咨询方法与工具资料库OPERLIST【精品文档】
咨询方法与工具资料库concept【精品文档】
APPENDIXBasic Vegetable ProductsSystems Implementation ProjectPhase IThis document is organized as follows:BackgroundObjectivesScopeApproachDeliverablesAssumptionsStaffingTiming & ScheduleProfessional FeesFurther details are included in the attached Arrangement and referenced in this letter by the document name shown in italic text.In June, BVP completed the selection of a process manufacturing, distribution/logistics and financial application. The joint BVP/AA committee selected Marcam's Prism product using J.D. Edwards financials. Software negotiations have been completed and BVP is now preparing to embark upon the implementation of the new software.The system will be judged successful by BVP if it achieves the following objectives, as articulated by BVP project team members:"The system has to work, with no bombs."BVP personnel will be trained to use and support the Marcam system with additional skills hired during the project as needed.Complete the project on time (Spring 1995).Complete project phases I through IV, as outlined in this document, on or below the overall $5.5 million budget.The scope of the Phase I of the Prism/JDE System Implementation project Prism Business Process Simulation will include:Designing and piloting the following functions:♦Inventory Control♦Warehouse Management and Radio Frequency♦Quality Management♦Purchasing (Maintenance and Raw Material goods are not in scope)♦Bar Coding♦Customer Order Management♦EDI for Customer Order Receipt and Order Acknowledgments♦Standard Costing for Finished Goods and Cost of Goods Sold♦Accounts Payable♦Accounts Receivable♦General LedgerMarcam's PRISM software product will be used as the core manufacturing and logistics system and J.D. Edwards modules will serve as the core financialmodules. The actual modules being piloted include:Marcam Prism♦Foundation♦Resource Management (For packaging and finished goods)♦Resource Processor (Packaging only)♦Purchasing♦Customer Order Management♦Quality Management including Sublotting (a.k.a. Gilroy) modification♦Warehouse ManagementJ.D. Edwards (supported by Marcam)♦Accounts Payable♦Accounts Receivable♦General LedgerPremenos (Not purchased yet by BVP)♦EDIPer BVP, process re-engineering that is necessary and obvious in order to implement the software.The Business Process Simulation will also include the testing of bar-coding equipment and radio frequency technology interfacing to Prism's Warehouseand Resource Management modules.Functional specifications for modifications and interfaces to the new systems required for Phase II implementation will be completed.Recommendations for performance measurements relevant to BVP's key post implementation operations.The AA role has been defined using the base case scenario with a structure of "coach", initially, moving towards "advisor" (rather than "driver" or "team").These terms are designed in the Phase I arrangement document attached to thecontract. The AA effort has been defined by BVP project management. AAexpects to serve in a thorough , complete and active role in this project, and iscommitted to the Basic Vegetable project's success. Due to the structure of ourrole as "coach", moving to "advisor", however, overall decisions and projectresponsibility rest with Basic Vegetable.The following is the overall phasing for the full implementation of the new software.Phase I Business Process SimulationOrder Fulfillment and Procurement ProcessesPhase II Implementation of Phase I ModulesPhase IIA Modesto ImplementationPhase IIB King City ImplementationPhase III Business Process SimulationProduction Analysis, Forecasting and CostingPhase IV Implementation of Phase III ModulesThe modules included in each phase are diagrammed in the attached Project Scope document. The focus of this arrangement is on Phase I of this process. The arrangements for the remaining phases will be finalized at a later date.In order to minimize implementation time and potential disruptions to production and customer service, we will follow the Business Process Simulation and Conference Room Pilot approach depicted below.。
咨询方法与工具资料库leadcos【精品文档】
LEADING FINANCE ORGANIZATIONSCOMPANYSOURCEAA CONTACTS CO. CONTACTS* COMMENTSArthur Andersen Global Best Practices - 2018/5/12 - 479074178.doc* AA Contact must be contacted first.3MManagement Accounting, October 1992Management Accounting, April 1993CFO, May 1994, p. 25Russ Michaeletz, MinneapolisEarl Klein, MinneapolisNumerousNumerousAt 3M, finance professionals are viewed as facilitators rather than traffic cops, and business unit managers are considered the controllers' "customers." Finance is involved at the outset of the product development process, and it views one of its main responsibilities as finding ways to encourage theinnovation and creativity of its customers. In fact, 3M carries its tradition of innovation to the finance function itself: the company offers an annual award to finance professionals who make some creative contribution that improves the bottom line.3M’s finance chief embodies the idea of CFO as business partner. According to an industry analyst, he is “not just a measurement person, but really sort of an architect of operating strategies that relate to financial goals.” Cost cutting is also a priority, with a targeted reduction of 2,000 personnel in the U.S. finance and administration staff over the period 1991-95.3M's commodity P&L system, considered one of its strategic assets, is a perfect example of how centralized financial control can support a highly decentralized organization. Since P&L information is based on the company's 2100 commodities (groups of products), managers can move these into different strategic groups without upsetting the central cost accounting structure.Senior VP for Finance and Office Administration: Giulio AgostiniArea Controller for Europe: David A. Kunz Staff Services Controller: Barry MauCOMPANY SOURCE AA CONTACTS CO. CONTACTS* COMMENTSAlliedSignal CFO, February 1993, p.30Financial World,September 28, 1993, p.49CFO, April 1993, p. 35CFO, June 1993, p. 15 Eric Edelstein,New JerseyJeff Black, NewYorkJim Sierck, SeniorVice President,Quality andProductivityDonna Ramelli,Vice President,Quality,EngineeredMaterialsAlliedSignal has implemented a shared servicesreorganization plan that focused on moving accountspayable, accounts receivable, payroll, fixed asset accounting,expense reporting, cash applications, and general ledger intoone of three "centers of excellence" that serve the entirecorporation. For example, the service center in theaerospace sector handles payroll for all salaried employeesin the U.S., not just those in the aerospace sector. Anothercenter of excellence, an aerospace site in Tempe, Arizona,processes travel and entertainment expenses for all three ofthe company's sectors.Travel and entertainment expense processing is a particularstrength. Policy improvements have driven T&E transactioncosts down 45% and brought annual savings of $1 million.More than 15 companies have benchmarked AlliedSignal'sT&E process.CFO: John W. BarterCOMPANY SOURCE AA CONTACTS CO. CONTACTS* COMMENTSDigital Equipment Corp. Financial ExecutiveJuly/August 1989, p. 42Journal of Accountancy,October 1993, p. 72.Management Accounting,November 1993, p. 22CFO, November 1994, p.32Global Finance,September 1994, p. 7Bob Hiebeler,Chicago-69WFred Bowers,BenchmarkingLeaderFrom 1986 to 1991, Digital's overall finance and accountingstaff was reduced to less than 4,000 from a high of 6,800 in1986. Once comprising 7% of total company headcount,accounting staff will soon be just 2%. In the process offinancial reengineering the company has achieved $12 to $15million in savings, eliminated more than 150 duplicatesystems, and virtually eliminated paper-based reporting.Areas of excellence at DEC include treasury and sharedservices. Payroll is one of DEC's special strengths. DEC's18 payroll employees pay about 70,000 workers in NorthAmerica every year. This level of productivity--about 200,000paychecks per processing employee per year is more than 10times the average.Current efforts focus on forging stronger links withnonfinance managers. At present, a team of financeemployees is charged with training engineering, sales, andcustomer support staff in modern accounting techniquessuch as activity-based costing.CFO and VP of Finance: Vincent Mullarkey。
咨询方法与工具资料库UAT_PH1【精品文档】
Village Nine LeisureIntencity SystemUser Acceptance Test PlanLast Edited: 12/05/2018Table of ContentsBACKGROUND (3)TEST GOALS & OBJECTIVES (3)APPROACH (4)TEST ENVIRONMENT (4)TEST TEAM (4)TEST CONDITIONS AND DATA (4)EXPECTED RESULTS (6)TESTING (6)CYCLE 1 - PRE TEST SETUP (DAY 1) (7)CYCLE 2 - DAILY TASKS (8)CYCLE 3 - END OF SHIFT (10)CYCLE 4 - END OF DAY PROCEDURES (11)CYCLE 5 - NEXT DAY PROCEDURES (DAY 2) (12)CYCLE 6 - MISCELLANOUS PROCEDURES (DAY 3) (14)BackgroundThe Central Data Repository (CDR) is a custom built application designed to allow the collation and reporting of data from several of the modules within the Village Nine Leisure System.The general flow of data is from the point of sale and revenue applications and is downloaded into the inventory and Report Writer modules, and then downloaded into the financial system at head office.Test Goals & ObjectivesThe major objective of a User Acceptance Test Phase is to test the functionality of the system and to ensure it meets therequrements of the users. This includes reporting, type of data being held and the procedures associated with operating the system. This test phase does not cover the validation of the data as they are covered within the system test phase of the project.The test objectives are as follows:∙Test the Functionality of the modules;∙Test the daily processing tasks;∙Test the downloading of information from other modules of Village Nines information systems;∙Test the generation and accuracy of the reports.∙Provide additional user training through hands on test execution.。
咨询方法与工具资料库ar【精品文档】
BELL SYGMA INC. : SOFTW ARE SELECTION 1995Saturday, May 12, 2018ACCOUNTS RECEIV ABLE REQUIREMENTSOVERALL REQUIREMENTS (2)Integration (2)Migration (2)Prior Period Adjustments/Post Dated Transactions (2)Other (2)INVOICE ENTRY (2)Validation (3)Processes on Invoice Entry (3)Advanced Invoice Features (3)RECEIPTS/PAYMENTS (4)Advanced Payment Features (5)Advanced Other Features (5)POSTING&CLOSING PROCEDURES (6)REPORTING FEATURES (6)Standard Features (6)Calculated Values (6)Customer Reports (7)Transaction Reports (7)Financial Reports (8)System Reports (8)FIELDS AVAILABLE (9)Reference Information (9)Transaction Dates (9)Descriptive Information (9)Numeric Information (10)Discount Information (10)Transaction Type Identifier (11)ACCOUNTS RECEIV ABLE REQUIREMENTSOVERALL REQUIREMENTSIntegration is critical for this module. Remote invoice processing is a long term objective. People in the field should be able to electronically complete an invoice, governed by the Accounts Receivable business rules. These transaction should go through an authorization/update process before posting. Lotus Notes or a VM application could provide the presentation layer.Billing system alternatives are under review. Service contract billing functionality and integration alternatives should be listed and discussed in detail.Revenue reconciliation to contract is important. Imaging functionality should be described in detail.Depending on the architecture of the new system, some of these requirements may be handled differently. Please describe how it would work with your product’s architecture.IntegrationMigrationPrior Period Adjustments/Post Dated TransactionsOtherINVOICE ENTRYACCOUNTS RECEIV ABLE REQUIREMENTS Upon configuration, system user can determine which validation causes hard stops and which causes warnings. ValidationProcesses on Invoice EntryAdvanced Invoice Features。
咨询方法与工具资料库techncal【精品文档】
BELL SYGMA INC. : SOFTW ARE SELECTION 1995Saturday, May 12, 2018THE TECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTOVERVIEW (3)THE PLANNED ARCHITECTURE (3)Three Tier Client/Server Architecture (6)STANDARD OPERATING ENVIRONMENT(SOE) (6)Finance Site (6)Client Work Stations (6)Operating System: (6)Network Connections: (6)Protocol: (7)Remote Asynchronous Access: (7)NOS (Network Operating Systems): (7)Middleware: (7)LANs & WANs (7)Data Base & Application Server (9)File Transfer: (9)Development Tools (9)REQUIRED CAPACITY AND SIZING INFORMATION (10)General Information (10)Concurrent Users (10)Accounts Receivable (10)Accounts Payable (10)General Ledger (11)Purchase Order (11)External Reference Tables (11)TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS (11)Application size and recommended configuration (12)Hardware Specifications (12)Physical Requirements and Response Times (13)CPP/Security and Recommended Plan (13)Growth and Scalability (14)Network Requirements (14)System and Application Management and Operations (14)Development Tools/Query Tools/Report Tools (14)THE TECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTVendor Hardware/Software Support for Recommended Hardware vendors (15)Software Technical Functionality (15)SUMMARY (15)THE TECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTOVERVIEWThis section describes Bell Sygma’s planned architecture providing system diagrams indicating platforms and interfaces. In a ddition, capacity information is provided. Finally, there are specific technical issues that are to be addressed by the vendor based on the Bell Sygma architecture described.THE PLANNED ARCHITECTUREBell Sygma has a three tier architectural model for system development where the business logic is seperated from the data and the presentation layer. These three tiers could be distributed across one or more physical platforms given the chosen operating environment and resource management policy. Bell Sygma has a Standard Operating Environment (SOE) policy which identifies the hardware, operating system, networked, relational database management system and development tools to be used. This SOE policy ensures that selected hardware and software to be evaluated, proves to be compatible with our existing environment and can be supported internally. The following described in more detail the three tier architecture and SOE variables.。
咨询方法与工具资料库rfp【精品文档】
TABLE OF CONTENTS______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Confidentiality Statement Page 1Instructions for Responding Page 2Project Calendar Pages 3 - 5LTX Company Overview Pages 6 - 9Key Business Issues Page 10Current Technical Architecture and Application Map Pages 11 - 12High Level Business Process Flows Page 13Current Transaction Volumes Page 14General Vendor/Product Characteristics Pages 15 - 17Technical Requirements Pages 18 - 21High Level Functional Requirements Page 22Guidelines for Completing Functional Requirements Matrix Page 23Functional Requirements Matrix Pages 24 - 51Estimated Costs WorksheetsSingle Location Pages 52 - 53 Two Locations Pages 54 - 55Proposed Implementation Strategy and Approach Page 56ReferencesPages 57 - 59________________________________________________________________________ LTX Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets automatic test equipment for the semiconductor industry that is used to test digital, linear and mixed signal ( a combination of digital and linear) integrated circuits (“ICs”) and discrete semiconductor components. The Company currently offers products in four broad categories: three lines of semiconductor test systems and a line of test system networking products. The three lines of test systems are: digital test systems, linear/mixed signal test systems, and discrete component test systems. LTX also sells service and applications support for its test systems. The semiconductors tested by the Company’s test systems are widely used in the computer, communications, automotive and consumer electronics industries. LTX markets its products worldwide to both manufacturers and users of digital, linear and mixed signal ICs and discrete semiconductor components. Digital ProductsLTX markets its digital test systems which include the Deltamaster and Micromaster under the Trillium name. These digital products are used to test digital ICs, in particular microprocessors and microcontrollers. These digital devices are used to operate and control nearly all electronic components. Microprocessors are found in personal computers, engineering workstations and industrial control systems and are among the most expensive semiconductor devices. Microcontrollers are used in automobiles, home appliances, cellular phones and televisions.Linear/Mixed Signal ProductsLTX offers two product lines for testing linear/mixed signal ICs, Synchro and Ninety. Linear ICs are used in almost every electronic application. The very nature of physical occurrences, such as sound, images, temperature, pressure, speed, acceleration, position and rotation, consists of continuously varying information. Linear ICs are used to amplify, filter and shape this information. Mixed signal ICs are capable of converting the signals from linear ICs into a digital format that can be processed by a computer. Mixed signal devices can also convert processed digital information into a linear form to control physical phenomena or to improve sound and images. Linear and mixed signal ICs are widely used in automobiles, computers, telephones and such home entertainment products as video cassette recorders, cameras, compact disc players and video games.Discrete ProductsThe Company’s iPTest systems are used to test discrete semiconductor components, such as diodes, small signal transistors and power transistors, as well as arrays of these components. These discrete components are used in every area of electronics. IPTest systems are also capable of accurately measuring the characteristics of transient voltage suppression components, which are widely used to protect personal computers and telecommunications products from harmful voltage spikes or surges.Networking ProductsLTX offers its EZNET hardware and software products to enable its customers to interface LTX test systems as well as com petitors’ test systems with the customer’s manufacturing, engineering or management information systems. Included in the Company/s EZNET product line is its dataVision software package, which is used by customers to collect, analyze and archive data from the testing process. These products enable LTX to provide its customers with a complete solution to their test information needs.______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Sales, Service and Customer SupportLTX sells, services and supports its products primarily through its worldwide sales and support organization. As of July 31, 1994, LTX maintained 22 customer support centers and 3 additional sales offices around the world. The Company considers service and support to be important to the success of its business, because of the highly technical nature of its products. Customer support activities include installation, training, field service and applications assistance. The Company’s support personnel are capable of performing all necessary maintenance of test systems sold by LTX, including routine servicing of components manufactured by third parties.CustomersThe Company’s major customers include many of the world’s leading semiconductor manufacturers such as:AT&T PhilipsHitachi SamsungIntel SGS-ThomsonMotorola Silicon SystemsNational Semiconductor SonySales to these major customers accounted for approximately 58% of net sales in fiscal 1994. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of net sales in fiscal 1994.CompetitionThe semiconductor test equipment industry is highly competitive, with many other domestic and foreign companies participating in the same markets as LTX. The Company’s major competitors in the market for digital test systems are Advantest Corporation (an affiliate of Fujitsu Limited), Schlumberger Limited and Teradyne, Inc. The Company’s principal competitor for linear/mixed signal test systems is Teradyne, Inc. The Company’s principal competitor for discrete component test systems is Tesec, Ltd.______________________________________________________________________________。
咨询方法与工具资料库_trai139【精品文档】
TABLE OF CONTENTS Prepare to TeachSection ............................................................................................................................................................................. P age Course Overview .. (2)Preparing to Teach (8)Conducting the School (11)Using Media (20)Agenda (24)Detailed Agenda (26)Sample Schedules (35)Materials and Equipment Requirements (38)Logistics (39)Course Background (40)COURSE OVERVIEWThis course was designed to provide Practice and Practice Management personnel with the basic tools, techniques, and skills to implement Continuous Improvement in their area.ObjectivesAt the end of the course, participants will be able to:❑Provide a "common language" to improve communication❑Provide framework to guide process improvement efforts❑Introduce problem-solving tools and techniques❑Use tools and techniques to help them identify ways to improve the processes in their areas.❑Create an "environment" in the classroom that mirrors that of a CI company❑Measure to determine that Continuous Improvement has improved in their areas.Module One: Continuous Improvement Overview 3.5 hoursThis module provides a high level overview of Continuous Improvement. Participants are introduces to the basic terms, concepts, history, and Quality Framework that are the foundation of CI. Videos and activities are included to support the instructional objectivesModule Two: PIM Overview .5 hourThis module gives a high level overview of the Process Improvement Model and describes how it correlates with the Quality Framework.Module Three: Process Improvement Phase I: What is our goal? 4.5 hoursThis module describes the first phase of the Process Improvement Model, What is our Goal? It teaches the steps and tasks of the phase through discussion, group activities, and a case study. Continuous Improvement tools are introduced here including the Nominal Group Technique (NGT), Stop-Start-Continue, Prioritization Matrix, and the development of an Improvement Statement.Module Four: Process Improvement Phase II 7 hoursThis module describes the second phase of the Process Improvement Model, How are we doing? The steps and tasks associated with this phase are taught using group activities and a continuation of the case study in the previous module. Additional CI tools are introduced here including Process Maps, Cause and Effect Diagram, Check Sheet, Histogram, Pareto Diagram, and Scatter Diagram.Module Five: Process Improvement Phase III 3.75 hoursThis module describes the third phase of the Process Improvement Model, How will we improve? The steps and tasks in this phase relate to identifying solutions and developing action plans to initiate CI in your office. Discussion and activities introduce participants to an Affinity Diagram, a Consensus Prioritization Matrix, and a Force Field Analysis.。
咨询方法与工具资料库PO-AFES【精品文档】
Vendor Item/Quote
c:\iknow\docshare\data\cur_work\479074515.doc
Page: 1
UUNET Technologies Purchasing Business Scenarios Arthur Andersen
Purchasing BPS Script Development 5/12/2018
ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
Purchasing Business Scenarios Area = Purchasing Function Event Scenario
Delete an existing vendor quote Enter new price breaks for the vendor to take effect at some future date Create a PO from multiple requisitions Change the “Ship-to” address on a PO (i.e. BancBoston c/o UUNET) Create multiple POs from one requisition Review/Adjust requisitioner’s request Enter a PO with no requisitions Create a PO from a paper requisition Create a PO for an employee purchase for personal use. Cancel a PO Cancel a line Send requisition back to requisitioner (voided) Send requisition back to requisitioner (for more information), but continuing the PO process Send requisition back to requisition and halt the PO process until issue resolved Requisitioner enters a Requisition on-line; subsequently, prints it and gives it to purchasing to process Release all POs Release subset of POs 20. PO14.1 21. PO15.1 22. RQ20.2 Add lines to a PO vendor 23. PO21.2 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. PO20.4 30. PO20.8 31. 32. 33. 34.
咨询方法与工具资料库7stratop1【精品文档】
Rep Facilitation Meeting Summary & OpportunitiesPurpose of the MeetingThe purpose of the Rep facilitation meeting was to develop consensus among the Technology Focus Group Reps about the most critical information needed in order to run a successful financial service practice and provide quality service. As a result of the status meeting, VEST achieved an understanding of the direction needed for critical improvement areas concerning the Rep desktop.The groups expectations at the start of the meeting were in line with the meeting purpose. The expectations are listed below: ∙Prioritize Rep Information needs∙Identify better ways to serve clients∙Identify ways to decrease administrative burdens∙Identify opportunities for VEST to better serve RepsRep Facilitation Meeting Summary & OpportunitiesBased on the Rep facilitation meeting, a prioritized list of Rep information requirements were defined as shown on the graph below. Each of the information areas identified in the box below were rated in terms of two (2) attributes, its relative future importance and current performance, (i.e., How well are current systems providing this information today?) .The following graph is a summary of the Rep information areas identified by the focus group as the most important strategic Rep information characteristics. An opportunity interpretation graph is provided on the right hand side of the graph.Rep Facilitation Meeting Summary & OpportunitiesUsing the interpretation graph provided on the following page, there are major Rep opportunity areas defined. The basic rule for interpreting the facilitation graph is this: the more important something is (the higher up), the better it should be performed (over to the left). Something at the very top of the graph should be almost all the way to the left, while something at the bottom should at least be to the midline. Using this interpretation definition, there are several areas which are important to the Reps, but not very well performed. These opportunities are described below:∙Near-Term Opportunities: Integrated Systems, Client Investment Monitoring, and Client Database∙Mid-Term Opportunities: Remote Order Entry, Paperless System, and Contact Management∙Long-Term Opportunities: Presentation Tools, Financial Planning, Real-Time On-Line Information∙Possible Maintainer Problem: Investment ResearchThe vision to carry out the identified Rep information opportunities are discussed in the next session - Rep desktop.。
咨询方法与工具资料库ANSWLOG【精品文档】
Building Global Teams To Deliver Integrated SolutionsPlease complete the following information at the end of your Competency Center/Technology session. Competency Center/Technology Team: LogisticsCompetency Center/Technology Leader(s): Pat Dolan, Jim KentWhere are the biggest challenges the integrated competency/technology teams face?Aquiring competent staff quickly and the funding to accomplish this.Developing set of workers performance measurement standards for a regional/national practice.What integrated competency/technology teams provide the greatest opportunity for BC?Logistics/information technology.How can we operate as a global team and how can we have a strategy with global influence?Develop worldwide Geo - regional competancy centers and collaborate among them.How do we encourage or support specialization in smaller practices which may lack the critical mass to doso?A regional practice not permanently attached to specific officer.How do we integrate with other parts of AA - such as ABA, EFC and T&L and how do we leverage that knowledge?We intend to develop relationships with specific audit/industry practice.How can we better serve AA Worldwide, not just BC?Work with those parts of the organiza tion that give us the best integrated solution to the client’s needs.What is missing (e.g. skills, infrastructure) for us to render services to our clients?c:\iknow\docshare\data\cur_work\279234375.doc。
咨询方法与工具资料库appddx【精品文档】
Appendix
APPENDIX I
DEFINITIONS, INPUTS, AND OUTPUTS
Arthur Andersen LLP
Page 192
H.B. Zachry Company Heavy Division Estimating and Bidding
INPUTS
Best Interest of HBZ Field Experience Estimating Skills Purchasing Skills Vendors/Subcontractors Statistical Skills Statistical Software Estimating Software/hardware Scheduling Software/hardware Risk Assessment Software Graphical Simulation Software (AUTOCAD, Animation) Standard Takeoff Methodology Standard Takeoff Methodology Vendor/Subcontractor Partners Standard Codes Historical Database Supplier Database Knowledge Champion
INPUTS
Management Philosophy “Manage the division as a project” Ability to understand the financial implications of pricing the Heavy Division’s products Ability to understand and adapt to the statistical models in place to model and price the Heavy Division’s products Statistical Software Economic (Time Value of Money) Software Graphical Simulation Software Bid Strategy Models Rating Model (Go, No Go Criteria) Probability of Success Model Market/Industry information Competitor profiles Strategic Plan Supplier profiles Assumptions (Synergy’s with other work) Industry/Economic Input (Future Work)
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Opportunity Assessment Checklist Tool Detail of Operational Performance ChecklistTransactions ProcessingAreas of Focus Cost Collect Information/ Establish Baseline Perform cost analysis of transactionheavy processes in the company Perform Analyses Determine if cost reduction opportunities exist in transactions processing Determine ways to improve validity/ accuracy of information throughout transaction processes Determine if time reduction opportunities exist by calculating time associated with transactions processingQualityDetermine if information collected/received throughout transactions processes is valid/ correct Map processes that are transactionheavy (See Process Mapping tool) Determine resources (human, information system, etc.) required to process transactions in each Operational Performance areaTime 1Opportunity Assessment Checklist Tool Detail of Operational Performance ChecklistReporting and ControlsAreas of Focus Cost Quality Collect Information/ Establish Baseline Not directly applicable to this area Identify high level capability of management reporting/ information systems Map high-level reporting relationships throughout organization Ask interviewees or select group of employees from throughout company to find out if information/reports they receive are adequate/timely Determine ability of management reporting/ information systems to meet needs of organization Determine management reporting improvement areas (e.g., access to information, timeliness, adequacy/ usefulness of information, etc.) Perform AnalysesQuality, Time 2Opportunity Assessment Checklist Tool Detail of Operational Performance ChecklistPlanningAreas of Focus Cost Collect Information/ Establish Baseline Days of sales of finished goods inventory by SKU and associated stocking rules (reorder points, EOQs, safety stock, forecasting error rate, etc.) Identify frequency and method for forecasting, paying special attention to longer term “forecasting,” versus shorter term production “scheduling” Production orders launched by SKU by month Production output by SKU by month (e.g., FGs to stocking locations or customers) Finished goods inventory list by SKU with associated sales and quantity volumes (profitability by SKU is also desirable, but difficult to obtain) Returns and warranty history by SKU Customer list by sales volume by month Customer orders by SKU by month Customer shipments by SKU by month Customer backorders by SKU by month Customer order changes (within and outside the production lead time window) Returns and warranty history by customer Perform Analyses Determine opportunities to reduce inventory levels due to mismatches in mathematical relationships between forecasting error, safety stock, EOQs and reorder points versus actual inventory and production results Conduct ABC analysis of FG inventory listings (performed based on sales dollar, quantity and profitability to see if significant differences exist using different analysis parameters) Determine if lowest performing finished goods products are worth retaining (i.e., the „Ds‟ or lowest „Cs‟ may not be economically viable, or cause too much complexity) Conduct ABC analysis of customers (performed based on sales dollar, quantity and profitability to see if significant differences exist using different analysis parameters) Determine if lowest performing customers are worth retaining (i.e., the „Ds‟ or lowest „Cs‟ may not be economically viable, or cause too much complexity)3Opportunity Assessment Checklist Tool Detail of Operational Performance ChecklistPlanning (continued)Areas of Focus Quality Collect Information/ Establish Baseline Identify information technology and/or current processes used for demand analysis Perform Analyses Determine high level capability of current information technology and/or current processes used (transaction systems, use of modeling and decision support tools, access to customer level sales data, etc.) Determine if techniques might be used to decrease the lead time for gathering customer demand data and translating it (and other key data) into production schedules Determine opportunities to reduce cycle time by utilizing segmented forecasting, planning and scheduling rules by ABC classification (more rigorous and aggressive on „As‟ versus „Bs‟ versus „Cs‟)TimeMap existing processes (activities, sequence, lead time, responsibilities, information/ paper flows) and high level material flows through the plant(s) and stocking locations Document associated policies (approvals, cut off dates, decision points, etc.)4Opportunity Assessment Checklist Tool Detail of Operational Performance ChecklistFinanceAreas of Focus Overall Company Collect Information/ Establish Baseline Review financial statements for overview of company financial health Use GBP‟s Financial Performance Review Diagnostic to compute key ratios (e.g., ROI, ROA, quick ratio, etc.) Obtain indicators of financial performance of similar companies Obtain Finance budget and actual spending Perform Analyses Investigate problem areas revealed in financial statements and ratio analysis to determine root causes Compare financial performance to that of similar companiesCost Identify reasons for significant gaps between budgeted and actual spending Identify areas for potential cost reduction in Finance function Determine ability of information system to meet needs of finance organization and overall company Analyze results of diagnostic to determine improvement areasQualityIdentify high level capability of finance/ treasury information systemUse GBP‟s Finance and Accounting Diagnostic Tool to benchmark the finance function against other companies Map processes, including closing the books, budgeting, SEC reporting, annual report production, risk management, general ledger management, planning, etc.TimeDetermine opportunities to increase efficiency in finance function processes5Opportunity Assessment Checklist Tool Detail of Operational Performance ChecklistMISAreas of Focus Collect Information/ Establish Baseline Perform AnalysesOverall Company CostSee Information Technology Performance Checklist Review IS budget and actual spending Obtain comparable industry standardsSee Information Technology Performance Checklist Determine reasons for significant gaps in budgeted and actual spending Compare IS spending with industry standards Analyze reasons for variations in IS spending compared with industry norms Analyze user surveys and determine utilization of software and automation of tasks Analyze customer satisfaction levels and identify shortfall areas QualityConduct workshop/ interviews with IS department management and selected users to brainstorm service delivered and levels reached Perform IS Customer Satisfaction/ User Survey Collect IS Helpdesk statistics Determine comparable Helpdesk statistics Determine adequacy/effectiveness of service level agreements provided by internal IS department and outsourcing companies Identify trends within Helpdesk calls to identify areas causing most user requests Compare service levels provided by AS department or outsourcing company with expected levels Identify areas where service level agreements are not sufficient or not present Determine IS ability to work to schedule Identify factors that cause IS department to fall behind in project schedules TimeReview IS adherence to project schedules Note: Gartner Group and Computer Economics statistics are good sources of data about software, hardware, IS trends in specific industries, etc., that can be used in the above analyses6Opportunity Assessment Checklist Tool Detail of Operational Performance ChecklistHuman Resource Management & DevelopmentAreas of Focus Overall Company Collect Information/ Establish Baseline Obtain employee turnover statistics Obtain average cost of training new employees Obtain industry turnover benchmarks, if available Inquire about reasons employees leave Obtain employee absenteeism statistics Obtain industry absenteeism benchmarks, if available Inquire about reasons employees are absent Perform Analyses Compare company turnover to industry statistics Determine if company needs to improve employee retention efforts Determine potential root causes of turnover Compare company absenteeism to industry statistics Determine if company needs to improve attendance efforts Determine potential root causes of absenteeism Compute lost time due to on-the-job accidents Determine if company needs to improve safety efforts Determine potential root causes for employee satisfaction/ dissatisfaction Obtain statistics of on-the-job accidents, including time lost due to accidents and workers‟ compensation claims Review safety efforts and policies Obtain company information concerning employee satisfaction Inquire about reasons for employee satisfaction/ dissatisfaction 7Opportunity Assessment Checklist Tool Detail of Operational Performance ChecklistHuman Resource Management & Development (continued)Areas of Focus Cost Collect Information/ Establish Baseline Review HR budget and actual spending Obtain HR expenses as a percent of total company expenses Review cost of training and training investment per employee Perform Analyses Identify reasons for significant gaps between budgeted and actual spending Identify areas for potential cost reduction in HR function Determine if training expenditures are too high or too low, given training provided Determine if recruiting expenditures are too high or too low, given current recruiting program Determine overall effectiveness of company training effortsReview cost of recruiting and investment per recruitQuality Obtain information about company training efforts (e.g., goals, subjects, plans, etc.) Determine how company measures effectiveness of training Obtain information about company recruiting efforts (e.g., goals, methods used to recruit, company materials provided, etc.) Determine how company measures effectiveness of recruiting Obtain HR department strategy Obtain HR department goalsDetermine overall effectiveness of company recruiting efforts Evaluate alignment of HR strategy with overall company strategy Evaluate effectiveness of HR in achieving established department goals Determine high level capability of current information system used for HR and identify performance gaps Determine opportunities to streamline/ improve HR processesIdentify information system for HR department processesTimeMap HR department processes (e.g., benefits administration, performance appraisal, compliance with government programs, new employee set-up/ termination, 401K administration, etc.)8Opportunity Assessment Checklist Tool Detail of Operational Performance ChecklistResearch and DevelopmentAreas of Focus Overall Company Collect Information/ Establish Baseline Obtain revenue and profitability by product/ service and date of market entry Obtain new product development project listing including project description, time frame, cost and responsibilities Perform Analyses Analyze new development success and failure rates (e.g., revenues derived from products/ services introduced in the last 2-3 years, ex post accuracy of project targets: project cost, quality, market entry data/ development lead time; achievement of initial business plan: market share, revenues, profitability) Determine effectiveness of new product development team (e.g., effective structure, innovative, risk taking, etc.) Identify responsibility structure for success and failure of new product development projects as well as the position of the typical project leader in the hierarchy of the company Determine the corporate culture for innovation and openness to new ventures Understand the management attitude to risk and problem solving Review R&D budget and actual spendingCost Identify reasons for significant gaps between budgeted and actual spending Identify areas for potential cost reduction in R&D function Determine effectiveness of financial justification calculation method for new product/ servicesObtain method of calculating financial impact of new products/ services9Opportunity Assessment Checklist Tool Detail of Operational Performance ChecklistResearch and Development (continued)Areas of Focus Quality Collect Information/ Establish Baseline Identify the existing process related performance measures (e.g., time to market, activity based cost and product/ service risk detection through quality reviews) Identify crossfunctional relationships and flow of information Determine the integration of customers and suppliers in the process (if possible based on limited interviews with customers and suppliers) Identify the use of existing information technology (e.g., CAD, CAM, digital prototyping) Perform Analyses Determine ability of new product/ service development to meet/ exceed performance measures Determine effectiveness of crossfunctional relationships and information flow Determine effectiveness of incorporation of customer/suppliers in the process Determine if current information technology meets the needs of new product/ service development Assess the use of information technology applications to improve cycle time and quality Compare existing product/ service development process with Best Practices (e.g., automotive, computer industries) Prepare value added versus non-value added direct labor activity analysis Determine alternatives for reducing cycle time TimeMap the existing high level end-to-end development process from defining market/customer needs to market entry (build on existing project management policies/ handbooks) 10。