On Kolmogorov Topological Spaces 1

合集下载

熵用于麻醉深度监测的研究进展

熵用于麻醉深度监测的研究进展

熵用于麻醉深度监测的研究进展安徽医科大学附属省立医院麻醉科(230001) 章蔚1 方才1 [摘要]自非线性动力学方法被应用于脑电图非平稳信号的处理以来,将熵的概念引入了麻醉深度监测领域。

与麻醉深度监测有关的熵包括Shannon熵、Kolmogorov 熵、单值分解熵、近似熵、交叉近似熵、状态熵和反应熵等,尤其是近年来倍受关注的状态熵和反应熵,用于麻醉深度监测具有简单、快速、准确等优点,临床应用前景广阔。

熵(Entropy)是由德国物理学家Rudolf-Clausius于1868年首次提出的,最初是物理学的概念。

上世纪40年代末,由于信息理论的需要出现了Shannon熵,50年代末以解决便历理论经典问题而崭露头角的Kolmogorov 熵,以及60年代中期,为研究拓朴动力系统而产生的拓朴熵(topological entropy),都相继诞生;1984年Johnson 和Shore等人进一步将熵引用于信号的功率谱[1]。

简言之,熵是关于不确定性的数学度量。

熵引入麻醉深度监测中是基于1937年Gibbs等首次提出用脑电图(EEG)监测麻醉深度,并将应用EEG信号来监测麻醉深度成为研究的热点。

众所周知,麻醉前后EEG波形会有明显变化,但因EEG个体差异及变化较大,而且不同麻醉药物、不同导联、温度及环境的变化都对EEG信号有较大影响,所以EEG信号一直无法直接应用于临床麻醉。

随着快速傅立叶变换(FFT)技术的成熟,产生了反映EEG频域特征的参数中间频率(MF)、频谱边缘频率(SEF)、脑电双频指数(BIS),前两者有各自的缺陷,未能广泛进入临床,最为成功的方法是BIS,虽然它能较灵敏地反映麻醉深度,但由于它存在对不同药物、不同麻醉方法反应不同的缺点,不能独立应用于临床麻醉监测。

近年来非线性动力学方法被广泛地应用于非平稳信号的处理,多种熵的分析也是如此,而脑电活动正是一种非平稳信号,所以该方法非常适合于EEG的处理[2]。

熵 - 李天岩

熵 - 李天岩

熵(Entropy)李天岩原载于数学传播十三卷三期.作者当时任教于美国密执安州立大学数学系1. Shannon 熵2. Kolmogorov 熵3. 拓朴熵(Topological Entropy)4. Boltzmann 熵在我们日常生活中,似乎经常存在看「不确定性」的问题。

比方说,天气预报员常说「明天下雨的可能性是 70%。

这是我们习以为常的「不确定性」问题的一个例子。

一般不确定性问题所包含「不确定」(uncertainty) 的程度可以用数学来定量地描述吗?在多数的情况下是可以的。

本世纪40年代末,由于信息理论(information theory) 的需要而首次出现的 Shannon 熵,50年代末以解决遍历理论 (ergodic theory) 经典问题而崭露头角的 Kolmogorov 熵,以及60年代中期,为研究拓朴动力系统 (topological dynamical system) 而产生的拓朴熵 (topological entropy) 等概念,都是关于不确定性的数学度量。

它们在现代动力系统和遍历理论中,扮演看十分重要的角色。

在自然科学和社会科学中的应用也日趋广泛。

本文的主旨在于引导尽量多的读者在这一引人入胜的领域中寻幽访胜,而不必在艰深的数学语言中踯躅不前。

物理、化学家们也许对他们早已熟悉的热力学熵更觉亲切。

我们在最后一节也将给古典的 Boltzmann 熵作一番数学的描述。

1. Shannon 熵设想我们有两枚五分硬币,一枚硬币表面光滑,材料均匀,而另一枚硬币则表面粗糙,奇形怪状。

我们把硬币上有人头的那面叫正面,另一面称反面。

然后在一个光滑的桌面上旋转硬币,等它停下来后,看是正面或是反面。

这是一个不确定性的问题:可能是正面,可能是反面。

第一枚硬币,由于正面和反面的对称性,正面或反面朝上的机率各为一半。

但对第二枚硬币来说,由于材料磨损,正面和反面不再对称。

可能正面朝上的机率为70%,反面朝上的机率为30%。

拉盖尔-高斯涡旋光束传播中的相位变化分析

拉盖尔-高斯涡旋光束传播中的相位变化分析

拉盖尔-高斯涡旋光束传播中的相位变化分析魏勇;朱艳英【摘要】为了研究拉盖尔-高斯涡旋光束在传播过程中的相位特性,采用螺旋相位板法获取涡旋光束,从菲涅耳衍射积分出发,对光束在传输过程中的相位变化以及整数阶与分数阶涡旋光束相位奇点的稳定性进行了理论推导和数值模拟。

当光束传输一段距离后,光场在观察平面上的等相位线由发散的射线变成了花瓣状的弧线。

结果表明,拓扑荷为整数阶的涡旋光束在传输过程中,相位奇点具有稳定性,而分数阶光束的相位奇点不再保持稳定性,其观察平面的光强分布不对称,且涡旋光束中心为暗核的特点消失。

该结论对光学微操纵和光信息编码技术的实现具有理论指导意义。

%In order to study the phase characteristics of Laguerre-Gaussian vortex beam during propagation , the vortex beam was obtained by means of spiral phase plates .Based on Fresnel diffraction integral formula , the phase change of the beam in the propagation process and the stability of vortex beam phase singularities at integer order and fractional order were studied by theoretical derivation and numerical simulation .When the beam was transmitted a certain distance , phase contours of the light field on the observation plane became from diverging rays into petal-shaped arcs .The results show that if topological charge of the vortex beam is integer order , the phase singularity of the beam assumes stability in the propagation process .The phase singularity of fractional order is unstable , intensity distribution on the observation plane is obvious asymmetric and the central darkness gradually disappears .The research results supplytheoretical foundation and practical guidance for the application of optical micro manipulation and information coding techniques .【期刊名称】《激光技术》【年(卷),期】2015(000)005【总页数】4页(P723-726)【关键词】物理光学;涡旋光束;相位分布;拓扑荷【作者】魏勇;朱艳英【作者单位】燕山大学理学院,秦皇岛066004; 燕山大学里仁学院,秦皇岛066004;燕山大学理学院,秦皇岛066004【正文语种】中文【中图分类】O436;TN241引言涡旋光束又称作暗中空光束或空心光束,即在传播方向上其中心的光强保持为0[1]。

A review of the species of protozoan epibionts on crustaceans-11

A review of the species of protozoan epibionts on crustaceans-11

A REVIEW OF THE SPECIES OF PROTOZOAN EPIBIONTS ONCRUSTACEANS.I.PERITRICH CILIATESBYGREGORIO FERNANDEZ-LEBORANS and MARIA LUISA TATO-PORTODepartamento de Biologia Animal I(Zoologia),Facultad de Biologia,Pnta9a,Universidad Complutense,E-28040Madrid,SpainABSTRACTAn updated inventory of the peritrich(Protozoa,Ciliophora)epibiont species on crustaceans has been carried out.Data concerning268epibiont species,their taxonomic position,and the various crustacean basibionts were considered.The overview comprised in this study may be of use in further surveys of protozoan-crustacean epibiosis.RESUMENSe ha realizado un inventario actualizado de las especies de peritricos(Protozoa,Ciliophora) epibiontes en crustáceos.Se han considerado los datos concernientes a268especies epibiontes,su posición taxonómica,y los diferentes crustáceos visión general que comprende este estudio puede ser utilizada en futuras investigaciones sobre la epibiosis protozoos-crustáceos.INTRODUCTIONEpibiosis is a facultative association of two organisms:the epibiont and the basibiont(Wahl,1989).The term“epibiont”includes organisms that,during the sessile phase of their life cycle,are attached to the surface of a living substratum, while the basibiont lodges and constitutes a support for the epibiont(Threlkeld et al.,1993).Both concepts describe ecological functions(Wahl,1989).Several crustacean groups,cladocerans,copepods,cirripedes,isopods,amphi-pods,and decapods,include forms that are hosts for macroepibiont invertebrates (Ross,1983),and for protozoan microepibionts of the phylum Ciliophora:apos-tomatids,chonotrichids,suctorians,peritrichs,and heterotrichs(Corliss,1979; Small&Lynn,1985).The study of ciliate epibionts on crustaceans began in the last century.Bütschli(1887-89)made a compilation from former publications.After-wards,other authors(Keiser,1921;Kahl,1934,1935;Precht,1935;Raabe,1947; c®Koninklijke Brill NV,Leiden,2000Crustaceana73(6):643-683644G.FERNANDEZ-LEBORANS&M.L.TATO-PORTONenninger,1948)not only described epibiont species,but proposed explanations for the processes of epibiosis.A review of the protozoan epibionts found on de-capod crustaceans was carried out by Sprague&Couch(1971).Green(1974), in a study of the epibionts living on cladocerans,pays considerable attention to protozoan species.Ho&Perkins(1985)have focused on the epibionts found on copepods.In other contemporary and also earlier works,the following aspects have been taken into account:(1)speci city between ciliates and their crustacean basi-bionts(Evans et al.,1981;Batisse,1986,1992;Clamp,1991);(2)the morpholog-ical and physiological adaptations of the epibionts(D’Eliscu,1975;Batisse,1986, 1994;Fenchel,1987;Clamp,1991;Lom&De Puytorac,1994);(3)the effects pro-duced by the epibionts on the crustaceans(Herman et al.,1971;Turner et al.,1979; Kankaala&Eloranta,1987;Nagasawa,1988);(4)the possible use of epibionts for the assessment of water quality(Antipa,1977;Henebry&Ridgeway,1979;Scott &Thune,1986);(5)the implications of protozoan epibionts on cultures of vari-ous species of crustaceans(Overstreet,1973;Johnson,1977,1978;Lightner,1977, 1988;Couch,1978;Scott&Thune,1986;V ogelbein&Thune,1988;Camacho& Chinchilla,1989);and(6)the organization of the epibiont communities on plank-tonic crustaceans(Threlkeld et al.,1993).Despite the fact that there is a considerable amount of information about the protozoan epibionts on crustaceans,since the works of Sprague&Couch(1971), Green(1974),and Ho&Perkins(1985),which relate to speci c crustacean groups, no further general reviews have appeared.Several new species of protozoan ciliate epibionts have recently been described(Dovgal,1985;Batisse,1992;Fernandez-Leborans&Gomez del Arco,1996;Zhadan&Mikrjukov,1996;Fernandez-Leborans et al.,1996,1997),and some of these are peritrich ciliates(Matthes& Guhl,1973;Bierhof&Roos,1977;Jankowski,1986;Dale&Blom,1987;Clamp, 1990,1991;Threlkeld&Willey,1993;Hudson&Lester,1994;Stoukal&Matis, 1994;Foissner,1996).The purpose of this work is to provide an up-to-date review of the peritrich ciliates living as epibionts on crustaceans:268species have been considered in this compilation,which may contribute data for studies of epibiosis in crustaceans.CRUSTACEAN PROTOZOAN EPIBIONTS,I.PERITRICH CILIATES645RESULTS1)Phylum CILIOPHORA Do ein,1901Class OLIGOHYMENOPHOREA De Puytorac,Batisse,Bohatier,Corliss, Deroux,Didier,Dragesco,Fryd-Versavel,Grain,Grolière,Hovasse,Iftode,Laval,Roque,Savoie&Tuffrau,1974Subclass P ERITRICHIA Calkins,1933Order S ESSILIDA Kahl,1933Family Epistylididae Kahl,1935Genus Rhabdostyla Kent,1880( g.1)R.bosminae Levander,1907.On the cladoceran Bosmina sp.R.conipes Kahl,1935.On the cladoceran Daphnia sp.Fresh water.On the cladocerans Daphnia magna,D.longispina and Scapholeberis mucronata (cf.Green,1957,1974).R.cyclopis Kahl,1935.On the copepod Cyclops sp.Fresh water.R.cylindrica Stiller,1935.On the cladoceran Leptodora ke Balaton (Hungary).On the cladoceran Leptodora kindtii.Denmark(Green,1974).R.hungarica Stiller,1931.On the cladoceran Leptodora ke Balaton (Hungary).R.globularis Stokes,1890.On the cladoceran Bosmina longirostris and on Diaphanosoma brachyurum.Germany(Nenninger,1948).R.invaginata Stokes,1886.On the ostracod Cypris sp.R.sessilis Penard,1922.On the copepod Cyclops sp.Fresh water.R.pyriformis Perty,1852(cf.Kahl,1935;on Entomostraca).On the clado-ceran Daphnia longispina(cf.Nenninger,1948).On the cladoceran Daph-nia hyalina(cf.Sommer,1950).On Daphnia pulex and Ceriodaphnia reticu-lata(cf.Hamman,1952).On Daphnia magna,D.pulex,D.cucullata,Simo-cephalus vetulus,Ceriodaphnia reticulata,and Leptodora kindtii(cf.Green, 1953).On Daphnia magna(cf.Green,1955).On Daphnia magna andD.longispina(cf.Green,1957).On Daphnia atkinsoni,D.hyalina,D.lon-gispina,D.curvirostris,D.obtusa,Ceriodaphnia laticaudata,and C.pulchel-la(cf.Green,1974).R.vernalis Stokes,1887.On the copepod Eucyclops agilis(cf.Henebry& Ridgeway,1979).1)For authors and dates of species of Crustacea mentioned herein,see separate section,below.646G.FERNANDEZ-LEBORANS&M.L.TATO-PORTOFigs.1-2.1,Rhabdostyla(R.pyriformis,after Green,1957);2,Epistylis(E.gammari,after Precht,1935).Rhabdostyla sp.Bierhof&Roos,1977.Between the spines at the end of the telson on Gammarus tigrinus.Germany.Rhabdostyla sp.Weissman et al.,1993.On the copepod Acartia hudsonica. Genus Epistylis Ehrenberg,1832( g.2)E.anastatica(Linnaeus,1767)(cf.Kent,1881).Syn.:Vorticella anastatica L.,1767.On Entomostraca and freshwater plants.On cyclopoid copepods and Daphnia pulex(cf.Green,1974).E.astaci Nenninger,1948.Fresh water.On the gills of the decapod Astacusastacus(as A. uviatilis)(Germany).On A.leptodactylus(cf.Stiller,1971).On the gills of Austropotamobius torrentium(cf.Matthes&Guhl,1973).E.bimarginata Nenninger,1948.Fresh water.On the appendages of Astacusastacus(as A. uviatilis).Germany.E.branchiophila Perty,1852.Syn.:E.formosa Nenninger,1948.On theparasitic copepod Lernaea cyprinacea,in freshwater environments of South Africa(Van As&Viljoen,1984).E.breviramosa Stiller,1931.On the antennal lament of the cladoceran Daph-nia ke Balaton(Hungary).On the copepod Cyclops sp.,Czechoslovakia (Srámek-Husek,1948).On the cladocerans Bosmina longirostris and Alona af nis(cf.Green,1974).E.cambari Kellicott,1885.On the gills of the decapod Cambarus sp.(NE ofU.S.A.).On the maxillae of the cray sh Astacus leptodactylus(fresh water) (cf.Matthes&Guhl,1973).E.crassicollis Stein,1867.On freshwater Entomostraca and on the pleopodsand gills of cray sh.On the gills of Astacus astacus(as A. uviatilis),andCRUSTACEAN PROTOZOAN EPIBIONTS,I.PERITRICH CILIATES647 the maxillae,maxillipeds,and gills of A.leptodactylus,in Europe(Matthes& Guhl,1973).E.cyprinaceae Van As&Viljoen,1984.On the parasitic copepod Lernaea cyprinacea(fresh water,South Africa).E.daphniae Fauré-Fremiet,1905.On the cladoceran Daphnia sp.On Daphnia magna(cf.Nenninger,1948).On the copepod Boeckella triarticulata(New Zealand)(Xu&Burns,1990).On the cladoceran Moina macrocopa in an urban stream.E.diaptomi Fauré-Fremiet,1905.On the copepod Diaptomus sp.E.digitalis Ehrenberg,1838.On the copepod Cyclops sp.E.epibarnimiana Van As&Viljoen,1984.On the parasitic copepod Lernaea barnimiana(fresh water,South Africa).E.fugitans Kellicott,1887.On the cladoceran Sida crystallina.North America.E.gammari Precht,1935.On the antennae of the gammarid Gammarus sp. (Kiel channel).On the proximal part of the rst antenna and,less commonly, on the second antenna of Gammarus oceanicus and G.salinus.In the Baltic Sea and areas of Norway(Fenchel,1965).On the rst antenna of Gammarus tigrinus(cf.Stiller,1971).E.halophila Stiller,1942.On the cladocerans Daphnia longispina and D.pulex (Lake Cserepeser,Hungary).E.harpacticola Kahl,1933.On harpacticoid copepods in the Kiel channel. E.helenae Green,1957.On the cladocerans Daphnia pulex,D.magna,D.ob-tusa,D.longispina,D.curvirostris,Ceriodaphnia pulchella,C.reticulata, ticaudata,Moina macrocopa,M.micrura,Chydorus sphaericus,Simo-cephalus serrulatus,and S.vetulus(cf.Green,1957,1974).On Daphnia magna(cf.Nenninger,1948).On Ceriodaphnia reticulata and Simocephalus vetulus(cf.Matthes,1950).E.humilis Kellicott,1887.On the gammarid Gammarus sp.and other Ento-mostraca.custris Imhoff,1884.On the pelagic copepod Cyclops sp.On the buccal appendages of the branchiopod Lepidurus apus(freshwater areas near Vienna, Austria)(Foissner,1996).E.magna V an As&Viljoen,1984.On the parasitic copepod Lernaea cypri-nacea(fresh water,South Africa).E.niagarae Kellicott,1883.On the body surface of cray sh(Niagara River, U.S.A.).On the antennae and body of the European cray sh Astacus lep-todactylus,on Austropotamobius torrentium,and on Orconectes limosus(as Cambarus af nis)(cf.Matthes&Guhl,1973).On the surface of the copepod648G.FERNANDEZ-LEBORANS&M.L.TATO-PORTOEucyclops serrulatus,and on the cladocerans Daphnia pulex,D.rosea,Cerio-daphnia reticulata,and Scapholeberis mucronata(lakes of Colorado,U.S.A.) (Willey&Threlkeld,1993).E.nitocrae Precht,1935.On the third pereiopod of Gammarus tigrinus(cf.Bierhof&Roos,1977).E.nympharum Engelman,1862.On cladocerans(Nenninger,1948).On Cy-clops sp.(cf.Foissner&Schiffman,1974).On the branchiuran Dolops ra-narum(cf.Van As&Viljoen,1984).E.ovalis Biegel,1954.On the gnathopods of Gammarus tigrinus.On the thirdpereiopod of the gammarid Gammarus pulex,and on the spines at the end of the third uropod of Gammarus tigrinus(cf.Bierhof&Roos,1977).E.plicatilis Ehrenberg,1838.On the copepods Eucyclops agilis,Cyclopsvernalis,and C.bicuspidatus(Ashmore Lake,Illinois,U.S.A.)(Henebry& Ridgeway,1979).E.salina Stiller,1941.On the rst and second antennae,coxae,and gills of thegammarid Gammarus pulex(cf.Bierhof&Roos,1977).E.thienemanni Sommer,1951.On the gills of Gammarus tigrinus(cf.Bierhof&Roos,1977).E.zschokkei(Keiser,1921).Syn.:Opercularia zschokkei Keiser,1921.On thegnathopods of the gammarid Gammarus tigrinus and on other Entomostraca.On the cladoceran Acantholeberis curvirostris(cf.Nenninger,1948).Epistylis sp.Hutton,1964.On the decapod Penaeus duorarum(Florida,U.S.A.).Between the setae of the rst antenna of Gammarus tigrinus(cf.Bierhof& Roos,1977).Epistylis sp.Hutton,1964.On the decapod Ploeticus robustus(Daytona Beach, Florida,U.S.A.).Epistylis sp.Viljoen&Van As,1983.Two species on the thoracic appendages of a freshwater brachyuran,apparently erroneously identi ed as“Potamon sp.”(South Africa)[the genus Potamon does not occur in southern Africa].Epistylis sp.Pearse,1932.On the gills of the decapods Coenobita clypeatus, Geograpsus lividus,and Pachygrapsus transversus(Florida,U.S.A.).Epistylis sp.Hudson&Lester,1994.On the gills of the decapod Scylla serrata (Moreton Bay,Queensland,Australia).Epistylis sp.Turner et al.,1979.On the estuarine copepods Acartia tonsa andA.clausi(Escambia Bay,Florida,U.S.A.).Epistylis sp.Villarreal&Hutchings,1986.Fresh water.On the maxillipeds, pereiopods,and ventral portion of the abdomen of the decapod Cherax tenuimanus(Australia).CRUSTACEAN PROTOZOAN EPIBIONTS,I.PERITRICH CILIATES649 Family Lagenophryidae Bütschli,1889Genus Lagenophrys Stein,1852( g.3)L.aegleae Mouchet-Bennati,1932.Fresh water.On the branchial laments of the anomurans Aegla sp.,Aegla castro,and Aegla franca.Arroyo Miguelete, (Uruguay)and Parana River(Brazil).L.ampulla Stein,1851.Fresh water.On the gills of species of the genus Gammarus.L.andos(Jankowski,1986)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syn.:Circolagenophrys andos Jankowski,1986.Fresh water.On the decapod Parastacus chilensis(Chile).L.anticthos Clamp,1988.Fresh water.On the branchial laments of the decapods Parastacus pugnax,P.defossus,and P.saffordi(Chile,Brazil, Uruguay).L.aselli Plate,1886.On the branchial surface of the isopod Asellus aquaticus (Hamburg,Germany).L.awerinzewi Abonyi,1928.On the gills of the decapod Potamon uviatilis(as Telphusa uviatilis)(Africa).L.bipartita Stokes,1890.On the cladoceran Daphnia sp.(fresh water,U.S.A.).L.branchiarum Nie&Ho,1943.Fresh water.On the gills of the caridean shrimp Macrobrachium nipponense(as Palaemon nipponense)(Japan).L.callinectes Couch,1967.Marine and in estuaries.On the gills of the decapods Callinectes sapidus,C.bocourti,and C.maracaiboensis(Chesapeake Bay, Maryland,Virginia,and Gulf of Mexico).mensalis Swarczewsky,1930.Fresh water.On gammarids(Lake Baikal).L.darwini Kane,1965.On the branchial laments of the decapod Cherax quadricarinatus(stream near Darwin,Australia).L.dennisi Clamp,1987.Fresh water.On the decapods Orconectes illinoiensis, Cambarus bartonii bartonii,and C.chasmodactylus(North America).L.deserti Kane,1965.Fresh water.On the gills of the decapods Cherax tenuimanus and C.quinquecarinatus(SW rivers,Australia).L.diogenes(Jankowski,1986).Syns.:Circolagenophrys diogenes Jankowski, 1986,Lagenophrys incompta Clamp,1987.Fresh water.On the gills of the decapods Orconectes illinoiensis and Cambarus diogenes(Illinois,U.S.A.).L.discoidea Kellicott,1887(cf.Clamp,1990).Syns.:Lagenophrys labiata Wallengren,1900(a junior homonym of biata Stokes,1887(cf.Clamp, 1990));L.wallengreni Abonyi,1928;Circolagenophrys entocytheris Jankow-ski,1986.Fresh water.On ostracods.On the cray sh Cambarus sp.,C.chas-modactylus,C.bartonii bartonii,and Orconectes illinoiensis(Ontario,Canada and U.S.A.).650G.FERNANDEZ-LEBORANS&M.L.TATO-PORTOFigs.3-7.3,Lagenophrys(L.eupagurus,after Clamp,1989);4,Clistolagenophrys(C.primitiva, after Swarczewsky,1930);5,Setonophrys(munis,after Clamp,1991);6,Operculigera (O.asymmetrica,after Clamp,1991);7,Usconophrys(U.aperta,after Clamp,1991).L.dungogi Kane,1965.On the branchial laments of the decapod Euastacus sp.(stream near Dungog,Australia).L.engaei Kane,1965.On the branchial laments,basal areas of the gills, branchiostegite membrane and,more rarely,on the pleopods of the decapods Engaeus victoriensis and Austroastacus hemicirratulus(Victoria,Tasmania, and Melbourne,Australia).L.eupagurus Kellicott,1893(cf.Clamp,1989).Syns.:Lagenophrys lunatus Imamura,1940;Lagenophrys articularis Nie&Ho,1943.Marine,in estu-arine areas and fresh water.On the decapods Litopenaeus setiferus(as Pe-CRUSTACEAN PROTOZOAN EPIBIONTS,I.PERITRICH CILIATES651 naeus s.)(Penaeidea,Penaeidae),on the surface of the body,Litopenaeus van-namei(as Penaeus v.),on the surface of the body,Macrobrachium nipponense (Caridea,Palaemonidae)on antennae and pleopods,Macrobrachium ohione, on the surface of the middle of the pleura,Macrobrachium rosenbergii,on the gills,Palaemon paucidens(Caridea,Palaemonidae),Palaemonetes inter-medius(Caridea,Palaemonidae),Palaemonetes kadiakensis,Palaemonetes paludosus,Palaemonetes pugio,Palaemonetes varians,on the whole body, except on the gills,Palaemonetes vulgaris,Upogebia af nis(Thalassinidea, Upogebiidae),and Pagurus longicarpus(Anomura,Paguridae),on the gills (U.S.A.,Japan,Venezuela,Thailand).L.foxi Clamp,1987.Fresh water.On the gills of the gammarids Gammarus pseudolimnaeus,G.troglophilus,G.minus,and Gammarus sp.(Missouri, U.S.A.).L.in ata Swarczewsky,1930.On the distal areas of pleopods of the gammarid Gmelinoides fasciata(Lake Baikal).L.jacobi(Kane,1969).Syn.:Stylohedra jacobi Kane,1969.On freshwater decapods in Australia.L.johnsoni Clamp,1990.Syn.:Lagenophrys labiata Stokes,1887(partim). Fresh water.On the appendages and the surface of the carapace of the gammarids Gammarus fasciatus,G.daiberi,G.tigrinus,and Crangonyx gracilis(New Jersey,Michigan,and North Carolina,U.S.A.).biata Stokes,1887(cf.Clamp,1990).Fresh water.On the appendages and on the surface of the carapace of the gammarids Gammarus fasciatus, G.daiberi,G.tigrinus,and Cangronyx gracilis(New Jersey,Michigan,and North Carolina,U.S.A.).L.leniusculus(Jankowski,1986).Syns.:Circolagenophrys leniusculus Jan-kowski,1986;L.oregonensis Clamp,1987.Fresh water.On the carapace, gills,ventral surface of the abdomen,uropods,pereiopods,and pleopods of the decapod Pacifastacus leniusculus leniusculus,and on the gills of P.leniusculus trowbridgii and P.connectens(North America).L.lenticula(Kellicott,1885)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syns.:Stylohedra lenticula Kellicott,1885;S.lenticulata Kahl,1935;Lagenophrys lenticulata(Kahl, 1935)(cf.Thomsen,1945).Fresh water.Setae of the sixth and seventh pereiopods of the gammarids Hyalella azteca and H.curvispina(U.S.A., Canada,Mexico,and Uruguay).L.limnoria Clamp,1988.Syn.:Circolagenophrys circularis Jankowski,1986 (cf.Clamp,1991).On the isopod Limnoria lignorum.L.macrostoma Swarczewsky,1930.Fresh water.On gammarids(Lake Baikal). L.matthesi Schödel,1983.On the maxillipeds of the gammarids Gammarus pulex and Carinogammarus roeselii.652G.FERNANDEZ-LEBORANS&M.L.TATO-PORTOL.metopauliadis Corliss&Brough,1965.Fresh water.On the gills of the brachyuran Metopaulias depressus(endemic on Jamaica).L.monolistrae Stammer,1935.On the pleopods of the isopod Monolistra sp.L.nassa Stein,1852.Fresh water.On the pleopods of the gammarid Gammarus pulex.L.oblonga Swarczewsky,1930.On the antennae of the gammarid Gammarus hyacinthinus(Lake Baikal).L.orchestiae Abonyi,1928.On the amphipod Orchestia cavimana(Lake Balaton,Hungary).L.ornata Swarczewsky,1930.Fresh water.On ke Baikal.L.ovalis Swarczewsky,1930.Fresh water.On the thoracic appendages of ke Baikal.L.parva Swarczewsky,1930.On ke Baikal.L.patina Stokes,1887(cf.Clamp,1990).Syn.:Lagenophrys labiata Stokes, 1887(cf.Shomay,1955).(Corliss&Brough,1965;Clamp,1973).Fresh water.On the pereiopods and gills of the gammarids Gammarus sp.and Hyalella azteca.American continent.L.rugosa Kane,1965.Fresh water.On the gills of the decapod Geocharax falcata(Victoria,Australia).L.similis Swarczewsky,1930.On ke Baikal.L.simplex Swarczewsky,1930.On ke Baikal.L.solida Swarczewsky,1930.On ke Baikal.L.stammeri Lust,1950.On ostracods.Germany.(Lust,1950a).L.stokesi Swarczewsky,1930.On ke Baikal.L.stygia Clamp,1990.Syn.:Lagenophrys labiata Stokes,1887(cf.Jakschik, 1967).Subterranean water.On the gills of the cave-dwelling amphipod Bactrurus mucronatus(Illinois,U.S.A.).L.tattersalli Willis,1942.On European copepods.L.turneri Kane,1969.On freshwater decapods in Australia.L.vaginicola Stein,1852.Syn.:Lagenophrys obovata Stokes,1887.On the genital setae and thoracopods of the copepods Cyclops miniatus and Cantho-camptus sp.L.verecunda Felgenhauer,1982.On the decapod Palaemonetes kadiakensis (Illinois,U.S.A.).L.willisi Kane,1965.Fresh water.On the gills of the decapods Cherax destructor,C.albidus,and C.rotundus(Melbourne,New South Wales(e.g., Newcastle),and NW Australia).Genus Clistolagenophrys Clamp,1991( g.4)C.primitiva(Swarczewsky,1930)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syn.:Lagenophrys primi-tiva Swarczewsky,1930.On pereiopods and pleopods of the gammarid Pallasea cancellus(Lake Baikal).Genus Setonophrys Jankowski,1986(cf.Clamp,1991)( g.5)S.bispinosa(Kane,1965)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syn.:Lagenophrys bispinosa Kane,1965.On pereiopods of the decapod Cherax rotundus setosus.Stream near Newcastle(N.S.W.,Australia).munis(Kane,1965)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syn.:Lagenophrys communis Kane,1965.On the body surface(telson,pleopods,pereiopods,carapace...) of the decapod Cherax destructor.On the gills of the decapods C.rotundus,C.albidus,C.quadricarinatus,Euastacus armatus,and Engaeus marmoratus(Victoria,Melbourne,and Tasmania,Australia).S.lingulata(Kane,1965)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syn.:Lagenophrys lingulata Kane,1965.On the branchial laments and branchiostegite membrane of the decapods Cherax destructor, C.albidus,and C.rotundus(Victoria, Melbourne,and coastal and central areas of Australia).S.nivalis(Kane,1969)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syn.:Lagenophrys nivalis Kane, 1969.On freshwater decapods in Australia.S.occlusa(Kane,1965)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syn.:Lagenophrys occlusa Kane, 1965.On the anterior zone of the branchial cavity of the decapods Cherax destructor,C.albidus,and C.rotundus(Victoria and New South Wales, Australia).S.seticola(Kane,1965)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syn.:Lagenophrys seticola Kane, 1965.On the setae of the decapods Engaeus fultoni and Geocharax falcata (Victoria,Melbourne,and Templestowe,Australia).S.spinosa(Kane,1965)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syn.:Lagenophrys spinosa Kane, 1965.On the pleopods,carapace,and telson of the decapod Cherax destructor (Victoria,Melbourne,and Heathcote,Australia).S.tricorniculata Clamp,1991.On the pleopods of the decapod Geocharax falcata(Victoria,Grampian Mountains,and Wannon River,Australia). Genus Operculigera Kane,1969( g.6)O.asymmetrica Clamp,1991.On the base of the gills of the freshwater decapods Parastacus pugnax and Samastacus spinifrons(Concepción and Talcahuano,Chile).O.insolita Clamp,1991.On the base of the gills of the freshwater decapod Parastacus pugnax(Concepción,Talcahuano,Malleco,and Puren,Chile).O.montanea Kane,1969.On the freshwater decapod Colubotelson sp.(Aus-tralia).O.obstipa Clamp,1991.Pleopods of the isopod Metaphreatoicus australis (New South Wales,Australia).O.parastacis Jankowski,1986.On the base of the gills of the decapod Parastacus nicoleti(Isla Teja,Valdivia,Chile).O.seticola Clamp,1991.On the setae at the base of gills of the decapod Parastacus pugnax(Concepción,Chile).O.striata Jankowski,1986.On the decapod Parastacus chilensis.Chile.O.taura Clamp,1991.On the branchial laments of the freshwater decapod Parastacus pugnax(Concepción,Malleco,and Puren,Chile).O.velata Jankowski,1986.On the gills of the anomuran Aegla laevis.Chile.O.zeenahensis Kane,1969.On freshwater decapods in Australia.Family Usconophryidae Clamp,1991Genus Usconophrys Jankowski,1985(cf.Clamp,1991)( g.7)U.aperta(Plate,1889)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syns.:Lagenophrys aperta Plate, 1889;Usconophrys dauricus Jankowski,1986.On the gills and pleopods of the isopod Asellus aquaticus(Marburg and Hessen,Germany;North Carolina, U.S.A.;Brittany,Finisterre,Plougarneau,Pont-Menou,and Douron River, France).U.rotunda(Precht,1935)(cf.Clamp,1991).Syn.:Lagenophrys rotunda Precht,1935.On ostracods.Germany.Family Operculariidae Fauré-Fremiet,1979(in Corliss,1979)Genus Opercularia Stein,1854( g.8)O.allensi Stokes,1887.Syn.:O.ramosa Stokes,1887.On several living and inert substrata.On the body of the cray sh Astacus leptodactylus(cf.Matthes &Guhl,1973).O.asellicola Kahl,1935.On the isopod Asellus sp.Germany.O.coarctata Claparède&Lachmann,1858.On crabs(Buck,1961).O.crustaceorum Biegel,1954.On the gills of the cray sh Astacus astacus(asA. uviatilis).On the maxillae,maxillipeds,and pleopods of Austropotamo-bius torrentium(cf.Matthes&Guhl,1973).O.cylindrata Wrzesniowski,1807.On the copepod Cyclops sp.O.gammari Fauré-Fremiet,1905.Pereiopods of the gammarid amphipod Gammarus sp.O.lichtensteini Stein,1868.On various crabs and molluscs.O.nutans Ehrenberg,1838.Syn.:O.microstoma Stein,1854.On Entomostraca.On the cladoceran Alona af nis(cf.Matthes,1950).On the maxillipeds of the European cray sh Astacus leptodactylus(cf.Matthes&Guhl,1973).O.protecta Penard,1922.On the setae of pereiopods of the gammarid amphi-pod Gammarus pulex.O.reichelei Matthes&Guhl,1973.Found exclusively on the maxillipeds of the cray sh Astacus leptodactylus.O.stenostoma Stein,1868.On the isopod Asellus aquaticus.Genus Orbopercularia Lust,1950(cf.Lust,1950b)( g.9)O.astacicola(Matthes,1950)(cf.Matthes&Guhl,1973).Syn.:Opercularia astacicola Matthes,1950.Maxillipeds and pleopods of the cray sh Aus-tropotamobius torrentium.Genus Propyxidium Corliss,1979( g.10)P.aselli Penard,1922.On the isopod Asellus sp.P.asymmetrica Matthes&Guhl,1973.On the European cray sh Astacus astacus(as A. uviatilis).P.bosminae Kahl,1935.On the cladoceran Bosmina sp.P.canthocampti Penard,1922.On the pereiopods of the harpacticoid copepod Canthocamptus sp.Fresh water.P.cothurnioide Kent,1880.On the ostracod Cypris sp.P.hebes Kellicott,1888.On the pereiopods of the isopod Asellus aquaticus.P.henneguyi(Fauré-Fremiet,1905)(cf.Kahl,1935).Syn.:Opercularia hen-neguyi Fauré-Fremiet,1905.On the rst abdominal segment of the copepod Cyclops sp.Genus Ballodora Dogiel&Furssenko,1921( g.11)B.dimorpha Dogiel&Furssenko,1921.On Porcellio sp.and other terrestrialisopods.Genus Nuechterleinella Matthes,1990( g.12)N.corneliae Matthes,1990.On the ostracod Cypria ophthalmica.Genus Bezedniella Stoukal&Matis,1994( g.13)B.prima Stoukal&Matis,1994.Fresh water.On the ostracod Cypria sp.(Slovakia).Figs.8-14.8,Opercularia(O.nutans,after Foissner et al.,1992);9,Orbopercularia(O.astacicola, after Matthes&Guhl,1973);10,Propyxidium(P.canthocampti,after Penard,1922);11,Ballodora (B.dimorpha,after Dogiel&Furssenko,1921);12,Nuechterleinella(N.corneliae,after Matthes, 1990);13,Bezedniella(B.prima,after Stoukal&Matis,1994);14,Rovinjella(R.spheromae,afterMatthes,1972).Family Rovinjellidae Matthes,1972Genus Rovinjella Matthes,1972( g.14)R.spheromae Matthes,1972.On the marine isopod Sphaeroma serratum. Family Scyphidiidae Kahl,1933Genus Scyphidia Dujardin,1841( g.15)Scyphidia sp.Henebry&Ridgeway,1979.On the cladocerans Scapholeberis kingi,Alona costata,and Pleuroxus denticulatus(Ashmore Lake,Illinois, U.S.A.).Family Vaginicolidae De Fromentel,1874Genus Platycola Kent,1881( g.16)P.baikalica(Swarczewsky,1930).Syn.:Vaginicola baicalica Swarczewsky, 1930.Fresh water.On the gills of the gammarids Brandtia lata,Pallasea grubei,and Echinogammarus fuscus(Lake Baikal).P.callistoma Hadzi,1940.Fresh water.On the cave-dwelling isopod Microlis-tra spinosissima(former Yugoslavia).P.circularis Dons,1940.Marine.On the uropods of the isopod Limnoria sp.P.decumbens(Ehrenberg,1830).Syns.:Vaginicola decumbens Ehrenberg, 1830;Platycola ampulla De Fromentel,1874;P.regularis De Fromentel, 1874;P.striata De Fromentel,1874;P.truncata De Fromentel,1874;P.longicollis Kent,1882;P.intermedia Kahl,1935;P.re exa Kahl,1935;P.amphora Swarcezwsky,1930;P.amphoroides Sommer,1951.Fresh water.On several vegetable and animal substrata.On the gills of the gammarid Brachiuropus sp.(Lake Baikal)(Swarczewsky,1930).geniformis Hadzi,1940.Fresh water.On the cave-dwelling isopod Micro-listra spinosissima(former Yugoslavia).P.pala Swarczewsky,1930.Syn.:Vaginicola pala Swarczewsky,1930.On the gills of the gammarid Palicarinus puzyllii(as Parapallesa pazill)(Lake Baikal).Genus Cothurnia Ehrenberg,1831(cf.Claparède&Lachmann,1858)( g.17)C.angusta Kahl,1933.Brackish or fresh water.On ostracods(Kiel,Germany).C.anomala Stiller,1951.Fresh water.On the amphipod Corophium curvispi-num(Lake Balaton,Hungary).C.antarctica(Daday,1911)(cf.Warren&Paynter,1991).Syn.:Cothurniopsisantarctica Daday,1911.Marine.Epibiont on the ostracod Philomedes lae-vipes(Antarctic areas).C.astaci Stein,1854.Fresh water.On the pleopods and gills of cray sh.On the maxillae,maxillipeds,and pleopods of the cray sh Astacus astacus。

The Topological Barrier A Synchronization Abstraction for Regularly-Structured Parallel App

The Topological Barrier A Synchronization Abstraction for Regularly-Structured Parallel App

The Topological Barrier:A Synchronization Abstraction for Regularly-Structured Parallel Applications∗Michael L.Scott and Maged M.MichaelDepartment of Computer ScienceUniversity of RochesterRochester,NY14627-0226{scott,michael}@keywords:barriers,synchronization,abstraction,communication topologyJanuary1996AbstractBarriers are a simple,widely-used technique for synchronization in parallel applications.In regularly-structured programs,however,barriers can overly-constrain execution by forc-ing synchronization among processes that do not really share data.The topological barrierpreserves the simplicity of traditional barriers while performing the minimum amount ofsynchronization actually required by the application.Topological barriers can easily beretro-fitted into existing programs.The only new burden on the programmer is the con-struction of a pair of functions to count and enumerate the neighbors of a given process.Wedescribe the topological barrier in pseudo-code and pictures,and illustrate its performanceon a pair of applications.∗This work was supported in part by NSF grants nos.CDA-8822724and CCR-9319445,and by ONR research grant no.N00014-92-J-1801(in conjunction with the DARPA Research in Information Science and Technology—High Performance Computing,Software Science and Technology program,ARPA Order no.8930).1IntroductionMany scientific applications,particularly those involving the simulation of physical systems, display a highly regular structure,in which the elements of a large,multi-dimensional array are updated in an iterative fashion,based on the current values of nearby elements.In the typical shared-memory parallelization of such an application,each process is responsible for updates in a polygonal(usually rectilinear)sub-block of the array.During the course of one iteration,a process updates values in the interior of its block,communicates with its neighbors to update values on the periphery of its block,and then passes through a barrier,which prevents it from beginning the next iteration until all other processes have completed the current iteration.If the new value of each array element indeed depends only on the values of nearby elements, then correctness requires synchronization only among neighbors.A general-purpose,all-process barrier is overkill:it forces mutually distant processes to synchronize with each other even though they share no data.Performance may suffer for several reasons:•In the absence of special-purpose hardware,a barrier requires O(log p)serialized steps to synchronize p processes.If the number of neighbors of any given process is bounded bya constant,then it should be possible to synchronize among neighbors in O(1)serializedsteps.•If work completes more quickly in some regions of the array than it does in other regions, then some earlier-arriving processes may be forced to wait at the barrier when they could be working on the next iteration.•Because processes leave a barrier at roughly the same time,communication in barrier-based applications tends to be quite bursty,as newly-released processes all attempt to fetch remote data at once.The resulting contention for memory and network resources can increase the latency of communication dramatically.Clearly nothing prevents the programmer from implementing the minimum amount of syn-chronization required by the application.Barriers are attractive,however,even if they over-synchronize,because they are so simple.As part of some recent experiments in software-managed cache coherence[3],we re-wrote a banded implementation of successive over-relaxation to use locks on boundary rows,rather than barriers,to synchronize between iterations.Per-formance did improve,but the changes required to the source were non-trivial:a single line of code in the original application(i.e.the call to the barrier)turned into54lines of lock acquisi-tions and releases in the newer version.The extra code is not subtle:just tedious.It could be incorporated easily in programs generated by parallelizing compilers[5].For programs written by human beings,however,it is a major nuisance.What we need for hand-written programs is a programming abstraction that preserves the simplicity of barriers from the programmer’s point of view,while performing the minimum amount of synchronization necessary in a given application.We present such an abstraction in section2.We call it a topological barrier;it exploits the sharing topology of the applica-tion.In section3we illustrate the performance advantage of topological barriers on a pair of applications.In section4we summarize conclusions.2The AlgorithmPseudo-code for the topological barrier appears infigure1.A pictorial representation of the barrier’s data structures appears infigure2.Each process has a private copy of a4-field record1that represents the barrier.Thefirstfield is a serial number that counts the number of barrier episodes that have been completed so far.The only purpose of this counter is to provide a value that is different in each episode,and on which all processes agree.The counter can be as small as two bits;roll-over is harmless.The secondfield of the barrier record for process i indicates the number of neighbors of i;this is the number of elements in the neighbors andflags arrays. In a toroidal topology,every process would have the same number of neighbors;in a mesh the processes on the edges would have fewer.The neighbors array for process i contains pointers toflag words in theflags arrays of i’s neighbors;i’s ownflag words are pointed at by elements of the neighbors arrays of i’s neighbors. To pass a barrier,process i(1)increments its copy of serial num,(2)writes this value into the appropriateflag variables of its neighbors,and(3)waits for its neighbors to write the same value into its ownflags.To minimize communication and contention,flag words should be local to the process that spins on them,either via explicit placement on a non-coherent shared-memory machine,or via automatic migration on a cache-coherent machine.To prevent a process from proceeding past a barrier and over-writing its neighbor’sflag variables before that neighbor has had a chance to notice them,we alternate use of two different sets offlags in consecutive barrier episodes.Gupta[2]has noted that in many applications there is work between iterations that is neither required by neighbors in the next iteration,nor dependent on the work of neighbors in the iteration just completed.Performance in such applications can often be improved by using a fuzzy barrier,which separates the arrival(“I’m here”)and departure(“Are you all here too?”) phases of the barrier into separate subroutines.We can create a fuzzy version of topological barrier trivially,by breaking it between the third and fourth lines.The initialization routine top bar init must be called concurrently by all processes in the program.It takes four arguments.Thefirst two specify the(private)barrier record to be initialized and the total number of processes that will participate in barrier episodes.The last two arguments are formal subroutines that top bar init can use to determine the number and identity of the neighbors of a given process p.These two subroutines must be re-written for every sharing topology.A synchronization library that included topological barriers would presumably provide routines for common topologies(lines,rings,meshes,tori);application programmers can write others as required.Programmers can also declare and initialize more than one barrier record within a single application,to accommodate different sharing topologies in different phases of the computation,or to allow subsets of processes to synchronize among themselves.An example pair of routines,in this case for an N×N square mesh,appears in figure3.Initialization proceeds in two phases.In thefirst phase,each process(1)calls a user-provided routine to determine its number of neighbors,(2)allocates space to hold its neighbors andflags arrays,(3)calls another user-provided routine to temporarilyfill the neighbors array with the process ids of its neighbors,and(4)writes pointers to these arrays,together with the count of neighbors,into a static shared array,where they can be seen by process1.In the second phase of initialization,process1uses the information provided by the various other processes to initialize the pointers in all of the neighbors arrays.To separate the two phases,and to confirm that the second phase hasfinished,we assume the existence of a standard,all-process barrier.To retro-fit an existing application to use topological barriers,the programmer must(1) obtain or write a suitable pair of topology routines(num neighbors and enumerate neighbors), (2)insert a call to top bar init,and(3)replace general barrier calls with calls to topological barrier.These tasks are substantially easier than coding the required synchronization explicitly, in-line.2proc=1..MAX_PROCS--NB:all arrays are indexed1..whatever.parity=0..1top_bar=recordserial_num:small integer--roll-over is harmlessnn:integer--number of neighborsneighbors:pointer to array of pointer to array[parity]of small integerflags:pointer to array of array[parity]of small integer--Two sets of neighbor and flag variables,for alternate barrier episodes.--Variables of type top_bar should be declared private.They should be initialized--by calling top_bar_init in all processes concurrently.Note that top_bar_init--assumes the existence of a general all-process barrier called basic_barrier.private self:proctop_bar_init(var tb:top_bar;num_procs:integernum_neighbors(p:proc):integerenumerate_neighbors(p:proc;var list:array of proc))--The following array is used during initialization only,--to communicate neighbor information among processes:static shared top_bar_info:array[proc]of recordnn:integerneighbors:pointer to array of pointer to array[parity]of small integerflags:pointer to array of array[parity]of small integernext_flag:integertb.serial_num:=0;tb.nn:=num_neighbors(self)new[tb.nn]tb.neighbors--allocate nn x1arraynew[tb.nn][2]tb.flags--allocate nn x2array--Shared.On an NCC-NUMA machine,must be physically local to self.enumerate_neighbors(self,(array of proc)tb.neighbors^)--Temporarily treat neighbors as an array of process ids,--rather than pointers to flag variables.foreach i:integer in1..tb.nntb.flags^[i][0]:=tb.flags^[i][1]:=0top_bar_info[self].nn:=tb.nn;top_bar_info[self].neighbors:=tb.neighborstop_bar_info[self].flags:=tb.flags;top_bar_info[self].next_flag:=1basic_barrier()--synchronize all processes(top_bar_info is initialized)if self=1foreach p:proc in1..num_procsforeach i:integer in1..top_bar_info[p].nnnb:proc:=top_bar_info[p].neighbors^[i]top_bar_info[p].neighbors^[i]:=&top_bar_info[nb].flags^[top_bar_info[nb].next_flag]top_bar_info[nb].next_flag++basic_barrier()--synchronize all processes(top_bar is initialized)topological_barrier(var tb:top_bar)tb.serial_num++--roll-over is harmlessforeach i:integer in1..tb.nntb.neighbors^[i]^[serial_num%2]:=tb.serial_numforeach i:integer in1..tb.nnrepeat/*spin*/until tb.flags^[i][serial_num%2]=serial_numFigure1:Pseudo-code for the topological barrier.This code is the same for all applications, regardless of sharing topology.3shared, local to i shared, local to jprivate to i private to jFigure2:Pictorial representation of the topological barrier data structures.Process j is i’s second neighbor;process i is j’sfirst neighbor.num_neighbors(p:proc)if p in{1,N,N*(N-1)+1,N*N}return2if p<N or p>N*(N-1)or(p-1)%N in{0,N-1}return3return4enumerate_neighbors(p:proc;var list:array of proc)if p=1list[1]:=2;list[2]:=N+1elsif p=Nlist[1]:=N-1;list[2]:=N*2elsif p=N*(N-1)+1list[1]:=N*(N-2)+1;list[2]:=N*(N-1)+2elsif p=N*Nlist[1]:=N*(N-1);list[2]:=N*N-1elsif p<Nlist[1]:=p-1;list[2]:=p+1;list[3]:=p+Nelsif(p-1)%N=0list[1]:=p-N;list[2]:=p+N;list[3]:=p+1elsif(p-1)%N=N-1list[1]:=p-N;list[2]:=p+N;list[3]:=p-1elsif p>N*(N-1)list[1]:=p-1;list[2]:=p+1;list[3]:=p-Nelselist[1]:=p-1;list[2]:=p+1;list[3]:=p-N;list[3]:=p+NFigure3:Example topology functions for a square N×N mesh(N>1).Code of this sort needs to be written for each different sharing topology.4121110987654321121110987654321Figure 4:Speedup graphs for SOR (left)and Mgrid (right)on a 12-processor SGI Challenge.Absolute times on one processor are the same for all three barriers.3Experimental ResultsTo verify the usefulness of the topological barrier abstraction,we retro-fitted a pair of regularly-structured applications—SOR and Mgrid—and measured their performance on a 12-processor SGI Challenge machine.We ran the applications with the topological barrier,the native (SGI library)barrier,and a tree-based barrier known to provide excellent performance and to scale well to large machines [4].Speedup graphs appear in figure 4.Absolute running times on one processor were essentially the same for all three barriers.SOR computes the steady state temperature of a metal sheet using a banded parallelization of red-black successive over-relaxation.We used a small (100×100)grid,to keep the number of rows per processor small and highlight the impact of synchronization.Mgrid is a simplified shared-memory version of the multigrid kernel from the NAS Parallel Benchmarks [1].It per-forms a more elaborate over-relaxation using multi-grid techniques to compute an approximate solution to the Poisson equation on the unit cube.We ran 10iterations,with 100relaxation steps in each iteration,and a grid size of 8×8×120.For SOR on 12processors,absolute running time with the topological barrier was 28%faster than with the native barrier,and 11%faster than with the tree barrier.For Mgrid on 12processors,running time with the topological barrier was 11%faster than with the native barrier,and 7%faster than with the tree barrier.For any given number of processors,the relative impact of barrier performance decreases with larger problem sizes,since each process does more work per iteration.Our small data sets may therefore overestimate the importance of barrier performance on small machines.Speculating about larger machines,we observe that increasing both the problem size and the number of processors,together,should increase the performance differences among barrier implementations,since the time to complete a general barrier is logarithmic in the number of processes,while the time to complete a topological barrier is essentially constant.54ConclusionsWe have introduced topological barriers as a programming abstraction for neighbor-based busy-wait synchronization in regularly-structured,iterative,shared-memory parallel programs,and have illustrated its utility with performance results for a pair of applications on a12-processor SGI machine.The notion of neighbor-based synchronization is not new;our contribution is to make it easy. The only potentially tricky part is to obtain or write a pair of functions to count and enumerate the neighbors of a process.Given these functions,a topological barrier can be retro-fitted into an existing barrier-based application simply by adding a call to an initialization routine,and then calling a different barrier.The latter task can be achieved either by modifying the source or by changing the identity of the barrier library routine.References[1] D.Bailey,J.Barton,sinski,and H.Simon.The NAS Parallel Benchmarks.ReportRNR-91-002,NASA Ames Research Center,January1991.[2]R.Gupta.The Fuzzy Barrier:A Mechanism for High Speed Synchronization of Proces-sors.In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems,pages54–63,Boston,MA,April1989.[3]L.I.Kontothanassis and ing Memory-Mapped Network Interfaces toImprove the Performance of Distributed Shared Memory.In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture,San Jose,CA, February1996.Earlier version available as“Distributed Shared Memory for New Gener-ation Networks,”TR578,Computer Science Department,University of Rochester,March 1995.[4]J.M.Mellor-Crummey and M.L.Scott.Algorithms for Scalable Synchronization onShared-Memory Multiprocessors.ACM Transactions on Computer Systems,9(1):21–65, February1991.[5]S.P.Midkiffand piler Algorithms for Synchronization.IEEE Trans-actions on Computers,C-36(12),December1987.6。

美国数学参考书目

美国数学参考书目

美国数学本科生、研究生基础课程参考书目在网上找书的时候恰好看到这个,看着觉得的确是经典书目大全,贴在这里供学弟学妹们参考:)其中所谓第几学年云云,各校要求不同,像我所在的学校,一般学生第一年选三到四门基础课(代数、分析、几何三大类中至少各挑一门),学年末进行qualifying笔试。

第二年开始选自己喜爱方向的高级课程,并通过qualifying口试。

第三年开始做research,并通过第二语言考试(法语或德语或俄语,一般人都选法语,因为代数几何经典大作都是法语的). 而Princeton 就没有基础课,只有seminar类型的课。

第一学年几何与拓扑:1、James R. Munkres, Topology:较新的拓扑学的教材适用于本科高年级或研究生一级;2、Basic Topology by Armstrong:本科生拓扑学教材;3、Kelley, General Topology:一般拓扑学的经典教材,不过观点较老;4、Willard, General Topology:一般拓扑学新的经典教材;5、Glen Bredon, Topology and geometry:研究生一年级的拓扑、几何教材;6、Introduction to Topological Manifolds by John M. Lee:研究生一年级的拓扑、几何教材,是一本新书;7、from calculus to cohomology by Madsen:很好的本科生代数拓扑、微分流形教材。

代数:1、Abstract Algebra Dummit:最好的本科代数学参考书,标准的研究生一年级代数材;2、Algebra Lang:标准的研究生一、二年级代数教材,难度很高,适合作参考书;3、Algebra Hungerford:标准的研究生一年级代数教材,适合作参考书;4、Algebra M,Artin:标准的本科生代数教材;5、Advanced Modern Algebra by Rotman:较新的研究生代数教材,很全面;6、Algebra:a graduate course by Isaacs:较新的研究生代数教材;7、Basic algebra Vol I&II by Jacobson:经典的代数学全面参考书,适合研究生参考。

(完整版)托福TPOextra答案解析和原文翻译

(完整版)托福TPOextra答案解析和原文翻译

TPO 34阅读解析第一篇Population and Climate【P1】地球人口的增长已经对大气和生态环境产生了影响。

化石燃料的燃烧,毁林,城市化,种植大米,养殖家畜,生产作为助推燃料和制冷剂的CFC增加了空气中CO2,甲烷,二氧化氮,二氧化硫灰尘和CFOs 的含量。

约70%的太阳能量穿过大气直射地球表面。

太阳射线提高了土地和海洋表面的温度,随后土地和海洋表面将红外射线反射会太空中。

这能使地球避免温度过高。

但是并不是所有的红外射线被返回会太空中,一些被大气中的气体吸收,然后再次反射回地球表面。

温室气体就是其中吸收了红外射线的一种气体,然后再次反射一些红外线到地球。

二氧化碳,CFC,甲烷和二氧化氮都是温室气体。

大气中温室效应形成和建立的很自然。

事实上,大气中如果没有温室气体,科学家预测地球温度比当前的能够低33度。

【P2】大气中当前二氧化碳浓度是360ppm。

人类活动正在对大气中二氧化碳浓度的增加有着重要的影响,二氧化碳浓度正在快速增长,目前预估在未来50-100年内,浓度将是目前的一倍。

IPCC在1992中做出一份报告,在该份报告中大多数大气科学家中观点一致,预测二氧化碳浓度翻倍可能会将全球气温提高1.4-4.5度。

IPCC在2001年的报告中做出的预测是气温几乎将会提高2倍。

可能发生的气温升高比在冰河时期发生的变化要大很多。

这种温度的升高也不会是一直的,在赤道周围变化最小,而在极点周围的变化则是2-3倍。

这些全球变化的本地化影响很难预测,但是大家一致认为可能会影响洋流的改变,在北半球的一些区域可能增加在冬天发洪水的可能性,在一些区域夏天发生干旱的概率提高,还有海平面的升高也可能会淹没位置较低的国家。

【P3】科学家积极参与地球气候系统中物理,化学和生物成分的调查,为了对温室气体的增加对未来全球气候的影响做出准确预测。

全球环流模型在这个过程中是重要的工具。

这些模型体现包含了当前对大气环流模式,洋流,大陆影响和类似东西所掌握的知识,在变化的环境下预测气候。

0411523v1 Twisted representations of vertex operator superalgebras

0411523v1 Twisted representations of vertex operator superalgebras

a r X i v :m a t h /0411523v 1 [m a t h .Q A ] 23 N o v 2004Twisted representations of vertex operatorsuperalgebrasChongying Dong 1and Zhongping ZhaoDepartment of Mathematics,University of California,Santa Cruz,CA 95064AbstractThis paper gives an analogue of A g (V )theory for a vertex operator superalgebra V and an automorphism g of finite order.The relation between the g -twisted V -modules and A g (V )-modules is established.It is proved that if V is g -rational,then A g (V )is finite dimensional semisimple associative algebra and there are only finitely many irreducible g -twisted V -modules.1IntroductionThe twisted sectors or twisted modules are basic ingredients in orbifold conformal field theory (cf.[FLM1],[FLM2],[FLM3],[Le1],[Le2],[DHVW],[DVVV],[DL2],[DLM2]).The notion of twisted module [FFR],[D]is derived from the properties of twisted vertex operators for finite automorphisms of even lattice vertex operator algebras constructed in [Le1],[Le2]and [FLM2],also see [DL2].In this paper we study the twisted modules for an arbitrary vertex operator superalgebra following [Z],[KW]and [DLM2].An associative algebra A (V )was introduced in [Z]for every vertex operator algebra V to study the representation theory for vertex operator algebra.The main idea is to reduce the study of representation theory for a vertex operator algebra to the study of represen-tation theory for an associative algebra.This approach has been very successful and the irreducible modules for many well-known vertex operator algebras have been classified by using the associative algebras.This theory has been extended to the vertex operator superalgebras in [KW]and has been further generalized to the twisted representations for a vertex operator algebra in [DLM2].This paper is a “super analogue”of [DLM2].We construct an associative algebra A g (V )for any vertex operator superalgebra V together with an automorphism g of finite order.Then the vacuum space of any admissible g -twisted V -module becomes a module for A g (V ).On the other hand one can construct a ‘universal’admissible g -twisted V -module from any A g (V )-module.This leads to a one to one correspondence between the set of inequivalent admissible g -twisted V -modules and the set of simple A g (V )-modules.As in the case of vertex operator algebra,if V is g -rational then A g (V )is a finite dimensional semisimple associative algebra.The ideas of this paper and other related papers are very natural and go back to the theory of highest weight modules for Kac-Moody Lie algebras and other Lie algebras with triangular decompositions.In the classical highest weight module theory,the highestweight or highest weight vector determines the highest weight module structure to some extend(different highest weight modules can have the same highest weight).The role of the vacuum space for an admissible twisted module is similar to the role of the highest weight space in a highest weight module.So from this point of view,the A g(V)theory is a natural extension of highest weight module theory in the representation theory of vertex operator superalgebras.A vertex operator superalgebra has a canonical automorphismσof order2arising from the structure of superspace.Theσ-twisted modules which are called the Ramond sector in the literature play very important roles in the study of geometry.Important topological invariants such as elliptic genus and certain Witten genus can be understood as graded trace functions on the Ramond sectors constructed from the manifolds.It is expected that the theory developed in this paper will have applications in geometry and physics.Since the setting and most results in this paper are similar to those in[DLM2]we only provide the arguments which are either new or need a lot of modifications.We refer the reader to[DLM2]for details.The organization of this paper is similar to that of[DLM2].We review the definition of vertex operator superalgebra and define various notions of g-twisted V-modules in section2.In section3,we introduce the algebra A g(V)for VOSA V.Section4is devoted to the study of Lie superalgebra V[g]which is kind of twisted affinization of V.A weak g-twisted V-module is naturally a V[g]-module.In section5,we construct the functorΩwhich sends a weak g-twisted V-module to an A g(V)-module.We construct another functor L from the category of A g(V)-modules to the category of admissible g-twisted V-modules in Section6.That is,for any A g(V)-module U we can construct a kind of“generalized Verma module”¯M(U)which is the universal admissible g-twisted V-module generated by U.It is proved that there is a1-1correspondence between the irreducible objects in these two categories.Moreover if V is g-rational,then A g(V)is a finite dimensional semisimple associative algebra.We discuss some examples of vertex operator superalgebras constructed from the free fermions and their twisted modules in Section7.2Vertex Operator superalgebra and twisted mod-ulesWe review the definition of vertex operator superalgebra(cf.[B],[FLM3],[DL1])and various notions of twisted modules in this section(cf.[D],[DLM2],[FFR],[FLM3],[Z]).Recall that a super vector space is a Z2-graded vector space V=V¯0⊕V¯1.The elements in V¯0(resp.V¯1)are called even(resp.odd).Let˜v be0if v∈V¯0,and1if v∈V¯1.Definition2.1.A vertex operator superalgebra is a12Z+V n=V¯0⊕V¯1.(2.1)with V¯0= n∈Z V n and V¯1= n∈112(m3−m)δm+n,0c;(2.6)dz0 Y(u,z1)Y(v,z2)−(−1)˜u˜v z−10δ z2−z1z2 Y(Y(u,z0)v,z2).(2.9) whereδ(z)= n∈Z z n and(z i−z j)n is expanded as a formal power series in z j.Throughout the paper,z0,z1,z2,etc.are independent commuting formal variables.Such a vertex operator superalgebra may be denoted by V=(V,Y,1,ω).In the case V¯1=0,this is exactly the definition of vertex operator algebra given in[FLM3].Definition2.2.Let V be a vertex operator superalgebra.An automorphism g of V is a linear automorphism of V preservingωsuch that the actions of g and Y(v,z)on V are compatible in the sense thatgY(v,z)g−1=Y(gv,z)for v∈V.Note that any automorphism of V commutes with L(0)and preserves each homoge-neous space V n.As a result,any automorphism preserves V¯0and V¯1.Let Aut(V)be the group of automorphisms of V.There is a special automorphism σ∈Aut(V)such thatσ|V¯0=1andσ|V¯1=−1.It is clear thatσis a central element of Aut(V).Fix g∈Aut(V)of order T0.Let o(gσ)=T.Denote the decompositions of V into eigenspaces with respect to the actions of gσand g as followsV=⊕r∈Z/T Z V r∗(2.10)V=⊕r∈Z/T0ZV r(2.11) where V r∗={v∈V|gσv=e2πir/T v}and V r={v∈V|gv=e2πir/T0v}Definition2.3.A weak g-twisted V-module M is a vector space equipped with a linear mapV→(End M)[[z1/T0,z−1/T0]v→Y M(v,z)= n∈1T0+Zu n z−n−1;(2.12)u l w=0for l>>0;(2.13)Y M(1,z)=Id M;(2.14) z−10δ z1−z2−z0 Y M(v,z2)Y M(u,z1)=z−12 z1−z0z2 Y M(Y(u,z0)v,z2).(2.15)Following the arguments in[DL1]one can prove that the twisted Jacobi identity is equivalent to the following associativity formula(z0+z2)k+r T0Y M(Y(u,z0)v,z2)w.(2.16) where w∈M and k∈Z+s.t z k+rz2 −r/T0δz1−z0Lemma2.4.The associativity formula(2.16)is equivalent to the following: (z0+z2)m+s T Y M(Y(u,z0)v,z2)wfor u∈V s∗and some m∈1T Y M(u,z)w involves only nonnegative integral powers of z.Proof:Let u∈V r.It is enough to prove that wt u+sT0are congruent modulo Z.It is easy to see that s≡T2˜u+2r modulo Z if T0is odd.Thus wt u+s2˜u+r2˜u and wt u are congruentmodulo Z,the result follows immediately.Equating the coefficients of z−m−11z−n−12in(2.17)yields[u m,v n]=∞i=0 m i (u i v)m+n−i.(2.18)We may also deduce from(2.12)-(2.15)the usual Virasoro algebra axioms,namely that if Y M(ω,z)= n∈Z L(n)z−n−2then[L(m),L(n)]=(m−n)L(m+n)+1dzY M(v,z)=Y M(L(−1)v,z)(2.20) (cf.[DLM1]).The homomorphism and isomorphism of weak twisted modules are defined in an ob-vious way.Definition2.5.An admissible g-twisted V-module is a weak g-twisted V-module M which carries a1T Z+M(n)(2.21)satisfyingv m M(n)⊆M(n+wt v−m−1)(2.22) for homogeneous v∈V.Definition2.6.An ordinary g-twisted V-module is a weak g-twisted V-moduleM= λ∈C Mλ(2.23) such that dim Mλisfinite and forfixedλ,M nThe admissible g-twisted V-modules form a subcategory of the weak g-twisted V-modules.It is easy to prove that an ordinary g-twisted V-module is admissible.Shifting the grading of an admissible g-twisted module gives an isomorphic admissible g-twisted V-module.A simple object in this category is an admissible g-twisted V-module M such that0and M are the only graded submodules.We say that V is g-rational if every admissible g-twisted V-module is completely reducible,i.e.,a direct sum of simple admissible g-twisted modules.V is called rational if V is1-rational.V is called holomorphic if V is rational and V is the only irreducible V-module up to isomorphism.If M=⊕n∈1T Z+M(n)∗(2.24)where M(n)∗=Hom C(M(n),C).The vertex operator Y M′(a,z)is defined for a∈V via Y M′(a,z)f,u = f,Y M(e zL(1)(−z−2)L(0)a,z−1)u (2.25) where · denotes the natural paring between M′and M.Then we have the following [FHL]:Lemma2.7.(M′,Y M′)is an admissible g−1-twisted V-module.Lemma2.7is needed in the proof of several results in Section6although we do not intend to give these proofs(cf.[DLM2]).3The associative algebra A g(V)Let r be an integer between0and T−1(or T0−1).We will also use r to denote its residue class modulo T or T0.For homogeneous u∈V r∗,we setδr=1if r=0andδr=0 if r=0.Let v∈V we defineu◦g v=Res z (1+z)wt u−1+δr+rz1+δrY(u,z)v(3.1)where(1+z)αforα∈C is to be expanded in nonnegative integer powers of z.Let O g(V) be the linear span of all u◦g v and define the linear space A g(V)to be the quotient V/O g(V).We will use A(V),O(V),u◦v,when g=1.The A(V)was constructed in[KW] and if V is a vertex operator,A g(V)was constructed in[DLM2].Lemma3.1.If r=0then V r∗⊆O g(V).Proof:The proof is the same as that of Lemma2.1in[DLM2].Let I=O g(V)∩V0∗.Then A g(V)≃V0∗/I(as linear spaces).Since O(V0∗)⊂I, A g(V)is a quotient of A(V0∗).We now define a product ∗g on V which will induce an associative product in A g (V ).Let r,u and v be as above and setu ∗gv =Res z (Y (u,z )(1+z )wt uT+nzY (v,z )u ∈O (V 0∗)and(iii)u ∗v −(−1)˜u ˜v v ∗u −Res z (1+z )wt u −1Y (u,z )v ∈O (V 0∗).Proof:See the proofs of Lemmas 2.1.2and 2.1.3of[Z]bynoting thatY (u,z )v ≡(−1)˜u ˜v (1+z )−wtu −wtv Y (v,−zz Y (c,z )u(3.4)andu∗c≡Res z(1+z)wt c−1z0 Y(c,z1)Y(a,z2)b−(−1)˜c˜a z−10δ z2−z1z2 Y(Y(c,z0)a,z2)b.(3.6) Forε=0or1,(3.6)implies:xε=Res z1(1+z1)wt c−εTz1Y(c,z1)(1+z2)wt a−1+δr+rz1+δr2Y(a,z2)b=(−1)˜a˜c Res z1Res z2(1+z1)wt c−εTz1(1+z2)wt a−1+δr+rz1+δr2z−12δ z1−z0z1(1+z2)wt a−1+δr+rz1+δr2Y(a,z2)Y(c,z1)b+Res z2Res z(1+z2+z0)wt c−εTTz1Y(c,z1)b+∞i,j=0(−1)j wt c−εi Res z2(1+z2)wt a−1+δr+r z j+2+δr2Y(c i+j a,z2)b=(−1)˜c˜a Res z2(1+z2)wt a−1+δr+rz1+δr2Y(a,z2)Res z1(1+z1)wt c−εT+j+1−εNext we prove that∗g is associative.We need to verify that(a∗b)∗c−a∗(b∗c)∈O g(V0∗)for a,b,c∈V0∗.A straightforward computation using the twisted Jacobi identity gives(a∗b)∗c=wt a i=0(a i−1b)∗c=wt ai=0 wt a i Res w(Y(a i−1b,w)(1+w)wt(a i−1b)wc)=Res w Res z−w(Y(Y(a,z−w)b,w)(1+z)wt a(1+w)wt bw(z−w)c)−(−1)˜a˜b Res w Res z(Y(b,w)Y(a,z)(1+z)wt a(1+w)wt bwc)−(−1)˜a˜b∞i=0Res w Res z(Y(b,w)Y(a,z)(−1)i+1z i w−i−1(1+z)wt a(1+w)wt bzwc)mod O g(V0∗)≡a∗(b∗c)mod O g(V0∗)Thus A g(V)≃V0∗T0,t−1dt f(t) g(t).(4.1) (see[B]).Then the tensor productL(V)=C[t1T0]⊗V.(4.2)is a vertex superalgebra with vertex operatorY (f (t )⊗v,z )(g (t )⊗u )=f (t +z )g (t )⊗Y (v,z )u.(4.3)The L (−1)operator of L (V )is given by D =dT 0)(t m ⊗ga ).(4.4)Let L (V,g )be the g -invariants which is a vertex sub-superalgebra of L (V ).Clearly,L (V,g )=⊕T 0−1r =0tr/T 0C [t,t −1]⊗V r .(4.5)Following [B],we know thatV [g ]=L (V,g )/D L (V,g )(4.6)is a Lie superalgebra with bracket[u +D L (V,g ),v +D L (V,g )]=u 0v +D L (V,g ).(4.7)For short let a (q )be the image of t q ⊗a ∈L (V,g )in V [g ].Then we have Lemma 4.1.Let a ∈V r ,v ∈V s and m,n ∈Z .Then(i)[ω(0),a (m +r T 0a (m −1+rT 0),b (n +s T 0ia ib (m +n +r +sTZ -graded.Since D increases degree by 1,D L (V,g )is a graded subspace ofL (V,g )and V [g ]is naturally 1TZV [g ]n .By Lemma 4.1,V [g ]is a1TZV [g ]±n .Lemma 4.2.V [g ]0is spanned by elements of the form a (wt a −1)for homogeneous a ∈V 0∗.Proof:Let a∈V.Then the degree wt a−n−1of a(n)is0if and only if a∈V0¯andn=wt a−1or a∈V T0/2¯1and n=wt a−1.The bracket of V[g]0is given by[a(wt a−1),b(wt b−1)]=∞j=0 wt a−1j a j b(wt(a j b)−1).(4.10)Set o(a)=a(wt a−1)for homogeneous a∈V0∗and extend linearly to all a∈V0∗. This gives a linear mapV0∗→V[g]0,a→o(a).(4.11) As the kernel of the map is(L(−1)+L(0))V0∗,we obtain an isomorphism of Lie super-algebras V0∗/(L(−1)+L(0))V0∗∼=V[g]0.The bracket on the quotient of V0∗is given by[a,b]= j≥0 wt a−1j a j b.Lemma4.3.Let A g(V)Lie be the Lie superalgebra of the associative algebra A g(V)intro-duced in section3such that[u,v]=u∗g v−(−1)˜u˜v v∗g u.Then the map o(a)→a+O g(V) is an onto Lie superalgebra homomorphism from V[g]0to A g(V)Lie.Proof:Recall that I=O g(V)∩V0∗.So we have a surjective linear mapV[g]0∼=V0∗/(L(−1)+L(0))V0∗→V0∗/I≃A g(V),o(a)→a+(L(−1)+L(0))V0∗→a+I.(4.12) The Lie homomorphism follows from[o(a),o(b)]=∞j=0 wt a−1j o(a j b).and[a+O g(V),b+O g(V)]≡a∗g b−(−1)˜a˜b b∗g a≡∞j=0 wt a−1j a j b≡Res z(1+z)wt a−1Y(a,z)b mod O g(V0∗)≡∞i=0 wt a−1i a i b mod O g(V0∗).5The functorΩThe main purpose in this section is to construct a covariant functorΩfrom the category of weak g-twisted V-modules to the category of A g(V)-modules(cf.Theorem5.1).Let M be a weak g-twisted V-module.We define the space of“lowest weight vectors”to beΩ(M)={w∈M|u wt u+n w=0,u∈V,n≥0}.The main result in this section says thatΩ(M)is an A g(V)-module.Moreover if f:M→N is a morphism in weak g-twisted V-modules,the restrictionΩ(f)of f toΩ(M)is an A g(V)-module morphism.Note that if M is a weak g-twisted V-module then M becomes a V[g]-module such that a(m)acts as a m.Moreover,M is an admissible g-twisted V-module if and only if M is a1TY(u,z)v.z2The argument in the Proof of Theorem2.1.2in[Z]with suitable modification giveso(u∗v)=o(u)o(v).Note that o(L(−1)u+L(0)u)=0and(L(−1)u+L(0)u)∗v=u◦v.We immediately have o(u◦v)=0onΩ(M).Ifa=Res z (1+z)wt c−1+rzY(u,z)v,we can use Lemma2.4.Since z wt u−1+rT Y M(u,z0+z2)Y M(v,z2)w=(z2+z0)wt u−1+rT2to(5.1)yields0=Res z0Res z2z−10zwt v−rT Y M(Y(u,z0)v,z2)w=∞i=0 wt u−1+rTi o(u i−1v)w=o Res z(1+z)wt u−1+r z Y M(u,z)v w=o(a)w(5.2) as required.If M is a nonzero admissible g-twisted V-modules we may and do assume that M(0) is nonzero with suitable degree shift.With these conventions we haveProposition5.2.Let M be a simple admissible g-twisted V-module.Then the following hold(i)Ω(M)=M(0).(ii)Ω(M)is a simple A g(V)-module.Proof:The proof is the same as in[DLM2].6Generalized Verma modules and the functor LIn this section we focus on how to construct admissible g-twisted V-modules from a given A g(V)-module U.We use the same trick which was used in[DLM2]to do this.We will define two g-twisted admissible V-modules¯M(U)and L(U).The¯M(U)is the universal admissible g-twisted V-module such that¯M(U)(0)=U and L(U)is smallest admissible g-twisted V-module whose L(U)(0)=U.Just as in the classical highest weight module theory,L(U)is the unique irreducible quotient of¯M(U)if U is simple.We start with an A g(V)-module U.Then U is automatically a module for A g(V)Lie.By Lemma4.3U is lifted to a module for the Lie superalgebra V[g]0.Let V[g]−act trivially on U and extend U to a P=V[g]−⊕V[g]0-module.Consider the induced moduleM(U)=Ind V[g]P(U)=U(V[g])⊗U(P)U(6.1)T0Zv(m)z−m−1(6.2)Then Y M(U)(v,z)satisfies condition(2.12)-(2.14).By Lemma4.1(ii),the identity(2.18) holds.But this is not good enough to establish the twisted Jacobi identity for the action (6.2)on M(U).Let W be the subspace of M(U)spanned linearly by the coefficients of(z0+z2)wt a−1+δr+r T Y(Y(a,z0)b,z2)u(6.3) for any homogeneous a∈V r∗,b∈V,u∈U.We set¯M(U)=M(U)/U(V[g])W.(6.4) Proposition6.1.Let M be a V[g]-module such that there is a subspace U of M satisfying the following conditions:(i)M=U(V[g])U;(ii)For any a∈V r∗and u∈U there is k∈wt a+Z+such that(z0+z2)k+r T Y(Y(a,z0)b,z2)u(6.5) for any b∈V.Then M is a weak V-module.Proof:We only need to prove the twisted Jacobi identity,which is equivalent to com-mutator relation(2.17)and the associativity(2.16).But the commutator formula is built in already as M is a V[g]-module.By Lemma2.4,the assumption(ii)can be reformulated as follows:(ii’)For any a∈V r and u∈U there is k∈Z+such that(z0+z2)k+r T0Y(Y(a,z0)b,z2)u(6.6) Since M is a V[g]-module generated by U it is enough to prove that if u satisfies(ii’) then c n u also satisfies(ii’)for c∈V and n∈1T0Y(c i a,z0+z2)Y(b,z2)u=(z2+z0)k2+r+sT0Y(a,z0+z2)Y(c i b,z2)u=(z2+z0)k2+r+sT0+n−k1>k2+r+s(z 0+z 2)k +rT 0c n Y (a,z 0+z 2)Y (b,z 2)u −(−1)˜a ˜c (−1)˜b ˜c∞ i =0n i (z 0+z 2)k +r T 0Y (a,z 0+z 2)Y (c i b,z 2)u=(−1)˜a ˜c (−1)˜b ˜c (z 0+z 2)k +rT 0+n −iY (Y (c i a,z 0)b,z 2)u−(−1)˜b ˜c∞ i =0n iz n −i2(z 2+z 0)k +rT 0c n Y (Y (a,z 0)b,z 2)u−(−1)˜a ˜c (−1)˜b ˜c ∞ i =0n i (z 2+z 0)k +r T 0Y (c i Y (a,z 0)b,z 2)u+(−1)˜a ˜c (−1)˜b ˜c ∞ i =0∞ j =0n j j iz n −i2(z 2+z 0)k +rT 0c n Y (Y (a,z 0)b,z 2)u−(−1)˜a ˜c (−1)˜b ˜c ∞ i =0n i (z 2+z 0)k +r T 0Y (c i Y (a,z 0)b,z 2)u+(−1)˜a ˜c (−1)˜b ˜c ∞ j =0∞ i =jn j n −ji −jz n −i2(z 2+z 0)k +rT 0c n Y (Y (a,z 0)b,z 2)u−(−1)˜a ˜c (−1)˜b ˜c∞ i =0n i z n −i 2(z 2+z 0)k +rT 0c n Y (Y (a,z 0)b,z 2)u−(−1)˜a ˜c (−1)˜b ˜c (z 2+z 0)k +rT 0Y (Y (a,z 0)b,z 2)c n u,=(z 2+z 0)k +rThe proof is complete.Applying Proposition6.1to¯M(U)gives the following main result of this section. Theorem6.2.¯M(U)is an admissible g-twisted V-module with¯M(U)(0)=U and with the following universal property:for any weak g-twisted V-module M and any A g(V)-morphismφ:U→Ω(M),there is a unique morphism¯φ:¯M(U)→M of weak g-twisted V-modules which extendsφ.As in[DLM2]we also haveTheorem6.3.M(U)has a unique maximal graded V[g]-submodule J with the property that J∩U=0.Then L(U)=M(U)/J is an admissible g-twisted V-module satisfying Ω(L(U))∼=U.L defines a functor from the category of A g(V)-modules to the category of admissible g-twisted V-modules such thatΩ◦L is naturally equivalent to the identity.We have a pair of functorsΩ,L between the A g(V)-module category and admissible g-twisted V-module category.AlthoughΩ◦L is equivalent to the identity,L◦Ωis not equivalent to the identity in general.The following result is an immediate consequence of Theorem6.3.Lemma6.4.Suppose that U is a simple A g(V)-module.Then L(U)is a simple admissible g-twisted V-module.Using Lemma6.4,Proposition5.2(ii),Theorems6.2and6.3gives:Theorem6.5.L andΩare equivalent when restricted to the full subcategories of com-pletely reducible A g(V)-modules and completely reducible admissible g-twisted V-modules respectively.In particular,L andΩinduces mutually inverse bijections on the isomor-phism classes of simple objects in the category of A g(V)-modules and admissible g-twisted V-modules respectively.We now apply the obtained results to g-rational vertex operator superalgebras to obtain:Theorem6.6.Suppose that V is a g-rational vertex operator superalgebra.Then the following hold:(a)A g(V)is afinite-dimensional,semi-simple associative algebra(possibly0).(b)V has onlyfinitely many isomorphism classes of simple admissible g-twisted mod-ules.(c)Every simple admissible g-twisted V-module is an ordinary g-twisted V-module.(d)V is g−1-rational.(e)The functors L,Ωare mutually inverse categorical equivalences between the cate-gory of A g(V)-modules and the category of admissible g-twisted V-modules.(f)The functors L,Ωinduce mutually inverse categorical equivalences between the category offinite-dimensional A g(V)-modules and the category of ordinary g-twisted V-modules.The proof is the same as that of Theorem8.1in[DLM2].7ExamplesIn this section we discuss the well known vertex operator superalgebras constructed from the free fermions and their twisted modules.In particular we compute the algebra A g (V )and classify the irreducible twisted modules using A g (V ).The classification results have been obtained previously in [Li2]with a different approach.Let H = li =1C a i be a complex vector space equipped with a nondegenerate symmet-ric bilinear form (,)such that {a i |i =1,2,...l }form an orthonormal basis.Let A (H,Z +12}subject to the relation [a (n ),b (m )]+=(a,b )δm +n,0.Let A +(H,Z +12,n >0},andmake C a 1-dimensional A +(H,Z +12)=A (H,Z +12)C∼=Λ[a i(−n )|n >0,n ∈Z +1∂a i (−n )if n is positive and by multiplication by a i (n )if nis negative.The V (H,Z +12Zso thatV (H,Z +12Zwe define a normal ordering:b 1(n 1)···b k (n k ):=(−1)|σ|b i 1(n i 1)···b i k (n i k )such that n i 1≤···≤n i k where σis the permutation of {1,...,k }by sending j to i j .For a ∈H set Y (a (−1/2),z )=n ∈12)···b k (−n k −12)where n i arenonnegative integers.We setY (v,z )=:(∂n 1b 1(z ))···(∂n k b k (z )):where ∂n =1dz)n .Then we have a linear map:V (H,Z +12))[[z,z −1]]v→Y (v,z )=n ∈Z v n z −n −1(v n ∈End V (H,Z +12li =1a i (−32).The following result is well known (cf.[FFR],[KW]and [Li1]).Theorem7.1.(V(H,Z+12)for i=1,...,l.We have already mentioned in Section2that any vertex operator superalgebra has a canonical automorphismσsuch thatσ=1on V¯0andσ=−1on V¯1.Note thatV(H,Z+12)¯1.We next discuss theσ-twisted V(H,Z+1∂b i(−n)∗if n is nonnegative and multiplication by b i(n)if n is nega-tive.Similarly,b i(n)∗acts as∂2)-module such thatY V(H,Z)(u(−12)is isomorphic to thematrix algebra M2k×2k(C)and V(H,Z)is the unique irreducibleσ-twisted V(H,Z+12)is isomorphic to thematrix algebra M2k×2k(C).Since g=σ,the decomposition(2.10)becomes V=V0∗.By lemma3.2(i),Res z (1+z)1z2+ma i(z)v= s≥0c s a i(−m+s−3lies in O σ(V (H,Z +12s.This implies that a i (−m −32+s )vmod O σ(V (H,Z +12))is spanned by b 1(−1/2)s 1···b k (−1/2)s k b ∗1(−1/2)t 1···b ∗k (−1/2)t kwith s i ,t i =0,1.As a result,dim A σ(V (H,Z +12)-module.By Theorem 5.1,Ω(V (H,Z ))is a simple A σ(V (H,Z +12)≥dim Ω(V (H,Z ))=22k .This forces dim A σ(V (H,Z +12))∼=M 2k ×2k (C ).We now deal with the case dim H =2k +1for some nonnegative integer k.Then H can be decomposed into:H =k i =1C b i +k i =1C b ∗i +C ewith (b i ,b j )=(b ∗i ,b ∗j )=0,(b i ,b ∗j )=δi,j ,(e,b i )=(e,b ∗i )=0,(e,e )=2.Let A (H,Z )be the associative algebra generated same as above,and A (H,Z )+be the subalgebra generated by {b i (n ),b ∗i (m ),e (n )|m,n ∈Z ,m >0,n ≥0,i =1,···,k }and make C a 1-dimensional A (H,Z )+-module so that b i (n )1=0for n ≥0and b ∗i (m )1=e (m )1=0for m >0,i =1,···,k.SetV (H,Z )=A (H,Z )⊗A (H,Z )+C∼=Λ[b i (−n ),b ∗i (−m ),e (−m )|n,m ∈Z ,n >0,m ≥0]and letW (H,Z )=Λ[b i (−n ),b ∗i (−m ),e (−n )|n,m ∈Z ,n >0,m ≥0]=W (H,Z )even⊕W (H,Z )odd be the decomposition into the even and old parity subspaces.Also defineV ±(H,Z )=(1±e (0))W (H,Z )even ⊕(1∓e (0))W (H,Z )odd .ThenV (H,Z )=V +(H,Z )⊕V −(H,Z )and V ±(H,Z )are irreducible A (H,Z )-modules.The actions of b i (n ),b ∗i (n )are the same as before.The e (n )acts as 2∂2),z )=u (z )=n ∈Zu (n )z −n −1/2for u ∈H.Proposition7.3.If dim H=2k+1is odd,then Aσ(V(H,Z+12)has exactly two irreducibleσ-twisted modulesV±(H,Z)up to isomorphism.Proof:The proof is similar to that of Proposition7.2.Note that the automorphismσof V(H,Z+12)as follows:For any a1(−n1)···a s(−n s)∈V(H,Z+1/2),τ(a1(−n1)a2(−n2)···a m(−n m))=(τa1)(−n1)(τa2)(−n2)···(τa m)(−n m).Let o(τσ)=N.We decompose H into eigenspaces with respect to theτσandτas follows:H=⊕r∈Z/N Z H r∗(7.4)H=⊕r∈Z/N0ZH r(7.5) where H r∗={v∈H|τσv=e2πir/N v},and H r={v∈H|τv=e2πir/N0v}.Let l0=dim H0∗.As before we need to consider two separate cases:l0is even or odd. If l0=2k0for some nonnegative integer k0,we haveH0∗=k0i=1C h i+k0 i=1C h∗iwith(h i,h j)=(h∗i,h∗j)=0,(h i,h∗j)=δi,j.Let l r=dim H r∗with r=0.If r=N−r,wefix bases b r,1,b r,2,···b r,lr∈H r∗and b∗r,1,b∗r,2,···b∗r,lr∈H(N−r)∗such that(b r,i,b∗r,j)=(b∗r,j,b r,i)=δi,j.If r=N−r,let{c1,c2,···c lN 2∗.Then M= N−1r=1Λ[b(−n)|n∈r2)-module so that for u∈H r∗, Y M(u(−1N +Zu(n)z−n−1/2(see[Li2]).Note that b r,i(n)acts as∂∂c i(−n)if n is positive andacts as multiplication by c i(n)if n is negative.Also,h i(n)acts as∂∂h i(−n)if n is positive,and acts as multiplication by h∗i(n)if nis nonnegative.One can easily calculate thatΩ(M)=Λ[h∗i(0)|h∗i∈H0∗,i=1,2,···k0]. So dimΩ(M)=2k0.Proposition7.4.If dim H0∗=l0=2k0then M= N−1r=1Λ[b(−n)|n∈r2)-module.Proof:As in the proof of Proposition7.2,it is sufficient to show that dim Aτ(V(H,Z+ 1N−1 z1+m a(z)b=∞l=0 r2l a(−m−12)).So using the same calculation done in Proposition7.2,we conclude that Aτ(V)is spanned byh1(−1/2)s1···h k0(−1/2)s k0h∗1(−1/2)t1···h∗k(−1/2)t k0with s i,t i=0,1.Hence dim Aτ(V(H,Z+1N+Z,1≤r≤N−1,n>0] are irreducibleτ-twisted V(H,Z+1∂e(−n)if n>0andas multiplication by e(n)if n≤0.The proof of Proposition7.4gives Proposition7.5.If dim H0∗=2k0+1is odd,V(H,Z+1[DVVV]R.Dijkgraaf,C.Vafa,E.Verlinde and H.Verlinde,The operator algebra of orbifold models,Comm.Math.Phys.123(1989),485-526.[DHVW]L.Dixon,J.Harvey,C.Vafa and E.Witten,Strings on orbifolds,Nucl.Phys.B261(1985),651;II,Nucl.Phys.B274(1986),285.[D] C.Dong,Twisted modules for vertex algebras associated with even lattice,J.of Algebra165(1994),91-112.[DL1] C.Dong and J.Lepowsky,Generalized Vertex Algebras and Relative Vertex Operators,Progress in Math.,Vol.112,Birkh¨a user Boston,1993.[DL2] C.Dong and J.Lepowsky,The algebraic structure of relative twisted vertex operators,J.Pure and Applied Algebra110(1996),259-295.[DLM1] C.Dong,H.Li and G.Mason,Regularity of rational vertex operator algebras, Adv.Math.132(1997),148–166.[DLM2] C.Dong,H.Li and G.Mason,Twisted representations of vertex operator alge-bras,Math.Ann.310(1998),571–600.[FFR]Alex J.Feingold,Igor B.Frenkel and John F.X.Ries,Spinor Construction of Vertex Operator Algebras,Triality,and E(1)8,Contemporary Math.121,1991.[FHL]I.Frenkel,Y.Huang and J.Lepowsky,On axiomatic approaches to vertex oper-ator algebras and modules,Mem.Amer.Math.Soc.1041993.[FLM1]I.B.Frenkel,J.Lepowsky and A.Meurman,A natural representation of the Fischer-Griess Monster with the modular function J as character,Proc.Natl.A81(1984),3256-3260.[FLM2]I.B.Frenkel,J.Lepowsky and A.Meurman,Vertex operator calculus,in:Math-ematical Aspects of String Theory,Proc.1986Conference,San Diego.ed.byS.-T.Yau,World Scientific,Singapore,1987,150-188.[FLM3]I.B.Frenkel,J.Lepowsky and A.Meurman,Vertex Operator Algebras and the Monster,Pure and Applied Math.,Vol.134,Academic Press,1988.[FZ]I.Frenkel and Y.Zhu,Vertex operator algebras associated to representations of affine and Virasoro algebras,Duke Math.J.66(1992),123-168.[KW]V.Kac and W.Wang,Vertex operator superalgebras and representations,Con-tem.Math.,AMS Vol.175(1994),161-191.[Le1]J.Lepowsky,Calculus of twisted vertex operators,Proc.Natl.Acad A 82(1985),8295-8299.。

代数英语

代数英语

(0,2) 插值||(0,2) interpolation0#||zero-sharp; 读作零井或零开。

0+||zero-dagger; 读作零正。

1-因子||1-factor3-流形||3-manifold; 又称“三维流形”。

AIC准则||AIC criterion, Akaike information criterionAp 权||Ap-weightA稳定性||A-stability, absolute stabilityA最优设计||A-optimal designBCH 码||BCH code, Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem codeBIC准则||BIC criterion, Bayesian modification of the AICBMOA函数||analytic function of bounded mean oscillation; 全称“有界平均振动解析函数”。

BMO鞅||BMO martingaleBSD猜想||Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture; 全称“伯奇与斯温纳顿-戴尔猜想”。

B样条||B-splineC*代数||C*-algebra; 读作“C星代数”。

C0 类函数||function of class C0; 又称“连续函数类”。

CA T准则||CAT criterion, criterion for autoregressiveCM域||CM fieldCN 群||CN-groupCW 复形的同调||homology of CW complexCW复形||CW complexCW复形的同伦群||homotopy group of CW complexesCW剖分||CW decompositionCn 类函数||function of class Cn; 又称“n次连续可微函数类”。

Cp统计量||Cp-statisticC。

演示文稿数学专业英语第八讲附数学课程英文表达

演示文稿数学专业英语第八讲附数学课程英文表达
书;
4、L. Hormander “Linear Partial Differential Operators, ” I&II:偏微分方程的经典参考书; 5、A Course in Abstract Harmonic Analysis by Folland:高级的研究生调和分析教材; 6、Abstract Harmonic Analysis by Ross Hewitt:抽象调和分析的经典参考书; 7、Harmonic Analysis by Elias M. Stein:标准的研究生调和分析教材; 8、Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order by David Gilbarg:偏微分 方程的经典参考书; 9、Partial Differential Equations ,by Jeffrey Rauch:标准的研究生偏微分方程教材。
覆盖范围较广;
9、Elements of Homotopy Theory by G.W. Whitehead:高级、经典的代数拓扑参考 书。
第六页,共34页。
• 实分析、泛函分析:
1、Royden, Real analysis:标准研究生分析教材; 2、Walter Rudin, Real and complex analysis:标准研究生分析教材;

4、Principles of Algebraic Geometry by giffiths/harris:全面、经典的代数几何参考 书,偏复代数几何; 5、Commutative Algebra with a view toward Algebraic Geometry by Eisenbud:高
调代数参考书;

The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem

The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem

This bound is usually interpreted as a bound on the vacuum energy density in QFT1 : |ρvac | < 10−29 g/cm3 ∼ 10−47 GeV 4 ∼ 10−9 erg/cm3 (3)
By contrast, theoretical estimates of various contributions to the vacuum energy density in QFT exceed the observational bound by at least 40 orders of magnitude. This large discrepancy constitutes the cosmological constant problem. More generally, one can distinguish at least three different meanings to the notion of a cosmological constant problem: 1. A ‘physics’ problem: QFT vacuum ↔ Λ. Various contributions to the vacuum energy density are estimated from the quantum field theories which describe the known particles and forces. The vacuum energy density associated with these theories is believed to have experimentally demonstrated consequences and is therefore taken to be physical real. The cosmological implications of this vacuum energy density follows when certain assumptions are made about the relation between general relativity and QFT. 2. An ‘expected scale’ problem for Λ. Dimensional considerations of some future theory of quantum gravity involving a fundamental scale – e.g. the Planck scale – lead physicists to expect that the cosmological constant, as well as other dimensional quantities, is of the order ∼ 1 in Planck units (for example, Λ should be of the order of Planck energy densities).2 3. An ‘astronomical’ problem of observing Λ. Astronomers and cosmologists may refer to the ‘cosmological constant problem’ as a problem of whether a small cosmological constant is needed to reconcile various cosmological models with observational data. Although we will indicate how these different notions of the cosmological constant problem are related, we shall in this paper be almost exclusively concerned with the first of these formulations. Accordingly, when we refer to the term ‘cosmological constant problem’ we normally mean 1. In this manuscript we critically discuss the origin of the QFT vacuum concept (see also [48, 49]), and attempt to provide a conceptual and historical clarification of the cosmological constant problem. The paper is organized as follows: We first trace the historical origin of the cosmological constant problem in the QFT context. We

Understanding protein folding with energy landscape theory

Understanding protein folding with energy landscape theory

9. Appendix : Glossary of terms 10. References 158
1. Introduction The current explosion of research in molecular biology was made possible by the profound discovery that hereditary information is stored and passed on in the simple, one-dimensional
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 35, 2 (2002), pp. 111–167. " 2002 Cambridge University Press DOI : 10.1017/S0033583502003761 Printed in the United Kingdom
(1D) sequence of DNA base pairs (Watson & Crick, 1953). The connection between heredity and biological function is made through the transmission of this 1D information, through RNA, to the protein sequence of amino acids. The information contained in this sequence is now known to be sufficient to completely determine a protein’s geometrical 3D structure, at least for simpler proteins which are observed to reliably refold when denatured in vitro, i.e. without the aid of any cellular machinery such as chaperones or steric (geometrical) constraints due to the presence of a ribosomal surface (for example Anfinsen, 1973) (see Fig. 1). Folding to a specific structure is typically a prerequisite for a protein to function, and structural and functional probes are both often used in the laboratory to test for the in vitro yield of folded proteins in an experiment. Further understanding of the molecular description of life thus requires answering the deceptively simple question of how the 1D sequence of amino acids in a protein chain

Entropy changes in the clustering of galaxies in a

Entropy changes in the clustering of galaxies in a

Vol.3, No.1, 65-68 (2011)doi:10.4236/ns.2011.31009Natural ScienceEntropy changes in the clustering of galaxies in an expanding universeNaseer Iqbal1,2*, Mohammad Shafi Khan1, Tabasum Masood11Department of Physics, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India; *Corresponding Author:2Interuniversity Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pune, India.Received 19 October 2010; revised 23 November 2010; accepted 26 November 2010.ABSTRACTIn the present work the approach-thermody- namics and statistical mechanics of gravitating systems is applied to study the entropy change in gravitational clustering of galaxies in an ex-panding universe. We derive analytically the expressions for gravitational entropy in terms of temperature T and average density n of the par-ticles (galaxies) in the given phase space cell. It is found that during the initial stage of cluster-ing of galaxies, the entropy decreases and fi-nally seems to be increasing when the system attains virial equilibrium. The entropy changes are studied for different range of measuring correlation parameter b. We attempt to provide a clearer account of this phenomena. The entropy results for a system consisting of extended mass (non-point mass) particles show a similar behaviour with that of point mass particles clustering gravitationally in an expanding uni-verse.Keywords:Gravitational Clustering; Thermodynamics; Entropy; Cosmology1. INTRODUCTIONGalaxy groups and clusters are the largest known gravitationally bound objects to have arisen thus far in the process of cosmic structure formation [1]. They form the densest part of the large scale structure of the uni-verse. In models for the gravitational formation of struc-ture with cold dark matter, the smallest structures col-lapse first and eventually build the largest structures; clusters of galaxies are then formed relatively. The clus-ters themselves are often associated with larger groups called super-clusters. Clusters of galaxies are the most recent and most massive objects to have arisen in the hiearchical structure formation of the universe and the study of clusters tells one about the way galaxies form and evolve. The average density n and the temperature T of a gravitating system discuss some thermal history of cluster formation. For a better larger understanding of this thermal history it is important to study the entropy change resulting during the clustering phenomena be-cause the entropy is the quantity most directly changed by increasing or decreasing thermal energy of intraclus-ter gas. The purpose of the present paper is to show how entropy of the universe changes with time in a system of galaxies clustering under the influence of gravitational interaction.Entropy is a measure of how disorganised a system is. It forms an important part of second law of thermody-namics [2,3]. The concept of entropy is generally not well understood. For erupting stars, colloiding galaxies, collapsing black holes - the cosmos is a surprisingly or-derly place. Supermassive black holes, dark matter and stars are some of the contributors to the overall entropy of the universe. The microscopic explanation of entropy has been challenged both from the experimental and theoretical point of view [11,12]. Entropy is a mathe-matical formula. Standard calculations have shown that the entropy of our universe is dominated by black holes, whose entropy is of the order of their area in planck units [13]. An analysis by Chas Egan of the Australian National University in Canberra indicates that the col-lective entropy of all the supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies is about 100 times higher than previ-ously calculated. Statistical entropy is logrithmic of the number of microstates consistent with the observed macroscopic properties of a system hence a measure of uncertainty about its precise state. Statistical mechanics explains entropy as the amount of uncertainty which remains about a system after its observable macroscopic properties have been taken into account. For a given set of macroscopic quantities like temperature and volume, the entropy is a function of the probability that the sys-tem is in various quantumn states. The more states avail-able to the system with higher probability, the greater theAll Rights Reserved.N. Iqbal et al. / Natural Science 3 (2011) 65-6866 disorder and thus greater the entropy [2]. In real experi-ments, it is quite difficult to measure the entropy of a system. The technique for doing so is based on the thermodynamic definition of entropy. We discuss the applicability of statistical mechanics and thermodynam-ics for gravitating systems and explain in what sense the entropy change S – S 0 shows a changing behaviour with respect to the measuring correlation parameter b = 0 – 1.2. THERMODYNAMIC DESCRIPTION OF GALAXY CLUSTERSA system of many point particles which interacts by Newtonian gravity is always unstable. The basic insta-bilities which may occur involve the overall contraction (or expansion) of the system, and the formation of clus-ters within the system. The rates and forms of these in-stabilities are governed by the distribution of kinetic and potential energy and the momentum among the particles. For example, a finite spherical system which approxi-mately satisfies the viral theorem, contracts slowlycompared to the crossing time ~ ()12G ρ- due to the evaporation of high energy particles [3] and the lack of equipartition among particles of different masses [4]. We consider here a thermodynamic description for the sys-tem (universe). The universe is considered to be an infi-nite gas in which each gas molecule is treated to be agalaxy. The gravitational force is a binary interaction and as a result a number of particles cluster together. We use the same approximation of binary interaction for our universe (system) consisting of large number of galaxies clustering together under the influence of gravitational force. It is important to mention here that the characteri-zation of this clustering is a problem of current interest. The physical validity of the application of thermody-namics in the clustering of galaxies and galaxy clusters has been discussed on the basis of N-body computer simulation results [5]. Equations of state for internal energy U and pressure P are of the form [6]:(3122NTU =-)b (1) (1NTP V=-)b (2) b defines the measuring correlation parameter and is dimensionless, given by [8]()202,23W nb Gm n T r K Tτξ∞=-=⎰,rdr (3)W is the potential energy and K the kinetic energy ofthe particles in a system. n N V = is the average num-ber density of the system of particles each of mass m, T is the temperature, V the volume, G is the universalgravitational constant. (),,n T r ξ is the two particle correlation function and r is the inter-particle distance. An overall study of (),n T r ξ has already been dis-cussed by [7]. For an ideal gas behaviour b = 0 and for non-ideal gas system b varies between 0 and 1. Previ-ously some workers [7,8] have derived b in the form of:331nT b nT ββ--=+ (4) Eq.4 indicates that b has a specific dependence on the combination 3nT -.3. ENTROPY CALCULATIONSThermodynamics and statistical mechanics have been found to be equal tools in describing entropy of a system. Thermodynamic entropy is a non-conserved state func-tion that is of great importance in science. Historically the concept of entropy evolved in order to explain why some processes are spontaneous and others are not; sys-tems tend to progress in the direction of increasing en-tropy [9]. Following statistical mechanics and the work carried out by [10], the grand canonical partition func-tion is given by()3213212,1!N N N N mkT Z T V V nT N πβ--⎛⎫⎡=+ ⎪⎣Λ⎝⎭⎤⎦(5)where N! is due to the distinguishability of particles. Λrepresents the volume of a phase space cell. N is the number of paricles (galaxies) with point mass approxi-mation. The Helmholtz free energy is given by:ln N A T Z =- (6)Thermodynamic description of entropy can be calcu-lated as:,N VA S T ∂⎛⎫=- ⎪∂⎝⎭ (7)The use of Eq.5 and Eq.6 in Eq.7 gives()3120ln ln 13S S n T b b -⎛⎫-=-- ⎪ ⎪⎝⎭- (8) where S 0 is an arbitary constant. From Eq.4 we write()31bn b T β-=- (9)Using Eq.9, Eq.8 becomes as3203ln S S b bT ⎡⎤-=-+⎢⎣⎦⎥ (10)Again from Eq.4All Rights Reserved.N. Iqbal et al. / Natural Science 3 (2011) 65-68 6767()13221n b T b β-⎡⎤=⎢⎣⎦⎥ (11)with the help of Eq.11, Eq.10 becomes as()011ln ln 1322S S n b b b ⎡-=-+-+⎡⎤⎣⎦⎢⎥⎣⎦⎤ (12) This is the expression for entropy of a system consist-ing of point mass particles, but actually galaxies have extended structures, therefore the point mass concept is only an approximation. For extended mass structures we make use of softening parameter ε whose value is taken between 0.01 and 0.05 (in the units of total radius). Following the same procedure, Eq.8 becomes as()320ln ln 13N S S N T N b Nb V εε⎡⎤-=---⎢⎥⎣⎦(13)For extended structures of galaxies, Eq.4 gets modi-fied to()()331nT R b nT R εβαεβαε--=+ (14)where α is a constant, R is the radius of a cell in a phase space in which number of particles (galaxies) is N and volume is V . The relation between b and b ε is given by: ()11b b b εαα=+- (15) b ε represents the correlation energy for extended mass particles clustering gravitationally in an expanding uni-verse. The above Eq.10 and Eq.12 take the form respec-tively as;()()3203ln 111bT b S S b b ααα⎡⎤⎢⎥-=-+⎢⎥+-+-⎢⎥⎣⎦1 (16) ()()()120113ln ln 2111b b b S S n b b ααα⎡⎤-⎡⎤⎢⎥⎣⎦-=-++⎢⎥+-+-⎢⎥⎣⎦1 (17)where2R R εεεα⎛⎫⎛⎫=⎪ ⎪⎝⎭⎝⎭(18)If ε = 0, α = 1 the entropy equations for extended mass galaxies are exactly same with that of a system of point mass galaxies approximation. Eq.10, Eq.12, Eq.16and Eq.17 are used here to study the entropy changes inthe cosmological many body problem. Various entropy change results S – S 0 for both the point mass approxima-tion and of extended mass approximation of particles (galaxies) are shown in (Figures 1and2). The resultshave been calculated analytically for different values ofFigure 1. (Color online) Comparison of isothermal entropy changes for non-point and point mass particles (galaxies) for an infinite gravitating system as a function of average relative temperature T and the parameter b . For non-point mass ε = 0.03 and R = 0.06 (left panel), ε = 0.04 and R = 0.04 (right panel).All Rights Reserved.N. Iqbal et al. / Natural Science 3 (2011) 65-68 68Figure 2. (Color online) Comparison of equi-density entropy changes for non-point and point mass particles (galaxies) for an infinite gravitating system as a function of average relative density n and the parameter b. For non-point mass ε= 0.03 and R = 0.04.R (cell size) corresponding to different values of soften-ing parameter ε. We study the variations of entropy changes S – S0with the changing parameter b for differ-ent values of n and T. Some graphical variations for S – S0with b for different values of n = 0, 1, 100 and aver-age temperature T = 1, 10 and 100 and by fixing value of cell size R = 0.04 and 0.06 are shown. The graphical analysis can be repeated for different values of R and by fixing values of εfor different sets like 0.04 and 0.05. From both the figures shown in 1 and 2, the dashed line represents variation for point mass particles and the solid line represents variation for extended (non-point mass) particles (galaxies) clustering together. It has been ob-served that the nature of the variation remains more or less same except with some minor difference.4. RESULTSThe formula for entropy calculated in this paper has provided a convenient way to study the entropy changes in gravitational galaxy clusters in an expanding universe. Gravity changes things that we have witnessed in this research. Clustering of galaxies in an expanding universe, which is like that of a self gravitating gas increases the gases volume which increases the entropy, but it also increases the potential energy and thus decreases the kinetic energy as particles must work against the attrac-tive gravitational field. So we expect expanding gases to cool down, and therefore there is a probability that the entropy has to decrease which gets confirmed from our theoretical calculations as shown in Figures 1 and 2. Entropy has remained an important contributor to our understanding in cosmology. Everything from gravita-tional clustering to supernova are contributors to entropy budget of the universe. A new calculation and study of entropy results given by Eqs.10, 12, 16 and 17 shows that the entropy of the universe decreases first with the clustering rate of the particles and then gradually in-creases as the system attains viral equilibrium. The gravitational entropy in this paper furthermore suggests that the universe is different than scientists had thought.5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe are thankful to Interuniversity centre for Astronomy and Astro-physics Pune India for providing a warm hospitality and facilities during the course of this work.REFERENCES[1]Voit, G.M. (2005) Tracing cosmic evolution with clus-ters of galaxies. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77, 207- 248.[2]Rief, F. (1965)Fundamentals of statistical and thermalphysics. McGraw-Hill, Tokyo.[3]Spitzer, L. and Saslaw, W.C. (1966) On the evolution ofgalactic nuclei. Astrophysical Journal, 143, 400-420.doi:10.1086/148523[4]Saslaw, W.C. and De Youngs, D.S. (1971) On the equi-partition in galactic nuclei and gravitating systems. As-trophysical Journal, 170, 423-429.doi:10.1086/151229[5]Itoh, M., Inagaki, S. and Saslaw, W.C. (1993) Gravita-tional clustering of galaxies. Astrophysical Journal, 403,476-496.doi:10.1086/172219[6]Hill, T.L. (1956) Statistical mechanics: Principles andstatistical applications. McGraw-Hill, New York.[7]Iqbal, N., Ahmad, F. and Khan, M.S. (2006) Gravita-tional clustering of galaxies in an expanding universe.Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 27, 373-379.doi:10.1007/BF02709363[8]Saslaw, W.C. and Hamilton, A.J.S. (1984) Thermody-namics and galaxy clustering. Astrophysical Journal, 276, 13-25.doi:10.1086/161589[9]Mcquarrie, D.A. and Simon, J.D. (1997) Physical chem-istry: A molecular approach. University Science Books,Sausalito.[10]Ahmad, F, Saslaw, W.C. and Bhat, N.I. (2002) Statisticalmechanics of cosmological many body problem. Astro-physical Journal, 571, 576-584.doi:10.1086/340095[11]Freud, P.G. (1970) Physics: A Contemporary Perspective.Taylor and Francis Group.[12]Khinchin, A.I. (1949) Mathamatical Foundation of statis-tical mechanics. Dover Publications, New York.[13]Frampton, P., Stephen, D.H., Kephar, T.W. and Reeb, D.(2009) Classical Quantum Gravity. 26, 145005.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/14/145005All Rights Reserved.。

全球最好的数学书籍

全球最好的数学书籍

全球最好的数学书籍全球最好的数学书籍有很多,以下是一些被广泛认可和推荐的数学书籍:1.《数学的发现》(The Mathematical Experience):作者:Phillip J. Davis,Reuben Hersh2.《数学的目的》(Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning):作者:A. D. Aleksandrov,A. N. Kolmogorov,M.A. Lavrent'ev3.《高等代数》(Higher Algebra):作者:Serge Lang4.《数学分析引论》(Principles of Mathematical Analysis):作者:Walter Rudin5.《线性代数及其应用》(Linear Algebra and Its Applications):作者:Gilbert Strang6.《数学分析基础》(Real Mathematical Analysis):作者:Charles C. Pugh7.《数学大师》(The Man Who Knew Infinity: A Life of the Genius Ramanujan):作者:Robert Kanigel8.《数学的故事》(A Mathematical Odyssey: Journey from the Real to the Complex):作者:Steven G. Krantz9.《拉格朗日四平方和定理》(The Four-Color Theorem: History, Topological Foundations, and Idea of Proof):作者:R. McLaughlin10.《简明数学史》(A Short Account of the History of Mathematics):作者:W. W. Rouse Ball这些书籍涵盖了各个数学领域,并提供了深入的数学知识和思维方式。

非线性动力学外语词

非线性动力学外语词

非线性动力学外语词非线性动力学非线性动力学 nonlinear dynamics @M动态系统 dynamical system SG=]@原象 preimage u@p控制参量 control parameter -"_h7>霍普夫分岔 Hopf bifurcation 6.k4倒倍周期分岔 inverse period- doubling bifurca-tion5-;>ZO全局分岔 global bifurcation Ms6魔[鬼楼]梯 devil's staircase @h[非线性振动 nonlinear vibration B}up<侵入物 invader -s锁相 phase- locking I`![!猎食模型 predator- prey model :y[状]态空间 state space w5O[状]态变量 state variable xg7JU吕埃勒-塔肯斯道路Ruelle- Takens route 0{斯梅尔马蹄 Smale horseshoe Cn/rpJ混沌 chaos CA!WI|李-约克定理 Li-Yorke theorem >>李-约克混沌 Li-Yorke chaos '2;洛伦茨吸引子 Lorenz attractor ]/9混沌吸引子 chaotic attractor zKAM环面 KAM torus "I/费根鲍姆数 Feigenbaum number {.费根鲍姆标度律 Feigenbaum scaling !6KAM定理Kolmogorov-Arnol'd Moser theorem, KAM theorem q3`勒斯勒尔方程 Rossler equation ?C_R9混沌运动 chaotic motion z&q|w费根鲍姆函数方程 Feigenbaum functional equation xS+l1蝴蝶效应 butterfly effect ;cA同宿点 homoclinic point bcx异宿点 heteroclinic point [MH$同宿轨道 homoclinic orbit J(y6异宿轨道 heteroclinic orbit M)PL_排斥子 repellor-XI超混沌 hyperchaos zg阵发混沌 intermittency chaos }.内禀随机性 intrinsic stochasticity l含混吸引子 vague attractor [of Kolmogorov]V AK hBkc奇怪吸引子 strange attractor :SFPU问题 Fermi-Pasta- Ulam problem, FPU problem #0x初态敏感性 sensitivity to initial state @反应扩散方程 reaction-diffusion equation -}CKy非线性薛定谔方程 nonlinear Schrodinger equation r,CP}w逆散射法 inverse scattering method K z/A孤[立]波 solitary wave u~i("[奇异摄动 singular perturbation /正弦戈登方程 sine-Gorden equation FU1{AN科赫岛 Koch island #Py豪斯多夫维数 Hausdorff dimension uKS[动态]熵 Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy, KS entropy 4ZU3卡普兰-约克猜想 Kaplan -Yorke conjecture #eX6康托尔集[合] Cantor set x8)c$;欧几里得维数 Euclidian dimension p+茹利亚集[合] Julia set "科赫曲线 Koch curve t谢尔平斯基海绵 Sierpinski sponge G李雅普诺夫指数 Lyapunov exponent r?M7芒德布罗集[合] Mandelbrot set 9l李雅普诺夫维数 Lyapunov dimension 0谢尔平斯基镂垫 Sierpinski gasket .d雷尼熵 Renyi entropy V'(s雷尼信息 Renyi information Ynv分形 fractal @Fv\7w分形维数 fractal dimension Z分形体 fractal s&f胖分形 fat fractal L退守物 defender cu Xx覆盖维数 covering dimension 8!nR.信息维数 information dimension WT度规熵 metric entropy ['R!j多重分形 multi-fractal (关联维数 correlation dimension 'QD*o拓扑熵 topological entropy (ZUa:拓扑维数 topological dimension Bv?J拉格朗日湍流 Lagrange turbulence 8.\N3布鲁塞尔模型 Brusselator^贝纳尔对流 Benard convection iE瑞利-贝纳尔不稳定性 Rayleigh-Benard instability i'LW0闭锁键blocked bond ep5%cl元胞自动机 cellular automaton Os2浸渐消去法 adiabatic elimination ^zS连通键 connected bond, unblocked bond自旋玻璃 spin glass %0h窘组 frustration +M窘组嵌板 frustration plaquette"窘组函数 frustration function P-zio窘组网络 frustration network 0n;@窘组位形 frustrating configuration 6)逾渗通路 percolation path d!,m逾渗阈[值] percolation threshold h入侵逾渗 invasion percolation hF!K1扩程逾渗 extend range percolation 6XH"z 多色逾渗 polychromatic percolation U3F 快变量 fast variable %/5A'f慢变量 slow variable >k卷筒图型 roll pattern SyN六角[形]图形 hexagon pattern d1)jx主[宰]方程 master equation r[vdYS役使原理 slaving principle \RG>]~耗散结构 dissipation structure )离散流体[模型] discrete fluid !UMP(自相似解 self-similar solution /{,a%协同学 synergetics|`sX自组织 self-organization uz跨越集团 spanning cluster DdZ~k奇点 singularity \y"Z多重奇点 multiple singularity ?C多重定态 multiple steady state Kr不动点 fixed point Sm吸引子 attractor g48p自治系统 autonomous system #:J结点 node dx'焦点 focus Z O简单奇点 simple singularity =7?h单切结点 one-tangent node NFxld3极限环 limit cycle yeIty\中心点 center k鞍点 saddle [point] jgwd4映射 map[ping] a1O:h<逻辑斯谛映射 logistic map[ping] !pXB5~沙尔科夫斯基序列Sharkovskii sequence O#~面包师变换baker's transformation F1Xx8Z吸引盆 basin of attraction L生灭过程 birth-and death process ufz台球问题 biliard ball problem 3i<f^y< p="">庞加莱映射 Poincar'e map tpz[C:庞加莱截面 Poincar'e section $pN猫脸映射 cat map[of Arnosov] $\[映]象 image L^}uD揉面变换 kneading transformation 3JQo$9倍周期分岔period doubling bifurcation e_)}单峰映射single hump map[ping] \Bl4圆[周]映射 circle map[ping] 2R]埃农吸引子 Henon attractor CN=O分岔 bifurcation ]分岔集 bifurcation set IB(ps)余维[数] co-dimension 55:叉式分岔 pitchfork bifurcation /N4<h)< p="">鞍结分岔 saddle-node bifurcation ,EYe9次级分岔 secondary bifurcation 9.[7?Y跨临界分岔 transcritical bifurcation 2$~GQ开折 unfolding c切分岔 tangent bifurcation D普适性 universality #g1`jL突变 catastrophe (db*G突变论 catastrophe theory $U=yTF折叠[型突变] fold [catastrophe] K"{ J尖拐[型突变] cusp [catastrophe] G+=\燕尾[型突变] swallow tail T}z:"e抛物脐[型突变] parabolic umbilic92t>1T双曲脐[型突变] hyperbolic umbilic o2sO椭圆脐[型突变] elliptic umbilic5e蝴蝶[型突变] butterfly .D阿诺德舌[头] Arnol'd tongue $$BZ反应 Belousov-Zhabotinski, reaction, BZ reaction Mp 法里序列 Farey sequence .cok法里树 Farey tree mE"洛特卡-沃尔泰拉方程 Lotka-V olterra equation +Pt梅利尼科夫积分 Mel'nikov integral S%锁频 frequency-locking TE{滞后[效应] hysteresis f"wm;突跳 jump &准周期振动 quasi-oscillation M=关闭窗口回首页</h)<></f^y<>。

Kolmogorov's -5_3 law

Kolmogorov's -5_3 law
Kolmogorov’s 5/3 law
by Karima Khusnutdinova
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Loughborough University, UK Mathematical Reviews Seminar, 29 October 2009
3. Reynolds stress and the spectrum of turbulence
One of the most important quantities describing the turbulent motion is the covariance tensor of the velocity field 1 1 Rij (r, x, t ) = ui (x − r, t )uj (x + r, t ). 2 2 In particular, −ρ0 Rij (0, x, t ) = −ρ0 ui uj = τij . The spectrum tensor is the Fourier transform of Rij with respect to separation vector r: Ψij (k, x, t ) = (2π )−3
Remark by U. Frish: “The last two lines, which are not usually quoted, may also be relevant, if ...”
3. Reynolds stress and the spectrum of turbulence
2. Introduction
What happens when increasing the Reynolds number in flow past a cylinder? (Van Dyke (1982) An Album of Fluid Motion)
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

JOURNAL OF FORMALIZED MATHEMATICSVolume6,Released1994,Published2003Inst.of Computer Science,Univ.of BiałystokOn Kolmogorov Topological Spaces1Zbigniew KarnoWarsaw UniversityBiałystokSummary.Let X be a topological space.X is said to be T0-space(or Kolmogorov space)provided for every pair of distinct points x,y∈X there exists an open subset of Xcontaining exactly one of these points;equivalently,for every pair of distinct points x,y∈Xthere exists a closed subset of X containing exactly one of these points(see[1],[6],[2]).The purpose is to list some of the standard facts on Kolmogorov spaces,using Mizar formalism.As a sample we formulate the following characteristics of such spaces:X is aKolmogorov space iff for every pair of distinct points x,y∈X the closures{y}aredistinct.There is also reviewed analogous facts on Kolmogorov subspaces of topological spaces.In the presented approach T0-subsets are introduced and some of their properties developed.MML Identifier:TSP_1.WWW:/JFM/Vol6/tsp_1.htmlThe articles[8],[10],[7],[9],[3],[4],[11],and[5]provide the notation and terminology for this paper.1.S UBSPACESLet Y be a topological structure.We see that the subspace of Y is a topological structure and it can be characterized by the following(equivalent)condition:(Def.1)(i)The carrier of it⊆the carrier of Y,and(ii)for every subset G0of it holds G0is open iff there exists a subset G of Y such that G is open and G0=G∩the carrier of it.Next we state the proposition(2)1Let Y be a topological structure,Y0be a subspace of Y,and G be a subset of Y.Suppose Gis open.Then there exists a subset G0of Y0such that G0is open and G0=G∩the carrier of Y0.Let Y be a topological structure.We see that the subspace of Y is a topological structure and it can be characterized by the following(equivalent)condition:(Def.2)(i)The carrier of it⊆the carrier of Y,and(ii)for every subset F0of it holds F0is closed iff there exists a subset F of Y such that F is closed and F0=F∩the carrier of it.Next we state the proposition(4)2Let Y be a topological structure,Y0be a subspace of Y,and F be a subset of Y.SupposeF is closed.Then there exists a subset F0of Y0such that F0is closed and F0=F∩the carrierof Y0.2.K OLMOGOROV S PACESLet T be a topological structure.Let us observe that T is discernible if and only if the conditions (Def.3)are satisfied.(Def.3)(i)T is empty,or(ii)for all points x,y of T such that x=y holds there exists a subset V of T such that V is open and x∈V and y/∈V or there exists a subset W of T such that W is open and x/∈W and y∈W. We introduce T is T0as a synonym of T is discernible.Let Y be a topological structure.Let us observe that Y is T0if and only if the conditions(Def.4) are satisfied.(Def.4)(i)Y is empty,or(ii)for all points x,y of Y such that x=y holds there exists a subset E of Y such that E is closed and x∈E and y/∈E or there exists a subset F of Y such that F is closed and x/∈F and y∈F.Let us note that every non empty topological structure which is trivial is also T0and every non empty topological structure which is non T0is also non trivial.Let us mention that there exists a topological space which is strict,T0,and non empty and there exists a topological space which is strict,non T0,and non empty.One can check the following observations:∗every non empty topological space which is discrete is also T0,∗every non empty topological space which is non T0is also non discrete,∗every non empty topological space which is anti-discrete and non trivial is also non T0,∗every non empty topological space which is anti-discrete and T0is also trivial,and∗every non empty topological space which is T0and non trivial is also non anti-discrete.Let X be a non empty topological space.Let us observe that X is T0if and only if:(Def.5)For all points x,y of X such that x=y holds{y}.Let X be a non empty topological space.Let us observe that X is T0if and only if:(Def.6)For all points x,y of X such that x=y holds x/∈{x}.Let X be a non empty topological space.Let us observe that X is T0if and only if:(Def.7)For all points x,y of X such that x=y and x∈{y}⊆2The proposition(3)has been removed.3.T0-S UBSETSLet Y be a topological structure and let I1be a subset of Y.We say that I1is T0if and only if the condition(Def.8)is satisfied.(Def.8)Let x,y be points of Y.Suppose x∈I1and y∈I1and x=y.Then there exists a subset V of Y such that V is open and x∈V and y/∈V or there exists a subset W of Y such that W is open and x/∈W and y∈W.Let Y be a non empty topological structure and let A be a subset of Y.Let us observe that A is T0if and only if the condition(Def.9)is satisfied.(Def.9)Let x,y be points of Y.Suppose x∈A and y∈A and x=y.Then(i)there exists a subset E of Y such that E is closed and x∈E and y/∈E,or(ii)there exists a subset F of Y such that F is closed and x/∈F and y∈F.Next we state two propositions:(5)Let Y0,Y1be topological structures,D0be a subset of Y0,and D1be a subset of Y1.Supposethe topological structure of Y0=the topological structure of Y1and D0=D1.If D0is T0,then D1is T0.(6)Let Y be a non empty topological structure and A be a subset of Y.Suppose A=the carrierof Y.Then A is T0if and only if Y is T0.In the sequel Y is a non empty topological structure.One can prove the following propositions:(7)For all subsets A,B of Y such that B⊆A holds if A is T0,then B is T0.(8)For all subsets A,B of Y such that A is T0or B is T0holds A∩B is T0.(9)Let A,B be subsets of Y.Suppose A is open or B is open.If A is T0and B is T0,then A∪Bis T0.(10)Let A,B be subsets of Y.Suppose A is closed or B is closed.If A is T0and B is T0,thenA∪B is T0.(11)For every subset A of Y such that A is discrete holds A is T0.(12)For every non empty subset A of Y such that A is anti-discrete and A is not trivial holds Ais not T0.Let X be a non empty topological space and let A be a subset of X.Let us observe that A is T0if and only if:(Def.10)For all points x,y of X such that x∈A and y∈A and x=y holds{y}.Let X be a non empty topological space and let A be a subset of X.Let us observe that A is T0if and only if:(Def.11)For all points x,y of X such that x∈A and y∈A and x=y holds x/∈{x}.Let X be a non empty topological space and let A be a subset of X.Let us observe that A is T0if and only if:(Def.12)For all points x,y of X such that x∈A and y∈A and x=y holds if x∈{y}⊆4.K OLMOGOROV S UBSPACESLet Y be a non empty topological structure.One can verify that there exists a subspace of Y which is strict,T0,and non empty.Let Y be a topological structure and let Y0be a subspace of Y.Let us observe that Y0is T0if and only if the conditions(Def.13)are satisfied.(Def.13)(i)Y0is empty,or(ii)for all points x,y of Y such that x is a point of Y0and y is a point of Y0and x=y holds there exists a subset V of Y such that V is open and x∈V and y/∈V or there exists a subset W of Y such that W is open and x/∈W and y∈W.Let Y be a topological structure and let Y0be a subspace of Y.Let us observe that Y0is T0if and only if the conditions(Def.14)are satisfied.(Def.14)(i)Y0is empty,or(ii)for all points x,y of Y such that x is a point of Y0and y is a point of Y0and x=y holds there exists a subset E of Y such that E is closed and x∈E and y/∈E or there exists a subsetF of Y such that F is closed and x/∈F and y∈F.In the sequel Y denotes a non empty topological structure.Next we state two propositions:(15)Let Y0be a non empty subspace of Y and A be a subset of Y.Suppose A=the carrier of Y0.Then A is T0if and only if Y0is T0.(16)Let Y0be a non empty subspace of Y and Y1be a T0non empty subspace of Y.If Y0is asubspace of Y1,then Y0is T0.In the sequel X is a non empty topological space.We now state three propositions:(17)Let X1be a T0non empty subspace of X and X2be a non empty subspace of X.If X1meetsX2,then X1∩X2is T0.(18)For all T0non empty subspaces X1,X2of X such that X1is open or X2is open holds X1∪X2is T0.(19)For all T0non empty subspaces X1,X2of X such that X1is closed or X2is closed holdsX1∪X2is T0.Let X be a non empty topological space.A Kolmogorov subspace of X is a T0non empty subspace of X.The following proposition is true(20)Let X be a non empty topological space and A0be a non empty subset of X.Suppose A0isT0.Then there exists a strict Kolmogorov subspace X0of X such that A0=the carrier of X0.Let X be a non trivial non empty topological space.Observe that there exists a Kolmogorov subspace of X which is proper and strict.Let X be a Kolmogorov space.One can verify that every non empty subspace of X is T0.Let X be a non-Kolmogorov space.Note that every non empty subspace of X which is non proper is also non T0and every non empty subspace of X which is T0is also proper.Let X be a non-Kolmogorov space.Observe that there exists a subspace of X which is strict and non T0.Let X be a non-Kolmogorov space.A non-Kolmogorov subspace of X is a non T0subspace of X.We now state the proposition(21)Let X be a non empty non-Kolmogorov space and A0be a subset of X.Suppose A0is notT0.Then there exists a strict non-Kolmogorov subspace X0of X such that A0=the carrier of X0.R EFERENCES[1]P.Alexandroff and H.H.Hopf.Topologie I.Springer-Verlag,Berlin,1935.[2]Ryszard Engelking.General Topology,volume60of Monografie Matematyczne.PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers,Warsaw,1977.[3]Zbigniew Karno.Separated and weakly separated subspaces of topological spaces.Journal of Formalized Mathematics,4,1992./JFM/Vol4/tsep_1.html.[4]Zbigniew Karno.Maximal discrete subspaces of almost discrete topological spaces.Journal of Formalized Mathematics,5,1993./JFM/Vol5/tex_2.html.[5]Zbigniew Karno.Maximal anti-discrete subspaces of topological spaces.Journal of Formalized Mathematics,6,1994.http://mizar.org/JFM/Vol6/tex_4.html.[6]Kazimierz Kuratowski.Topology,volume I.PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers,Academic Press,Warsaw,New York and London,1966.[7]Beata Padlewska and Agata Darmochwał.Topological spaces and continuous functions.Journal of Formalized Mathematics,1,1989./JFM/Vol1/pre_topc.html.[8]Andrzej Trybulec.Tarski Grothendieck set theory.Journal of Formalized Mathematics,Axiomatics,1989./JFM/Axiomatics/tarski.html.[9]Andrzej Trybulec.A Borsuk theorem on homotopy types.Journal of Formalized Mathematics,3,1991./JFM/Vol3/borsuk_1.html.[10]Zinaida Trybulec.Properties of subsets.Journal of Formalized Mathematics,1,1989./JFM/Vol1/subset_1.html.[11]Mariusz˙Zynel and Adam Guzowski.T0topological spaces.Journal of Formalized Mathematics,6,1994./JFM/Vol6/t_0topsp.html.Received July26,1994Published January2,2004。

相关文档
最新文档