].
(3) Improving education methods
The traditional education and teaching methods can not meet the actual needs of talents in today’s construction field. Teachers should change the single teaching meth-od to the diversified teaching method. On the one hand, we can use modern teaching to carry out teaching, on the other hand, we can improve the diversity of curriculum through practical teaching. With the rapid development of science and technology in China, there are more and more applications of related software in the architectural design industry. Some software of architectural design and architectural simulation have good teaching effect in teaching. Teachers should gradually guide students to ex-plore and apply new architectural design methods, architectural design tools and so on, think about new architectural design schemes in many aspects, pay attention to energy conservation and emission reduction in architectural design, and cultivate students’ in-novation ability and comprehensive application ability through model design, simula-tion use and other methods. In the aspect of practical teaching, teachers should strengthen the quantity setting of practice teaching courses and pay attention to the as-sessment of practical teaching quality. Practical teaching can strengthen students’ mas-tery of theoretical knowledge and improve their comprehensive application ability. Teachers should ensure that students practice teaching time is sufficient, so that stu-dents can practice in many aspects and master the relevant knowledge skillfully, after they are familiar with the basic operation process. For the assessment of practical teaching, teachers should ensure that students' learning attitude in practical learning is correct, and ensure the overall quality of practical teaching through supervision in the process of practice and assessment of practice quality[4].
(4) strengthening the construction of teachers
The innovative curriculum design is inseparable from the support of teachers. In the teaching, the university should pay attention to enrich and improve the construction of the teaching staff of architectural specialty, actively introduce professional teachers, im-prove the professional structure of the teaching staff, ensure the integration design of teachers' age structure, knowledge structure and professional title structure, and form a perfect teacher training team. For the introduction of teacher resources, we can cooperate with scientific research staff to collect green design talents in the field of architecture and hire them to become school teachers. For the construction of teachers in schools, we 130
Research on Innovative Teaching Mode of Architectural Design Course Based on the Goal
of Green Building Education should strengthen technical training, supplement professional knowledge regularly, in-spect the relevant construction departments, and strengthen mutual cooperation with the construction industry.
3. Conclusion
To sum up, the green building education needs to break the original teaching mode, integrate architectural professional knowledge with other professional knowledge, guide the formation of professional and technical level of the curriculum system, through the construction of multi-disciplinary and multi-level teaching courses, deepen the green de-sign idea into the teaching, and cultivate students’ innovative and practical ability.
Works Cited
[1] Wang Ning. “Research on practical teaching mode of green building design based
on digital technology”. University Education, 2018,99 (09): 94-96.
[2] Wang Haoyu. “Research and practice of green building design curriculum system
based on BIM”. Education and Teaching Forum, 2019398 (04): 174-75.
[3] Shi Dezhi, Liu Yuanyuan, Jiang Yan. “Exploration of curriculum construction and
teaching reform of Cleaner Production and Cleaner Production Audit”. Education and Teaching Forum, 2017 (4): 112-15.
[4] Zhang Lin, Chen Liwen, Cao Jianghong, et al. “Atlas analysis of green building
knowledge based on CiteSpace software”. Journal of Shandong University of ar-chitecture, 2018, V.33; No.151 (03): 30-35.
131。